Research Article

Comparison of Phytochemical Profile, Mineral Content, and In Vitro Antioxidant Activities of Corchorus capsularis and Corchorus olitorius Leaf Extracts from Different Populations

Table 2

Mineral content of different genotypes of C. capsularis and C. olitorius.

CodeMg mg/100 gm ± SDZn mg/100 gm ± SDSe μg/100 g ± SD

C136.82 ± 1.26 a-e4.21 ± 0.80 d-f111.68 ± 9.71 j-o
C236.56 ± 0.10 a-f6.25 ± 0.51 ab142.04 ± 12.54 c-f
C336.72 ± 2.03 a-e4.69 ± 0.90 c-e128.98 ± 8.83 f-i
C437.47 ± 0.52 a-d4.75 ± 0.57 c-e118.34 ± 7.20 i-n
C537.04 ± 0.42 a-e3.45 ± 0.29 f-h155.62 ± 3.87 i-n
C636.60 ± 2.04 a-f2.65 ± 0.65 g-j137.03 ± 8.70 f-i
C736.16 ± 2.50 a-g6.53 ± 1.02 ab152.18 ± 8.73 k-o
C834.49 ± 2.89 f-h5.11 ± 0.35 cd168.85 ± 7.30 e-h
C937.99 ± 0.31 a2.93 ± 0.66 g-i149.00 ± 12.77 g-j
C1033.66 ± 0.51 h4.67 ± 0.77 c-e157.77 ± 7.98 h-l
C1135.65 ± 1.03 c-h6.56 ± 1.15 ab116.68 ± 5.68 p
C1236.62 ± 0.54 a-f1.16 ± 0.62 lm129.76 ± 9.16 j-o
C1337.73 ± 0.18 a-c5.02 ± 0.86 cd107.85 ± 12.20 k-o
C1435.08 ± 2.22 e-h1.01 ± 0.32 m134.15 ± 8.89 g-k
C1537.01 ± 1.06 a-e2.36 ± 0.20 h-k126.02 ± 8.16 o
C1637.38 ± 0.33 a-d1.16 ± 0.33 m121.40 ± 10.28 no
C1736.52 ± 1.51 a-f3.53 ± 0.77 fg85.51 ± 8.25 h-l
C1836.52 ± 1.16 a-f4.50 ± 0.83 c-f113.52 ± 7.56 m-o
C1937.07 ± 0.42 a-e3.67 ± 0.98 e-g109.90 ± 5.80 l-o
O134.35 ± 2.57 gh4.38 ± 0.57 c-f122.08 ± 8.97 a-c
O237.84 ± 0.22 ab6.38 ± 0.78 ab116.71 ± 5.72 d-g
O335.77 ± 1.47 b-h7.35 ± 0.61 a121.13 ± 13.59 b-d
O435.54 ± 0.70 d-h5.49 ± 1.50 bc99.01 ± 6.32 a
O537.55 ± 0.17 a-d3.38 ± 0.55 f-I121.24 ± 11.53 b-e
O637.64 ± 0.98 a-d4.70 ± 0.72 c-e100.87 ± 9.50 ab
O735.50 ± 0.88 d-h2.29 ± 0.35 i-l105.11 ± 8.36 i-n
O836.84 ± 0.61 a-e1.74 ± 0.17 j-m121.43 ± 13.30 h-m
O936.48 ± 0.75 a-g1.41 ± 0.31 k-m105.99 ± 6.17 op
O1037.55 ± 1.15 a-d0.91 ± 0.28 m99.88 ± 9.21 h-l
O1136.03 ± 1.15 a-g2.56 ± 0.29 g-j106.28 ± 12.69 op

Results are expressed as means ± SD of three replicate analyses; different letters mean that they differ significantly at 5% (LSD).