Microstructural and Electrical Properties of Sn-Modified BaTiO3 Lead-Free Ceramics by Two-Step Sintering Method
Ba(Ti0.92Sn0.08)O3 lead-free ceramics were prepared using a two-step sintering (TSS) technique. Varying the first sintering temperature T1 (1400 and 1500°C) and the dwell time t1 (0, 15, and 30 min), we obtained dense ceramics which were then soaked at a constant temperature of 1000°C (T2) for 6 h (t2). The structural and electrical properties were investigated. XRD results indicated that all the ceramics showed a pure perovskite phase with tetragonal symmetry. Density and grain size increased with higher T1 temperatures and increased t1 dwell times. Enhanced electrical properties were achieved by sintering at the optimized T1 sintering temperature and t1 dwelling time. At the lower T1 sintering temperature of 1400°C, the dielectric and piezoelectric properties and the Curie temperature of the ceramics were improved significantly by increasing t1 dwell time. Further, increasing the sintering temperature T1 to 1500°C, excellent properties were obtained at t1 = 15 min which then deteriorated when t1 was increased to 30 min. The electrical properties of the sample sintered under the T1/t1/T2/t2 condition of “1500/15/1000/6” showed the best values. For this sample the piezoelectric coefficient (d33), dielectric permittivity (εr), loss factor (tanδ), and Curie temperature (TC) were 490 pC/N, 4385, 0.0272, and 48°C, respectively.
Because of the high toxicity of lead oxide, the use of Pb(ZrxTi1−x)O3-based materials has caused serious environmental problems. Hence, the development of piezoelectric materials has focused considerable attention in recent years on lead-free materials which exhibit highly piezoelectric properties [1–4]. Barium titanate (BaTiO3) is a lead-free ferroelectric material currently used to replace Pb(ZrxTi1−x)O3 piezoelectric ceramics in electronic devices (d33 = 191 pC/N) . It is a typical ferroelectric material with a tetragonal symmetry of perovskite structure at room temperature . It is known that an appropriate amount of doping into the BaTiO3 can produce piezoelectricity comparable with Pb(ZrxTi1−x)O3-based ceramics [5–9]. Among modified BaTiO3 composites, barium stannate titanate (BaTi1−xSnxO3) can modify both the microstructure and electrical properties of BaTiO3 . Enhanced piezoelectric properties have been reported for Ba0.90Ca0.10Ti1−xSnxO3 ceramics with a super-high d33 (521 pC/N) at x = 0.10 . However, the densification of Ba0.90Ca0.10Ti1−xSnxO3 ceramics requires sintering for 2 h at temperatures above 1400°C, which is too high for low-temperature cofired ceramics (LTCC) processing.
The two-step sintering process is heating rate-controlled and effectively densifies the ceramics at lower temperatures. For this method, samples are heated to a higher temperature (T1) and held at T1 for a short time t1, then the temperature is immediately lowered to a soaking temperature, T2. The process can eliminate pores and reduce the volatilization of the low melting point substances . In the present work, Ba(Ti1−xSnx)O3 ceramics at x = 0.08 were fabricated using the two-step sintering method to control grain growth, and the effects of sintering temperature and dwell time on the phase structure, microstructure, and electrical properties of the fabricated ceramics were systematically investigated.
2. Materials and Method
Ba(Ti1−xSnx)O3 (abbreviated as BTS: x = 0.08) lead-free ceramics were synthesized by a solid-state method using BaCO3 (99.9%), TiO2 (99.9%), and SnO2 (99.9%) as raw materials. All starting powders were ball milled in alcohol using zirconia balls for 24 h. After calcination at 1200°C for 2 h, the obtained powders were uniaxially pressed into disk-shaped compacts and then sintered using a two-step sintering method with the following profile. The green samples were first heated from room temperature to 900°C at a slow heating rate of 5°C/min and then to the sintering temperature T1 of either 1400 or 1500°C at a heating rate of 10°C/min and held for a short dwell time (t1) of 0, 15, or 30 min. To realize the desired final density and to control grain growth, the soaking temperature of the second stage, T2, was set lower than T1 at 1000°C with a cooling rate of 20°C/min, and the soaking time (t2) at T2 was 6 h. The symbols “T1/t1/T2/t2” are used to indicate the two-step sintering conditions.
The crystalline phases of the sintered samples were characterized with a powder X-ray diffractometer (XRD, X’Pert MPD, Philips) with CuKα radiation generated at 40 kV and 30 mA. The density of the sintered samples was measured using a water immersion method in accordance with Archimedes’ principle. The microstructure of the ceramic surfaces was examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Quanta400, FEI). The intercept method was used to determine the average grain size. For electrical characterizations, the ceramic samples were carefully polished and painted with silver paste on both sides. The dielectric properties were measured using a high precision LCR meter (LCR 821, GW INSTEK) from 25°C to 200°C at a heating rate of 3°C/min. To measure their piezoelectric properties, the ceramic samples were poled at room temperature (25°C) for 20 min under an electric field of 1.0–4.0 kV/mm in a silicone oil bath. The piezoelectric coefficient d33 was measured by a piezo-d33 meter (YE2730A d33 meter, APC International, Ltd.).
3. Results and Discussion
Figure 1 shows the XRD patterns of BTS samples sintered under “1500/t1/1000/6” conditions with different t1 dwell times of 0, 15, and 30 min at room temperature. It can be observed that all sintered samples showed a single perovskite structure with a tetragonal phase indicating that Sn4+ diffused into BaTiO3 lattices during sintering. The diffraction peaks showed slightly sharper at t1 of 15 min indicating an enhancement of crystallinity in the samples. Moreover, the intensity of the (111) diffraction peak of the sample sintered at t1 = 15 min was stronger than for other samples. The expanded XRD patterns of BTS ceramics in the 2θ range of 44.2–46.2° showed that the peak position shifted slightly to a higher angle with increasing dwell time t1, Fig. 1(b). In part this difference may relate to strain effects. The lattice parameters for samples with dwell time t1 = 0 and 15 min were a = 4.0232 and c = 4.0402 Å, whereas for samples with dwell time t1 = 30 min, they were a = 4.0190 and c = 4.0446 Å. It can also be seen that the intensity of the XRD peaks slightly decreased in response to decreased crystalline phase content, as well as increased lattice strain when t1 was increased to 30 min. Average crystallite size was calculated from the Debye–Scherrer formula :where D is crystallite size, λ is X-ray wavelength (0.15406 nm), β is full width at half maximum (FWHM) of peak in radians, and θ is Bragg’s angle. The average crystallite size increased with increasing dwell time up to 15 min and then remained constant as the value of t1 further increased to 30 min. It was found to be 34.2, 42.8, and 42.8 nm for dwell time t1 = 0, 15, and 30 min, respectively.
Figure 2 shows the microstructure of the BTS samples sintered under conditions of “T1/t1/1000/6” (T1 = 1400 and 1500°C; t1 = 0, 15, and 30 min). The SEM micrographs indicate that the microstructure is dependent on the sintering profile. At the lower sintering temperature (T1 = 1400°C) without dwell time (t1 = 0 min), well-sintered samples could not be obtained (SEM micrograph is not shown). At a dwell time of 30 min, the grain size increased rapidly and exhibited an abnormal grain growth. A relatively uniform grain size of 20.1 ± 3.4 µm could be achieved for samples sintered under the “1500/0/1000/6” condition. It is evident that the increase in the sintering temperature, T1, and dwelling time, t1, helped to promote grain growth. This is because the higher sintering temperature and dwell time can enlarge the diffusion coefficient and make grain boundary migration easier . In the present case, increasing the sintering temperature and dwell time improved densification as well as the grain growth. It can be seen in Table 1 that when the sintered samples underwent the same dwell time, t1, the bulk densities were increased by increasing the sintering temperature T1, whereas when the samples were sintered at the same sintering temperature T1, improvements in the relative density were recorded with correspondingly longer dwell times, t1. The optimal value of t1 dwell time depended significantly on the sintering temperature, T1. The highest density of 5.90 ± 0.01 g/cm3 was obtained when t1 = 15 min, and the density was slightly lower when t1 = 30 min. The densification of the BTS samples improved significantly at the higher sintering temperature T1 with the longer dwell time t1. In general, the two-step sintering technique not only effectively densified the ceramics, but also enabled sintering at a reduced temperature. For this work, the soaking temperature T2 was set at a low temperature of 1000°C. At higher temperatures and longer dwell times, grain boundary migration causes grain growth, while grain boundary diffusion can still be activated causing enhanced density . However, the density of the samples decreases if the dwell time exceeds the dwell time of the optimum sintering condition (“1500/30/1000/6”). Longer dwell time greatly influenced the porosity of the surface oxide layer with the surface getting more porous.
Figure 3 shows the temperature dependence of dielectric properties of the BTS ceramics as a function of sintering temperature, T1, and dwell time, t1. Increasing the sintering temperature and dwell time clearly increased the values of εr,RT up to the maximum value of 4385, which was attained when T1 was 1500°C and the dwell time 15 min. The value of εr,RT then decreased when t1 was increased to 30 min. This is due to an increase in grain size. The low dielectric loss of ≤2% indicated that these BTS ceramics sintered under two-step conditions are promising for practical applications. The temperature dependence of the dielectric permittivity (εr) of the BTS ceramics was also determined in order to characterize their phase transition behavior, as shown in Figure 3. The sintering temperature and dwell time also affected the Curie temperature. It can be seen that the tetragonal-cubic (or Curie temperature TC) phase transition temperatures all increased slightly at the higher sintering temperatures, T1, and longer dwell times, t1. The TC is shown in Table 1 as Tmax which showed the maximum value of dielectric permittivity. Since the sintering temperature and the dwell time (T1, t1) change the microstructure of ceramics, they have an important influence on the tetragonal-cubic phase transition temperature. It can be seen that the samples with bigger grain sizes exhibited higher TC values. This is attributed to the increased proportion of tetragonal phase and increased ferroelectricity of the ceramics. This result is consistent with other perovskite structure ceramics [14, 15]. The piezoelectric coefficient d33 as a function of sintering temperature, T1, and dwell time, t1, for the BTS ceramics, is also shown in Table 1. The d33 value increased with increasing sintering temperatures and dwell times, reached a maximum value of 490 pC/N at the “1500/15/1000/6” condition and then decreased at a dwell time of 30 min. At the longer dwell time, deflection in the stoichiometric composition and deterioration in the microstructure degraded the piezoelectric properties of the sample.
Two-step sintering was used to fabricate dense Ba(Ti, Sn)O3 ceramics at low sintering temperatures. The microstructural and electrical properties of the Ba(Ti0.92Sn0.08)O3 ceramics are obviously dependent on the sintering temperature (T1) and the dwelling time (t1). Under the optimal condition of “1500/15/1000/6,” the dense samples had an average grain size of approximately 30 μm and showed good dielectric and piezoelectric properties. Values for the piezoelectric constant (d33), relative permittivity (εr), loss factor (tanδ), and Curie temperature (TC) were 490 pC/N, 4385, 0.0272, and 48°C, respectively.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.
This research was financially supported by Prince of Songkla University under Contract no. SCI580905S.
J. Rödel, W. Jo, K. T. P. Seifert, E. M. Anton, T. Granzow, and D. Damjanovic, “Perspective on the development of lead-free piezoceramics,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, vol. 92, no. 6, pp. 1153–1157, 2009.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Saito, H. Takao, T. Tani et al., “Lead-free piezoceramics,” Nature, vol. 432, no. 7013, pp. 84–87, 2004.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. F. Liu and X. B. Ren, “Large piezoelectric effect in Pb-free ceramics,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 103, no. 25, p. 257602, 2009.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Datta and P. A. Thomas, “Structural investigation of a novel perovskite-based lead-free ceramics: xBiScO3–(1−x)BaTiO3,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 107, p. 043516, 2010.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. C. Lee and C. S. Chiang, “High dielectric constant of (Ba0.96Ca0.04)(Ti0.85Zr0.15)O3 multilayer ceramic capacitors with Cu doped Ni electrodes,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 509, no. 24, pp. 6973–6979, 2011.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Ogihara, C. A. Randall, and S. Trolier-McKinstry, “Weakly coupled relaxor behavior of BaTiO3–BiScO3 ceramics,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, vol. 92, no. 1, pp. 110–118, 2009.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Ma and X. Tan, “Morphotropic phase boundary and electrical properties of lead-free (1−x)BaTiO3–xBi(Li1/3Ti2/3)O3 ceramics,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 107, no. 12, p. 124108, 2010.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. J. Kim, M. H. Lee, J. S. Park, M.-H. Kim, and T. K. Song, “Effects of sintering temperature on the electric properties of Mn-modified BiFeO3-BaTiO3 bulk ceramics,” Journal of the Korean Physical Society, vol. 66, no. 7, pp. 1115–1119, 2015.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. V. Shvartsman, J. Dec, Z. K. Xu, J. Banys, P. Keburis, and W. K. Leemann, “Crossover from ferroelectric to relaxor behavior in BaTi1−xSnxO3 solid solutions,” Phase Transitions, vol. 81, no. 11-12, pp. 1013–1021, 2008.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Lin, K. W. Kwok, and H. L. W. Chan, “Structure, dielectric and piezoelectric properties of Ba0.90Ca0.10Ti1-xSnxO3 lead-free ceramics,” Ceramics International, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 6841–6846, 2014.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. L. Wang, K. J. Zhu, H. L. Ji, and J. H. Qiu, “Two-step sintering of the pure K0.5Na0.5NbO3 lead-free piezoceramics and its piezoelectric properties,” Ferroelectrics, vol. 392, no. 1, pp. 120–126, 2009.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Langford and A. Wilson, “Scherrer after sixty years: a survey and some new results in the determination of crystallite size,” Journal of Applied Crystallography, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 102-103, 1978.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. L. Cheng, W. C. Zhou, H. L. Du, F. Luo, and D. M. Zhu, “Effects of dwell time during sintering on electrical properties of 0.98(K0.5Na0.5)NbO3–0.02LaFeO3 ceramics,” Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 2984–2988, 2013.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. A. Kamel and G. de With, “Grain size effect on the poling of soft Pb(Zr, Ti)O3 ferroelectric ceramics,” Journal of European Ceramic Society, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 851–861, 2008.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. A. Randall, N. Kim, J. P. Kucera, W. W. Cao, and T. R. Shrout, “Intrinsic and extrinsic size effects in fine-grained morphotropic-phase boundary lead zirconate titanate ceramics,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 677–688, 1998.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar