Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Bioinorganic Chemistry and Applications
Volume 2017, Article ID 6947034, 19 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6947034
Review Article

A Review on Platelet Activating Factor Inhibitors: Could a New Class of Potent Metal-Based Anti-Inflammatory Drugs Induce Anticancer Properties?

1Laboratory of Biochemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15771 Athens, Greece
2Institute of Biosciences & Applications, NCSR Demokritos, 15310 Agia Paraskevi, Greece
3Laboratory of Inorganic Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Panepistimiopolis Zografou, 15771 Athens, Greece

Correspondence should be addressed to Athanassios I. Philippopoulos; rg.aou.mehc@pilihpta

Received 26 December 2016; Accepted 27 February 2017; Published 28 March 2017

Academic Editor: Concepción López

Copyright © 2017 Vasiliki D. Papakonstantinou et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

In this minireview, we refer to recent results as far as the Platelet Activating Factor (PAF) inhibitors are concerned. At first, results of organic compounds (natural and synthetic ones and specific and nonspecific) as inhibitors of PAF are reported. Emphasis is given on recent results about a new class of the so-called metal-based inhibitors of PAF. A small library of 30 metal complexes has been thus created; their anti-inflammatory activity has been further evaluated owing to their inhibitory effect against PAF in washed rabbit platelets (WRPs). In addition, emphasis has also been placed on the identification of preliminary structure-activity relationships for the different classes of metal-based inhibitors.

1. Introduction

This work was motivated by the fact that a comprehensive survey on metal-based potent inhibitors of PAF as active anti-inflammatory drugs has not been previously described in the literature. It is the aim of this microreview to reveal the critical role of the metal center and of the molecular structure (different coordination geometries) of the relevant metal complexes within this series of new metal-based potent inhibitors of PAF. Biological results of these compounds are reviewed and added to the dataset base of inorganic metal-based anti-inflammatory drugs. The review is divided into two general parts. At first, the general characteristics of PAF are described, followed by selected, known organic inhibitors of PAF. In the second part, the structural characteristics and the biological activity against PAF, of different classes of metal-based inhibitors, are presented.

2. General Characteristics of the Platelet Activating Factor

2.1. Platelet Activating Factor, Structure, and Activity

Platelet Activating Factor (PAF) has been characterized as a new, ubiquitous, potent, and unique class of lipid chemical mediators that share similar biological activities, namely, PAF-like activity molecules [1]. Originally, the term PAF was meant to be one phosphoglycerylether lipid, identified as 1-O-alkyl-2-acetyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine with 16–18 carbons at the ether-bonded fatty chain at the sn-1 position of the glycerol backbone, as shown in Figure 1 [2]. Interestingly, while most of the ether lipids replaced their ether bond with esterified analogues through time, PAF conserved its ether bond in sn-1 position because of its important biological role [3].

Figure 1: PAF molecular structure.

PAF is produced by a plethora of cells as platelets, neutrophils, monocytes/macrophages, lymphocytes, basophiles, eosinophils, mast cells, and endothelial cells and has many biological roles, both physiological and pathological depending mainly on the extent of PAF production and enzymatic regulation [4]. Under physiological conditions, the production of PAF is regulated by its enzymes [5] and the produced PAF participates in physiological processes as reproduction, memory formation, vascular tone, apoptosis, and angiogenesis. However, in pathological conditions, excess amounts of PAF can cause inflammation and lead to inflammatory conditions or diseases, such as allergy, asthma, atherosclerosis, diabetes, renal diseases, cancer, HIV pathogenesis, and periodontitis [6].

2.2. PAF Receptor

PAF exerts its autocrine and paracrine actions through binding to a well-characterized G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) located on the plasma membrane of a wide variety of mammalian cells such as endothelial cells, neutrophils, monocytes, dendritic cells, platelets, and leukocytes [7]. There are few studies that prove the existence of PAFR in endomembranes as well. The first one revealed three distinct classes of binding sites for PAF. Two of them were found on the microsomes and the third one was on the synaptic plasma membranes of rat cerebral cortex [8]. Later, other studies certified the intracellular existence of PAFR as well as the presence of PAF binding sites in the nucleus, both at the nuclear envelope and at nuclear matrix [911].

Finally, it seems that cytoplasmic PAFR is implicated in the acute effects of PAF, while the intracellular PAFR intermediates the long-standing effects of PAF via the modulation of gene expression.

The interaction of PAF with its receptor (PAFR) initiates a cascade of diverse intracellular signaling pathways, which translate the mediator’s message to the final cell response [12]. The signal transduction pathways activated by PAF are cell and species dependent and are regulated by several mechanisms. These include covalent modification and the internalization of PAFR, the modulation of PAFR gene expression, and binding potential along with the fine-tuning of the signal transduction pathways by a plethora of intracellular and extracellular modulators [6].

2.3. PAF Inhibitors

There are hundreds of molecules that are able to inhibit biological actions, mediated by PAF. Most of them have been screened in vitro in cell systems and animal models and the ones with the best properties, in terms of potency, bioavailability, and safety, have been also tested in clinical trials. There are many ways to classify PAF inhibitors such as (i) their source, isolated from natural sources or chemically synthesized; (ii) their chemical structure, nitrogen heterocyclic compounds, PAF analogues (PAF-like molecules), dihydropyridines, natural medicines, and others; or (iii) the way they interact with PAF receptor, specific or nonspecific inhibitors. IC50, of various PAF inhibitors against PAF aggregation in washed rabbit platelets, are presented in Table 1. In the present minireview, PAF inhibitors will be divided into a new classification method as organic and inorganic.

Table 1: IC50 (μM, final concentration) of various PAF inhibitors that induces 50% inhibition against PAF aggregation in washed rabbit platelets (WRPs). IC50 (μL) values are expressed in microliters of initial volume of oil that induces 50% inhibition against 1 × 10−11 M PAF final concentration in the aggregometer cuvette.

3. Organic PAF Inhibitors

3.1. Phytochemical Products

There are several hundreds of phytochemical products that can inhibit PAF biological activities and therefore act as anti-inflammatory agents. The purpose of this review is not to list all of them, so below are some of the most promising ones for therapeutic use or dietary supplements (Figure 2). Ginkgolides are diterpenes with a structure of twenty carbon cage molecules that come from the leaves and the roots of an ancient Chinese tree called Ginkgo biloba and belong to the natural specific inhibitors which antagonize the binding to PAF’s membrane receptor by a competitive way. Based on the molecular dynamics simulations, the binding of PAF to PAFR leads to its activated state, while the binding of Ginkgo biloba locks PAFR in its inactive state. There is a plethora of pathological conditions, where PAF is implicated, and Ginkgo biloba extracts have managed to ameliorate, as cognitive disorders, HIV infection, ischemia, tissue injuries, cancer, and airway diseases as asthma and allergy [13].

Figure 2: Phytochemical products with anti-PAF activity.

Andrographolide has a labdane diterpenoid structure and it is obtained from the stems and the leaves of a Asian plant called Andrographis paniculata which was traditionally used against viral infections and inflammatory diseases [14]. The studies around its inhibition against PAF have revealed that it is a nonspecific PAF inhibitor [15] with a plethora of promising effects as anti-inflammatory, anticancer, immunomodulatory, antiviral, and cardioprotective [16].

Alpha-bulnesene is a sesquiterpenoid molecule that comes from the essential oil of an Asian plant called Pogostemon cablin and acts as a PAF inhibitor exerting its inhibitory effect by antagonizing competitively PAF binding to its receptor and thus inhibits intracellular Ca2+ increase [17]. As it is a potent anti-inflammatory agent, it may be used for the inhibition or prevention of allergic syndromes, providing new antiallergic medicine that exhibits fewer side effects [18].

Kadsurenone is the first potent PAF antagonist that was discovered and comes from the Chinese herb Piper futokadsurae. It is a benzofuranoid neolignan whose structure was used as a template for the development of synthetic PAF antagonists as well as for the molecular modeling of PAFR [19].

Tussilagone (or L-652,469) is a terpene that comes from the buds of the plant Tussilago farfara and acts as a nonspecific PAF inhibitor by blocking the calcium channels [20]. It is extensively used in inflammatory respiratory diseases including cough, asthma, and acute/chronic bronchitis because of its anti-inflammatory properties [21].

Yangambin is a natural furofuran lignan, isolated from the Brazilian plant Ocotea duckei Vattimo. Studies have revealed that it is a specific PAF inhibitor which antagonizes competitively PAF binding to its receptor [22]. It displays beneficial actions against allergy and headache [23, 24] along with its cardioprotective role [25].

Lipid extracts from the plant Urtica dioica, the common nettle, were found to contain both PAF and PAF-like activity molecules and glycolipid derivatives which act as PAF inhibitors and hence explain the sense of urticaria and the beneficial effects of nettle as traditional allergy relief and diuretic remedy [26].

The lipid molecule, di-hydroxy-chimyl-alcohol, derived from pine pollen, was also found to exert anti-PAF action [27].

Cedrol is a sesquiterpene alcohol which is found as an essential oil in many plants as Biota orientalis, Pterocarpus indicusirginia, in various types of conifers as Cupressus and Juniperus, and in Origanum onites [28]. It is one of the well-known PAF antagonists [29].

3.2. Synthetic Products

The promising results of natural PAF inhibitors evoke the need for the development of synthetic PAF inhibitors. The first molecules that were synthesized had similar chemical structure with PAF, meaning a glycerol backbone such as CV-3988 [30], CV-6209 [31], ONO-6240 [32], and Ro 19-3704 [33]. The idea that followed was to replace the glycerol backbone with a cyclic structure such as SRI 63-073 [34], SRI 63-441 [35], UR-11353 [36], and CL-184,005 [37] (Figure 3).

Figure 3: Synthetic PAF inhibitors.

Later, the PAF inhibitors that were synthesized had no similar structure to PAF. These molecules contain heterocyclic structures which are characterized by sp2 nitrogen atom that is able to interact with PAFR as a hydrogen bond acceptor. These kinds of inhibitors are pyrrolothiazole-related antagonists as tulopafant [38], thiazolidine derivatives as SM-10661 [39], imidazolyl derivatives as modipafant [40], and lexipafant [41] and hetrazepine derivatives as WEB-2086 and WEB-2170 [42]. All the above synthetic antagonists display a great variability in their chemical structure which might have importance in their different pharmacological profile.

The success of the in vitro studies of PAF inhibitors in combination with the use of many natural PAF inhibitors as traditional remedies for inflammatory diseases had been very promising for the use of PAF inhibitors in the clinical practice. Many PAF inhibitors were tested in clinical trials displaying tolerability and safety but with no effectiveness. Modipafant [40], UK-74,505 [43], WEB 2086 [44], and SR27417A [45, 46] showed no effect against asthma disease. Lexipafant, one of the most potent PAF inhibitors, was tested against cognitive impairment [47], myocardial infraction [48], sepsis [49], and organ failure in severe pancreatitis [50] with no significant results. Moreover, SR27417A did not decrease the symptoms of acute ulcerative colitis [51]; BN 50730 showed no significant amelioration of rheumatoid arthritis [52] as well as Ro 24-238 against psoriasis [53] and TCV-309 against septic shock [54]. However, there are also trials with positive results such as UK,74505 on airway and systemic responses [55], levocetirizine in chronic idiopathic urticaria [56], WEB 2086 gel against UVB-induced dermatitis [57], BN 52021 on pulmonary function in the early postischemic period [58], and Y-24180 in bronchial hyperresponsiveness in patients with asthma [59]. Last but not least comes the use of rupatadine against allergic rhinitis and several other allergic disorders [60], the positive outcomes of which resulted in the production of the first circulating drug based on a PAF inhibitor, named Rupafin.

In addition, molecules demonstrating dual antagonistic actions against PAF as well as against another inflammatory mediator have been synthesized and their therapeutic properties have been studied in vitro. These molecules inhibit both PAF actions and 5-lipoxygenase, as LDP-392 [61], or thromboxane synthase [62], or iNOS induction [63]. Rupatadine, as well, is both an oral PAFR antagonist and a histamine H(1)-receptor antagonist [64].

As far as it concerns already used pharmaceutical products, there are many of them that were found to exhibit potent inhibitory effect against PAF actions, which is expected as Platelet Activating Factor is implicated in inflammatory processes and therefore in a plethora of pathological conditions with inflammatory background. PAF is known to be implicated in atherosclerosis [65] and many statins as well as digoxin, which are used for their cardioprotective properties, are also PAF inhibitors [66, 67]. Many of the antiretrovirals used for HIV infection are also PAF inhibitors, both in vitro and in vivo [6872].

3.3. Diet Products

The regulation of PAF actions is also succeeded by the daily ingestion of PAF inhibitors which are consumed through our diet (see Figures and , in the Supplementary Material available online at https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6947034). Among all diets, the Mediterranean diet consists of numerous products that exert potent anti-PAF activities in the washed platelet aggregation assay, such as virgin or regular olive oil [73, 74], wine and grapes [7578], honey [79], fish [8082], milk and yoghurt [83], and traditional Greek meals [84], the isolation and structural characterization of which demonstrated the presence of complex polar lipids as glycolipids and ganglioside derivatives, phenolics, and phenol glucosides [65]. Furthermore, from the acetylation of poplar lipids and phenolic compounds derived acetylated products with anti-PAF action [85, 86], especially, olive oil was found to contain high levels of PAF antagonists among other vegetable oils and the structure of its most active fraction was found to be a glycerolglycolipid [74]. In another study, olive pomace, crude olive pomace oil, and waste byproducts from olive pomace oil production were found to contain polar lipids as bioactive compounds that inhibit or antagonize PAF. The most bioactive compound came from olive pomace and has been chemically characterized as a glycerylether-sn-2-acetyl glycolipid [87]. Moreover, microconstituents of several seed oils, such as sesame, corn, and sunflower, were found to have either inhibitors or agonists of PAF. The most active agonist came from corn oil and was found to be almost five orders of magnitude less active than PAF, meaning that its action, in several cells and/or tissues, through PAF receptors, would minimize the biological effects of PAF [88]. In vivo, polar extracts from olive oil and olive pomace have reduced the atheromatic lesion in hypercholesterolemic rabbits [89, 90] and mellitus patients reduced platelet sensitivity after one month of traditional Mediterranean diet [84], while wine consumption improved platelet sensitivity independently of alcohol [91]. Considering the expanding role of PAF and other lipid mediators in human pathophysiology, the study of their dietary modulation is of increasing scientific interest. Today, a plethora of studies report molecules that inhibit the cellular effects of PAF in vitro and in experimental animal models or human studies in vivo, which are well presented in the review of Nomikos et al. [92].

Apart from Mediterranean products, PAF inhibitors can also be found in many other products as garlic [9395], soy sauce [96], and tea [97]. Last but not least comes curcumin which exerts potent antiplatelet activity through the inhibition of COX and the blockade of calcium signaling. Additionally, curcumin managed to reduce colonic mucosal and tumor PLA2 [98, 99].

Referring to vitamins, paracitol (Vitamin D) is known to improve the inflammatory status of hemodialysis patients, an ability possibly due to its anti-PAF activities [100] and also tocopherol (Vitamin E) inhibits PAF-induced aggregation [101, 102]. Besides, there are endogenous PAF inhibitors as blood cardiolipin which was shown to control PAF actions [103].

The involvement of PAF in cancer is already known and especially in carcinogenesis, melanoma, or metastasis [104107]. Also, various compounds with anti-PAF activities, as Ginkgo biloba extracts [108, 109], andrographolide [110, 111], tussilagone [112], WEB 2170 [113], and WEB 2086 [107], have been shown to exert anticancer properties in vitro. In addition, both cisplatin and WEB 2086 administered to animal models decreased dramatically tumor growth [114]. This manuscript studies whether a new class of potent metal-based anti-inflammatory drugs could induce indirect anticancer properties.

The hypothesis claims that the tumor cells express PAF receptor and therefore there are high PAF levels all around the microenvironment of the tumor. The use of anti-PAF compounds decreases PAF levels ergo inflammation and therefore enhances the anticancer properties of the chemotherapy. Moreover, the use of PAF inhibitors, such as metal compounds, which may have additional direct anticancer properties, will amplify the effectiveness of the common anticancer treatments.

4. Inorganic Metal-Based Inhibitors

As mentioned in the previous part, organic compounds represent well-known antagonists in the area, while application of metal-based compounds as PAF inhibitors has been systematically ignored, although the advantages of metal-based therapeutics over the organic analogues have been well addressed recently [115]. In fact, transition metal coordination compounds display a number of different coordination numbers and geometries (square planar, tetrahedral, and octahedral) as opposed to the typical tetrahedral geometry for the organic congeners. Moreover, metal complexes present a number of special characteristics such as wide structural diversity, the possibility of tuning thermodynamic and kinetic ligand substitution, and different oxidation states [116118]. In addition, a number of metal ions, playing a vital role for life, are involved in many natural biological processes [119122]. As a result, our current research interest has been focused on the synthesis of transition metal coordination compounds and their applications mainly as potent inhibitors of PAF, which may possess similar or significantly higher activity and/or selectivity in regard to the common organic-based inhibitors. This is a vast research area and work on this field has not been referred to previously. A recent review by Leung et al. [123] has highlighted some examples of transition metal complexes that have been investigated for their anti-inflammatory activity. However, a significant number of coordination compounds with potential anti-inflammatory action have not been included. In this respect, it is the aim of the present minireview to present existing metal-based coordination compounds that exert their inflammatory activity by blocking the expression of PAF. Preliminary structure-activity relationships have been established, studying diverse parameters such as (i) the coordination geometry of the metal complex (square planar versus octahedral, etc.), (ii) the nature of the bidentate ligands and occasionally of the moieties in its periphery, (iii) the effect of the counteranions, and (iv) the total charge and size of the complex.

Below, we describe the existing different categories of metal-based inhibitors of PAF which have been systematically studied. Other classes of anti-inflammatory compounds do not constitute the aim of this minireview.

4.1. Rhodium Complexes with Bidentate Nitrogen Containing Ligands
4.1.1. Rhodium(III) Compounds

In 2009, we have successfully reported a preliminary work [124] on the anti-PAF activity of a Rh(III) coordination compound, namely, cis-[Rh(L)2Cl2]Cl (Rh-1), where L stands for the bidentate ligand 2,2′-pyridylquinoxaline with an IC50 value of 250 nM (Figure 4). The corresponding bidentate ligand has been chosen owing to the remarkable biological properties reported [125, 126], while, on the other hand, investigation of the biological activity of inert metal complexes, such as rhodium(III) compounds, shows gradually increasing interest [127130]. These reasons led us to design the target molecule Rh-1 (Figure 4) with octahedral coordination geometry and evaluate in vitro its inhibitory effect against PAF-induced platelet aggregation in washed rabbit platelets (WRPs). The inhibitory effect of Rh-1 and of all other new compounds tested (vide infra) was expressed by their IC50 value in μM (Table 2). The IC50 values reflect the inhibition strength of each compound, since a low IC50 value reveals stronger inhibition of the PAF-induced aggregation for a given metal complex concentration. Rh-1 shows a strong inhibitory effect towards the PAF-induced WRPs aggregation with IC50 = 125 nM. This is an improved value as compared to the first measurement performed (IC50 = 250 nM) because of slight changes in the experimental protocol during the biochemical experiment [131]. Since PAF is participating in inflammation, these compounds are potential anti-inflammatory drugs. After that, following a systematic approach [132], we have successfully developed a series of analogous rhodium(III)-based inhibitors of PAF of the general type cis-[Rh(L1)2Cl2]Cl (Rh-2) and cis-[Rh(L2)2Cl2]Cl (Rh-3) incorporating the bidentate ligands L1 = 4-carboxy-2-(2′-pyridyl)quinoline and L2 = 2,2′-bipyridine-4,4′-dicarboxylic acid that bear one and two carboxylic acid groups (-COOH), respectively, in the ligand sphere (Figure 4).

Table 2: IC50 data (μM) final concentration in the aggregometer cuvette for rhodium PAF inhibitors towards WRPs.
Figure 4: Molecular structures of rhodium(III) inhibitors of PAF.

The idea, behind this, was to examine the possible effect of the carboxylic acid groups on the inhibition of the PAF, since, recently, an apparent dependence of biological activities (cytotoxicity and antioxidant efficiency) on incorporation of -COOH groups in the bipyridine ring has been reported [133]. The importance of the carboxylate moiety as a pharmacophore to the medicinal chemistry has been reported [134], while, interestingly, it has been proposed that approximately 25% of all drugs contain a COOH moiety.

The results of the biological assay performed reveal that indeed both substances (Rh-2 and Rh-3), containing different number of carboxylic acid groups in the ligand periphery, display submicromolar activity (IC50 = 0.35 μM and 0.51 μM, resp.) that is in the same order of magnitude as that of the Rh-1 inhibitor. Evaluation of the anticancer activity of these substances is currently underway so as to check the relationship between PAF and cancer (vide infra). On the other hand, the implication of PAF in carcinogenesis and cancer metastasis has been well documented, whereas the known BN 5202 inhibitor has showed antitumor effects [135]. Cytotoxicity tests of the Rh-1 compound against HEK-293 and cancer cell lines MCF-7 (breast cancer) were performed using cisplatin as a reference. Interestingly, preliminary results [131] reveal that Rh-1, a potent anti-PAF inhibitor (IC50 = 0.12 μM), is less cytotoxic (54% viability on HEK-293 cells) compared to the cisplatin analogue (10.3% viability) with an IC50 value of 0.55 μM against PAF. On the other hand, Rh-1 was proved to be less potent (77% viability) on the MCF-7 cancer cells. For cisplatin, a 16% viability was observed in this cell line, evidence of the lack of harsh toxicity of the Rh-1 accompanied by anticancer activity. Perhaps these compounds of the chemical formulas cis-[Rh(L)2Cl2]Cl, that inhibit PAF action, may also be used as a potential anticancer agent.

In an effort to get an insight about the possible mechanism of action of these substances related to the PAFR, we performed radioactivity experiments (Scatchard analysis) involving the specific binding of [3H]-PAF to washed rabbit platelets and its inhibition by complex Rh-1, that is the most potent of these Rh(III) derivatives. The specific PAF antagonist, BN 52021, was used as a reference compound and the radioactivity was measured by scintillation counting. This compound induced 18% inhibition of PAF binding onto platelet PAFR, whereas the highest %   (%   = [(total binding − total binding with tested compound)/specific binding] × 100) was observed at 50 nM (34% inhibition). These data suggest that Rh-1 inhibits PAF action on platelets and this effect is attributed only in part to the inhibition of PAF binding onto PAFR (nonspecific binding). It seems that, at low concentrations, 1 affects PAFR much more effectively and inhibits PAF action by another pathway [124]. Molecular docking theoretical calculations were in accord with the previous reported finding, denoting that the octahedral Rh(III) complex Rh-1 (and Rh-2 and Rh-3) with two aromatic ligands cannot fit into the ligand-binding site of the PAFR model. Instead, they could bind to the extracellular domain of the receptor (Figure 5) and, therefore, antagonize the substrate’s entrance to PAFR.

Figure 5: Molecular model of PAFR with the two predicted binding sites of the octahedral Rh(III) complex, Rh-1, and the square planar Rh(I) complexes, Rh-5 and Rh-6 (cartoon representation).

From the reaction of L with one equivalent of , the [Rh(L)Cl3(MeOH)] complex has been prepared as a mixture of the mer and fac isomers. Upon purification the mer-[Rh(L)Cl3(MeOH)] isomer (Rh-4) crystallizes selectively from a mixture of both isomers in solution, while the fac-isomer was not isolated in a pure form. Rh-4 is less effective (IC50 = 2.6 μM) compared to the more bulky compounds Rh-1, Rh-2, and Rh-3 (Figure 4). The calculated binding affinity of 3.20 μM is in very good agreement with the in vitro results. As far as the rhodium(III) compounds are concerned, we conclude that the number of bidentate ligands and, as a result, the size of the target molecule (metal complex) affect dramatically the biological activity expressed. Thus, Rh-4 which comprises a single aromatic ligand is less effective compared to the sterically demanding Rh-2 and Rh-3 complexes with two ligand molecules. At the same time, the role of total charge on the metal complex and ion size cannot be ruled out as recently reported for metal complexes as inhibitors of the 26S proteasome in tumor cells [136]. The rhodium precursor and the organic ligands L, L1, and L2 have also been tested, exhibiting a weak inhibitory effect, ranging from 20 μM to 67 μM. From this comparison, it becomes evident the crucial role of the metal center in the final structure of these coordination compounds towards these inflammatory mediators.

4.1.2. Rhodium(I) Compounds

The square planar Rh(I) complexes [Rh(L)(cod)]Cl (Rh-5) and [Rh(L)(cod)](NO3) (Rh-6) (Figure 6) were prepared from the [Rh(cod)Cl]2 dimer (cod = C8H12) precursor and the corresponding ligand L [132].

Figure 6: Molecular structure of Rh(I) inhibitors.

The biological evaluation showed that Rh-5 and Rh-6 exhibit an IC50 value within the range of 15 to 16 nM, indicating that these organometallic compounds are selective and potent inhibitors of PAF in the nanomolar scale. Docking theoretical calculations support the experimental results reported, predicting a high affinity of Rh-5 and Rh-6 for PAFR (estimated at = 20 nM) that is mainly attributed to the favourable van der Waals and desolvation energy terms of its hydrophobic ligand (cyclooctadiene moiety). Finally, a clear structure-activity relationship is deduced, denoting that the square planar organometallic rhodium(I) complexes Rh-5, Rh-6 are better inhibitors of the PAF-induced aggregation in comparison to the Rh(III) octahedral complexes Rh-1/Rh-2/Rh-3/Rh-4. The enhanced inhibitory activity of Rh-5 and Rh-6 could be further attributed to the presence of the hydrophobic cyclooctadiene moiety (vide infra the docking experiments, Figure 6). Interestingly, the biologic activity (observed IC50 values) of Rh-5 and Rh-6 against the PAF-induced aggregation is comparable to the corresponding action of some of the most potent PAF receptor antagonists, namely, WEB 2170, BN 52021, and rupatadine (IC50 = 0.02, IC50 = 0.03 and IC50 = 0.26 μM, resp.) [137139]. In any case, it has to be pointed out that, upon coordination of the organic ligands (L, L1, and L2) to the rhodium center a dramatic increase (synergetic effect) of the inhibitory activity towards, the PAF-induced rabbit PRP aggregation is taking place in a dose-dependent manner. Therefore, the effects of rhodium metal complexes towards this inflammatory mediator can be clearly attributed to the final structure (square planar and/or octahedral) of these coordination compounds.

4.2. Copper(II), Zinc(II), Ni(II), and Ga(III) with Chalcogenated Imidodiphosphinato Ligands

Tsoupras and coworkers [140, 141] have described a series of metal complexes (M = Cu, Co, Ni, Zn, Ga) with chalcogenated imidodiphosphinato ligands showing an inhibitory effect towards PAF-induced aggregation in the nanomolar to micromolar range (vide infra). The metal complexes examined are as follows: [M(OPPh2)(OPPh2)N}2], M = Cu (E = O,O; Cu-1); M = Zn ((E = O,O; Zn-1); (E = O,S); (E = S,S; Zn-2); (E = O,Se; Zn-3)); [M(OPPh2)(OPPh2)N}3], M = Ga (E = O,O; Ga-1); [M(Ph2Ρ)2N-S-CHMe}X2], M = Ni (E = P,P; X = Cl, Ni-1); (E = P,P; X = Br, Ni-2); (E = O,Se; Ni-3); M = Co, Ni (E = O,Se; Co-1). These complexes display diverse coordination geometries, which range from square planar for Cu-1, Ni-1 and Ni-2 to tetrahedral for Zn-1 and Zn-2, while a pseudotetrahedral environment has been found for the corresponding Zn-3, Co-1, and Ni-3 analogues. Their molecular structures are depicted in Figure 7 and the corresponding IC50 values are included in Table 3. Remarkably, Co-1 and Ni-3 (E = O,Se) exhibit the strongest inhibitory effect against the PAF-induced aggregation in WRPs with an IC50 value of 18 to 19 nM. The increased biological activity of both complexes has been mainly attributed to the typical open shell structure they possess. It seems also that, in these ligands, the combination of O and Se, as donor atoms, is beneficial for Co(II) and Ni(II) ions over the Zn(II) ions which possess a closed shell structure. In fact, the biological activity of Zn-3 drops almost two orders of magnitude (IC50 = 1.11 μM) than that of Co-1 and Ni-3. For the structurally related diamagnetic Zn(II) complexes Zn-1 (E = O,O) and Zn-2 (E = S,S), the presence of O or S donor atoms increases slightly the inhibitory capacity against PAF (IC50 = 0.54 μM and 0.36 μM, resp.). Moreover, the square planar Cu-1 compound exhibited medium inhibitory effect against PAF. On the other hand, the more bulky Ga-1 complex, consisting of a main group element and three bidentate PNP ligands with O,O as the donor atoms, shows an appreciable anti-PAF activity (IC50 = 62 nM). The authors have commented that the higher potency may be due to the octahedral structure of this compound. Finally, the square planar compounds Ni-1 and Ni-2 are the less active, owing to a partial degradation in DMSO. At this point, it should be stated that for biological purposes chemical stability in solution is a prerequisite. However, a large number of biological activity studies have been carried out so as to systematically ignore the possible effects of the corresponding medium that is used to dissolve a new substance under investigation. In particular, the presence of easily dissociating groups in a metal complex (halides, etc.) and the use of organic solvents with strong donor abilities (DMSO, DMF, and MeCN) constitute it susceptible to a possible decomposition in solution. The nature of the active species in solution remains unclear affecting the results of the biological experiment. In summary, the authors of this study have concluded that the stereochemical and electronic characteristics of the metal complexes previously described determine their inhibitory effect. Among the inhibitors studied, Co-1, Ni-3, and Ga-1 could be potentially examined for their anti-inflammatory activity. It may be that these compounds express their biological activity via a selective interaction with the PAF receptor, although this has not been examined. Docking theoretical calculations might be helpful towards this aim as previously shown for the rhodium(I)/(III) series [124, 132].

Table 3: IC50 data (μM) final concentration in the aggregometer cuvette for metal complexes bearing PNP ligands as PAF inhibitors.
Figure 7: Molecular structures of metal complexes bearing PNP ligands.
4.3. Re(I) Complex with a Phenanthroline-Dione Ligand

Kaplanis and coworkers [142] reported on a Re(I) derivative (Figure 8) of the general type fac-[Re(phendione)(CO)3Cl] (Re-1) (where phendione = 1,10-phenanthroline-5,6-dione) that has been evaluated as inhibitor of PAF-induced aggregation of washed rabbit platelets (IC50 = 0.86 μM).

Figure 8: Molecular structure of a Re(I) inhibitor.

It is to be noted that the starting material [Re(CO)5Cl] displayed a better biological activity (IC50 = 0.17 μM) as compared to the free ligand phendione (IC50 = 0.93 μM) and the Re(I) complex mentioned above. This is in contrast to previous data where coordination of a ligand to a metal ion enhances the inhibitory activity towards PAF aggregation of the metal complex [132, 141]. It may be that Re-1 complex does not fit into the binding site of PAFR; presumably it dissociates at the extracellular domain and finally the observed activity could be attributed to the activity of the phendione only. In fact, Re-1 and the free ligand exhibit the same inhibitory effect, while [Re(CO)5Cl] does not seem to contribute to the biological activity of the synthesized complex Re-1. In this respect, analogous observations have been reported for two new Rh(III) complexes of the formula mer-[Rh(L)Cl3(MeOH)], where L stands for substituted pyridylquinoline ligands [143]. Coordination of the pyridylquinoline bidentate ligands to the Rh(III) source (, IC50 = 67 μM) improves slightly the biological profile of the metal-based inhibitors, although the Rh(III) metal precursor is not that potent inhibitor as the relevant [Re(CO)5Cl] analogue. A plausible answer to the questions raised may be derived with the help of molecular docking theoretical calculations. Finally, Re-1 and [Re(CO)5Cl] showed activity against PAF-basic metabolic enzyme activities in rabbit leukocyte homogenates.

4.4. Ru(II) Complexes with Bidentate () and Tridentate () Nitrogen Based Ligands

Inspired by the previously described results on the field, we wanted to further extend our work to ruthenium(II) coordination compounds and further explore the activity of a variety of coordination compounds containing this metal, as PAF inhibitors [144]. The advantages of ruthenium in a number of biological actions have been well documented [145147]. Thus a series of octahedral ruthenium(II)/(III) complexes have been tested towards this goal. These substances that have been synthesized by our group incorporate heterocyclic bidentate () and tridentate ligands () with or without carboxylic acid ancillary functionalities displaying typical octahedral coordination geometries as the majority of ruthenium(II) coordination compounds (structurally related compounds). Among them, those with the -COOH moieties have been mainly tested as sensitizers in third-generation photovoltaic solar cells. Depending on the ruthenium(II) source, these substances can be divided into three categories. The first two comprise the cis-[Ru(bpy)2(L)]2+ [148] (Figure 9(a)) and cis-[Ru(dcbpyH2)2(L)]2+ [149] units (where bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine; L = 2-(2′-pyridyl)quinoxaline (L1), 4-carboxy-2-(2′-pyridyl)quinoline (L2), 2,2′-dipyridine-4,4′-dicarboxylic acid (dcbpyH2) (Figure 9(b))), while the third one displays the [Ru(bpp)]2+ (bpp is the tridentate ligand 2,6-Bis(1-pyrazolyl)pyridine) [150] and [Ru(bdmpp)]2+ (bdmpp = 2,6-bis(3,5-dimethyl-1-pyrazolyl)pyridine) core [144] (Figure 10).

Figure 9: Molecular structures of Ru(II) inhibitors with bidentate ligands.
Figure 10: Molecular structures of Ru(III)/(II) inhibitors with tridentate ligands.

In total, the formulas of the ruthenium complexes examined (studied) are as follows: cis-[Ru(bpy)2(L)]X2 (Ru-1a-Cl; Ru-1a-PF6, L = L2 = 4-carboxy-2-(2′-pyridyl)quinoline; Ru-1b-Cl, Ru-1b-PF6, L = dcbpyH2 = 2,2′-Bipyridine-4,4′-dicarboxylic acid), cis-[Ru(dcbpyH2)2(L)]X2 (Ru-2a, X = NO3, L = L1 = 2-(2′-pyridyl)quinoxaline; Ru-2b, X = NO3, L = L2), [Ru(bpp)Cl(dcbpyH)] (Ru-3a), [Ru(bpp)Cl(dcbpyH2)]Cl (Ru-3b) (bpp = 2,6-Bis(1-pyrazolyl)pyridine), and [Ru(bdmpp)Cl(dcbpyH2)]PF6 (Ru-4a) (bdmpp = 2,6-bis(3,5-dimethyl-1-pyrazolyl)pyridine), where cis-[Ru(bpy)2Cl2] (Ru-1), cis-[Ru(dcbpyH2)2Cl2] (Ru-2), [Ru(bpp)Cl3] (Ru-3) and [Ru(bdmpp)Cl3] (Ru-4). Results of the biological experiment show that most of the ruthenium complexes are potent inhibitors of PAF with IC50 values ranging from micromolar to submicromolar concentrations, extending therefore the range of their applications (Table 4). Inhibition is taking place in a dose-dependent manner. In addition, it has been demonstrated that coordination of the organic ligands to the ruthenium metal center enhances significantly the inhibitory potency against the PAF-induced aggregation. This remark corroborates the results of our previous work based on rhodium(I) and rhodium(III) inhibitors of PAF [124, 132].

Table 4: IC50 data (μM) of various Ru(II)/(III) PAF inhibitors.

Next, we studied the possible effect of the counterion upon ligand exchange reactions. Remarkably, we noticed that, upon substitution reaction of the chloride counteranion of the bpy derivatives Ru-1a-Cl and Ru-1b-Cl into the hexafluorophosphate salts, Ru-1a-PF6 (0.48 μM), and Ru-1b-PF6 (0.5 μM), a twentyfold and fourfold increase, respectively, of the PAF inhibitory effect is observed, rendering them more potent against PAF inhibition. This can be attributed in part to the higher inhibitory effect towards PAF of the trifluoroacetyl-analogues, fluoride containing substances, compared to the trichloroacetyl ones [151].

In the second class of complexes, we observed that the inhibitory activity of the ionic compounds Ru-2a, Ru-2b (IC50 values of approximately 0.2 μM) is considerably higher than that of the neutral precursor Ru-2 (4.5 μM), while an almost 3-fold increase over the bpy derivatives Ru-1a-PF6 and Ru-1b-PF6 (0.5 μM) is shown. We can conclude therefore that the presence of the cis-[Ru(dcbpyH2)2]2+ core containing -COOH acid groups as auxiliary substituents is more favourable over the classical cis-[Ru(bpy)2]2+ core. The inhibitory effect of the most potent ruthenium(II) compounds reported previously is comparable to that of the well-established rhodium(III) inhibitors, Rh-1, Rh-2, and Rh-3 (0.12 μM, 0.51 μM, and 0.35 μM, resp.) displaying octahedral coordination geometries as well. Presumably this could be attributed to the influence of the electronic configurations and the size of Ru(II) and Rh(III) ions. Remarkably, Ru-2a and Ru-2b compounds display comparable biological activity (IC50 values of 0.18 and 0.24 μM) with rupatadine fumarate, a potent PAF receptor antagonist (0.26 μM) that is used currently (Rupafin) in clinical practice [152]. Within this series, it seems that the ionic compounds are more potent as compared to the neutral precursors (Ru-1, Ru-2), a result which correlates well with our previous notes on the rhodium-based inhibitors [124, 132]. However, the neutral ruthenium(III) precursor Ru-3 (IC50 = 2.1 μM) displays a slightly higher potency compared to the internal salt Ru-3a (3.1 μM) and a more intense inhibitory effect than that of the salt-like complex Ru-3b (11.8 μM). In addition, the neutral ruthenium(III) precursor Ru-4 (IC50 = 2.6 μM) is less potent than the ionic complex Ru-4b (IC50 = 6.4 μM). Moreover, Ru-3 and Ru-4 are more active than the ruthenium(II) compounds Ru-1 (7 μM) and Ru-2 (4.5 μM), respectively. Obviously, these discrepancies indicate that the inhibitory effect of Ru(III) based inhibitors against PAF is an issue that merits further investigation.

4.5. Synopsis of the Metal-Based Inhibitors Reported in This Work

According to the experimental findings, it seems that the nature of the metal center and the nature of the organic ligand attached to it alter substantially the biological action expressed (vide infra). Although the biological probe studied is a complicated system, following simple coordination chemistry principles, we have managed to get some quite helpful structure-activity relationships as mentioned in the conclusions part that follows.

In general, the square planar Rh(I) complexes incorporating a 2-(2′-pyridyl)quinoxaline ligand (Rh-1, Rh-2; IC50 = 15-16 nM), the pseudotetrahedral Co(II) and Ni(II) complexes (Co-1, Ni-3, IC50 = 18-19 nM), and the octahedral Ga(III) complex bearing chalcogenated imidodiphosphinato ligands (Ga-1, IC50 = 62 nM) inhibited PAF in the nanomolar scale. Theoretical docking calculations (for the rhodium complexes) are in accord with the experimental findings denoting that Rh-1, Rh-2 inhibitors could fit in the ligand-binding site of PAF receptor (PAFR). Rh-1, Rh-2, and Rh-3 complexes as well as Ru-2a, Ru-2b and Zn-1, Zn-2, and Re-1 were potent inhibitors in the submicromolar range. A schematic representation of the more potent metal-based inhibitors is given in Figure 11.

Figure 11: The most potent inhibitors of PAF described in this work.

5. Conclusions

The present minireview describes the latest results on the application of a series of metal complexes with diverse structures and different metal cores as PAF inhibitors in WPRs, a new class of the so-called metal-based inhibitors of PAF. From this work, some preliminary structure-activity relationships have been established based on simplified structural comparison among the library of 30 small molecules investigated. A number of factors such as the counteranion, the total charge of the inhibitor, and the size of the target molecule determine, at least in part, the extent of their inhibitory action. Interestingly, the results show the important role of the metal center and the coordination geometries adopted upon coordination of the organic ligand. Thus, for the rhodium complexes, a straightforward relationship has been addressed, denoting that the square planar organometallic Rh(I) complexes display an inhibitory effect at the nanomolar level than the Rh(III) congeners. The effect of the cyclooctadiene moiety has been analyzed on the basis of theoretical docking calculations, and presumably the improved anti-PAF action has been attributed to the hydrophobic interactions of the cyclooctadiene within the special domains of the PAFR. In addition, the effect of the total charge has been examined, showing that the positively charged Rh compounds and the carboxylic acid containing Ru(II) analogous ([Ru(dcbpyH2)2]2+ core) seem to be the more potent. It may be that, in vitro, these substances display a better permeability across the negatively charged lipid membranes. However, the trend is not followed for the ruthenium bipyridine class ([Ru(bpy)]2+ core). On the other hand, on moving to the relevant PNP bifunctional entities, the biological motif alters. The neutral Ni(II)-(O,Se) and Co(I)-(O,Se) analogues now present a strong anti-PAF activity and possibly this may be an effect of the ligand properties.

Upon a thorough study of the molecular structures proposed, we realized that, in most of the cases (not the example of the Re(I) complex), the obtained metal complexes are characterized by an improved biological activity as compared to both the organic precursor and the metal source (synergetic effect). To obtain reasonable structure-activity relationships for the other categories tested, as for the rhodium metal compounds, theoretical docking calculations are required.

From the results of this study, one may conclude that indeed metal-based inorganic compounds are a very promising class of anti-PAF and anti-inflammatory drugs. For the rhodium(III) PAF inhibitor Rh-1, the moderate cytotoxicity observed in HEK 293 cell lines corroborates the increased anti-inflammatory action observed. Cisplatin that is also active against inflammation is less potent in HEK 293 cell lines. We suggest that this biological effect is due to the overall structural characteristics of Rh-1 that shows a combined anti-PAF and anticancer activity.

This is of interest, denoting that current organic inhibitors existing could be potentially replaced with a new class of metal-based inhibitors of PAF in the near future. Finally, the results of this study could help us to create a database set of coordination compounds with potential anti-inflammatory activity. In such a way, we could roughly predict or estimate the potency of other new metal-based substances against PAF, displaying similar molecular structures. Thus the preliminary results reported could provide us with the required knowledge so as to rationally design more potent anti-inflammatory drugs in the future.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article.

Acknowledgments

Athanassios I. Philippopoulos would like to thank Professor Dr. A. C. Filippou of the Chemistry Department of the University of Bonn for his support on the spectroscopic characterization of the compounds presented in this work. Also, Nefeli Lagopati would like to thank Dr. Paraskevi Kitsiou of the Institute of Biosciences & Applications, NCSR Demokritos, for her precious help with the cytotoxicity tests performed.

References

  1. N. J. Cusack, “Platelet-activating factor,” Nature, vol. 285, no. 5762, p. 193, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. C. A. Demopoulos, R. N. Pinckard, and D. J. Hanahan, “Platelet-activating factor. Evidence for 1-O-alkyl-2-acetyl-sn-glyceryl-3-phosphorylcholine as the active component (a new class of lipid chemical mediators),” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 254, no. 19, pp. 9355–9358, 1979. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. V. I. Kulikov and G. I. Muzya, “Ether lipids and platelet-activating factor: evolution and cellular function,” Biochemistry, vol. 62, no. 10, pp. 1103–1108, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. L. Balestrieri, D. Castaldo, C. Balestrieri, L. Quagliuolo, A. Giovane, and L. Servillo, “Modulation by flavonoids of PAF and related phospholipids in endothelial cells during oxidative stress,” Journal of Lipid Research, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 380–387, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. F. Snyder, “Platelet-activating factor: the biosynthetic and catabolic enzymes,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 305, no. 3, pp. 689–705, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. S. Antonopoulou, T. Nomikos, H. C. Karantonis, E. Fragopoulou, and C. A. Demopoulos, “PAF, a potent lipid mediator,” in Bioactive Phospholipids. Role in Inflammation and Atherosclerosis, A. D. Tselepis, Ed., pp. 85–134, Transworld Research Network, Trivandrum, India, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  7. Z.-I. Honda, S. Ishii, and T. Shimizu, “Platelet-activating factor receptor,” Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 131, no. 6, pp. 773–779, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. V. L. Marcheselli, M. J. Rossowska, M.-T. Domingo, P. Braquet, and N. G. Bazan, “Distinct platelet-activating factor binding sites in synaptic endings and in intracellular membranes of rat cerebral cortex,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 265, no. 16, pp. 9140–9145, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. F. Gobeil Jr., A. Fortier, T. Zhu et al., “G-protein-coupled receptors signalling at the cell nucleus: an emerging paradigm,” Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology, vol. 84, no. 3-4, pp. 287–297, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. A. M. Marrache, F. Gobeil Jr., T. Zhu, and S. Chemtob, “Intracellular signaling of lipid mediators via cognate nuclear G protein-coupled receptors,” Endothelium: Journal of Endothelial Cell Research, vol. 12, no. 1-2, pp. 63–72, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. T. Zhu, F. Gobeil Jr., A. Vazquez-Tello et al., “Intracrine signaling through lipid mediators and their cognate nuclear G-protein-coupled receptors: a paradigm based on PGE2, PAF, and LPA1 receptors,” Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology, vol. 84, no. 3-4, pp. 377–391, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. G. A. Zimerman, M. R. Elstad, D. E. Lorant et al., “Platelet-activating factor (PAF): signalling and adhesion in cell-cell interactions,” in Platelet-Activating Factor and Related Lipid Mediators 2, vol. 416 of Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, pp. 297–304, Springer, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  13. V. D. Papakonstantinou, “Ginkgo biloba and its anti-inflammatory value as a medical tool,” Hellenic Journal of Atherosclerosis, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 109–115, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  14. Y.-C. Shen, C.-F. Chen, and W.-F. Chiou, “Suppression of rat neutrophil reactive oxygen species production and adhesion by the diterpenoid lactone andrographolide,” Planta Medica, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 314–317, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. E. Amroyan, E. Gabrielian, A. Panossian, G. Wikman, and H. Wagner, “Inhibitory effect of andrographolide from Andrographis paniculata on PAF-induced platelet aggregation,” Phytomedicine, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 27–31, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. T. Jayakumar, C.-Y. Hsieh, J.-J. Lee, and J.-R. Sheu, “Experimental and clinical pharmacology of andrographis paniculata and its major bioactive phytoconstituent andrographolide,” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2013, Article ID 846740, 16 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. H.-C. Hsu, W.-C. Yang, W.-J. Tsai, C.-C. Chen, H.-Y. Huang, and Y.-C. Tsai, “α-Bulnesene, a novel PAF receptor antagonist isolated from Pogostemon cablin,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 345, no. 3, pp. 1033–1038, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. W.-H. Peng, T.-C. Lu, J.-C. Liao et al., “Analgesic and anti-inflammatory activities of the methanol extract from pogostemon cablin,” Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2011, Article ID 671741, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. T. Y. Shen, S. B. Hwang, M. N. Chang et al., “Characterization of a platelet-activating factor receptor antagonist isolated from haifenteng (Piper futokadsura): specific inhibition of in vitro and in vivo platelet-activating factor-induced effects,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 672–676, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. S.-B. Hwang, M. N. Chang, M. L. Garcia et al., “L-652,469—a dual receptor antagonist of platelet activating factor and dihydropyridines from Tussilago farfara L,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 141, no. 2, pp. 269–281, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. C. Hwangbo, H. S. Lee, J. Park, J. Choe, and J.-H. Lee, “The anti-inflammatory effect of tussilagone, from Tussilago farfara, is mediated by the induction of heme oxygenase-1 in murine macrophages,” International Immunopharmacology, vol. 9, no. 13-14, pp. 1578–1584, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. H. C. Castro-Faria-Neto, P. T. Bozza, H. N. Cruz et al., “Yangambin: a new naturally-occurring platelet-activating factor receptor antagonist: binding and in vitro functional studies,” Planta Medica, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 101–105, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. R. C. P. Marques, S. R. B. De Medeiros, C. Da Silva Dias, J. M. Barbosa-Filho, and L. F. Agnez-Lima, “Evaluation of the mutagenic potential of yangambin and of the hydroalcoholic extract of Ocotea duckei by the Ames test,” Mutation Research, vol. 536, no. 1-2, pp. 117–120, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. F. C. F. de Sousa, B. A. Pereira, V. T. M. Lima et al., “Central nervous system activity of yangambin from Ocotea duckei vattimo (Lauraceae) in mice,” Phytotherapy Research, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 282–286, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. E. Tibiriçá, “Cardiovascular properties of yangambin, a lignan isolated from Brazilian plants,” Cardiovascular Drug Reviews, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 313–328, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. S. Antonopoulou, C. A. Demopoulos, and N. K. Andrikopoulos, “Lipid separation from urtica dioica: existence of platelet-activating factor,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 44, no. 10, pp. 3052–3056, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. A. Siafaka-Kapadai, C. A. Demopoulos, and N. K. Andrikopoulos, “Biological activity of lipids of pine pollen on platelet aggregation in correlation with the platelet activating factor,” Biochemistry International, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 33–41, 1986. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. S. P. Bhatia, D. McGinty, C. S. Letizia, and A. M. Api, “Fragrance material review on cedrol,” Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 46, no. 11, pp. S100–S102, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. H. O. Yang, D.-Y. Suh, and B. H. Han, “Isolation and characterization of platelet-activating factor receptor binding antagonists from Biota orientalis,” Planta Medica, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 37–40, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. Z. Terashita, S. Tsushima, Y. Yoshioka, H. Nomura, Y. Inada, and K. Nishikawa, “CV-3988—a specific antagonist of platelet activating factor (PAF),” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 32, no. 17, pp. 1975–1982, 1983. View at Google Scholar
  31. Z.-I. Terashita, Y. Imura, M. Takatani, S. Tsushima, and K. Nishikawa, “CV-6209, a highly potent antagonist of platelet activating factor in vitro and in vivo,” Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, vol. 242, no. 1, pp. 263–268, 1987. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. T. Toyofuku, K. Kubo, T. Kobayashi, and S. Kusama, “Effects of ONO-6240, a platelet-activating factor antagonist, on endotoxin shock in unanesthetized sheep,” Prostaglandins, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 271–281, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. S. D'Humières, F. Russo-Marie, and B. Boris Vargaftig, “PAF-acether-induced synthesis of prostacyclin by human endothelial cells,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 131, no. 1, pp. 13–19, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. R. N. Saunders and D. A. Handley, “Platelet-activating factor antagonists,” Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology, vol. 27, pp. 237–255, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. D. A. Handley, J. C. Tomesch, and R. N. Saunders, “Inhibition of PAF-induced systemic responses in the rat, guinea pig, dog and primate by the receptor antagonist SRI 63-441,” Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 40–44, 1986. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. M. Merlos, L. A. Gómez, M. Giral, M. L. Vericat, J. García‐Rafanell, and J. Forn, “Effects of PAF‐antagonists in mouse ear oedema induced by several inflammatory agents,” British Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 104, no. 4, pp. 990–994, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. A. Wissner, M. L. Carroll, K. E. Green et al., “Analogues of platelet activating factor. 6. Mono- and bis-aryl phosphate antagonists of platelet activating factor,” Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 35, no. 9, pp. 1650–1662, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. D. P. O'Hair, A. M. Roza, R. Komorowski et al., “Tulopafant, a PAF receptor antagonist, increases capillary patency and prolongs survival in discordant cardiac xenotransplants,” Journal of Lipid Mediators, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 79–84, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. Y. Komuro, N. Imanishi, M. Uchida, and S. Morooka, “Biological effect of orally active platelet-activating factor receptor antagonist SM-10661,” Molecular Pharmacology, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 378–384, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. L. M. Kuitert, R. M. Angus, N. C. Barnes et al., “Effect of a novel potent platelet-activating factor antagonist, modipafant, in clinical asthma,” American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, vol. 151, no. 5, pp. 1331–1335, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. A. N. Kingsnorth, S. W. Galloway, and L. J. Formela, “Randomized, double-blind phase II trial of Lexipafant, a platelet-activating factor antagonist, in human acute pancreatitis,” British Journal of Surgery, vol. 82, no. 10, pp. 1414–1420, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. J. Casals-Stenzel and H. O. Heuer, “Use of WEB 2086 and WEB 2170 as platelet-activating factor antagonists,” Methods in Enzymology, vol. 187, pp. 455–465, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  43. L. M. Kuitert, K. P. Hui, S. Uthayarkumar et al., “Effect of the platelet-activating factor antagonist UK-74,505 on the early and late response to allergen,” The American Review of Respiratory Disease, vol. 147, no. 1, pp. 82–86, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. A. Freitag, R. M. Watson, G. Matsos, C. Eastwood, and P. M. O'Byrne, “Effect of a platelet activating factor antagonist, WEB 2086, on allergen induced asthmatic responses,” Thorax, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 594–598, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. D. J. Evans, P. J. Barnes, M. Cluzel, and B. J. O'Connor, “Effects of a potent platelet-activating factor antagonist, SR27417A, on allergen-induced asthmatic responses,” American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, vol. 156, no. 1, pp. 11–16, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. F. P. Gómez, J. Roca, J. A. Barberà, K. F. Chung, V. I. Peinado, and R. Rodriguez-Roisin, “Effect of a platelet-activating factor (PAF) antagonist, SR 27417A, on PAF-induced gas exchange abnormalities in mild asthma,” The European Respiratory Journal, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 835–839, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. D. P. Taggart, S. M. Browne, D. T. Wade, and P. W. Halligan, “Neuroprotection during cardiac surgery: a randomised trial of a platelet activating factor antagonist,” Heart, vol. 89, no. 8, pp. 897–900, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. R. Taylor, D. Fatovich, T. Hitchcock, C. Morrison, and L. Curtis, “Platelet-activating factor antagonism and streptokinase-induced hypotension in clinical acute myocardial infarction,” Clinical Science, vol. 100, no. 6, pp. 601–607, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. Y. Suputtamongkol, S. Intaranongpai, M. D. Smith et al., “A double-blind placebo-controlled study of an infusion of lexipafant (platelet-activating factor receptor antagonist) in patients with severe sepsis,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 693–696, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. C. D. Johnson, A. N. Kingsnorth, C. W. Imrie et al., “Double blind, randomised, placebo controlled study of a platelet activating factor antagonist, lexipafant, in the treatment and prevention of organ failure in predicted severe acute pancreatitis,” Gut, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 62–69, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. W. A. Stack, D. Jenkins, P. Vivet, and C. J. Hawkey, “Lack of effectiveness of the platelet-activating factor antagonist SR27417A in patients with active ulcerative colitis: a randomized controlled trial,” Gastroenterology, vol. 115, no. 6, pp. 1340–1345, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. P. Hilliquin, V. Chermat-Izard, and C.-J. Menkes, “A double blind, placebo controlled study of a platelet activating factor antagonist in patients with rheumatoid arthritis,” The Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 1502–1507, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. M. E. Elders, M. J. P. Gerritsen, and P. C. M. van de Kerkhof, “The effect of topical application of the platelet-activating factor-antagonist, Ro 24-0238, in psoriasis vulgaris—a clinical and immunohistochemical study,” Clinical and Experimental Dermatology, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 453–457, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. M. Poeze, A. H. M. Froon, G. Ramsay et al., “Decreased organ failure in patients with severe sirs and septic shock treated with the platelet-activating factor antagonist TCV-309: a prospective, multicenter, double-blind, randomized phase II trial,” Shock, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 421–428, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. B. J. O'Connor, S. Uden, T. J. Carty, J. D. Eskra, P. J. Barnes, and K. F. Chung, “Inhibitory effect of UK,74505, a potent and specific oral platelet activating factor (PAF) receptor antagonist, on airway and systemic responses to inhaled PAF in humans,” American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, vol. 150, no. 1, pp. 35–40, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. M. Johnson, G. Kwatra, D. K. Badyal, and E. A. Thomas, “Levocetirizine and rupatadine in chronic idiopathic urticaria,” International Journal of Dermatology, vol. 54, no. 10, pp. 1199–1204, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. E. Baltás, V. Trach, A. Dobozy, and L. Kemény, “Platelet-activating factor antagonist WEB 2086 inhibits ultraviolet-B radiation-induced dermatitis in the human skin,” Skin Pharmacology and Applied Skin Physiology, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 259–262, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. T. Wittwer, M. Grote, P. Oppelt, U. Franke, H.-J. Schaefers, and T. Wahlers, “Impact of PAF antagonist BN 52021 (Ginkolide B) on post-ischemic graft function in clinical lung transplantation,” The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 358–363, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. S. Hozawa, Y. Haruta, S. Ishioka, and M. Yamakido, “Effects of a PAF antagonist, Y-24180, on bronchial hyperresponsiveness in patients with asthma,” American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, vol. 152, no. 4 I, pp. 1198–1202, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. J. Mullol, J. Bousquet, C. Bachert et al., “Update on rupatadine in the management of allergic disorders,” Allergy: European Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 70, no. 100, pp. 1–24, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. C. Qian, S.-B. Hwang, L. Libertine-Garahan et al., “Anti-inflammatory activities of LDP-392, a dual PAF receptor antagonist and 5-lipoxygenase inhibitor,” Pharmacological Research, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 213–220, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. M. Fujita, T. Seki, H. Inada, K. Shimizu, A. Takahama, and T. Sano, “Novel agents combining platelet activating factor (PAF) receptor antagonist with thromboxane synthase inhibitor (TxSI),” Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 771–774, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. I. M. Hussaini, Y.-H. Zhang, J. J. Lysiak, and T. Y. Shen, “Dithiolane analogs of lignans inhibit interferon-γ and lipopolysaccharide-induced nitric oxide production in macrophages,” Acta Pharmacologica Sinica, vol. 21, no. 10, pp. 897–904, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. S. J. Keam and G. L. Plosker, “Rupatadine: a review of its use in the management of allergic disorders,” Drugs, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 457–474, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. C. A. Demopoulos, H. C. Karantonis, and S. Antonopoulou, “Platelet activating factor—a molecular link between atherosclerosis theories,” European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology, vol. 105, no. 11, pp. 705–716, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. N. Tsantila, A. B. Tsoupras, E. Fragopoulou, S. Antonopoulou, C. Iatrou, and C. A. Demopoulos, “In vitro and in vivo effects of statins on platelet-activating factor and its metabolism,” Angiology, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 209–218, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. D. Kelefiotis, E. Lanara, C. Vakirtzi-Lemonias et al., “Study of Digoxin as inhibitor of the in vivo effects of acetyl glyceryl ether phosphorycholine (AGEPC) in mice,” Life Sciences, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 623–633, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. M. Chini, A. B. Tsoupras, N. Mangafas et al., “Effects of HAART on platelet-activating factor metabolism in naive HIV-infected patients I: study of the tenofovir-DF/emtricitabine/efavirenz HAART regimen,” AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses, vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 766–775, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. M. Chini, A. B. Tsoupras, N. Mangafas et al., “Effects of highly active antiretroviral therapy on platelet activating factor metabolism in naïve HIV-infected patients: II study of the abacavir/lamivudine/efavirenz haart regimen,” International Journal of Immunopathology and Pharmacology, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 247–258, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. V. D. Papakonstantinou, M. Chini, N. Mangafas et al., “In vivo effect of two first-line ART regimens on inflammatory mediators in male HIV patients,” Lipids in Health and Disease, vol. 13, no. 1, article 90, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. A. B. Tsoupras, M. Chini, N. Tsogas et al., “Anti-platelet-activating factor effects of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART): a new insight in the drug therapy of HIV infection?” AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses, vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 1079–1086, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. T. Kelesidis, V. Papakonstantinou, P. Detopoulou et al., “The role of platelet-activating factor in chronic inflammation, immune activation, and comorbidities associated with HIV infection,” AIDS Reviews, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 191–201, 2015. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. S. Antonopoulou, C. E. Semidalas, S. Koussissis, and C. A. Demopoulos, “Platelet-Activating Factor (PAF) antagonists in foods: a study of lipids with PAF or anti-PAF-like activity in cow's milk and yogurt,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 44, no. 10, pp. 3047–3051, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  74. H. C. Karantonis, S. Antonopoulou, and C. A. Demopoulos, “Antithrombotic lipid minor constituents from vegetable oils. Comparison between olive oils and others,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 1150–1160, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. E. Fragopoulou, S. Antonopoulou, and C. A. Demopoulos, “Biologically active lipids with antiatherogenic properties from white wine and must,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 50, no. 9, pp. 2684–2694, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  76. E. Fragopoulou, S. Antonopoulou, T. Nomikos, and C. A. Demopoulos, “Structure elucidation of phenolic compounds from red/white wine with antiatherogenic properties,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)—Molecular and Cell Biology of Lipids, vol. 1632, no. 1–3, pp. 90–99, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  77. E. Fragopoulou, T. Nomikos, S. Antonopoulou, C. A. Mitsopoulou, and C. A. Demopoulos, “Separation of biologically active lipids from red wine,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 1234–1238, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  78. E. Fragopoulou, T. Nomikos, N. Tsantila, A. Mitropoulou, I. Zabetakis, and C. A. Demopoulos, “Biological activity of total lipids from red and white wine/must,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 49, no. 11, pp. 5186–5193, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  79. S. Koussissis, C. E. Semidalas, E. C. Hadzistavrou, V. Kalyvas, S. Antonopoulou, and C. A. Demopoulos, “PAF antagonists in food: isolation and identification of PAF antagonists in honey and wax,” Revue Francaise des Corps Gras, vol. 5, no. 6, p. 127, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  80. J. Rementzis, S. Antonopoulou, D. Argyropoulos, and C. A. Demopoulos, “Biologically active lipids from S. scombrus,” in Platelet-Activating Factor and Related Lipid Mediators 2, vol. 416 of Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, pp. 65–72, Springer, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  81. A. Panayiotou, D. Samartzis, T. Nomikos et al., “Lipid fractions with aggregatory and antiaggregatory activity toward platelets in fresh and fried cod (Gadus morhua): correlation with platelet-activating factor and atherogenesis,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 48, no. 12, pp. 6372–6379, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  82. T. Nomikos, H. C. Karantonis, C. Skarvelis, C. A. Demopoulos, and I. Zabetakis, “Antiatherogenic properties of lipid fractions of raw and fried fish,” Food Chemistry, vol. 96, no. 1, pp. 29–35, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  83. S. Antonopoulou, C. E. Semidalas, S. Koussissis, and C. A. Demopoulos, “Platelet Activating Factor (PAF) antagonists in foods: a study of lipids with PAF or anti-PAF-like activity in cow's milk and yogurt,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 44, no. 10, pp. 3047–3051, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  84. S. Antonopoulou, E. Fragopoulou, H. C. Karantonis et al., “Effect of traditional Greek Mediterranean meals on platelet aggregation in normal subjects and in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus,” Journal of Medicinal Food, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 356–362, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  85. C. A. Demopoulos and S. Antonopoulou, “A discovery trip to compounds with PAF-like activity,” Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol. 416, pp. 59–63, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  86. E. Fragopoulou, T. Nomikos, H. C. Karantonis et al., “Biological activity of acetylated phenolic compounds,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 80–89, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  87. H. C. Karantonis, N. Tsantila, G. Stamatakis et al., “Bioactive polar lipids in olive oil, pomace and waste byproducts,” Journal of Food Biochemistry, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 443–459, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  88. H. C. Karantonis, I. Zabetakis, T. Nomikos, and C. A. Demopoulos, “Antiatherogenic properties of lipid minor constituents from seed oils,” Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, vol. 83, no. 12, pp. 1192–1204, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  89. H. C. Karantonis, S. Antonopoulou, D. N. Perrea et al., “In vivo antiatherogenic properties of olive oil and its constituent lipid classes in hyperlipidemic rabbits,” Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 174–185, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  90. N. Tsantila, H. C. Karantonis, D. N. Perrea et al., “Antithrombotic and antiatherosclerotic properties of olive oil and olive pomace polar extracts in rabbits,” Mediators of Inflammation, vol. 2007, Article ID 36204, 11 pages, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  91. M. N. Xanthopoulou, K. Kalathara, S. Melachroinou et al., “Wine consumption reduced postprandial platelet sensitivity against platelet activating factor in healthy men,” European Journal of Nutrition, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  92. T. Nomikos, E. Fragopoulou, and S. Antonopoulou, “Food ingredients and lipid mediators,” Current Nutrition and Food Science, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 255–276, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  93. R. Apitz-Castro, S. Cabrera, M. R. Cruz, E. Ledezma, and M. K. Jain, “Effects of garlic extract and of three pure components isolated from it on human platelet aggregation, arachidonate metabolism, release reaction and platelet ultrastructure,” Thrombosis Research, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 155–169, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  94. H. Lim, K. Kubota, A. Kobayashi, T. Seki, and T. Ariga, “Inhibitory effect of sulfur-containing compounds in Scorodocarpus borneensis Becc. on the aggregation of rabbit platelets,” Bioscience, Biotechnology and Biochemistry, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 298–301, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  95. J. Morris, V. Burke, T. A. Mori, R. Vandongen, and L. J. Beilin, “Effects of garlic extract on platelet aggregation: a randomized placebo‐controlled double‐blind study,” Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology, vol. 22, no. 6-7, pp. 414–417, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  96. H. Tsuchiya, M. Sato, and I. Watanabe, “Antiplatelet activity of soy sauce as functional seasoning,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 47, no. 10, pp. 4167–4174, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  97. Y. M. Sagesaka, T. Uemura, N. Watanabe, K. Sakata, and J. Uzawa, “A new glucuronide saponin from tea leaves Camellia sinensis var. sinensis,” Bioscience, Biotechnology and Biochemistry, vol. 58, no. 11, pp. 2036–2040, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  98. C. V. Rao, A. Rivenson, B. Simi, and B. S. Reddy, “Chemoprevention of colon carcinogenesis by dietary curcumin, a naturally occurring plant phenolic compound,” Cancer Research, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 259–266, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  99. B. H. Shah, Z. Nawaz, S. A. Pertani et al., “Inhibitory effect of curcumin, a food spice from turmeric, on platelet-activating factor- and arachidonic acid-mediated platelet aggregation through inhibition of thromboxane formation and Ca2+ signaling,” Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 58, no. 7, pp. 1167–1172, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  100. S. N. Verouti, A. B. Tsoupras, F. Alevizopoulou, C. A. Demopoulos, and C. Iatrou, “Paricalcitol effects on activities and metabolism of platelet activating factor and on inflammatory cytokines in hemodialysis patients,” The International Journal of Artificial Organs, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 87–96, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  101. F. Violi, D. Pratico, A. Ghiselli et al., “Inhibition of cyclooxygenase-independent platelet aggregation by low vitamin E concentration,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 247–252, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  102. E. Kakishita, A. Suehiro, Y. Oura, and K. Nagai, “Inhibitory effect of vitamin E (α -tocopherol) on spontaneous platelet aggregation in whole blood,” Thrombosis Research, vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 489–499, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  103. D. Tsoukatos, C. A. Demopoulos, A. D. Tselepis et al., “Inhibition by cardiolipins of platelet-activating factor-induced rabbit platelet activation,” Lipids, vol. 28, no. 12, pp. 1119–1124, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  104. S. Ishii and T. Shimizu, “Platelet-activating factor (PAF) receptor and genetically engineered PAF receptor mutant mice,” Progress in Lipid Research, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 41–82, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  105. V. O. Melnikova, K. Balasubramanian, G. J. Villares et al., “Crosstalk between protease-activated receptor 1 and platelet-activating factor receptor regulates melanoma cell adhesion molecule (MCAM/MUC18) expression and melanoma metastasis,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 284, no. 42, pp. 28845–28855, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  106. V. O. Melnikova, G. J. Villares, and M. Bar-Eli, “Emerging roles of PAR-1 and PAFR in melanoma metastasis,” Cancer Microenvironment, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 103–111, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  107. A. B. Tsoupras, C. Iatrou, C. Frangia, and C. A. Demopoulos, “The implication of platelet activating factor in cancer growth and metastasis: potent beneficial role of PAF-inhibitors and antioxidants,” Infectious Disorders—Drug Targets, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 390–399, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  108. S. Yeu, C.-M. Sun, H.-H. Chuang, and P.-T. Chang, “Studies on the cytotoxic mechanisms of ginkgetin in a human ovarian adenocarcinoma cell line,” Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology, vol. 362, no. 1, pp. 82–90, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  109. Y. Zhang, A. Y. Chen, M. Li, C. Chen, and Q. Yao, “Ginkgo biloba extract kaempferol inhibits cell proliferation and induces apoptosis in pancreatic cancer cells,” Journal of Surgical Research, vol. 148, no. 1, pp. 17–23, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  110. T. Matsuda, M. Kuroyanagi, S. Sugiyama, K. Umehara, A. Ueno, and K. Nishi, “Cell differentiation-inducing diterpenes from Andrographis paniculata NEES,” Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 1216–1225, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  111. S. Nanduri, V. K. Nyavanandi, S. Sanjeeva Rao Thunuguntla et al., “Synthesis and structure-activity relationships of andrographolide analogues as novel cytotoxic agents,” Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters, vol. 14, no. 18, pp. 4711–4717, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  112. H. Li, H. J. Lee, Y. H. Ahn et al., “Tussilagone suppresses colon cancer cell proliferation by promoting the degradation of β-catenin,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 443, no. 1, pp. 132–137, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  113. S. I. de Oliveira, L. N. S. Andrade, A. C. Onuchic et al., “Platelet-activating factor receptor (PAF-R)-dependent pathways control tumour growth and tumour response to chemotherapy,” BMC Cancer, vol. 10, article 200, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  114. A. C. Onuchic, C. M. L. Machado, R. F. Saito, F. J. Rios, S. Jancar, and R. Chammas, “Expression of PAFR as part of a prosurvival response to chemotherapy: a novel target for combination therapy in melanoma,” Mediators of Inflammation, vol. 2012, Article ID 175408, 6 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  115. T. W. Hambley, “Metal-based therapeutics,” Science, vol. 318, no. 5855, pp. 1392–1393, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  116. S. H. van Rijt and P. J. Sadler, “Current applications and future potential for bioinorganic chemistry in the development of anticancer drugs,” Drug Discovery Today, vol. 14, no. 23-24, pp. 1089–1097, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  117. E. Meggers, “Exploring biologically relevant chemical space with metal complexes,” Current Opinion in Chemical Biology, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 287–292, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  118. G. Gasser, I. Ott, and N. Metzler-Nolte, “Organometallic anticancer compounds,” Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 3–25, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  119. N. Farrell, “Biomedical uses and applications of inorganic chemistry. An overview,” Coordination Chemistry Reviews, vol. 232, no. 1-2, pp. 1–4, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  120. H. B. Gray, “Biological inorganic chemistry at the beginning of the 21st century,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 100, no. 7, pp. 3563–3568, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  121. Y. K. Yan, M. Melchart, A. Habtemariam, and P. J. Sadler, “Organometallic chemistry, biology and medicine: ruthenium arene anticancer complexes,” Chemical Communications, no. 38, pp. 4764–4776, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  122. S. J. Lippard and J. M. Berg, “Bio-inorganic chemistry: newly charted waters,” Current Opinion in Chemical Biology, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 137–139, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  123. C.-H. Leung, S. Lin, H.-J. Zhong, and D.-L. Ma, “Metal complexes as potential modulators of inflammatory and autoimmune responses,” Chemical Science, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 871–884, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  124. A. I. Philippopoulos, N. Tsantila, C. A. Demopoulos, C. P. Raptopoulou, V. Likodimos, and P. Falaras, “Synthesis, characterization and crystal structure of the cis-[RhL2Cl2]Cl complex with the bifunctional ligand (L) 2-(2′-pyridyl)quinoxaline. Biological activity towards PAF (Platelet Activating Factor) induced platelet aggregation,” Polyhedron, vol. 28, no. 15, pp. 3310–3316, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  125. A. E. A. Porter, “The structure, reactions, synthesis, and uses of heterocyclic compounds,” in Comprehensive Heterocyclic Chemistry, vol. 3, pp. 157–197, Pergamon Press, New York, NY, USA, 1984. View at Google Scholar
  126. C. A. Mitsopoulou and C. Dagas, “Synthesis, characterization, DNA binding, and photocleavage activity of oxorhenium (V) complexes with α-diimine and quinoxaline ligands,” Bioinorganic Chemistry and Applications, vol. 2010, Article ID 973742, 9 pages, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  127. M. Harlos, I. Ott, R. Gust et al., “Synthesis, biological activity, and structure-activity relationships for potent cytotoxic rhodium(III) polypyridyl complexes,” Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 51, no. 13, pp. 3924–3933, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  128. S. Thangavel, M. Paulpandi, H. B. Friedrich, K. Murugan, S. Kalva, and A. A. Skelton, “Synthesis, characterization, antiproliferative and molecular docking study of new half sandwich Ir(III), Rh(III) and Ru(II) complexes,” Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry, vol. 159, pp. 50–61, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  129. D. A. Medvetz, K. D. Stakleff, T. Schreiber et al., “Ovarian cancer activity of cyclic amine and thiaether metal complexes,” Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 50, no. 7, pp. 1703–1706, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  130. F. P. Pruchnik, P. Jakimowicz, Z. Ciunik et al., “Rhodium(III) complexes with polypyridyls and pyrazole and their antitumor activity,” Inorganica Chimica Acta, vol. 334, pp. 59–66, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  131. P. Falaras and A. I. Philippopoulos, “Platelet Activating Factor (PAF) inhibitors with possible antitumor activity,” patent number 1006959, Industrial Property Organization of Greece, 2009.
  132. A. B. Tsoupras, A. Papakyriakou, C. A. Demopoulos, and A. I. Philippopoulos, “Synthesis, biochemical evaluation and molecular modeling studies of novel rhodium complexes with nanomolar activity against platelet activating factor,” Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry, vol. 120, pp. 63–73, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  133. T. S. Kamatchi, N. Chitrapriya, S. K. Kim, F. R. Fronczek, and K. Natarajan, “Influence of carboxylic acid functionalities in ruthenium (II) polypyridyl complexes on DNA binding, cytotoxicity and antioxidant activity: synthesis, structure and in vitro anticancer activity,” European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 59, pp. 253–264, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  134. A. Böcker, P. R. Bonneau, O. Hucke, A. Jakalian, and P. J. Edwards, “Development of specific “drug-like property” rules for carboxylate-containing oral drug candidates,” ChemMedChem, vol. 5, no. 12, pp. 2102–2113, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  135. S.-H. Xia and D.-C. Fang, “Pharmacological action and mechanisms of ginkgolide B,” Chinese Medical Journal, vol. 120, no. 10, pp. 922–928, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  136. C. N. Verani, “Metal complexes as inhibitors of the 26S proteasome in tumor cells,” Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry, vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 59–67, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  137. H. O. Heuer, “Current status of PAF antagonists,” Clinical and Experimental Allergy, vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 980–983, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  138. H. O. Heuer, “Involvement of platelet-activating factor (PAF) in septic shock and priming as indicated by the effect of hetrazepinoic PAF antagonists,” Lipids, vol. 26, no. 12, pp. 1369–1373, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  139. I. Izquierdo, M. Merlos, and J. García-Rafanell, “Rupatadine: A new selective histamine H1 receptor and platelet-activating factor (PAF) antagonist. A review of pharmacological profile and clinical management of allergic rhinitis,” Drugs of Today, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 451–468, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  140. A. B. Tsoupras, M. Roulia, E. Ferentinos, I. Stamatopoulos, C. A. Demopoulos, and P. Kyritsis, “Structurally diverse metal coordination compounds, bearing imidodiphosphinate and diphosphinoamine ligands, as potential inhibitors of the platelet activating factor,” Bioinorganic Chemistry and Applications, vol. 2010, Article ID 731202, 9 pages, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  141. E. Ferentinos, A. B. Tsoupras, M. Roulia, S. D. Chatziefthimiou, C. A. Demopoulos, and P. Kyritsis, “Inhibitory activity of the novel Zn[(OPPh2)(SePPh2)N]2 complex towards the Platelet Activating Factor (PAF) and thrombin: comparison with its isomorphous Co(II) and Ni(II) analogues,” Inorganica Chimica Acta, vol. 378, no. 1, pp. 102–108, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  142. M. Kaplanis, G. Stamatakis, V. D. Papakonstantinou, M. Paravatou-Petsotas, C. A. Demopoulos, and C. A. Mitsopoulou, “Re(I) tricarbonyl complex of 1,10-phenanthroline-5,6-dione: DNA binding, cytotoxicity, anti-inflammatory and anti-coagulant effects towards platelet activating factor,” Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry, vol. 135, pp. 1–9, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  143. A. Margariti, Rh(III) complexes and study of their biological activity against the Platelet Acivating Factor [M.S. thesis], National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece, 2014.
  144. A.-B. Tsoupras, V. Papakonstantinou, G. M. Stamatakis, C. A. Demopoulos, P. Falaras, and A. I. Philippopoulos, “Biochemical evaluation of ruthenium-based complexes towards PAF (Platelet Activating Factor) and Thrombin. Potent anti-inflammatory agents,” Science Letters Journal, vol. 4, article 208, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  145. W. H. Ang and P. J. Dyson, “Classical and non-classical ruthenium-based anticancer drugs: towards targeted chemotherapy,” European Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, vol. 2006, no. 20, pp. 4003–4018, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  146. A. Bergamo, C. Gaiddon, J. H. M. Schellens, J. H. Beijnen, and G. Sava, “Approaching tumour therapy beyond platinum drugs: status of the art and perspectives of ruthenium drug candidates,” Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry, vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 90–99, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  147. M. J. Clarke, “Ruthenium metallopharmaceuticals,” Coordination Chemistry Reviews, vol. 232, no. 1-2, pp. 69–93, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  148. G. Konti, E. Chatzivasiloglou, V. Likodimos et al., “Influence of pyridine ligand nature and the corresponding ruthenium(II) dye molecular structure on the performance of dye-sensitized solar cells,” Photochemical and Photobiological Sciences, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 726–732, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  149. A. Philippopoulos, P. Falaras, E. Chatzivasiloglou, O. Igglessi-Markopoulou, V. Likodimos, and G.-C. Konti, “Synthesis and spectroscopic characterization of new heteroleptic ruthenium(II) complexes incorporating 2-(2′-pyridyl) quinoxaline and 4-carboxy-2-(2′-pyridyl)quinoline,” Journal of Coordination Chemistry, vol. 65, no. 14, pp. 2535–2548, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  150. A. I. Philippopoulos, A. Terzis, C. P. Raptopoulou, V. J. Catalano, and P. Falaras, “Synthesis, characterization, and sensitizing properties of heteroleptic RuII complexes based on 2,6-bis(1-pyrazolyl)pyridine and 2,2′-bipyridine-4,4′-dicarboxylic acid ligands,” European Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, vol. 2007, no. 36, pp. 5633–5644, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  151. L. G. Kritikou, M. C. Moschidis, A. Siafaka, and A. C. Demopoulos, “Biological activities of phosphono-, 2-O-trichloroacetyl, 2-O-trifluoroacetyl- analogs of 1-O- Alkyl-2-O-acetyl-SN-glyceryl-3-phosphoryl-choline (AGEPC) and of acetylated glyceryl ether derivatives: platelet-Activating Factor,,” in Proceedings of the INSERM Symposium no. 23, pp. 65–72, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1983.
  152. M. Merlos, M. Giral, D. Balsa et al., “Rupatadine, a new potent, orally active dual antagonist of histamine and platelet-activating factor (PAF),” Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, vol. 280, no. 1, pp. 114–121, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus