Veterinary Medicine International

Veterinary Medicine International / 2014 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 760961 | 10 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/760961

Molecular Detection, Phylogenetic Analysis, and Identification of Transcription Motifs in Feline Leukemia Virus from Naturally Infected Cats in Malaysia

Academic Editor: Philip H. Kass
Received26 Jun 2014
Revised11 Sep 2014
Accepted11 Sep 2014
Published17 Nov 2014

Abstract

A nested PCR assay was used to determine the viral RNA and proviral DNA status of naturally infected cats. Selected samples that were FeLV-positive by PCR were subjected to sequencing, phylogenetic analysis, and motifs search. Of the 39 samples that were positive for FeLV p27 antigen, 87.2% (34/39) were confirmed positive with nested PCR. FeLV proviral DNA was detected in 38 (97.3%) of p27-antigen negative samples. Malaysian FeLV isolates are found to be highly similar with a homology of 91% to 100%. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that Malaysian FeLV isolates divided into two clusters, with a majority (86.2%) sharing similarity with FeLV-K01803 and fewer isolates (13.8%) with FeLV-GM1 strain. Different enhancer motifs including NF-GMa, Krox-20/WT1I-del2, BAF1, AP-2, TBP, TFIIF-beta, TRF, and TFIID are found to occur either in single, duplicate, triplicate, or sets of 5 in different positions within the U3-LTR-gag region. The present result confirms the occurrence of FeLV viral RNA and provirus DNA in naturally infected cats. Malaysian FeLV isolates are highly similar, and a majority of them are closely related to a UK isolate. This study provides the first molecular based information on FeLV in Malaysia. Additionally, different enhancer motifs likely associated with FeLV related pathogenesis have been identified.

1. Introduction

Feline leukaemia virus (FeLV) is a gammaretrovirus associated with anaemia, immunodeficiency, leukaemia, and lymphoma in cats [1]. FeLV has been studied extensively as a model for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and human T-cell lymphoma virus (HTLV) infections [2]. FeLV is distributed worldwide; however, prevalence varies greatly with geography and with risk factors that include age, health status, and population density [3, 4]. A recent study reported FeLV seroprevalence of 5.1% and 18.9% in healthy and sick Malaysian cats, respectively [4]. On the other hand, studies carried out in other Asian regions reported 0% FeLV prevalence in Vietnam [5]; 14.7% among cats in Singapore [6]; 2.9% in Japan [7]; and 6% each from Taiwan and Thailand [8, 9]. In non-Asian countries, FeLV prevalence has been reported to be 4.8% on Prince Edward Island, Canada [10]; 5.3% and 3.7% in Raleigh and Gainesville, USA, respectively [11]; 3.4% in all Canada [12]; and 4.6% in Egypt [13]. These discrepancies in prevalence of FeLV may arise due to differences in cat’s lifestyle and FeLV vaccination practices in different countries [4].

Diagnosis of FeLV is usually performed by detection of p27 antigen [14]. However, demonstrating p27 antigen is difficult during early viraemia and with latent infections. Studies have shown that FeLV viral RNA and provirus DNA are better predictors of progressive and latent infections, respectively [15, 16].

Apart from the envelope gene of FeLV, the long terminal repeats (LTRs) play important role in determining disease outcome and in differentiating exogenous from endogenous FeLV [15, 17]. Vaccination against FeLV is not carried out in Malaysia and, to date, FeLV clinical status of Malaysian cats has not been investigated using molecular assays. Additionally, unlike the ubiquitous feline infectious peritonitis (FIP) [18] sequence and phylogenetic characteristics of the Malaysian FeLV isolates have not been elucidated. The objectives of this study are to evaluate the presence of FeLV viral RNA and provirus DNA in selected antigenaemic and nonantigenaemic cats, respectively. Sequence characteristics, enhancer motifs as well as phylogenetic relationships of the Malaysian FeLV also were determined.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animals and Sampling

Heparinized blood samples were collected from cats presented at University Veterinary Teaching Hospital, Universiti Putra Malaysia (UVH-UPM). The samples were tested for the presence of FeLV p27 viral antigen using a commercially available test kit [4]. These cats were divided into p27 antigen positive and p27 antigen-negative groups. From each group, 39 cats were selected by convenience sampling method and the samples were subjected to PCR analysis. All cats had no history of vaccination against FeLV as vaccination against FeLV is not practiced in Malaysia. All samples were collected by the attending veterinary clinicians, as part of routine practices. In addition, consent for evaluation was obtained from the cat owners, prior to sampling.

2.2. Nucleic Acid and PCR Amplification

Viral RNA was extracted from the plasma of p27-positive cats, using high pure viral RNA purification kit (Roche, Germany). On the other hand, genomic DNA was isolated from whole blood of p27-negative cats, using QIAGEN DNA extraction kits (QIAGEN, Germany). All nucleic acid extraction procedures were carried out according to manufacturers’ instructions. RNA was reverse transcribed and subjected to nested PCR, using a one-step access RT PCR (Promega, USA). Genomic DNA was amplified by nested PCR assay.

Two sets of primers (outer and inner primers) were synthesised (1st BASE, Malaysia) and used to amplify a 601 bp segment of FeLV-U3LTR and partial gag regions. This segment recognises exogenous but not endogenous FeLV segments presence in cat genome; thus the primers used in this study are specific for exogenous FeLV detection. Outer PCR reaction was carried out using U3-F(1) (-ACA GCA GAA GTT TCA AGG CC -) and G-R(1) (-GAC CAG TGA TCA AGG GTG AG-) primers. The inner PCR reaction was carried out with U3-F(2) (-GCT CCC CAG TTG ACC AGA GT-) and G-R(2) (-GCT TCG GTA CCA AAC CGA AA-) primers [15].

The PCR mixture was prepared in 25 µL reaction volume containing 10 mM each of dNTPs mix, 0.2 mM Tfl DNA polymerase (5 U/µL), 0.1 U AMV (5 U/µL), 0.1 U recombinant RNasin ribonuclease inhibitor (400 U/µL), 0.8 U MgS (25 mM), 20 pmol of each of the forward and reverse primer, 5.0 µL of 1 times buffer, and 1 µL RNA or DNA template. Nuclease-free water was used to bring the mixture to its final volume of 25 µL. AMV reverse transcriptase enzymes and RNasin ribonuclease inhibitor were included only when RNA was a starting template for the PCR assay. In the nested PCR step, 1 L of outer PCR product was used as template.

In both inner and outer PCR steps, the target gene regions were amplified using the following conditions: reverse transcription: 45°C (45 min) (only in the case of RNA), initial denaturation: 94°C (2 min), denaturation: 94°C (45 sec), annealing: 58°C (30 sec), extension: 72°C (1 min), 35 cycles of repeats, and final extension: 72°C (7 min). PCR product was electrophoresed using 1.5% agarose (SeaKem LE USA), stained with 0.5 µg/mL ethidium bromide (Bio-Rad USA), and visualised under UV light (Geldoc system, Bio-Rad, USA). Extraction and amplification procedures were carried out in separate hood to reduce chances of contamination.

2.3. Sequence and Phylogenetic Analyses

In order to gain insight on the characteristics of Malaysian FeLV sequences, 29 nested PCR-positive samples (RNA ; DNA provirus ) were selected and purified using an Accuprep purification kit (Bioneer, Daejeon, Korea). Sequencing was carried out based on the amplified U3LTR-gag segment using a standard ABI Big Dye terminator version 3.1 sequence kit (Applied Biosystem). The obtained sequences were analysed for homology using the NCBI Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). In addition, multiple sequence alignment was carried out using ClustalW and the percentage nucleotide identity was determined using DNA identity matrix [19, 20]. On the other hand, single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), DNA distance matrix, and transcription binding proteins prediction analyses were carried out using geneious software version R7 [20]. A neighbour-joining (NJ) phylogenetic tree was constructed based on the U3LTR-gag sequences using MEGA5 software. The tree reliability was assessed using 100 bootstrap replicates [21]. All nucleotide sequences were deposited with the NCBI GenBank (Table 1).


IsolateAccession numberCountrySource

FeLV-UPM01HQ197367MalaysiaThis study
FeLV-UPM02HQ197368MalaysiaThis study
FeLV-UPM03HQ197369MalaysiaThis study
FeLV-UPM04HQ197370MalaysiaThis study
FeLV-UPM05HQ197371MalaysiaThis study
FeLV-UPM06HQ197372MalaysiaThis study
FeLV-UPM07HQ197373MalaysiaThis study
FeLV-UPM08HQ197374MalaysiaThis study
FeLV-UPM09HQ197375MalaysiaThis study
FeLV-UPM10HQ197376MalaysiaThis study
FeLV-UPM11HQ197377MalaysiaThis study
FeLV-UPM12HQ727890MalaysiaThis study
FeLV-UPM13HQ727891MalaysiaThis study
FeLV-UPM14HQ727892MalaysiaThis study
FeLV-UPM15JF815538MalaysiaThis study
FeLV-UPM16JF815539MalaysiaThis study
FeLV-UPM17JF815540MalaysiaThis study
FeLV-UPM18JF815541MalaysiaThis study
FeLV-UPM19JF815542MalaysiaThis study
FeLV-UPM20JF815543MalaysiaThis study
FeLV-UPM21JF815544MalaysiaThis study
FeLV-UPM22JF815545MalaysiaThis study
FeLV-UPM23JF815546MalaysiaThis study
FeLV-UPM24JF815547MalaysiaThis study
FeLV-UPM25JF815548MalaysiaThis study
FeLV-UPM26JF815549MalaysiaThis study
FeLV-UPM27JF815550MalaysiaThis study
FeLV-UPM28JF815551MalaysiaThis study
FeLV-UPM29JF815552MalaysiaThis study
FeLV-914MGEU048352BrazilGenBank
FeLV-1235MGEU43664BrazilGenBank
FeLV-843MGDQ821500BrazilGenBank
FeLV-887MGDQ821501BrazilGenBank
FeLV-922MGEU48356BrazilGenBank
FeLV-1286MGEU090948BrazilGenBank
FeLV-328MGAY745878BrazilGenBank
FeLV-RickardAF052723USAGenBank
FeLV-FAIDSM18247USAGenBank
FeLV-GM1D13922UKGenBank
FeLV-K01803K01803UKGenBank
FeLV-TWK25GQ465833TaiwanGenBank
FeLV-TW-K30GQ327961TaiwanGenBank

Note: FeLV01–FeLV14 sequences were amplified from plasma viral RNA while the remaining local sequence (FeLVUPM13–FeLVUPM29) were amplified from proviral DNA.

