Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity

Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity / 2017 / Article
Special Issue

MicroRNA Regulation of Oxidative Stress

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2017 |Article ID 9308310 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9308310

Rocco Caggiano, Fabio Cattaneo, Ornella Moltedo, Giovanni Esposito, Cinzia Perrino, Bruno Trimarco, Rosario Ammendola, Raffaella Faraonio, "miR-128 Is Implicated in Stress Responses by Targeting MAFG in Skeletal Muscle Cells", Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2017, Article ID 9308310, 13 pages, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9308310

miR-128 Is Implicated in Stress Responses by Targeting MAFG in Skeletal Muscle Cells

Academic Editor: Jaideep Banerjee
Received04 Apr 2017
Revised30 Jun 2017
Accepted18 Jul 2017
Published12 Sep 2017


MAFG (v-Maf avian musculoaponeurotic fibrosarcoma oncogene homolog G) is a bZIP-type transcriptional regulator that belongs to the small MAF (sMAFs) protein family. By interacting with other bZIP transcription factors, sMAFs can form homo- and heterodimers governing either repressive or activating transcriptional functions. As heterodimeric partner of Nrf2, MAFG positively influences the ARE-dependent antioxidant/xenobiotic pathways, at least in condition of a correct MAFG:Nrf2 balance. MicroRNAs (miRs) participate to different regulatory networks being involved as fine-tuning regulators of gene expression. However, the connections between cellular surveillance to stresses mediated by MAFG:Nrf2 and miR regulations are not well understood. Here, we explored the impact of miR-128 in expression of genes related to stress response. Bioinformatic predictions coupled with functional analysis revealed the presence of miR-128 binding site in the 3′UTR of MAFG. Ectopic miR-128 expression correlated with reduced expression of endogenous MAFG-dependent genes and negatively affected ARE-mediated molecular phenotype based on Nrf2 activity. Indeed, miR-128 impairs redox-dependent pathways induced in response to oxidative stress. Moreover, in condition of hypoxia, MAFG induction correlated with reduced levels of miR-128. This lead to increased mRNA levels of HMOX-1 and x-CT for blunting stress. Overall, these findings identify MAFG as novel direct target of miR-128.

1. Introduction

In response to oxidative and xenobiotic stresses, cells activate numerous defense systems associated with both enzymatic and not enzymatic activities. The events underlying these redox-related responses are accomplished by a tight regulation of gene expression patterns involving multilayered regulatory mechanisms [1, 2]. Two transcription factors shown to be highly involved in the regulation of numerous antioxidant and detoxifying genes at transcriptional levels are Nrf2 [nuclear factor (erythroid-derived 2)-like 2] [35] and MAFG (v-Maf avian musculoaponeurotic fibrosarcoma oncogene homolog G) [6]. In particular, in the form of heterodimer, the complex Nrf2:MAFG binds to and activates the transcription of antioxidant/xenobiotic genes harboring antioxidant responsive elements (ARE)/electrophile responsive elements (core ARE: TGACNNNGC), located in their transcription regulatory sequences [7, 8].

The proteins of the MAF family, described for the first time as a viral oncogene in their prototype v-Maf, are transcription factors, which are widely known to participate in gene expression regulation [9]. The MAF family consists of 7 members, which are grouped into “large” (c-Maf, MafA, MafB, and Nrl) and “small” (MafG, MafK, and MafF) Maf subfamily, based on their size [6]. Each member of the MAF family harbors a basic-leucine zipper (b-ZIP) domain involved in DNA binding and in dimer formation, either with themselves or with different b-ZIP transcription factors, in particular Nrf2 [10, 11]. In addition to the b-ZIP domain, large Maf proteins also possess an acidic transcriptional activation domain (TAD) that, on the contrary, is absent in the small Mafs (sMafs). For this reason, the regulatory activity of small Mafs on gene transcription can be positive or negative, depending on their specific partner and on the promoter context. In general, homodimers of sMafs lacking TAD (i.e., MafG:MafK) repress gene transcription by binding to the Maf recognition element (MARE: TGCTGACTCAGCA) [6, 12]. The heterodimers with cap ‘n’ collar (CNC) proteins such as p45 NF-E2 [13] or with NF-E2-related factors (Nrf1, Nrf2, and Nrf3) [14, 15] as well as with the Bach (BTB and CNC homology) factors (Bach1 and Bach2) [16], unlike homodimers, can either function as transcriptional activators or repressors [6]. Among these, as mentioned before, the Nrf2:sMaf heterodimers promote transcription and represent the most relevant means for adjusting a multitude of intracellular protein levels in response to oxidative/electrophilic stresses [5]. Under basal unstressed conditions, Nrf2 is polyubiquitinated and targeted to 26S proteasome by the Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1(Keap1)-Cul3 E3 ligase complex [17]. Stresses provoke dissociation of Keap1 through modification of specific cysteine residues [18]. Thus, Nrf2 can migrate into the nucleus, where in association with sMaf, in particular MAFG, binds to the promoters of target genes harboring ARE sequences to activate their transcription [8].

sMafs also interact with HIF-1α to positively regulate hypoxic responses [19]. On the other hand, Bach1:sMaf heterodimers act as negative regulator of the HMOX-1 gene and its role is supported by genetic data [20]. In addition, Fang and colleagues recently demonstrated that high MAFG levels driven by BRAF (V600) recruit Bach1 as partner along with CHD8, a chromatin remodeling factor, and DNMT3B, a DNA methyltransferase, to trigger epigenetic silencing of genes frequently hypermethylated in melanoma and colorectal cancer [21].

In the last decades, microRNAs (miRs) have added a new layer of complexity to the regulatory mechanisms underlying gene expression [22, 23]. miRs are small endogenous noncoding RNAs that downmodulate protein expression at posttranscriptional level. By interacting with specific regions, generally localized in the 3-untranslated regions (UTRs) of transcripts, miRs mediate repression of mRNA translation or stability [24, 25]. Given that each single miR could target multiple transcripts and often a miR regulates several targets of the same pathway, they supervise cellular signaling and networks involved in fundamental biological processes, including stress responses [2628].

Numerous studies have shown that miR-128 is involved in different cellular processes such as differentiation, apoptosis, senescence, and metabolism [2932]. Here, we investigated its role in the stress/antioxidant networks regulated by the heterodimeric complex Nrf2:MAFG. We demonstrated that miR-128 by targeting MAFG influences stress responses mediated by ARE-dependent genes.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Cell Cultures and Reagents

Human embryonic kidney HEK293 cells and mouse myogenic C2C12 cells were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA). Cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) (Thermo Fisher SCIENTIFIC, Italia, Monza, Italy) supplemented with fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Invitrogen) at 10% for HEK293 and 20% for C2C12 cells. To induce differentiation of C2C12 cells, culture medium was replaced to near-confluent cultures (about 90%) with DMEM containing 2% horse serum (Thermo Fisher SCIENTIFIC).

Hypoxia (2% O2) for 4 h was induced when C2C12 cells were at 85% confluence. After being washed three times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), cultures were transferred to a 37°C incubator within a hypoxic chamber (93% N2, 5% CO2, 2% O2), and culture medium was replaced with a saline buffer that was prebubbled for five minutes with the same gas mix, to provide an average O2 pressure (14.7 mmHg) equivalent to that in the ambient air of the chamber.

Treatments with diethylmaleate (DEM) (Sigma-Aldrich, Milan, Italy) were performed for 2 h (HEK293) or 4 h (C2C12) using a final concentration of 200 μM in complete culture medium.

2.2. Plasmid Constructs and Transfections

The plasmid expressing miR-128 (pCMV-miR-128) was obtained by cloning the human ARPP21 intronic region of 284 bp encompassing the pre-miR-128-2 sequence with 100 bp upstream and downstream flanking sequences into pRcCMVneo vector. This fragment was prepared from human IMR90 DNA by PCR using the following oligonucleotides: 5-ACgTAAAAgCTTAAgAAggCTATTgACAATCCAg-3 and 5-CgACATATCTAgATTTggTCAgCAggAATgaCAC harboring HindIII and XbaI restriction sites, respectively. The identity of the cloned region was established by digestion and confirmed by sequencing. The expression of mature miR-128 was evaluated by Northern blot (Supplementary Materials available online at https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9308310) in HEK293 cells and miR-128 levels measured by reverse transcription-quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR).

The luciferase constructs were produced by cloning the 3′UTR regions with the miR-128 site/s of candidate genes into the pGL3-control vector, downstream the Firefly luciferase gene (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). The 3′UTR fragment of MAFG was amplified by PCR using human IMR90 DNA with primer pairs containing XbaI sites: 5-ATCATTCTAGAGGATCCATGCAGGCATGCTGGCTCC-3 and 5-ATCATTCTAGATTCAAGCTACTATCAGACAATGT-3. The 3′UTR of Nrf2 was obtained from the full length cDNA (I.M.A.G.E.: 4548874) by using the following primers with Xba sites: 5-ACGTACTCAGATTTAGGAGGATTTGACCT-3 and 5-ACGTACTCAGATAACAGTCATAATAATCCTTTATTA-3. The orientation of the cloned fragments was established by digestion and confirmed by sequencing. The pGL3 constructs with the reverse orientation were used as negative controls. All the plasmids bearing the 3′UTR fragments were transfected in HEK293 cells with Lipofectamine 2000 Reagent (Thermo Fisher SCIENTIFIC) in 24-well plates (40.000 cells/well), according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and cotransfected with synthetic pre-miR-128 (ID: PM1176) or pre-miR-negative control number 1 (100 nM) (Thermo Fisher SCIENTIFIC) as well as with pCMV-miR-128 or pCMVneo (ratio 1 : 5). Transfections of cells with synthetic pre-miR-128 or pre-miR negative control were performed as previously described [33].

The plasmid expressing the FLAG-tagged Nrf2 and the plasmids GSTA1-LUC, x-CT-LUC, and NQO1-LUC bearing the promoters of the respective genes driving the expression of luciferase reporter gene have been described previously [34, 35].

2.3. Luciferase Reporter Assay

The pGL3-3′UTR constructs (100 ng) were cotransfected with the Renilla luciferase reporter plasmid (20 ng) as an internal control using Lipofectamine 2000 (Thermo Fisher SCIENTIFIC) in HEK293 cells in the presence of miR-128 or negative control. Luciferase activity was measured at 24 h after transfection using a dual luciferase reporter assay (Promega) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and performed on a 20/20n Luminometer (Turner BioSystems, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Relative luciferase activity was calculated by normalizing the Firefly luminescence to the Renilla luminescence and then calculated relative to the control. C2C12 cells plated in 24-well plates (30.000 cells/well) were cotransfected with the GSTA1-LUC, x-CT-LUC, and NQO1-LUC constructs (500 ng) and FLAG-Nrf2 or empty vector (60 ng) and simultaneously with miR-128 expressing plasmid or empty vector (500 ng) using Lipofectamine® LTX Reagent (Thermo Fisher SCIENTIFIC) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. All the transfections also contained a Renilla luciferase construct (40 ng) for internal normalization. Cells were then harvested at 36 h after transfections, and luciferase activity was determined as described above.

2.4. Western Blotting

Total proteins were extracted from transfected cells/treated cells with a buffer containing 0.02 M HEPES (pH 7.9), 0.4 M NaCl, 0.1% NP-40, 10% v/v glycerol, 1 mM NaF, 1 mM Na3VO4, and a protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma-Aldrich). Cytoplasmic and nuclear proteins were fractionated as previously described [34], and cytosolic/nuclear fractions were evaluated by using the antibody of UCHL3 [36]. Cellular protein extracts were loaded on SDS-PAGE, followed by blotting to PVDF membranes. After blocking in nonfat milk solution, membranes were probed with specific primary antibodies (indicated below) and then incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies for 1 h. Protein bands were visualized using the ECL chemiluminescence system (Amersham, Buckinghamshire, UK).

Murine adductor muscles were homogenized using the program Protein_1 on a gentleMACS tissue Dissociator (Miltenyi Biotec) [37]. Briefly, tissues were lysated in a buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 1 mM EDTA, 0.25% sodium deoxycholate, 10 mM NaF, 10 μM Na3VO4, 1 mM PMSF, and protease inhibitor cocktail (10 g/mg aprotinin, 10 g/ml pepstatin, and 10 g/ml leupeptin). Lysates were centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 15 min, and protein concentrations were measured using Bio-Rad assay kit (Bio-Rad) and immunoblotting was performed as described [38].

MAFG antibody was from GeneTex (GTX114541); HIF-1α antibody was from Novus Biologicals (NB100-105). Antibody of FLAG M2 was from Sigma-Aldrich. Antibodies of Nrf2 (number SC-13032), BMI-1 (number SC-390443), HMOX-1 (number SC-136960), tubulin (number SC-8035), UCHL3 (number SC-100340), and vinculin (number SC-7649) were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., Santa Cruz, CA, USA.

2.5. Reverse Transcription-Quantitative Real-Time PCR (RT-qPCR)

Total RNA was extracted using TRIzol reagent (Thermo Fisher SCIENTIFIC), and cDNA was synthesized from one µg of RNA using random primers and iScript cDNA synthesis kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). mRNA levels were quantified using IQ SYBR green supermix (Bio-Rad Laboratories) on the CFX96 real-time system instrument (Bio-Rad). Specific primers located in different exons of the same gene were designed to detect relative mRNA levels. The housekeeping β-2 microglobulin or c-ABL genes were used for internal normalization. All the PCR reactions were performed in triplicate, and PCR products were also visualized on agarose gels after ethidium bromide staining. The oligonucleotide sequences are reported in Supplemental Table S. Relative fold variations were calculated using the 2ΔΔCt method by the formula: , where ΔCt is the difference between the amplification fluorescent thresholds of the gene of interest and the internal reference gene/s used for normalization [39].

To detect the levels of mature miR-128, total RNA was prepared with TRIzol reagent (Thermo Fisher SCIENTIFIC) and miR amounts were evaluated by using the TaqMan miRNA assay kit (Thermo Fisher SCIENTIFIC). For normalization of RNA levels, the amounts of small nucleolar RNA RNU6 (Thermo Fisher SCIENTIFIC) were measured [39].

2.6. Animal Studies

All experiments involving animals were conforming to the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals published by the US National Institutes of Health (NIH Publication 8th edition, update 2011) and were approved by the animal welfare regulation of the University of Naples Federico II, Italy. Wild-type C57BL/6 male mice (age 8 to 9 weeks) were included in the study and maintained under identical conditions of temperature (21 ± 1°C), humidity (60 ± 5%), and light/dark cycle and had free access to normal mouse chow.

2.7. Peripheral Ischemia Procedure

Mice were anesthetized with an intraperitoneal injection of 1 ml/kg (50 mg/kg) of a mixture of 50% tiletamine and 50% zolazepam (50 mg/ml tiletamine and 50 mg/ml di zolazepam, Zoletil 100) plus xylazine 5 mg/kg (Sigma-Aldrich). The adequacy of anaesthesia was confirmed by the absence of reflex response to foot squeeze. Hindlimb ischemia was induced as previously described (PI, ) [40]. Briefly, the proximal and distal portions of the left femoral artery were ligated and arteriectomy was performed between these two sites. Mice were laid on a heating pad (37°C) under anaesthesia, and their blood flow was measured by a laser Doppler perfusion imager (Perimed, Periscan, USA) in the ischemic and nonischemic limbs before and 0 and 4 hours after surgery, to confirm vascularization impairment after the procedure. SHAM-operated animals underwent the same procedure without femoral artery ligation (SHAM, ). All SHAM-operated controls and all mice subjected to peripheral ischemia (PI) survived.

2.8. Statistical Analysis

For the statistical analyses, the Student’s t-test was used; data were considered significant at a value of .

3. Results

3.1. MAFG Is a Novel Direct Target of miR-128

A previous study of Venkataraman et al. reports that miR-128 promotes intracellular ROS increases [31]. Given that Nrf2 signaling is the main driver of the transcriptional program inducing the expression of a wide range of antioxidant genes [35], we hypothesized that miR-128 would affect this regulatory pathway. Thus, we used in silico prediction programs to search for putative targets of miR-128 among the components of Nrf2 pathway. TargetScan, miRanda, and RNAhybrid algorithms predicted conserved seed region/s of miR-128 in the 3′UTRs of Nrf2 and MAFG as well as on the Nrf2-regulated gene x-CT (Supplemental Table S). Since Nrf2 and MAFG are transcription factors and both implicated in the activation of ARE-dependent transcription [8], we performed further analyses on these genes. To assess whether Nrf2 and MAFG are direct targets of miR-128, the entire 3′UTR of Nrf2 and a region encompassing the mir-128 seed sequence of MAFG (250 bp) were cloned into the pGL3-vector downstream of the luciferase gene. Moreover, to validate specificity of miR-128 interaction with 3′UTRs, mutant reporter constructs (mut) harboring the same regions cloned in the opposite orientation were prepared. Figure 1(a) shows that ectopic expression of synthetic pre-miR-128 slightly decreases the luciferase activity of the construct harboring the 3′UTR region (wt) of Nrf2 in HEK293 cells. In the same conditions, miR-128 overexpression however significantly () reduced the activity of the reporter construct bearing the wild-type 3′UTR (wt) of MAFG compared to miR-SCR-transfected cells (Figure 1(b)). Conversely, mutant MAFG reporter construct (mut) did not respond to miR-128 increases (Figure 1(b)).

