Sarcoma

Sarcoma / 2016 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2016 |Article ID 5043640 | 11 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/5043640

Ewing’s Sarcoma as a Second Malignancy in Long-Term Survivors of Childhood Hematologic Malignancies

Academic Editor: Natia Esiashvili
Received03 Apr 2016
Accepted19 Jun 2016
Published25 Jul 2016

Abstract

Modern multimodal treatment has significantly increased survival for patients affected by hematologic malignancies, especially in childhood. Following remission, however, the risk of developing a further malignancy is an important issue. The long-term estimated risk of developing a sarcoma as a secondary malignancy is increased severalfold in comparison to the general population. Ewing’s sarcoma family encompasses a group of highly aggressive, undifferentiated, intra- and extraosseous, mesenchymal tumors, caused by several types of translocations usually involving the EWSR1 gene. Translocation associated sarcomas, such as Ewing sarcoma, are only rarely encountered as therapy associated secondary tumors. We describe the clinical course and management of three patients from a single institution with Ewing’s sarcoma that followed successfully treated lymphoblastic T-cell leukemia or non-Hodgkin lymphoma. The literature on secondary Ewing’s sarcoma is summarized and possible pathogenic mechanisms are critically discussed.

1. Introduction

Modern multimodal treatment strategies have significantly increased the survival of patients affected by hematologic malignancies, including indolent and aggressive forms of lymphoma and leukemia [1, 2]. In long-term survivors of childhood cancer, the risk of a second cancer is an important issue [3]. Standard treatment for newly diagnosed malignancies varies according to the phenotype, the line of differentiation, biological markers, and extent of the disease and comprises various combinations of chemotherapy [4], radiotherapy, targeted therapy with monoclonal antibodies, and stem cell transplantation, all of which have been implicated as risk factors for second malignancies. The most common second cancers reported in this population include cancers of the head and neck, melanoma, lung cancer, colon cancer, bladder cancer, renal cancer, Hodgkin disease, leukemia, and Kaposi sarcoma [5]. Patients who received radiation therapy are more likely to develop sarcomas, breast cancers, and mesothelioma compared with patients who have not received it [5].

Ewing’s sarcoma (ES) is an aggressive malignancy occurring as a primary tumor mostly in adolescents and young adults with an incidence of about 1/1 000 000, male to female ratio being 1,5 : 1 [6]. Most cases of ESs (80%) originate in bones, where this entity comprises the second most common primary tumor following osteosarcoma in children and adolescents. Up to 20% of primary ESs are located extraosseously in soft tissues, affecting not only extremities but also various internal organs [710]. ESs are characterized at the molecular level by the presence of a balanced translocation between the EWSR1 gene and a member of the ETS gene family, in at least 80% of cases the partner gene being the FLI1 gene (translocation t(11;22) (q24;q12) (EWS-FLI1)) [11]. This molecular signature and the clinical characteristics of the patients are typical for the peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumor (PNET) as well. Accordingly, in the current WHO classification [11], PNET once considered a separate entity is now considered to represent part of the histologic spectrum of the “Ewing family of tumors” [6, 12]. The presence of the fusion gene containing the EWSR1 gene and a member of the ETS family is the most important tumorigenic factor in ES; however, recent genomewide association studies (GWAS) have demonstrated an association of this tumor with the germline background of the affected patients [13]. These studies provide a plausible explanation for the epidemiological finding of a different incidence of ESs across human populations, for example, the significantly higher incidence in patients of Caucasian compared to African origin.

ESs, in contrast to sarcomas with complex karyotypes and without recurring genetic aberrations such as osteosarcoma, have only rarely been reported to occur secondary to cancer therapy, including multimodal therapy for hematologic malignancies [7, 14, 15]. The aim of this study is to analyze three cases of secondary ES in patients from our institutions with T-cell leukemia or non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) as well as summarize documented similar cases from the literature. In addition, the literature review on Ewing’s sarcoma as a secondary cancer is summarized and possible pathogenic mechanisms are critically discussed.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patients

Three patients with a diagnosis of a genetically confirmed Ewing sarcoma who were previously treated for leukemia or lymphoma during the period of 1991 to 2014 were identified among 98 Ewing sarcoma patients in the archives of the Institute of Surgical Pathology, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland. Complete follow-up data were available for all 3 patients, including information regarding tumor site and specific treatment modalities of the primary as well as of the secondary malignancy. The available histopathological slides of all 3 cases were reviewed to confirm the diagnosis of ES. A review of the literature published in PUBMED of previously reported cases of ES following another primary malignancy was performed.

The study has been carried out according to the ethical guidelines of our institution.

2.2. Histology and Immunohistochemistry

Tumor tissue samples were fixed in buffered 4% formalin and embedded in paraffin. 2 μm thick sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) according to standard procedures. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) using the CD99 antibody (dilution 1 : 25, clone HO36-1.1, Novocastra Lab Ltd) was performed on 2 μm thick paraffin sections, using the Ventana Benchmark XT automated staining system (Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, Arizona).

2.3. Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH)

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) studies were performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded, 4 μm thick tissue sections as described earlier [16]. Dual color break-apart FISH detecting translocations involving the EWSR1 (22q11) gene was performed using commercial probes (Vysis, Abbott AG, Baar, Switzerland). The SpectrumOrange- and SpectrumGreen-labeled EWSR1 probes covered 500 kb and 1,100 kb proximal and distal to the EWSR1 gene. The fluorescence staining was visualized with an Olympus BX61 microscope (Olympus, Volketswil, Switzerland) equipped with DAPI, SpectrumGreen and SpectrumOrange filters. Images were acquired with a CCD camera and processed with the AnalySIS imaging software (Soft Imagining System, Munster, Germany). For the assessment of EWSR1 gene rearrangements at least 50 nonoverlapping tumor nuclei were analyzed. If the sample contained at least 25% of split red and green signals, the tumor was regarded as translocation positive. The signal was considered as split, when red and green fluorescent spots were separated by at least twice the distance occupied by a single probe [17].

2.4. RNA Extraction and RT-PCR

To detect EWSR1-FLI1 and EWSR1-ERG fusions transcripts, total RNA was extracted form paraffin-embedded tissue as described earlier [18]. Amplification was done in a GeneAmp PCR System 9700 (Applied Biosystems) using an OneStep RT-PCR Kit (Qiagen). The 25 μL reactions contained 0.4 mM dNTP, 1x OneStep RT-PCR Buffer, 5 μL Q-solution, 1 μL enzyme mix (all from Qiagen), and 8 units of RNase OUT (Life Technologies). The primer pairs were as follows: (A) TCCTACAGCCAA GCTCCAAGTC (EWSR1-Ex7b) and ATTCATGTTGGGCTTGCTTTTC (FLI1-Ex9); (B) AGAGTAGCTATGGTCAACAA (EWSR1-Ex7a) and CCCA(TA)GCTCCTCT TCTG (FLI1-Ex6); (C) TCCTACAGCCAAGCTCCAAGTC (EWSR1-Ex7b) and CTCCAGGAGGAACTGCCAAA (ERG-Ex9).

The reverse transcription was done for 30 minutes at 50°C, followed by a PCR activation step for 15 minutes at 95°C and 40 cycles consisting of 1 minute at 94°C, 1 minute at 56°C, and 1 minute at 72°C followed by final extension at 72°C for 10 minutes. RNA-integrity was tested by running ACTB- and IPO8-specific internal control reactions for each sample.

3. Results

3.1. Patients

The basic patient characteristics are summarized in Table 1.


Pat. GenderAge at Dx (T-ALL) Age at Dx (ES) Latency (y) Location of ESTreatment of the primary hematological malignancy
Anthracyclines, TPII-InhVincaAlkylating agentAntimetaboliteRT

1m583Paravertebral (L5)ADRNoneCPA, IFOAra-CNone
2m16215Brain, temporal lobeDNRVCRCPAMTX, Ara-C, 6-MP, 6-TGWhole brain (12 Gy)
3f9112MandibleDNRVCRCPAMTX, Ara-C, 6-MP, 6-TGWhole body (12 Gy)

DNR, daunorubicin; ADR, doxorubicin; VCR, vincristine; CPA, cyclophosphamide; IFO, ifosfamide; MTX, methotrexate; Ara-C, cytarabine; 6-MP, 6-mercaptopurine; 6-TG, thioguanine; RT, radiotherapy.
3.1.1. Patient 1

T-cell lymphoblastic non-Hodgkin lymphoma was diagnosed in this male patient at the age of 5 years. He first presented with supraclavicular swelling. Histopathologic examination of the resected lymph node revealed high grade T-cell lymphoblastic non-Hodgkin lymphoma (Figure 1(a); unfortunately, except for the text of the final diagnosis and one H&E slide no further histopathological details are available). Diagnostic workup including chest and abdominal CT scans revealed no further tumor manifestations. He was treated according to the NHL-BFM 90 therapy (Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster), which comprises cyclophosphamide, dexamethasone, ifosfamide, methotrexate, cytarabine, prednisolone, etoposide, and cyclophosphamide without radiotherapy. Chemotherapy was completed after 2.5 years in 03/1998. The patient showed complete remission in the comprehensive follow-up investigations that included laboratory testing, CT scan of brain, chest, and abdomen, bone scan, bone marrow biopsy, cardiac scan, and renal scan.

Three years after the first presentation, he developed nocturnal thigh pain. A bone scan showed a large paravertebral (level L5) mass. Chest and thorax CT revealed lung metastases. Biopsy of the paravertebral lesion showed a malignant small, blue, round, cell tumor, histopathologically consistent with ES (Figure 1(b)). The diagnosis was confirmed by RT-PCR demonstrating the t(11;22) translocation with the EWSR1/FLI1 fusion transcript (Figure 1(c)).

The patient received chemotherapy with vincristine, actinomycin, ifosfamide, adriamycin, carboplatin, epirubicin, and etoposide, based on the CWS-96 protocol (high risk) [19]. Furthermore, he received radiotherapy to the chest and paravertebral region with a cumulative dose of 44.8 Gy. Subsequently, CT scans of the chest, abdomen, and spine revealed complete remission of the pulmonary metastases and size reduction of the left sided paravertebral mass at L4-5 level.

One year later, the patient underwent high dose chemotherapy with busulfan and alkeran and autologous stem cell transplantation. Unfortunately, he developed an infection with an unknown pathogen one month later that proved refractory to antibiotic treatment and he died from acute respiratory distress syndrome.

3.1.2. Patient 2

Acute lymphoblastic T-cell leukemia was diagnosed in this male patient at the age of 16 years. He presented with a mediastinal mass without central nervous system involvement. Bone marrow aspiration showed 95% blasts infiltration: CD3c+; CD3+; CD4+; CD8+; CD7+; CD5+; CD34+; CD56+; CD2+; TDT+; TCR a/b+. The patient underwent chemotherapy with vincristine, daunorubicin, L-asparaginase, methotrexate (MTX), and Ara-C. Dexamethasone and thioguanine were given during induction and reinduction. He received whole brain radiation (cumulative dose 12 Gy) and 4 doses of intrathecal therapy with MTX, prednisolone, and Ara-C. After completion of therapy in 10/2002, the patient showed hematological remission in the follow-up controls.

Five years and 8 months later, the patient presented to the emergency unit with headache and vomiting. MRI imaging revealed a large intracerebral tumor mass (Figure 2(a)). Resection of the tumor revealed a strongly CD99 positive, small, blue, round cell malignant tumor on histopathological examination (Figure 2(b)) that lacked the expression of lymphatic markers. No rearrangement of the TCR-γ gene locus was found on genotyping. The RT-PCR of the fusion products of the two most common Ewing sarcoma translocations t(11;22) EWSR1/FLI1 and t(21;22) ESWR1/ERG was negative; however, FISH analysis revealed the EWSR1 gene rearrangement (Figure 2(c)), confirming the diagnosis of Ewing sarcoma and suggesting the presence of one of the rare ES translocation types.

Postoperatively, radiotherapy with 54 Gy was applied to the right temporoparietal region over 6 weeks. The patient underwent two cycles of cisplatin and CCNU/lomustine; however, chemotherapy had to be discontinued in 02/2007 due to myelotoxicity. At the most recent follow-up in 7/2015, the patient was alive and doing well under anticonvulsive treatment; however, a small mass was found on control MRI in the right frontal lobe, suggesting a metastasis.

3.1.3. Patient 3

This female patient developed acute T-cell leukemia at the age of 9 years. She initially presented with fatigue accompanied by leukocytosis, mediastinal mass, and hepatosplenomegaly, but without CNS involvement. Cytogenetic analysis of the bone marrow aspiration revealed t(1;16), loss of TLX3, and biallelic deletion of 12p. The patient was treated according to the high risk protocol of the ALL-BFM-2000 trial with prednisone, vincristine, daunorubicin, L-asparaginase, cyclophosphamide, high dose methotrexate, cytarabine, mercaptopurine, thioguanine, and etoposide. Due to the risk stratification an allogenic bone marrow transplantation with an unrelated donor had to be performed five months after the presentation. Conditioning regimen included total body irradiation with a cumulative dose of 12 Gy (6 × 2 Gy), etoposide, and antithymocyte globulin Fresenius. A graft versus host disease- (GvHD-) prophylaxis with MTX and cyclosporin A was applied. In the following controls, she showed an enduring remission.

Two years and four months later, the patient reported a swelling in the region of the right 2nd lower molar tooth. MRI of the head (Figure 3(a)) demonstrated a large tumor mass of the right lower jaw that infiltrated the soft tissues of the floor of the mouth and displaced the tongue. Biopsy revealed the diagnosis of Ewing sarcoma with characteristic small, round, and blue cell histology and typical strong and membranous immunohistochemical expression of CD99 protein (Figure 3(b)). This diagnosis was confirmed by the demonstration of the EWSR1 gene rearrangement on FISH analysis (Figure 3(c)), with the fusion transcript EWSR1/FLI1 of the diagnostic translocation by RT-PCR (the same type of the translocation as in patient 1) (Figure 1(c)). The patient was then treated according to the Euro-Ewing 99 protocol with vincristine, ifosfamide, doxorubicin, etoposide, actinomycin D, and cyclophosphamide. Local tumor control was achieved with total tumor resection and mandibular reconstruction with a fibula plastic. Unfortunately, local ES recurrence with biopsy confirmation was detected one year later and the patient underwent radiotherapy with a cumulative dose of 54 Gy (30 × 1,8 Gy) accompanied by second-line chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, topotecan). Bone metastases in the right femur and fibula were first diagnosed in the following year, followed by wide metastatic spread (spine, lung), which prompted renewed chemotherapy with ifosfamide and palliative mediastinal radiotherapy.

3.2. Review of the Literature

There are only few reports on ES as a secondary malignancy (Table 2), mostly comprising single case reports or short series describing ES following treatment for unrelated tumors, such as breast carcinoma [20, 21], retinoblastoma [22, 23], or testicular mixed germ cell tumor [24]. The largest series of secondary ES by Applebaum et al. [25] evaluated data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) database between 1973 and 2008 and found 58 cases of secondary ES, accounting for up to 2.1% of all ES. Only 12.1% of patients received radiation to the ES site, while the frequency of previous chemotherapy is not reported. Interestingly, five further patients were diagnosed with ES concurrent with other tumors and were therefore not included in the study group of “secondary” ES. This study, however, is purely epidemiological, not including reevaluation of the diagnoses or molecular confirmation of ES. The most common group of primary tumors did not comprise further specified carcinomas (41%: 24 of 58), with rare cases of non-ES sarcomas, melanomas, brain tumors, or other neoplasia as a the primary tumor. In 24% (14/58) of cases in this study, hematological malignancies preceded secondary ES, representing the second most common primary malignancy group after carcinomas.


NumberNr with genetic confirmation (any method)ReferencePub yearAge at Dx PTAge at Dx ESLatency (y) Primary cancerLocation ESMolecular testTreatment of the primary hematological malignancy
Anthracyclines, TopoII-INHVincaAlkylating agentAntimetaboliteOther drugsRthAdditional treatment

1Meadows et al. [27]19775ALLNDND
21Tilly et al. [26]198481911ALLSacrumKaryotypeDNRVCRDTICPDCranial RT 24 Gy
3Anselmo et al. [34]199420277HLChest wallND
42Zoubek et al. [28]199512208Anaplastic T LCLPelvisKaryotype RT-PCRVP16CPA, MELMTX, Ara-CTBI 12 Gy SCT (auto)
5Delgado-Chavez et al. [35]199522264HLChest wallND
63Antillon et al. [29] 19977169ALLTibiaRT-PCRDNRVCRPD, L-asp
7Aparicio et al. [30] 199831512ALLUlnaNDADRVCR6-MP, MTX, Ara-CL-aspCranial RT
811187AMLFibulaNDDNR, ADR, MTZ, VP166-MP, 6-TG, Ara-C
9Bisogno et al. [31] 2004473HLThoracic wallNDADRVBLDTICRT 20 Gy
1071811CMLThighNDHUTBI 9 Gy, SCT (allo)
11Suarez et al. [36]2004891ALLChest wallNDARDVCRCPAMTX, 6-MP, Ara-CPD
124Kim et al. [32]2005374ALLHumerusKaryotype RT-PCRADRVCRCPA6-TG, MTX, Ara-CPD, L-asp
135Spunt et al. [33] 20069123LCLRibFISHADRVCRCPAPDRT 15 Gy
1468168ALLTibiaRT-PCRDNR, VP16VCRCPA6-MP, MTX, Ara-CPD, L-asp
15772316Small, noncleaved cell lymphomaRibFISHADRVCRCPAMTX, Ara-C
16812175HLChest wallRT-PCRADR, BLEVBLMTXPD
17Khadwal et al. [37]20068102HLKneeNDADR, BLEVBLRT 24 Gy
189Osone et al. [38]200710166ALLUrinary bladderRT-PCRADRVCRCPAMTX, 6-TGPD, L-aspnone
19Renard et al. [39]201171912ALLNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND
2010Lim et al. [40]201320222BurkittAdrenal glandFISHADRVCRCPAMTX, Ara-CDEXA
2111Hiramoto et al. [14]201357658B-LCLSoft tissue backRT-PCRDNRVCRCPAPDGCSF
14 more casesApplebaum
et al. [25]
2013NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND
3612Current series2016583Lymphoblastic lymphomaParavertebralRT-PCRADRCPA, IFOAra-C
3713Current series201616214T-ALLBrainFISHDNRVCRCPAMTX, Ara-C, 6-MP, 6-TGRT 12 Gy
3814Current series20169112T-ALLMandibleFISH, RT-PCRDNRVCRCPA MTX, Ara-C, 6-MPTBI RT 12 Gy

DNR, daunorubicin; VP-16, etoposide; ADR, doxorubicin; ACT, actinomycin D; MTZ, mitoxantrone; BLE, bleomycin; VCR, vincristine; VBL, vinblastine; DTIC, dacarbazine; CPA, cyclophosphamide; MEL, melphalan; IFO, ifosfamide; MTX, methotrexate; Ara-C, cytarabine; 6-MP, 6-mercaptopurine; 6-TG, thioguanine; HU, hydroxyurea; PD, prednisone; L-asp, L-asparaginase; RT, radiotherapy; TBI, total body irradiation; SCT, stem cell transplantation. ND: no data.

