Research Article  Open Access
Yongfu Li, Bin Yang, Taixiong Zheng, Yinguo Li, "Extended State Observer Based Adaptive BackStepping Sliding Mode Control of Electronic Throttle in Transportation CyberPhysical Systems", Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2015, Article ID 301656, 11 pages, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/301656
Extended State Observer Based Adaptive BackStepping Sliding Mode Control of Electronic Throttle in Transportation CyberPhysical Systems
Abstract
Considering the high accuracy requirement of information exchange via vehicletovehicle (V2V) communications, an extended state observer (ESO) is designed to estimate the opening angle change of an electronic throttle (ET), wherein the emphasis is placed on the nonlinear uncertainties of stickslip friction and spring in the system as well as the existence of external disturbance. In addition, a backstepping sliding mode controller incorporating an adaptive control law is presented, and the stability and robustness of the system are analyzed using Lyapunov technique. Finally, numerical experiments are conducted using simulation. The results show that, compared with backstepping control (BSC), the proposed controller achieves superior performance in terms of the steadystate error and rising time.
1. Introduction
Transportation cyberphysical systems (TCPS) aim to achieve full coordination and optimization of transportation systems, via the increased interaction and feedback between the transportation cyber systems and transportation physical systems [1–3]. For example, in the vehicle platoon, the desired control objective is that all vehicles in that platoon move with a safe space headway and a safe speed. Once an accident occurs in front of the platoon, the leading car must take an emergency brake to avoid collision, and then the following vehicles will respond to the front vehicles correspondingly. In this context, the V2Vbased communication of information on the opening angle of the electronic throttle (ET) of the preceding vehicles in a lane enables a following vehicle to react as fast as possible to avoid a collision by adaptively adjusting its ET. On the other hand, an elegantly designed controller could be applied for the throttle to track the desired valve opening angle, which can improve the fuel economy, emissions, and vehicle drivability [4].
Based on traffic models, many researchers have demonstrated that the headway spacing between preceding vehicles and following vehicles can be kept safe via speed controllers, which can effectively guarantee the stability of platoon of vehicles and avoid collision [5–10]. Since the vehicle speed is related to the opening angle of the ET [5], the stability of the platoon of vehicles is associated with electronic throttle control (ETC). However, the ETC with high performance is a challenging problem, due to the nonlinear factors such as parametric uncertainty, stickslip friction, gear backlash, and nonlinear spring [11–14]. Consequently, the study on control strategy for ET has attracted considerable attention in recent years.
Several control strategies have been proposed to improve the performance of ETC including (i) linear control [12, 13], (ii) optimal control [15–17], (iii) sliding mode control [18–21], (iv) model approximation control [14, 22], and (v) intelligent control [11, 23–27]. Deur et al. [12, 13] propose a proportionalintegralderivative (PID) controller that compensates the effects of friction and limphome using a feedback compensator. Vašak et al. [15] propose a model predictive optimal controller to handle with nonlinearities. However, the mixedinteger programming cannot be implemented in a realtime manner due to its computational complexity. Subsequently, Vašak et al. [16] deal with this problem through the precomputation of the state feedback control in the process of dynamic programming offline. Nevertheless, the control law obtained from a lookup table will lead to the deterioration of control performance. On the other hand, sliding mode control (SMC) for ET has attracted more attention due to its strong robustness. Horn and Reichhartinger [19] propose a highorder SMC to design ET controller, and then the twisting and the supertwisting algorithm are used to eliminate the impacts of chattering caused by the variable structure. Furthermore, Pan et al. [20] put forward the sliding mode observer based SMC for ET valve. However, compared with [19], the work of [20] does not reject the influences of chattering effectively. Recently, Bai and Tong [21] propose the adaptive backstepping SMC for ET system. However, they assume that the throttle opening angle change is measurable, which is not true in practice.
Recently, intelligent approaches have been widely used in the engine control, such as controller design, parameter identification, or fault diagnosis. Sheng and Bao [26] propose a fractional order fuzzyPID controller for ET, and the fruit fly optimization algorithm is used to search for the optimal values of the controller parameters. However, the gear backlash torque is ignored in this control strategy, which plays an important role in the controller design. Wang and Huang [27] put forward an intelligent fuzzy controller with a feedforward term to deal with the nonlinear hysteretic of ET. Meanwhile, the new closedloop backpropagation tuning is also proposed for the fuzzy output membership function to get better tracking performance. Unfortunately, the fuzzy rule for the feedforward controller is designed too simple to illustrate the characteristics of the nonlinear hysteresis. Moreover, with the development of automobile electronic technology, Yadav and Gaur [28] put the ETC into the uncertain hybrid electric vehicle (HEV) speed control, where a selftuning fuzzy PID controller and a special sliding mode adaptation mechanism are developed to achieve the robust performance of the ET controlled HEV. However, the use of the sign function in the SMC brings highfrequency chattering, which usually causes serious problems for actuators in real applications.
Since it is extremely difficult to measure those signals including the opening angle change of ET, the nonlinear factors, and external disturbance, Hu et al. [4] use a reducedorder observer to estimate the throttle opening angle change. Thereafter, a backstepping controller is designed for ETC based on Lyapunov techniques. However, the accuracy of the proposed method relies heavily on the precise information of the throttle; thus its robustness to estimation error should be improved. Moreover, the effect of torque caused by air flow and parameters variation is ignored in the algorithm, which is significant for the practical performance of the ETC.
Regarding the aforementioned issues, an extended state observer (ESO) based adaptive backstepping sliding mode controller for ET valve is proposed in this paper, and then an adaptive control law is further designed using Lyapunovbased techniques. Finally, the numerical experiments are conducted and the results show that the combination of the adaptive backstepping and SMC can improve the performance of ETC in terms of the steady error and the rising time.
The rest of this paper is organized as follows. Section 2 describes the mathematical model of the ET system including friction, nonlinear spring, and gear backlash. Section 3 designs an ESO for ET. Section 4 proposes an adaptive backstepping SMC controller. Section 5 performs simulationbased numerical experiments and compares the performance of the proposed controller with that of BSC controllers. The final section provides some concluding remarks.
2. Model
As shown in Figure 1, ET valve consists of a DC motor, a gearbox, a valve plate, a position sensor, and a dual return spring [11].
According to Kirchhoff’s law, the model of the motor winding circuit is as follows [4]: where and are the armature inductance and the overall resistance of the armature circuit, respectively. And , represent the dc motor armature current and the input control voltage, respectively. and denote the chopper gain and the electromotive force constant, and is the motor angular velocity.
In terms of the torque balance principle, the dynamic characteristic of throttle valve is given by [4] where is the position (opening angle) of throttle valve, is the overall moment of inertia with respect to the motor side, is motor torque constant, is the throttle return spring torque, is the torque caused by the air flow, and is gear ratio. is frictional torque caused by Coulomb and sliding friction as follows [4]: where is Coulomb friction coefficient and is sliding friction coefficient. In addition, the throttle return spring torque is given by [4] where is spring elastic coefficient, is the spring tightening torque coefficient, and is the default opening angle of the ET.
The system sampling time is chosen with respect to the dominant time constant of the linearized ET model and is set to [12]. The armature current dynamics can be neglected since the time constant . Therefore, (1) can be simplified as [12, 15]
Based on (2)–(5), the ET model is
Then, let and ; the statespace expression of (6) can be written as where , , and .
Let represent the total disturbance including the combining the , unknown (the torque caused by the air flow), and the external disturbance; we can rewrite (7) with consideration that the Coulomb friction coefficient is very small as follows: where , , and .
Taking the parametric variations of ET into consideration, (8) can be further rewritten as where , , .
Further, we have where is the total uncertainty given by where . and are the system parametric uncertainties.
3. Extended State Observer Design
Since ESO can estimate the system states as well as disturbance, we use the ESO to estimate the opening angle change of ET [29–31]. Based on (8), the nonlinear system is designed as follows [29]: where . In order to facilitate analysis, we also define , and is a nonlinear function. Hence, the ESO can be expressed as follows [29]:
Defining , , , then based on (8) and (13) we can obtain where is derivative of .
Assume that is bounded, and the nonlinear function is smooth; that is, and . Hence, (14) can be rewritten as follows:
Suppose
Substituting (16) into (15), the statespace equation of (15) can be expressed as
Define
Then (17) can be rewritten as
It is shown from (19) that can be determined by . Hence, we could choose appropriate parameters to guarantee the closedloop stability of system (19).
Submitting (16) into (12), the ESO can be obtained as follows: where the nonlinear function satisfies the following three conditions [29]:(i) is continuously differentiable;(ii);(iii).
4. Adaptive BackStepping SMC Design
To overcome the disturbance and ensure the robustness of controller [32–34], we design the adaptive backstepping controller with SMC for the ET system. Figure 2 illustrates the control strategy, where is the estimation of opening angle change for the ET.
The backstepping technique consists of a stepbystep construction of a new system with state variables , with being the desired value for state . Let the desired ET angle be , and we start by constructing the first state variable as the tacking error: Then, we will design the second desired state such that the state satisfies if , where is a positive constant. Then, it follows from (21) and (9) that . Hence, we have , and the second system state variable is constructed as The candidate Lyapunov function can be chosen as [35] Then, we have Based on the fact that , we know that ; thus it is obtained that To facilitate subsequent development, a sliding surface in terms of and is defined as follows: where .
Remark 1. It is worthwhile to point out that, in general, the sliding mode surface is usually defined as for traditional backstepping based SMC [36], for which it is required to guarantee that the system state converges to the sliding mode surface in finite time, and then, we can derive from (25) that will be stabilized to origin. However, unlike the traditional approach, we define the sliding surface as in (26) other than , and it is shown in the subsequent Theorems 2 and 3 that , , and will asymptotically converge to zero simultaneously, which relaxes the finitetime requirement for the sliding surface in the traditional design.
Inspired by the Lyapunovbased control design methods, a controller with the capability of disturbance rejection and strong robustness is designed as follows:
where , .
Theorem 2. With the proposed controller in (27), if the following condition is satisfied: with Then the closedloop system is Lyapunov stable in the sense that
Proof. Based on (23), a candidate Lyapunov function can be chosen as [37]
Then
Based on (32), let
where , ; then
Let
Hence
where . Consider
If , , and are designed reasonably to ensure , then is a positive definite matrix. Consequently,
According to , we know that is a nonincreasing function when , so .
Since
Based on (21), (26), and (32), we know that , , and are bounded when . Since , we know that . Assuming that , it is known from that . Furthermore, based on (39), we know that is uniformly continuous because .
In addition, we have
According to (40), we know that . Hence, we know that based on Barbalat’s Lemma [38]. Moreover, we know from that ; thus we have . Consequently, we have , , .
Furthermore, if the parametric uncertainties in ET are considered, an adaptive controller is designed as follows: where is the estimation of , and the parameter updating law is designed as
Theorem 3. With the proposed adaptive controller in (41) and the parameter estimation law in (42), if , with then the closedloop system is stable in the sense that
Proof. Firstly, we assume that the parametric uncertainties and external disturbance change slowly; then . To design the controller with adaptive capability of parametric uncertainties, the candidate Lyapunov function is defined as follows [37]:
where , and is the estimation of , . Then
Based on (46), we let
Hence, substituting (47) into (46), we have
According to (36), we can rewrite (48) as
If is a positive definite matrix, then . Hence, the proposed adaptive controller is Lyapunov stable.
Similar to the proof of Theorem 2, then we can use Barbalat’s Lemma to obtain that [38]
Based on the above discussion, if the immeasurable variable in (47) is replaced with the estimation value , we can obtain the backstepping SMC incorporating the proposed ESO as follows:
5. Numerical Experiments
5.1. Simulations
In order to verify the effectiveness of the proposed controller, the simulation of ETC is conducted under the Matlab/Simulink platform based on the dynamic characteristics of ET valve. In addition, we choose . The whole Simulink main program is shown in Figure 3 and the basic parameter configuration of ET is listed in Table 1.

According to the requirement of ETC in engineering applications given in [12], the reference inputs are chosen as the step and sine signals, respectively. Figure 4 depicts the signal tracking results using the step reference signal when the desired throttle opening is 60°. Figure 4 shows that the position of ET is able to track the reference signal without overshoot within 100 ms, while the tracking results with the sine reference signal are shown in Figure 5. From Figures 4 and 5, the results show that the proposed controller can satisfy the ET tracking control requirement in [12] with the step and sine reference signals.
As foregoing discussion, those parameters are designed using Lyapunov techniques. Figure 6 is the step response of ETC with parametric uncertainties when desired throttle opening is 60° and the parameters , , . Figure 6 shows that the settling time of ETC is less than 100 ms. Figure 6 also shows that the steadystate error of ETC tends to zero. Figure 7 is the adaptive estimation value of the total uncertainty . In addition, the results form Figure 6 show that the proposed controller has a better robustness compared with Figure 4.
The discussion mentioned above demonstrates that the proposed controller has strong robustness with respect to parametric uncertainties. That is to say, a stable vehicle speed can be guaranteed since the adaptive controller can quickly adjust the opening angle of ET valve when an external disturbance occurs.
In practical application, the mutation of throttle opening is inevitable, which has important influence on vehicle acceleration/deceleration. Furthermore, traffic congestion will lead to the stopandgo phenomenon in traffic flow, further resulting in the vehicle speed change. Hence, ET should have good responsiveness capability to track the change.
Therefore, it is significant to conduct analysis on the controller performance under the condition of input signal mutation. Moreover, the nonlinear spring does not allow opening angles below 5° and above 80° [20]; the experiment under the minimum and maximum values of square reference signal is set as 10° and 60°, respectively, as shown in Figure 8. Figure 8 shows that the proposed controller can track the small values accurately (the important condition of idle speed control), so does the large values (the essential condition of vehicle acceleration). In addition, the settling time is less than required 100 ms. On the other hand, Figure 8 also shows that the steadystate errors approximate 0, which illustrates that the proposed controller can satisfy the requirement of ETC. Hence, the results from this simulation show that the designed controller also has a good control performance under square wave input signal. It also implies that the vehicle in the platoon can follow the preceding vehicles with safe space headway and safe speed via ETC when the stopandgo phenomenon emerges.
5.2. Performance Comparison
Compared with the literature [4], this study considers not only the external disturbance, but also the parametric uncertainties and the torque caused by the air flow. Then the adaptive law is designed using the Lyapunov techniques. Finally, the experiment is conducted using simulation and the comparison results are summarized in Table 2. Table 2 shows that the proposed adaptive backstepping SMC has better control performance than the backstepping controller in [4] in terms of the settling time, steadystate error, and the overshoot.

5.3. Simulated Experiment
In this section, we incorporate the ET controller with mean value modeling of spark ignition engine under the conditions of pressing the accelerator pedal and easing it off [39]. The schematic block diagram of main simulation is shown in Figure 9. Figure 10 shows the throttle opening angle tracking performance. It can be seen that the proposed controller can track the desired input signal effectively. Figures 11, 12, and 13 show the manifold pressure, engine speed, and throttle airflow, respectively. The results show that the proposed controller can control the engine accurately via ETC.
6. Conclusions
To improve the accuracy of the information for ETC under V2V communications, an ESO based adaptive backstepping SMC is proposed based on the Lyapunov theory, in the presence of high nonlinearity of ET and immeasurable signals for throttle opening angle change. In addition, with the designed adaptive law, strong robustness to parametric uncertainties and external disturbance can be achieved. Simulation results show that the proposed controller can track the desired reference input signal fast and accurately with strong robustness to uncertainties and disturbances.
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.
Acknowledgments
This work is jointly supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 61304197), the Scientific and Technological Talents of Chongqing (Grant no. cstc2014kjrcqnrc30002), the Key Project of Application and Development of Chongqing (Grant no. cstc2014yykfB40001), the Nature Science Funds of Education Committee of Chongqing (Grant no. KJ130506), Natural Science Funds of Chongqing (Grant nos. cstc2014jcyjA60003 and cstc2012jjA40035), and Natural Science Funds of CQUPT (Grant nos. A201278 and A201327). The authors would like to express their gratitude to Dr. Hongchun Qu and Dr. Xiaoming Tang from Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications for their good discussions on the paper preparation.
References
 V. Milanes, S. E. Shladover, J. Spring, C. Nowakowski, H. Kawazoe, and M. Nakamura, “Cooperative adaptive cruise control in real traffic situations,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 296–305, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 D.H. Sun, Y.F. Li, W.N. Liu, M. Zhao, and X.Y. Liao, “Research summary on transportation cyber physical systems and the challenging technologies,” China Journal of Highway and Transport, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 144–154, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
 L. Li, D. Wen, and D. Yao, “A survey of traffic control with vehicular communications,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 425–432, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. F. Hu, C. Li, J. Li, H. Y. Guo, P. Y. Sun, and H. Chen, “Observerbased output feedback control of electronic throttles,” Acta Automatica Sinica, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 746–754, 2011. View at: Google Scholar  MathSciNet
 P. Ioannou and Z. Xu, “Throttle and brake control system for automatic vehicle following,” Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 345–377, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
 Y. Li and D. Sun, “Microscopic carfollowing model for the traffic flow: the state of the art,” Journal of Control Theory and Applications, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 133–143, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  MathSciNet
 T. Tang, W. Shi, H. Shang, and Y. Wang, “A new carfollowing model with consideration of intervehicle communication,” Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 76, no. 4, pp. 2017–2023, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Ploeg, N. Van De Wouw, and H. Nijmeijer, “Lp string stability of cascaded systems: application to vehicle platooning,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 786–793, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 W. Wang, S. S. Liao, X. Li, and J. S. Ren, “The process of information propagation along a traffic stream through intervehicle communication,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 345–354, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 L. Xiao and F. Gao, “Practical string stability of platoon of adaptive cruise control vehicles,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 1184–1194, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 X. F. Yuan, Y. N. Wang, L. H. Wu, X. Z. Zhang, and W. Sun, “Neural network based selflearning control strategy for electronic throttle valve,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 59, no. 8, pp. 3757–3765, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Deur, D. Pavković, N. Perić, M. Jansz, and D. Hrovat, “An electronic throttle control strategy including compensation of friction and limphome effects,” IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 821–834, 2004. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 D. Pavković, J. Deur, M. Jansz, and N. Perić, “Adaptive control of automotive electronic throttle,” Control Engineering Practice, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 121–136, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 X. Yuan and Y. Wang, “A novel electronicthrottlevalve controller based on approximate model method,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 883–890, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Vašak, M. Baotić, M. Morari, I. Petrović, and N. Perić, “Constrained optimal control of an electronic throttle,” International Journal of Control, vol. 79, no. 5, pp. 465–478, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  MathSciNet
 M. Vašak, M. Baotić, I. Petrović, and N. Perić, “Hybrid theorybased timeoptimal control of an electronic throttle,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 1483–1494, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 D. Kim, H. Peng, S. Bai, and J. M. Maguire, “Control of integrated powertrain with electronic throttle and automatic transmission,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 474–482, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 K. Nakano, U. Sawut, K. Higuchi, and Y. Okajima, “Modelling and observerbased slidingmode control of electronic throttle system,” ECTI Transactions on Electrical Engineering, Electronics, and Communications, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 22–28, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
 M. Horn and M. Reichhartinger, “Secondorder sliding mode control of electronic throttle valves,” in Proceedings of the IEEE 10th International Workshop on Variable Structure Systems (VSS '08), pp. 280–284, IEEE, Antalya, Turkey, June 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. D. Pan, Ü. Özguner, and O. H. Dağci, “Variablestructure control of electronic throttle valves,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 55, no. 11, pp. 3899–3907, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. Bai and S. Tong, “Adaptive backstepping slidingmode control of the electronic throttle system in modern automobiles,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2014, Article ID 383064, 8 pages, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  MathSciNet
 X. Yuan, Y. Wang, and L. Wu, “SVMbased approximate model control for electronic throttle valve,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 2747–2756, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Barić, I. Petrović, and N. Perić, “Neural networkbased sliding mode control of electronic throttle,” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 951–961, 2005. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Nentwig and P. Mercorelli, “Throttle valve control using an inverse local linear model tree based on a Fuzzy neural network,” in Proceedings of the 7th IEEE International Conference on Cybernetic Intelligent Systems (CIS '08), pp. 1–6, London, UK, September 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Barić, I. Petrović, and N. Perić, “Neural network based sliding mode controller for a class of linear systems with unmatched uncertainties,” in Proceedings of the 41st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, vol. 1, pp. 967–972, Las Vegas, Nev, USA, December 2002. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 W. Sheng and Y. Bao, “Fruit fly optimization algorithm based fractional order fuzzyPID controller for electronic throttle,” Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 73, no. 12, pp. 611–619, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  MathSciNet
 C.H. Wang and D.Y. Huang, “A new intelligent fuzzy controller for nonlinear hysteretic electronic throttle in modern intelligent automobiles,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 2332–2345, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. K. Yadav and P. Gaur, “Robust adaptive speed control of uncertain hybrid electric vehicle using electronic throttle control with varying road grade,” Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 305–321, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  MathSciNet
 Z. J. Kang and X. Y. Chen, “A design method of nonlinear extension state observer,” Electric Machines and Control, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 199–203, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
 A. A. Godbole, J. P. Kolhe, and S. E. Talole, “Performance analysis of generalized extended state observer in tackling sinusoidal disturbances,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 2212–2223, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Z. Gao, X. Dai, T. Breikin, and H. Wang, “Novel parameter identification by using a highgain observer with application to a gas turbine engine,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 271–279, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Morawiec, “The adaptive backstepping control of permanent magnet synchronous motor supplied by current source inverter,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 1047–1055, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. R. Dominguez, A. Navarrete, M. A. Meza, A. G. Loukianov, and J. Cañedo, “Digital slidingmode sensorless control for surfacemounted PMSM,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 137–151, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 D. Zhao, T. Zou, S. Li, and Q. Zhu, “Adaptive backstepping sliding mode control for leaderfollower multiagent systems,” IET Control Theory & Applications, vol. 6, no. 8, pp. 1109–1117, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  MathSciNet
 Y. C. Fang, P. C. Wang, N. Sun, and Y. C. Zhang, “Dynamics analysis and nonlinear control of an offshore boom crane,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 414–427, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Xia, Z. Zhu, and M. Fu, “Backstepping sliding mode control for missile systems based on an extended state observer,” IET Control Theory & Applications, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 93–102, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  MathSciNet
 N. Sun, Y. C. Fang, and H. Chen, “A new antiswing control method for underactuated cranes with unmodeled uncertainties: theoretical design and hardware experiments,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 453–465, 2015. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 X. Zhang, Y. Fang, and N. Sun, “Minimumtime trajectory planning for underactuated overhead crane systems with state and control constraints,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 61, no. 12, pp. 6915–6925, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 E. Hendricks and S. C. Sorenson, “Mean value modelling of spark ignition engines,” SAE Technical Paper 900616, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 Yongfu Li et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.