Research Article  Open Access
Xiaoyan Huo, Saima K. Khosa, Zubair Ahmad, Zahra Almaspoor, Muhammad Ilyas, Muhammad Aamir, "A New Lifetime ExponentialX Family of Distributions with Applications to Reliability Data", Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2020, Article ID 1316345, 16 pages, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/1316345
A New Lifetime ExponentialX Family of Distributions with Applications to Reliability Data
Abstract
Modeling reliability data with nonmonotone hazards is a prominent research topic that is quite rich and still growing rapidly. Many studies have suggested introducing new families of distributions to modify the Weibull distribution to model the nonmonotone hazards. In the present study, we propose a new family of distributions called a new lifetime exponentialX family. A special submodel of the proposed family called a new lifetime exponentialWeibull distribution suitable for modeling reliability data with bathtubshaped hazard rates is discussed. The maximumlikelihood estimators of the model parameters are obtained. A brief Monte Carlo simulation study is conducted to evaluate the performance of these estimators. For illustrative purposes, two real applications from reliability engineering with bathtubshaped hazard functions are analyzed. The practical applications show that the proposed model provides better fits than the other nonnested models.
1. Introduction
tThe hazard rate function (also known as failure rate function) is an important reliability characteristic. It deals with the failure of the system at the time, say t, given that the system has not failed prior to time t. Among the hazard rate functions, the bathtubshaped hazard rate curve is well known in reliability engineering. It represents the failure behavior of various engineering systems having initially a decreasing failure rate during the very first phase, a relatively constant failure rate in the middle part of the life (usually called useful life period), and finally an increasing failure rate in the last phase. In the context of the reliability theory, these three phases are known, respectively, as burning, random, and wearout failure regions.
In the last two decades, many new life distributions capable of modeling data with the bathtubshaped hazard rate function (hrf) have been introduced in the literature. Most of them are the modifications and extensions of the twoparameter Weibull distribution. For example, a threeparameter exponentiated Weibull (EW) of Mudholkar and Srivastava [1] has a bathtubshaped hazard function. A threeparameter modified Weibull extension (MWEx) of Xie et al. [2] exhibits data modeling with bathtub shape. The truncated Weibull distribution of Zhang and Xie [3] has a bathtubshaped hazard function. The twoparameter flexible Weibull extension (FWEx) of Bebbington et al. [4] has increasing, decreasing, or bathtubshaped function. An interesting extension of the Weibull model called Zubair–Weibull (ZW) distribution proposed by Ahmad [5] is capable of modeling the data exhibiting the bathtubshaped failure rate. A threeparameter extended alpha power transformed Weibull (EAPTW) of Ahmad et al. [6] and a threeparameter new extended alpha power transformed Weibull (NEAPTW) of Ahmad et al. [7] are all having failure rate function that can be increasing, decreasing, or bathtubshaped.
The parametric models such as the exponential, Rayleigh, Weibull, lognormal, and gamma distributions have been extensively used in fitting biomedical and reliability data [8]. The researchers in reliability engineering and other related fields have shown a great interest in studying the failure time of electronic devices [9]. An appropriate parametric model is always of interest in survival and reliability analysis, as it provides a concise description of the characteristics of failure times as well as hazard function that may not be available with nonparametric methods [10]. Also, as observed in Zhu et al. [8], the parametric Weibull is more flexible distribution than the Cox semiparametric model [11], since the associated hazard rate is not constant over time. However, unfortunately, the Weibull model is not capable of modeling data with nonmonotonic (unimodal, modified unimodal, and bathtubshaped) hrf.
Due to the importance of the statistical distributions in reliability engineering and other related fields, the researchers are motivated to introduce new flexible distributions. In this regard, serious attempts have been made and still growing rapidly. The new developments have been made through many different approaches such as (i) transformation of variables, (ii) composition of two or more distributions, (iii) compounding of distributions, and (iv) finite mixture of distributions.
Recent studies of Bagnato and Punzo [12] showed that the transformation approach is simple to use, but most often the inference and computation of the other distributional characteristics become complicated.