The first case of genetically confirmed ES following a hematological malignancy (ALL) was described in 1984 by Tilly et al. [26], although the first case without genetic documentation was mentioned by Meadows et al. [27] in 1977. According to the review of available literature, 38 cases (including the current study) of secondary ES have been described following the diagnosis of a hematologic malignancy (Table 2); however, confirmatory data on genetic tumor background (karyotype, FISH, and/or RT-PCR) has been provided in only 14 cases [14, 26, 2833].

The diagnosis of secondary ES followed in 1 to 16 years (mean 6 y) the diagnosis of a hematologic neoplasm, most often an acute lymphoblastic leukemia (46%: 11 of 24 cases with available information), Hodgkin lymphoma, or an aggressive form of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (5 cases (20%) each). There were only two patients with myelogenous neoplasia and 1 with no further specified small cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. The age of the patients at the first tumor diagnosis ranged from 3 to 22 y (mean 10 y) and at ES diagnosis from 7 to 27 y (mean 16 y), with only one substantially older patient (diagnoses at 57 and 65 y, resp.). All patients with available data received disease specific chemotherapy for their primary malignancy, consisting of a combination of various groups of cytostatic and cytotoxic substances (Table 2) with no obvious causative association. Secondary ES occurred most commonly in the chest wall and long bones (7 cases each) followed by visceral organs (3), pelvis (2), somatic soft tissue (2), and mandible (1).

4. Discussion

Modern multimodal therapy has led to markedly improved long-term survival of cancer patients. Concomitantly, a well-documented increased incidence of malignancies in cancer survivors in comparison to general population has been observed. Most cases of secondary tumors can be attributed to the effects of long-term toxicity of radio- and/or chemotherapy; however, the underlying mechanisms of tumorigenesis in this setting remain unclear. In most instances, nonrandom somatic molecular or chromosomal alterations are thought to be involved in the pathogenesis of secondary tumors. Among sarcomas, most therapy associated tumors belong to the category of tumors showing complex karyotypes with mostly nonrecurring genetic aberrations, including undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, osteosarcoma, or rarely malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors [41]. Therapy associated angiosarcomas show recurrent amplifications of the c-myc gene [42]. Alternatively, sarcomas with simple karyotypes, carrying specific translocations or point mutations, have only rarely been described in the context of secondary, therapy associated tumors [43]. The underlying pathomechanism of therapy-induced malignancies has been elucidated for only selected secondary tumor entities. For example, secondary leukemia following the use of mitoxantrone as an immune modulating drug in patients with multiple sclerosis has been attributed to inhibition of topoisomerase II (TI-II) [44, 45]. TI-II inhibition has been identified as being crucial in the development of the t(15;17) balanced translocation and generation of the PML-RARalpha fusion transcript characteristic for promyelocytic leukemia [46]. Anthracyclines or other drugs inhibiting TI-II are part of therapeutic regimens for hematologic malignancies (Table 2); however, it remains to be elucidated whether these agents play pathogenetically relevant role in the occurrence of ES as a secondary tumor.

It is well known that immunodeficiency after radio-/chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation are major challenges for survivors of hematological malignancies [47, 48]. Impaired antitumor activity of the innate or adaptive immune system might represent critical factors that predispose to the failure of the system to detect and eliminate newly mutated cells carrying the Ewing sarcoma translocation, thus allowing for the initiation of secondary ES.

Two of the patients described in the current study received radiation therapy, one total body radiation (TBI) and one to the site of the ES occurrence (brain), suggesting a possible role for the radiotherapy in the induction of the subsequent ES. However, among the data in the literature, previous irradiation to the ES site was noted in only 12.1% of the patients in the study of Applebaum et al. [25] and among the cases compiled in Table 2 with available data on the previous radiation, there were some patients with TBI (2 of 7), but also patients with no radiation to the body parts later affected by ES.

The pathogenesis of Ewing sarcoma is strongly linked to the presence of a translocation between the EWSR1 gene and a member of the ETS gene family [11]. The occurrence of the translocation itself was for a long time considered to be a random event. In addition, the risk of developing ES has been linked to increased maternal age [44] and there are associations with exposure to environmental toxins [3, 8, 9]. Alternatively, there are striking differences in the incidence ES according to racial background, ES showing significantly higher incidence among Caucasians than in patients of African origin. Recently published observations [13] of a different frequency of SNPs variants of the EGR2 gene related to Ewing sarcoma susceptibility and may account for this observation, since the frequency of the SNP variant is significantly higher in the non-Africans than in patients of African origin. This important study provides deeper insights into the etiology of the occurrence of this specific translocation associated sarcoma and allows the conclusion that this is not a random disease but rather the expression of a germ line predisposition syndrome, thus accounting for the strong predilection of the Ewing sarcoma to occur in young patients, similar to other genetically linked tumors.

Due to advances in next generation sequencing techniques and the application of powerful computational tools, similar germ line association studies (genomewide association studies, GWAS) are currently possible on large sets of genetic data for many tumor types. Germ line associations of patients with ALL has been recorded for susceptibility, drug response, and toxicities of ALL therapy [49]. Speculatively, as yet not identified common genetic predisposition trait may exist for Ewing sarcoma and some other neoplasia, including hematologic diseases.

Interestingly, in the recent comprehensive study of germ line mutations in the best characterized genes associated with cancer predisposition syndromes in pediatric cancer patients, 5 patients with relevant mutations (3 patients with TP53 gene mutations, one patients with PMS2 gene mutation, and one patient with RET gene mutation) were identified among 46 (10.8%) patients with Ewing sarcoma, frequency of which was higher than in cases of rhabdomyosarcoma (7%, 3/43) [50]. Ewing sarcoma has been rarely reported in well-defined germ line mutation associated syndromes (Cowden syndrome [51], multiple osteochondromatosis [52], and Williams syndrome [15]); however it has never been listed as a syndrome defining entity. Of note, none of the patients in our study had known cancer predisposition syndromes or family history of a recognized risk constellation.

According to Sultan et al. [53], 3% of Ewing sarcoma patients develop secondary tumors (4–9-fold risk compared to the general population, the risk being higher for children). In such cases, therapy associated hematologic neoplasms, radiation associated sarcomas, or carcinomas follow multimodal Ewing sarcoma therapy. The relative risk of developing a second malignancy seems to be higher for Ewing sarcoma patients in comparison to other tumors (except for retinoblastoma and primitive neuroectodermal tumors of the central nervous system), suggesting a relationship of ES to either aggressive chemotherapy or genetic predisposition, which may be augmented by the application of cytostatic and cytotoxic drugs.

In summary, we provide a detailed description of well-documented cases of Ewing sarcoma following a primary hematologic malignancy. Additionally we have reviewed the literature on this association and discussed the possible pathogenetic aspects. As the survival of cancer patients will continue to improve in the future, it is important to understand the risks associated with this success, including the risk of the development of second malignancies, both therapy related and/or linked to the genetic background of the patients.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank José Alves do Carmo, M.D., and Sara Ismail, M.D. (Department of Hematology and Department of Pathology, Hospital Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte, Lisbon, Portugal), for sharing data.

References

  1. P. C. Nathan, B. Hayes-Lattin, J. J. Sisler, and M. M. Hudson, “Critical issues in transition and survivorship for adolescents and young adults with cancers,” Cancer, vol. 117, no. 10, pp. 2335–2341, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. A. Kishtagari, M. Tavakkoli, and J. H. Park, “Survivorship in adolescents and young adults,” Acta Haematologica, vol. 132, no. 3-4, pp. 383–390, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. D. K. Choi, I. Helenowski, and N. Hijiya, “Secondary malignancies in pediatric cancer survivors: perspectives and review of the literature,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 135, no. 8, pp. 1764–1773, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. K. Dunleavy, M. Roschewski, and W. H. Wilson, “Precision treatment of distinct molecular subtypes of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: ascribing treatment based on the molecular phenotype,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 20, no. 20, pp. 5182–5193, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. J. D. Tward, M. M. M. Wendland, D. C. Shrieve, A. Szabo, and D. K. Gaffney, “The risk of secondary malignancies over 30 years after the treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma,” Cancer, vol. 107, no. 1, pp. 108–115, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. N. Esiashvili, M. Goodman, and R. B. Marcus Jr., “Changes in incidence and survival of Ewing sarcoma patients over the past 3 decades: surveillance epidemiology and end results data,” Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 425–430, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. M. A. Applebaum, J. Worch, K. K. Matthay et al., “Clinical features and outcomes in patients with extraskeletal Ewing sarcoma,” Cancer, vol. 117, no. 13, pp. 3027–3032, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. N. J. Balamuth and R. B. Womer, “Ewing's sarcoma,” The Lancet Oncology, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 184–192, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. E.-Y. K. Choi, J. M. Gardner, D. R. Lucas, J. B. McHugh, and R. M. Patel, “Ewing sarcoma,” Seminars in Diagnostic Pathology, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 39–47, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. G. M. Ibrahim, A. Fallah, M. Shahideh, U. Tabori, and J. T. Rutka, “Primary Ewing's sarcoma affecting the central nervous system: a review and proposed prognostic considerations,” Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 203–209, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. E. de Alava, L. S. Lessnik, and P. H. Sorensen, “Ewing sarcoma,” in WHO Classification of Tumours of Soft Tissue and Bone, C. D. M. Fletcher, J. A. Bridge, P. C. W. Hogendoorn, and F. Mertens, Eds., pp. 305–309, IARC, Lyon, France, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  12. K. N. Ganjoo and S. Patel, “The treatment outcome for adult patients with Ewing's sarcoma,” Current Oncology Reports, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 372–377, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. T. G. P. Grünewald, V. Bernard, P. Gilardi-Hebenstreit et al., “Chimeric EWSR1-FLI1 regulates the Ewing sarcoma susceptibility gene EGR2 via a GGAA microsatellite,” Nature Genetics, vol. 47, no. 9, pp. 1073–1078, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. N. Hiramoto, Y. Kobayashi, J. Nomoto et al., “Ewing sarcoma arising after treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma,” Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 417–421, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. N. Vanhapiha, S. Knuutila, K. Vettenranta, and O. Lohi, “Burkitt lymphoma and Ewing sarcoma in a child with Williams syndrome,” Pediatric Blood and Cancer, vol. 61, no. 10, pp. 1877–1879, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. B. Bode-Lesniewska, J. Hodler, A. von Hochstetter, L. Guillou, U. Exner, and R. Caduff, “Late solitary bone metastasis of a primary pulmonary synovial sarcoma with SYT-SSX1 translocation type: case report with a long follow-up,” Virchows Archiv, vol. 446, no. 3, pp. 310–315, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. U. Yamaguchi, T. Hasegawa, Y. Morimoto et al., “A practical approach to the clinical diagnosis of Ewing's sarcoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumour and other small round cell tumours sharing EWS rearrangement using new fluorescence in situ hybridisation probes for EWSR1 on formalin fixed, paraffin wax embedded tissue,” Journal of Clinical Pathology, vol. 58, no. 10, pp. 1051–1056, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. B. Bode, S. Frigerio, S. Behnke et al., “Mutations in the tyrosine kinase domain of the EGFR gene are rare in synovial sarcoma,” Modern Pathology, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 541–547, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. D. Modritz, R. Ladenstein, U. Pötschger et al., “Treatment for soft tissue sarcoma in childhood and adolescence. Austrian results within the CWS 96 study,” Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift, vol. 117, no. 5-6, pp. 196–209, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. J. Zhong, N. Chen, X. Chen et al., “Peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumor of the kidney in a 51-year-old female following breast cancer: a case report and review of the literature,” Oncology Letters, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 108–112, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. M. Cole, S. Parajuli, D. Laske et al., “Peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumor of the dura in a 51-year-old woman following intensive treatment for breast cancer,” American Journal of Case Reports, vol. 15, pp. 294–299, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. K. J. Helton, B. D. Fletcher, L. E. Kun, J. J. Jenkins III, and C. B. Pratt, “Bone tumors other than osteosarcoma after retinoblastoma,” Cancer, vol. 71, no. 9, pp. 2847–2853, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. J. U. Cope, M. Tsokos, and R. W. Miller, “Ewing sarcoma and sinonasal neuroectodermal tumors as second malignant tumors after retinoblastoma and other neoplasms,” Medical and Pediatric Oncology, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 290–294, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. S. Tanik, K. Zengin, S. Albayrak, R. Eryilmaz, D. Yilmaz, and N. Pirinçci, “Cutaneous Ewing's sarcoma secondary to chemotherapy given for testis tumor: case report,” International Journal of Surgery Case Reports, vol. 5, no. 12, pp. 972–974, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. M. A. Applebaum, R. Goldsby, J. Neuhaus, and S. G. DuBois, “Clinical features and outcomes in patients with secondary Ewing sarcoma,” Pediatric Blood and Cancer, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 611–615, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. H. Tilly, C. Bastard, B. Chevallier, E. Halkin, and M. Monconduit, “Chromosomal abnormalities in secondary Ewing's sarcoma,” The Lancet, vol. 324, no. 8406, p. 812, 1984. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. A. T. Meadows, G. J. D'Angio, V. Mike et al., “Patterns of second malignant neoplasms in children,” Cancer, vol. 40, supplement 4, pp. 1903–1911, 1977. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. A. Zoubek, I. Simonitsch, E. R. Panzer-Grümayer et al., “Ewing tumor after treatment of Ki-1+ anaplastic large cell lymphoma Therapy-associated secondary neoplasm or unrelated coincidence?” Cancer Genetics and Cytogenetics, vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 5–11, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. F. Antillon, S. C. Kaste, J. J. Jenkins et al., “Primitive neuroectodermal tumor of bone as a second malignant neoplasm in a child previously treated for acute lymphoblastic leukemia,” Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 473–476, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. J. Aparicio, A. Segura, J. Montalar, A. Verdeguer, V. Castel, and A. B. Sanchez-Heras, “Letter to the editor: ‘secondary cancers after ewing sarcoma and ewing sarcoma as second malignant neoplasm’,” Medical and Pediatric Oncology, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 259–260, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  31. G. Bisogno, G. Sotti, Y. Nowicki et al., “Soft tissue sarcoma as a second malignant neoplasm in the pediatric age group,” Cancer, vol. 100, no. 8, pp. 1758–1765, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. G. E. Kim, B. Beach, J. M. Gastier-Foster et al., “Ewing sarcoma as a second malignant neoplasm after acute lymphoblastic leukemia,” Pediatric Blood & Cancer, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 57–59, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  33. S. L. Spunt, C. Rodriguez-Galindo, C. E. Fuller et al., “Ewing sarcoma-family tumors that arise after treatment of primary childhood cancer,” Cancer, vol. 107, no. 1, pp. 201–206, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. A. P. Anselmo, C. Cartoni, A. Pacchiarotti et al., “Peripheral neuroectodermal tumor of the chest (Askin tumor) as secondary neoplasm after Hodgkin's disease: a case report,” Annals of Hematology, vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 311–313, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. R. Delgado-Chavez, P. Sobrevilla-Calvo, L. Green-Schneewiss, E. Reynoso-Gomez, and L. Quintanilla-Martinez, “Peripheral neuroectodermal tumor of the chest wall in a patient treated for Hodgkin's disease,” Leukemia and Lymphoma, vol. 17, no. 5-6, pp. 509–513, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. C. R. Suarez, S. J. Bertolone, A. B. Raj, and S. Coventry, “Second malignant neoplasms in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: primitive neuroectodermal tumor of the chest wall with germline p53 mutation as a second malignant neoplasm,” American Journal of Hematology, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 52–56, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. A. Khadwal, G. Biswas, B. Arora, P. A. Kurkure, C. Deshmukh, and V. Shetty, “Primitive neuroectodermal tumor (PNET) as second malignancy after treatment of Hodgkin's disease,” Indian Journal of Pediatrics, vol. 73, no. 5, pp. 437–438, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. S. Osone, H. Hosoi, K. Tanaka et al., “A case of a Ewing sarcoma family tumor in the urinary bladder after treatment for acute lymphoblastic leukemia,” Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, vol. 29, no. 12, pp. 841–844, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. M. Renard, S. Suciu, Y. Bertrand et al., “Second neoplasm in children treated in EORTC 58881 trial for acute lymphoblastic malignancies: low incidence of CNS tumours,” Pediatric Blood and Cancer, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 119–125, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. S. H. Lim, J. Y. Lee, J. Y. Lee et al., “Unusual presentation of Ewing sarcoma in the adrenal gland: a secondary malignancy from a survivor of Burkitt lymphoma,” Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 676–680, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. T. O. Henderson, J. Whitton, M. Stovall et al., “Secondary sarcomas in childhood cancer survivors: a report from the childhood cancer survivor study,” Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol. 99, no. 4, pp. 300–308, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. J. Manner, B. Radlwimmer, P. Hohenberger et al., “MYC high level gene amplification is a distinctive feature of angiosarcomas after irradiation or chronic lymphedema,” The American Journal of Pathology, vol. 176, no. 1, pp. 34–39, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. J.-F. Egger, J.-M. Coindre, J. Benhattar, P. Coucke, and L. Guillou, “Radiation-associated synovial sarcoma: clinicopathologic and molecular analysis of two cases,” Modern Pathology, vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 998–1004, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. M. Joannides and D. Grimwade, “Molecular biology of therapy-related leukaemias,” Clinical and Translational Oncology, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 8–14, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. J. L. Nitiss, “Targeting DNA topoisomerase II in cancer chemotherapy,” Nature Reviews Cancer, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 338–350, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. M. Pendleton, R. H. Lindsey, C. A. Felix, D. Grimwade, and N. Osheroff, “Topoisomerase II and leukemia,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1310, no. 1, pp. 98–110, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. C. N. Duncan, N. S. Majhail, R. Brazauskas et al., “Long-term survival and late effects among one-year survivors of second allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for relapsed acute leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes,” Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 151–158, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. W. Leung, G. Neale, F. Behm et al., “Deficient innate immunity, thymopoiesis, and gene expression response to radiation in survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia,” Cancer Epidemiology, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 303–308, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. T. Moriyama, M. V. Relling, and J. J. Yang, “Inherited genetic variation in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia,” Blood, vol. 125, no. 26, pp. 3988–3995, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. J. Zhang, M. F. Walsh, G. Wu et al., “Germline mutations in predisposition genes in pediatric cancer,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 373, no. 24, pp. 2336–2346, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. M. C. Chandhanayingyong, N. M. Bernthal, P. Ungarreevittaya, S. D. Nelson, S. P. Chawla, and A. S. Singh, “Ewing sarcoma in a patient with Cowden syndrome,” Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 1310–1314, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  52. P. A. Marrero Barrera and P. V. Marrero Ortiz, “Ewing sarcoma superimposed on a previous osteochondroma in multiple osteochondromatosis,” Orthopedics, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. e403–e406, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. I. Sultan, R. Rihani, R. Hazin, and C. Rodriguez-Galindo, “Second malignancies in patients with Ewing Sarcoma Family of Tumors: a population-based study,” Acta Oncologica, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 237–244, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2016 Fabian Wolpert et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

2139 Views | 605 Downloads | 5 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.