Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Immunology Research
Volume 2018 (2018), Article ID 5201759, 9 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5201759
Review Article

The Role of Phospholipase C Signaling in Macrophage-Mediated Inflammatory Response

1College of Veterinary Medicine and Jiangsu Co-innovation Center for Prevention and Control of Important Animal Infectious Diseases and Zoonoses, Yangzhou University, 48 Wenhui East Road, Yangzhou, Jiangsu 225009, China
2Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, Center for Veterinary Health Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA
3College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450002, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Clinton Jones and Gaiping Zhang

Received 24 June 2017; Revised 6 October 2017; Accepted 5 November 2017; Published 8 February 2018

Academic Editor: Zissis Chroneos

Copyright © 2018 Liqian Zhu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Macrophages are crucial members of the mononuclear phagocyte system essential to protect the host from invading pathogens and are central to the inflammatory response with their ability to acquire specialized phenotypes of inflammatory (M1) and anti-inflammatory (M2) and to produce a pool of inflammatory mediators. Equipped with a broad range of receptors, such as Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), CD14, and Fc gamma receptors (FcγRs), macrophages can efficiently recognize and phagocytize invading pathogens and secrete cytokines by triggering various secondary signaling pathways. Phospholipase C (PLC) is a family of enzymes that hydrolyze phospholipids, the most significant of which is phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate [PI(4,5)P2]. Cleavage at the internal phosphate ester generates two second messengers, inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3) and diacylglycerol (DAG), both of which mediate in diverse cellular functions including the inflammatory response. Recent studies have shown that some PLC isoforms are involved in multiple stages in TLR4-, CD14-, and FcγRs-mediated activation of nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB), mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), and interferon regulatory factors (IRFs), all of which are associated with the regulation of the inflammatory response. Therefore, secondary signaling by PLC is implicated in the pathogenesis of numerous inflammatory diseases. This review provides an overview of our current knowledge on how PLC signaling regulates the macrophage-mediated inflammatory response.

1. Introduction

Inflammation is part of the complex biological response of body tissues to harmful stimuli, such as pathogens, damaged cells, or to molecular “irritants,” and is a protective response involving both cellular and molecular mediators [1, 2]. Initially, both pro and anti-inflammatory signals with opposing effects are tightly regulated in a balanced status [3]. However, a disruption of this balance can result in an excessive inflammatory response resulting in cellular and tissue damage [46]. From extensive study, it has long been recognized that macrophages play a critical role in the initiation, maintenance, and resolution of inflammation.

Together with dendritic cells (DCs) and monocytes, macrophages are major components of the mononuclear phagocyte system. Macrophages participate in all phases of the immune and inflammatory responses [7]. Unstimulated macrophages are typically quiescent; however, stimulation of these cells by local micromilieu signals, however, results in their acquiring a polarized phenotype [8] either proinflammatory M1 macrophages or anti-inflammatory M2 macrophages. M1 macrophages, generally induced by LPS and IFNγ, generate high levels of proinflammatory cytokines [e.g., interleukin 1β (IL-1β), interleukin 6 (IL-6), interleukin 12 (IL-12), and tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α)] and oxidative metabolites [e.g., nitric oxide (NO) and ROS]; M2 macrophages stimulated by a variety of stimuli (e.g., IL-4/IL-13 and glucocorticoids) are important in the resolution of inflammation [9, 10]. Macrophages express a repertoire of pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) such as Toll-like receptors (TLRs), CD14, nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-like (Nod-like) receptors, and RIG-I-like receptors [1115]. This sensor array enables them to recognize a diverse range of ligands and to initiate quickly appropriate responses, such as phagocytosis, and immunomodulation through production of various cytokines [3, 14, 16]. Macrophages have elaborate strategies for the regulation of the inflammatory response.

Stimuli, such as lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and cytokines, activate macrophages by ligation of corresponding receptors, such as Toll-like receptors (TLRs) [14]. Upon activation, a variety of intracellular signals are triggered to promote the production of proinflammation cytokines [e.g., IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α], chemokine [e.g., macrophage inflammatory factor (MIP-1α) and IL-8], and toxic molecules (e.g., NO and ROS) [17, 18]. The “cytokine storm” characterized by the hyperinduction of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines is a pathogenic mechanism resulting in some pathogens causing tissue injury and multiorgan dysfunction [1921]. For example, the lethal lung inflammation due to infection by influenza virus (e.g., 1918 H1N1 and H5N1) and porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) is mainly caused by cytokine storms induced by these viral infections [20, 2224]. Macrophages are the major source of proinflammatory mediators [2527] and are therefore implicated in the pathogenesis of numerous inflammatory diseases.

Members of the phospholipase C (PLC) family are thus involved in intracellular and intercellular signal transduction. Accumulated evidence has demonstrated that the PLC signaling inhibitor U73122 attenuates both acute and chronic inflammation mediated by macrophages both in vivo and in vitro [2830], linking PLC signaling to macrophage-mediated inflammation. The involvement of PLCβ, γ, and δ in macrophage-mediated inflammation has been extensively studied, and herein the corresponding mechanisms are summarized and discussed.

2. The Spectrum of Expression of PLC Isoenzymes in Macrophages

PLC family enzymes are activated by numerous factors such as neurotransmitters, growth factors, histamine, and hormones, as reviewed by Nakamura and Fukami [31]. PI(4,5)P2 is the preferred substrate of PLC. Hydrolysis of PI(4,5)P2 leads to the generation of IP3 into the cytoplasm and DAG in the membrane. IP3 triggers the release of Ca2+ from intracellular stores, and DAG mediates the activation of protein kinase C (PKC). The activation of PKC and calcium signaling in turn activate downstream signaling [31, 32]. Concomitantly, PI(4,5)P2 also directly regulates a variety of cellular functions, including phagocytosis [33].

Protein kinase C (PKC) is a family of protein serine/threonine kinases that are involved in the phosphorylation of serine and threonine amino acid residues on other proteins, or other members of this family [34]. The PKC isoforms are divided into 3 subfamilies based on their activation requirements: classical PKCs (calcium dependent) (PKCα, βI, βII, and γ), novel PKCs (calcium independent) (PKCδ, ε, η, and θ), and atypical PKCs (PKC-ζ and λ/ι) [35, 36]. According to the literature, eight PKC isoforms (PKCα, βI, βII, δ, ε, η, ζ, and λ) are expressed in macrophages [37]. Though macrophages do not express detectable PKCθ, its expression is upregulated in response to LPS/IFNγ stimulation [38], suggesting that PKCθ expression in macrophages is inducible by certain inflammatory stimuli. It has been known that PKC inhibitors reduce LPS-stimulated cytokine secretion by macrophages, linking PKC activation to TLR4 signaling. It has been further evidenced that PKCα, δ, ε, and ζ are directly involved in multiple steps in TLR4 pathways, as well as in the downstream activation of inflammation pertinent signaling, such as MAPK and NF-κB [36, 39, 40]. PKCθ and PKCε also activate NF-κB-dependent pathways in muscle cells to promote expression of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokine [41]. PKCε regulates NF-κB-mediated NO production by macrophages in response to LPS stimulation [42]. Classical PKCs are critical components that control IRF-3-dependent gene expression downstream of TLR3 and TLR4 [43]. The role of PKC isoforms in TLR-dependent signaling transduction has been summarized in Figure 1. In view of the diversity of the PKC family and that PKC signaling is regulated by PLC enzymes, this further emphasizes the importance of PLC signaling in macrophage-mediated inflammation.

Figure 1: The expression of PKC isoforms in macrophages and their role in TLR-mediated inflammatory response. Among them eight, PKC isoforms (PKCα, βI, βII, δ, ε, η, ζ, and λ) are expressed in macrophages. PKCα, δ, ε, and ζ are directly related to TLR-induced inflammatory response. PKCθ expression in macrophages cannot be detected, but its expression can be induced by LPS/IFNγ stimulation.

Currently, there are a total of 6 classes of PLC isoenzymes discovered in mammals including the PLCβ, γ, δ, ε, η, and ζ. Each class of PLC is composed of many isotypes with distinct functions, domains, and regulatory mechanisms [44]. Based on the structure, they are further subdivided into 13 isoforms including PLCβ1–4, γ1-2, δ1, δ3-4, ε, ζ, and η1–2 [31]. The structures of these PLC isoforms show conserved domains such as the X and Y domains that are responsible for catalytic activity, as well as regulatory specific domains including the PH domain, the C2 domain, and EF hand motifs involved in various biological functions of PLC isoenzymes [44, 45]. PLC isoforms are distinct in their activation mode, expression levels, cellular localization, and tissue distribution linking to a specific function for each isoform.

The spectrum of the expression of PLC isoforms in macrophages is phenotype-specific. It has been reported that in the case of human macrophages (derived from peripheral blood mononuclear cells), PLCβ1–4, γ1-2, δ1, and η1-2 are expressed in unstimulated macrophages, PLCβ1–3, γ1-2, δ1 and 3, and η1-2 are expressed in M1 macrophages, and PLCβ1–3, γ1-2, δ3, and η1-2 are expressed in M2 macrophages. In addition, these PLC isoforms showed different subcellular localization in differently polarized macrophages [46]. The distinct expression spectrum and subcellular localization of these PLC isoforms reflect the diverse roles that they play in the regulation of the inflammatory response.

3. The Role of PLCβ in Macrophage-Mediated Inflammatory Response

Macrophages express all the four PLCβ isoforms orchestrating the Ca2+ signaling [47, 48], for example, the clostridium difficile ToxB-stimulated Ca2+ signaling in macrophages is enhanced via PLCβ-4 signaling, but depressed by the PLCβ-3 signaling [49]. Ca2+ and Erk1/2 signaling play important roles in the regulation of inflammatory response. PLCβ is involved in the activation of Erk1/2 signaling in macrophages. It has been demonstrated that the glyceryl ester of prostaglandins activates Erk1/2 signaling in a dose-dependent manner through a pathway that requires PLCβ signaling [50].

Cell adhesion is required for monocyte differentiation into macrophages. In human cytomegalovirus- (HCMV-) infected monocytic THP-1 cells, the viral protein US28 promotes adhesion to the endothelial cells via the activation of PLCβ/PKC signaling cascade. Therefore, it is possible that PLCβ signaling may promote the differentiation of monocytes to macrophages via cell adhesion [51]. U73122 is a pan inhibitor for PLC isoforms. We have demonstrated that U73122 inhibits PMA-induced human promonocytic U937 cell adhesion, as well as the differentiation into macrophages [29]. These two independent studies indicated that PLC signaling regulates cell adhesion and the differentiation of monocytes to macrophages.

It has been reported that LPS suppresses PLCβ-2 and β-1 expression in macrophages in an MyD88-dependent manner, and the suppressed PLCβ-2 plays an important role in switching M1 macrophages into an M2-like state [52, 53], suggesting that PLCβ-2 signaling is closely involved in macrophage polarization.

PLCβ signaling broadly regulates the expression of proinflammatory cytokines or chemokines in diverse cell cultures. The binding of HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein gp120 to CCR5 leads to PLCβ-1 nuclear localization which promotes the release of chemokine CCL2 by macrophages [54], suggesting that activation of PLCβ-1 signaling stimulates the expression of CCL2 in macrophages. PLCβ-3 regulates IL-8 expression in bronchial epithelial cells via TLR-mediated activation of calcium signaling and NF-κB pathway [55]. However, whether PLCβ-3 regulates cytokine expression in macrophages has not been reported.

