Stem Cells International

Stem Cells International / 2018 / Article
Special Issue

Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2018 |Article ID 5654917 | 11 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5654917

The Effect of Age on the Regenerative Potential of Human Eyelid Adipose-Derived Stem Cells

Academic Editor: Huseyin Sumer
Received25 Oct 2017
Revised04 Feb 2018
Accepted19 Feb 2018
Published19 Mar 2018

Abstract

Human eyelid adipose-derived stem cells (HEASCs) are a new source of autologous mesenchymal stem cells, which are derived from neuroectoderm and potentially applied in the tissue regeneration and cell therapies. Based on the prevalence of blepharoplasty in Asia and the availability of HEASCs, we investigated the effect of donor age on their characteristics and regenerative potential of HEASCs in vitro. The HEASCs were isolated from patients of three groups: (1) <20 years (), (2) >20 years, <45 years (), and (3) >55 years (). For each group, the proliferative capacity, colony-forming ability, surface markers, differentiation ability, wound healing function, and secreted protein were contrastively evaluated and quantified for statistical analysis. It was found that HEASCs were successfully isolated and cultured by an explant culture method. The proliferative rates, osteogenic and chondrogenic differentiation potentials, wound healing ability, and the expression of TGF-β1 and fibronectin protein of HEASCs significantly decreased as age increased. However, the expression of CD90 antigen and the adipogenic differentiation showed an age-related increase in HEASCs. As many degenerative diseases increase in prevalence with age, the age-related changes of the HEASCs proliferation potential, differentiation capacity, and wound healing ability should be taken into account whenever they are intended for use in research or cytotherapy.

1. Introduction

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are one of the most prominent stem cell types in the translational medicine due to their regenerative potential and paracrine effect for treating different kinds of diseases [13]. The use of MSCs in clinical trials is more than 600 trials listed in the clinical trials database (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/, accessed on July 2017). Although cell therapy with bone marrow-derived stem cells (BMSCs) is under investigation in preclinical studies and clinical trials, the use of adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) involves less religious and ethical concerns than using bone marrow-derived stem cells because they are easily obtainable from medical waste [4, 5]. Therefore, there has been the growing interest in applying ASCs as a potential cell source in stem cell-based therapy and tissue engineering.

Previous studies have reported the successful isolation and culture of multipotent stem cells from eyelid adipose tissue or orbital adipose tissues [68]. Human eyelid adipose-derived stem cells (HEASCs) are novel MSCs and originated from the neural crest source. In addition, HEASCs are also similar to BMSCs in the growth potential and surface marker expression [7, 9]. In addition, HEASCs lacked immunogenicity and were safe and well-tolerated after intravenous injections and topical administration in previous studies [10, 11]. Thus, it is possible that HEASCs may be an excellent candidate therapeutic adipose-derived stem cell type for treating complicated diseases.

In a wide range of animal model studies, it has been demonstrated that HEASCs can be successfully applied in repairing neurological disorders [12, 13]. In general, cell-based therapy involves the delivery of expanded cell populations to the degenerative tissues [14] or the mobilization of endogenous progenitor cells capable of proliferating and differentiating into required tissues through the paracrine function [15]. The regenerative potential of host tissues may be restricted by an age-related decline in progenitor populations [16, 17]. In this case, an external source of neural crest stem cells may meet the needs of regenerative damaged tissue cells. Although HEASCs can be easily obtained during blepharoplasty for an entropic and baggy lid and can be a good source of isolating stem cells for tissue repair purposes, more information concerning the effect of donor age on cell properties is essential for clinical applications and cell-based therapy. However, the research of the effect of donor age on HEASCs was limited [18]. Therefore, the aim of the study is to investigate how the morphology, cell surface markers, proliferative potential, differentiation capacity, wound healing ability, and secreted wound healing-related factors of HEASCs were affected by donor age.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design

This study was conducted from June in 2015 to December in 2016. Human eyelid adipose tissues were obtained from 13 systematically healthy donors who underwent blepharoplastic surgery. The eyelid adipose tissues were divided into three groups based on the donor’s age: Group A (age range, 7–18 and mean age, , ), Group B (age range, 21–45 and mean age, , ), and Group C (age range, 55–75 and mean age, , ). The protocol for this study was approved by the Research Committee of He Eye Hospital of He University and conformed to the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki. All participants have provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

