Stem Cells International

Stem Cells International / 2020 / Article
Special Issue

Epigenetic Regulation of Stem Cell Fate

View this Special Issue

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2020 |Article ID 1047896 |

Shuang Jiang, Yuchen Guo, "Epigenetic Clock: DNA Methylation in Aging", Stem Cells International, vol. 2020, Article ID 1047896, 9 pages, 2020.

Epigenetic Clock: DNA Methylation in Aging

Academic Editor: Yang Li
Received27 Mar 2020
Revised11 Jun 2020
Accepted20 Jun 2020
Published08 Jul 2020


Aging, which is accompanied by decreased organ function and increased disease incidence, limits human lifespan and has attracted investigators for thousands of years. In recent decades, with the rapid development of biology, scientists have shown that epigenetic modifications, especially DNA methylation, are key regulators involved in this process. Regular fluctuations in global DNA methylation levels have been shown to accurately estimate biological age and disease prognosis. In this review, we discuss recent findings regarding the relationship between variations in DNA methylation level patterns and aging. In addition, we introduce the known mechanisms by which DNA methylation regulators affect aging and related diseases. As more studies uncover the mechanisms by which DNA methylation regulates aging, antiaging interventions and treatments for related diseases may be developed that enable human life extension.

1. Introduction

Aging is an inevitable biological progress in which the functions of multiple organs gradually decline with time, leading to an increased susceptibility to diseases and environmental stressors [1, 2]. In humans, age has become the primary risk factor for various diseases, such as cardiovascular diseases, cancer, neurodegeneration diseases, and diabetes [3]. Scientists have made unremitting efforts to elucidate the causal mechanisms involved in the phenotypic alterations associated with age. Since many genes appear to show altered expression during the aging process, researchers have focused on studying the long-term effects of environment stress on gene expression regulation. Importantly, epigenetic modifications are proposed to play a crucial role in the progression of aging.

Epigenetic changes are known as genetic variations triggered by the environment and include alterations in histone modifications, DNA methylation, noncoding RNAs, transcription factor binding, and nucleosome positioning [4, 5]. DNA methylation is a biological process by which methyl groups are added to DNA molecules. Histone modifications include lysine methylation, arginine methylation, lysine acetylation, and serine phosphorylation. These modifications alter the extent to which DNA is wrapped around histones and the availability of genes within the DNA to be activated. Recently, numerous studies have emphasized the unique role of DNA methylation in aging [6, 7]. In addition to its effects on the aging process, a function shared by other epigenomic regulators, DNA methylation can also predict aging status. In this review, we will discuss the relationship between DNA methylation and aging as well as summarizing the primary mechanisms by which DNA methylation regulates the aging process.

2. DNA Methylation

As is shown in Figure 1, DNA methylation modification involves two different processes: the addition and removal of a methyl group at the fifth position of cytosine or the sixth position of adenine in DNA [8]. DNA 5-methylcytosine (5mC) is the most prevalent DNA methylation modification in eukaryotic genomes and primarily occurs on cytosines that precede a guanine nucleotide (CpG sites) [9]. The presence of 5mC is generally believed to prevent transcription factors from binding to a promoter region and thus suppress gene expression. DNA 6-adenine methylation (6mA) is a recently discovered epigenetic modification in the human genome that has been demonstrated to affect mammalian development [10, 11].

The two types of DNA methylation modifications, 5mC and 6mA, involve different enzymatic systems in mammals (see Table 1). 5mC methylation marks are established by DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs), including DNMT1, DNMT3A, and DNMT3B. DNMT1 is primarily responsible for the maintenance of methylation status across mitosis, while DNMT3A and DNMT3B work in a de novo methylation process. 5mC methylation can be oxidized and changes into 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC) by ten-eleven translocation (TET) enzymes, which contain TET1, TET2, and TET3 [12]. Moreover, recent studies have revealed the potential role of DNMTs in active DNA demethylation [13]. To date, only a few enzymes involved in 6mA methylation, such as N6AMT1 and ALKBH1, have been identified in mammals [10, 14]. However, a recent study challenged currently used 6mA detection techniques and suggested that more powerful evidence is needed to support the presence of 6mA [15]. DNA methylation modifications typically occur in promoter regions and then recruit classical readers of DNA methylation, methyl-CpG-binding proteins (MBDs). The variation in the expression of DNA methylation-associated enzymes has been observed in some age-related condition, which will be described in greater detail later.

Type of DNA methylationRole of enzymesFamilyMembers



Although continual changes in methylation status are supposed to be adaptive to aging, sometimes this process fails and becomes maladaptive. Ineffective adaptation accelerates the biological aging process and conversely impacts functional and phenotypic aging. Thus, fluctuations in DNA methylation levels in the human genome can serve as an “epigenetic clock” that regularly changes with age [1618]. Studies have shown that DNA methylation may function as an accurate biomarker to estimate “biological age,” which predicts age-related changes [19]. Furthermore, scientists have begun to understand the potential role of genome-wide patterns of DNA methylation in age-related diseases. To understand the causal connection between DNA methylation and aging, rigorous studies on the underlying biological mechanisms of DNA methylation-induced aging are currently in progress. The mechanisms of aging are complicated and involve multiple factors. Compared with other hallmarks of aging, phenotypic changes resulting from DNA methylation are thought to be associated with a loss of proteostasis, mitochondrial dysfunction, stem cell exhaustion, and immunosenescence [2022]. Thus, understanding the molecular nature of aging is a key to allow for the identification of targets for interventions to prevent age-related multimorbidity and disability.

3. DNA Methylation in Aging

3.1. DNA Methylation and Biological Age

It is generally acknowledged that chronological age is not an accurate indicator for the aging process, making it difficult to identify and validate effective measures to promote longevity and healthy aging. Thus, the concept of biological age has been proposed to accurately predict the aging status of an organ or person [23]. Enormous progress has been made in recent years in the development of several potential biological age estimators, of which DNA methylation level is the most promising [19]. Previous studies have clearly proven that genome-wide DNA methylation levels are associated with chronological age throughout the entire human lifespan [24, 25]. Some age-related DNA methylation changes occur in specific regions of the genome and are directional, indicating the existence of differentially methylated regions associated with aging [26]. Therefore, DNA methylation-based biomarkers enable accurate age estimation, which has also been proven by many investigations involving tissues, individuals, and populations [27, 28].

DNA methylation clocks, built from epigenetic DNA methylation marks, rely on the combined use of a mathematical algorithm and sets of CpGs to estimate the biological age of cells, organs, or individuals. In general, age-associated variations in DNA methylation levels comprise locus-specific hypermethylation and global hypomethylation [29]. Since the site-specific CpG methylation fraction can be different in cells from different DNA sources, it has been used to reflect both chronological and biological age.

To date, several human DNA methylation biological clocks have been built that are based on sets of CpGs across tissues and age spectra [3032]. Analyzing the whole blood samples of 656 individuals, Hannum et al. measured more than 450,000 CpG markers and used the resulting data to generate a quantitative model of aging [30]. In this model, 15% of the identified CpG markers demonstrated a remarkable association between percent DNA methylation and age. Similarly, Horvath built a multitissue predictor of age using 82 published DNA methylation datasets [31]. Interestingly, Horvath also showed that the estimated DNA methylation age of embryonic stem cells was nearly zero and increased with cell passaging, indicating that DNA methylation age is consistent with biological age at the cellular level [31].

Furthermore, the results of a growing body of epidemiological studies indicate remarkably high correlations between DNA methylation-based age and various aging-associated conditions [8]. Detailed assessments of DNA methylation clocks promote a better understanding of the biological foundation of aging and inform us about age-related disease risks. This approach is a typical example of interactions between epigenetics and aging, and its development will be informative and enable subsequent functional studies in humans. Most likely, the most exciting feature of epigenetic clocks is the reversibility of the DNA methylation process, which makes it possible to develop antiaging interventions [33, 34].

3.2. DNA Methylation and Age-Related Diseases

Longevity can indeed be regarded as a manifestation of healthy aging. In contrast, accelerated aging is always accompanied by the onset of chronic diseases, particularly degenerative diseases, which ultimately result in disability or premature death. Some researchers also consider age-related degenerative diseases as one of the factors that accelerate the aging process [35]. Emerging evidence indicates that DNA methylation is a crucial factor in age-related diseases.

Cardiovascular disease (CVD), one of the most common age-related diseases, accounted for 31% of global deaths in 2015 [36]. Systematic studies have associated CVD with DNA methylation [37]. In a 10-year follow-up study of 832 participants, increases in biological age, estimated by DNA methylation biomarkers, were accompanied by a 4% rising risk of CVD for each year [38]. CVD risk factors, such as smoking, also induce dysregulated DNA methylation [39]. In contrast, DNA methylation can directly regulate cardiovascular function by modifying the promoters of specific genes and reducing their expression. For example, reduced methylation of the angiotensin I-converting enzyme-encoding gene promoter affects the expression of this gene expression and eventually leads to hypertension [40]. Interestingly, a new role for DNA methylation in the metabolic reprogramming of ischemic cardiomyopathy has recently been discovered, a mechanism that is believed to contribute to the reprogramming of cardiac tissue during ischemia [41].

The incidence of most cancers exponentially increases with age. Aberrant DNA methylation patterns have been observed in variety of tumor cells, including colon, ovarian, and breast cancer cells [4244], indicating that they may serve as biomarkers in early diagnosis and treatment of cancer [45]. Two DNA methylation modifications appear to be primarily associated with cancer, including the hypomethylation of open sea regions and hypermethylation of promoter CpG islands, with other constituents only playing supplementary roles in the promoter or open sea region methylation process [46, 47]. Current DNA methylation-based biomarker studies focus on the influence of promoter hypermethylation in tumor suppressor genes (such as RYR2), which may alter cancer signaling transduction and promote the formation and development of cancer [4850]. These findings are useful in the development of demethylation drugs aimed at specific tumor treatments.

DNA alterations that occur with age have also been investigated in neurodegenerative diseases. A similar aberrant DNA methylation pattern is shared in patients with Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, and Down syndrome [51]. During the course of these neurodegenerative diseases, disrupted CpG methylation has been reported to be similar in a set of genes involved in many cellular pathways [51]. Of the identified genes, DNA methylation of the ankyrin 1 gene shows specificity in different brain regions and neurodegenerative diseases [52]. 5hmC has recently been shown to be a potential epigenetic marker in cognitive deterioration [53]. However, additional evidence is needed to demonstrate causality between DNA methylation variability and neurodegenerative disease pathology.

In accordance with these findings, it should be emphasized that DNA methylation has been identified as an early detection maker of age-associated diseases and may also serve as a novel therapeutic target. In vivo studies with animal disease models will be necessary to provide causal evidence of the association between age-related diseases and the aging process.

4. Mechanisms of Aging Induced by DNA Methylation

During aging, predefined genes constantly undergo epigenetic modifications and exhibit altered expression in response to internal and external environmental stress. Changes in DNA methylation may occur hundreds of times over the lifespan of an individual in the form of a fully adaptive response. However, in some cases, this methylation acts as a switch for the acceleration of pathological aging, resulting in negative consequences [54]. Thus, global fluctuations in DNA methylation are not only a consequence but also a cause of aging. Understanding the biological mechanisms underlying the observed associations may reveal novel targets for reversing aging-related phenotypes and ultimately prolonging lifespan.

4.1. Loss of Proteostasis

Proteostasis maintenance depends on chaperones and two proteolytic systems, the lysosome-autophagy and ubiquitin-proteasome systems [55]. An increase in the disruption of protein homeostasis is one of the primary features of aging. In most organisms, a gradual loss of proteostasis has been observed during aging, and it is reported that long-lived species tend to have more stable proteomes [56]. Additionally, the accumulation of unfolded, misfolded, or aggregated proteins is the leading cause of some neurodegenerative diseases [57].

Evidence has emerged showing that decreased autophagic activity is involved in DNA methylation. DNA methylation inhibits autophagy processes in two ways, one of which is the direct modification and silencing of autophagy-related genes by DNMTs. The promoter regions of Atg5 and LC3 are hypermethylated in aged mice, which suppresses gene expression and disrupts the completion of autophagosomes [58]. Whole-body overexpression of Atg5 results in antiaging phenotypes, extending the median lifespan of mice by 17.2% [59]. Furthermore, researchers have recently shown that DNA methylation inhibitors can rescue phenotypic changes associated with aging by reactivating autophagy-related genes [60, 61].

Another mechanism associated with the dysfunctional autophagy caused by DNA methylation is the modification of genes such as miR-129-5P and FoxO3a, encoding autophagy-related signaling molecules. In disc degeneration, hypermethylation in the promoter region of miR-129-5P reduces gene expression, which then blocks autophagy through downregulation of Beclin-1 [62]. FoxO3a is a protective transcriptional regulator that maintains cell homeostasis from environmental stress by increasing autophagy [63]. DNA hypermethylation of the FoxO3a promoter indirectly inhibits autophagy, contributing to aging-related endothelial dysfunction [64]. Abnormal methylation in some tumor-related genes, such as TCF21, CELF2, and NOR1, is also involved in autophagy regulation, which contributes to some premature aging disorders [6567].

While DNA methylation has gained recognition for its involvement in protein degradation, information regarding its effect on protein synthesis in senescent cells is just beginning to emerge. The expression of ribosomal RNA (rRNA) determines translational rate and protein synthesis, which decreases during physiological aging. It has been reported that abnormal methylation of ribosomal DNA (rDNA) promoters occurs with age [68]. Recent studies have confirmed that increased CpG methylation in rDNA promoter regions inhibits transcription and thus significantly reduces the expression of 18S, 5.8S, and 28S rRNA [69]. Furthermore, DNMTs have been shown to affect the synthesis of proteins associated with long-term memory, providing an explanation for memory impairments that occur with age [20].

Speculation has increased that experimental perturbation of proteostasis precipitates pathological change and accelerates aging. Therefore, further studies are needed to determine if genetic manipulations can successfully maintain proteostasis in aged mammals.

4.2. Mitochondrial Dysfunction

Mitochondria are considered to be the powerhouses of cells and are important for energy production through respiration and cellular metabolism regulation [70]. The accumulation of damage to mitochondria can reduce energy metabolism and increase the production of reactive oxidative species (ROS), leading to aging-associated changes. The expression of mitochondrial methyltransferases has been shown to be age-dependent, indicating that mitochondria are involved in the development of proaging features [71].

Increasing methylation of Elovl2 has recently been reported to be a crucial driver of aging by inducing a stress response in the endoplasmic reticulum and promoting mitochondrial dysfunction [6]. In some degenerative diseases, mitochondrial DNA and genes encoding the enzymes responsible for mitochondrial biogenesis, such as Mfn2 in diabetes, are hypermethylated and compromise the electron transport chain [72]. Increasing methylation of the D-loop region and mitochondrial NADH dehydrogenase 6 causes insulin resistance in obese individuals, which can easily develop during aging [73]. The upregulation of 5mC and DNMTs in neuronal mitochondria has been postulated to be an important feature of neurodegeneration. In addition, DNMT inhibitors can improve the protection against oxidative damage in senescent cells [74]. There is also a positive correlation between DNA methylation and base mismatch in the dysfunctional mitochondria of vascular diseases [75]. Moreover, the DNMT inhibitor 5-azacytidine has recently been shown to reverse the aged phenotype of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) by reducing ROS and nitric oxide levels, the accumulation of which results in low viability and mitochondrial dysfunction [21].

These findings raise the possibility that rejuvenation of mitochondrial dysfunction may be a potential approach for prolonging life. Thus, further investigation is warranted with respect to determining whether directly targeting DNA methylation can ameliorate mitochondrial damage and delay aging progression using animal models.

4.3. Stem Cell Exhaustion

Adult stem cells are of great importance in maintaining tissue homeostasis and regeneration over a lifetime. Stem cell exhaustion can be described as a qualitative and quantitative decline of stem cells. This process has been observed in many senescent tissues and organs and is regarded as one of the driving forces of aging. Importantly, epigenetic regulators have been shown to control stem cell fate [76, 77]. The role of epigenetic dysregulation in stem cell exhaustion has recently become the subject of intense research, and DNA methylation is thought to be an age-dependent upstream regulatory factor affecting cell-specific gene expression as stem cells become more specialized.

A great deal of evidence has revealed that changes of DNA methylation level regulate genes involved in self-renewal in aging hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs). Adelman et al. demonstrated that epigenetic reprogramming of human HSCs, including redistribution of DNA methylation, occurs with age [78]. Supporting this finding, the inactivation of DNMT3a enhances cell self-renewal at the cost of differentiation potential in vivo [79]. Ablation of both DNMT3a and DNMT3b results in a more severe effect on cell differentiation capacity, which is one of the characteristics of natural HSC aging [80]. A deficiency of DNA demethylases, known as TET, yields similar results, which reduces genomic levels of 5hmC and contributes to lineage skewing towards myelopoiesis in HSCs [81]. Further evidence has revealed a direct connection between TET and HSC function in leukemogenesis [82].

Significant differences in DNA methylation levels are observed at specific CpG sites, especially in differentiation-related genes, throughout both the aging processes and long-term cultures of MSCs [83]. The DNMT inhibitor RG108 has been reported to modulate the transcription of prosenescence genes and alleviate oxidative stress-mediated damage in human bone marrow-derived MSCs (BM-MSCs) [74, 84]. DNMT3a and DNMT3b methylate the promoters of stem cell functional genes during the chondrogenic differentiation of BM-MSCs, and the reversion process can be regulated by the demethylating agent 5-azacitidine [85]. Similar results have been obtained in human hair follicle MSCs in which the upregulation of DNMTs suppresses downstream genes associated with stem cell properties, which is essential for maintaining self-renewal capacity and reversing cell senescence [86]. In addition, the DNA 6mA demethylase ALKBH1 has also been shown to affect the ability of MSCs to differentiate, providing new evidence of the potential regulatory role of DNA 6mA in mediating the aging process [87].

Considering the gradual decline of regenerative ability in muscle tissue with age, muscle stem cell (MuSC) senescence is of great concern. There are many studies on the relationship between age-related alterations of DNA methylation and transcriptional variability in senescent MuSCs. Changes in DNMT and TET expression have been observed in MuSCs resulting from proliferation to differentiation and between quiescence and proliferation [88, 89]. Furthermore, the regeneration of skeletal muscle after injury is markedly inhibited in Dnmt3a-knockout mice [90]. Bigot et al. observed that age-related DNA methylation in MuSCs primarily acts on the sprouty1 pathway and that through its suppression, the self-renewal capacity of senescent MuSCs is destroyed [91].

4.4. Immunosenescence

The deterioration of the immune system in aging, known as immunosenescence, is characterized by immune lineage skewing and higher levels of inflammatory markers. This process is one of the causes of inflammaging, a sterile, low-grade, and chronic proinflammatory condition of older organisms [22]. Tserel et al. observed different DNA methylation levels and skewing in human CD8+ T cells isolated from different age groups [92]. Age-related DNA methylation involves variations in both the levels of immune-related factors and the proportions of immune cell types.

A recent study observed age-sensitive hypermethylation in the promotor region of Klf14 in several human tissues, which affects the differentiation of CD4+ T cells via suppression of FOXP3 [93]. Garg et al. demonstrated that regulatory T cells from aged mice have an intensified inhibitory impact on effector T cells due to the hypomethylation of the FoxP3 enhancer, which consequently increases immune suppression with age [94]. Similarly, the methylation content of GSTM1 is involved in type 1 T helper cell differentiation [95]. Alterations in Tet2 expression have been observed in myeloid malignancies, and TET2 has been shown to regulate myeloid and erythroid lineage differentiation [96]. The deficiency of DNMT1 in mice has been suggested to cause immune senescence and is involved in the development of early autoimmunity [97].

Abnormal DNA methylation induced by aging also accompanies disturbances in inflammatory cytokines. Shinozaki et al. measured DNA methylation levels in brain and blood samples and observed a significant negative association between aging and the DNA methylation of inflammatory factor genes (such as TNF-alpha and IL-6) [98]. Methylation levels in the mouse Klf14 promoter region increase with age and obesity and appear to be a regulatory factor of chronic inflammation in adipose tissue [99]. Furthermore, elevated 5hmC levels have been shown to promote the appearance of Iba1-positive inflammatory microglia in a study investigating age-related cerebrovascular alterations [100]. DNA methylation has also been suggested to have a role in the development of inflammation in several age-associated chronic diseases, such as cancer, osteoarthritis, and neurodegenerative diseases [101103].

5. Prospects and Conclusion

The underlying mechanisms of aging have perplexed scientists for decades. Detailed evaluations of global DNA methylation changes have provided insights into the process of aging, with DNA methylation serving as a biomarker of biological age and a driving force of aging. Current findings should stimulate further discussion and experimentation based on epigenetic regulation in cell-, tissue-, and disease-specific aging models. Future studies focusing on the mechanisms by which specific parameters, such as stress, affect methylation patterns will uncover additional details of the aging process. Identification of the target genes modified by DNA methylation-related regulatory elements in aging individuals is highly informative to figure out the hormone-like effectors and signal pathways that mediate these alterations as well as related diseases. The interaction among epigenetic regulators during aging should also be highly valued. Further studies should focus on the cross-talk among these epigenetic regulators, such as DNA methylation, RNA methylation, histone methylation, and noncoding RNAs, which will aid in providing a full picture of epigenetics and aging. The results of such studies may pave the way for antiaging interventions as well as treatments for related diseases, enabling human life extension.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


This work was partly supported by grants from the Research Funding for Talents Developing, West China Hospital of Stomatology Sichuan University (No. RCDWJS2020-23), and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation Grant (No. 2019TQ0218).


  1. M. Cardelli, “The epigenetic alterations of endogenous retroelements in aging,” Mechanisms of Ageing and Development, vol. 174, pp. 30–46, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. M. Jung and G. P. Pfeifer, “Aging and DNA methylation,” BMC Biology, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 7, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. C. López-Otín, M. A. Blasco, L. Partridge, M. Serrano, and G. Kroemer, “The hallmarks of aging,” Cell, vol. 153, no. 6, pp. 1194–1217, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. B. A. Benayoun, E. A. Pollina, and A. Brunet, “Epigenetic regulation of ageing: linking environmental inputs to genomic stability,” Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 593–610, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. L. N. Booth and A. Brunet, “The aging epigenome,” Molecular Cell, vol. 62, no. 5, pp. 728–744, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. X. Li, J. Wang, L. Wang et al., “Impaired lipid metabolism by age-dependent DNA methylation alterations accelerates aging,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 117, no. 8, pp. 4328–4336, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. N. Gensous, M. G. Bacalini, C. Pirazzini et al., “The epigenetic landscape of age-related diseases: the geroscience perspective,” Biogerontology, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 549–559, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. Y. Dor and H. Cedar, “Principles of DNA methylation and their implications for biology and medicine,” The Lancet, vol. 392, no. 10149, pp. 777–786, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. Z. D. Smith and A. Meissner, “DNA methylation: roles in mammalian development,” Nature Reviews. Genetics, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 204–220, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. C. L. Xiao, S. Zhu, M. He et al., “N6-Methyladenine DNA modification in the human genome,” Molecular Cell, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 306–318.e7, 2018, e7. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. E. L. Greer, B. Becker, C. Latza, A. Antebi, and Y. Shi, “Mutation of C. elegans demethylase spr-5 extends transgenerational longevity,” Cell Research, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 229–238, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. K. Skvortsova, E. Zotenko, P.-L. Luu et al., “Comprehensive evaluation of genome-wide 5-hydroxymethylcytosine profiling approaches in human DNA,” Epigenetics & Chromatin, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 16–16, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. C.-C. Chen, K.-Y. Wang, and C.-K. J. Shen, “DNA 5-methylcytosine demethylation activities of the mammalian DNA methyltransferases,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 288, no. 13, pp. 9084–9091, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. S.-M. Kweon, Y. Chen, E. Moon, K. Kvederaviciutė, S. Klimasauskas, and D. E. Feldman, “An Adversarial DNA N6-Methyladenine-Sensor Network Preserves Polycomb Silencing,” Molecular Cell, vol. 74, no. 6, pp. 1138–1147.e6, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. K. Douvlataniotis, M. Bensberg, A. Lentini, B. Gylemo, and C. E. Nestor, “No evidence for DNAN6-methyladenine in mammals,” Science Advances, vol. 6, no. 12, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. A. E. Field, N. A. Robertson, T. Wang, A. Havas, T. Ideker, and P. D. Adams, “DNA Methylation clocks in aging: categories, causes, and consequences,” Molecular Cell, vol. 71, no. 6, pp. 882–895, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. L. Ferrucci, M. Gonzalez-Freire, E. Fabbri et al., “Measuring biological aging in humans: a quest,” Aging Cell, vol. 19, no. 2, article e13080, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. C. G. Bell, R. Lowe, P. D. Adams et al., “DNA methylation aging clocks: challenges and recommendations,” Genome Biology, vol. 20, no. 1, p. 249, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. S. Horvath and K. Raj, “DNA methylation-based biomarkers and the epigenetic clock theory of ageing,” Nature Reviews. Genetics, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 371–384, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. K. Pearce, D. Cai, A. C. Roberts, and D. L. Glanzman, “Role of protein synthesis and DNA methylation in the consolidation and maintenance of long-term memory in Aplysia,” eLife, vol. 6, article e18299, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. K. Kornicka, K. Marycz, M. Marędziak, K. A. Tomaszewski, and J. Nicpoń, “The effects of the DNA methyltranfserases inhibitor 5-Azacitidine on ageing, oxidative stress and DNA methylation of adipose derived stem cells,” Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 387–401, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. N. D. Johnson and K. N. Conneely, “The role of DNA methylation and hydroxymethylation in immunosenescence,” Ageing Research Reviews, vol. 51, pp. 11–23, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. X. Bai, “Biomarkers of aging,” Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol. 1086, pp. 217–234, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. S. Maegawa, G. Hinkal, H. S. Kim et al., “Widespread and tissue specific age-related DNA methylation changes in mice,” Genome Research, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 332–340, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. R. S. Alisch, B. G. Barwick, P. Chopra et al., “Age-associated DNA methylation in pediatric populations,” Genome Research, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 623–632, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. D. G. Hernandez, M. A. Nalls, J. R. Gibbs et al., “Distinct DNA methylation changes highly correlated with chronological age in the human brain,” Human Molecular Genetics, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 1164–1172, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. J. T. Bell, P. C. Tsai, T. P. Yang et al., “Epigenome-wide scans identify differentially methylated regions for age and age-related phenotypes in a healthy ageing population,” PLoS Genetics, vol. 8, no. 4, article e1002629, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. A. E. Teschendorff, U. Menon, A. Gentry-Maharaj et al., “Age-dependent DNA methylation of genes that are suppressed in stem cells is a hallmark of cancer,” Genome Research, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 440–446, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. F. H. Xiao, Q. P. Kong, B. Perry, and Y. H. He, “Progress on the role of DNA methylation in aging and longevity,” Briefings in Functional Genomics, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 454–459, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. G. Hannum, J. Guinney, L. Zhao et al., “Genome-wide methylation profiles reveal quantitative views of human aging rates,” Molecular Cell, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 359–367, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. S. Horvath, “DNA methylation age of human tissues and cell types,” Genome Biology, vol. 14, no. 10, p. R115, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. M. E. Levine, A. T. Lu, A. Quach et al., “An epigenetic biomarker of aging for lifespan and healthspan,” Aging, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 573–591, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. J. J. Cole, N. A. Robertson, M. I. Rather et al., “Diverse interventions that extend mouse lifespan suppress shared age-associated epigenetic changes at critical gene regulatory regions,” Genome Biology, vol. 18, no. 1, p. 58, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. P. D’Aquila, F. De Rango, F. Guarasci et al., “Multi-tissue DNA methylation remodeling at mitochondrial quality control genes according to diet in rat aging models,” Nutrients, vol. 12, no. 2, p. 460, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. C. Franceschi, P. Garagnani, C. Morsiani et al., “The continuum of aging and age-related diseases: common mechanisms but different rates,” Frontiers in Medicine, vol. 5, p. 61, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. A. Nitsa, M. Toutouza, N. Machairas, A. Mariolis, A. Philippou, and M. Koutsilieris, “Vitamin D in cardiovascular disease,” In Vivo, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 977–981, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. A. Fernández-Sanlés, S. Sayols-Baixeras, I. Subirana, I. R. Degano, and R. Elosua, “Association between DNA methylation and coronary heart disease or other atherosclerotic events: a systematic review,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 263, pp. 325–333, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. L. Lind, E. Ingelsson, J. Sundström, A. Siegbahn, and E. Lampa, “Methylation-based estimated biological age and cardiovascular disease,” European Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 48, no. 2, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. W. Besingi and A. Johansson, “Smoke-related DNA methylation changes in the etiology of human disease,” Human Molecular Genetics, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 2290–2297, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. S. Stoll, C. Wang, and H. Qiu, “DNA methylation and histone modification in hypertension,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 19, no. 4, p. 1174, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. M. E. Pepin, C. M. Ha, D. K. Crossman et al., “Genome-wide DNA methylation encodes cardiac transcriptional reprogramming in human ischemic heart failure,” Laboratory Investigation, vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 371–386, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. Y. Yang, F. H. Chu, W. R. Xu et al., “Identification of regulatory role of DNA methylation in colon cancer gene expression via systematic bioinformatics analysis,” Medicine, vol. 96, no. 47, article e8487, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. L. Chen, T. Zeng, X. Pan, Y.-H. Zhang, T. Huang, and Y.-D. Cai, “Identifying methylation pattern and genes associated with breast cancer subtypes,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 20, no. 17, p. 4269, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. Y. Natanzon, E. L. Goode, and J. M. Cunningham, “Epigenetics in ovarian cancer,” Seminars in Cancer Biology, vol. 51, pp. 160–169, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. A. Koch, S. C. Joosten, Z. Feng et al., “Analysis of DNA methylation in cancer: location revisited,” Nature Reviews. Clinical Oncology, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 459–466, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. Z. Yang, A. Jones, M. Widschwendter, and A. E. Teschendorff, “An integrative pan-cancer-wide analysis of epigenetic enzymes reveals universal patterns of epigenomic deregulation in cancer,” Genome Biology, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 140, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. M. Klutstein, D. Nejman, R. Greenfield, and H. Cedar, “DNA methylation in cancer and aging,” Cancer Research, vol. 76, no. 12, pp. 3446–3450, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. K. Schmitt, B. Molfenter, N. K. Laureano et al., “Somatic mutations and promotor methylation of the ryanodine receptor 2 is a common event in the pathogenesis of head and neck cancer,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 145, no. 12, pp. 3299–3310, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. R. E. Bell, T. Golan, D. Sheinboim et al., “Enhancer methylation dynamics contribute to cancer plasticity and patient mortality,” Genome Research, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 601–611, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. S. Saghafinia, M. Mina, N. Riggi, D. Hanahan, and G. Ciriello, “Pan-cancer landscape of aberrant DNA methylation across human tumors,” Cell Reports, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 1066–1080.e8, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. J. V. Sanchez-Mut, H. Heyn, E. Vidal et al., “Human DNA methylomes of neurodegenerative diseases show common epigenomic patterns,” Translational Psychiatry, vol. 6, no. 1, article e718, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. A. R. Smith, R. G. Smith, J. Burrage et al., “A cross-brain regions study of ANK1 DNA methylation in different neurodegenerative diseases,” Neurobiology of Aging, vol. 74, pp. 70–76, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. J. Zhao, Y. Zhu, J. Yang et al., “A genome-wide profiling of brain DNA hydroxymethylation in Alzheimer's disease,” Alzheimers Dement, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 674–688, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. Y. Ben-Shlomo, R. Cooper, and D. Kuh, “The last two decades of life course epidemiology, and its relevance for research on ageing,” International Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 973–988, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. S. Kaushik and A. M. Cuervo, “Proteostasis and aging,” Nature Medicine, vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 1406–1415, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. S. B. Treaster, I. D. Ridgway, C. A. Richardson, M. B. Gaspar, A. R. Chaudhuri, and S. N. Austad, “Superior proteome stability in the longest lived animal,” Age, vol. 36, no. 3, p. 9597, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. E. T. Powers, R. I. Morimoto, A. Dillin, J. W. Kelly, and W. E. Balch, “Biological and chemical approaches to diseases of proteostasis deficiency,” Annual Review of Biochemistry, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 959–991, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. H. Khalil, M. Tazi, K. Caution et al., “Aging is associated with hypermethylation of autophagy genes in macrophages,” Epigenetics, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 381–388, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. J.-O. Pyo, S.-M. Yoo, H.-H. Ahn et al., “Overexpression of Atg5 in mice activates autophagy and extends lifespan,” Nature Communications, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 2300, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. L.-Y. Zhou, M. Zhai, Y. Huang et al., “The circular RNA ACR attenuates myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury by suppressing autophagy via modulation of the Pink1/FAM65B pathway,” Cell Death and Differentiation, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 1299–1315, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. K.-M. Ng, P. Y. Mok, A. W. Butler et al., “Amelioration of X-linked related autophagy failure in Danon disease with DNA methylation inhibitor,” Circulation, vol. 134, no. 18, pp. 1373–1389, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. K. Zhao, Y. Zhang, L. Kang et al., “Methylation of microRNA-129-5P modulates nucleus pulposus cell autophagy by targeting Beclin-1 in intervertebral disc degeneration,” Oncotarget, vol. 8, no. 49, pp. 86264–86276, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. L. Sun, M. Zhao, Y. Wang et al., “Neuroprotective effects of miR-27a against traumatic brain injury via suppressing FoxO3a-mediated neuronal autophagy,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 482, no. 4, pp. 1141–1147, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. S. Zha, Z. Li, S. Chen, F. Liu, and F. Wang, “MeCP2 inhibits cell functionality through FoxO3a and autophagy in endothelial progenitor cells,” Aging, vol. 11, no. 17, pp. 6714–6733, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. B. Chen, C. Zeng, Y. Ye et al., “Promoter methylation of TCF21 may repress autophagy in the progression of lung cancer,” Journal of Cell Communication and Signaling, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 423–432, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. L. Piqué, A. Martinez de Paz, D. Piñeyro et al., “Epigenetic inactivation of the splicing RNA-binding protein CELF2 in human breast cancer,” Oncogene, vol. 38, no. 45, pp. 7106–7112, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. M. Yi, J. Yang, W. Li et al., “The NOR1/OSCP1 proteins in cancer: from epigenetic silencing to functional characterization of a novel tumor suppressor,” Journal of Cancer, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 626–635, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. M. Wang and B. Lemos, “Ribosomal DNA harbors an evolutionarily conserved clock of biological aging,” Genome Research, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 325–333, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. R. Sanokawa-Akakura, S. Akakura, E. A. Ostrakhovitch, and S. Tabibzadeh, “Replicative senescence is distinguishable from DNA damage-induced senescence by increased methylation of promoter of rDNA and reduced expression of rRNA,” Mechanisms of Ageing and Development, vol. 183, p. 111149, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. C. Correia-Melo, F. D. M. Marques, R. Anderson et al., “Mitochondria are required for pro-ageing features of the senescent phenotype,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 724–742, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. L. A. Zinovkina and R. A. Zinovkin, “DNA methylation, mitochondria, and programmed aging,” Biochemistry. Biokhimiia, vol. 80, no. 12, pp. 1571–1577, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. A. J. Duraisamy, G. Mohammad, and R. A. Kowluru, “Mitochondrial fusion and maintenance of mitochondrial homeostasis in diabetic retinopathy,” Molecular Basis of Disease, vol. 1865, no. 6, pp. 1617–1626, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. D. Gao, B. Zhu, H. Sun, and X. Wang, “Mitochondrial DNA methylation and related disease,” Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol. 1038, pp. 117–132, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. Y. S. Oh, S. H. Kim, and G.-W. Cho, “Functional restoration of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patient-derived mesenchymal stromal cells through inhibition of DNA methyltransferase,” Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 613–620, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. M. Mishra and R. A. Kowluru, “DNA methylation-a potential source of mitochondria DNA base mismatch in the development of diabetic retinopathy,” Molecular Neurobiology, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 88–101, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. K. Xie, D. P. Ryan, B. L. Pearson et al., “Epigenetic alterations in longevity regulators, reduced life span, and exacerbated aging-related pathology in old father offspring mice,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 115, no. 10, pp. E2348–e2357, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. Y. Wu, L. Xie, M. Wang et al., “Mettl3-mediated m6A RNA methylation regulates the fate of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells and osteoporosis,” Nature Communications, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 4772, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  78. E. R. Adelman, H. T. Huang, A. Roisman et al., “Aging human hematopoietic stem cells manifest profound epigenetic reprogramming of enhancers that may predispose to leukemia,” Cancer Discovery, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 1080–1101, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  79. M. Jeong, H. J. Park, H. Celik et al., “Loss of Dnmt3a immortalizes hematopoietic stem cells in vivo,” Cell Reports, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  80. G. A. Challen, D. Sun, A. Mayle et al., “Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b have overlapping and distinct functions in hematopoietic stem cells,” Cell Stem Cell, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 350–364, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  81. M. Ko, H. S. Bandukwala, J. An et al., “Ten-eleven-translocation 2 (TET2) negatively regulates homeostasis and differentiation of hematopoietic stem cells in mice,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 108, no. 35, pp. 14566–14571, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  82. M. Agathocleous, C. E. Meacham, R. J. Burgess et al., “Ascorbate regulates haematopoietic stem cell function and leukaemogenesis,” Nature, vol. 549, no. 7673, pp. 476–481, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  83. S. Bork, S. Pfister, H. Witt et al., “DNA methylation pattern changes upon long-term culture and aging of human mesenchymal stromal cells,” Aging Cell, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 54–63, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  84. Y. S. Oh, S. G. Jeong, and G. W. Cho, “Anti-senescence effects of DNA methyltransferase inhibitor RG108 in human bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells,” Biotechnology and Applied Biochemistry, vol. 62, no. 5, pp. 583–590, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  85. Y. Nomura, E. S. Hara, Y. Yoshioka et al., “DNA methylation-based regulation of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem/progenitor cell chondrogenic differentiation,” Cells, Tissues, Organs, vol. 207, no. 3-4, pp. 115–126, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  86. Y. Lu, H. Qu, D. Qi et al., “OCT4 maintains self-renewal and reverses senescence in human hair follicle mesenchymal stem cells through the downregulation of p21 by DNA methyltransferases,” Stem Cell Research & Therapy, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 28, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  87. C. Zhou, Y. Liu, X. Li, J. Zou, and S. Zou, “DNA N6-methyladenine demethylase ALKBH1 enhances osteogenic differentiation of human MSCs,” Bone Research, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 16033, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  88. R. C. Laker and J. G. Ryall, “DNA methylation in skeletal muscle stem cell specification, proliferation, and differentiation,” Stem Cells International, vol. 2016, Article ID 5725927, 9 pages, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  89. N. Breuls, G. Giacomazzi, and M. Sampaolesi, “(Epi)genetic modifications in myogenic stem cells: from novel insights to therapeutic perspectives,” Cell, vol. 8, no. 5, p. 429, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  90. Y. Hatazawa, Y. Ono, Y. Hirose et al., “Reduced Dnmt3a increases Gdf5 expression with suppressed satellite cell differentiation and impaired skeletal muscle regeneration,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 1452–1467, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  91. A. Bigot, W. J. Duddy, Z. G. Ouandaogo et al., “Age-associated methylation suppresses SPRY1, leading to a failure of re-quiescence and loss of the reserve stem cell pool in elderly muscle,” Cell Reports, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 1172–1182, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  92. L. Tserel, R. Kolde, M. Limbach et al., “Age-related profiling of DNA methylation in CD8+ T cells reveals changes in immune response and transcriptional regulator genes,” Scientific Reports, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 13107, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  93. N. D. Johnson, H. W. Wiener, A. K. Smith et al., “Non-linear patterns in age-related DNA methylation may reflect CD4(+) T cell differentiation,” Epigenetics, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 492–503, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  94. S. K. Garg, C. Delaney, T. Toubai et al., “Aging is associated with increased regulatory T-cell function,” Aging Cell, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 441–448, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  95. S. H. Yeh, C. L. Liu, R. C. Chang, C. C. Wu, C. H. Lin, and K. D. Yang, “Aging-dependent DNA hypermethylation and gene expression of GSTM1 involved in T cell differentiation,” Oncotarget, vol. 8, no. 30, pp. 48591–48602, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  96. H. Kunimoto, A. S. McKenney, C. Meydan et al., “Aid is a key regulator of myeloid/erythroid differentiation and DNA methylation in hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells,” Blood, vol. 129, no. 13, pp. 1779–1790, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  97. R. Yung, D. Ray, J. K. Eisenbraun et al., “Unexpected effects of a heterozygous dnmt1 null mutation on age-dependent DNA hypomethylation and autoimmunity,” The Journals of Gerontology. Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, vol. 56, no. 6, pp. B268–B276, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  98. G. Shinozaki, P. R. Braun, B. W. Q. Hing et al., “Epigenetics of delirium and aging: potential role of DNA methylation change on cytokine genes in glia and blood along with aging,” Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, vol. 10, p. 311, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  99. C. Iwaya, H. Kitajima, K. Yamamoto et al., “DNA methylation of the Klf14 gene region in whole blood cells provides prediction for the chronic inflammation in the adipose tissue,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 497, no. 3, pp. 908–915, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  100. Y. Tsenkina, A. Ruzov, C. Gliddon, K. Horsburgh, and P. A. de Sousa, “White matter tract and glial-associated changes in 5-hydroxymethylcytosine following chronic cerebral hypoperfusion,” Brain Research, vol. 1592, pp. 82–100, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  101. D. Castellano-Castillo, S. Morcillo, M. Clemente-Postigo et al., “Adipose tissue inflammation and VDR expression and methylation in colorectal cancer,” Clinical Epigenetics, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 60, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  102. J. Shen, Y. Abu-Amer, R. J. O’Keefe, and A. McAlinden, “Inflammation and epigenetic regulation in osteoarthritis,” Connective Tissue Research, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 49–63, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  103. M. Neal and J. R. Richardson, “Epigenetic regulation of astrocyte function in neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta - Molecular Basis of Disease, vol. 1864, no. 2, pp. 432–443, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2020 Shuang Jiang and Yuchen Guo. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.