BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2013 / Article
Special Issue

Medicinal Practice of Bioactive Compounds (Natural/Synthetic): An Insight into Gastrointestinal Disorders

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2013 |Article ID 918460 |

Daleya Abdulaziz Bardi, Mohammed Farouq Halabi, Nor Azizan Abdullah, Elham Rouhollahi, Maryam Hajrezaie, Mahmood Ameen Abdulla, "In Vivo Evaluation of Ethanolic Extract of Zingiber officinale Rhizomes for Its Protective Effect against Liver Cirrhosis", BioMed Research International, vol. 2013, Article ID 918460, 10 pages, 2013.

In Vivo Evaluation of Ethanolic Extract of Zingiber officinale Rhizomes for Its Protective Effect against Liver Cirrhosis

Academic Editor: Ibrahim Banat
Received28 Jun 2013
Revised25 Oct 2013
Accepted29 Oct 2013
Published12 Dec 2013


Zingiber officinale is a traditional medicine against various disorders including liver diseases.The aim of this study was to assess the hepatoprotective activity of the ethanolic extract of rhizomes of Z. officinale (ERZO) against thioacetamide-induced hepatotoxicity in rats. Five groups of male Sprague Dawley have been used. In group 1 rats received intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of normal saline while groups 2–5 received thioacetamide (TAA, 200 mg/kg; i.p.) for induction of liver cirrhosis, thrice weekly for eight weeks. Group 3 received 50 mg/kg of silymarin. The rats in groups 4 and 5 received 250 and 500 mg/kg of ERZO (dissolved in 10% Tween), respectively. Hepatic damage was assessed grossly and microscopically for all of the groups. Results confirmed the induction of liver cirrhosis in group 2 whilst administration of silymarin or ERZO significantly reduced the impact of thioacetamide toxicity. These groups decreased fibrosis of the liver tissues. Immunohistochemistry assessment against proliferating cell nuclear antigen did not show remarkable proliferation in the ERZO-treated rats when compared with group 2. Moreover, factions of the ERZO extract were tested on Hep-G2 cells and showed antiproliferative activity (IC50 38–60 μg/mL). This study showed hepatoprotective effect of ERZO.

1. Introduction

Ginger or Zingiber officinale (family: Zingiberaceae) is a perennial reed-like plant with annual leafy stems. The plant is about a meter tall. The fragrant perisperm of Zingiberaceae is used as sweetmeats by the Bantu tribe [1]. Ginger is traditionally used as a common condiment for various foods and beverages such as soup, ginger ale, ginger bread, ginger snaps, parkin, ginger biscuits, and speculoos. Ginger rhizomes contain a number of pungent constituents and active ingredients [2]. The steam distillation of ginger powder is used to produce ginger oil and contains high amount of sesquiterpene hydrocarbons, predominantly zingiberene [3]. Gingerol is of the major pungent compounds in ginger and can be altered to shogaols, zingerone, and paradol [4] which takes part in several activities such as hepatoprotective [5], antiparasitic [6], antiflarial [7], antimicrobial [8], antidiabetic [9], and radioprotective [10]. Ginger also has a potential remedy against cardiovascular disease [11] and can prevent the development of morphine analgesic tolerance and physical dependence in rats [12]. The plant contains high level of total phenolic and flavonoid, responsible for its high antioxidant activities [13] (for reviews see [14, 15]).

Liver disease is still a worldwide health problem. It develops in about one-third of patients with chronic liver diseases [16] with considerable level of morbidity and mortality [17]. Liver cirrhosis is an irreversible process characterized by excess extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition in the liver accompanied with scar formation and destruction of the liver architecture [18]. During liver cirrhosis, the normal tissue is replaced with the scar tissue, which can block the blood flow of the liver. Liver cirrhosis also attenuates the liver’s functions. The liver by itself is able to regenerate the damaged parts, but, during end-stage cirrhosis, the liver is not capable of renovating the damaged cells. Etiology of the liver cirrhosis has a wide spectrum including viruses, toxins, drugs, and life style [19]. Despite several efforts in drug discovery, treatment for liver cirrhosis is still a concern. In fact complementary and alternative medicine is one of the promising resources for treatment of liver cirrhosis. In traditional remedies herbal drugs have been used for the treatment of liver ailments. Many medicinal plants have been introduced with hepatoprotective potential such as Vitex negundo [20], Boesenbergia rotunda [21], Phyllanthus niruri [22], Ipomoea aquatic [23], and Orthosiphon stamineus [24]. The phytochemicals phenolic compounds exhibit antioxidant properties that scavenge the free radicals and ROS [25]. Antioxidant activity is important in the treatment of liver cirrhosis [26, 27]. Thioacetamide (TAA) is a hepatotoxic chemical and is widely used in induction of hepatic necrosis. Moreover, thioacetamide causes oxidative stress during its metabolism by microsomal CYP2E1. These effects together cause acute hepatitis which consequently leads to apoptosis of liver cells. Several phytochemicals have been reported in Z. officinale with hepatoprotective activity. For instance, in liver, cineole may inhibit CYP2E1 [28] and tocopherol and hepatocyte lipid peroxidation [29]. Inhibition of active caspase-3, capsaicin, possesses hepatoprotective effect through its antioxidant and free radical scavenging mechanisms [30]. Hepatoprotective activity of the ethanolic extract of rhizomes of Z. officinale (ERZO) has not been reported specifically. Thus, the present study was to assess the hepatoprotective effect of ERZO against TAA-induced liver cirrhosis in rats.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals

In this study we used TAA (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany) for induction of liver cirrhosis in the rats. Silymarin, a standard drug, was purchased from International Laboratory USA. Ethanol (95%; industrial graded; R&M chemical, UK) and 10% Tween-20 (Merck, Germany), concentrated formalin (38–40%; Merck, Germany), Di-natrium hydrogenphosphat (Merck, Germany), sodium dihydrogen phosphate monohydrate (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany), toluene (Merck, Germany), xylene (BDH Laboratory supplies, England), and other ordinary laboratory materials were also obtained for this experiment.

2.2. Preparation of the Plant Extract

Fresh rhizome of the plant was purchased from a commercial company (Ethno Resources Sdn Bhd, Selangor, Malaysia) and was identified by the voucher specimen deposited at the Herbarium of Rimba Ilmu, Institute of Science Biology, University of Malaya. The rhizome was dried and ground into fine powder using an electrical blender. Fine powder (100 g) was homogenized in ethanol (95%; 500 mL) and left in a conical flask at room temperature for 3 days. Then, the mixture was filtered through a fine muslin cloth and a filter paper (Whatman No. 1). Using the Eyela rotary evaporator (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) the extract became concentrated. The extract was then lyophilized and yielded ERZO. Tween-20 (10%) was used to dissolve the extract in the concentrations of 50 mg/mL and 100 mg/mL. In this study doses of 250 mg/kg and 500 mg/kg were considered for the oral administration of ERZO.

Liquid-liquid partitioning was also performed on the crude ERZO. Briefly, the extract was reconstituted with distilled water (150 mL × 3) to form a suspension. Then it partitioned with n-hexane (200 mL × 3), chloroform (200 mL × 3), and butanol (200 mL × 3) to obtain soluble fractions of n-hexane, chloroform, and butanol. The fractions were mixed well, inverting the whole separation funnel. The suspension was allowed to be separated overnight. For each solvent, the separation was performed thrice. The organic fractions were pooled and the same procedures were performed to yield the respective fractions. Each dried fraction was then dissolved in DMSO (0.5%) in different concentrations for the cell culture experiment.

2.3. Animal Experiments

The study was approved by the ethics committee for animal experimentation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Malaysia, and the Ethic no. PM/07/05/2011/MMA (a) (R). All animals received human care according to the criteria outlined in the “Guide for the Care and Use of laboratory Animals” prepared by the National Academy of Sciences and published by the national Institute of health. The rats were provided from the Experimental Animal House, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya. The animals were kept at 25 ± 2°C (humidity, 50–60%) with 12 h light/dark cycle.

2.4. Acute Toxicity Test

The toxicity of the ERZO was evaluated in Sprague Dawley rats. The animals were treated with two distinct doses of ERZO. The animals were given standard rat pellets and tap water ad libitum. Thirty-six rats (18 males and 18 females), weighed 150–180 g, were assigned into 3 groups named control group (Tween-20 10% w/v; 5 mL/kg), low dose group (ERZO, 2 g/kg), and high dose group (ERZO, 5 g/kg). Prior to the dosing, the rats fasted (food but water) overnight. Food was withheld for a further 3 to 4 hours after dosing. Each group received their respective administration, orally. Then, the animals were observed high frequently for 48 h for any sign of abnormality. The rats were monitored for 14 days for any sign of toxicity. The animals were sacrificed on the 15th day. Histological, hematological, and serum biochemical parameters were also assessed [31].

2.5. Induction of Liver Injury

Thirty male SD rats (6–8 weeks old; weighted 150–180 g) were obtained from the Experimental Animal House, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya. The rats were randomly divided into 5 groups of 6 rats and kept individually in a cage with wide-mesh wire bottom (i.e., to prevent coprophagia during the experiment). Group 1 received i.p. injection of normal saline, thrice weekly, and oral admonition of distilled water (5 mL/kg), daily. Groups 2–5 were injected with 200 mg/kg TAA (i.p.), thrice weekly as previously described [32]. Group 2 received oral administraion of distilled water (5 mL/kg). Group 5 received silymarin (50 mg/kg) as standard drug. Groups 4 and 5 were fed daily with 250 mg/kg and 500 mg/kg of ERZO. The animals were given water ad libitum. The body weights of the animals were recorded weekly. The duration of the experiment was 8 weeks, according to the previous published work [24]. The rats fasted for 24 h after receiving their respective treatments. Then the animals were euthanized with ketamine (30 mg/kg) and xylazil (3 mg/kg) and diethyl ether inhalation. For each rat, the abdomen and thoracic cavities were opened. The internal organs were checked to be assured that the other organs appear intact, microscopically. The liver was washed with ice-cold normal saline and phosphate buffered saline (PBS; pH 7.4). The organ was carefully dissected and assessed grossly. The liver’s weight was recorded for each animal. The tissues were preceded for immunohistology evaluations and antioxidant activities. Blood was sampled through jugular vein to assess the liver’s function.

2.6. Biochemical Parameters for Liver Function

Blood analysis was performed at the Clinical Diagnosis Laboratory of University of Malaya Hospital. The main biochemical parameters to assess the liver function were aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT), globulin, conjugated bilirubin, total bilirubin, albumin, and total protein.

2.7. Histopathology of Liver Tissues

Liver tissues were fixed in 10% formalin. The fixed tissues were processed using an automated tissue processing machine (Leica, Germany) and were embedded in paraffin (Leica, Germany). Sections of 5 μm thickness were prepared for each liver tissue. The sections were processed for hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and Masson’s Trichrome (MT) staining. Another set of sections were prepared for immunohistochemistry study of the tissues and mitotic indexing. The liver tissues were further assessed for histopathological examination in a blinded fashion.

2.8. Immunohistochemistry and Mitotic Index

The sections were heated at 60°C for 60 min in an oven (Venticell, MMM, Einrichtungen, Germany). Then the tissues were deparaffinized with xylene. The dehydrating step was performed with graded alcohols (absolute alcohol, 95% and 70% alcohol). Antigen retrieval was performed with 10 mM sodium citrate buffer boiling in a microwave (Sanyo, Super Showe wave, Japan). The sections were placed in TBS contained Tween-20 (0.05%). The staining steps were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions (DakoCytomation, USA). In short, endogenous peroxidase was quenched by peroxidase blocking solution. Then the sections were incubated with proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA; 1 : 200), a biotinylated primary antibodies, for 15 min. Then, streptavidin-HRP was added and incubated for 15 min. The sections were incubated with diaminobenzidine-substrate chromagen DAB for 5 min. The sections were then dipped in weak ammonia (0.037 M/L). Under light microscopy, PCNA positive tissues were stained brown with blue background.

Cell proliferation was assessed though counting the number of mitotic cells per high-power field (HPF) at the magnification of 100x. For each slide 10 randomly selected fields were counted. The mitotic index (MI) was defined as the number of mitotic cells per 1,000 hepatocytes in paraffin-embedded liver samples stained with H&E [33].

2.9. Superoxide Dismutase and Malondialdehyde in Liver Tissue

The tissue samples were homogenized in cold 20 mM HEPES buffer (1 mM EGTA, 210 mM mannitol, and 70 mM sucrose; pH 7.2) using tephlon homogenizer (Polytron, Heidolph RZR 1, Germany). The cell debris was separated by centrifugation (Heraeus, Germany) at 1,500 g for 5 min (4°C). The supernatants were used for the estimation of SOD activity (Cayman Chemical Company, USA). The MDA level was also measured by thiobarbituric acid (TBARS) according to the manufacturer protocol (Cayman Chemical Company, USA).

2.10. Cell Culture and Cytotoxicity of ERZO’s Fractions

There were four different fractions, ZC, ZX, ZB, and ZW, representing chloroform, n-hexane, butanol, and aqueous fractions of Z. officinale, respectively. A human liver carcinoma cell line (Hep-G2) was obtained from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, USA). The 3-(4, 5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT assay) was used to assess the number of viable cells which has been adapted to measure the growth of cells in vitro. According to modified protocol [34], the assay was adapted to 96-well cell culture plates. Approximately, 5000 cells per well were seeded one day before the experiment. Cell lines were cultured in RPMI-1640 growth medium, supplemented with ERZO’s fractions at different concentrations (3–200 μg/mL), 10% (v/v) sterile fetal bovine serum (FBS, PAA Lab, Austria), 100 mg/mL streptomycin and 100 U/mL penicillin (PAA Lab, Austria), and 50 mg/mL fungizone (Sigma Aldrich). The cultures were incubated in 5% CO2 incubator at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere. The cells were harvested by detaching the cells from the culture flask using 1-2 mL of trypsin after the flask get confluent enough with the cells. The harvested cells were transferred aseptically into 50 mL sterile falcon tube and washed with physiological buffer (pH 7.2) under spinning at 1200 rpm for 2 minutes. The supernatant was discarded, and the cells pellet was mixed with 1 mL of sterile media and was mixed to form a cell suspension. Harvested cells were seeded into a 96-well culture plates at 100 μL/well and allowed to adhere overnight. ERZO’s fractions were predissolved in dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO) and diluted to different concentration spanning from 3–200 μg/mL. Blank DMSO was used as a control. Cells were incubated with the samples (three wells on a plate for each concentration) for 24 to 72 h. Thereafter, 10 μL of MTT (5 mg/mL) (Sigma) was added to each well and the plates were incubated at 37°C for 4 h. The media were then gently removed, and about 200 mL of DMSO was added to dissolve the formazan crystals. The MTT formazan production was quantified spectrophotometrically at 570 nm using a microplate reader (GF-M3000) for acidified isopropanol and at 555 nm for DMSO. OD reading was referenced to 700 nm to eliminate the background effect. The percentage cell viability was calculated according to the following equation: The value was calculated using the line graph which was drawn with % inhibition and sample concentration.

2.11. Statistical Analysis

In this study statistical analysis was done using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc test (SPSS ver. 20; SPSS Inc., USA). The value less than 0.05 was considered significant.

3. Results

3.1. Acute Toxicity Tests

The animals pretreated with ERZO (2 g/kg and 5 g/kg) remained alive and did not manifest any significant visible sign of toxicity within the experimental period. There was no clinical and behavioral abnormality. Histological assessment also confirmed that the extract is safe in doses less than 5 g/kg within 15 days.

3.2. Liver Injury and the Effects of ERZO on Liver

Figure 1 shows gross appearance of the liver for each group. Liver in all of the groups except group 2 possessed generally smooth surfaces without significant irregularities or sign of nodules. Table 1 lists the body weight and the liver weight for each rat during the experiment. Group 1 demonstrated a normal growth pattern for healthy rats. Administration of TAA to group 2 lowered the body weight dramatically. The administration of ERZO (250 mg/kg and 500 mg/kg) was comparable with the effects observed in group 3 (silymarin treated group).

Animal groupsBody weight (gm)Liver weight (gm)Liver index (LW/BW %)

Normal control
TAA control
HD 500 mg/kg
LD 250 mg/kg
Silymarin 50 mg/kg

Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Means among groups ( rats/group) show significant difference.
compared to TAA control group, and compared to normal control group.
3.3. Biomedical Parameter for Liver Function

According to Tables 2 and 3, group 2 exhibits the highest levels of ALP, ALT, AST, GGT, globulin, total bilirubin, and conjugated bilirubin but albumin and total protein were the lowest among the groups. ERZO (250 mg/kg) showed that the level of ALP, ALT, AST, GGT, globulin, total bilirubin, and conjugated bilirubin were reduced significantly, whilst albumin content was significantly elevated. In these groups, ERZO could significantly restore the biochemical parameters to the levels comparable with silymarin (the standard drug).

Animal groups T. protein (g/L)Albumin (g/L) Globulin (g/L)T. bilirubin (umol/L)Conjugated bilirubin (umol/L)

Normal control
TAA control
HD 500 mg/kg
LD 250 mg/kg
Silymarin 50 mg/kg

Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Means among groups ( rats/group) show significant difference.
compared to TAA control group, and compared to normal control group.

Animal groupsALP (IU/L)ALT (IU/L)AST (IU/L)GGT (IU/L)

Normal control
TAA control
HD 500 mg/kg
LD 250 mg/kg
Silymarin 50 mg/kg

Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Means among groups ( rats/group) show significant difference.
compared to TAA control group, and compared to normal control group.
3.4. Histopathological Study

A histological image is shown in Figure 2. Regular cellular architecture with distinct normal plates of hepatocytes separated by sinusoidal capillaries and central vein was remarkable in group 1 (Figure 2(a)). In TAA control group (group 2), the liver was enlarged with numerous micro- and macronodules accompanied with disrupted cellular architecture due to the presence of regenerating nodules. The liver was sectioned by fibrous septa extending from the central vein to portal triad. The liver in group 2 showed extensive hepatic damage with necrosis and severe proliferation of bile duct. Moreover, there were microvesicular and macrovesicular centrilobular type fatty changes. Intense inflammation consisting of granulocytes and mononuclear cells around the central vein and in portal areas and congestion appeared to be significant. The livers in groups 3–5 showed a relative protection against the hepatic lesions induced by TAA. There was less disruption of the hepatic cellular structure with mild fibrotic septa. Lymphocyte infiltration in these groups was not significant. They also showed occupied region of the liver by regenerative parenchyma nodules surrounded by septa of fibrous tissue with a remarkable increase in fat storing cells, Kupffer cells, and bile ductules (Figures 2(c), 2(d), and 2(e)).

Masson’s trichrome staining was performed to evaluate the degree of fibrosis. As shown in Figure 3(a), liver section from group 1 had no collagen deposition. Group 2 showed proliferation of bile duct with dense fibrous septa and increased deposition of collagen fibers around the congested central vein, which indicate a severe fibrosis (Figure 3(b)). The rat treated with 250 mg/kg and 500 mg/kg of ERZO showed less fibrous septa and irregular regenerating nodules (Figures 3(d) and 3(e)). The collagen deposition patterns appeared comparable among groups 3–5. These observations confirmed the hepatoprotection activity of ERZO.

3.5. Regulation of PCNA and Mitotic Index

Using immunohistochemical staining against PCNA and mitotic index, the proliferating cells were highlighted in the liver tissue sections (Figure 4 and Table 4). Normal hepatocytes as appeared in group 1 did not have PCNA positive cells. Moreover, this group did not possess significant number of mitotic cells. Similarly, group 3 had no sign of PCNA staining. In comparison, group 2 showed upregulation of PCNA as a proliferative factor for the renovation of the damage tissues caused by TAA. Administration of ERZO significantly declined the mitotic index with low level of PCNA.

Animal groupsMitotic index

Normal control0
TAA control
HD 500 mg/kg
LD 250 mg/kg
Silymarin 50 mg/kg

Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Means among groups ( rats/group) show significant difference; compared to normal control group.
3.6. SOD and MDA Content of Liver Homogenate

The antioxidant activity for group 2 showed that SOD was significantly reduced when compared with group 1. The treated groups with ERZO (250 mg/kg and 500 mg/kg) or silymarin restored the SOD level significantly (Figure 5). MDA level of liver homogenate was significantly high in group 2 but administration of ERZO considerably lowered the level of MDA. These results were comparable with the silymarin-treated group (Figure 6).

3.7. Cytotoxicity Effect of ERZO’s Fractions on Hep-G2

In vitro evaluation of ERZO’s fractions against human liver carcinoma cell line is presented in Table 5. It is observed that ZX fraction at low concentration <50 mg/mL has the highest inhibition activity with corresponding 59% inhibition and of 38 μg/mL. However, beyond 50 μg/mL, ZB fraction showed the lowest efficacy with corresponding 67% inhibition and of 60 μg/mL. In comparison to ZB fraction, ZC fraction was observed to be more potent on Hep-G2 cell line achieving a maximum inhibition of about 92% and of 42 μg/mL. The percentage inhibition appeared to continue to increase with increasing concentration up to 200 μg/mL. However, the aqueous fraction ZW performance was found to have an > 200 μg/mL.

ERZO fractionsIC50 ( g/mL)


4. Discussion

Several models have been introduced in induction of hepatic injuries [35]. TAA, a most common agent used for induction of liver cirrhosis in animal studies, converts into a toxic reactive metabolite named N-acetylp-benzoquinone imine (NAPBI) and halogenates free radical in hepatic cytochrome p450 [36]. A single dose of TAA causes centrilobular necrosis and subsequent regenerative response in animals [37]. Oral administration of TAA to rodents causes apoptosis and necrosis. In fact, thioacetamide can cause liver cirrhosis and hepatocarcinoma [38, 39], hepatocellular carcinomas, hepatocellular neoplasms, bile duct, and cholangiocellular neoplasms [34]. TAA is specific for the liver and regiospecific for the perivenous hepatocytes with a long window period between necrogenic effects and liver failure [37]. In this study, acute toxicity test showed that ERZO was not toxic <5 mg/kg and did not cause any sign of toxicity or mortality within 14 days of the experiment. This observation was in accordance with the previous studies on Z. officinale [40, 41]. Rats in group 2 showed hepatomegaly. The increased liver weight/body weight ratio in TAA-treated animal was due to the accumulation of fat and degeneration in the liver. This result was in agreement with a previous report on the increased liver weight/body weight ratio [42]. Our result showed that ERZO could significantly accelerate the recovery of the liver damage. Liver cirrhosis caused hepatomegaly but in this experiment treatment with ERZO significantly prevents the effect of TAA as previously described [24]. The reduction of body weight seen in ERZO treatments might be due to the reduction of hyperlipidemic [43].

TAA enhanced the levels of serum biochemical parameters such as globulin, total bilirubin, and conjugated bilirubin but lowered total protein and albumin as previously reported [44]. The serum biochemical level for ALT, AST, and ALP is in accordance with the extent of liver damage [45]. These results confirmed previous works [41, 44]. The elevation in AST and ALT reflects hepatocellular injury while ALP is linked to the GGT elevation [46]. ERZO reduced the level of ALP as previously reported by Ajith et al. 2007 [47].

Histological evaluation showed protective effect of ERZO against TAA-induced liver cirrhosis. TAA by its nature induces liver cirrhosis in rats. A normal liver has a regular and smooth surface, but in liver cirrhosis it appeared rough and nodular with formations of micronodules and macronodules. In the histopathology evaluation, severe structural damage, formation of irregular pseudolobules with dense fibrotic septa, and proliferation of bile ducts in presence of centrilobular and inflammatory cells were noticeable. The treatment with silymarin and ERZO (in both doses) was considerable. ERZO could enhance reconstitution of liver structure from cirrhosis. The protection level of ERZO was dosedependent as the treatment of 500 mg/kg of ERZO had more protective effect. Moreover, a remarkable reduction in liver fibrosis was observed in ERZO (especially at 500 mg/kg), as previously confirmed [44, 48]. As Masson’s trichrome staining showed, minimal reduction in collagen synthesis was seen in ERZO-treated groups. In a healthy liver, no significant collagen deposition was observed. The cytoplasm of the cells appeared clear, with dilated central veins [49, 50]. Liver cirrhosis induced by TAA caused severe fibrosis especially around bile ducts where dense fibrous septa and high deposition of collagen fibers with distorted nuclei and extensively vacuolated cytoplasm were considerable. The standard drug, silymarin, reduced collagen deposition and the cells architecture was resembled. Comparably, ERZO showed a moderate deposition of collagen fibers, especially in the dose of 500 mg/kg. Our results confirmed previous reports on the reduction of necrosis and fibrosis in hepatoxic liver cells in response to phytochemical treatments [49, 50].

The inhibitory effect of ERZO on hepatic stellate cell activation was confirmed by Lee et al. 2011 [51].

PCNA, also known as cyclin, is a nuclear protein synthesized in G1/S-phase of the cell cycle and is related to cell proliferative activity [5254]. PCNA is polymerase S accessory protein, essential for cellular DNA synthesis [54]. Liver cirrhosis showed upregulation of PCNA, indicating extensive proliferation for the replacement of the damaged tissues. Treatment with ERZO or silymarin significantly reduced the expression of PCNA as previously reported [55]. The antioxidant test for SOD for the treated rats with ERZO showed high level of activity in comparison with the TAA control group (group 2). The SOD activity appeared similar in both groups treated with ERZO or silymarin which confirmed the previously published work [47]. Reactive oxygen species and nitric oxide are responsible for the induction of hepatocytes apoptosis [56]. Administration of ERZO significantly reduced MDA activity as previously observed in adriamycin-induced model [57].

On evaluating the antiapoptotic efficacy, Hep-G2 cell line was used in this analysis. n-Hexan fraction of ERZO proved to be more potent on Hep-G2 cell line. On the other hand, chloroform fraction of ERZO showed a moderate potency. Butanol fraction of ERZO showed lower efficacy. However, water fraction of ERZO was observed to show the lowest inhibitory activity. In general, the observed efficacy could probably be due to the phytochemical constituents of this plant. The antioxidant action of Z. officinale has been proposed as one of the major possible mechanisms for the protective actions of the plant against toxicity. It has been shown that [6]-gingerol is endowed with strong antioxidant action both in vivo and in vitro, in addition to strong anti-inflammatory and antiapoptotic actions. Pretreatment with [6]-gingerol reduced UVB-induced intracellular reactive oxygen species levels, activation of caspases 3, 8, and 9, and Fas expression. It also reduced UVB-induced expression and transactivation of COX-2 [58]. The hepatoprotective effect of ERZO is due to its antioxidant potency [13] dominated by monoterpenoids [59]. This could be due to the fact that flavonoids have the ability to inhibit lipid peroxidation [5]. These data suggested that ERZO is a very effective agent for the prevention of liver cirrhosis.

5. Conclusion

In the present study, the hepatoprotective activity of ERZO was explored in vitro and in vivo. Histology, ERZO slowed down liver fibrosis progression and prevents the generation of free radical induced by TAA, which provide an insight into the mechanism of its biological action. According to these data, Z. officinale ingestion is safe in humans and might be a promising hepatoprotective agent.


This research was supported by the University of Malaya Grant PV046/2012A, RG 373/11HTM and University Malaya High Impact Research Grant (UM/MOHE/HIR Grant E000045-20001).

Supplementary Materials

Serum biochemical parameters and microscopic evaluation for the acute toxicity test showed no sign of toxicity, nephrotoxicity and/or hepatotoxicity.

  1. Supplementary Material


  1. J. M. Watt and M. G. Breyer-Brandwijk, The Medicinal and Poisonous Plants of Southern and Eastern Africa, 2nd edition, 1962.
  2. V. N. Dedov, V. H. Tran, C. C. Duke et al., “Gingerols: a novel class of vanilloid receptor (VR1) agonists,” British Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 137, no. 6, pp. 793–798, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. V. S. Govindarajan and D. W. Connell, “Ginger—chemistry, technology, and quality evaluation: part 1,” Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1–96, 1983. View at: Google Scholar
  4. V. S. Govindarajan and D. W. Connell, “Ginger—chemistry, technology, and quality evaluation: part 2,” Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 189–258, 1983. View at: Google Scholar
  5. C. Ezeonu, P. A. C. Egbuna, L. U. S. Ezeanyika, C. G. Nkwonta, and N. D. Idoko, “Antihepatotoxicity studies of crude extract of Zingiber officinale on CCl4 induced toxicityand comparison of the extract's fraction D hepatoprotective capacity,” Research Journal of Medical Sciences, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 102–107, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. S. Forouzan, M. Bahmani, P. Parsaei et al., “Anti-parasitic activites of Zingiber officinale methanolic extract on Limnatis nilotica,” Global Veterinaria, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 144–148, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  7. O. M. S. Mostafa, R. A. Eid, and M. A. Adly, “Antischistosomal activity of ginger (Zingiber officinale) against Schistosoma mansoni harbored in C57BL/6 mice,” Parasitology Research, vol. 109, no. 2, pp. 395–403, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. P. Karuppiah and S. Rajaram, “Antibacterial effect of Allium sativum cloves and Zingiber officinale rhizomes against multiple-drug resistant clinical pathogens,” Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine, vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 597–601, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. Z. M. Al-Amin, M. Thomson, K. K. Al-Qattan, and M. Ali, “Anti-diabetic and hypolipidaemic properties of ginger (Zingiber officinale) in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats,” British Journal of Nutrition, vol. 96, no. 4, pp. 660–666, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. M. S. Baliga, R. Haniadka, M. M. Pereira, K. R. Thilakchand, S. Rao, and R. Arora, “Radioprotective effects of Zingiber officinale Roscoe (ginger): past, present and future,” Food & Function, vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 714–723, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  11. R. Nicoll and M. Y. Henein, “Ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe): a hot remedy for cardiovascular disease?” International Journal of Cardiology, vol. 131, no. 3, pp. 408–409, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. F. Darvishzadeh-Mahani, S. Esmaeili-Mahani, G. Komeili, V. Sheibani, and L. Zare, “Ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe) prevents the development of morphine analgesic tolerance and physical dependence in rats,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 141, no. 3, pp. 901–907, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. A. Ghasemzadeh, H. Z. E. Jaafar, and A. Rahmat, “Antioxidant activities, total phenolics and flavonoids content in two varieties of Malaysia young ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe),” Molecules, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 4324–4333, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. S. Chrubasik, M. H. Pittler, and B. D. Roufogalis, “Zingiberis rhizoma: a comprehensive review on the ginger effect and efficacy profiles,” Phytomedicine, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 684–701, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. B. H. Ali, G. Blunden, M. O. Tanira, and A. Nemmar, “Some phytochemical, pharmacological and toxicological properties of ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe): a review of recent research,” Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 409–420, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. G. H. Koek, A. Bast, and A. Driessen, “Liver cirrhosis and vitamin E status,” in The Encyclopedia of Vitamin E, R. R. Watson, Ed., CABI Publishing, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  17. T. Ueki, Y. Kaneda, H. Tsutsui et al., “Hepatocyte growth factor gene therapy of liver cirrhosis in rats,” Nature Medicine, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 226–230, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. M. Pinzani, “Liver fibrosis,” in Springer Seminars in Immunopathology, vol. 21, pp. 475–490, Springer, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  19. M. Cruz-Pamplona, M. Margaix-Munoz, and M. G. Sarrión-Pérez, “Dental considerations in patients with liver disease,” Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 127–134, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  20. F. A. Kadir, F. Othman, M. A. Abdulla, F. Hussan, and P. Hassandarvish, “Effect of Tinospora crispa on thioacetamide-induced liver cirrhosis in rats,” Indian Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 64–68, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. S. M. Salama, M. Bilgen, A. S. Al Rashdi, and M. A. Abdulla, “Efficacy of Boesenbergia rotunda treatment against thioacetamide-induced liver cirrhosis in a rat model,” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2012, Article ID 137083, 12 pages, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. Z. A. Amin, M. Bilgen, M.A. Alshawsh, H. M. Ali, A. H. A. Hadi, and M. A. Abdulla, “Protective role of Phyllanthus niruri extract against thioacetamide-induced liver cirrhosis in rat model,” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2012, Article ID 241583, 9 pages, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. S. S. Alkiyumi, M. A. Abdullah, A. S. Alrashdi, S. M. Salama, S. I. Abdelwahab, and A. H. Hadi, “Ipomoea aquatica extract shows protective action against thioacetamide-induced hepatotoxicity,” Molecules, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 6146–6155, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  24. M. A. Alshawsh, M. A. Abdulla, S. Ismail, and Z. A. Amin, “Hepatoprotective effects of Orthosiphon stamineus extract on thioacetamide-induced liver cirrhosis in rats,” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2011, Article ID 103039, 6 pages, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. G. Miliauskas, P. Venskutonis, and T. van Beek, “Screening of radical scavenging activity of some medicinal and aromatic plant extracts,” Food Chemistry, vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 231–237, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. A. Rafat, K. Philip, and S. Muniandy, “Antioxidant potential and content of phenolic compounds in ethanolic extracts of selected parts of Andrographis paniculata,” Journal of Medicinal Plant Research, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 197–202, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  27. I. Stoilova, A. Krastanov, A. Stoyanova, P. Denev, and S. Gargova, “Antioxidant activity of a ginger extract (Zingiber officinale),” Food Chemistry, vol. 102, no. 3, pp. 764–770, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. N. H. Kim, S. H. Hyun, C. H. Jin et al., “Pretreatment with 1,8-cineole potentiates thioacetamide-induced hepatotoxicity and immunosuppression,” Archives of Pharmacal Research, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 781–789, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. V. Tayal, B. S. Kalra, S. Agarwal, N. Khurana, and U. Gupta, “Hepatoprotective effect of tocopherol against isoniazid and rifampicin induced hepatotoxicity in albino rabbits,” Indian Journal of Experimental Biology, vol. 45, no. 12, pp. 1031–1036, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  30. M. H. Hassan, M. Edfawy, A. Mansour, and A. A. Hamed, “Antioxidant and antiapoptotic effects of capsaicin against carbon tetrachloride-induced hepatotoxicity in rats,” Toxicology and Industrial Health, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 428–438, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  31. S. Y. Hor, M. Ahmad, E. Farsi, C. P. Lim, M. Z. Asmawi, and M. F. Yam, “Acute and subchronic oral toxicity of Coriolus versicolor standardized water extract in Sprague-Dawley rats,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 137, no. 3, pp. 1067–1076, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. P. Ljubuncic, H. Song, U. Cogan, H. Azaizeh, and A. Bomzon, “The effects of aqueous extracts prepared from the leaves of Pistacia lentiscus in experimental liver disease,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 100, no. 1-2, pp. 198–204, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. M. Selzner and P.-A. Clavien, “Failure of regeneration of the steatotic rat liver: disruption at two different levels in the regeneration pathway,” Hepatology, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 35–42, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  34. R. Sartor, C. Thomas, S. Natural et al., Some anti-thyroidand related substances, nitrofurans and industrial chemicals, World Health Organisation, Geneva, Switzerland, 1974.
  35. M. Ramya, C. K. Ashok Kumar, M. Teja Sree, and K. Revathi, “A review on hepatoprotective plants,” International Journal of Phytopharmacy Research, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 83–86, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  36. J. Chilakapati, K. Shankar, M. C. Korrapati, R. A. Hill, and H. M. Mehendale, “Saturation toxicokinetics of thioacetamide: role in initiation of liver injury,” Drug Metabolism and Disposition, vol. 33, no. 12, pp. 1877–1885, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. P. Staňková, O. Kučera, H. Lotková, T. Roušar, R. Endlicher, and Z. Červinková, “The toxic effect of thioacetamide on rat liver in vitro,” Toxicology in Vitro, vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 2097–2103, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. S. K. Natarajan, S. Thomas, P. Ramamoorthy et al., “Oxidative stress in the development of liver cirrhosis: a comparison of two different experimental models,” Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 947–957, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. J. Balkan, S. Dogru-Abbasoglu, O. Kanbagli et al., “Taurine has a protective effect against thioacetamide-induced liver cirrhosis by decreasing oxidative stress,” Human and Experimental Toxicology, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 251–254, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. K. Srivastava and T. Mustafa, “Ginger (Zingiber officinale) in rheumatism and musculoskeletal disorders,” Medical Hypotheses, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 342–348, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. A. Atta, T. A. Elkoly, S. M. Mouneir, G. Kamel, N. A. Alwabel, and S. Zaher, “Hepatoprotective effect of methanol extracts of Zingiber officinale and Cichorium intybus,” Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 72, no. 5, pp. 564–570, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. M. Galisteo, A. Suárez, M. P. Montilla, M. I. Fernandez, A. Gil, and M. C. Navarro, “Protective effects of Rosmarinus tomentosus ethanol extract on thioacetamide-induced liver cirrhosis in rats,” Phytomedicine, vol. 13, no. 1-2, pp. 101–108, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. S. V. Kadnur and R. K. Goyal, “Beneficial effects of Zingiber officinale Roscoe on fructose induced hyperlipidemia and hyperinsulinemia in rats,” Indian Journal of Experimental Biology, vol. 43, no. 12, pp. 1161–1164, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  44. J. Pal, S. P. Singh, O. Prakash, M. Batra, A. K. Pant, and C. S. Mathela, “Hepatoprotective and antioxidant activity of Zingiber chrysanthum Rosec. rhizomes,” Asian Journal of Traditional Medicines, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 242–251, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  45. S. Islam, L. Antonsson, J. Westin, and M. Lagging, “Cirrhosis in hepatitis C virus-infected patients can be excluded using an index of standard biochemical serum markers,” Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 40, no. 7, pp. 867–872, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. F. A. Hasan and S. Owyed, “Interpretation of liver chemistry tests,” Bulletin of the Kuwait Institute for Medical Specialization, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 27–31, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  47. T. A. Ajith, U. Hema, and M. S. Aswathy, “Zingiber officinale Roscoe prevents acetaminophen-induced acute hepatotoxicity by enhancing hepatic antioxidant status,” Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 45, no. 11, pp. 2267–2272, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. O. K. Yemitan and M. C. Izegbu, “Protective effects of Zingiber officinale (Zingiberaceae) against carbon tetrachloride and acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity in rats,” Phytotherapy Research, vol. 20, no. 11, pp. 997–1002, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. R. Nagalekshmi, A. Menon, D. K. Chandrasekharan, and C. K. K. Nair, “Hepatoprotective activity of Andrographis paniculata and Swertia chirayita,” Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 49, no. 12, pp. 3367–3373, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. U. Suriyakalaa, J. J. Antony, S. Suganya et al., “Hepatocurative activity of biosynthesized silver nanoparticles fabricated using Andrographis paniculata,” Colloids and Surfaces B, vol. 102, pp. 189–194, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  51. J. K. Lee, J. H. Kim, and H. K. Shin, “Therapeutic effects of the oriental herbal medicine Shosaikoto on liver cirrhosis and carcinoma,” Hepatology Research, vol. 41, no. 9, pp. 825–837, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  52. I. O. L. Ng, E. C. S. Lai, S. T. Fan, M. Ng, A. S. Y. Chan, and M. K. P. So, “Prognostic significance of proliferating cell nuclear antigen expression in hepatocellular carcinoma,” Cancer, vol. 73, no. 9, pp. 2268–2274, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  53. Y. Takasaki, “Anti-proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) antibody,” Japanese Journal of Clinical Medicine, vol. 68, pp. 578–581, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  54. N. H. Waseem and D. P. Lane, “Monoclonal antibody analysis of the proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA). Structural conservation and the detection of a nucleolar form,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 96, no. 1, pp. 121–129, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  55. M. M. E. Taha, A. B. Abdul, R. Abdullah, T. A. T. Ibrahim, S. I. Abdelwahab, and S. Mohan, “Potential chemoprevention of diethylnitrosamine-initiated and 2-acetylaminofluorene-promoted hepatocarcinogenesis by zerumbone from the rhizomes of the subtropical ginger (Zingiber zerumbet),” Chemico-Biological Interactions, vol. 186, no. 3, pp. 295–305, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. J. H. Wang, H. P. Redmond, Q. D. I. Wu, and D. Bouchier-Hayes, “Nitric oxide mediates hepatocyte injury,” The American Journal of Physiology, vol. 275, no. 5, pp. G1117–G1126, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  57. S. A. Sakr, H. A. Mahran, and H. A. Lamfon, “Protective effect of ginger (Zingiber officinale) on adriamycin-induced hepatotoxicity in albino rats,” Journal of Medicinal Plant Research, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 133–140, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  58. J.-K. Kim, Y. Kim, K.-M. Na, Y.-J. Surh, and T.-Y. Kim, “[6]-gingerol prevents UVB-induced ROS production and COX-2 expression in vitro and in vivo,” Free Radical Research, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 603–614, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. Y. Sivasothy, W. K. Chong, A. Hamid, I. M. Eldeen, S. F. Sulaiman, and K. Awang, “Essential oils of Zingiber officinale var. rubrum Theilade and their antibacterial activities,” Food Chemistry, vol. 124, no. 2, pp. 514–517, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2013 Daleya Abdulaziz Bardi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.