<i>Acrocomia aculeata</i> (Jacq.) Lodd. ex Mart. Leaves Increase SIRT1 Levels and Improve Stress Resistance

Monteiro-Alfredo, Tamaeh; Matafome, Paulo; Iacia, Bianca Pancoti; Antunes, Kátia Ávila; dos Santos, Jéssica Maurino; da Silva Melo da Cunha, Janielle; Oliveira, Sara; Oliveira, Alex Santos; Campos, Jaqueline Ferreira; Magalhães, Mariana; Cabral, Célia; Seiça, Raquel; Cardoso, Cláudia Andrea Lima; de Oliveira, Caio Fernando Ramalho; dos Santos, Edson Lucas; de Picoli Souza, Kely

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5238650

Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity

On this page

Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion Data Availability Additional Points Conflicts of Interest Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2020 | Article ID 5238650 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5238650

Acrocomia aculeata (Jacq.) Lodd. ex Mart. Leaves Increase SIRT1 Levels and Improve Stress Resistance

Tamaeh Monteiro-Alfredo,^1,2,3Paulo Matafome,^2,3,4Bianca Pancoti Iacia,¹Kátia Ávila Antunes,¹Jéssica Maurino dos Santos,¹Janielle da Silva Melo da Cunha,¹Sara Oliveira,^2,3Alex Santos Oliveira,¹Jaqueline Ferreira Campos,¹Mariana Magalhães,³Célia Cabral,^3,5and Raquel Seiça^2,3 et al.

Academic Editor: Janusz Gebicki

Received18 Oct 2019

Accepted20 Jan 2020

Published10 Mar 2020

Abstract

Oxidative stress is a metabolic disorder linked with several chronic diseases, and this condition can be improved by natural antioxidants. The fruit pulp of the palm Acrocomia aculeata (Jacq.) Lodd. ex Mart. is widely used in the treatment of various illnesses, but as far as we know, there are no reports regarding the properties of its leaves. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the antioxidant activity of A. aculeata leaf extracts obtained with water (EA-Aa), ethanol (EE-Aa), and methanol (EM-Aa) solvents. The extracts were chemically characterized, and their antioxidant activity was assessed through the scavenging of the free radicals DPPH and ABTS. EE-Aa and EM-Aa showed the highest amounts of phenolic compounds and free radical scavenging activity. However, EA-Aa was more efficient to protect human erythrocytes against AAPH-induced hemolysis and lipid peroxidation. Thus, we further show the antioxidant effect of EA-Aa in preventing AAPH-induced protein oxidation, H₂O₂-induced DNA fragmentation, and ROS generation in Cos-7 cells. Increased levels of Sirt1, catalase, and activation of ERK and Nrf2 were observed in Cos-7 treated with EA-Aa. We also verify increased survival in nematodes C. elegans, when induced to the oxidative condition by Juglone. Therefore, our results showed a typical chemical composition of plants for all extracts, but the diversity of compounds presented in EA-Aa is involved in the lower toxicity and antioxidant properties provided to the macromolecules tested, proteins, DNA, and lipids. This protective effect also proven in Cos-7 and in C. elegans was probably due to the activation of the Sirt1/Nrf2 pathway. Altogether, the low toxicity and the antioxidant properties of EA-Aa showed in all the experimental models support its further use in the treatment of oxidative stress-related diseases.

1. Introduction

Rising of life expectancy and lifestyle changes are strictly related to overwhelming incidence of chronic diseases worldwide [1]. The negative economic impacts on health systems resulted from the treatment of these diseases, stimulating the development of new, cheaper, and more effective therapeutic alternatives [2]. A key factor involved in the development and progression of many chronic diseases is the oxidative stress [3], which is caused by endogenous (deregulation in the body’s redox balance) [4] and exogenous (environmental agents) factors [5]. At low concentrations, reactive species (RS) are physiologically important and participate in cellular signaling of biochemical and immunological processes [6]. A prooxidant condition of the body’s redox balance is characterized by the increased RS production, especially reactive species of oxygen (ROS) and nitrogen (RNS). Under these circumstances, the antioxidant defenses are inefficient, failing to effectively neutralize the RS [7]. In excess, RS react with biomolecules such as carbohydrates, lipids, proteins, and nucleic acids, resulting in cellular dysfunction [8] and the development of chronic diseases such as diabetes [9] and cancer [10].

From the pharmacological point of view, medicinal plants are a relevant source of compounds to treat illnesses [11], in particular those related to oxidative stress. The pharmacological activities observed in several plants are due to the constitution of their secondary metabolites, such as flavonoids, tannins, and mainly phenolic compounds [12]. These antioxidant compounds could act alone or in synergism [13], and the positive relationship between the consumption of vegetables rich in antioxidant compounds and the prevention of diseases related to oxidative stress imbalance stimulates the search for plants that prompt both health maintenance and medicinal purposes [14–16].

Brazil owns an important part of the world’s biodiversity [17] and exclusive biomes such as Cerrado [18], serving as an important source of raw material for the production of food and herbal medicines [19, 20]. Among the native plants from Cerrado, Acrocomia aculeata (Jacq.) Lodd ex Mart., commonly known as macaúba or bocaiúva [21], is a palm with economic importance due to the large variety of products derived from its fruits and kernel, which are rich in proteins, vitamins, and oils [22]. In addition to its uses in cooking [22], cosmetic industry [21], and biodiesel production [23], it also has been used for ethnopharmacological purposes. In traditional medicine, A. aculeata has been used for the treatment of respiratory diseases, such as laxative and analgesic [24], and in the decrease of serum glucose and cholesterol levels [25]. Several chemical compounds with high antioxidant potential have already been described in A. aculeata. The fruit pulp is known to contain oleic acid [26], β-carotene [27], and α-tocoferol, whereas the kernel has lauric and oleic acids [28]. Although fruits are more widely used and studied, the leaves are used in animal nutrition [29] and no toxicity has been reported [30]. Given the scarcity of information regarding chemical composition, antioxidant properties, and pharmacological potential, we aimed to determine the chemical composition, toxicity, and antioxidant properties of A. aculeata leaves with the goal to obtain accurate information about this plant part underutilized.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Chemicals and Antibodies

Organic solvents and salts used in all experiments were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich/Merck, Biowest, and Fischer Scientific. Antibodies used were targeted to Sirt1, ERK, phospho-ERK-Thr202/Tyr204 (Cell Signalling), Nrf2 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and phospho-Nrf2-Ser40 (Invitrogen). Calnexin was used as the loading control (Sicgen, Portugal).

2.2. Plant Material

A. aculeata fresh leaves were collected in the morning, between July and August of 2014, in the region of Grande Dourados, Macaúba district, state of Mato Grosso do Sul (MS) (22°0702.4 S 54°2836.3 W), under the permission of the Brazilian Biodiversity Authorization and Information System (Sistema de Autorização e Informação sobre Biodiversidade, SISBIO; no. 50589). The species was identified by a plant taxonomist, and a voucher specimen was deposited in the herbarium (DDMS-UFGD) of the Federal University of Grande Dourados, Dourados (MS), Brazil, under the registration number 5103.

Leaves were washed, cut into 5 cm strips, and dried in an air circulation oven at until the mass of the samples was stabilized. The dried leaves were ground in a Willey-knife mill and sieved in a 10 mm mesh, and the resulting powder was stored at -20°C.

2.3. Isolation of Extracts

The aqueous extract of A. aculeata (EA-Aa) was obtained by infusion; the powder was mixed with boiled water (100 g/L) under manual shaking until its complete cooling. After, the extract was filtered, freeze-dried, and stored at -20°C. The ethanolic (EE-Aa) and methanolic (EM-Aa) extracts were prepared adding the leaf powder in ethanol and methanol, respectively, at the same proportion of EA-Aa. The extraction occurred by maceration during 7 days, followed by the process of concentration in a rotary evaporator and freeze-dried.

2.4. Chemical Composition

2.4.1. Total Phenolic Compounds, Flavonoids, and Condensed Tannins

Total phenolic compound of the extracts was determined by spectrophotometry (T70 UV/VIS Spectrometer, PG Instruments Ltd), using Folin-Ciocalteu reagent, and the results were expressed in milligram equivalents of gallic acid per gram of extract (mg EAG^-1) [31]. Total flavonoid content was determined using a 2% aluminium chloride solution in methanol as the reagent, resulting in an average value expressed in milligram equivalents of quercetin per gram of extract (mg·EQ^-1) [32]. The amount of condensed tannins was also determined by a spectrophotometric method, using a solution of vanillin in 8% acidified methanol [33]. The results were expressed in milligram equivalents of catechin per gram of extract (mg·EC^-1). All experiments were carried out in three independent experiments in triplicate.

2.4.2. Chromatographic Analysis by LC-6AD

The EA-Aa, EE-Aa, and EM-Aa were solubilized in water : methanol (8 : 2, ) and evaluated in a LC analytical column (LC-6AD Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) with the aid of a photodiode array detector (PDA) system which was monitored between wavelengths -800 nm, in an LC analytical apparatus, where the column was ODS HYPERSIL (C-18, , Thermo Electron Corporation). The flow quotient and the injection volume were, respectively, 1 mL·min^-1 and 10 μL. All the chromatographic analysis took place at a temperature of 25°C. Eluent A was composed of a binary mobile phase of water with 6% acetic acid and 2 mM of sodium acetate, and eluent B was composed of acetonitrile and the following gradient was applied: 0 min 5% B; 20 min 15% B; 30 min 60% B; and 40 min 100% B. Samples of vanillic acid, caffeic acid, ferulic acid, rosmarinic acid, p-coumaric acid, rutin, quercetin, luteolin, apigenin, and vanillin were used, prepared in methanol-water at a concentration of 1,000 μg·mL^-1 in 1 : 1 (water : methanol, ). The identification of the compounds with the aid of PDA detector scanning in the spectral range of 200-800 nm did not reveal interferences in retention time of the samples in LC by the developed elution method. Standards were identified and quantified based on their absorption spectra in the UV region and in retention time. Standards found in extracts were unambiguously identified by performing coinjection experiments in which aliquots of the extracts, and standards were mixed and diluted to a known volume and analyzed through LC. The calibration curves were determined by linear regression using LC. The linearity for standards was assessed for 10 concentration ranges. The average standard errors for the peak areas of replicated injections () were less than 2%, thus showing good repeatability of the calibration curve. The respective coefficients of determination () were 0.9994 for caffeic acid, vanillic acid, ferulic acid, and gallic acid, and is 0.9996 for rutin and quercetin.

2.4.3. Chromatographic Analysis by GC-MS

To prepare samples for CG-MS analysis, 2 mL of water and 2 mL of hexane were added separately to 100 mg of each A. aculeata extract (EA-Aa, EE-Aa, and EM-Aa); after phase formation, the hexane fraction was separated from the aqueous fraction. To the aqueous fraction, 2 mL of hexane was added and the process was repeated. After the two extractions, the hexane fractions were dried and suspended in 1,000 mL hexane. For GC-MS analysis, the solution was first filtered through a 0.45 μm ultrafilter.

To identify the compounds present in EA-Aa, EE-Aa, and EM-Aa, the samples were also evaluated by mass spectrometry (GC-MS). The GC-MS analysis was performed using a GC-2010 Plus, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan, equipped with a mass spectrometry detector (GC-MS Ultra 2010), using LM-5 (5% phenyl dimethylpolysiloxane), capillary column of fused silica ( and 0.2 μm thick film). The analysis took place under the following conditions: helium entrainment gas (99.999% and flow rate 1 mL·min^-1), 1 μL of injection volume, division ratio (1 : 20), furnace initial temperature adjusted to 150°C, and heating at 150°C to 280°C at 15°C·min ^-1 and a hold at 280°C for 15 min. The injector temperature was 280°C, and the quadrupole detector temperature was 280°C. The MS scanning parameters included an electron impact ionization voltage. The identifications were performed by comparing the mass spectra obtained in the NIST21 and WILEY229 libraries. In some cases, when the identified spectra were not found, only the structural type of the corresponding component was proposed based on its mass spectral fragmentation. When possible, reference compounds were cochromatographed to confirm GC-retention times. Standards of the stigmasterol, campesterol, β-sitosterol, lupeol, and lupeol acetate were prepared in hexane in the concentration of 1,000 μg·mL^-1. The concentrations of compounds were determined by extern calibration. The linearity for standards was assessed for 5 concentration ranges. The average standard errors for the peak areas of replicated injections () were less than 2%, thus showing good repeatability of the calibration curve. The respective coefficients of determination () were 0.9996 for stigmasterol, campesterol, β-sitosterol, and lupeol, and is 0.9994 for lupeol acetate.

2.5. Free Radical Scavenging Potential

2.5.1. 2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH)

The antioxidant activity of the EA-Aa, EE-Aa, and EM-Aa was evaluated through the capture of the free radical 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH). DPPH control solutions (0.11 mM) were incubated with positive control, ascorbic acid (AA), and extracts, prepared in different concentrations (0.1–2,000 μg·mL^-1) during 30 min, at room temperature, protected from light. After this period, spectrophotometer readings were performed at 517 nm. To calculate the percentage of inhibition of the free radical, the absorbance values of the samples and controls according to equation (1) were used [34]. Three independent experiments were performed in triplicate.

2.5.2. 2,2-Azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic Acid) (ABTS)

The scavenging capacity of the extracts was also determined with the free radical 2,2-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid) (ABTS). The stock solution of ABTS was previously prepared (12 to 16 h) from an oxidation reaction between potassium persulfate (2.45 mM) and ABTS (7 mM). The analysis was performed at the same concentrations as the DPPH assay; the spectrophotometer readings occurred at 734 nm after 6 min of reaction among the solution of ABTS and the extracts. The results were expressed as % of free radical scavenging, according to equation (2). Three independent experiments were performed [35].

2.6. Oxidative Hemolysis Assay

2.6.1. Toxicity in Erythrocytes

In order to evaluate the hemolytic effect of the extracts, peripheral whole blood of a single adult healthy donor was collected and stored in tubes containing anticoagulant sodium citrate. Experiments were performed under the approval of the Research Ethics Committee CEP/UFGD no. 5160. Then, a solution of 10% of erythrocytes in physiological solution (NaCl 0.9%) was prepared. Afterwards, erythrocytes were incubated with the positive control, ascorbic acid (AA), and the extracts EA-Aa, EE-Aa and EM-Aa in different concentrations (25–1,000 μg·mL^-1) at 37°C during 4 h, under constant shaking. In sequence, samples were centrifuged and the supernatant was read at 540 nm. Results were expressed as the percentage of hemolysis. Three independent experiments were performed in duplicate [36].

2.6.2. Oxidative Hemolysis Assay Induced by 2,2-Azobis(2-amidinopropane) Dihydrochloride (AAPH)

Following the evaluation of extract toxicity in erythrocytes, the protective effect against oxidative hemolysis was investigated. Hence, the same conditions and concentrations of the prior assay were repeated and 50 mM of 2,2-azobis(2-amidinopropane) dihydrochloride (AAPH) was used to induce lipid peroxidation of erythrocytes membrane. Hemolysis was determined as the previous assay [36].

2.6.3. Quantification of Malondialdehyde (MDA) Generation

After the incubation of the erythrocytes with AAPH, as described above, an aliquot of the supernatant was added to 20 nM of thiobarbituric acid (TBA) and incubated at 96°C during 45 min. After, the tubes were placed in an ice bath during 15 min to stop the reaction and 4 mL of butanol was added to the tubes, with subsequent vortex and centrifugation at 3,000 rpm during 5 min. The absorbance of the supernatant was performed in a spectrophotometer at 532 nm. The generation of the lipid peroxidation product, MDA, was expressed by the following [36]:

2.7. Protein Oxidation

The protective effect of extracts on protein oxidation was investigated using bovine serum albumin (BSA) as the standard. An amount of 3 μg of BSA was preincubated with 3 μL of EA-Aa in different concentrations (25–1,000 μg·mL^-1) during 30 min. Afterwards, 3 μL of 120 mM AAPH was added to each tube and further incubated at 37°C during 1 h. At the end of incubation, the samples were mixed with sample buffer, heated at 95°C during 3 min and applied onto 12% SDS-PAGE. The gels were solved in Mini-PROTEAN Tetra Cell (Bio-Rad Laboratories, CA, USA) at 200 V during 60 min and digitalized in Gel Doc EZ Imager (Bio-Rad Laboratories). The band volume was determined with the Image Lab software. The increase in band volume was considered a protein oxidative damage [37]. Afterwards, the difference between the BSA standard band volume and the remaining bands was obtained and graphed, displaying the protection against the protein oxidative damage according with different concentrations of EA-Aa.

2.8. DNA Fragmentation

The DNA damage was performed through the induction with H₂O₂. For this, plasmid DNA (50 ng·μL^-1) in a PBS solution was incubated with EA-Aa (25–1,000 μg·mL^-1) or standard controls, rutin (R), quercetin (Q), gallic acid (A), or catechin (C) (125 μg·mL^-1), and H₂O₂ 30%. Samples were incubated in a transilluminator UVT-312 at 302 nm, at room temperature during 5 min, followed by loading and electrophoresis in agarose gel 2% with ethidium bromide (10 mg·mL^-1). Gel was scanned by a Gel Doc™ EZ System photodocumenter, and the analysis was performed with Image Lab™ software. Experiments were realized in triplicate [38].

2.9. In Vitro Antioxidant Activity in Cos-7

2.9.1. Cell Culture

Fibroblast cell line derived from a green monkey (Cercopithecus aethiops) kidney (Cos-7) was cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium-high glucose (DMEM-HG), supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin, at 37°C and 5% CO₂. For the experiments, cells were used with an 80% of confluence [39].

2.9.2. Assessment of Cell Viability

To evaluate cell viability, Cos-7 cells were seeded in 48-well plates. After 24 h, cells were incubated with different concentrations (25–1,000 μg·mL^-1) of EA-Aa during 24 h, and cell viability was determined through the Alamar blue assay. Briefly, the medium was replaced by a solution of DMEM-HG with 10% of resazurin (0.1 mg·mL^-1). After 4 h of incubation, the absorbance was measured at 570 nm and 600 nm in a BioTek microplate reader (BioTek Instruments, Inc., Winooski, VT, USA). The data obtained by the Gen5 program were used to calculate Cos-7 viability, according to the following equation [40]:

2.9.3. Antioxidant Activity

To determine the antioxidant activity of the EA-Aa in Cos-7 cells, 8.10⁴ cells were seeded in 96-well plates. After 24 h, cells were incubated with EA-Aa in the same concentrations as the previous assay during 30 min. After this period, the previously determined IC₅₀ of the oxidative stress inductor H₂O₂ (0.5 μM) was added (data not shown). Following an incubation of 2 h, cell viability was determined according to equation (4).

2.9.4. Fluorescence Immunocytochemistry

In order to assess the role of the EA-Aa in the reduction of ROS formation, Cos-7 cells were seeded in MilliCells® EZ Slide 8-well glass (Millipore, MA). After 24 h, cells were treated with EA-Aa and H₂O₂ in the same conditions used in the previous antioxidant assay. The evaluation of intracellular ROS was realized with 2,7-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (H₂DCFDA) and with dihydroethidium (DHE) probes, following the manufacturer’s instructions (). DAPI was used to stain cell nucleus. Images were obtained with a fluorescence microscope (Zeiss Axio Observer Z1) with an incorporated camera (Zeiss, Germany), detected with 504 nm of excitation and 525 nm of emission for DCF, 587 nm of excitation and 610 nm of emission for DHE, and 353 nm of excitation and 465 nm of emission for DAPI. The settings were kept constant for all analysis. The entire image was used for quantification, and the analysis was performed with ImageJ software.

2.10. Western Blot

For Western blot analysis, Cos-7 cells were seeded in 6-well plates during 24 h and then treated with EA-Aa (500–1,000 μg·mL^-1) for 24 h. After, cells were washed with ice-cold PBS, disrupted in lysis buffer (0.25 M Tris-HCl, 125 mM NaCl, 1% Triton-X-100, 0.5% SDS, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 20 mM NaF, 2 mM Na₃VO₄, 10 mM β-glycerophosphate, 2.5 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 10 mM PMSF, and 40 μL of protease inhibitor), subjected to three freeze/thaw cycles in liquid nitrogen, and centrifuged (14,000 rpm, 20 min, 4°C). Protein concentration of the supernatant was measured through the BCA Protein Assay Kit [41], and the samples were mixed with Laemmli buffer (62.5 mM Tris-HCl, 10% glycerol, 2% SDS, 5% β-mercaptoethanol, 0.01% bromophenol blue). An amount of 15 μg of total protein was loaded onto 8% SDS-PAGE, solved and electroblotted onto PVDF membrane. A rainbow marker was used as a standard weight protein marker. Membranes were blocked with TBS-T 0.01% and 5% BSA and incubated with primary antibody (against Sirt1, ERK, phospho-ERK [Thr202/Tyr204], Nrf2, phospho-Nrf2 [Ser40], and catalase) overnight and with secondary antibodies (anti-rabbit, anti-mouse, and anti-goat) for 2 h at room temperature. Calnexin was used as the loading control. Immunoblots were detected with an ECL substrate and the Versadoc system (Bio-Rad Laboratories, USA).

2.11. In Vivo Antioxidant Activity in Caenorhabditis elegans

The wild-type N2 strain of the nematode C. elegans, donated by the Laboratory of Integrative Physiology of the Federal University of São Paulo, was used to access the role of EA-Aa in preventing oxidative damage in vivo. Nematodes were cultivated under standard conditions of 15°C and 20°C, in Petri dishes containing Nematode Growth Medium (NGM) agar with a coverage of E. coli strain OP50 [42]. To perform the antioxidant experiments, the nematode culture was synchronized through pregnant hermaphrodites and eggs already in plate with 2% sodium hypochlorite and 5 M sodium hydroxide [43].

2.11.1. Evaluation of Nematode Survival

The acute toxicity of the EA-Aa (100–2,500 μg·mL^-1) was carried out in L4 synchronized worms ( per group), transferred to previously filled 96-well plates with the respective doses of the extracts and M9 buffer. The survival rate was defined after 24 h of incubation at 20°C, with repeatedly physical stimuli with a platinum microspatula, under a stereomicroscope (Motic SMZ-140 and W10X/23; British Columbia, Canada). Three independent experiments were performed in duplicate [44].

2.11.2. Oxidative Stress Assay Induced with 5-Hydroxy-1,4-naphthoquinone (Juglone)

The evaluation of the protective effect of EA-Aa against oxidative stress in vivo was performed in C. elegans treated with the EA-Aa and exposed to the inducer of intracellular ROS, Juglone. For this, the animals were synchronized (as described in the previous test) and developed in the presence/absence of EA-Aa (500–1,000 μg·mL^-1). At the L4 stage, animals were transferred to 96-well plates containing M9 buffer and the extract or not. The animals were induced to oxidative stress with the addition of Juglone in an acute and lethal dose, defined in a dose-response curve (data not shown) of 250 μM at 20°C, and the survival of each group was analyzed hourly [44].

2.12. Statistical Analysis

The results were expressed as the error of the mean (SEM). We used the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test to determine normality. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) or the Kruskal-Wallis test was used to access differences between groups, and was considered significant.

3. Results

3.1. Chemical Composition

The phytochemical screening of the extracts showed that the alcoholic extractions were responsible for a larger amount of phenolic compounds, flavonoids, and tannins in relation to aqueous extraction. The content of phenolic compounds in EA-Aa, EE-Aa, and EM-Aa was , , and mg GAE·g^-1, respectively, the flavonoid content was , , and mg EG·G^-1, respectively, and the tannin content was , , and mg EC·g^-1, respectively. The chromatographic analysis performed with the extracts by LC-PDA has shown the same peaks (1–6) in all extracts, although peak 2 was only observable in the EA-Aa (Figures 1(a)–1(c)). According to the standards used, reported peaks are gallic acid, vanillic acid, caffeic acid, ferulic acid, rutin, and quercetin. With the exception of vanillic acid, identified only in EA-Aa, a similar content of compounds was shared among the extracts (Table 1). The GC-MS analysis was also performed in the EA-Aa, EE-Aa, and EM-Aa, and the following compounds were identified in EE-Aa and EM-Aa: campesterol, stigmasterol, β-sitosterol, lupeol, and lupeol acetate, as shown in Table 2. In the EA-Aa, no compounds were identified.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

3.2. Antioxidant Activity and Improvement of Oxidative Condition

3.2.1. DPPH and ABTS Free Radical Scavenging

The free radical scavenging potential was assessed using two different free radicals, DPPH and ABTS. The AA was used as a natural and hydrophilic antioxidant positive control. As shown in Table 3, the IC₅₀ and maximum activity concentration were lower in EE-Aa and EM-Aa, when compared to EA-Aa, but higher than the AA in both tests, suggesting higher direct free radical scavenging activity of EE-Aa and EM-Aa than EA-Aa.

3.2.2. EA-Aa Reduces Oxidative Stress in Different Biomolecule Sources

In order to evaluate the role of the A. aculeata extracts in a lipid source, human erythrocytes were incubated with growing concentrations of the extracts and the positive control AA. The hemolytic effect of EA-Aa, EE-Aa, and EM-Aa was evaluated, showing hemolysis in the higher concentrations of EE-Aa and EM-Aa, as well as observed for AA (Figure 2(a)). Then, the protective effect of the extracts against AAPH-induced hemolysis was investigated. Figure 2(b) shows that after 240 min of incubation, the EA-Aa promoted relevant protection with the improvement of AAPH-induced hemolysis. A reduction of 63.84% and 86.60% in relation to the group treated with AAPH was observed in the concentrations of 500 and 1,000 μg·mL^-1 (Figure 2(b)). Both EE-Aa and EM-Aa did not promote significant protection. In order to evaluate lipid peroxidation, the generation of MDA was determined after the induction with AAPH. In accordance with the hemolysis assay, lower MDA levels were observed in the group treated with EA-Aa (Figure 2(c)). The higher concentrations of EA-Aa (500 and 1,000 μg·mL^-1) reduced MDA levels in 83.44% and 90.87%, respectively, similarly to the 250 and 500 μg·mL^-1 of AA, which resulted in a reduction of 84.99% and 78.77% in relation to AAPH. No significant reduction of MDA formation was observed for the EM-Aa, but EE-Aa reduced 55.10% and 61.68% at 100 and 250 μg·mL^-1, respectively (Figure 2(c)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

Figure 2

Protective effect of A. aculeata extracts in human erythrocytes. (a) Hemolytic effect in human erythrocytes incubated with Aa extracts after 240 min of incubation; no hemolytic effect was observed in EA-Aa, while higher concentrations (500 –1,000 μg·mL^-1) of the other Aa extracts and the positive control AA showed hemolysis at the higher concentrations. (b) Antihemolytic effect of erythrocytes incubated with Aa extracts and AAPH (50 mM) after 240 min shows a protective effect of EA-Aa (500–1,000 μg·mL^-1) against AAPH-induced hemolysis. (c) MDA produced from AAPH-induced lipid peroxidation shows higher protection against lipid peroxidation in the highest concentrations (500–1,000 μg·mL^-1) of EA-Aa. vs. Ctrl in (a); ^#vs. Ctrl and vs. AAPH in (b) and (c); ; ; .

Since EA-Aa promoted the highest protection against oxidative hemolysis and MDA formation, this extract was selected to further antioxidant activity assays. Therefore, the role of EA-Aa in protein protection against oxidative damage induced from AAPH and DNA protection against UV-induced damage were assessed. Figure 3(a) shows the antioxidant effect of EA-Aa against AAPH-induced protein oxidation, demonstrating a clear concentration-dependent protection, with a decrease of fuzzy bands with higher EA-Aa concentrations. Similar results were observed in the DNA fragmentation assay, shown in Figure 3(b). A complete loss of DNA integrity was observed following exposure to UV and H₂O₂. Increasing concentrations of EA-Aa promoted a complete protection of plasmidial DNA, similar to the standard controls quercetin, rutin, gallic acid, and catechin (Figure 3(b)).

(a)

(b)

3.3. EA-Aa Reduces In Vitro and In Vivo Oxidative Stress and Improves Both Cell Viability and Nematode Survival

The antioxidant and cytoprotective effects of EA-Aa were further confirmed in higher complexity models, namely, in vitro in the cell line Cos-7 and in vivo in the nematode C. elegans. The IC₅₀ of the inducers, H₂O₂ (Cos-7) and Juglone (C. elegans), were determined (data not shown). The EA-Aa-induced cytotoxicity was determined after incubation with growing concentrations during 24 h. A slight reduction of Cos-7 viability was observed with increasing concentrations of EA-Aa (Figure 4(a)). Up to 1,000 μg·mL^-1, no effects on C. elegans survival were noticed. To affect C. elegans survival was necessary to increase the EA-Aa concentration in 50, 100, and 150% (Figure 5(a)). In order to determine the protective role of EA-Aa in vitro, Cos-7 cells were incubated with 0.5 μM H₂O₂ (IC₅₀). At higher concentrations, EA-Aa was able to rescue Cos-7 cells treated with H₂O₂, displaying an increase of 26.06% (750 μg·mL^-1) and 33.08% (1,000 μg·mL^-1) in cell viability in relation to H₂O₂-treated cells (Figure 4(a)). C. elegans survival was performed after the induction of oxidative stress with 250 μM Juglone (IC₅₀). EA-Aa led to an increase of 17.58% and 12.12% of nematode survival in the concentrations of 750 μg·mL^-1 and 1,000 μg·mL^-1 after 2 h of incubation. Following 4 h of Juglone exposure, EA-Aa increased the worm survival in 15.32% (750 μg·mL^-1) and 14.65% (1,000 μg·mL^-1).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

Figure 4

Inhibition of ROS generation by EA-Aa in Cos-7 cells. (a) Viability of Cos-7 cells treated with EA-Aa (500-1,000 μg·mL^-1) incubated with or without H₂O₂ (0.5 μM), shows low cytotoxicity of EA-Aa and protection (750–1,000 μg·mL^-1) against H₂O₂-induced oxidative damage from the decrease of H₂O₂-induced ROS (stained with DCF) (b) and O₂^⋅- generation (stained with DHE) (c) with EA-Aa (500–1,000 μg·mL^-1). Representative images of DCF and DHE are shown in (d) and (e), respectively. vs. control; vs. H₂O₂; ^#; ^##; .

(a)

(b)

In order to evaluate the protection against oxidative stress generation in Cos-7 cells, probes to total ROS (DCF) and to superoxide anion (DHE) were used. Increased staining to DCF (Figures 4(b)and 4(d)) and DHE (Figures 4(c) and 4(e)) was observed following the incubation of the cells with 0.5 μM H₂O₂ in relation to control cells.

The incubation of EA-Aa at the concentrations that protected cells against oxidative damage induced by H₂O₂, (750 and 1,000 μg·mL^-1) reduced the fluorescence signal from both probes at levels observed in control cells, showing that EA-Ae was able to neutralize the formation of ROS and superoxide anion, corroborating the previous assay of cellular viability where these concentrations increased cellular viability.

3.4. EA-Aa Activates Sirt1, ERK, and Nrf2 Pathway

The pathways activated by the EA-Aa were further assessed in Cos-7 cells by Western blotting analysis. Following the incubation of EA-Aa during 24 h, Sirt1 levels increased in 500 μg·mL^-1 and 750 μg·mL^-1 (Figure 6(a)). While increased phosphorylated ERK (p-ERK) (Thr202/Tyr204) was observed in all concentrations, phosphorylated Nrf2 (p-Nrf2) (Ser40) and catalase levels were observed only in the group treated with 750 μg·mL^-1of EA-Aa. No changes were observed in ERK and NRF2 levels (Figures 6(a)–6(f)).

4. Discussion

About 70% of the worldwide population consumes medicinal plants as a therapeutic purpose [45]. In the last decades, medicinal plants have been the focus of many studies on the investigation of therapeutic potentials, which are largely related to their secondary metabolites, such as phenolic compounds [46, 47]. Accordingly, this study characterizes the chemical composition of A. aculeata leaves, through the quantitative determination of phenolic compounds by colorimetric and chromatographic methods, as well as the determination of its antioxidant properties and the involved mechanisms.

Phenolic compounds are a class of plant secondary metabolites that act by redox chelation of metal ions, inhibiting the conversion of hydroperoxides into a RS and as a free radical scavenger by donating electrons from its hydroxyl groups [48]. Among this class, flavonoids are associated with several pharmacological benefits, widely distributed in plants, with important antioxidant activity contribution [49], already described in A. aculeata fruit pulp [24] and in other palm trees [50, 51]. Its potential comes from the donation of hydrogens or electrons to promote the stabilization of intermediate radical, also acting as an iron chelating agent [52].

The phenolic compounds identified in A. aculeata extracts were gallic, caffeic, vanillic, and ferulic acids and the flavonoids rutin and quercetin, which are likely to be linked to the potential of A. aculeata extracts in the antioxidant assays, as already reported in some studies with other plants [36, 48, 53–55]. GC-MS analysis also identified campesterol, stigmasterol, and β-sitosterol, as well as the triterpenes lupeol and lupeol acetate, which are known to possess antioxidant properties [56] and anti-inflammatory effects [57]. These molecules have been investigated with pharmacological purposes in cancer, diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases [58]. Triterpenes were only identified in EE-Aa and EM-Aa; its presence might be related to lower IC₅₀ values obtained in the free radical scavenging tests of DPPH and ABTS in comparison with EA-Aa.

The protective properties of A. aculeata extracts on oxidative stress-induced damage were assessed in lipid, protein, and DNA. Isolated erythrocytes were used to assess lipid peroxidation resulting from AAPH-mediated attack on cell membranes and ROS formation. This compound generates hydroxyl radicals [59] and a lipid peroxide radical (LOOH) after chain reactions in the polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) from cell membranes. As result of the oxidative chain reaction, α- and β-aldehydes are formed, such as MDA, 4-hydroxynonenal (4-HNE), and acrolein, as well as isoprostanes [60], which are collectively named as thiobarbituric reactive species (TBARS) [61]. The accumulation of TBARS could lead to cell dysfunction because of the damage of its structure, culminating in cell death [62]. In fact, to check the protective effect in A. aculeata extracts, we analyzed the AAPH-induced oxidative hemolysis and MDA generation. In this way, the protection against oxidation is considered beneficial for the maintenance of health and prevention against the development of several diseases [53]. Similar results were also obtained in Cerrado plants [36, 63]. The prooxidant effect showed by EE-Aa and EM-Aa in high concentrations is probably caused by the generation of free radicals, same as reported with AA [64]. The distinct chemical composition of EA-Aa allowed no toxic outcome in the same concentrations of the other two extracts and promoted antioxidant protection at higher concentrations; thus, it was chosen for further experiments.

The protective effects of the EA-Aa were further evaluated in vitro and in vivo in Cos-7 cells and nematodes C. elegans, respectively. The EA-Aa was considered safe due to its low toxicity (cell viability higher than 80%) even at high concentrations (1,000 μg·mL^-1). In Cos-7, the extract rescued cell viability in the presence of H₂O₂ at 750 μg·mL^-1 and 1,000 μg·mL^-1, and we also proved that EA-Aa were able to improve H₂O₂-induced ROS formation, assessed by the fluorescent probes H₂DCFDA and DHE [65]. This kind of oxidative protection is crucial in the protection against a lot of diseases related to this condition [3].

Although in vitro models are safe, like we used Cos-7 cells, they are the same set of cells that have the same function, and the effect of the extract could be underestimated, so we decided to evaluate the potential of the extract in in vivo models as well. And with regard to the protection against ROS generation, the effects of EA-Aa were reproducible in C. elegans, where the oxidative damage is induced by Juglone, an intracellular ROS generator that decreases viability and survival. So, the nematode survival was improved, by the prevention of Juglone-induced oxidative damage [66]. A. aculeata fruit pulp and kernel have shown similar results, in particular the in vitro antioxidant activity and absence of cytotoxicity [67], besides hypoglycemic [68] and anti-inflammatory and diuretic effects [69].

In order to understand the mechanisms involved in EA-Aa-induced prevention of oxidative damage, the levels of key enzymes involved in the response to cell stress were evaluated. EA-Aa increased the levels of Sirt1 and catalase and the activation of ERK and Nrf2. Sirtuins are a group of 7 enzymes in which a"?> whose pathway has an important role in metabolic homeostasis and redox balance [70]. They are located not only in the nucleus but also in the cytoplasm, interacting with relevant cytoplasmic targets such as ERK [71]. ERK is a MAPK that has a crucial role in the maintenance of cellular homeostasis, acting in stress and proliferative responses [72] at least in part through Nrf2 activation [73]. Nrf2 is a crucial factor involved in oxidative stress protection mechanisms [74]. Given that, it is involved in the regulation of anti-inflammatory and cell survival genes such as phase II detoxifying/antioxidant enzymes as catalase [75]. Catalase is a key enzyme in the adaptive response against H₂O₂ [76]. Based on our results, we suggest that the pharmacological activation of Sirt1 is involved in oxidative stress response promoted by the EA-Aa, probably through the activation of the ERK/Nrf2 pathway which increases catalase-mediated antioxidant defense. Plants that have phenolic compounds as part of its constitution have already been represented as potent sirtuin activators [77–80] and consequently the pathways associated with it.

Altogether, our results showed the composition of typical plant extract molecules, but the different composition of EA-Aa allowed the lower toxicity compared to the others extracts and it is related to the antioxidant capacity we show. EA-Aa has a direct effect on the protection of proteins, DNA and lipids and presented the same effect in Cos-7 cells and in C. elegans, by the activation of the Sirt1/Nrf2 pathway. Thus, the low toxicity and the relevant potential in the maintenance of body’s redox balance, allied to low cost and natural abundance, support further studies to explore the development of products based on it leaves to be used for both prevention and treatment of diseases related to oxidative stress.

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Additional Points

Highlights. Antioxidant potential of the extracts was proved from in vitro to in vivo assays. The aqueous extract showed no toxicity, making its future therapeutic use possible. The aqueous extract activates the Sirt1/Nrf2 pathway and increases catalase levels. A. aculeata reduces oxidative damage and improves C. elegans stress resistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interests.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from Fundação de Apoio ao Desenvolvimento do Ensino, Ciência e Tecnologia do Estado de Mato Grosso do Sul (FUNDECT), Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq). This work was also supported by Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT), Portugal (Strategic Projects UID/NEU/04539/2013 and UID/NEU/04539/2019).

References

WHO, World Health Organization - Background - The Global Burden of Chronic, World Health Organization, 2019, July 2019, https://www.who.int/nutrition/topics/2_background/en/.
A. Y. Chang, K. Cowling, A. E. Micah et al., “Past, present, and future of global health financing: a review of development assistance, government, out-of-pocket, and other private spending on health for 195 countries, 1995–2050,” The Lancet, vol. 393, no. 10187, pp. 2233–2260, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Peña-Oyarzun, R. Bravo-Sagua, A. Diaz-Vega et al., “Autophagy and oxidative stress in non-communicable diseases: a matter of the inflammatory state?” Free Radical Biology & Medicine, vol. 124, pp. 61–78, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. Ighodaro, “Molecular pathways associated with oxidative stress in diabetes mellitus,” Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, vol. 108, pp. 656–662, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Perrone, E. Laschi, and G. Buonocore, “Biomarkers of oxidative stress in the fetus and in the newborn,” Free Radical Biology & Medicine, vol. 142, pp. 23–31, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Miranda-Vizuete and E. Veal, “Caenorhabditis elegans as a model for understanding ROS function in physiology and disease,” Redox Biology, vol. 11, pp. 708–714, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Méndez, O. Vázquez-Martínez, R. Hernández-Muñoz, H. Valente-Godínez, and M. Díaz-Muñoz, “Redox regulation and pro-oxidant reactions in the physiology of circadian systems,” Biochimie, vol. 124, pp. 178–186, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Barone, F. Di Domenico, C. Mancuso, and D. Butterfield, “The Janus face of the heme oxygenase/biliverdin reductase system in Alzheimer disease: it’s time for reconciliation,” Neurobiology of Disease, vol. 62, pp. 144–159, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Palmeira, J. Teodoro, J. Amorim, C. Steegborn, D. Sinclair, and A. Rolo, “Mitohormesis and metabolic health: the interplay between ROS, cAMP and sirtuins,” Free Radical Biology & Medicine, vol. 141, pp. 483–491, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
U. S. Srinivas, B. W. Q. Tan, B. A. Vellayappan, and A. D. Jeyasekharan, “ROS and the DNA damage response in cancer,” Redox Biology, vol. 25, article 101084, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Dutra, M. Campos, A. Santos, and J. Calixto, “Medicinal plants in Brazil: pharmacological studies, drug discovery, challenges and perspectives,” Pharmacological Research, vol. 112, pp. 4–29, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Piccolella, G. Crescente, L. Candela, and S. Pacifico, “Nutraceutical polyphenols: new analytical challenges and opportunities,” Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, vol. 175, article 112774, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Shahidi, “Nutraceuticals and functional foods: Whole versus processed foods,” Trends in Food Science & Technology, vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 376–387, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Liu, P. Cao, A. Ren et al., “SA inhibits complex III activity to generate reactive oxygen species and thereby induces GA overproduction in Ganoderma lucidum,” Redox Biology, vol. 16, pp. 388–400, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Tao, R. Justiniano, D. Zhang, and G. Wondrak, “The Nrf2-inducers tanshinone I and dihydrotanshinone protect human skin cells and reconstructed human skin against solar simulated UV,” Redox Biology, vol. 1, pp. 532–541, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Wallert, J. Bauer, S. Kluge et al., “The vitamin E derivative garcinoic acid from Garcinia kola nut seeds attenuates the inflammatory response,” Redox Biology, vol. 24, article 101166, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. W. Fernandes, M. M. Vale, G. E. Overbeck et al., “Dismantling Brazil's science threatens global biodiversity heritage,” Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 239–243, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. R. Fonseca and E. M. Venticinque, “Biodiversity conservation gaps in Brazil: a role for systematic conservation planning,” Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 61–67, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Cercato, P. White, F. Nampo, M. Santos, and E. Camargo, “A systematic review of medicinal plants used for weight loss in Brazil: is there potential for obesity treatment?” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 176, pp. 286–296, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Chukwuma, M. Matsabisa, M. Ibrahim, O. Erukainure, M. Chabalala, and M. Islam, “Medicinal plants with concomitant anti-diabetic and anti-hypertensive effects as potential sources of dual acting therapies against diabetes and hypertension: a review,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 235, pp. 329–360, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. da Silva César, F. de Azedias Almeida, R. P. de Souza, G. C. Silva, and A. E. Atabani, “The prospects of using Acrocomia aculeata (macaúba) a non-edible biodiesel feedstock in Brazil,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 49, pp. 1213–1220, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. M. C. Costa, D. M. Oliveira, and L. E. C. Costa, “Macauba Palm—Acrocomia aculeata,” in Exotic Fruits, S. Rodrigues, E. Oliveira Silva, and E. S. Brito, Eds., pp. 297–304, Academic Press, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. K. Souza, F. B. Scheufele, T. L. B. Pasa, P. A. Arroyo, and N. C. Pereira, “Synthesis of ethyl esters from crude macauba oil (Acrocomia aculeata) for biodiesel production,” Fuel, vol. 165, pp. 360–366, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Agostini-Costa, “Bioactive compounds and health benefits of some palm species traditionally used in Africa and the Americas – a review,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 224, pp. 202–229, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Silva, Caracterização Química e avaliação do Potencial antidiabético e Citotóxico de Oleo Extraído de Acrocomia aculeata (macaúba), [M.S. thesis], Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados, Dourados, Brazil, 2012.
P. Hiane, M. Filho, M. Ramos, and M. Macedo, “Óleo da polpa e amêndoa de bocaiúva, Acrocomia aculeata (Jacq.) Lodd. Caracterização e composição em ácido graxos,” Brazilian Journal of Food Technology, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 256–259, 2005.
View at: Google Scholar
E. J. Sanjinez-Argandoña and C. A. M. Chuba, “Caracterização biométrica, física e química de frutos da palmeira bocaiuva Acrocomia aculeata (Jacq) Lodd,” Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 1023–1028, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Coimbra and N. Jorge, “Fatty acids and bioactive compounds of the pulps and kernels of Brazilian palm species, guariroba (Syagrus oleraces), jerivá (Syagrus romanzoffiana) and macaúba (Acrocomia aculeata),” Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, vol. 92, no. 3, pp. 679–684, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Ciconini, S. P. Favaro, R. Roscoe et al., “Biometry and oil contents of Acrocomia aculeata fruits from the Cerrados and Pantanal biomes in Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil,” Industrial Crops and Products, vol. 45, pp. 208–214, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Breda, A. Gasperini, V. Garcia et al., “Phytochemical analysis and antifungal activity of extracts from leaves and fruit residues of Brazilian savanna plants aiming its use as safe fungicides,” Natural Products and Bioprospecting, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 195–204, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Meda, C. E. Lamien, M. Romito, J. Millogo, and O. G. Nacoulma, “Determination of the total phenolic, flavonoid and proline contents in Burkina Fasan honey, as well as their radical scavenging activity,” Food Chemistry, vol. 91, no. 3, pp. 571–577, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Liberio, A. Pereira, R. Dutra et al., “Antimicrobial activity against oral pathogens and immunomodulatory effects and toxicity of geopropolis produced by the stingless bee Melipona fasciculata Smith,” BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 11, p. 108, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. S. Rocha, R. M. Lopes, D. B. Silva, R. F. Vieira, J. P. Silva, and T. S. Agostini-Costa, “Compostos fenólicos totais e taninos condensados em frutas nativas do cerrado,” Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 1215–1221, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Gupta and R. Gupta, “Bioprotective properties of Dragon’s blood resin: in vitro evaluation of antioxidant activity and antimicrobial activity,” BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 11, p. 13, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Re, N. Pellegrini, A. Proteggente, A. Pannala, M. Yang, and C. Rice-Evans, “Antioxidant activity applying an improved ABTS radical cation decolorization assay,” Free Radical Biology & Medicine, vol. 26, no. 9-10, pp. 1231–1237, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. M. dos Santos, T. M. Alfredo, K. Á. Antunes et al., “Guazuma ulmifolia Lam. decreases oxidative stress in blood cells and prevents doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity,” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2018, Article ID 2935051, 16 pages, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Mayo, D. Tan, R. Sainz, S. Lopez-Burillo, and R. Reiter, “Oxidative damage to catalase induced by peroxyl radicals: functional protection by melatonin and other antioxidants,” Free Radical Research, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 543–553, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Kumar and S. Chattopadhyay, “DNA damage protecting activity and antioxidant potential of pudina extract,” Food Chemistry, vol. 100, no. 4, pp. 1377–1384, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
“COS-7 (ATCC® CRL-1651™) Cercopithecus aethiops kidney,” July 2019, http://www.lgcstandards-atcc.org/Products/All/CRL-1651?geo_country=pt#culturemethod.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Magalhães, M. Almeida, E. Tavares-da-Silva et al., “miR-145-loaded micelleplexes as a novel therapeutic strategy to inhibit proliferation and migration of osteosarcoma cells,” European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 123, pp. 28–42, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Matafome, D. Santos-Silva, J. Crisóstomo et al., “Methylglyoxal causes structural and functional alterations in adipose tissue independently of obesity,” Archives of Physiology and Biochemistry, vol. 118, no. 2, pp. 58–68, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Brenner, “The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans,” Genetics, vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 71–94, 1974.
View at: Google Scholar
T. Fabian and T. Johnson, “Production of age-synchronous mass cultures of Caenorhabditis elegans,” Journal of Gerontology, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. B145–B156, 1994.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Asthana, A. Yadav, A. Pant, S. Pandey, M. Gupta, and R. Pandey, “Specioside ameliorates oxidative stress and promotes longevity in Caenorhabditis elegans,” Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C: Toxicology & Pharmacology, vol. 169, pp. 25–34, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
WHO, The World Traditional Medicines Situation, in Traditional medicines: Global Situation, Issues and Challenges, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2011.
N. Martins, L. Barros, and I. C. F. R. Ferreira, “In vivo antioxidant activity of phenolic compounds: Facts and gaps,” Trends in Food Science & Technology, vol. 48, pp. 1–12, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
U. Złotek, U. Szymanowska, A. Jakubczyk, M. Sikora, and M. Świeca, “Effect of arachidonic and jasmonic acid elicitation on the content of phenolic compounds and antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties of wheatgrass (Triticum aestivum L.),” Food Chemistry, vol. 288, pp. 256–261, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Daoud, D. Malika, S. Bakari et al., “Assessment of polyphenol composition, antioxidant and antimicrobial properties of various extracts of date palm pollen (DPP) from two Tunisian cultivars,” Arabian Journal of Chemistry, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 3075–3086, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Ganeshpurkar and A. K. Saluja, “The pharmacological potential of rutin,” Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 149–164, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. A. Che Idris, T. Karupaiah, K. Sundram et al., “Oil palm phenolics and vitamin E reduce atherosclerosis in rabbits,” Journal of Functional Foods, vol. 7, pp. 541–550, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Zhou, Y. Ma, Y. Jia, M. Pang, G. Cheng, and S. Cai, “Phenolic profiles, antioxidant activities and cytoprotective effects of different phenolic fractions from oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) fruits treated by ultra-high pressure,” Food Chemistry, vol. 288, pp. 68–77, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Lesjak, I. Beara, N. Simin et al., “Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of quercetin and its derivatives,” Journal of Functional Foods, vol. 40, pp. 68–75, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Casagrande, L. Macorini, K. Antunes et al., “Antioxidant and cytotoxic activity of hydroethanolic extract from Jacaranda decurrens leaves,” PLoS One, vol. 9, no. 11, article e112748, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Chen, C. Gnanaraj, P. Arulselvan, H. El-Seedi, and H. Teng, “A review on advanced microencapsulation technology to enhance bioavailability of phenolic compounds: based on its activity in the treatment of type 2 diabetes,” Trends in Food Science & Technology, vol. 85, pp. 149–162, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Kallel, D. Driss, F. Chaari et al., “Garlic (Allium sativum L.) husk waste as a potential source of phenolic compounds: Influence of extracting solvents on its antimicrobial and antioxidant properties,” Industrial Crops and Products, vol. 62, pp. 34–41, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Z. Pérez-González, A. Nieto-Trujillo, G. A. Gutiérrez-Rebolledo et al., “Lupeol acetate production and antioxidant activity of a cell suspension culture from Cnidoscolus chayamansa leaves,” South African Journal of Botany, vol. 125, pp. 30–38, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Saleem, “Lupeol, a novel anti-inflammatory and anti-cancer dietary Triterpene,” Cancer Letters, vol. 285, no. 2, pp. 109–115, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Jiang, X. Zhao, J. Xu et al., “The protective effect of dietary phytosterols on cancer risk: a systematic meta-analysis,” Journal of Oncology, vol. 2019, Article ID 7479518, 11 pages, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Morita, Y. Naito, T. Yoshikawa, and E. Niki, “Plasma lipid oxidation induced by peroxynitrite, hypochlorite, lipoxygenase and peroxyl radicals and its inhibition by antioxidants as assessed by diphenyl-1-pyrenylphosphine,” Redox Biology, vol. 8, pp. 127–135, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Gęgotek and E. Skrzydlewska, “Biological effect of protein modifications by lipid peroxidation products,” Chemistry and Physics of Lipids, vol. 221, pp. 46–52, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Peña-Bautista, M. Baquero, M. Vento, and C. Cháfer-Pericás, “Free radicals in Alzheimer's disease: Lipid peroxidation biomarkers,” Clinica Chimica Acta, vol. 491, pp. 85–90, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Sasson, “Nutrient overload, lipid peroxidation and pancreatic beta cell function,” Free Radical Biology & Medicine, vol. 111, pp. 102–109, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. dos Santos da Rocha, A. P. de Araújo Boleti, M. do Carmo Vieira et al., “Microbiological quality, chemical profile as well as antioxidant and antidiabetic activities of Schinus terebinthifolius Raddi,” Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C: Toxicology & Pharmacology, vol. 220, pp. 36–46, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Putchala, P. Ramani, H. Sherlin, P. Premkumar, and A. Natesan, “Ascorbic acid and its pro-oxidant activity as a therapy for tumours of oral cavity – a systematic review,” Archives of Oral Biology, vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 563–574, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Jung, “Soluble extract from Moringa oleifera leaves with a new anticancer activity,” PLoS One, vol. 9, no. 4, article e95492, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. L. Tambara, L. de Los Santos Moraes, A. H. Dal Forno et al., “Purple pitanga fruit (Eugenia uniflora L.) protects against oxidative stress and increase the lifespan in Caenorhabditis elegans via the DAF-16/FOXO pathway,” Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 120, pp. 639–650, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. da Silva, M. Ramiro, E. Iriguchi et al., “Antidiabetic, cytotoxic and antioxidant activities of oil extracted from Acrocomia aculeata pulp,” Natural Product Research, vol. 33, no. 16, pp. 2413–2416, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Â. Nunes, D. Buccini, J. Jaques et al., “Effect of Acrocomia aculeata kernel oil on adiposity in type 2 diabetic rats,” Plant Foods for Human Nutrition, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 61–67, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Lescano, R. Iwamoto, E. Sanjinez-Argandoña, and C. Kassuya, “Diuretic and anti-inflammatory activities of the microencapsulated Acrocomia aculeata (Arecaceae) oil on Wistar rats,” Journal of Medicinal Food, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 656–662, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Pirinen, G. Lo Sasso, and J. Auwerx, “Mitochondrial sirtuins and metabolic homeostasis,” Best Practice & Research Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 759–770, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Morris, “Seven sirtuins for seven deadly diseases of aging,” Free Radical Biology & Medicine, vol. 56, pp. 133–171, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Liu, X. Yang, M. Geng, and M. Huang, “Targeting ERK, an Achilles’ heel of the MAPK pathway, in cancer therapy,” Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 552–562, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Huang, W. Li, Z. Su, and A.-N. T. Kong, “The complexity of the Nrf2 pathway: beyond the antioxidant response,” The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry, vol. 26, no. 12, pp. 1401–1413, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Li, G. Wu, F. Han et al., “SIRT1 activation promotes angiogenesis in diabetic wounds by protecting endothelial cells against oxidative stress,” Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, vol. 661, pp. 117–124, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Ferrándiz, J. Nacher-Juan, and M. Alcaraz, “Nrf2 as a therapeutic target for rheumatic diseases,” Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 152, pp. 338–346, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Sepasi Tehrani and A. Moosavi-Movahedi, “Catalase and its mysteries,” Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, vol. 140, pp. 5–12, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Ajami, H. Pazoki-Toroudi, H. Amani et al., “Therapeutic role of sirtuins in neurodegenerative disease and their modulation by polyphenols,” Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, vol. 73, pp. 39–47, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Chung, H. Yao, S. Caito, J. Hwang, G. Arunachalam, and I. Rahman, “Regulation of SIRT1 in cellular functions: role of polyphenols,” Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, vol. 501, no. 1, pp. 79–90, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. W. Dolinsky, L. K. Cole, G. C. Sparagna, and G. M. Hatch, “Cardiac mitochondrial energy metabolism in heart failure: role of cardiolipin and sirtuins,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular and Cell Biology of Lipids, vol. 1861, no. 10, pp. 1544–1554, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Wang, J. He, M. Liao et al., “An overview of sirtuins as potential therapeutic target: structure, function and modulators,” European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 161, pp. 48–77, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2020 Tamaeh Monteiro-Alfredo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

1457

Downloads

970

Citations