[Retracted] Integration of Artificial Intelligence and Blockchain Technology in Healthcare and Agriculture

Vyas, Sonali; Shabaz, Mohammad; Pandit, Prajjawal; Parvathy, L. Rama; Ofori, Isaac

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4228448

Journal of Food Quality

On this page

Abstract Introduction Discussion Conclusion Data Availability Conflicts of Interest References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article Retraction

!

This article has been Retracted. To view the article details, please click the ‘Retraction’ tab above.

Special Issue

Artificial Intelligence in Food Quality Improvement 2021

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2022 | Article ID 4228448 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4228448

[Retracted] Integration of Artificial Intelligence and Blockchain Technology in Healthcare and Agriculture

Sonali Vyas,¹Mohammad Shabaz,²Prajjawal Pandit,³L. Rama Parvathy,⁴and Isaac Ofori⁵

Academic Editor: Ammar AL-Farga

Received31 Mar 2022

Revised22 Apr 2022

Accepted15 May 2022

Published28 May 2022

Abstract

Over the last decade, the healthcare sector has accelerated its digitization and electronic health records (EHRs). As information technology progresses, the notion of intelligent health also gathers popularity. By combining technologies such as the internet of things (IoT) and artificial intelligence (AI), innovative healthcare modifies and enhances traditional medical systems in terms of efficiency, service, and personalization. On the other side, intelligent healthcare systems are incredibly vulnerable to data breaches and other malicious assaults. Recently, blockchain technology has emerged as a potentially transformative option for enhancing data management, access control, and integrity inside healthcare systems. Integrating these advanced approaches in agriculture is critical for managing food supply chains, drug supply chains, quality maintenance, and intelligent prediction. This study reviews the literature, formulates a research topic, and analyzes the applicability of blockchain to the agriculture/food industry and healthcare, with a particular emphasis on AI and IoT. This article summarizes research on the newest blockchain solutions paired with AI technologies for strengthening and inventing new technological standards for the healthcare ecosystems and food industry.

1. Introduction

In the healthcare industry, blockchain and artificial intelligence (AI) technology are unique advancements. Healthcare indices are built using data from Google surveys conducted by several regulating agencies. “Knowledge from Google polls done by plenty of federal regulators is utilized to generate wellness indices.” Blockchain technology facilitates the storing of encrypted records required by AI. Healthcare practitioners can use blockchain to view the patient’s health records, and AI will use several suggested algorithms, decision-making capabilities, and massive amounts of data. Thus, by incorporating the most recent advancements, the healthcare system will become more service efficient and less costly and democratize healthcare [1]. Additionally, innovative technologies have improved their ability to handle big data sets in real time, enabling faster detection and diagnosis of ailments with automated treatment options and comparisons. Transparency and communication between patients and healthcare professionals are also improved via blockchain technology.

The monitoring of clinical trials can be done using numerical drug design approaches and AI to repurpose commercial pharmaceuticals and explore medication formulation’s effectiveness and dose measurement [2]. As a result of this fast-changing atmosphere, governments must determine the most efficient strategies for leveraging resources and accelerate reform while maintaining required uniformity and compliance. Blockchain technology enables the development and management of content blocks referred to as ledgers and the secure and automated analysis of data [3]. Blockchain aids in the analysis of health data and contributes to its prediction. Research has found that technology aids in a variety of ways, like assessing medical supplies files, encountering computerized learning with pharmacologic cautions, successful implementation of health and treatment regions, and the possibility of reassembling. The captured medical data provides immediate updates to medical specialists, healthcare providers, and payers. This is enhanced further by the collaboration of AI and blockchain. AI enables machines to recognize health trends and patterns. Additionally, the sector of self-driving automobiles has demonstrated their respective capacity to leverage AI to develop driverless vehicles. However, some businesses are developing methods for detecting fraud and determining financial hazards through machine learning. AI plays a factor in predictive value and facilitates the assessment of health info. For example, by contrasting medical supplies files, experiencing automatic teaching with pharmacological alerts, effectual implementation of health and areas of treatment, and the likelihood of reassembling, studies have identified that AI assists in an effective manner. Thus, researchers have used various methodologies based on blockchain and AI techniques to consider the above facts. These techniques allow the healthcare industry to analyze the data at exceptional speeds without compromising accuracy and data security and allowing explicit specialists to get to their information for a fixed period. Hence, the main incentive of this article is to highlight the contributions done by the researchers to provide us with guidance about the role and importance of using AI-Blockchain in EHR systems.

An electronic health record (her) is a repository of medical information produced during clinical settings and incidences. With the expansion of consciousness and home health gadgets, useful info concerning sufferers is now supplied in a timely manner and has lengthy therapeutic value.

The organization of the paper is done in sections to ease the readability. Section 2 presents the application of blockchain and AI in E-health systems and agriculture. Section 3 provides the background study for establishing the concepts. Section 4 provides the literature survey of recent studies followed by Section 5 which sums up the final discussion of the manuscript. The article is lastly concluded in the last section. In this research paper, the complete approach and workflow of the system have been discussed in-depth for the reader to obtain a fundamental notion about the applications of blockchain and AI in the health and food industry.

2. Role of Blockchain and AI in E-Healthcare and Agriculture

This section provides an overview of the applicability of blockchain and AI services in the e-Healthcare and agriculture industry.

2.1. Role in Healthcare

A centralized design, such as the one that underpins a traditional EHR system, entrusts a central institution to monitor, coordinate, and direct the whole network. AI can perform complex computational processes and rapidly evaluate massive amounts of patient data. However, some physicians remain wary about employing AI to impact a patient’s wellness, despite AI’s tremendous capabilities, which have proved that it can perform numerous dynamic and cognitive processes faster than a human [4, 5]. Figure 1 shows blockchain and AI in healthcare.

Also, a survey carried out in a recent study [6, 7] established that distance displays an inverse association with the consumption of health services. In this era, AI and blockchain are the two technologies that have individually demonstrated their potential growth in the healthcare industry. The field of utilizing these techniques in EHRs data processing has attracted interest from the scientific community. In contrast, blockchain has become more prevalent in the medical domain. It improves the interoperability issues of current EHR frameworks to forestall the altering just as malignant abuse of client’s records [8]. Various EHR-based software types, such as Epic, currently use live AI solutions for population health management and clinical decision support systems to predict hospital readmissions, patient risk levels, mortality, and patient deterioration. Likewise, a blockchain-based system called MedRec has provided access to patients. To investigate the above findings, scholars have deployed a range of tactics relying on blockchain and AI approaches. Several capabilities enable the health industry to assess information at high levels while significantly degrading information security or the flexibility for specific expertise to retrieve their info for a set number of hours. As a result, the core objective of this report is to spotlight the expert’s contributions in hopes of giving us insight into the position and effectiveness of AI-blockchain in EHR systems [9]. This investigation reviews the effects, proposes a study area, and examines the usage of blockchain in agriculture/food and health, with an emphasis on AI and IoT that has not been incorporated together earlier [10]. Furthermore, new systems have improved their ability to process large data sets in real time, allowing speedier disease identification and diagnosis as well as automated treatment alternatives and comparisons. Blockchain technology also improves transparency and communication between patients and healthcare practitioners.

2.2. Role in Agriculture

IoT, blockchain, and AI-enhanced supply chain provenance solution for the food sector’s Industry 4.0. AgrBlockIoT’s Agr-Food supply chain management solution integrates IoT devices that generate and consume digital data across the chain. Sensors and other IoT devices monitor agricultural diseases caused by pesticides and product traceability. These sensors transmit data directly to a collection of block-level smart contracts. The smart contract has predefined criteria. Figure 2 provides the distribution of papers pertaining to AI and blockchain in agriculture.

Integration of IoT, AI, and blockchain has the potential to improve the system’s efficiency, information traceability, smart farming, and logistics, among other things. In conjunction with IoT devices and machine learning, blockchain technology may give a more comprehensive and valuable image of the agriculture sector. By utilizing IoT, the item/product will be well connected to the resources and goods at each stage of the supply chain. AI is capable of evaluating items. These sensors transmit data directly to a collection of block-level smart contracts.

By utilizing IoT, the item/product will be well connected to the resources and goods at each stage of the supply chain. AI can analyze sowing conditions, crop timing, and agricultural land appropriateness, among other things.

2.2.1. Role of AI Machines in the Agriculture Supply Chain

The employment of machine learning algorithms in the agriculture supply chain’s four primary clusters (preproduction, production, processing, and distribution) is gaining traction. Indeed, machine learning technologies are applied at the preproduction stage, most notably for predicting crop yield, soil parameters, and irrigation requirements. Figure 3 provides an overview of blockchain in agriculture.

In the subsequent manufacturing process, machine learning might be utilized to identify diseases and forecast the weather. In the third cluster of the processing phase, machine learning algorithms are used, most notably to predict production planning to achieve high and safe product quality. Machine learning techniques might potentially be used in the distribution cluster, particularly in storage, transportation, and customer analysis. The preproduction cluster is the first link in the chain of agriculture supply. It is primarily concerned with agricultural output forecasting, soil parameters, and irrigation requirements. Numerous studies emphasize the critical nature of agricultural yield production to improve plant management. Indeed, by incorporating input data (equipment requirements, nutrients, and fertilizers) into efficient models powered by machine learning algorithms, these precision agriculture tools aim to assist stakeholders and farmers in making optimal crop yield forecasting decisions and enhancing intelligent farming practices.

3. Background Study

The undeniable accomplishment of Bitcoin popularized blockchain technology to conduct reliable transactions over unreliable networks. A blockchain is a chronologically ordered collection of blocks that include a list of complete and valid transaction records. The block immediately preceding a particular block is referred to as the parent block, while the initial block is the genesis block. A reference (hash value) connects each block to the preceding one, producing a chain.

A health information system is designed to manage, collect, store, and transmit patient’s data and the organizational system manages the complete data collected from the hospital repository. After being processed, the data from the information system is sent to three areas, i.e., Patient Management System, Clinical Information System, and Clinical Support Services. It also draws information into an electronic record that clinicians can see at the patient’s bedside. On the other side, clinical support system tools suggest the next steps for treatment and alert the information that the patient may not have seen. Figure 4 describes the framework of EHR.

The clinical decision support system is further divided into three types, i.e., the laboratory information system, which is the leading avenue for the laboratory staff to store data and provide laboratory results to healthcare providers. The data collected from Patient Management System is collaborated and stored in the Patient Information Database, which helps to generate the EHR.

3.1. Types of EHR

There are mainly two types of HER, i.e., cloud-based and client-based HER systems.(i)Client-based HER: the customer worker-based EHR gives admittance to the destinations through the web. Assume that a rustic center can share and synchronize its clinical records with the emergency clinics and facility through an open EHR worker without much of a stretch. Additionally, put-together clinical staff can log concerning the framework and assist the patients. They may look, sort, and be channel-dependent on specific measures before choosing what cases they should assist with. Figure 5 provides client-server architecture.(ii)Cloud-based HER: distributed computing introduced in this engineering is a productive segment by which patients and medical laborers can access, store, or recover electronic medical information in the cloud. The equipment and framework programming segments in the cloud are the validation worker, EHR information base, and the middleware, incorporating the organization and the interface. Toward the end, the different medical care places recover the patient’s clinical history and record history from the cloud utilizing the framework as assistance and programming as a help. The availability innovation used to associate with the cloud can be wired or remote innovation, for example, 3G/4G, WIFI, and the gadgets utilized are PC. Thus, cloud-based EHR has various advantages for clinical practices. Figure 6 provides a description of cloud-based EHR.

3.2. Functions of EHR

Electronic medical record architecture gives a bunch of fundamental applications that an EHR component must use to improve patient’s security, as well as decision support capabilities as documented in Table 1.

4. Literature Survey

It has been utilized to mine EHR information to help in infection finding and the executives, impersonating and enlarging the clinical dynamic of human doctors [18]. The application of AI in medicine has two main branches, i.e., virtual and physical; out of these, the virtual branch represents the machine and deep learning. Hence, the work done by the researchers using automated learning in the field of EHR is stated below [19]. Even the recent pandemic situation was accessed using AI-based approaches. The role of AI in EHR is shown in Figure 7.

Wong et al. [20] reviewed AI solutions for dementia care in medical informatics. They looked over and evaluated the present logical systems, identifying the essential concerns and challenges of having enough medical data. They also illustrated the future possibilities and research implications of severe AI, such as figuring out dementia informatics. Likewise, Marella et al. [21] developed an AI algorithm for deleting exposed adverse effects from EHR notes with free material. They worked on a dataset of 103,564 phrases extracted from the electronic clinical notes of 2695 patients with bosom malignant development. On the other hand, the author looked at four common scenarios that analysts could find helpful in determining when and for what tasks AI could be used to detect medical findings from EHR data. They claimed that medical results based on analytic measurements comprised a variety of clinical components and AI computations that might assist in illustrating the symptomatic complexity.

The authors also testified the enormous promise of computerized medical teaching capabilities and improved medical outcomes for cardiovascular and chronic illnesses patients. Brisimi et al. [22] developed a semiautomated method for screening situations that demonstrated the risks of EHRs from the essential populace-based security disclosing framework. Baxter et al. [23] developed the K-LRT approach and JCC strategy, which identified concealed tolerant groups and modified classifiers for each bunch while validating these computations on massive datasets. Torous and Walker [24] predicted the need for cautious intervention in patients with acute open-point glaucoma using organized data in the electronic health record. Additionally, their technique paved the way for future advancements in automated risk forecasting inside an EHR framework based on core data. Here, Liang [25] studied how innovation might be used to broaden replies to the issues associated with translational examination and clinical consideration.

To ensure security, Jabbar et al. [26] developed a framework to promote character confirmation, simplify the access to and exchange of EHR data, and increase the security of patient information. In the same way, Sun et al. [27] presented a blockchain framework for enhancing data interoperability and integrity in the context of EHR sharing, allowing for the trade of EHRs between multiple clinical suppliers and a decentralized Trusted Third-Party Auditor to ensure data respectability. This devised a property-based encryption scheme for the safe storage and efficient exchange of electronic clinical data in an interplanetary file system stockpiling environment. It regulated the entry of electronic healthcare data without interfering with constructive recuperation. Table 2 provides the research analysis.

5. Discussion

Rapid advancements in healthcare digitization have resulted in massive electronic patient records. This advancement paves the way for never-before-seen standards for protecting healthcare data and for the use and transmission of these records. E-Health structures may be a more viable option for preserving medical records on a global and linked scale and allowing for more access to clinical information based on the system’s requirements. There is a significant growth in the number of candidates for EHR in E-Health, which utilizes mobile devices to deliver medical support. Some medical services include data collection online and in-person and data sharing with other medical service providers. The EHR is a digital-based platform for storing and processing medical data readily available to patients and physicians. The primary goal of an EHR is to monitor and retain patients’ medical data better securely. This covers the patient’s entire medical history, current health status, and demographic information about the patient. To ensure consistency, service providers must update the provided services. Indeed, prior studies [57] advocated a variety of policies and norms to safeguard EHR privacy. These guidelines and regulations impose stringent security requirements to share and exchange health data. If sharing did not adhere to the guidelines, severe sanctions were levied on violators. The incorporation of AI and multiagent-based systems into health data facilitates management decision-making and action and communication and coordination. The primary objective of this system is to provide methodologies, tools, and infrastructure for managing and transmitting health data via the EHR. Electronic Health Records are real-time and patient-centric solutions. This enables authorized individuals to view and manage patient data. These data are in a digital format and are gathered following previously established criteria for storing patient health information. The data in this EHR can be accessed by the patient, an authorized physician, or a service provider. It is kept on cloud-based servers that are only accessible to authorized users. A network was used to connect the users and the data. The network handled all requests and transmissions. While this EHR has several advantages, it is more susceptible to many forms of threats. This is due to the way it was designed. Numerous dangers to data collection were discovered in these EHRs. As a result of these dangers, some users are hesitant to utilize this EHR to store and transfer their health data. As a result, this is proposed as a unique technique for guaranteeing privacy and security by merging AI agents and blockchain. In the health industry, blockchain enables clients to have complete visibility and transparency of the commodities. There are also a few electronic health record software vendors, which are listed as follows:(i)EPIC: Epic spotlights huge clinical meetings and inpatient settings. KLAS has positioned Epic’s EHR as the best in KLAS for a very long time in the most significant section. It is worker obsessed and designer driven with a product that is anything but difficult to exploit and execute in the association [58, 59].(ii)CERNER: Cerner is now the primary provider of Health IT arrangements and is the biggest supplier of frameworks for inpatient care. It upholds 55 or more specialties besides the medical sector, monetary, and vast links [60].(iii)CARECLOUD: Care-Cloud offers to fund the successful EHR, train the executives, and persistence skills in the board indoctrination [61]. KLAS has taken Care-Cloud as a primary supplier of cloud-based income cycle of the executive administrator for the concern of mobile rehearses.(iv)ATENAHEALTH: Atenahealth provides a cloud-based income sequence pact outfitted for the large, interdisciplinary doctor meetings. It provides tuition to the higher officials and EHR arrangement and an advanced UI alongside the cloud-based capacities like access from any program.(v)NEXTGEN: NextGen controls more than 155,000 doctors through their EHR programming. It is an entirely claimed auxiliary of Quality Systems, Inc. NextGen tailors its product to the necessities of wandering practices and holds a more grounded position with slight to medium practices. Its contribution is principally customer workers with an abundance of clinical substance for certain specialties.

Blockchain technology may be used to monitor the expertise of medical experts, allowing trustworthy medical institutions and healthcare organizations to document the credentials of their employees, therefore assisting healthcare organizations in streamlining their employment process. ProCredEx, located in the United States, has created a medical credential verification system based on the R3 Corda blockchain technology.

6. Conclusion

Healthcare providers, patients, and other stakeholders have used electronic storage of medical prescriptions and other pertinent records. These reports include sensitive patient information. As a result, there is a requirement to store this information decentralized for providing data and identity security. Numerous individuals see doctors regularly and receive various prescriptions and evaluations. Healthcare data is required in case of an emergency. Blockchain-based architectures can be used for storing and processing medical data (handwritten medications, printed pills, and printed messages) utilizing various AI techniques such as optical character recognition (OCR) to create a single patient medical history report. The optical mark recognition technique is an enterprise option for information extraction from the textual content text in a document image or electronic document and transfers the content into a robot framework for data manipulation such as altering or finding. For ease of use and reading, the report displays just the most critical information and is safely saved on a decentralized blockchain network for further use. This research examined cutting-edge blockchain research in healthcare and proposed the integration of AI and a blockchain-based approach to healthcare administration. Multiple studies have established the significance of machine learning deep learning and ensemble learning models as efficient prediction models in healthcare. Numerous projects in various nations and economies demonstrate that governments and relevant corporate sectors are increasing their involvement in digitizing healthcare systems. In this paper, the complete approach and workflow of the system have been discussed in-depth for the reader to obtain a fundamental notion about applications of blockchain and AI in the health and food industry. In the future trends. AI could be utilized to identify and prioritize certain sufferers for dosage surveillance, which is vital for prescribed drug manufacture and may limit turnaround times.

Data Availability

The data shall be made available on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

A. Gorkhali, L. Li, and A. Shrestha, “Blockchain: a literature review,” Journal of Management Analytics, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 321–343, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S.-C. Cha, J.-F. Chen, C. Su, and K.-H. Yeh, “A blockchain connected gateway for BLE-based devices in the internet of things,” IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 24639–24649, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Hölbl, M. Kompara, A. Kamišalić, and L. Nemec Zlatolas, “A systematic review of the use of blockchain in healthcare,” Symmetry, vol. 10, no. 10, p. 470, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Bell, W. J. Buchanan, J. Cameron, and O. Lo, “Applications of blockchain within healthcare,” Blockchain in Healthcare Today, vol. 1, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Ghosh and B. Mistri, “Spatial disparities in the provision of rural health facilities: application of GIS based modelling in rural Birbhum, India,” Spatial Information Research, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 655–668, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Roehrs, C. A. Da Costa, R. D. Righi, and K. S. De Oliveira, “Personal health records: a systematic literature review,” Journal of Medical Internet Research, vol. 19, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. C. Lin, J. S. Chen, M. F. Chiang, and M. R. Hribar, “Applications of artificial intelligence to electronic health record data in ophthalmology,” Translational Vision Science & Technology, vol. 9, no. 2, p. 13, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Ellingsen and M. Hertzum, “User requirements meet large-scale EHR suites: norwegian preparations for epic,” Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, vol. 270, pp. 703–707, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Al-Shawwa, E. Glynn, M. A. Hoffman, Z. Ehsan, and D. G. Ingram, “Outpatient health care utilization for sleep disorders in the cerner health facts database,” Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, vol. 17, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Salleh, “Creation and use of the electronic medical record,” Healthcare Service Delivery, vol. 1, pp. 1–12, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
R. S. Evans, “Electronic health records: then, now and in the future,” Yearbook of Medical Informatics, vol. 25, no. S1, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Bodley, J. L. Kwan, J. Matelski, P. J. Darragh, and P. Cram, “Test result management practices of Canadian internal medicine physicians and trainees,” Journal of General Internal Medicine, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 118–124, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. K. J. Groenhof, Z. H. Rittersma, M. L. Bots et al., “A computerised decision support system for cardiovascular risk management “live” in the electronic health record environment: development, validation and implementation-the utrecht cardiovascular cohort initiative,” Netherlands Heart Journal, vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 435–442, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Zhu, S.-P. Tu, D. Sewell et al., “Measuring electronic communication networks in virtual care teams using electronic health records access-log data,” International Journal of Medical Informatics, vol. 128, pp. 46–52, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Tutty, L. E. Carlasare, S. Lloyd, and C. A. Sinsky, “The complex case of EHRs: examining the factors impacting the EHR user experience,” Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 673–677, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Lal, Y. Pinevich, O. Gajic, V. Herasevich, and B. Pickering, “Artificial intelligence and computer simulation models in critical illness,” World Journal of Critical Care Medicine, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 13–19, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Satpathy, M. Mangla, N. Sharma, H. Deshmukh, and S. Mohanty, “Predicting mortality rate and associated risks in COVID-19 patients,” Spatial Information Research, vol. 29, pp. 455–464, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Tsang, X. Xie, and S.-M. Zhou, “Harnessing the power of machine learning in dementia informatics research: issues, opportunities, and challenges,” IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering, vol. 13, pp. 113–129, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. W. Forsyth, R. Barzilay, K. S. Hughes et al., “Machine learning methods to extract documentation of breast cancer symptoms from electronic health records,” Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 1492–1499, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Wong, M. M. Horwitz, L. Zhou, and S. Toh, “Using machine learning to identify health outcomes from electronic health record data,” Current Epidemiology Reports, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 331–342, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. M. Marella, E. Sparnon, and E. Finley, “Screening electronic health record–related patient safety reports using machine learning,” Journal of Patient Safety, vol. 13, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
T. S. Brisimi, T. Xu, T. Wang et al., “Predicting chronic disease hospitalizations from electronic health records: an interpretable classification approach,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 106, no. 4, pp. 690–707, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. L. Baxter, C. Marks, T.-T. Kuo, L. Ohno-Machado, and R. N. Weinreb, “Machine learning-based predictive modeling of surgical intervention in glaucoma using systemic data from electronic health records,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 208, pp. 30–40, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Torous and R. Walker, “Leveraging digital health and machine learning toward reducing suicide-from panacea to practical tool,” JAMA Psychiatry, vol. 76, no. 10, pp. 999–1002, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Liang, “Identity verification and management of electronic health records with blockchain technology,” in Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics (ICHI), Xi’an, China, June 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
R. Jabbar, N. Fetais, M. Krichen, and K. Barkaroui, “Blockchain technology for healthcare: enhancing shared electronic health record interoperability and integrity,” in Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Informatics, IoT, and Enabling Technologies (ICIoT), Doha, Qatar, February 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Sun, X. Yao, S. Wang, and Y. Wu, “Blockchain-based secure storage and access scheme for electronic medical records in IPFS,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 59389–59401, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. M. Lauritsen, M. Kristensen, M. V. Olsen et al., “Explainable artificial intelligence model to predict acute critical illness from electronic health records,” Nature Communications, vol. 11, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. J. Ellis, Z. Wang, N. Genes, and A. Ma’ayan, “Predicting opioid dependence from electronic health records with machine learning,” BioData Mining, vol. 12, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Hong, A. Wen, D. J. Stone et al., “Developing a FHIR-based EHR phenotyping framework: a case study for identification of patients with obesity and multiple comorbidities from discharge summaries,” Journal of Biomedical Informatics, vol. 99, Article ID 103310, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. S. Nori, C. A. Hane, Y. Sun, W. H. Crown, and P. A. Bleicher, “Deep neural network models for identifying incident dementia using claims and EHR datasets,” PLoS One, vol. 15, no. 9, Article ID e0236400, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Santos, A. Silva, M. Maciel, H. Burin, J. Urbanetto, and R. Vieria, “Fall detection in EHR using word embeddings and deep learning,” in Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE 19th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering (BIBE), Athens, Greece, October 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. S. Lindberg, M. Prosperi, R. I. Bjarnadottir et al., “Identification of important factors in an inpatient fall risk prediction model to improve the quality of care using EHR and electronic administrative data: a machine-learning approach,” International Journal of Medical Informatics, vol. 143, pp. 104272–104279, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. J. Steele, S. C. Denaxas, A. D. Shah, H. Hemingway, and N. M. Luscombe, “Machine learning models in EHR can outperform conventional survival models for predicting patient mortality in coronary artery disease,” PLoS One, vol. 13, Article ID e0202344, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Rajkomar, E. Oren, K. Chen et al., “Scalable and accurate deep learning with electronic health records,” NPJ Digital Medicine, vol. 1, pp. 18–24, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y.-H. Wang, P.-A. Nguyen, M. M. Islam, Y.-C. Li, and H.-C. Yang, “Development of deep learning algorithm for detection of colorectal cancer in EHR data,” MedInfo, vol. 264, pp. 438–441, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Park and J. Choi, “V-model: a new perspective for EHR-based phenotyping,” BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, vol. 14, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Rasmy, F. Tiryaki, Y. Zhou et al., “Representation of EHR data for predictive modeling: a comparison between UMLS and other terminologies,” Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, vol. 27, no. 10, pp. 1593–1599, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Wang, L. Tong, D. Davis, T. Arnoid, and T. Esposito, “The application of unsupervised deep learning in predictive models using electronic health record,” Medical Research Methodology, vol. 20, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Meng, W. Speier, M. Ong, and C. W. Arnold, “Multi-level embedding with topic modeling on electronic health records for predicting depression,” Explainable AI in Healthcare and Medicine, vol. 914, pp. 241–246, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Gligic, A. Kormilitzin, P. Goldberg, and A. Nevado-Holgado, “Named entity recognition in electronic health records using transfer learning bootstrapped neural networks,” Neural Networks, vol. 121, pp. 132–139, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. A. I. Omoregbe, I. O. Ndaman, S. Misra, O. O. Abayomi-Alli, and R. Damaševičius, “Text messaging-based medical diagnosis using natural language processing and fuzzy logic,” Journal of Healthcare Engineering, vol. 2020, Article ID 8839524, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Priyanga, V. V. Pattankar, and S. Sridevi, “A hybrid recurrent neural network‐logistic chaos‐based whale optimization framework for heart disease prediction with electronic health records,” Computational Intelligence, vol. 37, pp. 315–343, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Kavitha and M. Hanumanthappa, “Predicting oral squamous cell carcinoma in tobacco users by utilising fuzzy-based decision tree algorithm,” International Journal of Medical Engineering and Informatics, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 435–446, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Gupta and M. K. Gupta, “Computational prediction of cervical cancer diagnosis using ensemble-based classification algorithm,” The Computer Journal, vol. 66, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Hamedan, A. Orooji, H. Sanadgol, and A. Sheikhtaheri, “Clinical decision support system to predict chronic kidney disease: a fuzzy expert system approach,” International Journal of Medical Informatics, vol. 138, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. K. Roopa and B. S. Harish, “Automated ECG analysis for localizing thrombus in culprit artery using rule based information fuzzy network,” International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 16–25, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Shawwa, E. Ghosh, S. Lanius, E. Schwager, L. Eshelman, and K. B. Kashani, “Predicting acute kidney injury in critically ill patients using comorbid conditions utilizing machine learning,” Clinical Kidney Journal, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 1428–1435, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Shoenbill, N. Fost, U. Tachinardi, and E. A. Mendonca, “Genetic data and electronic health records: a discussion of ethical, logistical and technological considerations,” Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 171–180, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Hernandez-Boussard, K. L. Monda, B. C. Crespo, and D. Riskin, “Real world evidence in cardiovascular medicine: ensuring data validity in electronic health record-based studies,” Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, vol. 26, no. 11, pp. 1189–1194, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. J. Masino, M. C. Harris, D. Forsyth et al., “Machine learning models for early sepsis recognition in the neonatal intensive care unit using readily available electronic health record data,” PLoS One, vol. 14, no. 2, Article ID e0212665, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Afshar, A. Phillips, N. Karnik et al., “Natural language processing and machine learning to identify alcohol misuse from the electronic health record in trauma patients: development and internal validation,” Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 254–261, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Li, H. Salmasian, R. Harpaz, H. Chase, and C. Friedman, “Determining the reasons for medication prescriptions in the EHR using knowledge and natural language processing,” Annual Symposium Proceedings, vol. 2011, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
C.-Y. Hung, C.-H. Lin, T.-H. Lan, G.-S. Peng, and C.-C. Lee, “Development of an intelligent decision support system for ischemic stroke risk assessment in a population-based electronic health record database,” PLoS One, vol. 14, no. 3, Article ID e0213007, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. D. Samad, A. Ulloa, G. J. Wehner et al., “Predicting survival from large echocardiography and electronic health record datasets,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology: Cardiovascular Imaging, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 681–689, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Li, Y. Jin, W. Liu, B. P. S. Rawat, P. Cai, and H. Yu, “Fine-tuning bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (BERT)-based models on large-scale electronic health record notes: an empirical study,” JMIR Medical Informatics, vol. 7, no. 3, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
OECD, 2013 Annual Report on the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises-OECD, OECD, Paris, Paris, France, 2013, https://www.oecd.org/corporate/mne/2013annualreportontheguidelinesformnes.htm.
A. Neamah, “An emprical case analysis on the vendor products with eletronic health records with global prespectives,” Journal of Xi’an, vol. 12, pp. 1–12, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Gupta and L. K. Awasthi, “Peer enterprises: possibilities, challenges and some ideas towards their realization,” On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2007: OTM 2007 Workshops, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Khurshid, E. Oliveira, A. Kaerwer et al., “Developing a real time EHR integrated SdoH clinical tool,” AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science, vol. 2020, pp. 308–316, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Kapoor, A. Gupta, R. Gupta, S. Tanwar, G. Sharma, and I. E. Davidson, “Ransomware detection, avoidance, and mitigation scheme: a review and future directions,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 8, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2022 Sonali Vyas et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

4743

Downloads

2093

Citations