Stem Cells International

Stem Cells International / 2020 / Article
Special Issue

Current Status and Perspectives of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy 2020

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2020 |Article ID 8237197 | 12 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8237197

Extensive Characterization of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Marker Expression on Freshly Isolated and In Vitro Expanded Human Adipose-Derived Stem Cells from Breast Cancer Patients

Academic Editor: Jane Ru Choi
Received05 Mar 2020
Revised20 May 2020
Accepted27 May 2020
Published18 Jun 2020

Abstract

Variation in numbers and functions of cells in fat tissues may affect therapeutic outcomes and adverse events after autologous fat tissue grafting in postmastectomy breast cancer patients; however, the relevant information regarding cellular components is still incomplete. Phenotypic characterization of heterogeneous cell subsets in stromal vascular fraction (SVF) isolated from fat tissues by flow cytometry was also limited to a combination of few molecules. This study, therefore, developed a polychromatic staining panel for an in-depth characterization of freshly isolated SVF and expanded adipose-derived stem cells (ADSC) from the patients. ADSC were found predominant in SVF (~65% of CD45- cells) with a homogenous phenotype of CD13+CD31-CD34+CD45-CD73+CD90+CD105-CD146- (~94% of total ADSC). Endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) and pericytes were minor (~18% and ~11% of CD45- cells, respectively) with large heterogeneity. Downregulation of CD34 and upregulation of CD105 in ADSC were profound at passage 3, showing a phenotype similar to the classical mesenchymal stem cells from the bone marrow. Results from this study demonstrated that fat tissue collected from patients contains ADSC with a highly homogenous phenotype. The in vitro culture of these cells maintained their homogeneity with modified CD34 and CD105 expression, suggesting the expansion from a single population of ADSC.

1. Introduction

White adipose tissue has been recognized as the alternative source for stromal precursors and stem cells. Normally, adipose tissues can be divided into two types including white and brown adipose tissues according to their morphology and physiology. White adipose tissue contains a single lipid droplet creating white to yellow appearance and functions by storing lipids for excessive energy, whereas brown adipose tissue comprises multiple small vacuoles with abundance of iron-containing mitochondria generating brown color and works through lipid burning for heat production [13]. Besides these dissimilarities, brown adipose tissue is less in quantity in adult humans and located in vital regions such as cervical, supraclavicular, and axillary [4]. White adipose tissue is found predominantly in subcutaneous and several visceral depots (e.g., abdomen, hip, and thigh); thus, it becomes a sensible source for progenitor stem cells.

Compared to the bone marrow—another recommended source of stem cells, the yield of mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) from white adipose tissue was able to reach 0.5– cells/gram adipose tissue [5, 6] while only 0.001–0.01% of isolated cells was averagely achieved from the bone marrow [7] which was remarkably lower and insufficient for further propagation to use in cell therapy. The harvesting procedure of these bone marrow-derived stem cells (BMSC) is also relatively invasive to the patients and costs higher. Although BMSC are considered as a gold standard for adult stem cells, several concerns previously mentioned have become its limitation for clinical implementation. Other types of stem cells including embryonic stem cells (ESC) and induced-pluripotent stem cells (iPSC) have been restricted for clinical practices due to ethical consideration and cell regulation. Therefore, adipose-derived stem cells (ADSC) have recently been more attractive for therapeutic potentials because of their less invasive harvesting technique, less expensive cost, greater yield, and confirmed multilineage differentiation ability the same as MSC characteristics [5, 6, 8, 9].

A heterogeneous population of stromal vascular fraction (SVF) containing vascular endothelial cells, endothelial progenitor cells (EPC), pericytes, infiltrating cells of hematopoietic lineage, and adipose-derived stem cells (ADSC) can be isolated from lipoaspirates by enzymatic digestion and mechanical processing [8, 1013]. As ADSC are widely known for their regenerative property, they have then been introduced not only to reconstructive surgery targeting in soft tissues and skin but also in all fields of surgery with a wide range of potential clinical uses [14]. Oncoplastic breast surgery is one of the several surgical applications using ADSC through fat grafting for postmastectomy breast reconstruction in breast cancer patients [1517]. The clinical outcomes rely on abilities of ADSC in proliferation and differentiation to new functional adipocytes together with maintenance of mature fat graft volume. Therefore, ADSC have become great potential for novel breast reconstruction approaches and attractive to recent tissue engineering [18] instead of BMSC which were reported to occupy higher differentiation tendency towards osteoblasts and chondrocytes than adipocytes [19]. Many issues regarding cellular biology, oncological safety, clinical efficacy, and cell production as well as surgery techniques and experience with procedure are then concerned.

A supportive use of ADSC for clinical applications such as cell-assisted lipotransfer (CAL) was introduced by using a combination of SVF and aspirated fat for autologous tissue transfer [20]. This CAL technique was able to increase the efficacy by showing the higher survival rate and persistence of transplanted fat when compared to non-CAL (i.e., aspirated fat alone without ADSC) as well as reduced adverse effects from calcification, fibrosis formation, and pseudocyst [20]. Aspirated fat was then served as injection material for soft tissue augmentation which was also rich in EPC and pericytes promoting angiogenesis and microvasculature. However, EPC were concerned for catalyzing tumor vascularization [21, 22]. Detailed identification of EPC and pericytes in lipoaspirates is then warranted for better understanding of their relationship with the partial necrosis of aspirate fat or cancer-promoting risk after fat transplant.

