Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2017, Article ID 5832824, 10 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/5832824
Research Article

Combination Treatment with PPARγ Ligand and Its Specific Inhibitor GW9662 Downregulates BIS and 14-3-3 Gamma, Inhibiting Stem-Like Properties in Glioblastoma Cells

Department of Psychiatry, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea

Correspondence should be addressed to Chang-Nim Im; moc.liamg@dubylim

Received 15 February 2017; Revised 12 April 2017; Accepted 24 April 2017; Published 31 May 2017

Academic Editor: Marta M. Alonso

Copyright © 2017 Chang-Nim Im. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

PPARγ is a nuclear receptor that regulates differentiation and proliferation and is highly expressed in many cancer cells. Its synthetic ligands, such as rosiglitazone and ciglitazone, and its inhibitor GW9662, were shown to induce cellular differentiation, inhibit proliferation, and lead to apoptosis. Glioblastoma is a common brain tumor with poor survival prospects. Recently, glioblastoma stem cells (GSCs) have been examined as a potential target for anticancer therapy; however, little is known about the combined effect of various agents on GSCs. In this study, we found that cotreatment with PPARγ ligands and GW9662 inhibited stem-like properties in GSC-like spheres, which significantly express SOX2. In addition, this treatment decreased the activation of STAT3 and AKT and decreased the amounts of 14-3-3 gamma and BIS proteins. Moreover, combined administration of small-interfering RNA (siRNA) transfection with PPARγ ligands induced downregulation of SOX2 and MMP2 activity together with inhibition of sphere-forming activity regardless of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) cleavage. Taken together, our findings suggest that a combination therapy using PPARγ ligands and its inhibitor could be a potential therapeutic strategy targeting GSCs.

1. Introduction

Glioblastoma multiform (GBM, also known as glioblastoma) is a common and lethal malignant brain tumor [1]. Glioblastoma stem cells (GSCs) are at the root of tumor recurrence and are regarded as a potential target for anticancer therapy [2, 3].

PPARγ belongs to a nuclear receptor family, along with PPARα and β/d, and is highly expressed not only in adipocytes during differentiation [4] but also in various cancer cells [5]. PPARγ ligands such as thiazolidinedione and rosiglitazone induce differentiation and apoptosis in various human glioblastoma cells [611]. For instance, Kato et al. showed that 95% of glioma tissue expressed PPARγ mRNA and that a PPARγ ligand, troglitazone, inhibited growth in both SK-MG-1 and NB-1 cell lines [5]. Morosetti et al. reported that human glioblastoma cell lines, such as A172 and U87-MG, also express high levels of PPARγ, which rosiglitazone inhibited proliferation of those cell lines by G2/M arrest and apoptosis, and that the growth inhibitory effect was partially reversed by the PPARγ antagonist GW9662 [9], suggesting that it may work through PPARγ-dependent and PPARγ-independent pathways. PPARγ antagonists, such as GW9662, enhance PPARγ ligand-induced apoptosis [6, 12]. This suggests that both PPARγ ligands [1316] and GW9662 may be potential agents for glioblastoma therapy specifically targeting GSCs [17, 18].

14-3-3 is an adaptor protein that binds a variety of proteins via a p-Ser/Thr-containing motif. Seven 14-3-3 isoforms (beta, epsilon, zeta, eta, theta, gamma, and sigma) have been identified in mammalian cells. These isoforms are broadly and differentially expressed in almost all tissues and in brain tumors, such as glioblastoma and astrocytoma [1921]. 14-3-3 beta and sigma are well described, suggesting that these isoforms regulate proliferation in astrocytoma and stem cells, respectively [22, 23]. Jin et al. demonstrated that 14-3-3 gamma interacts with diverse proteins and that this interaction is strengthened by AKT [24], suggesting that AKT may act upstream of 14-3-3 and that they are connected to cancer progression [25]. The antiapoptotic actions of ligand-activated PPARγ are mediated through enhanced binding of PPAR to the promoter of 14-3-3 epsilon and upregulation of 14-3-3 epsilon expression, suggesting that the PPAR to 14-3-3 transcriptional axis plays an important role protecting cell and tissue integrity and may be a possible target for drug discovery [26, 27].

Bcl2-interacting cell death suppressor (BIS) [28], also known as BAG3 [29], has antiapoptotic functions and controls cellular protein quality [30, 31], and it is overexpressed in human glioblastoma tissue [32]. Our recent report demonstrated that BIS is linked to glioblastoma stemness by stabilization of the signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) [33]. These findings provide reliable evidence that BIS is a potential target for therapy. Although PPARγ ligands and/or its antagonists induce apoptosis in cancer cells, including glioblastoma cells [9, 10, 12], the link between 14-3-3 gamma and BIS in GSC-like spheres is not well defined.

Previously, we established a GSC-like sphere culture system in which SOX2 was expressed at significant levels [34] and hypothesized that PPARγ ligands may affect cancer stemness and induce apoptosis in GBM [35]. In this study, we describe the effect of a combination treatment with PPARγ ligands and its inhibitor GW9662 on spheres of glioblastoma cells through downregulation of BIS and 14-3-3 gamma levels, as well as inhibition of SOX2, MMP2 activity, and sphere-forming activity without enhancing the levels of cleaved poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Cell Culture

A172 and U87-MG (U87) human glioblastoma cells were purchased from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA) and maintained in DMEM (HyClone, Logan, UT, USA) contained with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 units/mL penicillin, and 100 mg/mL streptomycin at 37°C in 5% CO2 atmosphere. For sphere culture, cells (1 × 105 cells per well) were cultured on ultralow attachment 6-well plate (Corning, Tewksbury, MA) for 72 hours in serum-free glioblastoma sphere medium containing epidermal growth factor (EGF, 20 ng/mL, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF, 20 ng/mL, R&D Systems). For morphological examination, spheres per field were counted and pictures were taken under the inverted microscope.

2.2. Sphere-Formation Assay

Spheres cultivated in serum-free glioblastoma sphere medium containing EGF and bFGF were attached to standard culture plates in media containing 5% FBS stained with crystal violet solution (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). For morphological examination, spheres per field were counted and pictures were taken under the inverted microscope.

2.3. Cell Viability Assay

Cell proliferation was assessed as a function of metabolic activity using an EZ-Cytox Cell Viability Assay Kit (ItsBio, Seoul, Korea). The assay is based on reduction of tetrazolium chloride to the water-soluble formazan by succinate-tetrazolium reductase, which forms part of the mitochondrial respiratory chain. After treatment with 20 μL per well, cells were incubated for 2 hours at 37°C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere. Absorbance was measured on a microplate reader (Bio-Rad 680; Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) at 450 nm. After subtraction of the background, the viability was determined as the ratio relative to the control and reported as the mean±standard error (SE).

2.4. Western Blot

Cells were lysed with RIPA buffer (150 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, 50 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0) with protease inhibitor (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) on ice for 30 m. Equal amounts of protein were separated on 10% sodium dodecyl sulphate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Buckinghamshire, UK). The membranes were incubated for 1 h with 5% dry skim milk in TBST (20 mM Tris, 137 mM NaCl, and 0.1% Tween 20) buffer and then incubated with antibodies against BIS [28], p-STAT3 (Y705), p-AKT (S473), and PPARγ (Cell Signaling, Danvers, Massachusetts, USA), SOX2 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), cleaved PARP (Abcam, Cambridge, UK), or beta-actin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). After incubation with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse or anti-rabbit IgG (1 : 5,000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), the immunoreactive bands were visualized by an enhanced chemiluminescence substrate (ThermoFisher Scientific). Quantification of the intensities of each band was carried out using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA).

2.5. Small-Interfering RNA (siRNA) Transfection

Knockdown was performed by transfection of specific siRNA targeted with G-fectin (Genolution Pharmaceuticals, Seoul, Korea) according to manufacturer’s instruction. siRNA for control (5′-CCUACGCCACCAAUUUCGU-3′) and BIS (5′-AAGGUUCAGACCAUCUUGGAA-3′) were purchased from Bioneer (Daejeon, Korea). Si-14-3-3γ (5′-GCGAGCAACUGGUGCAGAA-3′) was purchased from Genolution Pharmaceuticals (Seoul, Korea).

2.6. Gelatin Zymography

Gelatin zymography was performed using supernatants from sphere media cultivated in sphere-forming media on ultralow attachment plate as previously described [33]. Briefly, conditioned media was separated by 10% SDS-PAGE containing 0.2% gelatin. The gel was renatured with 2.5% Triton X-100 buffer for 1 h and incubated with developing solution (50 mM Tris, pH 7.5, and 10 mM CaCl2) for 18–20 h at 37°C. The gel was then stained with 0.5% Coomassie Brilliant Blue (Sigma-Aldrich) in 30% methanol and 10% glacial acetic acid and destained with the same solution without dye.

2.7. Statistics

The Student t-test was used to compare the differences between two groups. Each experiment was repeated at least three times and values of <0.05 were considered as statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Effects of Single or Cotreatment with PPARγ Ligand and GW9662 on Glioblastoma Spheres

We verified that glioblastoma A172 and U87 cells express PPARγ and single treatment with ciglitazone (CG) or rosiglitazone (RS) at a concentration tested in this study did not affect protein levels of PPARγ as determined by western blotting (Figure 1(d)). To test our hypothesis that combined treatment with PPARγ ligands and the PPARγ inhibitor GW9662 (GW) yields a more favorable antiproliferative effect in glioblastoma spheres compared to single-agent treatments, we first examined its effects on cellular viability. To address this question, we utilized an in vitro sphere culture system [16] in which glioblastoma cells exhibited increased levels of SOX2, a representative stemness-related marker [34]. After treatment of a monolayer or spheres cultivated for 48 h with these agents, a WST-1 assay was performed as described in Materials and Methods. Combined treatment with PPARγ ligands and GW9662 (Figure 1(a)) for 48 h resulted in a moderate cooperative antiproliferative effect on A172 and U87 spheres compared with single treatment (Figures 1(e) and 1(f)). The morphology of monolayers was not significantly altered (data not shown), whereas sphere-forming ability was reduced upon combined treatment with PPARγ ligand and GW9662 compared with single-agent treatment (Figure 1(g)).

Figure 1: Structures of chemicals. (a) Ciglitazone (CG), C18H19N3O3S, and MW 357.428. (b) Rosiglitazone (RS), C18H23NO3S, and MW 333.44. (c) GW9662 (GW), C13H9ClN2O3, and MW 276.7. (d) Effects of CG and RS on protein levels of PPARγ. (e) and (f) combined treatments with PPARγ ligand and GW9662 decreased sphere-forming activity and viability in A172 and U87 spheres. After treatment with PPARγ ligand (CG or RS) with or without GW at the indicated concentrations for 48 h, spheres were photographed under an inverted microscope, cellular viability was measured using an assay kit and (g) spheres per field were counted as described in Materials and Methods. Scale bars: 100 μm. , , and versus control group without treatment. , , and versus only GW treated group.
3.2. Cotreatment with PPARγ Ligand and GW9662 Decreased BIS, 14-3-3 Gamma, and SOX2 Together with Reduced Phosphorylation of STAT3 and AKT

Since STAT3 and AKT are well-known regulators of proliferation and stemness, we analyzed their protein levels in a monolayer and in spheres after single or combinatorial treatment via western blotting. Combined treatment decreased SOX2 protein levels in spheres compared with a monolayer (Figures 2(a) and 2(b)). Similarly, both BIS and 14-3-3 gamma were moderately reduced upon cotreatment with PPARγ ligand and GW9662. Moreover, the combined treatment partially inhibited phosphorylation of both STAT and AKT in A172 and U87 spheres, indicating that the inhibitory effect on proliferation is mediated through the cellular survival pathway.

Figure 2: Combined treatment with PPARγ ligand and GW9662 downregulated survival-related signaling molecules and stemness-related marker protein SOX2. After treatment with PPARγ ligands (CG, 10 μM ciglitazone; RS, 100 μM rosiglitazone) with or without 20 μM GW9662 (GW) for 48 h, monolayer cells or spheres of A172 (a) or U87 (b) were analyzed via western blotting with specific antibodies and the intensity of each protein per β-actin was measured using ImageJ software (right panels) as described in Materials and Methods. and versus control group without treatment. and , versus only GW treated group.
3.3. Effect of BIS or 14-3-3γ Knockdown on Cellular Viability, MMP2, and SOX2

To address whether downregulation of BIS and 14-3-3 gamma by combined treatment with PPARγ ligands and GW9662 sensitizes glioblastoma cells towards inhibition of proliferation, we performed knockdown experiments silencing BIS and 14-3-3 gamma. Cells were treated with a PPARγ ligand agent for 48 h and a WST-1 assay was performed. Single treatment with si-BIS or si-14-3-3γ siRNAs induced morphological changes in spheres compared with the si-CTL-treated control group (Figure 3(a)). Furthermore, cotreatment with siRNA and PPARγ ligand significantly enhanced the inhibitory effect of WST activity (Figure 3(b)). Since cancer stem cells display a high potential for epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT), which is subsequently linked to an invasive phenotype, we examined matrix metalloprotease (MMP) activity as a critical agent for EMT [36, 37]. Data from zymography showed that combined treatment with 14-3-3 gamma depletion and CG or RS significantly inhibited MMP2 activity, while combination treatment with BIS depletion and RS did not (Figures 3(c) and 3(d)). To examine whether these combination treatments might affect AKT, stemness, and apoptosis, we performed western blotting assays using specific antibodies. Single treatment with si-14-3-γ or si-BIS decreased phosphorylation of AKT and SOX2 levels without enhancing poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) cleavage (Figure 3(e) and right panel). Finally, we examined whether 14-3-3 gamma or BIS depletion using siRNA affects sphere-forming activity. Single treatment with si-14-3-3γ or si-BIS decreased sphere-forming activity and cotreatment with CG or RS moderately inhibited sphere-forming activity (Figures 3(f) and 3(g)).

Figure 3: Downregulation using siRNA-enhanced PPARγ ligand-induced cell death in A172 spheres together with inhibition of matrix metalloprotease 2 (MMP2) activity. After transfection with 100 nM siRNA (si-CTL, si-14-3-3γ, or si-BIS), cells were transferred to sphere-forming conditions with or without PPARγ ligands (CG, 5 μM ciglitazone; RS, 50 μM rosiglitazone) for 48 h. Morphological spheres (a) were photographed under an inverted microscope and spheres per field (right panel) were counted, followed by viability (b), zymography (c and d), and western blotting (e) and spheres per field were counted (g) after crystal violet staining (f) as described in Materials and Methods. , , and versus control group without treatment. and versus only CG- or RS-treated group. versus only si-BIS or si-14-3-3γ treated group. versus only CG- or RS-treated group. and versus only si-BIS or si-14-3-3γ treated group.

4. Discussion

In this study, we demonstrated that a combined treatment with PPARγ ligand and its inhibitor GW9662 downregulated BIS and 14-3-3 gamma expression and decreased phosphorylation of STAT3 and AKT, leading to inhibition of GSC-like spheres and SOX2 expression (Figure 4). Combined administration of PPARγ ligand and its antagonist targeted 14-3-3 gamma and BIS, inhibiting stem cell-like properties in GSC-like spheres expressing SOX2. Our findings provide additional evidence that BIS may be a potential target in glioblastoma [38].

Figure 4: A scheme of the combined effects of PPARγ ligand and GW9662 on human glioblastoma cells under sphere-forming conditions. The schematic diagram demonstrates that combination treatment with PPARγ ligand (ciglitazone or rosiglitazone) and GW9662 downregulates BIS, 14-3-3 gamma, and activation of survival signaling molecules (p-AKT, p-STAT3) together with suppression of SOX2 and MMP2 activity, inhibiting stem cell-like properties and leading to apoptosis.

Emerging studies are focusing on combination therapy, such as chemo- and radiotherapy, to manage resistance from anticancer drug administration. We also found that A172 and U87 glioblastoma cells express PPARγ using western blotting analysis. Hence, its ligands have been suggested as potential targets for glioblastoma stem cells [35]. Our findings provide a BIS- and 14-3-3 gamma-mediated inhibitory mechanism for the GSC-like sphere system suggesting the potential of combination therapy targeting GSCs via the manipulation of the BIS and/or 14-3-3 gamma/SOX2 axis in which STAT3 and AKT function upstream. It should be noted that 14-3-3γ or BIS silencing itself resulted in the considerable decrease in SOX2 levels as well as increase in PARP cleavage without synergistic and additive effect of being combined with CG or RS.

Since it has been reported that invasion is the hallmark of malignant glioblastoma and MMP [37, 39] is considered as an important player and a potential target, zymography was performed using supernatant of spheres after respective siRNA transfection to A172 cells. Single treatment with PPARγ ligands did not significantly inhibit MMP2 activity but cotreatment with si-BIS or si-14-3-3γ inhibited MMP2 activity suggesting that these molecules might play a role in regulating MMP2 activity. It was consistent with findings from previous studies that BIS inhibits MMP2 activity [33, 40]. Meanwhile, Kim et al. [41] reported that CG increased the expression of MMP-2, and GW9662 attenuated the CG-induced PPARγ activation but it did not affect the pro-MMP2 activation in a fibrosarcoma cell line HT1080. Although there is difference in cellular context, significant inhibition of MMP2 activity by CG or RG single treatment in this study was not observed.

We tested whether si-14-3-3 beta and gamma affect sphere-forming activity and found that single treatment with si-14-3-3 gamma led to moderately reduced sphere-forming activity compared to si-14-3-3 beta (data not shown), meaning that 14-3-3 gamma may play a significant role in glioblastoma stemness. Each isoform appears to differentially modulate cellular progression. 14-3-3 beta negatively regulates senescence in glioblastoma cells through the ERK pathway [42] and 14-3-3 gamma controls stem cell-like properties, as described in this study. We observed that 14-3-3 gamma or BIS deletion downregulated the SOX2 expression level without enhancing PARP cleavage, suggesting that combined treatment with PPAR ligand and its inhibitor may modulate the stemness-related pathway through AKT and STAT3 rather than the apoptosis-related pathway. Frasson et al. reported that the PI3K/AKT pathway is closely related to the stemness of medulloblastoma cancer stem cells [43], supporting our findings of combined administration in the downregulation of SOX2 in glioblastoma cells. We previously reported that BIS depletion degrades STAT3 protein leading to inhibition of sphere-forming activity [33].

As an important survival signaling kinase, AKT phosphorylates BAD at Ser136 promoting binding of BAD to 14-3-3 proteins, preventing an association between BAD and BCL-2 and BCL-xL [44]. 14-3-3 sequesters BAD in the cytoplasm under physiologically normal conditions. When cells are stressed, BAD is phosphorylated and this phosphorylated BAD (p-BAD) translocates from the cytoplasm into mitochondria leading to apoptosis. Although BIS forms an immunoreactive complex with 14-3-3 zeta [45], suggesting that BIS may affect BAD directly or indirectly through 14-3-3, we did not find that BIS or 14-3-3 gamma depletion enhanced PPARγ ligand-induced PARP cleavage. Rather, single treatment significantly downregulated SOX2 expression levels. Hence, they may act directly or indirectly upon SOX2. The underlying mechanism by which BIS or 14-3-3 beta regulates SOX2 expression requires further investigation.

5. Conclusions

Combination treatment of GCSs with PPARγ ligand and its inhibitor GW9662 inhibited stem-like properties via downregulation of BIS and 14-3-3 gamma levels together with decreased SOX2 and MMP2 activity without enhancing PARP cleavage.

Disclosure

The English in this document has been checked by at least two professional editors, both native speakers of English. For a certificate, please see http://www.textcheck.com/certificate/JSHuCk.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Authors’ Contributions

Chang-Nim Im conceived the concept; Chang-Nim Im designed and performed the experiments, analyzed the data, and wrote the paper.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT and future Planning (NRF-2014R1A1A1006961 and NRF-2017R1A1A1A05000839). The author is grateful to Jung-Sook Im for her inspiration and support.

References

  1. J. G. Gurney and N. Kadan-Lottick, “Brain and other central nervous system tumors: rates, trends, and epidemiology,” Current Opinion in Oncology, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 160–166, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. X. Zhang, W. Zhang, X. Mao, H. Zhen, W. Cao, and S. Hu, “Targeting role of glioma stem cells for gliobastoma multiforme,” Current Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 20, no. 15, pp. 1974–1984, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. M. Jackson, F. Hassiotou, and A. Nowak, “Glioblastoma stem-like cells: at the root of tumor recurrence and a therapeutic target,” Carcinogenesis, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 177–185, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. A. Chawla, E. J. Schwarz, D. D. Dimaculangan, and M. A. Lazar, “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) γ: adipose-predominant expression and induction early in adipocyte differentiation,” Endocrinology, vol. 135, no. 2, pp. 798–800, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. Kato, T. Nagaya, M. Fujieda, K. Saito, J. Yoshida, and H. Seo, “Expression of PPARγ and its ligand-dependent growth inhibition in human brain tumor cell lines,” Japanese Journal of Cancer Research, vol. 93, no. 6, pp. 660–666, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. W. Lee, D. S. Kim, H. R. Kim et al., “Cell death is induced by ciglitazone, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma) agonist, independently of PPARgamma in human glioma cells,” Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 417, no. 1, pp. 552–557, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. D. W. Kang, C. H. Choi, J. Y. Park, S. K. Kang, and Y. K. Kim, “Ciglitazone induces caspase-independent apoptosis through down-regulation of XIAP and survivin in human glioma cells,” Neurochemical Research, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 551–561, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. D. C. Liu, C. B. Zang, H. Y. Liu, K. Possinger, S. G. Fan, and E. Elstner, “A novel PPAR alpha/gamma dual agonist inhibits cell growth and induces apoptosis in human glioblastoma T98G cells,” Acta Pharmacologica Sinica, vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 1312–1319, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  9. R. Morosetti, T. Servidei, M. Mirabella et al., “The PPARγ ligands PGJ2 and rosiglitazone show a differential ability to inhibit proliferation and to induce apoptosis and differentiation of human glioblastoma cell lines,” International Journal of Oncology, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 493–502, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. N. Strakova, J. Ehrmann, P. Dzubak, J. Bouchal, and Z. Kolar, “The synthetic ligand of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ ciglitazone affects human glioblastoma cell lines,” Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, vol. 309, no. 3, pp. 1239–1247, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. N. Strakova, J. Ehrmann, J. Bartos, J. Malikova, J. Dolezel, and Z. Kolar, “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPAR) agonists affect cell viability, apoptosis and expression of cell cycle related proteins in cell lines of glial brain tumors,” Neoplasma, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 126–136, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  12. K. L. Schaefer, K. Wada, H. Takahashi et al., “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ inhibition prevents adhesion to the extracellular matrix and induces anoikis in hepatocellular carcinoma cells,” Cancer Research, vol. 65, no. 6, pp. 2251–2259, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. H. P. Ellis and K. M. Kurian, “Biological rationale for the use of PPARgamma agonists in glioblastoma,” Frontiers in Oncology, vol. 4, p. 52, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  14. W. Chearwae and J. J. Bright, “PPARγ agonists inhibit growth and expansion of CD133+ brain tumour stem cells,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 99, no. 12, pp. 2044–2053, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. C. Grommes, D. S. Conway, A. Alshekhlee, and J. S. Barnholtz-Sloan, “Inverse association of PPARγ agonists use and high grade glioma development,” Journal of Neuro-Oncology, vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 233–239, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. E. Pestereva, S. Kanakasabai, and J. J. Bright, “PPARγ agonists regulate the expression of stemness and differentiation genes in brain tumour stem cells,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 106, no. 10, pp. 1702–1712, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. G. Karpel-Massler, M. A. Westhoff, S. Zhou et al., “Combined inhibition of HER1/EGFR and RAC1 results in a synergistic antiproliferative effect on established and primary cultured human glioblastoma cells,” Molecular Cancer Therapeutics, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 1783–1795, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. G. Karpel-Massler, C. Shu, L. Chau et al., “Combined inhibition of Bcl-2/Bcl-xL and Usp9X/Bag3 overcomes apoptotic resistance in glioblastoma in vitro and in vivo,” Oncotarget, vol. 6, pp. 14507–14521, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. S. Liang, G. Shen, Q. Liu et al., “Isoform-specific expression and characterization of 14-3-3 proteins in human glioma tissues discovered by stable isotope labeling with amino acids in cell culture-based proteomic analysis,” Proteomics–Clinical Applications, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 743–753, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. X. Yang, W. Cao, H. Lin et al., “Isoform-specific expression of 14-3-3 proteins in human astrocytoma,” Journal of the Neurological Sciences, vol. 276, no. 1-2, pp. 54–59, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. L. Cao, W. Cao, W. Zhang et al., “Identification of 14-3-3 protein isoforms in human astrocytoma by immunohistochemistry,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 432, no. 2, pp. 94–99, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. F. H. Gong, G. L. Wang, J. Ye, T. D. Li, H. M. Bai, and W. M. Wang, “14-3-3 beta regulates the proliferation of glioma cells through the GSK3 beta/beta-catenin signaling pathway,” Oncology Reports, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 2976–2982, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  23. T. C. Chang, C. C. Liu, E. W. Hsing et al., “14-3-3 sigma regulates beta-catenin-mediated mouse embryonic stem cell proliferation by sequestering GSK-3 beta,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 6, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  24. Y. H. Jin, Y. J. Kim, D. W. Kim et al., “Sirt2 interacts with 14-3-3 beta/gamma and down-regulates the activity of p53,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 368, no. 3, pp. 690–695, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. H. Hermeking, “The 14-3-3 cancer connection,” Nature Reviews Cancer, vol. 3, no. 12, pp. 931–943, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. K. K. Wu, “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors protect against apoptosis via 14-3-3,” PPAR Research, vol. 2010, Article ID 417646, 7 pages, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. K. K. Wu and J. Y. Liou, “Cyclooxygenase inhibitors induce colon cancer cell apoptosis via PPARdelta → 14-3-3epsilon pathway,” Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 512, pp. 295–307, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  28. J. Lee, T. Takahashi, N. Yasuhara, J. Inazawa, S. Kamada, and Y. Tsujimoto, “Bis, a Bcl-2-binding protein that synergizes with Bcl-2 in preventing cell death,” Oncogene, vol. 18, no. 46, pp. 6183–6190. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. S. Takayama, Z. Xie, and J. C. Reed, “An evolutionarily conserved family of Hsp70/Hsc70 molecular chaperone regulators,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 274, no. 2, pp. 781–786, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  30. H. Doong, K. Rizzo, S. Fang, V. Kulpa, A. M. Weissman, and E. C. Kohn, “CAIR-1/BAG-3 abrogates heat shock protein-70 chaperone complex-mediated protein degradation,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 278, no. 31, pp. 28490–28500, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  31. A. Gentilella and K. Khalili, “BAG3 expression in glioblastoma cells promotes accumulation of ubiquitinated clients in an Hsp70-dependent manner,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 286, no. 11, pp. 9205–9215, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. M. Festa, L. Del Valle, K. Khalili et al., “BAG3 protein is overexpressed in human glioblastoma and is a potential target for therapy,” The American Journal of Pathology, vol. 178, no. 6, pp. 2504–2512, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. C. N. Im, H. HyeonYun, B. Song et al., “BIS-mediated STAT3 stabilization regulates glioblastoma stem cell-like phenotypes,” Oncotarget, vol. 7, no. 23, pp. 35056–35070, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. C. N. Im, H. H. Yun, H. J. Yoo, M. J. Park, and J. H. Lee, “Enhancement of SOX-2 expression and ROS accumulation by culture of A172 glioblastoma cells under non-adherent culture conditions,” Oncology Reports, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 920–928, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. C. N. Im, “Targeting glioblastoma stem cells (GSCs) with peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) ligands,” IUBMB Life, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 173–177, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  36. S. A. Mani, W. Guo, and M.-J. Liao, “The epithelial-mesenchymal transition generates cells with properties of stem cells,” Cell, vol. 133, no. 4, pp. 704–715, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. P. Gabelloni, E. Da Pozzo, S. Bendinelli et al., “Inhibition of metalloproteinases derived from tumours: new insights in the treatment of human glioblastoma,” Neuroscience, vol. 168, no. 2, pp. 514–522, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  38. S. An, D. He, E. Wagner, and C. Jiang, “Peptide-like polymers exerting effective glioma-targeted siRNA delivery and release for therapeutic application,” Small, vol. 11, no. 38, pp. 5142–5150, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  39. K. Yasui, M. Shimamura, N. Mitsutake, and Y. Nagayama, “SNAIL induces epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and cancer stem cell-like properties in aldehyde dehydroghenase-negative thyroid cancer cells,” Thyroid, vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 989–996, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  40. C. N. Im, H. H. Yun, and J. H. Lee, “Heat shock factor 1 depletion sensitizes A172 glioblastoma cells to temozolomide via suppression of cancer stem cell-like properties,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 18, no. 2, p. 468, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  41. K. H. Kim, Y. S. Cho, J. Park, S. Yoon, K. Kim, and A. Chung, “Pro-MMP-2 activation by the PPARγ agonist, ciglitazone, induces cell invasion through the generation of ROS and the activation of ERK,” FEBS Letters, vol. 581, no. 17, pp. 3303–3310, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  42. S. B. Seo, J. Lee, H. H. Yun et al., “14-3-3β depletion drives a senescence program in glioblastoma cells through the ERK/SKP2/p27 pathway,” Molecular Neurobiology. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  43. C. Frasson, E. Rampazzo, B. Accordi et al., “Inhibition of PI3K signalling selectively affects medulloblastoma cancer stem cells,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2015, Article ID 973912, 11 pages, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  44. S. R. Datta, H. Dudek, X. Tao et al., “Akt phosphorylation of BAD couples survival signals to the cell- intrinsic death machinery,” Cell, vol. 91, no. 2, pp. 231–241, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. J. J. Lee, J. S. Lee, M. N. Cui et al., “BIS targeting induces cellular senescence through the regulation of 14-3-3 zeta/STAT3/SKP2/p27 in glioblastoma cells,” Cell Death and Disease, vol. 5, no. 11, p. e1537, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar