Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine / 2013 / Article
!A Corrigendum for this article has been published. To view the article details, please click the ‘Corrigendum’ tab above.
Special Issue

Bioactives and Traditional Herbal Medicine for the Treatment of Cardiovascular/Cerebrovascular Diseases

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2013 |Article ID 267217 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/267217

P.-Y. Chao, K.-H. Lin, C.-C. Chiu, Y.-Y. Yang, M.-Y. Huang, C.-M. Yang, "Inhibitive Effects of Mulberry Leaf-Related Extracts on Cell Adhesion and Inflammatory Response in Human Aortic Endothelial Cells", Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2013, Article ID 267217, 14 pages, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/267217

Inhibitive Effects of Mulberry Leaf-Related Extracts on Cell Adhesion and Inflammatory Response in Human Aortic Endothelial Cells

Academic Editor: Joen-Rong Sheu
Received02 Aug 2013
Revised05 Nov 2013
Accepted05 Nov 2013
Published28 Nov 2013


Effects of mulberry leaf-related extracts (MLREs) on hydrogen peroxide-induced DNA damage in human lymphocytes and on inflammatory signaling pathways in human aortic endothelial cells (HAECs) were studied. The tested MLREs were rich in flavonols, especially bombyx faces tea (BT) in quercetin and kaempferol. Polyphenols, flavonoids, and anthocyanidin also abounded in BT. The best trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC) was generated from the acidic methanolic extracts of BT. Acidic methanolic and water extracts of mulberry leaf tea (MT), mulberry leaf (M), and BT significantly inhibited DNA oxidative damage to lymphocytes based on the comet assay as compared to the H2O2-treated group. TNF-α-induced monocyte-endothelial cell adhesion was significantly suppressed by MLREs. Additionally, nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) expression was significantly reduced by BT and MT. Significant reductions were also observed in both NF-κB and activator protein (AP)-1 DNA binding by MLREs. Significant increases in peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) α and γ DNA binding by MLREs were also detected in M and MT extracts, but no evidence for PPAR α DNA binding in 50 μg/mL MT extract was found. Apparently, MLREs can provide distinct cytoprotective mechanisms that may contribute to its putative beneficial effects on suppressing endothelial responses to cytokines during inflammation.

1. Introduction

Atherosclerosis is a chronic inflammatory process characterized by increased oxidative stress [1]. The resulting adhesion of monocytes to the vascular endothelium and subsequent migration into the vessel wall are the pivotal early events in atherogenesis [2]. Inflammatory cytokines, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB), and activator protein (AP)-1 are the major redox-sensitive eukaryotic transcription factors that regulate the expression of adhesion molecules [3, 4]. Because the activation of NF-κB and AP-1 can be inhibited to various degrees by different antioxidants, endogenous reactive oxygen species (ROS) may play an important role in these redox-sensitive transcription pathways in atherogenesis [1, 5]. In macrophages, nuclear receptors such as glucocorticoid, estrogen, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs), and liver X receptors negatively modulate inflammatory responses by downregulation of AP-1 and NF-κB [68]. PPARs are transcription factors activated by fatty acids and fatty acid-derived eicosanoids [9]. Three isotypes (α, β/σ, and γ) expressed in macrophages control the inflammatory status and regulate cholesterol metabolism [10]. A number of phytochemicals commonly used in research have antioxidant activity that can protect cells from ROS-mediated DNA damage that results in mutation and subsequent carcinogenesis [11]. It is evident that quercetin metabolites are distributed in human atherosclerotic lesions [12]. The specific target should therefore be taken into account when evaluating the antioxidant activity of dietary flavonols in vivo. Several herbs are consumed to protect against common and serious diseases such as cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, cancer, and other age-related degenerative diseases as well [13]. These protective effects are considered, in large part, to be related to the various antioxidants contained in them. Several studies have shown that polyphenolic and flavonol substances are the most common compounds in herbs with strong antioxidant activity [1416]. The bioactive components of herbaceous plants may be responsible for anticancer effects through growth inhibition and apoptosis in human chronic myeloid leukemia K562 cells [17].

Morus, a genus of flowering plants in the family Moraceae, comprises 10–16 species of deciduous trees commonly known as mulberries that grow wild and under cultivation in many temperate regions of the world. Mulberries are widespread and important crops for fruit, timber, and silkworm feeding, as well as being excellent amenity trees. Morus leaves are also recognized as excellent animal food. Mulberry leaf extracts contain rutin, isoquercetin, and various derivatives of kaempferol and quercetin glycosides that can scavenge 1,1-diphenyl-2-picryl-hydrazyl (DPPH) radical [18] and inhibit the formation of conjugated dienes and thiobarbituric acid-reacting substances (TBARS) by copper-induced oxidative modification of rabbit and human low-density lipoproteins [19]. In addition to antioxidant activity, mulberry leaves and extracts have antimicrobial activity [20], induce apoptosis [18], are antiinflammatory and anti-hyperglycemic, attenuate atherosclerotic lesions in animal models, and lower blood lipids in mild hyperlipidemic patients [2124]. Although a variety of medicinal herbs including mulberry are known to be potent sources of polyphenols and flavonols, studies on the protective effects of antioxidant activity in mulberry leaf-related extracts (MLREs), especially bombyx faces tea and mulberry leaf tea, on DNA damage and cell adhesion are either scarce or little known. The objectives of this study were to isolate, identify, and evaluate the antioxidant components, antioxidant activity, and extent to which acidic methanolic hydrolysate and water extracts of mulberry leaves can protect DNA in human lymphocytes from oxidative damage induced by H2O2. The effects of MLREs, including bombyx faces tea (BT), mulberry leaf tea (MT), and mulberry leaf (M) methanolic extracts, on endothelial cell-monocyte adhesion and the inflammatory response were assessed in human aortic endothelial cells (HAEC). Moreover, the effects of MLREs on intracellular redox-sensitive transcriptional pathways such as NF-κB, AP-1, signal transducers, and activators of transcription (STAT)3, and PPAR α and γ, which may contribute to leukocyte recruitment and vascular inflammation in atherogenesis, were examined by western blot analysis and electrophoretic mobility shift assays. Our study explores the relationship between the composition and content of flavonols and polyphenols having antioxidant efficiency and the prevention of DNA oxidative damage afforded by mulberry leaf-related compounds. The results of our study may help determine the antioxidant activity and anti-inflammatory effects of MLREs.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Mulberry Leaf-Related Compounds Extract Preparation

Mulberry leaf-related compounds (MLRC) were generously provided by the owner of Quan-Ming Silkworm Farm located in Miaoli, Taiwan. Harvested mulberry leaves were divided into eight individual batches and lyophilized by freeze drying in a Freeze Dryer (FD-5060, Panchum Scientific Corp., Taipei, Taiwan), grinding to powder, and storing at −80°C until use. Extracts were produced from 200 mg aliquots of MLRC powder with a 50-fold volume of methanol at 4°C extract overnight and then filtered through Whatman grade no.1 qualitative filter paper. Extracts were concentrated by rotary vacuum evaporator (R205, Buchi, Switzerland), resuspended in 99.5% ethanol to 1 mL, and then stored at −20°C until HAECs treatment.

The edible portion of each MLRC leaf was weighed, lyophilized, ground to powder, and extracted by distilled deionized (dd)H2O [25]. The extraction mixture was heated to 90°C in a steam bath and refluxed for 2 h, cooled in the refrigerator, sonicated for 5 min, and diluted to 50 mL with ddH2O to form the final extract solution. Individual water extracts were used for the comet assay. Ten mL of 62.5% aqueous methanol containing BHT (2 g/L) was added to 1.25 g lyophilized samples, followed by adding 5 mL 6 M HCl to bring the total volume up to 12.5 mL. The final mixture consisted of 1.2 M HCl in 50% aqueous methanol. Acid hydrolysates methanolic extracts were analyzed for their antioxidant composition, antioxidant activity, and the comet assay.

2.2. Polyphenol Assay

Polyphenol content was determined according to the method of Taga et al. [26]. Briefly, standard gallic acid and an aliquot of the acidic methanolic extract were diluted with an ethanol/water (60 : 40, v/v) solution containing 0.3% HCl. Two mL of 2% Na2CO3 were mixed into each sample of 100 μL and allowed to equilibrate for 2 min before adding 50% Folin-Ciocalteu reagent. Absorbance at 750 nm was measured at room temperature. The standard curve for gallic acid was used to calculate polyphenol levels.

2.3. Determination of Total Flavonoids

Total flavonoid contents were determined using the method of Ordoñez et al. [27]. A 0.5 mL 2% AlCl3-ethanol solution was added to 0.5 mL of acidic methanolic extract, and absorbance was measured at 420 nm after standing for 1 h at room temperature. Extract samples were evaluated at a final concentration of 0.1 mg/mL. Total flavonoid content was calculated as a quercetin equivalent (mg/g).

2.4. Determination of Total Flavonols

Total flavonols in plant extracts were estimated using the method of Kumaran and Joel Karunakaran [28]. Two mL of 2% AlCl3 ethanol and 3.0 mL (50 g/L) sodium acetate were added to 2.0 mL acidic methanolic extracts. The absorption at 440 nm was read after 2.5 h at 20°C. Sample extracts were evaluated at a final concentration of 0.1 mg/mL. Total flavonoid content was calculated as a quercetin equivalent (mg/g).

2.5. Flavonols Analysis by HPLC

One mL of acid hydrolysates methanolic extract was filtered through 0.45 μm filter prior to 20 μL injection into a high-performance liquid chromatograph (HPLC). Samples were analyzed with a SpectraSystem UV6000LP Photodiode Array Detection System (Thermo Separation Products, San Jose, USA) and an ODS column (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm; YMC, ODS-A, YMC Co., Kyoto, Japan). The mobile phase consisted of methanol-water (30 : 70, v/v) with 1% formic acid and 100% methanol. The gradient was 25–74% methanol in 40 min at a flow rate of 0.75 mL/min. the spectrum was recorded at 365 nm for flavonol determination [25].

2.6. ABTS/HRP–H2O2 Assay of Total Antioxidant Activity

The total antioxidant capacity of hydrophilic and lipophilic antioxidants was determined using the horseradish peroxidase catalyzed oxidation of 2,2-azino-bis-(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS) [29]. The reaction mixture contained 0.5 mL of 1000 μM ABTS (in ddH2O) and 3.5 mL of 100 μM H2O2 (in 0.1 M PBS). The reaction was started by the addition of 0.5 mL of 44 U/mL peroxidase (in 0.1 M PBS). After 1 h, 0.05 mL of MLREs was added to the mixture. Absorbance was measured at 730 nm after 5 min. Trolox was used as a standard and the total antioxidant capacity of mulberry extracts was measured as mM Trolox equivalent.

2.7. Scavenging Activity on 1,1-Diphenyl-2-picryl-hydrazyl (DPPH) Radical

The scavenging activity on DPPH radical of MLRC acidic methanolic extracts was determined according to the method of Shimada et al. [30]. Briefly, an aliquot of 0.4 mL of acidic methanolic extracts with series dilution was added to 0.8 mL of 1 mM DPPH freshly prepared in methanol, mixed well, and left to stand for 30 min before measuring absorbance at 517 nm. The scavenging effect percentage was calculated as [1 − ( )/(control ] × 100. The IC50 of the scavenging effect percentage was then calculated.

2.8. Isolated Human Peripheral Blood Lymphocytes

Blood samples were obtained from six donors, four male and two female healthy nonsmokers, that were 24 to 48 years old. Fresh whole blood (20–30 mL) from volunteers was taken with informed consent, and lymphocytes were isolated using a separation solution kit supplemented with Ficoll-Paque Plus lymphocyte isolation sterile solution (Pharmacia Biotech, Sweden) [31]. Cells were harvested within 1 day of blood samples being taken and cultured with AIM V medium containing serum-free lymphocyte medium (Gibco Invitrogen, USA) in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 in air at 37°C for 24 h.

2.9. Dosage Selected for the Comet Assay

Previously, we demonstrated that the effect of lymphocyte exposure to 10 μM H2O2 on DNA single-strand break damage was 60-fold greater than the control and with 99.4% cell viability [32]. However, when lymphocytes were exposed to 50 μM H2O2, the oxidative damage increased significantly compared to the control under 98.2% cell viability. Therefore, 10 μM H2O2 for the treatment dosage was selected in the current study. Furthermore, when lymphocytes were treated with three concentrations (25, 50, and 100 μg/mL) of acidic methanolic and water extracts from indigenous purple vegetables [33] and herbaceous plants [34], the DNA damage was induced by exposing the lymphocytes to 10 μM H2O2 and shown the protection effects. Consequently, these concentrations of the extracts were chosen for the effect treatments.

2.10. Cell-Viability Testing

After culturing, lymphocytes were exposed to each MLREs. Each lymphocyte solution was used at three concentrations (25, 50, and 100 μg/mL) for 30 min at 37°C. DNA damage was induced by exposing lymphocytes to H2O2 (10 μM) for 5 min on ice. Treatment on ice minimized the possibility of cellular DNA repair after H2O2 injury. Cells were centrifuged at 100 g for 10 min, washed, and resuspended in the same medium as the comet assay. All experiments were carried out in triplicate. Cell viability was tested using the tetrazolium/formazan (MTT) assay [35] prior to and after treatment with MLRC extract or H2O2.

2.11. DNA Single Strand Break Damage Estimation Using the Comet Assay

The comet assay was performed as described in Szeto et al. [36] with acidic methanolic hydrolysate and water extracts from tested plants. Cultured lymphocytes (105 cells/mL) were embedded in 75 μL of 1% low-melting-point agarose on a microscope slide (precoated with agarose) at 37°C. The gel was allowed to set at 4°C and cells were lysed for a period of at least 2 h in lysis buffer at 4°C. Cells were then alkaline-unwound, following which electrophoresis was carried out using the electrophoresis buffer at 4°C for 15 min at 25 vDC and 300 mA. All steps were conducted under dim light to prevent additional DNA damage. Following electrophoresis, slides were dipped into a neutralization buffer and stained with ethidium bromide. The comet-like images resulting from the extension of DNA were scored as a reflection of the single strand breaks under a fluorescence microscope (Zeiss-Axiovert 100, Zeiss, Germany). Triplicate slides were prepared for each experimental point sample, and 50 comet-like images selected at random per slide to determine average DNA damage values. A computerized image analysis system (VisCOMET 1.6, Impuls GmbH, Germany) was employed to analyze two comet parameters, DNA damage by tail DNA percentage [(total brightness of tail area/total brightness of total area) × 100%] and tail moment (tail length × tail DNA%). The inhibition percentage of tail DNA% and tail moment were calculated relative to the 10 μM H2O2 treated group.

2.12. Cell Cultures and Treatment

HAECs (Clonetics Corp.) were grown in Medium 200 (GIBCO Invitrogen) supplemented with 1% low serum growth supplement (LSGS; GIBCO Invitrogen) and 10% FBS (GIBCO Invitrogen) in an atmosphere of 95% air and 5% CO2 at 37°C in plastic flasks in an incubator (Astec Co.) as described by Vielma et al. [37]. The human monocytic cell line, U937 (American Type Culture Collection) was grown in a suspension culture in RPMI-1640 (GIBCO Invitrogen) containing 10% FBS (Sigma) and 1% antibiotic-antimycotic mixture (Sigma) under an atmosphere of 95% air and 5% CO2 at 37°C. After incubation with MLREs and aspirin, or TNF-α, cell viability was assessed using the tetrazolium/formazan (MTT) assay [35]. The adhesion assays were performed as described by Zhu and Loft [38]. Briefly, U937 cells were labeled with a fluorescent dye, incubated with 10 μmol/L 2,7-bis (2-carboxyethyl)-5 (6)-carboxyfluorescein acetoxymethyl ester at 37°C for 1 h in RPMI-1640 medium and subsequently washed by centrifugation. Confluent HAECs in 24-well plates were incubated with U937 cells (106 cells/mL) at 37°C for 1 h. Nonadherent leukocytes were removed. The numbers of adherent leukocytes were determined by photographing and counting four randomly chosen fields per well at 100x using a Zeiss Axio Mager Z1 Upright Fluorescence Microscope. Experiments were performed in triplicate and repeated three times. HAECs were incubated with 25 μg and 50 μg of MLREs or 10 μM aspirin for 18 h, followed by treating with 2 ng/mL TNF-α for 6 h in the NF-κB p65, AP-1, and STAT-3 expression assays.

2.13. Nuclear Protein Isolation

Protein extracts were prepared as described by Min et al. [39]. Briefly, after cell activation for the indicated times, cells were washed in 1 mL ice-cold PBS, centrifuged at 400 g for 5 min, resuspended in 400 μL ice-cold hypotonic buffer (10 mM HEPES, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM EDTA, 10 mM KCl, 1 mM DTT, 0.5 mM PMSF, pH 7.9), incubated on ice for 10 min, vortexed, and centrifuged at 15,000 g for 30 sec. The supernatant was collected and stored at −70°C for cytosolic protein analysis. Pelleted nuclei were gently resuspended in 44.5 μL ice-cold extraction buffer (20 mM HEPES, pH 7.9 with 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.42 M NaCl, 0.2 mM EDTA, and 25% glycerol) with 5 μL of 10 mM DTT and 0.5 μL of Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Sigma), incubated on ice for 20 min, vortexed, and centrifuged at 15,000 g for 5 min at 4°C. Aliquots of the supernatant containing nuclear proteins were frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −70°C.

2.14. Western Blot Analysis

Nuclear lysates were subjected to 12% SDS-PAGE (Bio-Rad Laboratories), after which proteins were transferred to a PVDF membrane (Bio-Rad). Membranes were probed with a mouse monoclonal NF-κB p65 antibody (BD Biosciences). After incubation in a secondary antibody solution consisting of IRDye 700CW-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (LI-COR Biosciences) for 60 min at room temperature with gentle shaking, the membrane was washed four times for 5 min each at room temperature in PBS with 0.1% Tween-20 and while being gently shaken. After a final rinse, the membrane was scanned using AlphaEaseFC image analysis software (Alpha Innotech Corporation) to analyze spot density. The internal control was set at 100% to determine the relative density of protein expression [40].

2.15. Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay for NF-κB, AP-1, and STAT3

The binding reaction consisted of 1 μL 10× binding buffer (100 mM TRIS, 500 mM NaCl, 10 mM DTT, pH 7.5), 5 μL H2O, 2 μL 25 mM DTT/2.5% Tween-20, 1 μL IRDye 700-labeled EMSA oligonucleotides specific for NF-κB (5′-AGT TGA GGG GAC TTT CCC AGG C-3′ and 3′-CGC TTG ATG ACT CAG CCG GAA-5′), AP-1 (5′-CGC TTG ATG ACT CAG CCG GAA-3′ and 3′-GCG AAC TAC TGA GTC GGC CTT-5′), STAT3 (5′-GAT CCT TCT GGG AAT TCC TAG ATC-3′ and 3′-CTA GGA AGA CCC TTA AGG ATC TAG-5′) (Sigma), PPAR-α (5′-AAA AAC TGG GCC AAA GGT CT-3′), and PPAR-γ (5′-TGA AAC TAG GGT AAA GTT CA-3′) (Sigma), 1 μL poly (dI·dC), and 1 μL nuclear extract (as prepared previously). The mixture was incubated at room temperature for 20 min in the dark. After 1x Orange Loading Dye (LI-COR Biosciences) was added, the binding reaction was loaded onto a native 4% polyacrylamide gel and separated by electrophoresis at 90 vDC for 40 min. The gels were scanned using an Odyssey Infrared Imaging System (LI-COR Biosciences) [40].

2.16. Statistical Analysis

Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation, and statistical significance was analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey’s Range Test at the 0.05 significance level. Pearson’s linear correlation was also determined. The means of three replicates are reported.

3. Result

3.1. Antioxidant Composition and Antioxidant Activity

Polyphenols, flavonoids, and flavonols were abundant in BT at levels of 34.65 ± 0.82 mg/g DW gallic acid, 84.83 ± 8.68 mg/g DW quercetin equivalent, and 25.47 ± 3.86 mg/g DW quercetin equivalent, respectively (Table 1). Anthocyanidins were abundant in BT and ML at levels of 143.32 ± 1.81 and 135.82 ± 0.31 units/g DW, respectively. Table 2 shows that quercetin and kaempferol were both rich in BTat levels of 2853.33 ± 180.37 and 646.67 ± 50.33 μg/g DW, respectively, while the levels of M were 1666.67 ± 189.03 and 426.67 ± 46.19 μg/g DW, respectively. However, no myricetin or morin was detected in the MLRC (Table 2). Thus, these MLREs displayed variations in their antioxidant substances levels.

mg gallic acid/g DW
Flavonoids mg quercetin equivalent/g DWFlavonol mg quercetin equivalen/g DWAthocyanidin
unit/g DW


All values are means S.D. ( ).
Means within a column with different superscripts (a~c) are significantly different, .

Flavonols (µg/g DW)


ND: not detected.

MLREs showed antioxidant activity, proving their capacity to scavenge the ABTS radical cation. The antioxidant activity in acidic methanolic hydrolysate sample extracts was expressed in trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC) (Table 3). BT showed a significantly higher TEAC value ( μg/g DW) than MT ( μg/g DW) and M ( μg/g DW). TEAC values were positively and significantly ( , ) correlated with the content of quercetin among MLREs (Table 4). Thus, different quercetin contents displayed various levels of antioxidant activity. However, M had a significantly high efficacy for DPPH radical scavenging activity (IC50   μg/mL) compared to BT (IC50   μg/mL) and MT (IC50   μg/mL) (Table 3). Hence, each tested sample showed significant differences in scavenging of DPPH radical at IC50.

(Trolox mM)*
DPPH radical scavenging activity
IC50 (μg/mL)


TEAC value at sample 100 μg/mL concentration.

MyricetinMorin QuercetinKaempferol


—: no significant correlation.
TEAC values at 100 μg/mL of sample concentration.

3.2. Effects of Acidic Methanolic and Water Extracts from MLRC on H2O2-Induced DNA Damage to Lymphocytes

The effects of MLRC extracts on cell cytotoxicity were determined by the MTT assay. Lymphocytes were exposed to each of three different MLRC extracts at three concentrations (25, 50, and 100 μg/mL) for 30 min at 37°C. DNA damage was induced by exposing lymphocytes to H2O2 (10 μM) for 5 min on ice. No mulberry extracts were cytotoxic at the concentrations used, with >98% of cells remaining viable [41]. The comet assay was performed to determine the DNA damaging activity of the plants because it is a sensitive method for monitoring single strand DNA breaks at the single cell level. Any DNA damage that occurred is represented as a tail length (tail migration) of the DNA strand. The effects of pretreatment with acidic methanolic extracts of MLRC on 10 μM H2O2-induced DNA oxidative damage in human lymphocytes are presented in Figure 1, indicating that there was a protective effect of pretreatment on lymphocytes with each of the MLRC extracts at the lowest dose (25 μg/mL). Lymphocytes pretreated with 25–100 μg/mL extracts of MT extracts experienced a greater level of protection against H2O2 exposure than lymphocytes exposed to other tested compounds and in a dose-dependent manner. BT had better inhibition efficacy at lower concentration (25 μg/mL), and the maximum protective effect of lymphocyte pretreatment was observed with pretreatment by 25 μg/mL BT, exhibiting 14.62% of tail DNA% compared to treatment only with H2O2. MT had better inhibition efficacy (84.39%) than M and BT extracts at the 100 μg/mL level (Figure 1(a)). Tested plants showed at least 1342.63 of tail moment in BT extract at the 25 μg/mL level, while the BT extract at 100 μg/mL had the highest tail moment (3281.93) compared to the rest of the acidic methanolic extract samples (Figure 1(b)). Moreover, the trend in tail moment in all samples continued climbing up from 25–100 μg/mL.

The effects of various water extracts of MLRC H2O2-induced DNA damage to lymphocytes are presented in Figure 2. At lower concentrations, all tested samples had lower tail DNA%, indicating better inhibition efficacies (Figure 2(a)). BT and M had the best inhibition efficacies, with both exhibiting values of 14.22 and 14.69 tail DNA% at 25 μg/mL, respectively. Moreover, MT had a higher tail DNA% than the other extracts at the same dose, and the highest tail DNA% was observed in 32.12% of MT at a concentration of 100 μg/mL. The tail moment of all samples continued to increase up to the 100 μg/mL level (Figure 2(b)). The minimum tail moment occurred in M at 1536.74 in the 25 μg/mL extracts. Moreover, the DNA damage induced by H2O2 was significantly higher than the DNA damage treated with extracts, and H2O2 treated had 87.26 in tail DNA% and 8328.84 in tail moment.

3.3. Effects of MLREs on Monocyte-Endothelial Cell Adhesion

As shown in Figure 3, pretreatment of HAECs with 100 μg/mL MLREs for 18 h significantly suppressed the adhesion of U937 monocytes to TNF-α-stimulated HAECs similar to that of 10 μM aspirin (positive control). Data also show that 25 and 50 μg/mL BT, MT, and M methanol extracts inhibited the adhesion of U937 monocytes to TNF-α-stimulated HAECs by 81.98% and 81.87% (BT), 74.49% and 83.31% (MT), and 80.11% and 75.59% (M), respectively.

3.4. Effects of MLREs on NF-κB Activity, and MLREs Inhibits the Binding of NF-κB, AP-1, and STAT3

Figure 4 demonstrates that MLREs regulated the DNA-binding activity and expressions of NF-κB in HAECs. In untreated HAECs, NF-κB p65 was only found within the cytosol; however, its nuclear translocation was observed upon treatment with TNF-α. Compared to the TNF-α group, pretreatment with BT and MT methanol extracts significantly decreased the expression of NF-κB p65 in the nuclear compartment, while the M methanol extract did not reduce the expression of NF-κB p65 activity. Furthermore, an EMSA analysis was carried out to determine if the reduced expression of NF-κB in response to treatment with MLREs resulted in reduced binding of NF-κB to DNA. The treatment of HAECs with TNF-α led to increased binding of NF-κB; however, pretreatment of HAECs with BT, MT, and M significantly decreased DNA-bound NF-κB (Figure 5(a)). The increased binding of AP-1 with TNF-α resulted from the treatment of HAECs; however, pretreatment of HAECs with BT, MT, and M significantly decreased DNA-bound AP-1 (Figure 5(b)). STAT3 DNA-binding activities to its cognate recognition site were remarkably reduced compared to TNF-α treatment (lane 3) in the nuclear fraction, indicating that MLREs at 50 μg/mL inhibited STAT3-binding activities. In addition, the results in Figure 5(c) (lanes 4–10) show that aspirin, MLREs at 50 μg/mL, and BT at 25 μg/mL remarkably decreased STAT3 levels compared to TNF-α (lane 3); however, both MT and M at 25 μg/mL increased STAT3-binding activities. These results indicate that only 50 μg/mL MLREs, 25 μg/mL BT, and aspirin block STAT3 activation and might downregulate TNF-α-induced expressions of inflammatory signaling pathways.

3.5. MLREs Regulated the DNA-Binding Activity and Expressions of PPAR α and PPAR γ in HAECs

PPAR α and γ effectively bound to PPAR α and γ oligo-IRDye 700 as indicated in lanes 3–10 of Figure 6. Supershifts are bands from the binding of each specific antibody. The binding activities of PPAR α and γ were detected at baseline. The 25 μg/mL MT extract (lane 7) and 25 and 50 μg/mL M extracts (lanes 9-10) increased activity compared to incubating with TNF-α alone (lane 3). However, BT at both 25 and 50 μg/mL extracts showed reduced effects on PPAR α and γ expression. Moreover, the 50 μg/mL MT extract had no effect on PPAR α binding activity but increased the binding activity of PPAR γ in comparison to incubation with TNF-α alone. These data suggest that MT and M both promoted PPAR α and γ expression, at least in part, by increasing the DNA binding of transcription factors PPAR α and γ.

4. Discussion

4.1. Antioxidant Composition and Antioxidant Activity

BT contains high levels of polyphenols, flavonoids, flavonols, anthocyanidin, quercetin, and kaempferol (Tables 1 and 2). BT also had a higher TEAC value (155.14 mM, Table 3) than the TEAC values of 4.7 mM [42] and 6.4 mM [43] reported for quercetin, as well as 2.42 mM reported for quercetin-3-rutinoside [44]. Furthermore, González-Paramás et al. [45] demonstrated that flavonol contents were significantly and highly correlated ( ) with TEAC values. Kim et al. [46] reported that mulberry leaves contain abundant quercetin and inhibit lipid peroxidation at concentrations of 0.1 and 0.01 mg/mL. In our study, the amount of quercetin was significantly correlated ( , Table 4) with TEAC value. However, no correlation was found among myricetin, morin, kaempferol, and TEAC, which may be due to the structure required to reinforce the free radical scavenging activity that varies with the type of free radical. Naowaratwattana et al. [18] reported that a 50% methanolic extract of mulberry leaf contained rutin, isoquercetin, and various derivatives of kaempferol and quercetin glycosides, while a water extract contained primarily chlorogenic acid and caffeoylquinic acid derivatives. The IC50 of DPPH radical scavenging was 79.4 and 204.2 μg/mL for 50% methanolic and water extracts, respectively [18]. In our study, M extracts contained quercetin and kaempferol (Table 2), which may account for part of the highly scavenged DPPH radical in comparison to the rest of MLREs. Khan et al. [47] demonstrated that the IC50 was 220.23 μg/mL, which is much less efficacious than the mulberry leaf acidic methanolic extract IC50 of 188.8 μg/mL (Table 3). However, the IC50 of in vitro free radical scavenging activity of mulberry leaves from Naowaboot et al. [22] was μg/mL, which is more efficacious than the IC50 concentration derived in the present study. Taken together, the polyphenol-rich MLREs exhibited distinct cell-free antioxidant activity (i.e., TEAC) as validated by their levels of polyphenols and flavonols, with distinct antioxidant activity strongly accounting for the antioxidant activity of the extracts. The amount of quercetin was especially positively correlated with the observed TEAC values.

4.2. Estimation of DNA Single Strand Break Damage from Exposure to Acidic Methanolic and Water Extracts

One of the antioxidant activity tests, scavenging of DPPH radical, was selected due to its quick and simple, but it is a less biologically relevant assay. Previously, we reported that with 2 μg·mL−1 of methanolic and water extracts from the indigenous vegetables [33] and herb plants [48] significantly prolonged lag phase of low-density lipoprotein (LDL). The LDL oxidation assay is considered to be one of the most biologically relevant assays [49]. Both studies [33, 48] also showed that the concentration of the tested extracts for scavenging DPPH radical was in higher levels at 10 mg of tested extracts with 2–53% inhibition. Lower concentration was then chosen for the treated dosage in the present study. In addition, lower concentration also could avoid the toxicity effect of higher level of extracts on lymphocytes. Quercetin was found to protect against H2O2-induced DNA damage in human lymphocytes at 10 μM [50] and at 3.1 to 25 μM [51]. Quercetin was also reported to induce DNA strand breaks in various cell types, but only at higher doses at 100 μM or above [50]. Duthie et al. [50] proposed that the dihydroxy structure of quercetin and myricetin might be essential in protecting DNA against hydrogen peroxide. No such hydroxyl groups are present in the tocopherol molecule. Noroozi et al. [52] demonstrated that, in addition to quercetin, kaempferol could also inhibit H2O2-induced DNA strand breaks in human lymphocytes. In our study, both BT and M were rich in quercetin and kaempferol (Table 2), which may account for the protective roles of both extracts in preventing DNA strand breaks from human lymphocytes.

4.3. MLREs Regulated the DNA-Binding Activity and Expressions of NF-κB, AP-1, STAT3, and PPARs in HAECs

Because MLREs exhibited free radical scavenging, the anti-inflammatory effects of MLREs on TNF-α-induced cell adhesion and adhesion molecule expression were determined in the present study. Our results suggest that MLREs and aspirin significantly inhibited TNF-α-induced monocyte-endothelial cell adhesion (Figure 3). Significant reductions in NF-κB expression and DNA binding by aspirin, MT extract (25 μg/mL), and BT extract (both 25 and 50 μg/mL) were also observed. The adhesion of monocytes to the vascular endothelium and subsequent migration into the vessel wall are early events in atherogenesis [2]. Our results are consistent with previous research showing that dietary polyphenols such as catechin and quercetin significantly reduce the binding of monocytes to HAECs [53, 54]. The reduced cellular adhesion may be due to the inhibition of cellular adhesion molecule expression, as purple sweet potato leaf extract (PSPLE) reduced both VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 expression [40]. Shibata et al. [55] demonstrated that pretreatment of cultured bovine aortic endothelial cells (BAECs) with mulberry leaf aqueous fractions inhibited TNF-α- and LPS-induced expression of Lectin-like Ox-LDL receptor-1 (LOX-1), a cell-surface receptor for atherogenic Ox-LDL (oxidized low-density lipoprotein). It also appears to mediate Ox-LDL-induced inflammation, which may be crucial in atherogenesis. Furthermore, mulberry leaf aqueous fractions inhibited the TNF-α-induced activation of NF-κB and phosphorylation of inhibitory factor of NF-κB-alpha (IκB-α). Thus, mulberry leaf aqueous fractions suppress TNF-α- and LPS-induced LOX-1 gene expression mediated by inhibiting NF-κB activation.

Chan et al. [56] demonstrated that mulberry leaf extract (MLE) was rich in polyphenols. MLE can effectively inhibit the migration of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC) by blocking small guanosine triphosphatases (small GTPase) and Akt/NF-κB signals. The Rho family of small GTPases such as Rho, Rac, and Cdc42 acts as a molecular switch to regulate the actin cytoskeleton. The Rho family of GTPases is also reported to be involved in the regulation of NF-κB-dependent transcription [56]. MLE has been shown to possess hypoglycemic effects in an insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (type 1 diabetes) animal model, and potential hypoglycemic compounds in mulberry leaves were suggested to be 2-O-α-D-galactopyranosyl-DNJ and fagomine [57]. Konno et al. [58] further reported that mulberry latex contains alkaloidal sugar-mimic glycosidase inhibitors with antidiabetic activities such as 1,4-dideoxy-1,4-imino-D-arabinitol, 1-deoxynojirimycin, and 1,4-dideoxy-1,4-imino-D-ribitol. Kim et al. [59] recently showed that treated type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) with a 1 : 1 : 1 mixture of ginseng root, mulberry leaf water extract, and banana leaf water extract (6 g/d) for 24 weeks significantly decreased plasma intracellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) levels. This indicates suppressed inflammatory responses in T2D but no significant differences in glucose homeostasis control measurement changes. Rigamonti et al. [8] reported that both PPAR α and γ may be thought of as suppressing the activity of NFκB and AP-1 pathways that reduce inflammatory mediator production in the macrophages of humans and mice. In our study, MT and M promoted PPAR α and γ expression, at least in part, by increasing DNA binding of transcription factors PPAR α and γ. PPAR-α- and γ-dependent signaling pathways may also play important roles in mediating the TNF-α receptor signaling pathway by MT and M by suppressing the activity on NF-κB and AP-1 pathways. These pathways may regulate downstream proinflammatory gene expression and adhesion molecular expression. Clinically, PPAR γ agonists such as rosiglitazone are widely used in the treatment of T2D [60]. M and MT extracts increased PPAR γ activity, which may partly explain why inflammatory responses are suppressed in T2D.

Although reduced NF-κB expression and DNA binding were observed upon treatment with ML, MT, and BT (Figure 5), the mechanism was not assessed and is worthy of further study. In addition, the present results were obtained using in vitro studies and may be consistent with an in vivo model of atherogenesis similar to that reported by Enkhmaa et al. [21] in which mulberry leaves suppressed the development of atherosclerotic lesions. Previously, we proved that black beans significantly prolong LDL lag time and decrease the atheroma regions of the aortic arch and thoracic aorta in hypercholesterolemic NZW rabbits [61]. We then demonstrated that black soybean extract and PSPLE significantly decreased the adhesion of U937 monocytic cells to TNF-α-stimulated HAECs and reduced adhesion molecules expression (VCAM-1 and ICAM-1) as well as NF-κB-p65 expression [37]. This is particularly important given the opposing effects of flavonols from MLREs obtained using in vitro and ex vivo studies [62].

5. Conclusion

Tested MLREs were rich in flavonols and had strong antioxidant activity in protecting lymphocyte DNA from oxidative damage. In particular, BT was rich in quercetin and polyphenols. The antioxidant components of MLREs might downregulate intracellular redox-dependent signaling pathways in HAECs upon TNF-α stimulation, which might prevent ROS-mediated endothelial cell dysfunction. MLRCs have anti-inflammatory effects through the modulation of NF-κB, AP-1, STAT3, and PPARs signaling. These chemicals appear to provide distinct cytoprotective mechanisms that might contribute to their putative beneficial effects in suppressing endothelial responses to cytokines during inflammation. These results may benefit further in vivo studies to assess the therapeutic potential of phytochemicals as anti-inflammatories for use in cytokine-induced vascular disorders, including atherosclerosis.


This work was supported in part by Grants from the National Science Council of Taiwan (NSC 95–2320-B-034-001 and NSC 96–2320-B-034-001).


  1. W. Palinski, “United they go: conjunct regulation of aortic antioxidant enzymes during atherogenesis,” Circulation Research, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 183–185, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. P. Libby, “Molecular bases of the acute coronary syndromes,” Circulation, vol. 91, no. 11, pp. 2844–2850, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  3. P. A. Baeuerle and D. Baltimore, “Nf-κB: ten years after,” Cell, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 13–20, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. J. M. Kyriakis, “Activation of the AP-1 transcription factor by inflammatory cytokines of the TNF family,” Gene Expression, vol. 7, no. 4–6, pp. 217–231, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  5. J. M. Müller, R. A. Rupec, and P. A. Baeuerle, “Study of gene regulation by NF-κB and AP-1 in response to reactive oxygen intermediates,” Methods, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 301–312, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. G. Chinetti, J. Fruchart, and B. Staels, “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors: new targets for the pharmacological modulation of macrophage gene expression and function,” Current Opinion in Lipidology, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 459–468, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. G. Chinetti, J. C. Fruchart, and B. Staels, “Transcriptional regulation of macrophage cholesterol trafficking by PPARα and LXR,” Biochemical Society Transactions, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 1128–1131, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. E. Rigamonti, G. Chinetti-Gbaguidi, and B. Staels, “Regulation of macrophage functions by PPAR- α, PPAR- γ, and LXRs in mice and men,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 1050–1059, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. M. A. Bouhlel, J. Brozek, B. Derudas et al., “Unlike PPARγ, PPARα or PPARβ/δ activation does not promote human monocyte differentiation toward alternative macrophages,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 386, no. 3, pp. 459–462, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. G. Chinetti, J.-C. Fruchart, and B. Staels, “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors and inflammation: from basic science to clinical applications,” International Journal of Obesity, vol. 27, supplement 3, pp. S41–S45, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. Y. Zhu, J. H.-C. Lin, H. Liao et al., “LDL induces transcription factor activator protein-1 in human endothelial cells,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 473–480, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  12. J. Terao, “Dietary flavonoids as antioxidants,” Forum of Nutrition, vol. 61, pp. 87–94, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. Y. B. Feng, W. Q. Luo, and S. Q. Zhu, “Explore new clinical application of Huanglian and corresponding compound prescriptions from their traditional use,” Zhongguo Zhongyao Zazhi, vol. 33, no. 10, pp. 1221–1225, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  14. Y. H. Chu, C. L. Chang, and H. F. Hsu, “Flavonoid content of several vegetables and their antioxidant activity,” Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, vol. 80, no. 5, pp. 561–566, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  15. I. C. Arts, B. van de Putte, and P. C. Hollman, “Catechin contents of foods commonly consumed in The Netherlands. 1. Fruits, vegetables, staple foods, and processed foods,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 1746–1751, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. A. R. Proteggente, A. S. Pannala, G. Paganga et al., “The antioxidant activity of regularly consumed fruit and vegetables reflects their phenolic and vitamin C composition,” Free Radical Research, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 217–233, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. Y. L. Liu, L. H. Tang, Z. Q. Liang, B. You, and S. Yang, “Growth inhibitory and apoptosis inducing by effects of total flavonoids from Lysimachia clethroides Duby in human chronic myeloid leukemia K562 cells,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 131, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. W. Naowaratwattana, W. De-Eknamkul, and E. G. De Mejia, “Phenolic-containing organic extracts of mulberry (Morus alba L.) leaves inhibit HepG2 hepatoma cells through G2/M phase arrest and inhibition of topoisomerase IIα activity,” Journal of Medicinal Food, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 1045–1056, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. K. Doi, T. Kojima, and Y. Fujimoto, “Mulberry leaf extract inhibits the oxidative modification of rabbit and human low density lipoprotein,” Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 1066–1071, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  20. W. Wang, Y. Zu, Y. Fu, and T. Efferth, “In Vitro antioxidant and antimicrobial activity of extracts from Morus alba L. leaves, stems and fruits,” American Journal of Chinese Medicine, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 349–356, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. B. Enkhmaa, K. Shiwaku, T. Katsube et al., “Mulberry (Morus alba L.) leaves and their major flavonol quercetin 3-(6-malonylglucoside) attenuate atherosclerotic lesion development in LDL receptor-deficient mice,” Journal of Nutrition, vol. 135, no. 4, pp. 729–734, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  22. J. Naowaboot, P. Pannangpetch, V. Kukongviriyapan, B. Kongyingyoes, and U. Kukongviriyapan, “Antihyperglycemic, antioxidant and antiglycation activities of mulberry leaf extract in streptozotocin-induced chronic diabetic rats,” Plant Foods for Human Nutrition, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 116–121, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. M. M. Padilha, F. C. Vilela, C. Q. Rocha et al., “Antiinflammatory properties of Morus nigra leaves,” Phytotherapy Research, vol. 24, no. 10, pp. 1496–1500, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. P. Aramwit, O. Supasyndh, T. Siritienthong, and N. Bang, “Mulberry leaf reduces oxidation and c-reactive protein level in patients with mild dyslipidemia,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2013, Article ID 787981, 7 pages, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. U. Justesen, P. Knuthsen, and T. Leth, “Quantitative analysis of flavonols, flavones, and flavanones in fruits, vegetables and beverages by high-performance liquid chromatography with photo-diode array and mass spectrometric detection,” Journal of Chromatography A, vol. 799, no. 1-2, pp. 101–110, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. M. S. Taga, E. E. Miller, and D. E. Pratt, “Chia seeds as a source of natural lipid antioxidants,” Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 928–931, 1984. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. A. A. L. Ordoñez, J. D. Gomez, M. A. Vattuone, and M. I. Isla, “Antioxidant activities of Sechium edule (Jacq.) Swartz extracts,” Food Chemistry, vol. 97, no. 3, pp. 452–458, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. A. Kumaran and R. Joel Karunakaran, “In Vitro antioxidant activities of methanol extracts of five Phyllanthus species from India,” LWT-Food Science and Technology, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 344–352, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. G. Cao, H. M. Alessio, and R. G. Cutler, “Oxygen-radical absorbance capacity assay for antioxidants,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 303–311, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. K. Shimada, K. Fujikawa, K. Yahara, and T. Nakamura, “Antioxidative properties of xanthan on the autoxidation of soybean oil in cyclodextrin emulsion,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 945–948, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  31. J. Cole, M. H. L. Green, S. E. James, L. Henderson, and H. Cole, “A further assessment of factors influencing measurements of thioguanine-resistant mutant frequency in circulating T-lymphocytes,” Mutation Research, vol. 204, no. 3, pp. 493–507, 1988. View at: Google Scholar
  32. C.-Y. Hsu, C.-M. Yang, C.-M. Chen, P. Chao, and S. Hu, “Effects of chlorophyll-related compounds on hydrogen peroxide induced DNA damage within human lymphocytes,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 53, no. 7, pp. 2746–2750, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. S.-C. Tang, H.-F. Lo, K.-H. Lin et al., “The antioxidant capacity of extracts from Taiwan indigenous purple-leaved vegetables,” Journal of the Taiwan Society for Horticultural Science, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 43–57, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  34. K.-H. Lin, Y.-Y. Yang, H.-F. Lo et al., “Antioxidant activity of herbaceous plant extracts protect against hydrogen peroxide-induced DNA damage in human lymphocytes,” BioMed Central Research Notes. In press. View at: Google Scholar
  35. A. H. Cory, T. C. Owen, J. A. Barltrop, and J. G. Cory, “Use of an aqueous soluble tetrazolium/formazan assay for cell growth assays in culture,” Cancer Communications, vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 207–212, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  36. Y. T. Szeto, A. R. Collins, and I. F. F. Benzie, “Effects of dietary antioxidants on DNA damage in lysed cells using a modified comet assay procedure,” Mutation Research, vol. 500, no. 1-2, pp. 31–38, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  37. S. Vielma, G. Virella, A. J. Gorod, and M. F. Lopes-Virella, “Chlamydophila pneumoniae infection of human aortic endothelial cells induces the expression of FC γ receptor II (FcγRII),” Clinical Immunology, vol. 104, no. 3, pp. 265–273, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. C. Y. Zhu and S. Loft, “Effects of Brussels sprouts extracts on hydrogen peroxide-induced DNA strand breaks in human lymphocytes,” Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 39, no. 12, pp. 1191–1197, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. Y. D. Min, C.-H. Choi, H. Bark et al., “Quercetin inhibits expression of inflammatory cytokines through attenuation of NF-κB and p38 MAPK in HMC-1 human mast cell line,” Inflammation Research, vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 210–215, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. P. Y. Chao, Y. P. Huang, and W. B. Hsieh, “Inhibitive effect of purple sweet potato leaf extract and its components on cell adhesion and inflammatory response in human aortic endothelial cells,” Cell Adhesion & Migration, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 1–9, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  41. Y. Y. Yang, The antioxidative capacity in herb plant extracts and their protection role in DNA oxidative damage of lymphocyte [M.S. thesis], Chinese Culture University, Taipei, Taiwan, 2004.
  42. C. A. Rice-Evans, N. J. Miller, and G. Paganga, “Structure-antioxidant activity relationships of flavonoids and phenolic acids,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 933–956, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. M. Strube, G. R. Haenen, H. van den Berg, and A. Bast, “Pitfalls in a method for assessment of total antioxidant capacity,” Free Radical Research, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 515–521, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  44. P. G. Pietta, “Flavonoids as antioxidants,” Journal of Natural Products, vol. 63, no. 7, pp. 1035–1042, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. A. M. González-Paramás, S. Esteban-Ruano, C. Santos-Buelga, S. De Pascual-Teresa, and J. C. Rivas-Gonzalo, “Flavanol content and antioxidant activity in winery byproducts,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 234–238, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. S. Y. Kim, J. J. Gao, and H. K. Kang, “Two flavonoids from the leaves of Morus alba induce differentiation of the human promyelocytic leukemia (HL-60) cell line,” Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 451–455, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  47. M. A. Khan, A. A. Rahman, S. Islam et al., “A comparative study on the antioxidant activity of methanolic extracts from different parts of Morus alba L., (Moraceae),” BMC Research, vol. 6, pp. 24–32, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. A.-L. Chung, H.-F. Lo, K.-H. Lin et al., “Study on the antioxidant activity in herb plant extracts,” Journal of the Taiwan Society For Horticultural Science, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 139–152, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  49. R. L. Prior, X. Wu, and K. Schaich, “Standardized methods for the determination of antioxidant capacity and phenolics in foods and dietary supplements,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 53, no. 10, pp. 4290–4302, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. S. J. Duthie, A. R. Collins, G. G. Duthie, and V. L. Dobson, “Quercetin and myricetin protect against hydrogen peroxide-induced DNA damage (strand breaks and oxidised pyrimidines) in human lymphocytes,” Mutation Research, vol. 393, no. 3, pp. 223–231, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. G. A. Liu and R. L. Zheng, “Protection against damaged DNA in the single cell by polyphenols,” Pharmazie, vol. 57, no. 12, pp. 852–854, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  52. M. Noroozi, W. J. Angerson, and M. E. J. Lean, “Effects of flavonoids and vitamin C on oxidative DNA damage to human lymphocytes,” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 67, no. 6, pp. 1210–1218, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  53. T. Koga and M. Meydani, “Effect of plasma metabolites of (+)-catechin and quercetin on monocyte adhesion to human aortic endothelial cells,” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 73, no. 5, pp. 941–948, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  54. C. Meng, P. Somers, L. Hoong et al., “Discovery of novel phenolic antioxidants as inhibitors of vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 expression for use in chronic inflammatory diseases,” Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 47, no. 25, pp. 6420–6432, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. Y. Shibata, N. Kume, H. Arai et al., “Mulberry leaf aqueous fractions inhibit TNF-α-induced nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) activation and lectin-like oxidized LDL receptor-1 (LOX-1) expression in vascular endothelial cells,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 193, no. 1, pp. 20–27, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. K. C. Chan, H. H. Ho, C. N. Huang, M. Lin, H. Chen, and C. Wang, “Mulberry leaf extract inhibits vascular smooth muscle cell migration involving a block of small GTPase and Akt/NF-kB signals,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 57, no. 19, pp. 9147–9153, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. F. Chen, N. Nakashima, I. Kimura, M. Kimura, N. Asano, and S. Koya, “Potentiating effects on pilocarpine-induced saliva secretion, by extracts and N-containing sugars derived from mulberry leaves, in streptozocin- diabetic mice,” Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 1676–1680, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  58. K. Konno, H. Ono, M. Nakamura et al., “Mulberry latex rich in antidiabetic sugar-mimic alkaloids forces dieting on caterpillars,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 103, no. 5, pp. 1337–1341, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. H. J. Kim, K. H. Yoon, M. J. Kang et al., “A six-month supplementation of mulberry, Korean red ginseng, and banaba decreases biomarkers of systemic low-grade inflammation in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance and type 2 diabetes,” Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2012, Article ID 735191, 8 pages, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. G. Nicholson and G. M. Hall, “Diabetes mellitus: new drugs for a new epidemic,” British Journal of Anaesthesia, vol. 107, no. 1, pp. 65–73, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. P. Y. Chao, Y. L. Chen, Y. C. Lin et al., “Effects of black soybean on atherogenic prevention in hypercholesterolemic rabbits and on adhesion molecular expression in cultured HAECs,” Food and Nutrition Sciences, vol. 4, pp. 9–21, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  62. C. Chen, S. Li, C.-Y. O. Chen et al., “Constituents in purple sweet potato leaves inhibit in vitro angiogenesis with opposite effects ex vivo,” Nutrition, vol. 27, no. 11-12, pp. 1177–1182, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2013 P.-Y. Chao et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.