Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity

Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity / 2019 / Article
Special Issue

Antioxidant, Anti-Inflammatory, and Microbial-Modulating Activities of Nutraceuticals and Functional Foods 2019

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2019 |Article ID 8194804 | 30 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8194804

Systems Pharmacology and Microbiome Dissection of Shen Ling Bai Zhu San Reveal Multiscale Treatment Strategy for IBD

Academic Editor: Ilaria Peluso
Received22 Feb 2019
Revised19 Apr 2019
Accepted30 May 2019
Published23 Jun 2019


Generally, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) can be caused by psychology, genes, environment, and gut microbiota. Therefore, IBD therapy should be improved to utilize multiple strategies. Shen Ling Bai Zhu San (SLBZS) adheres to the aim of combating complex diseases from an integrative and holistic perspective, which is effective for IBD therapy. Herein, a systems pharmacology and microbiota approach was developed for these molecular mechanisms exemplified by SLBZS. First, by systematic absorption-distribution-metabolism-excretion (ADME) analysis, potential active compounds and their corresponding direct targets were retrieved. Then, the network relationships among the active compounds, targets, and disease were built to deduce the pharmacological actions of the drug. Finally, an “IBD pathway” consisting of several regulatory modules was proposed to dissect the therapeutic effects of SLBZS. In addition, the effects of SLBZS on gut microbiota were evaluated through analysis of the V3-V4 region and multivariate statistical methods. SLBZS significantly shifted the gut microbiota structure in a rat model. Taken together, we found that SLBZS has multidimensionality in the regulation of IBD-related physiological processes, which provides new sights into herbal medicine for the treatment of IBD.

1. Introduction

Recent studies have revealed several factors responsible for the digestive diseases such as irritable bowel syndrome/inflammatory bowel disease (IBS and IBD) [15]. However, the cellular mechanisms behind these diseases are complex and unclear. In recent years, much attention has been focused on the development of herbal medicine for the treatment of digestive diseases. Shen Ling Bai Zhu San (SLBZS), which is composed of 10 herbs, has been proven to have wide pharmacological effects on digestive diseases, including anti-inflammatory and gut microbiota modulation effect [6, 7].

A majority of herbal medicines exert pharmacological effects by targeting multiple host molecules. However, it is difficult to identify these herbal medicine targets. Therefore, a new method that can identify the active compounds and pharmacological targets of herbal medicine is in urgent need of development [8].

Systems pharmacology, which combines oral bioavailability prediction, multitarget prediction, and network analyses, is used to identify the active compounds and pharmacological targets of herbal medicine [911]. Herein, we applied the systems pharmacology method to explore the pharmacological mechanisms of SLBZS.

Additionally, high-throughput sequencing has been used to promote our understanding of the role of gut microbiota in health and disease [12]. For example, small intestinal bacterial overgrowth [13] and altered intestinal microbiota [14] are implicated in subgroups of patients with functional bowel disorders. However, due to the inherent limitations of the diagnostic methods, the exact evidence of the causal role of microbiota composition on the pathogenesis of the disease remains elusive.

In this study, a combination of systems pharmacology and 16S rRNA boosts our exploration of the potential relationship among drug-microbiota-target.

2. Results

In this study, a combination of oral bioavailability (OB) (≥30%) screening, Caco-2 permeability (Caco-2) (>-0.4), prediction of permeability, half-life (HL) (long), and drug-likeness (DL) (≥0.18) properties was applied to explore the active compounds of SLBZS. We also added , , , and HL = short with bioactivity as candidate compounds. Finally, we screened 97 SLBZS as candidate compounds (Table 1). The number of active compounds in Dolicho LablabL, Atractylodes macrocephala, Wolfiporia cocos, Glycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch, Platycodon grandiflorus, Semen Nelumbinis, Panax Ginseng, Fructus Amomi, Dioscorea opposita, and Semen Coicis was 4, 7, 15, 20, 3, 8, 23, 9, 10, and 8, respectively.


MOL1LuteolinPlatycodon grandiflorus
Semen Nelumbinis

MOL212-Senecioyl-2E,8E,10E-atractylentriolAtractylodes macrocephala62.400.01Short0.222

MOL314-Acetyl-12-senecioyl-2E,8E,10E-atractylentriolAtractylodes macrocephala60.310.33Short0.311

MOL414-Acetyl-12-senecioyl-2E,8Z,10E-atractylentriolAtractylodes macrocephala63.370.42Short0.301

MOL5Alpha-humuleneAtractylodes macrocephala22.981.88Short0.061

MOL6(3S,8S,9S,10R,13R,14S,17R)-10,13-Dimethyl-17-[(2R,5S)-5-propan-2-yloctan-2-yl]-2,3,4,7,8,9,11,12,14,15,16,17-dodecahydro-1H-cyclopenta[a]phenanthren-3-olAtractylodes macrocephala36.231.45Long0.783

MOL7Atractylenolide IAtractylodes macrocephala37.371.30Long0.152

MOL83β-AcetoxyatractyloneAtractylodes macrocephala54.071.13Long0.222

MOL9Palmitic acidDolicho LablabL19.301.09Short0.104

MOL10QuercetinGlycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch
Semen Nelumbinis

MOL11Linoleic acidDolicho LablabL41.901.16Short0.143

MOL12(2R)-2-[(3S,5R,10S,13R,14R,16R,17R)-3,16-Dihydroxy-4,4,10,13,14-pentamethyl-2,3,5,6,12,15,16,17-octahydro-1H-cyclopenta[a]phenanthren-17-yl]-6-methylhept-5-enoic acidWolfiporia cocos30.930.01Short0.814

MOL13Trametenolic acidWolfiporia cocos38.710.52Short0.802

MOL147,9(11)-Dehydropachymic acidWolfiporia cocos35.110.03Short0.817

MOL15CerevisterolWolfiporia cocos37.960.28Long0.772

MOL16(2R)-2-[(3S,5R,10S,13R,14R,16R,17R)-3,16-Dihydroxy-4,4,10,13,14-pentamethyl-2,3,5,6,12,15,16,17-octahydro-1H-cyclopenta[a]phenanthren-17-yl]-5-isopropyl-hex-5-enoic acidWolfiporia cocos31.070.05Short0.825

MOL17Ergosta-7,22E-dien-3beta-olWolfiporia cocos43.511.32Short0.721

MOL18(2R)-2-[(5R,10S,13R,14R,16R,17R)-16-Hydroxy-3-keto-4,4,10,13,14-pentamethyl-1,2,5,6,12,15,16,17-octahydrocyclopenta[a]phenanthren-17-yl]-5-isopropyl-hex-5-enoic acidWolfiporia cocos38.260.12Short0.825

MOL193beta-hydroxy-24-methylene-8-lanostene-21-oic acidWolfiporia cocos38.700.61Short0.812

MOL20Pachymic acidWolfiporia cocos33.630.10Short0.814

MOL21Poricoic acid AWolfiporia cocos30.61-0.14Short0.765

MOL22Poricoic acid BWolfiporia cocos30.52-0.08Short0.754

MOL23Poricoic acid CWolfiporia cocos38.150.32Short0.754

MOL24HederageninWolfiporia cocos36.911.32Short0.753

MOL25Tumulosic acidWolfiporia cocos29.880.13Short0.812

MOL26Dehydroeburicoic acidWolfiporia cocos44.170.38Short0.833

MOL27Denudatin BDioscorea opposita61.470.90Long0.382

MOL28Beta-sitosterolPanax Ginseng
Fructus Amomi

MOL29SitosterolGlycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch
Semen Coicis

MOL30Docosanoic acidDolicho LablabL15.691.21Short0.261

MOL31RutinGlycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch
Semen Nelumbinis

MOL32KaempferolGlycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch
Panax Ginseng

MOL33StigmasterolPanax Ginseng
Fructus Amomi
Dioscorea opposita
Semen Coicis

MOL34Licochalcone AGlycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch40.790.82Short0.292

MOL35CholesterolDioscorea opposita
Semen Coicis

MOL36Sitosterol alpha1Semen Coicis43.281.41Short0.783

MOL37MandenolSemen Coicis42.001.46Short0.194

MOL3824-Ethylcholest-4-en-3-oneFructus Amomi36.081.46Short0.761

MOL39Poriferast-5-en-3beta-olFructus Amomi36.911.45Short0.753

MOL40IsoliquiritigeninGlycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch85.320.44Short0.157

MOL41Sitosteryl acetateFructus Amomi40.391.39Short0.853

MOL42[(2R)-2,3-Dihydroxypropyl] (Z)-octadec-9-enoateSemen Coicis34.130.34Short0.305

MOL43GynesineDolicho LablabL60.070.58Short0.036

MOL44Icosa-11,14,17-trienoic acid methyl esterFructus Amomi44.811.52Short0.234

MOL45SpinasterolPlatycodon grandiflorus42.981.44Short0.763

MOL46HyperinSemen Nelumbinis6.94-1.42Short0.774

MOL4718beta-glycyrrhetinic acidGlycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch22.050.10Long0.746

MOL48IsotrifoliolGlycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch31.940.53Long0.423

MOL49(2S)-6-(2,4-Dihydroxyphenyl)-2-(2-hydroxypropan-2-yl)-4-methoxy-2,3-dihydrofuro[3,2-g]chromen-7-oneGlycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch60.250.00Long0.634

MOL50Licochalcone BGlycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch76.760.47Short0.195

MOL51Licochalcone CGlycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch4.440.63Long0.292

MOL52Glycyrrhizic acidGlycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch19.62-2.66Long0.112

MOL53ShinpterocarpinGlycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch80.301.10Long0.735

MOL54GlabridinGlycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch53.250.97Long0.475

MOL55IsoglycyrolGlycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch44.700.91Long0.841

MOL56Icos-5-enoic acidGlycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch30.701.22Short0.203

MOL57Gadelaidic acidGlycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch30.701.20Short0.202

MOL58Gancaonin HGlycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch50.100.60Long0.788

MOL5918α-Hydroxyglycyrrhetic acidGlycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch41.16-0.29Short0.712

MOL60XambioonaGlycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch54.851.09Long0.873

MOL61DeoxyharringtoninePanax Ginseng39.270.19Short0.815

MOL62DianthraminePanax Ginseng40.45-0.23Short0.203

MOL63ArachidonatePanax Ginseng45.571.27Short0.203

MOL64Ginsenoside RoPanax Ginseng1.98-2.86Long0.053

MOL65Ginsenoside Rb1Panax Ginseng6.24-3.99Long0.042

MOL66Ginsenoside-Rb2Panax Ginseng6.02-3.92Long0.042

MOL67Ginsenoside-RcPanax Ginseng8.16-3.97Long0.042

MOL68Ginsenoside-Rg3Panax Ginseng17.75-2.02Long0.222

MOL69Ginsenoside rh2Panax Ginseng36.32-0.51Long0.562

MOL70Ginsenoside-Rh3_qtPanax Ginseng13.090.97Long0.762

MOL71Ginsenoside-Rh4Panax Ginseng5.22-0.73Short0.602

MOL72Ginsenoside-Rh4_qtPanax Ginseng31.110.50Short0.782

MOL73Ginsenoside-Rs1Panax Ginseng6.27-3.69Long0.043

MOL74Ginsenoside-Rs2Panax Ginseng8.14-4.03Short0.043

MOL75Gomisin BPanax Ginseng31.990.60Long0.835

MOL76PanaxadiolPanax Ginseng33.090.82Long0.792

MOL77PanaxytriolPanax Ginseng33.760.06Short0.133

MOL78Alexandrin_qtPanax Ginseng36.911.30Long0.751

MOL79Ginsenoside Rg5Panax Ginseng6.15-1.92Long0.231

MOL80Ginsenoside Rg5_qtPanax Ginseng39.560.88Long0.792

MOL81HancinolDioscorea opposita64.010.53Long0.372

MOL82Hancinone CDioscorea opposita59.050.74Long0.391

MOL8324-Methylcholest-5-enyl-3belta-O-glucopyranoside_qtDioscorea opposita37.581.33Short0.721

MOL84CampesterolDioscorea opposita37.581.34Short0.711

MOL85IsofucosterolDioscorea opposita43.781.36Short0.761

MOL86Dioscoreside C_qtDioscorea opposita36.380.39Long0.872

MOL87DoradexanthinDioscorea opposita38.160.52Short0.544

MOL88Platycodin DPlatycodon grandiflorus7.60-4.99Long0.012

MOL89Methyl icosa-11,14-dienoateFructus Amomi39.671.47Short0.233

MOL90(5S,8S,9S,10R,13R,14S,17R)-17-[(1R,4R)-4-Ethyl-1,5-dimethylhexyl]-10,13-dimethyl-2,4,5,7,8,9,11,12,14,15,16,17-dodecahydro-1H-cyclopenta[a]phenanthrene-3,6-dioneFructus Amomi33.120.90Short0.791

MOL91Stigmasta-5,22-dien-3-beta-yl acetateFructus Amomi46.441.41Short0.863

MOL92CoixenolideSemen Coicis32.401.09Short0.431

MOL932-MonooleinSemen Coicis34.230.32Short0.292

MOL94GaluteolinSemen Nelumbinis2.70-1.50Short0.793

MOL9514-Methyl-24-methylene-dihydromangiferodiolSemen Nelumbinis36.870.79Short0.802

MOL964-Methyl-N-methylcoclaurineSemen Nelumbinis55.351.44Long0.262

MOL97GamabufotalinSemen Nelumbinis36.32-0.29Short0.801

2.1. Target Identification and Network Analysis

SLBZS exerts a pharmacological effect by targeting several host molecules [15, 16]. To identify the drug-target direct interactions on a large scale, we hypothesized that the ensemble features of the ligand group can accurately reflect the direct binding information of a specific target based on ligand-target interaction data to establish the WES model. In the present study, 74 potential targets were predicted for the 97 candidate compounds (Supp Table S1 and S2).

2.2. Network Construction
2.2.1. Compound-Target Network

The compounds from SLBZS acted on multiple targets, and each target was involved with a variety of compounds. Figure 1(a) shows that the compound-target network contains 171 nodes and 330 compound-target interactions. We screened 74 target proteins from the potential target list related to intestinal disease processes, including inflammatory bowel disease, duodenal ulcer, and colitis. Additionally, multiple relationships between the compounds and targets were illustrated in this network. For instance, quercetin exhibited the highest number of target candidate-target interactions (), followed by luteolin () and kaempferol (), thereby indicating the multitarget properties of SLBZS ingredients.

2.2.2. Target-Disease Network

To identify the relationship between SLBZS and disease, the DrugBank, TTD, and PharmGKB databases were searched. As shown in Figure 1(b) and Supp Table S3, 73 SLBZS compounds were related to 4 types of diseases, including digestive system disease (), pathology processes (), signs and symptoms (), and cancer ().

2.2.3. Target-Pathway Network

A total of 59 candidate targets and 47 KEGG pathways constituted the target-pathway network (Figure 1(c)). Apparently, most targets were related to different pathways, indicating that SLBZS may exert synergistic effects through these different pathways. Additionally, one active compound may target different molecular targets, illustrating the multitarget mechanism of SLBZS. Moreover, to investigate the synergic effects of these 10 herbal medicines on IBD, an integrated “digestive-related pathway” approach was applied based on the current research of digestive disease pathology including the MAPK signaling pathway, NF-kappa B signaling pathway, calcium signaling pathway, and chemokine signaling pathway (Figure 2 and Supp Table S4 and S5).

2.2.4. Target Tissue Location

Supp Figure S1 shows the tissue location network based on these 70 targets, which can be divided into six tissue modules, including the liver, heart, spleen, lung, kidney, and gut. Thus, the candidate compounds reflect multiple targets that can be localized to more than one tissue (Supp Table S6).

2.3. Structural Changes of Intestinal Microbiota by SLBZS

To analyze the alteration in the intestinal microbiota structure in rats treated with herbal medicine for IBD, the Illumina sequencing system was used to generate high-quality sequences from stool samples. The α diversity of the intestinal microflora indicates that DSS can significantly decrease the Chao1 and Shannon diversity indices in both experimental groups (MOD and SLBZS), whereas the SLBZS group showed a higher Shannon index when compared to the Chao1 index after treatment with SLBZS (Figures 3(a)3(d)). Principal component analysis (PCA) and principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) showed that SLBZS significantly altered the intestinal microbiota structure of rats (Figures 3(e) and 3(f)). Similarly, the unweighted UniFrac distance and unweighted pair-group method with arithmetic means (UPGMA) showed that DSS and SLBZS treatment can clearly separate rats (Figures 3(g) and 3(h)).

To find key system types related to the efficacy of SLBZS, MetaStat analysis was used in this study. Using mothur software, the statistical algorithm of MetaStat [17] was used to perform a pairwise comparison test on the differences between the samples (groups) of each taxon at the gate and genus levels. A detailed phylogenetic analysis of the taxonomic composition of the microbiome of mice treated with DSS showed that the increased inflammatory conditions observed upon DSS administration were associated with variations in the abundance of specific taxa, including Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Proteobacteria, and Actinobacteria [18, 19] (Figure 4(a)).

Significant changes towards restoration of normobiosis were detected among the less abundant genera belonging to the Firmicutes phylum in the DSS+SLBZS-derived microbiota. For instance, Corynebacteriaceae, Lactobacillaceae, Paraprevotellaceae, Veillonellaceae, Prevotellaceae, and Clostridiaceae which were expanded in colitic rats were reduced upon SLBZS treatment and returned to levels comparable to those observed in control group rats (Figure 4(b)).

SLBZS-derived samples showed significant increases in known commensals, including Adlercreutzia and Dorea, and in the SCFA-producing taxa Ruminococcus spp., Blautia sp., Clostridium spp., Veillonella spp., Coprococcus spp., and Roseburia spp. (Figure 4(c) and Supp Figure S2), which are reported to be reduced in IBD patients [2022]. Additionally, PICRUSt was applied to predict microbiota metabolism [23]. 328 pathways were involved in the microbiota metabolism and 176 pathways were significantly changed by SLBZS (Figure 5 and Supp Figure S3). After treatment with SLBZS, the relative abundance of functional genes in the following categories significantly () increased: cell motility, signal transduction, membrane transport, and amino acid metabolism, all of which were reduced in the DSS-treated group. Meanwhile, cell growth and death, replication and repair, infectious diseases, immune system diseases, glycan biosynthesis and metabolism, and digestive system genes were significantly () decreased but were increased in the DSS group.

2.4. Alleviation of IL-1β, IL-10, and TNF-α and Pathological Changes by SLBZS

We analyzed the data from the experiment, and after one week of treatment, IL-1β and TNF-α were significantly decreased by SLBZS, whereas IL-10 was increased. As shown in Figures 6(a)6(c), IL-1β and TNF-α were significantly decreased, while IL-10 increased after treatment with SLBZS. The histological changes in the colons of each group are shown in Figures 6(d)6(f). The colon of the control group exhibited normal histological features. In the model group, there was infiltration of colon mucosal inflammatory cells, and the intestinal villus epithelial cells were degenerated, necrotic, and shed. Pathological changes were significantly reduced in the SLBZS group.

3. Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the efficacy of TCM on IBD with a systems pharmacology and microbiota approach. Chinese herbs are a complex system of multicomponent, multitarget, and synergistic effects among its components. This systematic pharmacological technique is used to study TCM active compounds and target identification and identify targets and the relationship between drugs and diseases.

In this study, some herbal medicines may contain the same compound, such as Glycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch and Panax Ginseng, Panax Ginseng and Fructus Amomi, and Panax Ginseng and Glycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch. Among these, Atractylodes macrocephala, Glycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch, and Panax Ginseng have been found to have extensive pharmacological effects, such as antioxidant, immunomodulation, and anti-inflammatory [2429]. In particular, the low molecular weight Glycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch can inhibit tumor cell proliferation to exert anticancer and immunomodulatory effects. They also increase the thymus/spleen index and T lymphocyte population. In addition, Glycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch can increase the expression of antitumor factors such as IL2, IL6, and IL7 and reduce the protumor cytokine TNFα [24]. Shimato et al. have demonstrated that Atractylodes macrocephala can promote the production of G-CSF, clinically used to treat neutropenia and prevent chemotherapy-induced immunodeficiency [27]. Also, Panax Ginseng has been demonstrated to regulate multiple types of immune cells including macrophages, NK cells, DCs, T cells, and B cells [30]. Moreover, luteolin and quercetin, which existed widely in Glycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch, Platycodon grandiflorus, and Semen Nelumbinis, have been proven to have broad biological and pharmacological effects [31, 32].

Despite the different numbers of each herbal-related targets, significant target overlap occurred between these herbals. The results indicate that these targets can be regulated by different herbs in SLBZS to play a synergistic role [15, 16]. For example, several compounds including alexandrin_qt, campesterol, isofucosterol, and panaxadiol were involved in modulating the activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (Pparg), which might be ascribed to lipid and glucose metabolism [33, 34].

Based on network construction, the results indicate that most compounds modulate multiple targets to exert their pharmacological effects. For example, quercetin exhibits not only antitumor [35] and anticancer [31] activity but also antiproliferative effects [36]. Antiproliferative effects of conjugated metabolites of quercetin have been evaluated against three different cancer cell lines [36]. In addition, luteolin presents anti-inflammatory effects, serves as a neuroprotective agent [37], and also exhibits antitumor effect [32, 38]. The antitumor effect of luteolin may be transmitted by cMet/Akt/ERK signaling [38]. Furthermore, the results indicated that several targets are hit by multiple ingredients in the compound-target network. Pparg showed the highest degree (), along with Sphk1 (Sphingosine kinase 1, ), Klf5 (Kruppel-like factor 5, ), and Akr1b10 (Aldo-keto reductase family 1 member B10, ), demonstrating the potential therapeutic effect of each drug contained in SLBZS for combating intestinal disease via modulation of these relevant proteins. These targets play crucial pathological rules in disease related to cancer [3942]. AKR1B10 has been shown to be closely related to tumor size and cell metastasis of gastric cancer, and AKR1B10 can be used as a good prognostic indicator for gastric cancer [39]. Deletion of KLF5 can result in a decrease in PI3K/AKT signaling and accumulate HIF1α in prostate tumors to promote tumor angiogenesis [40]. Previous research has illustrated that the PPARγ allele may be involved in the development, differentiation, and metastasis of gastric cancer in Turkey [43]. Sphk1 has been shown to be involved in the pathogenesis of human hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and DMS can inhibit the effects of Sphk1. Therefore, Sphk1 can be used as a potential target for the treatment of HCC [42].

Reportedly, the proteins Mmp12, Pparg, and Ptgs2 are related to digestive system disease and cancer. Biancheri et al. demonstrated that Mmp12 contributes to the responsiveness of patients with IBD to anti-TNF agents [44] and might be involved in the remodeling of injured gut tissue with respect to the migration, proliferation, and differentiation of endothelial cells [45]. Pparg is involved in the inhibition of tissue damage associated with immune activation through the inhibition of the NF-κB pathway [46]. Ptgs2 can repair the injured intestinal mucosa and exert a critical role in the pathophysiology of Salmonella typhimurium-induced ulcerative colitis [47].

Some pathways, such as the NF-κB pathway [46], MAPK pathway [48, 49], calcium signaling pathway [50], and chemokine signaling pathway [51], have been improved in relation to digestive disease. In addition, these pathways are reflected in several modules such as inflammation, proliferation apoptosis, survival, and proliferation.

The MAPK cascade is a highly conserved module that is involved in various cellular functions, including cell proliferation, differentiation, and migration. A study on the pharmacological approach showed that stevioside exerts antiapoptotic and anti-inflammatory effects through the inhibition of the release of cytokines and the activation of the MAPK signaling pathway [52]. Another pharmacological study showed that berberine might execute an antiapoptotic function by inhibiting the MAPK pathway [53]. In macrophages, carbon monoxide (CO) reduces lipopolysaccharide-induced proinflammatory cytokines effectuated by the MAPK pathway [48]. Recent studies have highlighted that oxidative stress activates MAPKs and MT2A (a mediator of MAPKs) that play a crucial role in antiapoptosis and anti-inflammation [54]. Studies have shown that black raspberries (BRB) have a preventive effect on rat esophageal cancer, and the mechanism may be that BRB reverse oxidative stress and inhibit NF-κB/MAPK pathway [55]. Rutin exerts neuroprotective effects by increasing superoxide dismutase and glutathione peroxidase levels in the peripheral blood and inhibiting the p38 MAPK pathway [56]. This finding reveals the importance of MAPKs in the normal digestive function.

NF-κB is found in almost all animal cell types and is involved in cellular responses to stimuli such as stress, cytokines, free radicals, heavy metals, ultraviolet irradiation, oxidized LDL, and bacterial or viral antigens. NF-κB also regulates the expression of antiapoptotic genes which play an important role in cell survival and play various roles in cell development, proliferation, differentiation, and metabolism [57]. Furthermore, the degree of NF-κB activation induced by LPS is significantly increased in Atg7-deficient intestinal epithelium. This also shows that autophagy can relieve endotoxin-induced inflammatory responses in intestinal endothelial cells, thereby maintaining intestinal homeostasis [58]. Both innate and adaptive immune responses are associated with NF-κB, and the development and maintenance of cells and tissues associated with the immune system are under the control of the NF-κB transcription factor family in multiple pathways. Initially, the role of NF-κB in the thymus was limited to the important role of RelB [59], but it became clearer in the development of medullary thymic epithelial cells [6062].

Calcium (Ca2+) ions are important for cell signaling, and they exert an allosteric regulation of many enzymes and proteins once they enter the cytosol of the cytoplasm. Studies have shown that intracellular Ca2+ release is accomplished by Zn+ triggering inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate (IP3) [63, 64]. Activation of mitogen-activated protein (MAP) and phosphoinositide 3 (PI3) kinase pathways protects colonic epithelial cells. In experimental colitis, metabolic calcium signaling in colonocytes is induced by zinc-induced receptors [65]. In Caco-2 cell monolayers, DSS increases the intracellular Ca2+ concentration and depletes intracellular Ca2+ by BAPTA/AM, disrupts tight junctions, and causes barrier dysfunction [66]. These findings reveal the importance of the calcium signaling pathway, which might be instrumental to the success of future human trials of a new strategy to treat digestive disease.

Chemokine receptors are cytokine receptors found on the surface of certain cells that interact with a type of cytokine called a chemokine. Chemokines can activate a range of signaling pathways to mediate their biological effects by binding to G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Duffy and D6 bind to CXC and CC inflammatory chemokines, respectively [67]. Chemokines can be divided into “inflammatory” chemokines and “steady state” chemokines [68]. Inflammatory chemokines can play important roles in recruiting leukocytes to the site of inflammation, such as neutrophils, monocyte macrophages, dendritic cells (DC), and natural killer (NK), which play key roles in the innate immune response. The results demonstrated that the chemokine signaling pathway can be further divided into modules such as survival, migration, apoptosis, cellular growth, and cytokine production. In the immune system, chemokines are mainly produced and transported by leukocytes and play an important role in the immune system [69]. Chemokines act by binding to chemokine receptors. Activation of chemokine receptors induces proliferation and differentiation of immune cells, and both are essential processes in innate and adaptive immune responses [70].

In summary, these pathways are regulated by different compounds, suggesting that digestive diseases may affect different pathways. In addition, multiple protein targets belong to a variety of signaling pathways, suggesting that certain proteins can simultaneously affect multiple signaling pathways.

In this experiment, IL-1β, IL-10, and TNF-α were analyzed. IL-1β and TNF-α participate in the MAPK and NF-κB pathways, and the two pathways share crosstalk. Recent studies have shown that IL-1β and TNF-α can be proinflammatory cytokines in IBD [7174], whereas IL-10 has been demonstrated to play a vital role in the control of inflammation and prevention of enteritis [75]. In patients with colitis and inflammatory bowel disease, damaged mitochondria accumulate in macrophages when IL-10 signal is deficient. This leads to abnormal activation of NLRP3 inflammasome and IL-1β production [76, 77].

In our research, changes to the intestinal microbial structure by SLBZS were observed. SLBZS treatment inhibits two genera that contain potential pathogens, Corynebacterium and Helicobacter, which are strongly associated with peptic ulcers, chronic gastritis, duodenitis, and stomach cancer [78]. Blautia is a group of bacteria containing various acetate and butyrate producers [79, 80]. This research observed that an increase in the SCFA producer Blautia in the SLBZS treatment group was consistent with previous animal studies [81]. Roseburia and Lachnospira, as SCFA producers, were reported to recover a balanced community after diet treatment in type 2 diabetic patients [82]. Ruminococcus is present in the digestive tract of ≥90% of people and is involved in diseases associated with the intestines, such as IBD. A recent study demonstrated the ability of Ruminococcus to produce propanol and propionate as the end products of metabolism [83]. These new findings provide us with insights into the specificity of the genera’s adaptability to the gut environment and promote our understanding of the role of gut commensals in health and disease.

Based on the 16S rRNA results, we found that SLBZS treatment can alter the microbial structure of the intestine, which has an enhanced effect on the intestinal microbiota richness and diversity in DSS model rats. Therefore, SLBZS seems to offset the structural changes caused by DSS. As a result, the identified bacterial phylotypes in response to SLBZS treatment in DSS rats may be related to the development and improvement of DSS-induced metabolic abnormalities. The overrepresentation of the KEGG gene in the patient’s microbiome can reflect the deleterious metabolism of the neurotransmitter pathway and the host gut protection glycosaminoglycan mucin, in contrast to the beneficial counterpart in the control [84]. Our PICRUSt analyses revealed that SLBZS can significantly increase amino acid metabolism, which may indicate SCFA. This is consistent with the increased SCFA-producing genera. Infectious disease, immune system disease, and digestive system disease were all reduced after treatment with SLBZS, which had a positive effect on IBD.

However, a large number of validation tests are required. The systems pharmacology results can directly prove the effect of the active compounds of SLBZS on the target, while a change in the microbiota structure can supplement the interaction between the Chinese herbal compounds and gut commensals, then revealing the underlying mechanism. Taken together, the combination of the two methods can systematically illustrate the relationship among active compounds, targets, and the microbiota and contribute to the study of the mechanism of IBD.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Dataset Construction

The current data were obtained from the TCM pharmacology analysis platform (TCMSP, http://lsp.nwu.edu.cn/tcmsp.php) and a large amount of literature mining. We collected 980 compounds and their physicochemical properties from SLBZS: 14 compounds of Dolicho LablabL, 55 compounds of Atractylodes macrocephala, 34 compounds of Wolfiporia cocos, 280 compounds of Glycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch, 102 compounds of Platycodon grandiflorus, 31 compounds of Semen Nelumbinis, 190 compounds of Panax Ginseng, 165 compounds of Fructus Amomi, 71 compounds of Dioscorea opposita, and 38 compounds of Semen Coicis. Detailed information is freely available from the TCMSP analysis platform.

4.2. Active Compound Screening Model
4.2.1. Oral Bioavailability (OB)

In the present study, oral bioavailability (OB) was estimated based on OBioavail 1.1 [85] and the IntegOB. OB is one of the major pharmacokinetic parameters in the ADME (absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion) profile of a drug. The molecule with suitable served as the candidate compound for further research.

4.2.2. Caco-2 Permeability

The oral absorption of drugs was primarily completed via intestinal epithelial cells (IEC). In this study, a computer Caco-2 permeability prediction model was applied to predict intestinal permeability of all TCM components in TCMSP. The number of is considered to exhibit adequate intestinal epithelial permeability.

4.2.3. DL (Drug-Likeness)

Drug-likeness is a qualitative concept used in drug design for how “druglike” a substance is with respect to factors like bioavailability. It is estimated from the molecular structure before the substance is even synthesized and tested.

4.2.4. HL (Half-Life)

The half-life of a substance is the duration required for a drug to lose half of its pharmacological activity. HL = long is defined as a suitable half-life range.

4.3. Drug Targeting

Drug targeting was implemented by a novel computational model designed to detect the direct drug targets based on an in-house weighted ensemble similarity (WES) method [86] with satisfactory validation of both internal and external data.

4.4. Network Construction

TCM is a complex material system comprised of the effective active compound, the target of the action, and the related diseases; it does not correspond to the theory of “single gene, single target, and single disease.” In order to resolve these issues, we constructed a compound-target network to reveal the association between the drug and the target protein. The construction of the network aided in identifying the protein targets of each compound in Chinese medicine, understanding the mechanism underlying the activity of the drug in the treatment of the disease, and studying the target in the disease network. Thus, in the generated network, nodes represent compounds, targets, signaling pathways, or diseases, while edges represent compound-target, target-disease, and target-pathway interactions. The bipartite graphs were generated using Cytoscape 2.8.1 [87].

4.5. Compound Organ Location

In order to elucidate the gut disorder at the organ level, firstly, the GO targets were analyzed for most of the selected targets, followed by the analysis of distribution in tissues and organs. Determination of target tissue distribution was based on microarray analysis data of different tissue types in BioGPS database (http://biogps.org). wherein represents human tissue, represents tissue location, represents a tissue-specific pattern of mRNA expression of one target, represents the expression position of mRNA of one target in , represents one target in the tissue of the average expression, is the number of organizations, and indicates a target tissue location.

4.6. Animal Management

A rat model test was performed to test the effect of SLBZS on the IBD model. After a week of acclimation period, 30 rats (male and 10 weeks) were randomly divided into 3 groups—control group (CON), model group (MOD), and SLBZS group (SLBZS). The MOD and SLBZS group rats were administered 3% DSS (40 kDa; MP Biomedicals) for 7 days, while the CON was administered with equal volume of saline. After 7 days, the SLBZS group was intragastrically administered with SLBZS 2 mL (1.2 g) for 7 days, and the other two groups were orally given an equal volume of saline. The condition of the rats was monitored twice per day. After 24 hours of the last administration, feces, serum, and colon were collected and stored at -80°C. The animal experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of South China Agricultural University (Approval No. CNAS BL0011).

4.7. Preparation of SLBZS

SLBZS was prepared using the published method [7]. SLBZS is a traditional Chinese patent medicine, composed of Panax Ginseng (10 g), Wolfiporia cocos (10 g), Atractylodes macrocephala (10 g), Dioscorea opposita (10 g), Dolichos Lablab (7.5 g), Semen Nelumbinis (5 g), Semen Coicis (5 g), Fructus Amomi (5 g), Platycodon grandiflorus (5 g), and Glycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch (5 g). The ten Chinese herbs were purchased from qualified suppliers based on standards specified in the Chinese Pharmacopoeia (Guangzhou, China). The herb materials were mixed and extracted twice at 80°C by stirring it for 1 h using 10 vols of distilled water (v/m). Then, we centrifuged the extract at 1500 × at room temperature. The SLBZS decoction was filtered and then concentrated to 1 g mL−1 (net content) with deionized water.

4.8. 16S rRNA Gene Sequence Analysis of Intestinal Flora in Fecal Samples

Total genomic DNA of fecal samples was extracted by the InviMag Stool DNA Kit (Invitek, Germany) as previously described [7]. Fecal microbial DNA was extracted using Fast DNA SPIN extraction kits (MP Biomedicals, Santa Ana, CA, USA) and applied to amplification of the V3-V4 region of 16S rDNA. Fecal microbiota composition was assessed using Illumina HiSeq sequencing of 16S rDNA Amplicon and QIIME-based microbial analysis. The procedures for fecal microbial DNA extraction, sequencing and library construction, and microbial analysis are described in the supplementary methods.

4.9. Histologic Observation of the Colon

Histologic colon samples were prepared as previously described [7]. The colon samples were collected and fixed in 10% formalin, dehydrated with a sequence of ethanol solutions, embedded in paraffin, sliced (4-5 μm), and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE), then observed with Olympus BH22 Microscope (Japan).

4.10. Measurement of Serum Cytokines

Interleukin- (IL-) 1β, IL-10, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) were tested using an ELISA kit (Cusabio, Houston, TX, USA; https://www.cusabio.com/). Indices were tested according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

4.11. Quantification and Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed with GraphPad Prism 5 (GraphPad Software). Statistical significance was calculated using Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparison correction. , , and were regarded as statistically significant.


IBD:Inflammatory bowel disease
IBS:Irritable bowel syndrome
TCM:Traditional Chinese medicine
IEC:Intestinal epithelial cells
SLBZS:Shen Ling Bai Zhu San
PICRUSt:Phylogenetic investigation of communities by reconstruction of unobserved states
DSS:Dextran sulfate sodium
ADME:Absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion
OB:Oral bioavailability
Caco-2:Caco-2 permeability
UPGMA:Unweighted pair-group method with arithmetic.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

All authors declare that there is no conflict of interest with any financial organization regarding the material discussed in the manuscript.

Authors’ Contributions

Wei-jie Lv and Cui Liu designed the work, performed the research study, and drafted the manuscript. Zeng-quan Li, Yue-fei Li, and Wen-qian Chen participated in the experimental work. Li-min Chao, Yue Li, and Ying Xiong analyzed the database. Xiao-long Xu and Shi-ning Guo designed and supervised the research study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.


We thank the Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine Laboratory Animal Center (Guangzhou, China) for providing experimental animal and sample collecting. Thanks are due to the Shanghai Personal Biotechnology Limited Company for the analysis of data. This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 31472232).

Supplementary Materials

Tissue location, alteration of phyla and genera, PICRUSt, the information of targets, the relationship between compounds and targets, topology parameters between targets and diseases, the information of pathway, topology parameters between targets and pathway, the relationship between targets and tissues, and supplementary method. (Supplementary Materials)


  1. S. Danese and C. Fiocchi, “Ulcerative colitis,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 365, no. 18, pp. 1713–1725, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. B. Khor, A. Gardet, and R. J. Xavier, “Genetics and pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease,” Nature, vol. 474, no. 7351, pp. 307–317, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. D. P. McGovern, S. Kugathasan, and J. H. Cho, “Genetics of inflammatory bowel diseases,” Gastroenterology, vol. 149, no. 5, pp. 1163–1176.e2, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. N. A. Molodecky, I. S. Soon, D. M. Rabi et al., “Increasing incidence and prevalence of the inflammatory bowel diseases with time, based on systematic review,” Gastroenterology, vol. 142, no. 1, pp. 46–54.e42, 2012, e42; quiz e30. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. J. M. Peloquin, G. Goel, E. J. Villablanca, and R. J. Xavier, “Mechanisms of pediatric inflammatory bowel disease,” Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 31–64, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. C. Liu, C. Zhang, W. J. Lv et al., “Structural modulation of gut microbiota during alleviation of suckling piglets diarrhoea with herbal formula,” Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2017, Article ID 8358151, 11 pages, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. W. J. Lv, C. Liu, C. X. Ye et al., “Structural modulation of gut microbiota during alleviation of antibiotic-associated diarrhea with herbal formula,” International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, vol. 105, Part 3, pp. 1622–1629, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. D. Normile, “Asian medicine: the new face of traditional Chinese medicine,” Science, vol. 299, no. 5604, pp. 188–190, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. D. C. Hao and P. G. Xiao, “Network pharmacology: a Rosetta Stone for traditional Chinese medicine,” Drug Development Research, vol. 75, no. 5, pp. 299–312, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. A. L. Hopkins, “Network pharmacology: the next paradigm in drug discovery,” Nature Chemical Biology, vol. 4, no. 11, pp. 682–690, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. S. C. Janga and A. Tzakos, “Structure and organization of drug-target networks: insights from genomic approaches for drug discovery,” Molecular BioSystems, vol. 5, no. 12, pp. 1536–1548, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. I. Sekirov, S. L. Russell, L. C. Antunes, and B. B. Finlay, “Gut microbiota in health and disease,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 90, no. 3, pp. 859–904, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. A. C. Ford, B. M. R. Spiegel, N. J. Talley, and P. Moayyedi, “Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in irritable bowel syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis,” Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 7, no. 12, pp. 1279–1286, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. A. Salonen, W. M. de Vos, and A. Palva, “Gastrointestinal microbiota in irritable bowel syndrome: present state and perspectives,” Microbiology, vol. 156, no. 11, pp. 3205–3215, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. C. Huang, C. L. Zheng, Y. Li, Y. H. Wang, A. P. Lu, and L. Yang, “Systems pharmacology in drug discovery and therapeutic insight for herbal medicines,” Briefings in Bioinformatics, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 710–733, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. S. W. Zhao and S. Li, “Network-based relating pharmacological and genomic spaces for drug target identification,” PLoS One, vol. 5, no. 7, article e11764, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. J. R. White, N. Nagarajan, and M. Pop, “Statistical methods for detecting differentially abundant features in clinical metagenomic samples,” PLoS Computational Biology, vol. 5, no. 4, article e1000352, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. P. M. Munyaka, M. F. Rabbi, E. Khafipour, and J. E. Ghia, “Acute dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced colitis promotes gut microbial dysbiosis in mice,” Journal of Basic Microbiology, vol. 56, no. 9, pp. 986–998, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. T. Osaka, E. Moriyama, S. Arai et al., “Meta-analysis of fecal microbiota and metabolites in experimental colitic mice during the inflammatory and healing phases,” Nutrients, vol. 9, no. 12, p. 1329, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. D. Gevers, S. Kugathasan, L. A. Denson et al., “The treatment-naive microbiome in new-onset Crohn’s disease,” Cell Host & Microbe, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 382–392, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. A. Koh, F. De Vadder, P. Kovatcheva-Datchary, and F. Backhed, “From dietary fiber to host physiology: short-chain fatty acids as key bacterial metabolites,” Cell, vol. 165, no. 6, pp. 1332–1345, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. N. W. Palm, M. R. de Zoete, T. W. Cullen et al., “Immunoglobulin A coating identifies colitogenic bacteria in inflammatory bowel disease,” Cell, vol. 158, no. 5, pp. 1000–1010, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. M. G. I. Langille, J. Zaneveld, J. G. Caporaso et al., “Predictive functional profiling of microbial communities using 16S rRNA marker gene sequences,” Nature Biotechnology, vol. 31, no. 9, pp. 814–821, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. P. A. Ayeka, Y. H. Bian, P. M. Githaiga, and Y. Zhao, “The immunomodulatory activities of licorice polysaccharides (Glycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch.) in CT 26 tumor-bearing mice,” BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 17, no. 1, p. 536, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. Y. S. Baraya, K. K. Wong, and N. S. Yaacob, “The immunomodulatory potential of selected bioactive plant-based compounds in breast cancer: a review,” Anti-Cancer Agents in Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 770–783, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. H. Kang, Y. G. Hwang, T. G. Lee et al., “Use of gold nanoparticle fertilizer enhances the ginsenoside contents and anti-inflammatory effects of red ginseng,” Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 26, no. 10, pp. 1668–1674, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. Y. Shimato, M. Ota, K. Asai, T. Atsumi, Y. Tabuchi, and T. Makino, “Comparison of byakujutsu (Atractylodes rhizome) and sojutsu (Atractylodes lancea rhizome) on anti-inflammatory and immunostimulative effects in vitro,” Journal of Natural Medicines, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 192–201, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. Y. O. Son, S. H. Kook, and J. C. Lee, “Glycoproteins and polysaccharides are the main class of active constituents required for lymphocyte stimulation and antigen-specific immune response induction by traditional medicinal herbal plants,” Journal of Medicinal Food, vol. 20, no. 10, pp. 1011–1021, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. R. Yang, B. C. Yuan, Y. S. Ma, S. Zhou, and Y. Liu, “The anti-inflammatory activity of licorice, a widely used Chinese herb,” Pharmaceutical Biology, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 5–18, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. S. Kang and H. Min, “Ginseng, the ‘immunity boost’: the effects of Panax ginseng on immune system,” Journal of Ginseng Research, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 354–368, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. C. Chen, J. Zhou, and C. Y. Ji, “Quercetin: a potential drug to reverse multidrug resistance,” Life Sciences, vol. 87, no. 11-12, pp. 333–338, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. Y. Lin, R. X. Shi, X. Wang, and H. M. Shen, “Luteolin, a flavonoid with potential for cancer prevention and therapy,” Current Cancer Drug Targets, vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 634–646, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. M. Aprile, M. R. Ambrosio, V. D'Esposito et al., “PPARG in human adipogenesis: differential contribution of canonical transcripts and dominant negative isoforms,” Ppar Research, vol. 2014, Article ID 537865, 11 pages, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. Y. Kang, S. Hengbo, L. Jun et al., “PPARG modulated lipid accumulation in dairy GMEC via regulation of ADRP gene,” Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 116, no. 1, pp. 192–201, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. G. Y. Xu, H. S. Shi, L. B. Ren, G. Xu, H. Gou, and D. Gong, “Enhancing the anti-colon cancer activity of quercetin by self-assembled micelles,” International Journal of Nanomedicine, vol. 10, pp. 2051–2063, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. L. Delgado, I. Fernandes, S. Gonzalez-Manzano, V. de Freitas, N. Mateus, and C. Santos-Buelga, “Anti-proliferative effects of quercetin and catechin metabolites,” Food & Function, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 797–803, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. S. F. Nabavi, N. Braidy, O. Gortzi et al., “Luteolin as an anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective agent: a brief review,” Brain Research Bulletin, vol. 119, Part A, pp. 1–11, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. J. Lu, G. L. Li, K. F. He et al., “Luteolin exerts a marked antitumor effect in cMet-overexpressing patient-derived tumor xenograft models of gastric cancer,” Journal of Translational Medicine, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 42, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. L. Zemanova, J. Hofman, E. Novotna et al., “Flavones inhibit the activity of AKR1B10, a promising therapeutic target for cancer treatment,” Journal of Natural Products, vol. 78, no. 11, pp. 2666–2674, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. X. P. Ci, C. S. Xing, B. T. Zhang et al., “KLF5 inhibits angiogenesis in PTEN-deficient prostate cancer by attenuating AKT activation and subsequent HIF1α accumulation,” Cancer Research, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 91, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. W. F. Tang, Y. M. Chen, Y. F. Wang, H. Y. Gu, S. C. Chen, and M. Q. Kang, “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARG) polymorphisms and breast cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis,” International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 12226–12238, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  42. Z. J. Zhang, Z. Y. Yan, Z. Yuan, Y. Z. Sun, H. F. He, and C. Y. Mai, “RETRACTED ARTICLE: SPHK1 inhibitor suppresses cell proliferation and invasion associated with the inhibition of NF-κB pathway in hepatocellular carcinoma,” Tumor Biology, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 1503–1509, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. E. Canbay, O. Kurnaz, B. Canbay et al., “PPAR-gamma Pro12Ala polymorphism and gastric cancer risk in a Turkish population,” Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 5875–5878, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. P. Biancheri, R. J. Brezski, A. Di Sabatino et al., “Proteolytic cleavage and loss of function of biologic agents that neutralize tumor necrosis factor in the mucosa of patients with inflammatory bowel disease,” Gastroenterology, vol. 149, no. 6, pp. 1564–1574.e3, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. D. Gingras, A. Renaud, N. Mousseau, E. Beaulieu, Z. Kachra, and R. Beliveau, “Matrix proteinase inhibition by AE-941, a multifunctional antiangiogenic compound,” Anticancer Research, vol. 21, no. 1A, pp. 145–155, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  46. G. P. Vandoros, P. A. Konstantinopoulos, G. Sotiropoulou-Bonikou et al., “PPAR-gamma is expressed and NF-KB pathway is activated and correlates positively with COX-2 expression in stromal myofibroblasts surrounding colon adenocarcinomas,” Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, vol. 132, no. 2, pp. 76–84, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. W. S. Cho and C. Chae, “Expression of cyclooxygenase-2 and nitric oxide synthase 2 in swine ulcerative colitis caused by Salmonella typhimurium,” Veterinary Pathology, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 419–423, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. Y. Naito, K. Uchiyama, T. Takagi, and T. Yoshikawa, “Therapeutic potential of carbon monoxide (CO) for intestinal inflammation,” Current Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 70–76, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. Q. H. Yang, Y. J. Xu, Y. Z. Liu et al., “Effects of Chaihu-Shugan-San and Shen-Ling-Bai-Zhu-San on p38 MAPK pathway in Kupffer cells of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis,” Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2014, Article ID 671013, 8 pages, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. R. A. Bozym, K. Patel, C. White et al., “Calcium signals and calpain-dependent necrosis are essential for release of coxsackievirus B from polarized intestinal epithelial cells,” Molecular Biology of the Cell, vol. 22, no. 17, pp. 3010–3021, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. S. Mukherjee, D. Sinha, A. K. Ghosh, and T. Biswas, “Bacterial ligand stimulates TLR2-dependent chemokines of colon cell,” Immunobiology, vol. 219, no. 5, pp. 350–356, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. T. Wang, X. Song, Z. Zhang et al., “Stevioside inhibits inflammation and apoptosis by regulating TLR2 and TLR2-related proteins in S. aureus-infected mouse mammary epithelial cells,” International Immunopharmacology, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 192–199, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. W. H. Hsu, Y. S. Hsieh, H. C. Kuo et al., “Berberine induces apoptosis in SW620 human colonic carcinoma cells through generation of reactive oxygen species and activation of JNK/p38 MAPK and FasL,” Archives of Toxicology, vol. 81, no. 10, pp. 719–728, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. X. B. Ling, H. W. Wei, J. Wang et al., “Mammalian metallothionein-2A and oxidative stress,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 17, no. 9, p. 1483, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. N. Shi, F. Chen, X. L. Zhang et al., “Suppression of oxidative stress and NFκB/MAPK signaling by lyophilized black raspberries for esophageal cancer prevention in rats,” Nutrients, vol. 9, no. 4, p. 413, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. H. L. Song, X. Zhang, W. Z. Wang et al., “Neuroprotective mechanisms of rutin for spinal cord injury through anti-oxidation and anti-inflammation and inhibition of p38 mitogen activated protein kinase pathway,” Neural Regeneration Research, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 128–134, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. M. S. Hayden and S. Ghosh, “NF-κB, the first quarter-century: remarkable progress and outstanding questions,” Genes & Development, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 203–234, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. Y. Fujishima, S. Nishiumi, A. Masuda et al., “Autophagy in the intestinal epithelium reduces endotoxin-induced inflammatory responses by inhibiting NF-κB activation,” Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, vol. 506, no. 2, pp. 223–235, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. L. Burkly, C. Hession, L. Ogata et al., “Expression of relB is required for the development of thymic medulla and dendritic cells,” Nature, vol. 373, no. 6514, pp. 531–536, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. M. Irla, S. Hugues, J. Gill et al., “Autoantigen-specific interactions with CD4(+) thymocytes control mature medullary thymic epithelial cell cellularity,” Immunity, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 451–463, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. Y. Hikosaka, T. Nitta, I. Ohigashi et al., “The cytokine RANKL produced by positively selected thymocytes fosters medullary thymic epithelial cells that express autoimmune regulator,” Immunity, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 438–450, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. T. Akiyama, Y. Shimo, H. Yanai et al., “The tumor necrosis factor family receptors RANK and CD40 cooperatively establish the thymic medullary microenvironment and self-tolerance,” Immunity, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 423–437, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. N. Dubi, L. Gheber, D. Fishman, I. Sekler, and M. Hershfinkel, “Extracellular zinc and zinc-citrate, acting through a putative zinc-sensing receptor, regulate growth and survival of prostate cancer cells,” Carcinogenesis, vol. 29, no. 9, pp. 1692–1700, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. H. Azriel-Tamir, H. Sharir, B. Schwartz, and M. Hershfinkel, “Extracellular zinc triggers ERK-dependent activation of Na+/H+ exchange in colonocytes mediated by the zinc-sensing receptor,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 279, no. 50, pp. 51804–51816, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. L. Sunuwar, M. Medini, L. Cohen, I. Sekler, and M. Hershfinkel, “The zinc sensing receptor, ZnR/GPR39, triggers metabotropic calcium signalling in colonocytes and regulates occludin recovery in experimental colitis,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, vol. 371, no. 1703, article 20160331, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. G. Samak, K. K. Chaudhry, R. Gangwar, D. Narayanan, J. H. Jaggar, and R. K. Rao, “Calcium/Ask1/MKK7/JNK2/c-Src signalling cascade mediates disruption of intestinal epithelial tight junctions by dextran sulfate sodium,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 465, no. 3, pp. 503–515, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. L. Gardner, A. M. Patterson, B. A. Ashton, M. A. Stone, and J. Middleton, “The human Duffy antigen binds selected inflammatory but not homeostatic chemokines,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 321, no. 2, pp. 306–312, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. N. W. Lukacs, “Role of chemokines in the pathogenesis of asthma,” Nature Reviews. Immunology, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 108–116, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. A. Zlotnik and O. Yoshie, “The chemokine superfamily revisited,” Immunity, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 705–716, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. C. Esche, C. Stellato, and L. A. Beck, “Chemokines: key players in innate and adaptive immunity,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 125, no. 4, pp. 615–628, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. M. Grizotte-Lake and S. Vaishnava, “Autophagy: suicide prevention hotline for the gut epithelium,” Cell Host & Microbe, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 147-148, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. Q. Hou, L. Ye, H. Liu et al., “Lactobacillus accelerates ISCs regeneration to protect the integrity of intestinal mucosa through activation of STAT3 signaling pathway induced by LPLs secretion of IL-22,” Cell Death and Differentiation, vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 1657–1670, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. R. Dey, A. B. Joshi, F. Oliveira et al., “Gut microbes egested during bites of infected sand flies augment severity of leishmaniasis via inflammasome-derived IL-1β,” Cell Host & Microbe, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 134–143.e6, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. V. Neudecker, M. Haneklaus, O. Jensen et al., “Myeloid-derived miR-223 regulates intestinal inflammation via repression of the NLRP3 inflammasome,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 214, no. 6, pp. 1737–1752, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. C. Burrello, F. Garavaglia, F. M. Cribiù et al., “Therapeutic faecal microbiota transplantation controls intestinal inflammation through IL10 secretion by immune cells,” Nature Communications, vol. 9, no. 1, article 5184, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. W. K. E. Ip, N. Hoshi, D. S. Shouval, S. Snapper, and R. Medzhitov, “Anti-inflammatory effect of IL-10 mediated by metabolic reprogramming of macrophages,” Science, vol. 356, no. 6337, pp. 513–519, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. A. M. Kabat and E. J. Pearce, “Inflammation by way of macrophage metabolism,” Science, vol. 356, no. 6337, pp. 488-489, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  78. Q. Yu, S. Zhang, L. Li et al., “P716. Enterohepatic helicobacter species as a potentially causative factor of inflammatory bowel disease: a meta-analysis,” Journal of Crohn's and Colitis, vol. 9, Supplement 1, pp. S439–S440, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  79. S. K. Park, M. S. Kim, and J. W. Bae, “Blautia faecis sp. nov., isolated from human faeces,” International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, vol. 63, pp. 599–603, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  80. S. K. Park, M. S. Kim, S. W. Roh, and J. W. Bae, “Blautia stercoris sp. nov., isolated from human faeces,” International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, vol. 62, Part 4, pp. 776–779, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  81. X. Zhang, Y. Zhao, J. Xu et al., “Modulation of gut microbiota by berberine and metformin during the treatment of high-fat diet-induced obesity in rats,” Scientific Reports, vol. 5, no. 1, article 14405, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  82. M. Candela, E. Biagi, M. Soverini et al., “Modulation of gut microbiota dysbioses in type 2 diabetic patients by macrobiotic Ma-Pi 2 diet,” The British Journal of Nutrition, vol. 116, no. 1, pp. 80–93, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  83. E. H. Crost, L. E. Tailford, G. Le Gall, M. Fons, B. Henrissat, and N. Juge, “Utilisation of mucin glycans by the human gut symbiont Ruminococcus gnavus is strain-dependent,” PLoS One, vol. 8, no. 10, article e76341, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  84. B. R. Stevens, R. Goel, K. Seungbum et al., “Increased human intestinal barrier permeability plasma biomarkers zonulin and FABP2 correlated with plasma LPS and altered gut microbiome in anxiety or depression,” Gut, vol. 67, no. 8, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  85. X. Xu, W. X. Zhang, C. Huang et al., “A novel chemometric method for the prediction of human oral bioavailability,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 6964–6982, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  86. C. L. Zheng, Z. H. Guo, C. Huang et al., “Large-scale direct targeting for drug repositioning and discovery,” Scientific Reports, vol. 5, no. 1, article 11970, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  87. M. E. Smoot, K. Ono, J. Ruscheinski, P. L. Wang, and T. Ideker, “Cytoscape 2.8: new features for data integration and network visualization,” Bioinformatics, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 431-432, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2019 Wei-jie Lv et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

966 Views | 255 Downloads | 1 Citation
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder