Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine / 2012 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2012 |Article ID 409823 | 9 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/409823

Aqueous Extract of Paeonia suffruticosa Inhibits Migration and Metastasis of Renal Cell Carcinoma Cells via Suppressing VEGFR-3 Pathway

Academic Editor: Lixing Lao
Received28 Jun 2011
Accepted02 Nov 2011
Published08 Feb 2012


Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) cells are characterized by strong drug resistance and high metastatic incidence. In this study, the effects of ten kinds of Chinese herbs on RCC cell migration and proliferation were examined. Aqueous extract of Paeonia suffruticosa (PS-A) exerted strong inhibitory effects on cancer cell migration, mobility, and invasion. The results of mouse xenograft experiments showed that the treatment of PS-A significantly suppressed tumor growth and pulmonary metastasis. We further found that PS-A markedly decreased expression of VEGF receptor-3 (VEGFR-3) and phosphorylation of FAK in RCC cells. Moreover, the activation of Rac-1, a modulator of cytoskeletal dynamics, was remarkably reduced by PS-A. Additionally, PS-A suppressed polymerization of actin filament as demonstrated by confocal microscopy analysis and decreased the ratio of F-actin to G-actin in RCC cells, suggesting that PS-A inhibits RCC cell migration through modulating VEGFR-3/FAK/Rac-1 pathway to disrupt actin filament polymerization. In conclusion, this research elucidates the effects and molecular mechanism for antimigration of PS-A on RCC cells and suggests PS-A to be a therapeutic or adjuvant strategy for the patients with aggressive RCC.

1. Introduction

Chinese herb medicines have been discovered to be potential therapies for various diseases, including diabetes mellitus, tumor, and hypertension [1]. Recently, increasing evidence has shown that some of Chinese herb medicines can be applied to improve the efficiency of conventional cancer therapies and reduce the side effects of chemotherapies for human malignancies, such as breast cancer and prostate cancer [2, 3].

The root cortex of Paeonia suffruticosa has been widely used as traditional Chinese herb remedy for treating various diseases, including macula, epilepsy, and menstrual disorders [4]. Paeonia suffruticosa was demonstrated to exhibit antiproliferation, anti-inflammation, antiinfection, antihypertention, antidiabetics, and neuroprotective activities [58]. The active compounds have been identified from Paeonia suffruticosa, such as paeonol and paeoniflorin [914]. However, the effect and detailed mechanism for antimigration of Paeonia suffruticosa on cancer cells are still unclear.

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) represents 3% of all human malignancies worldwide with an increasing incidence [1517]. About 70% of RCCs have been found to be clear cell subtype [18]. The response of RCC cells to traditional therapies, such as the chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, and radiation therapy is very poor [19, 20], and one-fourth of the patients have locally invasive or metastatic RCC [21, 22], resulting in a low five-year survival rate of RCC patients. Several immunotherapies have been used for the treatment of metastatic RCC [23], but only small population of patients with advanced RCC show response with a high toxicity [24].

In this study, we examined the antimigration and antiproliferation effects of the aqueous extracts from ten kinds of Chinese herb medicines, including Paeonia suffruticosa, Trichosanthes kirilowii, San jhong kuei jian tang, Taraxacum monogolicum, Kalimeris indica, Platycodi radix, Abrus precatorius, Catharanthus roseus, Andrographis paniculata, and Curcuma zedoaria, and further elucidated the molecular mechanism for the strong antimigration activity of Paeonia suffruticosa to RCC cells.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Preparation of Chinese Herb Extracts

Aqueous extracts from Paeonia suffruticosa, Trichosanthes kirilowii, San jhong kuei jian tang, Taraxacum monogolicum, Kalimeris indica, Platycodi Radix, Abrus precatorius, Catharanthus roseus, Andrographis paniculata, and Curcuma zedoaria were provided by Sun-Ten Pharmaceutical Company (Taipei, Taiwan). Briefly, one hundred grams of dried Chinese herbs was boiled with 1,500 mL of H2O at 100°C for 30 min and was sieved using a 100-mesh sieve. The extracts were concentrated to 100 mL and were filtered through a 200-mesh sieve. The extracts were dried by speed vacuum concentration and then stored at −20°C until used. Furthermore, the chemical profile of aqueous extracts of Paeonia suffruticosa (PS-A) was analyzed by using high-pressure liquid chromatograms (HPLC) and shown in Figure 1. Briefly, HPLC was performed using an Agilent 1100 liquid chromatography (Waldbronn, Germany), consisting of a photodiode array detector. The chromatographic separation of samples (20 μL, 20 mg/mL) was carried out on a Phenomenex Prodigy ODS3 100A column (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm), eluted with the mixture of water (A) and acetonitrile (B). The linear gradient program was set as A-B (v/v) from 90 : 10 to 5 : 95 in 60 min with a flow rate of 0.6 mL/min. Absorbance was monitored at 230 nm. Paeoniflorin and paeonol were used as reference compounds for Paeonia suffruticosa [10].

2.2. Chemicals and Reagents

Paeonol was purchased from WAKO (Japan) and paeoniflorin was from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). The HPLC-grade acetonitrile was obtained from Mallinckrodt (KY, USA), and deionized water was prepared from a Barnstead water purification system (Dubuque, IA, USA). Alexa568-phalloidin and Hoechst 33258 were from Invitrogen Co. Antibodies against VEGF receptor-3, phospho-FAK (Y397), and Rac-1 were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc. Actin, immobilon Western, and secondary antibodies were purchased from Millipore Co. EDTA-free protease inhibitor cocktail was from Roche Diagnostics.

2.3. Cell Line and Culture

Renal cell carcinoma cell line 786O was obtained from ATCC and maintained with Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum, 2 mM L-glutamine, 0.1 mM nonessential amino acids, and 10 U/mL penicillin/streptomycin at 37°C in a 5% CO2 humidified incubator.

2.4. Cell Proliferation Assay

786O cells (7 × 102 cells/well) were seeded into 96-well plates overnight and treated with various concentrations of PS-A for 1–3 days. At the end of treatment, the cells were incubated with 100 μL of fresh medium containing 0.5 mg/mL of 3-[4,5-dimethyl-2-thiazolyl]-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide (MTT, Sigma). After incubation for 4 h, 100 μL of 10% SDS/0.1 M HCl was added into well to dissolve the crystal. Absorbance of the reaction products was measured at 590 nm with a reference wavelength 650 nm.

2.5. Transwell Migration and Invasion Assay

After serum starvation for 24 h, 786O cells (2.5 × 104 cells) were resuspended in 300 μL of serum-free medium containing various concentrations of PS-A and then seeded into transwell chambers with or without 40 μL of matrigel (1 mg/mL, BD) for invasion or migration assay, respectively. The chambers were put into wells of 24-well plates and incubated with 1 mL of complete medium with 10% FBS at 37°C for 6 h. Cells on the bottom side of the membrane were fixed by 1% formaldehyde/PBS for 10 min and stained with 0.2% crystal violet for 60 min. The migrated or invaded cells were counted using an inverted contrast light microscope under 100x magnification.

2.6. Wound-Healing Assay

786O cells were full confluent in 12-well plates at the time of scrapping. Cells were wound with P200 pipette tips and washed with PBS. Cells were then incubated with fresh complete medium containing various concentrations of PS-A. Photographs were taken at the same position of the wound at 0 and 6 h after scrapping.

2.7. Mouse Xenograft Model

Four-week-old female NOD-SCID mice were obtained from the National Laboratory Animal Center. Approval for animal experiments was obtained from the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of College of Medicine, National Taiwan University. For tumor growth experiments, 786O cells (2 × 106 cells) were inoculated subcutaneously into the flank of mice. Two days after injection, mice were randomly divided into two groups (4 mice per group) and oral-administrated with water or PS-A (0.29 g/kg) five times per week. Tumor size was measured with calipers every five day, and mice were sacrificed after 45 days. Tumor volume was evaluated using the formula: 0.52 × (width)2 × length [25]. For tumor metastasis experiments, 786O cells (2 × 106 cells) were intravenously inoculated to the lateral tail vein. Two days after injection, mice were randomly divided into two groups (4 mice per group), and oral-administrated with water or PS-A (0.29 g/kg) five times per week and weighted every five day. Mice were sacrificed after 48 days, and the lungs were excised and fixed by 10% of formaldehyde. The metastatic nodules of lungs were counted for evaluation of approximating tumor content of lungs.

2.8. Western Blot Analysis

After serum starvation for 24 h, 786O cells (106 cells) were treated with or without 0.3 mg/mL of PS for 24 h and then lysed by RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100, 0.1% SDS, and Roche protease inhibitor cocktail). Fifty μg of protein was resolved on 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel and transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (Millipore, Bedford, MA). The membrane was incubated with primary specific antibodies to VEGFR-3, phosphor-FAK, or actin, followed by horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (Chemicon International, Temecula, CA). Signals were visualized using enhanced chemiluminescence detection reagent from Millipore. Band intensities were obtained using a UVP BioImaging System (UVP Inc., Upland, CA).

2.9. Rac-1 Activity Assay

786O cells were starved for 24 h, treated with or without 0.3 mg/mL of PS-A for 12 h, and lysed by lysis buffer (50 mM Tris pH 7.6, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 0.5 mM MgCl2, and Roche protease inhibitor cocktail). 800 μg of total lysate was mixed to glutathione beads coupled with the bacterially produced Rac binding domain of Pak (PBD)-GST fusion protein (a gift from Dr. Zee-Fen Chang) by head-to-head rotation at 4°C overnight. After centrifugation at 14,000 rpm for 2 min, the GST-PBD beads were washed five times with 500 μL of lysis buffer by rotating for 10 min and then boiled with SDS sample buffer (125 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 4% SDS, 5% β-mercaptoethanol, 30% glycerol, and 0.2% bromophenol blue dye) for 10 min to release GTP-bound Rac-1 proteins and then subjected to western blot analysis.

2.10. Immunofluorescence Analysis

786O cells were seeded on 22 × 22 mm cover slides and then treated with fresh medium containing various concentrations of PS-A for 12 h. Cells were washed by PBS and fixed using 4% formaldehyde/PBS for 10 min. After being permeabilized by 0.25% Triton X-100/PBS, cells were stained by Alexa568-phalloidin and Hoechst 33258 for 15 min. The cover slides were mounted in 80% glycerol and sealed with nail polish. The images were analyzed with a Leica TCS SP5 Spectral Confocal System.

2.11. Preparation of F- and G-Actin Fractions

F-actin was separated from G-actin as described previously with some modifications [26]. Briefly, 786O cells (2 × 105 cells) were treated with 0.3 mg/mL of PS-A for 12 h and then incubated with 200 μL actin stabilizing buffer (1% Triton X-100, 1 μg/mL phalloidin and Roche protease inhibitor cocktail) at room temperature for 5 min. The lysate was collected, and F-actin was separated from G-actin by centrifuging at 100,000 ×g at 37°C for 1 h. The supernatant was G-actin-containing fraction, and the pellet containing F-actin was washed by PBS twice and dissolved by 200 μL of actin dissolving buffer (1% Triton X-100, 2% SDS and protease inhibitor cocktail) on ice for 1 h. The F-actin and G-actin fractions were then analyzed by western blotting. The intensity of band in each lane was determined with a Gel-Pro analyzer (Media Cybernetics, GA, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Aqueous Extracts of Paeonia suffruticosa Suppresses RCC Cell Migration

To identify active Chinese herb medicines to suppress metastatic process of RCC, aqueous extracts of ten kinds of Chinese herb medicines were prepared for treating 786O cells, the aggressive RCC cell line. The results of MTT assay and transwell migration assay revealed that aqueous extracts of Paeonia suffruticosa (PS-A) showed a higher inhibitory effect on cancer cell growth (IC50  growth = 1.5 mg/mL) and a higher ratio between inhibitory effects on cancer cell proliferation and migration in 786O cells (IC50  growth/IC50  migration = 5.0), whereas the other nine CHMs showed lower or no inhibitory effects on cell migration activity (Table 1, Figures 2(a) and 2(b)). Additionally, cell mobility and invasion activities of 786O cells were strongly suppressed by the treatment of PS-A (Figures 2(c) and 2(d)). These results suggest that PS-A has strong anticancer activities to RCC cells.

IC50  growth (mg/mL)IC50  migration (mg/mL)IC50  growth/IC50  migration

Paeonia suffruticosa1.50.35.0
Trichosanthes kirilowii30.06.24.8
San jhong kuei jian tang22.49.82.3
Taraxacum monogolicum3.82.31.7
Kalimeris indica4.83.71.3
Platycodi radix2.11.71.2
Abrus precatorius5.9
Catharanthus roseus 25.1
Andrographis paniculata
Curcuma zedoaria

3.2. PS-A Inhibits Tumor Growth and Metastasis In Vivo

To investigate the effects of PS-A on tumor growth in vivo, 2 × 106 of 786O cells were injected subcutaneously into the hind limb of NOD-SCID mice, and then the mice were oral-administrated with water or PS-A (0.29 g/kg) five days per week for 45 days. As shown in Figure 3(a), tumor weight of PS-A-treated mice was remarkably lower than that of control group (234.8 mg versus 437.5 mg, resp.; ). Moreover, 2 × 106 of 786O cells were i.v. injected into lateral tail vein of NOD-SCID mice to examine the effects of PS-A (0.29 g/kg) on the metastatic activity of cancer cells. After 48 days, the number of pulmonary nodules in PS-treated mice was significantly lower than that of untreated group (10 ± 1.2 versus  nodules/lung, resp.; ; Figure 3(b)). Additionally, feeding of PS-A (0.29 g/kg) for 48 days had no significant effect on body weight of mice, suggesting that PS-A showed a very low toxicity to NOD-SCID mice (Figure 3(c)). These results indicate that PS-A inhibits tumor growth and pulmonary metastasis of RCC cells significantly.

3.3. PS-A Represses VEGFR-3/FAK/Rac-1 Signaling Pathway

To explore the mechanism for the anticancer activities of PS-A, we examined the effect of PS-A on VEGFRs, which play an important role in tumor cell growth and metastasis [27]. The results revealed that the expression of VEGFR-3 was markedly inhibited by treating 786O cells with PS-A (Figure 4(a)). It has been shown that VEGFRs are involved in the activation of FAK [28]. Therefore, we examined the phosphorylated status of FAK in RCC cells treated with PS-A. The results revealed that the phosphorylation of FAK in PS-A-treated 786O cells was remarkably reduced as compared with that of control cells (Figure 4(a)). Recent reports have shown that phosphorylated FAK is capable of promoting the activation of Rac-1 [29]. To investigate the effects of PS-A on activation of Rac-1, GST-PBD fusion proteins were purified to perform pull-down assay. GTP-bound Rac-1 of 786O cells was significantly decreased by treating with PS-A as demonstrated by pull-down assay, revealing that PS-A reduces the activation of Rac-1 (Figure 4(b)). These results indicate that PS-A suppresses cancer cell migration by inhibiting VEGFR-3/FAK/Rac-1 signaling pathway.

3.4. PS-A Reduces the Formation of Actin Filaments of RCC Cells

Recent studies demonstrated that Rac-1 has been reported to be a modulator of cytoskeletal dynamics to affect cell migration [30], and the dynamic change of actin cytoskeleton plays an essential role in cell mobility and migration [31]. Therefore, the effects of PS-A on the formation of actin filaments were studied by staining with phalloidin. The results revealed that PS-A markedly decreased actin filament formation as shown by confocal microscope analysis (Figure 5(a)). The ratio of F-actin to G-actin in PS-A-treated 786O cells was significantly reduced as compared with that of control cells (Figure 5(b)). These results indicate that PS-A disrupts the polymerization of actin filaments to inhibit the migration of RCC cells.

4. Discussion

Many studies demonstrated the anticancer activities of Chinese herb medicines in leukemia, colorectal carcinoma, gastric cancer, breast cancer, and prostate cancer [3236]. Therefore, Chinese herb medicines have been considered as the alternative medicine to treat many tumors which are resistant to traditional cancer therapies. In this study, ten kinds of potential Chinese herb medicines were screened and the aqueous extracts of Paeonia suffruticosa exhibited a higher antiproliferation activity to RCC cells. Previous studies showed that Paeonia suffruticosa inhibits proliferation in human malignancies including liver cancer [7, 13], esophageal cancer [11, 37], and lung cancer cell lines [14]. Therefore, Paeonia suffruticosa could be considered as a potential adjuvant therapy to enhance the efficacy of chemotherapy for patients with aggressive RCC.

VEGFR-3 belongs to the family of receptor tyrosine kinase and is able to activate FAK/Rac-1 pathway [28, 38, 39]. Garces et al. have demonstrated that the NH2-terminus of VEGFR-3 is associated with the COOH terminus of FAK, and disruption of VEGFR3/FAK interaction results in the dissociation of FAK from the focal adhesions [28]. The expression of VEGFR-3 has been found to be upregulated in various human malignancies, including leukemia, breast cancer, colorectal cancer, prostate cancer, renal cell carcinoma, and hepatocellular carcinoma [38, 40]. Expression levels of VEGFR-3 are correlated with portal vein invasion, tumor recurrence, and shorter disease-free survival in HCC patients [41, 42]. It has been shown that the activation of VEGFR-3 participates in cell proliferation, migration, and survival [43]. This study demonstrated that PS-A at the concentration of IC50  migration markedly reduces VEGFR-3 expression and inhibits the activation of VEGFR-3 signaling, indicating that PS-A may have the potential to prevent the progression of human malignancies.

The invasion of cancer cells into adjacent tissues is a critical step in the process of tumor metastasis [44]. Developing of the migratory capacity plays an essential role in cancer cell invasiveness [31]. In this investigation, we demonstrate that PS-A exhibits strong inhibitory effects on the migration, invasion, and metastasis of RCC cells. It might be achieved by disrupting the polymerization of actin filaments, which is tightly regulated during cell migration [45]. Previous studies suggested that the motility of cancer cells is mainly managed by the Rho family of GTPases [46]. Our results showed that the activity of Rac-1, one member of the Rho family, was suppressed by PS-A in RCC cells, indicating the potential mechanism for the inhibitory effects of PS-A to cancer cell migration.

In conclusion, this research demonstrates that PS-A is able to prohibit tumor growth and metastasis through disrupting the formation of actin filament and impairing the signaling pathway of VEGFR-3. The present results elucidate anticancer mechanism of PS-A and suggest that PS-A is a potential therapeutic or adjuvant strategy for the treatment of RCC patients.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests.


This work was supported by the Grant DOH-98-TD-I-111-TM020 from National Science and Technology Plan, Department of Health, Taiwan. S.-C. Wang and S.-W. Tang equally contributed to this work.


  1. M. Markman, “Safety issues in using complementary and alternative medicine,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 20, no. 18, pp. 39S–41S, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  2. Y. Cui, X. O. Shu, Y. Gao et al., “Use of complementary and alternative medicine by Chinese women with breast cancer,” Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, vol. 85, no. 3, pp. 263–270, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. M. A. Richardson, T. Sanders, J. L. Palmer, A. Greisinger, and S. E. Singletary, “Complementary/alternative medicine use in a comprehensive cancer center and the implications for oncology,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 18, no. 13, pp. 2505–2514, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  4. H. C. Lin, H. Y. Ding, and Y. C. Wu, “Two novel compounds from Paeonia suffruticosa,” Journal of Natural Products, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 343–346, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. C. L. Hsieh, C. Y. Cheng, T. H. Tsai et al., “Paeonol reduced cerebral infarction involving the superoxide anion and microglia activation in ischemia-reperfusion injured rats,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 106, no. 2, pp. 208–215, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. Y. Li, W. Zhang, L. Huang, and J. Shi, “Pharmacological of cortex moutan and core,” Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 214–254, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  7. G. S. Oh, H. O. Pae, H. Oh et al., “In vitro anti-proliferative effect of 1,2,3,4,6-penta-O-galloyl-beta-D-glucose on human hepatocellular carcinoma cell line, SK-HEP-1 cells,” Cancer Letters, vol. 174, no. 1, pp. 17–24, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. M. P. Sheehan and D. J. Atherton, “One-year follow up of children treated with Chinese medicinal herbs for atopic eczema,” British Journal of Dermatology, vol. 130, no. 4, pp. 488–493, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. T. Okubo, F. Nagai, T. Seto, K. Satoh, K. Ushiyama, and I. Kano, “The inhibition of phenylhydroquinone-induced oxidative DNA cleavage by constituents of Moutan Cortex and Paeoniae Radix,” Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 199–203, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  10. C. H. Lau, C. M. Chan, Y. W. Chan et al., “Pharmacological investigations of the anti-diabetic effect of Cortex Moutan and its active component paeonol,” Phytomedicine, vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 778–784, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. G. P. Sun, X. Wan, S. P. Xu, H. Wang, S. H. Liu, and Z. G. Wang, “Antiproliferation and apoptosis induction of paeonol in human esophageal cancer cell lines,” Diseases of the Esophagus, vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 723–729, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. Y. Sun, Y. Dong, H. J. Jiang et al., “Dissection of the role of paeoniflorin in the traditional Chinese medicinal formula Si-Ni-San against contact dermatitis in mice,” Life Sciences, vol. 84, no. 11-12, pp. 337–344, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. S. P. Xu, G. P. Sun, Y. X. Shen, W. Wei, W. R. Peng, and H. Wang, “Antiproliferation and apoptosis induction of paenol in HepG2 cells,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 250–256, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  14. J. Y. Hung, C. J. Yang, Y. M. Tsai, H. W. Huang, and M. S. Huang, “Antiproliferative activity of paeoniflorin is through cell cycle arrest and the Fas/Fas ligand-mediated apoptotic pathway in human non-small cell lung cancer A549 cells,” Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 141–147, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. A. J. Pantuck, A. Zisman, and A. Belldegrun, “The changing natural history of renal cell carcinoma,” Journal of Urology, vol. 166, pp. 1611–1623, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  16. P. Russo, “Renal cell carcinoma: presentation, staging, and surgical treatment,” Seminars in Oncology, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 160–176, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  17. C. P. Pavlovich and L. S. Schmidt, “Searching for the hereditary causes of renal-cell carcinoma,” Nature Reviews Cancer, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 381–393, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  18. J. C. Cheville, C. M. Lohse, H. Zincke, A. L. Weaver, and M. L. Blute, “Comparisons of outcome and prognostic features among histologic subtypes of renal cell carcinoma,” American Journal of Surgical Pathology, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 612–624, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. R. J. Amato, “Chemotherapy for renal cell carcinoma,” Seminars in Oncology, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 177–186, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  20. B. R. Lane, B. I. Rini, A. C. Novick, and S. C. Campbell, “Targeted molecular therapy for renal cell carcinoma,” Urology, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 3–10, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. D. J. Van Spronsen, K. J. M. De Weijer, P. F. A. Mulders, and P. H. M. De Mulder, “Novel treatment strategies in clear-cell metastatic renal cell carcinoma,” Anti-Cancer Drugs, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 709–717, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. T. Ishimura, I. Sakai, I. Hara, H. Eto, and H. Miyake, “Microscopic venous invasion in renal cell carcinoma as a predictor of recurrence after radical surgery,” International Journal of Urology, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 264–268, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. M. S. Ernstoff, T. S. Crocenzi, J. D. Seigne et al., “Developing a rational tumor vaccine therapy for renal cell carcinoma: immune Yin and Yang,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 733ss–740s, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. J. A. Glaspy, “Therapeutic options in the management of renal cell carcinoma,” Seminars in Oncology, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 41–46, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  25. E. Corey, L. G. Brown, J. E. Quinn et al., “Zoledronic acid exhibits inhibitory effects on osteoblastic and osteolytic metastases of prostate cancer,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 295–306, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  26. G. Chen, P. Raman, P. Bhonagiri, A. B. Strawbridge, G. R. Pattar, and J. S. Elmendorf, “Protective effect of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate against cortical filamentous actin loss and insulin resistance induced by sustained exposure of 3T3-L1 adipocytes to insulin,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 279, no. 38, pp. 39705–39709, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. M. J. Cross, J. Dixelius, T. Matsumoto, and L. Claesson-Welsh, “VEGF-receptor signal transduction,” Trends in Biochemical Sciences, vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 488–494, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. C. A. Garces, E. V. Kurenova, V. M. Golubovskaya, and W. G. Cance, “Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-3 and focal adhesion kinase bind and suppress apoptosis in breast cancer cells,” Cancer Research, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 1446–1454, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. D. P. Choma, V. Milano, K. M. Pumiglia, and C. M. DiPersio, “Integrin α3β1-dependent activation of FAK/Src regulates Rac1-mediated keratinocyte polarization on laminin-5,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 127, no. 1, pp. 31–40, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. S. J. Heasman and A. J. Ridley, “Mammalian Rho GTPases: new insights into their functions from in vivo studies,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 9, no. 9, pp. 690–701, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. D. Vignjevic and G. Montagnac, “Reorganisation of the dendritic actin network during cancer cell migration and invasion,” Seminars in Cancer Biology, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 12–22, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. Y. Y. Cha, E. O. Lee, H. J. Lee et al., “Methylene chloride fraction of Scutellaria barbata induces apoptosis in human U937 leukemia cells via the mitochondrial signaling pathway,” Clinica Chimica Acta, vol. 348, no. 1-2, pp. 41–48, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. Q. Chen, W. Peng, S. Qi, and A. Xu, “Apoptosis of human highly metastatic lung cancer cell line 95-D induced by acutiaporberine, a novel bisalkaloid derived from Thalictrum acutifolium,” Planta Medica, vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 550–553, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. T. C. Hsieh, X. Lu, J. Guo et al., “Effects of herbal preparation Equiguard on hormone-responsive and hormone-refractory prostate carcinoma cells: mechanistic studies,” International Journal of Oncology, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 681–689, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  35. S. Y. Lin, J. D. Liu, H. C. Chang, S. D. Yeh, C. H. Lin, and W. S. Lee, “Magnolol suppresses proliferation of cultured human colon and liver cancer cells by inhibiting DNA synthesis and activating apoptosis,” Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 84, no. 3, pp. 532–544, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. J. Ma, N. Y. Fu, D. B. Pang, W. Y. Wu, and A. L. Xu, “Apoptosis induced by isoliquiritigenin in human gastric cancer MGC-803 cells,” Planta Medica, vol. 67, no. 8, pp. 754–757, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  37. X. A. Wan, G. P. Sun, H. Wang, S. P. Xu, Z. G. Wang, and S. H. Liu, “Synergistic effect of paeonol and cisplatin on oesophageal cancer cell lines,” Digestive and Liver Disease, vol. 40, no. 7, pp. 531–539, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. J. L. Su, C. J. Yen, P. S. Chen et al., “The role of the VEGF-C/VEGFR-3 axis in cancer progression,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 96, no. 4, pp. 541–545, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. Y. Wang, M. Nakayama, M. E. Pitulescu et al., “Ephrin-B2 controls VEGF-induced angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis,” Nature, vol. 465, no. 7297, pp. 483–486, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. H. Bando, M. Brokelmann, M. Toi et al., “Immunodetection and quantification of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-3 in human malignant tumor tissues,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 111, no. 2, pp. 184–191, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. Z. Lian, J. Liu, M. Wu et al., “Hepatitis B x antigen up-regulates vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 3 in hepatocarcinogenesis,” Hepatology, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 1390–1399, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. D. K. Dhar, H. Naora, A. Yamanoi et al., “Requisite role of VEGF receptors in angiogenesis of hepatocellular carcinoma: a comparison with angiopoietin/Tie pathway,” Anticancer Research, vol. 22, no. 1 A, pp. 379–386, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  43. A. Salameh, F. Galvagni, M. Bardelli, F. Bussolino, and S. Oliviero, “Direct recruitment of CRK and GRB2 to VEGFR-3 induces proliferation, migration, and survival of endothelial cells through the activation of ERK, AKT, and JNK pathways,” Blood, vol. 106, no. 10, pp. 3423–3431, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. A. Besson, R. K. Assoian, and J. M. Roberts, “Regulation of the cytoskeleton: an oncogenic function for CDK inhibitors?” Nature Reviews Cancer, vol. 4, no. 12, pp. 948–955, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. A. J. Ridley, M. A. Schwartz, K. Burridge et al., “Cell migration: integrating signals from front to back,” Science, vol. 302, no. 5651, pp. 1704–1709, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. A. Hall, “Rho GTpases and the actin cytoskeleton,” Science, vol. 279, no. 5350, pp. 509–514, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2012 Shih-Chin Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

1319 Views | 1132 Downloads | 2 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.