Physicochemical Properties, Mineral Content, Antioxidant Activities, and Microbiological Quality of Bupleurum spinosum Gouan Honey from the Middle Atlas in Morocco
Table 3
Physicochemical analysis of honey samples.
Honey samples
Locality name
Honey color
pH
Free acidity (mEq/kg)
Lactonic acidity (mEq/kg)
Total acidity (mEq/kg)
Moisture (%)
Ash content (%)
Electrical conductivity (μS/cm)
Diastasic activity
TSS (%)
Pfund scale (mm)
Melanoidins
H1
Bouyablane
Dark amber
4.81 ± 0.03a
12.77 ± 1.34d
5.51 ± 0.50d
18.37 ± 0.67f
17.60 ± 0.04e
0.42 ± 0.00c
671.27 ± 1.79b
26.01 ± 1.07a
82.73 ± 0.85abc
150.50 ± 7.38ab
0.98 ± 0.01b
H2
El-Mers
Dark amber
4.11 ± 0.02 defg
26.21 ± 1.56abc
10.50 ± 1.39b
36.91 ± 0.58b
16.19 ± 0.04g
0.50 ± 0.02b
637.02 ± 1.65e
17.51 ± 0.44c
83.80 ± 0.20a
161.71 ± 6.12a
1.03 ± 0.01b
H3
Boulemane
Dark amber
4.22 ± 0.05 de
26.55 ± 2.22ab
8.23 ± 0.17bc
35.18 ± 0.16b
17.00 ± 0.02f
0.37 ± 0.00e
450.54 ± 1.54c
22.19 ± 1.00b
83.00 ± 0.03ab
158.36 ± 7.89ab
0.96 ± 0.01bc
H4
Ribat El-Kheire
Extra white
4.02 ± 0.06 defgh
31.85 ± 1.09a
14.14 ± 0.94a
45.53 ± 0.63a
19.20 ± 0.21b
0.21 ± 0.00h
427.38 ± 1.20f
19.78 ± 1.55b
80.80 ± 0.08d
30.47 ± 3.15e
0.21 ± 0.02f
H5
Tafajight
Dark amber
4.50 ± 0.03c
15.85 ± 1.13d
8.90 ± 0.66bc
24.17 ± 0.36e
19.00 ± 0.07c
0.23 ± 0.01g
647.92 ± 2.03d
21.67 ± 0.50b
80.97 ± 0.14d
149.01 ± 6.54abc
0.89 ± 0.01d
H6
Ait-Bazza
Amber
4.17 ± 0.03 def
12.16 ± 1.17d
4.98 ± 0.36d
27.14 ± 1.76d
19.60 ± 0.06a
0.25 ± 0.01f
612.79 ± 4.39g
10.76 ± 0.59e
80.40 ± 0.03de
106.52 ± 3.13d
0.64 ± 0.02e
H7
Timahdite
Amber
4.33 ± 0.02d
22.84 ± 2.44ab
11.19 ± 0.29b
33.13 ± 0.68bc
18.60 ± 0.03d
0.39 ± 0.00d
632.93 ± 2.44e
15.87 ± 0.59d
81.40 ± 0.03d
111.30 ± 0.47d
0.70 ± 0.03e
H8
Enjil
Dark amber
4.67 ± 0.02b
13.86 ± 0.88d
6.20 ± 0.20d
19.94 ± 1.02f
15.81 ± 0.06h
0.55 ± 0.00a
682.16 ± 2.29a
22.98 ± 1.33b
84.20 ± 0.05a
175.53 ± 1.93a
1.15 ± 0.03a
All values are expressed as means of triplicate determinations ± standard deviation. TSS = total soluble solid. Values in the same column followed by the same letter are not significantly different by Tukey’s multiple range test ().