Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mediators of Inflammation
Volume 2015, Article ID 128076, 15 pages
Review Article

Necroptotic Cell Death Signaling and Execution Pathway: Lessons from Knockout Mice

1Department of Pharmacology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, 05508-900 São Paulo, SP, Brazil
2Department of Animal Science, Federal Rural University of the Semiarid Region, 59625-900 Mossoró, RN, Brazil

Received 27 December 2014; Revised 24 March 2015; Accepted 16 April 2015

Academic Editor: Laura Soucek

Copyright © 2015 José Belizário et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Under stress conditions, cells in living tissue die by apoptosis or necrosis depending on the activation of the key molecules within a dying cell that either transduce cell survival or death signals that actively destroy the sentenced cell. Multiple extracellular (pH, heat, oxidants, and detergents) or intracellular (DNA damage and Ca2+ overload) stress conditions trigger various types of the nuclear, endoplasmic reticulum (ER), cytoplasmatic, and mitochondrion-centered signaling events that allow cells to preserve the DNA integrity, protein folding, energetic, ionic and redox homeostasis, thus escaping from injury. Along the transition from reversible to irreversible injury, death signaling is highly heterogeneous and damaged cells may engage autophagy, apoptotic, or necrotic cell death programs. Studies on multiple double- and triple- knockout mice identified caspase-8, flip, and fadd genes as key regulators of embryonic lethality and inflammation. Caspase-8 has a critical role in pro- and antinecrotic signaling pathways leading to the activation of receptor interacting protein kinase 1 (RIPK1), RIPK3, and the mixed kinase domain-like (MLKL) for a convergent execution pathway of necroptosis or regulated necrosis. Here we outline the recent discoveries into how the necrotic cell death execution pathway is engaged in many physiological and pathological outcome based on genetic analysis of knockout mice.

1. Introduction

Cell death is a crucial process in ontogeny, homeostasis, and pathologies [1, 2]. Over 100 billion cells die in our bodies by different cell death pathways every day. The cells die by apoptosis, a physiological and regulated cell death process which is tolerogenic and partially inflammatory, or necroptosis, a pathological and regulated cell death process, which is inherently immunogenic and elicits intense inflammatory reaction [3, 4]. Pyroptosis [5], immunogenic cell death [6, 7], and other distinct cell death processes have been defined at morphological and biochemical levels [3, 4, 8, 9]. Many questions concerning the cross talk among the cell death regulators, their intracellular signaling pathways, and the immunological consequences remain unanswered. Genetic dissection in simple model organisms [10] and mice models [11] has provided us with critical genes of cell-death pathways that control early and late biochemical and morphological events in organ development and cellular homeostasis. A variety of cell death modalities share extrinsic and intrinsic pathways that integrate mitochondrial metabolism, cell proliferation checkpoints, and DNA repair mechanisms [3, 4, 9]. It is now becoming evident that perturbations of intracellular ionic homeostasis induced by certain transmembrane non- and voltage dependent-channels and ion-linked channel receptors play critical roles in the course of cell death processes [15, 9]. Here we will summarize common features of necrosis, apoptosis, and necroptosis and the multiple intracellular signal pathways that regulate their cellular triggering in many physiological and pathological situations. In the end, we will outline and discuss important phenotypes of knockout mice models that serve to define the role of caspase-8, flip, and fadd genes and other major components of apoptotic and necroptotic downstream signaling effectors.

2. Cell Death Modalities

2.1. Accidental Necrosis

Necrosis derives from the Greek word “necros” and has long been used by pathologists to describe morphologically the death of cells or tissue as result of pathological infection, cellular injury, and noxious stimuli [1, 4]. The term necrosis is now referred to as accidental cell death, which is a form of nonregulated, nonspecific, and uncontrolled cell death by meaning of genetic and biochemical interventions [4]. Necrotic death occurs quickly as a consequence of extreme physicochemical stress, such as heat, acidification, osmotic shock, mechanical stress, and freeze-thawing of cells [2]. Necrotic cells are characterized by loss of plasma membrane integrity, increase in cell volume (also known as oncosis), organelle swelling, lack of internucleosomal DNA fragmentation, and cellular collapse (Figure 1). These events occur at early or late stages of cellular collapse due to cellular energy depletion (ATP), mitochondrial permeability transition, increases in cytosolic calcium concentration, high production of free radicals, reactive (activated) oxygen species (ROS), oxidization of membrane lipids, plasma membrane damage and permeability changes, and critical DNA and protein structural damage [2, 8].

Figure 1: Distinct morphological features of apoptosis and necroptosis. (a) Apoptosis is characterized by cell shrinkage, membrane blebbing condensation, margination of nuclear chromatin, and packaging of apoptotic bodies and its engulfment by neighbor cells. (b) Necroptosis is characterized by the increase in cell volume, swelling of organelles, perforation of plasma membrane, cellular collapse, and release of cellular contents.
2.2. Apoptosis

The term “apoptosis” was derived from a Greek word that means “falling off” and was first coined by Kerr et al. [1] to describe a morphological manifestation of cellular demise. The complex cellular morphology known as apoptosis can be confidently recognized by a series of morphological changes at the microscopy level (Figure 1). Apoptosis is characterized by cell shrinkage, membrane blebbing, condensation and margination of nuclear chromatin, degradation of DNA into nucleosomal units (200 bp), and formation of apoptotic bodies. However, the hallmark of an apoptotic process is its dependence on caspase activation [1, 8, 12].

Cells undergo apoptosis in response to extrinsic or intrinsic pathways that are regulated by various antiapoptotic and proapoptotic proteins [8, 13]. The extrinsic pathway is mediated by binding of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) to its receptor (TNFR-1) which is followed the formation of two TNFR complexes [14]. TNFR-1 complex I comprises the adaptor protein TNFR1-associated death domain protein (TRADD), the death domain- (DD-) containing protein kinase receptor-interacting protein 1 (RIPK1), the ubiquitin E3 ligases TNFR-associated factor 2 (TRAF2), and cellular inhibitor of apoptosis protein 1 (cIAP1). TNFR-1 complex II comprises the adaptor FAS-associated death domain protein (FADD), caspase-8, RIPK1 (IIa), and/or RIPK3 (IIb). E3 ubiquitin ligases, including cIAP-1 and -2 and deubiquitinases, including CYLD (cylindromatosis), A20, Cezanne, HOIL-1/HOIP/Sharpin (LUBAC ubiquitin ligase complex), modify the balance between TNFR-1 complex I and complex II [1315] leading to either cell survival via activation of nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) or alternative cell death signaling pathways.

Homodimerization and activation of caspase-8 within either TNFR complex I or II propagate the activation of effector caspases-3, -6, and -7, which then cause cellular destruction by apoptosis without mitochondria participation (known as type I intrinsic pathway). Both caspase-8 and cFLIP (FADD-like IL-1β-converting enzyme-inhibitory protein) possess two DED (death effector domain) domains. Their heterodimerization will block the apoptotic signaling cascade, leading to cellular survival and NF-κB-mediated proinflammatory response. Thus the ratio of different c-FLIP isoforms (long and short isoforms) bound to procaspase-8 is a critical regulator of both procaspase-8 dimerization/activation and cell death by apoptosis and necroptosis [16].

The intrinsic pathway is also called the mitochondrial pathway and is absolutely dependent on BAX and BAK protein activation by BH3-only molecules (BH3s) of The BCL-2 (B-cell lymphoma/leukemia 2) family proteins. Various BH3s proteins of the pro-apoptotic family, including BAD, BIK, BID, BIM, BMF, NOXA, and PUMA participate in this process. These proteins interact and dislocate the BH3s proteins of the anti-apoptotic family, including BCL-2, BCL-XL and MCL-1, allowing conformational changes and association of BAX/BAK proteins at specific sites of the mitochondrial outer membrane. Cytochrome is an abundant protein of the mitochondrial inner membrane and acts as an electron transport intermediate. BAX and BAK promote apoptosis by perturbing the permeability of the mitochondrial outer membrane, referred to as MOMP, which lead to the release of cytochrome [17]. The cytochrome released into the cytoplasm stimulates the formation of the apoptosome, a scaffold for activation of caspase-9, which, in turn, cleaves and activates the effector caspases-3, -6, and -7. Mitochondrial membrane permeabilization leads to the release of other apoptogenic proteins, including apoptosis inducing factor (AIF), Smac/Diablo, HtrA2/Omi (serine protease), and endonuclease G, which execute distinct functions in the downstream apoptosis-signaling pathway. Accordingly, new small-molecule inhibitors of Bcl-2 proteins, including ABT-199 and ABT-263, are viewed as promising new anticancer agents.

In vivo, apoptotic cells maintain their plasma membrane integrity. However, apoptotic cells under certain conditions promote the exposure or release of ecto-calreticulin, phosphatidylserine, HSP70, HSP90, opsonins, thrombospondin, and high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1), which are known as cDAMPs [18]. The uptake of apoptotic cells by macrophages promotes the release proinflammatory cytokines [19, 20] and cell growth and wound healing through the release of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), respectively [21]. Several cytokines and lipid mediators produced by immune cells and surrounding tissue are involved in the resolution of acute and chronic inflammation [22].

2.3. Necroptosis

Necroptosis is referred to as cell death initiated by TNF receptors following chemical suppression of caspases [3]. Peter Vandenabeele and Junying Yuan were the first authors to describe the morphological and biochemical features of necroptosis (more details in Section 4). It is morphologically characterized by the increase in cell volume, swelling of organelles, plasma membrane permeabilization, cellular collapse, and release of cellular contents. Necroptotic cells promote highly inflammatory response as consequence of the release of cytokines, cDAMPs, and PAMPs [18, 20]. Necroptosis is now considered a regulated cell death program that ultimately relays in a core execution pathway to promote final cellular demise [4, 9]. A detailed mechanism for necroptotic cell death execution pathway has been described that involves the integration of many downstream signaling pathways with a trio formed by the receptor interacting protein kinase 1 (RIPK1), RIPK3, and MLKL [23, 24]. Importantly, many cell death triggers can induce necroptosis at various pathological scenarios [9].

Recently it has been demonstrated that cells undergo regulated necroptosis after activation canonical and noncanonical extrinsic or intrinsic pathways triggered by TNF-α, TLR (toll-like receptors) and NLR (NOD-like receptors) agonists, interferons, viral and bacterial products, and diverse pathophysiological signals [9]. The emerging connections between necroptosis and apoptosis intrinsic and extrinsic pathways are depicted on Figure 2 described in more details in the next sections.

Figure 2: Schematic overview of the multiple signaling pathways to apoptosis, necroptosis and autophagy. TNF-α binding to TNFR causes the assembly of a membrane-proximal supramolecular complex including (but not limited to) TRADD, FADD, and RIPK1 (receptor interacting protein kinase 1). Recruitment and activation of caspase-8 play a crucial role in initiation of apoptotic or necrotic cell death. Active caspase-8 cleaves Bid, generating tBid, with together with Bax and Bak promote the mitochondria outer membrane permeabilization (MOMP) allowing the release of cytochrome . Cleavage of both RIP1 and RIP3 by caspase-8 leads to apoptosis, whereas phosphorylation of RIP1 and RIP3 protein kinases causes their activation and in turn the recruitment of MLKL (mixed lineage kinase domain-like). MLKL is phosphorylated by RIP3 and initiated structural changes that led to its insertion in the plasma membrane and formation channels. MLKL channels increase Na+ influx, osmotic pressure, and membrane rupture, ending with cell death by necroptosis. Membrane rupture promotes the release of cellular contents and, in particular, various endogenous DAMPs. Various chemotherapeutical drugs, chemical and biological stressors, cause mitochondrial dysfunctions and consequently increase the level of ROS (reactive oxygen species, ROS) generation and collapse of electrochemical gradient, which compromise the ADP/ATP exchange transporter. High Ca2+ upload in the matrix favors the transient or irreversible opening or closure of the outer/inner mitochondrial permeability transition pore complex (MPTPC) that is well known to participate in the mitochondrial permeability transition (MPT). This is accompanied by mitochondrial depolarization, loss of membrane potential (ΔΨm), and massive swelling due to influx of ions and water into the matrix. Depending on the extension of cell injury, the cells undergo apoptosis, necrosis, or autophagy programs. Autophagy of damaged organelles constitutes a survival response that prevents cell death. VDAC: the voltage-dependent anion channel, also known as porin; DAMPs: damaged associated-molecular patterns; TNFα: tumor necrosis factor α; TNFR: tumor necrosis factor receptor; FADD: Fas-associated death domain protein; Z-VAD.fmk: Z-Val-Ala-Asp(OMe)-fluoromethylketone; LMP: lysosomal membrane permeabilization; PTPC: permeability transition pore complex; Smac: second mitochondria-derived activator of caspase.

3. Mitochondrial Channels and Pores That Control Apoptosis and Necroptosis Cell Death

The role of mitochondria is well defined in apoptotic cell death and accidental necrosis. The mitochondrial involvement in necroptosis is still very preliminary and debatable. Given that various transmembrane non- and voltage dependent-channels and ion-linked channel receptors play critical roles in the course of cell death processes, here we will update on some of the putative mechanisms that contribute to apoptotic and necrotic cell death.

3.1. Regulation of Mitochondrial Osmotic Balance

Mitochondria function in a cytosolic milieu containing Na+, K+, and Ca2+ as well as other anions and cations [25]. The inner mitochondrial membrane, however, is impermeable to these ions and their flux and concentrations in the mitochondrial matrix are controlled by different subtypes of pores, channels, and exchangers. The mitochondrial K+ balance is controlled by ATP-dependent (KATP) and Ca2+-dependent (KCa) K+ channels responsible for influx and by K+/H+ exchanger responsible for removal of excess of matrix K+ [26, 27]. Sodium balance is governed by Na+/Ca2+ (influx) and Na+/H+ (efflux) exchangers and calcium balance by Ca2+ channel (influx) and Na+/Ca2+ exchangers (efflux). The balance of the main cytoplasmic anions, phosphate and chloride is regulated by numerous carriers and channels [25, 27]. Cell size decreases due to water loss from increased K+ and Cl ionic effluxes. The mitochondrial inner membrane also has unique water channels named aquaporins, which facilitate water or other small-uncharged molecule transport between the cytoplasm and matrix [28]. The rate of water flux in or out of the mitochondrion is determined not only by the osmotic gradient that acts as the driving force for water transport but also by the water permeability of the inner membrane [28].

The mechanisms by which Ca2+ ions modulate both oxidative phosphorylation and mitochondrial matrix swelling have been a matter of great debate for decades. Halestrap and colleague [29] demonstrated that an increase in intramitochondrial Ca2+ concentration can increase the flux of K+ into mitochondria. Since then, several mechanisms have been proposed to explain this finding. First, it was proposed that elevated matrix Ca2+ could open a putative mitochondrial large conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channel (KCa channel) [26, 30]. Activation of calcium efflux pathways via Na+/Ca+ and Na+/H+ exchangers (mitochondrial NHE1) during intramitochondrial Ca2+ overload causes dissipation of the mitochondrial membrane potential and loss of proton gradient [27]. Loss of proton gradient suppresses the activity of K+/H+ exchange leading to the mitochondrial swelling. Finally, if the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger becomes saturated, a high intramitochondrial Ca2+ could rise to the level sufficient to facilitate entry of potassium as well as other ions and solutes and inducing massive swelling of the matrix [26]. An increase of Ca2+ concentration up to the micromolar level inhibits pyrophosphatase activity in the matrix, which, in turn, may transiently displace adenine nucleotides from adenine nucleotide translocase (ANT) and convert the latter into a potassium channel. Most likely the total net flux of ions is directed toward the mitochondrial matrix and this ion movement, accompanied by osmotically mediated entrance of water, which leads finally to mitochondrial swelling [31]. The swelling could lead to a rupture of the mitochondrial outer membrane allowing further expansion of the matrix. Thus, rupture of the mitochondrial outer membrane has been proposed as alternative way of permeating the release of cytochrome in the apoptotic process, but this is debatable [32].

3.2. ROS-Induced Mitochondrial Permeability

ROS (reactive oxygen species) overproduction can lead to severe mitochondrial dysfunction commonly observed in the necrotic cell death process [2]. Reactive oxygen species induce mitochondrial structural oxidation and opening of the permeability transition pores, channels, and exchangers [33]. Under normal metabolic conditions, electron-transporting complexes I, II, III, and IV plus a nonredox H+-translocating complex, ATP synthase (also called complex V, FoF1-ATP synthase), coenzyme Q, and cytochrome carry out oxidative phosphorylation [34]. The a- and b-type cytochromes are inaccessible components of large complexes, but cytochrome is monomeric, freely diffusible in the inner membrane, and in equilibrium between the inner membrane, intermembrane space and cristae. A small percentage of the total O2 consumed by the mitochondrial electron transport chain in healthy tissues becomes ROS, such as superoxide (), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and hydroxyl radical (OH−) [33]. This ROS production occurs primarily in complex I (NADH dehydrogenase) and complex III (ubiquinone-cytochrome reductase). O2 itself is also a free radical because it has two unpaired electrons in its outer orbit that make it reactive. Increase in the level of products of the one-electron reduction of O2 is known to induce the mitochondrial permeabilization transition. The hypothesis is that pore formation is involved in the organization of a defense system preventing ROS formation. It is proposed that an ROS-induced nonspecific pore opening lowers ROS production due to (a) maximal stimulation of mitochondrial O2 consumption and, hence, intracellular lowering of ROS and (b) complete dissipation of mitochondrial membrane potentials and, as a consequence, maximal oxidation of such respiratory chain carriers such as coenzyme Q, which serve as one-electron O2 reductant [34].

Earlier studies have shown that OH· oxidize thiol (–SH) groups of sensor proteins which directly promote the activation or opening of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore [33, 34]. The mitochondrial permeability transition pore complex (PTPC) is a nonspecific pore in the inner mitochondrial membrane (IMM) whose opening is triggered by high concentration Ca2+ in the matrix [3537]. Ca2+ loading increases the production of ROS, including superoxide. PTP is considered to function as a point of no return for both apoptosis and necrosis. This supramolecular complex may contain or be regulated by ANT (adenine nucleotide translocator), the mitochondrial ADP/ATP nucleotide exchanger, VDAC (the voltage-dependent anion channel), also known as porin, protein cyclophilin D (CypD), the peripheral benzodiazepine receptor, the phosphate carrier, and the FoF1 ATP synthase [38, 39]. CyPD binds to the FoF1 ATP synthase into lipid bilayers to form a Ca2+-activated channel that displays features of the mPTP [38]. In this physiological configuration, PTP functions together with other channels and exchangers in the regulation of mitochondrial Ca2+ homeostasis [2, 38, 39].

The roles of MOMP and MPT have been mostly considered to participate in the two independent pathways for release of apoptotic and necrotic factors from mitochondria [17]. Bax and Bak interact with the MPT to induce a permeability transition and cytochrome release in isolated mitochondria [40, 41]. Interestingly, intermediate structures common to membrane fusion or fission machineries have also been described to participate in mitochondrial permeabilization phenomenon [17, 42]. New ideas and experiments concerning structures and functions of membrane-permeation channels, exchanger, and pores are under way to confirm whether they act together or separately to promote the mitochondrial events common to apoptotic and necrotic intrinsic pathways [41].

3.3. Mitophagy

The outcome of cells with mitochondrial damage can vary. Apoptosis can eliminate ROS-producing cells (cell selection). Autophagy (self-eating) is a catabolic process that targets organelles and cytoplasmic components for degradation by the lysosome [43]. Autophagy has not been considered a modality in cell death; nonetheless, many stimuli that activate apoptosis induce autophagy, whereas signals that inhibit apoptosis inhibit autophagy [43, 44]. The pan caspase inhibitor Z-VAD-fmk inhibits caspases but also blocks lysosomal cathepsins and hence cell death by autophagy. Antiapoptotic proteins, such as Bcl-2 family members, bind to and inhibit beclin (Atg 6), and proapoptotic factors, such as BH3-only proteins, to disrupt this inhibitory interaction and thereby activate autophagy [44]. Autophagy is triggered by ROS derived from either the mitochondrial electron transport chain or NAPDH oxidases. Autophagy of damaged mitochondria limits ROS-modulated caspase-1 activation and seems to negatively regulate pyroptosis [44]. Mitophagy is a specialized form of autophagy in which mitochondria are specifically targeted for degradation at the autophagolysosome, with subsequent degradation by cell’s own lysosomal system [44]. Depolarization of mitochondrial membranes is a prerequisite for mitophagy. This process occurs for a period of time for clearance of mitochondria in which damage is not too extensive. Therefore, autophagy of damaged organelles constitutes a survival response that prevents cell death.

4. Critical Role of Plasma Membrane Permeabilization by MLKL in the Execution Pathway for Necroptosis

4.1. Necrosome Complex

The interconnected and complex signaling pathways to apoptosis and necroptosis were first recognized by Wallack and Goeddel’s groups in 1995-1996. These investigators reported that the interaction of TNF receptors, TRADD and FADD, via DED (death effector domain) was critical for the recruitment of caspase-2, -8, and -10 and the induction of cytotoxicity by TNF family members [45, 46]. The genetic analysis of the caspase-8-deficient and FADD-deficient mice demonstrated the essential role of these genes for embryo development and signaling to tumor necrosis death receptors-induced apoptosis in a physiological setting [4547]. On the other hand, it was also observed that the cell killing by FADD oligomerization could be caspase-independent suggesting the existence of a particular nonapoptotic cell death program [4850]. Vercammen and colleagues [51] were the first to report on the induction the morphological features of necroptosis in L929 cells following pharmacological blockage of pan caspase activity by a peptide cell permeable inhibitor named Z-Val-Ala-Asp.fluoromethylketone or ZVAD-fmk.

These studies were confirmed by other authors who identified other cell death genes and small molecule inhibitors that strongly sensitize cells to TNF-α, TRAIL, and FasL in eliciting a necrosis-like cell death [48, 5255]. Degterev and colleagues identified necrostatin-1, a small molecule inhibitor of RIPK1 enzymatic activity [53, 56]. Mitochondria release the second mitochondria-derived activator of caspase (Smac/DIABLO) which bind and inactivate the inhibitors of apoptosis cIAP-1, cIAP-2, and XIAP. Smac mimetics are peptide antagonists of cIAP-1, cIAP-2, and XIAP. The incubation of cells with these peptides enhances TNF-induced necroptosis by promoting autodegradation of cIAP-1, cIAP-2, and XIAP [57] and the formation of RIPK1-dependent complex named necrosome [9].

RIPK1 bears a DD domain allowing its recruitment to TNF-α, TRAIL, and CD95 large complexes that initiate the necroptotic cell death pathway [50, 58]. Hitomi and colleagues [54] identified RIPK1 among 7 genes out of 432 genes in a large screening for candidates required for TNF plus zVAD-fmk-induced necroptosis in L929 cells. He and colleagues [55] used a combination of genome-wide siRNA screening and immune precipitation assays to identify RIPK3 as key determinant for necrotic cell death downstream RIPK1. Cho and colleagues [59] undertook a large screening using an siRNA library consisting of 691 human kinase genes to identify additional RIPK1 partners in the induction of necroptosis in FADD-deficient Jurkat cells. RIPK3 was identified as crucial upstream activating kinase that regulates RIPK1-dependent necroptosis in vitro, because of its physiological importance in the protection against vaccinia virus infection [59].

Caspase-8 forms with its enzymatically inert homolog cellular FLICE-like inhibitory protein long (cFLIPL) protein, an active complex named ripoptosome. This complex contains caspase-8, FADD, RIPK1, and RIPK3 [13]. Caspase-8 inhibition within this complex blocks the cleavage of RIPK1 and RIPK3 allowing RIPK1 to phosphorylate RIPK3. RIPK3 does not have DD domain in its terminus suggesting other physiological roles in cells [58]. The identification of necrosulfonamide, a small molecule that specifically blocks necroptosis in human cells, was the key to further delineate the downstream pathway mediated by RIPK3 [60]. The mixed lineage kinase domain-like protein (MLKL) was identified as the natural target of RIPK3 kinase [60]. Overexpression of MLKL was able to induce the distinguishable hallmarks of necroptosis [61]. These studies led to the assumption that necroptotic cell death occurs upon the assembly of a large, signal-induced multiprotein complex containing RIPK1, RIPK3, and MLKL which was named necrosome [9, 62]. The RHIM (RIP homotypic interaction motif) domains in molecular structures of RIPK1 and RIPK3 proteins allow the homotypic protein–protein interactions which are essential to form filamentous amyloid structures required for necroptotic signaling [15, 63]. A recent study showed that RIPK3 catalytic activity is dispensable for apoptosis but essential for necroptosis and both apoptosis and necroptosis could proceed simultaneously [64].

4.2. MLKL Channel

MLKL is recruited to the necrosome via interaction of its kinase-like domain (KLD) with the kinase domain of RIPK3 [65, 66]. MLKL is a kinase-dead protein. The N-terminal region of MLKL contains a 4HBH (a four-helical bundle domain) with four helices (amino acids 1–125) and, within its N-terminal, two more helices (amino acids 125–181) in its BR domain. MLKL has a pleckstrin homology (PH) domain, similar to the domain of the phospholipase C δ (PLCδ), pleckstrin, spectrin, and dynamin [67]. This PH domain seems to be required for its insertion into the membrane surface, more specifically, through binding to phosphatidylinositol phosphates [66, 6870]. The PH domain can bind to different phosphoinositide polyphosphates and inositol polyphosphates [71]. After its phosphorylation by RIPK3, MLKL translocates to lipid rafts inside of the plasma membrane and interacts with the positively charged patch formed by phosphoinositolphosphate (PIPs) molecules. This leads to formation of a high molecular weight pore-forming structure that allows the diffusion of ions, in particular, sodium [68, 69]. This increases intracellular osmotic pressure and eventually leads to membrane rupture [68, 70]. More importantly, MLKL induced-leakage has been demonstrated after it is bound to PIP, PI(4,5)P2, and PI(3,4,5)P3 containing liposomes [69]. All of the above events are not seen in apoptosis. Nonetheless, MLKL may likely function in a similar mechanism proposed to Bax or Bak proteins for membrane insertion and pore formation. Finally, one study has suggested the possible role of MLKL in regulating extracellular Ca2+ influx from the transient receptor potential melastatin-related 7, which deserves further investigation [66].

A recent study showed that the RIPK3-MLKL interaction and translocation of necrosomes to mitochondria associated membranes are essential for necroptosis signaling [68]. It was demonstrated that the assembly of RIPK1-RIPK3 complex initiates the intrinsic necroptosis pathway with the participation of PGAM5L and PGAM5S. These two protein phosphatases cause the activation Drp1 (dynamin-related protein 1) and its translocation to the mitochondria. In mammalian cells, mitochondrial fusion is regulated by mitofusin-1 and -2 (MFN-1/2) and optic atrophy 1 (OPA1), whereas mitochondrial fission is controlled by Drp1. Throughout the necrosis process, Drp1 associated with its mitochondrial anchors Fis1 and Mff to induce mitochondrial fragmentation; however, cytochrome is not released as it occurs in the apoptosis intrinsic pathway [72]. Thus both mitochondrial fission and fusion proteins appear to modulate necroptosis through activities that are distinct from their roles in mitochondrial dynamics, a question that remains to be confirmed [73]. However, recent studies have excluded the requirement of PGAM5 and DRP1 in necroptosis [65, 74, 75].

The production of ROS has been shown to be essential for TNFα-induced programmed necrosis in L929 cells and mouse embryonic fibroblasts [51]. The importance of the mitochondrial axis in the induction of necroptosis was confirmed in one study showing that once activated RIPK3 kinase initiates the phosphorylation of several downstream target proteins including phospholipase A2 and the proteases calpains and cathepsin [76]. Other critical targets include the cytoplasmatic NOXA1/NADPH oxidase complex and mitochondrial complex I, which are responsible for excessive ROS production, ATP depletion, and opening of the mitochondrial permeability transition pores [76]. These events are accompanied by prolonged JNK activation and stimulation of several metabolic enzymes of glycolysis, glycogenolysis, and glutaminolysis as well as the stimulation of the Krebs cycle [76]. In fact, a previous study has shown that the Nox1 NADPH oxidase has a role in the TNF-induction of necrotic cell death [77].

Not surprisingly, RIPK1, RIPK3, and MLKL are strongly expressed in immunologic organs like the thymus and spleen and lymphoid and myeloid cell lines, as compared to fetal and adult organs. The relative expression is shown as dendrogram in Figure 3. It is now well established that necroptosis occurs both in T lymphocytes after HIV-1 infection and neutrophils and macrophages after bacterial infection and during tissues injury [9]. A number of pathogens cause host cell death and caspase-8 and RIPK3 are considered the key regulators of macrophage cell death [78, 79]. Future work is needed to clarify the relationship of these metabolic and bioenergetic mechanisms and their overlapping with either early or later plasma membrane associated biochemical events [65, 74, 75].

Figure 3: Expression of caspase-8, RIPK1, RIPK3, and MLKL in fetal and adult organs and hematopoietic and myeloid cells. Each row corresponds to each protein concentration displayed as white (no expression) to red color intensity. The heat map was obtained from

5. Knockout Mice Models for In Vivo Cell Death Studies

Mice models have been the key biological tools to define apoptotic and necrotic cell death in development, physiology, and homeostasis as revealed in gene-knockout (KO) mice for a broader number of the TNF and Bcl-2 family members and their regulators [11, 80, 81]. Major phenotypes observed in mice deficient in cell death-pathway genes by intercrossing different null alleles are shown in Table 1. The crossing of these transgenic KO mouse models deficient in two and three genes has helped elucidate cell death necroptotic pathways and the essential role of downstream regulator genes involved in several inflammatory pathologies. Some examples are shown in Table 2.

Table 1: Summary of phenotypes of double- and triple-knockout mice ablated for genes that regulate apoptotic and necroptotic cell death pathways.
Table 2: Summary of phenotypes in double- and triple-knockout mice ablated for genes that regulate apoptosis, necroptosis, and inflammation.
5.1. Mice Models for Lethal Genes

Knockout mice for caspase-8, caspase-8−/−, FADD, and fadd−/− or double-knockouts for both show an embryonically lethal phenotype due to uncontrolled apoptosis or necroptosis [11, 82, 83]. The embryonic lethality in mice lacking FADD or caspase-8 is due to massive necrosis and can be rescued by RIPK1 or RIPK3 deletion, respectively. Ripk1−/− mice die at birth of systemic inflammation and the large area of necrosis in the liver and thymus [84, 85]. On the contrary, knockout of RIPK3 in mice did not cause any measurable defect in development, fertility, NF-κB activation, and apoptosis [86]. Ripk3−/− mice were resistant to necrotic pancreatitis (cerulein-induced) and vaccinia virus-induced hepatic necrosis [55]. The rescue of a lethal phenotype in RIPK1 knockout is often used as an argument for the implication of necroptosis. Mice deficient in FADD or caspase-8 die during embryogenesis; however, mice with triple deletion of FADD, caspase-8, and RIPK3 are viable [55, 62, 87, 88]. The cardiac, vascular, and hematopoietic defects that occur during the heart development of caspase-8 and FADD knockout mice are caused by RIPK3-mediated necrosis [87, 89]. Therefore, FADD and caspase-8 act as prosurvival factors that suppress the deleterious effects of necrosis by promoting the cleavage and inactivation of RIPK1 and RIPK3. On the other hand, double-knockout mice for ripk3−/− and flip−/− die during embryonic development due to uncontrolled apoptosis driven by active caspase-8 [89]. These experiments demonstrate that FLIP is an important brake on both apoptotic and necrotic cell death in vivo.

Caspase-8 and RIPK3 are all essential for clonal expansion for T and B cell clones [63]. Mice deficient in Casp8−/− fail to develop and die in utero, which may ultimately be due to failing to maintain the proliferation of T and B cells [90]. After stimulation, T cells lacking caspase-8 or its adaptor protein FADD developed hyperautophagic morphology and die by necroptosis [90]. Proliferation in caspase-8-deficient T cells is fully rescued by crossing with ripk3−/− mice, although such rescue ultimately leads to lymphadenopathy [63].

Although TNF-α was initially identified by its ability to kill tumor cells, most normal and tumor cells do not undergo cell death in response to this cytokine [91]. The treatment of wild type murine embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) with TNF does not induce cell death. Overexpression of the ripk3 gene causes necroptosis in MEFs stimulated with TNF in the absence of RIPK1, caspase-8, Bax, and Bak [92]. RIPK3 activation may be driven by spontaneously high RIPK3 levels or by another RHIM-containing protein such as DAI or TRIF [92]. MLKL is a RHIM-containing protein that is activated in cells with elevated RIPK3 consistent with its important role in necroptosis [92]. RIPK3 can partner also with TLR3 and TLR4 to induce macrophage necrosis and NF-kB activation but this requires TRIF [93].

MLKL is one essential effector of necroptosis since it causes cell death by a caspase- and Bax/Bak-independent mechanism [72]. Mice deficient in Mlkl gene are anatomically normal, viable, and fertile [94]. Cells from Mlkl−/− mice failed to undergo TNF-mediated necroptosis, as expected. Double deficient mice of caspase-8 and Mlkl genes, Casp8−/−; Mlkl−/− mice, were normal but showed pronounced splenomegaly, thrombocytopenia, and lymphadenopathy after a few months of age [94]. This phenotype is similar as described by mice lacking functional FAS (lpr) or FAS ligand (gld mutant mice) [11].