In summary, in macrophages, PLCβ-1 signaling regulates the expression of CCL2, and PLCβ-2 signaling regulates cell polarization, while PLCβ-3 and PLCβ-4 signaling regulates Ca2+ signaling with opposite effect.

4. The Involvement of PLCγ in Macrophage-Mediated Inflammatory Response

There are two main isoforms of PLCγ expressed in humans, PLCγ-1 and PLCγ-2, which regulate the development and functions of various hematopoietic cells [56, 57], for example, PLCγ1 regulates T cell activation and development through interaction with T cell receptor (TCR), and PLCγ-2 regulates development and maturation of B cells via interaction with pre-B cell receptor (BCR), reviewed by Nakamura and Fukami [31]. PLCγ-1 and PLCγ-2 are activated downstream of receptor (RTK) and nonreceptor tyrosine kinases, with tyrosine phosphorylation of PLCγ as the major mechanism. However, there is a novel mechanism towards the activation of PLCγ-2, which depends not on protein tyrosine phosphorylation, but on Rac GTPases [5759]. Ubiquitously expressed PLCγ-1 is mainly activated by growth factors, including platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), epidermal growth factor (EGF), and fibroblast growth factor (FGF) [60]. PLCγ-1 binds to the tyrosine-phosphorylated receptors of EGF via its SH2 domain and downstream proteins via the SH3 domain [61]. We have recently identified that the exposure of macrophages to the proinflammatory cytokines TNF-α and IL-1β, as well as to influenza virus H1N1, leads to activation of PLCγ-1 in macrophages, which expands the spectrum of upstream stimulators for PLCγ-1 signaling [30]. Influenza virus H1N1 infection activates PLCγ-1 signaling through EGR receptor (EGFR) in alveolar epithelial cell line (A549 cells) [62]. But whether EGFR or the other RTKs act as an upstream activator for PLC signaling in macrophages is largely unknown. PLCγ-2, being predominantly expressed in hematopoietic cells, is activated by immune cell (T cell, B cell, and Fc) receptors associated with multiprotein complexes [60]. So PLCγ-1 and PLCγ-2 may be differentially activated to perform diverse functions.

Upon stimulation by LPS, TLR4 signaling induces proinflammatory cytokine production. Generally, TLRs regulate TLR-specific gene expression through the recruitment of distinct combinations of TLR/IL1R (TIR) domain-containing adaptor proteins, such as myeloid differentiation primary response gene 88 (MyD88), Toll/IL-1 receptor domain-containing adaptor protein (TIRAP), TIR domain-containing adaptor inducing IFN-β (TRIF), TRIF-related adaptor molecule (TRAM), and sterile α- and armadillo motif-containing protein (SARM) to form a signalosome, which activates downstream signals [63]. TLR4 is unique among these TLRs in its ability to utilize all of the TIR domain-containing adaptors and mediate activation of both MyD88-dependent and MyD88-independent (TRAM–TRIF-dependent) pathways [6466], which are required to stimulate proinflammatory cytokine production in macrophages. In MyD88-dependent pathway, both MyD88 and TIRAP are required to activate NF-κB and MAPK cascades and proinflammatory cytokine production [67, 68]. The MyD88-independent signaling events are controlled by TRIF and TRAM and induce IRF3-dependent type I interferon production [65, 69]. So in TLR4-mediated signaling, distinct adaptors are recruited to form diverse complexes which activate various downstream inflammatory signaling.

The involvement of PLCγ signaling in TLR4-mediated inflammation has been well identified. Currently, it is clear that PI(4,5)P2 plays an important role in TLR4 signaling. Mechanistically, TIRAP localizes to the plasma membrane by binding to PI(4,5)P2; there it recruits TLR4 and MyD88 to PI(4,5)P2-rich sites on the plasma membrane to form the TLR4 signalosome [69]. The distinct cellular localization of TLR4 complex leads to optional activation of MyD88-dependent or MyD88-independent signaling. Once TLR4 complex resides at the plasma membrane, the MyD88-dependent NF-κB signaling is activated. Subsequently, the TLR-4 is delivered to the endosome compartment where MyD88-independent IRF3 signaling is activated [70]. The critical role that PI(4,5)P2 plays in TLR4 signaling is in linking TLR4 to PLCγ which controls the metabolism of PI(4,5)P2 [71]. Mechanisms for the regulation of LPS-induced TLR4 endocytosis and IRF3 activation by PLCγ-2 have been established: IP3, the cleavage product of PI(4,5)P2 by PLCγ-2, binding to IP3 receptors (IP3Rs) in the endoplasmic reticulum results in the release of Ca2+. The increased cytosolic Ca2+ is required for translocation of TLR4 from the plasma membrane to endosomes, where TRIF-dependent IRF3 activation takes place. In contrast, LPS-induced activation of NF-κB pathway did not require PLCγ2-IP3-Ca2+ cascade [71]. Thus, signaling that affects TLR4 endocytosis could regulate TRIF-dependent signaling from endosome.

The LPS-binding protein CD14, together with TLR4 and MD-2, forms a multireceptor complex on the cell membrane [72]. CD14 controls the LPS-induced endocytosis of TLR4. LPS-induced clustering of CD14 triggers PI(4,5)P2 generation in macrophages [73], which may result in the activation of PLCγ2-IP3-Ca2+ cascade. The increase in cytosolic Ca2+, released from intracellular calcium stores, promotes the translocation of TLR4 from the plasma membrane to endosomes and so results in the activation of downstream inflammatory signaling. In addition, the CD14-dependent endocytosis pathway is regulated by several cytosolic regulators. Among them, the tyrosine kinase Syk and its downstream effector PLCγ-2 have been identified. The stimulation of Syk/PLCγ-2 signaling by CD14 triggers an influx of Ca2+ from the extracellular environment, which promotes internalization of TLR4 [72, 74]. So the endocytosis of TLR4 in response to CD14 clustering is partially regulated by the increased concentration of cytosolic Ca2+ originating either from intracellular calcium stores or the extracellular environment, which emphasizes the important role of Ca2+ in TLR4-mediated inflammation. In addition, these results support the idea that PLCγ-2 regulates the inflammatory response by controlling the cytosolic level of Ca2+. Apart from Ca2+, PKC signaling is also involved in TLR4 signaling in macrophages. It has been reported that the infection of both P. aeruginosa and K. pneumoniae activates TLR4/PLCγ cascades which in turn activates the PKCα/Jun N-terminal protein kinase (JNK)/NF-κB axis and eventually induces the production of proinflammatory cytokines [75].

The generation of intracellular ROS in macrophages plays an important role in inflammation pertinent signaling transduction. The minimally oxidized LDL (mmLDL) stimulates ROS generation in macrophages through activation of NADPH oxidase 2 (Nox2), which is a suggested pathogenic mechanism for the development of atherosclerosis. It has been evidenced that mmLDL induces generation of ROS in macrophages through sequential activation of TLR4/Syk/PLCγ-1/PKCα/Nox2 cascade and thereby stimulates expression of proinflammatory cytokines IL-1β, IL-6, and RANTES [76, 77]. These studies indicate that PLCγ-1 regulates inflammatory response by the activation of PKCα, which is different from the role of PLCγ-2-dependent regulation of cytosolic Ca2+. Interestingly, we have recently shown that influenza virus H1N1 infection activates PLCγ-1 signaling and triggers ROS expression in human macrophages dU937 cells, which can be blocked by the PLC inhibitor U73122 [30]. Taken together, these two independent results reveal that PLCγ signaling regulates the generation of an important messenger ROS.

Phagocytosis by macrophages is a process that involves engulfment and clearing of invading microbial pathogens, concomitantly stimulating an inflammatory response leading to upregulation of inflammatory genes, such as TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-12. The mechanism for FcγR-mediated phagocytosis has been extensively investigated. The ingestion of IgG-opsonized targets is initiated by the engagement and clustering of FcγRs, which induce receptor tyrosine phosphorylation and subsequent activation of multiple downstream signaling pathways to promote the development of the phagocytic cup and the extension of pseudopods. The sequential process including cup formation, phagosome internalization, and phagolysosome formation is critical steps in the process of phagocytosis [78]. The translocation of PKCε to phagosome is a critical step to regulate the rate of FcγR-dependent phagocytosis [79]. Diverse mechanisms regarding as to how FcγR-dependent phagocytosis is regulated by PLCγ signaling have been revealed, for example, PLCγ-1 is consistently concentrated at phagosomes and provides DAG to facilitate PKCε localization to the phagosome [80]; Syk-dependent as well as Bruton’s tyrosine kinase- (Btk-) and Tec-dependent activation of PLCγ-2 affects early and later stages of phagocytosis, respectively [78].

Peptidoglycan (PGN), the major cell wall component of Gram-positive bacteria, is able to stimulate proinflammatory cytokine production in macrophages. Normal human plasma from uninfected people contains low titer of anti-PGN IgG [81]. The anti-PGN IgG and FcγRs are the key mediators of systemic inflammation in Gram-positive bacteria-induced sepsis [81, 82]. The binding of PGN to anti-PGN IgG triggers FcγR-mediated phagocytosis, which consequently leads to an inflammatory response [81]. In this mechanism, the phagocytosis of PGN-IgG-FcγR complex in macrophages is triggered by Ca2+ release from intracellular Ca2+ stores controlled by PLCγ-2 signaling [82, 83], suggesting that the regulation of intracellular calcium signaling by PLCγ-2 is involved in IgG-FcγR-mediated phagocytosis and cytokine production.

5. PLCδ Controls Phagocytosis

The PLCδ1-PH domain negatively regulates FcγRII-mediated cell spreading and phagocytosis through destabilizing PI(4,5)P2 availability in macrophages [84]. In addition, it has been reported that LPS stimulation reduces PLCδ1 expression at both mRNA and protein levels, an effect which would allow upregulation of the TLR4-induced proinflammatory cytokine production and FcγR-mediated phagocytosis [85]. These studies suggest that PLCδ1 negatively regulates TLR4/FcγR-mediated inflammatory response in macrophages. The roles of the other PKCδ isoforms including PKCδ3 and PKCδ4 in macrophage-mediated inflammation are not yet defined.

6. The Involvement of PLCε in Inflammatory Response Has Been Characterized In Vivo, but Not in Macrophages

PLCε is involved in a variety of signaling pathways and controls different cellular functions. Its role in carcinogenesis has been documented. With a PLCε knockout mice model (PLCε−/−), PLCε has been identified as a novel tumor suppressor [86]. Also with this mouse model, it has been revealed that the airway inflammation induced by cigarette smoke in vivo was partially mediated by PLCε signaling [87]. The PLCε has also been convincingly demonstrated to regulate Ca2+ signaling in β cells and cardiomyocytes [88]. However, whether PLCε is expressed in macrophages, as well as it is having any role in the macrophage-mediated inflammatory response, has not been identified.

7. Conclusions and Perspectives

Evidence accumulating from multiple studies has indicated that the PLC enzymes which functionally rely on the hydrolysis of PI(4,5)P2 to produce IP3 and DAG with subsequent modulation of calcium and PKC signaling regulate macrophage-mediated inflammatory response. The macrophage inflammatory response, such as the expression of inflammation-related genes and endocytosis, is controlled by calcium and/or PKC signaling. The PKC family contains ten isoforms with individual regulatory mechanism (summarized in Figure 1). Intracellular Ca2+ levels regulate multiple signaling pathways. In addition, the PLC family contains at least 13 members with specific activity for each one. Diversity of PKC family and the versatile Ca2+ signaling networks confers PLC enzyme multiple functions in the regulation of inflammatory response. Therefore, PLC enzymes are promising targets for the development of novel anti-inflammatory drugs.

Macrophages express various receptors, such as TLRs, CD14, and FcγRs, which have been identified as important upstream activators of PLC signaling (summarized in Figure 2). These receptors, such as CD14 and TRL4, may independently or collaboratively regulate the same or distinct PLC isoforms. In addition, some PLC isoforms may have opposite or synergistic effects on the same downstream signaling, for example, the concentration of intracellular Ca2+ is increased by PLCβ-4 signaling, but decreased by PLCβ-3. These studies indicate the complexity of the PLC-dependent signaling in the inflammatory response, and further research on PLC-dependent functions will contribute towards our understanding of the underlying mechanism of some inflammatory diseases.

Figure 2: Schematic of macrophage-mediated inflammatory response through PLC signaling. PLCβ1-2, PLCγ1-2, and PLCδ shown in black indicated that these PLC isoforms are expressed in macrophages and are involved in macrophage-mediated inflammatory response. PLCβ3 and PLCδ3 shown in blue indicated that their involvement in inflammatory response has been identified in epithelial cell but not in macrophages. PLCβ4, PLCδ4, PLCζ, and PLCη1-2 shown in red indicated that whether they are involved in inflammatory response has not been identified. PLCε shown in green indicated that the involvement of inflammatory response has been identified with mouse model, in vivo. But whether it regulates inflammatory response in macrophages has not been identified.

Disclosure

Because of space limitations, the authors could not fully discuss all the important roles of PLC isozymes in other biological functions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Acknowledgments

The authors apologize to those researchers whose work was not cited. This work was supported by the Chinese National Science Foundation Grant (nos. 31472172 and 31772743), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant no. 2016YFD0500704), the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD and TAPP), the USDA-NIFA Competitive Grants Program (13-01041 and 16-09370), and funds derived from Sitlington Endowment.

References

  1. L. Ferrero-Miliani, O. H. Nielsen, P. S. Andersen, and S. E. Girardin, “Chronic inflammation: importance of NOD2 and NALP3 in interleukin-1β generation,” Clinical and Experimental Immunology, vol. 147, no. 2, pp. 227–235, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. B. Kaminska, “MAPK signalling pathways as molecular targets for anti-inflammatory therapy—from molecular mechanisms to therapeutic benefits,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) – Proteins and Proteomics, vol. 1754, no. 1-2, pp. 253–262, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. N. Fujiwara and K. Kobayashi, “Macrophages in inflammation,” Current Drug Targets - Inflammation & Allergy, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 281–286, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. Y. S. Yi, Y. J. Son, C. Ryou, G. H. Sung, J. H. Kim, and J. Y. Cho, “Functional roles of Syk in macrophage-mediated inflammatory responses,” Mediators of Inflammation, vol. 2014, Article ID 270302, 12 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. R. Medzhitov, “Inflammation 2010: new adventures of an old flame,” Cell, vol. 140, no. 6, pp. 771–776, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J. L. Dunster, “The macrophage and its role in inflammation and tissue repair: mathematical and systems biology approaches,” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Systems Biology and Medicine, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 87–99, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. N. J. Reyes, E. G. O'Koren, and D. R. Saban, “New insights into mononuclear phagocyte biology from the visual system,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 322–332, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. F. O. Martinez, A. Sica, A. Mantovani, and M. Locati, “Macrophage activation and polarization,” Frontiers in Bioscience, vol. 13, no. 13, pp. 453–461, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. N. Wang, H. Liang, and K. Zen, “Molecular mechanisms that influence the macrophage M1-M2 polarization balance,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 5, p. 614, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. A. Sindrilaru, T. Peters, S. Wieschalka et al., “An unrestrained proinflammatory M1 macrophage population induced by iron impairs wound healing in humans and mice,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 121, no. 3, pp. 985–997, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. J. H. Fritz, R. L. Ferrero, D. J. Philpott, and S. E. Girardin, “Nod-like proteins in immunity, inflammation and disease,” Nature Immunology, vol. 7, no. 12, pp. 1250–1257, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. N. W. Palm and R. Medzhitov, “Pattern recognition receptors and control of adaptive immunity,” Immunological Reviews, vol. 227, no. 1, pp. 221–233, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. L. Franken, M. Schiwon, and C. Kurts, “Macrophages: sentinels and regulators of the immune system,” Cellular Microbiology, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 475–487, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. P. R. Taylor, L. Martinez-Pomares, M. Stacey, H. H. Lin, G. D. Brown, and S. Gordon, “Macrophage receptors and immune recognition,” Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 901–944, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. S. Gordon, A. Pluddemann, and F. Martinez Estrada, “Macrophage heterogeneity in tissues: phenotypic diversity and functions,” Immunological Reviews, vol. 262, no. 1, pp. 36–55, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. S. Gordon, “Pattern recognition receptors: doubling up for the innate immune response,” Cell, vol. 111, no. 7, pp. 927–930, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. S. A. Wadsworth, D. E. Cavender, S. A. Beers et al., “RWJ 67657, a potent, orally active inhibitor of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase,” The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, vol. 291, no. 2, pp. 680–687, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  18. J. W. Lee, N. H. Kim, J. Y. Kim et al., “Aromadendrin inhibits lipopolysaccharide-induced nuclear translocation of NF-ĸB and phosphorylation of JNK in RAW 264.7 macrophage cells,” Biomolecules & Therapeutics, vol. 21, pp. 216–221, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. J. R. Tisoncik, M. J. Korth, C. P. Simmons, J. Farrar, T. R. Martin, and M. G. Katze, “Into the eye of the cytokine storm,” Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 16–32, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. Y. J. Lee and C. Lee, “Cytokine production in immortalized porcine alveolar macrophages infected with porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus,” Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology, vol. 150, no. 3-4, pp. 213–220, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. J. Han, L. Zhou, X. Ge, X. Guo, and H. Yang, “Pathogenesis and control of the Chinese highly pathogenic porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus,” Veterinary Microbiology, vol. 209, pp. 30–47, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. J. H. Beigel, J. Farrar, A. M. Han et al., “Avian influenza A (H5N1) infection in humans,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 353, no. 13, pp. 1374–1385, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. J. S. Peiris, K. P. Hui, and H. L. Yen, “Host response to influenza virus: protection versus immunopathology,” Current Opinion in Immunology, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 475–481, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. Q. Liu, Y. H. Zhou, and Z. Q. Yang, “The cytokine storm of severe influenza and development of immunomodulatory therapy,” Cellular & Molecular Immunology, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 3–10, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. P. Hofmann, H. Sprenger, A. Kaufmann et al., “Susceptibility of mononuclear phagocytes to influenza A virus infection and possible role in the antiviral response,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 408–414, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  26. N. V. Serbina, T. Jia, T. M. Hohl, and E. G. Pamer, “Monocyte-mediated defense against microbial pathogens,” Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 421–452, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. C. Shi and E. G. Pamer, “Monocyte recruitment during infection and inflammation,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 11, no. 11, pp. 762–774, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. C. Hou, T. Kirchner, M. Singer, M. Matheis, D. Argentieri, and D. Cavender, “In vivo activity of a phospholipase C inhibitor, 1-(6-((17β-3-methoxyestra-1,3,5(10)-trien-17-yl)amino)hexyl)-1H-pyrrole-2,5-dione (U73122), in acute and chronic inflammatory reactions,” The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, vol. 309, no. 2, pp. 697–704, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. L. Zhu, C. Yuan, Y. Ma, X. Ding, G. Zhu, and Q. Zhu, “Anti-inflammatory activities of phospholipase C inhibitor U73122: inhibition of monocyte-to-macrophage transformation and LPS-induced pro-inflammatory cytokine expression,” International Immunopharmacology, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 622–627, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. L. Zhu, C. Yuan, X. Ding et al., “PLC-γ1 is involved in the inflammatory response induced by influenza A virus H1N1 infection,” Virology, vol. 496, pp. 131–137, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. Y. Nakamura and K. Fukami, “Regulation and physiological functions of mammalian phospholipase C,” Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 161, no. 4, pp. 315–321, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. W. D. Singer, H. A. Brown, and P. C. Sternweis, “Regulation of eukaryotic phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C and phospholipase D,” Annual Review of Biochemistry, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 475–509, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. K. Fukami, S. Inanobe, K. Kanemaru, and Y. Nakamura, “Phospholipase C is a key enzyme regulating intracellular calcium and modulating the phosphoinositide balance,” Progress in Lipid Research, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 429–437, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. C. H. Wilson, E. S. Ali, N. Scrimgeour et al., “Steatosis inhibits liver cell store-operated Ca2+ entry and reduces ER Ca2+ through a protein kinase C-dependent mechanism,” The Biochemical Journal, vol. 466, no. 2, pp. 379–390, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. G. G. Wescott, C. M. Manring, and D. M. Terrian, “Translocation assays of protein kinase C activation,” Methods in Molecular Medicine, vol. 22, pp. 125–132, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  36. D. J. Loegering and M. R. Lennartz, “Protein kinase C and toll-like receptor signaling,” Enzyme Research, vol. 2011, Article ID 537821, 7 pages, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. R. Sudan, N. Srivastava, S. P. Pandey, S. Majumdar, and B. Saha, “Reciprocal regulation of protein kinase C isoforms results in differential cellular responsiveness,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 188, no. 5, pp. 2328–2337, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. C. Pfeifhofer-Obermair, K. Albrecht-Schgoer, S. Peer et al., “Role of PKCtheta in macrophage-mediated immune response to Salmonella typhimurium infection in mice,” Cell Communication and Signaling, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 14, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. Z. H. Qiu and C. C. Leslie, “Protein kinase C-dependent and -independent pathways of mitogen-activated protein kinase activation in macrophages by stimuli that activate phospholipase A2,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 269, no. 30, pp. 19480–19487, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  40. M. M. Monick, A. B. Carter, G. Gudmundsson, L. J. Geist, and G. W. Hunninghake, “Changes in PKC isoforms in human alveolar macrophages compared with blood monocytes,” The American Journal of Physiology-Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology, vol. 275, no. 2, Part 1, pp. L389–L397, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  41. M. Jove, A. Planavila, R. M. Sanchez, M. Merlos, J. C. Laguna, and M. Vazquez-Carrera, “Palmitate induces tumor necrosis factor-α expression in C2C12 skeletal muscle cells by a mechanism involving protein kinase C and nuclear factor-ĸB activation,” Endocrinology, vol. 147, no. 1, pp. 552–561, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. E. Jones, I. M. Adcock, B. Y. Ahmed, and N. A. Punchard, “Modulation of LPS stimulated NF-kappaB mediated nitric oxide production by PKCε and JAK2 in RAW macrophages,” Journal of Inflammation, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 23, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. J. Johnson, C. Molle, E. Aksoy, M. Goldman, S. Goriely, and F. Willems, “A conventional protein kinase C inhibitor targeting IRF-3-dependent genes differentially regulates IL-12 family members,” Molecular Immunology, vol. 48, no. 12-13, pp. 1484–1493, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. P. G. Suh, J. I. Park, L. Manzoli et al., “Multiple roles of phosphoinositide-specific phospholipase C isozymes,” BMB Reports, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 415–434, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  45. L. Cocco, M. Y. Follo, L. Manzoli, and P. G. Suh, “Phosphoinositide-specific phospholipase C in health and disease,” Journal of Lipid Research, vol. 56, no. 10, pp. 1853–1860, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. T. Di Raimo, M. Leopizzi, G. Mangino et al., “Different expression and subcellular localization of phosphoinositide-specific phospholipase C enzymes in differently polarized macrophages,” Journal of Cell Communication and Signaling, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 283–293, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. R. A. Rebres, T. I. Roach, I. D. Fraser et al., “Synergistic Ca2+ responses by Gαi- and Gαq-coupled G-protein-coupled receptors require a single PLCβ isoform that is sensitive to both Gβγand Gαq,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 286, no. 2, pp. 942–951, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. T. I. Roach, R. A. Rebres, I. D. Fraser et al., “Signaling and cross-talk by C5a and UDP in macrophages selectively use PLCβ3 to regulate intracellular free calcium,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 283, no. 25, pp. 17351–17361, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. R. A. Rebres, C. Moon, D. Decamp et al., “Clostridium difficile toxin B differentially affects GPCR-stimulated Ca2+ responses in macrophages: independent roles for Rho and PLA2,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 87, no. 6, pp. 1041–1057, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. C. S. Nirodi, B. C. Crews, K. R. Kozak, J. D. Morrow, and L. J. Marnett, “The glyceryl ester of prostaglandin E2 mobilizes calcium and activates signal transduction in RAW264.7 cells,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, no. 101, pp. 1840–1845, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. S. E. Wu and W. E. Miller, “The HCMV US28 vGPCR induces potent Gαq/PLC-β signaling in monocytes leading to increased adhesion to endothelial cells,” Virology, vol. 497, pp. 233–243, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. S. Shukla, G. Elson, P. J. Blackshear, C. S. Lutz, and S. J. Leibovich, “3UTR AU-Rich Elements (AREs) and the RNA-binding protein tristetraprolin (TTP) are not required for the LPS-mediated destabilization of phospholipase-Cβ-2 mRNA in murine macrophages,” Inflammation, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 645–656, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. S. Grinberg, G. Hasko, D. Wu, and S. J. Leibovich, “Suppression of PLCβ2 by endotoxin plays a role in the adenosine A2A receptor-mediated switch of macrophages from an inflammatory to an angiogenic phenotype,” The American Journal of Pathology, vol. 175, no. 6, pp. 2439–2453, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. F. Spadaro, S. Cecchetti, C. Purificato et al., “Nuclear phosphoinositide-specific phospholipase C β1 controls cytoplasmic CCL2 mRNA levels in HIV-1 gp120-stimulated primary human macrophages,” PLoS One, vol. 8, no. 3, article e59705, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. V. Bezzerri, P. d'Adamo, A. Rimessi et al., “Phospholipase C-β3 is a key modulator of IL-8 expression in cystic fibrosis bronchial epithelial cells,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 186, no. 8, pp. 4946–4958, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. J. I. Wilde and S. P. Watson, “Regulation of phospholipase C γ isoforms in haematopoietic cells: why one, not the other?” Cellular Signalling, vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 691–701, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. A. Schade, C. Walliser, M. Wist et al., “Cool-temperature-mediated activation of phospholipase C-γ2 in the human hereditary disease PLAID,” Cellular Signalling, vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 1237–1251, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. B. L. Slomiany and A. Slomiany, “Mechanism of Rac1-induced amplification in gastric mucosal phospholipase Cγ2 activation in response to Helicobacter pylori: modulatory effect of ghrelin,” Inflammopharmacology, vol. 23, no. 2-3, pp. 101–109, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. T. Piechulek, T. Rehlen, C. Walliser, P. Vatter, B. Moepps, and P. Gierschik, “Isozyme-specific stimulation of phospholipase C-γ2 by Rac GTPases,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 280, no. 47, pp. 38923–38931, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. H. Koss, T. D. Bunney, S. Behjati, and M. Katan, “Dysfunction of phospholipase Cγ in immune disorders and cancer,” Trends in Biochemical Sciences, vol. 39, no. 12, pp. 603–611, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. M. J. Kim, J. S. Chang, S. K. Park, J. I. Hwang, S. H. Ryu, and P. G. Suh, “Direct interaction of SOS1 Ras exchange protein with the SH3 domain of phospholipase C-γ1,” Biochemistry, vol. 39, no. 29, pp. 8674–8682, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. L. Zhu, H. Ly, and Y. Liang, “PLC-γ1 signaling plays a subtype-specific role in postbinding cell entry of influenza A virus,” Journal of Virology, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 417–424, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. M. Carty, R. Goodbody, M. Schroder, J. Stack, P. N. Moynagh, and A. G. Bowie, “The human adaptor SARM negatively regulates adaptor protein TRIF-dependent Toll-like receptor signaling,” Nature Immunology, vol. 7, no. 10, pp. 1074–1081, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. S. Akira and K. Takeda, “Toll-like receptor signalling,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 4, no. 7, pp. 499–511, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  65. M. Yamamoto, S. Sato, H. Hemmi et al., “Role of adaptor TRIF in the MyD88-independent toll-like receptor signaling pathway,” Science, vol. 301, no. 5633, pp. 640–643, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. T. Wan, T. Liu, H. Zhang, S. Tang, and W. Min, “AIP1 functions as Arf6-GAP to negatively regulate TLR4 signaling,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 285, no. 6, pp. 3750–3757, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. T. Horng, G. M. Barton, R. A. Flavell, and R. Medzhitov, “The adaptor molecule TIRAP provides signalling specificity for Toll-like receptors,” Nature, vol. 420, no. 6913, pp. 329–333, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. M. Yamamoto, S. Sato, H. Hemmi et al., “TRAM is specifically involved in the Toll-like receptor 4-mediated MyD88-independent signaling pathway,” Nature Immunology, vol. 4, no. 11, pp. 1144–1150, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. J. C. Kagan and R. Medzhitov, “Phosphoinositide-mediated adaptor recruitment controls Toll-like receptor signaling,” Cell, vol. 125, no. 5, pp. 943–955, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. J. C. Kagan, T. Su, T. Horng, A. Chow, S. Akira, and R. Medzhitov, “TRAM couples endocytosis of Toll-like receptor 4 to the induction of interferon-β,” Nature Immunology, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 361–368, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. C. Y. Chiang, V. Veckman, K. Limmer, and M. David, “Phospholipase Cγ-2 and intracellular calcium are required for lipopolysaccharide-induced Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) endocytosis and interferon regulatory factor 3 (IRF3) activation,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 287, no. 6, pp. 3704–3709, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. I. Zanoni and F. Granucci, “Role of CD14 in host protection against infections and in metabolism regulation,” Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, vol. 3, p. 32, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. A. Plociennikowska, M. I. Zdioruk, G. Traczyk, A. Swiatkowska, and K. Kwiatkowska, “LPS-induced clustering of CD14 triggers generation of PI(4,5)P2,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 128, no. 22, pp. 4096–4111, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. I. Zanoni, R. Ostuni, L. R. Marek et al., “CD14 controls the LPS-induced endocytosis of Toll-like receptor 4,” Cell, vol. 147, no. 4, pp. 868–880, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. X. Zhou, Y. Ye, Y. Sun et al., “Transient receptor potential channel 1 deficiency impairs host defense and proinflammatory responses to bacterial infection by regulating protein kinase Cα signaling,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 35, no. 16, pp. 2729–2739, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  76. Y. S. Bae, H. Y. Lee, Y. S. Jung, M. Lee, and P. G. Suh, “Phospholipase Cγ in Toll-like receptor-mediated inflammation and innate immunity,” Advances in Biological Regulation, vol. 63, pp. 92–97, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  77. Y. S. Bae, J. H. Lee, S. H. Choi et al., “Macrophages generate reactive oxygen species in response to minimally oxidized low-density lipoprotein: toll-like receptor 4- and spleen tyrosine kinase-dependent activation of NADPH oxidase 2,” Circulation Research, vol. 104, pp. 210–218, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  78. J. Jongstra-Bilen, A. Puig Cano, M. Hasija, H. Xiao, C. I. Smith, and M. I. Cybulsky, “Dual functions of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase and Tec kinase during Fcγ receptor-induced signaling and phagocytosis,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 181, no. 1, pp. 288–298, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  79. E. C. Larsen, J. A. DiGennaro, N. Saito et al., “Differential requirement for classic and novel PKC isoforms in respiratory burst and phagocytosis in RAW 264.7 cells,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 165, no. 5, pp. 2809–2817, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  80. K. L. Cheeseman, T. Ueyama, T. M. Michaud et al., “Targeting of protein kinase C-ε during Fcγ receptor-dependent phagocytosis requires the εC1B domain and phospholipase C-γ1,” Molecular Biology of the Cell, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 799–813, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  81. D. Sun, B. Raisley, M. Langer et al., “Anti-peptidoglycan antibodies and Fcγ receptors are the key mediators of inflammation in Gram-positive sepsis,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 189, no. 5, pp. 2423–2431, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  82. M. J. Kim, S. Y. Rah, J. H. An, K. Kurokawa, U. H. Kim, and B. L. Lee, “Human anti-peptidoglycan-IgG-mediated opsonophagocytosis is controlled by calcium mobilization in phorbol myristate acetate-treated U937 cells,” BMB Reports, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 36–41, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  83. D. Aki, Y. Minoda, H. Yoshida et al., “Peptidoglycan and lipopolysaccharide activate PLCγ2, leading to enhanced cytokine production in macrophages and dendritic cells,” Genes to Cells: Devoted to Molecular & Cellular Mechanisms, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 199–208, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  84. E. Szymanska, A. Sobota, E. Czurylo, and K. Kwiatkowska, “Expression of PI(4,5)P2-binding proteins lowers the PI(4,5)P2level and inhibits FcγRIIA-mediated cell spreading and phagocytosis,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 260–272, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  85. K. Kudo, T. Uchida, M. Sawada, Y. Nakamura, A. Yoneda, and K. Fukami, “Phospholipase C δ1 in macrophages negatively regulates TLR4-induced proinflammatory cytokine production and Fcγ receptor-mediated phagocytosis,” Advances in Biological Regulation, vol. 61, pp. 68–79, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  86. M. Martins, A. McCarthy, R. Baxendale et al., “Tumor suppressor role of phospholipase Cε in Ras-triggered cancers,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 111, no. 11, pp. 4239–4244, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  87. A. Oldenburger, W. Timens, S. Bos et al., “Epac1 and Epac2 are differentially involved in inflammatory and remodeling processes induced by cigarette smoke,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 28, no. 11, pp. 4617–4628, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  88. A. Tyutyunnykova, G. Telegeev, and A. Dubrovska, “The controversial role of phospholipase C epsilon (PLε) in cancer development and progression,” Journal of Cancer, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 716–729, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus