Analytical Cellular Pathology

Analytical Cellular Pathology / 2016 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2016 |Article ID 8012716 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/8012716

A. J. I. S. Rathnayake, H. W. W. Goonasekera, V. H. W. Dissanayake, "Phenotypic and Cytogenetic Characterization of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells in De Novo Myelodysplastic Syndromes", Analytical Cellular Pathology, vol. 2016, Article ID 8012716, 11 pages, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/8012716

Phenotypic and Cytogenetic Characterization of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells in De Novo Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Academic Editor: Alain Chapel
Received29 Apr 2016
Revised02 Jul 2016
Accepted07 Aug 2016
Published29 Aug 2016

Abstract

Bone marrow (BM) mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) are vital in hematopoiesis. Whether BM-MSCs alter their characteristics in Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) is still controversial. We characterized MSCs of de novo MDS patients in Sri Lanka who have not been reported previously in the literature. We also analyzed MSCs derived from different MDS subtypes. MSCs were culture-expanded, characterized by flow cytometry, and induced towards osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation. Growth properties were determined using growth curves and population doubling times. Karyotyping and FISH were performed on MSCs. Cell morphology, differentiation potential, and CD marker expression of MDS-MSCs of all subtypes were comparable to those of control-MSCs. No significant growth differences were observed between control MSCs and MDS-MSCs of all subtypes (). 31% of MDS-MSCs had chromosomal aberrations (der(3),del(6q),del(7p), loss of chromosomes) whose BM karyotypes were normal. Highest percentage of karyotypic abnormalities was observed in RCMD-MSCs. Patients with abnormal BM karyotypes had no aberrant MSC clones. Results show that in spite of presence of genetically abnormal clones in MDS-MSC populations, in vitro phenotypic and growth characteristics of MSCs in MDS remain unchanged. Further, the occurrence of genetic abnormalities in BM-MSCs in MDS could be considered as an autonomous event from that of their hematopoietic counterparts.

1. Introduction

Multipotent mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) are a group of undifferentiated cells, with the ability of self-renewal and differentiation into multiple cell lineages including adipocytes, osteocytes, and chondrocytes [1, 2]. They are characterized by the expression of CD73, CD90, and CD105 and lack expression of hematopoietic markers such as CD34 and CD45 [1]. Bone marrow (BM) resident MSCs regulate hematopoiesis, homeostasis, and maintenance of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) through direct cell to cell contacts and by secretion of regulatory factors [3, 4]. Biological characteristics of MSCs, the most vital component in the functioning niche for HSCs, are thought to be altered in hematological malignancies [58].

Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) are a complex bone marrow hematopoietic stem cell disorders characterized by peripheral cytopenia, cellular dysplasia, and dysfunction resulting in an ineffective hematopoiesis [6, 7]. Emerging research and in vitro models demonstrate that the disease is not simply derived from an abnormal HSC clone but also is a combined result of defective cells in the marrow microenvironment and their complex interactions with hematopoietic compartment [6, 7]. Functional integrity of BM-MSCs in MDS and their contribution in pathogenesis and progression of MDS are controversial [512]. While some reports have found that the stromal compartment in MDS is cytogenetically and functionally normal [10, 11], other researches have shown that the MSCs are cytogenetically abnormal and defective in carrying out their normal functions [5, 12, 13]. The groups which claim for the view of MDS-MSCs are normal, have shown that the cellular morphology, expression of surface antigens, and differentiation ability of MDS-MSCs are comparable to normal MSCs, and are devoid of chromosomal aberrations [10, 14, 15]. In contrast, some other studies have reported altered proliferative and differentiation capacities, immunomodulatory properties, cell-cell interactions, signaling pathways, and cytogenetic profiles [13, 1620]. Coexistence of genetic aberrations in both hematopoietic and mesenchymal stem cell compartments was reported previously [12, 2123] and the aberrations in MSCs are found to be present more frequently in patients with cytogenetically abnormal HSCs [21]. Whether the abnormalities occur in both compartments together with a clonal relationship or in an independent manner is still not clear [2123]. Therefore it is essential to carry out further research on their phenotypic and cytogenetic properties to address the existing controversies and to better understand the disease biology.

The cytogenetic characteristics of BM of MDS have shown differences in Asian populations compared to the Western people; +8 and del(7q) are the most frequent cytogenetic abnormality in Asian MDS patients whereas del(5q) has been reported as the most common cytogenetic abnormality in Western MDS patients [2429]. It is also reported that the age of onset in Asia is younger than in Western countries [28, 29]. Most of the studies have been done using North American and European populations and data on South Asian MDS patient populations are sparse. Therefore, although the biological features and cytogenetic profiles of MSCs have been reported previously [9, 12, 2123] it is important to further explore the phenotypic and cytogenetic features of MDS patients in different ethnicities due to population differences in cell profiles [29, 30]. Further, the studies which compare the characteristics of MSCs derived from different MDS subtypes are limited. Hence, this study was carried out on Sri Lankan primary MDS patients who have not been reported previously in the literature in order to better understand the characteristics of MDS-MSCs as well as fill the deficiency of data from South Asian context.

In this study we analyzed the morphology, immunophenotypes, differentiation ability, growth, and cytogenetic profiles of the BM-MSCs from a newly diagnosed de novo MDS patient group in Sri Lanka. We also compared the characteristics of MSCs derived from different subtypes of MDS.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patients

Twenty patients diagnosed as having de novo MDS were recruited from 3 tertiary care general hospitals (National Hospital of Sri Lanka, Colombo South Teaching Hospital, and Colombo North Teaching Hospital) and a cancer care hospital (National Cancer Institute, Maharagama) in Sri Lanka. Patients reported to above hospitals from 2013 to 2015 were recruited. MDS diagnosis was based on clinical presentation, peripheral blood counts, BM aspiration, trephine biopsy reports, and BM karyotypes and classified into subtypes according to the WHO classification of 2008. Patients with secondary MDS and other chronic diseases were excluded. Five persons who have an indication to undergo bone marrow aspiration as part of their diagnostic work-up other than a primary/secondary bone marrow failure syndrome were also recruited for the study as controls. The study was carried out according to the Declaration of Helsinki (2008). The protocol was approved by the Ethics Review Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo (ERC-12-40), and all necessary permits were obtained from the abovementioned hospitals to recruit their patients for the described study. Bone marrow samples for the study were obtained at the time of initial diagnostic BM aspiration under local anesthesia. An information sheet which contained details of purpose of the study, duration, procedures, confidentiality, potential risks, hazards, discomforts, and so forth and a consent form were prepared in all the three national languages used in Sri Lanka. The information sheet was given to the patients before the marrow sampling and its content was explained to the patients and their relatives. It was also explained that their participation is voluntary, that they will not be identified in the reporting of the findings, and that they may withdraw at any point before the results of the study are published with no penalty or effect on medical care or loss of benefits. The participants were invited to ask questions before getting the written consent. Written informed consent for the study was obtained prior to BM sample collection.

2.2. Isolation and Expansion of MSCs

BM samples (5–10 mL) were collected into heparinized tubes at the time of bone marrow sampling for initial diagnosis of MDS. Isolation of BM MSCs was done using adhesion protocol developed by Colter et al. [31]. The mononuclear cells (MNCs) were isolated from bone marrow using Ficoll gradient. Isolated cells were cultured in T-25 flasks (Corning) at the density of 106 cells/mL in DMEM-KO (knockout) (Gibco) supplemented with 10% FBS (Gibco), 2 mM glutamine (Gibco), and 1% antibiotics (Penicillin-Streptomycin, Gibco) (MSC complete media) and incubated at 37°C in humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 overnight. After 4 days, nonadherent cells with spent cell culture media were discarded from the culture flask, washed with PBS, and were subjected to total medium changes until the appearance of 80% confluent adherent cell layer. The morphology of MSCs was examined daily under an inverted microscope. To detach the cells from the bottom of the flask, cells were incubated with prewarmed 0.05% Trypsin-0.53 mM EDTA and the cells were observed under the inverted microscope for detachment every 30 seconds. When 90% of the cells were detached complete culture media were added to neutralize trypsin, cells were centrifuged, and the pellet was resuspended in prewarmed complete growth medium. An aliquot was taken to determine the total number of viable cells and the cells were subcultured in T75 at a density of 2 × 106 cells/cm2. Isolated mesenchymal cells generated from in vitro cultures were cryopreserved for future analysis. Same procedures were followed to isolate MSCs from controls.

2.3. Morphology and Differentiation Assays

The morphology of cultured MSCs was observed every 3 days under a phase contrast microscope. Morphology was compared with the MSCs isolated from BM of controls.

Differentiation studies were performed at passages 2–4 MSCs. Cells were grown in mesenchymal complete media until they reached 100% confluency. To induce osteogenic differentiation, osteogenic differentiation media (DMEM-HG, 10% FBS, 100 nM dexamethasone, 10 mM β-glycerophosphate, and 0.2 mM ascorbate) were added and incubated for 21 days. Media were changed every 3 days. Osteogenic differentiation was detected by Alizarin S stain for calcium deposition. Cells were fixed with 10% formalin (Sigma-Aldrich) for 15 minutes, washed with distilled water, and stained with Alizarin Red S for 45 minutes.

To induce adipogenic differentiation, cells were incubated with adipogenic media (DMED-HG, 1 mM dexamethasone, 0.5 mM 3-isobutyl-1-methyl-xanthine, 10 μg/mL recombinant human insulin, 100 mM indomethacin, and 10% FBS) for 15 days. Adipogenic differentiation was confirmed by the observation of neutral lipid-vacuoles. Cells were fixed with 10% formalin and stained with Oil Red O (Sigma-Aldrich) for 15 minutes.

2.4. Immunophenotype Analysis of MSCs after Expansion

Passage 2 MSCs obtained from MDS patients and controls were trypsinized and analyzed by flow cytometry using CD34-phycoerythrin (PE), CD73-fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC), CD90-PE, CD105-FITC, and CD45-FITC (BD, USA). 10,000 labeled cells were acquired and analyzed using a FACScalibur flow cytometer (BD, USA). The antibody combinations were used as follows: CD34-PE and CD73-FITC, CD90-PE and CD45-FITC, and CD105-FITC. Expression of positive CD markers was analyzed according to the MDS subtype, RCUD (), RCMD (), RAEB (), and controls ().

2.5. Proliferation Pattern of MDS-MSCs
2.5.1. Growth Curves and Population Doubling Times

MDS and control MSCs of passage 3 at logarithmic growth phase were seeded in 12-well plates at 0.5 × 104 cells/cm2 in MSC complete media and grown for 14 days. Duplicate cultures from each sample and control were harvested every 2 days at a regular time for 14 days and viable cell counts were measured by trypan blue exclusion method using a hemocytometer. Growth curves were drawn for control MSCs () and MDS-MSCs () and for each subtype (RCUD; , RCMD; , RAEB; and del(5q); ). For each sample cells in duplicate wells were harvested every 2 days and the average was taken. Each data point in the curve represents the mean of each group. For del(5q) () each data point was drawn taking the mean cell number of two independent wells.

Doubling time was calculated as follows [32]:where is starting time of the culture, is termination time of the culture, is initial cell number of the culture, and is ultimate cell number of the culture.

2.5.2. CFU-F Assays

CFU-F assays were performed as described previously [33]. Passage 2 MSCs of MDS patients and controls (100 cells/dish) were plated on 35 mm tissue culture-treated dishes in triplicate in complete MSC medium with antibiotics and cultured for 14 days. Medium was changed every 3 days. At the end of 14 days, colonies were washed with PBS, fixed with methanol, and stained with Wright Giemsa. Clones of >50 cells were scored as CFU-F.

2.6. Karyotyping and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) Assays

G-banding technique was used to karyotype culture-expanded MSCs. MSCs of passage 3 were seeded at 1 × 106 cells/cm2 in RPMI media supplemented with 10% FBS and 2 mM glutamine and grown until they are 70–80% confluent. Two independent cultures were set. Colcemid® (10 mg/mL) was added to each flask to a final dilution of 0.05 μg/mL and then incubated at 37°C overnight (12–14 hrs). Duration of incubation time with colcemid was optimized for our laboratory conditions. To optimize the conditions cultures were incubated for 2 hours and 5 hours and overnight (12–14 hrs) after addition of colcemid and cells were prepared for cytogenetic analysis. Cultures with overnight colcemid incubation yielded the highest number of analyzable metaphases and were considered as the optimum for MSCs in our laboratory conditions. Cells were harvested with 0.05% Trypsin-EDTA, incubated at 37°C with 0.075 M KCl for 30 min, and fixed with freshly prepared fixative (methanol : acetic acid 3 : 1 v/v). Chromosomal spreads for analysis were prepared by dropping the cell suspension on slides at 76–82% humidity and GTL banding was performed. At least 20 metaphases were analyzed.

Karyotypes were given according to the 2013 International System for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature (ISCN) guidelines [34]. Presence of an abnormal clone was ascertained by the observation of more than two metaphase spreads having the same numerical or structural abnormality. For gain of chromosomes and loss of chromosomes it was ≥2 and ≥3 metaphase spreads, respectively.

FISH was carried out on BM-MSCs of confirmed del(5q) patients using the probe XL 5q31.2/5q33 (D-5042-100-OG, Meta Systems, USA) according to the manufacture’s protocol. At least 200 cells were counted by two individuals independently and ≥95% were set as the cut-off.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

Standard statistical software was used for statistical analysis. The t-test or nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test was used for numerical comparison.

3. Results

3.1. Demographics and Diagnosis

The age of the MDS patients ranged from 31 to 75 years with the median age of 64.5 years. Majority (65%) was women and male to female ratio of MDS patients was 7 : 13. The study group consisted of 11 (55%) patients with refractory cytopenia with unilineage dysplasia (RCUD), 3 (15%) patients with refractory anemia with excess blasts (RAEB), 5 (25%) patients with refractory cytopenia with multilineage dysplasia (RCMD), and 1 (5%) patient with MDS associated with isolated del(5q) (Table 1).


Patient IDMDS subtypeAgeSexCytogenetics of BMCytogenetics of MSCs

14-020RCMD68F46,XX46,XX,der(3) [8]
14-058RCUD73F46,XX46,XX
14-066RCUD31FRandom loss of chromosomesND
14-069RCUD73F46,XX46,XX
14-072RAEB II55MFailed46,XY,del(6)(q23q26) [5]
14-079RAEB II75MFailed46,XY
14-080RCMD74M46,XY38~43,XY,del(7)(p21p22) [3]
14-081Del(5q)67F46,XX,del(5)(q12q34) [5], 46,XX.ish del(5)(q31.2q33)(CDC25C-,EGR1-,RPS14-)46,XX
FISH negative for del(5)(q31.2q33)
14-083RCUD54F46,XX46,XX
14-086 RCMD49F46,XX,del(12)(p12) [3]46,XX
14-089 RCUD70MFailed31~46,XY
14-090 RCUD59F46,XX,del(11)(q22q24) [7]46,XX
15-001 RCMD65F46,XX46,XX
15-015 RAEB I66M46,XY46,XY
15-017RCMD50M46,XY,+1933~46,XY
15-018RCUD62M46,XY46,XY

RCUD: refractory cytopenia with unilineage dysplasia, RAEB: refractory anaemia with excess blasts, RCMD: refractory cytopenia with multilineage dysplasia, and ND: no analyzable metaphases obtained.
3.2. Morphology and Differentiation Potential of MDS-MSCs

Culture-expanded MDS-MSCs of all MDS subtypes and controls showed fibroblast-like, thin spindle-shaped cell morphology (Figure 1(a)). Both control and MDS-MSCs demonstrated adipogenic differentiation as confirmed by the formation of lipid vacuoles stained with Oil Red O after 15 days. Lipid vacuole formation was observed from day 5 onwards after the addition of adipogenic media. All MSCs showed osteogenic differentiation after 21 days as confirmed by staining with alizarin S for calcium deposits (Figure 1(b)). MSCs isolated from all subtypes of MDS patients were capable of differentiating into adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation cell lineages.

3.3. MSC Immunophenotype after Expansion

MSCs of all patients and controls were positive for CD90 (≥95%), CD73 (≥80%), and CD105 (≥75%) and were negative for CD34 and CD45 (<2%) (supplementary Figures and (in Supplementary Material available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/8012716) for representative FACs plots). Expression of positive markers was analyzed according to the MDS subtype and the expression profile for each subtype was categorized as follows: negative: 0–2%, low: 3–20%, medium 21–50%, medium high: 51–80%, and high: >80% (Figure 2). All MSCs isolated from controls and MDS subtypes showed high positivity for CD90 with >95% mean percentage of positive cells (control: %, RCUD: %, RCMD: %, RAEB: %) and high fluorescent intensity (4th logarithmic decade) (supplementary Figure ). For CD73, mean expression frequencies were control %, RCMD %, RCUD %, and RAEB %. In RCMD the percentage of positive cells was low compared to the other subtypes and showed variations in expression levels of CD73 in terms of intensity (101–104 intensity units). CD105 expression was high in RCMD (>92.6 ± 1.2%) compared to that of control (%), RCUD (%), and RAEB (%) (Figure 2).

3.4. Proliferation Pattern of MDS-MSCs

Growth curves of MDS-MSCs and control MSCs showed a lag period at 1-2 days of culture and reached an exponential growth at 2–10 days followed by a stationary phase at 10–14 days (Figure 3(a)). Population doubling times (PDT) were hours (h) for controls and  h for MDS-MSCs (). PDTs for each subtype were RCUD  h, RCMD  h, RAEB  h, and del(5q)  h (Figure 3(b)). The PDTs obtained for MDS subtypes were not significantly different from PDT obtained for controls (). Mean CFU-F frequency of MDS-MSCs was /100 cells (range: 7–41; ) and that of controls was /100 cells (range: 8–35; ) (supplementary Figure ). CFU-F frequencies of MDS-MSCs were not significantly different from that of control MSCs ().

3.5. Cytogenetic Analysis of Cultured MDS-MSCs

Normal karyotypes were present in 63% (11/16) of the patient MSCs. 31% (5/16) of the patient MSCs showed abnormal karyotypes (Table 1) including random loss of chromosomes. Three of 5 RCMD patients (60%), 1/6 (16.7%) of RCUD, and 1/3 (33.3%) of RAEB patients had these abnormalities in their MSCs. Of 16 samples karyotyped one culture of MSCs from RCUD patient failed to yield any analyzable metaphase spreads.

The aberrations were seen in chromosomes 3, 6, and 7 (Figure 4(a)). Two RCMD and one RAEB patient showed structural abnormalities. One patient diagnosed with RCMD was found to have a derivative of chromosome three with the karyotype, 46,XX,der(3) in eight spreads. MSCs of another patient with RCMD was found to have deletion in the short arm of the chromosome 7 (38~43,XY,del(7)(p21p22)) in addition to the observation of randomly missing chromosomes in most of the metaphase spreads. The RAEB patient with abnormal karyotype had 46,XY,del(6)(q23q26). These patients did not show chromosomal aberrations in their BM karyotypes. The four MDS patients with abnormal BM karyotypes did not show same or any structural abnormality in their MSCs except random loss of chromosomes in one patient (15-017). The karyotype of MSCs of the del 5q patient (whose BM karyotype and FISH were positive for deletion 5q) was normal (46,XX) and the finding was confirmed by FISH analysis of MSCs with two red and two green signals (Figure 4(b)). Loss of chromosome material was observed in most of the MSC spreads. Culture-expanded MSCs of controls showed normal karyotypes.

4. Discussion

BM-MSCs are key components in the bone marrow microenvironment which regulate functioning niche of hematopoietic stem cells through direct cellular interactions and by secretion of regulatory factors [24]. Some researches have shown that the stromal cell layers derived from MDS marrow are normal while the others declare on their inability to maintain the normal hematopoiesis [1016, 3538]. Further, variations in the disease biology and genetic profiles among different ethnicities have been reported [2428]. Hence it is important to further investigate whether the MSCs in MDS marrow are normal or not. Studying biological characteristics of MDS-MSCs obtained from different populations certainly expand our current knowledge on complex marrow stroma and its role in pathophysiology of MDS. Therefore, with the primary aim of elucidating phenotypic and cytogenetic characteristics of BM-MSCs derived from MDS and to compare these characteristics of MSCs of different MDS subtypes we carried out this study on a group of newly diagnosed de novo MDS patients. This study was done on a South Asian MDS group, Sri Lankan primary MDS patients who have not been reported previously in the literature. Hence the study contributes to the global understanding of MSCs by providing data on yet unreported population.

Sixty-nine MDS patients have been reported in Sri Lanka in the year of 2007 according to the latest publication of National Cancer Registry published by the Ministry of Health, Sri Lanka [39]. The study was done on a representative sample () of Sri Lankan de novo MDS patients reported to four main hospitals in Colombo area during the period of 2013–2015.

Isolated MDS-MSCs and control MSCs were assessed for characteristics of MSCs as defined by the International Society for Cellular Therapy (ISCT) [1]. Culture-expanded MDS-MSCs showed plastic adherence and fibroblast like spindle shaped cell morphology. In keeping with the published literature cell morphology of MDS-MSCs was similar to that of control MSCs and to the morphology reported in literature [1, 2, 31]. Furthermore, MSCs derived from MDS subtypes and controls were able to differentiate into osteogenic and adipogenic lineages. The results suggest that the MDS-MSCs are comparable to controls with respect to cell morphology and differentiation ability and are consistent with previous studies done in other populations [9, 12, 14, 15]. It was not possible to maintain two of the primary cultures (patient numbers 13-014 and 14-054) which were contaminated after 4-5 days and two other cultures (patient numbers 13-001 and 14-050, whose morphological assessment and differentiation studies were done) due to contaminations at passage 2 and excluded from further experiments.

The data available on functional properties of MDS derived MSCs are contradictory. Some researches have shown that the MSC layers derived from MDS patients are able to support the growth of mononuclear cells or hematopoietic progenitor cells at least for many weeks in culture [10, 12, 15]. Flores-Figueroa et al. in 2008 showed that MDS derived MSCs are able to sustain the growth and development of hematopoietic cells as efficiently as normal MSCs as evident by the production of myeloid cells throughout their culture period [15]. In contrast, some other researches have shown that MSCs of MDS exhibit defective hematopoietic supportive capacity compared to healthy MSCs [13, 37, 40]. Many studies have shown deficient growth characteristics in MDS derived MSCs compared to the healthy cells [14, 37, 4042]. MSCs isolated from MDS patients have previously shown decreased growth and proliferative capacities with increased population doubling time and low proliferation rates with increased apoptosis [3538]. In contrast, in our study the growth characteristics of MDS-MSCs were similar to that of control MSCs in terms of growth rates and PDTs. No significant difference was observed between the MDS-MSCs and control MSCs (). Further, the MSCs derived from all subtypes adhered to the flask between 15 and 48 hours after seeding P3 cells at log phase and showed exponential growth from day 2 to day 10. We did not observe significant changes in the in vitro growth characteristics of MSCs derived from MDS subtypes (RCUD, RCMD, RAEB, and del(5q)) in terms of PDTs (). Further, CFU-F frequencies of P2 MDS-MSCs were not significantly different from that of control MSCs ().

CD markers have shown to be important in hematological disorders [19]. Researches have reported the varied expression of surface CD markers of MSCs in disease states [19, 20]. Researches have identified the possible involvement of CD73 in MSC differentiation via A2AR ( adenosine receptor) signaling [43]. CD105 which is a glycoprotein has a role in angiogenesis and has strong interactions with TGF-beta signaling and thus has a role in cancer development [44]. The expression patterns of these markers in disease conditions deserve attention due to their regulatory roles in cancer development and possible use in cancer therapy [45]. While some studies show that MDS-MSCs express normal levels of CD73, CD90, and CD105 [14, 15] some researchers have observed decreased levels of CD90 and CD105 expression in MDS-MSCs [19, 20]. Campioni et al. in 2006 reported that the cultured BM-MSCs of patients with hematological malignancies express CD90 and CD105 in lower frequencies compared to the normal BM-MSCs [19] and in another study they proposed that the low CD90 expression on BM-MSCs might be related to the deficiency in immunomodulatory properties of MSCs on T cell proliferation [20]. However in our study, the percentage of cells of P2 MDS-MSCs that express CD90 was very high (>95%) and was comparable to controls. Further, the mean fluorescent intensity for CD90 expressed by MDS-MSCs was also very high (4th logarithmic decade). RCMD-MSCs demonstrated low CD73 and high CD105 expression frequencies with variations in the expression levels (101–104 intensity units) compared to the control MSCs and MSCs of other MDS subtypes. The variations observed in expression pattern of positive markers may have a clinical significance in the pathogenesis of MDS. However, these findings need to be validated with higher patient numbers. The inconsistencies in MSC immunophenotypic profiles reported in literature may be due to differences in culture conditions including culture media used by different laboratories or may be due to the heterogeneity of MDS patients.

Identification of cytogenetic profiles of MSCs in MDS is important to determine the cause of functional differences in marrow stroma in MDS. Here we analyzed the karyotypes of culture-expanded MDS-MSCs. To optimize the karyotyping protocol for MSCs, we tested different colcemid exposure times: 2 hr, 5 hr, and overnight (12–14 hr). The overnight (12–14 hours) incubation with colcemid yielded the highest number of analyzable metaphase spreads and was considered as the optimum for MSCs in our laboratory conditions. This result also supports the findings by Muntión et al. in which they have found that 15 hour colcemid exposure time as the optimum for MSC karyotyping [46].

Detection of chromosomal abnormalities in MDS-MSCs in the absence of BM karyotypic abnormalities is an important finding in this study. These abnormalities were particularly observed in RCMD patients (60%, 3/5). Of MSCs studied, 31% (5/16) were cytogenetically abnormal and included structural and numerical abnormalities with loss of chromosomes. The percentage of presence of structural chromosomal aberrations in MDS derived MSCs is found to be low in some studies [21, 22], while there are other reports that claim for higher rates of having abnormal MSCs in MDS [12, 23]. In Blau et al. research in 2011 on MDS/AML patients it was found that the presence of genetic abnormalities was as low as 16% of the patients studied [21]. According to Kim et al. the detection of chromosomal aberrations in marrow stromal cells was only 5% (1/21) MDS patients studied [22]. In contrast Song et al. in 2012 have observed higher rates of cytogenetic aberrations (68% (15/22)) in MDS derived MSCs [23]. A study by Flores-Figueroa reported that 55.5% (5/9) of MDS-MSCs as having cytogenetic abnormalities [12]. In our patient group the detection of cytogenetic aberrations were moderate (31%) which is higher than some of the previous studies [21, 22] but lower than some other reports [12, 23].

The observed structural abnormalities included 46,XX,der(3) and 46,XY,del(7)(p21p22) in two RCMD patients and 46,XY,del(6)(q23q26) in a RAEB II patient. Only a very few studies describe the structural genetic aberrations of MSCs in relation to MDS. One study describing chromosomal abnormalities in MSCs by Blau et al. in 2007 reported structural abnormalities in MSCs including a derivative 7 and del(3)(p21) [9]. In another study same group had found del(7q) in their MDS/AML MSC populations [21]. Aberrations of chromosomes 3 and 7 in HSC compartment are found to be present in MDS [47]. Recent finding suggests that MDS patients with interchanged or inverted pieces chromosome 3 has higher risk of evolving into AML [47]. Deletion 6q results in loss of tumor suppressor genes and is commonly seen in lymphoid malignancies [47]. Here we report the presence of aberrant chromosome 3 and deletions in chromosomes 6 and 7 in MDS-MSCs which may have implications on the functioning of these cells in hematopoiesis and pathogenesis of MDS [9].

Previous studies report that the cytogenetic abnormalities are predominantly present in MSCs in those cases with chromosomal abnormalities in their hematopoietic counterpart [9, 12]. It has been also reported that the aberration rate was lower (33%) in MSCs of patients with normal karyotypes [22]. Interestingly, in this study we observed chromosomal aberrations in MSCs of MDS patients with normal BM karyotypes. Similarly, the three patients who had chromosomal abnormalities in their BM karyotypes did not show cytogenetic alterations in their MSC karyotypes. This includes the del(5q) patient whose MSCs exhibited a normal karyotype with FISH being negative for deletion 5q31.2/5q33. Hence we believe presence of chromosomal aberrations in MSCs could be regarded as an independent event and our findings may not support the idea that MSCs in MDS are derived from the same “neoplastic clone” even though such a possibility cannot be ruled out.

We also observed that most of the spreads showed randomly missing chromosomes and loss of chromosome material. This was particularly observed in three samples (RCUD, RCMD, and RAEB) where more than 90% of the spreads captured had missing chromosomes. Flores-Figueroa et al. and Blau et al. in their studies reported the presence of chromosomal aberrations in MDS derived MSCs involving loss of chromosomal material [9, 12]. Loss of chromosomal material could be evidence of genetic instability of MDS derived MSCs and may suggest the potential involvement in the pathogenesis of MDS.

It was reported that the MSCs cultured from the normal bone marrow show normal karyotypes after many passages [48]. However, we do not rule out the possibility of developing genomic changes under different culture conditions. Hence to avoid such possibilities, two independent cultures were set from passage 3 cells which contained more homogeneous cell population.

5. Conclusions

This study shows that MSC morphology, positivity to MSC CD markers, and differentiation ability remain unchanged in de novo MDS. MDS-MSCs demonstrated karyotypic abnormalities independent of BM karyotypes. RCMD patients showed higher degree of presence of abnormalities in their MSC populations with low CD73 and high CD105 expression frequencies compared to the MSCs of controls and other subtypes. Further, in contrast to some previous reports here we show that the CD90 expression on BM-MSCs of all subtypes is very high and is comparable to control-MSCs. Presence of distinct genetic abnormalities compared to their corresponding hematopoietic counterpart in MDS stromal cells supports the view that the occurrence of genetic abnormalities in MSC compartment in MDS could be an autonomous event from that of their hematopoietic counterparts. While this study supports and confirms previously published data in relation to the morphology, immunophenotype, and differentiation ability of MDS-MSCs, this study also emphasizes the importance of studying MDS subtypes separately as MDS subtype dependent variations were observed in CD marker expression levels and cytogenetic profiles. Even though variabilities of methodologies of isolation and expansion or culture conditions cannot be ruled out as causes for contradictory data from different MDS-MSC research groups, one of the main reasons as we believe is the heterogeneity of the MDS disease biology and the distinct pathophysiology of MDS subtypes. Therefore more and more data on MDS derived MSCs of different populations and data on MDS subtypes are required in order to clarify the existing controversies. Taken together, the study has implications on expanding our knowledge on morphological and clinical heterogeneity of MSCs in MDS.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by a grant from the University Grants Commission, Sri Lanka. The authors would like to thank the staff of the Human Genetics Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, National Hospital of Sri Lanka, Colombo North Teaching Hospital, Ragama, Colombo South Teaching Hospital, Kalubowila, and the National Cancer Institute, Maharagama, and consultant hematologists.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary figure 1and figure 2 show the CD marker expression plots of MSCs derived from representative MDS patients. The forward scatter versus side scatter dot plot shows the gate of the MSC population (R1). The MDS-MSCs were positive for CD73, CD90 and CD105 and were negative for CD34 and CD45 surface markers.

CFU-F assay results for MDS-MSCs and control-MSCs are shown in supplementary figure 3. Mean CFU-F frequency of MDS-MSCs was 19.63±4.91 (range: 7-41; n = 16) and that of controls was 17.93 ± 4.25 (range: 8-35; n = 5). CFU-F frequencies of MDS-MSCs were not significantly different from that of control MSCs (p > 0.05).

  1. Supplementary Material

References

  1. M. Dominici, K. Le Blanc, I. Mueller et al., “Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement,” Cytotherapy, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 315–317, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. C. Pontikoglou, F. Deschaseaux, L. Sensebé, and H. A. Papadaki, “Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells: biological properties and their role in hematopoiesis and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation,” Stem Cell Reviews and Reports, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 569–589, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. E. Beutler, M. A. Litchman, B. Coller, T. Kipps, and U. Seligsohn, Willams Hematology, McGraw-Hill Education, New York, NY, USA, 6th edition, 2001.
  4. C. Nombela-Arrieta, J. Ritz, and L. E. Silberstein, “The elusive nature and function of mesenchymal stem cells,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 126–131, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. S. Aizawa, M. Nakano, O. Iwase et al., “Bone marrow stroma from refractory anemia of myelodysplastic syndrome is defective in its ability to support normal CD34-positive cell proliferation and differentiation in vitro,” Leukemia Research, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 239–246, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. E. D. Warlick and B. D. Smith, “Myelodysplastic syndromes: review of pathophysiology and current novel treatment approaches,” Current Cancer Drug Targets, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 541–558, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. R. Kurzrock, “Myelodysplastic syndrome overview,” Seminars in Hematology, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 18–25, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  8. M. Wetzler, R. Kurzrock, Z. Estrov, E. Estey, and M. Talpaz, “Cytokine expression in adherent layers from patients with myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myelogenous leukemia,” Leukemia Research, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 23–34, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. O. Blau, W.-K. Hofmann, C. D. Baldus et al., “Chromosomal aberrations in bone marrow mesenchymal stroma cells from patients with myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloblastic leukemia,” Experimental Hematology, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 221–229, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. V. Soenen-Cornu, C. Tourino, M.-L. Bonnet et al., “Mesenchymal cells generated from patients with myelodysplastic syndromes are devoid of chromosomal clonal markers and support short- and long-term hematopoiesis in vitro,” Oncogene, vol. 24, no. 15, pp. 2441–2448, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. A. Ramakrishnan, N. Awaya, E. Bryant, and B. Torok-Storb, “The stromal component of the marrow microenvironment is not derived from the malignant clone in MDS,” Blood, vol. 108, supplement 1, pp. 772–773, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. E. Flores-Figueroa, R. M. Arana-Trejo, G. Gutiérrez-Espíndola, A. Pérez-Cabrera, and H. Mayani, “Mesenchymal stem cells in myelodysplastic syndromes: phenotypic and cytogenetic characterization,” Leukemia Research, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 215–224, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. G. Varga, J. Kiss, J. Várkonyi et al., “Inappropriate notch activity and limited mesenchymal stem cell plasticity in the bone marrow of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes,” Pathology & Oncology Research, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 311–319, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. M. Klaus, E. Stavroulaki, M.-C. Kastrinaki et al., “Reserves, functional, immunoregulatory, and cytogenetic properties of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes,” Stem Cells and Development, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 1043–1054, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. E. Flores-Figueroa, J. J. Montesinosa, P. Flores-Guzmána et al., “Functional analysis of myelodysplastic syndromes-derived mesenchymal stem cells,” Leukemia Research, vol. 32, pp. 1407–1416, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  16. K. Pavlaki, C. G. Pontikoglou, A. Demetriadou et al., “Impaired proliferative potential of bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes is associated with abnormal WNT signaling pathway,” Stem Cells and Development, vol. 23, no. 14, pp. 1568–1581, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. H. J. Deeg, C. Beckham, M. R. Loken et al., “Negative regulators of hemopoiesis and stroma function in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome,” Leukemia and Lymphoma, vol. 37, no. 3-4, pp. 405–414, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  18. M.-C. Kastrinaki, K. Pavlaki, A. K. Batsali et al., “Mesenchymal stem cells in immune-mediated bone marrow failure syndromes,” Clinical and Developmental Immunology, vol. 2013, Article ID 265608, 10 pages, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. D. Campioni, S. Moretti, L. Ferrari, M. Punturieri, G. L. Castoldi, and F. Lanza, “Immunophenotypic heterogeneity of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells from patients with hematologic disorders: correlation with bone marrow microenvironment,” Haematologica, vol. 91, no. 3, pp. 364–368, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  20. D. Campioni, R. Rizzo, M. Stignani et al., “A decreased positivity for CD90 on human mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) is associated with a loss of immunosuppressive activity by MSCs,” Cytometry Part B—Clinical Cytometry, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 225–230, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. O. Blau, C. D. Baldus, W.-K. Hofmann et al., “Mesenchymal stromal cells of myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia patients have distinct genetic abnormalities compared with leukemic blasts,” Blood, vol. 118, no. 20, pp. 5583–5592, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. Y. Kim, D. W. Jekarl, J. Kim et al., “Genetic and epigenetic alterations of bone marrow stromal cells in myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia patients,” Stem Cell Research, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 177–184, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. L.-X. Song, J. Guo, Q. He et al., “Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in myelodysplastic syndromes: cytogenetic characterization,” Acta Haematologica, vol. 128, no. 3, pp. 170–177, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. H.-F. Tien, C.-H. Wang, S.-M. Chuang et al., “Cytogenetic studies, ras mutation, and clinical characteristics in primary myelodysplastic syndrome: a study on 68 Chinese patients in Taiwan,” Cancer Genetics and Cytogenetics, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 40–49, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. W. Intragumtornchai, D. Swasdikul, N. Suwanwela et al., “Myelodysplastic syndrome in Thailand: a retrospective pathologic and clinical analysis of 117 cases,” Leukemia Research, vol. 21, supplement 1, p. S5, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  26. R. Chaubey, S. Sazawal, R. Dada, M. Mahapatra, and R. Saxena, “Cytogenetic profile of indian patients with de novo myelodysplastic syndromes,” Indian Journal of Medical Research, vol. 134, no. 10, pp. 452–457, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  27. A. Rashid, M. Khurshid, U. Shaikh, and S. Adil, “Chromosomal abnormalities in primary myelodysplastic syndrome,” Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan, vol. 24, no. 9, pp. 632–635, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  28. H. Xiong, X. Y. Yang, J. Han, Q. Wang, and Z. L. Zou, “Cytokine expression patterns and mesenchymal stem cell karyotypes from the bone marrow microenvironment of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes,” Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 207–213, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. B. Chen, W.-L. Zhao, J. Jin et al., “Clinical and cytogenetic features of 508 Chinese patients with myelodysplastic syndrome and comparison with those in Western countries,” Leukemia, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 767–775, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. S.-W. Jung, S.-Y. Lee, D.-W. Jekarl et al., “Cytogenetic characteristics and prognosis analysis in 231 myelodysplastic syndrome patients from a single institution,” Leukemia Research, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 735–740, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. D. C. Colter, R. Class, C. M. DiGirolamo, and D. J. Prockop, “Rapid expansion of recycling stem cells in cultures of plastic-adherent cells from human bone marrow,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 97, no. 7, pp. 3213–3218, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. Y. Gao, Z. Zhu, Y. Zhao, J. Hua, Y. Ma, and W. Guan, “Multilineage potential research of bovine amniotic fluid mesenchymal stem cells,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 3698–3710, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. H. Castro-Malaspina, R. E. Gay, G. Resnick et al., “Characterization of human bone marrow fibroblast colony-forming cells (CFU-F) and their progeny,” Blood, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 289–301, 1980. View at: Google Scholar
  34. L. G. Shaffer, J. McGowan-Jordan, and M. Schimd, ISCN 2013: An International System for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature, Karger, Basel, Switzerland, 2013.
  35. G. B. Tennant, V. Walsh, L. N. Truran, P. Edwards, K. I. Mills, and A. K. Burnett, “Abnormalities of adherent layers grown from bone marrow of patients with myelodysplasia,” British Journal of Haematology, vol. 111, no. 3, pp. 853–862, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. G. B. Tennant, L. N. Truran, A. K. Burnett, and A. Kenneth, “Reduced growth of normal myeloid progenitors on MDS stroma is unrelated to confluence,” British Journal of Haematology, vol. 93, supplement 2, p. 66, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  37. S. Geyh, S. Öz, R.-P. Cadeddu et al., “Insufficient stromal support in MDS results from molecular and functional deficits of mesenchymal stromal cells,” Leukemia, vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 1841–1851, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. M.-C. Kastrinaki, C. Pontikoglou, M. Klaus, E. Stavroulaki, K. Pavlaki, and H. A. Papadaki, “Biologic characteristics of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in myelodysplastic syndromes,” Current Stem Cell Research and Therapy, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 122–130, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. Cancer Incidence Data: Sri Lanka, 2007, Ministry of Health, Sri Lanka, http://www.health.gov.lk/en/publication/cancer/Cancer%20Registry%202007%20final%20version.pdf.
  40. Z.-G. Zhao, W. Xu, H.-P. Yu et al., “Functional characteristics of mesenchymal stem cells derived from bone marrow of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes,” Cancer Letters, vol. 317, no. 2, pp. 136–143, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. O. Lopez-Villar, J. L. Garcia, F. M. Sanchez-Guijo et al., “Both expanded and uncultured mesenchymal stem cells from MDS patients are genomically abnormal, showing a specific genetic profile for the 5q- syndrome,” Leukemia, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 664–672, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. C. M. Aanei, P. Flandrin, F. Zugun Eloae et al., “Intrinsic growth deficiencies of mesenchymal stromal cells in myelodysplastic syndromes,” Stem Cells and Development, vol. 21, no. 10, pp. 1604–1615, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. A. Ode, J. Schoon, A. Kurtz et al., “CD73/5′-ecto-nucleotidase acts as a regulatory factor in osteo-/chondrogenic differentiation of mechanically stimulated mesenchymal stromal cells,” European Cells and Materials, vol. 25, pp. 37–47, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  44. S. E. Duff, C. Li, J. M. Garland, and S. Kumar, “CD105 is important for angiogenesis: evidence and potential applications,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 984–992, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. Z.-W. Gao, K. Dong, and H.-Z. Zhang, “The roles of CD73 in cancer,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2014, Article ID 460654, 9 pages, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. S. Muntión, F. M. Sánchez-Guijo, S. Carrancio et al., “Optimisation of mesenchymal stromal cells karyotyping analysis: implications for clinical use,” Transfusion Medicine, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 122–127, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. J.-L. Huret, M. Ahmad, M. Arsaban et al., “Atlas of genetics and cytogenetics in oncology and haematology,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. D920–D924, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. M. Reyes, T. Lund, T. Lenvik, D. Aguiar, L. Koodie, and C. M. Verfaillie, “Purification and ex vivo expansion of postnatal human marrow mesodermal progenitor cells,” Blood, vol. 98, pp. 2615–2625, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2016 A. J. I. S. Rathnayake et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views1109
Downloads506
Citations

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.