BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2015 / Article
Special Issue

MicroRNAs in Cancer Management: Big Challenges for Small Molecules

View this Special Issue

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2015 |Article ID 125094 |

Huiyin Lan, Haiqi Lu, Xian Wang, Hongchuan Jin, "MicroRNAs as Potential Biomarkers in Cancer: Opportunities and Challenges", BioMed Research International, vol. 2015, Article ID 125094, 17 pages, 2015.

MicroRNAs as Potential Biomarkers in Cancer: Opportunities and Challenges

Academic Editor: Francesco Nicassio
Received06 Jun 2014
Accepted05 Sep 2014
Published22 Mar 2015


MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a group of small noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) that posttranscriptionally regulate gene expression by targeting their corresponding messenger RNAs (mRNAs). Dysregulated miRNAs have been considered as a new type of ‘‘oncomiRs’’ or ‘‘tumor suppressors,” playing essential roles in cancer initiation and progression. Using genome-wide detection methods, ubiquitously aberrant expression profiles of miRNAs have been identified in a broad array of human cancers, showing great potential as novel diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers of cancer with high specificity and sensitivity. The detectable miRNAs in tissue, blood, and other body fluids with high stability provide an abundant source for miRNA-based biomarkers in human cancers. Despite the fact that an increasing number of potential miRNA biomarkers have been reported, the transition of miRNAs-based biomarkers from bench to bedside still necessitates addressing several challenges. In this review, we will summarize our current understanding of miRNAs as potential biomarkers in human cancers.

1. Introduction

According to NIH (National Institutes of Health), a biomarker is described with a characteristic that it is objectively measured and evaluated as an indicator of normal biological processes, pathogenic processes, or pharmacologic responses to a therapeutic intervention [1]. Useful biomarkers can provide great insights into tumorigenesis and facilitate the development of improved therapies. Cancer is not only one of the biggest global killers but also one of the fastest growing causes of death [2]. Hunting for cancer biomarkers capable of providing diagnostic, prognostic, or therapeutic information has become a necessary but challenging work in cancer research. Currently, some available biomarkers such as PSA (prostate-specific antigen) for prostate cancer, CEA (carcinoembryonic antigen) for colorectal cancer, AFP (a-fetoprotein) for liver cancer, CA 125 for ovarian cancer, and CA 19–9 for pancreatic cancer invariably display an inferior sensitivity and specificity, despite their generally clinical applications. Due to high rates of “overdiagnosis” and “pseudodisease” by PSA test, the USPSTF (US Preventive Services Task Force) issued a grade D recommendation to recommend against routine PSA-based screening for prostate cancer in July 2012 [3]. Therefore, it is an urgent request for more reliable biomarkers to serve as precise indicators of developments and changes of cancer at the cellular levels and the patient’s response of cancer therapy.

The discovery of miRNAs has captured increased attention of researchers recently. Following the Lin-4 in C. elegans, known as the first member of miRNAs, discovered in 1993 [4], more and more miRNAs have been found and investigated; herein, a number of miRNAs have been identified to essentially revolve in human carcinogenesis by acting as “oncoMirs” or “tumor suppressive miRNAs” [5]. Strikingly, based on the pervasive cancer-associated aberrant expression profiles of dysregulated miRNAs, together with the characteristics of miRNAs such as temporal and spatial specificity, sensitivity, and stability in both paraffin sections and body fluids, miRNAs have shown great potential as a new class of biomarkers in cancer. Furthermore, with the extensive use of next generation of technologies such as miRNA microarrays and high-throughput deep sequencing techniques [6], translating biomarker into practice with increased diagnostic and therapeutic sensitivity and specificity would be less of a problem [7]. Among these contexts, the potential of miRNAs being involved in carcinogenesis as cancer biomarkers has been extensively investigated and developed.

In this review, we will overview recent advances in the dysregulation of tumor-associated miRNAs in both biopsies and circulation and highlight some critical challenges for the transition of miRNAs as cancer biomarkers from a research setting into clinical application.

2. Overview of miRNAs: Definition, Biogenesis, and Functions

miRNAs belong to the heterogeneous class of ncRNAs, of 22–24 nt RNAs that play important regulatory roles by targeting mRNAs for cleavage or translational repression [8]. By definition, miRNAs are small RNA molecules incapable of encoding proteins, but possessing important structural, catalytic, and regulatory functions. According to the latest miRBase release (v21, June 2014,, there are 28645 entries representing hairpin precursor miRNAs from 223 species, expressing 35828 mature miRNA products. MiRNA genes are located either in independent noncoding DNA loci or in the introns of protein-coding genes [9]. Furthermore, up to 50% miRNAs are clustered on chromosomes with a common promoter [10] and cotranscribed to form different miRNAs families which share common mRNAs targets and biological processes because of their identical seed regions [11].

It is well established that miRNA biogenesis is a complex process which generally includes three main steps as follows. (i) In the nucleus, miRNA genes are transcripted by RNA polymerase II to form primary miRNA transcripts (pri-miRNAs) [12]. (ii) Subsequently, the Drosha RNase III endonuclease trims the pri-miRNA to liberate a pre-miRNA hairpin which is actively transported to the cytoplasm by Ran-GTP and exportin-5 [8, 13]. (iii) Its final maturation is processed in the cytoplasm where Dicer RNase III endonuclease cleaves the pre-miRNA into a single-stranded mature miRNA [13] and then the mature miRNA binds to proteins of the argonaute (Ago) family and assembles the RNA induced silencing complex (RISC) together to exert its further physiological functions.

After being incorporated into the RISC, the mature miRNA induces posttranscriptional gene silencing by tethering RISC to be partially complementary to the target mRNA predominantly found within the 3′-untranslated region (UTR) [14]. Inspiringly, a recent study showed that a single miRNA may repress more than 100 mRNAs on average and over 60% of human protein-coding genes are conserved targets of miRNAs [15]. Given this vast majority of mRNA targets regulated by miRNAs, aberrant miRNA expression profoundly influences a wide variety of cell regulation pathways important to cell proliferation [16], apoptosis [17], and stress responses [18]. In cancer disease phenotype, miRNAs serve exclusively as a novel class of oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes named “oncomiRs” or “tumor suppressive miRs” [19]. Following the first identified tumor suppressive miRNA gene miR-15a/miR-16-1 revolving in the development of B-cell lymphocytic leukemia [20], a growing number of oncomiRs have been validated as well as tumor suppressive miRs (more details are in the review [21]). Remarkably, it has been continually confirmed by numbers of studies that “oncomiRs” or “tumor suppressive miRs” revolve in a multitude of cancer-related signaling pathways. For example, miR-17 activates PI3K/AKT pathway and regulates tumor growth [22], the axis of p53-miRNA-34 network regulates Wnt pathway [23] and promotes EMT program [24], and let-7 leads to growth inhibition by negatively regulating RAS pathway [25]. Taken together, these observations give a miRNAs-mediated complex network model that connects oncogenic and tumor suppressive signaling pathways in human cancers, indicating that miRNAs may play a more indispensable role in the pathogenesis of human cancers than previously thought.

3. miRNAs as Potential Biomarkers in Cancer

3.1. Aberrant miRNA Expression Profiles in Cancer
3.1.1. Linkage of Aberrant miRNA Expression Profiles with Cancer Development

Aberrant expression of miRNAs in cancer is characterized by abnormal expression levels of mature or precursor miRNA transcripts in comparison with those in the corresponding normal tissues. A steadily growing number of reports have proven that human cancers frequently show an aberrant expression profile of miRNAs as well as pre-miRNAs. With various kinds of high-throughput sequencing platforms applied to analyze the genome-wide expression of miRNA genes these years, aberrant expression profiles of miRNAs either downregulated or upregulated have been discovered in a broad variety of human malignant cancers, including lymphoma [26], breast cancer [27], colorectal cancer [28], prostate cancer [29], and glioma [30].

Although the causes of aberrant miRNAs expression in cancer have not yet been fully elucidated, several defined mechanisms can be possible, including chromosomal abnormalities, genomic mutations, epigenetic changes, and alterations in miRNA biogenesis. Notably, some miRNA genes are frequently located at fragile sites and genomic regions related to cancer [31]. In other words, alterations of miRNAs expression can directly reflect the chromosomal or genomic changes of cancer-associated genes. Together with important roles of cancer-associated miRNAs identified in various types of cancer cell lines [32] and clinical tumor specimens [3335], the aberrant expressions of miRNAs appear to show significant values of clinical applications.

3.1.2. Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Predictive Values of miRNA Signatures for Cancer

Given those circumstances above, alterations of miRNAs expression in different types of neoplasia constitute specific patterns of miRNA signature for certain types of cancer. Logically, these specific miRNA signatures would be attractively conducive to early diagnosis, signifying the prognosis and predicting the response of cancer therapy.

(i) Diagnosis and Classification. It was observed that, with cancers derived from different epithelial and hematopoietic lineage having distinct miRNA profiles, miRNA signatures were able to discriminate them according to their developmental origins. For example, in a research trying to identify cancers with unknown primary tissue of origin by using microarray platform to evaluate the expressions of 47 miRNAs in 101 FFPE (formalin fixed and paraffin embedded) samples from primary or metastatic cancers, overall, the accuracy reached 100% for primary cancers and 78% for metastatic cancers. When the signature was applied to an independent published dataset of 170 samples, correct prediction was further verified in 86% of the metastasis cases [36].

For patients with malignant cancers, precise determination of tumor subtype significantly influences the decision-making of treatments. For example, In renal cell carcinoma (RCC), a research team developed a classification system applying method of decision trees that can distinguish different RCC subtypes in 94 different subtype cases using unique miRNA signatures analysis [37]. This system obtained a sensitivity of 97% for differentiating normal cases from RCC patients. And among the four types of RCC (clear cell RCC (ccRCC), papillary RCC (pRCC), oncocytoma, and chromophobe RCC (chRCC)), 100% for ccRCC subtype from the other fours, 97% for pRCC subtype from oncocytoma and chRCC, and 100% accuracy for distinguishing oncocytoma from chRCC subtype [37]. Moreover, another study by Gilad et al. validated a miRNA-based assay capable of differentiating between four main types of lung cancer in an independent set of 451 samples. They got a result for more than 90% of the samples with overall accuracy of 94%, with a similar performance observed in pathologic and cytologic samples [38]. Collectively, these findings above suggested that miRNAs signatures were able to serve as an accurate classification tool for different cancers in pathologic and cytologic samples.

Moreover, the need of biomarkers for cancer early diagnosis is extremely important because of the fact that survival and prognosis of patients extensively depend on the stage of tumor at the time of detection, with an early diagnosis generally associated with a better prognosis. Promisingly, miRNA signatures have been identified to possess a robust potential as early diagnosis biomarkers. For example, overexpression of miR-205 and miR-21 in ductal adenocarcinoma has been reported to precede phenotypic changes in the ducts [39], suggesting that aberrant miRNA production was an early event in the development of cancer and thus supporting the possibility to use them for early detection of cancers.

(ii) Prognostic Values. In addition to cancer diagnosis including distinguishing tissue of origin, subtypes, and early detection of cancer, miRNA signatures can be also valuable for cancer prognosis prediction, which has been vilified by a number of studies recently. The first evidence was proposed by Calin et al. in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), where a unique miRNA signature composed of 13 genes can differentiate CLL patients with abnormal expression of prognostic factors (ZAP-70 and IgV(H)) from normal cases. Besides, the same miRNA signature was associated with the presence or absence of disease progression [40]. Moreover, in lung cancer, a signature of five miRNAs has been used in the prediction of treatment outcome for non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), among which high expression of miR-221 and let-7a is associated with good prognosis, as opposed to elevated miR-137, miR-372, and miR-182 with poor prognosis [41]. Likewise, high expression of the miR-183 family (miR-183, miR-182, and miR-96) was associated with overall poor survival in patients with lung cancer [42]. In addition, a recent study interrogated plasma miR-10b and miR-373 levels, which are known mediators of metastasis in breast cancer, and they uncovered association of these miRNAs for detecting the lymph node metastasis, thereby showing potential as prognostic biomarkers [43]. It is worth noting that one miRNA alone can also possess accurate predictive power which was clarified by a study in patients with breast cancer, they identified the fact that overexpression of miR-210 is associated with an increased risk of recurrence and a reduced chance of relapse-free survival, and miR-210 alone allowed prediction of prognosis to the same level as a 76-gene mRNA signature test (GENE76) [44]. In prostate cancer, miRNAs have also been connected to prognosis of PC, such as miR-141 and miR-375, which turned out to correlate with high Gleason score or lymph-node positive status in a second independent validation study [45]. Besides, signature of miR-410 and miR-645 was negatively associated with overall survival in advanced serous ovarian cancer [46]. Remarkably, a pattern of seven-miRNA signature recently identified in gastric cancer can predict overall survival and relapse-free survival [47], and, in patients with stage II colon cancer, a six-miRNA-based classifier established was an independent prognostic factor for disease recurrence [48].

(iii) Predictive Values for Response to Therapy. Apart from their use as prognostic biomarkers, miRNA signatures could also predict the responses to various cancer managements. The correlation between miRNA signatures and the responses of specific therapies is of great clinical value because of the involvement of miRNAs in chemoresistance identified in many studies [49, 50]. For instance, Meng et al. firstly found that inhibition of miR-21 and miR-200b increased sensitivity to gemcitabine in cholangiocarcinoma cell lines [51]. Subsequently, it was proven that high miR-21 expression involved in gemcitabine chemoresistance was able to predict significantly shorter overall survival (OS) in pancreatic cancer treated with gemcitabine [52]. Likewise, by conferring taxol resistance through the suppression of Bak1 expression, high expression of miR-125b in breast cancer predicted the poor response to taxol-based treatments [53]. In colorectal cancer, the presence of the KRAS mutation was associated with upregulation of miR-127-3p, miR-92a, and miR-486-3p and downregulation of miR-378, which constituted a miRNA signature capable of predicting colorectal cancers resistant to EGFR antagonists [54]. Additionally, it was demonstrated that let-7g and miR-181b may be indicators of chemotherapy response to S-1 based chemotherapy in CRC [55]. In glioma cancer, miR-181d upregulation may correspond to a better response to temozolomide, while upregulation of miR-21 may predict poor response caused by temozolomide resistance [30]. Remarkably, in relapsed patients with NSCLC, the loss of heterozygosity of miR-128b, an EGFR regulator, was correlated with response to the EGFR inhibitor gefitinib [56]. In belief, given these specific miRNA signatures serving as predictors of response to various cancer management, it may be possible to improve patients’ prognosis by selecting the right treatment course as soon after diagnosis as possible and permit rapid adaption of treatment to the acquisition of chemotherapeutic and radioresistance. What is more is that, by predicting response to molecular-targeted agents, the use of predictive biomarkers could be promisingly conducive to accelerate the development of new anticancer therapies in clinical trials [57].

In summary, based on the aberrant miRNA expression profiles identified in human cancers, miRNAs give us a totally new horizon in understanding the development management of cancer. Despite of some certain miRNAs commonly exhibiting altered expression across various kinds of tumors, particular types of cancers often express their exclusive patterns of miRNAs referring to their tissues of origin [33]. Such specific miRNA signatures exhibited in types of tumors mentioned above are also termed as “miRNome,” which characterizes the malignant state and defines some of their clinicopathological features such as grade, stage, aggressiveness, vascular invasion, and proliferation index [31]. Given the great value of miRNA signatures for cancer diagnosis, prognosis and prediction of therapeutic responses, a comprehensive list of miRNAs identified as various biomarkers in different cancer types are summarized in Table 1.

CancerType of biomarkermiRNAs biomarkersReference

Breast cancerDiagnosticmiR-10b, -21, -30a, -92a, -125b, -141, -145, -200, -801, -155, -191, -203, -210[112, 113]
PrognosticmiR-10b, -373, miR-210[43, 44]

Lung cancerDiagnosticmiR-21, -155, miR-16, miR-17, -19b, -25, -29c, -30c, -106a, -126, -451, -660, -28-3p[114116]
PrognosticmiR-221, let-7a, -137, miR-372, -182[41, 42]
miR-1, -15b, -16, -21, -126, -142-3p, -148a, -197[116]

Liver cancerDiagnosticmiR-222, -223, -181a, -181b, -181c, -200c, -203, -21, -224, -10b, -222, 126, -96[117, 118]
PrognosticmiR-21, -22, -26, -29, -31, -122, -124, -135a, -139, -145, -146a, -155, -200c, -221, -222, -222, -223[119]
PredictivemiR-21, -200b[52]

Colon cancerDiagnosticmiR-15b, -18a, -29a, -335, miR-17-3p, -20a, -21, -92, -601, -760, -29a[120, 121]
PredictivemiR-127-3p, -92a, -486-3p, -378, let-7g, miR-181b[54, 55]

Pancreatic cancerDiagnosticmiR-205, -21, miR-642b, -885-5p, -22[39, 123]
miR-145, -150, -223, -636, -26b, -34a, -122, -126*, -145, -150, -223, -505, -636, -885.5p[124]
PrognosticmiR-130b, miR-21, -105, -196a-2, -203, -210, -222, -452, -105, -127, -187, - 518a-2, - 30a-3p[125, 126]

Prostate cancerDiagnosticmiR-30c, -622, -1285, miR-10b, -373, let-7c, -7e[43, 127]
miR-141, -375, miR-26a, -195[128]
PrognosticmiR-141, -375, miR-20a, -21, -141, -145, -221[45, 129]

Ovarian cancerDiagnosticmiR-200 family, let-7 family, miR-21, -29a, -92, -93, miR-126, -127, -132, -155, -214, -182, -205, -144, -222, -302 [131133]
PrognosticmiR-410, -645, miR-200 family, miR-141, -429[46, 134]
PredictivemiR-23a, -27a, -30c, let-7g, -199a-3p, -181a, -181b, -213[132]

3.2. Potential Source of miRNA-Based Biomarkers
3.2.1. Stability of miRNAs

In addition to the high specificity and sensitivity of miRNA biomarkers in cancer diagnosis as previously described, miRNAs are characterized by robust stability as well in stored RNA samples, including fixed tissue, blood, and other body fluids, which further supports their potential as biomarkers. Recent studies have systematically investigated the stability of miRNAs even after being subjected to severe conditions that would normally degrade mRNA or other types of larger RNAs. For example, in two similar studies, miRNA expression profiles in FFPE from colorectal cancer (CRC) samples dating back up to 10 year were assessed and compared with fresh frozen CRC samples; a high similarity of miRNAs profiles was observed. Moreover, differing formalin fixation times did not significantly influence miRNAs profiles in FFPE specimens in light of quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) [58, 59]. For another instance of extracellular miRNAs stability reported by Chen at al., they treated some miRNAs with or without RNase A digestion; then they surprisingly found that half of miRNAs remain intact after 3 hours of exposure to RNase A, but all high molecular weight RNAs set as controls were rapidly degraded. More importantly, after being treated with several harsh conditions including boiling, low/high pH (pH = 1/13), extended storage, or freeze-thaw cycles, miRNAs in sera still maintained potent intrinsic stability as expected [60]. Taken together, these data consistently revealed that miRNAs, particularly serum miRNAs, possess considerable resistance to the enzymatic cleavage by RNase A and various severe conditions, so as to maintain their intrinsic stability for long.

Generally, there are mainly three explanations for miRNAs’ stability. Firstly, as a class of small molecules with a short length of only 20–24 nt, miRNAs tend to be less subjected to degradation during FFPE sample processing. Secondly, these small RNAs are taken into encapsulation by cell-derived lipid vesicles such as exosomes [61], microparticles [62], or apoptotic bodies [63]. However, the precise mechanisms of miRNAs’ selective packaging remain elusive yet. Thirdly, the nuclease-resistant extracellular miRNAs were predominantly associated with RNA binding proteins such as argonaute proteins (Ago1 or Ago2), nucleophosmin (NPM1), or ribosomal proteins [64], which exert a robust protective effect on miRNAs from abundant nucleases in extracellular space. Overwhelmingly, Turchinovich et al. argued that most of the extracellular miRNAs are not exclusively associated with cell-exported exosomes; instead, a majority of them are floating outside exosomes to bind to Ago2 protein [64]. Nevertheless, no final conclusion has yet been reached on the main mechanism of how to maintain miRNAs’ stability. But what we can confirm is that inherent stability of miRNAs in both FFPE and circulation perfectly presents great advantages for them as ideal biomarkers of cancer.

3.2.2. miRNAs in FFPET

Tissue biopsy specimen in the form of FFPET (FFPE tissue) is commonly used for tissue storage, which preserves good tissue integrity so as to provide excellent resources for discovery of disease-detecting biomarkers, not excepting the miRNAs-based biomarkers of cancer certainly. Better than mRNAs which are too unstable to be suitable for qRT-PCR, miRNAs are stable enough to be well preserved even over prolonged FFPE block storage and quantified from FFPET by qRT-PCR. In a word, miRNAs from substantial FFPET can provide tremendous source for cancer-related biomarkers.

Numerous studies have discovered and evaluated a broad variety of potential miRNAs biomarker candidates in FFPET which provide valuable information for cancer diagnosis and prognosis. A recent study used bioinformatics to screen miRNAs classifiers in 69 FFPE pancreatic specimens including benign, premalignant, and malignant. Different miRNA panels mapped to these lesions above, separate anyone from the two others with sensitivity and specificity up to 85%–100% [65]. Furthermore, in another study by Casanova-Salas et al. [66], an independent cohort of 273 FFPET samples was used for validation of new potential biomarkers by qRT-PCR. They assessed the relationship of two miRNAs (miR-182 and miR-187) most differentially expressed in prostate cancer with the clinicopathological characteristics and outcome of patients, and it was observed that miR-187 expression was decreased in advanced prostate cancer cases, which was consistent with microarray data. Moreover, the higher expression of miR-182 independently conferred a worse prognosis for BPFS and PFS using Cox proportional hazard multivariable analysis. Therefore, such results showed the promising potential of miRNAs for serving as biomarkers in cancer diagnosis or prognosis.

In addition, other miRNAs identified as potential biomarkers in FFPET for various types of malignancies are summarized in Table 2.

CancermiRNAs as biomarkersExpressionReference

GlioblastomamiR-323, -329, -155, -210Up[135]
miR-326, -130aDown[135]
miR-21, -221Up[136]
miR-128, -181bDown[136]

Head and neck cancermiR-21, -31, -107, -138, -504, -10bUp[137]
miR-16, -20a, -106b, -142-3pUp[138]
miR-155, -423, -451, let-7iUp[138]
miR-10a, -125b, -375Down[138]

Breast cancermiR-21, -29b-2, -125bUp[139]
miR-16, -155, -191, -196aUp[139]
miR-34b, -145, -205, let-7aDown[140, 141]

Lung cancermiR-21, -205Up[142]

Liver cancermiR-519dUp[143]

Gastric cancermiR-21, -221, -222Up[146]
miR-10b, -21, -106a, -223, -338Up[47]
miR-30a-5p, -31, -126, let-7aDown[47]

Pancreatic cancermiR-192-5p, -202-3p, -337-5p, -130-3pUp[65]
miR-187, -30a-3pUp[147]
miR-21, -155, -203, -210, -222, let-7aUp[148]

Cervical cancermiR-21, -27a, -34a, -146aUp[150]
miR-155, -196a, -203, -221Up[150]

Ovarian cancermiR-223Up[151]
miR-9, -200a, -200b, -429Down[151]

Prostate cancermiR-31, -143, -221Up[152]
miR-126, -146a, -150Down[152]

Colorectal cancermiR-31, -135bUp[154]
miR-21, -23a, -193a-3p, -338-5pDown[155]

BladdermiR-10a-5p, -31-5p, -130a, -3pUp[156]
miR-145, -30a-3p, -125b, -133aDown[157]
miR-133b, -195, -199aDown[157]

3.2.3. miRNAs in Blood (Total Blood, Serum, Plasma, and Exosome)

Apart from the diagnostic miRNA signatures identified in specimens from tumor tissues, studies have also shown the diagnostic and prognostic usefulness of miRNAs in circulation. In fact, except for miRNAs in the biopsies and tumor samples, a substantial number of cancer-related miRNAs can be also detected in blood including total blood, serum, and plasma, as well as other body fluids such as saliva, urine, breast milk, seminal fluid, and tears [67].

In fact, the intriguing phenomenon of cancer-associated nucleic acids in circulation has been identified for decades. Generally, from their intracellular origin, miRNAs can be secreted extracellularly in cell-derived extracellular vesicles such as exosomes or bound to other lipoproteins as mentioned above, although the concrete mechanisms for the origin of such miRNAs released by tumor cells have not yet been clarified and little is known about the mechanisms of how to specifically direct miRNAs into multivesicular bodies or exosomes.

However, what we know at present is that miRNAs in blood released by tumor cells may not simply act as a set of bystander product of tumor cells. It has been widely identified that tumor-released (TR) exosomes could act as intercellular mediators transporting diverse types of proteins, mRNA, and miRNAs that can promote angiogenesis, cell proliferation, and cell survival, resulting in establishing an oncogenic niche systemically [68]. Recently, a paradigm of autocrine and paracrine miRNA signaling pathway contributing to microenvironment of cancer through TR exosomes has been proposed. For example, Skog et al. firstly found that the messengers encoding for EGFRvIII protein and miR-21 are transported in glioblastoma-derived exosomes and these molecules could be taken up by normal host cells and transformed into functional signals, stimulating proliferation of cancer cells [69]. Furthermore, Fabbri recently demonstrated that miR-21 and -29a secreted by tumor cells via exosomes could bind to toll-like receptor (TLR) 7/8 and activate these receptors on immune cells, leading to TLR-mediated NF-κB activation and secretion of prometastatic inflammatory cytokines that may ultimately lead to tumor growth and metastasis [70]. These observations above revealed that the mobile miRNAs entrapped in exosomes in blood could function as hormones, entering the circulation and travelling to distant organs to exert their hormone-like effects, leading to widespread consequences within the recipient cells at a distance from the donor cells.

Additionally, Pigati and colleagues verified the fact that the cancer-related miRNAs are specific to the cancer cells, which is a further consideration supporting detection of the circulating miRNAs to serve as molecular tumor markers. They found that the bulk of miR-451 and miR-1246 produced by malignant cells was selectively released into blood particularly, but the majority of these miRNAs produced by normal cells were retained intracellularly [71]. Their findings indicated that release of miRNAs into blood and other biological fluids is selective presumably with an explanation that the assortment of them might be changed by malignant transformation [72].

Therefore, with a stable form and extensively hormone-like effects, the noninvasively detectable cancer-specific miRNAs in circulation have been widely investigated and demonstrated to efficiently discriminate cancer patients from healthy people, predict the prognosis, and monitor the therapeutic response. Comprehensively, recent studies for discovery of potential miRNAs biomarkers for types of cancers in blood and other body fluids have been listed in Table 3.

Cancer SamplesmiRNAs biomarkersExpressionReference

GlioblastomaSerummiR-15b, -23a, -133a, -150, -197, -497Up[158]
PlasmamiR-128, -342-3pDown[30]
CSFmiR-21, -17-5p, -200Up[30]

Head and neckPlasmamiR-31, -10b, -24, -181, -184Up[87]
miR-200a, -125aDown[87]

Breast cancerSerummiR-373, -155 Up[159]
miR-34a, -17Down[159]
miR-222, -103, -23a, -29a, -23b, -24, -25Up[160]
PlasmamiR-148b, -376c, -409-3p, -801Up[80]

Lung cancerSerummiR-21-3p, -205-5p, -205-3p, -141, -200c Up[92]
miR-21, -24, -205, -30dUp[93]
PlasmamiR-21, -155Up[114]
ExosomemiR-17-3p, -21, -106a, -146, -155, -191,-192, -203, -205, -210, -212, -214Up[161]
SputummiR-205, -210, -708Up[90]

Liver cancerSerummiR-122Up[162]
miR-21, -122, -223Up[164]
miR-21, -1, -25, -92a, -206, -375, let-7fUp[165]

Gastric cancerSerummiR-221, -376c, -744Up[167]
miR-1, -20a, -27a, -34, -423-5pUp[168]
PlasmamiR-106b, -20a, -221Up[81]
miR-21, -223, -218Up[169]
miR-451, -486Down[170]

Pancreatic cancerSerummiR-21, -100, -155Up[171]
miR-203, -369-5p, -376a, -375Up[172]
PlasmamiR-21, -210, -155, -196aUp[82, 173]
ExosomemiR-21, -17-5pUp[174]

Colorectal cancerSerummiR-29aUp[175]
PlasmamiR-17-3p, -92Up[68]
miR-92a, -29aUp[176]
miR-27b, -148a, -326Up[177]
miR-15b, -17Up[179]

Ovarian cancerSerummiR-21, -92, -93, -126, -29aUp[131]
miR-155, -127, -99bDown[131]
PlasmamiR-205 Up[180]
ExosomemiR-21, -141, -200a/b/c, -203, -205, -214Up[84]

Prostate cancerSerummiR-26a-1, -141, -375Up[181]
miR-16, -195, -26a, let7iUp[128]
miR-20b, -874, -1274a, -1207-5p, -93, -106aUp[182]
miR-223, -26b, -30c, -24Down[182]
ExosomemiR-107, -574-3pUp[85]

BladderBloodmiR-129, -133bUp[183]
miR-26b-5p, -144-5p, -374-5pUp[184]
miR-378g, -942, -106a-5p, -142-3p, -374aUp[185]
UrinemiR-18a, -25, -187Up[89]
miR-142-3p, -140-5p, -204Down[89]
miR-200, -155, -192, -205Up[186]

Large B-cell lymphomaSerummiR-21, -155, -210Up[73]
miR-15a, -16-1, -29c, -155Up[187]

LeukemiaSerummiR-181b-5p, -10a-5p, -93-5pUp[188]
miR-129-5p, -155-5p, -320dUp[188]
miR-29c, -223Down[189]

In serum, following the first paradigm showed that the diagnostic and prognostic potential of miR-21 that was associated with increased relapse-free survival of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients by Lawrie et al. [73] and lots of new candidate miRNA biomarkers in serum of cancer patients have been reported. For example, Chen et al. demonstrated that a profiling of 10 differentially expressed serum miRNAs selected from a sample set including 400 NSCLC cases and 220 controls provided a high sensitivity and specificity for NSCLC diagnosis. They used risk score analysis to evaluate the diagnostic value of the serum miRNAs profile system and found that these 10 miRNAs were able to distinguish NSCLC cases from controls with sensitivity of 93% and specificity of 90%. What is more is that these 10 serum miRNAs were correlated with the stage of NSCLC patients [74]. Moreover, in a recent study, Wu et al. reported 35 miRNAs targeting 11 genes involved in the TGF-β signaling pathway for their associations with survival among 141 highly expressed serum miRNAs collected from 391 patients with advanced NSCLC. They concluded that 17 miRNAs were significantly associated with 2-year patient survival using Cox regression model. Of these 17 miRNAs, miR-16 exhibited the most statistical significance, whose high expression was associated with an obviously better survival [75]. Findings of similar crosstalk between TGF-beta signaling and miRNAs machinery also have been clarified in other cancers such as CRC [76] and glioblastoma [77].

In plasma, Mitchell et al. firstly proved that miRNAs are readily measurable by direct cloning and sequencing from a plasma small RNA library. To further determine whether tumor-derived miRNAs enter the circulation at levels sufficient to be measurable as biomarkers, they established a mouse prostate cancer xenograft model system, collected the plasma, and isolated miRNAs for analyzing the different expression of miRNAs compared to the control. They found that levels of miR-629 and miR-660 were able to independently differentiate xenografted mice from controls with 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity [78]. Such conclusion, thereby, provided a firm grounding of the fact that that tumor-derived miRNAs measured in plasma can serve as noninvasion biomarkers for cancer detection. Examples are numerous. Plasma miR-21, miR-145, and miR-155 used in combination helped in distinguishing lung cancer from healthy smokers with 69.4% sensitivity and 78.3% specificity [79]. Combination of miR-148b, miR-409-3p, and miR-801 discriminated powerfully between breast cancer cases and healthy controls [80]. Three plasma microRNAs (miR-106b, miR-20a, and miR-221) had a statistically significant elevation in gastric cancer patients so as to serve as novel biomarkers for the early detection of GC [81]. Interestingly, the combination of miR-16, miR-196a, and CA19-9 was more effective for pancreatic cancer diagnosis, especially in early tumor screening [82]. Ng et al. revealed that expression of miR-92 in plasma is significantly elevated and differentiated CRC from gastric cancer or normal subjects of CRC patients with a high sensitivity of 89% and specificity of 70%; thus miR-92 in plasma could have roles as a potential marker for CRC screening [68]. Moreover, high expression of miR-27b, miR-148a, and miR-326 was associated with decreased progression-free survival of CRC patients [68].

Exosomes are a class of small (50–90 nm) membrane vesicles formed in the plasma membrane by the fusion of endocytic vesicles and extracellularly released into surrounding body fluids [83]. As is mentioned above, miRNAs passively released from normal or tumor-lysed cells may be preferentially secreted and packaged into exosomes that provide a protective effect on the stability of extracellular miRNAs [61]. Excitingly, it was discovered that the exosomal miRNAs content was similar to that in the original tumors [84], thus peaking researchers’ interests in the use of exosomal miRNA profiles for diagnostic markers of cancer. For example, Hessvik compared miRNAs in PC-3 cells with the noncancerous prostate cell line by microarray and qRT-PCR analysis. It was found that the exosomal miRNA profile released by PC-3 was highly similar to the profile of corresponding parent cells. In a study of ovarian cancer, researchers found that levels of 8 exosomal miRNAs (miR-21, miR-141, miR-200a, miR-200c, miR-200b, miR-203, miR-205, and miR-214) previously demonstrated as diagnostic markers were similar between cellular and exosomal miRNAs, which were significantly distinct from profiles observed in benign disease [84]. In another study, exosomal miRNAs were profiled from the plasma of prostate cancer patients with or without metastases and a distinct set of 11 miRNAs was present at significantly greater amounts in patients with metastases compared to those without metastases. And the association of miR-141 and miR-375 among these 11 microRNAs was confirmed in plasma exosomes from a separate patient cohort with recurrent or nonrecurrent disease, thus demonstrating that changes of miRNAs concentration present in exosomes could be of great value for early detection and tumor staging diagnosis [85]. Collectively, these results suggested that miRNA profiles of circulating tumor exosomes could potentially be used as surrogate diagnostic markers for biopsy profiles and could also serve as potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers of cancer.

3.2.4. miRNAs in Other Body Fluids

Although the majority of studies identified circulating miRNAs in serum and plasma, miRNAs have also been detected in other body fluids such as urine, tears, breast milk, and seminal, amniotic, bronchial, lavage as well as pleural, peritoneal, and cerebrospinal fluids [67, 86]. Recent studies have confirmed the potential use of tumor-specific miRNAs as diagnostic or prognostic markers for cancer in these body fluids. For instance, miR-125a and miR-200a were identified with significantly lower levels in the saliva for oral cancer detection [87]. The RNA ratio of miRNA-126 : miRNA-152 enabled the detection of bladder cancer from urine with high specificity of 82% and sensitivity of 72% [88]. A subset of six miRNAs (miR-187, miR-18a, miR-25, miR-142-3p, miR-140-5p, and miR-204) was capable of correctly classifying bladder urothelial cell carcinoma (UCC) patients with an overall sensitivity of 84.8% and specificity of 86.5% [89]. In combination of miR-205, miR-210 and miR-708 in sputum distinguished lung squamous cell carcinoma patients from normal subjects with 73% sensitivity and 96% specificity thus helping in the early detection of lung squamous cell carcinomas [90]. What is more is that urinary level of cell-free miR-214 could be an independent prognostic parameter for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer recurrence [91]. Presence of miR-21 and miR-15b in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of glioma patients also has been identified as a source of biomarkers [30].

However, as a matter of fact, miRNAs, no matter in serum, plasma, exosomes, or other body fluids, may not be absolutely specific to a certain cancer type. MiR-21 in serum is exactly a representative example for this. From a serial of investigations, it is found that high expression of serum miR-21 in lung cancer associated with poor prognosis [92] and the dynamic change of serum miR-21 between postoperative and preoperative lung carcinoma patients can potentially serve as biomarkers for disease recurrence after surgery operation [93]. In other types of cancer, also, the level of serum miR-21 significantly elevated in patients with CRC and advanced adenoma thus exhibiting its potential diagnostic value for early detection of CRC [94], as well as the prognostic value because of the postoperative reductions in serum miR-21 level which occurred [95]. Observations of analogous diagnostic and prognostic significance also have been identified in esophageal squamous cell carcinomas [96], pancreatic cancer [97], hepatocellular carcinoma [98], and ovarian cancer [99]. Therefore, a concept that has to be noted again is the “miRNome” defined as the full complement of miRNAs in a cell, which emphasizes that different tissues have distinctive patterns of miRNome expression with each tissue presenting a specific signature [100]. In order to map to every type of cancer with higher accuracy and specificity, further studies with larger sample numbers are needed to allow generalized detection of unique patterns of miRNome toward every type of cancer, even before or after therapy, and thus may really help in the identification of useful biomarkers in cancer efficiently.

4. Methods for MiRNA Detection

Though miRNAs show striking potential as new biomarkers of human cancers in clinic settings and maintain high stability in both FFPET and body fluids, the methods for miRNAs’ detection are still challenging yet for the intrinsic characterisitic of miRNAs such as small size, low level, a high degree of sequence similarity among various members, and tissue-specific or stage-specific expressions. Currently, there are various strategies for the detection of miRNAs, including qRT-PCR, in situ hybridization (ISH), enzymatic luminescence miRNA assay and northern blotting, microarrays, deep sequencing or next-generation sequencing (NGS), and nanopore technology et al. [101]. Herein, qRT-PCR is the most commonly used manner, quantifying the miRNome from low levels with high sensitivity and specificity, which is very important for the lack of large amounts of RNA from clinical samples could be obtained. More importantly, qRT-PCR is more convenient and reliable than methods based on hybridization for its potential as it can be performed in high-throughput assays to allow for large-scale miRNAs detection at the same time and still with high specificity or sensitivity [102]. Therefore, qRT-PCR technique has become the gold standard of nucleic acid quantification currently [103]. Nevertheless, several limitations of qRT-PCR also hinder its use in practice. For example, the selection of inner reference genes is essential and critical for data normalization, but the determination of suitable reference genes as the normalizer remains as a highly controversial issue. As previous studies displayed, the commonly used reference genes include miR-16, miR-142-3p, 18S rRNA, miR-638, let-7a, miR-1249, miR-295, 5SRNA, U6, U6B, RNU38B, RNU43, RNU62, and SNORD43 [104]. Unfortunately, there is no single gene that is constitutively expressed in all cell types and under all experimental conditions [105]. Rigorous experimental justification for these data reported is deficient, and these data are contradicted and inconsistent in their crossing comparison, so none of them has been widely accepted as a standard control. Therefore, further studies are needed to develop a set of stable internal control genes for accurate quantification of miRNAs profiles by qRT-PCR even for each type of human cancers.

Microarray is another technique for miRNAs profiling based on nucleic acid hybridization between target molecules and their corresponding complementary probes. The miRNAs oligonucleotide probes are immobilized to glass slides through covalent crosslinking between the amino groups and the SAM (self-assembling monolayer), forming a ready-to-use miRNA microarray. When hybridized with the miRNA microarray, the isolated miRNAs labeled with fluorescent dye can emit fluorescence after being specifically bound to the corresponding probes. Through detecting the fluorescence signal intensity at different positions on the slides, relative quantities of the corresponding miRNAs can be evaluated consequently [106]. Furthermore, microarray-based techniques are particularly attractive for their powerful high-throughput function allowing for detecting the presence of a wide range of defined miRNAs simultaneously within numerous samples processed in parallel in a single experiment. However, deficiencies of microarray also exist, for example, background noise and crosshybridization problems as well as measuring only the relative abundances of previously discovered miRNAs [107].

Deep sequencing relying on next-generation sequencing machines appears to be another promising quantitative technology for miRNAs profiling, because it provides high-throughput sequencing enabling processing up to millions of sequence reads in parallel simultaneous with high speed [108]. In this method, adapters are ligated to the prepared cDNA libraries from RNA sample of interest, followed by the massively parallel sequencing of millions of individual cDNA molecules from the library. Bioinformatic analysis translates the sequence reads into miRNAs abundance levels with relative quantification and then discovers novel miRNAs differentially expressed and their associated genes by using digital approaches may be publicly available or custom-made software tools [107]. Compared with the microarray, deep sequencing technologies are not subject to the problems of background noise and crosshybridization; they measure absolute abundance over a wider dynamic range than microarrays and are not limited by array content, allowing for reflecting the actual picture of the miRNA profiles and the discoveries of novel miRNAs having not been previously identified [109].

Nanopore single-molecule technology, a novel method recently reported by several studies to electrically detect miRNAs in tissue or biofluids, requires no labeling, enzyme reactions, or amplification [110, 111]. Wang et al. showed that a nanopore sensor, which generates a target-specific signature signal by using a programmable oligonucleotide probe, were capable of quantifying subpicomolar levels of cancer-associated miRNAs and distinguishing single-nucleotide differences between miRNA family members [111]. Coinciding with the work of Wang et al., another study by Wanunu et al. used a 3 nm synthetic nanopore to detect the complex of liver miR-122a hybridized with the probe: miRNA duplex enriched through binding to the viral protein p19, and then the abundance of the duplex was quantified using a nanopore, providing accurate quantification for cellular miRNAs in tissues finally [110]. Taken together, these works by them demonstrated that the nanopore-based miRNAs techniques may with promising potential for quantitative miRNAs detection to discover more novel biomarkers and thus it would be validated as noninvasive method for early diagnosis in cancer patients.

5. Perspectives and Challenges

Years of research work have indicated that miRNAs play important regulatory roles in translational repression, eventually contributing to the cancer development. Indeed, gene profiling studies have identified a number of significant dysregulated miRNAs as “oncomiRs” or “tumor suppressors” in a variety of human cancers, and overwhelming amounts of data have strongly validated that the ubiquitously aberrant expressions of miRNAs were closely associated with the pathogenesis and progression of human malignancies. These dysregulated miRNAs constitute unique patterns of miRNome in different categories of cancers, which provide accurate fingerprints to detect and classify various cancers. Particularly, as circulating miRNAs in blood and other body fluids are readily detected by various techniques in a relatively noninvasive manner, the clinical application of miRNAs as a new generation of cancer biomarker is considered to be prospecting.

Despite the encouraging results, we are still confronted with many difficulties on the long way of transiting miRNAs as biomarker from bench to bedside. First, exactly as the proposing of the misconceptions that the 98% in human genome is noncoding and thus junk DNA, miRNAs are probably only the tip of the iceberg of noncoding genes in our complex genome. More miRNA transcripts remain to be excavated extensively. Second, more fundamental investigations are needed to further elucidate the exact miRNAs’ functional roles in cancer biology. Apart from the pathway by targeting mRNAs for cleavage or translational repression, if there are any other unrevealed mechanisms led to the translational repression, or even any other undiscovered regulation functions more than posttranscriptional regulation. Third, it is needed to further clarify the potential biological functions of circulating miRNAs, particularly the mechanisms of MVBs-contained miRNAs for cell-cell communication, tumor immune evasion, and tumor microenvironment. After all, the underlying mechanism of miRNAs secretion or the mechanisms of the selectivity of miRNAs packaging are still elusive. Fourth, more consistent and reliable miRNA signatures or miRNome in both FFPET and circulation are urgent to be established by adequately large sample size of cohort studies on multiple, independent populations. Fifth, methods for the detection and analysis of miRNAs should be further optimized. To ensure the miRNAs’ detection results are as consistent as possible, a set of technical methods both miRNA extraction procedures and technology platforms should be compared with each other or optimized for different types of cancer patients. In addition, it is worth noting that further studies are needed to develop a set of stable inner reference genes to accurately quantify miRNAs even for each type of human cancers.

Despite such challenges that are a lot, the potential of miRNAs as a new class of cancer biomarkers is attractive and cannot be underestimated. MiRNAs are being expected to bring an exciting new dimension to the field of clinical management for human cancers in the near future.

Conflict of Interests

No potential conflicts of interests were disclosed regarding the publication of this paper.

Authors’ Contribution

Huiyin Lan and Haiqi Lu contributed equally to the work.


This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (nos. 81301706, 81372178), Department of Health in Zhejiang Province (WKJ2012-2-013; 2013RCA029), and Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (nos. Y13H160010 and LR12H16001).


  1. A. J. Atkinson, W. A. Colburn, V. G. DeGruttola et al., “Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: preferred definitions and conceptual framework,” Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 89–95, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. R. Lozano, M. Naghavi, K. Foreman et al., “Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010,” The Lancet, vol. 380, no. 9859, pp. 2095–2128, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  3. V. A. Moyer, “Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. preventive services task force recommendation statement,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 157, no. 2, pp. 120–134, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. R. C. Lee, R. L. Feinbaum, and V. Ambros, “The C. elegans heterochronic gene lin-4 encodes small RNAs with antisense complementarity to lin-14,” Cell, vol. 75, no. 5, pp. 843–854, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. Y. W. Kong, D. Ferland-McCollough, T. J. Jackson, and M. Bushell, “microRNAs in cancer management,” The Lancet Oncology, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. e249–e258, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. T. A. Farazi, H. M. Horlings, J. J. Ten Hoeve et al., “MicroRNA sequence and expression analysis in breast tumors by deep sequencing,” Cancer Research, vol. 71, no. 13, pp. 4443–4453, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. C. Wilson, S. Schulz, and S. A. Waldman, “Biomarker development, commercialization, and regulation: individualization of medicine lost in translation,” Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 153–155, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. D. P. Bartel, “MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function,” Cell, vol. 116, no. 2, pp. 281–297, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. J. Krol, I. Loedige, and W. Filipowicz, “The widespread regulation of microRNA biogenesis, function and decay,” Nature Reviews Genetics, vol. 11, no. 9, pp. 597–610, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. V. N. Kim, J. Han, and M. C. Siomi, “Biogenesis of small RNAs in animals,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 126–139, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. C. P. Concepcion, C. Bonetti, and A. Ventura, “The MicroRNA-17-92 family of MicroRNA clusters in development and disease,” Cancer Journal, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 262–267, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. X. Cai, C. H. Hagedorn, and B. R. Cullen, “Human microRNAs are processed from capped, polyadenylated transcripts that can also function as mRNAs,” RNA, vol. 10, no. 12, pp. 1957–1966, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. Y. Lee, C. Ahn, J. Han et al., “The nuclear RNase III Drosha initiates microRNA processing,” Nature, vol. 425, no. 6956, pp. 415–419, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. M. D. Jansson and A. H. Lund, “MicroRNA and cancer,” Molecular Oncology, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 590–610, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. R. C. Friedman, K. K.-H. Farh, C. B. Burge, and D. P. Bartel, “Most mammalian mRNAs are conserved targets of microRNAs,” Genome Research, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 92–105, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. X.-Y. Li, Q.-F. Luo, C.-K. Wei, D.-F. Li, J. Li, and L. Fang, “MiRNA-107 inhibits proliferation and migration by targeting CDK8 in breast cancer,” International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 32–40, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  17. B. Wojtas, C. Ferraz, T. Stokowy et al., “Differential miRNA expression defines migration and reduced apoptosis in follicular thyroid carcinomas,” Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, vol. 388, no. 1-2, pp. 1–9, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. C. Furdui, “Ionizing radiation: mechanisms and therapeutics,” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 218–220, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. I. Koturbash, F. J. Zemp, I. Pogribny, and O. Kovalchuk, “Small molecules with big effects: the role of the microRNAome in cancer and carcinogenesis,” Mutation Research, vol. 722, no. 2, pp. 94–105, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. G. A. Calin, C. D. Dumitru, M. Shimizu et al., “Frequent deletions and down-regulation of micro-RNA genes miR15 and miR16 at 13q14 in chronic lymphocytic leukemia,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 99, no. 24, pp. 15524–15529, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. G. Di Leva, M. Garofalo, and C. M. Croce, “MicroRNAs in cancer,” Annual Review of Pathology, vol. 9, pp. 287–314, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. E. Rao, C. Jiang, M. Ji et al., “The miRNA-17 ~ 92 cluster mediates chemoresistance and enhances tumor growth in mantle cell lymphoma via PI3K/AKT pathway activation,” Leukemia, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 1064–1072, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. N. H. Kim, H. S. Kim, N. G. Kim et al., “p53 and microRNA-34 are suppressors of canonical Wnt signaling,” Science Signaling, vol. 4, no. 197, article ra71, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. N. H. Kim, H. S. Kim, X.-Y. Li et al., “A p53/miRNA-34 axis regulates Snail1-dependent cancer cell epithelial-mesenchymal transition,” The Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 195, no. 3, pp. 417–433, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. S. M. Johnson, H. Grosshans, J. Shingara et al., “RAS is regulated by the let-7 microRNA family,” Cell, vol. 120, no. 5, pp. 635–647, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. K. Mazan-Mamczarz and R. B. Gartenhaus, “Role of microRNA deregulation in the pathogenesis of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL),” Leukemia Research, vol. 37, no. 11, pp. 1420–1428, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. M. Ouyang, Y. Li, S. Ye et al., “MicroRNA profiling implies new markers of chemoresistance of triple-negative breast cancer,” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 5, Article ID e96228, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. Y. Dong, W. K. K. Wu, C. W. Wu, J. J. Y. Sung, J. Yu, and S. S. M. Ng, “MicroRNA dysregulation in colorectal cancer: a clinical perspective,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 104, no. 6, pp. 893–898, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. M. Maugeri-Saccà, V. Coppola, D. Bonci, and R. De Maria, “MicroRNAs and prostate cancer: from preclinical research to translational oncology,” Cancer Journal, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 253–261, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. C. A. Tumilson, R. W. Lea, J. E. Alder, and L. Shaw, “Circulating microRNA biomarkers for glioma and predicting response to therapy,” Molecular Neurobiology, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. G. A. Calin and C. M. Croce, “MicroRNA signatures in human cancers,” Nature Reviews Cancer, vol. 6, no. 11, pp. 857–866, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. A. J. Schetter, S. Y. Leung, J. J. Sohn et al., “MicroRNA expression profiles associated with prognosis and therapeutic outcome in colon adenocarcinoma,” The Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 299, no. 4, pp. 425–436, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. N. Yanaihara, N. Caplen, E. Bowman et al., “Unique microRNA molecular profiles in lung cancer diagnosis and prognosis,” Cancer Cell, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 189–198, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. M. A. Ko, G. Zehong, C. Virtanen et al., “MicroRNA expression profiling of esophageal cancer before and after induction chemoradiotherapy,” Annals of Thoracic Surgery, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 1094–1103, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. S. R. Baglio, V. Devescovi, D. Granchi, and N. Baldini, “MicroRNA expression profiling of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells during osteogenic differentiation reveals Osterix regulation by miR-31,” Gene, vol. 527, no. 1, pp. 321–331, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. M. Ferracin, M. Pedriali, A. Veronese et al., “MicroRNA profiling for the identification of cancers with unknown primary tissue-of-origin,” Journal of Pathology, vol. 225, no. 1, pp. 43–53, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. Y. M. Youssef, N. M. A. White, J. Grigull et al., “Accurate molecular classification of kidney cancer subtypes using MicroRNA signature,” European Urology, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 721–730, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. S. Gilad, G. Lithwick-Yanai, I. Barshack et al., “Classification of the four main types of lung cancer using a microRNA-based diagnostic assay,” The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 510–517, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. M. C. Du Rieu, J. Torrisani, J. Selves et al., “MicroRNA-21 is induced early in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma precursor lesions,” Clinical Chemistry, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 603–612, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. G. A. Calin, M. Ferracin, A. Cimmino et al., “A microRNA signature associated with prognosis and progression in chronic lymphocytic leukemia,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 353, no. 17, pp. 1793–1801, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. A. Markou, Y. Liang, and E. Lianidou, “Prognostic, therapeutic and diagnostic potential of microRNAs in non-small cell lung cancer,” Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, vol. 49, no. 10, pp. 1591–1603, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. W. Zhu, X. Liu, J. He, D. Chen, Y. Hunag, and Y. K. Zhang, “Overexpression of members of the microRNA-183 family is a risk factor for lung cancer: a case control study,” BMC Cancer, vol. 11, article 393, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. W. Chen, F. Cai, B. Zhang, Z. Barekati, and X. Y. Zhong, “The level of circulating miRNA-10b and miRNA-373 in detecting lymph node metastasis of breast cancer: potential biomarkers,” Tumor Biology, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 455–462, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. F. Rothé, M. Ignatiadis, C. Chaboteaux et al., “Global microRNA expression profiling identifies MiR-210 associated with tumor proliferation, invasion and poor clinical outcome in breast cancer,” PLoS ONE, vol. 6, no. 6, Article ID e20980, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. J. C. Brase, M. Johannes, T. Schlomm et al., “Circulating miRNAs are correlated with tumor progression in prostate cancer,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 128, no. 3, pp. 608–616, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. K. K. Shih, L.-X. Qin, E. J. Tanner et al., “A microRNA survival signature (MiSS) for advanced ovarian cancer,” Gynecologic Oncology, vol. 121, no. 3, pp. 444–450, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. X. Li, Y. Zhang, Y. Zhang, J. Ding, K. Wu, and D. Fan, “Survival prediction of gastric cancer by a seven-microRNA signature,” Gut, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 579–585, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. J. X. Zhang, W. Song, Z. H. Chen et al., “Prognostic and predictive value of a microRNA signature in stage II colon cancer: a microRNA expression analysis,” The Lancet Oncology, vol. 14, no. 13, pp. 1295–1306, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. L. Lei, Y. Huang, and W. Gong, “miR-205 promotes the growth, metastasis and chemoresistance of NSCLC cells by targeting PTEN,” Oncology Reports, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 2897–2902, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  50. M. Xu, H. Jin, C. X. Xu, W. Z. Bi, and Y. Wang, “MiR-34c inhibits osteosarcoma metastasis and chemoresistance,” Medical Oncology, vol. 31, no. 6, p. 972, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  51. F. Meng, R. Henson, M. Lang et al., “Involvement of human micro-RNA in growth and response to chemotherapy in human cholangiocarcinoma cell lines,” Gastroenterology, vol. 130, no. 7, pp. 2113–2129, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. E. Giovannetti, N. Funel, G. J. Peters et al., “MicroRNA-21 in pancreatic cancer: correlation with clinical outcome and pharmacologic aspects underlying its role in the modulation of gemcitabine activity,” Cancer Research, vol. 70, no. 11, pp. 4528–4538, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. M. Zhou, Z. Liu, Y. Zhao et al., “MicroRNA-125b confers the resistance of breast cancer cells to paclitaxel through suppression of pro-apoptotic Bcl-2 antagonist killer 1 (Bak1) expression,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 285, no. 28, pp. 21496–21507, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. N. Mosakhani, V. K. Sarhadi, I. Borze et al., “MicroRNA profiling differentiates colorectal cancer according to KRAS status,” Genes Chromosomes and Cancer, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. G. Nakajima, K. Hayashi, Y. Xi et al., “Non-coding microRNAs hsa-let-7g and hsa-miR-181b are associated with chemoresponse to S-1 in colon cancer,” Cancer Genomics and Proteomics, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 317–324, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  56. G. J. Weiss, L. T. Bemis, E. Nakajima et al., “EGFR regulation by microRNA in lung cancer: correlation with clinical response and survival to gefitinib and EGFR expression in cell lines,” Annals of Oncology, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 1053–1059, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. C. P. Carden, D. Sarker, S. Postel-Vinay et al., “Can molecular biomarker-based patient selection in Phase I trials accelerate anticancer drug development?” Drug Discovery Today, vol. 15, no. 3-4, pp. 88–97, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. Y. Xi, G. Nakajima, E. Gavin et al., “Systematic analysis of microRNA expression of RNA extracted from fresh frozen and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples,” RNA, vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 1668–1674, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. K. R. M. Leite, J. M. S. Canavez, S. T. Reis et al., “miRNA analysis of prostate cancer by quantitative real time PCR: comparison between formalin-fixed paraffin embedded and fresh-frozen tissue,” Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 533–537, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. X. Chen, Y. Ba, L. Ma et al., “Characterization of microRNAs in serum: a novel class of biomarkers for diagnosis of cancer and other diseases,” Cell Research, vol. 18, no. 10, pp. 997–1006, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. L. Cheng, R. A. Sharples, B. J. Scicluna, and A. F. Hill, “Exosomes provide a protective and enriched source of miRNA for biomarker profiling compared to intracellular and cell-free blood,” Journal of Extracellular Vesicles, vol. 3, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. V. Muralidharan-Chari, J. W. Clancy, A. Sedgwick, and C. D'Souza-Schorey, “Microvesicles: mediators of extracellular communication during cancer progression,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 123, no. 10, pp. 1603–1611, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. A. Zernecke, K. Bidzhekov, H. Noels et al., “Delivery of microRNA-126 by apoptotic bodies induces CXCL12-dependent vascular protection,” Science Signaling, vol. 2, no. 100, p. ra81, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. A. Turchinovich, L. Weiz, A. Langheinz, and B. Burwinkel, “Characterization of extracellular circulating microRNA,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 39, no. 16, pp. 7223–7233, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. L. S. Lee, A. E. Szafranska-Schwarzbach, D. Wylie et al., “Investigating MicroRNA expression profiles in pancreatic cystic neoplasms,” Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology, vol. 5, article e47, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  66. I. Casanova-Salas, J. Rubio-Briones, A. Calatrava et al., “Identification of miR-187 and miR-182 as Biomarkers of Early Diagnosis and Prognosis in Patients with Prostate Cancer Treated with Radical Prostatectomy,” Journal of Urology, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. J. A. Weber, D. H. Baxter, S. Zhang et al., “The microRNA spectrum in 12 body fluids,” Clinical Chemistry, vol. 56, no. 11, pp. 1733–1741, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. E. K. O. Ng, W. W. S. Chong, H. Jin et al., “Differential expression of microRNAs in plasma of patients with colorectal cancer: a potential marker for colorectal cancer screening,” Gut, vol. 58, no. 10, pp. 1375–1381, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. J. Skog, T. Würdinger, S. van Rijn et al., “Glioblastoma microvesicles transport RNA and proteins that promote tumour growth and provide diagnostic biomarkers,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 10, no. 12, pp. 1470–1476, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. M. Fabbri, “TLRs as miRNA receptors,” Cancer Research, vol. 72, no. 24, pp. 6333–6337, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. L. Pigati, S. C. Yaddanapudi, R. Iyengar et al., “Selective release of microRNA species from normal and malignant mammary epithelial cells,” PLoS ONE, vol. 5, no. 10, Article ID e13515, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. J. Palma, S. C. Yaddanapudi, L. Pigati et al., “MicroRNAs are exported from malignant cells in customized particles,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 40, no. 18, pp. 9125–9138, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. C. H. Lawrie, S. Gal, H. M. Dunlop et al., “Detection of elevated levels of tumour-associated microRNAs in serum of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma,” The British Journal of Haematology, vol. 141, no. 5, pp. 672–675, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. X. Chen, Z. Hu, W. Wang et al., “Identification of ten serum microRNAs from a genome-wide serum microRNA expression profile as novel noninvasive biomarkers for nonsmall cell lung cancer diagnosis,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 130, no. 7, pp. 1620–1628, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. Y. Wang, J. Gu, J. A. Roth et al., “Pathway-based serum microRNA profiling and survival in patients with advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer,” Cancer Research, vol. 73, no. 15, pp. 4801–4809, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. J. Gong, N. Shen, H. M. Zhang et al., “A genetic variant in microRNA target site of TGF-β signaling pathway increases the risk of colorectal cancer in a Chinese population,” Tumor Biology, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 4301–4306, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  77. G. Genovese, A. Ergun, S. A. Shukla et al., “microRNA regulatory network inference identifies miR-34a as a novel regulator of TGF-β signaling in glioblastoma,” Cancer Discovery, vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 736–749, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  78. P. S. Mitchell, R. K. Parkin, E. M. Kroh et al., “Circulating microRNAs as stable blood-based markers for cancer detection,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 105, no. 30, pp. 10513–10518, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  79. D. Tang, Y. Shen, M. Wang et al., “Identification of plasma microRNAs as novel noninvasive biomarkers for early detection of lung cancer,” European Journal of Cancer Prevention, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 540–548, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  80. K. Cuk, M. Zucknick, J. Heil et al., “Circulating microRNAs in plasma as early detection markers for breast cancer,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 132, no. 7, pp. 1602–1612, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  81. H. Cai, Y. Yuan, Y.-F. Hao, T.-K. Guo, X. Wei, and Y.-M. Zhang, “Plasma microRNAs serve as novel potential biomarkers for early detection of gastric cancer,” Medical Oncology, vol. 30, article 452, no. 1, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  82. J. Liu, J. Gao, Y. Du et al., “Combination of plasma microRNAs with serum CA19-9 for early detection of pancreatic cancer,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 131, no. 3, pp. 683–691, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  83. G. van Niel, I. Porto-Carreiro, S. Simoes, and G. Raposo, “Exosomes: a common pathway for a specialized function,” Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 140, no. 1, pp. 13–21, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  84. D. D. Taylor and C. Gercel-Taylor, “MicroRNA signatures of tumor-derived exosomes as diagnostic biomarkers of ovarian cancer,” Gynecologic Oncology, vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 13–21, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  85. R. J. Bryant, T. Pawlowski, J. W. F. Catto et al., “Changes in circulating microRNA levels associated with prostate cancer,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 106, no. 4, pp. 768–774, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  86. Y. Ge, L. Xiao, X. Chen, Y. Peng, L. Sun, and F. Liu, “MicroRNAs in peritoneal dialysis effluent are promising biomarkers for peritoneal fibrosis in peritoneal dialysis patients,” Medical Hypotheses, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 155–156, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  87. N. J. Park, H. Zhou, D. Elashoff et al., “Salivary microRNA: discovery, characterization, and clinical utility for oral cancer detection,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 15, no. 17, pp. 5473–5477, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  88. M. Hanke, K. Hoefig, H. Merz et al., “A robust methodology to study urine microRNA as tumor marker: microRNA-126 and microRNA-182 are related to urinary bladder cancer,” Urologic Oncology, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 655–661, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  89. L. Mengual, J. J. Lozano, M. Ingelmo-Torres, C. Gazquez, M. J. Ribal, and A. Alcaraz, “Using microRNA profiling in urine samples to develop a non-invasive test for bladder cancer,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 133, no. 11, pp. 2631–2641, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  90. L. Xing, N. W. Todd, L. Yu, H. Fang, and F. Jiang, “Early detection of squamous cell lung cancer in sputum by a panel of microRNA markers,” Modern Pathology, vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 1157–1164, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  91. S. M. Kim, H. W. Kang, W. T. Kim et al., “Cell-free microRNA-214 from urine as a biomarker for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer,” Korean Journal of Urology, vol. 54, no. 11, pp. 791–796, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  92. X.-G. Liu, W.-Y. Zhu, Y.-Y. Huang et al., “High expression of serum miR-21 and tumor miR-200c associated with poor prognosis in patients with lung cancer,” Medical Oncology, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 618–626, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  93. H.-B. Le, W.-Y. Zhu, D.-D. Chen et al., “Evaluation of dynamic change of serum miR-21 and miR-24 in pre- and post-operative lung carcinoma patients,” Medical Oncology, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 3190–3197, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  94. G.-H. Liu, Z.-G. Zhou, R. Chen et al., “Serum miR-21 and miR-92a as biomarkers in the diagnosis and prognosis of colorectal cancer,” Tumor Biology, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 2175–2181, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  95. Y. Toiyama, M. Takahashi, K. Hur et al., “Serum miR-21 as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in colorectal cancer,” Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol. 105, no. 12, pp. 849–859, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  96. E.-H. Cai, Y.-X. Gao, Z.-Z. Wei, W.-Y. Chen, P. Yu, and K. Li, “Serum miR-21 expression in human esophageal squamous cell carcinomas,” Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 1563–1567, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  97. P. Wang, L. Zhuang, J. Zhang et al., “The serum miR-21 level serves as a predictor for the chemosensitivity of advanced pancreatic cancer, and miR-21 expression confers chemoresistance by targeting FasL,” Molecular Oncology, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 334–345, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  98. W. Ge, D.-C. Yu, Q.-G. Li, X. Chen, C.-Y. Zhang, and Y.-T. Ding, “Expression of serum miR-16, let-7f, and miR-21 in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and their clinical significances,” Clinical Laboratory, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 427–434, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  99. Y.-Z. Xu, Q.-H. Xi, W.-L. Ge, and X.-Q. Zhang, “Identification of serum microRNA-21 as a biomarker for early detection and prognosis in human epithelial ovarian cancer,” Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 1057–1060, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  100. C.-G. Liu, G. A. Calin, B. Meloon et al., “An oligonucleotide microchip for genome-wide microRNA profiling in human and mouse tissues,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 101, no. 26, pp. 9740–9744, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  101. M. De Planell-Saguer and M. C. Rodicio, “Detection methods for microRNAs in clinic practice,” Clinical Biochemistry, vol. 46, no. 10-11, pp. 869–878, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  102. P. Mestdagh, T. Feys, N. Bernard et al., “High-throughput stem-loop RT-qPCR miRNA expression profiling using minute amounts of input RNA,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 36, no. 21, article e143, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  103. T. D. Schmittgen, E. J. Lee, J. Jiang et al., “Real-time PCR quantification of precursor and mature microRNA,” Methods, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 31–38, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  104. J. Shen, S. A. Stass, and F. Jiang, “MicroRNAs as potential biomarkers in human solid tumors,” Cancer Letters, vol. 329, no. 2, pp. 125–136, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  105. J. R. Dijkstra, L. J. M. Mekenkamp, S. Teerenstra, I. de Krijger, and I. D. Nagtegaal, “MicroRNA expression in formalin-fixed paraffin embedded: tissue using real time quantitative PCR: the strengths and pitfalls,” Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 683–690, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  106. W. Li and K. Ruan, “MicroRNA detection by microarray,” Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, vol. 394, no. 4, pp. 1117–1124, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  107. C. J. Creighton, J. G. Reid, and P. H. Gunaratne, “Expression profiling of microRNAs by deep sequencing,” Briefings in Bioinformatics, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 490–497, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  108. Y. Li, Z. Zhang, F. Liu, W. Vongsangnak, Q. Jing, and B. Shen, “Performance comparison and evaluation of software tools for microRNA deep-sequencing data analysis,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 4298–4305, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  109. L. Weng, X. Wu, H. Gao et al., “MicroRNA profiling of clear cell renal cell carcinoma by whole-genome small RNA deep sequencing of paired frozen and formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue specimens,” Journal of Pathology, vol. 222, no. 1, pp. 41–51, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  110. M. Wanunu, T. Dadosh, V. Ray, J. Jin, L. McReynolds, and M. Drndić, “Rapid electronic detection of probe-specific microRNAs using thin nanopore sensors,” Nature Nanotechnology, vol. 5, no. 11, pp. 807–814, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  111. Y. Wang, D. Zheng, Q. Tan, M. X. Wang, and L. Q. Gu, “Nanopore-based detection of circulating microRNAs in lung cancer patients,” Nature Nanotechnology, vol. 6, no. 10, pp. 668–674, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  112. D. Madhavan, M. Zucknick, M. Wallwiener et al., “Circulating miRNAs as surrogate markers for circulating tumor cells and prognostic markers in metastatic breast cancer,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 18, no. 21, pp. 5972–5982, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  113. F. Mar-Aguilar, J. A. Mendoza-Ramírez, I. Malagón-Santiago et al., “Serum circulating microRNA profiling for identification of potential breast cancer biomarkers,” Disease Markers, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 163–169, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  114. X. Luo, C. Stock, B. Burwinkel, and H. Brenner, “Identification and evaluation of plasma microRNAs for early detection of colorectal cancer,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 5, Article ID e62880, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  115. A. Navarro, T. Diaz, E. Gallardo et al., “Prognostic implications of miR-16 expression levels in resected non-small-cell lung cancer,” Journal of Surgical Oncology, vol. 103, no. 5, pp. 411–415, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  116. M. Boeri, C. Verri, D. Conte et al., “MicroRNA signatures in tissues and plasma predict development and prognosis of computed tomography detected lung cancer,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 108, no. 9, pp. 3713–3718, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  117. Y. Ladeiro, G. Couchy, C. Balabaud et al., “MicroRNA profiling in hepatocellular tumors is associated with clinical features and oncogene/tumor suppressor gene mutations,” Hepatology, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 1955–1963, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  118. J. F. Ji and X. W. Wang, “New kids on the block diagnostic and prognostic microRNAs in hepatocellular carcinoma,” Cancer Biology and Therapy, vol. 8, no. 18, pp. 1683–1690, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  119. A. Karakatsanis, I. Papaconstantinou, M. Gazouli, A. Lyberopoulou, G. Polymeneas, and D. Voros, “Expression of microRNAs, miR-21, miR-31, miR-122, miR-145, miR-146a, miR-200c, miR-221, miR-222, and miR-223 in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma or intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and its prognostic significance,” Molecular Carcinogenesis, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 297–303, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  120. M. D. Giráldez, J. J. Lozano, G. Ramírez et al., “Circulating MicroRNAs as biomarkers of colorectal cancer: results from a genome-wide profiling and validation study,” Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 681.e3–688.e3, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  121. Q. Wang, Z. Huang, S. Ni et al., “Plasma miR-601 and miR-760 are novel biomarkers for the early detection of colorectal cancer,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 9, Article ID e44398, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  122. H. Cheng, L. Zhang, D. E. Cogdell et al., “Circulating plasma MiR-141 is a novel biomarker for metastatic colon cancer and predicts poor prognosis,” PLoS ONE, vol. 6, no. 3, Article ID e17745, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  123. G. A. Ganepola, J. R. Rutledge Suman, P. Suman, A. Yiengpruksawan, and D. H. Chang, “Novel blood-based microRNA biomarker panel for early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer,” World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 22–33, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  124. N. A. Schultz, C. Dehlendorff, B. V. Jensen et al., “MicroRNA biomarkers in whole blood for detection of pancreatic cancer,” JAMA—Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 311, no. 4, pp. 392–404, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  125. G. Zhao, J.-G. Zhang, Y. Shi et al., “MiR-130b is a prognostic marker and inhibits cell proliferation and invasion in pancreatic cancer through targeting STAT3,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 9, Article ID e73803, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  126. W. A. Mardin and S. T. Mees, “MicroRNAs: novel diagnostic and therapeutic tools for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma?” Annals of Surgical Oncology, vol. 16, no. 11, pp. 3183–3189, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  127. Z.-H. Chen, G.-L. Zhang, H.-R. Li et al., “A panel of five circulating microRNAs as potential biomarkers for prostate cancer,” Prostate, vol. 72, no. 13, pp. 1443–1452, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  128. R. Mahn, L. C. Heukamp, S. Rogenhofer, A. von Ruecker, S. C. Müller, and J. Ellinger, “Circulating microRNAs (miRNA) in serum of patients with prostate cancer,” Urology, vol. 77, no. 5, pp. 1265.e9–1265.e16, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  129. J. Shen, G. W. Hruby, J. M. McKiernan et al., “Dysregulation of circulating microRNAs and prediction of aggressive prostate cancer,” Prostate, vol. 72, no. 13, pp. 1469–1477, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  130. H.-L. Zhang, L.-F. Yang, Y. Zhu et al., “Serum miRNA-21: elevated levels in patients with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer and potential predictive factor for the efficacy of docetaxel-based chemotherapy,” Prostate, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 326–331, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  131. K. E. Resnick, H. Alder, J. P. Hagan, D. L. Richardson, C. M. Croce, and D. E. Cohn, “The detection of differentially expressed microRNAs from the serum of ovarian cancer patients using a novel real-time PCR platform,” Gynecologic Oncology, vol. 112, no. 1, pp. 55–59, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  132. P. P. Shah, L. E. Hutchinson, and S. S. Kakar, “Emerging role of microRNAs in diagnosis and treatment of various diseases including ovarian cancer,” Journal of Ovarian Research, vol. 2, no. 1, article 11, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  133. M. S. Zaman, D. M. Maher, S. Khan, M. Jaggi, and S. C. Chauhan, “Current status and implications of microRNAs in ovarian cancer diagnosis and therapy,” Journal of Ovarian Research, vol. 5, no. 1, article 44, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  134. C. W. S. Kan, M. A. Hahn, G. B. Gard et al., “Elevated levels of circulating microRNA-200 family members correlate with serous epithelial ovarian cancer,” BMC Cancer, vol. 12, article 627, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  135. S. Qiu, S. Lin, D. Hu, Y. Feng, Y. Tan, and Y. Peng, “Interactions of miR-323/miR-326/miR-329 and miR-130a/miR-155/miR-210 as prognostic indicators for clinical outcome of glioblastoma patients,” Journal of Translational Medicine, vol. 11, no. 1, article 10, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  136. A. Conti, M. Aguennouz, D. La Torre et al., “miR-21 and 221 upregulation and miR-181b downregulation in human grade II-IV astrocytic tumors,” Journal of Neuro-Oncology, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 325–332, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  137. H. F. Tu, S. C. Lin, and K. W. Chang, “MicroRNA aberrances in head and neck cancer: pathogenetic and clinical significance,” Current Opinion in Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 104–111, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  138. A. B. Y. Hui, M. Lenarduzzi, T. Krushel et al., “Comprehensive MicroRNA profiling for head and neck squamous cell carcinomas,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 1129–1139, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  139. A. B. Hui, W. Shi, P. C. Boutros et al., “Robust global micro-RNA profiling with formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded breast cancer tissues,” Laboratory Investigation, vol. 89, no. 5, pp. 597–606, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  140. L. F. Sempere, M. Christensen, A. Silahtaroglu et al., “Altered microRNA expression confined to specific epithelial cell subpopulations in breast cancer,” Cancer Research, vol. 67, no. 24, pp. 11612–11620, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  141. Y.-M. Lee, J.-Y. Lee, C.-C. Ho et al., “miRNA-34b as a tumor suppressor in estrogen-dependent growth of breast cancer cells,” Breast Cancer Research, vol. 13, no. 6, article R116, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  142. R. Aharonov, D. Lebanony, H. Benjamin et al., “Diagnostic assay based on hsa-miR-205 expression distinguishes squamous from nonsquamous non-small-cell lung carcinoma,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 27, no. 12, pp. 2030–2037, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  143. F. Fornari, M. Milazzo, P. Chieco et al., “In hepatocellular carcinoma miR-519d is up-regulated by p53 and DNA hypomethylation and targets CDKN1A/p21, PTEN, AKT3 and TIMP2,” Journal of Pathology, vol. 227, no. 3, pp. 275–285, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  144. M. Rong, R. He, Y. Dang, and G. Chen, “Expression and clinicopathological significance of miR-146a in hepatocellular carcinoma tissues,” Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences, vol. 119, no. 1, pp. 19–24, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  145. Q. Zhi, J. Zhu, X. Guo et al., “Metastasis-related miR-185 is a potential prognostic biomarker for hepatocellular carcinoma in early stage,” Biomedicine and Pharmacotherapy, vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 393–398, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  146. M. Koelz, J. Lense, F. Wrba, M. Scheffler, H. P. Dienes, and M. Odenthal, “Down-regulation of miR-221 and miR-222 correlates with pronounced Kit expression in gastrointestinal stromal tumors,” International Journal of Oncology, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 503–511, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  147. M. Bloomston, W. L. Frankel, F. Petrocca et al., “MicroRNA expression patterns to differentiate pancreatic adenocarcinoma from normal pancreas and chronic pancreatitis,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 297, no. 17, pp. 1901–1908, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  148. T. Greither, L. F. Grochola, A. Udelnow, C. Lautenschläger, P. Würl, and H. Taubert, “Elevated expression of microRNAs 155, 203, 210 and 222 in pancreatic tumors is associated with poorer survival,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 126, no. 1, pp. 73–80, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  149. J. Yu, K. Ohuchida, K. Mizumoto et al., “MicroRNA, hsa-miR-200c, is an independent prognostic factor in pancreatic cancer and its upregulation inhibits pancreatic cancer invasion but increases cell proliferation,” Molecular Cancer, vol. 9, article 169, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  150. X. Hu, J. K. Schwarz, J. S. Lewis Jr. et al., “A microRNA expression signature for cervical cancer prognosis,” Cancer Research, vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 1441–1448, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  151. A. Laios, S. O'Toole, R. Flavin et al., “Potential role of miR-9 and miR-223 in recurrent ovarian cancer,” Molecular Cancer, vol. 7, article 35, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  152. A. Masamune, E. Nakano, S. Hamada, T. Takikawa, N. Yoshida, and T. Shimosegawa, “Alteration of the microRNA expression profile during the activation of pancreatic stellate cells,” Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 323–331, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  153. S. Saini, S. Majid, S. Yamamura et al., “Regulatory role of mir-203 in prostate cancer progression and metastasis,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 17, no. 16, pp. 5287–5298, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  154. C. W. Wu, S. C. Ng, Y. Dong et al., “Identification of microrna-135b in stool as a potential noninvasive biomarker for colorectal cancer and adenoma,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 20, no. 11, pp. 2994–3002, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  155. F. L. Yong, C. W. Law, and C. W. Wang, “Potentiality of a triple microRNA classifier: MiR-193a-3p, miR-23a and miR-338-5p for early detection of colorectal cancer,” BMC Cancer, vol. 13, article 280, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  156. U. Segersten, Y. Spector, Y. Goren, S. Tabak, and P.-U. Malmström, “The role of microRNA profiling in prognosticating progression in Ta and T1 urinary bladder cancer,” Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 613–618, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  157. T. Ichimi, H. Enokida, Y. Okuno et al., “Identification of novel microRNA targets based on microRNA signatures in bladder cancer,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 125, no. 2, pp. 345–352, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  158. C. Yang, C. Wang, X. Chen et al., “Identification of seven serum microRNAs from a genome-wide serum microRNA expression profile as potential noninvasive biomarkers for malignant astrocytomas,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 132, no. 1, pp. 116–127, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  159. C. Eichelser, D. Flesch-Janys, J. Chang-Claude, K. Pantel, and H. Schwarzenbach, “Deregulated serum concentrations of circulating cell-free microRNAs miR-17, miR-34a, miR-155, and miR-373 in human breast cancer development and progression.,” Clinical chemistry, vol. 59, no. 10, pp. 1489–1496, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  160. Q. Wu, C. Wang, Z. Lu, L. Guo, and Q. Ge, “Analysis of serum genome-wide microRNAs for breast cancer detection,” Clinica Chimica Acta, vol. 413, no. 13-14, pp. 1058–1065, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  161. G. Rabinowits, C. Gerçel-Taylor, J. M. Day, D. D. Taylor, and G. H. Kloecker, “Exosomal microRNA: a diagnostic marker for lung cancer,” Clinical Lung Cancer, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 42–46, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  162. P. Qi, S.-Q. Cheng, H. Wang, N. Li, Y.-F. Chen, and C.-F. Gao, “Serum microRNAs as biomarkers for hepatocellular carcinoma in Chinese patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection,” PLoS ONE, vol. 6, no. 12, Article ID e28486, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  163. Y. Yamamoto, N. Kosaka, M. Tanaka et al., “MicroRNA-500 as a potential diagnostic marker for hepatocellular carcinoma,” Biomarkers, vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 529–538, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  164. J. Xu, C. Wu, X. Che et al., “Circulating MicroRNAs, miR-21, miR-122, and miR-223, in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma or chronic hepatitis,” Molecular Carcinogenesis, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 136–142, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  165. J. Qi, J. Wang, H. Katayama, S. Sen, and S. M. Liu, “Circulating microRNAs (cmiRNAs) as novel potential biomarkers for hepatocellular carcinoma,” Neoplasma, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 135–142, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  166. K. Z. Qu, K. Zhang, H. R. Li, N. H. Afdhal, and M. Albitar, “Circulating MicroRNAs as biomarkers for hepatocellular carcinoma,” Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 355–360, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  167. M.-Y. Song, K.-F. Pan, H.-J. Su et al., “Identification of serum microRNAs as novel non-invasive biomarkers for early detection of gastric cancer,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 3, Article ID e33608, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  168. R. Liu, C. Zhang, Z. Hu et al., “A five-microRNA signature identified from genome-wide serum microRNA expression profiling serves as a fingerprint for gastric cancer diagnosis,” European Journal of Cancer, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 784–791, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  169. B.-S. Li, Y.-L. Zhao, G. Guo et al., “Plasma microRNAs, miR-223, miR-21 and miR-218, as novel potential biomarkers for gastric cancer detection,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 7, Article ID e41629, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  170. H. Konishi, D. Ichikawa, S. Komatsu et al., “Detection of gastric cancer-associated microRNAs on microRNA microarray comparing pre- and post-operative plasma,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 106, no. 4, pp. 740–747, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  171. J. J. LaConti, N. Shivapurkar, A. Preet et al., “Tissue and serum microRNAs in the KrasG12D transgenic animal model and in patients with pancreatic cancer,” PLoS ONE, vol. 6, no. 6, Article ID e20687, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  172. S. Yabushita, K. Fukamachi, H. Tanaka et al., “Circulating micrornas in serum of human k-ras oncogene transgenic rats with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas,” Pancreas, vol. 41, no. 7, pp. 1013–1018, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  173. J. Wang, J. Chen, P. Chang et al., “MicroRNAs in plasma of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients as novel blood-based biomarkers of disease,” Cancer Prevention Research, vol. 2, no. 9, pp. 807–813, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  174. R. Que, G. Ding, J. Chen, and L. Cao, “Analysis of serum exosomal microRNAs and clinicopathologic features of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma,” World Journal of Surgical Oncology, vol. 11, article no. 219, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  175. L.-G. Wang and J. Gu, “Serum microRNA-29a is a promising novel marker for early detection of colorectal liver metastasis,” Cancer Epidemiology, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. e61–e67, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  176. Z. Huang, D. Huang, S. Ni, Z. Peng, W. Sheng, and X. Du, “Plasma microRNAs are promising novel biomarkers for early detection of colorectal cancer,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 127, no. 1, pp. 118–126, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  177. J. B. Kjersem, T. Ikdahl, O. C. Lingjaerde, T. Guren, K. M. Tveit, and E. H. Kure, “Plasma microRNAs predicting clinical outcome in metastatic colorectal cancer patients receiving first-line oxaliplatin-based treatment,” Molecular Oncology, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 59–67, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  178. X.-X. Pu, G.-L. Huang, H.-Q. Guo et al., “Circulating miR-221 directly amplified from plasma is a potential diagnostic and prognostic marker of colorectal cancer and is correlated with p53 expression,” Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 1674–1680, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  179. A. E. Frampton, J. Krell, T. M. H. Gall, L. Castellano, J. Stebbing, and L. R. Jiao, “MIR-15b and MIR-17 are tumor-derived plasma micrornas dysregulated in colorectal neoplasia,” Annals of Surgery, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  180. H. Zheng, L. Zhang, Y. Zhao et al., “Plasma miRNAs as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for ovarian cancer,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 11, Article ID e77853, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  181. A. M. Westermann, D. Schmidt, S. Holdenrieder et al., “Serum microRNAs as biomarkers in patients undergoing prostate biopsy: results from a prospective multi-center study,” Anticancer research, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 665–669, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  182. F. Moltzahn, A. B. Olshen, L. Baehner et al., “Microfluidic-based multiplex qRT-PCR identifies diagnostic and prognostic microRNA signatures in the sera of prostate cancer patients,” Cancer Research, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 550–560, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  183. L. Dyrskjøt, M. S. Ostenfeld, J. B. Bramsen et al., “Genomic profiling of microRNAs in bladder cancer: miR-129 is associated with poor outcome and promotes cell death in vitro,” Cancer Research, vol. 69, no. 11, pp. 4851–4860, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  184. A. Tölle, M. Jung, S. Rabenhorst, E. Kilic, K. Jung, and S. Weikert, “Identification of microRNAs in blood and urine as tumour markers for the detection of urinary bladder cancer,” Oncology Reports, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 1949–1956, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  185. Z. C. Zhang, Y. Huang, X. J. Wang, M. Wang, and L. L. Ma, “Expression of circulating microRNAs in patients with bladder urothelial carcinoma,” Journal of Peking University Health Sciences, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 532–536, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  186. G. Wang, E. S.-Y. Chan, B. C.-H. Kwan et al., “Expression of microRNAs in the urine of patients with bladder cancer,” Clinical Genitourinary Cancer, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 106–113, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  187. C. Fang, D.-X. Zhu, H.-J. Dong et al., “Serum microRNAs are promising novel biomarkers for diffuse large B cell lymphoma,” Annals of Hematology, vol. 91, no. 4, pp. 553–559, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  188. F. Zhi, X. Cao, X. Xie et al., “Identification of circulating MicroRNAs as potential biomarkers for detecting acute myeloid leukemia,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 2, Article ID e56718, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  189. B. Stamatopoulos, N. Meuleman, B. Haibe-Kains et al., “microRNA-29c and microRNA-223 down-regulation has in vivo significance in chronic lymphocytic leukemia and improves disease risk stratification,” Blood, vol. 113, no. 21, pp. 5237–5245, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2015 Huiyin Lan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles