Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity

Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity / 2017 / Article
Special Issue

Natural Products Targeting on Oxidative Stress and Inflammation: Mechanisms, Therapies, and Safety Assessment

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2017 |Article ID 1956104 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1956104

Fumiya Harada, Tetsuro Morikawa, Anton Lennikov, Anthony Mukwaya, Mira Schaupper, Osamu Uehara, Rie Takai, Koki Yoshida, Jun Sato, Yukihiro Horie, Hiroyuki Sakaguchi, Ching-Zong Wu, Yoshihiro Abiko, Neil Lagali, Nobuyoshi Kitaichi, "Protective Effects of Oral Astaxanthin Nanopowder against Ultraviolet-Induced Photokeratitis in Mice", Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2017, Article ID 1956104, 13 pages, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1956104

Protective Effects of Oral Astaxanthin Nanopowder against Ultraviolet-Induced Photokeratitis in Mice

Academic Editor: Xiaolun Sun
Received02 Apr 2017
Revised14 Jun 2017
Accepted25 Jul 2017
Published28 Sep 2017


Purpose. Astaxanthin (AST) has a strong antioxidant cellular membrane chaperone protective effect. Recently, a water-soluble nanosized AST (nano-AST) form was produced, which is expected to improve the efficacy of oral intake effects. The purpose of this study was to examine whether oral nano-AST has therapeutic effects on UV-induced photokeratitis in mice. Methods. C57BL/6 mice were administered twice with either nano-AST, AST oil, lutein, or bilberry extracts 3 hours before and shortly before UV irradiation (dose: 400 mJ/cm2). The corneas were collected 24 hours after irradiation and stained with H&E and TUNEL. NF-κB, dihydroethidium (DHE), COX-2, p-IκB-α, TNFα, and CD45 expression were evaluated through immunohistochemistry, Western blot analysis, and qPCR. Results. Corneal epithelium was significantly thicker in mice orally administered with nano-AST than in the others (), with significantly less NF-κB nucleus translocation (), and significantly fewer TUNEL cells (). Weaker DHE signals were detected in the nano-AST group () relative to the others. Furthermore, reduced inflammation and decreased cell death in corneal tissue were observed in the nano-AST group, as indicated by a reduction in the expression of COX-2, p-IκB-α, TNFα, and CD45. Conclusions. Oral administration of nano-AST demonstrated a protective effect on UV-induced photokeratitis via antioxidative, anti-inflammatory, and antiapoptotic activity.

1. Introduction

Exposure of the eye to ultraviolet B (UVB) radiation can lead to photokeratitis, a condition which is associated with upregulated expression of inflammatory mediators such as nuclear factor- (NF-) κB and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2/COX2) as part of the prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase (PTGS) system [1]. Acute UVB exposure affects all layers of the cornea and especially the epithelium [2] through inducing apoptosis and necrosis in corneal cells [3]. Previous reports indicated that UVB irradiation at 400 mJ/cm2 to mouse corneas is a useful model for studying acute photokeratitis and for testing the potency of antioxidant compounds [3].

Astaxanthin (AST; 3,30-dihydroxy-b,b-carotene-4,40-dione), a carotenoid without vitamin A activity [4, 5], has potential clinical applications due to its antioxidant activity, which is higher than that of β-carotene and α-tocopherol [4, 6]. Moreover, its pharmacological effects are reported, including antitumor, anticancer, antidiabetic, and anti-inflammatory activities [69]. Furthermore, a previous study suggests that oral AST might ameliorate metabolic syndrome in obese mice [8]. Its cell protective effects were demonstrated in the liver and vocal cords as well [10, 11]. AST exhibits reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenging activity [12] and inhibits UVB-induced apoptosis in keratinocytes [13]. In the eye, AST attenuates retinal damage by reducing apoptosis of retinal ganglion cells in mice through inhibiting oxidative stress [14] and light-induced retinal damage [15]. Furthermore, AST decreases retinal oxidative stress in streptozotocin-induced diabetes [16], reduces retinal ischemia damage [17], and inhibits cell death of retinal ganglion cells under various stresses [18] in murine models. In humans, AST oral supplementation is reported to increase superoxide scavenging activity of aqueous humor [19].

Humans have consumed food products that are natural sources of AST, such as salmon, crabs, and seaweed, since ancient times without any known side effect or toxicity. In 1999, pure AST was approved as a dietary supplement by Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the United States [20]. AST is partially absorbed by the intestinal mucosal cells. However, the lipophilicity of AST causes limited bioavailability of AST due to incomplete first-pass metabolism and reaching systemic circulation [21].

Recently, however, AST has been successfully produced as nanoemulsion droplets. Meor Mohd Affandi et al. exposed water/AST oil solution to high-speed centrifugation at high pressure (800 bars) to produce stabile AST oil nanodroplets (nano-AST) with a diameter of 150–160 nm. The chemical composition of AST is not altered; the nanodroplets do not aggregate and can be further dissolved in water [22].

Reduced self-oxidation and prolonged shelf life of the nano-AST compound are reported, and potential higher bioavailability is suggested. [22] FUJIFILM (Tokyo, Japan) confirmed increased serum concentration of nano-AST and its prolonged half-life in rats upon oral administration compared to AST dissolved in oil [23].

We previously reported that AST exhibits a dose-dependent anti-inflammatory effect [24, 25] and inhibits the production of inflammatory mediators of NF-κB downstream pathway, by reducing NF-κB activation and tumor necrosis factor-a (TNFα) production in vitro [26].

In this study, we set out to determine whether oral nano-AST has potential therapeutic effects on UV-induced photokeratitis in mice and to evaluate the protective effect comparable to commonly used antioxidants, including lutein, water-soluble bilberry extract, and AST dissolved in oil (AST oil).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Care of Animals

For the present study, 8–10-week-old C57BL/6J male mice were obtained from Sankyo Labo Service Corporation Inc. (Sapporo, Japan). Mice were maintained under specific pathogen-free conditions in a licensed animal care facility at the Health Sciences University of Hokkaido (Sapporo, Japan). Experiments were approved by the animal experiment committee of the Health Sciences University of Hokkaido. All procedures involving animals were performed according to the Regulations for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals at the Health Sciences University of Hokkaido and by the ARVO resolution on the use of animals in research.

2.2. Treatments and UVB Irradiation

The following substances were used: (1)nano-AST (ASP-1; Lot: F4X03, FUJIFILM Corporation, Tokyo, Japan; 0.5, 5, and 50 mg/kg, double-distilled water (DDW));(2)AST oil (ASTOTS-10O; Lot: 150121-100; Takeda Shiki, Kashiwa, Japan; oil);(3)Marigold extract (lutein; Flora GLO; Lot: UE014040117; DSM Nutrition Japan, Tokyo, Japan; oil);(4)bilberry extract (anthocyanidin; dried bilberry extract, ET; Lot: 31584/M1; DDW).

The ratio and dosages of AST oil, lutein, and bilberry extract of AST: lutein: bilberry = 1 : 1 : 10 were extrapolated based on reports used as food supplementation in the human eyes; AST oil: 6 mg/day, lutein: 6–10 mg/day, and bilberry extract: 120 mg/day [21, 2729].

Initially, to determine the effective concentration of nano-AST, UVB-exposed animals were administrated either with nano-AST (0.5, 5, and 50 mg/kg) or DDW (positive control). Nonirradiated and nontreated animals served as negative control (naïve). Afterwards, nano-AST protective effect (50 mg/kg) on murine UV-induced photokeratitis was compared to AST oil (50 mg/kg), lutein (50 mg/kg), and bilberry extract (500 mg/kg) as well as naïve control group. Drugs/compound/treatment was orally administrated using soft mouse feeding needles 3 hours before and immediately prior UV irradiation. Mice were anesthetized intraperitoneal (i.p.) with pentobarbital (50 mg/kg; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and UVB irradiated (290–320 nm) at a dose of 400 mJ/cm2 using FS-20 Fluorescent lamp (Panasonic, Osaka, Japan). At the experimental endpoint (24 hours after treatment), animals were scarified (pentobarbital, 100 mg/kg, i.p.) and tissue samples were harvested.

2.3. Histology and Immunohistochemistry

The corneas were harvested, fixed with 10% formaldehyde overnight at 4°C, and embedded into paraffin. Sagittal sections of 5 μm thick were stained with hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) for morphological analysis and imaged with OLYMPUS BX50 (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) using FLOVEL Filing System camera (Flovel, Tokyo, Japan). The epithelial thickness of the central cornea was measured by a masked observer and averaged.

Cell death was investigated through terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) staining using Cell Death Detection Kit (Roche Diagnostics Japan, Tokyo, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. TUNEL-stained sections were imaged with Eclipse TE 2000-E (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) using the EZ-C1 3.80 software. TUNEL-positive cells were counted and averaged.

For immunohistochemistry, deparaffinization, rehydration, and antigen retrieval by boiling sections in sodium citrate buffer (10 mM sodium citrate, 0.05% Tween 20, pH 6.0) and blocking (1% BSA, 1 hour, at room temperature (RT)) were performed. Sections were then incubated with primary antibodies, including rabbit polyclonal anti-CD45 antibody (ab10558; 1 : 100; Abcam, Cambridge, UK), rabbit polyclonal anti-COX-2 antibody (aa584-598; 1 : 100; Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, MI, USA), mouse monoclonal p-IκB-α (B-9) (sc-8404; 1 : 200; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), and rabbit monoclonal cleaved caspase 3 (c-caspase 3); (D175; 1 : 100; Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA).

Stained sections were visualized (DyLight 488 or DyLight 594 secondary antibody (1 : 1000; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA)), mounted (ProLong Diamond antifade reagent with DAPI (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA)), and imaged using LSM 700 (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). In resulting images, COX-2-positive cells (green) were counted using ImageJ, relative to the total number of DAPI-stained nuclei (blue). Images were randomized for analysis and quantified in a masked manner.

2.4. NF-κB Nuclear Colocalization

Corneal tissues were embedded in optimal cutting temperature (OCT) compound, flash frozen in liquid nitrogen, and sectioned (10 μm thickness). Thawed sections were washed (0.1 M PBS, RT), blocked (1% BSA, 1 hour, RT), stained against NF-κB (rabbit monoclonal anti-NF-κB (ab16502; 1 : 100; Abcam, Cambridge, UK)) overnight at 4°C, and washed (0.1 M PBS). Sections were incubated with a fluorescent dye-conjugated goat anti-rabbit antibody (1 : 100; Cell Signaling Technology Japan, Tokyo, Japan), mounted (ProLong Gold antifade reagent with DAPI; Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and imaged. Colocalized (pink) signals in merged images were evaluated and extracted using Photoshop (Adobe Systems, San Jose, CA, USA). The numbers of resulting NF-κB colocalized nuclei counted by a masked observer and averaged.

2.5. Detection of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS)

Dihydroethidium (DHE, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), an oxidative red fluorescent dye, was used for cytosolic superoxide anion (O2−) detection in OCT section by oxidation [30]. Briefly, sections were thawed and immediately applied with 30 μM of DHE solution in PBS for 5 min, following washing with PBS and mild fixation using 1% PFA, 10 min. Stained sections were washed with PBS and mounted with ProLong Diamond antifade reagent with DAPI (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).

Images were acquired with Eclipse TE 2000-E (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan), and areas identical in size, including the corneal epithelial layer and subjacent stroma, were evaluated for mean luminosity values and quantified with ImageJ (National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA). Counterstaining with DAPI was done for enhanced tissue visualization but was not used for quantification.

2.6. Western Blot Analysis

Tissue was homogenized by Qiagen TissueLyser LT (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), and whole protein was extracted by Ready-Prep™ total protein extraction kit working solution, supplemented with Protease Halt Protease and Phosphates inhibitor cocktail (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Protein concentration was quantified (Qubit 3.0 Fluorometer, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), boiled (25 μg of total protein in Laemmli Sample Buffer 1 : 3 volume ratio, 5 min, 95°C, Bio-Rad), and seperated by SDS-PAGE (Mini Protean Precast Acrylamide Gels, Bio-Rad). Samples were transferred to a polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane by electroblotting (Trans-Blot Turbo Transfer Pack, Bio-Rad), followed by blockage (5% skimmed milk, 1 hour, RT, Bio-Rad). Subsequently, antibody incubation was performed using rabbit polyclonal anti-CD45 antibody (ab10558; 1 : 250; Abcam, Cambridge, UK), mouse monoclonal p-IκB-α (B-9) antibody (sc-8404; 1 : 200, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), and rabbit polyclonal COX-2 antibody (aa 584-598; 1 : 200, Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, MI, USA). Followed by horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary goat anti-rabbit (AP307P, 2700944, 1 : 1000; Merck Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) and anti-mouse antibodies (AP308P, 2688593; 1 : 1000; Merck Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA), even protein loading was verified by rabbit polyclonal anti-β-actin antibody (PA1-21167; 1 : 2000; Thermo Fisher Scientific). Signals were visualized with Chemiluminescence Clarity™ Western ECL substrate (Bio-Rad) according to the manufacturer’s protocol and detected using LAS-500 Imaging System (General Electric, Fairfield, CT, USA).

2.7. RNA Isolation and Quantitative Real-Time PCR (qPCR)

Corneal tissue without scleral rim was disrupted (Qiagen TissueLyser LT, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), RNA was extracted (RNeasy Mini Kit, Qiagen), quantified (NanoDrop 2000, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and reverse transcript to cDNA according to the manufacturer’s protocol (ReverTra Ace® qPCR RT Master Mix, Toyobo, Osaka, Japan). qPCR was performed for TNFα (mTNFα forward: GCCTCTTCTCATTCCTGCTTG; reverse: CTGATGAGAGGGAGGCCATT [31]) and GAPDH (mGAPDH forward: AGAACATCATCCCTGCATCC; reverse: CACATTGGGGGTAGGAACAC) using Kapa SYBR Fast for LightCycler 480 (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan). Three technical and five biological replicates were run per group

TNFα threshold cycle (CT) values were normalized to GAPDH values, and gene expression was calculated using the relative quantification method (2−△△Ct). Obtained data were adjusted as fold change relative to the naïve group.

3. Statistical Analysis

All values are expressed as the mean ± standard error of mean (SEM) for the respective groups. Statistical analyses were determined using the two-tailed Student t-test. A value less than 0.05 was considered as significant. The following markings are used in the figures: nonsignificant (n.s.) (); ; ; .

4. Results

4.1. Determining the Optimal Therapeutic Amount of Nano-AST and Dose-Dependent Protective Effect

At 24 hours after UVB exposure, corneal epithelial cell layer was preserved in mice treated orally with 50 mg/kg nano-AST. In contrast, administration of 0.5 and 5 mg/kg nano-AST exhibited similar epithelial damage as well as edema in the subepithelial layer relative to the UVB control group (Figure 1(a)). Quantification of corneal epithelial thickness (Figure 1(b)) revealed that the corneal epithelium in the 50 mg/kg nano-AST group was significantly thicker compared to that of the UVB controls () whereas epithelial thickness in the 0.5 and 5 mg/kg nano-AST-treated animals did not significantly differ from that of the UBV controls (). Based on these results, 50 mg/kg was considered as an effective concentration of nano-AST for further experiments.

4.2. Effect of Nano-AST Treatment Compared to AST Oil, Lutein, and Bilberry Extract

Next, we investigated the protective effect of AST oil, lutein, and bilberry extract and compared it to nano-AST (Figure 2). Nano-AST treatment preserved the epithelium and resulted in milder morphological changes in the corneal surface compared to that in other groups (Figure 2(a)). No significant protective effect was observed in AST oil-, lutein-, and bilberry extract-treated groups, indicated by no detectable, significant difference () in corneal thickness relative to the UVB control animals (Figure 2(b)). In contrast, nano-AST (50 mg/kg) significantly preserved corneal epithelial thickness compared to the UVB control group (), AST oil (), lutein (), and bilberry extract (), (Figure 2(b)).

4.3. Nano-AST Treatment Reduced ROS Production in Corneal Tissue

To investigate ROS production, harvested corneal tissue was stained with DHE (Figure 3). Immunohistochemistry revealed strong DHE expression in the UVB-irradiated groups, whereas a markedly reduced signal was detected in both nano-AST- and AST oil-treated animals (Figure 3(a)). Quantitative analysis of DHE signal (Figure 3(b)) displayed that ROS production was significantly reduced in the oral nano-AST () and AST oil ()groups relative to the UVB-irradiated control group, while treatment with lutein or bilberry extract did not have a significant effect on ROS production in UVB-irradiated corneal tissues.

4.4. Nano-AST Treatment Reduced Corneal Cell Death and caspase 3-Dependent Apoptosis

UVB exposure induces apoptosis in corneal cells; therefore, we evaluated the effect of nano-AST and other antioxidants on cell death. First, apoptotic cells were stained with TUNEL (Figure 4(a)). Numerous TUNEL-positive nuclei were detected in UVB-irradiated corneas, whereas only a few TUNEL-positive cells were observed in nano-AST-treated corneas. AST oil, lutein, and bilberry extract administration, however, displayed no noticeable different TUNEL staining signals compared to the UVB control. Obtained data through TUNEL staining was further supported by the apoptosis marker c-caspase 3 staining (Figure 4(b)). Quantification of the amount of TUNEL-positive cells (Figure 4(c)) revealed significant reduced number of apoptotic cell upon nano-AST administration compared to the UVB control ()and other treatment groups (). In contrast, no significant difference was detected between the UBV control group and animals treated with AST oil, lutein, or bilberry extract (, n.s.).

4.5. Nano-AST Treatment Reduced NF-κB Activation

NF-κB resides in the cytoplasm in its inactive form, as observed in nonirradiated naïve mouse corneal tissues (Figure 5(a)). UVB irradiation activates the NF-κB signaling pathway, resulting in NF-κB translocation into the nucleus, shown in the UVB-irradiated groups (Figure 5(a)). The number of NF-κB translocated into the nuclei was quantified (Figure 5(b)). Quantification revealed significantly reduced NF-κB nuclear colocalization signals within the nucleus in the nano-AST group relative to the UVB control group (). Administration of AST oil, lutein, and bilberry extract did not significantly reduce NF-κB translocation () when compared to the UVB control.

4.6. Nano-AST Suppressed the Expression of Proinflammatory Cyclooxygenase- (COX-) 2 and Phosphorylated IκB-α and CD45 Key Mediator in Recruitment of Inflammatory Cells

COX-2, a downstream gene of NF-κB, is a crucial mediator for inflammatory cell recruitment. The expression of the proinflammatory factor COX-2 was induced upon UVB exposure (Figure 6(a), UVB control). However, clear reduction of COX-2 signal in the corneal tissue was revealed by immunohistochemistry nano-AST-treated group. While slight reduction of COX-2 signaling was observed in some AST oil-treated samples, evaluation of the percentage of COX-2-positive cells confirmed significant decrease in nano-AST- () treated animals but revealed no significant reduction in the other treatment groups compared to the UVB control (Figure 6(b)). These results were further supported by Western blot analysis, with clear reduction of COX-2 band intensity in nano-AST-treated corneas and to lesser extent in AST oil-treated group. In contrast, lutein and bilberry extract administration did not cause decreased COX-2 expression proven by immunohistochemistry and Western blot analysis. NF-κB is held in the cytoplasm by the inhibitory protein IκBα. During NF-κB activation, IκBα is phosphorylated (pIκBα) leading to the sequestration of NF-κB, IκBα complex and NF-κB nucleus translocation. Consistent with NF-κB nuclear translocation staining (Figure 5), immunohistochemistry revealed diminished pIκBα signal in the nano-AST-treated group and decreased expression after AST oil administration compared to the UVB control (Figure 6(a)). Western blot analysis of pIκBα expression in the cornea demonstrated slight difference between the UVB control and nano-AST band intensity (Figure 6(c)).

Furthermore, the expression of CD45 was attenuated in nano-AST and to a lesser extent in AST-treated mouse corneas (Figure 6(c)).

4.7. Nano-AST Treatment Reduced TNFα Transcription

The expression profile for TNFα in the treatment groups (UVB control, nano-AST, and AST oil) was assessed by qPCR (Figure 7). The transcription of TNFα was markedly increased in the UVB control group compared to the naïve (), however, significantly reduced in the nano-AST () group relative to the UVB control. TNFα gene expression was not significantly affected by AST oil, lutein, or bilberry treatment ()

5. Discussion

Corneal epithelium serves to protect the underlying corneal stroma, posterior eye structures, and tissues against UVB damage by absorbing a substantial amount of UV radiation. Epithelial cells have an innate antioxidant system [32] that is overwhelmed as a result of exposure to more energetic UVB light. Upon UVB exposure, ROS production transiently increases and activates cell signaling pathways [33]. Excessive UVB irradiation causes DNA and cell membrane damage that leads to the induction of necrosis and apoptosis of corneal epithelial cells as well as activation of transcription factors such as NF-κB [34].

NF-κB is known as one of the major transcription factors mediating inflammation and cell survival [35]. Activated NF-κB induces upregulation of inflammatory mediators, enzymes, and cytokines such as COX-2, PGE2, and TNFα [9]. TNFα initiates an inflammatory positive feedback loop, resulting in NF-κB activation [36]. Early tissue infiltration with inflammatory cells, primarily with CD45 and CD11b-positive leukocytes, occurs within hours after UVB exposure and causes further tissue damage [37].

AST inhibits in vivo activation of NF-κB in endotoxin-induced uveitis (EIU) and choroidal neovascularization models [24, 25]. We previously reported that topical AST eye drops suspended in polyethylene glycol (PEG) protect against UV-induced photokeratitis through the reduction of NF-κB expression and ROS activation [38]. However, lack of water solubility of AST is the limiting factor for topical use, as well as its opaque nature, which reduces vision for a short time after application. Thus, AST usage is limited to skin cosmetics products.

Furthermore, as the cornea is one of the nonvascular tissues, significantly higher blood AST level is required to achieve the desired therapeutic effect in corneal diseases after oral ingestion.

The present study indicates a protective effect of oral nano-AST administration against UV-induced acute photokeratitis. 50 mg/kg nano-AST administered orally preserved epithelial morphology and significantly reduced number of TUNEL- and NF-κB-positive cells in the cornea. Immunohistochemistry, Western blot analysis, and qPCR further supported these results by indicating a significant reduction of COX-2, CD45, p-IκBα, and TNFα expression, which leads to decreased inflammatory and cell death responses.

As previously reported, oral administration of nano-AST results in a 1.5–1.8 times higher plasma AST concentration compared to AST oil intake, and the plasma AST level peaked 3 hours after administration [23]. We can speculate that hydrophilic nano-AST can reach a level high enough to be effective at the ocular surface by penetration of the blood-eye barrier, and thus reaching the aqueous humor as well as the tear fluid.

To determine the relative efficacy of the nano-AST formulation, antioxidant compounds which are well known in research and commercial applications [39] were incorporated into the experimental design, such as lutein, AST oil, and bilberry extract.

Endogenously synthesized lutein is known to be detected in macular tissue of humans and some animal eyes [40]. It has been demonstrated that macular carotenoid levels can be altered through dietary manipulation and lower carotenoid levels in age-related macular degeneration (AMD) patients have been reported [41]. While the high antioxidant potency of lutein is well known and demonstrated in various cells [42] and tissues [43], its lipophilicity limits its oral bioavailability [44]. In the present study, lutein did not produce any noticeable effect on cell death, inflammation, or ROS response in the cornea.

Recent data suggested that anthocyanins are as bioavailable as other flavonoid subclasses [45], such as flavan-3-ols and flavones, which have relative bioavailabilities between 2.5% and 18.5% [46, 47]. However, anthocyanins are subjected to rapid metabolic elimination and produce many diverse breakdown products and metabolites [45], thereby limiting its usefulness for treatment of ocular diseases. In this study, both lutein and bilberry extracts were ineffective in suppressing corneal damage, in contrast to nano-AST.

AST oil reduced ROS production (comparable to nano-AST). However, AST oil did not have a significant effect on corneal epithelial cell death or inflammation. This result could be explained by the better bioavailability of nano-AST compared to AST oil [23]. Additionally, a threshold level for NF-κB activation to induce an “all-or-nothing” response was reported in tissue hypoxia [48]. Therefore, partial inhibition of NF-κB activation that does not reduce the activation to threshold level would have little effect on the subsequent inflammatory cascade. This contention is supported by our Western blot and histological observations, where AST oil administration slightly reduced p-IκB-α and COX-2 expression but had minimal effect on corneal epithelial morphology, cell death markers, or TNFα expression profile. These results may also indicate that the effect of AST is not limited to ROS scavenging.

A recent study indicated that AST could have a direct effect on c-Jun-N-terminal kinase 1, which regulates numerous factors downstream of c-Jun, such as ATF2, SMAD4, and HSF1. These factors are highly involved in apoptosis, DNA repair, cellular proliferation, and chaperone responses, respectively [49]. Furthermore, AST has been shown to downregulate gene expression of COX-2 as well as COX-2 protein and attenuates phosphorylation of mitogen- and stress-activated protein kinase- (MSK-) 1 resulting in the decreased phosphorylation of NF-κB in UVB-irradiated human keratinocytes [50]. The exact mechanism of how AST achieves such effects is not yet entirely understood. However, the reduction of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress or phosphorylation of MSK-1 are suggested as possible candidates [49, 50]. Further mechanistic studies of phosphorylation of c-Jun-N-terminal kinase 1 and ER stress in corneal epithelial cell cultures are required to gain a deeper understanding of the direct intracellular effects of AST that potentially becoming more prominent in nano-AST formulation.

To date, AST is not known to cause any direct toxicity even at high doses or concentrations in vivo [51] or in vitro [24]. As nano-AST is chemically identical to AST [22], it is not expected to induce direct cytotoxic effect as well. However, AST is known to accumulate in the skin, causing visible pink coloration in rats during prolonged oral consumption at doses 30 g/kg [51], while the effective concentration of nano-AST in the current study did not exceed 50 mg/kg, 600 times lower than that reported to cause a noticeable change in skin color in AST oral consumption [51]. We cannot exclude that increased solubility of nano-AST may cause a change in skin color at lower concentrations, which might be undesirable effect and limiting factor for human use. Chronical study of oral nano-AST effects on AST accumulation and color changes in mammalian skin is required to determine what amount may produce such an effect.

Our findings in nano-AST formulation not only suggest possible clinical use in situations of increased UVB exposure, such as UVB exposure risks for professional mountaineers, Arctic, and Antarctic personnel, but also suggest nano-AST potential as a supplementary and preventive treatment for wide spectrum of inflammatory and degenerative conditions in the cornea, as increased ROS production in the ocular surface associated with dry eye disease [52], keratoconus [53], Fuchs’ endothelial dystrophy, and bullous keratopathy [54].

6. Conclusion

The present study provides evidence that nano-AST is effective in protecting the ocular surface against the detrimental effects of acute UVB exposure, with no obvious adverse side effects observed. Oral nano-AST intake might be a promising naturally derived water-soluble substance for protecting against ocular surface damage in conditions of high oxidative stress.


No other researchers involved in this work received remuneration direct or indirect of any form from FUJIFILM Inc. Experimental results were verified by researchers from the Department of Ophthalmology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linkoping University, Linkoping, Sweden, that have no relations with FUJIFILM Inc.

Conflicts of Interest

Hiroyuki Sakaguchi is a full-time employee of Health Care Laboratory, FUJIFILM Inc., Tokyo, Japan.

Authors’ Contributions

The study was conceived and designed by Fumiya Harada, Anton Lennikov, and Nobuyoshi Kitaichi. The experiments were performed by Fumiya Harada, Osamu Uehara, Tetsuro Morikawa, Rie Takai, Anton Lennikov, Anthony Mukwaya, and Mira Schaupper. Histological staining was acquired and analyzed by Fumiya Harada, Tetsuro Morikawa, Anton Lennikov, Mira Schaupper, and Nobuyoshi Kitaichi. Western blot analysis was performed and interpreted by Anton Lennikov, Mira Schaupper, and Anthony Mukwaya. qPCR data was acquired by Fumiya Harada, Mira Schaupper, and Anton Lennikov and analyzed by Fumiya Harada and Anthony Mukwaya. The manuscript was prepared by Fumiya Harada, Osamu Uehara, Yoshihiro Abiko, Anton Lennikov, Anthony Mukwaya, Mira Schaupper, Neil Lagali, and Nobuyoshi Kitaichi. All authors critically reviewed and revised the manuscript and approved the final version for submission.


The authors would like to acknowledge the contribution of Nikon Imaging Center at Hokkaido University to this study in the form of confocal microscopy image acquisition and analysis, the contribution of Dr. Daichi Hiraki from the Division of Oral Medicine and Pathology, Department of Human Biology and Pathophysiology, School of Dentistry, Health Sciences University of Hokkaido for “blinded” quantification of histological results. Nano-AST compound was kindly provided by FUJIFILM Corporation. FUJIFILM Inc. has provided partial funding for conducting this study including expendable assets such as animals, antibodies, and reagents. FUJIFILM Inc. has also provided nano-AST and bears responsibility for the purity and validity of the provided compound for the DHE formulation of astaxanthin stated to be used in this study.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Table 1: Corneal epithelial thickness, 24 hours after UVB exposure, when treated with different doses of Nano-AST. Supplementary Table 2: Comparison of Nano-AST to other antioxidant treatments. Supplementary Table 3: Mean grey value DHE (ROS) staining in cornea. Supplementary Table 4: Quantification of TUNEL positive cells. Supplementary Table 5: Quantification of NF-?B positive nuclei. Supplementary Table 6: Quantification of COX-2 positive cells ratio. Supplementary Table 7: Quantitative PCR analysis of TNFa expression in the mouse cornea.

  1. Supplementary material


  1. O. D. Schein, “Phototoxicity and the cornea,” Journal of the National Medical Association, vol. 84, no. 7, pp. 579–583, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  2. A. P. Cullen, B. R. Chou, M. G. Hall, and S. E. Jany, “Ultraviolet-B damages corneal endothelium,” American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics, vol. 61, no. 7, pp. 473–478, 1984. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. N. Kitaichi, T. Shimizu, K. Yoshida et al., “Macrophage migration inhibitory factor ameliorates UV-induced photokeratitis in mice,” Experimental Eye Research, vol. 86, no. 6, pp. 929–935, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. R. G. Fassett and J. S. Coombes, “Astaxanthin, oxidative stress, inflammation and cardiovascular disease,” Future Cardiology, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 333–342, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. H. Jyonouchi, S. Sun, Y. Tomita, and M. D. Gross, “Astaxanthin, a carotenoid without vitamin A activity, augments antibody responses in cultures including T-helper cell clones and suboptimal doses of antigen,” The Journal of Nutrition, vol. 125, no. 10, pp. 2483–2492, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  6. M. Kobayashi, “In vivo antioxidant role of astaxanthin under oxidative stress in the green alga Haematococcus pluvialis,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 550–555, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. B. P. Chew, J. S. Park, M. W. Wong, and T. S. Wong, “A comparison of the anticancer activities of dietary beta-carotene, canthaxanthin and astaxanthin in mice in vivo,” Anticancer Research, vol. 19, no. 3A, pp. 1849–1853, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  8. M. Ikeuchi, T. Koyama, J. Takahashi, and K. Yazawa, “Effects of astaxanthin in obese mice fed a high-fat diet,” Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry, vol. 71, no. 4, pp. 893–899, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. F. J. Pashkow, D. G. Watumull, and C. L. Campbell, “Astaxanthin: a novel potential treatment for oxidative stress and inflammation in cardiovascular disease,” The American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 101, no. 10A, pp. 58D–68D, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. J. T. Chen and K. Kotani, “Astaxanthin as a potential protector of liver function: a review,” Journal of Clinical Medicine Research, vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 701–704, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. M. Kaneko, Y. Kishimoto, R. Suzuki, Y. Kawai, I. Tateya, and S. Hirano, “Protective effect of astaxanthin on vocal fold injury and inflammation due to vocal loading: a clinical trial,” Journal of Voice, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 352–358, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. A. Mortensen, L. H. Skibsted, J. Sampson, C. Rice-Evans, and S. A. Everett, “Comparative mechanisms and rates of free radical scavenging by carotenoid antioxidants,” FEBS Letters, vol. 418, no. 1-2, pp. 91–97, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. Y. Yoshihisa, M. U. Rehman, and T. Shimizu, “Astaxanthin, a xanthophyll carotenoid, inhibits ultraviolet-induced apoptosis in keratinocytes,” Experimental Dermatology, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 178–183, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. L. Y. Dong, J. Jin, G. Lu, and X. L. Kang, “Astaxanthin attenuates the apoptosis of retinal ganglion cells in db/db mice by inhibition of oxidative stress,” Marine Drugs, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 960–974, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. T. Otsuka, M. Shimazawa, T. Nakanishi et al., “Protective effects of a dietary carotenoid, astaxanthin, against light-induced retinal damage,” Journal of Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 123, no. 3, pp. 209–218, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. P. T. Yeh, H. W. Huang, C. M. Yang, W. S. Yang, and C. H. Yang, “Astaxanthin inhibits expression of retinal oxidative stress and inflammatory mediators in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats,” PLoS One, vol. 11, no. 1, article e0146438, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. T. Otsuka, M. Shimazawa, Y. Inoue et al., “Astaxanthin protects against retinal damage: evidence from in vivo and in vitro retinal ischemia and reperfusion models,” Current Eye Research, vol. 41, no. 11, pp. 1465–1472, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. R. Yamagishi and M. Aihara, “Neuroprotective effect of astaxanthin against rat retinal ganglion cell death under various stresses that induce apoptosis and necrosis,” Molecular Vision, vol. 20, pp. 1796–1805, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  19. H. Hashimoto, K. Arai, S. Hayashi et al., “Effects of astaxanthin on antioxidation in human aqueous humor,” Journal of Clinical Biochemistry and Nutrition, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. G. Riccioni, N. D'Orazio, S. Franceschelli, and L. Speranza, “Marine carotenoids and cardiovascular risk markers,” Marine Drugs, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 1166–1175, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. R. R. Ambati, S. M. Phang, S. Ravi, and R. G. Aswathanarayana, “Astaxanthin: sources, extraction, stability, biological activities and its commercial applications—a review,” Marine Drugs, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 128–152, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. M. M. R. Meor Mohd Affandi, T. Julianto, and A. B. A. Majeed, “Development and stability evaluation of astaxanthin nanoemulsion,” Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, vol. 4, Supplement 1, pp. 143–148, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  23. M. Ogawa, M. Sato, and K. Suzuki, “Development of astaxanthin nano emulsion with improved shelf life and enhanced absorbability,” FUJI Film Research & Development, vol. 52, no. 2007, pp. 26–29, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  24. K. Ohgami, K. Shiratori, S. Kotake et al., “Effects of astaxanthin on lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammation in vitro and in vivo,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 2694–2701, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. K. Izumi-Nagai, N. Nagai, K. Ohgami et al., “Inhibition of choroidal neovascularization with an anti-inflammatory carotenoid astaxanthin,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 1679–1685, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. Y. Suzuki, K. Ohgami, K. Shiratori et al., “Suppressive effects of astaxanthin against rat endotoxin-induced uveitis by inhibiting the NF-kappaB signaling pathway,” Experimental Eye Research, vol. 82, no. 2, pp. 275–281, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. E. R. Muth, J. M. Laurent, and P. Jasper, “The effect of bilberry nutritional supplementation on night visual acuity and contrast sensitivity,” Alternative Medicine Review, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 164–173, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  28. N. I. Krinsky, J. T. Landrum, and R. A. Bone, “Biologic mechanisms of the protective role of lutein and zeaxanthin in the eye,” Annual Review of Nutrition, vol. 23, pp. 171–201, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. N. K. Scripsema, D. N. Hu, and R. B. Rosen, “Lutein, zeaxanthin, and meso-zeaxanthin in the clinical management of eye disease,” Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 2015, Article ID 865179, 13 pages, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. A. Lennikov, N. Kitaichi, K. Noda et al., “Amelioration of endotoxin-induced uveitis treated with an IkappaB kinase beta inhibitor in rats,” Molecular Vision, vol. 18, pp. 2586–2597, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  31. I. Yamakawa, H. Kojima, T. Terashima et al., “Inactivation of TNF-alpha ameliorates diabetic neuropathy in mice,” American Journal of Physiology. Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 301, no. 5, pp. E844–E852, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. S. A. Marchitti, Y. Chen, D. C. Thompson, and V. Vasiliou, “Ultraviolet radiation: cellular antioxidant response and the role of ocular aldehyde dehydrogenase enzymes,” Eye & Contact Lens, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 206–213, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. D. E. Heck, A. M. Vetrano, T. M. Mariano, and J. D. Laskin, “UVB light stimulates production of reactive oxygen species: unexpected role for catalase,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 278, no. 25, pp. 22432–22436, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. W. P. Roos and B. Kaina, “DNA damage-induced cell death by apoptosis,” Trends in Molecular Medicine, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 440–450, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. Y. Yamamoto and R. B. Gaynor, “Therapeutic potential of inhibition of the NF-kappaB pathway in the treatment of inflammation and cancer,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 107, no. 2, pp. 135–142, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. A. Hoffmann, A. Levchenko, M. L. Scott, and D. Baltimore, “The IkappaB-NF-kappaB signaling module: temporal control and selective gene activation,” Science, vol. 298, no. 5596, pp. 1241–1245, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. K. D. Cooper, N. Duraiswamy, C. Hammerberg et al., “Neutrophils, differentiated macrophages, and monocyte/macrophage antigen presenting cells infiltrate murine epidermis after UV injury,” The Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 101, no. 2, pp. 155–163, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. A. Lennikov, N. Kitaichi, R. Fukase et al., “Amelioration of ultraviolet-induced photokeratitis in mice treated with astaxanthin eye drops,” Molecular Vision, vol. 18, pp. 455–464, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  39. R. L. Roberts, J. Green, and B. Lewis, “Lutein and zeaxanthin in eye and skin health,” Clinics in Dermatology, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 195–201, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. P. S. Bernstein, M. D. Yoshida, N. B. Katz, R. W. McClane, and W. Gellermann, “Raman detection of macular carotenoid pigments in intact human retina,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 39, no. 11, pp. 2003–2011, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  41. J. T. Landrum, R. A. Bone, and M. D. Kilburn, “The macular pigment: a possible role in protection from age-related macular degeneration,” Advances in Pharmacology, vol. 38, pp. 537–556, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  42. P. Palozza, S. Serini, F. Nicuolo, and G. Calviello, “Modulation of apoptotic signalling by carotenoids in cancer cells,” Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, vol. 430, no. 1, pp. 104–109, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. E. R. Sindhu, K. C. Preethi, and R. Kuttan, “Antioxidant activity of carotenoid lutein in vitro and in vivo,” Indian Journal of Experimental Biology, vol. 48, no. 8, pp. 843–848, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  44. E. Kotake-Nara and A. Nagao, “Absorption and metabolism of xanthophylls,” Marine Drugs, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 1024–1037, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. C. Czank, A. Cassidy, Q. Zhang et al., “Human metabolism and elimination of the anthocyanin, cyanidin-3-glucoside: a (13)C-tracer study,” The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 97, no. 5, pp. 995–1003, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. C. Manach, G. Williamson, C. Morand, A. Scalbert, and C. Remesy, “Bioavailability and bioefficacy of polyphenols in humans. I. Review of 97 bioavailability studies,” The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 81, Supplement 1, pp. 230S–242S, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  47. G. Williamson and C. Manach, “Bioavailability and bioefficacy of polyphenols in humans. II. Review of 93 intervention studies,” The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 81, Supplement 1, pp. 243S–255S, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  48. A. Ferencz, B. Racz, B. Gasz, K. Kalmar-Nagy, O. P. Horvath, and E. Roth, “Threshold level of NF-kB activation in small bowel ischemic preconditioning procedure,” Transplantation Proceedings, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 1800–1802, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. S. Bhuvaneswari, B. Yogalakshmi, S. Sreeja, and C. V. Anuradha, “Astaxanthin reduces hepatic endoplasmic reticulum stress and nuclear factor-kappaB-mediated inflammation in high fructose and high fat diet-fed mice,” Cell Stress & Chaperones, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 183–191, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. S. Terazawa, H. Nakajima, M. Shingo, T. Niwano, and G. Imokawa, “Astaxanthin attenuates the UVB-induced secretion of prostaglandin E2 and interleukin-8 in human keratinocytes by interrupting MSK1 phosphorylation in a ROS depletion-independent manner,” Experimental Dermatology, vol. 21, Supplement 1, pp. 11–17, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. D. Petri and A. K. Lundebye, “Tissue distribution of astaxanthin in rats following exposure to graded levels in the feed,” Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C: Toxicology Pharmacology, vol. 145, no. 2, pp. 202–209, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. J. L. Alio, M. J. Ayala, M. E. Mulet, A. Artola, J. M. Ruiz, and J. Bellot, “Antioxidant therapy in the treatment of experimental acute corneal inflammation,” Ophthalmic Research, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 136–143, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. E. Arnal, C. Peris-Martinez, J. L. Menezo, S. Johnsen-Soriano, and F. J. Romero, “Oxidative stress in keratoconus?” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 52, no. 12, pp. 8592–8597, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. R. Buddi, B. Lin, S. R. Atilano, N. C. Zorapapel, M. C. Kenney, and D. J. Brown, “Evidence of oxidative stress in human corneal diseases,” The Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 341–351, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2017 Fumiya Harada et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.