Research Article

Effect of Pretreatment and Drying Methods on the Quality of Anchote (Coccinia abyssinica (Lam.)) Flour

Table 2

Proximate composition of anchote flour as affected by pretreatments and drying methods.

Moisture (%)Protein (%)Ash (%)Fiber (%)Fat (%)Carbohydrate (%)

CS10.34 ± 0.06a3.27 ± 0.02de4.87 ± 0.05a3.22 ± 0.61e1.01 ± 0.41b80.95 ± 0.43d
CSo9.62 ± 0.19c3.33 ± 0.05d4.83 ± 0.03b3.63 ± 0.02d1.14 ± 0.03a81.92 ± 0.01c
CO9.04 ± 0.14de3.33 ± 0.07d4.79 ± 0.01c3.84 ± 0.03c0.91 ± 0.05d82.37 ± 0.05b
BS9.92 ± 0.31b3.14 ± 0.05f3.98 ± 0.02d3.92 ± 0.01c0.83 ± 0.05f81.95 ± 0.02c
BSo9.14 ± 0.15d3.22 ± 0.61ef3.96 ± 0.01d4.32 ± 0.12b0.92 ± 0.31d82.33 ± 0.06b
BO8.91 ± 0.13ef3.16 ± 0.05f3.99 ± 0.02d4.71 ± 0.12a0.72 ± 0.01h83.03 ± 0.07a
KS9.16 ± 0.02d3.86 ± 0.04b4.89 ± 0.02a3.57 ± 0.02d0.88 ± 0.05e81.72 ± 0.01c
KSo8.87 ± 0.05fg4.02 ± 0.01a4.83 ± 0.01b3.63 ± 0.05d0.98 ± 0.05c81.87 ± 0.01c
KO8.71 ± 1.13g3.76 ± 0.09c4.82 ± 0.02bc3.90 ± 0.01c0.77 ± 0.01g81.92 ± 0.81c
LSD0.160.50.030.100.020.25
CV1.021.442.391.521.502.17

Values are mean ± standard deviation. Values in the same column followed by different letters are significantly different (). CS: control and sun-dried sample, CSo: control and solar-dried sample, CO: control and oven-dried sample, BS: blanching and sun-dried sample, BSo: blanching and solar-dried sample, BO: blanching and oven-dried sample, KS: potassium metabisulphite and sun-dried sample, KSo: potassium metabisulphite and solar-dried sample, KO: potassium metabisulphite and oven-dried sample, LSD: least significant difference, and CV: coefficient of variation.