Mediators of Inflammation

Mediators of Inflammation / 2017 / Article
!A Corrigendum for this article has been published. To view the article details, please click the ‘Corrigendum’ tab above.
Special Issue

Cellular Senescence and Inflammaging in Age-Related Diseases

View this Special Issue

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2017 |Article ID 2309034 |

Angelica Giuliani, Francesco Prattichizzo, Luigina Micolucci, Antonio Ceriello, Antonio Domenico Procopio, Maria Rita Rippo, "Mitochondrial (Dys) Function in Inflammaging: Do MitomiRs Influence the Energetic, Oxidative, and Inflammatory Status of Senescent Cells?", Mediators of Inflammation, vol. 2017, Article ID 2309034, 11 pages, 2017.

Mitochondrial (Dys) Function in Inflammaging: Do MitomiRs Influence the Energetic, Oxidative, and Inflammatory Status of Senescent Cells?

Academic Editor: Michal A. Rahat
Received29 Sep 2017
Accepted20 Nov 2017
Published27 Dec 2017


A relevant feature of aging is chronic low-grade inflammation, termed inflammaging, a key process promoting the development of all major age-related diseases. Senescent cells can acquire the senescence-associated (SA) secretory phenotype (SASP), characterized by the secretion of proinflammatory factors fuelling inflammaging. Cellular senescence is also accompanied by a deep reshaping of microRNA expression and by the modulation of mitochondria activity, both master regulators of the SASP. Here, we synthesize novel findings regarding the role of mitochondria in the SASP and in the inflammaging process and propose a network linking nuclear-encoded SA-miRNAs to mitochondrial gene regulation and function in aging cells. In this conceptual structure, SA-miRNAs can translocate to mitochondria (SA-mitomiRs) and may affect the energetic, oxidative, and inflammatory status of senescent cells. We discuss the potential role of several of SA-mitomiRs (i.e., let-7b, miR-1, miR-130a-3p, miR-133a, miR-146a-5p, miR-181c-5p, and miR-378-5p), using miR-146a as a proof-of-principle model. Finally, we propose a comprehensive, metabolic, and epigenetic view of the senescence process, in order to amplify the range of possible approaches to target inflammaging, with the ultimate goal of decelerating the aging rate, postponing or blunting the development of age-related diseases.

1. Introduction

Aging constitutes the major risk factor for a variety of diseases with a high-incidence in the Western society. Type 2 diabetes (T2DM), metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular diseases (CVD), neurodegenerative diseases, and a plethora of common cancer types share aging as a common risk factor and therefore are often referred as aging-related diseases (ARDs). A pervasive feature of aging is a progressive and chronic state of systemic low-grade inflammation referred as inflammaging [1]. Major ARDs all share a common inflammatory background. The role of various inflammatory molecules—mainly tumor necrosis factor- (TNF-) α, interleukin- (IL-) 1b, IL-6, and transforming growth factor- (TGF-) β—in the promotion or exacerbation of a wide range of ARDs is increasingly emerging [1]. A number of mechanisms, pathways, and cell types have been shown to possibly contribute to inflammaging [2]. Initial hypothesis affirmed that inflammaging was mainly due to the long-lasting exposure to acute and chronic infections and the consequent life-long antigenic burden [3]. However, a long list of sterile potential sources of inflammatory molecules during both the cellular and the organismal aging process has been proposed [2].

The “old” free radical theory of aging (FRTA) states that organisms age because cells accumulate free radical-induced damage over time [4]. One interesting view that coupled FRTA with inflammaging is the oxi-inflammaging theory [5]. Accordingly, excessive or uncontrolled free radical production can induce an inflammatory response, and free radicals are themselves inflammation effectors. Oxidative metabolism at mitochondrial level is probably the major source of intracellular ROS production, which in turn represents a life-long-lasting stress. Aging-related ROS accumulation can contribute to telomere attrition [6], oxidative genomic damage [7], but can even act as signaling molecules in the development and maintenance of the senescent phenotype of the cell [8].

However, increasing evidence suggests oxidative stress is not per se a major determinant of aging; in fact, (i) deletion of many antioxidant enzymes increases rather than decreases life span and health span in various models of lower organisms and (ii) interventions with nonspecific antioxidant molecules do not reduce the incidence of ARDs [912]. On the contrary, (excessive) inflammation appears as a phenomenon that alone is sufficient to reduce both life span and fitness at old age [13, 14]. Thus, in aging cells, mitochondria-derived ROS and oxidative stress should be regarded for their role as proinflammatory triggers rather than damaging molecules that progressively disrupt cell components and cellular homeostasis alone.

MicroRNAs (miRNAs o miRs) are small noncoding RNAs involved in gene expression modulation, primarily silencing the mRNA target by binding its 3-untranslated region (UTR) in the cytoplasm. However, increasing evidence proves that miRNAs can also exert posttranscriptional control when bound to a region outside of the 3UTR and specifically within the 5UTR and coding regions of the mRNA target. Moreover, in some cases, they activate transcription of a specific gene or stabilize the mRNA [15]. A single miRNA has the ability to regulate multiple targets and, in turn, a single mRNA can be targeted by several miRs [16]. Because of their regulatory functions, these small single strand RNAs are virtually implicated in all cellular processes. Over the years, a set of miRNAs with a well-recognized role in inflammaging, organismal aging, and development of ARDs has been defined [1719]; examples are miR-146a-5p, miR-21, miR-126a-3p. Interestingly, recent studies suggest that a subset of these microRNAs can be found inside or indirectly affect the mitochondria (mitomiRs) [20]. They all have a nuclear encoding, but the existence of few small noncoding RNAs of mitochondrial origin is documented [21].

In this review, we explore the role of mitochondria in fostering “inappropriate” inflammatory responses during the aging process. We take advantage of cellular senescence as a fractal model to delineate the contribution of dysfunctional mitochondria to the inflammaging process since recent discoveries indicate that mitochondrial activities sustain or drive the inflammatory program of senescent cells. In addition, we explore mitochondria-linked mechanisms that can promote inflammaging independently of senescent cells. Finally, we explain the hypothesis that senescence-deregulated mitomiRs could directly affect mitochondrial function by targeting mtDNA, thus influencing the energetic, oxidative, and, in turn, inflammatory status of senescent cells, possibly playing a role in organismal aging.

2. Senescent Cells Fuel Inflammaging through the Senescence-Associated Secretory Phenotype

Recently, cellular senescence has been suggested as a relevant contributor to both the inflammaging and the aging process. This statement is mainly sustained by data on animal models showing that periodic clearance of senescent cells is accompanied by a mean life span and health span extension, coupled with a reduced inflammatory gene expression in multiple tissues, including kidney and the heart [22]. Senescent cells are characterized by a permanent cell cycle arrest, accompanied by morphological and gene expression changes [23]. They are usually identified by the high expression of proteins promoting cell cycle arrest, that is, p16, p21, and p53, the expression of DNA damage markers, that is, γH2AX phosphorylation, senescence-associated heterochromatin foci (SAHF), and telomere-associated DNA damage foci (TAF), and an increased activity of senescence-associated (SA) beta-galactosidase (β-Gal) [24]. Many stimuli can foster the acquisition of the senescent phenotype, for example, radiation, telomere erosion or damage, oncogenic stress, oxidative stress, and a number of DNA damaging agents [2426]. In turn, senescent cells can acquire a proinflammatory phenotype named senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP). SASP consists in secretion of inflammatory cytokines, growth factors, and proteases [24]. Increased levels of SASP-related compounds have been reported in a number of human ARDs such as diabetes [2729], atherosclerosis [30], and cancer [31]. More importantly, senescent cell accumulation in selected microenvironments—with a subsequent locally increased concentration of inflammatory cytokines—drives the pathogenesis of prototypical ARDs, that is, osteoarthritis and osteoporosis [32, 33].

A plethora of pathways and proteins has been implicated with inflammatory molecule secretion in senescent cells, for example, NF-κB, mTOR, and JAK [27, 34]. The classical SASP network relies on cell surface IL-1α as an essential cell-autonomous regulator of IL-6/IL-8 secretion [35]. However, recent findings indicate that an alternative inflammatory network is possible in senescent cells and that it is strictly dependent on mitochondrial function [36]. In addition, mitochondria appear as indispensable for the proinflammatory and the proaging features of senescent cells [37].

3. Senescent Cells Bear a Distinct Metabolic Phenotype, and Mitochondrial Dysfunction Is Partly Responsible for Their Proinflammatory Program

The senescence process is accompanied by metabolic changes within the cell. Many of the proteins important for the senescence process have a pivotal metabolic function [38]. As a result, senescent cells show a distinct metabolic phenotype. They bear an active metabolic state, maybe due to the acquisition of their peculiar secretory profile, which implies a high transcriptional activity and possibly a high metabolic demand. Senescent cells increase their glucose consumption, a phenomenon not coupled by an increased energetic state. In fact, senescent cells present a strong reduction in the amount of ATP in favor of adenosine diphosphate (ADP) and adenosine monophosphate (AMP) [39]. The increases of AMP/ATP and ADP/ATP ratios are sensed by and activate AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK). [40]. AMPK activation, in turn, can induce senescence via p53 phosphorylation [41], whose activation has been associated with the promotion of glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation, but even to downmodulation of glycolysis [42]. Furthermore, mTOR, one of the master regulators of the SASP but even of the senescence process itself [43], is strictly linked to nutrient availability, in particular to amino acids and glucose [44]. The same nutrients promote the activation of the transcription factor NF-κB, which plays a pivotal role in the inflammatory program of both immune cells and senescent cells. NF-κB governs energy homeostasis and metabolic adaptation by controlling the balance between glycolysis and respiration for energy provision [45]. Inhibition of NF-κB diminishes oxygen consumption and causes reprogramming to aerobic glycolysis (i.e., the Warburg effect) in mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) under basal culture conditions and induced necrosis on glucose starvation [45]. This NF-κB-dependent modulation of oxidative phosphorylation system (OXPHOS) involves the p53-mediated upregulation of mitochondrial synthesis of cytochrome c oxidase 2 (SCO2) [46], a subunit of complex IV of the mitochondrial electron transport chain [4648].

The OXPHOS is composed of complexes I-IV (the electron transport chain, ETC), located within the mitochondrial inner membrane, and generates a gradient of H+ ions, which drives the ADP phosphorylation via the ATP synthase (FoF1 ATPase—complex V) [49, 50]. During aerobic respiration, a variable percentage of electrons leaks from the ETC, particularly from complexes I and III, prematurely reduces oxygen, and generates ROS [51]. This process is exacerbated in senescent cells and leads to an overproduction of ROS.

In “usual” senescence models, mitochondria do play a fundamental role. In fact, the absence of mitochondria reduced a spectrum of senescence effectors and phenotypes while preserving ATP production via enhanced glycolysis. A plethora of senescent-associated changes was dependent on mitochondria, particularly the proinflammatory phenotype. A DNA damage response (DDR) pathway converging on mTORC1 phosphorylation promoted PGC-1β-dependent mitochondrial biogenesis, contributing to ROS-mediated activation of the DDR and cell cycle arrest. Of note, the reduction in mitochondrial content in vivo, by either mTORC1 inhibition or PGC-1β deletion, prevented senescence in the aging mouse liver [37].

A recent paper clearly shows that mitochondrial dysfunction per se is sufficient to trigger a particular form of senescence accompanied by a peculiar proinflammatory program but independent from ROS and DNA damage. In this model, mitochondrial dysfunction-associated senescence (MiDAS) lacks an IL-1/NF-κB-dependent mechanism but would involve secretion of factors other than “classical” SASP factors. Major MiDAS-associated molecules are IL-10, TNF-α, and CCL27, which are secreted in a NF-κB-independent manner. This novel senescence phenotype would result from a reduced NAD+/NADH ratio, which in turn may cause AMPK and p53 activation [36]. Of note, treatment with a NAD+ precursor delays senescence of neural and melanocyte stem cells, increasing mouse life span [52].

4. Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Damage Promote Inflammaging through ROS- and PRR-Mediated Mechanisms

Life-long stimulation of the cells of innate immunity is still one of the more consistent hypotheses regarding the cellular origin of inflammaging. Beyond bacteria- and virus-derived products, a long list of endogenous molecules can promote this inflammatory program [2]. When misplaced, many “normal” cell components are recognized as damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), which are recognized by pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), a large family of proteins that include toll-like receptors (TLRs) and NOD-like receptors (NLRs). During aging, PRRs are subjected to a prolonged and increased exposure to “stress” molecules that leads to chronic inflammatory responses.

Cell injury due to various stressors can trigger the release outside of the mitochondrial matrix of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), N-formyl peptides and lipids, such as cardiolipin, that can act as DAMPs by activating receptors of the innate immunity [2, 53] and the inflammasomes. In particular, there is a direct link between released oxidized mtDNA, activation of NLRP3, the most studied NLR, and caspase-1-mediated maturation of IL-1β and IL-18 [54, 55]. Accordingly, increasing evidence suggests an important role of inflammasomes in major ARDs [27]. For instance, the ablation of Nlrp3 gene in mice is able to attenuate inflammaging, thus increasing health span [13]. Once activated, inflammasome promotes the transmission of the senescence bystander cells via the release of inflammatory mediators [56]. In turn, mitochondria-derived ROS can activate the inflammasome, probably through the Trx/TXNIP complex, further linking mitochondrial function to low-grade inflammation [57]. Accordingly, ROS themselves can partly mediate the senescence “bystander effect”, that is, the transition of the senescent phenotype from a SC to neighbor cells [58].

MtDNA can even bind TLR9, which senses DNA of bacterial and viral origin [59]. Because of the prokaryotic origin of mitochondria, mtDNA contains a significant number of unmethylated CpG DNA repeats, similarly to bacterial genomes. This is sufficient to trigger TLR9 activation, leading to NF-κB signaling and increased expression of proinflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β [60]. Further, mtDNA can even activate the cytosolic DNA sensor cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS) [61]. During an infection, DNA of microbial origin by binding to cGAS activates the cGAS/stimulator of interferon gene (STING) pathway thus triggering expression of inflammatory genes. Since DNA damage plays a prominent role in the development of the SASP [62], this pathway could be considered a mediator of inflammaging. Of note, even mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) can bind the cytosolic cGAS, suggesting that mitochondria can play a major role in the senescence/SASP process in different manners [63, 64]. Notably, mtDNA can be released into extracellular fluids as a product of tissue damage and its plasma levels increase during aging and in selected ARDs [65], supporting the notion that circulating mtDNA is part of the systemic communicome initiating and propagating inflammaging [2].

Human mtDNA consists of circular, double-stranded, supercoiled molecules that are found in each cell in one up to 10,000 copies, depending on the bioenergetic requirements of the tissue and whose number declined with aging [66]. It encodes 13 subunits of respiratory chain complexes (in addition to 2 rRNAs and 22 tRNAs), which are transcribed and translated directly within the mitochondrion by its own gene expression system. These polypeptides include indispensable components of the complex I (7 subunits—ND1-ND6, ND4L), III (apocytochromeb), IV (3 subunits—COX I–III), and of F0/F1 ATP synthase (ATPase6 and ATPase8). The mitochondrial genome has a higher mutation rate than the nuclear genome; thus, its mutations accumulate during aging [67]. However, Greaves et al. have shown that selected pathogenic mutations increase and clonally expand during aging, but not the frequency of mutation [68]. Of note, mtDNA mutation accumulation in mouse tissues is influenced by the nuclear genetic background and correlates to neither cellular ROS content nor tissue senescence [69]. Interestingly, a number of genetic variants of the mtDNA, named haplogroups, have been identified. These, each containing functional single nucleotide polymorphism (SNPs), affect the oxidative metabolism of mitochondria, and several of them are associated to extreme longevity [70]. The interaction between nuclear genes and mtDNA has been proposed as a possible mechanism explaining a favorable/unfavorable inflammaging profile and consequently successful or unsuccessful aging [71]. Overall, these data suggest that any physiological SNP or pathogenic mutation in mtDNA could induce respiration alteration with a wide range of possible resulting (pathological) phenotype, affecting in turn inflammaging and ARD development [72, 73].

5. A Subgroup of MicroRNAs Targets mtDNA or Nuclear mRNA with Mitochondrial Function

The miRNA machinery is known to primarily act in the cytoplasm. miRNAs have also been detected in membrane-bound compartments, such as secreted vesicles and mitochondria [74]. Through different experimental approaches in different mammalian species, a number of studies have enabled identification of “signatures” of miRNAs located in the mitochondria. To date, they are summarized under a descriptive term: mitomiRs [75]. Indeed, this name includes nuclear-encoded miRNAs that translocate into the mitochondria organelle and target either mitochondrial or nuclear mRNA. Early studies on the subject are mostly descriptive to detect the presence of microRNAs within the mitochondrion. Kren and colleagues first detected 15 nuclear-encoded mitomiRs from rat livers that seemed to be involved in the modulation of genes associated with apoptosis, cell proliferation, and differentiation [76]. Bian et al. identified a pool of 20 miRs highly expressed in mitochondria of mice liver. Interestingly, mitochondria have a unique population of miRNAs, independent of the total cellular abundance of miRs and they may be involved in the regulation of mitochondria-specific and general cellular functions [77]. For the first time, in 2011, Barrey and coworkers showed the presence of pre-miRs inside mitochondria, postulating that some pre-miRNA sequences could be processed to mature miRNAs, which could be immediately active on the mitochondrial transcripts or exported in the cytosol in order to interfere with genomic mRNA [78]. Subsequently, other groups identified new mitomiRs from HeLa [79, 80], HEK293 [80], 143B cells [81], 206ρ° cells [82], and mouse heart [83] (Tables 1 and 2). The notion emerging is that mitochondria have a discrete and unique pool of mitomiRs; the association of miRs with mitochondria is species and cell type-specific [75].

Barrey et al. [78]Bandiera et al. [20]Sripada et al. [80]Zhang et al. [60]Mercer et al. [81]Dasgupta et al. [82]
Human skeletal/muscular cellsHeLa cellsHeLa/HEK293Skeletal muscle143B cells206 ρ° cells


Bian et al. [77]Jagannathan et al. [83]Kren et al. [76]Das et al. [84]
Mouse liverMouse heartRat liverRat cardiomyocytes


6. MitomiRs Targeting Mitochondrial Genome Are Deregulated by Organismal Aging or Cellular Senescence

Mitochondria maintain and express their own genome that may be regulated by microRNAs. As mtDNA encodes for 13 subunits of the electron transport chain, their regulation by mitomiRs may have profound effects on ATP synthesis and ultimately may influence the whole mitochondrial function.

Bioinformatics analysis suggested that mitomiRs can target various mitochondrial transcripts: several potential mitochondrial targets for let-7b (ATP6, ATP8, COX2, and ND5) [78] as well as for miR-146a-5p and miR-181c-5p [82] have been described; miR-133a was predicted to target ND1 [78], whereas miR-130a-3p targets COX3 [76]. Using ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA) software to analyze mtDNA targets, Jagannathan et al. observed potential interactions between all 13 mitochondrial genome-encoded electron transport chain proteins with mitomiRs. The functional significance of a specific miRNA in heart-derived mitochondria was demonstrated for the first time by Das and colleagues: miR-181c-5p originates from the nuclear genome, is processed in the cytosol, and translates to the mitochondria, where it regulates mitochondrial energy metabolism by targeting mt-COX1 mRNA. Overexpression of miR-181c-5p results in a loss of mt-COX1 protein, resulting in an imbalance among the mitochondria-encoded subunits in complex IV, thus promoting ROS generation. Perturbations induced by miR-181c-5p could have important consequences in myocardial pathophysiology [84]. More recently, in vivo administration of miR-181c-5p in rats confirmed these data leading to complex IV dysfunction, altered mitochondrial metabolism, and ROS generation, ultimately promoting heart failure [85].

On the contrary, when miR-1 localizes into mitochondria, it promotes mitochondrial translation of ND1 and COX1 mtDNA-encoded transcripts while repressing its nuclear DNA-encoded targets in the cytoplasm. In this way, miR-1 enhances protein synthesis and ATP production, required for muscle cell differentiation [74]. This study suggests the possibility that the localization and relative abundance of a specific microRNA in the cytoplasm and mitochondria determines its different role in the regulation of specific targets and in the coordination of mitochondrial activities [86].

Another study showed that miR-1, together with other two mitomiRs, miR-133a and let-7b, is essential for adult skeletal muscle differentiation and maintenance; for this reason, they are called myomiRs [87, 88]. Muscles contain a high mitochondrial content, in order to provide massive demand of ATP for movement, postural maintenance, and respiration. During aging, skeletal muscle mitochondria revealed a progressive decline in respiratory chain function, a phenomenon associated with insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes mellitus [89]. These miRs seem to modulate some key proteins of OXPHOS complexes, so their deregulation may affect ETC functionality. Of note, some of these myomiRs are released in circulation after physical exercise [90]. Physical activity is associated to a plethora of beneficial effects and the underlying mechanisms are not fully understood. For instance, high-intensity aerobic interval exercise is associated with wide proteomic changes in the muscle of old subjects, with evident phenotypic gains in muscle mitochondrial function. Noticeable, mRNA expression changes do not overlap protein expression changes, suggesting that enhanced protein translation, but possibly even epigenetic mechanisms influence such positive adaptation [91].

Another remarkable study showed a redistribution of mitomiRs in the diabetic heart. Cardiac tissue is rich in mitochondria with spatially distinct subpopulations: subsarcolemmal mitochondria (SSM), located beneath the cell membrane, and interfibrillar mitochondria (IFM), situated between the myofibrils. MitomiRs were differentially regulated in the two mitochondrial subpopulations in diabetes relative to control. In addition, mitomiR-378-3p is highly expressed in diabetic IFM (versus IFM control) and targets mt-ATP6 with a concomitant reduction in the functionality of the ATP synthase. In vivo, miR-378-3p antagomir delivery led to the preservation of ATP6 protein levels in diabetic IFM, similar to nondiabetic control. Interestingly, miR-378-3p antagomir resulted in an increase of ATP synthase activity, which was significantly decreased in diabetic [83]. MiR-378-3p is located in the first intron of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (Ppargc1b) gene, which encodes for PGC-1β. PGC-1β is preferentially expressed in tissues with relatively high mitochondrial content, and miR-378-3p is coexpressed with its host gene and seems to counterbalance the metabolic actions of PGC-1β. Mice genetically lacking miR-378-3p exhibit enhanced mitochondrial fatty acid metabolism and elevated oxidative capacity of insulin-target tissues [92], proving its key role in mitochondrial respiration.

According to their role in age-related diseases, for example, heart failure and diabetes [1820, 74, 85, 93], many mitomiRs have been described to be deregulated during organismal and cellular aging (SA-miRs). Thus, it has been hypothesized that SA-miRs and mtDNA-targeting mitomiRs play a major role in the mitochondrial dysfunction observed in both cellular senescence and the inflammaging process [94]. Notably, among all mitomiRs targeting mitochondrial genome, a subset of miRs has been associated to inflammatory processes, that is, miR-130a-3p [95] or to both inflammation and aging, that is, let-7b [96, 97], miR-146a-5p [98], miR-181c-5p [99, 100], miR-133a [101, 102], and miR-1 [103, 104].

MiR-146a-5p is one of the best-characterized miRNAs involved in both SASP and inflammaging. NF-κB activation initiates the transcription of proinflammatory cytokines and of miR-146, which in turn directly targets IRAK1 and TRAF6, two key adaptor molecules in the TLR/NF-κB pathway, trying to switch off the proinflammatory signal at the end of inflammatory response. While this mechanism efficiently regulates immune system responses [105], in senescent cells, its increase is insufficient to ameliorate the SASP [93, 106, 107]. As each miRNA has multiple targets, sustained and chronic expression of miR-146a-5p in senescent cells could affect many pathways other than the proinflammatory ones. In fact, mir-146a-5p has the mitochondrial encoded proteins ND1, ND2, ND4, ND5, and ND6, as well as ATP8 as putative and potential targets, suggesting that senescence may affect epigenetically the expression and function of complexes I and V. Of note, complex I is the most relevant one in determining ROS production in dysfunctional mitochondria [108]. In addition, miR-146a-5p can even target superoxide dismutase- (SOD-) 2, a major mitochondrial antioxidant enzyme [109] and Bcl-2, a known determinant of mitochondrial dynamics, involved in the regulation of mitochondrial fusion and fission [94]. Thus, it is easy to speculate that senescence-regulated miRNAs, which are transcribed with the goal of ameliorating inflammation, could also influence mitochondrial behavior, with a still unknown positive or negative effect on mitochondrial oxidative and energetic functions.

7. Conclusions and Future Prospects

Recent discoveries suggest that mitochondria are major determinants of aging. Senescent cells carry dysfunctional mitochondria, which are partly responsible for their proinflammatory program. Aged, dysfunctional, or damaged mitochondria can promote inflammaging even through continuous immune system stimulation. In the complex picture of the dynamic interaction between nucleus and mitochondria, microRNAs should be considered as new, relevant players. Despite the few data available on this specific topic, emerging evidence and bioinformatics studies indicate that miRNAs of nuclear origin profoundly affect mitochondrial function. This phenomenon seems to be of particular importance for the aging process, considering that many senescence-associated miRNAs have got or may have targets within mtDNA. Overall, a comprehensive view of the epigenetic and nonepigenetic mechanisms triggered by the senescence process is of importance to understand the overall phenotype of aged cells, which behave differently from a transcriptional, metabolic, energetic, and oxidative point of view (Figure 1). Such holistic view could eventually extend the spectrum of possibilities to target senescent cells and, more in general, the aging process, especially considering that miRNA-based, epigenetic therapies are already in progress in order to functionally reprogram target cells to a desired phenotype.

Cutting-edge technologies such as ultradeep sequencing and single-cell RNAseq will help to disentangle the importance of SA-mitomiRs in the aging process at both cellular and population level thus accumulating knowledge to better define dynamics underlying the epigenetic regulation of mitochondrial function in healthy aging and major ARDs.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interests.

Authors’ Contributions

All authors contributed significantly to the manuscript.


This work was supported by grants from UNIVPM to MRR and from Fundaciò La Maratò de TV3 to AC.


  1. C. Franceschi and J. Campisi, “Chronic inflammation (inflammaging) and its potential contribution to age-associated diseases,” The Journals of Gerontology Series A, vol. 69, Supplement 1, pp. S4–S9, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. C. Franceschi, P. Garagnani, G. Vitale, M. Capri, and S. Salvioli, “Inflammaging and ‘Garb-aging’,” Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 199–212, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. C. Franceschi, M. Bonafè, S. Valensin et al., “Inflamm-aging: an evolutionary perspective on immunosenescence,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 908, pp. 244–254, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. D. Harman, “Aging: a theory based on free radical and radiation chemistry,” Journal of Gerontology, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 298–300, 1956. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. M. De la Fuente and J. Miquel, “An update of the oxidation-inflammation theory of aging: the involvement of the immune system in oxi-inflamm-aging,” Current Pharmaceutical Design, vol. 15, no. 26, pp. 3003–3026, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. V. Serra, T. Grune, N. Sitte, G. Saretzki, and T. von Zglinicki, “Telomere length as a marker of oxidative stress in primary human fibroblast cultures,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 908, pp. 327–330, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. M. L. Hegde, P. M. Hegde, D. Arijit, I. Boldogh, and S. Mitra, “Human DNA glycosylase NEIL1’s interactions with downstream repair proteins is critical for efficient repair of oxidized DNA Base damage and enhanced cell survival,” Biomolecules, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 564–578, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. J. F. Passos, G. Nelson, C. Wang et al., “Feedback between p21 and reactive oxygen production is necessary for cell senescence,” Molecular Systems Biology, vol. 6, p. 347, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. V. I. Pérez, A. Bokov, H. Van Remmen et al., “Is the oxidative stress theory of aging dead?” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects, vol. 1790, no. 10, pp. 1005–1014, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. H. D. Sesso, W. G. Christen, V. Bubes et al., “Multivitamins in the prevention of cardiovascular disease in men: the physicians’ health study II randomized controlled trial,” JAMA, vol. 308, no. 17, pp. 1751–1760, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. S. Rautiainen, I. M. Lee, P. M. Rist et al., “Multivitamin use and cardiovascular disease in a prospective study of women,” The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 144–152, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. G. Bjelakovic, D. Nikolova, and C. Gluud, “Antioxidant supplements and mortality,” Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 40–44, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. Y. H. Youm, R. W. Grant, L. R. McCabe et al., “Canonical Nlrp3 inflammasome links systemic low-grade inflammation to functional decline in aging,” Cell Metabolism, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 519–532, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. D. Jurk, C. Wilson, J. F. Passos et al., “Chronic inflammation induces telomere dysfunction and accelerates ageing in mice,” Nature Communications, vol. 2, p. 4172, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. S. Vasudevan, Y. Tong, and J. A. Steitz, “Switching from repression to activation: microRNAs can up-regulate translation,” Science, vol. 318, no. 5858, pp. 1931–1934, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. K. Breving and A. Esquela-Kerscher, “The complexities of microRNA regulation: mirandering around the rules,” The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology, vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 1316–1329, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. F. Olivieri, M. R. Rippo, V. Monsurrò et al., “MicroRNAs linking inflamm-aging, cellular senescence and cancer,” Ageing Research Reviews, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 1056–1068, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. F. Olivieri, L. Spazzafumo, M. Bonafè et al., “MiR-21-5p and miR-126a-3p levels in plasma and circulating angiogenic cells: relationship with type 2 diabetes complications,” Oncotarget, vol. 6, no. 34, pp. 35372–35382, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. F. Prattichizzo, A. Giuliani, V. De Nigris et al., “Extracellular microRNAs and endothelial hyperglycaemic memory: a therapeutic opportunity?” Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism, vol. 18, no. 9, pp. 855–867, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. S. Bandiera, S. Hanein, S. Lyonnet, and A. Henrion-Caude, “Mitochondria as novel players of the cellular RNA interference,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 286, no. 38, article le19, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. S. Shinde and U. Bhadra, “A complex genome-microRNA interplay in human mitochondria,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2015, Article ID 206382, 13 pages, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. D. J. Baker, T. Wijshake, T. Tchkonia et al., “Clearance of p16Ink4a-positive senescent cells delays ageing-associated disorders,” Nature, vol. 479, no. 7372, pp. 232–236, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. C. M. Beauséjour, A. Krtolica, F. Galimi et al., “Reversal of human cellular senescence: roles of the p53 and p16 pathways,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 22, no. 16, pp. 4212–4222, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. B. G. Childs, M. Durik, D. J. Baker, and J. M. van Deursen, “Cellular senescence in aging and age-related disease: from mechanisms to therapy,” Nature Medicine, vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 1424–1435, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. G. Hewitt, D. Jurk, F. D. Marques et al., “Telomeres are favoured targets of a persistent DNA damage response in ageing and stress-induced senescence,” Nature Communications, vol. 3, p. 708, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. M. Fumagalli, F. Rossiello, M. Clerici et al., “Telomeric DNA damage is irreparable and causes persistent DNA-damage-response activation,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 355–365, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. F. Prattichizzo, V. De Nigris, L. La Sala, A. D. Procopio, F. Olivieri, and A. Ceriello, ““Inflammaging” as a druggable target: a senescence-associated secretory phenotype—centered view of type 2 diabetes,” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2016, Article ID 1810327, 10 pages, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. A. K. Palmer, T. Tchkonia, N. K. LeBrasseur, E. N. Chini, M. Xu, and J. L. Kirkland, “Cellular senescence in type 2 diabetes: a therapeutic opportunity,” Diabetes, vol. 64, no. 7, pp. 2289–2298, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. Y. Zhu, J. L. Armstrong, T. Tchkonia, and J. L. Kirkland, “Cellular senescence and the senescent secretory phenotype in age-related chronic diseases,” Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 324–328, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. B. G. Childs, D. J. Baker, T. Wijshake, C. A. Conover, J. Campisi, and J. M. van Deursen, “Senescent intimal foam cells are deleterious at all stages of atherosclerosis,” Science, vol. 354, no. 6311, pp. 472–477, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. J. Campisi, “Aging, cellular senescence, and cancer,” Annual Review of Physiology, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 685–705, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. O. H. Jeon, C. Kim, R. M. Laberge et al., “Local clearance of senescent cells attenuates the development of post-traumatic osteoarthritis and creates a pro-regenerative environment,” Nature Medicine, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 775–781, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. J. N. Farr, M. Xu, M. M. Weivoda et al., “Targeting cellular senescence prevents age-related bone loss in mice,” Nature Medicine, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 1072–1079, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. M. Xu, T. Tchkonia, H. Ding et al., “JAK inhibition alleviates the cellular senescence-associated secretory phenotype and frailty in old age,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 112, no. 46, pp. E6301–E6310, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. A. V. Orjalo, D. Bhaumik, B. K. Gengler, G. K. Scott, and J. Campisi, “Cell surface-bound IL-1α is an upstream regulator of the senescence-associated IL-6/IL-8 cytokine network,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 106, no. 40, pp. 17031–17036, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. C. D. Wiley, M. C. Velarde, P. Lecot et al., “Mitochondrial dysfunction induces senescence with a distinct secretory phenotype,” Cell Metabolism, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 303–314, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. C. Correia-Melo, F. D. Marques, R. Anderson et al., “Mitochondria are required for pro-ageing features of the senescent phenotype,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 724–742, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. C. D. Wiley and J. Campisi, “From ancient pathways to aging cells-connecting metabolism and cellular senescence,” Cell Metabolism, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 1013–1021, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. W. Zwerschke, S. Mazurek, P. Stöckl, E. Hütter, E. Eigenbrodt, and P. Jansen-Dürr, “Metabolic analysis of senescent human fibroblasts reveals a role for AMP in cellular senescence,” The Biochemical Journal, vol. 376, no. 2, pp. 403–411, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. D. G. Hardie, D. Carling, and M. Carlson, “The AMP-activated/SNF1 protein kinase subfamily: metabolic sensors of the eukaryotic cell?” Annual Review of Biochemistry, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 821–855, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. R. G. Jones, D. R. Plas, S. Kubek et al., “AMP-activated protein kinase induces a p53-dependent metabolic checkpoint,” Molecular Cell, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 283–293, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. A. M. Puzio-Kuter, “The role of p53 in metabolic regulation,” Genes & Cancer, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 385–391, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. R. M. Laberge, Y. Sun, A. V. Orjalo et al., “MTOR regulates the pro-tumorigenic senescence-associated secretory phenotype by promoting IL1A translation,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 1049–1061, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. X. D. Zhang, Z. H. Qin, and J. Wang, “The role of p53 in cell metabolism,” Acta Pharmacologica Sinica, vol. 31, no. 9, pp. 1208–1212, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. C. Mauro, S. C. Leow, E. Anso et al., “NF-κB controls energy homeostasis and metabolic adaptation by upregulating mitochondrial respiration,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 1272–1279, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. S. C. Leary, “Redox regulation of SCO protein function: controlling copper at a mitochondrial crossroad,” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 1403–1416, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. S. Matoba, J. G. Kang, W. D. Patino et al., “p53 regulates mitochondrial respiration,” Science, vol. 312, no. 5780, pp. 1650–1653, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. L. Tornatore, A. K. Thotakura, J. Bennett, M. Moretti, and G. Franzoso, “The nuclear factor kappa B signaling pathway: integrating metabolism with inflammation,” Trends in Cell Biology, vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 557–566, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. R. A. Reid, J. Moyle, and P. Mitchell, “Synthesis of adenosine triphosphate by a protonmotive force in rat liver mitochondria,” Nature, vol. 212, pp. 257-258, 1966. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. I. Bratic and A. Trifunovic, “Mitochondrial energy metabolism and ageing,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Bioenergetics, vol. 1797, no. 6-7, pp. 961–967, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. Y. Liu, G. Fiskum, and D. Schubert, “Generation of reactive oxygen species by the mitochondrial electron transport chain,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 80, no. 5, pp. 780–787, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. H. Zhang, D. Ryu, Y. Wu et al., “NAD+ repletion improves mitochondrial and stem cell function and enhances life span in mice,” Science, vol. 352, no. 6292, pp. 1436–1443, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. C. Fang, X. Wei, and Y. Wei, “Mitochondrial DNA in the regulation of innate immune responses,” Protein & Cell, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 11–16, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. R. Zhou, A. S. Yazdi, P. Menu, and J. Tschopp, “A role for mitochondria in NLRP3 inflammasome activation,” Nature, vol. 469, no. 7329, pp. 221–225, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. K. Nakahira, J. A. Haspel, V. A. Rathinam et al., “Autophagy proteins regulate innate immune responses by inhibiting the release of mitochondrial DNA mediated by the NALP3 inflammasome,” Nature Immunology, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 222–230, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. J. C. Acosta, A. Banito, T. Wuestefeld et al., “A complex secretory program orchestrated by the inflammasome controls paracrine senescence,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 978–990, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. T. Lane, B. Flam, R. Lockey, and N. Kolliputi, “TXNIP shuttling: missing link between oxidative stress and inflammasome activation,” Frontiers in Physiology, vol. 4, p. 50, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. G. Nelson, O. Kucheryavenko, J. Wordsworth, and T. von Zglinicki, “The senescent bystander effect is caused by ROS-activated NF-κB signalling,” Mechanisms of Ageing and Development, 2017, In press. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. M. S. Lamphier, C. M. Sirois, A. Verma, D. T. Golenbock, and E. Latz, “TLR9 and the recognition of self and non-self nucleic acids,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1082, no. 1, pp. 31–43, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. J. Z. Zhang, Z. Liu, J. Liu, J. X. Ren, and T. S. Sun, “Mitochondrial DNA induces inflammation and increases TLR9/NF-κB expression in lung tissue,” International Journal of Molecular Medicine, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 817–824, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. L. Yuan, Y. Mao, W. Luo et al., “Palmitic acid dysregulates the Hippo-YAP pathway and inhibits angiogenesis by inducing mitochondrial damage and activating the cytosolic DNA sensor cGAS-STING-IRF3 signaling mechanism,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 292, no. 36, pp. 15002–15015, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. S. Glück, B. Guey, M. F. Gulen et al., “Innate immune sensing of cytosolic chromatin fragments through cGAS promotes senescence,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 1061–1070, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. M. R. de Galarreta and A. Lujambio, “DNA sensing in senescence,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 1008-1009, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. H. Yang, H. Wang, J. Ren, Q. Chen, and Z. J. Chen, “cGAS is essential for cellular senescence,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 114, no. 23, pp. E4612–E4620, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. N. Y. Lam, T. H. Rainer, R. W. Chiu, G. M. Joynt, and Y. M. Lo, “Plasma mitochondrial DNA concentrations after trauma,” Clinical Chemistry, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 213–216, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. D. M. Stocco, J. Cascarano, and M. A. Wilson, “Quantitation of mitochondrial DNA, RNA, and protein in starved and starved-refed rat liver,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 295–306, 1977. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. A. Trifunovic, “Mitochondrial DNA and ageing,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Bioenergetics, vol. 1757, no. 5-6, pp. 611–617, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. L. C. Greaves, M. Nooteboom, J. L. Elson et al., “Clonal expansion of early to mid-life mitochondrial DNA point mutations drives mitochondrial dysfunction during human ageing,” PLoS Genetics, vol. 10, no. 9, article e1004620, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. Y. G. Yao, F. M. Ellison, J. P. McCoy, J. Chen, and N. S. Young, “Age-dependent accumulation of mtDNA mutations in murine hematopoietic stem cells is modulated by the nuclear genetic background,” Human Molecular Genetics, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 286–294, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. G. De Benedictis, G. Rose, G. Carrieri et al., “Mitochondrial DNA inherited variants are associated with successful aging and longevity in humans,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 13, no. 12, pp. 1532–1536, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  71. S. Salvioli, M. Capri, S. Valensin et al., “Inflamm-aging, cytokines and aging: state of the art, new hypotheses on the role of mitochondria and new perspectives from systems biology,” Current Pharmaceutical Design, vol. 12, no. 24, pp. 3161–3171, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. S. Salvioli, M. Capri, A. Santoro et al., “The impact of mitochondrial DNA on human lifespan: a view from studies on centenarians,” Biotechnology Journal, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 740–749, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. K. Khrapko and J. Vijg, “Mitochondrial DNA mutations and aging: devils in the details?” Trends in Genetics, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 91–98, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. X. Zhang, X. Zuo, B. Yang et al., “MicroRNA directly enhances mitochondrial translation during muscle differentiation,” Cell, vol. 158, no. 3, pp. 607–619, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. J. Geiger and L. T. Dalgaard, “Interplay of mitochondrial metabolism and microRNAs,” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, vol. 74, no. 4, pp. 631–646, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. B. T. Kren, P. Y. Wong, A. Sarver, X. Zhang, Y. Zeng, and C. J. Steer, “MicroRNAs identified in highly purified liver-derived mitochondria may play a role in apoptosis,” RNA Biology, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 65–72, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. Z. Bian, L. M. Li, R. Tang et al., “Identification of mouse liver mitochondria-associated miRNAs and their potential biological functions,” Cell Research, vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 1076–1078, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  78. E. Barrey, G. Saint-Auret, B. Bonnamy, D. Damas, O. Boyer, and X. Gidrol, “Pre-microRNA and mature microRNA in human mitochondria,” PLoS One, vol. 6, no. 5, article e20220, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  79. S. Bandiera, S. Rüberg, M. Girard et al., “Nuclear outsourcing of RNA interference components to human mitochondria,” PLoS One, vol. 6, no. 6, article e20746, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  80. L. Sripada, D. Tomar, P. Prajapati, R. Singh, A. K. Singh, and R. Singh, “Systematic analysis of small RNAs associated with human mitochondria by deep sequencing: detailed analysis of mitochondrial associated miRNA,” PLoS One, vol. 7, no. 9, article e44873, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  81. T. R. Mercer, S. Neph, M. E. Dinger et al., “The human mitochondrial transcriptome,” Cell, vol. 146, no. 4, pp. 645–658, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  82. N. Dasgupta, Y. Peng, Z. Tan, G. Ciraolo, D. Wang, and R. Li, “miRNAs in mtDNA-less cell mitochondria,” Cell Death Discovery, vol. 1, article 15004, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  83. R. Jagannathan, D. Thapa, C. E. Nichols et al., “Translational regulation of the mitochondrial genome following redistribution of mitochondrial microRNA in the diabetic heart,” Circulation: Cardiovascular Genetics, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 785–802, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  84. S. Das, M. Ferlito, O. A. Kent et al., “Nuclear miRNA regulates the mitochondrial genome in the heart,” Circulation Research, vol. 110, no. 12, pp. 1596–1603, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  85. S. Das, D. Bedja, N. Campbell et al., “miR-181c regulates the mitochondrial genome, bioenergetics, and propensity for heart failure in vivo,” PLoS One, vol. 9, no. 5, article e96820, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  86. J. Nouws and G. S. Shadel, “Micromanaging mitochondrial translation,” Cell, vol. 158, no. 3, pp. 477-478, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  87. K. R. Mitchelson and W. Y. Qin, “Roles of the canonical myomiRs miR-1, -133 and -206 in cell development and disease,” World Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 162–208, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  88. S. Lin, W. Luo, Y. Ye et al., “Let-7b regulates myoblast proliferation by inhibiting IGF2BP3 expression in dwarf and normal chicken,” Frontiers in Physiology, vol. 8, p. 477, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  89. A. Wredenberg, C. Freyer, M. E. Sandström et al., “Respiratory chain dysfunction in skeletal muscle does not cause insulin resistance,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 350, no. 1, pp. 202–207, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  90. J. Denham and P. R. Prestes, “Muscle-enriched microRNAs isolated from whole blood are regulated by exercise and are potential biomarkers of cardiorespiratory fitness,” Frontiers in Genetics, vol. 7, p. 196, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  91. M. M. Robinson, S. Dasari, A. R. Konopka et al., “Enhanced protein translation underlies improved metabolic and physical adaptations to different exercise training modes in young and old humans,” Cell Metabolism, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 581–592, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  92. M. Carrer, N. Liu, C. E. Grueter et al., “Control of mitochondrial metabolism and systemic energy homeostasis by microRNAs 378 and 378,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 109, no. 38, pp. 15330–15335, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  93. F. Prattichizzo, A. Giuliani, R. Recchioni et al., “Anti-TNF-α treatment modulates SASP and SASP-related microRNAs in endothelial cells and in circulating angiogenic cells,” Oncotarget, vol. 7, no. 11, pp. 11945–11958, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  94. M. R. Rippo, F. Olivieri, V. Monsurrò, F. Prattichizzo, M. C. Albertini, and A. D. Procopio, “MitomiRs in human inflamm-aging: a hypothesis involving miR-181a, miR-34a and miR-146a,” Experimental Gerontology, vol. 56, pp. 154–163, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  95. S. Su, Q. Zhao, C. He et al., “miR-142-5p and miR-130a-3p are regulated by IL-4 and IL-13 and control profibrogenic macrophage program,” Nature Communications, vol. 6, article 8523, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  96. G. G. Teng, W. H. Wang, Y. Dai, S. J. Wang, Y. X. Chu, and J. Li, “Let-7b is involved in the inflammation and immune responses associated with helicobacter pylori infection by targeting toll-like receptor 4,” PLoS One, vol. 8, no. 2, article e56709, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  97. J. Nishino, I. Kim, K. Chada, and S. J. Morrison, “Hmga2 promotes neural stem cell self-renewal in young but not old mice by reducing p16Ink4a and p19Arf expression,” Cell, vol. 135, no. 2, pp. 227–239, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  98. F. Olivieri, R. Lazzarini, L. Babini et al., “Anti-inflammatory effect of ubiquinol-10 on young and senescent endothelial cells via miR-146a modulation,” Free Radical Biology & Medicine, vol. 63, pp. 410–420, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  99. L. Zhang, Y. J. Li, X. Y. Wu, Z. Hong, and W. S. Wei, “MicroRNA-181c negatively regulates the inflammatory response in oxygen-glucose-deprived microglia by targeting toll-like receptor 4,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 132, no. 6, pp. 713–723, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  100. D. Guo, Y. Ye, J. Qi et al., “Age and sex differences in microRNAs expression during the process of thymus aging,” Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 409–419, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  101. J. Singh, E. Boopathi, S. Addya et al., “Aging-associated changes in microRNA expression profile of internal anal sphincter smooth muscle: role of microRNA-133a,” American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, vol. 311, no. 5, pp. G964–G973, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  102. C. Besler, D. Urban, S. Watzka et al., “Endomyocardial miR-133a levels correlate with myocardial inflammation, improved left ventricular function, and clinical outcome in patients with inflammatory cardiomyopathy,” European Journal of Heart Failure, vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 1442–1451, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  103. A. Magenta, E. Dellambra, R. Ciarapica, and M. C. Capogrossi, “Oxidative stress, microRNAs and cytosolic calcium homeostasis,” Cell Calcium, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 207–217, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  104. R. W. Georgantas, K. Streicher, S. A. Greenberg et al., “Inhibition of myogenic microRNAs 1, 133, and 206 by inflammatory cytokines links inflammation and muscle degeneration in adult inflammatory myopathies,” Arthritis & Rhematology, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 1022–1033, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  105. M. P. Boldin, K. D. Taganov, D. S. Rao et al., “miR-146a is a significant brake on autoimmunity, myeloproliferation, and cancer in mice,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 208, no. 6, pp. 1189–1201, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  106. F. Olivieri, R. Lazzarini, R. Recchioni et al., “MiR-146a as marker of senescence-associated pro-inflammatory status in cells involved in vascular remodelling,” Age, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 1157–1172, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  107. D. Bhaumik, G. K. Scott, S. Schokrpur et al., “MicroRNAs miR-146a/b negatively modulate the senescence-associated inflammatory mediators IL-6 and IL-8,” Aging, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 402–411, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  108. M. P. Murphy, “How mitochondria produce reactive oxygen species,” The Biochemical Journal, vol. 417, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  109. G. Ji, K. Lv, H. Chen et al., “MiR-146a regulates SOD2 expression in H2O2 stimulated PC12 cells,” PLoS One, vol. 8, no. 7, article e69351, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2017 Angelica Giuliani et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.