Journal of Lipids

Journal of Lipids / 2017 / Article
!A Corrigendum for this article has been published. To view the article details, please click the ‘Corrigendum’ tab above.

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2017 |Article ID 1029702 |

Lena Foseid, Hanne Devle, Yngve Stenstrøm, Carl Fredrik Naess-Andresen, Dag Ekeberg, "Fatty Acid Profiles of Stipe and Blade from the Norwegian Brown Macroalgae Laminaria hyperborea with Special Reference to Acyl Glycerides, Polar Lipids, and Free Fatty Acids", Journal of Lipids, vol. 2017, Article ID 1029702, 9 pages, 2017.

Fatty Acid Profiles of Stipe and Blade from the Norwegian Brown Macroalgae Laminaria hyperborea with Special Reference to Acyl Glycerides, Polar Lipids, and Free Fatty Acids

Academic Editor: Gerhard M. Kostner
Received31 Dec 2016
Revised07 May 2017
Accepted24 May 2017
Published20 Jun 2017


A thorough analysis of the fatty acid profiles of stipe and blade from the kelp species Laminaria hyperborea is presented. Lipid extracts were fractionated into neutral lipids, free fatty acids, and polar lipids, prior to derivatization and GC-MS analysis. A total of 42 fatty acids were identified and quantified, including the n-3 fatty acids -linolenic acid, stearidonic acid, and eicosapentaenoic acid. The fatty acid amounts are higher in blade than in stipe (7.42 mg/g dry weight and 2.57 mg/g dry weight, resp.). The highest amounts of n-3 fatty acids are found within the neutral lipid fractions with 590.6 ug/g dry weight and 100.9 ug/g dry weight for blade and stipe, respectively. The amounts of polyunsaturated fatty acids are 3.4 times higher in blade than stipe. The blade had the highest PUFA/SFA ratio compared to stipe (1.02 versus 0.76) and the lowest n-6/n-3 ratio (0.8 versus 3.5). This study highlights the compositional differences between the lipid fractions of stipe and blade from L. hyperborea. The amount of polyunsaturated fatty acids compared to saturated- and monounsaturated fatty acids is known to influence human health. In the pharmaceutical, food, and feed industries, this can be of importance for production of different health products.

1. Introduction

The increase in world population and lack of sufficient food beg for new sources of food and feed. As much as 60% of the world food energy intake is provided by the cereals wheat, rice, and corn [1]. These cereals, while high in metabolizable energy and carbohydrates, have small amounts of important nutrients such as proteins, minerals, vitamins (especially A and C), and fatty acids, especially long chained polyunsaturated n-3 fatty acids [24]. A promising supplement for food and feed is a better utilization of marine resources. World production and harvesting of micro- and macroalgae have doubled from 2004 to 2014 [5]. Still, 97% of the production and harvesting is found in Asia [5]; thus, there is a large potential for expansion in other parts of the world. Macroalgae are a diverse group of marine plants, informally divided into three groups: Rhodophyta (red algae), Chlorophyta (green algae), and Phaeophyta (brown algae). Use of seaweed as feed, food, and fertilizers in times of food shortage was common in northern Europe from around the 10th century and up until about middle of the 18th century [6]. At present time in Scandinavia and other Western countries, the utilization of seaweeds is limited to industrial products, such as alginate, agar, carrageenan, and thickeners, and only scarcely used in food and feed industries. Biomarine processing industries have great potential in coastal regions. Norway is particularly privileged due to the long coastline combined with the presence of nutritious ocean currents (North Atlantic Drift and Norwegian Coastal Current), which ensure a good climate for growth of marine flora and fauna.

Seaweed has for many years been thought to have positive effect on human health, and consumption of these marine plants has been linked to a lower incidence of cancer, hyperlipidemia, and coronary heart disease [7]. They are also reported to possess antimicrobial, antiviral, anti-inflammatory, and immunotropic properties [8]. Many of the reported medicinal effects of marine algae have not been confirmed, but Brown et al. and Stein and Borden have published comprehensive reviews on this topic [7, 9]. Lipid profiles and compositions can be of importance for human health and for commercial application [1012]. Eukaryotic algae contain a diverse composition of acyl lipids and their fatty acids, albeit the number of algae which have been comprehensively studied is relatively few [11]. Lipids in macroalgae can be divided into neutral lipids that include monoglycerides, diglycerides, triglycerides, sterols, and polar lipids that include glycolipids, phospholipids, and betaine lipids [10, 11, 13]. An important nutritional benefit of marine macroalgae is attributed to the high level of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), especially n-3 and n-6 fatty acids [14]. A diet with a low n-6/n-3 ratio is reported to have suppressive effects on cardiovascular diseases, cancer, and inflammatory and autoimmune diseases [15]. With a global decline in fish stocks, seaweed may be a good option for an alternative and sustainable source of n-3 PUFAs [7]. Previous studies regarding fatty acids in brown macroalgae have had a nutritional or pharmaceutical focus. Fatty acid content has only been determined as one among several parameters, resulting in limited fatty acid profiles [1620]. More extensive FA profiling has been done on certain species of brown macroalgae [8, 2123]. Little is however known about fatty acid compositions of individual lipid classes of marine macrophytes in general [8]. The brown macroalgae Laminaria hyperborea, a common species of kelp found in the northern Atlantic, has only previously been characterized with regard to fatty acids in three studies [6, 12, 24], all presenting limited profiles identifying no more than nine fatty acids. Within-plant fatty acid distribution for this species has previously only been reported by Schmid and Stengel [24] with Laminaria hyperborea harvested on the west coast of Ireland. Variations in distribution of fatty acids between different parts of the seaweed depend on the morphology of the species as well as its physiological and ecological circumstances [25].

Before considering the marine algae as a food source, it is important to assess its nutritional value. In this context, the aim of this study has been to provide a thorough analysis of the fatty acid profiles in stipe and blade from the macroalgae L. hyperborea. In this study, the lipids were fractionated into free fatty acids (FFAs), acyl glycerides (neutral lipids, NLs), and polar lipids (PLs) by using solid phase extraction. The fatty acids from each class were identified and quantified by GC-MS.

2. Material and Methods

Chloroform and hexane were of Chromasolv® quality, heptane, diethyl ether, methanol, and NaCl puriss pa. quality, all from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). The acetic acid was from Honeywell Riedel-de Haen (Seelze, Germany).

2.1. Standards

A fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) mix with 37 components (Food Industry FAME MIX, Restek, Bellefonte, PA, USA) was used for identification of the FAMEs. A 21-component FAME mix (Qualmix PUFA Fish M, Methyl Esters (Menhaden Oil), Larodan AB, Solna, Sweden) was used for identification of all-cis-6,9,12,15-octadecatetraenoic acid methyl ester, all-cis-8,11,14,17-eicosatetraenoic acid methyl ester, and all-cis-7,10,13,16,19-docosapentaenoic acid methyl ester. In addition, the following individual FAME standards were used: nonanoic acid methyl ester (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), 13-methyltetradecanoic acid methyl ester, trans-9-tetradecenoic acid methyl ester, cis-9-heptadecenoic acid methyl ester, cis-13-octadecenoic acid methyl ester, cis-9-eicosenoic acid methyl ester, and hexacosanoic acid methyl ester (all from Larodan AB, Solna, Sweden). Three internal standards were used (10 mg/mL, dissolved in CHCl3), one for each lipid fraction; 1,2-dinonadecanoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphatidylcholine for the PL fractions, nonadecanoic acid for the FFA fractions, and trinonadecanoin for the NL fractions (all from Larodan AB, Solna, Sweden). Nonadecanoic acid methyl ester (Larodan AB, Solna, Sweden) was added to the 37 components FAME mix for retention time identification, since C19:0 was used as internal standard in the samples.

2.2. Pretreatment of L. hyperborea

L. hyperborea was provided and identified by FMC BioPolymer AS. It was harvested off the west coast of Norway, outside Sør-Trøndelag County Municipality in October 2015. On board the trawler L. hyperborea was rinsed, crude-cut, and preserved with formalin manually. The holdfast was discarded. Once off the trawler stipe and blade were vacuum packed separately. When received at the university, stipe and blade were rinsed with water to eliminate contaminants, frozen with liquid N2 (99.999%, AGA, the Linde Group, Munich, Germany), and freeze-dried (Alpha 2–4 LD plus, Martin Christ Gefriertrocknungsanlagen GmbH, Osterode am Harz, Germany). The freeze-dried material was crushed in a QMM Micromixer and pulverized in a Laboratory Mixer 3100 (Danfoss) by G. A. Lund at Pharmatech AS, Fredrikstad, Norway. The water content of fresh seaweed was measured according to ISO 11465:1993/Cor1:1994.

2.3. Lipid Extraction

Four sample replicates of both stipe and blade were used and they were all treated separately during the sample preparation stages. The lipids were extracted with a modified Folch’s method [26]. In brief, 5–10 g alga powder was extracted in a separatory funnel with 10 times its volume CHCl3 : MeOH (2/1), and 50 µL of each internal standard was added with a Hamilton® syringe. To induce phase separation, 0.9% NaCl was added after mixing (0.2 times the volume of CHCl3 : MeOH). After approximately 20 min the organic phase was transferred to a test tube (Duran® 20 × 150 mm, Mainz, Germany). The polar phase was reextracted with CHCl3, 30–60 mL depending on amount of alga powder. The organic phases of each sample were combined and evaporated with a vacuum evaporator (Q-101, Buchi Labortechnik AG, Flawil, Switzerland) at 40°C, redissolved in 1.00 mL chloroform, and transferred to vials for SPE.

A liquid-handling robot (Gilson, GX-271, ASPEC, Middleton, WI, USA) was used to carry out the SPE procedure. The method used was based on previous work by Pinkart et al. 1998 and Ruiz et al. 2004 [27, 28]. Aminopropyl-modified silica phase SPE columns, 500 mg, 3 mL (Chromabond, Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany) were conditioned with 7.5 mL hexane before 500 µL of sample was applied. The NLs (mono-, di-, and triglycerides) were eluted with 5 mL chloroform, then the FFAs with 5 mL diethyl ether:acetic acid (98 : 2 v/v), and lastly the PLs with 5 mL methanol. The possibility of cross contaminations between any of the three classes was checked by performing tests with standards for each lipid class. The recovery was 90% or higher. The eluates were transferred to culture tubes (Duran 12 × 100 mm, Mainz, Germany) and evaporated under N2 (g) at 40°C.

2.4. Formation of FAMEs

For formation of FAMEs the NL and PL fractions were redissolved in 2 mL of heptane, before addition of 1.5 mL of 3.3 mg/mL sodium methoxide. The sodium methoxide solution was made by dissolving metallic sodium (Purum, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) in methanol to a concentration of 3.3 mg/mL. The culture tubes were then shaken horizontally for 30 min at 350 rpm (Biosan Ltd., PSU-10i, Riga, Latvia) and left to settle vertically for 10 min before the heptane phases were transferred to vials for storage at −20°C prior to GC-MS analysis. The FFA fractions were redissolved in 1 mL BF3-MeOH (14%, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). The samples were heated for 5 min at 70°C in a water bath. After heating, 1 mL heptane was added to each sample tube before mixing on a vortex mixer. The heptane phases were transferred to vials and stored at −20°C prior to analysis by GC-MS.

2.5. Analysis of FAMEs by GC-MS

The analysis of the FAMEs was based on a previously published method [29]. Shortly, the analyses were carried out on an Agilent 6890 Series gas chromatograph (GC; Agilent Technology, Wilmington, DE, USA) in combination with an Autospec Ultima mass spectrometer (MS; Micromass Ltd., Manchester, England) using an EI ion source. The GC was equipped with a CTC PAL Autosampler (CTC Analytics, AG, Zwingen, Switzerland). Separation was carried out on a 60 m Restek column (Rtx®-2330) with 0.25 mm ID and a 0.2 µm film thickness of fused silica 90% biscyanopropyl/10% phenylcyanopropyl polysiloxane stationary phase (Restek Corporation, Bellefonte, PA, USA). For carrier gas, helium (99.99990%, from Yara, Rjukan, Norway) was used at 1 mL/min constant flow. The EI ion source was used in positive mode, producing 70 eV electrons at 250°C. The MS was scanned in the range 40–600 m/z with 0.3 s scan time, 0.2 s interscan delay, and 0.5 s cycle time. The transfer line temperature was set at 270°C. The resolution was 1000.

A split ratio of 1/10 was used with injections of 1.0 µL sample. Two injections parallels were used for each sample replicate. Identification of fatty acids was performed by comparing retention times with standards as well as MS library searches. MassLynx version 4.0 (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) and NIST 2014 Mass Spectral Library (Gaithersburg, MD, USA) were used. Relative response factors previously determined by Devle et al. [29] were employed for quantitative determination. The resulting amounts are given in g/g dry weight (DW). The GC oven had a start temperature of 65°C, held for 3 min, the temperature was then raised to 150°C (40°C/min), held for 13 min, before being increased to 151°C (2°C/min), held for 20 min, with a slow increase to 230°C (2°C/min), and held for 10 min, before a final increase to 240°C (50°C/min), and the end temperature was held for 3.7 min.

3. Results and Discussion

We have identified and quantified 42 different fatty acids in L. hyperborea, as shown in Table 1. This is a significantly higher number than previously reported by others for this species [6, 12, 24]. Seaweeds usually contain a lipid level of <1–5% [19, 21, 30]. The portions of the total lipids that contain molecules with fatty acids depend significantly on species, geographical location, and seasonal changes [12, 18, 24, 31, 32]. In our study, the total FA (TFA) content relative to dry weight in blade and stipe was 0.74% and 0.26%, respectively. This 3 : 1 ratio between blade and stipe is consistent with Schmid and Stengels [24] findings of within-plant variations for the same species, even though they had twice the TFA content (0.5% and 1.5% in stipe and blade, resp.). The water content was found to be 83.3%  ± 0.5 and 85.6%  ± 0.8 in blade and stipe, respectively. The fatty acid profile was determined for the NL, FFA, and PL fractions in stipe and blade separately. For the individual lipid fractions, the %TFA was the highest in NLs with 42.9% and 54.5% in stipe and blade, respectively. The PL fraction for the stipe consisted of 48.5% TFA versus 31.5% TFA in blades. The %TFA for the FFAs ranged from 8.6% in stipe to 13.9% in blade. While up to 41 different fatty acids were detected within a lipid fraction, the same 10 fatty acids predominated in all fractions in both stipe and blade. In this group of 10, three FAs were saturated (SFA, C14:0, C16:0, and C18:0), one was monounsaturated (MUFA, C18:1 cis-9) and the remaining five were polyunsaturated (PUFA, C18:2 cis-9,12, C18:3 cis-9,12,15, C18:4 cis-6,9,12,15, C20:4 cis-5,8,11,14, and C20:5 cis-5,8,11,14,17).

Fatty acidStipeBlade

C7:0 5 1.32 ± 0.09n.d.n.d.0.49 ± 0.03n.d.n.d.
C8:01.47 ± 0.110.70 ± 0.04n.d.5.36 ± 0.630.65 ± 0.03n.d.
C9:0n.d.0.41 ± 0.06n.d.n.d.0.64 ± 0.03n.d.
C10:00.76 ± 0.05n.d.n.d.4.98 ± 0.630.39 ± 0.06n.d.
C12:00.53 ± 0.091.66 ± 0.220.13 ± 0.010.73 ± 0.032.87 ± 0.120.09 ± 0.01
C13:0n.d.0.19 ± 0.01n.d.0.17 ± 0.010.96 ± 0.030.07 ± 0.01
C14:0101.28 ± 1.8021.94 ± 0.78272.39 ± 9.92223.80 ± 4.6594.20 ± 4.02312.39 ± 5.60
C14:0 13 methyln.d.0.33 ± 0.05n.d.n.d.0.39 ± 0.02n.d.
C14:1 trans-9n.d.0.20 ± 0.02n.d.n.d.1.86 ± 0.12n.d.
C14:1 cis-90.89 ± 0.040.13 ± 0.020.27 ± 0.032.45 ± 0.030.46 ± 0.020.38 ± 0.01
C15:00.95 ± 0.051.00 ± 0.052.52 ± 0.038.73 ± 0.186.40 ± 0.1810.43 ± 0.14
C16:0163.36 ± 5.0882.19 ± 3.08276.64 ± 6.91900.21 ± 17.85298.88 ± 12.12417.29 ± 5.39
C16:n.d.n.d.n.d.0.77 ± 0.101.31 ± 0.030.65 ± 0.02
C16:n.d.0.53 ± 0.040.37 ± 0.052.24 ± 0.092.75 ± 0.091.05 ± 0.02
C16:1 cis-974.99 ± 2.5614.38 ± 0.2154.60 ± 1.02179.65 ± 1.9474.12 ± 2.11104.78 ± 1.14
C17:00.32 ± 0.020.52 ± 0.060.57 ± 0.046.62 ± 0.241.73 ± 0.071.83 ± 0.05
C16:2 cis or trans-7,10(n-6)0.62 ± 0.040.13 ± 0.020.49 ± 0.072.00 ± 0.071.72 ± 0.052.53 ± 0.05
C17:1 cis-90.33 ± 0.030.10 ± 0.040.35 ± 0.34.14 ± 0.242.02 ± 0.051.96 ± 0.06
C18:05.95 ± 0.2817.35 ± 0.712.54 ± 0.0984.00 ± 2.0121.04 ± 0.704.42 ± 0.06
C18:1 cis-9234.12 ± 5.8747.46 ± 0.43418.07 ± 10.331200.51 ± 29.95219.90 ± 5.17546.84 ± 11.59
C18:1 cis-113.37 ± 0.312.27 ± 0.044.85 ± 0.2211.39 ± 0.216.64 ± 0.147.68 ± 0.14
C18:2 all-cis-9,12 (n-6)44.67 ± 1.762.70 ± 0.0948.39 ± 101183.66 ± 4.1927.79 ± 0.6788.57 ± 1.19
C18:3 all-cis-6,9,12(n-6)3.23 ± 0.22n.d.3.59 ± 0.1314.02 ± 0.183.02 ± 0.0612.29 ± 0.19
C20:06.67 ± 0.541.35 ± 0.071.52 ± 0.1049.59 ± 1.199.80 ± 0.254.79 ± 0.09
C18:3 all-cis-9,12,15 (n-3)7.31 ± 0.310.65 ± 0.032.37 ± 0.1583.56 ± 1.3821.99 ± 0.5325.22 ± 0.68
C20:1 cis-9n.d.0.39 ± 0.083.34 ± 0.187.87 ± 0.404.17 ± 0.059.75 ± 0.19
C20:1 cis-11n.d.0.16 ± 0.040.39 ± 0.050.89 ± 0.050.39 ± 0.020.95 ± 0.03
C18:4 all-cis-6,9,12,15 (n-3)5.6 ± 0.30.93 ± 0.0310.74 ± 0.2468.90 ± 1.2964.62 ± 1.33259.58 ± 2.77
C20:2 all-cis-11,14(n-6)3.73 ± 0.350.27 ± 0.054.88 ± 0.1810.35 ± 0.332.87 ± 0.128.57 ± 0.17
C20:1.93 ± 0.160.12 ± 0.020.90 ± 0.071.91 ± 0.050.50 ± 0.031.08 ± 0.03
C20:1.49 ± 0.140.07 ± 0.011.04 ± 0.064.50 ± 0.590.72 ± 0.042.71 ± 0.05
C20:n.d.0.04 ± 0.010.43 ± 0.031.20 ± 0.630.28 ± 0.020.79 ± 0.03
C20:3 all-cis-8,11,14(n-6)3.63 ± 0.350.16 ± 0.025.19 ± 0.2018.23 ± 1.290.80 ± 0.024.46 ± 0.08
C22:0n.d.0.06 ± 0.01n.d.0.93 ± 0.130.41 ± 0.02n.d.
C20:4 all-cis-5,8,11,14 (n-6)344.56 ± 11.4617.39 ± 0.3982.89 ± 1.49516.97 ± 11.5266.32 ± 2.11139.90 ± 1.25
C20:n.d.n.d.0.44 ± 0.042.80 ± 0.140.92 ± 0.043.21 ± 0.07
C20:4 all-cis-8,11,14,17(n-3)3.29 ± 0.26n.d.2.39 ± 0.1313.52 ± 0.333.76 ± 0.1710.12 ± 0.17
C20:5 all-cis-5,8,11,14,17 (n-3)81.72 ± 3.282.91 ± 0.0740.62 ± 0.87409.27 ± 9.5181.58 ± 1.90339.09 ± 3.60
C24:0n.d.0.29 ± 0.02n.d.0.64 ± 0.081.45 ± 0.06n.d.
C22:5 all-cis-7,10,13,16,19(n-3)3.01 ± 0.280.18 ± 0.011.56 ± 0.0915.37 ± 0.504.97 ± 0.1211.29 ± 0.26
C22:6 all-cis-4,7,10,13,16,19 (n-3)n.d.0.08 ± 0.010.33 ± 0.06n.d.1.67 ± 0.060.22 ± 0.02
C26:0n.d.0.27 ± 0.02n.d.n.d.1.08 ± 0.07n.d.


Fatty acids are identified by NIST library search only; unknown isomer of fatty acid, identified by NIST library search only; LA: linoleic acid; ALA: alpha linolenic acid; SDA: stearidonic acid; AA: arachidonic acid; EPA: eicosapentaenoic acid; DHA: docosahexaenoic acid; n.d. = not detected. NL, neutral lipid; FFA, free fatty acid; PL, polar lipid.

The predominating fatty acids constitute more than 90% of the total fatty acid content in all the fractions, as shown in Figure 1. They are found in amounts varying from 0.65 to 1200 µg/g DW (Table 1). A fatty acid was classified as predominating if it was above 2% of the total fatty acid content in at least one of the lipid fractions in either stipe or blade. All these ten fatty acids corresponded to those identified by others [6, 12, 24]. Schmid and Stengel [24] identified C18:3n-6, at 1.2% in stipe and 5.5% in blade, which differs from our results, where C18:3n-6 is not above 2% in any of the blade lipid fractions. This could be due to geographical and/or seasonal variations. The same FA was not detected at all by Van Ginneken et al. [12] and also not reported by Mæhre et al. [6], who both studied L. hyperborea as one of several macroalgal species. Only a maximum of two trans fatty acids, C14:1 trans-9 and C16:2 cis or trans-7,10, were identified in the samples, both in relatively low amounts (≤2.53 µg/g DW). Among the predominating fatty acids are important dietary n-3 fatty acids such as -linolenic acid (ALA, C18:3n-3), stearidonic acid (SDA, C18:4n-3), and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA, C20:5n-3) as well as two n-6 fatty acids, linoleic acid (LA, C18:2n-6),and arachidonic acid (AA, C20:4n-6). How favorable L. hyperborea is for the human diet (and thus also in animal feed) depends on several factors, for example, content of essential FAs (LA and ALA), other important nutritional FAs (SDA, AA, and EPA), and the ratios between PUFA/SFA and n-6/n-3 fatty acids.

It is known that brown seaweeds grown in temperate or subarctic areas can accumulate n-3 and n-6 PUFAs [33]. In both stipe and blade the lowest amounts of n-3 and n-6 fatty acids are found in the FFA fraction. The highest amounts are found in the NL fraction, with the exception of n-3 in blade where the amount in the PL fraction is higher than in the NL fraction (646 and 591 µg/g DW, resp.). The highest amounts of the essential FAs LA and ALA were found in the NLs for the blade (183.7 g/g DW and 83.6 g/g DW, resp.). However, for stipe, the highest amount of LA was found in the PL fraction (48.4 g/mL) and highest amount of ALA was found in the NL fraction (7.3 g/g DW). There was a lower proportion of the n-6 FA arachidonic acid in blade versus stipe (9.8% and 17.3%, resp.). This corresponds to what was reported by Schmid and Stengel [24].

The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends a daily intake of 0.25 g EPA+ C22:6 n-3 (DHA) as part of a healthy diet [34]. Even though seaweed can have high levels of EPA, the fatty acid DHA is generally absent or only found in small amounts in different phaeophytes [18]. The highest amount of DHA in our study was found in the blade FFA fraction (1.7 g/g DW). With a total content of EPA+DHA in blade at 832 g/g DW, achieving the recommended amount by consumption of seaweed alone is highly unlikely, as the daily intake would have to be approximately 300 g dried seaweed (or 1500 g fresh seaweed). Although n-3 and n-6 PUFAs are usually easily oxidized, studies have shown that these PUFAs have exhibited high oxidative stability in seaweed lipids in dried seaweed products [35]. The reason for this might be due to a protective effect of galactosyl and sulfoquinovosyl moieties on PUFAs bonded to glycoglycerolipids (the main membrane lipids) [33].

Stipe and blade differ not only in content of the individual FAs but also in the amounts of SFAs, MUFAs, and PUFAs (Table 2). The stipe had the highest distribution of SFA with 37.7% of TFA, whereas MUFA and PUFA for the stipe were at 33.6% and 28.7%, respectively. The blades, however, had a higher distribution of PUFAs with 34.2% of TFA and a lower distribution of SFA and MUFA with 33.4% and 32.4%, respectively. Stengel 2015 also reported a higher distribution of PUFAs in blade versus stipe with 52.0% and 32.2%, respectively. The FA distribution differs significantly with geographical and seasonal variations, most likely due to nutrition, light conditions, and other biological factors. Van Ginneken et al. [12] found a PUFA distribution of 53% of TFA in L. hyperborea (fronds) harvested in France with 25% SFA and 22% MUFA. Mæhre et al. [6] harvested the same species (whole plant) from the Norwegian coast and reported 34.2% PUFA, 33.7% SFA, and 26.5% MUFA. These results are very similar to our findings, even though there was a significant distance in time of harvest (May/June 2010 versus October 2015). The total amount of PUFAs in blade is 3.4 times higher than in stipe, and the total amounts of SFAs and MUFAs are 2.6 and 2.8 times higher, respectively. PUFAs are preferred over SFAs from a dietary perspective, and replacing SFAs with PUFAs in the diet decreases the risk of coronary heart disease [34]. The NL fraction in stipe and the PL fraction in blade have the highest PUFA/SFA ratio of 1.79 and 1.21, respectively. When combining the lipid fractions the blade FAs had a higher PUFA/SFA ratio compared to the stipe FAs (1.02 versus 0.76).


SFA282.62 ± 5.04128.26 ± 3.10556.30 ± 10.021286.26 ± 18.12440.89 ± 12.01751.31 ± 6.15
MUFA313.71 ± 6.0165.72 ± 0.40482.21 ± 10.121409.90 ± 29.37313.60 ± 5.47674.05 ± 12.35
PUFA504.81 ± 11.1425.63 ± 0.41206.27 ± 1.181346.68 ± 11.22278.53 ± 2.12910.63 ± 4.22

n-3100.92 ± 3.114.75 ± 0.0758.02 ± 0.91590.62± 10.14178.58 ± 2.23645.52 ± 4.34
n-6402.10 ± 11.0120.65 ± 0.40145.44 ± 1.09745.24 ± 11.3697.53 ± 2.18256.51 ± 1.11

The standard deviations are the highest standard deviation among the summarized values. NL, neutral lipid; FFA, free fatty acid; PL, polar lipid; SFA, saturated fatty acid; MUFA, monounsaturated fatty acid; PUFA, polyunsaturated fatty acid.

L. hyperborea has an n-6/n-3 ratio of 0.8/1 in blade and 3.5/1 in stipe. The ratios vary between the lipid fractions, as seen in Table 2, but are higher in stipe than in blade. In Western diet the n-6/n-3 ratio is 15–20/1 and this is significantly higher than ~1, which was normal during human evolution [15, 36]. However, for health benefits lowering this ratio is considered to be beneficial and associated with prevention of inflammatory, cardiovascular, and neural disorders [12]. n-6/n-3 ratios of 2–5/1 are reported to have suppressive effects on cardiovascular, inflammatory, and autoimmune diseases [15, 37, 38]. Since there is a significant difference between the n-6/n-3 ratios in stipe and blade, using only blade could be considered if a very low n-6/n-3 ratio is desired. Though, in this context it should also be mentioned that FAO in their 2010 report [34] do not consider this ratio to be important and give no specific recommendations of such.

While the same fatty acids predominate, the amounts in blade are consistently higher than those in stipe, as seen in Figure 2. This is consistent with results found by Schmid and Stengel [24]. At minimum, the amounts in blade are 1.1 times higher than in stipe for myristic acid (C14:0) in the PL fraction, and at maximum, 69.3 times higher than in stipe for SDA in the FFA fraction. For the FFA and PL fractions, the largest differences are found in the fatty acids ALA, SDA, and EPA. In the NL fraction, the largest difference between stipe and blade amounts is found in stearic acid (C18:0), while blade and stipe amounts are almost equal in the FFA and PL fractions for the same fatty acid.

4. Conclusions

A total of 42 different fatty acids are identified and quantified in the stipe and blade of L. hyperborea, with maximum two fatty acids having trans configuration. Some fatty acids are found in either stipe or blade, while others are only present in certain lipid fractions (NL, FFA, and PL) within stipe and blade. Among the predominating fatty acids are the n-3 fatty acids ALA (10.4 and 131 µg/g DW), SDA (17.2 and 394 µg/g DW), and EPA (126 and 830 µg/g DW), as well as two n-6 fatty acids: LA (96 and 296 µg/g DW) and AA (444 and 723 µg/g DW); the values in parentheses are for stipe and blade, respectively. The ratios between n-6 and n-3 fatty acids are ≤4.4/1 in all lipid fractions but especially low (≤1.3/1) in blade. The blades also presented the highest PUFA/SFA ratio. Regarding the potential of commercialization in respect of nutritional applications of L. hyperborea, blade is found to represent the most suitable material, due to higher levels of PUFAs and a low n-6/n-3 ratio.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.


The authors would like to thank FMC Biopolymer for sampling the L. hyperborea and Pharmatech AS for milling all samples. The authors would also like to thank the Institute of Marine Research for allowing them to use their picture of a kelp forest in the graphical abstract. This work was supported by the Norwegian University of Life Sciences.


  1. “FAO: Staple foods: What do people eat?” in Dimensions of Need: An atlas of Food and Agriculture, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  2. O. K. Chung and Ohm J.-B., “Cereal Lipids,” in Handbook of Cereal Science and Technology, K. Kulp and J. G. Ponte, Eds., Marcel Dekker, Inc., 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  3. “FAO Food and Nutrition Series no 29 by M. C. Lathman: Chapter 26. Cereals, starchy roots and other mainly carbohydrate foods, in: Human nutrition in the developing world 1997”. View at: Google Scholar
  4. L. Yu, G. Li, M. Li, F. Xu, T. Beta, and J. Bao, “Genotypic variation in phenolic acids, vitamin E and fatty acids in whole grain rice,” Food Chemistry, vol. 197, pp. 776–782, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. FAO, Fishery Statistical Collections, Global Production, Aqutatic Plants, 2014.
  6. H. K. Mæhre, M. K. Malde, K.-E. Eilertsen, and E. O. Elvevoll, “Characterization of protein, lipid and mineral contents in common Norwegian seaweeds and evaluation of their potential as food and feed,” Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, vol. 94, no. 15, pp. 3281–3290, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. E. M. Brown, P. J. Allsopp, P. J. Magee et al., “Seaweed and human health,” Nutrition Reviews, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 205–216, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. N. M. Sanina, S. N. Goncharova, and E. Y. Kostetsky, “Fatty acid composition of individual polar lipid classes from marine macrophytes,” Phytochemistry, vol. 65, no. 6, pp. 721–730, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. J. R. Stein and C. A. Borden, “Causative and beneficial algae in human disease conditions: a review,” Phycologia, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 485–501, 1984. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. I. A. Guschina and J. L. Harwood, “Lipids and lipid metabolism in eukaryotic algae,” Progress in Lipid Research, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 160–186, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. J. L. Harwood and I. A. Guschina, “The versatility of algae and their lipid metabolism,” Biochimie, vol. 91, no. 6, pp. 679–684, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. V. J. T. Van Ginneken, J. P. F. G. Helsper, W. De Visser, H. Van Keulen, and W. A. Brandenburg, “Polyunsaturated fatty acids in various macroalgal species from north Atlantic and tropical seas,” Lipids in Health and Disease, vol. 10, article no. 104, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. A. J. Harborn, Phytochemical Methods A Guide to Modern Techniques of Plant Analysis, Springer, 1998.
  14. L. Mišurcová, “Chemical Composition of Seaweeds,” in Handbook of Marine Macroalgae, Biotechnology and Applied Phycology, S.-K. Kim, Ed., Wiley-Blackwell, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. A. P. Simopoulos, “The importance of the ratio of omega-6/omega-3 essential fatty acids,” Biomedicine and Pharmacotherapy, vol. 56, no. 8, pp. 365–379, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. G. A. Fariman, S. J. Shastan, and M. M. Zahedi, “Seasonal variation of total lipid, fatty acids, fucoxanthin content, and antioxidant properties of two tropical brown algae (Nizamuddinia zanardinii and Cystoseira indica) from Iran,” Journal of Applied Phycology, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 1323–1331, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. R. F. Patarra, J. Leite, R. Pereira, J. Baptista, and A. I. Neto, “Fatty acid composition of selected macrophytes,” Natural Product Research, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 665–669, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. H. Pereira, L. Barreira, F. Figueiredo et al., “Polyunsaturated fatty acids of marine macroalgae: potential for nutritional and pharmaceutical applications,” Marine Drugs, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 1920–1935, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. D. I. Sánchez-Machado, J. López-Cervantes, J. López-Hernández, and P. Paseiro-Losada, “Fatty acids, total lipid, protein and ash contents of processed edible seaweeds,” Food Chemistry, vol. 85, no. 3, pp. 439–444, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. G. Silva, R. B. Pereira, P. Valentão, P. B. Andrade, and C. Sousa, “Distinct fatty acid profile of ten brown macroalgae,” Brazilian Journal of Pharmacognosy, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 608–613, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. C. Dawczynski, R. Schubert, and G. Jahreis, “Amino acids, fatty acids, and dietary fibre in edible seaweed products,” Food Chemistry, vol. 103, no. 3, pp. 891–899, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. D. Rodrigues, A. C. Freitas, L. Pereira et al., “Chemical composition of red, brown and green macroalgae from Buarcos bay in Central West Coast of Portugal,” Food Chemistry, vol. 183, Article ID 17304, pp. 197–207, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. S. V. Khotimchenko, “Fatty acids of brown algae from the Russian Far East,” Phytochemistry, vol. 49, no. 8, pp. 2363–2369, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. M. Schmid and D. B. Stengel, “Intra-thallus differentiation of fatty acid and pigment profiles in some temperate Fucales and Laminariales,” Journal of Phycology, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 25–36, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. B. J. Gosch, N. A. Paul, R. de Nys, and M. Magnusson, “Seasonal and within-plant variation in fatty acid content and composition in the brown seaweed Spatoglossum macrodontum (Dictyotales, Phaeophyceae),” Journal of Applied Phycology, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 387–398, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. J. Folch, M. Lees, and G. H. Sloane Stanley, “A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipides from animal tissues,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 226, no. 1, pp. 497–509, 1957. View at: Google Scholar
  27. H. C. Pinkart, R. Devereux, and P. J. Chapman, “Rapid separation of microbial lipids using solid phase extraction columns,” Journal of Microbiological Methods, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 9–15, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. J. Ruiz, T. Antequera, A. I. Andres, M. J. Petron, and E. Muriel, “Improvement of a solid phase extraction method for analysis of lipid fractions in muscle foods,” Analytica Chimica Acta, vol. 520, no. 1-2, pp. 201–205, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. H. Devle, E.-O. Rukke, C. F. Naess-Andresen, and D. Ekeberg, “A GC - Magnetic sector MS method for identification and quantification of fatty acids in ewe milk by different acquisition modes,” Journal of Separation Science, vol. 32, no. 21, pp. 3738–3745, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. D. B. Stengel, S. Connan, and Z. A. Popper, “Algal chemodiversity and bioactivity: Sources of natural variability and implications for commercial application,” Biotechnology Advances, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 483–501, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. J. V. Vilg, G. M. Nylund, T. Werner et al., “Seasonal and spatial variation in biochemical composition of Saccharina latissima during a potential harvesting season for Western Sweden,” Botanica Marina, vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 435–447, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. B. J. Gosch, M. Magnusson, N. A. Paul, and R. de Nys, “Total lipid and fatty acid composition of seaweeds for the selection of species for oil-based biofuel and bioproducts,” GCB Bioenergy, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 919–930, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. K. Miyashita, N. Mikami, and M. Hosokawa, “Chemical and nutritional characteristics of brown seaweed lipids: A review,” Journal of Functional Foods, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 1507–1517, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. FAO Food and Nutrition Paper 91: Fats and fatty acids in human nutrition - Report of an expert consultation, 2010.
  35. R. Sugimura, M. Suda, A. Sho et al., “Stability of fucoxanthin in dried undaria pinnatifida (wakame) and baked products (scones) containing wakame powder,” Food Science and Technology Research, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 687–693, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. A. P. Simopoulos, “An increase in the Omega-6/Omega-3 fatty acid ratio increases the risk for obesity,” Nutrients, vol. 8, no. 3, article no. 128, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. G. L. Russo, “Dietary n - 6 and n - 3 polyunsaturated fatty acids: From biochemistry to clinical implications in cardiovascular prevention,” Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 77, no. 6, pp. 937–946, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. P. M. Kris-Etherton, D. S. Taylor, S. Yu-Poth et al., “Polyunsaturated fatty acids in the food chain in the United States,” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, pp. 179S–188S, 2000. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2017 Lena Foseid et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.