Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Materials Science and Engineering
Volume 2016, Article ID 5368635, 13 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/5368635
Research Article

Measurement of Surface Damage through Boundary Detection: An Approach to Assess Durability of Cementitious Composites under Tannery Wastewater

Department of Civil Engineering, BUET, Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh

Received 22 April 2016; Revised 19 June 2016; Accepted 28 June 2016

Academic Editor: Gonzalo Martínez-Barrera

Copyright © 2016 Tanvir Manzur et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. T. Ramasami, S. Rajamani, and J. Raghavarao, “Pollution control in leather industry: emerging technological options,” in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Surface and Colloidal Science and Its Relevance to Soil Pollution, Madras, India, March 1994.
  2. J. Skalny, J. Marchard, and I. Odler, Sulfate Attack on Concrete, Spon Press, Taylor & Francis Group, London, UK, 2002.
  3. P. W. Brown, “An evaluation of the sulfate resistance of cements in a controlled environment,” Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 11, no. 5-6, pp. 719–727, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. F. M. Lea, “The action of ammonium salts on concrete,” Magazine of Concrete Research, vol. 17, no. 52, pp. 115–116, 1965. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. I. Biczok, Concrete Corrosion and Concrete Protection, Akademiai Kiado, Budapest, Hungary, 1972.
  6. “Standard specification for standard sand,” Tech. Rep. ASTM C778-13, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pa, USA, 2013.
  7. S. Saha and S. A. Papry, Assessment of cement mortar degradation when exposed to tannery wastewater [Undergraduate thesis], Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology, 2016.
  8. M. Bosnic, J. Buljan, and R. P. Daniles, Pollutants in Tannery Effluents, UNIDO, Vienna, Austria, 2000.
  9. S. L. Sultana, S. Mahmud, and T. Manzur, “Review on possible detrimental effects of tannery wastewater constituents on concrete,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Civil Infrastructure and Construction Materials (CICM '15), MIST, Dhaka, Bangladesh, December 2015.
  10. “Standard test method for compressive strength of hydraulic cement mortars,” Tech. Rep. ASTM C109/C109M-13e1, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pa, USA, 2013.
  11. C. O. Casado, Image Contrast Enhancement Methods, Research Project, Faculty of Telecommunications, Department of Radio Communications and Video Technologies, Technical University, Sofia, Bulgaria, 2010.
  12. Mathworks, January 2016, http://www.mathworks.com/help/images.
  13. V. Kumar and P. Gupta, “Importance of statistical measures in digital image processing,” International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering, vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 56–62, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  14. R. Hidayat and R. Green, Real-Time Texture Boundary Detection from Ridges in the Standard Deviation Space, Computer Science and Software Engineering Department, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. M. Mastriani and A. E. Giraldez, “Enhanced directional smoothing algorithm for edge-preserving smoothing of synthetic-aperture radar images,” Journal of Measurement Science Review, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 1–11, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  16. A. Ito, Y. Aoki, and S. Hashimoto, “Accurate extraction and measurement of fine cracks from concrete block surface image,” in Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, pp. 2202–2207, Sevilla, Spain, November 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. R. Garg and A. Kumar, “Comparision of various noise removals using bayesian framework,” International Journal of Modern Engineering Research, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 265–270, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  18. F. A. Jassim, “Semi-optimal edge detector based on simple standard deviation with adjusted thresholding,” International Journal of Computer Applications, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 43–48, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. R. C. Gonzalez and R. E. Woods, Digital Image Processing, Prentice Hall, New York, NY, USA, 2002.
  20. I. Sobel, “An isotropic 3×3 gradient operator,” in Machine Vision for Three-Dimensional Scenes, H. Freeman, Ed., pp. 376–379, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  21. D. Rana and S. Dalai, “Review on traditional methods of edge detection to morphological based techniques,” International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technologies, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 5915–5920, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  22. K. Wang and W. Dai, “Approach of image edge detection based on Sobel operators and grey relation,” Computer Applications, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 1035–1036, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  23. M. Juneja and P. S. Sandhu, “Performance evaluation of edge detection techniques for images in spatial domain,” International Journal of Computer Theory and Engineering, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 614–621, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. M. S. Sri and M. Narayana, “Edge detection by using lookup table,” International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 483–488, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  25. N. Senthilkumaran and R. Rajesh, “A study on edge detection methods for image segmentation,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Mathematics and Computer Science (ICMCS '09), vol. 1, pp. 255–259, 2009.
  26. K. Sharma and N. Kaur, “Comparative analysis of various edge detection techniques,” International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Software Engineering, vol. 3, no. 12, pp. 617–621, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  27. J. Canny, “A computational approach to edge detection,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 679–698, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. M. Kumar and S. Singh, “Edge detection and denoising medical image using morphology,” International Journal of Engineering Sciences & Emerging Technologies, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 66–72, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  29. P. Dhankhar and N. Sahu, “A review and research of edge detection techniques for image segmentation,” International Journal of Computer Science and Mobile Computing, vol. 2, no. 7, pp. 86–92, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  30. A. M. Raid, W. M. Khedr, M. A. El-dosuky, and M. Aoud, “Image restoration based on morphological operations,” International Journal of Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 9–21, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar