Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 2017 (2017), Article ID 6896390, 7 pages
Research Article

Gene Expression Profiling of the Optic Nerve Head of Patients with Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma

1Department of Ophthalmology, The Fourth Hospital of Xi’an, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710004, China
2Department of Endocrinology, Shaanxi Provincial People’s Hospital, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710068, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Hui Li; moc.361@hlyfxs

Received 8 November 2016; Revised 1 February 2017; Accepted 14 February 2017; Published 6 April 2017

Academic Editor: Ji-jing Pang

Copyright © 2017 Xinrong Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Background. The pressure-induced axonal injury of the vulnerable ONH has led many researchers to view glaucoma from the perspective of the genetic basis of the angle of the ONH. However, genetic studies on POAG from this perspective are limited. Methods. Microarray dataset GSE45570 of the ONH of healthy individuals and POAG patients were downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus. After screening for the DEGs using the limma package, enrichment analysis was performed using DAVID. The DEG interaction network was constructed using cancer spider at Thereafter, DEG-related TFs were predicted using TRANSFAC, and TF-DEG regulatory networks were visualized using Cytoscape. Results. Thirty-one DEGs were identified including 11 upregulated and 20 downregulated DEGs. Thereafter, gene ontology terms of nucleosome assembly, sensory perception and cognition, and pathway of signaling by GPCR were found to be enriched among the DEGs. Furthermore, DEG interaction and TF-DEG networks were constructed. NEUROD1 was present in both the DEG network and the TF-DEG network as the node with the highest degree and was predicted as a marker gene in the ONH of patients with POAG. Conclusion. NEUROD1 may contribute greatly to the ONH of patients with POAG and was found to be involved in eye development and diseases.

1. Background

After cataracts, glaucoma is the second-leading cause of blindness worldwide [1], and it has been classified into specific types, including primary glaucoma and its variants [2]. Primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) is defined as a progressive optic neuropathy with acquired loss of optic nerve fibers [3]. The characteristics of insidious onset and irreversible blindness caused by POAG have made it a major worldwide health concern [4]. As the most common type of glaucoma, POAG accounts for approximately 60–70% cases of glaucoma [5]. Therefore, understanding the mechanisms of POAG and developing novel therapeutic strategies are of great importance.

The altering evacuation of the aqueous humor in POAG always causes an increase in intraocular pressure and causes anatomical damage to the optic nerve. The optic nerve head (ONH) is the site where the optic nerve forms a ganglion with cell axons [6]. It is the likely site of initial damage, including axonal cytoskeleton damage, axonal transport disruption, and putative axonal regeneration, in the glaucomatous eye [7]. Furthermore, the fortified astrocytes of ONH are the targets of elevated intraocular pressure [8]. The pressure-induced axonal injury of the vulnerable ONH has led many researchers to view glaucoma from the perspective of the genetic basis of the ONH. Optic nerve degeneration in glaucoma was observed in individuals harboring common variants of the 9p21 and 8q22 loci [9]. Moreover, interleukin-6-type cytokine signaling are associated with gene expression responses in early ONH injury in rat model of glaucoma [10]. Transforming growth factor-β2 is also involved in glaucomatous damage to the ONH [11]. However, genetic studies of POAG from the perspective of ONH are limited.

In this study, differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in normal and POAG ONH samples were identified. Thereafter, enrichment analysis, DEG interaction network construction, transcription factor (TF) prediction, and TF-DEG network analyses were performed successively. These bioinformatics analyses may be useful in identifying ONH marker genes in patients with POAG and provide a basis for developing new therapies for this disease.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Microarray Data

Gene expression profiling data of GSE45570 was downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database ( based on the GPL5175 Affymetrix human exon 1.0 ST array. Six normal ONH samples (mean age = 87.67) and 6 ONH samples from patients with POAG (mean age = 88.83) were collected.

2.2. Data Preprocessing and Screening for DEGs

The probes in gene expression matrix were converted into gene names according to the platform annotation information. The expression values of the probes mapped to a given gene were averaged and considered as the final gene expression value for each sample. Thereafter, the missing data were imputed by the K-nearest neighbor (KNN) method using the impute package of R [12], and median normalization was performed using the preprocessCore package of R [13]. Finally, the limma package in R [13] was used to identify significant DEGs in the POAG ONH and normal ONH samples. and |log2 fold change (FC)| > 0.585 were required for each DEGs.

2.3. Pathway and Functional Enrichment Analyses

The Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery (DAVID) provides a comprehensive set of functional annotation tools for investigators to understand the biological relevance of genes [14]. In this study, DAVID was applied to investigate the main Gene Ontology (GO) functions and the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways of DEGs involved in POAG. was chosen as the cut-off criterion.

2.4. DEG Interaction Network Analysis ( provides a common interface for a collection of current analytical tools used in genomics, proteomics, and metabolomics studies. In this study, CCancer spider in was applied to implement a global network statistical framework for analyzing mined DEGs and their correlative genes in ONH samples of patients with POAG. The DEG interaction network was obtained with the cut-off criteria of based on the hypergeometric distribution test.

2.5. TF-DEG Network Construction

The DEGs in the ONH of POAG samples were aligned and annotated with the gene symbols in the TRANSFAC database [15] to screen for potential TFs. DEG-related binding sites for TFs were predicted using the University of California Santa Cruz (UCSC) database. Finally, the TF-DEG network was visualized using Cytoscape [16].

3. Results

3.1. Data Preprocessing and DEG Screening

The normalized microarray data is shown in Figure 1. All boxes representing gene expression values of samples were centered on a straight line after median normalization of microarray data. Thirty-one significant DEGs were identified after screening of DEGs using and |log2 FC| > 0.585 as the cut-off criteria (Table 1). Among them, there were 11 upregulated DEGs such as the prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2 (PTGS2) gene. Meanwhile, 20 other genes were downregulated, such as the eyes shut homolog (EYS) and interphotoreceptor matrix proteoglycan 2 (IMPG2) genes.

Figure 1: Microarray chips normalization.
Table 1: The 31 significant DEGs between POAG ONH and normal ONH samples.
3.2. Functional and Pathway Enrichment Analyses

GO function () and KEGG pathway () enrichment analyses were performed to investigate the specific functions associated with DEGs. As shown in Table 2, the upregulated genes were mainly enriched in the terms of nucleosome assembly and chromatin assembly, whereas genes involved in sensory perception and cognition were mainly downregulated. Moreover, signaling by GPCR and olfactory transduction pathways were enriched in the downregulated DEGs. It is noteworthy that the guanine nucleotide-binding protein (G protein) alpha-transducing activity polypeptide 2 (GNAT2) and retinol-binding protein 3 (RBP3) were jointly and significantly enriched in GO terms of sensory perception, cognition, and signaling by GPCR pathway.

Table 2: GO and KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of DEGs.
3.3. DEG Interaction Network

The associations of DEGs and their related genes were analyzed by CCancer spider at Ten DEGs and 8 other closely related genes were identified and the DEG interaction network was obtained () (Figure 2). In this network, the downregulated GNAT2 was a disease-related gene, and it was linked with RBP3 by the short-wave-sensitive opsin 1 (OPN1SW).

Figure 2: Differentially expressed genes (DEG) interaction network. Squares represent inputted DEGs; triangles represent intermediate genes recorded in; red nodes represent disease-related genes; blue nodes represent carcinoma-related genes.
3.4. TF-DEG Network

TFs of the DEGs were predicted based on TRANSFAC and UCSC. The TF-DEG network was constructed upon integrating DEGs and TFs (Figure 3). The neuronal differentiation 1 (NEUROD1) with the highest node degree of 36 was located in the center of the network.

Figure 3: Transcription factor (TF) differentially expressed genes (DEG) network. Red nodes represent upregulated DEGs; green nodes represent downregulated DEGs; yellow triangles represent TFs; arrowed lines represent the regulatory relationship.

4. Discussion

Gene expression profiling was systematically analyzed in this study to gain insight into the molecular mechanism of POAG from the perspective of the genetic basis of the ONH. Consequently, 31 DEGs were screened, including 11 upregulated and 20 downregulated genes. Based on pathway and functional enrichment analyses, genes involved in nucleosome assembly, sensory perception, and cognition were enriched by these DEGs. Further, the DEG interaction network and the TF-DEG network analyses indicated that NEUROD1 might be a marker gene in the ONH of patients with POAG.

Certain DEGs, such as EYS, PTGS2, and IMPG2, identified in this study have been demonstrated to be associated with ophthalmic diseases and might participate in the development of POAG. The downregulated EYS was enriched in functional terms of visual perception and sensory perception of light stimulus. EYS is expressed in the photoreceptor layer of the retina, and a mutation in EYS plays a role in autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa [17]. Moreover, upregulated PTGS2 found in our study encodes a cyclooxygenase, which acts both as a peroxidase and as a dioxygenase [18]. It was reported that PTGS2, located on chromosome 1q23–q25, might be related to POAG (GLC1A) [19]. Meanwhile, IMPG2, encoding a proteoglycan, contributes to the development of the interphotoreceptor matrix and may play a role in the maintenance and growth of the light-sensitive photoreceptor [20]. Diseases including maculopathy and retinitis pigmentosa type 56 are associated with this gene [21]. All these findings suggest that the DEGs identified in the ONH might be involved in the development of POAG.

The DEG interaction network demonstrated that genes such as GNAT2 and RBP3 which were linked with OPN1SW may be potential markers and may be jointly regulated genes in the ONH of patients with POAG. These genes were jointly enriched in the significant GO functional terms including sensory perception and cognition. Remarkably, GNAT2 is a disease-related gene, as identified in this study. During visual impulses, the coupling of cGMP-phosphodiesterase and rhodopsin transducin is activated by transducin [22]. The alpha subunit of transducin is encoded by GNAT2 [23], and evidence shows that GNAT2 is involved in diseases such as achromatopsia [24] and oligocone trichromacy [25]. Moreover, GNAT2 and OPN1SW are cone-specific markers, and the dysregulation of these genes may be related to retinal disease [26]. Furthermore, RBP3 is a glycoprotein expressed in the interphotoreceptor matrix of the retina [27]; it is also associated with retinitis pigmentosa [28]. Interestingly, the clinical signs of retinopathy in OXYS rats appear by approximately 3 months of age. The phototransduction genes such as GNAT2 and OPN1SW and eye development genes such as GNAT2 and RBP3 are unexpectedly upregulated in OXYS rats at 3 months of age [29]. Hence, the dysregulated GNAT2 and RBP3 associated with OPN1SW might jointly function in the ONH and contribute to the development of POAG.

Notably, the TF-DEG network demonstrated that downregulated NEUROD1 was significantly linked with 36 TFs, and this gene was identified in the DEG interaction network. Moreover, NEUROD1 promotes the formation of early retinal ganglion cells [30], and retinal ganglion cell counts are associated with early visual field defects of glaucoma [31]. Thus, NEUROD1 might be a key marker gene in the ONH of POAG patients. Early studies on cultured retinal cells have shown that loss of NEUROD1 causes delayed amacrine differentiation, increased bipolar cell population, death of a subset of rod photoreceptors, and increased gliogenesis [32]. Furthermore, knockout of NEUROD1 in mice highlighted a role of this gene in long-term maintenance and survival of photoreceptors and photoreceptor differentiation [33]. More recently, targeted gene deletion studies showed that NEUROD1 is required for the survival of photoreceptors, but not pinealocytes, indicating a specific role for this gene in photoreceptors [34]. Photoreceptors are affected by chronically elevated intraocular pressure and are associated with glaucoma [35]. Optical coherence tomography studies showed that eye damage in glaucoma patients related to structural changes in the photoreceptor layer [36]. This highlighted a crucial role of NEUROD1 in POAG.

In conclusion, we identified 31 significant DEGs between normal ONH and the ONH of patients with POAG based on gene expression profiling. Further, network and TF prediction analyses revealed genes with abnormal expression, including GNAT2, RBP3, and NEUROD1, which might have important implications in POAG. These genes, especially NEUROD1, are involved in different eye diseases. At the genetic level, the presence of abnormally expressed genes further confirmed the hypothesis that the ONH is closely related to the occurrence of POAG. Moreover, our analyses may provide a basis for developing novel therapies for POAG. However, more in-depth experimental studies (such as real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction) are needed to verify our findings.


Xinrong Wang and Ke Gong are co-first authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

Xinrong Wang and Ke Gong participated in the design of this study, and they both performed the statistical analysis. Haiyan Li, Congyi Wang, and Chaoyi Qu performed the study and collected important background information. Hui Li drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.


This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 81100208).


  1. S. Kingman, “Glaucoma is second leading cause of blindness globally,” Bulletin of the World Health Organization, vol. 82, no. 11, pp. 887–888, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. H. A. Quigley, “Glaucoma,” Lancet, vol. 377, no. 9774, pp. 1367–1377, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. R. N. Weinreb, C. K. Leung, J. G. Crowston et al., “Primary open-angle glaucoma,” Nature Reviews Disease Primers, vol. 2, no. 9422, p. 16067, 2016. View at Google Scholar
  4. F. M. Wagdy, S. H. Elsayed, H. M. Elsobky, and D. F. Eldegwy, “Early glaucoma surgery in primary open angle glaucoma,” Life Science Journal, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 18–26, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  5. L. Abdu, “Epidemiological properties of primary open angle glaucoma in Nigeria,” Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 2013, no. 1, p. 402739, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. N. L. Brown, S. Patel, J. Brzezinski, and T. Glaser, “Math5 is required for retinal ganglion cell and optic nerve formation,” Development, vol. 128, no. 13, pp. 2497–2508, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  7. G. Chidlow, A. Ebneter, J. P. Wood, and R. J. Casson, “The optic nerve head is the site of axonal transport disruption, axonal cytoskeleton damage and putative axonal regeneration failure in a rat model of glaucoma,” Acta Neuropathologica, vol. 121, no. 6, pp. 737–751, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. C. Dai, P. T. Khaw, Z. Q. Yin, D. Li, G. Raisman, and Y. Li, “Structural basis of glaucoma: the fortified astrocytes of the optic nerve head are the target of raised intraocular pressure,” Glia, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 13–28, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. J. L. Wiggs, B. L. Yaspan, M. A. Hauser et al., “Common variants at 9p21 and 8q22 are associated with increased susceptibility to optic nerve degeneration in glaucoma,” PLoS Genetics, vol. 8, no. 4 article e1002654, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. E. C. Johnson, T. A. Doser, W. O. Cepurna et al., “Cell proliferation and interleukin-6–type cytokine signaling are implicated by gene expression responses in early optic nerve head injury in rat glaucoma,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 504–518, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. R. Fuchshofer, “The pathogenic role of transforming growth factor-β2 in glaucomatous damage to the optic nerve head,” Experimental Eye Research, vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 165–169, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. N. L. Crookston and A. O. Finley, yaImpute: yaImpute: An R Package for k-NN Imputation, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. R. Saito, M. E. Smoot, K. Ono et al., “A travel guide to Cytoscape plugins,” Nature Methods, vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 1069–1076, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. D. W. Huang, B. T. Sherman, and R. A. Lempicki, “Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources,” Nature Protocols, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 44–57, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. B. V. Matys and E. Al, “TRANSFAC: transciptional regulation, from patterns to profiles,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 374–378, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. E. Smoot, K. Ono, J. Ruscheinski, P. L. Wang, and T. Ideker, “Cytoscape 2.8: new features for data integration and network visualization,” Bioinformatics, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 431–432, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. M. M. A. El-Aziz, C. A. O'Driscoll, R. S. Kaye et al., “Identification of novel mutations in the ortholog of Drosophila eyes shut gene (EYS) causing autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 51, no. 8, pp. 4266–4272, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. T. Hla and K. Neilson, “Human cyclooxygenase-2 cDNA,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 89, no. 16, pp. 7384–7388, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. A. Belmouden, M. F. Adam, S. D. de Dinechin et al., “Recombinational and physical mapping of the locus for primary open-angle glaucoma (GLC1A) on chromosome 1q23–q25,” Genomics, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 348–358, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. M. H. Kuehn, E. M. Stone, and G. S. Hageman, “Organization of the human IMPG2 gene and its evaluation as a candidate gene in age-related macular degeneration and other retinal degenerative disorders,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 42, no. 13, pp. 3123–3129, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  21. D. Bandah-Rozenfeld, R. W. Collin, E. Banin et al., “Mutations in IMPG2, encoding interphotoreceptor matrix proteoglycan 2, cause autosomal-recessive retinitis pigmentosa,” The American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 199–208, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. M. Abood, J. Hurley, M. Pappone, H. R. Bourne, and L. Stryer, “Functional homology between signal-coupling proteins. Cholera toxin inactivates the GTPase activity of transducin,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 257, no. 18, pp. 10540–10543, 1982. View at Google Scholar
  23. E. H. Hurowitz, J. M. Melnyk, Y.-J. Chen, H. Kouros-Mehr, M. I. Simon, and H. Shizuya, “Genomic characterization of the human heterotrimeric G protein α, β, and γ subunit genes,” DNA Research, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 111–120, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. T. Rosenberg, B. Baumann, S. Kohl, E. Zrenner, A. L. Jorgensen, and B. Wissinger, “Variant phenotypes of incomplete achromatopsia in two cousins with GNAT2 gene mutations,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 45, no. 12, pp. 4256–4262, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. M. Michaelides, G. Holder, K. Bradshaw, D. M. Hunt, J. D. Mollon, and A. T. Moore, “Oligocone trichromacy: a rare and unusual cone dysfunction syndrome,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 497–500, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. S. Yoshida, A. J. Mears, J. S. Friedman et al., “Expression profiling of the developing and mature Nrl−/− mouse retina: identification of retinal disease candidates and transcriptional regulatory targets of Nrl,” Human Molecular Genetics, vol. 13, no. 14, pp. 1487–1503, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. S.-L. Fong, W.-B. Fong, T. A. Morris, K. M. Kedzie, and C. D. Bridges, “Characterization and comparative structural features of the gene for human interstitial retinol-binding protein,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 265, no. 7, pp. 3648–3653, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  28. S. Li, Z. Yang, J. Hu et al., “Secretory defect and cytotoxicity: the potential disease mechanisms for the retinitis pigmentosa (RP)-associated interphotoreceptor retinoid-binding protein (IRBP),” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 288, no. 16, pp. 11395–11406, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. O. S. Kozhevnikova, E. E. Korbolina, N. I. Ershov, and N. G. Kolosova, “Rat retinal transcriptome: effects of aging and AMD-like retinopathy,” Cell Cycle, vol. 12, no. 11, p. 1745, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. T. Inoue, M. Hojo, Y. Bessho, Y. Tano, J. E. Lee, and R. Kageyama, “Math3 and NeuroD regulate amacrine cell fate specification in the retina,” Development, vol. 129, no. 4, pp. 831–842, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  31. F. A. Medeiros, R. Lisboa, R. N. Weinreb, J. M. Liebmann, C. Girkin, and L. M. Zangwill, “Retinal ganglion cell count estimates associated with early development of visual field defects in glaucoma,” Ophthalmology, vol. 120, no. 4, pp. 736–744, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. E. M. Morrow, T. Furukawa, J. E. Lee, and C. L. Cepko, “NeuroD regulates multiple functions in the developing neural retina in rodent,” Development, vol. 126, no. 1, pp. 23–36, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  33. M. E. Pennesi, J.-H. Cho, Z. Yang et al., “BETA2/NeuroD1 null mice: a new model for transcription factor-dependent photoreceptor degeneration,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 453–461, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  34. M. J. Ochocinska, E. M. Muñoz, S. Veleri et al., “NeuroD1 is required for survival of photoreceptors but not pinealocytes: results from targeted gene deletion studies,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 123, no. 1, pp. 44–59, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. T. M. Nork, J. N. Ver Hoeve, G. L. Poulsen et al., “Swelling and loss of photoreceptors in chronic human and experimental glaucomas,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 118, no. 2, pp. 235–245, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  36. N. Fan, N. Huang, D. S. C. Lam, and C. K. Leung, “Measurement of photoreceptor layer in glaucoma: a spectral-domain optical coherence tomography study,” Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 2011, p. 264803, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar