The Scientific World Journal

The Scientific World Journal / 2014 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 893981 | 6 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/893981

Rapid Detection and Differentiation of Clonorchis sinensis and Opisthorchis viverrini Using Real-Time PCR and High Resolution Melting Analysis

Academic Editor: Rafael Toledo
Received04 Mar 2014
Revised03 Aug 2014
Accepted03 Aug 2014
Published19 Oct 2014

Abstract

Clonorchis sinensis and Opisthorchis viverrini are both important fish-borne pathogens, causing serious public health problem in Asia. The present study developed an assay integrating real-time PCR and high resolution melting (HRM) analysis for the specific detection and rapid identification of C. sinensis and O. viverrini. Primers targeting COX1 gene were highly specific for these liver flukes, as evidenced by the negative amplification of closely related trematodes. Assays using genomic DNA extracted from the two flukes yielded specific amplification and their identity was confirmed by sequencing, having the accuracy of 100% in reference to conventional methods. The assay was proved to be highly sensitive with a detection limit below 1 pg of purified genomic DNA, 5 EPG, or 1 metacercaria of C. sinensis. Moreover, C. sinensis and O. viverrini were able to be differentiated by their HRM profiles. The method can reduce labor of microscopic examination and the contamination of agarose electrophoresis. Moreover, it can differentiate these two flukes which are difficult to be distinguished using other methods. The established method provides an alternative tool for rapid, simple, and duplex detection of C. sinensis and O. viverrini.

1. Introduction

Opisthorchis viverrini and Clonorchis sinensis are pathologically important members of the family Opisthorchiidae. Chronic infections with these liver flukes closely associate with the development of the bile duct cancer (cholangiocarcinoma) and the liver cancer (hepatocarcinoma) in humans [1]. In a recent survey in Chinese endemic areas, the overall prevalence of C. sinensis infection was 0.58% in 356,629 residents from 688 sampled pilot sites in China [2]. Opisthorchiasis caused by O. viverrini is considered an important food-borne parasitic disease in Southeast Asia including Thailand, Lao PDR, Vietnam, and Cambodia; approximately 67.3 million people are at risk of the infection [3]. Humans get infected by ingestion of undercooked or pickled freshwater fish containing metacercariae of O. viverrini and C. sinensis, which are classified by the International Agency for Research on Cancer as a group 1 biological carcinogen in 2009 [4].

C. sinensis and O. viverrini have similar life cycles, locations, pathogenicity and their morphologies, in particular the forms of their eggs and metacercariae differ only slightly [5]. However, the ability to differentiate the species of liver and minute intestinal flukes is important from both a clinical and epidemiological perspective. The frequency and types of pathology and clinical diseases among C. sinensis and O. viverrini seem to differ; for example, cholelithiasis is one of the most serious complications of clonorchiasis but a rare complication of opisthorchiasis [6]. Although both flukes are implicated as predisposing factors for cholangiocarcinoma, this is more frequent with O. viverrini. From an epidemiological perspective, C. sinensis will make control more challenging.

A number of methods have been developed to detect these two species, such as direct microscopy, ELISA [7], conventional PCR [8], and loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) [9]. There are, however, many drawbacks of these methods. For example, microscopic examination is cumbersome and time consuming, requiring experienced laboratory technicians, and often it is difficult to distinguish eggs from those of closely related heterophyids, which have similar egg morphologies. Eggs can therefore only be characterised as “Opisthorchis/Clonorchis-like” eggs [10]. Crude or recombinant antigens have been evaluated for immunodiagnosis; however, the specificity and sensitivity of these methods are still in great need of improvement [11, 12]. Both conventional PCR and LAMP have high risk of contamination. Moreover, even with expensive probe labeled real-time PCR, the two liver flukes are difficult to be distinguished [13].

Recently, high resolution melting (HRM) for fast, high-throughput analysis of many pathogens has been developed, for example, variation scanning [14], species determination [15], genotyping [16], and even the identification of recent and nonrecent HIV infections [17]. The real-time PCR platform with HRM is a single-step closed tube, reduces turnaround time of the assay reported here to almost 1 h, eliminates the risk of contamination, and saves expense. These features make it advantageous for use in laboratories. Here, we developed a real-time PCR assay coupled with HRM analysis for rapid identification and differentiation of C. sinensis and O. viverrini.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Samples

Adult worms of C. sinensis were collected from naturally infected cats in Guangdong Province. Adult worms of O. viverrini were kindly provided by Professor Sung-Jong Hong, Department of Medical Environmental Biology, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Republic of Korea, which were originated from the Lao PDR. Several closely related trematodes infecting humans were included as “heterologous” control samples for assessing the specificity of the real-time PCR assay, namely, Fasciola hepatica, Fasciola gigantica, Schistosoma mansoni, and Schistosoma japonicum. All parasite materials were preserved in 70% ethanol and kept at −20°C until the extraction of genomic DNA. Metacercariae of C. sinensis were collected from the fish muscles essentially according to a previously reported method [9]. Fecal samples were obtained from the residents in Guangdong Province, China. The fecal samples were examined three times by the Kato-Katz thick smear using nylon screens and plastic templates.

