The Scientific World Journal

The Scientific World Journal / 2014 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 652630 |

C. Y. Cheng, R. H. Pickler, "Perinatal Stress, Fatigue, Depressive Symptoms, and Immune Modulation in Late Pregnancy and One Month Postpartum", The Scientific World Journal, vol. 2014, Article ID 652630, 7 pages, 2014.

Perinatal Stress, Fatigue, Depressive Symptoms, and Immune Modulation in Late Pregnancy and One Month Postpartum

Academic Editor: H. A. Beydoun
Received31 Aug 2013
Accepted04 Dec 2013
Published22 Jan 2014


Stress and fatigue are common complaints of pregnant and postpartum women as is depression. These symptoms may be related to immunomodulation. However, few studies have examined these relationships. The aim of this study was to examine the relationships among stress, fatigue, depression, and cytokines as markers of immune modulation in prenatal and postpartum women. Women completed questionnaires and gave blood samples during late pregnancy and again at 4–6 weeks postpartum. Blood was analyzed for cytokines as measures of immune modulation. Stress, fatigue, and depression were experienced at moderately high levels, with higher levels of fatigue and depression in the postpartum but higher stress in the prenatal period. Levels of several cytokines were increased in the postpartum over the prenatal period. Stress and depression were related in the prenatal period and stress, depression, and fatigue were related in the postpartum. While various cytokines were related to each other in both periods, only stress was related to MIP-1β, a cytokine that may be important for childbirth processes. More studies, especially longitudinal and interventional studies, are needed to increase our knowledge about etiology, patterns, symptoms, factors, and management of maternal distress. The search for reliable biomarkers for at-risk mothers remains a priority.

1. Introduction

Pregnancy and the transition to motherhood may cause stress for women that negatively affects their psychological health [1]. Maternal stress is associated with early labor onset, poor fetal development, and poor child motor and mental development [24]. Fatigue has been found to be related to stress [5], with pregnant women often reporting tiredness or fatigue (87.2% to 96.5) [68]. However, few studies have focused on prenatal fatigue. Among those few studies, mothers perceived a significantly higher level of fatigue in the evening than in the morning as well as more severe fatigue from the seventh to ninth month of pregnancy [9], although the increase in fatigue may start as early as 11 to 12 weeks of gestation [10]. Prenatal fatigue is also related to prenatal depression, anxiety [11, 12], and preterm birth [13] and is predictive of cesarean delivery [6]. In other words, maternal stress and fatigue have a similar impact on a woman’s health and well-being during pregnancy.

Depression during pregnancy and the postpartum period is more widely studied than stress or fatigue. The prevalence of prenatal depression reported differs by the tools used. For example, depression was reported to be 7.4%, 12.8%, and 12.0% in the first, second, and third trimester, respectively, when using Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, Beck Depression Inventory, or structured interviews [14]. However, when using the Center for Epidemiologic Study-Depression (CES-D) scale, the mean rate was 20.4% among women of various ethnicities during the entire pregnancy [15]. Despite differences in rates of reported incidence, it is clear that women with prenatal depression have higher rates of preterm delivery and preeclampsia as well as poor fetal and infant outcomes [16]. Additionally, the factors related to prenatal depressive symptoms are generally agreed upon and include a history of depression, perceived poor health, alcohol and cigarette use, low educational level, unemployment, and unmarried status [15, 17]. Moreover, black women have higher rates of prenatal depressive mood than white women [17]. Finally, studies have demonstrated that depressive symptoms are associated with levels of stress and number of stressful life events [18, 19] and pregnant women experience more stressful events than nonpregnant women [20].

In an attempt to understand the psychological components of maternal well-being, including stress, fatigue, and depression, during pregnancy and with an aim toward identifying biomarkers that may help to identify women who are at risk for poor pregnancy outcomes, researchers have attempted to link immune modulation to maternal well-being. It is well known that to maintain a successful pregnancy, a healthy immune system is needed. It is hypothesized that cytokines, major biomarkers of immune function, produced by T helper (Th) 2 cells predominate over the cytokines produced by Th1 cells during mid- and late pregnancy [21]. Although the differences in function of cytokines produced by Th1 and Th2 cells are not entirely clear, generally examples of Th1 cytokines include interleukin-2 (IL-2) and interferon gamma (IFN-γ) while IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, and IL-10 are considered Th2 cytokines. So, for example, compared to nonpregnant women, IFN-γ is lower in the third trimester [22], while IL-6 and IL-10 increase from early pregnancy to late pregnancy [23]. Other cytokines, such as IL-2, IL-12, and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), remain stable throughout pregnancy [24]. Unfortunately, there is little consensus about the meaning associated with various cytokine levels during pregnancy. For example, compared to nonpregnant women, IL-6, IL-10, and IFN-γ in normal pregnancy were found to be higher in one study [25], lower in another study [26], but showed no differences in other studies [2729]. Moreover, while some studies have reported an increase in IL-6 and IFN-γ from early pregnancy to late pregnancy [23, 24, 29] others reported a decrease or no significant changes in their values [26, 30, 31].

Additionally, while there is interest in understanding the relationship of immune modulat on to psychological or physical well-being during and after pregnancy, very few studies have been conducted on these relationships. So, while stress has been found to be associated with lower immunoglobulin G (Ig) production [32] and thus with reduced immune function, the relationships between stress and cytokine levels are not consistent. Of the few reported studies, higher levels of stress were found to be related to elevated IL-6 and IL-1β in first and third trimesters and decreased IL-10 in first trimester [23]. However, stress was not related to IL-6 and TNF-α in a later study [33]. The only study that examined maternal fatigue and immune modulation during pregnancy found that elevated IL-1β at one week postpartum was related to fatigue at two weeks and one month postpartum. However, fatigue at 28 days postpartum was not related to IL-1β measured at the same time [34]. Moreover, while more depressive symptoms during pregnancy have been associated with higher levels of IL-6 and TNF-α [31, 33], other studies have not found this relationship [35].

Because of the detrimental influence of prenatal depression on maternal and child health, as well as the high prevalence of maternal stress and fatigue and their relationship to depression, and the lack of studies and inconsistent results regarding the immunomodulating effects of cytokines on these measures of maternal well-being, this study explored changes and relationships between perinatal stress, fatigue, depressive symptoms, and immune modulation as measured by cytokines. The research questions were (a) what changes occur in maternal stress, fatigue, depressive symptoms, and cytokines from late pregnancy to one month postpartum? and (b) what are the relationships between levels of stress, fatigue, depressive symptoms, and cytokines?

2. Methods

A psychoneuroimmunologic (PNI) model, which describes interrelationships between psychosocial factors, neuroimmunologic pathways, and health outcomes, was used to guide the study [36] The model hypothesizes that chronic stress leads to activation of the immune system, which may further lead to adverse health outcomes [37]. In other words, cytokines secreted in response to stress mediate the effects of psychosocial variables on health. In this study, maternal stress and fatigue were hypothesized to stimulate the immune system, measured by levels of serum cytokines, which in turn was hypothesized to contribute, with stress and fatigue, to maternal depressive symptoms.

2.1. Design

The study used a repeated measures correlational design. Data were collected when participants were at 36 weeks or greater gestation and at four to six weeks postpartum. The study was approved by the university’s institutional review board, and informed, written consent was obtained from all participants.

2.2. Sample

The study included 46 pregnant women who were older than 17 years, without pregnancy complications, over 36 weeks of gestation, and understood English. Five women delivered before data collection or lost contact with the investigator and were thus dropped from the study. In addition, invalid or inadequate blood samples for prenatal cytokine analyses were provided by 3 participants. Twenty participants did not come to the postpartum visit and were lost to follow-up; 4 participants refused to provide blood samples and 2 participants did not complete the CES-D scale. This left 12 completed surveys and blood samples at both data collection points. Of these 12 participants, 58.3% were African American, 66.7% had a high school or higher education, 16.7% were married or partnered while 66.7% were single never married, 25% were full-time employed while 3.3% were part-time employed, 50% had a C-section, and 27.3% were primiparous. The participants’ mean age was 28 () years. The mean gestational age of infants delivered by the sample participants was 39.3 () weeks and the mean birth weight was 3330.6 () grams. There were no differences in parity, race, marital status, educational level, employment, birth method, infant birth weight, and gestational age between participants who completed both prenatal and postnatal data collections and those who completed only the prenatal data collection.

2.3. Procedure

Participants were recruited from the prenatal clinic of a large, urban medical center. Pregnant women who met inclusion criteria were invited to participate in the study. Participants were asked to inform the investigators when they gave birth at which time an appointment for the 4 to 6 weeks postpartum data collection was made. The postpartum visit was scheduled to coincide with either a postpartum or well-child visit. If the participants did not inform the investigators that they had delivered, phone calls were made to the participants after their expected date of confinement. Participants were asked to complete a set of questionnaires and give 1 mL of blood at both data collection points.

2.4. Measures

Maternal Stress. The 10-item Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) was used to collect data about stress. The PSS-10 was shortened from the original 14-item PSS to measure the degree by which situations were appraised as stressful in one’s life [38]. The PSS-10 is a 5-point (scores 0 to 4) response scale. A higher score on the PSS indicates higher levels of stress. The internal reliability and validity of the PSS-10 were supported in the scale-development study [38]. The Cronbach alpha for the PSS-10 at prenatal and postpartum intervals in the current study was .75 and .88, respectively. The median score of the PSS was used to divide participants into low and high stress groups in the current study; median scores were 20 and 17 in prenatal and postpartum period, respectively.

Maternal Fatigue. The study used a single item asking participants whether fatigue was a problem to them and if so how they rated their level of fatigue. Participants chose from not a problem (0), minor (1), or major (2) problem. The participants were categorized into yes (minor or major) and no (not a problem) fatigue groups for comparison.

Maternal Depressive Symptoms. Maternal depressive symptoms were measured with the CES-D. The CES-D is a 20-item, four-point (0–3) response scale [39]. Higher scores indicate more depressive symptoms. The CES-D has been used in samples of women during the perinatal period with good reliability [40]. The Cronbach alpha for the CES-D was .89 in both prenatal and postpartum women in the current study. A score of 16 is generally used as a cutoff for depression; this score was used to categorize participants into yes or no depression groups.

Immune Function. Immune function was measured by serum cytokine levels using 1 mL of blood. The serum of all blood samples was frozen at −20°C and not thawed until analysis; all samples were analyzed at the same time. Analyses were conducted using the Bioplex Cytokine Assay, a multiplex bead-based assay used to quantitate multiple cytokines in a single run in diverse matrices. In this study, 17 representative pro- and anti-inflammatory serum cytokines were analyzed, including IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-7, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12, IL-13, IL-17, macrophage inflammatory protein 1 alpha (MIP-1α), granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF), IFN-γ, monocyte chemotactic protein (MCP-1), macrophage inflammatory protein 1-beta (MIP-1β), and TNF-α.

2.5. Data Analysis

All data were analyzed with SPSS 15.0. IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12, IL-13, IL-17, TNF-α, GM-CSF, and IFN-γ had out-of-range values for more than 30% of the available samples or could not be normalized after transformation; these cytokines were excluded from statistical analysis. All variables except prenatal and postnatal IL-1β, which were skewed, were normally distributed. All skewed variables were normalized by log procedures before inferential analyses were conducted. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the participants’ demographic information and level of measured variables. Paired t-test was used to test changes in variables from late pregnancy to the postpartum. Chi square or Fisher exact test was used to compare proportions between groups. Pearson correlations were used to test correlations between variables and independent t-test was used to compare cytokine levels between high-low stress, yes-no fatigue, and yes-no depression groups. Because of the small sample size, effect sizes were also computed. A significance level of .05 was set and 2-tailed test was used.

3. Results

3.1. Changes of Measured Variables from Prenatal to Postpartum

The results of changes in measured variables can be seen in Table 1. Participants although perceived higher stress than did general population of females in the USA, their difference in the level of perceived stress was not exceedingly high (, ) [38]. Stress decreased from the prenatal periods to the postpartum period although the change was not statistically significant (, , ). Mothers experienced fatigue about 750% and 83% of time in the prenatal and postpartum periods, respectively. In addition, 25% of mothers in the prenatal periods thought fatigue was a major problem. More mothers experienced depressive symptoms in the prenatal period (67%) than in postpartum (50%) although the difference was not statistically significant; however, during the prenatal period, mothers had significantly higher scores on the CES-D than in the postpartum (, , ). Serum cytokine G-CSF increased from the prenatal to the postpartum period with a median high effect size (, , ).

Mean ± SDMedianRangeMean ± SDMedianRange

IL-1 .33.04–39.26 1.32.15–
IL-5 .67.10–5.40 1.55.44–
IL-7 8.101.74–28.30 9.234.02–16.75−.
G-CSF 32.707.38–54.30 38.1717.65–122.442.
MIP-1 141.2338.74–350.50 161.1967.01–440.
MCP 22.0312.54–93.16 33.787.12–90.22−.
Stress 18.0014–26 17.009–26−
Depressive symptoms 23.008–33 16.002–22−

% %Chi/Fisher

 Not a problem325.0216.7
Depressed 866.7650.0.55.27

3.2. Relationships between Measured Variables

The relationships among variables can be seen in Table 2. Prenatal maternal stress, fatigue, and depression were intercorrelated. Prenatal stress had a medium but nonsignificant negative relationship with MCP (). Prenatal depressive symptoms had high but nonsignificant positive relationships with IL-7 () but was significantly related with MIP-1β (). Fatigue had a medium but nonsignificant negative relationship with IL-5 () and a positive relationship with MCP (). Levels of prenatal cytokines were not statistically different when participants were grouped as either low-high stress, yes-no fatigue, or yes-no depression.


(1) Prestress1.00
(2) Predepression.371.00
(3) Prefatigue.39.461.00
(4) Pre-IL1.41−.27−.061.00
(5) Pre-IL5−.25.15−.47.181.00
(6) Pre-IL7−.25.51.12−.27.241.00
(7) Pre-GCSF−.02−.06−.13.24−.07−.281.00
(8) Pre-MCP−.37.19.33−.14.19.39−.091.00
(9) Pre-MIP.16.64*.12−.
(10) Poststress.33.62*.47−.24−.30−.*1.00
(11) Postdepression−.14.53.15−.08.19.45−.04.34.67*.65*1.00
(12) Postfatigue−.
(13) Post-IL1.02−.10.29.15−.36−.29.05−.23−.40.25.12−.111.00
(14) Post-IL5−.34.24−.10−.08.56.73*−.46.19.18−.23.45.18−.311.00
(15) Post-IL7−.54−.06−.16−.32.02.48−.17.19−.22−.29.10.16−.09.341.00
(16) Post-GCSF−.07−.08.44.28−.17−.32.56.13−.32.07−.02.36.63*−.36−.201.00
(17) Post-MCP−.47−.36.13−.12−.09−.10.04.72*−.10−.12−.13.08−.20−.
(18) Post-MIP.00.05−.21−.30−.39−.08.47−.−.23−.35−.04−.21−.03

, .

Postnatal stress and depressive symptoms were strongly and positively correlated () while depressive symptoms were related to fatigue with a median high effect size (). Postnatal stress was significantly related to postnatal depressive symptoms (). Postnatal stress had medium high positive relationships with postnatal MIP-1β (). Postnatal fatigue had medium nonsignificant positive relationships with postnatal G-CSF () and MIP-1β () whereas depressive symptoms had a medium nonsignificant relationship with IL-5 (). Levels of postnatal cytokines were not statistically different when participants were grouped as either low-high stress, yes-no fatigue, or yes-no depression.

4. Discussion

The study used a repeated measure design to examine relationships between stress, fatigue, depressive symptoms, and cytokines in late pregnancy and the early postpartum. Results showed that mothers experienced more depressive symptoms prenatally than postnatally and that maternal stress, fatigue, and depressive symptoms were intercorrelated. All cytokines analyzed in this study except for G-CSF, an anti-inflammatory cytokine that increased, did not show significant change from late pregnancy to postpartum.

Findings from this study are not different in some ways from those found in other studies. Concentrations of some cytokines remain stable during pregnancy. For example, levels of IL-1β in cervical mucus or vaginal washing fluid do not differ from the second trimester to the third trimester [41, 42]. Similar to IL-1β, levels of TNF-α remain stable during pregnancy [23, 29, 41, 43] with higher levels of TNF-α being related to preterm labor [44]. Another proinflammatory cytokine, IL-12, has similar activity; an increased level of IL-12 in amniotic fluid may cause oligohydramnios and further lead to preterm labor [45] or other pregnancy complications. In this study with all term labors, prenatal serum IL-1β was equal to its concentration in the postpartum. This result supports the hypothesis that preterm labor may be caused by infection/inflammatory processes that involve increased proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-1β and TNF-α [44, 46, 47], which were not seen in this study. In fact, this study also found positive correlations between pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-13 and TNF-α, and this finding is similar to findings in another study [44]. A balance of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines during late pregnancy as shown in this study may be essential to maintaining pregnancy, although the small sample size precludes drawing this conclusion.

The findings regarding MIP-1α require some explanation. MIP-1α is a chemokine. Chemokines, a family of small cytokines that have the ability to induce chemotaxis, play an important role in embryo implantation and labor. During embryo implantation, chemokines recruit and activate leukocytes and migrating trophoblast [48]. At term or in pathological conditions, several specific chemokines such as MIP-1α are hypothesized to recruit leukocytes inducing the further secretion of cytokines such as TNF-α and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). A cascade mechanism of activation of reproductive tissues then results in myometrial contractions, cervical ripening, and rupture of membranes [49]. Although no studies could be found focusing on MIP-1β specifically during pregnancy and the postpartum, it is possible that MIP-1β, like other chemokines, plays a role in activation of labor, explaining the findings in this study of medium but nonsignificant relationships between prenatal stress, depressive symptoms, and MIP-1β at time periods close to delivery. The immunological role of MIP-1β and its mediating role on stress and depression may be worth further investigation.

Similar to other study findings, the current study found that fatigue was experienced by many pregnant and postpartum women [8, 50] and was related to depressive symptoms both in the prenatal and postpartum periods [12, 19, 51, 52]. Interestingly only postpartum fatigue showed direct effects on depressive symptoms, even though there was no statistically significant difference in the percentage of mothers who experienced fatigue in the postpartum versus the prenatal period. Childcare responsibilities might explain some of the effects of postpartum fatigue on postpartum depressive symptoms. Since decreased energy or unexplainable fatigue is one of the diagnosing symptoms of depression [53] and perinatal fatigue influences both maternal and child health as well as pregnancy outcomes, fatigue [54], whether it is reported or not by pregnant or postpartum women, needs to be actively assessed. Mothers at high risk for fatigue should also be assessed for causes of fatigue such as anemia, thyroid conditions, and infection.

In the current study, occurrence and severity of depression were higher during pregnancy than in the postpartum period. Additionally, women who experienced more prenatal depressive symptoms experienced more postpartum depressive symptoms. Prenatal depression influences not only the pregnant woman but also her fetus and child [16], having potentially serious effects on women’s health and on the health of their children. Yet, despite its influences, prenatal depression has not been fully studied. More studies, especially longitudinal and interventional studies, are needed to increase our knowledge about etiology, patterns, symptoms, factors, and management of prenatal depression. Moreover, the search for reliable biomarkers for women at risk for pre- and postnatal depression remains a priority.

5. Conclusion

The current study found that many mothers experienced fatigue and depressive symptoms and that mothers experienced higher levels of stress than women in the general population. Additionally, it was found that maternal stress, fatigue, depressive symptoms, and some aspects of immune modulation as measured by serum cytokines were related. However, given the limitations of the small sample size and missing data, conclusions about these findings are difficult to make. It is likely that the levels of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines found in this study are normal and that the balance seen is one that is necessary to maintain pregnancy. It is suggested that studies with larger samples using longitudinal designs from early pregnancy with multiethnicities be conducted. These studies should focus on biochemical markers that can be used to increase our knowledge about maternal immunity, physical and psychological well-being, and pregnancy outcomes.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


This work was supported in part by an Award from the National Institute of Nursing Research, National Institutes of Health (P20 NR008988).


  1. R. H. Glazier, F. J. Elgar, V. Goel, and S. Holzapfel, “Stress, social support, and emotional distress in a community sample of pregnant women,” Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 25, no. 3-4, pp. 247–255, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. A. C. Huizink, P. G. R. de Medina, E. J. H. Mulder, G. H. A. Visser, and J. K. Buitelaar, “Stress during pregnancy is associated with developmental outcome in infancy,” Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 810–818, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. G. Latendresse, “The interaction between chronic stress and pregnancy: preterm birth from a biobehavioral perspective,” Journal of Midwifery and Women's Health, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 8–17, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. P. D. Wadhwa, L. Glynn, C. J. Hobel et al., “Behavioral perinatology: biobehavioral processes in human fetal development,” Regulatory Peptides, vol. 108, no. 2-3, pp. 149–157, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. S. Maghout-Juratli, J. Janisse, K. Schwartz, and B. B. Arnetz, “The causal role of fatigue in the stress-perceived health relationship: a MetroNet study,” Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 212–219, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. L. Y. Chien and Y. L. Ko, “Fatigue during pregnancy predicts caesarean deliveries,” Journal of Advanced Nursing, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 487–494, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  7. F. H. Chou, L. L. Lin, A. T. Cooney, L. O. Walker, and M. W. Riggs, “Psychosocial factors related to nausea, vomiting, and fatigue in early pregnancy,” Journal of Nursing Scholarship, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 119–125, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  8. M. Zib, L. Lim, and W. A. Walters, “Symptoms during normal pregnancy: a prospective controlled study,” Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 401–410, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  9. S. M. Elek, D. B. Hudson, and M. O. Fleck, “Expectant parents' experience with fatigue and sleep during pregnancy,” Birth, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 49–54, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  10. K. A. Lee and M. E. Zaffke, “Longitudinal changes in fatigue and energy during pregnancy and the postpartum period,” Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 183–191, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  11. L. C. Pugh and R. A. Milligan, “Patterns of fatigue during childbearing,” Applied Nursing Research, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 140–143, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  12. N. Fairbrother, E. K. Hutton, K. Stoll, W. Hall, and S. Kluka, “Psychometric evaluation of the multidimensional assessment of fatigue scale for use with pregnant and postpartum women,” Psychological Assessment, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 150–158, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. Y. L. Ko, Y. C. Wu, and P. C. Chang, “Physical and social predictors for pre-term births and low birth weight infants in Taiwan,” The Journal of Nursing Research, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 83–89, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  14. H. A. Bennett, A. Einarson, A. Taddio, G. Koren, and T. R. Einarson, “Prevalence of depression during pregnancy: systematic review,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 103, no. 4, pp. 698–709, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. S. M. Marcus, H. A. Flynn, F. C. Blow, and K. L. Barry, “Depressive symptoms among pregnant women screened in obstetrics settings,” Journal of Women's Health, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 373–380, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  16. T. Field, M. Diego, and M. Hernandez-Reif, “Prenatal depression effects on the fetus and newborn: a review,” Infant Behavior and Development, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 445–455, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. A. R. Gavin, D. H. Chae, S. Mustillo, and C. I. Kiefe, “Prepregnancy depressive mood and preterm birth in black and white women: findings from the CARDIA study,” Journal of Women's Health, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 803–811, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. K. I. Pakenham, A. Smith, and S. L. Rattan, “Application of a stress and coping model to antenatal depressive symptomatology,” Psychology, Health and Medicine, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 266–277, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. A.-K. Pesonen, K. Räikkönen, T. E. Strandberg, and A.-L. Järvenpää, “Continuity of maternal stress from the pre- to the postnatal period: associations with infant's positive, negative and overall temperamental reactivity,” Infant Behavior and Development, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 36–47, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. T. Field, M. Hernandez-Reif, and M. Diego, “Risk factors and stress variables that differentiate depressed from nondepressed pregnant women,” Infant Behavior and Development, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 169–174, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. T. G. Wegmann, H. Lin, L. Guilbert, and T. R. Mosmann, “Bidirectional cytokine interactions in the maternal-fetal relationship: is successful pregnancy a TH2 phenomenon?” Immunology Today, vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 353–356, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  22. S. Saito, M. Sakai, Y. Sasaki, K. Tanebe, H. Tsuda, and T. Michimata, “Quantitative analysis of peripheral blood Th0, Th1, Th2 and the Th1:Th2 cell ratio during normal human pregnancy and preeclampsia,” Clinical and Experimental Immunology, vol. 117, no. 3, pp. 550–555, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. M. E. Coussons-Read, M. L. Okun, and C. D. Nettles, “Psychosocial stress increases inflammatory markers and alters cytokine production across pregnancy,” Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 343–350, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. A. E. Curry, I. Vogel, K. Skogstrand et al., “Maternal plasma cytokines in early- and mid-gestation of normal human pregnancy and their association with maternal factors,” Journal of Reproductive Immunology, vol. 77, no. 2, pp. 152–160, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. M. Maes, R. Verkerk, S. Bonaccorso, W. Ombelet, E. Bosmans, and S. Scharpé, “Depressive and anxiety symptoms in the early puerperium are related to increased degradation of tryptophan into kynurenine, a phenomenon which is related to immune activation,” Life Sciences, vol. 71, no. 16, pp. 1837–1848, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. Y. Shimaoka, Y. Hidaka, H. Tada et al., “Changes in cytokine production during and after normal pregnancy,” The American Journal of Reproductive Immunology, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 143–147, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  27. N. Kruse, M. Greif, N. F. Moriabadi, L. Marx, K. V. Toyka, and P. Rieckmann, “Variations in cytokine mRNA expression during normal human pregnancy,” Clinical and Experimental Immunology, vol. 119, no. 2, pp. 317–322, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. H. Renz, C. Wilke, I. Tekesin, L. Hellmeyer, U. Herz, and S. Schmidt, “Suppression of IL-2 and IFN-γ production in women with spontaneous preterm labor,” Journal of Perinatal Medicine, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 20–27, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. S. Vassiliadis, A. Ranella, L. Papadimitriou, A. Makrygiannakis, and I. Athanassakis, “Serum levels of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines in non-pregnant women, during pregnancy, labour and abortion,” Mediators of Inflammation, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 69–72, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. M. L. Okun and M. E. Coussons-Read, “Sleep disruption during pregnancy: how does it influence serum cytokines?” Journal of Reproductive Immunology, vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 158–165, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. M. Maes, A.-H. Lin, W. Ombelet et al., “Immune activation in the early puerperium is related to postpartum anxiety and depressive symptoms,” Psychoneuroendocrinology, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 121–137, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. D. M. Silberman, M. R. Wald, and A. M. Genaro, “Acute and chronic stress exert opposing effects on antibody responses associated with changes in stress hormone regulation of T-lymphocyte reactivity,” Journal of Neuroimmunology, vol. 144, no. 1-2, pp. 53–60, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. L. M. Christian, A. Franco, R. Glaser, and J. D. Iams, “Depressive symptoms are associated with elevated serum proinflammatory cytokines among pregnant women,” Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 750–754, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. E. J. Corwin, I. Bozoky, L. C. Pugh, and N. Johnston, “Interleukin-1β elevation during the postpartum period,” Annals of Behavioral Medicine, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 41–47, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  35. E. J. Corwin, N. Johnston, and L. Pugh, “Symptoms of postpartum depression associated with elevated levels of interleukin-1 beta during the first month postpartum,” Biological Research for Nursing, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 128–133, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. N. L. McCain, D. P. Gray, J. M. Walter, and J. Robins, “Implementing a comprehensive approach to the study of health dynamics using the psychoneuroimmunology paradigm,” Advances in Nursing Science, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 320–332, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  37. B. S. McEwen, “Seminars in medicine of the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center: protective and damaging effects of stress mediators,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 338, no. 3, pp. 171–179, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. S. Cohen and G. M. Williamson, “Perceived stress in a probability sample of the United States,” in The Social Psychology of Health, S. Spacepan and S. Oskamp, Eds., pp. 31–67, Sage, Newbury Park, Calif, USA, 1988. View at: Google Scholar
  39. L. S. Radloff, “The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population,” Applied Psychological Measurement, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 385–401, 1977. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. R. B. Canady, B. L. Bullen, C. Holzman, C. Broman, and Y. Tian, “Discrimination and symptoms of depression in pregnancy among African American and white women,” Women's Health Issues, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 292–300, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. G. G. G. Donders, A. Vereecken, E. Bosmans, and B. Spitz, “Vaginal cytokines in normal pregnancy,” The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 189, no. 5, pp. 1433–1438, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. W. H. Kutteh and R. D. Franklin, “Quantification of immunoglobulins and cytokines in human cervical mucus during each trimester of pregnancy,” The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 184, no. 5, pp. 865–874, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. H. Saarelainen, P. Valtonen, K. Punnonen et al., “Flow mediated vasodilation and circulating concentrations of high sensitive C-reactive protein, interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor-α in normal pregnancy—the cardiovascular risk in young finns study,” Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 347–352, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. D. R. Velez, S. J. Fortunato, N. Morgan et al., “Patterns of cytokine profiles differ with pregnancy outcome and ethnicity,” Human Reproduction, vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 1902–1909, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. A. Lemancewicz, R. Urban, J. Urban, M. Skotnicki, M. Krȩtowska, and S. Sierakowski, “Evaluation of interleukin concentrations in amniotic fluid in preterm and term parturition and in oligohydramnios,” Medical Science Monitor, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 924–927, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  46. R. Romero, J. Espinoza, L. F. Gonçalves, J. P. Kusanovic, L. Friel, and S. Hassan, “The role of inflammation and infection in preterm birth,” Seminars in Reproductive Medicine, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 21–39, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. D. W. Sadowsky, K. M. Adams, M. G. Gravett, S. S. Witkin, and M. J. Novy, “Preterm labor is induced by intraamniotic infusions of interleukin-1β and tumor necrosis factor-α but not by interleukin-6 or interleukin-8 in a nonhuman primate model,” The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 195, no. 6, pp. 1578–1589, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. L. A. Salamonsen, N. J. Hannan, and E. Dimitriadis, “Cytokines and chemokines during human embryo implantation: roles in implantation and early placentation,” Seminars in Reproductive Medicine, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 437–444, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. N. Gomez-Lopez, E. Laresgoiti-Servitje, D. M. Olson, G. Estrada-Gutiérrez, and F. Vadillo-Ortega, “The role of chemokines in term and premature rupture of the fetal membranes: a review,” Biology of Reproduction, vol. 82, no. 5, pp. 809–814, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. K. M. Paarlberg, A. D. J. J. M. Vingerhoets, J. Passchier, G. A. Dekker, and H. P. van Geijn, “Psychosocial factors and pregnancy outcome: a review with emphasis on methodological issues,” Journal of Psychosomatic Research, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 563–595, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. E. J. Corwin, J. Brownstead, N. Barton, S. Heckard, and K. Morin, “The impact of fatigue on the development of postpartum depression,” Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 577–586, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. M. Olff, “Stress, depression and immunity: the role of defense and coping styles,” Psychiatry Research, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 7–15, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. American Psychiatric Association, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC, USA, 4th edition, 2000.
  54. E. J. Corwin and M. Arbour, “Postpartum fatigue and evidence-based interventions,” MCN: The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 215–220, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 C. Y. Cheng and R. H. Pickler. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.