Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 213574, 9 pages
Research Article

Potential Probiotic Escherichia coli 16 Harboring the Vitreoscilla Hemoglobin Gene Improves Gastrointestinal Tract Colonization and Ameliorates Carbon Tetrachloride Induced Hepatotoxicity in Rats

1Molecular Microbial Biochemistry Laboratory, Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda, Vadodara Gujarat 390002, India
2C.G. Bhakta Institute of Biotechnology, Faculty of Applied Science, UKA Tarsadia University, Bardoli, Surat Gujarat 394 350, India

Received 23 February 2014; Accepted 2 June 2014; Published 19 June 2014

Academic Editor: Alexander Suvorov

Copyright © 2014 Prasant Kumar et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


The present study describes the beneficial effects of potential probiotic E. coli 16 (pUC8:16gfp) expressing Vitreoscilla hemoglobin (vgb) gene, associated with bacterial respiration under microaerobic condition, on gastrointestinal (GI) colonization and its antioxidant activity on carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) induced toxicity in Charles Foster rats. In vitro, catalase activity in E. coli 16 (pUC8:16gfp) was 1.8 times higher compared to E. coli 16 (pUC-gfp) control. In vivo, E. coli 16 (pUC8:16gfp) not only was recovered in the fecal matter after 70 days of oral administration but also retained antibacterial activities, whereas E. coli 16 (pUC-gfp) was not detected. Oral administration of 200 and 500 μL/kg body weight of CCl4 to rats at weekly interval resulted in elevated serum glutamyl pyruvate transaminase (SGPT) and serum glutamyl oxalacetate transaminase (SGOT) levels compared to controls. Rats prefed with E. coli 16 (pUC8:16gfp) demonstrated near to normal levels for SGPT and SGOT, whereas the liver homogenate catalase activity was significantly increased compared to CCl4 treated rats. Thus, pUC8:16gfp plasmid encoding vgb improved the growth and GI tract colonization of E. coli 16. In addition, it also enhanced catalase activity in rats harboring E. coli 16 (pUC8:16gfp), thereby preventing the absorption of CCl4 to GI tract.

1. Introduction

Human gastrointestinal (GI) tract has a very complex microbiota, with approximately 500–1000 different species [1]. At birth, babies emerge from a sterile environment into one that is loaded with microbes as a result of which the infant’s intestine rapidly becomes home to one of the densest populations of bacteria on earth [2]. The endogenous GI microbiota plays a fundamentally important role in health and disease, yet this ecosystem remains to be incompletely characterized [3]. The critical functions of the commensal microbiota include protection against irritable bowel syndrome, inflammatory bowel disease, colorectal cancer, and epithelial cell injury, regulation of host fat storage, and stimulation of intestinal angiogenesis [4, 5]. In GI tract, the microbial diversity changes from stomach to rectum. The microbiota of infants possesses three taxonomic groups, whereas healthy adults contain only five phyla and, amongst proteobacteria, E. coli is the predominant commensal microorganism present in the GI tract [2, 68]. E. coli being a facultative anaerobe colonizes the GI tract at early stages and is proposed to facilitate the colonization of obligate anaerobes belonging to 22 different phyla by the creation of a reduced environment [9]. Many E. coli strains were demonstrated to have probiotic properties [1013]. Previously, we isolated several E. coli strains from rat feces demonstrating characteristics such as acid tolerance, antibiotic susceptibility, nonpathogenicity, adherence capability, and antimicrobial activity to the Enterobacteriaceae family [13]. The E. coli 16 showed better adherence and acid tolerance capability along with other characteristics conferring this strain as potential probiotic [13].

Oxygen electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) imaging technique showed that the GI tract environment fluctuates between anaerobic and microaerobic conditions [14]. In order to adapt the microaerobic environment of GI tract, bacteria downregulate or repress aerobic genes and simultaneously activate anaerobic genes [3]. E. coli being a facultative anaerobe has aerobic respiratory control (ARC) system and fumarate nitrate reductase (FNR) system for aerobic and anaerobic conditions, respectively [15]. Aerobic bacterial respiration is essential for effective competition and colonization of E. coli in microaerobic environment of GI tract [16].

In oxygen poor habitats, Vitreoscilla sp., an obligate aerobe, survives due to efficient oxygen-binding kinetics of Vitreoscilla hemoglobin (VHb) encoded by vgb gene [17]. A heterologous expression of VHb in E. coli resulted in improved cell growth and protein production under microaerobic conditions [15]. Additionally, heterologous expression of vgb in Enterobacter aerogenes reduced H2O2 toxicity [18]. In E. coli, the protective role of VHb is mediated through oxidative stress regulator OxyR, which in turn activates VHb biosynthesis [19, 20]. VHb also has been shown to possess peroxidase activity [21, 22]. The chimera of superoxide dismutase and VHb protein rapidly detoxified reactive oxygen species (ROS) produced under oxidative stress conditions in E. coli [22].

Carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) causes tissue injury especially in hepatocytes by the formation of reactive trichloromethyl radicals [23]. Trichloromethyl radical reacts with molecular oxygen to form trichloromethylperoxyl radical and oxidizes lipid molecules by hydrogen abstraction especially in hepatocytes. The present study was designed to investigate the effects of E. coli 16 harboring vgb gene on GI tract colonization and CC14 induced hepatotoxicity.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bacterial Strains, Plasmids, and Culture Conditions

The bacterial strains and the plasmids used in this study are listed in Table 1. E. coli 16 isolate was maintained on Hichrome coliform agar and MacConkey agar plates (HiMedia, Mumbai, India). E. coli DH5α was used for constructing recombinant plasmids. E. coli BL21 was used for expressing the proteins. Luria-Bertani (LB) rich medium [5 g/L yeast extract (HiMedia, Mumbai, India), 10 g/L, Tryptone (HiMedia, Mumbai, India), and 10 g/L NaCl] and M9 minimal medium (12.8 g/L Na2HPO4·7H2O, 3 g/L KH2PO4, 0.5 g/L NaCl, 1 g/L NH4Cl, 3 mg/L CaCl2, and 1 mM MgSO4) were used for plasmid construction and bacterial culture, respectively. NaNO3 (10 g/L) was added to the medium for induction of the nar promoter and 1 mM FeSO4 was added as a metal cofactor for VHb protein [18]. Plasmid-containing cells were grown in medium supplemented with 100 μg/mL ampicillin.

Table 1: Bacterial strains and plasmids.

2.2. Construction of Recombinant Plasmids and Transformation in E. coli 16

Green fluorescent protein (GFP) would be suitable as an in vivo marker for monitoring E. coli 16. Cloning of the gfp gene into the SmaI site of pUC8:16 results in lacZ-gfp fusion in which gfp is in frame with lacZ sequence. The recombinant plasmid was confirmed by restriction digestions. The plasmids pUC-gfp and pUC8:16gfp were independently transformed in the potential probiotic E. coli 16 using the CaCl2 method [24]. The transformants were screened by their fluorescence at 365 nm in ultraviolet transilluminator.

2.3. Preparation of E. coli 16 Culture and Cell-Free Extracts for Catalase Assays

Luria broth culture was grown as 60 mL of culture in a 100 mL flask. The cells were incubated at 37°C using agitation rates of 75 rpm and were treated with CCl4 (65 mM) at 0.4 to 0.5 O.D., that is, midlog phase, and incubated for 30 h. The cells were then harvested by centrifugation at 9,200 g for 2 min at 4°C. The cell pellet was washed once with 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) followed by resuspension in the same buffer. The cells were subjected to sonication (Branson Sonifier Model 450) for a total period of 1 min at a pulse rate of 15 s in an ice bath, followed by centrifugation at 9,200 g at 4°C for 30 min to remove the cell debris. The supernatant thus obtained was used as cell-free extract for the catalase assay.

2.4. Catalase Assay of Cell-Free Extract

The cell-free extract was added in a cuvette followed by addition of 30 mM H2O2 prepared in 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0). The decrease in absorbance was measured at 240 nm for 1 min to determine the catalase activity [25]. The molar extinction coefficient of 43.6 M/cm was used to determine the catalase activity and the activity was reported as units/min/mg of protein.

2.5. Animal Experiments

Male Charles Foster rats were housed in the departmental animal house facility under controlled room temperature . The animals were fed chow diet and water ad libitum. The experiments were carried out after the approval of the Animal Ethical Committee of Department of Biochemistry, The MS University of Baroda, Vadodara (Approval no. 938/A/06/-CPCSEA). The guidelines of the Committee for the Purpose of Control and Supervision of Experiments on Animals (CPCSEA) were followed.

2.5.1. GI Tract Colonization Experiments

Three-month aged rats were given drinking water containing streptomycin sulphate (5 g/liter) for 24 h to remove the existing resident facultative microflora and then starved for food and water for 18–20 h. The rats were divided into two groups and were fed approximately 109 CFU of E. coli 16 (pUC-gfp) and E. coli 16 (pUC8:16gfp), respectively, in 1 mL of 20% sucrose once a day for up to 3 days. After the bacterial suspension was ingested, food and water were restored, and fecal plate counts were determined at regular intervals till the 70th day. Fecal samples were homogenized, serially diluted in 0.85% saline, and plated on Luria agar plates containing ampicillin (100 μg/mL). After 24 h, the plates were inspected under UV light for the fluorescence. As soon as the reduction of fluorescent colonies of fecal samples was noted, rats were given ampicillin (50 mg/kg body weight) (days 23–25 and days 48–51) in drinking water [16, 26].

Selected fluorescent colonies from fecal samples were screened for vgb gene. The colony PCR was carried out on using a set of specific primers that anneal to a region of the vgb gene in E. coli 16 (pUC8:16gfp) and amplify a 714 bp fragment. Similarly, least dilution of fecal homogenate was plated on Luria agar plates containing lawn of E. coli DH5α to show the inherent antimicrobial property of E. coli 16 (pUC8:16gfp). The pUC8:16gfp is a nonmobilizable plasmid and does not get transferred horizontally [26].

2.5.2. Effect of E. coli 16 (pUC8:16gfp) under Oxidative Stress

A total of 15 rats (14 to 16 months) were equally divided into five groups (). Group I served as normal control and was orally given saline for 3 days followed by 2 weeks interval up to 45 days. Group II served as potential probiotic E. coli 16 (pUC8:16gfp) where rats were fed the culture orally with saline for 3 days followed by 2 weeks interval up to 45 days. Group III served as normal control with CCl4 and was orally given saline for 3 days followed by 2 weeks interval up to 45 days. Further, two doses (200 μL and 500 μL) of CCl4 were given with olive oil as carriers at weekly interval and the antioxidant parameters in plasma and liver were monitored to assess the liver function. Group IV (potential probiotic E. coli 16 (pUC-gfp) with CCl4) served as vector control and the same procedure was followed as that of Group III. Group V [potential probiotic E. coli 16 (pUC8:16gfp)] with CCl4 served as test and the same procedure was followed as that of Group III. At the end of the 2nd dose, on the 3rd day, rats were mildly anesthetized and blood was collected via retroorbital sinus followed by plasma separation for further biochemical analysis. Later, animals were sacrificed by decapitation under mild anesthesia and liver was excised and stored at −80°C for further estimations.

2.5.3. Assessment of Liver Function

Liver damage in the above mentioned groups of rats was assessed by estimating the plasma levels of serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT) and serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase (SGPT) using commercially available mono single test IFCC, kinetic SGOT and SGPT test kits from Reckon Diagnostics Pvt. Ltd, Vadodara, Gujarat, India, as per the manufacturer’s instructions.

2.5.4. Estimation of Lipid Peroxidation and Catalase Activity

Liver samples (100 mg/mL) were homogenized in 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer and centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 15 min. The supernatant thus obtained was used for estimating the lipid peroxidation levels and catalase activity. Catalase activity was expressed as enzyme activity per mg of protein. The protein concentration in each fraction was determined by modified Lowry method [27], using bovine serum albumin as standard. The mean malondialdehyde (MDA) content (μmol/mg protein) was used as an indicator of lipid peroxidation and assayed in the form of thiobarbituric acid-reacting substances (TABRS) [28]. Catalase activity was measured using the method described previously [25].

2.5.5. Microscopic Examination of Liver

Liver samples were fixed using 4% buffered paraformaldehyde followed by dehydration in graded alcohol series and embedded in paraffin wax. About 4-5 μm thick sections were cut (by Leica RM 2155 Microtome) followed by staining with hematoxylin and eosin for examination using Leica microscope.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Statistical evaluation of the data was performed by one way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Bonferroni’s corrections for multiple comparisons. The results were expressed as mean ± SEM using GraphPad Prism version 5.0 for Windows, GraphPad Software, San Diego, California, USA.

3. Results

3.1. Effect of vgb Gene Expression on E. coli 16 (pUC8:16gfp)

A significant effect of vgb expression was observed as E. coli 16 (pUC8:16gfp) demonstrated an increase in growth rate under microaerobic condition compared to its pUC-gfp vector control (Figure 1).

Figure 1: Growth curve of E. coli 16 pUCgfp and pUC8:16gfp transformants under static condition in flasks at 37°C. Microaerophilic condition was maintained by addition of NaNO3 (1%) in M9 medium.
3.2. vgb Gene Expression Enhances In Vitro Catalase Activity of E. coli 16 (pUC8:16gfp)

In the presence of CCl4, catalase activity of E. coli 16 (pUC8:16gfp) was increased by 1.8-fold as compared to E. coli 16 (pUC8-gfp) vector control (Figure 2). This suggests that vgb gene was expressed under microaerobic environment and was functional in E. coli 16 (pUC8:16gfp).

Figure 2: In vitro catalase activities of E. coli 16 containing pUC8:16gfp construct. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM ( each group) and analysis was performed using one way ANOVA. and compared to E. coli 16 with CCl4 treated groups.
3.3. GI Tract Colonization of E. coli 16 (pUC8:16gfp) in Rats Exposed to Intermittent Antibiotic Challenge

E. coli 16 (pUC-gfp) transformants declined significantly in feces as compared to E. coli 16 (pUC8:16gfp) transformants. On the 21st day, the fecal E. coli 16 (pUC-gfp) counts were reduced by 100 times as compared to E. coli 16 (pUC8:16gfp) counts. After 22nd to 24th days, upon the first treatment of ampicillin, the counts of both E coli 16 (pUC-gfp) and E. coli 16 (pUC8:16gfp) transformants in feces were increased. However, after 48 days, E. coli 16 (pUC-gfp) was not detected, whereas E. coli 16 (pUC8:16gfp) counts remained constant. Moreover, after 51 days, E. coli 16 (pUC-gfp) was not detected even after ampicillin treatment whereas E. coli 16 (pUC8:16gfp) was detected even after second ampicillin treatment up to the 70th day (Figure 3(a)). Thus, the retention time of potential probiotic E. coli 16 (pUC8:16gfp) was significantly improved in the GI tract of rats. On the 48th day of postfeeding (Figures 3(b) and 3(c)), ampicillin resistant bacterial colonies were detected from fecal samples. These colonies demonstrated fluorescence as well as antimicrobial properties suggesting that both properties were retained in the E. coli 16 (pUC8:16gfp).

Figure 3: (a) Plate counts of fluorescent colonies in fecal samples of rats, following oral administration of E. coli 16 (pUC-gfp) and E. coli 16 (pUC8:16gfp) to respective groups of rats for the effects of antibiotic on the colonization process. (b) E. coli 16 strain transformed with pUC8:16gfp plasmid showed antimicrobial activity and expressed green fluorescent protein in fecal samples of Charles Foster rats. The plate (in the right side) showed antimicrobial activity under transmitted light and the same plate (in the left side) showed green fluorescent protein under ultraviolet light at 365 nm. The plate assay suggested that the transformants retained their antimicrobial activity even after passing through rat GI tract, and pUC8:16gfp plasmid did not affect the inherent antimicrobial activity of the E. coli. (c) Colony PCR for vgb gene in colonies showing fluorescence and antimicrobial activity in the plate. 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis revealed 714 bp specific band of vgb gene (lanes: 2 and 3). Lane 1 represents 100 bp ladder; lane 4 represents plasmid pUC-gfp serving as negative control; lane 5 represents plasmid pUC8:16gfp serving as positive control for vgb gene.
3.4. Effects of E. coli 16 (pUC8:16gfp) on Liver Function
3.4.1. SGOT and SGPT Activity in Plasma

Oral administration of CCl4 to Groups III (normal control with CCl4) and IV (vector control) rats resulted in significantly elevated () serum levels of SGPT and SGOT as compared to Group I (control) and Group II [prefed with potential probiotic E. coli 16 (pUC8:16gfp)] untreated rats. Treatment of CCl4 to Group V rats [prefed with potential probiotic E. coli 16 (pUC8:16gfp)] resulted in significantly decreased () activities of SGOT and SGPT enzymes as compared to Group III and Group IV rats (Figures 4(a) and 4(b)). Rats treated with CCl4 and prefed with potential probiotic E. coli 16 (pUC8:16gfp) resulted in near to normal plasma SGPT and SGOT levels.

Figure 4: Effect of probiotic E. coli 16 (pUC8:16gfp) encoding vgb gene on liver parameters: (a) serum glutamyl oxalacetate transaminase (SGOT) levels, (b) serum glutamyl pyruvate transaminase (SGPT) levels, (c) catalase activity, and (d) lipid peroxidation levels in different groups of rats treated with CCl4. SGOT and SGPT activities were measured in plasma, whereas catalase activity and lipid peroxidation levels were measured in liver homogenates. , , , and compared to Group I (control without CC14 treatment). Values are expressed as mean ± SEM ( each group) and analysis was performed using one way ANOVA.
3.4.2. Liver Lipid Peroxidation Level and Catalase Activity

Catalase activity was significantly decreased in the liver homogenate of CCl4 treated Group III and Group IV rats as compared to control groups. Potential probiotic E. coli 16 (pUC8:16gfp) Group V rats showed significantly () increased catalase activity compared to CCl4 treated Group III rats (Figure 4(c)). Slight decrease in the mean MDA levels was found in the liver of Group V (CCl4-exposed) rats compared to Group III rats (Figure 4(d)).

3.4.3. Histopathological Analysis of Liver

Histopathological analysis of liver cells using hematoxylin and eosin stains in Group III and Group IV rats treated with CCl4 revealed extensive liver damage, characterized by the disruption of the lattice nature of the hepatocytes, damaged cell membranes, degenerated nuclei, disintegrated central veins, and damaged hepatic sinusoids as compared to the liver of Groups I and II (control) rats. However, in Group V rats [treated with CCl4 and prefed with potential probiotic E. coli 16 (pUC8:16gfp)], only minimal disruption of the hepatic cellular structure was observed (Figure 5).

Figure 5: Effect of probiotic E. coli 16 (pUC8:16gfp) encoding vgb gene on CCL4-induced histopathological changes in different groups of rats: (a) photomicrograph of liver from Group II [control rat with probiotic E. coli 16 (pUC8:16gfp)], (b) photomicrograph of liver from Group III (rat treated with CCL4), (c) photomicrograph of liver from Group V [rat treated with CCL4 along with probiotic E. coli 16 (pUC8:16gfp)], and (d) photomicrograph of liver from Group IV [rat treated with CCL4 along with probiotic E. coli 16 (pUC-gfp)] as vector control. Haematoxylin and eosin were used for staining the paraffin-embedded sections.

4. Discussion

Probiotic bacteria exert their effects by competing with potentially pathogenic bacteria for ecological niches, thereby preventing their colonization. The exact mechanism of colonization of E. coli in the GI tract is not clear, but it is known that the respiration of E. coli in GI tract is very much essential for its successful colonization and competitiveness in the GI tract [16]. Colonization and competitiveness of facultative anaerobes, that is, E. coli, depend on their respiratory flexibility which in turn depends on high-affinity cytochrome bd oxidase. Previous study has shown that VHb improves the oxygen uptake rate of E. coli under microaerobic condition, by 5-fold and 1.5 increase of cytochrome bo3 and cytochrome bd oxidase, respectively [29]. In the study, VHb expression was enhanced by low oxygen tension via a fumarate and nitrate reductase regulator- (FNR-) dependent mechanism [29]. When a vgb gene is introduced into E. coli, the cell growth and yield of the target protein were increased significantly [16, 18, 3034]. In the present study, E. coli 16 (pUC8:16gfp) plasmid expressing vgb gene was also found to increase the growth rate in microaerobic condition as well as improve the GI tract colonization and enhance the catalase activity. The expression of vgb gene significantly improved the colonization of potential probiotic E. coli 16 (pUC8:16gfp) in rat GI tract, possibly due to improved cell growth and better respiratory adaptation under low oxygen tension.

Superoxide radicals formed within biological systems are toxic to living cells. Trichloroperoxyl radical (CC13OO) synthesized from and CC14 has a highly toxic effect on metabolic oxidizing activities presumably because of the electron-withdrawing nature of the trichloromethyl group [23, 35]. Heterologous expression of nonheme catalase in Lactobacillus lactis improved the antioxidant status and alleviated the risk of 1,2-dimethyl hydrazine induced colon cancer [36, 37]. Near to normal levels of SGPT and SGOT activity in CCl4 treated rats with E. coli 16 (pUC8:16gfp) plasmid demonstrate the protection of the toxic effects of CCl4 in the liver. Previous reports have suggested that the protective effects could be attributed to the peroxidase activity of VHb [21, 38]. Additionally, VHb is known to decrease the oxidative stress caused by H2O2 by enhancing the catalase activity [18]. The present study also found 1.8-fold increased activity of catalase contributed by vgb gene under in vitro condition. It has been shown that VHb in E. coli induces the expression of catalase-peroxidase G (katG) and superoxide dismutase A (sodA) genes, thereby protecting from damage caused by ROS [19]. In comparison, when vgb gene was expressed in E. coli oxyR mutant, the vgb expression was increased but the strain showed high sensitivity to oxidative stress without induction of antioxidant genes. Thus, oxidative stress regulator OxyR mediates the protective effect of vgb under oxidative stress [19].

5. Conclusion

The present investigation showed that vgb gene when expressed in a potential probiotic E. coli 16 strain increased its GI tract colonization, thereby improving its survival. In addition, vgb gene being an antioxidant, it detoxified the CCl4 in GI tract and thereby reduced the hepatotoxicity in rats. Hence, the retention of probiotics in GI tract is thus enhanced; it reduces the doses to maintain an effective probiotic count in the GI tract. These additional benefits may increase the efficiency of the probiotics making them more effective in minimum dose intervals.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


The authors thank Professor Stark, B.C (Biology Division, Department of Biological, Chemical, and Physical Sciences, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL, USA), and Dr. Schultz, M. (Department of Internal Medicine I, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany) for their generous gift of pUC8:16 and pUC-gfp plasmids, respectively, Dr. Ansarullah (Division of Phytotherapeutics and Metabolic Endocrinology, Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, The MS University of Baroda, Vadodara, Gujarat, India) for his kind help in performing histopathological results and assessment, and Prasant Kumar, who is a Ph.D. student financially supported by Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India, for his fellowship.


  1. N. Peekhaus and T. Conway, “What's for dinner?: entner-Doudoroff metabolism in Escherichia coli,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 180, no. 14, pp. 3495–3502, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. L. E. Comstock, “Microbiology: the inside story,” Nature, vol. 448, no. 7153, pp. 542–544, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. P. G. Falk, L. V. Hooper, T. Midtvedt, and J. I. Gordon, “Creating and maintaining the gastrointestinal ecosystem: what we know and need to know from gnotobiology,” Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 1157–1170, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. P. B. Eckburg, E. M. Bik, C. N. Bernstein et al., “Microbiology: diversity of the human intestinal microbial flora,” Science, vol. 308, no. 5728, pp. 1635–1638, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. V. Stanghellini, G. Barbara, C. Cremon et al., “Gut microbiota and related diseases: clinical features,” Internal and Emergency Medicine, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 57–63, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. E. M. Bik, P. B. Eckburg, S. R. Gill et al., “Molecular analysis of the bacterial microbiota in the human stomach,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 103, no. 3, pp. 732–737, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. P. J. Turnbaugh, R. E. Ley, M. A. Mahowald, V. Magrini, E. R. Mardis, and J. I. Gordon, “An obesity-associated gut microbiome with increased capacity for energy harvest,” Nature, vol. 444, no. 7122, pp. 1027–1031, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. O. Tenaillon, D. Skurnik, B. Picard, and E. Denamur, “The population genetics of commensal Escherichia coli,” Nature Reviews Microbiology, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 207–217, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. C. Palmer, E. M. Bik, D. B. DiGiulio, D. A. Relman, and P. O. Brown, “Development of the human infant intestinal microbiota,” PLoS biology, vol. 5, no. 7, article e177, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. S. N. Adler, “The probiotic agent Escherichia coli M-17 has a healing effect in patients with IBS with proximal inflammation of the small bowel,” Digestive and Liver Disease, vol. 38, no. 9, p. 713, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. L. Cursino, D. Šmajs, J. Šmarda et al., “Exoproducts of the Escherichia coli strain H22 inhibiting some enteric pathogens both in vitro and in vivo,” Journal of Applied Microbiology, vol. 100, no. 4, pp. 821–829, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. O. Gillor, A. Etzion, and M. A. Riley, “The dual role of bacteriocins as anti- and probiotics,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 81, no. 4, pp. 591–606, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. P. Kumar, S. Ferzin, S. Chintan, and G. N. Kumar, “Isolation and characterization of potential probiotic Escherichia coli strains from rat faecal samples,” The American Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 112–117, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. G. He, R. A. Shankar, M. Chzhan, A. Samouilov, P. Kuppusamy, and J. L. Zweier, “Noninvasive measurement of anatomic structure and intraluminal oxygenation in the gastrointestinal tract of living mice with spatial and spectral EPR imaging,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 96, no. 8, pp. 4586–4591, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. P. S. Tsai, M. Nageli, and J. E. Bailey, “Intracellular expression of Vitreoscilla hemoglobin modifies microaerobic Escherichia coli metabolism through elevated concentration and specific activity of cytochrome o,” Biotechnology and Bioengineering, vol. 79, no. 5, pp. 558–567, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. S. A. Jones, F. Z. Chowdhury, A. J. Fabich et al., “Respiration of Escherichia coli in the mouse intestine,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 75, no. 10, pp. 4891–4899, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. R. Kaur, S. Ahuja, A. Anand et al., “Functional implications of the proximal site hydrogen bonding network in Vitreoscilla hemoglobin (VHb): role of Tyr95 (G5) and Tyr126 (H12),” FEBS Letters, vol. 582, no. 23-24, pp. 3494–3500, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. H. Geckil, S. Gencer, H. Kahraman, and S. O. Erenler, “Genetic engineering of Enterobacter aerogenes with the Vitreoscilla hemoglobin gene: cell growth, survival, and antioxidant enzyme status under oxidative stress,” Research in Microbiology, vol. 154, no. 6, pp. 425–431, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. A. Anand, B. T. Duk, S. Singh et al., “Redox-mediated interactions of VHb ( Vitreoscilla haemoglobin) with OxyR: novel regulation of VHb biosynthesis under oxidative stress,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 426, no. 3, pp. 271–280, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. M. Y. Akbas, T. Doruk, S. Ozdemir, and B. C. Stark, “Further investigation of the mechanism of Vitreoscilla hemoglobin (VHb) protection from oxidative stress in Escherichia coli,” Biologia, vol. 66, no. 5, pp. 735–740, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. M. Kvist, E. S. Ryabova, E. Nordlander, and L. Bülow, “An investigation of the peroxidase activity of Vitreoscilla hemoglobin,” Journal of Biological Inorganic Chemistry, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 324–334, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. C. Isarankura-Na-Ayudhya, S. Yainoy, T. Tantimongcolwat, L. Bülow, and V. Prachayasittikul, “Engineering of a novel chimera of superoxide dismutase and Vitreoscilla Hemoglobin for rapid detoxification of reactive oxygen species,” Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, vol. 110, no. 6, pp. 633–637, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. S. K. Natarajan, P. Ramamoorthy, S. Thomas et al., “Intestinal mucosal alterations in rats with carbon tetrachloride-induced cirrhosis: changes in glycosylation and luminal bacteria,” Hepatology, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 837–846, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. J. Sambrook and D. W. Russell, Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA, 3rd edition, 2001.
  25. H. Aebi, “Catalase in vitro,” Methods in Enzymology, vol. 105, pp. 121–126, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. T. M. Schultza, S. Watzla, T. A. Oelschlaegerd et al., “Green fluorescent protein for detection of the probiotics microorganism Escherichia coli strain Nissle 1917 (EcN) in vivo,” Journal of Microbiological Methods, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 389–398, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. O. H. LOWRY, N. J. ROSEBROUGH, A. L. FARR, and R. J. RANDALL, “Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 193, no. 1, pp. 265–275, 1951. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. H. Ohkawa, N. Ohishi, and K. Yagi, “Assay for lipid peroxides in animal tissues by thiobarbituric acid reaction,” Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 351–358, 1979. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. P. S. Tsai, P. T. Kallio, and J. E. Bailey, “Fnr, a global transcriptional regulator of Escherichia coli, activates the Vitreoscilla hemoglobin (VHb) promoter and intracellular VHb expression increases cytochrome d promoter activity,” Biotechnology Progress, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 288–293, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. C. Khosla and J. E. Bailey, “Heterologous expression of a bacterial haemoglobin improves the growth properties of recombinant Escherichia coli,” Nature, vol. 331, no. 6157, pp. 633–635, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. K. L. Dikshit, R. P. Dikshit, and D. A. Webster, “Study of Vitreoscilla globin (vgb) gene expression and promoter activity in E. coli through transcriptional fusion,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 18, no. 14, pp. 4149–4155, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. M. Khosravi, D. A. Webster, and B. C. Stark, “Presence of the bacterial hemoglobin gene improves α-amylase production of a recombinant Escherichia coli strain,” Plasmid, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 190–194, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. J. A. DeModena, S. Gutierrez, J. Velasco et al., “The production of cephalosporin C by Acremonium chrysogenum is improved by the intracellular expression of a bacterial hemoglobin,” Bio/Technology, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 926–929, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. C. Isarankura-Na-Ayudhya, P. Panpumthong, T. Tangkosakul, S. Boonpangrak, and V. Prachayasittikul, “Shedding light on the role of Vitreoscilla hemoglobin on cellular catabolic regulation by proteomic analysis,” International Journal of Biological Sciences, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 71–80, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. H. Yamamoto, T. Nagano, and M. Hirobe, “Carbon tetrachloride toxicity on Escherichia coli exacerbated by superoxide,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 263, no. 25, pp. 12224–12227, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. T. Rochat, J. J. Gratadoux, A. Gruss et al., “Production of a heterologous nonheme catalase by Lactobacillus casei: an efficient tool for removal of H2O2 and protection of Lactobacillus bulgaricus from oxidative stress in milk,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 72, no. 8, pp. 5143–5149, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. A. De Moreno De LeBlanc, J. G. LeBlanc, G. Perdigón et al., “Oral administration of a catalase-producing Lactococcus lactis can prevent a chemically induced colon cancer in mice,” Journal of Medical Microbiology, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 100–105, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. Y. Suwanwong, M. Kvist, C. Isarankura-Na-Ayudhya, N. Tansila, L. Bulow, and V. Prachayasittikul, “Chimeric antibody-binding Vitreoscilla Hemoglobin (VHb) mediates redox-catalysis reaction: new insight into the functional role of VHb,” International Journal of Biological Sciences, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 208–215, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus