BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2017 / Article
!A Corrigendum for this article has been published. To view the article details, please click the ‘Corrigendum’ tab above.

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2017 |Article ID 4176170 |

Wei Gao, Jin-Xiao Liang, Chi Ma, Jing-yin Dong, Qiu Yan, "The Protective Effect of N-Acetylcysteine on Ionizing Radiation Induced Ovarian Failure and Loss of Ovarian Reserve in Female Mouse", BioMed Research International, vol. 2017, Article ID 4176170, 11 pages, 2017.

The Protective Effect of N-Acetylcysteine on Ionizing Radiation Induced Ovarian Failure and Loss of Ovarian Reserve in Female Mouse

Academic Editor: Janusz Blasiak
Received23 Dec 2016
Revised20 Mar 2017
Accepted11 Apr 2017
Published21 May 2017


Ionizing radiation may cause irreversible ovarian failure, which, therefore, calls for an effective radioprotective reagent. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the potential radioprotective effect of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) on ionizing radiation induced ovarian failure and loss of ovarian reserve in mice. Kun-Ming mice were either exposed to X-irradiation (4 Gy), once, and/or treated with NAC (300 mg/kg), once daily for 7 days before X-irradiation. We examined the serum circulating hormone levels and the development of ovarian follicles as well as apoptosis, cell proliferation, and oxidative stress 24 hours after X-irradiation. In addition, morphological observations on the endometrial luminal epithelium and the fertility assessment were performed. We found that NAC successfully restored the ovarian and uterine function, enhanced the embryo implantation, improved the follicle development, and altered the abnormal hormone levels through reducing the oxidative stress and apoptosis level in granulosa cells while promoting the proliferation of granulosa cells. In conclusion, the radioprotective effect of NAC on mice ovary from X-irradiation was assessed, and our results suggested that NAC can be a potential radioprotector which is capable of preventing the ovarian failure occurrence and restoring the ovarian reserve.

1. Introduction

Ovarian failure is defined as loss of ovarian physiological function and is the most serious gynecological disease that results in infertility and comes with low estradiol levels and elevated follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) [1]. Ovarian failure occurred with the depletion of the follicles and increased rate of oocyte atresia [2]. Anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH), which is produced in the granulosa cells in late prenatal and small antral follicles, is considered as a sensitive indicator of the longitudinal decline of ovarian reserve [3]. The level of AMH decreases with age, especially after age of 30 years, where it declines more steeply [4, 5]. The ovarian granulosa cells play a key role in fertility and pregnancy by regulating ovulation and luteal regression [6]. The proliferation and apoptotic state of the ovarian granulosa cells reflect the ovarian function. Among all the physicochemical factors, ionizing radiation is the most common cause for ovarian failure which affects the fertility tremendously [7].

Ionizing radiation, including gamma and X-ray, is considered as one of the important etiologies for infertility [8]. An increasing risk of infertility and abortion was found in the pregnant women who work in nuclear industry [9]. Women who received pelvic radiation during childhood were at high risk of acute ovary failure and/or premature menopause [10]. Adult females who received radiotherapy are at high risk of oocyte loss and reduction in follicle store [11]. In addition, the impairment of ovaries induced by ionizing radiation was shown by in vivo observation [12].

Searching for more effective radioprotectors has drawn wide attention for the women of child-bearing age who may be exposed to ionizing radiation (such as radiotherapy). Ionizing radiation impairs the cellular function mainly by generating reactive oxygen species (ROS) [13, 14]. ROS plays an important role in chemical toxicants induced growth inhibition and apoptosis in cultured mouse antral follicles [15]. NAC, a well-known thiol-containing antioxidant, is a safe drug which has been wildly used in clinics for over 50 years [1]. As a precursor of intracellular cysteine [16], NAC showed its capability of facilitating intracellular glutathione (GSH) biosynthesis in different cells lines and organs. NAC administration prevented the UV exposure induced oxidative damage in mice skin [17]. Mansour and colleagues found that pretreating the rat with NAC protected the liver from gamma irradiation by increasing the antioxidative enzymes while the levels of MDA, NO(x), and DNA damage decreased [18]. In Wu and colleagues’ in vitro study, N-acetylcysteine amide (NACA), a thiol antioxidant which affects the cells in an extremely similar manner to NAC, was found to attenuate radiation induced cytotoxicity in Chinese hamster ovary cells [19]. The protective effect of NAC on mouse ovary heterotopic autotransplantation was testified to promote the follicular survival and function in mice ovarian grafts [20]. Till now, the protective effect of NAC on radiation induced damage in organs (such as liver and skin) has been studied in recent years [21, 22]. However, the underlying mechanism of how NAC administration protects the ovarian function from being impaired by ionizing radiation exposure still needs further exploration.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Mice and NAC Treatment/Pretreatment and X-Irradiation

All experimental procedures involved in the mouse studies were approved by the Institutional Review Board in Dalian Medical University. We established the mouse POF model by using outbreed Kun-Ming mice (6 weeks old) weighing , which were provided by Lab Animal Center in Dalian Medical University of China. After the stabilization period, all of the mice were randomly divided into 4 groups, respectively: control, X-irradiation, NAC treatment alone, and NAC/X-irradiation. Mice of X-irradiation and NAC/X-irradiation groups received whole-body X-irradiation as a single dose of 4 Gy. In NAC and NAC/X-irradiation groups, the mice were injected intraperitoneally daily with NAC (300 mg/kg, dissolved in normal saline) for 7 days before sample collection. In NAC/X-irradiation group, the mice were then exposed to a single dose of (4 Gy) whole-body X-irradiation.

X-irradiation was performed at the intensity of 100 cGy/min with a CLINAC 2300C/D-SN 27 X-ray unit.

2.2. Fertility Assessment

Another 24 female mice of all groups (6 mice per group) were used, mated with sexually experienced male mice at the ratio of 2 : 1 after superovulation. A vaginal plug was used to mark the first day of pregnancy (D1). The uteruses were obtained on D7.

2.3. ELISA

Serum was collected by centrifugation at 3000 ×g for 15 min and kept at −80°C until being assayed for estradiol, progesterone, FSH, and AMH. Four ELISA kits (Mouse Estradiol(E2)/Progesterone/FSH/AMH ELISA Kit) (LengTon, China) were used for detection of serum estradiol, progesterone, FSH, and AMH level according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

2.4. Histopathological Examination

The ovaries or uterus was fixed in 10% formalin overnight and embedded in paraffin. Serial sections of 7 μm thickness were stained with hematoxylin and eosin for light microscopic histological examination. In all ovarian samples, the eighth cut was chosen for counting the number of follicles and evaluating follicular development. Images were captured using a light microscope (Olympus, Japan). Follicles were classified as primordial, preantral, antral, and atretic as described in Britt and colleagues’ study [23].

2.5. Western Blot

Mice were sacrificed after X-irradiation, and ovaries were removed and lysed in 6 ml 1x DPBS buffer containing 1% triton-x100, protease inhibitors, and 2 mM PMSF. After briefly homogenizing, sonicating, and centrifuging at 4°C for 30 min, the supernatant was collected, and 50 μg of the lysate of each group was loaded onto a SDS-PAGE and transferred onto NC membranes and revealed with anti-PCNA rabbit monoclonal antibody (1 : 1000) (Proteintech, USA). The relative densitometric analysis of the western blot was performed using Image Pro Plus software 6.0 and expressed as a percentage of control.

2.6. Scanning Electron Microscopy of Pinopod

After NAC and/or X-irradiation treatment, superovulation was induced in female mice administering 5 IU of pregnant mares’ serum gonadotropin intraperitoneally, followed by 5 IU human chorionic gonadotropin intraperitoneally 48 h later. Then they were placed with males: each 2 female mice were caged with one male mouse. All mice of the study groups were sacrificed on day 7 after superovulation (the pinopod only emerged during the peri-implantation period), implanted embryos in each uterine horn were counted and analyzed, and the endometrium was examined by using full-thickness tissue collected from the uterine horns of mice from all groups. For scanning electron microscopy (SEM) observation, protocol was followed as described in previous study [24]. The images were taken in scanning electron microscope (JEM-2000 EX).

2.7. GPx Activity Assessment

To determine the glutathione peroxidase (GPx) activity, Cellular Glutathione Peroxidase Assay Kit (Beyotime, China) was used following the manufacturer’s instructions. The results were expressed as mU/mg protein.

2.8. Immunohistochemistry

The ovaries were harvested, fixed, and embedded in paraffin, using anti-8-OHdG mouse monoclonal antibody (1 : 100) (Santa Cruz, USA), anti-anti-cytochrome c rabbit polyclonal antibody (1 : 100) (Bioworld, USA), anti-caspase 3 rabbit polyclonal antibody (1 : 100) (Bioworld, USA), anti-PCNA polyclonal antibody (1 : 100) (Proteintech, USA), and Histostain-Plus Kits (ZSGB-BIO, China). Following deparaffinization, the tissue sections were incubated with first antibody at 4°C overnight and then reacted with biotinylated secondary anti-mouse IgG antibody for 30 min at room temperature. Streptavidin was added and followed by diaminobenzidine (DAB) staining. Subsequently, the tissue sections were counterstained with hematoxylin and images were captured on microscope (Olympus, Japan). The immunohistochemical staining was quantified by using Image Pro Plus software 6.0 and expressed as mean density.

2.9. Statistical Analysis

All data were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). The data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Student’s -test, using SPSS 11.5 software. The level of significance was set at for all statistical analyses.

3. Results

3.1. Ovarian Weight Changes

Weights of ovaries were compared after normalization to 1 g body weight. Table 1 showed significant reduction in ovarian weight in irradiated group compared with that of the control group. Pretreatment of NAC before X-irradiation maintained the ovarian weight to a normal level. Mice treated with NAC alone did not show any significant difference from that of the control group.

Groups⁢Ovarian weight
mgmg/g body weight


Data expressed as mean ± SD. or : significantly different from control or X-irradiation group, respectively, at using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey–Kramer as a post hoc test.
3.2. Circulating Hormone Levels

Serum estradiol level of X irradiated group showed significant decrease to 53.89% of control values ( versus in control), as shown in Figure 1(a). In contrast, the serum level of FSH was significantly increased 1.9-fold ( versus in control) by exposure to X-irradiation, as shown in Figure 1(b). Meantime, pretreating the mice with NAC before X-irradiation restored the serum level of estradiol to nonradiation treated levels (Figure 1(a)) and the FSH level was significantly decreased in comparison to X-ray treated mice (Figure 1(b)). Also, the serum progesterone ( versus in control) and AMH ( versus in control) level were significantly decreased when mice were exposed to the X-irradiation and pretreatment with NAC significantly restored the serum level of progesterone and AMH to the control level (Figures 1(c) and 1(d)).

3.3. Folliculogenesis

The population of primordial follicles was reduced by 81% in irradiated ovaries ( versus in controls) (Figures 2(A)-(a) and 2(B)). Also, as shown in Figures 2(A)-(b) and 2(B), X-irradiation reduced the number of preantral follicles by 39% ( versus in controls). However, there was no significant difference in number of antral follicles in the X-irradiation group compared with control group (Figures 2(A)-(c) and 2(B)). Moreover, we found significantly increasing number of atretic follicles in irradiated ovaries by 300% ( versus in controls). Meantime, we found that pretreatment with NAC before X-irradiation significantly increased the number of primordial and preantral follicles and reduced the number of the atretic follicles compared to the X-irradiation group. No significant effect was found on the number of antral follicles compared with the control group.

3.4. Immunohistochemical Analysis and Expression of PCNA

Immunohistochemical detection of PCNA was assessed to evaluate the ovarian granular cells proliferation. Strong expression of PCNA was shown in the granular cells of the ovaries obtained from the mice of control and NAC treated groups (Figures 4(A)–4(a) and (c)) while significantly weak expression of PCNA was shown in the X-irradiation group (Figure 4(A)-(b)). Meantime, pretreatment of NAC to the mice significantly augmented the PCNA expression to normal level (Figure 4(A)-(d)). The immunohistochemical staining was quantified as shown in Figure 4(B) and expressed as mean density.

We also assessed the PCNA expression by western blot (Figures 4(C) and 4(D)). Ovarian tissue obtained from the X irradiated mice showed significantly lower expression compared with control group, and treating with NAC before X-irradiation significantly increased the PCNA expression. The relative densitometric analysis of the western blot was given in Figure 4(D).

3.5. Oxidative Stress

The oxidative stress and activity of antioxidant enzymes were assessed by immunohistochemical detection of 8-OHdG formation and GPx activity assay. As shown in Figure 5(A), in the ovaries of control and NAC group, the cells showed weak positivity of 8-OHdG (Figures 5(A)–5(a) and (c)), and high 8-OHdG formation was observed in X-irradiation group (Figure 5(A)-(b)). Meantime, pretreating the mice with NAC protected the ovary from X-irradiation induced 8-OHdG formation (Figure 5(A)-(d)). The immunohistochemical staining of 8-OHdG was quantified as mean density and the results are represented in Figure 5(B).

As shown in Figure 5(C), X-irradiation stimulated significant reduction of GPx activity in ovary tissue by 43% compared to the control group, while pretreating the mice with NAC significantly restored the GPx activity.

3.6. Apoptosis

The immunohistochemical analysis of cytochrome c and caspase 3 were conducted to assess the state of apoptosis in mice ovary (Figures 6(A)–6(D)). We found low expression of cytochrome c (Figures 6(A)–6(a) and (c)) and caspase 3 (Figure 6(B)-(a), (c)) in ovarian granulosa and theca interstitial cells obtained from the mice treated without or with NAC alone. In contrast, we found significantly increased level of cytochrome c (Figure 6(A)-(b)) and caspase 3 (Figure 6(B)-(b)) in the samples obtained from the mice treated with X-irradiation alone compared with those of the control group. Treating the mice with NAC before X-irradiation significantly decreased the expression of cytochrome c (Figure 6(A)-(d)) and caspase 3 (Figure 6(B)-(d)). The immunohistochemical staining of cytochrome c and caspase 3 was quantified as mean density and the results are represented in Figures 6(C) and 6(D).

We also assessed the state of apoptosis by TUNEL assay (data not shown). Widespread TUNEL signal was visible in ovary tissue obtained from mice exposed to X-irradiation while little fluorescence signal was observed in ovaries of the mice without or with NAC treatment alone. Meantime, significantly weakened TUNEL signal was observed in the ovary of NAC pretreated mice.

3.7. Morphological Change in Uterus and Fertility Assessment

Uterine sections obtained from control and NAC treated groups showed normal histological structure of endometrial luminal epithelial structure and the underlying glandular structure (Figures 3(A)–3(a) and (c)). After X-irradiation, the endometrial luminal epithelial structure showed degeneration structure with blebbing membrane (Figure 3(A)-(b)). Interestingly, the tissue obtained from the mice pretreated with NAC showed normal histological structure of endometrial luminal epithelial structure (Figure 3(A)-(d)).

Pinopodes, coming with the loss of microvilli on the surface of endometrial epithelium, are large, rounded, and smooth-surfaced projections of the apical plasma membrane. By SEM, uterine endometrium obtained from the mice of control and NAC treated groups showed uniformly distributed pinopode presenting cells (Figures 3(B)–3(a) and (c)). After X-irradiation, the endometrium represent no pinopod formation at all (Figure 3(B)-(b)), and the endometrium obtained from the mice of NAC pretreated group showed blebs (Figure 3(B)-(d)), which is considered an initial phase of pinopod maturation [24].

The protective effects of NAC on the low reproductive capacity in terms of fecundability and fecundity induced by X-irradiation were shown in Table 2. Four in six female mice of control group were mated and pregnant with a litter size of 18.2 embryos/female. Only one in six irradiated mice was mated and yet not pregnant (0% versus 100% in control) with a litter size of 0 (0 versus 18.2, embryos for controls). Treating the mice with NAC before X-irradiation preserved their fertility and increased the ability of females to become pregnant (100%) with litter size of 10 pups/female. Female mice treated with NAC only were led to (100%) pregnancy with litter size of 20.6 embryos/female.

GroupsMating percentageFecundabilityFecundity


Fecundability was expressed as a percentage of pregnant females among mated females. Fecundity was expressed as the number of embryos per mated females. or : significantly different from control or X-irradiation group, respectively, at /0.05.

4. Discussion

Ovarian failure is characterized by loss of follicles and folliculogenesis due to low proliferation of ovarian granular cell. Our morphological detection showed that X-irradiation significantly promoted the depletion of the primordial follicles. This result was basically consistent with Mandl’s study, which had shown that the primordial follicles were much more sensitive than the antral follicles to the ionizing radiation exposure [25]. In the present study, NAC administration effectively preserved the primordial follicles’ reserve and promoted the maturation of follicle. The proliferation of granulosa cells plays an important role in follicles development and maturation. It has been reported that ionizing radiation decreased the proliferation of the granulosa cells in rat ovary [12]. In rat ovaries, PCNA was not detected in granulosa cells or oocytes in primordial follicles but was highly expressed with the initiation of follicle growth [26]. Our result coincided with the report that, in control group, high expression of PCNA was detected in granulosa cells of antral follicle which indicated high level of proliferation [26]. We also found that the PCNA expression was significantly increased by NAC pretreatment before X-irradiation. It has been reported that ionizing radiation elevated the p53 expression which then regulated the expression of downstream gene p21, thus leading to the downregulation of PCNA [27]. Bae and colleagues’ study showed an inhibitory effect of NAC administration on p53 expression and phosphorylation [28], from which we inferred that NAC elevated the PCNA expression by downregulating the p53 expression. Our present study showed an in vivo evidence that NAC can promote granulosa cells proliferation, thus protecting the follicle development from X-irradiation.

The loss of follicles and folliculogenesis leads to disordered hormone secretion as well as the abnormal morphology and function of the ovarian effector organs (such as uterus). Ovarian failure comes with low serum levels of estradiol and elevated FSH level and leads to infertility [1]. In the present study, we found lower estradiol levels and extremely higher FSH concentration in X irradiated group, and the ovary weight was significantly reduced. Our results showed typical ovarian failure. Moreover, the AMH level was also decreased by X-irradiation exposure. AMH, which is produced in the granulosa cells in late prenatal and small antral follicles, is considered as a sensitive indicator of the longitudinal decline of ovarian reserve [3]. AMH value showed an extremely low, even undetectable level in POF (premature ovarian failure) patients [29]. Low AMH value combined with abnormal FSH level has strong impact on pregnancy rate [30]. In our study, the similar result was demonstrated, which further indicated an ovarian failure. Meantime, in NAC/X-ray group, such abnormal hormone condition was significantly recovered, which indicated that NAC is capable of protecting the ovarian function from ionizing radiation.

In addition, we found significant uterine lining mucosal epithelium degeneration and limited embryo implantation of female mice after X-irradiation exposure. In Said and colleagues’ study, the degeneration of endometrial epithelium from mice was observed after exposure to ionizing radiation [12], and similar result was also obtained in Bath and colleagues’ study [31]. Estradiol secretion is essential for maintaining the normal growth of endometrial epithelial structure [32]. In our results, pretreatment with NAC increased the serum estradiol level and thus inhibited the endometrial epithelium degeneration. Pinopods, as an important morphologic marker of uterine function, are surface projections of the endometrial cells involved in uterine pinocytosis in mammals [33]. The presence and development of the pinopods depend on the ovarian secretion of progesterone [34] which is closely associated with normal luteal cells function and follicular development. X-irradiation significantly depressed the plasma progesterone concentration in mice by promoting the luteal regression [35, 36]. We found a significant disappearance of the pinopodes on the surface of the mice endometrial epithelium after exposure to X-irradiation. Interestingly, NAC administration increased the progesterone concentration and, meantime, preserved the pinopods formation as shown in our result, which means the endometrial receptivity was restored. We also found that NAC pretreatment before X-irradiation could elevate the fertility capacity of the female mice, which was due to the increased estradiol level. Estradiol has a positive effect on sexual behavior; increase in E2 levels facilitates female mate-searching and assessment behaviors [24]. Our results suggested that NAC attenuated the deterioration of uterine and preserved the fertility capacity of female mice through normalizing the disordered circulating hormone levels induced by X-irradiation.

The central mechanism of how NAC protected the ovary from X-irradiation was the inhibition of oxidative stress. Ionizing radiation can directly disrupt the atomic structures and result in chemical and biological changes in living cells, which initiates physiological changes or cell death [14]. Also, indirectly, it can generate reactive chemical species like ROS that may damage nucleic acids, proteins, and lipids by acting through radiolysis of water [37]. When attacked by ROS, bases in DNA can be oxidized, such as the oxidation of deoxyguanosine (dG) to 8-OHdG [38], which is higher in aging oocytes [39]. Increased ROS level and decreased antioxidant enzymes activity (such as GPx) combined together to impair the progesterone secretion [40], endometrial epithelium degeneration, and follicle regression [41, 42]. NAC is a well-known sulfhydryl-containing antioxidant and its role in radioprotection has been explored in several studies [43, 44]. In vivo study has reported that NAC preserved the ovarian function in ovary tissue transplantation through scavenging oxygen free radicals [20]. On the other hand, cell proliferation can be suppressed by ROS [45]. According to our previous discussion, NAC administration increased the PCNA level in granulosa cells through reducing the ROS generation. In the current study, the antioxidant effect of NAC was shown by increasing the GPx activity and decreasing the 8-OHdG formation induced by X-irradiation.

Besides oxidative stress, we also assessed the apoptosis induced by X-irradiation in mice ovarian granular cell. Increase of ROS level leads to release of mitochondrial cytochrome c and triggering of apoptosis by activating caspase 3 [46]. The ovarian granulosa cells play a key role in fertility and pregnancy by regulating ovulation and luteal regression [6]. Cell apoptosis is closely associated with the initiation of follicular atresia and luteal cell death [47]. In the present study, the apoptosis induced by X-irradiation in ovarian granulosa cells was observed. NAC inhibits apoptosis induced by toxicant in nonovary cells [17, 48]. Also, treating the Chinese hamster ovary cells with NAC can effectively inhibit cell apoptosis induced by radiation [19]. Our study indicated that NAC protected the ovarian function from X-irradiation and enhances the follicular development through decreasing the apoptosis induced by oxidative stress.

In conclusion, NAC effectively restored the ovarian function and fertility capability of female mice and may be capable of being used as an ovarian radioprotector. However, the underlying mechanism of how NAC prevents the irradiation-induced inhibition of granulose cell proliferation still needs further exploration.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

Wei Gao performed the experiment and drafted the manuscript. Jinxiao Liang and Chi Ma performed the data analysis. Qiu Yan conceived the idea and designed the experiment. Jingyin Dong finalized the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.


The project was supported by the (1) China 973 Grant no. 2012CB822100 and National Natural Science Foundation of China Research grants nos. 31670810 and 31270866 and (2) Program of Zhejiang Province Medical Science and Technology no. 2015KYB108.


  1. C. M. Powell, R. T. Taggart, T. C. Drumheller et al., “Molecular and cytogenetic studies of an X;autosome translocation in a patient with premature ovarian failure and review of the literature,” American Journal of Medical Genetics, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 19–26, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. A. N. Shelling, “Premature ovarian failure,” Reproduction, vol. 140, no. 5, pp. 633–641, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. C. Weenen, J. S. E. Laven, A. R. M. von Bergh et al., “Anti-Müllerian hormone expression pattern in the human ovary: potential implications for initial and cyclic follicle recruitment,” Molecular Human Reproduction, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 77–83, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. A. De Vet, J. S. E. Laven, F. H. De Jong, A. P. N. Themmen, and B. C. J. M. Fauser, “Antimüllerian hormone serum levels: a putative marker for ovarian aging,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 77, no. 2, pp. 357–362, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. I. A. J. van Rooij, F. J. M. Broekmans, G. J. Scheffer et al., “Serum antimüllerian hormone levels best reflect the reproductive decline with age in normal women with proven fertility: a longitudinal study,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 83, no. 4, pp. 979–987, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. A. Amsterdam and N. Selvaraj, “Control of differentiation, transformation, and apoptosis in granulosa cells by oncogenes, oncoviruses, and tumor suppressor genes,” Endocrine Reviews, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 435–461, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. C. Y. Andersen, S. G. Kristensen, T. Greve, and K. T. Schmidt, “Cryopreservation of ovarian tissue for fertility preservation in young female oncological patients,” Future Oncology, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 595–608, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. T. Dehghan, H. Mozdarani, A. Khoradmehr, S. M. Kalantar, M. Bakhshandeh, F. Bouzarjomehri et al., “Evaluation of embryo quality after concurrent use of ovarian stimulating hormones and gamma irradiation,” Iranian Journal of Reproductive Medicine, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 573–580, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  9. P. Doyle, N. Maconochie, E. Roman, G. Davies, P. G. Smith, and V. Beral, “Fetal death and congenital malformation in babies born to nuclear industry employees: report from the nuclear industry family study,” Lancet, vol. 356, no. 9238, pp. 1293–1299, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. D. M. Green, C. A. Sklar, J. D. Boice Jr. et al., “Ovarian failure and reproductive outcomes after childhood cancer treatment: results from the childhood cancer survivor study,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 27, no. 14, pp. 2374–2381, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. M. Sönmezer and K. Oktay, “Assisted reproduction and fertility preservation techniques in cancer patients,” Current Opinion in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Obesity, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 514–522, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. R. S. Said, A. S. Nada, and E. El-Demerdash, “Sodium selenite improves folliculogenesis in radiation-induced ovarian failure: a mechanistic approach,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 12, Article ID e50928, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. H. Wiseman and B. Halliwell, “Damage to DNA by reactive oxygen and nitrogen species: role in inflammatory disease and progression to cancer,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 313, no. 1, pp. 17–29, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. D. R. Spitz, E. I. Azzam, J. J. Li, and D. Gius, “Metabolic oxidation/reduction reactions and cellular responses to ionizing radiation: a unifying concept in stress response biology,” Cancer and Metastasis Reviews, vol. 23, no. 3-4, pp. 311–322, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. W. Wang, Z. R. Craig, M. S. Basavarajappa, R. K. Gupta, and J. A. Flaws, “Di (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate inhibits growth of mouse ovarian antral follicles through an oxidative stress pathway,” Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, vol. 258, no. 2, pp. 288–295, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. S.-Y. Sun, “N-acetylcysteine, reactive oxygen species and beyond,” Cancer Biology & Therapy, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 109-110, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. M. A. Cotter, J. Thomas, P. Cassidy et al., “N-acetylcysteine protects melanocytes against oxidative stress/damage and delays onset of ultraviolet-induced melanoma in mice,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 13, no. 19, pp. 5952–5958, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. H. H. Mansour, H. F. Hafez, N. M. Fahmy, and N. Hanafi, “Protective effect of N-acetylcysteine against radiation induced DNA damage and hepatic toxicity in rats,” Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 773–780, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. W. Wu, L. Abraham, J. Ogony, R. Matthews, G. Goldstein, and N. Ercal, “Effects of N-acetylcysteine amide (NACA), a thiol antioxidant on radiation-induced cytotoxicity in Chinese hamster ovary cells,” Life Sciences, vol. 82, no. 21-22, pp. 1122–1130, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. M. Mahmoodi, M. Soleimani Mehranjani, S. M. A. Shariatzadeh, H. Eimani, and A. Shahverdi, “N-acetylcysteine improves function and follicular survival in mice ovarian grafts through inhibition of oxidative stress,” Reproductive BioMedicine Online, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 101–110, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. E. Ozgur, D. Sahin, A. Tomruk et al., “The effects of N-acetylcysteine and epigallocatechin-3-gallate on liver tissue protein oxidation and antioxidant enzyme levels after the exposure to radiofrequency radiation,” International Journal of Radiation Biology, vol. 91, no. 2, pp. 187–193, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. A. G. Goodson, M. A. Cotter, P. Cassidy et al., “Use of oral N-acetylcysteine for protection of melanocytic nevi against UV-induced oxidative stress: towards a novel paradigm for melanoma chemoprevention,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 15, no. 23, pp. 7434–7440, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. K. L. Britt, A. E. Drummond, V. A. Cox et al., “An age-related ovarian phenotype in mice with targeted disruption of the Cyp 19 (Aromatase) gene,” Endocrinology, vol. 141, no. 7, pp. 2614–2623, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. C. E. Quinn, J. Detmar, and R. F. Casper, “Pinopodes are present in Lif null and Hoxa10 null mice,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 1021–1028, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. A. M. Mandl, “A quantitative study of the sensitivity of oocytes to x-irradiation,” Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, vol. 150, no. 938, pp. 53–71, 1959. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. K. Oktay, R. S. Schenken, and J. F. Nelson, “Proliferating cell nuclear antigen marks the initiation of follicular growth in the rat,” Biology of Reproduction, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 295–301, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. Y. Xiong, G. J. Hannon, H. Zhang, D. Casso, R. Kobayashi, and D. Beach, “p21 is a universal inhibitor of cyclin kinases,” Nature, vol. 366, no. 6456, pp. 701–704, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. M. Bae, J. W. Lim, and H. Kim, “Oxidative DNA damage response in helicobacter pylori-infected mongolian gerbils,” Journal of Cancer Prevention, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 271–275, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. E. A. H. Knauff, M. J. C. Eijkemans, and C. B. Lambalk, “Anti-Müllerian hormone, inhibin B, and antral follicle count in young women with ovarian failure,” The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol. 94, no. 3, pp. 786–792, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. Y.-P. Chen, W.-H. Wu, H.-M. Wu, C.-K. Chen, H.-S. Wang, and H.-Y. Huang, “Effects of anti-Müllerian hormone and follicle stimulating hormone levels on invitro fertilization pregnancy rate,” Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 313–316, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. L. E. Bath, H. O. D. Critchley, S. E. Chambers, R. A. Anderson, C. J. H. Kelnar, and W. H. B. Wallace, “Ovarian and uterine characteristics after total body irradiation in childhood and adolescence: response to sex steroid replacement,” British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 106, no. 12, pp. 1265–1272, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. S. R. Patil, Ravindra, S. R. Patil, R. Londonkar, and S. B. Patil, “Nicotine induced ovarian and uterine changes in albino mice,” Indian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 503–508, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  33. M. Salehnia, “Different pattern of pinopodes expression in stimulated mouse endometrium,” Experimental Animals, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 349–352, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. M. Salehnia, “Progesterone shifts the pinopodes expression of mouse endometrium to pre-implantation time after ovarian hyperstimulation,” Iranian Journal of Reproductive Medicine, vol. 1, pp. 20–23, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  35. J. E. Hixon, D. R. Gengenbach, and W. Hansel, “Failure of prostaglandin F2α to cause luteal regression in ewes after destruction of ovarian follicles by X irradiation,” Biology of Reproduction, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 126–135, 1975. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. B. R. Rueda, I. R. Hendry, L. Ndjountche, J. Suter, and J. S. Davis, “Stress-induced mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling in the corpus luteum,” Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, vol. 164, no. 1-2, pp. 59–67, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. E. J. Hall and A. J. Giaccia, Radiobiology for the Radiologist, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 6th edition, 2006.
  38. T. Lindahl, “Instability and decay of the primary structure of DNA,” Nature, vol. 362, no. 6422, pp. 709–715, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. A. B. Salmon, A. Richardson, and V. I. Pérez, “Update on the oxidative stress theory of aging: does oxidative stress play a role in aging or healthy aging?” Free Radical Biology & Medicine, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 642–655, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. Y. Noda, K. Ota, T. Shirasawa, and T. Shimizu, “Copper/Zinc superoxide dismutase insufficiency impairs progesterone secretion and fertility in female mice,” Biology of Reproduction, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. M. J. Beltran-Garcia, A. Espinosa, N. Herrera, A. J. Perez-Zapata, C. Beltran-Garcia, and T. Ogura, “Formation of copper oxychloride and reactive oxygen species as causes of uterine injury during copper oxidation of Cu-IUD,” Contraception, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 99–103, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. P. J. Devine, S. D. Perreault, and U. Luderer, “Roles of reactive oxygen species and antioxidants in ovarian toxicity,” Biology of Reproduction, vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 1–10, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. J. S. Murley, Y. Kataoka, D. Cao, J. J. Li, L. W. Oberleyd, and D. J. Grdina, “Delayed radioprotection by NFκB-mediated induction of Sod2 (MnSOD) in SA-NH tumor cells after exposure to clinically used thiol-containing drugs,” Radiation Research, vol. 162, no. 5, pp. 536–546, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. R. Neal, R. H. Matthews, P. Lutz, and N. Ercal, “Antioxidant role of N-acetyl cysteine isomers following high dose irradiation,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 689–695, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. H. Dhillon, S. Chikara, and K. M. Reindl, “Piperlongumine induces pancreatic cancer cell death by enhancing reactive oxygen species and DNA damage,” Toxicology Reports, vol. 1, pp. 309–318, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. K. England and T. G. Cotter, “Direct oxidative modifications of signalling proteins in mammalian cells and their effects on apoptosis,” Redox Report, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 237–245, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. M. R. Hussein, “Apoptosis in the ovary: molecular mechanisms,” Human Reproduction Update, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 162–178, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. H. M. Jin, D. C. Zhou, H. F. Gu et al., “Antioxidant N-acetylcysteine protects pancreatic β-cells against aldosterone-induced oxidative stress and apoptosis in female db/db mice and insulin-producing MIN6 cells,” Endocrinology, vol. 154, no. 11, pp. 4068–4077, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2017 Wei Gao et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.