2.2. Genomic DNA Extraction

Total genomic DNA was extracted from adult worms, using the commercial QiAamp DNA extraction kit (Qiagen). In the case of adult worms, only a single specimen was used in each DNA extraction. Briefly, the sample was enzymatically digested in 180 μL of a lysis solution (ATL buffer-Qiagen); then 20 μL proteinase-K (50 g/mL) was added and incubated at 56°C for 2-3 h with brief vortexing every 30 min. For eggs, the incubation time was set 1-2 h longer. The mixture, after adding 200 μL buffer AL (Qiagen) containing guanidine hydrochloride and 4 μL RNase A (100 mg/mL) and mixing by pulse-vortexing for 15 s, was further incubated at 70°C for 10 min. Thereafter, 200 μL of ethanol (96–100%) was added and mixed by vortexing for 15–20 s. The contents were then loaded onto a QIAamp Spin Column for DNA binding and spin down for 1 min. The column with the DNA bound was washed several times using solutions (AW1; AW2 buffers—Qiagen) provided according to manufacturer’s instruction. Finally, the genomic DNA was eluted in 50 μL elution buffer (AE) and stored at −20°C until use. The DNA from fecal samples was extracted using QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and the DNA from metacercariae in fish tissue was extracted according to a previous description [9, 13]. The concentration of DNA samples was estimated using Thermo Nanodrop 1000.

2.3. Primers, Real-Time PCR, and HRM Analysis

A pair of primers targeting the COX1 gene of C. sinensis and O. viverrini (COX1e-F: 5′-GGTAGGGTGGTTTGAGC-3′ and COX1e-R: 5′-TCATAGTAACCGAGCTAAA-3′) was synthesized by Takara Biotechnology (Dalian, China). Real-time PCR amplification was performed in Lightcycler 480 (Roche, USA). The total reaction volume was 20 μL, which consisted of 1x Fast-Plus EvaGreen qPCR Master Mix (Bio-rad, USA), reaction buffer containing dNTPs, MgCl2, fast-activating chemically modified hot start enzyme, Cheetah Taq, 0.3 μM of each primer, and 1 μL genomic DNA as template.

The PCR was carried out with initiation at 95°C for 60 s, then 45 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 10 s, annealing at 59°C for 10 s, and extension at 72°C for 20 s. When PCR amplification was completed, HRM analysis was performed by lowering the temperature to 60°C for 5 min, followed by increasing the temperature ramping from 60° to 95° at 0.11°C/s, 25 acquisitions/°C. In this process, the PCR amplicons were allowed to denature and reanneal in fluorescence with changes in temperature . The HRM profile was then analyzed using HRM analysis software, as reported previously [15]. The normalized melting curves were analyzed and clustered samples into different groups with similar melting profiles. Hence, the difference in the shape of the “normalized melting curve” will help cluster samples into different species, and the samples can be detected and grouped at the same time.

3. Results

3.1. Specificity of the Detection Assay and Confirmation of Amplicon Identity

The specificity of the primers was determined by performing PCR using pure genomic DNA from F. hepatica, F. gigantica, S. mansoni, and S. japonicum. A BLAST search of the chosen primer and probe sequences resulted in a hit of the target sequence in C. sinensis and O. viverrini, suggesting the specificity of the primers. Moreover, no fluorescence signal was detected from the “heterologous control samples,” as mentioned above. In all, 57 C. sinensis samples, including 36 worms, 11 fish samples, 10 fecal samples, and 10 O. viverrini worms, get positive results, which was confirmed by microscopic method, while 31 uninfected fish or fecal samples appear negative (Figure 1(a)). To ensure the accuracy of the method, all amplifications were sequenced and proved highly homologous to corresponding sequences.

3.2. Detection Limit and Correlation between Cp and Diluted DNA

In order to evaluate the detection limit and correlation of the real-time PCR assay, the 10-fold serial dilutions of a genomic DNA were prepared. The DNA was extracted using QiAamp DNA extraction kit (Qiagen) and quantified by spectrophotometry. The 10-fold diluted DNA was performed and good result acquired. The formula of Cp value and template concentration (10 ng/μL to 1 pg/μL) is , when tested with C. sinensis (Figure 2(a)), while it is , when tested with O. viverrini (Figure 2(b)).

It seems that the sensitivity of O. viverrini approaches the sensitivity of C. sinensis, which are shown in Figures 2(c) and 2(d). The detection limit of the assay was 1 pg for O. viverrini genomic DNA, when considering 40 cycles as the cutoff. To determine the detection limit in fecal samples and fish tissue, 1, 2, 5, and 10 C. sinensis eggs or metacercariae were spiked into samples, which were proved negative by microscopic method. Each mixed sample was separately used for DNA extraction as described earlier. Finally, we concluded that the detection limit was 5 EPG for fecal samples and 1 MPG (metacercariae per gram fish filet) for fish samples, which was consistent with that of a previous study [13].

3.3. HRM Analysis

The sequence difference between the forward and reverse primers will bring different melting temperature () values and normalized melting curves. Constant HRM profiles with distinct peaks were persistently obtained for all positive samples. As shown in Figure 1(b), there were two kinds of characteristic profiles. The amplification product from all 57 C. sinensis samples had a of 78.05 ± 0.07°C, while the amplification product from 10 O. viverrini samples had an average 80.89 ± 0.06°C. As shown in Figure 1(c), there were two obvious groups: one represented C. sinensis and the other represented O. viverrini. To ensure the accuracy of the method, the amplified products were sequenced in both directions. The results showed that all sequences were uniform with the HRM analysis result.

The HRM analysis with different template concentrations (10 ng/μL to 1 pg/μL) of the template appeared to be reliable, while the profile is unsatisfactory when the template concentrations were ≤1 pg. The melting peaks were obtained from each dilution (10 ng/μL to 1 pg/μL), and it shows that of C. sinensis was 78.97 ± 0.11, while of O. viverrini was 80.92 ± 0.08°C (Figure 2(e)). All the dilutions were divided into two obvious clusters: one represented differently diluted C. sinensis and the other represented O. viverrini (Figure 2(f)).

4. Discussion

Diagnosis of trematode infection is very important for effective treatment and controlling the spread of infections. Since more and more travelers visited endemic countries, an accurate differential diagnostic method for human clonorchiasis and opisthorchiasis should be developed [1, 2]. Here, we developed an unlabelled real-time PCR with HRM assay targeting the COX1 for the two important liver flukes. The differentiation may not be that important in areas where only one species of the liver flukes is prevalent, but it is necessary in endemic areas where C. sinensis and O. viverrini are present. Accurate laboratory tests will help diagnose suspected patients.

The method established in the present study has an accuracy of 100% in reference to microscopic methods. Moreover, the detection limit of the method was below 1 pg of purified genomic DNA, 5 EPG, or 1 metacercaria, which was equal to probed real-time PCR [13] and superior to conventional PCR [8]. Real-time PCR using SYBR Green has also been developed targeting many pathogens, but it can only detect gross differences between amplicons generated by real-time PCR, with nonsaturating dyes which would inhibit the PCR reaction. EvaGreen has been proven to be superior to SYBR Green with high reaction efficiencies [18]. The instrumentation for HRM analysis has also been improved with a high rate of data acquisition, ideal optics, tight temperature control, and adequate analysis software; the accuracy of the dissociation versus temperature (i.e., melting) curve is as sensitive as 0.01°C, so single base can also be differentiated [19].

O. viverrini, C. sinensis, and Opisthorchis felineus are the three most medically important species in the family Opisthorchiidae [3]. Now, we still could not validate the detection for the three liver flukes in the same time, because unfortunately both the samples and the genetic information of O. felineus are absent. However, once the sequence difference between three species was proved enough, a multiplex real-time PCR for three liver flukes will be developed in the near future.

A previous molecular method targeting the second internal transcribed spacer (ITS2) of rDNA showed good sensitivity, but O. viverrini and C. sinensis were not able to be differentiated because of high homology [20]. Here, we have designed more than 20 pairs of primers targeting different genes, and the result shows that COX1 is superior to 16S rRNA and ITS rDNA, when used for HRM analysis. Another advantage of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) rather than nuclear rDNA is that the mitochondrial genome is present in hundreds or thousands of copies per cell. A further research shows that the length of amplicons smaller than 100 bp is preferable, because shorter amplicon size increases the difference in signal. All these conclusions are in accordance with previous research.

5. Conclusion

The present study established a method based on real-time PCR and HRM analysis for the rapid identification and differentiation of C. sinensis and O. viverrini simultaneously. It offers a potential means for detection of these flukes in the intermediate hosts. Moreover, it would also help in determining the worm burden in fish or infected individuals in endemic areas and would therefore be a useful tool for epidemiological surveys.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests in this paper.

Acknowledgments

Project support was provided by the Science Fund for Creative Research Groups of Gansu Province (Grant no. 1210RJIA006), the National Science and Technology Support Program (Grant no. 2012BAK11B05), and the Science & Technology Program of Zhongshan (Grant no. 20123A299).

References

  1. B. Fried, A. Reddy, and D. Mayer, “Helminths in human carcinogenesis,” Cancer Letters, vol. 305, no. 2, pp. 239–249, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. L. Xue-Ming, C. Ying-Dan, Y. Ouyang, Z. Hong-Man, L. Rui, and M. Wei, “Overview of human clonorchiasis sinensis in China,” Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 248–254, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  3. B. Sripa, S. Kaewkes, P. M. Intapan, W. Maleewong, and P. J. Brindley, “Food-borne trematodiases in Southeast Asia epidemiology, pathology, clinical manifestation and control,” Advances in Parasitology, vol. 72, pp. 305–350, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. S. Hong and Y. Fang, “Clonorchis sinensis and clonorchiasis, an update,” Parasitology International, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 17–24, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. N. D. Young, B. E. Campbell, R. S. Hall et al., “Unlocking the transcriptomes of two carcinogenic parasites, Clonorchis sinensis and Opisthorchis viverrini,” PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, vol. 4, no. 6, article e719, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. L. A. Marcos, A. Terashima, and E. Gotuzzo, “Update on hepatobiliary flukes: fascioliasis, opisthorchiasis and clonorchiasis,” Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 523–530, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. S. Sirisinha, D. Sahassananda, D. Bunnag, and H. J. Rim, “Immunological analysis of Opisthorchis and Clonorchis antigens,” Journal of Helminthology, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 133–138, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. R. J. Traub, J. Macaranas, M. Mungthin et al., “A new PCR-based approach indicates the range of Clonorchis sinensis now extends to Central Thailand,” PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, vol. 3, no. 1, article e367, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. X. Q. Cai, M. J. Xu, Y. H. Wang et al., “Sensitive and rapid detection of Clonorchis sinensis infection in fish by loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP),” Parasitology Research, vol. 106, no. 6, pp. 1379–1383, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. R. K. Schuster, “Opisthorchiidosis—a review,” Infectious Disorders—Drug Targets, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 402–415, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. I. Nagano, F. Pei, Z. Wu et al., “Molecular expression of a cysteine proteinase of Clonorchis sinensis and its application to an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for immunodiagnosis of clonorchiasis,” Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 411–416, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. V. Eursitthichai, V. Viyanant, S. Tesana, P. Sithithaworn, N. Kosa, and R. Grams, “Opisthorchis viverrini: evaluation of 28 kDa glutathione S-transferase as diagnostic tool in human opisthorchiasis,” Acta Tropica, vol. 114, no. 2, pp. 76–80, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. X.-Q. Cai, H.-Q. Yu, J.-S. Bai et al., “Development of a TaqMan based real-time PCR assay for detection of Clonorchis sinensis DNA in human stool samples and fishes,” Parasitology International, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 183–186, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. P. H. Nissen, S. E. Christensen, S. A. Ladefoged, K. Brixen, L. Heickendorff, and L. Mosekilde, “Identification of rare and frequent variants of the CASR gene by high-resolution melting,” Clinica Chimica Acta, vol. 413, no. 5-6, pp. 605–611, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. M. R. Zianni, M. R. Nikbakhtzadeh, B. T. Jackson, J. Panescu, and W. A. Foster, “Rapid discrimination between Anopheles gambiae s.s. and Anopheles arabiensis by High-Resolution Melt (HRM) analysis,” Journal of Biomolecular Techniques, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. E. Tajiri-Utagawa, M. Hara, K. Takahashi, M. Watanabe, and T. Wakita, “Development of a rapid high-throughput method for high-resolution melting analysis for routine detection and genotyping of noroviruses,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 435–440, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. M. M. Cousins, D. Swan, C. A. Magaret, D. R. Hoover, and S. H. Eshleman, “nalysis of HIV using a High Resolution Melting (HRM) diversity assay: automation of HRM data analysis enhances the utility of the assay for analysis of HIV incidence,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 12, Article ID e51359, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. A. C. Eischeid, “SYTO dyes and EvaGreen outperform SYBR Green in real-time PCR,” BMC Research Notes, vol. 4, article 263, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. D. Jin, Y. Luo, Z. Zhang et al., “Rapid molecular identification of Listeria species by use of real-time PCR and high-resolution melting analysis,” FEMS Microbiology Letters, vol. 330, no. 1, pp. 72–80, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. E.-M. Kim, J. J. Verweij, A. Jalili et al., “Detection of Clonorchis sinensis in stool samples using real-time PCR,” Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology, vol. 103, no. 6, pp. 513–518, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Xian-Quan Cai et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1813 Views | 501 Downloads | 10 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19.