Therefore, phenotypic characterization of ADSC is essential as the initial step for cellular biology confirmation. Flow cytometry is widely used since it is the gold standard method for evaluation of cell composition in a sample and functionally relevant cell surface marker expressions. Although numerous studies put efforts by using a broad range of surface markers for ADSC identification, there is still a controversial discussion on the expression of some surface protein molecule by ADSC on the day of isolation, such as CD105 [23, 24] and CD146 [2426]. This variation may be resulted from different monoclonal antibody panels used for multicolor staining in a single sample and from physiological difference between fresh and cryopreserved samples. Isolated SVF or ADSC samples were also obtained from healthy donors in most reports while the use of ADSC for postmastectomy breast reconstruction requires autologous fat transplantation. This study is thus aimed at investigating an in-depth characterization of ADSC, EPC, and pericytes in fresh liposuction aspirates from breast cancer patients by using a developed 8-color staining panel with flow cytometric analysis. Serial changes in ADSC phenotypic profiles were also explored from the day of cell isolation until completion at passage 3. Besides that, multilineage differentiation ability of the expanded ADSC was evaluated to ensure their MSC characteristics.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Population

Twenty-two breast cancer female patients aged between 47 and 62 years old requiring autologous fat transplantation for breast reconstruction at the Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand, were recruited for the study. The protocols were approved by the Institution Review Board (IRB) of the Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital (COA number 580/2016). Written informed consent was also obtained from each subject prior to the study.

2.2. Sample Collection

Lipoaspirates were withdrawn from the abdomen by a tumescence technique using a 3 mm diameter suction tube coupled with a 10 mL vacuum syringe. The collected tissues were then kept in the syringes for fresh isolation and characterization of ADSC on the same day before further serial passaging.

2.3. Cell Isolation from Lipoaspirates

Raw lipoaspirates were centrifuged at 2,000g for 3 min followed by a removal of oil and blood. The remaining fat tissues were digested with 2 mg/mL collagenase A type I (Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA) at 37°C for 60 min under shaking. Neutralization of enzymatic activity was done by adding a complete medium containing Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM, Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA), 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA), 1% l-glutamine (Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA), 1% penicillin-streptomycin (Pen-Strep, Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA), and 0.01% gentamycin (Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA) before centrifugation at 400g, 4°C for 10 min. After that, the collected pellet was resuspended in ammonium chloride potassium (ACK) lysis buffer (Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA) for red blood cell (RBC) lysis and centrifuged at 400g, 4°C for 10 min, for RBC removal. The obtained pellet was then resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA) containing 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA, Sigma-Aldrich, USA), and the cell suspension was filtered through 100 and 40 μm cell strainers (Corning, NY, USA) to discard cellular debris followed by centrifugation again at 400g, 4°C for 10 min. The SVF pellet was collected and resuspended in 1% BSA in PBS. The cells were then counted by a trypan blue exclusion method.

2.4. Cell Culture

Three samples of freshly isolated SVF cells at the day of isolation (D0) were cultured in the DMEM complete medium at 10,000 cells/cm2 of a culture plate. After 3 days, nonadherent cells were washed and discarded. The remaining adherent cells were then expanded in complete medium, and replenishments of fresh medium were performed every 3 days. When the expanded cells reached 80% confluency, they were detached from the culture plates with 0.25% trypsin (Gibco Life Technologies, CA) and considered to be at passage 0 (P0). The isolated adherent cells at P0 were then continually expanded for subcultivation through passage 3 (P3). The expanded ADSC at each passage (i.e., P0, P1, P2, and P3) were counted by a trypan blue exclusion method and characterized by immunofluorescent staining and flow cytometric analysis.

2.5. Phenotypic Characterization

For phenotypic characterization of the freshly isolated and expanded cells, they were stained with fluorochrome-conjugated monoclonal antibodies including CD13-allophycocyanin (APC), CD31-Alexa Fluor® 488, CD34-Brilliant Violet™ 421 (BV421), CD45-peridinin-chlorophyll-protein (PerCP), CD73-phycoerythrin/Dazzle™ (PE/Dazzle™) 594, CD90-Brilliant Violet™ 510 (BV510), CD105-phycoerythrin cyanine 7 (PECy7), and CD146-phycoerythrin (PE). All reagents were obtained from BioLegend, CA, USA. The samples were then incubated for 15 min before washing and resuspending in 450 μL PBS. All samples were analyzed by LSRFortessa flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, USA) and FlowJo® software (Tree Star, San Carlos, CA).

2.6. Multilineage Differentiation

At the end of passage 3, the cultured ADSC were confirmed for their differentiation capability towards adipocytes, osteocytes, and chondrocytes through histological analyses. For adipogenesis, the expanded ADSC at 40,000 cells/well in a 6-well plate were cultured in 1 mL of adipogenic differentiation medium (STEMCELL™ Technologies, Canada) and then incubated at 37°C and 5% CO2 for 14 days. On day 14, the induced cells were washed with 1X PBS twice and fixed with 10% formaldehyde in PBS for 30 min. After that, the fixed cells were washed with 60% isopropanol (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) in aqueous before stained with Oil Red O staining solution (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) for 60 min. The stained cells were extensively washed with water to remove unbound dye and subsequently observed under an inverted fluorescent microscope (Nikon, Ti-S Intensilight Ri1 NIS-D, Japan). Representative images of the induced cells were compared to a control group (i.e., noninduced ADSC cultured in DMEM complete medium).

With respect to osteogenesis, ADSC at 40,000 cells/well in a 6-well plate were cultured in 1 mL of osteogenic differentiation medium (STEMCELL™ Technologies, Canada) and then incubated at 37°C and 5% CO2 for 14 days. On day 14, the induced cells were washed with 1x PBS twice and fixed with 70% ethanol (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) for 30 min. After that, ethanol was removed and the fixed cells were stained with Alizarin Red S staining solution (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) for 30 min before extensively washed with water. Representative images of the induced cells were captured by the inverted fluorescent microscope and compared with a noninduction control.

For chondrogenesis, a micromass culture system was used. The cultured ADSC at concentration of 200,000 cells/10 μL DMEM complete medium were dropped at the center of a 12-well plate and incubated at 37°C and 5% CO2 without the culture medium for 1 h. After that, the chondrogenic differentiation medium containing DMEM supplemented with 100 nM dexamethasone (Sigma-Aldrich, USA), 50 mg/mL ascorbic acid (Sigma-Aldrich, USA), 100 μg/mL sodium pyruvate (Sigma-Aldrich, USA), 1 : 100 diluted ITS+Premix (a mixture containing 6.25 mg/mL insulin, 6.25 mg/mL transferrin, 6.25 mg/mL selenous acid, 1.25 mg/mL BSA, and 5.35 mg/mL linoleic acid, BD Biosciences, USA), 10 ng/mL transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGF-β1, PeproTech®, USA), and 40 mg/mL proline (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) was added into the culture plate and incubated at 37°C and 5% CO2 for 21 days. The chondrogenic differentiation medium was changed every 3 days. On day 21, the cell pellets were frozen in Tissue-Tek® O.C.T.™ Compound (Sakura®, Japan) with liquid N2 for cryostat sectioning by CryoStar™ NX70 Cryostat (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). The sectioned cell samples were placed on microscope slides, then washed with 1x PBS thrice and fixed with 10% formaldehyde in PBS for 10 min before gently removing the fixing agent. The fixed cells were stained with Alcian Blue staining solution (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) for 30 min and, respectively, washed with water, 70%, 80%, and 90% and absolute ethanol and xylene. Representative images of the induced cells were captured by the inverted fluorescent microscope and compared with a -induction control.

2.7. Data Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism® software version 7.02 (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA). Data was expressed as (SD). A two-way analysis of variance with a Bonferroni’s multiple comparisons test was used to determine statistical differences of the mean quantity among SVF subpopulations including mesenchymal stem cells (MSC), ADSC, EPC, and pericytes. values < 0.05 were considered as a statistical significance.

3. Results

3.1. Characterization of Cell Populations in SVF of Lipoaspirates from Breast Cancer Patients

To identify cell populations in SVF of white adipose tissues from breast cancer patients, an 8-marker staining panel including CD13, CD31, CD34, CD45, CD73, CD90, CD105, and CD146 was developed for polychromatic flow cytometric analysis. A gating strategy was employed for phenotypic characterization of cell subpopulation (Figure 1). Freshly isolated SVF cells were first gated for doublet discrimination (data not shown), and then, a live cell population was identified by using the light scattered properties (FSC-A vs. SSC-A). After that, nonhematopoietic cells (i.e., CD45-) were selected before being further identified into three subpopulations of SVF based on the expression of CD34 and CD31. ADSC were thus identified as CD31-CD34+, whereas EPC were identified as CD31+CD34+. In addition, CD31-CD34- was further characterized by using the expression of CD146 to obtain pericytes (CD31-CD34-CD146+). According to this gating strategy, the minimum markers of CD31, CD34, CD45, and CD146 were sufficient to identify 3 major heterogeneous subsets of SVF.

Freshly isolated SVF samples from twenty-two patients were then used to determine the amount of each SVF subpopulations. In a live cell population, was identified as nonhematopoietic cells. This cell subset was further used to identify ADSC, EPC, and pericytes. Quantities of cell subpopulations in the CD31-CD34- subset were also investigated for the expression of a set of surface markers including CD73, CD90, and CD105 (i.e., considered as MSC). As shown in Figure 2, the nonhematopoietic cell portion of SVF comprised a significantly large population of ADSC () followed by similar numbers of EPC and pericytes ( and , respectively). In contrast, only a small population of these cells was identified as MSC (), suggesting a majority of stem cells in SVF belongs to ADSC.

3.2. Phenotypic Profiles and Subpopulations of ADSC, EPC, and Pericytes

With respect to detailed phenotypic profiles of ADSC, EPC, and pericytes in the freshly isolated SVF, their surface maker expressions of CD13, CD73, CD90, CD105, and CD146 were determined (Figure 3). For ADSC, the expressions of CD13, CD73, and CD90 were observed with high intensity while the expression of CD105 and CD146 was not found. The surface marker expression of EPC, on the other hand, exhibited moderate expression intensities of CD13, CD90, and CD105 with a high intensity of CD146 and an absence of CD73 expression. For pericytes, the dim expressions of CD13 and CD90 were observed while the expression of CD146 was found with high intensity. The expressions of CD73 and CD105 were also not observed in pericytes. These results suggested that ADSC population was homogeneous, whereas EPC and pericytes were heterogeneous.

Subsets of ADSC, EPC, and pericytes were then examined based on these 5 surface markers by using Boolean gating analysis (Table 1). The result showed that a majority of ADSC exhibited CD13+CD73+CD90+CD105-CD146- phenotype () and the rest of the ADSC population either expressed CD146 or CD105. Unlike ADSC, a great variation was observed for EPC subpopulations. Ten subpopulations of EPC were identified in which the majority exhibited CD13+CD73-CD90+CD105+CD146+ phenotype (). Interestingly, approximately 15% of EPC showed simultaneous expressions of CD73, CD90, CD105, and 146 ( for the CD13+CD73+CD90+CD105+CD146+ subset and for the CD13-CD73+CD90+CD105+CD146+ subset). It is worth noting that the expressions of CD90 and CD146 were common in most EPC subsets with 8 out of 10 subsets expressing CD90 and 7 out of 10 subsets expressing CD146. For pericytes, since all of them expressed CD146, 8 subpopulations were characterized based on differential expressions of CD13, CD73, CD90, and CD105. The predominant subset exhibited CD13+CD73-CD90+CD105-CD146+ phenotype () and followed by the CD13-CD73-CD90+CD105-CD146+ subset (). Interestingly, these 2 subsets contributed to almost half of pericytes with mere difference on CD13 expression.


PopulationSubset% Frequency of total population

ADSCCD13+CD73+CD90+CD105-CD146-
CD13+CD73+CD90+CD105-CD146+
CD13+CD73+CD90+CD105+CD146-

EPCCD13+CD73-CD90+CD105+CD146+
CD13+CD73+CD90+CD105+CD146+
CD13-CD73-CD90+CD105-CD146+
CD13-CD73-CD90+CD105+CD146+
CD13-CD73-CD90-CD105-CD146-
CD13+CD73-CD90+CD105-CD146+
CD13-CD73-CD90+CD105-CD146-
CD13-CD73+CD90+CD105+CD146+
CD13-CD73-CD90-CD105-CD146+
CD13-CD73-CD90+CD105+CD146-

PericyteCD13+CD73-CD90+CD105-CD146+
CD13-CD73-CD90+CD105-CD146+
CD13-CD73-CD90-CD105+CD146+
CD13+CD73-CD90-CD105-CD146+
CD13+CD73-CD90+CD105+CD146+
CD13+CD73+CD90+CD105-CD146+
CD13-CD73-CD90+CD105+CD146+
CD13+CD73+CD90+CD105+CD146+

3.3. Phenotypic Changes of ADSC after Serial Passaging

While ADSC on the day of isolation (D0) did not express CD105 which was regarded as a maker for identification of MSC (i.e., used in a combination with CD73 and CD90), the expression of CD34 was observed appearing to be similar to pericyte progenitors and hematopoietic stem cells. These results suggested that freshly isolated ADSC from SVF are distinct from MSC. Therefore, the phenotypic alteration during the in vitro expansion of ADSC was then determined. ADSC were expanded over serial passaging starting from the day of SVF isolation determined as passage 0 (P0) until the completion at passage 3 (P3). Phenotypes of the expanded ADSC from each passage were analyzed by polychromatic flow cytometry using the 8-marker staining panel. A representative phenotypic profile of the expanded ADSC from 4 different passages (P0, P1, P2, and P3) was demonstrated in Figure 4. Similar to freshly isolated ADSC from SVF, the expressions of CD13, CD73, and CD90 of the expanded ADSC remained consistently high throughout the culture period (Figure 4) while the expressions of CD45 and CD31 were absent from the expanded cell populations (data not shown). More importantly, a remarkable downregulation of CD34 was observed since P0 and its expression gradually decreased until a complete diminution on P3. On the contrary, most of the expanded cells showed a remarkable upregulation of CD105 since P0 and its expression maintained throughout the culture period.

To characterize cell subpopulations in the expanded cells, simultaneous expressions of cell surface markers were analyzed. Although the highly homogeneous ADSC with CD13+CD31-CD34+CD45-CD73+CD90+CD105-CD146- phenotype were observed in freshly isolated SVF and largely contributed as major progenitor cells in the expansion culture, a notable decrease of this cell population was observed on P0 and its presence remained low throughout the culture period (Table 2). While many different cell subsets were observed in the expanded cell population due to a variation in cell surface marker expressions, approximately 80% belonged to only 2 major phenotypes including CD13+CD31-CD34+CD45-CD73+CD90+CD105+CD146- and CD13+CD31-CD34-CD45-CD73+CD90+CD105+CD146- (Table 2). Interestingly, the frequency of the expanded cells with CD13+CD31-CD34-CD45-CD73+CD90+CD105+CD146- phenotype was slightly higher than another subset at the beginning on P0 and then considerably increased over the serial passages (approximately 70% on P3). Due to these phenotypic changes, the characteristic of the expanded ADSC (i.e., CD13+CD34-CD45-CD73+CD90+CD105+CD146-) at the end of P3 became more similar to that of MSC from the bone marrow.


Cultured ADSC subsetP0P1P2P3

CD13+CD31-CD34+CD45-CD73+CD90+CD105-CD146-
CD13+CD31-CD34+CD45-CD73+CD90+CD105+CD146-
CD13+CD31-CD34-CD45-CD73+CD90+CD105+CD146-

3.4. Differentiation Potential of the Expanded ADSC

Before the evaluation of differentiation capability of the expanded ADSC at the end of P3, morphology of ADSC was observed for confirmation of a typical fibroblast-like adherent appearance (Figure 5). ADSC were then examined for their multipotency through histological analyses using specific induction and staining protocols. The induced and noninduced cells were stained with Oil Red O to detect neutral triglycerides and lipid droplets in adipogenic assay, whereas Alizarin Red S was used to identify calcium deposits in osteogenic detection and Alcian Blue was used to observe proteoglycan in chondrogenic protocol. Results show that ADSC were able to differentiate into adipocytes and osteocytes within 14 days as well as chondrocytes within 21 days under the induction conditions when compared to the noninduced ADSC (Figure 6).

4. Discussion

Our study demonstrates the existence of cell subpopulations within multipotent ADSC, EPC, and pericytes in freshly isolated SVF from abdominal fat of breast cancer patients. At present, characterization of the phenotypes and properties of ASDC, EPC, and pericytes is usually limited to SVF from healthy donors and only a few studies reported cell subpopulations in freshly isolated SVF from breast cancer patients [21, 22, 27]. Most previous cellular characterization was performed through multiparameter immunophenotypic analysis with a single marker or a combination of up to 4 biomarkers [24, 25, 2729] which may be inadequate to clearly clarify subpopulations. We then developed the 8-color staining panel with flow cytometry for extensive and accurate characterization of ADSC, EPC, and pericytes with their cellular subsets in lipoaspirates from breast cancer patients. The typical MSC marker proteins including surface enzymes CD13 (amino-peptidase) and CD73 (5ecto-nucleotidase) and extracellular matrix proteins CD90 (Thy-1), CD105 (endoglin), and CD146 (Muc18) as well as hematopoietic cell lineage markers CD34 (mucusialin) and CD45 (leukocyte common antigen, LCA, Ly-5), and endothelial cell marker CD31 (platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1, PECAM-1) were chosen for immunophenotypic identification.

Our results showed that ADSC, EPC, and pericytes were able to be distinguished by a minimum of 4 markers including CD31, CD34, CD45, and CD146. While all three cell types do not express CD45, ADSC only expressed CD34 and EPC expressed both CD31 and CD34. Pericytes, on the other hand, did not express all of those markers except CD146. This identification of the 3 main populations was in agreement with previous studies [22, 26, 27, 30]. In our freshly isolated SVF, ADSC were the most abundant followed by EPC and pericytes (, , and of CD45- cells, respectively) which differed from a finding by Agostini et al. showing ADSC with and EPC with of CD34+CD45- cells [27]. The differences in numbers may be influenced from different presentation in cell percentages (% of CD45- cells vs. % of CD34+CD45- cells), variation in sample sizes ( vs. ), and donor-dependent variability, despite the same sample sources from breast cancer patients and similar surface markers used for characterization. Moreover, most of our nonhematopoietic lineage (CD45-) in SVF comprised CD34+ cells (over 80% of CD45- cells), meaning that percentages of ADSC and EPC would be even greater when reporting in % of CD34+CD45- cells. By presenting cell numbers in % of CD45- cells, it allows us to identify pericytes residing in CD34-CD45- population.

Unlike MSC expressing CD73, CD90, and CD105, the expression of CD105 was absent from freshly isolated ADSC. In order to determine the presence of predefined MSC, we then examined whether there was any cells with CD34-CD45-CD73+CD90+CD105+ phenotype in freshly isolated SVF. Since a small population of MSC was found at of CD45- cells, the result suggested that a larger proportion of ADSC might play a major role for regenerative effects after lipotransfer. To verify homogeneity and heterogeneity of the 3 main populations of SVF (including ADSC, EPC, and pericytes), a set of surface markers including CD13, CD73, CD90, CD105, and CD146 was taken into consideration. Freshly isolated ADSC (CD31-CD34+CD45-) were homogeneous as a major population belongs to cells with CD13+CD73+CD90+CD105-CD146- phenotype ( of ADSC). In addition, two minor subsets with changes in either CD146 or CD105 expression ( and of ADSC, respectively) were identified. The presence of a large proportion of the highly homogeneous ADSC suggested homogeneity in the regenerative capacity and served as a major source for the in vitro expanded ADSC.

On the contrary, EPC and pericytes were heterogeneous with the presence of several subsets. A majority of EPC was identified as CD13+CD73-CD90+CD105+CD146+ cells with the greatest number of of EPC and smaller proportions were distributed among the other 9 subsets expressing different combinations of those 5 markers. While pericytes were identified as the cells with CD31-CD34-CD45-CD146+ phenotype, almost a half portion of pericytes was identified as the cells with CD13+CD73-CD90+CD105-CD146+ () and CD13+CD73-CD90+CD105-CD146+ () phenotypes. The other 7 subsets of pericytes showed variation in the expressions of CD13, CD73, CD90, and CD105. Agostini et al. also reported a similar profiling of freshly isolated ADSC from breast cancer patients; however, EPC were found with the different phenotype of CD13- and CD73+ [27]. These differences may be caused from a different combination of cell surface markers used in the study as a maximum of 4 surface markers was analyzed simultaneously (i.e., combinations of CD34, CD45, and 7-aminoactinomycin (7-AAD) with either one of these markers including CD31, CD73, CD90, CD105, or CD146). This limitation in multicolor flow cytometry prevented simultaneous detection of different markers as observed in our study. We found the CD13-CD73+CD90+CD105+CD146+ cell subset with only of total EPC which was not represented as the majority of EPC. Nevertheless, the considerable phenotypes of all ADSC, EPC, and pericytes from breast cancer patients in this study were comparable to those from healthy donors [23].

In this study, phenotypic changes of the expanded ADSC over serial passaging were also observed. Although freshly isolated ADSC began with CD34+CD45-CD73+CD90+CD105-CD146- phenotype, this population disappeared since the beginning passage (P0), suggesting the phenotypic differentiation occurs along the expansion of ADSC since the early stage of the in vitro culture. The results also showed that the in vitro expanded ADSC still maintained CD13+CD31-CD45-CD73+CD90+CD146- phenotype, although the CD34 expression was gradually downregulated together with a marked increase in CD105 expression since P0 which maintained at high levels over the culture period as previously described [6, 27]. Most of all expanded ADSC remarkably and stably exhibited CD34- and CD105+ phenotypes at passage 3 (P3) which were in agreement with those reported by Agostini et al. [27].

More importantly, the characteristic of a large proportion of the expanded ADSC (CD13+CD31-CD34-CD45-CD73+CD90+CD105+CD146-) became similar to MSC characteristic from the bone marrow (CD34-CD45-CD73+CD90+CD105+) [31]. However, a small proportion of the expanded ADSC with CD13+CD31-CD34+CD45-CD73+CD90+CD105+CD146- phenotype was detected. Although this subpopulation expressed CD34 similarly to freshly isolated ADSC, the upregulation of CD105 was observed, suggesting the presence of an intermediary differentiated subset that may later downregulate CD34 expression. Furthermore, the phenotype of the cultured ADSC from breast cancer patients was similar to that from healthy donors [28, 32], suggesting that regenerative functions of ADSC and MSC should be indifferent after the expansion. This can be partly supported by the evidence showing that the cultured ADSC from the breast cancer patients possessed the same multipotent differentiation ability towards adipocytes, osteocytes, and chondrocytes. Therefore, the observed phenotypic comparability can at least affirm the use of ADSC from breast cancer patients for reconstructive surgery. Despite the flow cytometric staining strategy for immunophenotypic characterization of ADSC used in this study, the omics methodology has also been an alternative approach for further molecular identification of MSC to distinguish MSC between different cell sources and cell subtypes by using ribonucleic acid (RNA) deep sequencing together with nano-liquid chromatography (LC)-mass spectrometry (MS)/MS analyses [33]. However, this latter approach is more complicated and more expensive as well as has several concerns on possible overestimation of differences from biological noise in RNA sequencing technique and dynamic range restriction in MS methods.

Regarding the clinical translation in postmastectomy breast reconstruction, there are two tentative approaches for lipoinjection by using either freshly isolated SVF or cultured ADSC together with aspirated fat for soft tissue augmentation and tissue defect restoration. Sufficient numbers of ADSC in freshly isolated SVF without in vitro expansion can be achieved for treatment if a large volume of liposuction aspirates can be collected from adipose tissue sources. Alternatively, a selection of specific cell subsets with clinical relevance for treatment may offer a beneficial option. The results from our study provide promising criteria for the characterization of specific cell subsets which might result in a superior outcome for tissue reconstruction. Although ADSC in freshly isolated SVF have been considered as minimal manipulated cells providing more safety than the cultured ones, their enrichment may be required to reach therapeutic numbers in some cases, such as patients with low fat tissue, underweight patients, or patients with extensive reconstruction procedures. Moreover, the usefulness of liposuction aspirates containing EPC and pericytes remains controversial whether providing advantages in therapeutic support or disadvantages in cancer promotion [34, 35]. It is worth noting that freshly isolated and long-term cryopreserved ADSC themselves unlikely caused tumorigenesis and the cryopreserved ADSC were able to maintain normal levels of tumor suppressor markers, telomerase activity, and telomere length without serious DNA damage throughout 3 months of cryopreservation [36]. Identification of cellular components in SVF is then necessary and should be employed to ensure phenotypes and functional characteristics of ADSC, EPC, and pericytes in lipoaspirates used in a reconstruction procedure. Besides using ADSC for breast reconstruction, ADSC have also been extensively studied for other therapeutic potentials such as ischemic disease therapy through the paracrine secretion of bioactive factors in order to promote tissue repair and angiogenesis [37], impairment of irradiated wounds via wound healing acceleration and tissue revitalization [38], treatment of peripheral nerve injuries by promoting axon regeneration, myelin formation, and restoration of denervation muscle atrophy [39], and treatment of avascular necrosis of femoral head (AVNFH) via the increase in vascularity and new bone formation [40]. These various clinical applications thus make ADSC a promising therapeutic candidate for advanced cell-based therapy in many diseases.

5. Conclusion

In this study, we determined the in-depth characteristics of ADSC, EPC, and pericytes together with their subsets in freshly isolated SVF from 22 breast cancer patients by using our developed multiparametric phenotyping based on flow cytometric analysis using 8 surface protein markers. Phenotypic changes and multipotent differentiation capability of the expanded ADSC were also confirmed and similar to MSC characteristic. Comprehensive phenotypes of SVF observed in this study may associate with clinical outcomes, survival rate of transferred fat tissue, and cancer-promoting risk after postmastectomy breast reconstruction. The identification of functional relevant cell surface markers of individual cellular subset is also important for further investigation to determine its contribution in therapeutic functions or adverse side effects.

Data Availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflicting financial interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully thank Dr. Worapitcha Trongkamonthum and Dr. Poramet Leungon for clinical data assistance and all patients for donating lipoaspirates used in this study. The authors are also very grateful for the technical support on cell differentiation assays from Prof. Gang Li and his team from the Department of Orthopaedic and Traumatology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR. This study was financially supported by the Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University (grant number R016033006) and Siriraj Foundation (D003917). PT, VL, and NO are supported by Chalermphrakiat grant from the Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University.

References

  1. D. Langin, “Recruitment of brown fat and conversion of white into brown adipocytes: strategies to fight the metabolic complications of obesity?” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1801, no. 3, pp. 372–376, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. D. Ricquier and F. Bouillaud, “Mitochondrial uncoupling proteins: from mitochondria to the regulation of energy balance,” The Journal of Physiology, vol. 529, no. 1, pp. 3–10, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. R. K. Zwick, C. F. Guerrero-Juarez, V. Horsley, and M. V. Plikus, “Anatomical, physiological, and functional diversity of adipose tissue,” Cell Metabolism, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 68–83, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. N. E. Wehrli, G. Bural, M. Houseni, K. Alkhawaldeh, A. Alavi, and D. A. Torigian, “Determination of age-related changes in structure and function of skin, adipose tissue, and skeletal muscle with computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography,” Seminars in Nuclear Medicine, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 195–205, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. M. J. Oedayrajsingh-Varma, S. M. van Ham, M. Knippenberg et al., “Adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cell yield and growth characteristics are affected by the tissue-harvesting procedure,” Cytotherapy, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 166–177, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. Y. Zhu, T. Liu, K. Song, X. Fan, X. Ma, and Z. Cui, “Adipose-derived stem cell: a better stem cell than BMSC,” Cell Biochemistry and Function, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 664–675, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. M. F. Pittenger, A. M. Mackay, S. C. Beck et al., “Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells,” Science, vol. 284, no. 5411, pp. 143–147, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. P. A. Zuk, M. Zhu, H. Mizuno et al., “Multilineage cells from human adipose tissue: implications for cell-based therapies,” Tissue Engineering, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 211–228, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. L. Aust, B. Devlin, S. J. Foster et al., “Yield of human adipose-derived adult stem cells from liposuction aspirates,” Cytotherapy, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 7–14, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. P. A. Zuk, M. Zhu, P. Ashjian et al., “Human adipose tissue is a source of multipotent stem cells,” Molecular Biology of the Cell, vol. 13, no. 12, pp. 4279–4295, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. Y. W. Eom, J. E. Lee, M. S. Yang et al., “Rapid isolation of adipose tissue-derived stem cells by the storage of lipoaspirates,” Yonsei Medical Journal, vol. 52, no. 6, pp. 999–1007, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. L. S. Baptista, R. J. F. C. do Amaral, R. B. V. Carias, M. Aniceto, C. Claudio-da-Silva, and R. Borojevic, “An alternative method for the isolation of mesenchymal stromal cells derived from lipoaspirate samples,” Cytotherapy, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 706–715, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. M. P. Francis, P. C. Sachs, L. W. Elmore, and E. S. Holt, “Isolating adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells from lipoaspirate blood and saline fraction,” Organogenesis, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 11–14, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  14. M. Locke, J. Windsor, and P. R. Dunbar, “Human adipose-derived stem cells: isolation, characterization and applications in surgery,” ANZ Journal of Surgery, vol. 79, no. 4, pp. 235–244, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. J. Y. Petit, V. Lohsiriwat, K. B. Clough et al., “The oncologic outcome and immediate surgical complications of lipofilling in breast cancer patients: a multicenter study--Milan-Paris-Lyon experience of 646 lipofilling procedures,” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, vol. 128, no. 2, pp. 341–346, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. M. Rietjens, F. de Lorenzi, F. Rossetto et al., “Safety of fat grafting in secondary breast reconstruction after cancer,” Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 477–483, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. J. Y. Petit, M. Rietjens, E. Botteri et al., “Evaluation of fat grafting safety in patients with intra epithelial neoplasia: a matched-cohort study,” Annals of Oncology, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 1479–1484, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. N. O'Halloran, D. Courtney, M. J. Kerin, and A. J. Lowery, “Adipose-derived stem cells in novel approaches to breast reconstruction: their suitability for tissue engineering and oncological safety,” Breast Cancer, vol. 11, p. 1178223417726777, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
  19. R. Rohban and T. R. Pieber, “Mesenchymal stem and progenitor cells in regeneration: tissue specificity and regenerative potential,” Stem Cells International, vol. 2017, Article ID 5173732, 16 pages, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. D. Matsumoto, K. Sato, K. Gonda et al., “Cell-assisted lipotransfer: supportive use of human adipose-derived cells for soft tissue augmentation with lipoinjection,” Tissue Engineering, vol. 12, no. 12, pp. 3375–3382, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. I. Martin-Padura, G. Gregato, P. Marighetti et al., “The white adipose tissue used in lipotransfer procedures is a rich reservoir of CD34+ progenitors able to promote cancer progression,” Cancer Research, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 325–334, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. S. Orecchioni, G. Gregato, I. Martin-Padura et al., “Complementary populations of human adipose CD34+ progenitor cells promote growth, angiogenesis, and metastasis of breast cancer,” Cancer Research, vol. 73, no. 19, pp. 5880–5891, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. K. Yoshimura, T. Shigeura, D. Matsumoto et al., “Characterization of freshly isolated and cultured cells derived from the fatty and fluid portions of liposuction aspirates,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 208, no. 1, pp. 64–76, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. M. J. Oedayrajsingh Varma, R. G. M. Breuls, T. E. Schouten et al., “Phenotypical and functional characterization of freshly isolated adipose tissue-derived stem cells,” Stem Cells and Development, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 91–104, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. J. B. Mitchell, K. McIntosh, S. Zvonic et al., “Immunophenotype of human adipose-derived cells: temporal changes in stromal-associated and stem cell-associated markers,” Stem Cells, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 376–385, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. L. Zimmerlin, V. S. Donnenberg, M. E. Pfeifer et al., “Stromal vascular progenitors in adult human adipose tissue,” Cytometry Part A, vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 22–30, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. F. Agostini, F. M. Rossi, D. Aldinucci et al., “Improved GMP compliant approach to manipulate lipoaspirates, to cryopreserve stromal vascular fraction, and to expand adipose stem cells in xeno-free media,” Stem Cell Research & Therapy, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 130, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. P. C. Baer, S. Kuçi, M. Krause et al., “Comprehensive phenotypic characterization of human adipose-derived stromal/stem cells and their subsets by a high throughput technology,” Stem Cells and Development, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 330–339, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. A. C. W. Zannettino, S. Paton, A. Arthur et al., “Multipotential human adipose-derived stromal stem cells exhibit a perivascular phenotype in vitro and in vivo,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 214, no. 2, pp. 413–421, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. L. Zimmerlin, V. S. Donnenberg, J. P. Rubin, and A. D. Donnenberg, “Mesenchymal markers on human adipose stem/progenitor cells,” Cytometry Part A, vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 134–140, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  31. M. Dominici, K. le Blanc, I. Mueller et al., “Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement,” Cytotherapy, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 315–317, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. E. T. Camilleri, M. P. Gustafson, A. Dudakovic et al., “Identification and validation of multiple cell surface markers of clinical-grade adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal cells as novel release criteria for good manufacturing practice-compliant production,” Stem Cell Research & Therapy, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 107, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. A. M. Billing, H. Ben Hamidane, S. S. Dib et al., “Comprehensive transcriptomic and proteomic characterization of human mesenchymal stem cells reveals source specific cellular markers,” Scientific Reports, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 21507, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. V. Lohsiriwat, G. Curigliano, M. Rietjens, A. Goldhirsch, and J. Y. Petit, “Autologous fat transplantation in patients with breast cancer: “silencing” or “fueling” cancer recurrence?” Breast, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 351–357, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. F. Bertolini, V. Lohsiriwat, J. Y. Petit, and M. G. Kolonin, “Adipose tissue cells, lipotransfer and cancer: a challenge for scientists, oncologists and surgeons,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1826, no. 1, pp. 209–214, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. K. W. Yong, W. K. Z. W. Safwani, F. Xu et al., “Assessment of tumourigenic potential in long-term cryopreserved human adipose-derived stem cells,” Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 2217–2226, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. K. W. Yong, J. R. Choi, M. Mohammadi, A. P. Mitha, A. Sanati-Nezhad, and A. Sen, “Mesenchymal stem cell therapy for ischemic tissues,” Stem Cells International, vol. 2018, Article ID 8179075, 11 pages, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. S. H. Wu, T. Shirado, T. Mashiko et al., “Therapeutic effects of human adipose-derived products on impaired wound healing in irradiated tissue,” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, vol. 142, no. 2, pp. 383–391, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. Y. Sowa, T. Kishida, T. Imura et al., “Adipose-derived stem cells promote peripheral nerve regeneration in vivo without differentiation into Schwann-like lineage,” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, vol. 137, no. 2, pp. 318e–330e, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. A. Abudusaimi, Y. Aihemaitijiang, Y. H. Wang, L. Cui, S. Maimaitiming, and M. Abulikemu, “Adipose-derived stem cells enhance bone regeneration in vascular necrosis of the femoral head in the rabbit,” The Journal of International Medical Research, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 1852–1860, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2020 Premrutai Thitilertdecha et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

197 Views | 87 Downloads | 0 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.