2.2. Isolation and Culture of HEASCs

All eyelid adipose tissue samples were processed under the same conditions. After surgical harvesting, redundant adipose tissues were placed in Hanks’ Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS, Gibco) to rinse three times and minced into pieces about after removing of the fibrous tissues and visible blood vessels. The piece of tissue was adopted to explant culture and attached to 6 cm culture dish and inverted for 1 h. After that, the tissues were maintained in the human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell growth medium (Cyagen Biosciences, China) at 37°C with 5% CO2, and the medium was changed every 2 days. After cell growth, the tissues were moved into a new culture dish. Once adherent cells reach 90%–100% confluence, they were detached with 1 : 1 TrypLE Express (Invitrogen, China) and replated at 1 : 3 under the same culture conditions.

Primary culture of HEASCs was designated as “passage 0.” To prepare cells for experiments, they were passaged five times.

2.3. Cell Proliferation Assays

HEASCs at passage 5 were plated in 96-well plates at a density of 3000 per well, and cell proliferative rate was assayed using the Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. In brief, 10 μl of CCK-8 solution was added to each well and the samples were incubated for 3 h. The absorbance was measured at 490 nm. This experiment was repeated three times.

For the colony-forming unit (CFU) assay, HEASCs were plated at a density of 100 cells in 60 mm plates and allowed to grow for 14 days. Cultures were terminated and stained with crystal violet for colony visualization. For colony number counting, only aggregates of >50 cells were scored as colonies; colonies < 50 cells in number and/or faintly stained were excluded. The colonies were counted manually under an inverted microscope.

2.4. Flow Cytometry Analysis

After HEASCs were harvested, nonspecific bindings were blocked and the cells were stained with different fluorochrome-conjugated monoclonal antibodies specific for CD105, CD44, CD73, CD90, CD31, CD34, and CD45 (all antibodies purchased from BD Biosciences). Isotype-matched antibodies were used as controls. Samples were analyzed on a FACSCalibur, and data acquisition and analysis were performed using CellQuest (BD Biosciences).

2.5. Multilineage Differentiation
2.5.1. Adipogenic Differentiation

Adipogenic differentiation was induced by culturing HEASCs for 2 weeks in the adipogenic differentiation medium (Gibco) and assessed by Oil Red O (Sigma-Aldrich) staining as an indicator of intracellular lipid accumulation. Prior to staining, the cells were fixed with 70% ethanol for 15 min at room temperature and then stained with fresh Oil Red O for 15 min at room temperature. Excess stain was removed by washing with 70% ethanol and then distilled water to visualize lipid droplets. To elute the Oil Red O solution, 100% isopropanol was added for 1 h on an orbital shaker and the optical density of the solution was measured at 490 nm.

2.5.2. Osteogenic Differentiation

Osteogenic differentiation was induced by culturing HEASCs for 3 weeks in the osteogenic differentiation medium (Gibco) followed by examining extracellular matrix calcification by Alizarin Red S (Sigma-Aldrich) staining. For Alizarin Red S staining, cells were fixed with 70% ethanol and washed with distilled water, then incubated in 2% Alizarin Red S solution for 15 min at room temperature. The cells were washed five times in PBS and then fixed with ice-cold 70% ethanol for 1 h. The Alizarin Red S solution was extracted by incubation of the cells in cetylpyridinium chloride for 1 h. The optical density of the solution was read at 550 nm.

2.5.3. Chondrogenic Differentiation

HEASCs were trypsinized, counted, and centrifuged into cell pellets ( per pellet) in 15 ml conical tubes (BD Falcon). Chondrogenic differentiation medium (Gibco) was gently overlaid so as to not detach the cell nodules, and the culture was maintained in the chondrogenic differentiation medium for 3 weeks. Afterwards, the pellets were fixed and frozen in O.C.T. (Tissue-Tek, Sakura, Zoeterwoude, Netherlands). The pellets were sectioned, fixed with 4% polymethanol, stained against Alcian blue stain, and further stained with hematoxylin-eosin stain (Sigma-Aldrich).

2.6. Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction

Total cellular RNA was isolated from the differentiated cells using a TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) at day 21 to determine the expression of multilineage-associated genes. For each run, water was used as a negative control. The reaction product was quantified with a relative quantificative tool. The reactions were performed under the following cycling conditions: 95°C for 10 min, 45 cycles of 95°C for 15 s, and 60°C for 1 min. All experiments were conducted three times. For each sample, copy numbers of target gene were divided by those of GAPDH to normalize for target gene expression, thus avoiding sample-to-sample differences in RNA quantity. Primers used for real-time RT-polymerase chain reaction are listed in Table 1.


GenePrimer 5-3Amplicon length (bp)

AggrecanF: GACTTCCGCTGGTCAGATGG20
R: GTTTGTAGGTGGTGGCTGTG20

Runx-2F: TCGGAGAGGTACCAGATGGG20
R: CATTCCGGAGCTCAGCAGAA20

PPARγF: GCAGGAGCAGAGCAAAGAG19
R: GAGGAGAGTTACTTGGTCGTTC22

OPNF: TGGGAGGGCTTGGTTGTC18
R: TTCCTTGGTCGGCGTTTG18

SOX9F: AAAGGCTACGACTGGACG18
R: CGGCTGGTACTTGTAATCC19

COMPF: CGAGTCCGCTGTATCAACACC21
R: TCCGTGCAAACCTGCTTGT19

COL2F: GCTCCCAGAACATCACCTACC21
R: TGAACCTGCTATTGCCCTCT20

2.7. Condition Medium (CM) of HEASCs Collection

The HEASCs were plated in 75 cm2 flasks. After getting confluence, the medium was changed to 10 ml per flask of DMEM/F12 and incubated for 48 hours. Then, supernatants were collected to filter and centrifuge at 2000 for 30 min. The supernatant was developed as HEASCs-CM.

2.8. Human Corneal Epithelial Cell Wound Healing Assay

To evaluate the function of HEASCs-CM, human corneal epithelial cell line (Guangzhou, China) was seeded in 12-well plates at cells per well and incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2 until forming a confluent monolayer in the DMEM/F12 medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Gibco). The confluent layer was scratched with a 100 μl sterile pipette tip after washing with DPBS for 3 times. Then the culture medium was replaced with HEASCs-CM. Image ( per treatment) from the center of the wells was taken with an IX51 Olympus microscope with a DPI 7.2 digital camera and time 0, 24 h, and 48 h after scratching. The areas of wound healing were analyzed and compared with the ImageJ software.

2.9. Measurement of Secreted Wound Healing-Related Factors in HEASCs-CM

The HEASCs-CM from all donor age group was collected to evaluate the secreted protein using human enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). ELISA was performed using a human platelet-derived growth factor-BB (PDGF-BB), human transforming growth factor β1 (TGF-β1), human vascular endothelial cell growth factor (VEGF), human cellular fibronectin (cFn), human collagen type I (Col I), human interleukin 8 (IL-8) ELISA kit (CUSABIO, China), and their protocols. As a reference for quantification, a standard curve was established by a serial dilution for PDGF-BB protein (0.156 ng/ml–10 ng/ml), TGF-β1 protein (0.78 ng/ml–50 ng/ml), VEGF protein (31.25 pg/ml–2000 pg/ml), cFn protein (12.5 ng/ml–800 ng/ml), Col-1 protein (1.56 ng/ml–100 ng/ml), and IL-8 protein (31.25 pg/ml–2000 pg/ml).

2.10. Statistical Analysis

All data collected were presented as a mean ± standard deviation (SD). One-way analysis of variance with Bonferroni post hoc multiple comparison test was used to determine possible significant differences () between groups. Data analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 5.0. All experiments were performed in triplicate and repeated on at least three separate occasions.

3. Results

3.1. Proliferative Activities of HEASCs

The HEASCs successfully outgrew from all donor age eyelid adipose tissues after 6–20 days of explant culture. In culture, the cell populations isolated from all eyelid tissues were capable of forming adherent cells, a characteristic of other stromal stem cell populations, and retaining their bipolar shape (Figure 1(a)). The proliferative capacities of all cells were assessed at passage five at the following time points: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 days. The HEASCs from Group C demonstrated a significantly lower proliferative rate at days 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 (, or ) compared with the other groups (Figure 1(b)). To further evaluate the proliferative potential, we measured the numbers of CFUs as a function of donor age groups. On the 14th day, we counted and found an age-related decrease of CFU-forming cells in donor age groups (Figure 2).

3.2. Flow Cytometry Results

The expression of MSC markers was observed in HEASCs from donors of various ages by flow cytometry analysis. The HEASCs from three groups positively expressed CD105, CD44, CD73, and CD90, but little expression of CD31, CD34, and CD45 antigens (Figure 3(a)). There was a significant difference in the expression of CD90 compared to other MSCs. The expression level of CD90 (57.98 ± 7.52) in the Group C appeared significantly higher than the other groups (35.74 ± 4.87 and 39.23 ± 3.58, resp.) (Figure 3(b)). Thus, the expression of CD90 in HEASCs showed an age-related increase between the donor age groups.

3.3. Differentiation Potential of HEASCs

In addition to proliferative ability and the expression of specific antigens on the cell surface of HEASCs, the capacity for differentiation into different mesenchymal tissues is one of the key properties of any MSC. The differentiation potential of HEASCs was evaluated by culturing them in adipogenic, osteogenic, and chondrogenic media to stimulate multilineage differentiation. After 14-day adipogenic induction in vitro, the HEASCs from all groups exhibited adipogenic differentiation potential, as determined by the presence of Oil Red-positive lipid droplets. The amount of lipid droplets was significantly increased along with the donor age (Figures 4(a) and 4(b)). Meanwhile, the gene expression of PPARγ showed a higher level than that of the A and B groups (Figure 4(c)).

Osteogenic differentiation was assessed by Alizarin Red S staining and gene expression after 20 days in the osteogenic differentiation medium. Alizarin Red S staining showed a significant decrease with aging (Figures 4(d) and 4(e)), while RUNX2, an early transcription factor, has no differences. OPN, a secreted phosphoprotein, has significantly lower expression in the aged group (Figure 4(f)).

Chondrogenic differentiation was evaluated by Alcian blue staining and gene expression. Visually, the chondrogenic sections showed that the compact chondrocytes were circled by extracellular matrix in the younger donors. Conversely, the chondrocytes were loose and irregular in shape in the elderly group (Figure 4(g)). The expression of chondrogenic-related gene Aggrecan, Sox9, COMP, and COL 2A1 was consistent with Alcian blue staining (Figure 4(h)).

3.4. Effect of HEASCs-CM-Derived Donor Age Groups on Human Corneal Epithelial Cell Wound Healing In Vitro

To investigate whether the donor age group of HEASCs-CM impact corneal epithelial cell wound repair, we performed an in vitro wound healing assay. The HEASCs-CM significantly stimulated the rate of wound closure in Group A and Group B over Group C after 24-hour incubation; the percentage of wound closure in HEASCs-CM of these groups was 85%, 88%, and 66%, respectively. The percentage of wound closure in donor age groups was 100% after 48 h (Figures 5(a) and 5(b)). Thus, there was a significant decrease in the wound healing potential of HEASCs in advanced age group at 24 h.

3.5. Proteins Secreted in HEASCs-CM Encourage Wound Healing

For further analysis of the wound healing potential of HEASCs of donors, we assessed the expression level of secreted wound healing-related factors in HEASCs-CM in all groups. These factors have been reported that they played an important function in wound healing, which include growth factors: PDGF-BB, TGF-β1, and VEGF; matrix factors: cFn and Col-1; and inflammatory cytokine: IL-8. As shown in Figure 6, the expression of TGF-β1 and cFn protein in HEASCs-CM was decreased with aging, while there was an exception of producing higher concentration of VEGF in the elderly group. The expression of PDGF-BB, Col-I, and IL-8 in the conditioned medium has no significant differences among these groups. These results suggested that the differences of HEASCs-CM on modulating human corneal epithelial cell wound repair might be due to the variance of expression of wound healing-related factors by HEASCs-CM.

4. Discussion

Adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) are seen as useful autologous stem cells, which have gained increasing interest in the field of regenerative medicine. However, ASC therapy cannot yet be used reliably because these cells show different properties across patients and different tissue sites [19, 20]. Of note, it is an advantage to use ASCs from young donor age and of early passage culture for the clinical application of stem cell therapy; some researchers have reported the effects of donor age, long-term passage, and cryopreservation on ASC characterization, as well as proliferation and differentiation capacities in vitro [2123]. Eyelid adipose-derived stem cells (EASCs) represent a unique origin of ASCs, which are derived from neural crest cells that differ from mesodermal-origin ASCs [7, 9]. Previous studies have disclosed that HEASCs from eyelid adipose tissue can differentiate into insulin-secreting cells and normalize type I diabetes mice [6]. In addition, the topical application of HEASCs can promote corneal tissue regeneration through paracrine effects and differentiation into corneal epithelial cells [11]. However, there is limited study demonstrating the effect of donor age on EASC properties [18].

In this study, we showed that HEASCs isolated from different donor age groups had a similar bipolar-shaped morphology by an explant culture method. However, we demonstrated that the proliferative rate of HEASCs was significantly decreased in the elderly group. Meanwhile, there was a difference in the number of CFUs in different donor age groups. The donor age-related decline of CFU number is consistent with the result that was observed in the proliferative ability of HEASCs. These results are consistent with the results that were observed in BMSCs [24].

At the surface marker expression assessment, we observed that HEASCs expressed a similar level of CD73, CD44, and CD105. However, the expression level of CD90 differed among these groups, which increased with aging. The similarity of lower expression of CD90 has been demonstrated in the previous study that most eyelid adipose-derived stem cells expressed CD90 at late passage (P13–P15) [9]. Thus, we could propose that the higher expression of CD90 in the elderly group is because of the longer time of growth in vitro in the elderly group compared to younger groups. It is noted that CD90 is membrane-bound glycoprotein, with the function related to angiogenic stimuli [25]. Meanwhile, the result was in accordance with the increase expression of VEGF in the HEASCs-CM of elderly groups (Figure 6). As we know, degenerative eye diseases, like age-related macular degeneration, are primarily a disease of old age, and VEGF (an endothelial specific growth factor) plays a key role of promoting angiogenesis and mainly influencing on eye diseases [26].

The effect of donor age on the differentiation ability of MSCs remains controversial. We found an age-related decrease in chondrogenic and osteogenic differentiations, but contrary to adipogenic differentiation potential, which was increased with aging in HEASCs. Ye et al. reported that aged orbital adipose-derived stem cells showed decreases in multilineage differentiation potential [18]. The decline of the chondrogenic differentiation potential of HEASCs is similar to that of ASC studies [27]. In contrast, we found that the HEASCs from aging promoted the adipogenic differentiation. The accumulation of adipocytes with increasing age is noted. In addition, previous studies found that ASCs from elderly donor favor the adipogenic differentiation. The author postulated that the increase of the adipogenic differentiation potential of MSCs might be negatively affected by bone regeneration [27, 28]. Although Run X2, an early transcription factor, has no differences, we observed that the expression of OPN, the gene marker of osteoblasts, declined with aging. In addition, the calcium deposits and Alizarin Red S staining were faint and lower in the aged group. Meanwhile, we clearly found an age-related decrease in chondrogenic differentiation of HEASCs (Figure 4).

Previous studies demonstrated that MSCs have gained a prominent and promising role in restoring corneal transparency through the paracrine function [29]. Thus, we evaluated the age-related effects on the wound healing potential of HEASCs by the human corneal epithelial cell scratching model in vitro. The result of this study demonstrated that the wound healing potential of HEASCs-CM declined with aging. Wound healing is a complicated process. When the cornea is damaged, the secreted protein of MSCs can accumulate at the site of injury and interact synergistically to initiate and coordinate wound healing. Therefore, we further investigated the effect of donor age on the wound healing-related protein expression in the HEASCs-CM. The results showed that the secreted protein of TGF-β1 and fibronectin was age related and downexpressed in the HEASCs-CM, while the expression of VEGF is upregulated with aging. TGF-β1 is involved in mediating the extracellular matrix formation, stimulating cell proliferation, and reepithelization. Fibronectin is involved in cell adhesion, cell motility, and wound healing. VEGF can promote angiogenesis, induce permeabilization of blood vessels, and play an essential role in wound healing. The increased expression of VEGF is consistent with the upregulation of CD90. VEGF may be involved in the degenerative disease of the elderly patient. There were no significant differences in the expression of PDGF-BB, Col-I, and IL-8, all of which were involved in the processes of wound healing [30, 31].

In conclusion, we have demonstrated that the proliferative rate, osteogenic and chondrogenic differentiation capacity, and wound healing function of HEASCs were influenced by age increase. A shift in favor of expression of CD90 surface marker and adipogenic differentiation with increased age were observed. In this study, we evaluated the effect of age on the properties of HEASCs through the protein level. To gain further insight into the molecular mechanisms, additional studies need to be performed. In particular, gene expression in HEASCs as a function of age on a genome-wide scale must be addressed to provide a comprehensive understanding of molecular mechanisms of aging.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interests regarding the study described in this paper.

Authors’ Contributions

Mingqi Zhang and Zhuoshi Wang contributed equally to this work.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (2013CB967500).

References

  1. A. M. Dimarino, A. I. Caplan, and T. L. Bonfield, “Mesenchymal stem cells in tissue repair,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 4, p. 201, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. T. Squillaro, G. Peluso, and U. Galderisi, “Clinical trials with mesenchymal stem cells: an update,” Cell Transplantation, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 829–848, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. M. Isakson, C. de Blacam, D. Whelan, A. McArdle, and A. J. P. Clover, “Mesenchymal stem cells and cutaneous wound healing: current evidence and future potential,” Stem Cells International, vol. 2015, Article ID 831095, 12 pages, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. S. Kern, H. Eichler, J. Stoeve, H. Klüter, and K. Bieback, “Comparative analysis of mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow, umbilical cord blood, or adipose tissue,” Stem Cells, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 1294–1301, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. Y. Zhu, T. Liu, K. Song, X. Fan, X. Ma, and Z. Cui, “Adipose-derived stem cell: a better stem cell than BMSC,” Cell Biochemistry and Function, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 664–675, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. H. M. Kang, J. Kim, S. Park et al., “Insulin-secreting cells from human eyelid-derived stem cells alleviate type I diabetes in immunocompetent mice,” Stem Cells, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 1999–2008, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. J. H.-C. Ho, W. H. Ma, T. C. Tseng, Y. F. Chen, M. H. Chen, and O. K. S. Lee, “Isolation and characterization of multi-potent stem cells from human orbital fat tissues,” Tissue Engineering Part A, vol. 17, no. 1-2, pp. 255–266, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. B. S. Korn, D. O. Kikkawa, and K. C. Hicok, “Identification and characterization of adult stem cells from human orbital adipose tissue,” Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 27–32, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. S. H. Kim, S. H. Bang, S. A. Park et al., “Character comparison of abdomen-derived and eyelid-derived mesenchymal stem cells,” Cell Proliferation, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 291–299, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. M. H. Chien, M. Y. Bien, C. C. Ku et al., “Systemic human orbital fat-derived stem/stromal cell transplantation ameliorates acute inflammation in lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury,” Critical Care Medicine, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 1245–1253, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. K. J. Lin, M. X. Loi, G. S. Lien et al., “Topical administration of orbital fat-derived stem cells promotes corneal tissue regeneration,” Stem Cell Research & Therapy, vol. 4, no. 3, p. 72, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. J. Zhou, P. Lu, H. Ren et al., “17β-Estradiol protects human eyelid-derived adipose stem cells against cytotoxicity and increases transplanted cell survival in spinal cord injury,” Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 326–343, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. G. Wang, L. Cao, Y. Wang et al., “Human eyelid adipose tissue-derived Schwann cells promote regeneration of a transected sciatic nerve,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, article 43248, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. F. M. Chen, H. H. Sun, H. Lu, and Q. Yu, “Stem cell-delivery therapeutics for periodontal tissue regeneration,” Biomaterials, vol. 33, no. 27, pp. 6320–6344, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. M. B. Murphy, K. Moncivais, and A. I. Caplan, “Mesenchymal stem cells: environmentally responsive therapeutics for regenerative medicine,” Experimental & Molecular Medicine, vol. 45, no. 11, article e54, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. F. M. Chen, M. Zhang, and