Another promising approach for obtaining new families of distributions, which gives a reasonably good fit for reallife data, is the method of composition; see Bakar et al. [13]. However, it should be noted that the new distributions obtained by the composition approach involve more than three parameters causing difficulties in the estimation process and computational efforts are required.
Another prominent approach is compounding of distributions to cater data modeling with unimodality. However, the density obtained via this method may not have a closedform expression which makes the estimation more cumbersome as shown in Punzo et al. [14].
Finite mixture models represent a further approach to define very flexible distributions which are also able to capture, for instance, multimodality of the underlying distribution (Punzo et al. [15]). The price to pay for this greater flexibility is a more complicated and computationally challenging inference.
Using the above approaches, a number of families of distributions have been introduced; see Topp–Leone odd loglogistic family [16], the BurrX generator [17], exponentiated transmutedG family [18], the BurrXII system of densities [19], a new extended G family [20], type I general exponential class of distributions [21], and type II general exponential class of distributions [22], among others.
Carrying out this branch of distribution theory, Alzaatreh et al. [23] defined the TX family method to introduce new families of distributions. Let be the probability density function (pdf) of a random variable, say T, where , , and let be a function of of a random variable, say X, satisfying the following conditions:(1)(2) is differentiable and monotonically increasing(3) as and as
The cdf of the TX family of distributions is defined as follows:where satisfies the conditions stated above. The pdf corresponding to (1) is given by
For the contributed work based on the idea of TX approach, we refer to Ahmad et al. [24]. Using the approach of TX method, one can introduce new members of survival family [25] via the cdf:where is the survival function of the baseline distribution.
Taking inspiration from (1), in this article, we propose a new family of distributions to provide the best fit to data in reliability sciences and other related fields. Let , then its cdf is given by
The density function corresponding to (4) is
If follows (5) and setting in (1), Ahmad et al. [26] defined the cdf of the weighted T family as follows:where is the parameter vector that may belong to . Ahmad et al. proposed an extended version of (6), called Zfamily of distributions by setting and , in (1), given by
The expression in (7) represents a wide family of univariate continuous distributions. Clearly, when , the cdf of the proposed family derived in (7) becomes identical to the baseline cdf, and for , the expression (7) reduces to (6). The pdf corresponding to (7) is given by
No doubt, the Zfamily defined in (8) is a more flexible class of distributions. However, expression (8) involves the logarithmic term resulting in complication of the density function and the derivation of many mathematical properties becomes complicated. To avoid this problem, we introduce an alternative form of (8). The newly proposed family is introduced by reparametrizing . The form of the newly proposed family is much simple and flexible than the Zfamily.
If follows (5) and setting in (1), we define the cdf of the new lifetime exponentialX (NLTEX) family by
Clearly, for , expression (9) reduces to (6). The density function and hrf corresponding to (9) are, respectively, given by
A special submodel of the proposed family called a new lifetime exponentialWeibull (NLTEW) distribution is considered in detail. The proposed model is very flexible and offers data modeling with increasing, decreasing, and bathtub and inverted bathtubshaped hazard rate functions. Finally, we concentrate our attention to illustrate the proposed model by analyzing two reallife applications from reliability engineering.
The paper is outlined as follows: a special submodel of the proposed family is defined in Section 2. Some mathematical properties are derived in Section 3. Maximumlikelihood estimation of the model parameters is addressed in Section 4. Two reallife applications to reliability data are analyzed in Section 5. Finally, some concluding remarks are presented in Section 6.
2. Special Submodels
This section offers some special submodels of the proposed class.
2.1. NLTEWeibull Distribution
Let be the cdf of the Weibull model given by , where . Then, the cdf of the NLTEW distribution has the following expression:
The pdf and hrf of the NLTEW model are given, respectively, by
For different values of the model parameters, plots of the density function of the NLTEW model are sketched in Figure 1.
(a)
(b)
For different values of the model parameters, plots of the hrf of the NLTEW are sketched in Figures 2 and 3.
(a)
(b)
(a)
(b)
In Figure 1, we plotted different shapes for the density of NLTEW distribution for fixed values of and different values of and . When , the proposed model behaves like exponential distribution. But, as the value of and increases, the proposed model captures the characteristics of the Weibull distribution. However, the proposed model has certain advantages over the Weibull distribution. For example, it is capable of modeling lifetime data with monotonic and nonmonotonic hrf. As it is given in Figures 2 and 3, the hrf of the proposed model is very flexible in accommodating different shapes, namely, decreasing, increasing, unimodal, and most importantly with bathtubshaped hrf. Hence the NLTEW distribution becomes an important model to fit several real lifetime data in applied areas such as reliability engineering and biomedical analysis.
2.2. NLTERayleigh Distribution
Let be the cdf of the Rayleigh model given by . Then, the cdf of the NLTERayleigh (NLTER) distribution has the following expression:
The pdf and hrf of the NLTER distribution are given, respectively, by
For different values of the model parameters, plots of the density and hazard rate functions of the NLTER model are sketched in Figure 4.
(a)
(b)
2.3. NLTEExponential Distribution
Let be the cdf of the exponential model given by . Then, the cdf of the NLTEexponential (NLTEE) distribution has the following expression:
The pdf and hrf of the NLTEE model are given, respectively, by
For different values of the model parameters, plots of the density function of the NLTEE distribution are sketched in Figure 5.
(a)
(b)
In Figure 5, we plotted different shapes for the density of NLTEE distribution for different values of and . From Figure 5, we can see that the hrf of the NLTEE distribution behaves approximately constant. However, the proposed model has certain advantages over the exponential distribution. For example, it is capable of modeling lifetime data with increasing hrf where the classical exponential distribution is not capable of modeling data with increasing hrf. Hence, the NLTEE distribution becomes an important model to fit several real lifetime data in applied areas such as reliability engineering and biomedical analysis, where modeling data with increasing hrf are of interest.
3. Mathematical Properties
In this section, some mathematical properties of the NLTEX distributions are derived.
3.1. Quantile Function
The quantile function of NLTEX family is derived as follows:where is the solution of the equation and has the uniform distribution on interval . Nonlinear expression (18) can be used to obtain the random numbers for the NLTEX family of distributions.
3.2. Moments
Here, we derive some kinds of moments for the NLTEX family. For the sake of simplicity, we omit the dependency of and on the parameter vector . Density (8) can be represented as follows:where . For any positive integer , the moment of the NLTEX distributions is given by
On using (20) in (21), we get the moment of the NLTEX distributions.
For , we get the first four moments of the NLTEX distributions. The effects of the shape parameters on the skewness and kurtosis can be detected on the moments. Based on moments, we obtain skewness and kurtosis measures of the NLTEWeibull distribution. The skewness of NLTEWeibull distribution is obtained using the following expression:where and are the second and third moments of the random variable X with pdf (8). Furthermore, the kurtosis of X is derived as follows:where is the fourth moment of X. These measures are less sensitivity to outliers. Plots for the mean, variance, skewness, and kurtosis of the NLTEWeibull distribution are displayed in Figure 6.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
3.3. Residual Life
The residual life plays a vital role in practice particularly in reliability theory. The remaining waiting time for an event to happen conditioned that we have already been waiting is what we call residual life. Let X follow NLTEX family of distributions, then the residual life of X is given by
3.4. Reverse Residual Life
The reverse residual life of a lifetime random variable is of interest in many areas of applied sciences such as survival analysis, actuarial studies, and risk management. The residual lifetime of X denoted by is given by
3.5. On Other Means and Moments
The following result proposes an expansion of the primitive:where .
Several crucial conditional moments can be obtained using the integral for various values of . The most useful of them are presented as follows:(i)The conditional moments of X are given by(ii)The reversed moments of X are given by(iii)The mean deviations of X about the mean, say , are given by where .(iv)The mean deviations of X about the median, say , are given by
The residual life parameters can be also determined using and for several values of r. In particular, the following(i)The mean residual life is defined as follows: and the variance residual life is given by(ii)The mean reversed residual life is defined as follows: and the variance reversed residual life is defined as
4. MaximumLikelihood Estimation and Monte Carlo Simulation Study
In this section, we use the maximumlikelihood method to estimate the model parameters and also provide a Monte Carlo (MC) simulation study to assess the behavior of these estimators.
4.1. MaximumLikelihood Estimation
In this section, we obtain the maximumlikelihood estimators (MLEs) of the model parameters of the NLTEX distributions from complete samples only. Let be an observed sample of size n obtained from (9). The corresponding loglikelihood function can be expressed as follows:
The loglikelihood function can be maximized either directly or by solving the nonlinear likelihood function obtained by differentiating (34). We used the goodnessoffit function optim() Rfunction with the argument method = “LBFGSB” to obtain the MLEs. The firstorder partial derivatives of (34) with respect to the parameters are given, respectively, by
Setting and equal to zero and solving numerically these expressions simultaneously yield the MLEs of .
4.2. Simulation Study
In this section, we perform a Monte Carlo simulation study with the objective to assess the behavior of the MLEs of NLTEW model via the optim() Rfunction with the argument method = “LBFGSB.” It is used for maximizing the loglikelihood function of a probabilistic model. We consider 750 MC replicates under different sample sizes n = 25, 50, …, 750. For each sample size, we compute the average MLEs, mean square errors (MSE), biases, and absolute biases. The results obtained after performing the MC simulation are provided in Tables 1 and 2 and displayed graphically in Figures 7 and 8.


(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
The simulation results provided in Figures 7 and 8 indicate the following:(i)The estimates are quite stable and, more importantly, are close to the true values for these sample sizes(ii)The estimated biases decrease when the sample size increases(iii)The estimated MSEs decay toward zero when the sample size increases
5. Applications of the NLTEW Model to Reliability Data
In this section, we use two reliability datasets to illustrate the importance and flexibility of the proposed distribution. The comparison of the proposed distribution is made with a nested model, the Weibull distribution, and with some other nonnested models such as exponentiated Weibull (EW), alpha power transformed Weibull (APTW), transmuted Weibull (TW), and flexible Weibull extended (FWE) distributions. The analysis is performed via the optim() Rfunction with the argument method = “BFGS”. The cdfs of the competing distributions are as follows:(i)Weibull distribution(ii)EW distribution(iii)APTW distribution(vi)TW distribution(v)FWE distribution
Next, we consider certain analytical measures in order to verify which distribution fits better the considered data. These analytical measures include (i) discrimination measures such as Akaike information criterion (AIC), Bayesian information criterion (BIC), Hannan–Quinn information criterion (HQIC), consistent Akaike information criterion (CAIC), and (ii) three other goodnessoffit measures including Anderson–Darling (AD) test statistic, Cramer–von Mises (CM) test statistic, and Kolmogorov–Smirnov (KS) test statistic with corresponding values; for detail, see Afify et al. [27].
5.1. Arset Data
The first dataset representing the lifetimes of 50 devices taken from Arset [28]. Many authors have analyzed this dataset, including Mudholkar and Srivastava [1]; Xie and Lai [29]; Lai et al. [30]; Sarhan and Zaindin [31]; and Silva et al. [32]. This dataset is known to have a bathtubshaped hazard rate as shown by the scaled TTTtransform plot (Figure 9). For the Arset data, the MLEs with standard errors of the competing models are provided in Table 3. The values of the discrimination measures are provided in Table 4, whereas the goodnessoffit measures are presented in Table 5. In support of the results provided in Tables 4 and 5, the fitted pdf and cdf of the proposed model are presented in Figure 10. The scaled TTTtransform and probabilityprobability (PP) plots of the NLTEW model are sketched in Figure 9. These plots indicate that the proposed model provides the best fit to data.
(a)
(b)



(a)
(b)
5.2. Meeker and Escobar Data
The second data representing the failure times of a sample of 30 devices are taken from Meeker and Escobar [33]. This dataset has already been studied by Almalki and Yuan [34]. The Meeker and Escobar dataset has a bathtubshaped hazard function as indicated by the scaled TTTtransform plot (Figure 11). Corresponding to the second data, the MLEs with standard errors of the competing models are provided in Table 6. The values of the discrimination measures are provided in Table 7, whereas the goodnessoffit measures are presented in Table 8. In support of the results provided in Tables 7 and 8, the fitted pdf and cdf of the proposed model are presented in Figure 12. The scaled TTTtransform and probabilityprobability (PP) plots of the NLTEW model are sketched in Figure 11. It is clear in Figure 12 that the NLTEW distribution fits the left and right peaks in the histogram better (see the fitted pdf) and its survival function follows the estimated cdf closely.
(a)
(b)



(a)
(b)
From the results provided in Tables 4 and 5 (for data 1) and Tables 7 and 8 (for data 2), it is clear that the proposed model could be chosen as the best model among the fitted models since the proposed model has the lowest values of the goodnessoffit measures and maximum value.
6. Concluding Remarks
A new family of distributions called a new lifetime exponentialX family has been introduced. A threeparameter special submodel of the proposed family called a new lifetime exponentialWeibull distribution is studied in detail. The proposed model is very flexible and is capable of accommodating different shapes of the failure rates including bathtubshaped to describe the failure behavior of a variety of lifetime datasets. Maximumlikelihood estimators of the model parameters are obtained and a Monte Carlo simulation study has been carried out. Finally, two real datasets with bathtubshaped failure rate, as indicated by the scaled TTTtransform plots, have been analyzed for illustrative purposes.
Future work includes MCMC methods with censored data, modeling regression problems with covariates, and parameter reduction.
Data Availability
The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.
Acknowledgments
The first author also acknowledges the support of 2019 Soft Science Project of Science and Technology Department of Jilin Province, Research on Service Quality Improvement of Science and Technology Innovation Platform of Jilin Province (no. 20190601051FG).
References
 G. S. Mudholkar and D. K. Srivastava, “Exponentiated Weibull family for analyzing bathtub failurerate data,” IEEE Transactions on Reliability, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 299–302, 1993. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Xie, Y. Tang, and T. N. Goh, “A modified Weibull extension with bathtubshaped failure rate function,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 279–285, 2002. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 T. Zhang and M. Xie, “On the upper truncated Weibull distribution and its reliability implications,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 96, no. 1, pp. 194–200, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Bebbington, C.D. Lai, and R. Zitikis, “A flexible Weibull extension,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 92, no. 6, pp. 719–726, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Z. Ahmad, “The ZubairG family of distributions: properties and applications,” Annals of Data Science, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 195–208, 2018. View at: Google Scholar
 Z. Ahmad, M. Ilyas, and G. G. Hamedani, “The extended alpha power transformed family of distributions: properties and applications,” Journal of Data Science, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 726–741, 2019. View at: Google Scholar
 Z. Ahmad, M. Elgarhy, and N. Abbas, “A new extended alpha power transformed family of distributions: properties and applications,” Journal of Statistical Modelling: Theory and Applications, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 13–28, 2019. View at: Google Scholar
 H. P. Zhu, X. Xia, H. Y. Chuan, A. Adnan, S. F. Liu, and Y. K. Du, “Application of Weibull model for survival of patients with gastric cancer,” BMC Gastroenterology, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. J. AlMalki, “Statistical analysis of lifetime data using new modifed weibull distributions,” The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK, 2014, Doctoral dissertation. View at: Google Scholar
 A. S. Wahed, T. M. Luong, and J.H. Jeong, “A new generalization of Weibull distribution with application to a breast cancer data set,” Statistics in Medicine, vol. 28, no. 16, pp. 2077–2094, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 D. R. Cox, “Regression models and lifetables,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 187–202, 1972. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 L. Bagnato and A. Punzo, “Finite mixtures of unimodal beta and gamma densities and the k bumps algorithm,” Computational Statistics, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 1571–1597, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. A. Bakar, N. Hamzah, M. Maghsoudi, and S. Nadarajah, “Modeling loss data using composite models,” Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, vol. 61, pp. 146–154, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
 A. Punzo, L. Bagnato, and A. Maruotti, “Compound unimodal distributions for insurance losses,” Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, vol. 81, pp. 95–107, 2018. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. Punzo, A. Mazza, and A. Maruotti, “Fitting insurance and economic data with outliers: a flexible approach based on finite mixtures of contaminated gamma distributions,” Journal of Applied Statistics, vol. 45, no. 14, pp. 2563–2584, 2018. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 E. Brito, G. M. Cordeiro, H. M. Yousof, M. Alizadeh, and G. O. Silva, “The ToppLeone odd loglogistic family of distributions,” Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, vol. 87, no. 15, pp. 3040–3058, 2017. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. M. Yousof, A. Z. Afify, G. G. Hamedani, and G. Aryal, “The burr X generator of distributions for lifetime data,” Journal of Statistical Theory and Applications, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 288–305, 2017. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 F. Merovci, M. Alizadeh, H. M. Yousof, and G. G. Hamedani, “The exponentiated transmutedG family of distributions: theory and applications,” Communications in Statistics—Theory and Methods, vol. 46, no. 21, pp. 10800–10822, 2017. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 G. M. Cordeiro, H. M. Yousof, T. G. Ramires, and E. M. M. Ortega, “The burr XII system of densities: properties, regression model and applications,” Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 432–456, 2018. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 G. G. Hamedani, E. Altun, M. Ç. Korkmaz, H. M. Yousof, and N. S. Butt, “A new extended G family of continuous distributions with mathematical properties, characterizations and regression modeling,” Pakistan Journal of Statistics and Operation Research, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 737–758, 2018. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 D. G. G. Hamedani, H. M. Yousof, M. Rasekhi, M. Alizadeh, and S. M. Najibi, “Type I general exponential class of distributions,” Pakistan Journal of Statistics and Operation Research, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 39–55, 2018. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 G. G. Hamedani, M. Rasekhi, S. Najibi, H. M. Yousof, and M. Alizadeh, “Type II general exponential class of distributions,” Pakistan Journal of Statistics and Operation Research, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 503–523, 2019. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. Alzaatreh, C. Lee, and F. Famoye, “A new method for generating families of continuous distributions,” Metron, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 63–79, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Z. Ahmad, G. G. Hamedani, and N. S. Butt, “Recent developments in distribution theory: a brief survey and some new generalized classes of distributions,” Pakistan Journal of Statistics and Operation Research, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 87–110, 2019. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 F. Jamal and M. Nasir, “Some new members of the TX family of distributions,” in Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Statistical Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan, January 2019. View at: Google Scholar
 Z. Ahmad, E. Mahmoudi, S. Dey, and S. K. Khosa, “Modeling vehicle insurance loss data using a new member of TX family of distributions,” Journal of Statistical Theory and Applications, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 133–147, 2020. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. Z. Afify, G. M. Cordeiro, H. M. Yousof, A. Saboor, and E. M. Ortega, “The MarshallOlkin additive Weibull distribution with variable shapes for the hazard rate,” Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 365–381, 2018. View at: Google Scholar
 M. V. Aarset, “How to identify a bathtub hazard rate,” IEEE Transactions on Reliability, vol. R36, no. 1, pp. 106–108, 1987. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Xie and C. D. Lai, “Reliability analysis using an additive Weibull model with bathtubshaped failure rate function,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 87–93, 1996. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. D. Lai, M. Xie, and D. N. P. Murthy, “A modified Weibull distribution,” IEEE Transactions on Reliability, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 33–37, 2003. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. M. Sarhan and M. Zaindin, “Modifed Weibull distribution. APPS,” Applied Sciences, vol. 11, pp. 123–136, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
 G. O. Silva, E. M. M. Ortega, and G. M. Cordeiro, “The beta modified Weibull distribution,” Lifetime Data Analysis, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 409–430, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 W. Q. Meeker and L. A. Escobar, Statistical Methods for Reliability Data, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NY, USA, 2014.
 S. J. Almalki and J. Yuan, “A new modified Weibull distribution,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 111, pp. 164–170, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
Copyright
Copyright © 2020 Xiaoyan Huo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.