Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Neural Plasticity
Volume 2019, Article ID 5089321, 16 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5089321
Review Article

Rodent Models of Developmental Ischemic Stroke for Translational Research: Strengths and Weaknesses

1Institute of Neuroscience, National Research Council (CNR), Via Moruzzi 1, I-56124 Pisa, Italy
2Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, via Savi 10, I-56126 Pisa, Italy
3Department of Neuroscience, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health NEUROFARBA, University of Florence, Area San Salvi–Pad. 26, I-50135 Florence, Italy

Correspondence should be addressed to Tommaso Pizzorusso; ti.rnc.ni@osammot

Received 18 May 2018; Revised 19 December 2018; Accepted 6 February 2019; Published 4 April 2019

Guest Editor: Simona Fiori

Copyright © 2019 Mariangela Gennaro et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Cerebral ischemia can occur at any stage in life, but clinical consequences greatly differ depending on the developmental stage of the affected brain structures. Timing of the lesion occurrence seems to be critical, as it strongly interferes with neuronal circuit development and determines the way spontaneous plasticity takes place. Translational stroke research requires the use of animal models as they represent a reliable tool to understand the pathogenic mechanisms underlying the generation, progression, and pathological consequences of a stroke. Moreover, in vivo experiments are instrumental to investigate new therapeutic strategies and the best temporal window of intervention. Differently from adults, very few models of the human developmental stroke have been characterized, and most of them have been established in rodents. The models currently used provide a better understanding of the molecular factors involved in the effects of ischemia; however, they still hold many limitations due to matching developmental stages across different species and the complexity of the human disorder that hardly can be described by segregated variables. In this review, we summarize the key factors contributing to neonatal brain vulnerability to ischemic strokes and we provide an overview of the advantages and limitations of the currently available models to recapitulate different aspects of the human developmental stroke.

1. Introduction

An ischemic stroke is a transient or permanent interruption of the blood supply into the cerebral vasculature and represents worldwide one of the most important causes of death and of long-term disability in the survivors [1]. Although the risk of brain ischemia increases in the elderly, the insult can hit young people, at the perinatal and pediatric ages [2]. Depending on the developmental stage of the affected brain structures, a broad spectrum of clinical signs may arise [2] such as hemiplegic cerebral palsy that represents the most frequent deficit after developmental ischemia, with a prevalence of 90% within the affected children [1].

Despite several studies shedding light on different pathogenic mechanisms underlying the generation, progression, and pathological consequences of the developmental ischemic stroke, the translation from the bench to the bedside of these findings encounters several obstacles.

In translational research, animal models for strokes represent a fundamental tool (a) to understand the molecular mechanisms underlying the short- and long-term physiological responses of all individual neuronal systems and of the whole brain to injury, (b) to set up new therapeutic strategies to salvage and rescue those structures, and (c) to find the best temporal window of intervention with pharmacological and rehabilitation interventions [3, 4]. In this view, notwithstanding the complexity of all cascade events, the choice of a reliable model is a researcher priority to reconcile the existing marked differences between rodents and humans at the level both of the cerebral vasculature [5] and of the nervous system architecture [6]. Keeping in consideration of how hard it is to match developmental stages across different species, in this review, we aim to summarize developmental ischemic stroke pathophysiological mechanisms, focusing on key factors contributing to neonatal brain vulnerability. We also provide an overview of the models currently used to recapitulate the human developmental ischemic stroke, describing their advantages and limitations.

2. Clinical Features of Perinatal and Pediatric Ischemic Stroke

According to the timing of the stroke occurrence during development, two types of strokes are defined: perinatal and pediatric [2, 7]. The perinatal stroke, also known as neonatal, occurs from the 20th week of fetal life through to the 28th postnatal day and represents a significant cause of death and disability involving as many as 1 in 2,300 live births [1, 7]. By contrast, with a prevalence of 2-13 in 100,000, the pediatric stroke can occur from the twenty-eighth day after birth through to age eighteen [812]. Despite their different etiology, ischemia due to vascular (arterial or venous) thrombosis is the main cause of hemiplegia in up to 94% of cases of the perinatal versus pediatric stroke [1, 2, 1315]. Additional neurological signs including intellectual disabilities, behavioral deficits, language and visual defects, psychiatric disorders, and epilepsy are more frequent after the perinatal stroke with respect to the pediatric condition [1, 2, 7, 9, 14, 1618].

As stated before, depending on the timing of ischemia occurrence, different structures can undergo prevalent damage. For example, in preterm injured babies, white matter injury is more affected due to the abundance of developing oligodendrocytes that are highly sensitive to excitotoxicity and neuroinflammation [19]. On the other hand, in term babies, who have significantly less oligodendrocyte progenitors, grey matter structures (e.g., the basal ganglia, thalamic nuclei, and cerebral cortex) are the most commonly affected by the injury [20, 21]. In general, the perinatal stroke seems to be associated with a greater risk of worse outcomes [2, 7, 14, 18] when compared to the pediatric stroke scenario. This phenomenon is linked to the existence of different stages of the critical period throughout development in which the brain is differently susceptible to the early damage [2, 7]. Thus, in contrast to “Kennard’s principle” by which the younger brain holds a greater capability to recover from injury, it seems that an earlier injury may in some cases more deeply impact the early developing brain, finally disturbing and so disrupting its pattern of maturation. This form of plasticity called maladaptive plasticity could be particularly disruptive for motor circuitry refinement where an aberrant mechanism of plasticity frequently arises [2, 7, 2225]. Under maladaptation, the affected corticospinal tract does not exert the usual role in the movement control proper of the first few months after birth [24], but rather, an abnormal bilateral pattern of the innervation of the spinal motor neuron is observed, with deleterious consequences for long-term motor function [2224, 26]. Perinatal and pediatric strokes have long remained undiagnosed or misdiagnosed, because of the difficulty of interpreting the paucity of motor handicaps [7]. In this context, Eyre and others in 2007 suggested that the delay in the emergence of motor signs depended upon the activity-dependent competition between the ipsilateral corticospinal tract (CST) from the undamaged side and the spared CST axons from the damaged side. However, recent efforts in clinical research have been made to find novel tools to detect hemiplegic signs as early as possible. For instance, the assessment of general movements at the neonatal epoch has been pointed out as a promising predictive method to detect the presence of neonatal cerebral infarction in infants [27, 28].

3. Ischemic Stroke Pathophysiology in the Immature Brain

Several experimental and clinical studies have been reviewed on the pathophysiology of perinatal and pediatric ischemic strokes frequently showing the presence of different mechanisms activated upon developmental injury [2, 14, 29]. The severity of damage following the neonatal brain ischemia may depend upon several factors: the type of neuronal cell death mainly activated during development [30], the maturation of the immune system [31], and the developmental stage of the cerebral vasculature [32] (Figure 1).

Figure 1: Comparison between the rodent and human development of some molecular, cellular, and structural elements of the nervous system. The grey rectangle depicts the “perinatal” range throughout life. Perinatal insults, such as an ischemic stroke, that hit during this age can interfere with several aspects of neural development.
3.1. Excitotoxicity

Soon after blood flow interruption in the territory of a major brain artery, a failure in energy-dependent processes is generated, with the sudden loss of membrane potential, strong depolarization and Ca++ influx due to the activation [33]. As a consequence, neurons and glia undergo ion and water imbalance with the subsequent formation of intracellular edemas and membrane depolarization that leads to glutamate-dependent excitotoxicity that in turn triggers alteration in the brain metabolic profile [34] and death pathways [35]. The immature brain shows unique patterns of cell death activation in response to an ischemic lesion [3638]. In fact, while necrosis is the prominent mechanism of neuronal cell death in the core lesion in adults, apoptosis is more readily activated in the immature brain. This is in part due to the high expression of key components of apoptotic pathways, such as caspase-3, that have a pivotal role in the programmed neuronal death during brain development [30, 36, 37]. Indeed, in a developing rat model of hypoxia-ischemia (HI), AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), a sensor of cellular energy status also involved in chronic inflammatory disorder [39], regulates FOXO3a-mediated neuronal apoptosis through increased expression levels of pro-apoptosis proteins, such as Bim and Caspase-3 [40].

The immature brain displays high excitability that can contribute to excitotoxic injury. This intrinsic high excitability of the immature brain relies mostly on a developmental increase in expression levels of the glutamate receptor [41, 42], both in ionotropic (NMDA) and in metabotropic (AMPA) ones. In fact, experimental evidence in rats suggests that the NMDA receptor density peaks late in the first postnatal week in both the hippocampus and the neocortex, whereas the AMPA receptor density peaks in the second postnatal week at around P10 [43]. Moreover, a different composition of individual receptor subunits of NMDA [42, 44] and AMPA [45] due to a developmental regulation of their expression also contributes to increasing the glutamate-dependent excitotoxicity after a perinatal ischemic lesion. The higher expression of NR2B versus NR2A, together with a lower ratio of the GluR2 expression versus other AMPA receptor subunits in the immature neocortex and hippocampus, accounts for increased Ca2+ permeability, which in turn leads to exacerbated excitotoxicity after the injury [46]. An additional factor impinging on glutamate-dependent excitotoxicity after early injury is the intrinsic nature in action of the GABAergic system, which is immature and excitatory during early postnatal brain development [47, 48]. The reduced expression of several endogenous antioxidant enzymes as well as the very high concentration of unsaturated fatty acids, the high rate of oxygen consumption, and the availability of redox-active iron [49] also contributes to cytotoxicity.