Z. F. Wu, “Toward delivery of multiple growth factors in tissue engineering,” Biomaterials, vol. 31, no. 24, pp. 6279–6308, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. F. M. Chen, L. A. Wu, M. Zhang, R. Zhang, and H. H. Sun, “Homing of endogenous stem/progenitor cells for in situ tissue regeneration: promises, strategies, and translational perspectives,” Biomaterials, vol. 32, no. 12, pp. 3189–3209, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. X. Ye, C. Liao, G. Liu, Y. Xu, J. Tan, and Z. Song, “Age-related changes in the regenerative potential of adipose-derived stem cells isolated from the prominent fat pads in human lower eyelids,” PLoS One, vol. 11, no. 11, article e0166590, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. V. van Harmelen, K. Röhrig, and H. Hauner, “Comparison of proliferation and differentiation capacity of human adipocyte precursor cells from the omental and subcutaneous adipose tissue depot of obese subjects,” Metabolism, vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 632–637, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. B. M. Schipper, K. G. Marra, W. Zhang, A. D. Donnenberg, and J. P. Rubin, “Regional anatomic and age effects on cell function of human adipose-derived stem cells,” Annals of Plastic Surgery, vol. 60, no. 5, pp. 538–544, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. S. M. Devitt, C. M. Carter, R. Dierov, S. Weiss, R. P. Gersch, and I. Percec, “Successful isolation of viable adipose-derived stem cells from human adipose tissue subject to long-term cryopreservation: positive implications for adult stem cell-based therapeutics in patients of advanced age,” Stem Cells International, vol. 2015, Article ID 146421, 11 pages, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. K. Gonda, T. Shigeura, T. Sato et al., “Preserved proliferative capacity and multipotency of human adipose-derived stem cells after long-term cryopreservation,” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, vol. 121, no. 2, pp. 401–410, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. A. Bogdanova, U. Berzins, S. Nikulshin et al., “Characterization of human adipose-derived stem cells cultured in autologous serum after subsequent passaging and long term cryopreservation,” Journal of Stem Cells, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 135–148, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  24. A. Stolzing, E. Jones, D. McGonagle, and A. Scutt, “Age-related changes in human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells: consequences for cell therapies,” Mechanisms of Ageing and Development, vol. 129, no. 3, pp. 163–173, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. D. Campioni, F. Lanza, S. Moretti, L. Ferrari, and A. Cuneo, “Loss of Thy-1 (CD90) antigen expression on mesenchymal stromal cells from hematologic malignancies is induced by in vitro angiogenic stimuli and is associated with peculiar functional and phenotypic characteristics,” Cytotherapy, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 69–82, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. H. Wang and M. E. Hartnett, “Regulation of signaling events involved in the pathophysiology of neovascular AMD,” Molecular Vision, vol. 22, pp. 189–202, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
  27. M. Maredziak, K. Marycz, K. A. Tomaszewski, K. Kornicka, and B. M. Henry, “The influence of aging on the regenerative potential of human adipose derived mesenchymal stem cells,” Stem Cells International, vol. 2016, Article ID 2152435, 15 pages, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. K. Kornicka, K. Marycz, K. A. Tomaszewski, M. Maredziak, and A. Smieszek, “The effect of age on osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation potential of human adipose derived stromal stem cells (hASCs) and the impact of stress factors in the course of the differentiation process,” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2015, Article ID 309169, 20 pages, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. A. W. Joe and K. Gregory-Evans, “Mesenchymal stem cells and potential applications in treating ocular disease,” Current Eye Research, vol. 35, no. 11, pp. 941–952, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. Y. Xu, S. Guo, C. Wei et al., “The comparison of adipose stem cell and placental stem cell in secretion characteristics and in facial antiaging,” Stem Cells International, vol. 2016, Article ID 7315830, 14 pages, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. S. Fabi and H. Sundaram, “The potential of topical and injectable growth factors and cytokines for skin rejuvenation,” Facial Plastic Surgery, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 157–171, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2018 Mingqi Zhang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

767 Views | 351 Downloads | 0 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19.