3. Results and Discussion

FeLV infection is of concern to cat owners due to its ability to induce tumours and immunodeficiency, thus predisposing cats to other secondary diseases. In this study, a U3-LTR and gag regions of exogenous without endogenous FeLV sequences were amplified by nested PCR methods. Post-PCR analysis using electrophoresis revealed an expected amplicon size of 770 bp in the outer PCR and 601 bp in the nested inner PCR assay (Figure 1). Overall, it was found that 97.4% (38/39) of p27 antigen-negative cats were positive for FeLV provirus DNA suggesting that this category of cats likely goes undetected when only p27 detection is used to judge their FeLV clinical status. Similar studies reported high prevalence of FeLV provirus DNA in Brazilian cats [22]. However, Hofmann-Lehmann et al. [23] reported a lower provirus DNA rate in cats in Switzerland. The observed differences in prevalence among different countries could be associated with cat lifestyle, as well as variations in factors known to favour FeLV transmission [3, 4]. Provirus DNA detection rate observed in this study could be associated with regressive or latent FeLV infection, which is characterized by integration of DNA provirus into the host cell genome and absence of viral antigen in circulation [1, 15].

The consequence of latent FeLV infection is that provirus DNA could reactivate to an infectious state, especially following stress and/or immunosuppression. Thus, cats that are p27 antigen-negative, but provirus DNA positive, could serve as sources of infection of FeLV-naïve cats [24]. A previous study has established an association between feline lymphoma and provirus DNA positivity in p27 antigen-negative cats, though this has not been evaluated in the present study [25]. Moreover, transmission of FeLV has been shown to occur in cats following blood transfusion from cats with provirus DNA, thus highlighting the importance of screening blood donor cats for provirus DNA [26].

Viral RNA was detected in 87.2% (34/39) of p27 antigen-positive cats whereas 13% (5/39) tested negative using RT-PCR assay. Since plasma viral RNA is an indicator of FeLV viraemia, cats that are positive for FeLV p27 antigen and viral RNA are likely to harbour replicating virus [27]. Cats in this category may progress to a persistent viraemic stage, succumbing to FeLV-associated illness [28].

Failure to detect FeLV viral RNA in about 13% p27 antigen-positive cats (p27-positive/viral RNA-negative) could result from atypical infection, wherein the virus is sequestered and replicates locally in tissues such as salivary gland, mammary gland, and urinary epithelium, causing intermittent or low-grade antigenaemia, although there is no detectable viraemia [28, 29]. Our findings are consistent with the results of an earlier study that failed to isolate FeLV from about 10% of p27 antigen-positive cats, irrespective of the antigen detection methods used. Such cats were considered as “discordant,” suggesting that p27 antigen-positive status may not always correlate with viraemia [30]. Another potential explanation for p27-positive-RNA-negative status might be false positive antigen or false negative RNA tests that arise occasionally because of low positive predictive value of p27 antigen tests in regions with low FeLV prevalence [31]. Clinical relevance of atypical FeLV infection is not well-understood, and it has been recommended to monitor the status of discordant cats over time [27, 28]. No additional follow-up was carried out in the present study, because most owners were not willing to subject cats to repeated venepunctures [4].

Based on the U3LTR and partial gag regions, nucleotide sequence analyses revealed homology of 91–100% among Malaysian FeLV isolates. However, homology decreased to 84.6% when local isolates were compared with reference isolates. Previous studies reported strong sequence conservation (>97%) among FeLV isolates of different geographic and temporal clusters [32, 33]. In agreement with Jackson et al. [17], we do observe point mutations and nucleotide deletion in Malaysian FeLV isolates (see Supplementary Material available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/760961).While U3LTR is conserved in FeLV, field isolates have been reported to exhibit sequence variation within the terminally repeated LTRs regions [17, 33]. Mutational changes in the LTR regions have been implicated with enhanced transcriptional and/or insertion activities of FeLV, thus supporting T-cell lymphomagenesis [34, 35].

In this study, several transcription binding motifs were predicted within the amplified U3LTR-gag region (Table 2). Of these, NF-GMa, Krox-20/WT1I-del2, BAF1, AP-2, TBP, TFIIF-beta, TRF, and TFIID motifs were found to be conserved between local FeLV isolates and the two characterized FeLV-Rickard subgroup A and FeLV-FAIDS reference isolates. On the other hand, E1A-F, ELP, Sp1, CEBPbeta, BAF1, GCF, HNF-3, and PEA3 motifs are found in some local isolates but were absent in reference sequences. These motifs may have implication for viral oncogenicity or probably favours viral replication. For example, an Sp1 enhancer, a member of Sp/Kruppel-like factor, was reported to activate gene transcription and contribute to abnormal metabolism of cancer cells [36, 37] whereas CEBPbeta regulates the growth and differentiation of myeloid as well as lymphoid cells [38]. Studies have shown that, the U3-LTR sequence contains multiple transcription binding sites that aid viral replication and pathogenesis. Interactions of different transcription binding factors, via the U3-LTRs, may contribute to cellular gene transactivation and viral leukemogenesis [39, 40]. Enhancer motifs observed in this study appeared in multiple locations such as in the case of E1A-F, BAF1, and TFIID, each occurring in duplicate; GCF appeared in triplicate while AP-2 is repeated 5 times at different positions. An enhancer duplication and triplication has been reported in naturally occurring cases of FeLV-induced T-cell lymphomas [41, 42]. The clinical relevance of multiple enhancers in cats used in the present study is not determined, although some FeLV positive cats had evidence of different tumour forms at post-mortem (result not shown). Previous studies reported that E1A-F, a member ets-oncogene family transcription factor, upregulates the multiple matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) genes thus contributing to the malignant phenotypic activity by increasing the invasion and metastatic activities of cancerous cells [43]. TFIID, a potential protooncogene with TATA-box protein and a TBP-associated factor also plays role in transcription initiation and genome expression [44]. On the other hand, AP2 and SP1 are known to activate epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene. In addition, overexpression of these gene has been reported to cause cellular transformation [45, 46]. Surprisingly we also identified a triplicate of GCF binding factor that has suppressor effect on EGR gene; these discrepancies, however, need further elucidation with quantitative real-time PCR [47].


MotifsSequenceSeq lengthCoverageOccurrence in local sequenceOccurrence in reference FeLV

NF-GMaGAGGTTTCAT10523–532All local seq except UPM08FeLV-Rickard; FeLV-FAIDs
E1A-FCGGATGT7521–527UPM08NA
E1A-FCGGATGT770–76UPM18NA
ELPCAAGGTC7523–527UPM03, 14, 18, 20NA
Sp1GGGGCTAGG7521–527UPM03, 18, 20NA
CEBPbetaCTGGAAA7387–393UPM18, 20NA
Krox-20/WT1I-del2CGCCCCCGC9374–382All local seqFeLV-Rickard; FeLV-FAIDs
E2FTTTTGGCGG9334–342UPM03, 14, 18, 20FeLV-Rickard; FeLV-FAIDs
BAF1TCCTTGTATACG12301–312All except UPM03, 14, 18, 20NA
BAF1TCCTTGTATACG12158–169All local seqNA
AP-2CCCAACCG8243–250All local seqFeLV-Rickard; FeLV-FAIDs
AP-2CCCAACCG859–66All local seq except UPM17FeLV-Rickard; FeLV-FAIDs
AP-2CCCAACCG858–65 UPM03, 14, 18, 20, 25NA
AP-2CCCAACCG84 to 11All except UPM03, 14NA
AP-2CCCAACCG83 to11All local seqFeLV-Rickard
GCFCCGCCCC793–99All local seqFeLV-Rickard, FeLV-FAIDs
GCFCCGGCGC764–70All local seq except UPM03, UPM 14NA
GCFGCGCGCC726–32UPM27NA
HNF-3TGTTTGC7129–135All local seq except UPM06NA
PEA3GCGGAAGT869–76UPM18NA
TBPTATAAAA739–45All local seqFeLV-Rickard, FeLV-FAIDs
TFIIF-betaTATAAAA739–45All local seqFeLV-Rickard, FeLV-FAIDs
TRFTATAAAA739–45All local seqFeLV-Rickard, FeLV-FAIDs
TFIIDTATAAAA739–45All local seqFeLV-Rickard, FeLV-FAIDs
TFIIDCTTCTCGC810 to 17UPM03, 14, 20NA
MEP-1TATAAAA723–29All local seq except UPM03, 14, 18, 20FeLV-Rickard
MBF-ITATAAAA723–29All local seq except UPM03, 14, 18, 21FeLV-Rickard
MTF-1TATAAAA723–29All except UPM03, 14, 18, 22FeLV-Rickard

NA: not applicable or not present; seq: sequences.

Absence of length mutation (nucleotide position 473–481) in Malaysian FeLV isolates, as observed in FeLV isolates from Taiwan (FeLV-TW-25 and FeLV-TW-30) and a European isolate (FeLV-GM1), might suggest limited influence of geography in evolutionary patterns of FeLV, unlike its lentiviral counterpart, feline immunodeficiency virus [33, 48].

Phylogenetic analysis based on the U3LTR-gag sequence revealed that Malaysian FeLV isolates are closely related (Tables 3(a), 3(b), and 3(c)) but when compared with reference isolates, separated into two distinct clusters, with the majority (86.2%) being closely related to FeLV-K01803 isolate from UK. The remaining local FeLV isolates (13.8%) clustered with FeLV-GM1 (Figure 2). The reason for the observed similarity between local FeLV isolates and European isolates, but not with Taiwanese isolates, may suggest the lack of geographical influence, this should be explored further. It is possible also that FeLV might have been introduced into Malaysia as a result of translocation of domestic pets from Europe. Due to a somewhat conserved nature of the U3LTR region, conclusion about the FeLV subgroup requires further investigations of FeLV envelope protein gene.

(a)

FeLV-Rickard
AF052723
FeLV-FAIDS 
M18247
FeLV-UPM03
HQ197369
FeLV-UPM18
JF815541
FeLV-UPM20
JF815543
FeLV-UPM29
JF815552
FeLV-UPM28
JF815551
FeLV-UPM12
HQ727890
FeLV-UPM06
HQ197372

FeLV-Rickard [AF052723]98.1294.92593.60993.79796.80596.80596.99296.617
FeLV-FAIDS [M18247]98.1295.30193.98594.17396.42996.42996.61796.617
FeLV-UPM03 [HQ197369]94.92595.30196.42998.49694.73794.73794.92594.549
FeLV-UPM18 [JF815541]93.60993.98596.42996.05393.79793.79793.98593.609
FeLV-UPM20 [JF815543]93.79794.17398.49696.05393.60993.60993.79793.421
FeLV-UPM29 [JF815552]96.80596.42994.73793.79793.60910099.81299.436
FeLV-UPM28 [JF815551]96.80596.42994.73793.79793.60910099.81299.436
FeLV-UPM12 [HQ727890]96.99296.61794.92593.98593.79799.81299.81299.624
FeLV-UPM06 [HQ197372]96.61796.61794.54993.60993.42199.43699.43699.624
FeLV-UPM23 [JF815546]96.80596.42994.73793.79793.60999.24899.24899.43699.06
FeLV-UPM21 [JF815544]96.80596.42994.73793.79793.60999.24899.24899.43699.06
FeLV-UPM24 [JF815547]96.80596.42994.73793.79793.60999.24899.24899.43699.06
FeLV-UPM26 [JF815549]96.80596.42994.73793.79793.60999.24899.24899.43699.06
FeLV-UPM09 [HQ197375]96.80596.42994.73793.79793.60999.24899.24899.43699.06
FeLV-UPM17 [JF815540]96.61796.24194.54993.60993.42199.0699.0699.24898.872
FeLV-UPM16 [JF815539]96.61796.24194.54993.60993.42199.0699.0699.24898.872
FeLV-UPM25 [JF815548]96.42996.05394.54993.79793.42198.87298.87299.0698.684
FeLV-UPM19 [JF815542]95.86595.48993.79792.85792.66998.30898.30898.49698.12
FeLV-UPM27 [JF815550]96.61795.86594.17393.23393.04598.68498.68498.87298.496
FeLV-UPM22 [JF815545]96.61796.05394.36193.42193.23398.87298.87299.0698.684
FeLV-UPM10 [HQ197376]96.42996.05394.36193.42193.23399.24899.24899.43699.06
FeLV-UPM15 [JF815538]96.99296.61794.92593.98593.79799.43699.43699.62499.248
FeLV-UPM11 [HQ197377]96.99296.61794.92593.98593.79799.43699.43699.62499.248
FeLV-UPM13 [HQ727891]96.80596.42994.73793.79793.60999.62499.62499.81299.436
FeLV-UPM05 [HQ197371]96.42996.05394.36193.42193.23399.24899.24899.43699.06
FeLV-UPM07 [HQ197373]96.80596.42994.73793.79793.60999.62499.62499.81299.436
FeLV-UPM02 [HQ197368]96.80596.42994.73793.79793.60999.62499.62499.81299.436
FeLV-UPM01 [HQ197367]96.80596.42994.73793.79793.60999.62499.62499.81299.436
FeLV-UPM04 [HQ197370]96.61796.24194.54993.60993.42199.0699.0699.24898.872
FeLV-UPM08 [HQ197374]94.73793.98592.66991.72991.54197.1897.1897.36896.992
FeLV-UPM14 [HQ727892]95.86596.24199.0696.99297.93295.67795.67795.86595.489

(b)

FeLV-UPM23 [JF815546]FeLV-UPM21 [JF815544]FeLV-UPM24 [JF815547]FeLV-UPM26 [JF815549]FeLV-UPM09 [HQ197375]FeLV-UPM17 [JF815540]FeLV-UPM16 [JF815539]FeLV-UPM25 [JF815548]FeLV-UPM19 [JF815542]FeLV-UPM27 [JF815550]

FeLV-Rickard [AF052723]96.80596.80596.80596.80596.80596.61796.61796.42995.86596.617
FeLV-FAIDS [M18247]96.42996.42996.42996.42996.42996.24196.24196.05395.48995.865
FeLV-UPM03 [HQ197369]94.73794.73794.73794.73794.73794.54994.54994.54993.79794.173
FeLV-UPM18 [JF815541]93.79793.79793.79793.79793.79793.60993.60993.79792.85793.233
FeLV-UPM20 [JF815543]93.60993.60993.60993.60993.60993.42193.42193.42192.66993.045
FeLV-UPM29 [JF815552]99.24899.24899.24899.24899.24899.0699.0698.87298.30898.684
FeLV-UPM28 [JF815551]99.24899.24899.24899.24899.24899.0699.0698.87298.30898.684
FeLV-UPM12 [HQ727890]99.43699.43699.43699.43699.43699.24899.24899.0698.49698.872
FeLV-UPM06 [HQ197372]99.0699.0699.0699.0699.0698.87298.87298.68498.1298.496
FeLV-UPM23 [JF815546]10010010010099.81299.81299.62499.0699.436
FeLV-UPM21 [JF815544]10010010010099.81299.81299.62499.0699.436
FeLV-UPM24 [JF815547]10010010010099.81299.81299.62499.0699.436
FeLV-UPM26 [JF815549]10010010010099.81299.81299.62499.0699.436
FeLV-UPM09 [HQ197375]10010010010099.81299.81299.62499.0699.436
FeLV-UPM17 [JF815540]99.81299.81299.81299.81299.81299.62499.43698.87299.248
FeLV-UPM16 [JF815539]99.81299.81299.81299.81299.81299.62499.43698.87299.248
FeLV-UPM25 [JF815548]99.62499.62499.62499.62499.62499.43699.43698.68499.06
FeLV-UPM19 [JF815542]99.0699.0699.0699.0699.0698.87298.87298.68498.496
FeLV-UPM27 [JF815550]99.43699.43699.43699.43699.43699.24899.24899.0698.496
FeLV-UPM22 [JF815545]99.62499.62499.62499.62499.62499.43699.43699.24898.68499.248
FeLV-UPM10 [HQ197376]99.62499.62499.62499.62499.62499.43699.43699.24898.68499.06
FeLV-UPM15 [JF815538]99.81299.81299.81299.81299.81299.62499.62499.43698.87299.248
FeLV-UPM11 [HQ197377]99.81299.81299.81299.81299.81299.62499.62499.43698.87299.248
FeLV-UPM13 [HQ727891]99.62499.62499.62499.62499.62499.43699.43699.24898.68499.06
FeLV-UPM05 [HQ197371]99.24899.24899.24899.24899.24899.0699.0698.87298.30898.684
FeLV-UPM07 [HQ197373]99.62499.62499.62499.62499.62499.43699.43699.24898.68499.06
FeLV-UPM02 [HQ197368]99.62499.62499.62499.62499.62499.43699.43699.24898.68499.06
FeLV-UPM01 [HQ197367]99.62499.62499.62499.62499.62499.43699.43699.24898.68499.06
FeLV-UPM04 [HQ197370]99.0699.0699.0699.0699.0698.87298.87298.68498.1298.496
FeLV-UPM08 [HQ197374]96.80596.80596.80596.80596.80596.61796.61796.42996.05396.617
FeLV-UPM14 [HQ727892]95.67795.67795.67795.67795.67795.48995.48995.48994.73795.113

(c)

FeLV-UPM22 [JF815545]FeLV-UPM10 [HQ197376]FeLV-UPM15 [JF815538]FeLV-UPM11 [HQ197377]FeLV-UPM13 [HQ727891]FeLV-UPM05 [HQ197371]FeLV-UPM07 [HQ197373]FeLV-UPM02 [HQ197368]FeLV-UPM01 [HQ197367]FeLV-UPM04 [HQ197370]FeLV-UPM08 [HQ197374]FeLV-UPM14 [HQ727892]

FeLV-Rickard [AF052723]96.61796.42996.99296.99296.80596.42996.80596.80596.80596.61794.73795.865
FeLV-FAIDS [M18247]96.05396.05396.61796.61796.42996.05396.42996.42996.42996.24193.98596.241
FeLV-UPM03 [HQ197369]94.36194.36194.92594.92594.73794.36194.73794.73794.73794.54992.66999.06
FeLV-UPM18 [JF815541]93.42193.42193.98593.98593.79793.42193.79793.79793.79793.60991.72996.992
FeLV-UPM20 [JF815543]93.23393.23393.79793.79793.60993.23393.60993.60993.60993.42191.54197.932
FeLV-UPM29 [JF815552]98.87299.24899.43699.43699.62499.24899.62499.62499.62499.0697.1895.677
FeLV-UPM28 [JF815551]98.87299.24899.43699.43699.62499.24899.62499.62499.62499.0697.1895.677
FeLV-UPM12 [HQ727890]99.0699.43699.62499.62499.81299.43699.81299.81299.81299.24897.36895.865
FeLV-UPM06 [HQ197372]98.68499.0699.24899.24899.43699.0699.43699.43699.43698.87296.99295.489
FeLV-UPM23 [JF815546]99.62499.62499.81299.81299.62499.24899.62499.62499.62499.0696.80595.677
FeLV-UPM21 [JF815544]99.62499.62499.81299.81299.62499.24899.62499.62499.62499.0696.80595.677
FeLV-UPM24 [JF815547]99.62499.62499.81299.81299.62499.24899.62499.62499.62499.0696.80595.677
FeLV-UPM26 [JF815549]99.62499.62499.81299.81299.62499.24899.62499.62499.62499.0696.80595.677
FeLV-UPM09 [HQ197375]99.62499.62499.81299.81299.62499.24899.62499.62499.62499.0696.80595.677
FeLV-UPM17 [JF815540]99.43699.43699.62499.62499.43699.0699.43699.43699.43698.87296.61795.489
FeLV-UPM16 [JF815539]99.43699.43699.62499.62499.43699.0699.43699.43699.43698.87296.61795.489
FeLV-UPM25 [JF815548]99.24899.24899.43699.43699.24898.87299.24899.24899.24898.68496.42995.489
FeLV-UPM19 [JF815542]98.68498.68498.87298.87298.68498.30898.68498.68498.68498.1296.05394.737
FeLV-UPM27 [JF815550]99.24899.0699.24899.24899.0698.68499.0699.0699.0698.49696.61795.113
FeLV-UPM22 [JF815545]99.24899.43699.43699.24898.87299.24899.24899.24898.68496.61795.301
FeLV-UPM10 [HQ197376]99.24899.43699.43699.62499.24899.62499.62499.62499.0697.1895.301
FeLV-UPM15 [JF815538]99.43699.43610099.81299.43699.81299.81299.81299.24896.99295.865
FeLV-UPM11 [HQ197377]99.43699.43610099.81299.43699.81299.81299.81299.24896.99295.865
FeLV-UPM13 [HQ727891]99.24899.62499.81299.81299.62410010010099.43697.1895.677
FeLV-UPM05 [HQ197371]98.87299.24899.43699.43699.62499.62499.62499.62499.0696.80595.301
FeLV-UPM07 [HQ197373]99.24899.62499.81299.81210099.62410010099.43697.1895.677
FeLV-UPM02 [HQ197368]99.24899.62499.81299.81210099.62410010099.43697.1895.677
FeLV-UPM01 [HQ197367]99.24899.62499.81299.81210099.62410010099.43697.1895.677
FeLV-UPM04 [HQ197370]98.68499.0699.24899.24899.43699.0699.43699.43699.43696.61795.489
FeLV-UPM08 [HQ197374]96.61797.1896.99296.99297.1896.80597.1897.1897.1896.61793.609
FeLV-UPM14 [HQ727892]95.30195.30195.86595.86595.67795.30195.67795.67795.67795.48993.609

4. Conclusion

This study revealed the occurrence of FeLV viral RNA and provirus DNA among naturally infected Malaysian cats. Based on the U3LTR-gag sequence, Malaysian FeLV isolates are highly conserved and more closely related to K01803 isolate from UK compared to Taiwanese and other reference isolates. Presence of multiple enhancers some of which have been linked with FeLV induced tumours may contribute to the development of poor prognostic outcome in naturally infected Malaysian cats although this needs further investigation. Overall, this is the first molecular study for evidence of FeLV in Malaysia. We also identified several motifs that have potential implications in FeLV-induced leukemogenesis. Future studies need to explore association between FeLV positive status and occurrence of feline tumour in Malaysian cats. The present findings is useful in designing molecular diagnostics for clinical applications and for improved understanding of FeLV infection outcome and epidemiology.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank cat owners and clinicians for their support, Dr. Dennis F. Lawler for proof reading the paper, and Saeid Kadkhodaei for assistance in sequence analysis. This project was funded by Science Fund, Ministry of Science and Technology and Innovation, Project no. 02-01-04-SF1070.

Supplementary Materials

Multiple sequence alignment of Malaysian FeLV with reference isolates.

  1. Supplementary Figure

References

  1. J. L. Rojko, E. A. Hoover, L. E. Mathes, R. G. Olsen, and J. P. Schaller, “Pathogenesis of experimental feline leukemia virus infection,” Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 759–768, 1979. View at: Google Scholar
  2. O. Jarrett, “The relevance of feline retroviruses to the development of vaccines against HIV,” AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 385–387, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. S. E. Gleich, S. Krieger, and K. Hartmann, “Prevalence of feline immunodeficiency virus and feline leukaemia virus among client-owned cats and risk factors for infection in Germany,” Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery, vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 985–992, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. F. Bande, S. S. Arshad, L. Hassan et al., “Prevalence and risk factors of feline leukaemia virus and feline immunodeficiency virus in peninsular Malaysia,” BMC Veterinary Research, vol. 8, article 33, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. T. Miyazawa, Y. Ikeda, K. Maeda et al., “Seroepidemiological survey of feline retrovirus infections in domestic and leopard cats in Northern Vietnam in 1997,” Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, vol. 60, no. 11, pp. 1273–1275, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. M. Chew-Lim, N. Fong, and S. Y. Chong, “A survey of the feline leukaemia virus in Singapore,” Annals of the Academy of Medicine Singapore, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 646–648, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  7. S. Maruyama, H. Kabeya, R. Nakao et al., “Seroprevalence of Bartonella henselae, toxoplasma gondii, FIV and FeLV infections in domestic cats in Japan,” Microbiology and Immunology, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 147–153, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. A. Litster and P. Nilkumhang, “Prevalence of feline leukaemia virus and feline immunodeficiency virus infection in Thailand,” in Proceedings of the 28th Congress of World Small Animal Association, Bangkok, Thailand, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  9. J. A. Lin, M. C. Cheng, Y. Inoshima et al., “Seroepidemiological survey of feline retrovirus infections in cats in Taiwan in 1993 and 1994,” The Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 161–163, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. K. L. Gibson, K. Keizer, and C. Golding, “A trap, neuter, and release program for feral cats on Prince Edward Island,” Canadian Veterinary Journal, vol. 43, no. 9, pp. 695–698, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  11. I. T. Lee, J. K. Levy, S. P. Gorman, P. C. Crawford, and M. R. Slater, “Prevalence of feline leukemia virus infection and serum antibodies against feline immunodeficiency virus in unowned free-roaming cats,” Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, vol. 220, no. 5, pp. 620–622, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. S. Little, W. Sears, J. Lachtara, and D. Bienzle, “Seroprevalence of feline leukemia virus and feline immunodeficiency virus infection among cats in Canada,” Canadian Veterinary Journal, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 644–648, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  13. Y. M. Al-Kappany, M. R. Lappin, O. C. H. Kwok, S. A. Abu-Elwafa, M. Hilali, and J. P. Dubey, “Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii and concurrent Bartonella spp., Feline immunodeficiency virus, feline leukemia virus, and Dirofilaria immitis infections in egyptian cats,” Journal of Parasitology, vol. 97, no. 2, pp. 256–258, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. K. Hartmann, P. Griessmayr, B. Schulz et al., “Quality of different in-clinic test systems for feline immunodeficiency virus and feline leukaemia virus infection,” Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 439–445, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. T. Miyazawa and O. Jarrett, “Feline leukaemia virus proviral DNA detected by polymerase chain reaction in antigenaemic but non-viraemic (“discordant”) cats,” Archives of Virology, vol. 142, no. 2, pp. 323–332, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. V. Cattori and R. Hofmann-Lehmann, “Absolute quantitation of feline leukemia virus proviral DNA and viral RNA loads by TaqMan real-time PCR and RT-PCR,” in Anonymous Molecular Beacons: Signalling Nucleic Acid Probes, Methods, and Protocols, p. 73, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  17. M. L. Jackson, D. M. Haines, and V. Misra, “Sequence analysis of the putative viral enhancer in tissues from 33 cats with various feline leukemia virus-related diseases,” Veterinary Microbiology, vol. 53, no. 3-4, pp. 213–225, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. A. Amer, A. Siti Suri, O. Abdul Rahman et al., “Isolation and molecular characterization of type I and type II feline coronavirus in Malaysia,” Virology Journal, vol. 9, article 278, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. T. A. Hall, “BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for windows 95/98/NT,” Nucleic Acids Symposium, vol. 41, pp. 95–98, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  20. M. Kearse, R. Moir, A. Wilson et al., “Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data,” Bioinformatics, vol. 28, no. 12, pp. 1647–1649, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. J. Felsenstein, “Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap,” Evolution, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 783–791, 1985. View at: Google Scholar
  22. F. M. Coelho, M. R. Q. Bomfim, F. D. A. Caxito et al., “Naturally occurring feline leukemia virus subgroup A and B infections in urban domestic cats,” Journal of General Virology, vol. 89, no. 11, pp. 2799–2805, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. R. Hofmann-Lehmann, J. B. Huder, F. Boretti, B. Sigrist, and H. Lutz, “Feline leukaemia provirus load during the course of experimental infection and in naturally infected cats,” Journal of General Virology, vol. 82, no. 7, pp. 1589–1596, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  24. B. R. Madewell and O. Jarrett, “Recovery of feline leukaemia virus from non-viraemic cats,” Veterinary Record, vol. 112, no. 15, pp. 339–342, 1983. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. L. J. Gabor, M. L. Jackson, B. Trask, R. Malik, and P. J. Canfield, “Feline leukaemia virus status of Australian cats with lymphosarcoma,” Australian Veterinary Journal, vol. 79, no. 7, pp. 476–481, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. S. Nesina, A. K. Helfer-Hungerbuehler, F. Boretti et al., “Transmission of FeLV infection by provirus positive blood,” in Proceedings of the 11th International Feline Retrovirus Research Symposium Anonymous, Leipzig, Germany, August 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  27. H. Lutz, D. Addie, S. Belák et al., “Feline leukaemia ABCD guidelines on prevention and management,” Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 565–574, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. E. A. Hoover and J. I. Mullins, “Feline leukemia virus infection and diseases,” Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, vol. 199, no. 10, pp. 1287–1297, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  29. K. A. Hayes, J. L. Rojko, and L. E. Mathes, “Incidence of localized feline leukemia virus infection in cats,” The American Journal of Veterinary Research, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 604–607, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  30. O. Jarrett, M. C. Golder, and K. Weijer, “A comparison of three methods of feline leukaemia virus diagnosis,” Veterinary Record, vol. 110, no. 14, pp. 325–328, 1982. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. J. A. Beatty, S. Tasker, O. Jarrett et al., “Markers of feline leukaemia virus infection or exposure in cats from a region of low seroprevalence,” Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery, vol. 13, no. 12, pp. 927–933, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. P. R. Donahue, E. A. Hoover, G. A. Beltz et al., “Strong sequence conservation among horizontally transmissible, minimally pathogenic feline leukemia viruses,” Journal of Virology, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 722–731, 1988. View at: Google Scholar
  33. C. Chandhasin, P. Lobelle-Rich, and L. S. Levy, “Feline leukaemia virus LTR variation and disease association in a geographical and temporal cluster,” Journal of General Virology, vol. 85, no. 10, pp. 2937–2942, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. Y. Fujino, K. Ohno, and H. Tsujimoto, “Molecular pathogenesis of feline leukemia virus-induced malignancies: insertional mutagenesis,” Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology, vol. 123, no. 1-2, pp. 138–143, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. L. S. Levy, “Advances in understanding molecular determinants in FeLV pathology,” Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology, vol. 123, no. 1-2, pp. 14–22, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. M. C. Archer, “Role of sp transcription factors in the regulation of cancer cell metabolism,” Genes and Cancer, vol. 2, no. 7, pp. 712–719, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. R. Pal, M. Janz, D. L. Galson et al., “C/EBPβ regulates transcription factors critical for proliferation and survival of multiple myeloma cells,” Blood, vol. 114, no. 18, pp. 3890–3898, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. A. Amer, A. Siti Suri, O. Abdul Rahman et al., “Isolation and molecular characterization of type I and type II feline coronavirus in Malaysia,” Virology Journal, vol. 9, article 278, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. S. K. Ghosh and D. V. Faller, “Feline leukemia virus long terminal repeat activates collagenase IV gene expression through AP-1,” Journal of Virology, vol. 73, no. 6, pp. 4931–4940, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  40. A. L. Abujamra, D. V. Faller, and S. K. Ghosh, “Mutations that abrogate transactivational activity of the feline leukemia virus long terminal repeat do not affect virus replication,” Virology, vol. 309, no. 2, pp. 294–305, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. Y. Matsumoto, Y. Momoi, T. Watari, R. Goitsuka, H. Tsuilmoto, and A. Hasegawa, “Detection of enhancer repeats in the long terminal repeats of feline leukemia viruses from cats with spontaneous neoplastic and nonneoplastic diseases,” Virology, vol. 189, no. 2, pp. 745–749, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. G. B. Athas, P. Lobelle-Rich, and L. S. Levy, “Function of a unique sequence motif in the long terminal repeat of feline leukemia virus isolated from an unusual set of naturally occurring tumors,” Journal of Virology, vol. 69, no. 6, pp. 3324–3332, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  43. M. Shindoh, F. Higashino, and T. Kohgo, “E1AF, an ets-oncogene family transcription factor,” Cancer Letters, vol. 216, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. M. Purrello, C. Di Pietro, A. Viola et al., “Genomics and transcription analysis of human TFIID,” Oncogene, vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 1633–1638, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. R. Kageyama, G. T. Merlino, and I. Pastan, “Nuclear factor ETF specifically stimulates transcription from promoters without a TATA box,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 264, no. 26, pp. 15508–15514, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  46. T. J. Velu, L. Beguinot, W. C. Vass et al., “Epidermal growth factor-dependent transformation by a human EGF receptor proto-oncogene,” Science, vol. 238, no. 4832, pp. 1408–1410, 1987. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. Y. Kitadai, H. Yamazaki, W. Yasui et al., “GC factor represses transcription of several growth factor/receptor genes and causes growth inhibition of human gastric carcinoma cell lines,” Cell Growth & Differentiation, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 291–296, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  48. J. Pecon-Slattery, J. L. Troyer, W. E. Johnson, and S. J. O'Brien, “Evolution of feline immunodeficiency virus in Felidae: implications for human health and wildlife ecology,” Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology, vol. 123, no. 1-2, pp. 32–44, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Faruku Bande et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1477 Views | 595 Downloads | 1 Citation
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19.