3.2. Inflammation

Free-radical formation and activation of the inflammatory cascades also contribute to neuronal cell death after an ischemic injury in the immature brain [29]. Inflammation plays a dual role in perinatal ischemic stroke pathophysiology [50]. It represents a risk factor of perinatal stroke onset; however, it also contributes to protect the brain from injury, by supporting tissue healing [51, 52]. Its detrimental effects could be due to the facilitatory effects of perinatal inflammation on the pathophysiology of ischemia [53, 54], an effect linked to the ability of congenital inflammation eliciting thrombus formation; for a review, see [55]. The immaturity of the immune system at the perinatal age also impinges on the brain pathological response to ischemia [50]. For example, the nonclassical complement activation in term infants as well as in rat pups is downregulated with respect to the mature brain [56]. Furthermore, in adulthood, microglia activation plays a detrimental role in the acute phase of the ischemic lesion as it produces inflammatory mediators such as ROS and releases other toxic molecules [54]. In contrast, during development, microglia can play a reparative role [57, 58], since it actively releases anti-inflammatory cytokines and neurotrophic factors that contribute to resolve inflammation processes protecting viable neurons from apoptotic death [59]. Direct evidence of its protective role comes from two experimental studies where selective pharmacologic depletion of microglial cells two days before inducing tMCAO in P7 rats caused, respectively, a larger infarct size [59] and increased intracerebral hemorrhages [60]. Astrocytes act in concert with microglia in neonatal stroke pathophysiology. Indeed, early after injury, astrocytes actively contribute to the production of proinflammatory cytokines, in association with neurons and endothelial cells [59]. As for an adult stroke, also after neonatal ischemia, astrogliosis is sustained by higher activation of JAK/STAT signaling in both astrocytes and neurons, with a final insulting effect on brain cells [6163]. In this context, recent work demonstrated that reducing this signaling pathway indirectly either by inhibiting the STAT3 transducer and activator glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK3β) [61] or by blocking JAK2 and downstream STAT3 phosphorylation [63] promotes neuroprotection and reduced inflammatory response after a neonatal stroke. However, other controversial result come from a study carried in a model of hypoxia-ischemia (HI), where it has been shown that reactive astroglia does not exacerbate lesion extension, since GFAP deletion did not affect infarct volume [64]. Similar results were observed in a model of perinatal brain injury [65]. In the chronic phase, astrocytes contribute to limit edema after neonatal brain injury, since astrocyte end-feet in the neurovascular unit increases aquaporin 4 expression, thus facilitating water clearance to the vascular compartment [65].

3.3. Immaturity

Another crucial intrinsic factor contributing to the higher vulnerability of the developing brain to neonatal ischemia is the immaturity of brain microvessels [66]. For example, comparison of protein and transcript contents of the mouse forebrain enriched in microvessels at different ages across development showed an age-dependent increase of proteins and mRNA specific for endothelial cell adhesion, junction pathway, and extracellular matrix as well as for a shift of energy metabolism, transport, and antioxidant effector proteins, all associated with the acquisition of a mature microvessel structure [66]. Brain-blood barrier (BBB) permeability also appears different when compared with the adults both in physiological and pathological conditions [67]. In fact, BBB permeability in the early postnatal age is much lower with respect to the later stage of development, and in response to perinatal ischemic injury, extravasation of albumin at 2 hours after reperfusion is increased from 5- to 25-fold in the rat adult injured brain but only 2-fold in a newborn [67]. It has been proposed that the reduced BBB permeability at the early stage of brain development relies upon a higher expression of several tight junction and basal membrane components in neonates [67], on distinct mechanisms of endothelial cell activation, immature extracellular matrix (ECM) components [66], and neutrophil-endothelial interactions [67, 68]. Altogether, these mechanisms, in addition to preserving BBB integrity, also prevent neutrophil, monocyte, and T and B cell infiltration from the peripheral district to the brain [32]. Taking together, all these data point at the existence of a critical time window of neonate brain vulnerability to early damage that strongly determines the pattern of brain injury.

4. Developmental Ischemic Stroke Models

While several animal models of the adult ischemic stroke have been developed so far, few animal models of perinatal and pediatric strokes are available to recapitulate the mechanisms underlying the onset and the evolution of acute and long lasting deficits in children. In Table 1 a summary of the rodent models of the developmental ischemic stroke, and their assessment, is listed.

Table 1: Summary of main rodent models of the developmental stroke used in translational research.
4.1. Models of Hypoxia-Ischemia

Over the past three decades, the Levine-Rice model of neonatal hypoxic-ischemic (HI) has been extensively used to generate the human perinatal ischemic stroke and has been characterized through histological analysis as well as behavioral tests (for reviews, see [6971]). This model is a modification in the pups of the Levine preparation previously performed in the adult rat [72], and it is characterized by one to more hours of unilateral ligation of the common carotid artery followed by reperfusion and recovery. Afterward, whole body hypoxia is practiced by placing animals into a hypoxic chamber containing humidified 8% O2. This model causes hypoperfusion in the ligated side of the brain, while the nonligated side is exposed to hypoxia alone [73]. Rat pups at P7 have been preferentially used versus mice [74, 75] to study neonatal stroke pathophysiology [14, 55], as well as neuroprotection, regenerative potential of the immature brain [7679], and the applicable rehabilitative therapies [80]. However, the HI neonatal model generates high variability in infarct size, leading to a multifactorial pathological condition; moreover, model induction strikingly differs from the etiology of hypoxic-ischemic injury in humans and does not cause a consistent focal injury pattern, making study of the injured core and penumbra more challenging [74, 75].

4.2. Models of Occlusion of the Middle Cerebral Artery

Since human perinatal ischemic strokes mainly affect the MCA [81, 82], models developed for adult ischemic stroke were adapted to earlier ages. The MCAO model implies the temporary occlusion of the common carotid artery (CCA), introducing a suture directly into the internal carotid artery (ICA) and advancing the suture until it interrupts blood flow to the MCA [83, 84]. Depending on the duration of MCAO, interruption of cerebral blood flow CBF can be transient or permanent, causing therefore mild to severe brain damage and outcome [83]. Furthermore, not only the infarct size but also reperfusion can be modulated depending on the duration of occlusion [74]. Temporary MCAO in neonatal animals was investigated for the first time by Ashwal et al. [85], who performed this technique in P14-P18 rats. 3 hours of occlusion induced a lesion that affects 40-50% of the total hemisphere, resembling in part a global human pediatric stroke. MCAO was also performed in P7 rats, where disruption of CBF and cytotoxic edema formation were observed in MCA territory, accompanied by subsequent microglia and astroglia infiltration after reperfusion [86]. Unfortunately, this method produced a high mortality rate, with only 21% of rats still surviving after 28 days [87], making difficult any long-term assessment of outcomes. Embolic MCAO was also implemented [86]: the embolus measure was designed according to the rat size and resulted in an infarct affecting 51-56% of the ipsilateral hemisphere [88]. Ninety minutes of the intraluminal filament MCAO model at P20-25, followed by 22 h of reperfusion, was also used to characterize a mouse model of a childhood ischemic stroke [89]. One of the most interesting data obtained in this study is the assessment of sex-specific responses to cerebral ischemia in a juvenile mouse brain. The results showed a lack of gender difference in the response to ischemic injury and a sexual dimorphic neuroprotective role of estrogen [89]. These results greatly differ from what is usually observed in adults, either in humans or in rodent models [90].

Transient MCAO without permanent ligation or cauterization has been applied to P10 rats, comparing the effect of different durations of artery occlusion on the extension of brain injury and on behavioral outcome. In this case, extension of the brain lesion correlated with duration of occlusion, since a 90 min occlusion produced a mild-to-moderate injury pattern affecting the striatum and causing transient locomotor deficits, while 3 h caused a moderate-to-severe injury that often affected the cortex and hippocampus and caused enduring locomotor deficits that outlasted the reperfusion phase [91]. Recently, direct electrocoagulation of the unilateral MCA in P12 CB-17 mice has been used: this model holds a reduced variability both in brain injury and in CBF after 24 h from insult with respect to the HI model. Furthermore, using electrocoagulation as a permanent insult, significant neurofunctional deficits in the rotarod and open field can be elicited [92].

4.3. Models of Thrombotic Ischemia

The photothrombotic stroke is a model of thromboischemia based on intravascular photooxidation of a photoactive dye (in most cases, the rose bengal given through intraperitoneal administration) through brief irradiation of the intact skull by a light beam at a specific wavelength [93]. Depending on the intensity and duration of light illumination, as well as the stereotaxic coordinates chosen, different extensions of the lesion can be produced [6, 94]. Until now, photothrombotic models have been mostly used to study stroke in adults [9598], and only recently, it has been used to recapitulate the perinatal stroke condition both in neonate piglets [99] and in rats at P7 [100]. Among the advantages of this model is the possibility of creating small size infarcts to target specific regions [6]. However, there are intrinsic disadvantages of this model since, in contrast with human stroke pathophysiology, its nature is only occlusive, and no growth and maturation of the ischemic penumbra and local collateral flow/reperfusion can take place [101].

4.4. Models of ET1 Vasoconstriction

Endothelin 1 (ET1) is a small (21 amino acids) vasoactive peptide produced by the endothelium and smooth muscle cells [102] which acts as a paracrine and autocrine factor [103] constricting vessels [104] through specific receptors (ETRA and ETRB) [105]. ETRA is mainly located on smooth muscle cells, and its activation is thought to be the major contributor to vasoconstriction upon ET1 binding [106]. Instead, ETRB is localized on both the smooth muscle and endothelial cells but is associated with vasodilation, caused by the release of nitric oxide (NO) and prostacyclin from endothelial cells [107]. Other than in vascular cells, the endothelin system (ET system) is also present in the central nervous system [102], where it plays an important role in the case of lesion occurrence. Indeed, after brain injury, ET1 is acutely overexpressed in the cerebrospinal fluid and plasma of humans [108, 109], rats [110], and pigs [111], suggesting that endogenous upregulation is an evolutionary conserved mechanism. However, whether the ET system overactivation may be protective or detrimental for the postlesion outcome is still a matter of debate. Several experimental works indicate that the endogenous ET system upregulation may contribute to lesion pathophysiology. Indeed, postlesion upregulation of either ET1 or ETR expressions correlate with astrogliosis [112], extent of the brain lesion [113], BBB dysfunction [114116], and inflammation [117]. This evidence is a very important issue to keep in mind when generating ET1 models of ischemia, as it influences the interpretation of experimental results. ET1 can be either stereotaxically injected into parenchymal regions of interest or topically applied on the pial surface of the brain, to constrict local arterioles, or near the MCA [118, 119] reperfusion occurs, but at a much slower rate with respect to the intraluminal suture model. Lesion size can be modulated by varying the concentration or volume of ET1 to achieve reproducible injury [120]. The constant hypoperfusion rate prevents the development of an extensive edema, moving partially away from the human ischemia. On the other hand, this model seems to be more appropriate for chronic long-term studies rather than for studies on the acute effects of a stroke [121].

In contrast to adult stroke studies, very few works have used ET1 to generate models of the developmental stroke thus far [122]. ET1 was previously injected into the striatal area of the juvenile (P21) rat brain to induce a reproducible focal lesion [123], but only anatomical changes in response to ET1 injection were evaluated. Tsenov et al. in 2007 [124] used intrahippocampal ET-1 injection to generate a model of ischemia-induced seizures in immature rats, at P12 and P25, respectively, showing that at both developmental ages, ET1 into the dorsal hippocampus elicited convulsions as well as neuron loss.

4.5. Rodent Models: Similarities and Differences with Human Brain Development

The success of generating reliable models of the human developmental stroke strongly relies upon the ability to get the similarities in the cross-species corticospinal system function and development (for a review, see [125]). Most of the studies use rodent models because they can be easily manipulated to explore the genetic basis of motor development [126] as well as to understand motor learning mechanisms using behavioral and functional approaches [127]. Rodents show some similarities with humans at the CST level [127129].

Indeed, as in humans, rodents have a CST that projects the full length of the spinal cord [129131] and is involved in fine movement control [127, 132]. Both in humans and in rodents, CST development is accomplished at the postnatal age [133, 134]. Indeed, temporal changes in the diffusion anisotropy quantified by diffusor tensor imaging DTI in rats from P0 (day of birth) to P56 showed developmental changes in the DTI metrics in multiple gray and white matter structures related to neuronal and axonal pruning and myelination [133]. Furthermore, in the neonatal rat, the corticospinal projection originates from the whole neocortex including the visual cortex, and corticospinal projections also have transient ipsilateral projections that are predominantly pruned when maturity is reached [135].

However, notable differences between the human and rodent developing brain exist. In primis, there is a complete absence of gyrification in the rodent brain [136]; second, great differences in the CST path are present: rodent CST axons run into the dorsal funiculus and do not establish direct synapses onto spinal motor neurons [137], but rather, the CST almost entirely projects more dorsally to the premotor spinal circuits [134, 138142]. Concerning brain vasculature, similarities and differences of the circle of Willis between rodents and humans have been reported [5]. Both in rodents and humans, the internal carotid artery irrorates the anterior circulation whilst the posterior cerebral artery supplies the posterior circulation [5]. Moreover, in both species, the internal carotid artery provides the major blood source to the encephalon; however, it is more extended in rodents versus humans since it has a greater number of collaterals which supply a wide cerebral area [5]. This interspecies difference in brain vascular morphology may impinge on the degree of blood flow deprivation induced by different models and accordingly on the entity of neuronal damage.

4.6. Milestones Controlling CST Development across Different Species

Another crucial factor to be kept in mind when generating a rodent model of experimental models of a stroke is the ability to match the age-specific motor behavior repertoire with the progressive steps of CST maturation across species. While the corticospinal system matures, adaptive motor behaviors begin to be expressed [143, 144]. In mammals, CST development begins prenatally while mature motor skills are developed during the first month in the rat [145] and the first 2 to 3 months in cats [25]. Human motor development is incomplete until 12-13 years [146, 147]. As shown in Figure 2, several experimental studies have clarified that the mammal CST maturation process involves the interplay between genetics, neural activity, and experience to allow appropriate circuit formation and acquisition of complex tasks [6, 122, 134, 148176]. For example, guidance cues such as EphrinB3 and its receptor tyrosine kinase EphA4 ensure the correct CST pathfinding [172], since selective elimination of the EphA4 gene in the mouse forebrain leads to a strong CST bilateral projection to the spinal cord that persists up to adulthood with enduring skilled motor impairments (Figure 2) [168]. Activity- and use-dependent processes subsequently shape the pattern initially established by genetic mechanisms and lead to the withdrawal of less active ipsilateral CST projections while contralateral ones are instead reinforced [23, 24, 141, 166]. Indeed, studies in cats have revealed that blocking motor experience or motor cortex activity causes defects in CS axon remodeling in the spinal cord, leading to permanent impairments in skilled movements [177]. Furthermore, concurrently to CS axon remodeling, motor maps for interjoint muscle synergies also develop during the postnatal stages in cats [155]. Recently, the mechanism by which rodents gradually acquire precise control over their flexor and extensor muscles to allow acquisition of skilled abilities has been elucidated [178]. In this elegant work, Gu et al. showed that maturation of muscle activation patterns controlling skilled movements is acquired through reorganization of the CS axons controlling antagonist muscles, according to an activity-dependent Bax/Bak-caspase pathway. Deletion of the Bax/Bak proteins selectively in the mouse motor cortex resulted in the lack of activity-dependent pruning of exuberant axon collaterals [178], suggesting therefore the nonapoptotic pathway Bax/Bak as a novel milestone for proper CST motor development in rodents. Thus, across species, motor control development implies a triad of events during the refinement period: loss of transient ipsilateral termination with growth of experience-selected axons to local spinal targets, development of motor cortical motor maps, and finally myelination [179].

Figure 2: (a) Molecular and environmental factors involved in physiological CST development in rodents. (b) Processes altered after a brain injury that hits during CST development. Insets show some of the mechanisms involved in the acute damage provoked by cerebral ischemia (excitotoxicity, top right) and the factor involved in the axonal pathfinding and midline crossing in the CST development (EphA4/EphrinB3, bottom right).

Although great insights into the milestones controlling normal maturation of CST across different species have been achieved, a debate on the appropriate matching of age between human and rodent neonates, as well as on how to correlate neuronal events that occur during maturation across these species, still remains open [180]. Some authors suggest that depending upon different criteria, such as brain weight growth [181], white matter myelination [182], corticospinal system development [183], and EEG maturation [184], the human term would include P7-P10 in rodents, with brain development at P7 in rats being more comparable to that of premature or full-term infants [70, 182, 185]. P20 in rodents would correspond to a 2–3-year-old human child [180, 181]. Nonetheless, there are some controversial opinions about which postnatal age in the rodent would recapitulate the term infant stage. For example, in an attempt to generate a model of the human term moderate HI, Quairiaux et al. used rat pups at P3 to characterize the effect of this really early damage on morphological and functional outcome [186]. In this work, in agreement with previous findings [187], the lesion at this early developmental stage caused impairments that mainly involved the somatosensory parietal cortex [186]. The importance of age of ischemia occurrence as a determinant for stroke outcome is underscored by a study that compared the effects of a stroke in the rat motor cortex at two temporally close ages: P14, when CS axons reach a maximum level of spinal cord gray matter innervations [154], and P21, when the CST axon pruning reaches its maximal levels [188]. Focal ischemic lesions at these two ages caused substantially different outcomes: the P14 lesion resulted in being more detrimental than the P21 lesion for long-term motor outcome in association with an extensive but mistargeted CST sprouting at the spinal cord level [122]. These data imply the existence of a strict age-dependent regulation of CST plasticity that can even be maladaptive during development.

5. Conclusions

Despite the variability in the techniques adopted and the developmental stages used to model human developmental ischemic strokes, preclinical studies continue to be extremely useful. Indeed, they inform us about the existence of multiple factors influencing the postinjury functional outcome. The timing of lesion occurrence seems to be critical, as it strongly interferes with CST development and determines the way spontaneous plasticity takes place. Classical studies showed that the effects of visual deprivation during temporal windows of development-designated critical periods dramatically impaired visual acuity maturation resulting in amblyopia. Similarly, a developmental brain injury causing a “deprivation” of activity of CST could also have long-term functional consequences that could strongly depend upon the age of the lesion and the relationship with critical motor periods [23]. The comparison with the current knowledge coming from visual system experience-dependent development suggests that experience-dependent changes could also be exploited to open a window for restorative therapies in the case of early motor system injuries. So far, harnessing poststroke neural plasticity via electrophysiological and behavioral approaches was found to have beneficial effects promoting significant recovery of motor function, and early intervention after a perinatal ischemic stroke has been shown crucial in preventing maladaptive plasticity [22, 122]. However, future studies should be directed to identify the age-specific molecular programs triggered by developmental injury. Specifically, finding a causal link of the age-specific regulation between genetic factors and environmental molecular cues would help to determine the pattern of sprouting and therefore implement more effective therapeutic strategies aimed at regaining or preserving motor functions. Technological development has dramatically accelerated moving towards cell-specific studies, both at the molecular (e.g., single-cell sequencing from defined populations) and functional (e.g., in-depth in vivo functional imaging and noninvasive stimulation) level. Applying these methods to selectively study the CST and its milieu in models of a juvenile stroke will be fundamental to understand which molecular factors and which pattern of electrical activity can regulate developing CST growth and pruning, with positive consequences on the development of treatments that could also be beneficial in adult models of CST lesions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. T. N. K. Raju, K. B. Nelson, D. Ferriero, J. K. Lynch, and the NICHD-NINDS Perinatal Stroke Workshop Participants, “Ischemic perinatal stroke: summary of a workshop sponsored by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke,” Pediatrics, vol. 120, no. 3, pp. 609–616, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. A. Kirton and G. deVeber, “Paediatric stroke: pressing issues and promising directions,” The Lancet Neurology, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 92–102, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. B. Kolb and A. Muhammad, “Harnessing the power of neuroplasticity for intervention,” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, vol. 8, p. 377, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. Nishibe, E. T. R. Urban, S. Barbay, and R. J. Nudo, “Rehabilitative training promotes rapid motor recovery but delayed motor map reorganization in a rat cortical ischemic infarct model,” Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 472–482, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J. B. Casals, N. C. Pieri, M. L. Feitosa et al., “The use of animal models for stroke research: a review,” Comparative Medicine, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 305–313, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  6. S. T. Carmichael, “Rodent models of focal stroke: size, mechanism, and purpose,” NeuroRx, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 396–409, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. A. Kirton and G. Deveber, “Life after perinatal stroke,” Stroke, vol. 44, no. 11, pp. 3265–3271, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. B. S. Schoenberg, J. F. Mellinger, and D. G. Schoenberg, “Cerebrovascular disease in infants and children: a study of incidence, clinical features, and survival,” Neurology, vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 763–768, 1978. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. G. deVeber, “Stroke and the child’s brain: an overview of epidemiology, syndromes and risk factors,” Current Opinion in Neurology, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 133–138, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. K. Lynch, D. G. Hirtz, G. DeVeber, and K. B. Nelson, “Report of the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke workshop on perinatal and childhood stroke,” Pediatrics, vol. 109, no. 1, pp. 116–123, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. J. Broderick, G. T. Talbot, E. Prenger, A. Leach, and T. Brott, “Stroke in children within a major metropolitan area: the surprising importance of intracerebral hemorrhage,” Journal of Child Neurology, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 250–255, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. M. Giroud, M. Lemesle, G. Madinier, E. Manceau, G. V. Osseby, and R. Dumas, “Stroke in children under 16 years of age. Clinical and etiological difference with adults,” Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, vol. 96, no. 6, pp. 401–406, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. K. B. Nelson and J. K. Lynch, “Stroke in newborn infants,” Lancet Neurology, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 150–158, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. D. Fernández-López, N. Natarajan, S. Ashwal, and Z. S. Vexler, “Mechanisms of perinatal arterial ischemic stroke,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 921–932, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. O. Eeg-Olofsson and Y. Ringheim, “Stroke in children. Clinical characteristics and prognosis,” Acta Paediatrica Scandinavica, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 391–395, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. G. deVeber, E. S. Roach, A. R. Riela, and M. Wiznitzer, “Stroke in children: recognition, treatment, and future directions,” Seminars in Pediatric Neurology, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 309–317, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. S. Lanthier, L. Carmant, M. David, A. Larbrisseau, and G. de Veber, “Stroke in children: the coexistence of multiple risk factors predicts poor outcome,” Neurology, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 371–378, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. K. B. Nelson, “Perinatal ischemic stroke,” Stroke, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 742–745, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. S. A. Back et al., “Selective vulnerability of late oligodendrocyte progenitors to hypoxia-ischemia,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 455–463, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. A. Kirton, J. Armstrong-Wells, T. Chang et al., “Symptomatic neonatal arterial ischemic stroke: the International Pediatric Stroke Study,” Pediatrics, vol. 128, no. 6, pp. e1402–e1410, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. P. S. McQuillen and D. M. Ferriero, “Selective vulnerability in the developing central nervous system,” Pediatric Neurology, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 227–235, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. G. Cioni, G. D'Acunto, and A. Guzzetta, “Perinatal brain damage in children: neuroplasticity, early intervention, and molecular mechanisms of recovery,” Progress in Brain Research, vol. 189, pp. 139–154, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. J. A. Eyre, “Corticospinal tract development and its plasticity after perinatal injury,” Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 1136–1149, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. J. A. Eyre, J. P. Taylor, F. Villagra, M. Smith, and S. Miller, “Evidence of activity-dependent withdrawal of corticospinal projections during human development,” Neurology, vol. 57, no. 9, pp. 1543–1554, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. J. H. Martin, “Chapter 3 development of the corticospinal system and spinal motor circuits,” Handbook of Clinical Neurology, vol. 82, pp. 39–56, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. J. H. Martin and S. J. Lee, “Activity-dependent competition between developing corticospinal terminations,” Neuroreport, vol. 10, no. 11, pp. 2277–2282, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. A. Guzzetta, E. Mercuri, G. Rapisardi et al., “General movements detect early signs of hemiplegia in term infants with neonatal cerebral infarction,” Neuropediatrics, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 61–66, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. I. Novak, C. Morgan, L. Adde et al., “Early, accurate diagnosis and early intervention in cerebral palsy: advances in diagnosis and treatment,” JAMA Pediatrics, vol. 171, no. 9, pp. 897–907, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. L. Titomanlio, D. Fernández-López, L. Manganozzi, R. Moretti, Z. S. Vexler, and P. Gressens, “Pathophysiology and neuroprotection of global and focal perinatal brain injury: lessons from animal models,” Pediatric Neurology, vol. 52, no. 6, pp. 566–584, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. C. Manabat, B. H. Han, M. Wendland et al., “Reperfusion differentially induces caspase-3 activation in ischemic core and penumbra after stroke in immature brain,” Stroke, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 207–213, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. Z. S. Vexler and M. A. Yenari, “Does inflammation after stroke affect the developing brain differently than adult brain?” Developmental Neuroscience, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 378–393, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. I. Kratzer, S. Chip, and Z. S. Vexler, “Barrier mechanisms in neonatal stroke,” Frontiers in Neuroscience, vol. 8, p. 359, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. P. Deb, S. Sharma, and K. M. Hassan, “Pathophysiologic mechanisms of acute ischemic stroke: an overview with emphasis on therapeutic significance beyond thrombolysis,” Pathophysiology, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 197–218, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. B. J. Blaise, L. Schwendimann, V. Chhor et al., “Persistently altered metabolic phenotype following perinatal excitotoxic brain injury,” Developmental Neuroscience, vol. 39, no. 1-4, pp. 182–191, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. P. Lipton, “Ischemic cell death in brain neurons,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 79, no. 4, pp. 1431–1568, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. L. S. Honig and R. N. Rosenberg, “Apoptosis and neurologic disease,” The American Journal of Medicine, vol. 108, no. 4, pp. 317–330, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. J. W. Olney, D. F. Wozniak, V. Jevtovic-Todorovic, N. B. Farber, P. Bittigau, and C. Ikonomidou, “Drug-induced apoptotic neurodegeneration in the developing brain,” Brain Pathology, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 488–498, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  38. T. West, M. Atzeva, and D. M. Holtzman, “Caspase-3 deficiency during development increases vulnerability to hypoxic-ischemic injury through caspase-3-independent pathways,” Neurobiology of Disease, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 523–537, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. C. A. Peixoto, W. H. . Oliveira, S. M. . R. Araújo, and A. K. S. Nunes, “AMPK activation: role in the signaling pathways of neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration,” Experimental Neurology, vol. 298, Part A, pp. 31–41, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. D. Li, L. Luo, M. Xu et al., “AMPK activates FOXO3a and promotes neuronal apoptosis in the developing rat brain during the early phase after hypoxia-ischemia,” Brain Research Bulletin, vol. 132, pp. 1–9, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. M. V. Johnston, “Excitotoxicity in perinatal brain injury,” Brain Pathology, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 234–240, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  42. R. Knox, C. Zhao, D. Miguel-Perez et al., “Enhanced NMDA receptor tyrosine phosphorylation and increased brain injury following neonatal hypoxia-ischemia in mice with neuronal Fyn overexpression,” Neurobiology of Disease, vol. 51, pp. 113–119, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. T. R. Insel, L. P. Miller, and R. E. Gelhard, “The ontogeny of excitatory amino acid receptors in rat forebrain—I. N-methyl-D-aspartate and quisqualate receptors,” Neuroscience, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 31–43, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. X. Jiang, D. Mu, R. A. Sheldon, D. V. Glidden, and D. M. Ferriero, “Neonatal hypoxia-ischemia differentially upregulates MAGUKs and associated proteins in PSD-93-deficient mouse brain,” Stroke, vol. 34, no. 12, pp. 2958–2963, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. D. E. Pellegrini-Giampietro, “The distinct role of mGlu1 receptors in post-ischemic neuronal death,” Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 24, no. 9, pp. 461–470, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. P. Jonas, C. Racca, B. Sakmann, P. H. Seeburg, and H. Monyer, “Differences in Ca2+ permeability of AMPA-type glutamate receptor channels in neocortical neurons caused by differential GluR-B subunit expression,” Neuron, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 1281–1289, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. Y. Ben-Ari, “The yin and yen of GABA in brain development and operation in health and disease,” Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, vol. 6, p. 45, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. F. E. Jensen, “Relationship between encephalopathy and abnormal neuronal activity in the developing brain,” International Review of Neurobiology, vol. 49, pp. 23–35, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  49. M. J. Lafemina, R. A. Sheldon, and D. M. Ferriero, “Acute hypoxia-ischemia results in hydrogen peroxide accumulation in neonatal but not adult mouse brain,” Pediatric Research, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 680–683, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. J. C. Y. Lai, E. Rocha-Ferreira, C. J. Ek, X. Wang, H. Hagberg, and C. Mallard, “Immune responses in perinatal brain injury,” Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, vol. 63, pp. 210–223, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. U. S. Bhalala, R. C. Koehler, and S. Kannan, “Neuroinflammation and neuroimmune dysregulation after acute hypoxic-ischemic injury of developing brain,” Frontiers in Pediatrics, vol. 2, p. 144, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  52. H. Hagberg, C. Mallard, D. M. Ferriero et al., “The role of inflammation in perinatal brain injury,” Nature Reviews Neurology, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 192–208, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. A. Larouche, M. Roy, H. Kadhim, A. M. Tsanaclis, D. Fortin, and G. Sébire, “Neuronal injuries induced by perinatal hypoxic-ischemic insults are potentiated by prenatal exposure to lipopolysaccharide: animal model for perinatally acquired encephalopathy,” Developmental Neuroscience, vol. 27, no. 2-4, pp. 134–142, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. X. Wang, H. Hagberg, C. Nie, C. Zhu, T. Ikeda, and C. Mallard, “Dual role of intrauterine immune challenge on neonatal and adult brain vulnerability to hypoxia-ischemia,” Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology, vol. 66, no. 6, pp. 552–561, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. A. Giraud, C. Guiraut, M. Chevin, S. Chabrier, and G. Sébire, “Role of perinatal inflammation in neonatal arterial ischemic stroke,” Frontiers in Neurology, vol. 8, p. 612, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. H. A. Lassiter, B. M. Walz, J. L. Wilson et al., “The administration of complement component C9 enhances the survival of neonatal rats with Escherichia coli sepsis,” Pediatric Research, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 128–136, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. R. C. Paolicelli and C. T. Gross, “Microglia in development: linking brain wiring to brain environment,” Neuron Glia Biology, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 77–83, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. R. Yamasaki, H. Lu, O. Butovsky et al., “Differential roles of microglia and monocytes in the inflamed central nervous system,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 211, no. 8, pp. 1533–1549, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. J. V. Faustino, X. Wang, C. E. Johnson et al., “Microglial cells contribute to endogenous brain defenses after acute neonatal focal stroke,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 31, no. 36, pp. 12992–13001, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. D. Fernandez-Lopez, J. Faustino, A. L. Klibanov et al., “Microglial cells prevent hemorrhage in neonatal focal arterial stroke,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 36, no. 10, pp. 2881–2893, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. B. D'Angelo, C. Joakim Ek, Y. Sun, C. Zhu, M. Sandberg, and C. Mallard, “GSK3β inhibition protects the immature brain from hypoxic-ischaemic insult via reduced STAT3 signalling,” Neuropharmacology, vol. 101, pp. 13–23, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. K. Shrivastava, G. Llovera, M. Recasens et al., “Temporal expression of cytokines and signal transducer and activator of transcription factor 3 activation after neonatal hypoxia/ischemia in mice,” Developmental Neuroscience, vol. 35, no. 2-3, pp. 212–225, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. M. Hristova, E. Rocha-Ferreira, X. Fontana et al., “Inhibition of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) reduces neonatal hypoxic-ischaemic brain damage,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 136, no. 5, pp. 981–994, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. K. Järlestedt, C. I. Rousset, M. Faiz et al., “Attenuation of reactive gliosis does not affect infarct volume in neonatal hypoxic-ischemic brain injury in mice,” PLoS One, vol. 5, no. 4, article e10397, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. J. Badaut, S. Ashwal, B. Tone, L. Regli, H. R. Tian, and A. Obenaus, “Temporal and regional evolution of aquaporin-4 expression and magnetic resonance imaging in a rat pup model of neonatal stroke,” Pediatric Research, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 248–254, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. B. Porte, J. Hardouin, Y. Zerdoumi et al., “Major remodeling of brain microvessels during neonatal period in the mouse: a proteomic and transcriptomic study,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 495–513, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. D. Fernandez-Lopez, J. Faustino, R. Daneman et al., “Blood-brain barrier permeability is increased after acute adult stroke but not neonatal stroke in the rat,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 32, no. 28, pp. 9588–9600, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. B. D’Angelo, C. J. Ek, M. Sandberg, and C. Mallard, “Expression of the Nrf2-system at the blood-CSF barrier is modulated by neonatal inflammation and hypoxia-ischemia,” Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 479–490, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. P. Rumajogee, T. Bregman, S. P. Miller, J. Y. Yager, and M. G. Fehlings, “Rodent hypoxia-ischemia models for cerebral palsy research: a systematic review,” Frontiers in Neurology, vol. 7, p. 57, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. R. C. Vannucci, J. R. Connor, D. T. Mauger et al., “Rat model of perinatal hypoxic-ischemic brain damage,” Journal of Neuroscience Research, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 158–163, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  71. R. C. Vannucci and S. J. Vannucci, “Perinatal hypoxic-ischemic brain damage: evolution of an animal model,” Developmental Neuroscience, vol. 27, no. 2-4, pp. 81–86, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. S. Levine, “Anoxic-ischemic encephalopathy in rats,” The American Journal of Pathology, vol. 36, pp. 1–17, 1960. View at Google Scholar
  73. A. B. Edwards, K. W. Feindel, J. L. Cross et al., “Modification to the Rice-Vannucci perinatal hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy model in the P7 rat improves the reliability of cerebral infarct development after 48hours,” Journal of Neuroscience Methods, vol. 288, pp. 62–71, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. S. Ashwal and W. J. Pearce, “Animal models of neonatal stroke,” Current Opinion in Pediatrics, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 506–516, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. J. Y. Yager and S. Ashwal, “Animal models of perinata hypoxic-ischemic brain damage,” Pediatric Neurology, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 156–167, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  76. D. M. Fagel, Y. Ganat, E. Cheng et al., “Fgfr1 is required for cortical regeneration and repair after perinatal hypoxia,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 1202–1211, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  77. D. M. Fagel, Y. Ganat, J. Silbereis et al., “Cortical neurogenesis enhanced by chronic perinatal hypoxia,” Experimental Neurology, vol. 199, no. 1, pp. 77–91, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  78. Y. Niimi and S. W. Levison, “Pediatric brain repair from endogenous neural stem cells of the subventricular zone,” Pediatric Research, vol. 83, no. 1-2, pp. 385–396, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  79. N. Xu, Y. Zhang, D. M. Doycheva et al., “Adiponectin attenuates neuronal apoptosis induced by hypoxia-ischemia via the activation of AdipoR1/APPL1/LKB1/AMPK pathway in neonatal rats,” Neuropharmacology, vol. 133, pp. 415–428, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  80. H. Kim, Y. S. Koo, M. J. Shin et al., “Combination of constraint-induced movement therapy with electroacupuncture improves functional recovery following neonatal hypoxic-ischemic brain injury in rats,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2018, Article ID 8638294, 11 pages, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  81. A. Kirton, “Predicting developmental plasticity after perinatal stroke,” Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, vol. 55, no. 8, pp. 681-682, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  82. J. Lee, L. A. Croen, C. Lindan et al., “Predictors of outcome in perinatal arterial stroke: a population-based study,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 303–308, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  83. F. Fluri, M. K. Schuhmann, and C. Kleinschnitz, “Animal models of ischemic stroke and their application in clinical research,” Drug Design, Development and Therapy, vol. 9, pp. 3445–3454, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  84. S. Liu, G. Zhen, B. P. Meloni, K. Campbell, and H. R. Winn, “Rodent stroke model guidelines for preclinical stroke trials (1st edition),” Journal of Experimental Stroke and Translational Medicine, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 2–27, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  85. S. Ashwal, D. J. Cole, S. Osborne, T. N. Osborne, and W. J. Pearce, “A new model of neonatal stroke: reversible middle cerebral artery occlusion in the rat pup,” Pediatric Neurology, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 191–196, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  86. N. Derugin, D. M. Ferriero, and Z. S. Vexler, “Neonatal reversible focal cerebral ischemia: a new model,” Neuroscience Research, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 349–353, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  87. S. Ashwal, B. Tone, H. R. Tian, S. Chong, and A. Obenaus, “Comparison of two neonatal ischemic injury models using magnetic resonance imaging,” Pediatric Research, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 9–14, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  88. T. C. Wen, M. Rogido, P. Gressens, and A. Sola, “A reproducible experimental model of focal cerebral ischemia in the neonatal rat,” Brain Research Protocols, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 76–83, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  89. P. S. Herson, C. G. Bombardier, S. M. Parker et al., “Experimental pediatric arterial ischemic stroke model reveals sex-specific estrogen signaling,” Stroke, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 759–763, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  90. P. S. Herson, I. P. Koerner, and P. D. Hurn, “Sex, sex steroids, and brain injury,” Seminars in Reproductive Medicine, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 229–239, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  91. A. Larpthaveesarp and F. F. Gonzalez, “Transient middle cerebral artery occlusion model of neonatal stroke in P10 rats,” Journal of Visualized Experiments, vol. 122, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  92. M. Tsuji, M. Ohshima, A. Taguchi, Y. Kasahara, T. Ikeda, and T. Matsuyama, “A novel reproducible model of neonatal stroke in mice: comparison with a hypoxia-ischemia model,” Experimental Neurology, vol. 247, pp. 218–225, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  93. B. D. Watson, W. D. Dietrich, R. Busto, M. S. Wachtel, and M. D. Ginsberg, “Induction of reproducible brain infarction by photochemically initiated thrombosis,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 497–504, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  94. T. Kuroiwa, G. Xi, Y. Hua, T. N. Nagaraja, J. D. Fenstermacher, and R. F. Keep, “Development of a rat model of photothrombotic ischemia and infarction within the caudoputamen,” Stroke, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 248–253, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  95. C. E. Brown, P. Li, J. D. Boyd, K. R. Delaney, and T. H. Murphy, “Extensive turnover of dendritic spines and vascular remodeling in cortical tissues recovering from stroke,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 27, no. 15, pp. 4101–4109, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  96. T. C. Harrison, G. Silasi, J. D. Boyd, and T. H. Murphy, “Displacement of sensory maps and disorganization of motor cortex after targeted stroke in mice,” Stroke, vol. 44, no. 8, pp. 2300–2306, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  97. C. E. Brown, C. Wong, and T. H. Murphy, “Rapid morphologic plasticity of peri-infarct dendritic spines after focal ischemic stroke,” Stroke, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 1286–1291, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  98. S. Lai, A. Panarese, C. Spalletti et al., “Quantitative kinematic characterization of reaching impairments in mice after a stroke,” Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 382–392, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  99. J. W. Kuluz, R. Prado, D. He, W. Zhao, W. D. Dietrich, and B. Watson, “New pediatric model of ischemic stroke in infant piglets by photothrombosis: acute changes in cerebral blood flow, microvasculature, and early histopathology,” Stroke, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 1932–1937, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  100. T. Brima, J. Otahal, and P. Mares, “Increased susceptibility to pentetrazol-induced seizures in developing rats after cortical photothrombotic ischemic stroke at P7,” Brain Research, vol. 1507, pp. 146–153, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  101. V. M. Lee, N. G. Burdett, T. A. Carpenter et al., “Evolution of photochemically induced focal cerebral ischemia in the rat. Magnetic resonance imaging and histology,” Stroke, vol. 27, no. 11, pp. 2110–2119, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  102. S. Nakagomi, S. Kiryu-Seo, and H. Kiyama, “Endothelin-converting enzymes and endothelin receptor B messenger RNAs are expressed in different neural cell species and these messenger RNAs are coordinately induced in neurons and astrocytes respectively following nerve injury,” Neuroscience, vol. 101, no. 2, pp. 441–449, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  103. M. Yanagisawa, H. Kurihara, S. Kimura et al., “A novel potent vasoconstrictor peptide produced by vascular endothelial cells,” Nature, vol. 332, no. 6163, pp. 411–415, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  104. T. F. Luscher and M. Barton, “Endothelins and endothelin receptor antagonists: therapeutic considerations for a novel class of cardiovascular drugs,” Circulation, vol. 102, no. 19, pp. 2434–2440, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  105. T. Masaki and M. Yanagisawa, “Endothelins,” Essays in Biochemistry, vol. 27, pp. 79–89, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  106. K. E. Wiley and A. P. Davenport, “Endothelin receptor pharmacology and function in the mouse: comparison with rat and man,” Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology, vol. 44, Supplement 1, pp. S4–S6, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  107. D. J. Webb and F. E. Strachan, “Clinical experience with endothelin antagonists,” American Journal of Hypertension, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 71S–79S, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  108. Y. Lampl, G. Fleminger, R. Gilad, R. Galron, I. Sarova-Pinhas, and M. Sokolovsky, “Endothelin in cerebrospinal fluid and plasma of patients in the early stage of ischemic stroke,” Stroke, vol. 28, no. 10, pp. 1951–1955, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  109. J. W. C. Leung, M. C. Y. Ho, A. C. Y. Lo, S. S. M. Chung, and S. K. Chung, “Endothelial cell-specific over-expression of endothelin-1 leads to more severe cerebral damage following transient middle cerebral artery occlusion,” Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology, vol. 44, Supplement 1, pp. S293–S300, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  110. E. Stenman, M. Malmsjö, E. Uddman, G. Gidö, T. Wieloch, and L. Edvinsson, “Cerebral ischemia upregulates vascular endothelin ETB receptors in rat,” Stroke, vol. 33, no. 9, pp. 2311–2316, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  111. W. M. Armstead and C. W. Kreipke, “Endothelin-1 is upregulated after traumatic brain injury: a cross-species, cross-model analysis,” Neurological Research, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 133–136, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  112. A. Gadea, S. Schinelli, and V. Gallo, “Endothelin-1 regulates astrocyte proliferation and reactive gliosis via a JNK/c-Jun signaling pathway,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 28, no. 10, pp. 2394–2408, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  113. A. C. Lo, A. Y. S. Chen, V. K. L. Hung et al., “Endothelin-1 overexpression leads to further water accumulation and brain edema after middle cerebral artery occlusion via aquaporin 4 expression in astrocytic end-feet,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 998–1011, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  114. N. Kawai, R. M. McCarron, and M. Spatz, “Endothelins stimulate sodium uptake into rat brain capillary endothelial cells through endothelin A-like receptors,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 190, no. 2, pp. 85–88, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  115. M. Spatz, N. Kawai, J. Bembry, F. Lenz, and R. M. McCarron, “Human brain capillary endothelium: modulation of K+ efflux and K+, Ca2+ uptake by endothelin,” Neurochemical Research, vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 1125–1132, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  116. C. G. Hughes, A. Morandi, T. D. Girard et al., “Association between endothelial dysfunction and acute brain dysfunction during critical illness,” Anesthesiology, vol. 118, no. 3, pp. 631–639, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  117. A. Poggesi, M. Pasi, F. Pescini, L. Pantoni, and D. Inzitari, “Circulating biologic markers of endothelial dysfunction in cerebral small vessel disease: a review,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 72–94, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  118. V. Windle, A. Szymanska, S. Granterbutton et al., “An analysis of four different methods of producing focal cerebral ischemia with endothelin-1 in the rat,” Experimental Neurology, vol. 201, no. 2, pp. 324–334, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  119. L. Gherardini, M. Gennaro, and T. Pizzorusso, “Perilesional Treatment with Chondroitinase ABC and Motor Training Promote Functional Recovery After Stroke in Rats,” Cerebral Cortex, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 202–212, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  120. J. Biernaskie, D. Corbett, J. Peeling, J. Wells, and H. Lei, “A serial MR study of cerebral blood flow changes and lesion development following endothelin-1-induced ischemia in rats,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 827–830, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  121. R. Schirrmacher, M. Dea, W. D. Heiss et al., “Which aspects of stroke do animal models capture? A multitracer micro-PET study of focal ischemia with Endothelin-1,” Cerebrovascular Diseases, vol. 41, no. 3-4, pp. 139–147, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  122. M. Gennaro, A. Mattiello, R. Mazziotti et al., “Focal stroke in the developing rat motor cortex induces age- and experience-dependent maladaptive plasticity of corticospinal system,” Frontiers in Neural Circuits, vol. 11, p. 47, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  123. R. Saggu, “Characterisation of endothelin-1-induced intrastriatal lesions within the juvenile and adult rat brain using MRI and 31P MRS,” Translational Stroke Research, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 351–367, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  124. G. Tsenov, A. Mátéffyová, P. Mareš, J. Otáhal, and H. Kubová, “Intrahippocampal injection of endothelin-1: a new model of ischemia-induced seizures in immature rats,” Epilepsia, vol. 48, Supplement 5, pp. 7–13, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  125. G. J. Clowry, R. Basuodan, and F. Chan, “What are the best animal models for testing early intervention in cerebral palsy?” Frontiers in Neurology, vol. 5, p. 258, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  126. A. Gramsbergen, “Normal and abnormal development of motor behavior: lessons from experiments in rats,” Neural Plasticity, vol. 8, no. 1-2, 29 pages, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  127. B. P. Olveczky, “Motoring ahead with rodents,” Current Opinion in Neurobiology, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 571–578, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  128. R. J. Nudo and R. B. Masterton, “Descending pathways to the spinal cord: a comparative study of 22 mammals,” The Journal of Comparative Neurology, vol. 277, no. 1, pp. 53–79, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  129. K. A. Tennant, D. A. L. Adkins, N. A. Donlan et al., “The organization of the forelimb representation of the C57BL/6 mouse motor cortex as defined by intracortical microstimulation and cytoarchitecture,” Cerebral Cortex, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 865–876, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  130. F. M. Bareyre, M. Kerschensteiner, T. Misgeld, and J. R. Sanes, “Transgenic labeling of the corticospinal tract for monitoring axonal responses to spinal cord injury,” Nature Medicine, vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 1355–1360, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  131. E. M. Rouiller, V. Moret, and F. Liang, “Comparison of the connectional properties of the two forelimb areas of the rat sensorimotor cortex: support for the presence of a premotor or supplementary motor cortical area,” Somatosensory & Motor Research, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 269–289, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  132. I. Q. Whishaw, S. M. Pellis, B. Gorny, B. Kolb, and W. Tetzlaff, “Proximal and distal impairments in rat forelimb use in reaching follow unilateral pyramidal tract lesions,” Behavioural Brain Research, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 59–76, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  133. K. H. Bockhorst, P. A. Narayana, R. Liu et al., “Early postnatal development of rat brain: in vivo diffusion tensor imaging,” Journal of Neuroscience Research, vol. 86, no. 7, pp. 1520–1528, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  134. E. A. J. Joosten and D. P. R. Bar, “Axon guidance of outgrowing corticospinal fibres in the rat,” Journal of Anatomy, vol. 194, no. 1, pp. 15–32, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  135. D. D. O'Leary and B. B. Stanfield, “A transient pyramidal tract projection from the visual cortex in the hamster and its removal by selective collateral elimination,” Brain Research, vol. 392, no. 1-2, pp. 87–99, 1986. View at Google Scholar
  136. J. Dubois, M. Benders, C. Borradori-Tolsa et al., “Primary cortical folding in the human newborn: an early marker of later functional development,” Brain, vol. 131, no. 8, pp. 2028–2041, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  137. R. N. Lemon and J. Griffiths, “Comparing the function of the corticospinal system in different species: organizational differences for motor specialization?” Muscle & Nerve, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 261–279, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  138. J. Armand, “The origin, course and terminations of corticospinal fibers in various mammals,” Progress in Brain Research, vol. 57, pp. 329–360, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  139. E. A. Joosten, A. A. Gribnau, and P. J. Dederen, “An anterograde tracer study of the developing corticospinal tract in the rat: three components,” Brain Research, vol. 433, no. 1, pp. 121–130, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  140. E. A. J. Joosten, A. A. M. Gribnau, and P. J. W. C. Dederen, “Postnatal development of the corticospinal tract in the rat. An ultrastructural anterograde HRP study,” Anatomy and Embryology, vol. 179, no. 5, pp. 449–456, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  141. E. A. J. Joosten, R. L. Schuitman, M. E. J. Vermelis, and P. J. W. C. Dederen, “Postnatal development of the ipsilateral corticospinal component in rat spinal cord: a light and electron microscopic anterograde HRP study,” The Journal of Comparative Neurology, vol. 326, no. 1, pp. 133–146, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  142. Q. Welniarz, I. Dusart, and E. Roze, “The corticospinal tract: evolution, development, and human disorders,” Developmental Neurobiology, vol. 77, no. 7, pp. 810–829, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  143. K. E. Adolph and J. M. Franchak, “The development of motor behavior,” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, vol. 8, no. 1-2, p. e1430, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  144. D. G. Lawrence and D. A. Hopkins, “The development of motor control in the rhesus monkey: evidence concerning the role of corticomotoneuronal connections,” Brain, vol. 99, no. 2, pp. 235–254, 1976. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  145. T. Terashima, “Course and collaterals of corticospinal fibers arising from the sensorimotor cortex of the reeler mouse,” Developmental Neuroscience, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 8–19, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  146. A. Nezua, S. Kimura, S. Uehara, T. Kobayashia, M. Tanaka, and K. Saito, “Magnetic stimulation of motor cortex in children: maturity of corticospinal pathway and problem of clinical application,” Brain and Development, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 176–180, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  147. S. Schneiberg, H. Sveistrup, B. McFadyen, P. McKinley, and M. F. Levin, “The development of coordination for reach-to-grasp movements in children,” Experimental Brain Research, vol. 146, no. 2, pp. 142–154, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  148. S. Arber, “Motor circuits in action: specification, connectivity, and function,” Neuron, vol. 74, no. 6, pp. 975–989, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  149. P. Arlotta, B. J. Molyneaux, J. Chen, J. Inoue, R. Kominami, and J. D. Macklis, “Neuronal subtype-specific genes that control corticospinal motor neuron development in vivo,” Neuron, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 207–221, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  150. D. Bagnard, M. Lohrum, D. Uziel, A. W. Püschel, and J. Bolz, “Semaphorins act as attractive and repulsive guidance signals during the development of cortical projections,” Development, vol. 125, no. 24, pp. 5043–5053, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  151. A. Bagri, O. Marı́n, A. S. Plump et al., “Slit proteins prevent midline crossing and determine the dorsoventral position of major axonal pathways in the mammalian forebrain,” Neuron, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 233–248, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  152. M. J. Barallobre, M. Pascual, J. A. del Río, and E. Soriano, “The netrin family of guidance factors: emphasis on netrin-1 signalling,” Brain Research Reviews, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 22–47, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  153. M. G. Blackmore, Z. Wang, J. K. Lerch et al., “Kruppel-like factor 7 engineered for transcriptional activation promotes axon regeneration in the adult corticospinal tract,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 109, no. 19, pp. 7517–7522, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  154. A. J. Canty and M. Murphy, “Molecular mechanisms of axon guidance in the developing corticospinal tract,” Progress in Neurobiology, vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 214–235, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  155. S. Chakrabarty and J. H. Martin, “Postnatal development of the motor representation in primary motor cortex,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 84, no. 5, pp. 2582–2594, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  156. M. Dottori, L. Hartley, M. Galea et al., “EphA4 (Sek1) receptor tyrosine kinase is required for the development of the corticospinal tract,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 95, no. 22, pp. 13248–13253, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  157. J. H. Finger, R. T. Bronson, B. Harris, K. Johnson, S. A. Przyborski, and S. L. Ackerman, “The netrin 1 receptors Unc5h3 and Dcc are necessary at multiple choice points for the guidance of corticospinal tract axons,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 22, no. 23, pp. 10346–10356, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  158. K. L. Fink, F. López-Giráldez, I. J. Kim, S. M. Strittmatter, and W. B. J. Cafferty, “Identification of intrinsic axon growth modulators for intact CNS neurons after injury,” Cell Reports, vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 2687–2701, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  159. K. M. Friel and J. H. Martin, “Role of sensory-motor cortex activity in postnatal development of corticospinal axon terminals in the cat,” The Journal of Comparative Neurology, vol. 485, no. 1, pp. 43–56, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  160. K. Itoh, L. Cheng, Y. Kamei et al., “Brain development in mice lacking L1-L1 homophilic adhesion,” The Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 165, no. 1, pp. 145–154, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  161. A. Kirton, G. deVeber, C. Gunraj, and R. Chen, “Cortical excitability and interhemispheric inhibition after subcortical pediatric stroke: plastic organization and effects of rTMS,” Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 121, no. 11, pp. 1922–1929, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  162. T. Lai, D. Jabaudon, B. J. Molyneaux et al., “SOX5 controls the sequential generation of distinct corticofugal neuron subtypes,” Neuron, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 232–247, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  163. D. P. Leone, W. E. Heavner, E. A. Ferenczi et al., “Satb2 regulates the differentiation of both callosal and subcerebral projection neurons in the developing cerebral cortex,” Cerebral Cortex, vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 3406–3419, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  164. D. P. Leone, G. Panagiotakos, W. E. Heavner et al., “Compensatory actions of Ldb adaptor proteins during corticospinal motor neuron differentiation,” Cerebral Cortex, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 1686–1699, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  165. K. Liu, Y. Lu, J. K. Lee et al., “PTEN deletion enhances the regenerative ability of adult corticospinal neurons,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 1075–1081, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  166. J. H. Martin, “The corticospinal system: from development to motor control,” The Neuroscientist, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 161–173, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  167. B. J. Molyneaux, P. Arlotta, T. Hirata, M. Hibi, and J. D. Macklis, “Fezl is required for the birth and specification of corticospinal motor neurons,” Neuron, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 817–831, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  168. S. Paixão, A. Balijepalli, N. Serradj et al., “EphrinB3/EphA4-mediated guidance of ascending and descending spinal tracts,” Neuron, vol. 80, no. 6, pp. 1407–1420, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  169. F. Polleux, G. Ince-Dunn, and A. Ghosh, “Transcriptional regulation of vertebrate axon guidance and synapse formation,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 331–340, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  170. I. Salimi and J. H. Martin, “Rescuing transient corticospinal terminations and promoting growth with corticospinal stimulation in kittens,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 24, no. 21, pp. 4952–4961, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  171. N. Serradj and J. H. Martin, “Motor experience reprograms development of a genetically-altered bilateral corticospinal motor circuit,” PLoS One, vol. 11, no. 9, article e0163775, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  172. N. Serradj, S. Paixao, T. Sobocki et al., “EphA4-mediated ipsilateral corticospinal tract misprojections are necessary for bilateral voluntary movements but not bilateral stereotypic locomotion,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 34, no. 15, pp. 5211–5221, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  173. S. Soleman, P. K. Yip, D. A. Duricki, and L. D. F. Moon, “Delayed treatment with chondroitinase ABC promotes sensorimotor recovery and plasticity after stroke in aged rats,” Brain, vol. 135, no. 4, pp. 1210–1223, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  174. S. Srivatsa, S. Parthasarathy, Z. Molnár, and V. Tarabykin, “Sip1 downstream effector ninein controls neocortical axonal growth, ipsilateral branching, and microtubule growth and stability,” Neuron, vol. 85, no. 5, pp. 998–1012, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  175. M. L. Starkey, K. Bartus, A. W. Barritt, and E. J. Bradbury, “Chondroitinase ABC promotes compensatory sprouting of the intact corticospinal tract and recovery of forelimb function following unilateral pyramidotomy in adult mice,” The European Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 36, no. 12, pp. 3665–3678, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  176. J. M. Weimann, Y. A. Zhang, M. E. Levin, W. P. Devine, P. Brûlet, and S. K. McConnell, “Cortical neurons require Otx1 for the refinement of exuberant axonal projections to subcortical targets,” Neuron, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 819–831, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  177. P. T. J. A. Williams, Y.-Q. Jiang, and J. H. Martin, “Motor system plasticity after unilateral injury in the developing brain,” Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, vol. 59, no. 12, pp. 1224–1229, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  178. Z. Gu, N. Serradj, M. Ueno et al., “Skilled movements require non-apoptotic Bax/Bak pathway-mediated corticospinal circuit reorganization,” Neuron, vol. 94, no. 3, pp. 626–641.e4, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  179. P. R. Huttenlocher, “Myelination and the development of function in immature pyramidal tract,” Experimental Neurology, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 405–415, 1970. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  180. B. D. Semple, K. Blomgren, K. Gimlin, D. M. Ferriero, and L. J. Noble-Haeusslein, “Brain development in rodents and humans: identifying benchmarks of maturation and vulnerability to injury across species,” Progress in Neurobiology, vol. 106-107, pp. 1–16, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  181. J. Dobbing and J. Sands, “Comparative aspects of the brain growth spurt,” Early Human Development, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 79–83, 1979. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  182. H. Hagberg, R. Ichord, C. Palmer, J. Y. Yager, and S. J. Vannucci, “Animal models of developmental brain injury: relevance to human disease. A summary of the panel discussion from the third Hershey conference on developmental cerebral blood flow and metabolism,” Developmental Neuroscience, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 364–366, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  183. G. J. Clowry, “The dependence of spinal cord development on corticospinal input and its significance in understanding and treating spastic cerebral palsy,” Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 1114–1124, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  184. T. Umeda and T. Isa, “Differential contributions of rostral and caudal frontal forelimb areas to compensatory process after neonatal hemidecortication in rats,” The European Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 34, no. 9, pp. 1453–1460, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  185. H. Hagberg, E. Bona, E. Gilland, and M. Puka-Sundvall, “Hypoxia-ischaemia model in the 7-day-old rat: possibilities and shortcomings,” Acta Paediatrica, vol. 422, pp. 85–88, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  186. C. Quairiaux, S. V. Sizonenko, P. Megevand, C. M. Michel, and J. Z. Kiss, “Functional deficit and recovery of developing sensorimotor networks following neonatal hypoxic-ischemic injury in the rat,” Cerebral Cortex, vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 2080–2091, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  187. S. V. Sizonenko, E. Sirimanne, Y. Mayall, P. D. Gluckman, T. Inder, and C. Williams, “Selective cortical alteration after hypoxic-ischemic injury in the very immature rat brain,” Pediatric Research, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 263–269, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  188. J.-Y. C. Hsu, S. A. Stein, and X.-M. Xu, “Development of the corticospinal tract in the mouse spinal cord: a quantitative ultrastructural analysis,” Brain Research, vol. 1084, no. 1, pp. 16–27, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  189. Y. Wang, P. T. Cheung, G. X. Shen et al., “Hypoxic-ischemic brain injury in the neonatal rat model: relationship between lesion size at early MR imaging and irreversible infarction,” American Journal of Neuroradiology, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 51–54, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  190. R. C. Vannucci, R. M. Brucklacher, and S. J. Vannucci, “Intracellular calcium accumulation during the evolution of hypoxic-ischemic brain damage in the immature rat,” Developmental Brain Research, vol. 126, no. 1, pp. 117–120, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  191. R. Geddes, R. C. Vannucci, and S. J. Vannucci, “Delayed cerebral atrophy following moderate hypoxia-ischemia in the immature rat,” Developmental Neuroscience, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 180–185, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  192. J. E. Rice, R. C. Vannucci, and J. B. Brierley, “The influence of immaturity on hypoxic-ischemic brain damage in the rat,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 131–141, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  193. R. C. Vannucci, J. Towfighi, and S. J. Vannucci, “Secondary energy failure after cerebral hypoxia-ischemia in the immature rat,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, vol. 24, no. 10, pp. 1090–1097, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  194. Y. Liu, F. S. Silverstein, R. Skoff, and J. D. E. Barks, “Hypoxic-ischemic oligodendroglial injury in neonatal rat brain,” Pediatric Research, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 25–33, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  195. F. A. Welsh, R. C. Vannucci, and J. B. Brierley, “Columnar alterations of NADH fluorescence during hypoxia-ischemia in immature rat brain,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 221–228, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  196. N. Benjelloun, S. Renolleau, A. Represa, Y. Ben-Ari, and C. Charriaut-Marlangue, “Inflammatory responses in the cerebral cortex after ischemia in the P7 neonatal rat,” Stroke, vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 1916–1924, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  197. S. Renolleau, D. Aggoun-Zouaoui, Y. Ben-Ari, and C. Charriaut-Marlangue, “A model of transient unilateral focal ischemia with reperfusion in the P7 neonatal rat: morphological changes indicative of apoptosis,” Stroke, vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 1454–1461, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  198. N. Derugin, M. Wendland, K. Muramatsu et al., “Evolution of brain injury after transient middle cerebral artery occlusion in neonatal rats,” Stroke, vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 1752–1761, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus