BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2017 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2017 |Article ID 6594271 | 10 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6594271

Genetic Variant of Kalirin Gene Is Associated with Ischemic Stroke in a Chinese Han Population

Academic Editor: Maria Barbolina
Received11 Feb 2017
Revised10 Apr 2017
Accepted18 May 2017
Published19 Jun 2017

Abstract

Introduction. Ischemic stroke is a complex disorder resulting from the interplay of genetic and environmental factors. Previous studies showed that kalirin gene variations were associated with cardiovascular disease. However, the association between this gene and ischemic stroke was unknown. We performed this study to confirm if kalirin gene variation was associated with ischemic stroke. Methods. We enrolled 385 ischemic stroke patients and 362 controls from China. Three SNPs of kalirin gene were genotyped by means of ligase detection reaction-PCR method. Data was processed with SPSS and SHEsis platform. Results. SNP rs7620580 (dominant model: OR = 1.590, p = 0.002 and adjusted OR = 1.662, p = 0.014; additive model: OR = 1.490, p = 0.002 and adjusted OR = 1.636, p = 0.005; recessive model: OR = 2.686, p = 0.039) and SNP rs1708303 (dominant model: OR = 1.523, p = 0.007 and adjusted OR = 1.604, p = 0.028; additive model: OR = 1.438, p = 0.01 and adjusted OR = 1.476, p = 0.039) were associated with ischemic stroke. The GG genotype and G allele of SNP rs7620580 were associated with a risk for ischemic stroke with an adjusted OR of 3.195 and an OR of 1.446, respectively. Haplotype analysis revealed that A–T–G,G-T-A, and A-T-A haplotypes were associated with ischemic stroke. Conclusions. Our results provide evidence that kalirin gene variations were associated with ischemic stroke in the Chinese Han population.

1. Introduction

Cerebrovascular diseases and cardiovascular diseases are among the top three leading causes of death and disability worldwide [1, 2]. The mortality rate due to stroke is as high as 276.9/100,000 each year in China [3], which means nearly 400,000 people die of stroke every year. Ischemic stroke (IS) is a complex disorder resulting from the interplay of genetic and environmental factors (such as age, smoking, hypertension, cardiac arrhythmias, and diabetes mellitus) [4]. It has been shown that genetic factors increase the risk of stroke. The risk rate of a person with a family history of stroke is up to 30% [5]. Compared with dizygotic twins, the rates of death and hospitalization due to stroke were increased for monozygotic twins [6].

Present prevention and treatment of stroke are involved in the control of risk factors [7] and revascularization of vascular stenosis. Medical therapy was often effective for preventing stroke. However, some patients may still experience recurrent ischemic stroke in spite of receiving aggressive medical treatment [8]. With the rapid advance of precise medicine, it is of great importance to find and validate biomarkers for the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of stroke.

The protein encoded for by the kalirin gene (KALRN) is a guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF), which has numerous functions, such as neuron morphogenesis [9, 10], modifies synphilin-1 aggregate transport [11], and promotes smooth muscle cell (SMC) migration and proliferation [12]. Studies found that KALRN gene variations were associated with CHD [1316]. As an atherosclerotic disease, stroke may share some genes with coronary heart disease (CHD). A possible association between KALRN gene polymorphisms and IS among distinct population remains unknown. Thus, the aim of the present study was to investigate if KALRN SNPs were associated with ischemic stroke among Han Chinese.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Subjects

A cohort of 747 individuals, including 385 ischemic stroke patients and 362 hypertensive controls without stroke, was included in the present study. The ischemic stroke group was composed of 297 patients found during the epidemiological survey of Fuxin rural areas (Liaoning province, China) [17] and 88 ischemic stroke patients from the First Hospital of China Medical University. The study subjects were unrelated to one another, were all Han Chinese, and were older than 35 years of age. Subjects were excluded if they had a history of hemorrhagic stroke, tumor, trauma, myocardial infarction, or atrial arrhythmia. All IS cases were confirmed to be atherosclerotic ischemic stroke by brain imaging using computed tomography (CT) scanning and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). A diagnosis of IS was confirmed by 2 neurologists.

The control group included unrelated individuals without any history or symptoms of cerebrovascular disease and were matched with the IS patients for residency area, ethnic origin, and gender. Brain imaging was not used for controls. As stroke is a late-onset disease, we selected older people as controls to minimize the chances for misclassification as “stroke-free.”

All participants were given a questionnaire that included demographic variables (age, gender, and nationality). Histories of conventional risk factors (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, smoking, and alcohol drinking) were also recorded. Blood pressure (BP) was measured using a standardized automated electronic sphygmomanometer (Omron, Dalian, China). Biochemical analyses were done using an automated enzymatic procedure (AU640, Olympus, Japan) in our central laboratory. After providing informed consent, 5 ml venous blood was obtained from each subject and kept at –20°C until analyzed.

The work has been carried out in accordance with the Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki) for experiments involving human subjects. Our procedures were approved by the Ethics Committee of China Medical University, and written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

2.2. SNP Selection and Genotyping

Genomic DNA was isolated from EDTA anticoagulated whole blood of subjects in the laboratory of Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University using blood genomic DNA extraction kits according to the manufacturer’s protocol (TIANamp Genomic DNA kit, Tiangen Biochemical Technology, Beijing, China) and kept at −20°C until analyzed.

The three selected SNPs for the present study were tag-SNPs selected from HapMap databases: rs7620580 (TTTGCTTGGTAGTGGTTGCATGTGC[A/G]TGTGTGCATGTGTGGACTGTCTGCT, Chromosome: 3: 124326456; Functional Consequence: intron variant), rs2289843 (AGGTGACATACATCTGAAATTTGTC[A/T]GCCTAAAAAGAACAAAGATAATAAT, Chromosome: 3:  124477247; Functional Consequence: synonymous codon) and rs1708303 (AGAATGGAGGCAAGTCCGAGTCCGT[A/G]GCCAACCTGCAGGCCCAGCCCTCCC, Chromosome: 3: 124632469; Functional Consequence: synonymous codon). The SNPs were to cover the genes of interest with an r2 threshold of 0.8 and minor allele frequency (MAF) greater than 0.1. Genotyping was done using the ligase detection reaction method (LDR-PCR) [1820]. Primers were designed with primer 5 and probes were designed by Shanghai Generay Biotech (http://www.generay.com.cn/) (Table 1). Allele and genotype frequencies were determined by analyzing the raw data from ABI 3730XL with Peak Scanner Software v1.0 (ABI). About 10% randomly selected samples were genotyped repeatedly to ensure that the results were 100% concordant.


SNPPrimersProbes

rs7620580F: GGTAACTCTTGGTGACTTTGCTA: TTTTTTTTTTGCTTGGTAGTGGTTGCATGTGCA
R: CATTCACCCCTTTGATCTGTGTG: TTTTTTTTTTTTTGCTTGGTAGTGGTTGCATGTGCG
TR: -P-TGTGTGCATGTGTGGACTGTCTGCTTTTTTT-FAM-
rs2289843F: CATTATGCCAAAGCAGAGAAGTA: GGTGACATACATCTGAAATTTGTCA
R: TGGTGGACAGAAGGGAACAACTT: TTTGGTGACATACATCTGAAATTTGTCT
TR: -P-GCCTAAAAAGAACAAAGATAATAAT-FAM-
rs1708303F: TTCTCTGGACTGGGGTCTACATA: TTTTGAATGGAGGCAAGTCCGAGTCCGTA
R: ACAGGACTCGTCAGCCACTTCTG: TTTTTTTGAATGGAGGCAAGTCCGAGTCCGTG
TR: -P-GCCAACCTGCAGGCCCAGCCCTCCCTTT-FAM-

2.3. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were done using SPSS (v 13.0) and the SHEsis analysis platform (http://analysis.bio-x.cn/myAnalysis.php). Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) with normal distribution by using the -test. Count data are presented as number of cases and percentage. Pearson Chi-square () tests or Fisher’s exact test were used to compare the frequencies of demographic variables and to assess differences in SNP genotypes and alleles between cases and controls. Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) was assessed using tests. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were determined using unconditional logistic regression analysis. Multivariate analysis was evaluated by logistic regression models to test the association of gene variation and ischemic stroke risk after adjusting the confounding risk factors. The SHEsis analysis platform was used to calculate linkage disequilibrium indices (D′ and r2) and inferred haplotype frequencies [21, 22].

3. Results

3.1. Subject Characteristics

The demographic and clinical characteristics of the subjects were shown in Table 2. There were no significant differences between cases and controls for gender, heart rate, or total cholesterol levels. Because we chose cases that were younger than controls, their mean ages were different (62.30 ± 9.75 versus 69.01 ± 7.32 years). As expected, the prevalence of the most common risk factors for atherosclerosis was significantly different between cases and controls: body mass index (BMI) (), drinking (), smoking (), triglyceride (TG) (), low density lipid cholesterol (LDL-C) (), high density lipid cholesterol (HDL-C) (), and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) ().


 CasesControls

Age (years)<0.001
Gender (male/female, )219/166209/1530.814
Heart rate (bpm)0.849
SBP (mmHg)<0.001
DBP (mmHg)<0.001
BMI (kg/m2)0.006
Drinking (%)95 (24.7%)123 (34.0%)0.006
Smoking (%)156 (40.5%)174 (48.1%)0.039
CHOL (mmol/L)0.499
TG (mmol/L)0.006
LDL-C (mmol/L)<0.001
HDL-C (mmol/L)<0.001
FPG (mmol/L)0.035

Note: , number; SBP, systolic pressure; DBP, diastolic pressure; BMI, body mass index; TG, triglyceride; CHOL, total cholesterol; HDL-C, high density lipid cholesterol; LDL-C, low density lipid cholesterol; FPG, fasting plasma glucose.
3.2. Association between SNPs and Ischemic Stroke Risk

The genotype distributions and allelic frequencies for the 3 SNPs that we selected among cases and controls were shown in Tables 3 and 4. All allele distributions of the studied SNPs were in HWE.


GenotypeIS ()Control ()OR (95% CI)OR (95% CI)

rs7620580
AA1992281.0001.000
AG1661221.559 (1.153–2.107)0.004 1.534 (1.011–2.328)0.045
GG20121.910 (0.911–4.004)0.0873.195 (1.228–8.312)0.017
Recessive1.598 (0.770–3.318)0.2082.686 (1.049–6.879)0.039
Additive1.490 (1.157–1.919)0.002 1.636 (1.163–2.300)0.005
Dominant1.590 (1.187–2.130)0.002 1.662 (1.110–2.487)0.014
rs2289843
TT1011071.0001.000
TA1951811.141 (0.813–1.602)0.4451.291 (0.809–2.059)0.285
AA89741.274 (0.845–1.922)0.2481.402 (0.807–2.434)0.231
Recessive1.170 (0.826–1.658)0.3771.197 (0.748–1.914)0.453
Additive1.130 (0.920–1.386)0.2431.189 (0.903–1.566)0.216
Dominant1.180 (0.857–1.625)0.3111.326 (0.856–2.053)0.206
rs1708303
AA2412601.0001.000
AG132941.515 (1.103–2.081)0.010 1.610 (1.040–2.490)0.033
GG1281.618 (0.650–4.027)0.3011.550 (0.484–4.969)0.461
Recessive1.424 (0.575–3.524)0.4451.338 (0.421–4.250)0.622
Additive1.438 (1.092–1.892)0.010 1.476 (1.020–2.135)0.039
Dominant1.523 (1.119–2.073)0.007 1.604 (1.051–2.447)0.028

adjusted for age, SBP, DBP, FPG, TG, HDL, LDL, smoking, drinking, and BMI.

AlleleCases ()Controls ()OR (95% CI)HWE P in controls

rs76205800.37
A allele5645781
G allele2061461.446 (1.136–1.841)0.003
rs22898430.87
T allele3973951
A allele3733291.128 (0.920–1.382)0.246
rs17083030.88
A allele6146141
G allele1561101.418 (1.084–1.855)0.011

For a dominant model, analyses were done by combining the heterozygous variant genotype with the homozygous variant genotype. For a recessive model, analyses were done by combining the heterozygous variant genotype with the wild type homozygous genotype. As shown in Table 3, SNP rs7620580 (dominant model: OR = 1.590 (95% CI 1.187–2.130), = 0.002; additive model: OR = 1.490 (95% CI 1.157–1.919), = 0.002) and SNP rs1708303 (dominant model: OR = 1.523 (95% CI 1.119–2.073), = 0.007; additive model: OR = 1.438 (95% CI 1.092–1.892), = 0.01) were significantly associated with ischemic stroke in this population. The GG genotype and G allele of SNP rs7620580 were associated with a risk for ischemic stroke with an adjusted OR of 3.195 (95% CI 1.228–8.312, ) and OR of 1.446 (95% CI 1.136–1.841, = 0.003), respectively (Tables 3 and 4). However, there were no significant differences in the allele and genotype distributions for SNP rs2289843 between cases and controls in total subjects.

Because some conventional confounding risk factors may also contribute to the development of stroke, we analyzed the associations between these SNPs and IS after adjusting for these factors. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that, after adjusting for age, systolic pressure, diastolic pressure, BMI, smoking, drinking, TG, HDL-C, LDL-C, and FPG, SNP rs7620580 (dominant model: OR = 1.662 (95% CI 1.110–2.487), = 0.014; additive model: OR = 1.636 (95% CI 1.163–2.300), ; recessive model: OR = 2.686 (95% CI 1.049–6.879), ) and SNP rs1708303 (dominant model: OR = 1.604 (95% CI 1.051–2.447), ; additive model: OR = 1.476 (95% CI 1.020–2.135), ) still showed associations with ischemic stroke.

We found an interaction between the gene variation and environment (Table 5). So we also studied the association of the KALRN SNPs and IS under different environmental exposures, such as gender and overweight (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2) (Table 6). Genotypic association of SNP rs7620580 was also revealed in men before and after adjustment of covariates in the additive and dominant models. But in women, significant difference was present only after adjustment of covariates (additive model: OR = 1.804 (95% CI 1.032–3.152), = 0.038, dominant model OR = 2.007 (95% CI 1.062–3.793), = 0.032). The association of SNP rs1708303 and IS was present in women in the crude additive and dominant model (OR = 1.566 (95% CI 1.045–2.345), = 0.030, and OR = 1.665 (95% CI 1.046–2.652), = 0.032, resp.) but was lost after adjustment. No association of SNP rs1708303 and IS was found in men (). SNP rs2289843 genotypes were associated with IS only in women after adjustment for covariates in recessive and additive model (OR = 2.186 (95% CI 1.035–4.620), = 0.040, and OR = 1.658 (95% CI 1.059–2.595), = 0.027, resp.). As shown in Table 6, the genotype distributions of rs7620580 and rs1708303 were also different between overweight subjects and nonoverweight subjects (BMI < 25 kg/m2). No genotypic association between SNP rs2289843 and IS was revealed in subjects with different BMI ().


GenotypeGenderIS ()Control ()OR (95% CI)

rs7620580
AAM1091331
F90951.156 (0.788–1.697)0.459
AA + AGM110761.766 (1.200–2.600)0.004
F76580.783 (0.434–1.415)0.418
rs2289843
TT + TAM1661581
F1301301.171 (0.822–1.668)0.383
AAM53510.954 (0.591–1.542)0.849
F36231.736 (0.799–3.770)0.163
rs1708303
AAM1431521
F981081.212 (0.823–1.784)0.331
AA + AG
 
M76571.444 (0.928–2.247)0.104
F68451.182 (0.607–2.303)0.623

GenotypeOverweightIS ()Control ()OR (95% CI)

rs7620580
AANull129176
Yes69521.839 (1.201–2.816)0.005
AA + AGNull121971.714 (1.206–2.437)0.003
Yes64370.760 (0.399–1.450)0.406
rs2289843
TT + TANull197220
Yes97681.601 (1.112–2.306)0.011
AANull53531.080 (0.703–1.660)0.725
Yes36211.113 (0.523–2.368)0.782
rs1708303
AANull152193
Yes88671.679 (1.145–2.461)0.008
AA + AG
 
Null98801.534 (1.065–2.210)0.022
Yes45221.015 (0.503–2.051)0.966

GenotypeSmokingIS ()Control ()OR (95% CI)

rs7620580
AANull117117
Yes821110.739 (0.503–1.084)0.122
AA + AGNull112711.577 (1.065–2.336)0.023
Yes74631.008 (0.559–1.819)0.979
rs2289843
TT + TANull177159
Yes1191291.062 (0.612–1.842)0.832
AANull52291.486 (0.972–2.272)0.068
Yes37450.599 (0.313–1.145)0.121
rs1708303
AANull145133
Yes961270.693 (0.486–0.988)0.043
AA + AG
 
Null84551.401 (0.926–2.118)0.11
Yes60471.206 (0.647–2.246)0.556

GenotypeDrinkingIS ()Control ()OR (95% CI)

rs7620580
AANull146153
Yes53750.741 (0.487–1.125)0.159
AA + AGNull144861.755 (1.236–2.491)0.002
Yes42480.706 (0.370–1.347)0.291
rs2289843
TT + TANull224194
Yes72940.777 (0.424–1.425)0.415
AANull66451.286 (0.879–1.880)0.195
Yes23290.757 (0.371–1.542)0.443
rs1708303
AANull182168
yes59920.592 (0.401–0.873)0.008
AA + AG
 
null108711.404 (0.974–2.024)0.069
yes36311.29 (0.649–2.562)0.468


rs7620580

Gender

GenotypeWomanMan
OR (95% CI)OR (95% CI)OR (95% CI)OR (95% CI)

AG1.368 (0.866–2.162)1.988 (1.035–3.816)1.723 (1.154–2.572)▲▲1.776 (1.096–2.877)
GG1.583 (0.433–5.796)2.236 (0.410–12.201)2.135 (0.864–5.277)3.661 (1.215–11.036)
Recessive1.397 (0.387–5.048)1.682 (0.319–8.876)1.716 (0.704–4.179)2.895 (0.982–8.541)
Additive1.334 (0.896–1.987)1.804 (1.032–3.152)1.608 (1.158–2.233)▲▲1.832 (1.235–2.719)▲▲
Dominant1.383 (0.884–2.163)2.007 (1.062–3.793)1.766 (1.200–2.600)▲▲1.923 (1.206–3.067)▲▲

BMI

GenotypeBMI 25 kg/m2BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2
OR (95% CI)OR (95% CI)OR (95% CI)OR (95% CI)

AA1111
AG1.658 (1.157–2.377)▲▲1.598 (0.999–2.557)1.302 (0.744–2.278)1.966 (0.887–4.357)
GG2.200 (0.866–5.462)3.055 (0.918–10.166)1.319 (0.367–4.744)4.130 (0.858–19.874)
Recessive1.802 (0.734–4.422)2.565 (0.781–8.424)1.181 (0.335–4.157)3.105 (0.681–14.156)
Additive1.593 (1.175–2.160)▲▲1.651 (1.112–2.451)1.236 (0.780–1.959)1.999 (1.077–3.711)
Dominant1.703 (1.200–2.416)▲▲1.699 (1.077–2.680)1.304 (0.758–2.241)2.188 (1.019–4.700)

rs2289843

Gender

GenotypeWomanMan
OR (95% CI)OR (95% CI)OR (95% CI)OR (95% CI)

TT1111
TA1.070 (0.643–1.779)1.443 (0.687–3.033)1.203 (0.763–1.895)1.421 (0.825–2.446)
AA1.635 (0.842–3.175)2.782 (1.134–6.826)1.113 (0.656–1.891)1.208 (0.645–2.264)
Recessive1.565 (0.879–2.787)2.186 (1.035–4.620)0.989 (0.636–1.539)0.970 (0.573–1.642)
Additive1.250 (0.903–1.730)1.658 (1.059–2.595)1.059 (0.813–1.380)1.108 (0.810–1.515)
Dominant1.192 (0.734–1.936)1.765 (0.872–3.570)1.172 (0.765–1.796)1.344 (0.810–2.231)

BMI

GenotypeBMI 25kg/m2BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2
OR (95% CI)OR (95% CI)OR (95% CI)OR (95% CI)

TT1111
TA1.033 (0.692–1.541)1.134 (0.678–1.897)1.490 (0.782–2.839)1.889 (0.733–4.866)
AA1.129 (0.686–1.858)1.370 (0.723–2.596)1.548 (0.737–3.252)1.569 (0.581–4.241)
Recessive1.106 (0.722–1.693)1.266 (0.730–2.197)1.202 (0.646–2.236)1.071 (0.474–2.420)
Additive1.060 (0.827–1.357)1.167 (0.850–1.602)1.250 (0.860–1.817)1.238 (0.754–2.034)
Dominant1.059 (0.724–1.548)1.197 (0.736–1.947)1.510 (0.818–2.756)1.741 (0.740–4.097)

rs1708303

Gender

GenotypeWomanMan
OR (95% CI)OR (95% CI)OR (95% CI)OR (95% CI)

AA1111
AG1.613 (0.996–2.612)1.663 (0.846–3.272)1.444 (0.947–2.202)1.497 (0.901–2.487)
GG2.204 (0.644–7.548)1.191 (0.236–6.015)1.063 (0.261–4.330)0.875 (0.168–4.564)
Recessive1.886 (0.556–6.394)1.020 (0.205–5.072)0.953 (0.235–3.863)0.778 (0.150–4.034)
Additive1.566 (1.045–2.345)1.414 (0.809–2.470)1.332 (0.914–1,941)1.331 (0.848–2.090)
Dominant1.665 (1.046–2.652)1.602 (0.837–3.068)1.417 (0.938–2.141)1.447 (0.881–2.374)

BMI

GenotypeBMI 25 kg/m2BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2
OR (95% CI)OR (95% CI)OR (95% CI)OR (95% CI)

AA1111
AG1.590 (1.094–2.309)1.368 (0.841–2.227)1.450 (0.783–2.686)2.435 (1.003–5.912)
GG1.261 (0.433–3.674)0.969 (0.248–3.781)3.807 (0.434–33.355)2.035 (0.164–25.291)
Recessive1.086 (0.375–3.140)0.880 (0.227–3.417)3.437 (0.395–29.930)1.651 (0.136–20.089)
Additive1.431 (1.036–1.978)1.232 (0.813–1.867)1.564 (0.912–2.683)2.095 (0.962–4.562)
Dominant1.561 (1.086–2.244)1.329 (0.829–2.131)1.557 (0.854–2.840)2.397 (1.018–5.644)

adjusted for age, SBP, and drinking history in men; adjusted for age, SBP, LDL-C, and smoking history in women; adjusted for age, SBP, LDL-C, and smoking history in BMI 25 kg/m2; adjusted for age, SBP, LDL-C, and smoking history in BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2; < 0.05, < 0.01.

Thus, we concluded that rs7620580, rs1708303, and rs2289843 polymorphisms may have been associated with a risk for the development of IS among Han Chinese (Table 3).

3.3. Haplotype Analysis

We also analyzed haplotypes using SHEsis program platform. Haplotypes were constructed in KALRN based on the three SNPs (rs7620580, rs2289843, and rs1708303). These 3 SNPs were in linkage disequilibrium in this study population (Figures 1 and 2). Of 8 possible haplotypes, only 6 had frequencies of >0.03 among both cases and controls and were included in our haplotype analysis (Table 7). The frequencies of the A–T–G and G-T-A haplotypes in cases were significantly higher than that in controls (12.0% versus 6.0%, and 11.0% versus 6.9%, = 0.006, resp.). The frequencies of A-T-A haplotype in cases were significantly lower than those in controls (26.2% versus 38.3%, p < 0.001).


HaplotypeCases (freq.)Controls (freq.)OR (95% CI)

A-T-A202 (0.262)281 (0.388)0.557 (0.446~0.695)<0.001
A-T-G92 (0.120)44 (0.060)2.138 (1.467~3.115)<0.001
A-A-A242 (0.315)219 (0.303)1.064 (0.852~1.328)0.585
A-A-G28 (0.036)35 (0.048)0.745 (0.447~1.242)0.257
G-T-A84 (0.110)50 (0.069)1.661 (1.152~2.395)0.006
G-A-A85 (0.111)64 (0.088)1.295 (0.919~1.823)0.139

All haplotypes with a frequency of < 0.03 were ignored for this analysis.

4. Discussion

In this study, we investigated possible associations between 3 polymorphisms of the KALRN gene and ischemic stroke in a northern Chinese Han population. We found that SNP rs7620580, rs2289843, and rs1708303 were associated with IS and revealed that the G allele of SNP rs7620580 and G allele of SNP rs1708303 were risk factors for IS. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate that these three SNPs were associated with the occurrence of ischemic stroke in Chinese population.

Age and hypertension are independent risk factors for stroke. As with other atherosclerotic diseases, stroke is a late-onset disease. Susceptibility genes can influence an early-onset of this disease when environmental factors have not had sufficient time to modify the phenotype. Several studies of the MTHFR and apolipoprotein E genes [23], PDE4D genes [24], and variations on chromosome 9p21 [25] have shown age-dependent effects. Thus, we selected place of residence and sex-matched, older, and higher blood pressure patients without stroke as controls to minimize the chances of misclassification as “stroke-free” and to exclude the impact of hypertension in the control group.

The protein encoded for by the KALRN gene is a complex protein with multiple catalytic, protein-protein, and protein-lipid interaction domains. It is involved in neuron morphogenesis [9, 10] and granule maturation [26, 27] and modifies synphilin-1 aggregate transport and formation [11]. Kalirin 7 is the most abundant isoform of kalirin in the adult brain that is nearly exclusively localized to the postsynaptic density (PSD) [28, 29] and plays an essential role in dendritic spine formation and function [3033]. Kalirin 7 is also involved in ischemic signal transduction [34]. Nitric oxide (NO) acts as a neurotransmitter. Kalirin inhibits inducible nitric-oxide synthase (iNOS) activity [35] and promotes SMC migration and proliferation both in vitro and in vivo [12]. Kalirin’s RhoGEF activity could plausibly augment atherogenesis by enhancing vascular SMC proliferation and migration [12, 3638] and endothelial dysfunction [39].

The KALRN gene has been linked to schizophrenia [40, 41] and adult attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder [42]. Recent studies found that KALRN gene variations were associated with atherosclerotic diseases, such as coronary heart disease [13, 15] and stroke [43, 44], whereas Olsson et al. [45] found no linkage. These differences may have been due to the different ethnic groups that were studied. Different IS risk factors may also affect the results of association study. As we have shown in Table 6, the associations were presented in man or thinner subjects, while they disappeared in woman or overweight ones. So the difference of our study and Olsson’s may have been also due to different risk factors of the study subjects. Besides genetic and environmental backgrounds, differences in sample size, population admixture, and different selection criteria may explain the discrepancy, too.

The studied SNPs rs1708303 and rs2289843 were located in exons. We found that an intronic locus SNP rs7620580 was associated with IS, too. Perhaps polymorphisms in the intron region are in linkage disequilibrium with unidentified variants in regulatory elements, which affect gene transcription rates or gene expression efficiency. It is possible that an intron SNP interferes with nucleotide splicing or the formation of different spliceosomes, which might change gene structure and influence protein folding.

There were several limitations for our study. First, our subjects were selected from the rural elderly patients in Northern China during an epidemiological investigation; the conclusion may not represent populations of other genetic background. Further large-scale, randomized, long-term studies from different regions and ethnic or social background will be needed to confirm our present findings. Second, one of our selected SNPs (rs 7620580) was located in introns, the function of which was not clear. Third, because stroke is a disease that might involve multiple SNPs among multiple genes, a comprehensive analysis of the interactions between candidate genes will be more powerful than a single-locus analysis. Finally, functional studies are needed to confirm our findings from this study.

5. Conclusions

Our results provide evidence that KALRN gene variations were associated with ischemic stroke in the Chinese Han population.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from the Special Program for National Key Basic Research and Development Program (2010CB535011). The authors thank the subjects for their participation. The authors also thank Professors Qiang Ruan and Ying Qi for technical help.

References

  1. J. F. Meschia, C. Bushnell, B. Boden-Albala et al., “Guidelines for the primary prevention of stroke: A statement for healthcare professionals from the American heart association/American stroke association,” Stroke, vol. 45, no. 12, pp. 3754–3832, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. C. J. L. Murray and A. D. Lopez, “Alternative projections of mortality and disability by cause 1990–2020: global burden of disease study,” The Lancet, vol. 349, no. 9064, pp. 1498–1504, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. J. He, D. Gu, X. Wu et al., “Major causes of death among men and women in China,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 353, no. 11, pp. 1124–1134, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. H. S. Markus and S. Bevan, “Mechanisms and treatment of ischaemic stroke - Insights from genetic associations,” Nature Reviews Neurology, vol. 10, no. 12, pp. 723–730, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. E. Floßmann, U. G. R. Schulz, and P. M. Rothwell, “Systematic Review of Methods and Results of Studies of the Genetic Epidemiology of Ischemic Stroke,” Stroke, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 212–227, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. S. Bak, D. Gaist, S. H. Sindrup, A. Skytthe, and K. Christensen, “Genetic liability in stroke: a long-term follow-up study of Danish twins,” Stroke, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 769–774, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. M. J. O'Donnell, S. L. Chin, S. Rangarajan et al., “Global and regional effects of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with acute stroke in 32 countries (INTERSTROKE): a case-control study,” The Lancet, vol. 388, no. 10046, pp. 761–775, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. M. F. Waters, B. L. Hoh, M. J. Lynn et al., “Factors associated with recurrent ischemic stroke in the medical group of the SAMMPRIS Trial,” JAMA Neurology, vol. 73, no. 3, pp. 308–315, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. P. Mandela and X.-M. Ma, “Kalirin, a key player in synapse formation, is implicated in human diseases,” Neural Plasticity, vol. 2012, Article ID 728161, 9 pages, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. M. E. Cahill, Z. Xie, M. Day et al., “Kalirin regulates cortical spine morphogenesis and disease-related behavioral phenotypes,” in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 106, pp. 13058–13063, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  11. Y.-C. Tsai, O. Riess, A. S. Soehn, and H. P. Nguyen, “The Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factor Kalirin-7 Is a Novel Synphilin-1 Interacting Protein and Modifies Synphilin-1 Aggregate Transport and Formation,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 12, Article ID e51999, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. J.-H. Wu, A. C. Fanaroff, K. C. Sharma et al., “Kalirin promotes neointimal hyperplasia by activating rac in smooth muscle cells,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 702–708, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. M. Boroumand, S. Ziaee, N. Zarghami et al., “The Kalirin gene rs9289231 polymorphism as a novel predisposing marker for coronary artery disease,” Laboratory Medicine, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 302–308, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. B. D. Horne, E. R. Hauser, L. Wang et al., “Validation study of genetic associations with coronary artery disease on chromosome 3q13-21 and potential effect modification by smoking,” Annals of Human Genetics, vol. 73, no. 6, pp. 551–558, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. L. Wang, E. R. Hauser, S. H. Shah et al., “Peakwide mapping on chromosome 3q13 identifies the kalirin gene as a novel candidate gene for coronary artery disease,” American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 80, no. 4, pp. 650–663, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. C. Ward-Caviness, C. Haynes, C. Blach et al., “Gene-smoking interactions in multiple Rho-GTPase pathway genes in an early-onset coronary artery disease cohort,” Human Genetics, vol. 132, no. 12, pp. 1371–1382, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. L. Zheng, Z. Sun, J. Li et al., “Pulse pressure and mean arterial pressure in relation to ischemic stroke among patients with uncontrolled hypertension in rural areas of China,” Stroke, vol. 39, no. 7, pp. 1932–1937, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. P. Yi, Z. Chen, YanZhao et al., “PCR/LDR/capillary electrophoresis for detection of single-nucleotide differences between fetal and maternal DNA in maternal plasma,” Prenatal Diagnosis, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 217–222, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. G. Thomas, R. Sinville, S. Sutton et al., “Capillary and microelectrophoretic separations of ligase detection reaction products produced from low-abundant point mutations in genomic DNA,” Electrophoresis, vol. 25, pp. 1668–1677, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  20. Y. Shi, Z. Li, Q. Xu et al., “Common variants on 8p12 and 1q24.2 confer risk of schizophrenia,” Nature Genetics, vol. 43, no. 12, pp. 1224–1227, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. Y. Y. Shi and L. He, “SHEsis, a powerful software platform for analyses of linkage disequilibrium, haplotype construction, and genetic association at polymorphism loci,” Cell Research, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 97-98, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. Z. Li, Z. Zhang, Z. He et al., “A partition-ligation-combination-subdivision em algorithm for haplotype inference with multiallelic markers: update of the SHEsis (http://analysis.bio-x.cn),” Cell Research, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 519–523, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. X.-Y. Xin, Y.-Y. Song, J.-F. Ma et al., “Gene polymorphisms and risk of adult early-onset ischemic stroke: A meta-analysis,” Thrombosis Research, vol. 124, no. 5, pp. 619–624, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. H.-F. Lin, Y.-C. Liao, C.-W. Liou, C.-K. Liu, and S.-H. H. Juo, “The phosphodiesterase 4D gene for early onset ischemic stroke among normotensive patients [13],” Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 436–438, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. S. Olsson, K. Jood, C. Blomstrand, and C. Jern, “Genetic variation on chromosome 9p21 shows association with the ischaemic stroke subtype large-vessel disease in a Swedish sample aged </= 70,” European journal of neurology, vol. 18, pp. 365–367, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  26. F. Ferraro, X.-M. Ma, J. A. Sobota, B. A. Eipper, and R. E. Mains, “Kalirin/Trio Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factors regulate a novel step in secretory granule maturation,” Molecular Biology of the Cell, vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 4813–4825, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. C. A. Rabiner, R. E. Mains, and B. A. Eipper, “Kalirin: A dual Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor that is so much more than the sum of its many parts,” Neuroscientist, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 148–160, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. X.-M. Ma, D. D. Kiraly, E. D. Gaier et al., “Kalirin-7 is required for synaptic structure and function,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 28, no. 47, pp. 12368–12382, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. P. Penzes, R. C. Johnson, R. Sattler et al., “The neuronal Rho-GEF Kalirin-7 interacts with PDZ domain-containing proteins and regulates dendritic morphogenesis,” Neuron, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 229–242, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. X.-M. Ma, J.-P. Huang, E.-J. Kim et al., “Kalirin-7, an important component of excitatory synapses, is regulated by estradiol in hippocampal neurons,” Hippocampus, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 661–677, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. X. M. Ma, J. Huang, Y. Wang, B. A. Eipper, and R. E. Mains, “Kalirin, a multifunctional Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor, is necessary for maintenance of hippocampal pyramidal neuron dendrites and dendritic spines,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 23, pp. 10593–10603, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  32. X.-M. Ma, Y. Wang, F. Ferraro, R. E. Mains, and B. A. Eipper, “Kalirin-7 is an essential component of both shaft and spine excitatory synapses in hippocampal interneurons,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 711–724, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. Z. Xie, D. P. Srivastava, H. Photowala et al., “Kalirin-7 controls activity-dependent structural and functional plasticity of dendritic spines,” Neuron, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 640–656, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. M. Beresewicz, J. E. Kowalczyk, and B. Zabłocka, “Kalirin-7, a protein enriched in postsynaptic density, is involved in ischemic signal transduction,” Neurochemical Research, vol. 33, no. 9, pp. 1789–1794, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. E. A. Ratovitski, M. R. Alam, R. A. Quick et al., “Kalirin inhibition of inducible nitric-oxide synthase,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 274, no. 2, pp. 993–999, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. P. Boucher, M. Gotthardt, W.-P. Li, R. G. W. Anderson, and J. Herz, “LRP: Role in vascular wall integrity and protection from atherosclerosis,” Science, vol. 300, no. 5617, pp. 329–332, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. J.-H. Wu, L. Zhang, A. C. Fanaroff et al., “G protein-coupled receptor kinase-5 attenuates atherosclerosis by regulating receptor tyrosine kinases and 7-transmembrane receptors,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 308–316, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. V. Subramanian, J. Golledge, T. Ijaz, D. Bruemmer, and A. Daugherty, “Pioglitazone-induced reductions in atherosclerosis occur via smooth muscle cell-specific interaction with PPARγ,” Circulation Research, vol. 107, no. 8, pp. 953–958, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. A. Nohria, M. E. Grunert, Y. Rikitake et al., “Rho kinase inhibition improves endothelial function in human subjects with coronary artery disease,” Circulation Research, vol. 99, no. 12, pp. 1426–1432, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. N. J. Bradshaw and D. J. Porteous, “DISC1-binding proteins in neural development, signalling and schizophrenia,” Neuropharmacology, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 1230–1241, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. J. J. Hill, T. Hashimoto, and D. A. Lewis, “Molecular mechanisms contributing to dendritic spine alterations in the prefrontal cortex of subjects with schizophrenia,” Molecular Psychiatry, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 557–566, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. K.-P. Lesch, N. Timmesfeld, T. J. Renner et al., “Molecular genetics of adult ADHD: Converging evidence from genome-wide association and extended pedigree linkage studies,” Journal of Neural Transmission, vol. 115, no. 11, pp. 1573–1585, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. M. Dang, Z. Wang, R. Zhang et al., “KALRN Rare and Common Variants and Susceptibility to Ischemic Stroke in Chinese Han Population,” NeuroMolecular Medicine, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 241–250, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. T. Krug, H. Manso, L. Gouveia et al., “Kalirin: A novel genetic risk factor for ischemic stroke,” Human Genetics, vol. 127, no. 5, pp. 513–523, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. S. Olsson, K. Jood, O. Melander et al., “Lack of association between genetic variations in the KALRN region and ischemic stroke,” Clinical Biochemistry, vol. 44, no. 12, pp. 1018–1020, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2017 Hong Li et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

792 Views | 187 Downloads | 0 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
 Sign up for content alertsSign up