To set up a more physiological miR-128 hyperexpression, we also prepared a construct (pCMV-miR-128) that drives miR-128 overexpression from the ARPP21 genomic region (see Materials and Methods). We confirmed that ectopic expression of miR-128 through pCMV-miR-128 (of about 100 folds at 24 h posttransfection, Supplemental Figure S) in HEK293 cells indeed reduced the luciferase activity of the MAFG-3′UTR reporter construct while there was no effect on the Nrf2-3′UTR construct, very similar to the results obtained with synthetic pre-miR-128 (data not shown).

To validate the above results on the expression of endogenous MAFG protein, we next performed Western blotting analysis on extracts from HEK293 cells transfected for 24 h either with synthetic pre-miR-128 or with pCMV-miR-128. Figure 1(c) shows that endogenous protein levels of MAFG are significantly reduced in condition of miR-128 overexpression, compared to the negative control-transfected cells. In the same conditions, the downregulation of BMI-1 protein levels, a known miR-128 target, is also detected (Figure 1(c)).

We also observed that miR-128 hyperexpression correlates with MAFG downregulation (Supplemental Figure S) in physiological/pathological conditions, like differentiation of mouse C2C12 myoblasts [41, 42] or atrophic stimulation of differentiated C2C12 [43]. Taken together, the above reported results suggest that miR-128 represses the expression of the MAFG protein.

3.2. miR-128 Influences the Basal Expression of Some MAFG-Regulated Genes

Following the observation that MAFG is negatively regulated by miR-128, we aimed to test the effects of miR-128 on MAFG-dependent transcriptional activity. To this end, we examined the mRNA levels of various MAFG-regulated genes [15, 44] such as AKR1D1, ALDH3, CCDC53, HMOX-1, Nrf2, PCBD2, and UCHL1 upon miR-128 hyperexpression (Figure 2(a)). The results show that in HEK293 cells, the basal expression of AKR1D1, ALDH3, and PCBD2 genes was reduced in conditions of miR-128 overexpression. These results further support a role of miR-128 in the regulation of a set of MAFG-dependent genes.

MAFG is a known basic leucine zipper (bZIP) protein that was shown to interact with other transcription factors, in particular with Nrf2 to activate the expression of numerous genes [7, 15]. Furthermore, MAFG could enhance nuclear retention of Nrf2 [45]. Therefore, we next determined whether the Nrf2 levels are influenced by miR-128 overexpression. Nrf2 is present at very low levels in the cells; thus to stabilize its levels, we exposed wild-type HEK293 and transfected HEK293 cells to low concentration of diethylmaleate (DEM), a glutathione depleting agent [46], for 2 h before harvesting. Western blotting analysis was used to detect the endogenous Nrf2 protein levels after exposure to DEM (Figure 2(b)). In HEK293 control cells, Nrf2 was found substantially increased in the cytosol and also weakly enhanced in the nucleus by DEM exposure. In the same conditions of treatments, cells transfected with miR-128 did not result in reduced accumulation/translocation of Nrf2 compared to cells transfected with empty vector. These results are also in line with the data obtained by 3′UTR luciferase assays that demonstrated that miR-128 is not involved in Nrf2 posttranscriptional regulation.

Since miR-128 has site/s in the 3′UTR of MAFG conserved among mammals (Supplemental Table 1) and since targets of miRNA are cell-type specific, we also examined the effect of miR-128 on the expression of endogenous mouse MAFG using the mouse myogenic C2C12 cell line. The results showed that ectopic expression of miR-128 also promotes downregulation of MAFG protein in the mouse context (Figure 2(c)). In the same conditions, as expected, BMI-1 protein levels were downregulated. In parallel, we evaluated whether the changes observed for MAFG-dependent genes in HEK293 are also present in mouse C2C12 after miR-128 overexpression. As shown in Figure 2(d), the basal mRNA levels of AKR1D1, ALDH3, and UCHL1 genes were reduced in conditions of miR-128 hyperexpression. These results support a role of miR-128 in the regulation of MAFG protein levels and of MAFG-dependent genes also in mouse contexts.

3.3. Ectopic Expression of miR-128 Influences the Expression of an Array of ARE-Dependent Genes

MAFG as bZIP protein interacts with Nrf2 to facilitate its binding to the ARE consensus within the regulatory regions of numerous cytoprotective genes. To determine whether MAFG downregulation through miR-128 also affects the basal transcription of an array of genes that are typically regulated by the Nrf2:MAFG heterodimer [8, 11], we examined the mRNA levels of representative genes such as GCLC, GSTA-1, NQO1, x-CT, and SQSTM1 in C2C12 cells overexpressing miR-128. The mRNA levels of Nrf2 and p21WAF1 were used as controls, since it has been demonstrated that these genes are not dependent on MAFG regulation [8]. As shown in Figure 3(a), the mRNA levels of GCLC, NQO1, and SQSTM1 were significantly () downregulated in C2C12 cells, whereas other Nrf2 target genes such as x-CT and GSTA-1 were upregulated. These findings indicate that protein reduction of MAFG following miR-128 overexpression influences the basal expression of some ARE-dependent genes in C2C12 cells. The above results also suggest that lowered basal expression of GCLC and NQO1 after miR-128 overexpression could explain the ROS increase observed by other authors [31].

Increased levels of Nrf2:MAFG heterodimer activate the transcription of a wide variety of genes containing ARE sequences in their promoters [8]. Therefore, we analyzed the ability of miR-128 to influence the Nrf2 activity on ARE regulatory regions of selected genes. To this aim, we used luciferase reporter constructs, namely, GSTA1-LUC, NQO1-LUC, and x-CT-LUC [34, 35], that in conditions of Nrf2 overexpression strongly induce luciferase activity [34, 35]. Thus, the above LUC constructs were cotransfected in C2C12 cells along with a construct expressing FLAG-Nrf2 or with empty vector, in the absence or presence of miR-128. As shown in Figure 3(b), the luciferase activity driven by the regulatory regions of x-CT and GSTA-1 genes is highly induced after ectopic expression of Nrf2, compared with the control vector, and these effects are completely abolished by the overexpression of miR-128. Even though the Nrf2-mediated activation of NQO1-LUC was less prominent, miR-128 significantly weakened this induction (Figure 3(b)). The expression of ectopic Nrf2 was validated by Western blotting analysis with anti-FLAG antibody.

These results suggested that miR-128 counteracts the Nrf2-mediated induction of ARE-dependent promoters through MAFG downmodulation. The differences observed between the ARE-responsive regions (Figure 3(b)) and the mRNA levels of endogenous GSTA-1 and x-CT (Figure 3(a)) genes could be due to the contributions of additional regulatory regions/transcription factors in the chromatin contexts.

3.4. miR-128 Interferes with the DEM-Mediated Induction of ARE-Dependent Genes

The effects described above led us to investigate whether a reduced expression of endogenous MAFG through miR-128 could result in dysregulation of endogenous stress responses. We selected a group of genes that are responsive to oxidative stress induced by DEM, a well-known inducer of ROS accumulation, by taking advantage of a published list of genes that are responsive to this agent in mouse context [8]. C2C12 cells were transfected with miR-128 or control vectors for 36 h and then exposed to DEM. RT-qPCR analysis was used to determine transcript levels of a small set of ARE-dependent genes, namely, GCLC, GSTA-1, HMOX-1, NQO1, and x-CT. As shown in Figure 4, upon DEM treatments, the endogenous mRNA levels of these genes are strongly induced in C2C12 cells transfected with CMV-neo. In the same conditions of treatments, miR-128 overexpression significantly decreased the DEM-mediated induction of the above genes, when compared to control-transfected cells. In conclusion, miR-128 by downregulating MAFG antagonizes the expression of ARE-dependent genes. The mRNA levels of Nrf2 transcripts, used as control gene, were unaffected [8].

3.5. miR-128 Downmodulation Regulates MAFG Increase in Hypoxic Condition Both In Vitro and In Vivo

Given that MAFG regulates hypoxic responses by interacting with HIF-1α [19], we examined the involvement of miR-128-MAFG axis in C2C12 cell responses to hypoxia. First, we estimated the endogenous levels of miR-128 after exposure to hypoxia (2% O2) for 4 h. RT-qPCR analysis for mature miR-128 amounts showed significant () decreased levels of miR-128 after hypoxia in C2C12 (Figure 5(a)). To test whether the observed miR-128 changes influence, also MAFG protein levels, we performed Western blotting analysis of MAFG and HMOX-1, which is a common target of HIF-1α and Nrf2 transcription factors. The results show that the protein levels of HMOX-1, as expected, are induced following treatment of C2C12 cells within 4 h of low O2. Importantly, at the same time, we observed an increase of MAFG protein, which correlates with an enhanced HIF-1α expression (Figure 5(b)).

Since hypoxia induces ROS production, we also measured the mRNA levels of selected ARE-regulated genes such as HMOX-1 and x-CT. In this condition, the mRNA levels of these genes are strongly induced after exposure of C2C12 cells to hypoxia (Figure 5(c)). These results indicate that miR-128 downregulation could be important for adjusting the MAFG levels necessary for both HIF-1α transactivation and ARE-dependent gene induction in hypoxic conditions in vitro.

Finally, we analyzed the role of miR-128-MAFG axis in the ischemic process in vivo. We induced peripheral ischemia (PI) by femoral artery ligation for 4 h in C57BL/6J mice (). Sham-operated animals () underwent the same surgical procedures without ligation of femoral artery. Hindlimb blood flow was analyzed by ecolordoppler pre- and 4 h after surgical procedures (Figure 5(d)). Western blotting experiments show that MAFG protein levels are significantly induced in the hindlimb muscle lysates (Figure 5(e)). We also investigated whether the upregulated levels of MAFG are inversely correlated to miR-128 amounts. RT-qPCR analysis for mature miR-128 levels show a significant decrease of miR-128 levels (Figure 5(f)).

Overall, these results indicate that miR-128-MAFG axis is an important contributor for responses to hypoxia both in vitro and in vivo.

4. Discussion

miRs play crucial roles in the regulation of gene expression. miRs are considered primarily “fine-tuning” regulators of protein activities, and thus they could balance the antioxidant responses. Recent studies indeed indicate that many miRs called redoximiRs can be either direct or indirect effectors of redox-related pathways [47]. In particular, several evidences demonstrate that, on one hand, Nrf2 itself can be a direct target of miRs and that, on the other hand, Nrf2 modulators, such as Keap1 and Bach1, can be regulated by miRs [5, 4851]. The transcription factor Nrf2 participates in the adaptive responses to oxidative stress by enhancing transcription of many genes encoding antioxidant/detoxification enzymes, and impaired Nrf2 functions decrease tolerance to oxidative/chemical insults [5].

Herein, we identified a new function of miR-128 as redoximiR, which has a direct role in suppressing MAFG expression. Based on complementary screening for MAFG-dependent genes as well as for ARE-dependent genes functioning through Nrf2:MAFG heterodimer or Nrf2-regulated genes, we demonstrate that miR-128 interferes with the induction of a group of selected genes, namely, GCLC, GSTA-1, HMOX-1, NQO1, and x-CT under oxidative stress. In fact, MAFG acts as positive partner of Nrf2 and its downmodulation by miR-128 consequently affects the Nrf2/ARE pathway.

Deregulated redox signaling and diminished antioxidant defenses represent a major cause of pathophysiological processes including cardiovascular and neurodegenerative diseases, cataracts, diabetes, and cancers, most of which are age related. Therefore, pharmacological/natural strategies addressed to an increase of Nrf2 activity could be beneficial for preventing oxidative stress-related diseases [5255].

Hypoxia is known to produce ROS, suggesting a cross-talk between HIF-1α and the Nrf2 pathways [56]. Since MAFG is related to both of these signalings, we also analyzed the involvement of miR-128 in hypoxic responses. Our results indicate that miR-128-MAFG axis significantly contribute in responses to hypoxia in C2C12 cells and the decrease of miR-128 is parallel with MAFG induction, which consequently could affect MAFG-related genes such as HMOX-1 and x-CT. Of note, the responses observed in vitro are also observed during the ischemic process in vivo.

Several studies demonstrate the involvement of miR-128 in different cellular processes such as differentiation, apoptosis, senescence, and metabolism [2932]. Furthermore, miR-128 is found downregulated under hypoxic conditions in human trophoblasts [57] and a recent study implicates a protective role in vivo of miR-128 inhibition during myocardial I/R injury [58]. We demonstrate that mir-128 is involved in the modulation of the antioxidant responses in vitro as well as in ischemic condition both in vitro and in vivo. Indeed, repression of miR-128 parallels with MAFG increases that consequently could affect MAFG-related genes such as HMOX-1 and x-CT. Our findings further suggest that downmodulation of miR-128 might contribute to the coordination of the adaptive hypoxic reprogramming that among many others involves genes that are dependent on MAFG, now considered a regulatory hub for numerous transcription factors [8, 15, 19].

Ischemic cardiovascular diseases are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in developed countries [59]. Even though the detrimental role of ROS generated during ischemia is well demonstrated, an effective antioxidant therapy is still far to be determined. Many studies indeed indicate that Nrf2 protects against cardiovascular diseases albeit reductive conditions also generate ROS (reviewed in [60, 61]). In this context, our work highlights a novel possibility to manage the activities of the Nrf2 signal by miR-128, alone or in combination with other pharmacologic strategies, that in future studies can be considered.

miR-128 has been detected in plasma and its levels are altered in various pathological conditions [6264], but further studies are required to better clarify the potential role of mir-128 levels as new prognostic and/or diagnostic marker in cardiovascular ischemic diseases.


ALDH1A1:Aldehyde dehydrogenase 1A1
ARE:Antioxidant-responsive element
AKR1D1:Aldo-keto reductase family 1, member D1
ALDH3A1:Aldehyde dehydrogenase 3 family member A1
CCDC53:Coiled-coil domain containing 53
HMOX-1/HO-1:Heme oxygenase-1
PCBD2:Pterin-4 alpha-carbinolamine dehydratase 2
BACH:BTB and CNC homology
bZIP:Basic-region leucine zipper
CHD8:Chromo-ATPase/helicase DNA-binding protein 8
CNC:Cap ‘n’ collar
DNMT3B:DNA methyltransferase 3 beta
EpRE:Electrophile-responsive element
GCLC:Glutamate-cysteine ligase catalytic
GST:Glutathione S-transferase
HIF-1α:Hypoxia inducible factor 1 alpha subunit
Keap1:Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1
Nrf2/NF-E2:Nuclear factor-erythroid 2
NQO1:NAD(P):Quinone oxidoreductase 1
NRF:NF-E2 p45-related factor
PCR:Polymerase chain reaction
PVDF:Polyvinylidene difluoride
RT-qPCR:Reverse transcription-quantitative real-time PCR
ROS:Reactive oxygen species
sMaf:Small Maf (musculoaponeurotic fibrosarcoma retrovirus transforming gene)
UCHL1:Ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1
UTR:Untranslated region.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

Rocco Caggiano and Fabio Cattaneo contributed equally to this work.


This study was supported by the Ministero dell’Università e della Ricerca Scientifica e Tecnologica (MiUR PRIN 2009).

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Table S1: List of putative redox-related targets of miR-128 predicted in human by in silico computational analysis. Supplemental Table S2: Sequences of oligonucleotides used for this study. Supplementary Figure S1: Northern blot analysis of miR-128 expression. Supplementary Figure S2: Expression of MAFG under physiological/pathological conditions.

  1. Supplementary material
  2. Supplementary material


  1. K. M. Holmstrom and T. Finkel, “Cellular mechanisms and physiological consequences of redox-dependent signalling,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 411–421, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. Y. Mikhed, A. Görlach, U. G. Knaus, and A. Daiber, “Redox regulation of genome stability by effects on gene expression, epigenetic pathways and DNA damage/repair,” Redox Biology, vol. 5, pp. 275–289, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. L. Baird and A. T. Dinkova-Kostova, “The cytoprotective role of the Keap1-Nrf2 pathway,” Archives of Toxicology, vol. 85, no. 4, pp. 241–272, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. J. D. Hayes and A. T. Dinkova-Kostova, “The Nrf2 regulatory network provides an interface between redox and intermediary metabolism,” Trends in Biochemical Sciences, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 199–218, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. C. Espinosa-Diez, V. Miguel, D. Mennerich et al., “Antioxidant responses and cellular adjustments to oxidative stress,” Redox Biology, vol. 6, pp. 183–197, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. F. Katsuoka and M. Yamamoto, “Small Maf proteins (MafF, MafG, MafK): history, structure and function,” Gene, vol. 586, no. 2, pp. 197–205, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. F. Katsuoka, H. Motohashi, T. Ishii, H. Aburatani, J. D. Engel, and M. Yamamoto, “Genetic evidence that small maf proteins are essential for the activation of antioxidant response element-dependent genes,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 25, no. 18, pp. 8044–8051, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  8. Y. Hirotsu, F. Katsuoka, R. Funayama et al., “Nrf2-MafG heterodimers contribute globally to antioxidant and metabolic networks,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 40, no. 20, pp. 10228–10239, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. G. P. Sykiotis and D. Bohmann, “Stress-activated cap'n'collar transcription factors in aging and human disease,” Science Signaling, vol. 3, no. 112, article re3, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. K. Itoh, T. Chiba, S. Takahashi et al., “An Nrf2/small Maf heterodimer mediates the induction of phase II detoxifying enzyme genes through antioxidant response elements,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 236, no. 2, pp. 313–322, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. A. Otsuki, M. Suzuki, F. Katsuoka et al., “Unique cistrome defined as CsMBE is strictly required for Nrf2-sMaf heterodimer function in cytoprotection,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 91, pp. 45–57, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. T. Q. de Aguiar Vallim, E. J. Tarling, H. Ahn et al., “MAFG is a transcriptional repressor of bile acid synthesis and metabolism,” Cell Metabolism, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 298–310, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. R. Fujita, M. Takayama-Tsujimoto, H. Satoh et al., “NF-E2 p45 is important for establishing normal function of platelets,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 33, no. 14, pp. 2659–2670, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. Y. Zhang and Y. Xiang, “Molecular and cellular basis for the unique functioning of Nrf1, an indispensable transcription factor for maintaining cell homoeostasis and organ integrity,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 473, no. 8, pp. 961–1000, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. F. Katsuoka, H. Yamazaki, and M. Yamamoto, “Small Maf deficiency recapitulates the liver phenotypes of Nrf1- and Nrf2-deficient mice,” Genes to Cells, vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 1309–1319, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. Y. Zhou, H. Wu, M. Zhao, C. Chang, and Q. Lu, “The Bach family of transcription factors: a comprehensive review,” Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 345–356, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. D. D. Zhang and M. Hannink, “Distinct cysteine residues in Keap1 are required for Keap1-dependent ubiquitination of Nrf2 and for stabilization of Nrf2 by chemopreventive agents and oxidative stress,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 23, pp. 8137–8151, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  18. A. T. Dinkova-Kostova, R. V. Kostov, and P. Canning, “Keap1, the cysteine-based mammalian intracellular sensor for electrophiles and oxidants,” Archives of Biochemistry Biophysics, vol. 617, pp. 84–93, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. K. Ueda, J. Xu, H. Morimoto, A. Kawabe, and S. Imaoka, “MafG controls the hypoxic response of cells by accumulating HIF-1alpha in the nuclei,” FEBS Letters, vol. 582, no. 16, pp. 2357–2364, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. J. Sun, H. Hoshino, K. Takaku et al., “Hemoprotein Bach1 regulates enhancer availability of heme oxygenase-1 gene,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 21, no. 19, pp. 5216–5224, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. M. Fang, L. Hutchinson, A. Deng, and M. R. Green, “Common BRAF(V600E)-directed pathway mediates widespread epigenetic silencing in colorectal cancer and melanoma,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 113, no. 5, pp. 1250–1255, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. G. Stefani and F. J. Slack, “Small non-coding RNAs in animal development,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 219–230, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. K. U. Tüfekci, M. G. Oner, R. L. Meuwissen, and S. Genç, “The role of microRNAs in human diseases,” Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 1107, pp. 33–50, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. D. P. Bartel, “MicroRNAs: target recognition and regulatory functions,” Cell, vol. 136, no. 2, pp. 215–233, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. A. E. Pasquinelli, “MicroRNAs and their targets: recognition, regulation and an emerging reciprocal relationship,” Nature Reviews Genetics, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 271–282, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. A. K. Leung and P. A. Sharp, “MicroRNA functions in stress responses,” Molecular Cell, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 205–215, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. R. C. Siow and H. J. Forman, “Redox regulation of microRNAs in health and disease,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 64, pp. 1–3, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. D. Ayers, B. Baron, and T. Hunter, “miRNA influences in NRF2 pathway interactions within cancer models,” Journal of Nucleic Acids, vol. 2015, Article ID 143636, 6 pages, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. A. M. Krichevsky, K. S. King, C. P. Donahue, K. Khrapko, and K. S. Kosik, “A microRNA array reveals extensive regulation of microRNAs during brain development,” RNA, vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 1274–1281, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. J. Godlewski, M. O. Nowicki, A. Bronisz et al., “Targeting of the Bmi-1 oncogene/stem cell renewal factor by microRNA-128 inhibits glioma proliferation and self-renewal,” Cancer Research, vol. 68, no. 22, pp. 9125–9130, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. S. Venkataraman, I. Alimova, R. Fan, P. Harris, N. Foreman, and R. Vibhakar, “MicroRNA 128a increases intracellular ROS level by targeting Bmi-1 and inhibits medulloblastoma cancer cell growth by promoting senescence,” PLoS One, vol. 5, no. 6, article e10748, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. Y. K. Adlakha and N. Saini, “MicroRNA: a connecting road between apoptosis and cholesterol metabolism,” Tumour Biology, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 8529–8554, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. M. Comegna, M. Succoio, M. Napolitano et al., “Identification of miR-494 direct targets involved in senescence of human diploid fibroblasts,” FASEB Journal, vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 3720–3733, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. R. Faraonio, P. Vergara, D. D. Marzo, M. Napolitano, T. Russo, and F. Cimino, “Transcription regulation in NIH3T3 cell clones resistant to diethylmaleate-induced oxidative stress and apoptosis,” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, vol. 8, no. 3-4, pp. 365–374, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. R. Faraonio, P. Vergara, D. Di Marzo et al., “p53 suppresses the Nrf2-dependent transcription of antioxidant response genes,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 281, no. 52, pp. 39776–39784, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. M. Succoio, M. Comegna, C. D'Ambrosio, A. Scaloni, F. Cimino, and R. Faraonio, “Proteomic analysis reveals novel common genes modulated in both replicative and stress-induced senescence,” Journal of Proteomics, vol. 128, pp. 18–29, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. G. G. Schiattarella, F. Cattaneo, G. Pironti et al., “Akap1 deficiency promotes mitochondrial aberrations and exacerbates cardiac injury following permanent coronary ligation via enhanced mitophagy and apoptosis,” PLoS One, vol. 11, no. 5, article e0154076, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. F. Cattaneo, M. Parisi, T. Fioretti, D. Sarnataro, G. Esposito, and R. Ammendola, “Nuclear localization of formyl-peptide receptor 2 in human cancer cells,” Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, vol. 603, pp. 10–19, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. K. J. Livak and T. D. Schmittgen, “Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(−delta delta C(T)),” Methods, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 402–408, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  40. G. Esposito, G. G. Schiattarella, C. Perrino et al., “Dermcidin: a skeletal muscle myokine modulating cardiomyocyte survival and infarct size after coronary artery ligation,” Cardiovascular Research, vol. 107, no. 4, pp. 431–441, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. P. Siengdee, N. Trakooljul, E. Murani, M. Schwerin, K. Wimmers, and S. Ponsuksili, “MicroRNAs regulate cellular ATP levels by targeting mitochondrial energy metabolism genes during C2C12 myoblast differentiation,” PLoS One, vol. 10, no. 5, article e0127850, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. L. Shi, B. Zhou, P. Li et al., “MicroRNA-128 targets myostatin at coding domain sequence to regulate myoblasts in skeletal muscle development,” Cellular Signalling, vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 1895–1904, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. B. Bodega, F. Marasca, V. Ranzani et al., “A cytosolic Ezh1 isoform modulates a PRC2-Ezh1 epigenetic adaptive response in postmitotic cells,” Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 444–452, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. S. A. Agrawal, D. Anand, A. D. Siddam et al., “Compound mouse mutants of bZIP transcription factors Mafg and Mafk reveal a regulatory network of non-crystallin genes associated with cataract,” Human Genetics, vol. 134, no. 7, pp. 717–735, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. W. Li, S. Yu, T. Liu et al., “Heterodimerization with small Maf proteins enhances nuclear retention of Nrf2 via masking the NESzip motif,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Proteins and Proteomics, vol. 1783, no. 10, pp. 1847–1856, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. R. Faraonio, F. Pane, M. Intrieri, T. Russo, and F. Cimino, “In vitro acquired cellular senescence and aging-specific phenotype can be distinguished on the basis of specific mRNA expression,” Cell Death and Differentiation, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 862–864, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. X. Cheng, C. H. Ku, and R. C. Siow, “Regulation of the Nrf2 antioxidant pathway by microRNAs: new players in micromanaging redox homeostasis,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 64, pp. 4–11, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. S. Kurinna and S. Werner, “NRF2 and microRNAs: new but awaited relations,” Biochemical Society Transactions, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 595–601, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. C. Zhang, L. Shu, and A. N. Kong, “MicroRNAs: new players in cancer prevention targeting Nrf2, oxidative stress and inflammatory pathways,” Current Pharmacology Reports, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 21–30, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. Y. Guo, S. Yu, C. Zhang, and A. N. Kong, “Epigenetic regulation of Keap1-Nrf2 signaling,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 88, Part B, pp. 337–349, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. X. Sun, H. Zuo, C. Liu, and Y. Yang, “Overexpression of miR-200a protects cardiomyocytes against hypoxia-induced apoptosis by modulating the kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1-nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 signaling axis,” International Journal of Molecular Medicine, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 1303–1311, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. J. Y. Chan and S. H. Chan, “Activation of endogenous antioxidants as a common therapeutic strategy against cancer, neurodegeneration and cardiovascular diseases: a lesson learnt from DJ-1,” Pharmacology & Therapeutics, vol. 156, pp. 69–74, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. K. Kanninen, R. Heikkinen, T. Malm et al., “Intrahippocampal injection of a lentiviral vector expressing Nrf2 improves spatial learning in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 106, pp. 16505–16510, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. R. T. Kolamunne, I. H. Dias, A. B. Vernallis, M. M. Grant, and H. R. Griffiths, “Nrf2 activation supports cell survival during hypoxia and hypoxia/reoxygenation in cardiomyoblasts; the roles of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species,” Redox Biology, vol. 1, pp. 418–426, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. K. J. Liang, K. T. Woodard, M. A. Weaver, J. P. Gaylor, E. R. Weiss, and R. J. Samulski, “AAV-Nrf2 promotes protection and recovery in animal models of oxidative stress,” Molecular Therapy, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 765–779, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. V. Malec, O. R. Gottschald, S. Li, F. Rose, W. Seeger, and J. Hänze, “HIF-1 alpha signaling is augmented during intermittent hypoxia by induction of the Nrf2 pathway in NOX1-expressing adenocarcinoma A549 cells,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 48, no. 12, pp. 1626–1635, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. R. B. Donker, J. F. Mouillet, D. M. Nelson, and Y. Sadovsky, “The expression of Argonaute2 and related microRNA biogenesis proteins in normal and hypoxic trophoblasts,” Molecular Human Reproduction, vol. 13, pp. 273–279, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. X. C. Zeng, L. Li, H. Wen, and Q. Bi, “MicroRNA-128 inhibition attenuates myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury-induced cardiomyocyte apoptosis by the targeted activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma,” Molecular Medicine Reports, vol. 14, pp. 129–136, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. J. Loscalzo, Harrison's Cardiovascular Medicine, McGraw-Hill Medical, New York, 2010.
  60. Y. Huang, W. Li, Z. Y. Su, and A. N. Kong, “The complexity of the Nrf2 pathway: beyond the antioxidant response,” The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry, vol. 26, no. 12, pp. 1401–1413, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. D. E. Handy and J. Loscalzo, “Responses to reductive stress in the cardiovascular system,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 109, pp. 114–124, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. L. Zhuang, L. Xu, P. Wang, and Z. Meng, “Serum miR-128-2 serves as a prognostic marker for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma,” PLoS One, vol. 10, no. 2, article e0117274, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. J. Sun, K. Liao, X. Wu, J. Huang, S. Zhang, and X. Lu, “Serum microRNA-128 as a biomarker for diagnosis of glioma,” International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 456–463, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  64. J. Vistbakka, I. Elovaara, T. Lehtimäki, and S. Hagman, “Circulating microRNAs as biomarkers in progressive multiple sclerosis,” Multiple Sclerosis Journal, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 403–412, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2017 Rocco Caggiano et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.