5.2. Mice Models for Inflammatory Genes

Various pathological processes such as ischemic brain injury, myocardial infarction, organ transplantation, and virus replication are accompanied by strong inflammatory response. This inflammatory process is characterized by extensive necrosis of tissues. Studies on mouse models with FADD-TNFR1 and FADD-MyD88 deficiency revealed that both TNF and TLR signaling partially contribute to progression of inflammation [55, 88, 95]. Studies on mouse models have also shown that TNF-induced systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and CLP-induced peritoneal sepsis are driven by both RIPK1 and RIPK3-dependent necroptosis [12, 58]. The regulated necrosis is also associated with tissue damage and inflammation driven by activation of sterile inflammatory response, including ischemia-reperfusion injury, Alzheimer’s disease, atherosclerosis, and toxic insult to liver and lung [9, 96]. A recent study showed that loss of the RIPK3 or MLKL can provide protection to Ripk1−/− mice from systemic inflammation but fails to protect these mice from lethal intestinal inflammation [85]. Ripk1−/− and Ripk3−/− mice have significantly lower rates of death and inflammation, whereas the Ripk1−/− and Myd88−/− mice have reduced inflammation, however, not reduced mortality [85]. Together, these studies demonstrated that only Ripk1−/−, Ripk3−/−, and Casp8−/− mice are protected from inflammation and intestinal disruption, reach adulthood, and are viable and fertile [83, 85, 89]. Future studies using Ripk1−/− Ripk3−/− and Ripk1−/− Mlkl−/− mice will be important to understand the role of these proteins in inflammation and the release of cytokines and CDAMPs.

Mice with chronic proliferative dermatitis mutation (cpdm mutant) develop TNF-dependent multiorgan inflammation, which is characterized by dermatitis, liver inflammation, splenomegaly, and loss of Peyer’s patches [97]. These mice are deficient in SHARPIN, a protein that, together with HOIL-1, is a key regulator of HOIP (LUBAC), an ubiquitin ligase complex that catalyzes the addition of linear ubiquitin to target proteins [15]. SHARPIN is required for the TNFR signaling complex and for prevention of cell death in various cells, including epidermal keratinocytes [15]. A recent study has demonstrated that RIPK3 or MLKL deficiency is able to prevent liver inflammation in shpn−/− mice as well as restoring splenic architecture splenic phenotype and leukocytosis [97]. Only combined caspase 8 heterozygosity and RIPK3 deficiencies were able to almost completely prevent chronic proliferative dermatitis in shpn−/− mice. The role of SHARPIN in the skin-inflammation phenotype is mainly due to keratinocyte mitochondria-dependent apoptosis [85]. Since RIPK3 and MLKL deletion markedly reduced leukocytosis, it is suggested that the hematopoietic phenotype is mediated by necroptosis [97].

The E3 ligases, cIAP-1 (Clap 1 gene), cIAP-2 (Clap 2 gene), and Xiap, are responsible for RIPK1 polyubiquitination, but knockout mice of these genes are surprisingly phenotypically normal. Double-knockout Xiap−/− Clap2−/− mice are also phenotypically normal. However, Xiap−/− Clap1−/− and Clap1−/− Clap2−/− double-knockout mice are embryonic lethal and this can be rescued by crossing these animals with Ripk1−/− and Ripk3−/− mice [98].

Mice deficient in Cylindromatosis (CYLD) gene are viable and fertile during adulthood life. CYLD deficiency leads to hyperubiquitinated RIPK1 in the necrosome and impaired phosphorylation of RIPK1 and RIPK3, thereby blocking caspase-8 activation. CYLD is a caspase-8 substrate and when activated it cleaves CYLD and prevents necroptosis, similar to what occurs with the cleavage of RIPK1 and RIPK3 [99]. CYLD is required for TLR3 or TLR4 receptor-induced necroptosis. The crossing of cyld−/− mice with other members of the NLR and TLR families promises to deliver further experimental evidence on its crucial role in innate response. Finally, deficiency of both RIPK3 and caspase-8 or FADD completely abrogated Yersinia-induced cell death and caspase-1 activation. Mice ablated of RIPK3 and caspase-8 genes in their hematopoietic compartment showed high susceptibility to Yersinia infection as well as displayed a very low production of proinflammatory cytokines by monocyte and neutrophils [100]. We are waiting for the participation of additional components in these pathways and more complex interactions among them in the intracellular resolution of infections.

5.3. Mice Models for Mitochondria-Associated Channel and Pore Genes

Ischemia and reperfusion injury (IRI) cause a wide array of functional and structural alterations of mitochondria. Ca2+ Overload and MPTP openings are critical steps in this process. MPT is critically dependent on ANT, the ADP/ATP nucleotide exchanger, and the mitochondrial protein cyclophilin D (CypD), the regulator of ANT. Studies have been done to prove the parallel existence of two independent pathways of regulated necrosis in ischemia-reperfusion injury [101, 102]. Knockout of the gene encoding CypD renders mitochondria resistant to Ca2+ overload-induced swelling and the heart and brain partially resistant to cell death due to ischemic injury [103]. RIPK3-deficient mice are protected from IRI as well as from hyperacute TNFα-induced shock [104]. The in vivo analysis of cisplatin-induced acute kidney injury and hyperacute TNF-shock in Cyp-D and RIPK3 double-deficient mice demonstrated striking differences, but animals died after no longer than 120 h [102]. Protection of RIPK3-knockout mice was significantly stronger than for CypD-deficient mice. Cyclosporin prevents CyP-D binding to the ANT, whereas sanglifehrin (SfA) inhibits the peptidyl-prolyl cis-transisomerase (PPIase) activity of CyP-D but does not prevent its binding to the ANT. The protection from kidney injury upon long ischemia was observed when applying a combination of Nec-1 (necrostatin) and SfA, but the protection was not complete [102]. Necrostatin-1 blocks necroptosis in many settings by interacting and inhibiting RIPK1 kinase activity, which is required for activation of RIPK3. Nonetheless, necrostatin failed to block necroptosis in the absence of RIPK1, suggesting the RIPK1 has a protective role [104]. Moreover, mice with a kinase-dead mutation of RIPK1 show normal development and maturation, although cells from these animals appear to be defective in TNF-induced necroptosis [62].

The Bax−/−Bak−/− mice typically die at a perinatal age with multiple developmental defects, and only 10% survive into adulthood [81]. Mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) from Bax−/− Bak1−/− double-knockout (DKO) grown in culture are highly resistant to cell death by the apoptotic inducer staurosporine, confirming their critical role in apoptosis [105]. Recently, Karch and colleagues demonstrated that these cells are also resistant to H2O2, ionomycin, and DNA alkylation agents, which are inducers of necrotic phenotypes [106]. Consistent with results in DKO MEFs, cardiac-specific deletion of Bax/Bak1 significantly protected the heart from ischemia-reperfusion (I-R) injury and reduced mortality in mice subjected to permanent myocardial infarction injury [106]. MEFs from Ppif (CypD) deficient mice are insensitive to Ca2+-induced MPTP opening, and Bax/Bak does not directly affect the MPTP at the level of the inner membrane. However, the authors concluded that, in the absence of BAX/BAK, the outer membrane resists swelling and prevents organelle rupture, thereby preventing cell death. The antiapoptotic family members, Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL, act directly or indirectly to preserve the integrity of the outer mitochondrial membrane. To examine this issue, the authors showed that the Bcl-2/Bcl-xL inhibitor ABT-737 sensitized the MPTP to open with mild Ca2+ stimulation or ionomycin treatment in wild type but not in Bax/Bak1 DKO cells. In light on these results, the authors concluded that Bax/Bak oligomers within the outer membrane are required for mitochondrial permeability pore-dependent cell death by serving as a necessary functional component of the MPTP [106]. Similar observations were previously reported by Irrinki and colleagues [107]. These authors investigated necroptosis induced by TNF, cycloheximide (CHX) plus z-VAD-fmk in MEFs derived from mice bearing two or three knockout genes including fadd−/−, rip1−/−, NEMO−/−, caspase-8−/−, bad−/−bak−/− (double-knockout), and bax−/−bak−/− (double-knockout) genes. Moreover, it was demonstrated that overexpression of Bcl-xL protects cells from necroptosis induced by these agents [107]. Other putative mechanisms through which the outer membrane proteins could affect formation of the MPTP are reviewed in [38].

Future work along these lines using RIPK-3 and MLKL-deficient mice as well as the combination with other mutant mice may uncover the complex regulation and interconnectivity among apoptosis effectors of mitochondrial intrinsic pathway and regulated necrosis execution pathway.

6. Conclusion and Future Directions

In the last decade, a number of cellular and molecular studies have advanced the knowledge and acceptance that in response to a variety of stress conditions, physicochemical insults, viral and bacterial infection, necroptosis rather than apoptosis emerges as predominately cell death in tissues into adult life.

We have highlighted the intricately connected and overlapping extrinsic and intrinsic molecular pathways regulating both apoptosis and necroptosis. We now know that besides TNF family of receptors many other cell-surface and intracellular receptors, including TLRs, NLRs, IFNRs, and T-cell receptors, can induce regulated cell death. Similarly, intracellular deregulation and/or imbalance of synthesis and metabolic pathways inside mitochondria, endoplasmic reticulum, and intracellular organelles can provoke regulated cell death. Exploring and classifying the molecular mechanisms underlying the initiation and execution pathways will help us search for new strategies to enhance or inhibit necroptotic cell death rates in pathological clinical scenarios such as inflammation, cancer resistance to chemotherapy, and excessive tissue death as result of ischemia and injury.

Caspase-8 and cFLIP heterodimers act as key regulators of death checkpoint to alternate the cell death pathway and canonic and noncanonical NF-κB signaling. Intracellular downstream signaling components of the TNFR multicomplexes and NF-κB signaling complexes, such as E3 ligases, cIAP-1, and cIAP-2, deubiquitinases, CYLD, A20, and HOIL-1/HOIP/Sharpin (LUBAC), are equally very important positive and negative regulators of inflammation and cell death decision checkpoints to apoptosis and necroptosis.

Mice models lacking the caspase-8, FADD, or FLIP are embryonic lethal and are rescued with ablation of RIPK1 and RIPK3 genes. With the help of gene-deficient mice models we will advance in the studies aiming to further understand the precise roles of these proteins at cell decision points from apoptosis to necroptosis and inflammation. TNF can activate RIPK3 in the absence of RIPK1 and surprisingly RIPK3 has a proinflammatory role itself. Future studies need to be done to understand how RIPK3-dependent necroptotic cell death can be activated in an RIPK1-independent manner. In this regard, the RHIM-containing protein such as DAI and TRIF as well as IFNAR merits further investigation because of its role in virus-induced necroptosis. Many other landmark genes will have place in the molecular pathways leading to regulated cell death. Knockout mice and their cell lines lacking essential genes will be important to investigate cross talk and kinetics aspects of cell death triggering, propagation, and resolution. These animal models will have critical role to future preclinical tests of new drugs for inhibiting cell death causing human diseases.

The plasma membrane permeabilization induced by MLKL oligomers plays a key role in the execution pathway for necroptosis. The 4HBH phospholipid-binding domain acts by recruiting the MLKL protein to bind to lipid ligands embedded in the membrane surface. Since PIP, PI(4,5)P2, and PI(3,4,5)P3 are abundant phospholipids in ubiquitous cell membranes, it is crucial to establish whether MLKL binding and pore-forming molecular mechanism can be specifically and efficiently modulated by combination of membrane lipids. Elucidating the combinatorial “codes” and critical domain structure for this interaction will help us design and develop new therapeutic strategies to prevent cell death triggered in prolonged degenerative, inflammatory, and infectious diseases.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Authors’ Contribution

All authors equally contributed to this work.


The authors thank Peter Vandenabeele, Douglas Green, and Ricardo Weinlich for contributions and helpful discussions. The work in our lab is sponsored by the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) and Fundaçao Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP).


  1. J. F. R. Kerr, A. H. Wyllie, and A. R. Currie, “Apoptosis: a basic biological phenomenon with wide-ranging implications in tissue kinetics,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 239–257, 1972. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. S. Orrenius, P. Nicotera, and B. Zhivotovsky, “Cell death mechanisms and their implications in toxicology,” Toxicological Sciences, vol. 119, no. 1, pp. 3–19, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. L. Galluzzi, I. Vitale, J. M. Abrams et al., “Moleculaar definitions of cell death subroutines: recommendations of the nomenclature committee on cell death 2012,” Cell Death and Differentiation, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 107–120, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. L. Galluzzi, J. M. Bravo-San Pedro, I. Vitale et al., “Essential versus accessory aspects of cell death: recommendations of the NCCD 2015,” Cell Death & Differentiation, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 58–73, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. S. L. Fink and B. T. Cookson, “Pyroptosis and host cell death responses during Salmonella infection,” Cellular Microbiology, vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 2562–2570, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. A. D. Garg, D. Nowis, J. Golab, P. Vandenabeele, D. V. Krysko, and P. Agostinis, “Immunogenic cell death, DAMPs and anticancer therapeutics: an emerging amalgamation,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta—Reviews on Cancer, vol. 1805, no. 1, pp. 53–71, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. G. Kroemer, L. Galluzzi, O. Kepp, and L. Zitvogel, “Immunogenic cell death in cancer therapy,” Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 31, pp. 51–72, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. L. Duprez, E. Wirawan, T. V. Berghe, and P. Vandenabeele, “Major cell death pathways at a glance,” Microbes and Infection, vol. 11, no. 13, pp. 1050–1062, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. T. V. Berghe, A. Linkermann, S. Jouan-Lanhouet, H. Walczak, and P. Vandenabeele, “Regulated necrosis: the expanding network of non-apoptotic cell death pathways,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 135–147, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. P. Syntichaki and N. Tavernarakis, “Death by necrosis. Uncontrollable catastrophe, or is there order behind the chaos?” EMBO Reports, vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 604–609, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. A. M. Ranger, B. A. Malynn, and S. J. Korsmeyer, “Mouse models of cell death,” Nature Genetics, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 113–118, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. A. Kaczmarek, P. Vandenabeele, and D. V. Krysko, “Necroptosis: the release of damaged-associated molecular patterns and its physiological relevance,” Immunity, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 209–223, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. N. S. Wilson, V. Dixit, and A. Ashkenazi, “Death receptor signal transducers: nodes of coordination in immune signaling networks,” Nature Immunology, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 348–355, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. L. Wang, F. Du, and X. Wang, “TNF-α induces two distinct caspase-8 activation pathways,” Cell, vol. 133, no. 4, pp. 693–703, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. D. Ofengeim and J. Yuan, “Regulation of RIP1 kinase signalling at the crossroads of inflammation and cell death,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 727–736, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. L. S. Dickens, I. R. Powley, M. A. Hughes, and M. MacFarlane, “The ‘complexities’ of life and death: death receptor signalling platforms,” Experimental Cell Research, vol. 318, no. 11, pp. 1269–1277, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. T. Bender and J.-C. Martinou, “Where killers meet—permeabilization of the outer mitochondrial membrane during apoptosis,” Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology, vol. 5, no. 1, Article ID a011106, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. B. Sangiuliano, N. M. Pérez, D. F. Moreira, and J. E. Belizário, “Cell death-associated molecular-pattern molecules: inflammatory signaling and control,” Mediators of Inflammation, vol. 2014, Article ID 821043, 14 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. D. V. Krysko, K. D'Herde, and P. Vandenabeele, “Clearance of apoptotic and necrotic cells and its immunological consequences,” Apoptosis, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 1709–1726, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. S. J. Martin, C. M. Henry, and S. P. Cullen, “A perspective on mammalian caspases as positive and negative regulators of inflammation,” Molecular Cell, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 387–397, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. I. K. H. Poon, C. D. Lucas, A. G. Rossi, and K. S. Ravichandran, “Apoptotic cell clearance: basic biology and therapeutic potential,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 166–180, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. R. Medzhitov, “Inflammation 2010: new adventures of an old flame,” Cell, vol. 140, no. 6, pp. 771–776, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. P. Vandenabeele, L. Galluzzi, T. V. Berghe, and G. Kroemer, “Molecular mechanisms of necroptosis: an ordered cellular explosion,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 700–714, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. N. Vanlangenakker, T. V. Berghe, and P. Vandenabeele, “Many stimuli pull the necrotic trigger, an overview,” Cell Death and Differentiation, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 75–86, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. A. Kaasik, D. Safiulina, A. Zharkovsky, and V. Veksler, “Regulation of mitochondrial matrix volume,” American Journal of Physiology—Cell Physiology, vol. 292, no. 1, pp. C157–C163, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. K. D. Garlid and P. Paucek, “Mitochondrial potassium transport: The K+ cycle,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta—Bioenergetics, vol. 1606, no. 1–3, pp. 23–41, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. H. Ardehali and B. O'Rourke, “Mitochondrial KATP channels in cell survival and death,” Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 7–16, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. G. Calamita, D. Ferri, P. Gena et al., “The inner mitochondrial membrane has aquaporin-8 water channels and is highly permeable to water,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 280, no. 17, pp. 17149–17153, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. A. P. Halestrap, K. Y. Woodfield, and C. P. Connern, “Oxidative stress, thiol reagents, and membrane potential modulate the mitochondrial permeability transition by affecting nucleotide binding to the adenine nucleotide translocase,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 272, no. 6, pp. 3346–3354, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. I. Inoue, H. Nagase, K. Kishi, and T. Higuti, “ATP-sensitive K+ channel in the mitochondrial inner membrane,” Nature, vol. 352, no. 6332, pp. 244–247, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. V. Gogvadze, J. D. Robertson, M. Enoksson, B. Zhivotovsky, and S. Orrenius, “Mitochondrial cytochrome c release may occur by volume-dependent mechanisms not involving permeability transition,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 378, no. 1, pp. 213–217, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. A. Sesso, J. E. Belizário, M. M. Marques et al., “Mitochondrial swelling and incipient outer membrane rupture in pre-apoptotic and apoptotic cells,” Anatomical Record, vol. 295, no. 10, pp. 1647–1659, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. J. E. Belizário, J. Alves, J. M. Occhiucci, M. Garay-Malpartida, and A. Sesso, “A mechanistic view of mitochondrial death decision pores,” Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, vol. 40, no. 8, pp. 1011–1024, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. A. J. Kowaltowski, N. C. de Souza-Pinto, R. F. Castilho, and A. E. Vercesi, “Mitochondria and reactive oxygen species,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 333–343, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. E. Basso, L. Fante, J. Fowlkes, V. Petronilli, M. A. Forte, and P. Bernardi, “Properties of the permeability transition pore in mitochondria devoid of cyclophilin D,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 280, no. 19, pp. 18558–18561, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. P. Bernardi, A. Krauskopf, E. Basso et al., “The mitochondrial permeability transition from in vitro artifact to disease target,” FEBS Journal, vol. 273, no. 10, pp. 2077–2099, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  37. V. Petronilli, P. Costantini, L. Scorrano, R. Colonna, S. Passamonti, and P. Bernardi, “The voltage sensor of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore is tunel by the oxidation-reduction state of vicinal thiols,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 269, no. 24, pp. 16638–16642, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  38. P. Bernardi, “The mitochondrial permeability transition pore: a mystery solved?” Frontiers in Physiology, vol. 4, article 95, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. A. P. Halestrap and A. P. Richardson, “The mitochondrial permeability transition: a current perspective on its identity and role in ischaemia/reperfusion injury,” Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, vol. 78, pp. 129–141, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  40. M. Narita, S. Shimizu, T. Ito et al., “Bax interacts with the permeability transition pore to induce permeability transition and cytochrome c release in isolated mitochondria,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 95, no. 25, pp. 14681–14686, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. J. M. Hardwick, Y.-B. Chen, and E. A. Jonas, “Multipolar functions of BCL-2 proteins link energetics to apoptosis,” Trends in Cell Biology, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 318–328, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. R. J. Youle and A. Strasser, “The BCL-2 protein family: opposing activities that mediate cell death,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 47–59, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. N. Mizushima, B. Levine, A. M. Cuervo, and D. J. Klionsky, “Autophagy fights disease through cellular self-digestion,” Nature, vol. 451, no. 7182, pp. 1069–1075, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. D. Feng, L. Liu, Y. Zhu, and Q. Chen, “Molecular signaling toward mitophagy and its physiological significance,” Experimental Cell Research, vol. 319, no. 12, pp. 1697–1705, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. M. P. Boldin, T. M. Goncharov, Y. V. Goltsev, and D. Wallach, “Involvement of MACH, a novel MORT1/FADD-interacting protease, in Fas/APO-1- and TNF receptor-induced cell death,” Cell, vol. 85, no. 6, pp. 803–815, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. M. Muzio, A. M. Chinnaiyan, F. C. Kischkel et al., “FLICE, a novel FADD-homologous ICE/CED-3-like protease, is recruited to the CD95 (Fas/APO-1) death-inducing signaling complex,” Cell, vol. 85, no. 6, pp. 817–827, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. H. Hsu, H.-B. Shu, M.-G. Pan, and D. V. Goeddel, “TRADD-TRAF2 and TRADD-FADD interactions define two distinct TNF receptor 1 signal transduction pathways,” Cell, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 299–308, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. A. Kawahara, Y. Ohsawa, H. Matsumura, Y. Uchiyama, and S. Nagata, “Caspase-independent cell killing by Fas-associated protein with death domain,” The Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 143, no. 5, pp. 1353–1360, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. W.-C. Yeh, J. L. de la Pompa, M. E. McCurrach et al., “FADD: essential for embryo development and signaling from some, but not all, inducers of apoptosis,” Science, vol. 279, no. 5358, pp. 1954–1958, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. N. Holler, R. Zaru, O. Micheau et al., “Fas triggers an alternative, caspase-8-independent cell death pathway using the kinase RIP as effector molecule,” Nature Immunology, vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 489–495, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. D. Vercammen, R. Beyaert, G. Denecker et al., “Inhibition of caspases increases the sensitivity of L929 cells to necrosis mediated by tumor necrosis factor,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 187, no. 9, pp. 1477–1485, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. H. Matsumura, Y. Shimizu, Y. Ohsawa, A. Kawahara, Y. Uchiyama, and S. Nagata, “Necrotic death pathway in Fas receptor signaling,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 151, no. 6, pp. 1247–1255, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. A. Degterev, Z. Huang, M. Boyce et al., “Chemical inhibitor of nonapoptotic cell death with therapeutic potential for ischemic brain injury,” Nature Chemical Biology, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 112–119, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. J. Hitomi, D. E. Christofferson, A. Ng et al., “Identification of a molecular signaling network that regulates a cellular necrotic cell death pathway,” Cell, vol. 135, no. 7, pp. 1311–1323, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. S. He, L. Wang, L. Miao et al., “Receptor interacting protein kinase-3 determines cellular necrotic response to TNF-α,” Cell, vol. 137, no. 6, pp. 1100–1111, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. A. Degterev, J. Hitomi, M. Germscheid et al., “Identification of RIP1 kinase as a specific cellular target of necrostatins,” Nature Chemical Biology, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 313–321, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. S. L. Petersen, L. Wang, A. Yalcin-Chin et al., “Autocrine TNFα signaling renders human cancer cells susceptible to Smac-mimetic-induced apoptosis,” Cancer Cell, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 445–456, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. L. Duprez, N. Takahashi, F. van Hauwermeiren et al., “RIP kinase-dependent necrosis drives lethal systemic inflammatory response syndrome,” Immunity, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 908–918, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. Y. Cho, S. Challa, D. Moquin et al., “Phosphorylation-driven assembly of the RIP1-RIP3 complex regulates programmed necrosis and virus-induced inflammation,” Cell, vol. 137, no. 6, pp. 1112–1123, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. L. Sun, H. Wang, Z. Wang et al., “Mixed lineage kinase domain-like protein mediates necrosis signaling downstream of RIP3 kinase,” Cell, vol. 148, no. 1-2, pp. 213–227, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. J. Zhao, S. Jitkaew, Z. Cai et al., “Mixed lineage kinase domain-like is a key receptor interacting protein 3 downstream component of TNF-induced necrosis,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 109, no. 14, pp. 5322–5327, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. K. Newton, D. L. Dugger, K. E. Wickliffe et al., “Activity of protein kinase RIPK3 determines whether cells die by necroptosis or apoptosis,” Science, vol. 343, no. 6177, pp. 1357–1360, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. R. Weinlich, C. P. Dillon, and D. R. Green, “Ripped to death,” Trends in Cell Biology, vol. 21, no. 11, pp. 630–637, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. W. D. Cook, D. M. Moujalled, T. J. Ralph et al., “RIPK1- and RIPK3-induced cell death mode is determined by target availability,” Cell Death & Differentiation, vol. 21, pp. 1600–1612, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. J. M. Murphy, P. E. Czabotar, J. M. Hildebrand et al., “The pseudokinase MLKL mediates necroptosis via a molecular switch mechanism,” Immunity, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 443–453, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. Z. Cai, S. Jitkaew, J. Zhao et al., “Plasma membrane translocation of trimerized MLKL protein is required for TNF-induced necroptosis,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 55–65, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. M. A. Lemmon, “Membrane recognition by phospholipid-binding domains,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 99–111, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. X. Chen, W. Li, J. Ren et al., “Translocation of mixed lineage kinase domain-like protein to plasma membrane leads to necrotic cell death,” Cell Research, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 105–121, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. Y. Dondelinger, W. Declercq, S. Montessuit et al., “MLKL compromises plasma membrane integrity by binding to phosphatidylinositol phosphates,” Cell Reports, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 971–981, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. H. Wang, L. Sun, L. Su et al., “Mixed lineage kinase domain-like protein MLKL causes necrotic membrane disruption upon phosphorylation by RIP3,” Molecular Cell, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 133–146, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. J. H. Hurley and S. Misra, “Signaling and subcellular targeting by membrane-binding domains,” Annual Review of Biophysics and Biomolecular Structure, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 49–79, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  72. Z. Wang, H. Jiang, S. Chen, F. Du, and X. Wang, “The mitochondrial phosphatase PGAM5 functions at the convergence point of multiple necrotic death pathways,” Cell, vol. 148, no. 1-2, pp. 228–243, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. J.-C. Martinou and R. J. Youle, “Mitochondria in apoptosis: Bcl-2 family members and mitochondrial dynamics,” Developmental Cell, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 92–101, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. D. M. Moujalled, W. D. Cook, J. M. Murphy, and D. L. Vaux, “Necroptosis induced by RIPK3 requires MLKL but not Drp1,” Cell Death & Disease, vol. 5, no. 2, Article ID e1086, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. S. W. G. Tait, A. Oberst, G. Quarato et al., “Widespread mitochondrial depletion via mitophagy does not compromise necroptosis,” Cell Reports, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 878–885, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  76. D.-W. Zhang, J. Shao, J. Lin et al., “RIP3, an energy metabolism regulator that switches TNF-induced cell death from apoptosis to necrosis,” Science, vol. 325, no. 5938, pp. 332–336, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  77. Y.-S. Kim, M. J. Morgan, S. Choksi, and Z.-G. Liu, “TNF-induced activation of the Nox1 NADPH oxidase and its role in the induction of necrotic cell death,” Molecular Cell, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 675–687, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  78. D. Weng, R. Marty-Roix, S. Ganesan et al., “Caspase-8 and RIP kinases regulate bacteria-induced innate immune responses and cell death,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 111, no. 20, pp. 7391–7396, 2014. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  79. S. McComb, E. Cessford, N. A. Alturki et al., “Type-I interferon signaling through ISGF3 complex is required for sustained Rip3 activation and necroptosis in macrophages,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 111, no. 31, pp. E3206–E3213, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  80. E. E. Varfolomeev, M. Schuchmann, V. Luria et al., “Targeted disruption of the mouse Caspase 8 gene ablates cell death induction by the TNF receptors, Fas/Apo1, and DR3 and is lethal prenatally,” Immunity, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 267–276, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  81. T. Lindsten, A. J. Ross, A. King et al., “The combined functions of proapoptotic Bcl-2 family members Bak and Bax are essential for normal development of multiple tissues,” Molecular Cell, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 1389–1399, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  82. P. Vandenabeele and G. Melino, “The flick of a switch: Which death program to choose?” Cell Death and Differentiation, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 1093–1095, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  83. C. P. Dillon, R. Weinlich, D. A. Rodriguez et al., “RIPK1 blocks early postnatal lethality mediated by caspase-8 and RIPK3,” Cell, vol. 157, no. 5, pp. 1189–1202, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  84. M. A. Kelliher, S. Grimm, Y. Ishida, F. Kuo, B. Z. Stanger, and P. Leder, “The death domain kinase RIP mediates the TNF-induced NF-κB signal,” Immunity, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 297–303, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  85. J. A. Rickard, J. A. O'Donnell, J. M. Evans et al., “RIPK1 regulates RIPK3-MLKL-driven systemic inflammation and emergency hematopoiesis,” Cell, vol. 157, no. 5, pp. 1175–1188, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  86. K. Newton, X. Sun, and V. M. Dixit, “Kinase RIP3 is dispensable for normal NF-kappa Bs, signaling by the B-cell and T-cell receptors, tumor necrosis factor receptor 1, and Toll-like receptors 2 and 4,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 1464–1469, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  87. W. J. Kaiser, J. W. Upton, A. B. Long et al., “RIP3 mediates the embryonic lethality of caspase-8-deficient mice,” Nature, vol. 471, no. 7338, pp. 368–373, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  88. C. P. Dillon, A. Oberst, R. Weinlich et al., “Survival Function of the FADD-CASPASE-8-cFLIPL Complex,” Cell Reports, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 401–407, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  89. A. Oberst, C. P. Dillon, R. Weinlich et al., “Catalytic activity of the caspase-8–FLIPL complex inhibits RIPK3-dependent necrosis,” Nature, vol. 471, no. 7338, pp. 363–367, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  90. J. V. Lu, B. M. Weist, B. J. Van Raam et al., “Complementary roles of Fas-associated death domain (FADD) and receptor interacting protein kinase-3 (RIPK3) in T-cell homeostasis and antiviral immunity,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 108, no. 37, pp. 15312–15317, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  91. B. J. Sugarman, B. B. Aggarwal, P. E. Hass, I. S. Figari, M. A. Palladino Jr., and H. M. Shepard, “Recombinant human tumor necrosis factor-alpha: effects on proliferation of normal and transformed cells in vitro,” Science, vol. 230, no. 4728, pp. 943–945, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  92. D. M. Moujalled, W. D. Cook, T. Okamoto et al., “TNF can activate RIPK3 and cause programmed necrosis in the absence of RIPK1,” Cell Death & Disease, vol. 4, article e465, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  93. S. He, Y. Liang, F. Shao, and X. Wang, “Toll-like receptors activate programmed necrosis in macrophages through a receptor-interacting kinase-3-mediated pathway,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 108, no. 50, pp. 20054–20059, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  94. J. Wu, Z. Huang, J. Ren et al., “Mlkl knockout mice demonstrate the indispensable role of Mlkl in necroptosis,” Cell Research, vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 994–1006, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  95. M. C. Bonnet, D. Preukschat, P. S. Welz et al., “The adaptor protein FADD protects epidermal keratinocytes from necroptosis in vivo and prevents skin inflammation,” Immunity, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 572–582, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  96. H. Kono and K. L. Rock, “How dying cells alert the immune system to danger,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 279–289, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  97. J. A. Rickard, H. Anderton, N. Etemadi et al., “TNFR1-dependent cell death drives inflammation in Sharpin-deficient mice,” eLife, vol. 3, Article ID e03464, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  98. M. Moulin, H. Anderton, A. K. Voss et al., “IAPs limit activation of RIP kinases by TNF receptor 1 during development,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 1679–1691, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  99. M. A. O'Donnell, E. Perez-Jimenez, A. Oberst et al., “Caspase 8 inhibits programmed necrosis by processing CYLD,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 13, no. 12, pp. 1437–1442, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  100. N. H. Philip, C. P. Dillon, A. G. Snyder et al., “Caspase-8 mediates caspase-1 processing and innate immune defense in response to bacterial blockade of NF-κB and MAPK signaling,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 111, no. 20, pp. 7385–7390, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  101. V. Temkin, Q. Huang, H. Liu, H. Osada, and R. M. Pope, “Inhibition of ADP/ATP exchange in receptor-interacting protein-mediated necrosis,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 2215–2225, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  102. A. Linkermann, J. H. Bräsenb, M. Dardingd et al., “Two independent pathways of regulated necrosis mediate ischemia-reperfusion injury,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 110, no. 29, pp. 12024–12029, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  103. C. P. Baines, R. A. Kaiser, N. H. Purcell et al., “Loss of cyclophilin D reveals a critical role for mitochondrial permeability transition in cell death,” Nature, vol. 434, no. 7033, pp. 658–662, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  104. A. Linkermann, J. H. Bräsen, F. de Zen et al., “Dichotomy between RIP1- and RIP3-mediated necroptosis in tumor necrosis factor-α-induced shock,” Molecular Medicine, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 577–586, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  105. M. C. Wei, W.-X. Zong, E. H.-Y. Cheng et al., “Proapoptotic BAX and BAK: a requisite gateway to mitochondrial dysfunction and death,” Science, vol. 292, no. 5517, pp. 727–730, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  106. J. Karch, J. Q. Kwong, A. R. Burr et al., “Bax and Bak function as the outer membrane component of the mitochondrial permeability pore in regulating necrotic cell death in mice,” eLife, vol. 2013, no. 2, Article ID e00772, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  107. K. M. Irrinki, K. Mallilankaraman, R. J. Thapa et al., “Requirement of FADD, NEMO, and BAX/BAK for aberrant mitochondrial function in tumor necrosis factor alpha-induced necrosis,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 31, no. 18, pp. 3745–3758, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus