Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Stem Cells International
Volume 2016, Article ID 3924858, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3924858
Review Article

Preconditioning of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells to Enhance Their Regulation of the Immune Response

1Department of Biomedical Sciences, Nazarbayev University School of Medicine, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan
2Stem Cell Laboratory, National Center for Biotechnology, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan
3Center for Life Sciences, Nazarbayev University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan
4Division of Cardiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
5Research Laboratory of Electronics and Department of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA

Received 5 August 2016; Accepted 28 September 2016

Academic Editor: Marcelo Ezquer

Copyright © 2016 Arman Saparov et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have attracted the attention of researchers and clinicians for their ability to differentiate into a number of cell types, participate in tissue regeneration, and repair the damaged tissues by producing various growth factors and cytokines, as well as their unique immunoprivilege in alloreactive hosts. The immunomodulatory functions of exogenous MSCs have been widely investigated in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases and transplantation research. However, a harsh environment at the site of tissue injury/inflammation with insufficient oxygen supply, abundance of reactive oxygen species, and presence of other harmful molecules that damage the adoptively transferred cells collectively lead to low survival and engraftment of the transferred cells. Preconditioning of MSCs ex vivo by hypoxia, inflammatory stimulus, or other factors/conditions prior to their use in therapy is an adaptive strategy that prepares MSCs to survive in the harsh environment and to enhance their regulatory function of the local immune responses. This review focuses on a number of approaches in preconditioning human MSCs with the goal of augmenting their capacity to regulate both innate and adaptive immune responses.

1. Introduction

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are a heterogeneous fibroblast-like population of cells that can be isolated from nearly all human tissues, including, but not limited to, bone marrow, adipose, skeletal muscle, heart, umbilical cord, and placenta. MSCs have attracted the attention of scientists and clinicians due to their multilineage differentiation potential and active participation in tissue repair and regeneration after migration to the site of tissue injury [13]. When stimulated by appropriate signals, MSCs are capable of differentiating into a number of specialized cell types such as adipocytes, osteoblasts, chondrocytes, and, less frequently, endothelial cells and cardiomyocytes [46]. In addition, MSCs possess strong immunosuppressive and immunomodulatory properties that are mediated by both cell-cell contact and production of various signaling factors. MSCs are capable of suppressing or modulating the components of the innate immune system and the functions of T and B cells including regulatory cells, along with influencing Th1 and Th2 cell differentiation [710]. Another advantage of MSCs is their immunoprivilege and relative safety when used in allogeneic hosts. However, they can lose their immunoprivilege after differentiation by upregulating MHC class II and Ia expressions and downregulating the expression of immunosuppressive MHC class Ib [7]. Moreover, the reduction in prostaglandin E2 production plays a role in losing MSC hypoimmunogenicity. Despite the large number of published data regarding the benefits of MSCs in preclinical experimental settings, the use of MSCs in treating patients with various immune system related diseases showed mixed results [11, 12]. This discrepancy is presumably attributable to the inability of MSCs to survive and/or to function properly in the inhospitable host environment.

One of the approaches to improve the ability of MSCs to survive in the harsh microenvironment and to enhance their regulation of the immune responses is to precondition the cells ex vivo in the specifically designed/engineered environment with different physical or chemical parameter(s)/factor(s). For example, hypoxic preconditioning and three-dimensional culture aggregates are common approaches to mimic natural MSC habitats in tissues, such as bone marrow and adipose tissue, for enhancing MSC survival. The exposure of MSCs to hypoxia caused AKT and BAD phosphorylation as well as the increase in BAG1 and BCL-XL mRNA expression and, as a result, improved cell survival by activating antiapoptotic signaling mechanisms [13]. Hsiao and colleagues reported that hypoxia preconditioned MSCs increased their survival by ATK activation and enhanced their migration by upregulating chemokine receptors, such as CXCR4 and CX3CR1 [14]. Increased survival and migration of MSCs exposed to hypoxia ex vivo could explain the increased tissue regenerative potential of these cells in the hind limb ischemia injury model [15]. Beegle and colleagues demonstrated that hypoxic preconditioning of MSCs increased their survival by reducing glucose consumption and lactate secretion as well as lowering the levels of cytochrome c and heme oxygenase 1 [16]. The combination of hypoxia with reoxygenation further increased the expression of prosurvival proteins (HIF-1α, erythropoietin receptor, and phosphorylated AKT) and trophic factors (VEGF, ANG, FGF, and BDNF) by MSCs [17]. Furthermore, MSC cultures in three-dimensional aggregates increased their survival by reducing caspase 3/7 activity [18, 19] and by upregulating BCL-2 and AKT [20].

Taking into consideration the natural interactions between immune cells and MSCs at the site of tissue injury/inflammation [8, 21, 22], it is important to enhance the ability of MSCs to regulate the immune response. For example, if MSCs can effectively regulate the function of inflammatory cells that actively damage the surrounding tissue and/or participate in cell debris clearance at the site of injury, this would be likely to enhance tissue healing, which ultimately reduces scar formation. To enable the dampening of the acute inflammatory response and to promote the regeneration of the functional tissue, it is important to enhance the capacity of MSCs to induce constructive immune response after injury. This review focuses on various approaches in preconditioning human MSCs with the goal of enhancing their ability to regulate both innate and adaptive immune responses.

2. The Effects of Preconditioned Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells on the Innate Immune Response

MSCs are capable of influencing the function of various cells and components of innate immunity including monocytes/macrophages, neutrophils, natural killer (NK) cells, and the complement system [23, 24]. This section discusses recently published data on the effect of MSC preconditioning on the regulation of the innate immune response.

2.1. Hypoxia-Treated MSCs and Innate Immunity

When exposed to hypoxia, MSCs upregulated expression of antiapoptotic proteins to improve their survival in the hostile environment and thus to increase availability of locally functional MSCs [1316]. Hypoxia also significantly increased the proliferation of bone marrow-derived MSCs (BM-MSCs) and production of IL-6 and IL-8 by the treated cells [25]. Moreover, the conditioned media from hypoxia-treated MSCs increased migration of CD14+ monocytes in vitro and macrophages in vivo in an experimental model of wound healing [25].

2.2. Treatment of MSCs with Cytokines and Innate Immune Response

A number of studies report the effects of cytokine-preconditioned MSCs on innate immunity [2629]. Noone and colleagues demonstrated that the pretreatment of human MSCs with interferon gamma (IFN-γ) results in increased suppression of NK activation and enhanced protection of MSCs from NK-mediated cytotoxicity [26]. This was in part through upregulation of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) and prostaglandin E-2 (PGE-2) synthesis. In addition, INF-γ pretreated MSCs increased expression of nonclassical MHC ligands for the NK inhibitory receptor CD94/NKG2A and reduced expression of activating ligands ULBP1–3 which is recognized by NKG2D [26]. Combining IFN-γ treatment with TNF-α significantly increased the ability of MSCs to secrete factor H, which is a key molecule involved in the inhibition of complement activation [30]. The depletion of factor H in the MSC-conditioned serum-free media abolished their complement inhibitory activities. Moreover, the inhibition of IDO and PGE-2 production decreased the production of factor H by MSCs, which indicates an important role of these molecules in the production of factor H [30]. Furthermore, François and colleagues reported that the treatment of BM-MSCs with TNF-α and IFN-γ increased the production of IDO, which participated in the differentiation of CD14+ monocytes into IL-10 producing anti-inflammatory CD206+ M2 macrophages [27]. Moreover, the generated anti-inflammatory M2 macrophages were capable of suppressing the proliferation of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells that were activated via CD3/CD28 pathway [27].

The treatment of umbilical cord-derived MSCs (UC-MSCs) with IL-1β significantly upregulated the expression of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), IL-6, and IL-8 compared with untreated MSCs [28]. IL-1β treatment also enhanced the MSC production of CXCR4 and the ability of MSCs to migrate in vitro [28]. In addition, IL-1β-treated MSCs improved their ability to migrate to the spleen, mesenteric lymph nodes, and colon in the experimental model of colitis in mice and contributed to the reduction of the number of M1 macrophages in the murine peritoneal cavity. Using a similar treatment, Carrero and colleagues reported that IL-1β preconditioning of MSCs isolated from bone marrow increased expression of multiple cytokines including TNF-α, IL-6, IL-8, and IL-23A and chemokines such as CCL5, CCL20, CXCL1, CXCL3, CXCL5, CXCL6, CXCL10, and CXCL11 as well as adhesion molecules VCAM-1, ICAM-1, and ICAM-4 [29]. Furthermore, the treatment of MSCs with IL-1β also increased their ability to recruit neutrophils, monocytes, lymphocytes, and eosinophils, with NF-κB playing an important role in this process [29]. These data indicate that the pretreatment of MSCs with IL-1β not only increases expression of multiple cell adhesion molecules, which in turn facilitate the migration of MSCs to the site of injury/inflammation, but also enhances the production of numerous chemokines, which are capable of recruiting immune cells and cytokines, which can regulate the function of the target cells.

2.3. Treatment of MSCs with TLR Ligands and Innate Immunity

Conditioned media from LPS-treated human UC-MSCs significantly increased the expression of anti-inflammatory cytokines, including IL-10 and TGF-β, and reduced expression of proinflammatory cytokines, such as IL-1, IL-6, and TNF-α, by human monocytic cell line. The conditioned media also increased the monocyte’s preferential differentiation towards anti-inflammatory M2 macrophages [31]. This effect may be mediated by let-7 microRNA through the TLR4/NF-κB/STAT3/ATK signaling pathway. In addition, let-7 microRNA participate in the differentiation and effector function of natural killer T cells [32].

Recently, Fuenzalida and colleagues compared the stimulation of UC-MSCs via toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) by using LPS, a TLR4 ligand, to the stimulation via TLR3 by using polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid (poly(I:C)), a TLR3 ligand [33]. The treatment of MSCs with poly(I:C) significantly increased expression of IDO compared to the untreated cells, while LPS treatment showed no effect on the MSC IDO expression. However, both poly(I:C) and LPS elevated the levels of IL-6 and IL-8 in MSCs compared to the untreated cells; LPS treatment demonstrated higher expression of both cytokines. These results suggest that MSCs stimulated via TLR3 have a stronger immunosuppressive phenotype with IDO upregulation compared to MSCs stimulated via TLR4.

PGE-2 is an important molecule that converts proinflammatory M1 macrophages into anti-inflammatory M2 macrophages. Gray and colleagues screened several molecules, including IFN-β, IFN-γ, IL-1β, IL-6, LPS, and poly(I:C), on their ability to enhance the immunomodulatory properties of MSCs [34]. IFN-β, IFN-γ, IL-1β, or LPS treatment of MSCs significantly increased the production of PGE-2, with IL-1β and LPS having the highest impact. The pairing of these factors demonstrated that the combination of IL-1β and LPS had the greatest effect on the production of PGE-2. The downregulation of PGE-2 production in macrophages by MSCs may be mediated by the inhibition of MAPK and ERK phosphorylation [35]. In addition, the treatment of MSCs with TGF-β can also decrease the production of PGE-2 by MSCs and decrease the number of CD14+ CD206+ macrophages [36]. Moreover, the assessment of TNF-α production, as an important proinflammatory cytokine produced by macrophages, showed that pretreatment of MSCs with IL-1β or LPS had the greatest impact on the suppression of TNF-α production by human macrophages. However, the combination of these two factors reduced the ability of MSCs for suppression [34]. Thus, these data demonstrate that the combination of two most effective factors can unexpectedly decrease MSCs’ ability to regulate the immune response compared to the use of a single factor. This suggests potential conflicts in regulatory signals.

2.4. 3-Dimensional Cell Culture of MSCs and Innate Immune Response

In addition to using various factors and hypoxia, a 3-dimensional cell culture system has been used in order to mimic in vivo development and to improve the immunomodulatory properties of human MSCs. For example, it has been shown that conditioned medium from MSC spheroids more effectively inhibited the production of TNF-α, IL-6, IL-12p40, IL-23, and CXCL2 and increased the production of anti-inflammatory cytokines IL-1ra and IL-10 by LPS stimulated macrophages. MSC spheroid conditioned medium also induced higher production of PGE-2 in LPS stimulated macrophages when compared to the conditioned medium from the MSC monolayer culture counterpart [37]. In addition, the formation of spheres by MSCs leads to self-activation of tumor necrosis factor alpha-induced protein 6 (TSG6) and COX-2 that increase PGE-2 production and conversion of proinflammatory M1 macrophages into anti-inflammatory M2 macrophages, as well as more effectively suppressing TNF-α production by LPS stimulated macrophages [38, 39]. In another study, it was demonstrated that the immunosuppressive effect of MSC spheroids on the functional activity of macrophages can be significantly increased by the combinatorial treatment of IFN-γ and TNF-α [40]. In particular, MSC spheroids preconditioned with IFN-γ and TNF-α enhanced the suppression of TNF-α production by macrophages compared to the untreated spheroids. However, it was observed that immunomodulatory factor secretion is highly dependent on the composition of the cell culture medium. Human MSC spheroids in MesenCult-XF serum-free medium displayed significantly less expression of PGE-2, IDO, TGF-β1, and IL-6 compared to MSCs cultured in the same medium supplemented with fetal bovine serum [40]. Moreover, Ylostalo and colleagues have also demonstrated that MSC activation in a 3D environment critically depends on the culture medium. They revealed that the addition of human serum albumin into defined xeno-free culture media resulted in compact MSC spheres with high cell viability, together with high expression of anti-inflammatory molecules (PGE-2 and TSG6). Moreover, it was found that MSC spheres cultured in this medium markedly inhibit the activity of LPS stimulated macrophages [41].

Thus, there are multiple MSC preconditioning approaches that can be utilized either singly or combinatorically to enhance MSC regulation of the innate immune system. Table 1 summarizes these approaches in MSC preconditioning and their effects on the innate immune response.

Table 1: Regulation of the innate immune response by preconditioned human mesenchymal stem cells.

3. The Effects of Preconditioned Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells on the Adaptive Immune Response

An important feature of MSCs is their powerful immunomodulatory effect on the adaptive immune system, which makes them attractive cellular therapeutic agents to treat inflammatory diseases, such as graft versus host disease, systemic lupus erythematosus, and rheumatoid arthritis and to maintain peripheral immunological tolerance after organ transplantation [4248]. Over the past decade, a number of studies reported that preconditioning of MSCs promotes their immunomodulatory effects on the cells of the adaptive immune system [49]. To improve the therapeutic efficacy of MSCs, different preconditioning strategies have been adopted. Hypoxic stimulation and cytokine application are two major approaches used for the optimization of the immunomodulatory properties of MSCs.

3.1. Hypoxia-Treated MSCs and Adaptive Immunity

For the preconditioning of MSCs, hypoxic pretreatment enhances the immunomodulatory effect of MSCs by improving the secretion of cytokines and soluble factors related to immunosuppression [5052]. For example, it has been reported that hypoxia modulates the cytokine profile of human gingiva-derived MSCs (G-MSCs), by stimulating the production of anti-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-10, and shifting the cytokine profile towards the anti-inflammatory mediators. In one study, hypoxia promoted the immunosuppressive effects of human MSCs by increasing the IL-10 production and FasL expression by human G-MSCs, thereby enhancing their prohibitory effect on peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) proliferation and promoting the induction of PBMC apoptosis [53]. Roemeling-Van Rhijn and colleagues showed that hypoxia markedly upregulated expression of IDO in human adipose tissue-derived MSCs (AT-MSCs) [54], which is critical in immune regulation by MSCs in part through induction of T cell anergy, generation of regulatory T cells (Tregs), and increased IL-10 production by effector T cells [55, 56]. PGE-2 also plays an important role in mediating the suppression of T cell proliferation by human mesoangioblasts [56]. Additionally, it was demonstrated that coculture of AT-MSCs in hypoxic condition enhanced the suppression of CD4+ and CD8+ T cell [54] as well as PBMC proliferation [57] in comparison to normoxic culture in both cell-cell contact and transwell conditions.

3.2. Treatment of MSCs with Cytokines and Adaptive Immune Response

In addition to hypoxic preconditioning, MSCs have the ability to inhibit immune cell activity in response to inflammatory cytokines and soluble factors. This process, termed priming, is very complex and little is known about all of the factors and signaling pathways involved [24]. One of the most studied mechanisms by which inflammation triggers MSC immunomodulatory activity is a treatment with IFN-γ. Krampera and colleagues demonstrated an important role of IFN-γ, which is mainly produced by NK, CD4+, and CD8+ T cells, in the regulation of immunomodulatory functions of MSCs [58]. The immunosuppressive activity of MSCs on proliferation of T and NK cells is partially mediated by the enhancement of IDO production. This data shows that the inflammatory environment stimulates the function of MSCs and the blockade of IFN-γ abrogates this effect. Moreover, it was reported that IFN-γ-treated human BM-MSCs markedly suppress Th1 cytokine (IFN-γ, TNF-α, and IL-2) production by T cells and their proliferation [59]. Although IFN-γ-treated MSCs upregulate their IDO expression, the inhibitory function of MSCs can be mediated by B7H1 and B7DC pathways. In another study, it was demonstrated that the treatment of UC-MSCs with IFN-γ enhanced their ability to induce a greater number of Tregs in comparison to UC-MSCs not treated with IFN-γ [60]. Similar observations by Fan and colleagues demonstrated that IL-1β-treated human UC-MSCs significantly increased the numbers of Tregs and Th2 cells, in addition to the decreased numbers of Th1 and Th17 cells in their spleens and mesenteric lymph nodes compared with the control mice in the experimental model of colitis [28].

Recently, it has been reported that the combination of IFN-γ and TNF-α is more effective for induction of MSCs in expressing high levels of immunosuppressive molecules (IDO, programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) and HLA-G) and proinflammatory chemokines including CCL5, CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11 [61]. These chemokines and molecules can induce the accumulation of immune cells in close association with MSCs, thereby forming a microenvironment in which the effects of the locally acting factors produced by MSCs lead to strong immunosuppression [62]. Furthermore, Cuerquis and colleagues demonstrated that the pretreatment of allogeneic MSCs with IFN-γ and TNF-α significantly increased the suppressive activity of these cells towards CD3/CD28 activated T cells compared to the control group without pretreatment; this effect was mediated by IDO rather than PGE-2 [63]. However, IFN-γ and TNF-α pretreatment reduced the early surge in IFN-γ and IL-2 production by activated PBMCs that was induced by MSCs without any treatment. In regard to unstimulated PBMCs, the pretreatment of MSCs with IFN-γ and TNF-α increased CD69 expression by CD4+ T cells when compared to the group without any treatment. Moreover, it was shown that INF-γ and TNF-α promote the ability of human MSCs to express programmed death ligand-2 (PD-L2) and induce the differentiation of CD4+ IL-10+ and CD8+ IL-10+ Treg subpopulations [64].

Prasanna and colleagues directly compared two populations of MSCs isolated either from bone marrow or from Wharton’s jelly and reported that pretreatment of BM-MSCs with either IFN-γ or TNF-α enhanced their ability to suppress mitogen-induced proliferation of lymphocytes while not affecting Wharton’s jelly-derived MSCs (WJ-MSCs) [65]. However, the treatment of WJ-MSCs with either IFN-γ or TNF-α had a more drastic suppressive effect on lymphocyte proliferation in the mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR) compared to BM-MSCs. These data demonstrate that similar treatment of MSCs isolated from different anatomical locations had different effects on the mitogenic or allogenic T cell responses.

Preconditioning of UC-MSCs with poly(I:C) significantly increased the suppression of T cell proliferation in the MLR compared with untreated cells or MSCs treated with LPS [33]. This result demonstrates differences in the MSC responses to the stimulation of TLR3 or TLR4 ligands; MSCs preconditioned with TLR3 ligands produced a stronger immunosuppressive phenotype compared with MSCs preconditioned with TLR4 ligands.

In addition to the treatment of MSCs with IFN-γ, TNF-α, and IL-1β for the enhancement of their regulation of the immune response, a novel approach that uses IL-17A was recently reported as an alternative approach for cell preconditioning. Sivanathan and colleagues demonstrated that IL-17A treatment did not upregulate either MHC class I or class II expression by MSCs and more effectively increased the suppression of mitogen-activated CD3+ T cells compared to the IFN-γ, TNF-α, or IL-1β treatment [66]. IL-17A treatment of MSCs further increased their ability to downregulate CD25 expression by the mitogen-activated CD4+ T cells and inhibited Th1 cytokine production (IFN-γ, TNF-α, and IL-2) by this population of cells. Moreover, IL-17A-treated MSCs, similar to IFN-γ-treated MSCs, are capable of increasing or inducing CD4+FoxP3+ Tregs in cocultures with mitogen-activated CD4+ CD25− T cells in a cell-contact dependent manner. These results suggest that IL-17A-treated MSCs increase the generation of Tregs that are potent suppressors T cell activation without upregulation of either MHC class I or class II expression. This promising approach can be further explored in the tolerance maintained after organ transplantation and the treatment of autoimmune diseases.

Other than the common mediators used by MSCs to modulate the immune response such as IDO, PGE-2, and HLA-G, galectin-9 has been shown to be upregulated by MSCs in response to a number of stimuli including IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-1a, IL-1β, PGE-2, and some TLR ligands [67]. The importance of galectin-9 in the suppression of proliferation of both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells by MSCs was demonstrated by the deletion of galectin-9 gene that reduced the suppressive effects of MSCs. Moreover, galectin-9 plays an important role in the generation and function of inducible regulatory T cells [68].

3.3. Glucocorticoid-Treated MSCs and Adaptive Immunity

The use of glucocorticoid steroids is another approach to precondition the cells. Ankrum and colleagues demonstrated that glucocorticoids, such as budesonide and dexamethasone, increased IDO activity in primary human MSCs without altering their metabolic activity, morphology, or viability and upregulating MCH class II [69]. This pretreatment even decreased the expression of MHC class I by PBMC, which can be beneficial when allogeneic MSCs are used in the therapy. Interestingly, the addition of IFN-γ to the preconditioned media upregulated the expression of both MHC class I and MHC class II molecules. The increased IDO activity is mediated through glucocorticoid receptor and FOXO3, since the inhibition of either of these molecules abrogates this effect.

Table 2 summarizes the effects of MSCs preconditioning on their ability to regulate the adaptive immune response. In summary, many studies have indicated that preconditioning of human MSCs can be used to enhance their regulation of the adaptive immune response. This approach is definitely worth investigating further for the treatment of autoimmune diseases, particularly for the induction of immune tolerance.

Table 2: Regulation of the adaptive immune response by preconditioned human mesenchymal stem cells.

4. Conclusions

MSCs have the unique ability of differentiating into a number of cell types and contributing to tissue regeneration after being adoptively transferred. However, a hostile environment at the site of tissue injury leads to a low survival rate and engraftment of the transferred cells [2, 70, 71]. Preconditioning of MSCs by hypoxia, inflammatory stimulus, and other factors/conditions prior to their use in therapy is a new strategy to prepare MSCs to survive and function better after transplantation and to enhance their regulation of the local or systemic immune response. A number of approaches have been proposed to precondition MSCs, including hypoxia, cytokines (IFN-γ, TNF-α, and IL-1β), TLR ligands (LPS and poly(I:C)), and 3-dimensional cell culture. These models demonstrated the possibility of enhancing the regulation of both the innate and adaptive immune responses. Optimization of signaling factors and their combinations to be used in MSC preconditioning should be further investigated. Thus, MSC preconditioning enhances the ability of MSCs to survive in the harsh environment and to regulate both innate and adaptive immune responses and this approach can be further explored in the treatment of patients affected by immune system related diseases.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a grant from Nazarbayev University (Arman Saparov).

References

  1. A. I. Caplan and D. Correa, “The MSC: an injury drugstore,” Cell Stem Cell, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 11–15, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. A. Saparov, C.-W. Chen, S. A. Beckman, Y. Wang, and J. Huard, “The role of antioxidation and immunomodulation in postnatal multipotent stem cell-mediated cardiac repair,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 14, no. 8, pp. 16258–16279, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. Y. Wang, X. Chen, W. Cao, and Y. Shi, “Plasticity of mesenchymal stem cells in immunomodulation: pathological and therapeutic implications,” Nature Immunology, vol. 15, no. 11, pp. 1009–1016, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. Q. Chen, P. Shou, C. Zheng et al., “Fate decision of mesenchymal stem cells: adipocytes or osteoblasts?” Cell Death & Differentiation, vol. 23, pp. 1128–1139, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. S. Kokabu, J. W. Lowery, and E. Jimi, “Cell fate and differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells,” Stem Cells International, vol. 2016, Article ID 3753581, 7 pages, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. H. Tao, Z. Han, Z. C. Han, and Z. Li, “Proangiogenic features of mesenchymal stem cells and their therapeutic applications,” Stem Cells International, vol. 2016, Article ID 1314709, 11 pages, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. W. Faiella and R. Atoui, “Immunotolerant properties of mesenchymal stem cells: updated review,” Stem Cells International, vol. 2016, Article ID 1859567, 7 pages, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. M. E. Bernardo and W. E. Fibbe, “Mesenchymal stromal cells: sensors and switchers of inflammation,” Cell Stem Cell, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 392–402, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. M. Najar, G. Raicevic, H. Fayyad-Kazan et al., “Mesenchymal stromal cells and immunomodulation: a gathering of regulatory immune cells,” Cytotherapy, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 160–171, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. A. Uccelli and N. K. Rosbo, “The immunomodulatory function of mesenchymal stem cells: mode of action and pathways,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1351, no. 1, pp. 114–126, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. A. Trounson and C. McDonald, “Stem cell therapies in clinical trials: progress and challenges,” Cell Stem Cell, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 11–22, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. F. Gao, S. M. Chiu, D. A. Motan et al., “Mesenchymal stem cells and immunomodulation: current status and future prospects,” Cell Death & Disease, vol. 7, no. 1, p. e2062, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. A. M. Bader, K. Klose, K. Bieback et al., “Hypoxic preconditioning increases survival and pro-angiogenic capacity of human cord blood mesenchymal stromal cells in vitro,” PLoS ONE, vol. 10, no. 9, Article ID e0138477, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. S. T. Hsiao, R. J. Dilley, G. J. Dusting, and S. Y. Lim, “Ischemic preconditioning for cell-based therapy and tissue engineering,” Pharmacology and Therapeutics, vol. 142, no. 2, pp. 141–153, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. I. Rosová, M. Dao, B. Capoccia, D. Link, and J. A. Nolta, “Hypoxic preconditioning results in increased motility and improved therapeutic potential of human mesenchymal stem cells,” STEM CELLS, vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 2173–2182, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. J. Beegle, K. Lakatos, S. Kalomoiris et al., “Hypoxic preconditioning of mesenchymal stromal cells induces metabolic changes, enhances survival, and promotes cell retention in vivo,” STEM CELLS, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 1818–1828, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. Y. S. Kim, M. Y. Noh, K. A. Cho et al., “Hypoxia/reoxygenation-preconditioned human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells rescue ischemic rat cortical neurons by enhancing trophic factor release,” Molecular Neurobiology, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 792–803, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. S. S. Ho, K. C. Murphy, B. Y. Binder, C. B. Vissers, and J. K. Leach, “Increased survival and function of mesenchymal stem cell spheroids entrapped in instructive alginate hydrogels,” Stem Cells Translational Medicine, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 773–781, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. K. C. Murphy, S. Y. Fang, and J. K. Leach, “Human mesenchymal stem cell spheroids in fibrin hydrogels exhibit improved cell survival and potential for bone healing,” Cell and Tissue Research, vol. 357, no. 1, pp. 91–99, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. Y. Xu, T. Shi, A. Xu, and L. Zhang, “3D spheroid culture enhances survival and therapeutic capacities of MSCs injected into ischemic kidney,” Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 1203–1213, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. D. J. Prockop, “Concise review: two negative feedback loops place mesenchymal stem/stromal cells at the center of early regulators of inflammation,” STEM CELLS, vol. 31, no. 10, pp. 2042–2046, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. A. I. Caplan and J. M. Sorrell, “The MSC curtain that stops the immune system,” Immunology Letters, vol. 168, no. 2, pp. 136–139, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. K. Le Blanc and D. Mougiakakos, “Multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells and the innate immune system,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 383–396, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. M. Krampera, “Mesenchymal stromal cell ‘licensing’: a multistep process,” Leukemia, vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 1408–1414, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. L. Chen, Y. Xu, J. Zhao et al., “Conditioned medium from hypoxic bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells enhances wound healing in mice,” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 4, Article ID e96161, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. C. Noone, A. Kihm, K. English, S. O'Dea, and B. P. Mahon, “IFN-γ stimulated human umbilical-tissue-derived cells potently suppress NK activation and resist NK-mediated cytotoxicity in vitro,” Stem Cells and Development, vol. 22, no. 22, pp. 3003–3014, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. M. François, R. Romieu-Mourez, M. Li, and J. Galipeau, “Human MSC suppression correlates with cytokine induction of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase and bystander M2 macrophage differentiation,” Molecular Therapy, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 187–195, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. H. Fan, G. Zhao, L. Liu et al., “Pre-treatment with IL-1β enhances the efficacy of MSC transplantation in DSS-induced colitis,” Cellular & Molecular Immunology, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 473–481, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. R. Carrero, I. Cerrada, E. Lledó et al., “IL1β induces mesenchymal stem cells migration and leucocyte chemotaxis through NF-κB,” Stem Cell Reviews and Reports, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 905–916, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. Z. Tu, Q. Li, H. Bu, and F. Lin, “Mesenchymal stem cells inhibit complement activation by secreting factor H,” Stem Cells and Development, vol. 19, no. 11, pp. 1803–1809, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. D. Ti, H. Hao, C. Tong et al., “LPS-preconditioned mesenchymal stromal cells modify macrophage polarization for resolution of chronic inflammation via exosome-shuttled let-7b,” Journal of Translational Medicine, vol. 13, no. 1, article 308, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. L. A. Pobezinsky, R. Etzensperger, S. Jeurling et al., “Let-7 microRNAs target the lineage-specific transcription factor PLZF to regulate terminal NKT cell differentiation and effector function,” Nature Immunology, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 517–524, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. P. Fuenzalida, M. Kurte, C. Fernández-O'Ryan et al., “Toll-like receptor 3 pre-conditioning increases the therapeutic efficacy of umbilical cord mesenchymal stromal cells in a dextran sulfate sodium–induced colitis model,” Cytotherapy, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 630–641, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. A. Gray, T. Maguire, R. Schloss, and M. L. Yarmush, “Identification of IL-1β and LPS as optimal activators of monolayer and alginate-encapsulated mesenchymal stromal cell immunomodulation using design of experiments and statistical methods,” Biotechnology Progress, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 1058–1070, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. W. Gu, L. Song, X.-M. Li, D. Wang, X.-J. Guo, and W.-G. Xu, “Mesenchymal stem cells alleviate airway inflammation and emphysema in COPD through down-regulation of cyclooxygenase-2 via p38 and ERK MAPK pathways,” Scientific Reports, vol. 5, article 8733, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. G. Zhao, H. Miao, X. Li et al., “TGF-β3-induced miR-494 inhibits macrophage polarization via suppressing PGE2 secretion in mesenchymal stem cells,” FEBS Letters, vol. 590, no. 11, pp. 1602–1613, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  37. J. H. Ylöstalo, T. J. Bartosh, K. Coble, and D. J. Prockop, “Human mesenchymal stem/stromal cells cultured as spheroids are self-activated to produce prostaglandin E2 that directs stimulated macrophages into an anti-inflammatory phenotype,” Stem Cells, vol. 30, no. 10, pp. 2283–2296, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. T. J. Bartosh, J. H. Ylöstalo, N. Bazhanov, J. Kuhlman, and D. J. Prockop, “Dynamic compaction of human mesenchymal stem/precursor cells into spheres self-activates caspase-dependent il1 signaling to enhance secretion of modulators of inflammation and immunity (PGE2, TSG6, and STC1),” Stem Cells, vol. 31, no. 11, pp. 2443–2456, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. T. J. Bartosh, J. H. Ylöstalo, A. Mohammadipoor et al., “Aggregation of human mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) into 3D spheroids enhances their antiinflammatory properties,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 107, no. 31, pp. 13724–13729, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. J. A. Zimmermann and T. C. Mcdevitt, “Pre-conditioning mesenchymal stromal cell spheroids for immunomodulatory paracrine factor secretion,” Cytotherapy, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 331–345, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. J. H. Ylostalo, T. J. Bartosh, A. Tiblow, and D. J. Prockop, “Unique characteristics of human mesenchymal stromal/progenitor cells pre-activated in 3-dimensional cultures under different conditions,” Cytotherapy, vol. 16, no. 11, pp. 1486–1500, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. W. Cao, K. Cao, J. Cao, Y. Wang, and Y. Shi, “Mesenchymal stem cells and adaptive immune responses,” Immunology Letters, vol. 168, no. 2, pp. 147–153, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. E. Ben-Ami, S. Berrih-Aknin, and A. Miller, “Mesenchymal stem cells as an immunomodulatory therapeutic strategy for autoimmune diseases,” Autoimmunity Reviews, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 410–415, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. S. Aggarwal and M. F. Pittenger, “Human mesenchymal stem cells modulate allogeneic immune cell responses,” Blood, vol. 105, no. 4, pp. 1815–1822, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. L. M. Ball and R. M. Egeler, “Acute GvHD: pathogenesis and classification,” Bone Marrow Transplantation, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. S58–S64, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. L. Sun, K. Akiyama, H. Zhang et al., “Mesenchymal stem cell transplantation reverses multiorgan dysfunction in systemic lupus erythematosus mice and humans,” STEM CELLS, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 1421–1432, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. A. Papadopoulou, M. Yiangou, E. Athanasiou et al., “Mesenchymal stem cells are conditionally therapeutic in preclinical models of rheumatoid arthritis,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 71, no. 10, pp. 1733–1740, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. W. Ge, J. Jiang, M. L. Baroja et al., “Infusion of mesenchymal stem cells and rapamycin synergize to attenuate alloimmune responses and promote cardiac allograft tolerance,” American Journal of Transplantation, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 1760–1772, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. M. W. Lee, S. Ryu, D. S. Kim, K. W. Sung, H. H. Koo, and K. H. Yoo, “Strategies to improve the immunosuppressive properties of human mesenchymal stem cells,” Stem Cell Research and Therapy, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 1, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. T. P. Frazier, J. M. Gimble, I. Kheterpal, and B. G. Rowan, “Impact of low oxygen on the secretome of human adipose-derived stromal/stem cell primary cultures,” Biochimie, vol. 95, no. 12, pp. 2286–2296, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. E. Andreeva, I. Andrianova, J. Rylova, A. Gornostaeva, P. Bobyleva, and L. Buravkova, “Proinflammatory interleukins' production by adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stromal cells: the impact of cell culture conditions and cell-to-cell interaction,” Cell Biochemistry and Function, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 385–392, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. L. Xu, X. Wang, J. Wang et al., “Hypoxia-induced secretion of IL-10 from adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell promotes growth and cancer stem cell properties of Burkitt lymphoma,” Tumor Biology, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 7835–7842, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. C. M. Jiang, J. Liu, J. Y. Zhao et al., “Effects of hypoxia on the immunomodulatory properties of human gingiva-derived mesenchymal stem cells,” Journal of Dental Research, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 69–77, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. M. Roemeling-Van Rhijn, F. K. F. Mensah, S. S. Korevaar et al., “Effects of hypoxia on the immunomodulatory properties of adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 4, article 203, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. A. U. Engela, C. C. Baan, A. M. A. Peeters, W. Weimar, and M. J. Hoogduijn, “Interaction between adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells and regulatory T-cells,” Cell Transplantation, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 41–54, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. K. English, R. Tonlorenzi, G. Cossu, and K. J. Wood, “Mesoangioblasts suppress T cell proliferation through IDO and PGE-2-dependent pathways,” Stem Cells and Development, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 512–523, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. P. I. Bobyleva, E. R. Andreeva, A. N. Gornostaeva, and L. B. Buravkova, “Tissue-related hypoxia attenuates proinflammatory effects of allogeneic pbmcs on adipose-derived stromal cells in vitro,” Stem Cells International, vol. 2016, Article ID 4726267, 13 pages, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. M. Krampera, L. Cosmi, R. Angeli et al., “Role for interferon-γ in the immunomodulatory activity of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells,” STEM CELLS, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 386–398, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. S. Tipnis, C. Viswanathan, and A. S. Majumdar, “Immunosuppressive properties of human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells: role of B7-H1 and IDO,” Immunology and Cell Biology, vol. 88, no. 8, pp. 795–806, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. R. Chinnadurai, I. B. Copland, S. R. Patel, and J. Galipeau, “IDO-independent suppression of T cell effector function by IFN-γ-licensed human mesenchymal stromal cells,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 192, no. 4, pp. 1491–1501, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. P. Jin, Y. Zhao, H. Liu et al., “Interferon-γ and tumor necrosis factor-α polarize bone marrow stromal cells uniformly to a Th1 phenotype,” Scientific Reports, vol. 6, Article ID 26345, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  62. S. Ma, N. Xie, W. Li, B. Yuan, Y. Shi, and Y. Wang, “Immunobiology of mesenchymal stem cells,” Cell Death & Differentiation, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 216–225, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. J. Cuerquis, R. Romieu-Mourez, M. François et al., “Human mesenchymal stromal cells transiently increase cytokine production by activated T cells before suppressing T-cell proliferation: effect of interferon-γ and tumor necrosis factor-α stimulation,” Cytotherapy, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 191–202, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. H. Li, W. Wang, G. Wang et al., “Interferon-γ and tumor necrosis factor-α promote the ability of human placenta–derived mesenchymal stromal cells to express programmed death ligand-2 and induce the differentiation of CD4+ interleukin-10+ and CD8+ interleukin-10+ Treg subsets,” Cytotherapy, vol. 17, no. 11, pp. 1560–1571, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  65. S. J. Prasanna, D. Gopalakrishnan, S. R. Shankar, and A. B. Vasandan, “Pro-inflammatory cytokines, IFNγ and TNFα, influence immune properties of human bone marrow and Wharton jelly mesenchymal stem cells differentially,” PLoS ONE, vol. 5, no. 2, article e9016, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. K. N. Sivanathan, D. M. Rojas-Canales, C. M. Hope et al., “Interleukin-17A-induced human mesenchymal stem cells are superior modulators of immunological function,” Stem Cells, vol. 33, no. 9, pp. 2850–2863, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. F. Gieseke, A. Kruchen, N. Tzaribachev, F. Bentzien, M. Dominici, and I. Müller, “Proinflammatory stimuli induce galectin-9 in human mesenchymal stromal cells to suppress T-cell proliferation,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 43, no. 10, pp. 2741–2749, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. C. Wu, T. Thalhamer, R. F. Franca et al., “Galectin-9-CD44 interaction enhances stability and function of adaptive regulatory T cells,” Immunity, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 270–282, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. J. A. Ankrum, R. G. Dastidar, J. F. Ong, O. Levy, and J. M. Karp, “Performance-enhanced mesenchymal stem cells via intracellular delivery of steroids,” Scientific Reports, vol. 4, Article ID 04645, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. C.-W. Chen, M. Okada, J. D. Proto et al., “Human pericytes for ischemic heart repair,” Stem Cells, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 305–316, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. C. Toma, W. R. Wagner, S. Bowry, A. Schwartz, and F. Villanueva, “Fate of culture-expanded mesenchymal stem cells in the microvasculature: in vivo observations of cell kinetics,” Circulation Research, vol. 104, no. 3, pp. 398–402, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus