BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2010 / Article
!A Letter to Editor for this article has been published. To view the article details, please click the ‘Letter to the Editor’ tab above.
Special Issue

Immunology and Cell Biology of Parasitic Diseases

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2010 |Article ID 439174 |

Rodrigo P. Soares, Carina Margonari, Nágila C. Secundino, Maria E. Macêdo, Simone M. da Costa, Elizabeth F. Rangel, Paulo F. Pimenta, Salvatore J. Turco, "Differential Midgut Attachment of Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis in the Sand Flies Lutzomyia (Nyssomyia) whitmani and Lutzomyia (Nyssomyia) intermedia", BioMed Research International, vol. 2010, Article ID 439174, 7 pages, 2010.

Differential Midgut Attachment of Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis in the Sand Flies Lutzomyia (Nyssomyia) whitmani and Lutzomyia (Nyssomyia) intermedia

Academic Editor: Abhay R. Satoskar
Received19 Jun 2009
Accepted31 Aug 2009
Published24 Nov 2009


The interaction between Leishmania and sand flies has been demonstrated in many Old and New World species. Besides the morphological differentiation from procyclic to infective metacyclic promastigotes, the parasite undergoes biochemical transformations in its major surface lipophosphoglycan (LPG). An upregulation of -glucose residues was previously shown in the LPG repeat units from procyclic to metacyclic phase in Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis, which has not been reported in any Leishmania species. LPG has been implicated as an adhesion molecule that mediates the interaction with the midgut epithelium of the sand fly in the Subgenus Leishmania. These adaptations were explored for the first time in a species from the Subgenus Viannia, L. (V.) braziliensis with its natural vectors Lutzomyia (Nyssomyia) intermedia and Lutzomyia (Nyssomyia) whitmani. Using two in vitro binding techniques, phosphoglycans (PGs) derived from procyclic and metacyclic parasites were able to bind to the insect midgut and inhibit L. braziliensis attachment. Interestingly, L. braziliensis procyclic parasite attachment was 11-fold greater in the midgut of L. whitmani than in L. intermedia. The epidemiological relevance of L. whitmani as a vector of American Cutaneous Leishmaniasis (ACL) in Brazil is discussed.

1. Introduction

Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis, the etiological agent of American Cutaneous Leishmaniasis (ACL), has the widest geographic distribution in the Americas and can be transmitted by the sand flies Lutzomyia (Psychodopygus) wellcomei, Lutzomyia (P.) complexa, Lutzomyia migonei, Lutzomyia (Nyssomyia) whitmani, Lutzomyia (N.) intermedia [1, 2], and Lutzomyia (N.) neivai [3]. From those, L. (N.) whitmani is considered of the highest epidemiological importance [4].

Leishmania parasites in their sand fly vectors spend their life cycle as flagellated promastigotes within the gut, where they must confront several challenges to survive including the activity of digestive enzymes, the need to escape from the peritrophic matrix, elimination of unattached parasites from the sand fly gut with the digested blood products, and the need to develop infective forms which can be transmitted to the vertebrate host [58].

Many studies have demonstrated that the promastigotes’ dominant surface lipophosphoglycan (LPG) protects the parasites against those adverse conditions preventing loss of the parasite in the gut for many species of the subgenus Leishmania. LPG has been biochemically characterized and implicated in the Leishmania specificity to different vectors [9, 1117]. All LPGs have a conserved glycan core region of Gal( 1,6)Gal( 1,3) ( 1,3)[Glc( 1)-PO4]Man( 1,3)Man( 1,4)GlcN( 1) linked to a 1-O-alkyl-2-lyso-phosphatidylinositol anchor. LPG intra- and interespecific polymorphisms are in the size and variability of side-chains attached to the repeat unit Gal( 1,4)Man( 1)-PO4 backbone and in the cap [18]. In L. braziliensis LPG, a novel mechanism in the carbohydrate regulation in the LPG side-chains was observed. The LPG from the procyclic form is devoid of side chains, while in the metacyclic phase it contains one or two (1,3)glucose residues as side chains [10]. In other species such as the Indian strain of L. donovani and L. infantum, both belonging to the subgenus Leishmania, the opposite occurs, resulting in downregulation of (1,3)glucose residues during metacyclogenesis (Figure 1). The consequence is a loss of attachment by metacyclic LPG and midgut detachment of these Leishmania species [9, 15].

The developmental patterns of Leishmania within the sand fly gut do not depend on the vector but rather on the inherent behavior of the parasite species involved. Those behavior patterns were used to determine the currently accepted classification of Leishmania into the subgenera Viannia and Leishmania for species that show peripylarian and suprapylarian patterns, respectively [19]. Development of Leishmania (Leishmania) spp is restricted to anterior regions of the pylorus, beginning in the thoracic and abdominal midgut [20]. However, Leishmania (Viannia) spp involves an obligatory phase in the posterior gut (mainly in the pylorus) prior to anterior migration and establishment of the parasites in the abdominal and thoracic midgut with following colonization of the foregut and mouth parts [21]. In this manuscript, we report for the first time the interaction of LPG with L. whitmani and L. intermedia midguts, vectors of ACL in Brazil.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Parasites

Leishmania braziliensis World Health Organization reference strain (MHOM/BR/75/M2903) was used. Starter cultures of promastigotes were grown in Medium 199 supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS, penicillin (100 units/mL), streptomycin (50  g/mL), 12.5 mM glutamine, 0.1 M adenine, 0.0005% hemin, and 40 mM Hepes, pH 7.4 at 25°C. Cells were grown at 26°C to a density of 1–  cells/mL [10].

2.2. Purification of Metacyclic Cells

Parasites from stationary phase were harvested and resuspended in Medium 199 containing peanut agglutinin (PNA) from Arachis hypogaea (35  g/mL). After 30 minutes incubation at room temperature, procyclic parasites that were agglutinated by the lectin (PNA+) were removed by low-speed centrifugation (150 g, 5 minutes, 4°C). Non-agglutinated metacyclic cells remaining in the supernatant (PNA ) were washed 2 times by centrifugation with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (2100 g, 15 minutes, 4°C) [10]. The yield of PNA+ and PNA parasites was approximately 1.0 1011 and 5.0 109 cells, respectively.

2.3. Extraction and Purification of LPG from L. braziliensis

LPGs from procyclics (PNA ) and metacyclics (PNA ) parasites were extracted in solvent E (H2O/ethanol/diethyl ether/pyridine/NH4OH; 15:15:5:1:0.017), dried by N2 evaporation, and resuspended in 0.1 N acetic acid/0.1 M NaCl. Then, they were applied to a column of phenyl-Sepharose (2 mL) equilibrated in the same buffer and LPG was eluted using solvent E. For binding studies, purified LPG was treated with PI-specific phospholipase C from Bacillus cereus (16 hours, 37°C). The dilapidated PG was separated from the cleaved lipid anchor by passage through a column of phenyl-Sepharose (2 mL) [22].

2.4. Midgut Binding Studies

Lutzomyia whitmani and L. intermedia sand flies were captured in Corte de Pedra, Bahia state, Brazil (13°26′23′′S, 39°39′3′′W). Taxonomical identification was performed prior to dissecting the midguts using the taxonomic key of Young and Duncan [23]. Binding of promastigotes was quantified by an in vitro technique [12]. Blood-unfed females maintained on 30% sucrose were dissected in PBS. Midguts (6–13 per group) were opened along the length of the abdominal segment with a fine needle, placed in concave wells of a microscope chamber slide, and incubated for 30 minutes with procyclic and metacyclic promastigotes (2 107 cells/mL, 50  l). Then, guts were washed in successive drops of PBS and the number of attached parasites is determined with a Neubauer-counting chamber. In a second experiment, the midguts were incubated for 20 minutes with PGs (10  g/mL) derived from procyclic and metacyclic promastigotes, washed with PBS, and then incubated with procyclic promastigotes (2.0 107 cells/mL) for 20 minutes at room temperature. Controls were dissected guts incubated only with procyclic promastigotes. The guts were then individually washed and counted as described above.

For binding of purified PG to midguts in vitro, opened, dissected midguts were fixed with 2% formaldehyde in PBS (4°C, 20 minutes). After several washes in PBS, the guts were incubated for 20 minutes with PG (10  g/mL) from procyclic or metacyclic parasites. After several washes, the guts were incubated in a 1:400 dilution of ascites containing the anti-LPG antibody CA7AE followed by incubation with fluorescein antimouse IgG (FITC) (1:1000). Stained guts were examined with a fluorescence microscope [9].

2.5. Data Analysis

The D’Agostino-Pearson omnibus test was made to test the null hypothesis—that the data are sampled from a Gaussian distribution— value ( ) shows that the data deviate from Gaussian distribution. For this reason, nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis was performed to test equality of population medians among groups and independent samples. Data were analyzed by GraphPad Prism 4.0 software and was considered significant.

3. Results and Discussion

Leishmania parasites have to face adverse conditions to accomplish their life cycle either in the invertebrate or in the vertebrate hosts [24]. For that purpose, the parasites developed a range of molecules represented by the secreted acid phosphatases (sAPs), glycoinositolphospholipids (GIPLs), filamentous proteophosphoglycans (fPPGs), lipophosphoglycans (LPGs), and lectins [2527]. From these molecules, LPG is the most studied molecule and considered a multivirulent factor in Leishmania [28]. During the life cycle of L. braziliensis and other species of the subgenus Viannia, a crucial step for parasite survival is attachment to different parts of midgut. In this article, we focused on the interaction of this species with the midgut epithelium, where the parasites have to attach prior to arrival in the foregut and mouth parts. In the vector midgut, the ingested amastigotes need to transform into promastigotes. After metacyclogenesis, procyclic promastigotes differentiate in metacyclics, the infective forms to be passed to a new vertebrate host [20]. The relationship between stage differentiation and midgut adhesion has been previously reported for L. major, L.infantum, and L. donovani (India and Sudan). In those species, procyclic promastigotes attach to the midgut using the LPG, while metacyclic forms detach. In the case of L. major, the side chains comprising the LPG repeat units from procyclic parasites are often terminated with (1,3)galactose, while metacyclic LPG side chains are capped with (1,2)arabinose. In L. donovani from Sudan, procyclic LPG is devoid of side-chains, but metacyclic LPG increases in size, resulting in masking of the cap. The procyclic LPG of L. infantum and L. donovani (India) has -glucose residues that are downregulated in the metacyclic phase [9, 12, 14, 15].

Using a similar quantitative in vitro assay for the attachment of living L. braziliensis promastigotes, dissected midguts from L. intermedia and L. whitmani were analyzed. A differential pattern of attachment was observed in procyclic and metacyclic L. braziliensis. In L. whitmani, the average number of attached procyclics was 11-fold compared to the metacyclics ( versus , ). For L. intermedia, the attachment of procyclics ( ) and metacyclics ( ) was very low and not statistically different ( ) (Figure 2). While comparing procyclic attachment between the two sand fly species, in L. whitmani the number of parasites that attached was 10-fold higher than in L. intermedia ( versus , ). Those data suggest that procyclic L. braziliensis were able to attach to the midgut with a mechanism different from hemidesmosomes seen in the pyloric and anterior regions [21], since they were able to easily detach and being counted in our in vitro system.

The number of metacyclic promastigotes that attach was very low in both L. whitmani and in L. intermedia ( ) (Figure 2) and therefore, only procyclics were used for the subsequent inhibition experiments. To test if the parasite attachment could be intermediate by LPG molecules, a competitive binding experiment was developed, where midguts were previously incubated with PGs derived from procyclic and metacyclic forms. Both PGs strongly blocked ( 10-fold) the attachment of procyclic L. braziliensis in L. whitmani and L. intermedia midguts (Figure 3) ( ). Interesting observation arose regarding the unexpected binding of metacyclic PG (Figure 4) to the midguts and its inhibition of parasite attachment (Figure 3). The possible explanation is that the attachment of L. braziliensis metacyclics to the midguts of L. whitmani and L. intermedia was very low in numbers. Furthermore, L. braziliensis has 10–20 less LPG molecules expressed on its cell surface than species from the subgenus Leishmania [10] and thus much less ligands for midgut attachment. These data also suggest the existence of an LPG-ligand in the sand fly midguts, which is necessary for L. braziliensis to establish and maintain the infection with further passage of the parasites towards the mouth parts. A galectin receptor for L. major LPG (subgenus Leishmania) in P. papatasi midgut was recently reported [29].

To confirm if PGs from procyclic and metacyclic promastigotes were recognizing any ligand in the midguts, the molecules were incubated with the dissected organs and revealed by immunocytochemical fluorescent staining with a specific antibody CA7AE, which recognizes PGs from procyclic and metacyclic L. braziliensis [10] (Figure 4). Consistent with our observations using live parasites, a similar pattern of stage-specific bindings was observed, where procyclic and metacyclic PGs were able to attach to opened L. whitmani and L. intermedia midguts (Figure 4(a) and 4(b)). The attachment of both types of PGs in this model may be attributed to the presence of (1,3)glucose residues in the procyclic promastigote cap and in the repeat units of metacyclics [10]. The role of (1,3)glucose residues in attachment was also demonstrated in L. donovani (India) [15] and L. infantum (Brazil) [9]. Those data suggest that upregulation of glucoses is necessary for L. braziliensis development. By adding glucoses in its LPG, perypilariam metacyclics might have to traverse midgut following their early development in the hindgut. Given that the term metacyclic normally refers to the detached infective stage available for transmission in the subgenus Leishmania, in the subgenus Viannia, this term should perhaps be renamed as suggested elsewhere [26]. However, how those parasites would detach from the midgut is still a missing step, which cannot be demonstrated in our in vitro system. A possibility is that a “second metacyclic-like” stage, if any, could detach from midgut prior to migration to foregut.

Although both studied sand flies are known to be successful vectors, the adhesion of the parasites in L. whitmani was more pronounced ( 11-fold) than in L. intermedia. Another interesting result is that procyclics were able to attach more than the metacyclics in L. whitmani, while in L. intermedia this attachment was low for both forms (Figure 2). This finding has a major epidemiological relevance, once L. whitmani is known to be the most important and widely distributed ACL vector [2, 4, 3032] mainly in the Northeast of Brazil. On the other hand, L. intermedia is more concentrated in Southeast, especially in the State of Rio de Janeiro where is the main vector of L. braziliensis [2, 3336]. However, in Corte de Pedra, State of Bahia, the border state between Northeast and Southeast, where the insects were captured for this study, both species occur sympatrically being able to transmit ACL all over the year [37].

Recently, it was shown that L. longipalpis was more efficient vector of L. infantum than Lutzomyia evansi [38]. Infection success was dependent on the establishment of the parasite in the midgut, which was very irregular in L. evansi. Consequently, those results explain the irregularity in the Visceral Leishmaniasis transmission where L. evansi occurs. To be considered a good vector, many conditions have to be followed: the distribution of the sand fly vector has to be coincident with the human disease; the insect must be found infected in the peridomestic or domestic areas and it has to feed avidly on man and many hosts [39]. However, if differences in Leishmania attachment have an impact on the efficacy of disease transmission by L. whitmani and L. intermedia still awaits further investigation.

4. Conclusions

In the Subgenus Leishmania, there are strong biochemical and genetic evidences that LPG is a critical molecule for the attachment process to sand fly midguts. However, for L. braziliensis, which makes less LPG [10], the role of this molecule seems to be necessary at least during the transient parasite passage through the midgut. The term metacyclics refers to the vertebrate infective parasite stage able to detach from the midgut as it was observed in the species from the subgenus Leishmania. Nonetheless, in the subgenus Viannia, we found two patterns of metacyclic attachment: (1) similar to the Subgenus Leishmania as observed for L. whitmani, a very competent vector and (2) very low as observed in L. intermedia, where LPG seems to have a less important role. We thus conclude that the unusual pattern of attachment of L. braziliensis in the midgut may be a result of its perypilarian behavior related with the vector susceptibility/specificity. Yet to be elucidated is how other glycoconjugates may be critical on the anterior migration of the parasite to the mouth part in the sand fly digestive tract. In the species of the Subgenus Viannia, the pattern of membrane glycoconjugates is different from those of the Subgenus Leishmania, which results in higher expression of GIPLs in L. braziliensis and L. panamensis [40]. However, the current study reinforces our understanding that LPG may still play a key role in the interaction with those vectors.


R. P. Soares is a research fellow supported by CNPq (National Council for the Development of Research of Brazil, process no. 305008/2007-2) and Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR ID A50880); C. Margonari is supported by CNPq (processes PDJ 155064/2006-1 and 476381/2007-0), P. F. Pimenta is a research fellow supported by CNPq and PRONEX, and S. J. Turco is supported by the National Institutes of Health Grant AI20941. The authors thank Dr. Ana Paula Madureira for help with statistical analysis.


  1. R. Lainson and J. J. Shaw, “New world leishmaniasis,” in Topley & Wilson' s Microbiology & Microbial Infections, Parasitology, F. E. G. Cox, D. Wakelin, S. H. Gillespie, and D. D. Despommier, Eds., pp. 313–349, ASM Press, London, UK, 10th edition, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  2. E. F. Rangel and R. Lainson, “Ecologia das Leishmanioses: transmissores de leishmaniose tegumentar americana,” in Flebotomíneos do Brasil, E. F. Rangel and R. Lainson, Eds., pp. 291–310, FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  3. C. B. Marcondes, I. A. Bittencourt, P. H. Stoco, I. Eger, E. C. Grisard, and M. Steindel, “Natural infection of Nyssomyia neivai (Pinto, 1926) (Diptera: Psychodidae, Phlebotominae) by Leishmania (Viannia) spp. in Brazil,” Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 103, no. 11, pp. 1093–1097, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. S. M. da Costa, M. Cechinel, V. Bandeira, J. C. Zannuncio, R. Lainson, and E. F. Rangel, “Lutzomyia (Nyssomyia) whitmani s.l . (Antunes & Coutinho, 1939) (Diptera: Psychodidae: Phlebotominae): geographical distribution and the epidemiology of American cutaneous leishmaniasis in Brazil—mini-review,” Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, vol. 102, pp. 149–153, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  5. D. Borovsky and Y. Schlein, “Trypsin and chymotrypsin-like enzymes of the sandfly Phlebotomus papatasi infected with Leishmania and their possible role in vector competence,” Medical and Veterinary Entomology, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 235–242, 1987. View at: Google Scholar
  6. Y. Schlein, R. L. Jacobson, and J. Shlomai, “Chitinase secreted by Leishmania functions in the sandfly vector,” Proceedings of the Royal Society B, vol. 245, no. 1313, pp. 121–126, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  7. Y. Schlein, R. L. Jacobson, and G. Messer, “Leishmania infections damage the feeding mechanism of the sandfly vector and implement parasite transmission by bite,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 89, no. 20, pp. 9944–9948, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. P. F. P. Pimenta, G. B. Modi, S. T. Pereira, M. Shahabuddin, and D. Sacks, “A novel role for the peritrophic matrix in protecting Leishmania from the hydrolytic activities of the sandfly midgut,” Parasitology, vol. 115, pp. 359–369, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  9. R. P. P. Soares, M. E. Macedo, C. Ropert et al., “Leishmania chagasi: lipophosphoglycan characterization and binding to the midgut of the sandfly vector Lutzomyia longipalpis,” Molecular & Biochemical Parasitology, vol. 121, pp. 213–224, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  10. R. P. P. Soares, T. L. Cardoso, T. Barron, M. S. S. Araujo, P. F. P. Pimenta, and S. J. Turco, “Leishmania braziliensis: a novel mechanism in the lipophosphoglycan regulation during metacyclogenesis,” International Journal for Parasitology, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 245–253, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. M. J. McConville, S. J. Turco, M. A. J. Ferguson, and D. L. Sacks, “Developmental modification of lipophosphoglycan during the differentiation of Leishmania major promastigotes to an infectious stage,” EMBO Journal, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 3593–3600, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  12. P. F. P. Pimenta, S. J. Turco, M. J. McConville, P. G. Lawyer, P. V. Perkins, and D. L. Sacks, “Stage-specific adhesion of Leishmania promastigotes to the sandfly midgut,” Science, vol. 256, no. 5065, pp. 1812–1815, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  13. P. F. P. Pimenta, E. M. Saraiva, E. Rowton et al., “Evidence that the vectorial competence of phlebotomine sand flies for different species of Leishmania is controlled by structural polymorphisms in the surface lipophosphoglycan,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 91, no. 19, pp. 9155–9159, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  14. D. L. Sacks, P. F. P. Pimenta, M. J. McConville, P. Schneider, and S. J. Turco, “Stage-specific binding of Leishmania donovani to the sand fly vector midgut is regulated by conformational changes in the abundant surface lipophosphoglycan,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 181, no. 2, pp. 685–697, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. A. B. Mahoney, D. L. Sacks, E. Saraiva, G. Modi, and S. J. Turco, “Intra-species and stage-specific polymorphisms in lipophosphoglycan structure control Leishmania donovani-sand fly interactions,” Biochemistry, vol. 38, no. 31, pp. 9813–9823, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. S. Kamhawi, G. B. Modi, P. F. P. Pimenta, E. Rowton, and D. L. Sacks, “The vectorial competence of Phlebotomus sergenti is specific for Leishmania tropica and is controlled by species-specific, lipophosphoglycan-mediated midgut attachment,” Parasitology, vol. 121, no. 1, pp. 25–33, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. R. P. P. Soares, T. Barron, K. McCoy-Simandle, M. Svobodova, A. Warburg, and S. J. Turco, “Leishmania tropica: intraspecific polymorphisms in lipophosphoglycan correlate with transmission by different Phlebotomus species,” Experimental Parasitology, vol. 107, no. 1-2, pp. 105–114, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. S. J. Turco and A. Descoteaux, “The lipophosphoglycan of Leishmania parasites,” Annual Review of Microbiology, vol. 46, pp. 65–94, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  19. R. Lainson and J. J. Shaw, “Evolution, classification and geographical distribution,” in The Leishmaniasis in Biology and Medicine, W. Peters and R. Killick-Kendrick, Eds., vol. 1, pp. 1–120, Academic Press, London, UK, 1987. View at: Google Scholar
  20. L. L. Walters, G. B. Modi, G. L. Chaplin, and R. B. Tesh, “Ultrastructural development of Leishmania chagasi in its vector, Lutzomyia longipalpis (Diptera: Psychodidae),” American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 41, pp. 295–317, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  21. L. L. Walters, G. L. Chaplin, G. B. Modi, and R. B. Tesh, “Ultrastructural biology of Leishmania (Viannia) panamensis (=Leishmania braziliensis panamensis) in Lutzomyia gomezi (Diptera: Psychodidae): a natural host-parasite association,” American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 40, pp. 19–39, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  22. P. A. Orlandi Jr. and S. J. Turco, “Structure of the lipid moiety of the Leishmania donovani lipophosphoglycan,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 262, no. 21, pp. 10384–10391, 1987. View at: Google Scholar
  23. D. G. Young and M. A. Duncan, “Guide to the identification and geographical distribution of Lutzomyia sand flies in Mexico, the West Indies, Central and South America (Diptera: Psychodidae),” Memoirs of the American Entomological Institute, vol. 54, pp. 1–881, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  24. D. Sacks and S. Kamhawi, “Molecular aspects of parasite-vector and vector-host interactions in Leishmaniasis,” Annual Review of Microbiology, vol. 55, pp. 453–483, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. M. E. Rogers, T. Ilg, A. V. Nikolaev, M. A. J. Ferguson, and P. A. Bates, “Transmission of cutaneous leishmaniasis by sand flies is enhanced by regurgitation of fPPG,” Nature, vol. 430, no. 6998, pp. 463–467, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. S. Kamhawi, “Phlebotomine sand flies and Leishmania parasites: friends or foes?” Trends in Parasitology, vol. 22, pp. 439–445, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  27. P. Volf and J. Myskova, “Sand flies and Leishmania: specific versus permissive vectors,” Trends in Parasitology, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 91–92, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. A. Descoteaux and S. J. Turco, “Glycoconjugates in Leishmania infectivity,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1455, no. 2-3, pp. 341–352, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. S. Kamhawi, M. Ramalho-Ortigão, V. M. Pham et al., “A role for insect galectins in parasite survival,” Cell, vol. 119, no. 3, pp. 329–341, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. A. Hoch, L. Ryan, J. A. Vexanat, A. Cassia, A. C. Rosa, and A. C. Barreto, “Isolation of Leishmania leishmania braziliensis and other trypanosomatids from Phlebotominae in a mucocutaneous leishmaniasis endemic area, Bahia, Brazil,” Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, vol. 81, supplement, p. 62, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
  31. A. C. R. Azevedo, E. F. R. Rangel, E. M. Costa, J. David, A. W. Vasconcelos, and U. G. Lopes, “Natural infection of Lutzomyia (Nyssomyia) whitmani (Antunes & Coutinho, 1939) by Leishmania of the braziliensis complex in Baturité, Ceará state, Northeast Brazil,” Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, vol. 85, p. 251, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  32. R. G. de Queiroz, I. A. B. Vasconcelos, A. W. Vasconcelos, F. A. C. Pessoa, R. N. Dousa, and J. R. David, “Cutaneous leishmaniases in Ceará state in Northeastern Brazil: incrimination of L. whitmani (Diptera: Psychodidae) as a vector of Leishmania braziliensis in Baturité municipality,” American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 50, pp. 693–698, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  33. M. de Brito, C. Casanova, L. M. Mascarini, D. M. Wanderley, and F. M. Corrêa, “Phlebotominae (Diptera: Psychodidae) in area of transmission of american tegumentar leishmaniasis in the north coast of the State of São Paulo, Brazil,” Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, vol. 35, pp. 431–437, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  34. E. F. Rangel, N. A. Souza, E. D. Wermelinger, and A. F. Barboza, “Infecção natural de Lutzomyia intermedia (Lutz & Neiva, 1912) em área endêmica de leishmaniose tegumentar do Estado do Rio de Janeiro,” Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, vol. 79, pp. 395–396, 1984. View at: Google Scholar
  35. E. F. Rangel, A. C. Azevedo, C. A. Andrade, N. A. Souza, and E. D. Wermelinger, “Studies on sand fly fauna (Diptera: Psychodidae) in a focus of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Mesquita, Rio de Janeiro state, Brazil,” Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, vol. 85, pp. 39–45, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  36. E. F. Rangel, A. F. Barbosa, C. A. Andrade, N. A. Sousa, and E. D. Wermelinger, “Development of Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis Vianna, 1911 in Lutzomyia intermedia (Lutz & Neiva, 1912) (Diptera: Psychodidae: Phlebotominae) under experimental conditions,” Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, vol. 87, pp. 235–238, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  37. J. C. Miranda, E. Reis, A. Schriefer et al., “Frequency of infection of Lutzomyia phlebotomines with Leishmania braziliensis in a Brazilian endemic area as assessed by pinpoint capture and polymerase chain reaction,” Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, vol. 97, no. 2, pp. 185–188, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  38. J. Montoya-Lerma, H. Cadena, M. Oviedo et al., “Comparative vectorial efficiency of Lutzomyia evansi and Lu. longipalpis for transmitting Leishmania chagasi,” Acta Tropica, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 19–29, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. R. Killick-Kendrick, “The biology and control of Phlebotomine sand flies,” Clinics in Dermatology, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 279–289, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. J. Zawadzki, C. Scholz, G. Currie, G. H. Coombs, and M. J. McConville, “The glycoinositolphospholipids from Leishmania panamensis contain unusual glycan and lipid moieties,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 282, no. 2, pp. 287–299, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2010 Rodrigo P. Soares et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.