Journal of Ophthalmology

Journal of Ophthalmology / 2014 / Article
Special Issue

Current Concepts and Future Developments of Corneal Cross-Linking

View this Special Issue

Clinical Study | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 604731 | 6 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/604731

Pulsed Light Accelerated Crosslinking versus Continuous Light Accelerated Crosslinking: One-Year Results

Academic Editor: Elias Jarade
Received19 May 2014
Revised24 Jun 2014
Accepted30 Jun 2014
Published03 Aug 2014

Abstract

Purpose. To compare functional results in two cohorts of patients undergoing epithelium-off pulsed (pl-ACXL) and continuous light accelerated corneal collagen crosslinking (cl-ACXL) with dextran-free riboflavin solution and high-fluence ultraviolet A irradiation. Design. It is a prospective, comparative, and interventional clinical study. Methods. 20 patients affected by progressive keratoconus were enrolled in the study. 10 eyes of 10 patients underwent an epithelium-off pl-ACXL by the KXL UV-A source (Avedro Inc., Waltham, MS, USA) with 8 minutes (1 sec. on/1 sec. off) of UV-A exposure at 30 mW/cm2 and energy dose of 7.2 J/cm2; 10 eyes of 10 patients underwent an epithelium-off cl-ACXL at 30 mW/cm2 for 4 minutes. Riboflavin 0.1% dextran-free solution was used for a 10-minutes corneal soaking. Patients underwent clinical examination of uncorrected distance visual acuity and corrected distance visual acuity (UDVA and CDVA), corneal topography and aberrometry (CSO EyeTop, Florence, Italy), corneal OCT optical pachymetry (Cirrus OCT, Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany), endothelial cells count (I-Conan Non Co Robot), and in vivo scanning laser confocal microscopy (Heidelberg, Germany) at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months of follow-up. Results. Functional results one year after cl-ACXL and pl-ACXL demonstrated keratoconus stability in both groups. Functional outcomes were found to be better in epithelium-off pulsed light accelerated treatment together with showing a deeper stromal penetration. No endothelial damage was recorded during the follow-up in both groups. Conclusions. The study confirmed that oxygen represents the main driver of collagen crosslinking reaction. Pulsed light treatment optimized intraoperative oxygen availability improving postoperative functional outcomes compared with continuous light treatment.

1. Introduction

Riboflavin UV-A induced corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL) represents a relatively new procedure available for the conservative treatment of progressive keratoconus [1, 2] and secondary corneal ectasia [3] due to its capacity in increasing biomechanical corneal resistance [4, 5] and intrinsic anticollagenase activity [6]. The physiochemical basis of crosslinking lies in the photodynamic types I-II reactions [7] induced by the interaction between 0.1% riboflavin molecules absorbed in corneal tissue and UV-A rays delivered at 3 mW/cm2 for 30 minutes (5.4 J/cm2 energy dose) releasing reactive oxygen species (ROS) that mediated crosslinks formation between and within collagen fibers [8, 9].

Conventional epithelium-off crosslinking (CXL) demonstrated its safety and long-term efficacy in stabilizing progressive keratoconus and secondary ectasias in different clinical trials [1015]. On the other hand the procedure is time consuming lasting about 1 hour [16]. The Bunsen-Roscoe law of reciprocity [1719] theoretically demonstrated that the photochemical process behind crosslinking depends on the absorbed UV-A energy and its biological effect is proportional to the total energy dose delivered in the tissue [1719]. According to this concept it is theoretically possible to deliver the same energy dose ensuring a proportional biological effect by setting different UV-A powers and exposure times in order to accelerate and shorten the crosslinking procedure in accelerated crosslinking (A-CXL) modality [1820]. According to photochemical crosslinking studies based on kinetics model [7] the UV-A illumination caused a rapid depletion of oxygen in a riboflavin soaked cornea and turning the UV light off led to replenishment of the oxygen to its original level within 3 to 4 minutes [7]. Krueger et al. [21] and Herekar [22] have also observed a rapid oxygen depletion during corneal crosslinking with riboflavin and concluded that the reactive oxygen species (ROS), specifically, singlet oxygen, are the predominant CXL reaction drivers. Under aerobic conditions, which are present during the first 10 to 15 seconds of UV-A exposure, sensitized photooxidation of the substrate (proteoglycan core proteins [23] and collagen in the corneal matrix) occurs mainly by its reaction with photochemically generated ROS, such as singlet molecular oxygen. This is consistent with a type II photochemical mechanism. After the first 10 to 15 seconds, oxygen becomes totally depleted and the reaction between the substrate and riboflavin becomes consistent with a predominantly type I photochemical mechanism [7]. Pulsing the UV light during crosslinking treatment theoretically restarts the photodynamic type II reaction achieving an additional oxygen concentration allowing more singlet oxygen release for crosslinking of collagen molecules. We report a comparative clinical study of continuous (cl-ACXL) and pulsed light (pl-ACXL) accelerated corneal collagen crosslinking in a series of 20 patients with progressive keratoconus investigating the functional outcomes at one-year follow-up and estimating the treatment penetration by means of in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM).

2. Methods

After specific informed consent subscription, 20 patients affected by progressive keratoconus were enrolled in the study. They were divided into 2 treatment groups: 10 eyes of 10 patients (pulsed light treatments), with age between 13 and 26 years (mean: 21.5 years), underwent an epithelium-off pulsed light accelerated corneal collagen crosslinking (pl-ACXL) by the KXL I UV-A source (Avedro Inc., Waltham, MS, USA) with 8 minutes (1 sec. on/1 sec. off) of UV-A exposure at 30 mW/cm2 with an energy dose of 7.2 J/cm2; 10 eyes of 10 patients (continuous light treatments), with age between 11 and 24 years (mean: 18,5 years), underwent an epithelium-off continuous light accelerated corneal collagen crosslinking (cl-ACXL) with the same instrument, UV-A power setting at 30 mW/cm2 for 4 minutes of continuous UV-A light exposure, and energy dose of 7.2 J/cm2. The riboflavin solution used in both treatment groups was composed of dextran-free riboflavin 0.1% with hydroxyl, propyl, methyl, and cellulose (VibeX Rapid, Avedro Inc., Waltham, MS, USA), with 10 minutes of corneal soaking. Treated eyes were dressed by a soft contact lens bandage for 3 days and medicated with ciprofloxacin eye drops, diclofenac, and sodium hyaluronate eye drops 4 times/day.

2.1. Inclusion Criteria

The parameters we considered to establish keratoconus progression and inclusion criteria for each group were worsening of UCVA/BSCVA > 0.50 Snellen lines, increase of SPH/CYL > 0.50 D, increase of topographic symmetry index SAI/SI >1 D, increase of mean K reading > 1 D, reduction of the thinnest point at corneal OCT pachymetry ≥10 μm, and clear cornea at biomicroscopic examination. We considered “significant” for the inclusion in the study the variation of at least 3 of the parameters listed above (one clinical plus two instrumental).

2.2. Assessment Criteria

Pre- and postoperative examination included uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), corneal topography simulated K average readings (K ave.), apical curvature (AK), and surface aberrometry (coma aberration) by CSO EyeTop Topographer (Costruzione Strumenti Oftalmici, Florence, Italy). In vivo scanning laser confocal microscopy was performed by the HRT II (Rostock Cornea Module, Heidelberg, Germany) and anterior segment OCT analysis by the Cirrus OCT instrument (Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany) in order to assess treatment penetration. Statistical analysis was performed using Wilcoxon test. All analyses were done using SPSS v16.0. A P value ≤ 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

3. Results

UDVA showed a statistically not significant improvement of +0.5, SD ± 1.2 () and +0.9, SD ± 1.1 () decimal equivalents in cl-ACXL and pl-ACXL, respectively, at one-year follow-up; see Figure 1.

CDVA showed an improvement, even not statistically significant, in both groups by a mean value of +1.6 SD ± 1.0 (P 0.56) and 1.8 SD ± 1.3 () decimal equivalents, respectively, one year after treatment; see Figure 2.

Topographic simulated K average value demonstrated a not statistically significant decrease one year after cl-ACXL by a mean value −0.13 Diopters, SD ± 0.13 (), while after cl-ACXL the reduction of K average was found to be statistically significant by a mean value of −1.2 Diopters, SD ± 0.4 (); see Figure 3.

Apical curvature value (AK) provided by the topographer showed a slight not statistically significant increase in cl-ACXL and a statistically significant decrease in pl-ACXL by a mean value of +0.15 Diopters, SD ± 0.8 (), and −1.39 Diopters, SD ± 0.38 (), respectively, at one-year follow-up; see Figure 4.

Coma aberration values showed a statistically not significant difference one year after treatment by a mean value of +0.44 μm, SD ± 0,41 (P 0.58), in cl-ACXL and +0.02 μm, SD ± 0,02 (0.068), in pl-ACXL; see Figure 5.

In vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) after cl-ACXL showed an uneven demarcation line at mean depth of 160 μm (range: 150–180 μm) that was well visible one month after treatment. A deeper demarcation line was recorded after pl-ACXL at a mean depth of 200 μm (range: 190–215 μm) measured from the epithelial surface. A demarcation line was detectable at slit lamp examination; see Figures 6 and 7 and Table 1.


UDVA (de) CDVA (de) ave. (D) AK (D) Coma (µm)

Continuous light ACXL (cl-ACXL)+0.5 +1.6−0.13 +0.15 +0.44
Pulsed light ACXL (pl-ACXL)+0.9+1.8−1.2−1.39 +0.02

de: decimal equivalents; UDVA: uncorrected distance visual acuity; CDVA: corrected distance visual acuity; ave.: delta simulated average reading; (D): delta apical curvature; coma: delta coma aberration.

Preoperative mean endothelial cell density was 2450 cells/mm2 (range: 2082 to 3026 cells/mm2) in the cl-ACXL group and 2672 cells/mm2 (range: 2459–3016 cells/mm2) in the pl-ACXL group. Postoperative endothelial cells count at 12 months was 2355 cells/mm2 on average (range: 2172–2950 cells/mm2) in the cl-ACXL group and 2495 cells/mm2 (range: 2400–3125 cells/mm2) in pl-ACXL group.

No adverse events were recorded in both treatment groups during the follow-up.

4. Discussion

This comparative analysis, even if in a small case series, demonstrated the efficacy of continuous and pulsed light accelerated crosslinking in stabilizing keratoconus progression after one year of follow-up. Pulsed light treatment showed a slightly better functional outcome both in uncorrected and in corrected distance visual acuity even if there is no statistically significant difference between the two treatment modalities. UCVA was found to be slightly better in pl-ACXL patients and it may correlate with the statistically significant improvement of mean K values and reduction of apical curvature recorded in this cohort of patients. Conversely, there is no statistically significant difference in CDVA that improved in both groups at one-year follow-up. This slight difference could be attributed to the small number of the eyes included in the study. No adverse events were recorded in both treatment groups.

Pulsed light treatment showed a deeper apoptotic effect, meanly at 215 μm of stromal depth (range: 190–235 μm), while continuous light accelerated treatment revealed a penetration of 160 μm on average (range: 150–180 μm), both at confocal and at corneal OCT analysis as shown in Figures 6 and 7.

These findings were found to be slightly better than those recently reported in the literature [24] probably due to the higher energy dose used in our treatments (7.2 J/cm2 instead of 5.4 J/cm2) and pulsed light modality. Indeed, pulsing the UV-A light inducing an intraoperative oxygen reuptake while prolonging treatment time at 8 minutes may influence a deeper penetration of oxidative damage [25].

Accelerated corneal collagen crosslinking with pulsed and continuous UV-A light illumination reached the anterior part of the corneal stroma until 200 μm of depth. This aspect assumes a physicochemical relevance because, as reported in the literature [26], the most important biomechanical effect related to crosslinking is concentrated in the anterior midstroma. Anyway the penetration of accelerated crosslinking remains under the value of conventional procedure (300 μm) at 3 mW/cm2 for 30 minutes of UV-A exposure. Actually we do not know if this factor may negatively influence the biomechanical stability of keratoconus in a long-term follow-up. Conventional epithelium-off CXL procedure (riboflavin 0.1% plus dextran 20%, UV-A 3 mW/cm2 = 5.4 J/cm2 for 30 minutes) remains the gold standard in the conservative treatment of early-stage progressive keratoconus particularly in pediatric patients, even if, in our preliminary experience, the accelerated crosslinking with epithelium removal demonstrated its safety for endothelium both in pulsed and in continuous light treatment modality, shortening the CXL procedure time under 20 minutes, being well tolerated by patients. Pulsed light treatment seems slightly more capable to penetrate deeper in the corneal stroma compared to continuous light treatment giving better functional outcome even if in a limited case series. The functional improvement of accelerated CXL with pulsed energy could be traced back in an optimization of oxygen availability thanks to the on/off cycle of oxygen delivery. Anyway both treatments were found to have a similar efficacy in stabilizing keratoconus during the follow-up period. Pulsed and continuous light accelerated crosslinking represents safe evolving crosslinking procedures in order to achieve keratoconus stabilization in a short treatment time. The efficacy of these techniques still needs to be investigated in the mid-long-term follow-up and in a large cohort of patients.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that they have no financial interests in the paper.

References

  1. G. Wollensak, E. Spoerl, and T. Seiler, “Riboflavin/ultraviolet-A-induced collagen crosslinking for the treatment of keratoconus,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 135, no. 5, pp. 620–627, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. A. Caporossi, S. Baiocchi, C. Mazzotta, C. Traversi, and T. Caporossi, “Parasurgical therapy for keratoconus by riboflavin-ultraviolet type A rays induced cross-linking of corneal collagen: preliminary refractive results in an Italian study,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 837–845, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. F. Hafezi, J. Kanellopoulos, R. Wiltfang, and T. Seiler, “Corneal collagen crosslinking with riboflavin and ultraviolet A to treat induced keratectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 33, no. 12, pp. 2035–2040, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. G. Wollensak, E. Spoerl, and T. Seiler, “Stress-strain measurements of human and porcine corneas after riboflavin-ultraviolet-A-induced cross-linking,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 29, no. 9, pp. 1780–1785, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. G. Wollensak, M. Wilsch, E. Spoerl, and T. Seiler, “Collagen fiber diameter in the rabbit cornea after collagen crosslinking by riboflavin/UVA,” Cornea, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 503–507, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. E. Spoerl, G. Wollensak, and T. Seiler, “Increased resistance of crosslinked cornea against enzymatic digestion,” Current Eye Research, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 35–40, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. P. Kamaev, M. D. Friedman, E. Sherr, and D. Muller, “Photochemical kinetics of corneal cross-linking with riboflavin,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 2360–2367, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. E. Spoerl, M. Huhle, and T. Seiler, “Induction of cross-links in corneal tissue,” Experimental Eye Research, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 97–103, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. E. Spoerl and T. Seiler, “Techniques for stiffening the cornea,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 711–713, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  10. F. Raiskup-Wolf, A. Hoyer, E. Spoerl, and L. E. Pillunat, “Collagen crosslinking with riboflavin and ultraviolet-A light in keratoconus: long-term results,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 796–801, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. A. Caporossi, C. Mazzotta, S. Baiocchi, and T. Caporossi, “Long-term results of riboflavin ultraviolet a corneal collagen cross-linking for keratoconus in italy: the Siena eye cross study,” The American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 149, no. 4, pp. 585–593, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. C. Wittig-Silva, M. Whiting, E. Lamoureux, R. G. Lindsay, L. J. Sullivan, and G. R. Snibson, “A randomized controlled trial of corneal collagen cross-linking in progressive keratoconus: preliminary results,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. S720–S725, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  13. C. Wittig-Silva, E. Chan, F. M. Islam et al., “A randomized, controlled trial of corneal collagen cross-linking in progressive Keratoconus: three-year results,” Ophthalmology, vol. 121, pp. 812–821, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. A. Caporossi, C. Mazzotta, S. Baiocchi, T. Caporossi, and R. Denaro, “Age-related long-term functional results after riboflavin UV A corneal cross-linking,” Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 2011, Article ID 608041, 6 pages, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. A. Caporossi, C. Mazzotta, S. Baiocchi, T. Caporossi, R. Denaro, and A. Balestrazzi, “Riboflavin-UVA-induced corneal collagen cross-linking in pediatric patients,” Cornea, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 227–231, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. E. Spoerl, M. Mrochen, D. Sliney, S. Trokel, and T. Seiler, “Safety of UVA-riboflavin cross-linking of the cornea,” Cornea, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 385–389, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. G. S. Brindley, “The Bunsen-Roscoe law for the human eye at very short durations,” The Journal of Physiology, vol. 118, no. 1, pp. 135–139, 1952. View at: Google Scholar
  18. S. Schumacher, L. Oeftiger, and M. Mrochen, “Equivalence of biomechanical changes induced by rapid and standard corneal cross-linking, using riboflavin and ultraviolet radiation,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 52, no. 12, pp. 9048–9052, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. J. Wernli, S. Schumacher, E. Spoerl, and M. Mrochen, “The efficacy of corneal cross-linking shows a sudden decrease with very high intensity UV light and short treatment time,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 1176–1180, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. HU. Celik, N. Alagöz, Y. Yildirim et al., “Accelerated with laser in situ keratomileusis,” Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 1424–1431, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  21. R. R. Krueger, E. Spoerl, and S. Herekar, “Rapid vs standard collagen CXL with equivalent energy dosing,” in Proceedings of the 3rd International Congress of Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking, Zurich, Switzerland, December 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  22. S. V. Herekar, “Method for equi -dosed time fractionated pulsed UVA irradiation of collagen/riboflavin mixtures for ocular structural augmentation,” US patent US2009/0149923A1, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  23. G. Wollensak, E. Spörl, C. Mazzotta, T. Kalinski, and S. Sel, “Interlamellar cohesion after corneal crosslinking using riboflavin and ultraviolet A light,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 95, no. 6, pp. 876–880, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. D. Touboul, D. Efron Smadja, D. Praud, F. Malet, and J. Colin, “Corneal confocal microscopy following conventional, transepithelial , and accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking procedures for keratoconus,” Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 28, no. 11, pp. 769–776, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  25. H. Merwald, G. Klosner, C. Kokesch, M. Der-Petrossian, H. Hönigsmann, and F. Trautinger, “UVA-induced oxidative damage and cytotoxicity depend on the mode of exposure,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B, vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 197–207, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. S. Schumacher, M. Mrochen, J. Wernli, M. Bueeler, and T. Seiler, “Optimization model for UV-riboflavin corneal cross-linking,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 762–769, 2012. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Cosimo Mazzotta et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

3292 Views | 766 Downloads | 66 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19.