Research Article | Open Access
Xiulong Chen, Yuewen Li, "Dynamics Analysis of Spatial Parallel Mechanism with Irregular Spherical Joint Clearance", Shock and Vibration, vol. 2019, Article ID 6242971, 21 pages, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6242971
Dynamics Analysis of Spatial Parallel Mechanism with Irregular Spherical Joint Clearance
Clearances caused by machining accuracy and assembly requirements are regular, but they will be irregular due to the wear of the kinematic pairs. At present, there are few studies on wear of space kinematic pairs. In order to grasp the effect of irregular spherical joint clearance after wear on the dynamic response, a method for solving irregular clearance problems based on the Newton–Euler method is proposed, and the dynamic response of 4-UPS-UPU spatial parallel mechanism with irregular spherical joint clearance is investigated. The kinematic model and contact force model of the clearance of the spherical joint are derived. The dynamic model of the mechanism with spherical joint clearance is established by the Newton–Euler method. Based on the Archard model, the three-dimensional dynamic wear model for spherical joint with clearances is developed. The wear depth and wear position of the spherical joint are obtained by the numerical solution. The method of reconstructing the geometric morphology after wear is proposed based on the finite element thought. The solution of the irregular clearance problem is put forward, and the dynamic response of the mechanism after wear is also analyzed. The results show that the dynamic response curves of the mechanism fluctuate around the ideal curves whether before wear or after wear. Compared with the regular clearance before wear, the results of the irregular clearance after wear have a greater impact on acceleration and contact force, and the vibration of the acceleration and contact force curve become more intense than before. Moreover, the displacement, velocity, and acceleration curves of the irregular clearance show some hysteresis than that before wear. Therefore, it can be inferred that the irregular clearance has more adverse effects on the mechanism and aggravates the wear between the elements of the kinematic joint; in addition, the stability and the reliability of the mechanism can be reduced.
Due to factors such as manufacturing error and assembly error, there will be clearances between joints . At the same time, friction caused by relative motion between the joint elements with clearance will inevitably lead to joint wear, which is also a major reason to cause the equipment failure [2, 3]. Also, with the increase of equipment use time, mechanical performance degradation caused by wear of joints will gradually show up. Therefore, the study on dynamic responses of mechanism with irregular joint clearance after wear is very important for increasing the reliability, improving product quality, and prolonging the service life of the mechanical system.
So far, researchers have done a lot of studies on the dynamic characteristics of the multibody system with regular clearances , including revolute joints [5, 6], spherical joints [7–9], cylindrical joints [10, 11], and so on. However, there are few studies on the dynamic performance of multibody systems with irregular clearances. Ma and Qian  presented a general procedure for dynamic modeling and simulation when multiple revolute joint clearances are considered. Then, ADAMS is used to confirm the validity of the model. Varedi-Koulaei et al.  studied the dynamic characteristics of 3-RRR planar parallel manipulator with six revolute joint clearances by using a continuous contact force model based on the elastic Hertz theory with a dissipative term. Erkaya et al.  took a fully articulated 3D slider-crank mechanism as the research object, the effects of spherical joint clearance on partly compliant were studied by a numerical method, and the advantages and disadvantages of flexible connection are analyzed. Marques et al.  presented a new formulation to model spatial revolute joints with radial and axial clearances, and the numerical calculation of the planar and spatial crank-slider mechanism is taken as an example. Tian et al.  put forward a new approach to model and analyze flexible spatial multibody systems with cylindrical joint clearance that considered the dry friction and lubrication. Two cases are used to verify the validity of the method. Chen et al.  established the dynamic model of 4-UPS-RPU parallel mechanism with regular clearance based on the Lagrange method, and the influence of regular clearance on the dynamic response and chaotic characteristics of the system is analyzed.
Also, scholars have done a lot of research studies on the irregular clearances after joint wear [18–22], but most of them are focused on revolute joints, and the study on spatial joint, such as spherical joint, is still rare. Pei et al.  took the crank-slider mechanism as the research object, and the clearance model of two revolute joints and the dynamic model of the system are established. The wear of the two revolute joints in the multibody system is studied by combining the dynamics and tribology. Lai et al.  proposed an effective method for calculating the wear of revolute joint of low-speed planar mechanisms, and the method can accurately predict the wear of joints when the wear depth increments are not big; meanwhile, the method was verified by experiments using planar four-bar mechanisms. Zhu et al.  put forward to a nonlinear contact pressure distribution model by combining dynamic analysis with wear calculation and verified it by experiments. This work not only describes the nonlinear relationship between contact pressure and penetration depth, but also avoids the complexity of contact pressure calculation. Sun et al.  established a dynamic wear model to predict the wear volume in a mechanism, involving aleatory and epistemic uncertainty. The result shows that when both aleatory and epistemic uncertainties are considered, the wear volume boundary is wider and better than that when only aleatory uncertainty is considered. Shankar and Nithyaprakash  studied the effect of different radial clearance values on contact pressure and wear of artificial hip under normal walking conditions with the finite element method. Wang et al.  established the dynamic model of spatial four-bar mechanism with spherical joint clearance and carried out the wear prediction. The results are verified by finite element simulation.
The main aim of this paper is to propose a method of reconstructing the geometric morphology of the spherical joint after wear and a method for establishing the dynamic equation of the mechanism with irregular spherical joint clearance after wear based on the Newton–Euler method. Also, the influence of irregular spherical joint clearance on the dynamic response of the spatial parallel mechanism is studied. A spatial 4-UPS-UPU parallel mechanism (Figure 1) that can be used as a parallel machine tool is taken as the research object in this study. In Section 2, the kinematic model and contact force model of spherical joint clearance are established. In Section 3, the dynamic model of parallel mechanism with clearance is developed and the dynamic equation of the mechanism is derived based on the Newton–Euler method. In Section 4, the wear model of the joint clearance is established and the geometric morphology of the spherical joint is reconstructed based on the finite element thought. A method for solving the dynamic response of irregular clearance problems is proposed. In Section 5, a simulation example is used to reconstruct the surface of the spherical joint, and the dynamic characteristics of irregular clearance after wear are analyzed by comparing with regular clearance.
2. Kinematic Analysis of Spherical Joints with Clearance and Establishment of Contact Force Model
2.1. Kinematic Model of Spherical Joint with Clearance
In Figure 2, the fixed coordinate system, the moving coordinate system, and the branch coordinate system are established on the center of the fixed platform, the center of the moving platform, and each branch chain, respectively. The three coordinate systems are recorded as , , and , where . It is assumed that there is a clearance at the spherical joint between the 3rd driving limb and the moving platform. As shown in Figure 3, is the center of the ball sleeve and is the center of the sphere. and represent the normal vector and the tangent vector, respectively.
The eccentricity between the spherical elements is as follows:where is the coordinate of the moving platform center in the fixed system when the clearance is not considered, is the coordinate of the moving platform center in the fixed system when the clearance is considered, is the rotation matrix of the moving coordinate system relative to the fixed coordinate system when the clearance is not considered, and is the rotation matrix of the moving coordinate system relative to the fixed coordinate system when the clearance is considered.
The scalar of the eccentricity is expressed as
The normal unit vector is written as
Contact deformation of the two contact bodies when the sphere and the ball sleeve are in contact can be expressed aswhere is the radius of clearance, is the radius of the ball sleeve, and is the radius of the sphere.
According to the geometric relationship between the ball sleeve and the sphere, whether the clearance elements are in contact can be judged as follows: and are the contact points on the ball sleeve and sphere when the ball sleeve and sphere are in contact. The position coordinate of two points in can be written as
Then, the velocity of contact points can be expressed aswhere
The relative normal velocity and the relative tangential velocity of the joint elements with clearance can be obtained by projecting the relative velocity onto the contact plane and the normal plane, respectively:
The scalar of the relative tangential velocity is expressed as
2.2. Contact Force Model of Spherical Joint with Clearance
2.2.1. Establishment of Normal Contact Force Model
Lankarani–Nikravesh contact force model has been verified by experimental results [29, 30] and applied in many studies. Also, the damping hysteresis effect and the energy loss due to internal damping during the impact process are considered in L-N model. Therefore, the L-N model is chosen in this study, and the normal contact force can be expressed aswhere
In formulas (11)–(14), is the power exponent; is the collision depth; is the coefficient of restitution; is the relative permeation velocity, that is, velocity of the center of the ball sleeve relative to the center of the sphere; is the initial collision velocity; K is the stiffness of the material; and are Poisson’s ratio of the ball sleeve and the sphere, respectively; and are the elastic modulus of the ball sleeve and the sphere; and and are the radius of the ball sleeve and the sphere.
2.2.2. Establishment of the Tangential Contact Force Model
The Coulomb friction model is more common in the tangential force model of multibody system dynamics and it can better describe the friction phenomenon in collision. However, the problem of the instability of numerical integration will occur when the value of the tangential velocity approaches zero. The modified Coulomb’s friction model proposed by Ambrósio  can avoid that and it is used in this study. The expression of tangential contact force is as follows:where is the sliding friction coefficient and is the coefficient of dynamic correction. The expression of is written aswhere and represent the limit value of given velocity, respectively. According to , the limit velocity is selected as = 0.0001 m/s and = 0.01 m/s.
When joint elements are in contact, the contact force can be expressed as
For convenience, the dynamic force from the third driving limb to the moving platform is expressed by that is .
3. Dynamic Modeling of Spatial Parallel Mechanism with Clearance of Spherical Joints
3.1. Kinematic Analysis of Parallel Mechanisms with Spherical Clearance
According to the coordinates of the Hooke joint and spherical joint on each branch, the length of the fifth driving limb can be written as
By using the single-open-chain method, the mathematical model of the two rotation angles of the Hooke joint on the fixed platform with clearance considered can be obtained:
The branch chain coordinate system on the first, second, fourth, and fifth driving limb is established. The rotation matrix to is written as
The rotation matrix of the branch chain coordinate system relative to the moving coordinate system can be expressed as
The angular velocity of the moving platform in the fixed coordinate system can be expressed as
The angular acceleration of the moving platform can be expressed as
The six-axis velocity of the moving platform in the fixed coordinate system can be expressed aswhere is the linear velocity of the center of the moving platform.
The velocity of each hinge point on the moving platform can be expressed as
The driving velocity of each driving limb in can be expressed as
Then, the linear velocity of each driving limb can be written as
After that, the linear acceleration of the driving limb can be expressed aswhere represents the unit direction vector of each driving limb; is the radius vector of the center of moving platform to each spherical joint ; is the acceleration of the center of the moving platform with spherical joint clearance; is the antisymmetric operator of ; is the antisymmetric operator of ; and is a three-order unit matrix.
The angular velocity of each driving limb is expressed as
The angular acceleration of each driving limb is written as
The linear velocity of the center of mass of the oscillating rod in the fixed coordinate system is expressed as
The linear acceleration of the center of mass of the oscillating rod in the fixed coordinate system is expressed as
In the same way, the linear velocity of the center of mass of the telescopic rod in the fixed coordinate system is expressed as
The linear acceleration of the center of mass point of the telescopic rod in the fixed coordinate system is expressed as
3.2. Force Analysis of Hooke Joint
The structure of Hooke hinge is shown in Figure 4, which can bear certain torque, and the force analysis diagram is shown in Figure 5. The torque of the moving platform to the driving limbs can be expressed as
The torque of the moving platform to the driving limbs transformed from the Hooke joint coordinate system to the moving coordinate system can be expressed aswhere .
In the same way, the torque of the fixed platform to the driving limbs can be expressed as
The torque of the fixed platform to the driving limbs transformed from the Hooke joint coordinate system to the branch chain coordinate system can be expressed as
3.3. The Establishment of Dynamic Equation of Limbs
Supposing the vector is the force of each driving limb acting on the moving platform in when i = 1, 2, 4, 5. is the gravitational acceleration in .
Resultant moment of each driving limb relative to hinge points on the fixed platform in the branch chain coordinate system can be expressed as
For the first, second, fourth, and fifth limbs, according to the Euler equationwhere is the torque of the moving platform to each driving limb in . When i = 1, , and when i = 2, 4, 5, . is the torque of the fixed platform to each driving limb in . When i = 1, , and when i = 2, 4, 5, . and are the linear acceleration of the center of mass of the oscillating rod and telescopic rod, and and are the angular velocity and the angular acceleration of the oscillating rod, respectively.
For the first, second, fourth, and fifth limbs, according to the Euler equationwhere , and is the force of the 3rd driving limb acting on the moving platform. and are the linear acceleration of the center of mass of the oscillating rod and telescopic rod, and and are the angular velocity and the angular acceleration of the oscillating rod, respectively.
3.4. Dynamic Equation of the Moving Platform with Clearance
The force balance equation of the moving platform is derived according to Newton’s second law, and its expression in the fixed coordinate system is written aswhere is the force of each chain to the moving platform in . When , its expression is , and when i = 3, its expression is .
According to the Euler equation, the moment equilibrium equation of the centroid of the moving platform is derived in the moving coordinate system , and the expression is written aswhere and is the position vector of the center of the moving platform to the center of the spherical joint in . is the force of each limb to the moving platform in . When , its expression is , and when , its expression is . is the torque of the moving platform to each driving limb in .
Because the differential equations have strong nonlinearity, which makes its analytical solutions hard to deduce, so the numerical method is adopted to solve the above equation. The ODE113 which uses the variable order multistep Adams–Bashforth–Moulton PECE algorithm is used in MATLAB to solve it.
4. Geometric Reconstruction of Spherical Joint and Dynamics Analysis with Irregular Clearance
Usually, the clearance generated by processing error, manufacturing accuracy, and assembly requirements is regular. In the process of equipment operation, the elements of the motion pair will wear each other. The wear depth is not uniform: some parts are serious, some are lighter, and some do not wear. Therefore, the clearance after wear is irregular. The following are all studies on irregular spherical joint clearance after wear.
4.1. Wear Model
At present, there are two kinds of wear models in tribology: Archard wear model and Reye’s hypothesis wear model . In this paper, the former is used to calculate the wear depth. The Archard model takes many parameters into account such as contact material, sliding speed, material hardness, and wear volume. The reliability of that was verified through a series of experiments. The results are more accurate and have been approved by most scholars and widely used. Its expression can be written aswhere is the wear volume, is the dimensionless wear coefficient, is the normal contact force, is the Brinell hardness of soft materials, and is the relative slip distance.
In practical engineering applications, since the wear depth is more advantageous to engineering applications than the wear volume, the Archard wear model can be written as where is the linear wear coefficient , is the wear depth, and is the normal contact stress.
According to the relationship between tangential velocity and slip distance, the form can also be written as
4.2. Approximate Contact Area of the Spherical Joint with Clearance
Figure 6(a) depicts the contact form between the spherical joint elements with clearance. The approximate contact area of the spherical joint with clearance is derived according to the geometric relation of the contact body. The contact area is divided into equal-height parts and each part is approximated as a cylinder. The sum of each cylinder’s lateral area is the approximate contact area between the spherical joint elements. In Figures 6(b) and 6(c), and are the center of the ball sleeve and the center of the sphere, is the contact angle, a is the contact radius, is the contact height, is the position of maximum contact deformation, the height of each cylinder is , and the radius is .
According to the cosine theorem, the contact angle can be expressed as
The contact radius can be expressed as
Contact height can be expressed as
Therefore, when the contact occurs between the elements of spherical joints, the approximate contact area is as follows:
4.3. Analysis and Calculation of Wear Depth
Because the position and slip distance of the contact point change with the motion of the mechanism, the continuous contact process must be discretized in order to achieve a stable wear state. According to the Archard model, the expression of the wear depth can be expressed aswhere is the wear depth at each time point, is the contact stress at each time point, and is the time steps.
Contact stress can be expressed as
In order to predict the three-dimensional wear volume of spherical joints with clearance, the wear depth is decomposed in three directions:where , , and are components of normal contact stress in three directions and , , and are the tangential velocities corresponding to the component of the normal contact force in three directions.
According to the preceding analysis, the relative contact velocity between the sphere and the ball sleeve can be obtained:
Corresponding relative contact velocity of normal contact force in X direction is
In the same manner, corresponding relative contact velocities of normal contact force in Y and Z directions are as follows:
It is assumed that both the sphere and the ball sleeve will wear since the material of the ball sleeve and the sphere is the same:
In summary, the wear depth component in three directions can be solved, and the analysis process is shown in Figure 7.
4.4. Geometric Reconstruction and Wear Dynamic Solution
The wear depth between the clearance elements and the change of the clearance value are very small when the mechanism runs few cycles. If the surfaces of the sphere and the ball sleeve are reconstructed after each contact, the calculation cost will be greatly increased and the efficiency will be low. Therefore, it can be assumed that the clearance surface morphology does not change with time in a certain period of operation .
According to the finite element thought, the geometric surface of the spherical joint is discretized. In each integral step, the contact between the sphere and the sleeve is judged. When the sphere and the ball sleeve are in contact, the position (discrete area) and wear depth of the collision between the sphere and the ball sleeve are calculated. At the end of the simulation, the total wear depth of each region can be obtained by accumulating the wear depth of each region. By using this method, the geometric morphology of the spherical joint clearance after wear can be obtained.
According to the direction of longitude and latitude, the sphere is divided into several areas, forming a dense spherical mesh (the accuracy of calculation will be higher with the increase of partition number, but the amount of calculation will increase exponentially). The coordinates of the spherical mesh nodes are saved as a matrix to determine in which region the wear depth occurs. Then, the wear depth of the region is added or subtracted. Finally, the geometric shape of the clearance of the spherical joint is obtained, and the new grid node coordinates are preserved and the clearance radius of different regions is calculated.
In order to study the effect of the spherical joint after wear on the dynamic characteristics of parallel mechanisms, that is, the effect of the irregular clearance on dynamics, a nonlinear dynamic variable stiffness coefficient is introduced:
In this case, the radius of the ball sleeve and the sphere is not constant. After discretization, different regions have different clearance radius, so different regions correspond to different stiffness coefficients. When solving the dynamics of the parallel mechanism, the first step is to determine which discrete region the collision will occur in. Then, calculate the stiffness coefficient of the region by taking the clearance radius in the region. Finally, the dynamic equation of clearance is solved. The dynamic solution process after wear is shown in Figure 8.
5. Case Study of Spatial Parallel Mechanism with Clearance
5.1. Parameter Setting of 4-UPS-UPU Parallel Mechanism with Spherical Joint Clearance
5.2. Geometry Reconstruction of Spherical Joint after Wear
The smaller the discrete area is, the higher the calculation accuracy is, but the amount of calculation will increase exponentially. In order to ensure the accuracy, the sphere is divided into 360 zones according to the direction of longitude and latitude to form a dense spherical mesh. The coordinates of spherical mesh nodes are saved as a matrix of 360 ∗ 360 to determine in which region the wear depth occurs, and then, the corresponding coordinates of the region are added or subtracted. Finally, the geometric shape of the clearance of the spherical joint is obtained, and the new mesh node coordinates are preserved and the clearance radius of different regions is calculated. Because the wear between joint elements is very small in a short time, the numerical simulation of tens of thousands and more cycles is unrealistic. Therefore, the simulation is carried out in 100 cycles, and the wear condition of the 100 cycles is scaled up 10000 times to approximate the wear condition of 106 cycles. Based on the above, the wear dynamics of the mechanism is analyzed. The parallel mechanism is not loaded at present, and the simulation trajectory is shown as follows:
The wear depth of each time step is related to the selected size of the simulation step. The smaller the step is, the smaller the wear depth in a time step is. The geometry of the ball sleeve can be obtained by adding the wear depth in each time step to the coordinates of the spherical mesh nodes according to the position relationship, as shown in Figure 9(a). In order to observe the wear effect on the surface of the ball sleeve easily, the figure is obtained by accumulating the wear depth on the surface of a sphere with a radius of 1.5 × 10−6 m (that is, the wear depth is enlarged 10000 times). Figure 9(b) is an enlarged view of the geometric morphology of the wear area. According to the local enlarged view, it can be judged that some areas of the ball sleeve will be concave due to wear. Figure 9(c) shows more directly the wear position of the spherical sleeve. The wear mainly occurs in the lower right area of the spherical joint. In order to better describe the wear depth quantificationally, the surface is expanded to a two-dimensional plane. Figure 9(d) is the wear depth of the ball sleeve, and the wear depth can reach 7.2507 × 10−7 m. Figure 9(d) is the wear area of the expanded ball sleeve. It can be clearly seen that the wear area presents irregular shape, and the yellow area is the most serious wear, followed by the light blue area. The wear area is mainly concentrated in longitude 100∼200 degrees and latitude 0∼170 degrees.
5.3. Dynamic Response Analysis of Mechanism with Irregular Clearance
The displacement curves of the moving platform of parallel mechanism are shown in Figure 10. It can be seen from the graph that the displacement and angular displacement curves of the moving platform basically coincide with the ideal displacement curves when the clearance is regular or irregular. The difference between the curves can be seen only in enlarged view, which shows that the influence of clearance on the displacement curve and angular displacement curve is very small, and the difference between regular clearance and irregular clearance is also very small. At the same time, the displacement and angular displacement after wear are slightly hysteresis than before wear.
The velocity curve and angular velocity curve before and after wear are shown in Figure 11. It can be seen from the diagram that regular clearance and irregular clearance have a greater influence on velocity and angular velocity of the mechanism. From Figures 11(a)–11(d), the velocity curve fluctuates around the ideal curve in these two cases in the X and Y directions. The influence of regular and irregular clearance on velocity is similar. In X direction, the maximum velocity before wear is 0.323 m/s (7.993s) and the minimum velocity is −0.3186 m/s (6.987s). The maximum velocity after wear is 0.3231 m/s (7.995s), and the minimum velocity is −0.3189 m/s (6.991s). In the Y direction, the maximum velocity before wear is 0.3335 m/s (6.514s) and the minimum velocity is −0.3252 m/s (7.503s). The maximum velocity after wear is 0.3333 m/s (6.516s), and the minimum velocity is −0.3248 m/s (7.506s). From Figures 11(e)–11(j), in the Z, , and directions, compared with the curve before wear, the curve after wear has local high-frequency vibration on the basis of the original fluctuation, but the trend is closer to the curves before wear. In Z direction, the maximum velocity before wear is 0.01171 m/s (6.536s) and the minimum velocity is −0.008329 m/s (8.558s). The maximum velocity after wear is 0.01183 m/s (6.538s), and the minimum velocity is −0.008368 m/s (8.561s). In direction, the maximum angular velocity before wear is 0.05921 rad/s (6.542s) and the minimum angular velocity is −0.05606 m/s (8.496s). The maximum angular velocity after wear is 0.05873 rad/s (6.544s), and the minimum angular velocity is −0.05557 m/s (8.499s). In direction, the maximum angular velocity before wear is 0.07063 rad/s (6.573s) and the minimum angular velocity is −0.07672 m/s (6.536s). The maximum angular velocity after wear is 0.07091 rad/s (6.575s), and the minimum angular velocity is −0.07757 m/s (6.538s). To sum up, it can be seen that there is little difference in the numerical value before and after wear, but the velocity and angular velocity curves after wear show a certain hysteresis than that before wear.
The acceleration and angular acceleration curves before and after wear are shown in Figure 12. It is easy to see from the curves that the influence of regular clearance and irregular clearance on acceleration is greater than velocity and displacement. At the same time, from Figures 12(a)–11(h), in X and Y directions, the fluctuation of curves after wear is slightly larger than that before wear. It can be seen from the enlarged view that the curves after wear are more unstable than those before wear, and the acceleration curves after wear also show a certain hysteresis compared with the curves before wear. The influence of irregular clearance on acceleration after wear is greater than that of regular clearance, especially in Z, , and directions. From Figures 12(e)–12(j), in Z direction, the maximum value of vibration before wear is 1.918 m/s2 (6.582s) and the minimum value is −0.667 m/s2 (6.491s). The maximum value of vibration after wear is 2.002 m/s2 (6.529s), and the minimum value is −1.149 m/s2 (7.225s). In direction, the maximum value of vibration before wear is 6.388 rad/s2 (6.467s) and the minimum value is −6.705 rad/s2 (8.485s). The maximum value of vibration after wear is 8.187 rad/s2 (6.416s), and the minimum value is −8.908 m/s2 (9.596 s). In the direction, the maximum value of vibration before wear is 5.194 rad/s2 (6.491s), and the minimum value is −14.86 rad/s1 (6.582s). The maximum value of vibration after wear is 8.789 rad/s2 (7.225s), and the minimum value is −15.55 m/s2 (6.529s). Compared with the velocity curve, the peak value of the acceleration curve before and after wear varies greatly. At the same time, the curves after wear also show a certain hysteresis compared with that before wear. Also, it can be seen from the partial enlarged view that the irregular clearance makes the acceleration curve more jitter. The reason is that the surface of the sphere and the ball sleeve is nonuniform wear, and the surface curvature of the contact point of the spherical joint changes at all times during the operation. The curvature radius becomes larger in severe wear area, and the contact force between the clearance elements on the spherical surface varies more severely, which leads to the larger jitter of acceleration. Therefore, the dynamic effect of irregular wear on the mechanism should be considered during the operation of the mechanism. Otherwise, the prediction of dynamic characteristics will gradually become inaccurate with the increase of wear.
The contact force curves of the clearance between the spherical joints before and after wear are shown in Figure 13. It can be seen from the graph that the irregular clearance after wear makes the collision force change more intensely, which shows similar characteristics to the acceleration, but the basic trend is consistent. The maximum value of contact force is 533.5 N (8.122s) before wear, and the minimum value is 117.2 N (7.04s). After wear, the fluctuation range of contact force becomes larger. The maximum value reaches 569.8 N (8.124s) and the minimum value reaches 90.05 N (704.3s). It can be concluded that the worn spherical joint directly affects the curvature radius of the contact point, thus affecting the contact force and ultimately leading to changes in the dynamic response.
In summary, it can be seen from the influence of irregular clearance on the dynamic characteristics of parallel mechanism that the irregular clearance after wear will make the acceleration and contact force curve more intense. In addition, the more intense jitter of the curves will aggravate the wear of the spherical joint. The two processes promote each other, and the wear will be more serious. Eventually, the vibration of the mechanism will be aggravated, and the stability and accuracy of the mechanism will be reduced. Therefore, it is necessary to consider the adverse effects of wear on the mechanism when analyzing the dynamic characteristics of the mechanism. Otherwise, it will not be able to accurately predict the dynamic performance of the equipment after long-time use.
In this paper, the dynamic response of 4-UPS-UPU parallel mechanism with irregular spherical joint clearance is studied. The main conclusions are as follows:(i)The dynamic model of 4-UPS-UPU parallel mechanism with spherical joint clearance is established based on the Newton–Euler method. The wear model of clearance joint is derived based on the Archard model, and the wear depth is solved by tangential contact velocity.(ii)A method of reconstructing the geometric morphology of the spherical joint with clearance is proposed based on the finite element thought. The geometric morphology of the spherical joint with clearance is reconstructed. The wear area and depth of the spherical joint are visually and accurately displayed, and the wear condition is predicted.(iii)A method for analyzing dynamic responses of the mechanism with irregular clearance after wear is proposed, and the dynamics problem of irregular clearance is solved. The results show that the dynamic response curves of parallel mechanism with regular clearance and after wear with irregular clearance both fluctuate around ideal curves. Compared with regular clearance, irregular clearance after wear has the least effect on displacement and the greatest effect on acceleration. At the same time, the displacement, velocity, and acceleration curves with irregular clearance show some hysteresis compared with the regular clearance. In addition, irregular clearance can cause acceleration and contact force to produce more intense jitter and cause adverse effects on the mechanism. Compared with previous studies, the conclusions of this paper are basically similar to those in other literature studies.
The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
This research was supported by the Shandong Key Research and Development Public Welfare Program (2019GGX104011) and the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (Grant no. ZR2017MEE066).
- Z. F. Bai, Y. Zhao, and J. Chen, “Dynamics analysis of planar mechanical system considering revolute clearance joint wear,” Tribology International, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 85–95, 2013.
- S. Mukras, N. H. Kim, N. A. Mauntler, T. Schmitz, and W. G. Sawyer, “Comparison between elastic foundation and contact force models in wear analysis of planar multibody system,” Journal of Tribology, vol. 132, no. 3, 2010.
- Y. Zhao, D. Pan, Z. F. Bai, and B. D. You, “Dynamic wear characteristics analysis for two-axis-position mechanism of satellite antennas with joint clearance,” Mechanical Design and Manufacture, no. 5, pp. 107–109, 2011.
- Q. Tian, P. Flores, and H. M. Lankarani, “A comprehensive survey of the analytical, numerical and experimental methodologies for dynamics of multibody mechanical systems with clearance or imperfect joints,” Mechanism & Machine Theory, vol. 122, pp. 1–57, 2018.
- X. Zhang and X. Zhang, “Minimizing the influence of revolute joint clearance using the planar redundantly actuated mechanism,” Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, vol. 46, pp. 104–113, 2017.
- Z. F. Bai and Y. Sun, “A study on dynamics of planar multibody mechanical systems with multiple revolute clearance joints,” European Journal of Mechanics—A/Solids, vol. 60, pp. 95–111, 2016.
- G. Wang and H. Liu, “3D wear prediction of 4-DOF parallel mechanism with clearance spherical joint and flexible moving platform,” Journal of Tribology, vol. 140, no. 3, 2018.
- P. Flores, J. Ambrósio, J. C. P. Claro, and H. M. Lankarani, “Dynamics of multibody systems with spherical clearance joints,” Journal of Computational and Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 240–247, 2006.
- P. Flores and H. M. Lankarani, “Spatial rigid-multibody systems with lubricated spherical clearance joints: modeling and simulation,” Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 60, no. 1-2, pp. 99–114, 2010.
- T. S. Liu, L. F. Qian, and Q. Yin, “Kinematics accuracy and dynamic analysis of multi-body systems with spatial cylindrical clearance joints,” Shock and Vibration, vol. 36, no. 19, pp. 151–157, 2017.
- C. Liu, Q. Tian, and H. Hu, “Dynamics and control of a spatial rigid-flexible multibody system with multiple cylindrical clearance joints,” Mechanism and Machine Theory, vol. 52, no. 52, pp. 106–129, 2012.
- J. Ma and L. Qian, “Modeling and simulation of planar multibody systems considering multiple revolute clearance joints,” Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 90, no. 3, pp. 1907–1940, 2017.
- S. M. Varedi-Koulaei, H. M. Daniali, and M. Farajtabar, “The effects of joint clearance on the dynamics of the 3RRR planar parallel manipulator,” Robotica, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 1223–1242, 2017.
- S. Erkaya, S. Doğan, and E. Ş ğana/Cross, “Analysis of the joint clearance effects on a compliant spatial mechanism,” Mechanism and Machine Theory, vol. 104, pp. 255–273, 2016.
- F. Marques, F. Isaac, N. Dourado, and P. Flores, “An enhanced formulation to model spatial revolute joints with radial and axial clearances,” Mechanism and Machine Theory, vol. 116, pp. 123–144, 2017.
- Q. Tian, C. Liu, M. Machado, and P. Flores, “A new model for dry and lubricated cylindrical joints with clearance in spatial flexible multibody systems,” Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 64, no. 1-2, pp. 25–47, 2011.
- X. Chen, W. Gao, Y. Deng, and Q. Wang, “Chaotic characteristic analysis of spatial parallel mechanism with clearance in spherical joint,” Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 2625–2642, 2018.
- F. Akyürek, K. Yaman, and Z. Tekiner, “An experimental work on tool wear affected by die clearance and punch hardness,” Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, vol. 42, no. 11, pp. 4683–4692, 2017.
- M. D. Haneef, R. B. Randall, W. A. Smith et al., “Vibration and wear prediction analysis of IC engine bearings by numerical simulation,” Wear, vol. 384-385, pp. 15–27, 2017.
- Y. Xue, J. Chen, S. Guo et al., “Finite element simulation and experimental test of the wear behavior for self-lubricating spherical plain bearings,” Friction, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 297–306, 2018.
- J. Zhang, Z. Chen, L. Wang, D. Li, and Z. Jin, “A patient-specific wear prediction framework for an artificial knee joint with coupled musculoskeletal multibody-dynamics and finite element analysis,” Tribology International, vol. 109, pp. 382–389, 2017.
- S. Mukras, N. H. Kim, N. A. Mauntler, T. L. Schmitz, and W. G. Sawyer, “Analysis of planar multibody systems with revolute joint wear,” Wear, vol. 268, no. 5-6, pp. 643–652, 2010.
- P. Li, W. Chen, D. Li, R. Yu, and W. Zhang, “Wear analysis of two revolute joints with clearance in multibody systems,” Journal of Computational & Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 11, no. 1, 2015.
- X. Lai, H. He, Q. Lai et al., “Computational prediction and experimental validation of revolute joint clearance wear in the low-velocity planar mechanism,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 85, pp. 963–976, 2017.
- A. Zhu, S. He, J. Zhao et al., “A nonlinear contact pressure distribution model for wear calculation of planar revolute joint with clearance,” Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 315–328, 2016.
- D. Sun, G. Chen, T. Wang et al., “Wear prediction of a mechanism with joint clearance involving aleatory and epistemic uncertainty,” Journal of Tribology, vol. 136, no. 4, Article ID 041101, 2014.
- S. Shankar and R. Nithyaprakash, “Effect of radial clearance on wear and contact pressure of hard-on-hard hip prostheses using finite element concepts,” Tribology Transactions, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 814–820, 2014.
- G. Wang, H. Liu, P. Deng et al., “Dynamics analysis of spatial multibody system with spherical joint wear,” Journal of Tribology, vol. 137, no. 2, Article ID 021605, 2015.
- P. Flores, C. S. Koshy, H. M. Lankarani, J. Ambrósio, and J. C. P. Claro, “Numerical and experimental investigation on multibody systems with revolute clearance joints,” Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 383–398, 2011.
- C. S. Koshy, P. Flores, and H. M. Lankarani, “Study of the effect of contact force model on the dynamic response of mechanical systems with dry clearance joints: computational and experimental approaches,” Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 73, no. 1-2, pp. 325–338, 2013.
- J. A. C. Ambrósio, “Impact of rigid and flexible multibody systems: deformation description and contact models,” Virtual Nonlinear Multibody Systems, vol. 103, pp. 57–81, 2003.
- F. Meng, S. Wu, F. Zhang, and L. Liang, “Numerical modeling and experimental verification for high-speed and heavy-load planar mechanism with multiple clearances,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2015, Article ID 180312, 11 pages, 2015.
- P. Flores, “Modeling and simulation of wear in revolute clearance joints in multibody systems,” Mechanism and Machine Theory, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 1211–1222, 2009.
- Z. F. Bai, Research on Dynamic Characterisitcs of Mechanism with Joint Clearance, Harbin Industrial University, Harbin, China, 2011.
Copyright © 2019 Xiulong Chen and Yuewen Li. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.