Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine / 2020 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2020 |Article ID 8048273 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8048273

Behzad Shahbazi, Saba Feyzmand, Fataneh Jafari, Nastaran Ghiasvand, Gholamreza Bahrami, Ali Fattahi, Solomon Habtemariam, Seyed-Mohammad Nabavi, Yalda Shokoohinia, "Antidiabetic Potential of Prosopis farcta Roots: In Vitro Pancreatic Beta Cell Protection, Enhancement of Glucose Consumption, and Bioassay-Guided Fractionation", Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2020, Article ID 8048273, 9 pages, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8048273

Antidiabetic Potential of Prosopis farcta Roots: In Vitro Pancreatic Beta Cell Protection, Enhancement of Glucose Consumption, and Bioassay-Guided Fractionation

Academic Editor: Raffaele Capasso
Received02 Jul 2019
Accepted24 Dec 2019
Published20 Jan 2020


By using the streptozotocin- (STZ-) induced cytotoxicity in β-TC3 cells as an assay model, a bioassay-guided fractionation study was employed to isolate and characterize the potential antidiabetic principles of roots of Prosopis farcta. A combination of open column chromatography on reverse-phase silica gel using a water-ethanol gradient (10 : 90 to 100 : 0) followed by HPLC-based fractionation led to an active compound that appears to be composed of carbohydrate/sugar. When cell viability under STZ was reduced to 49.8 ± 4% (mean ± SD), treatment with the active compound at the concentration of 0.5 mg/mL either as a coadministration or a pretreatment improved the viability to 93 ± 1.9% and 91.5 ± 7%, respectively. The reduction in the mitochondrial membrane potential by STZ (47.34 ± 8.9% of control) was similarly recovered to 84.5 ± 4.3 (coadministration) and 88 ± 5.5% (pretreatment) by the active fraction. The bioassay-guided fractionation, β-cell protective effect, and increased glucose consumption (up to 1.49-fold increase) in hepatocytes by the extracts and active fraction are also discussed.

1. Introduction

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a metabolic disorder characterized by insulin resistance which may also be combined with insufficient amount of insulin release from pancreatic β-cells [1]. In addition to genetic factors [2], obesity and lack of physical activity are well-established risk factors for T2D [3]. The mortality and morbidity of patients with T2D are associated with the micro- (retinopathy, nephropathy, and neuropathy) and macrovascular (ischemic heart disease, peripheral vascular disease, and cerebrovascular diseases) complications associated with hyperglycemia [4, 5]. While antidiabetic drugs in current use (e.g., sulphonylureas such as glibenclamide) offer some benefits, they also induce undesirable side effects such as hypoglycemia, weight gain, skin reactions, acute porphyria, and rarely hyponatremia [5]. The use of plants for the treatment of diabetes goes back to more than 3,500 years, with many of them considered to be associated with relatively little side effects compared with synthetic drugs [6]. Hence, the search for novel natural product-based therapeutic agents for complex metabolic disorders is currently advocated [7, 8].

Prosopis farcta (family Fabaceae) is a well-known medicinal plant that grows in Jordan, Kuwait, Turkey, Iraq, Northern Africa, South Western Asia, and Iran (Khuzestan, Gilan, Fars, Hormozgan, Baluchestan, Khorasan, and Tehran provinces). The plant commonly known by its local name as the “Syrian mesquite” generally grows in warm and dryer climate [9].

In traditional medicine, P. farcta is known to be used for treating various disease conditions including neurological disorders [10], hyperlipidemia [11], diabetes, inflammatory diseases [12], wounds and skin disorder, prostate disorders [13], measles, urinary [14], cardiac or chest pain, angina pectoris [15], infectious disease, diarrhea, colds [13], and hepatic diseases [4]. An indication on the antidiabetic potential of the roots has also been outlined in our previous preliminary studies [16]. In the current study, we employed in vitro studies to fractionate the crude extract and attempted to isolate the active principle. The effect of the carbohydrate/sugar components as active principle to ameliorate the streptozotocin- (STZ-) induced cytotoxicity in pancreatic β-cells (β-TC3) and increased glucose consumption in hepatocytes are discussed.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. General Instruments and Chemicals

1H NMR spectra were measured on a Bruker DRX-500 AVANCE instrument. Chemical shifts were referenced to the residual solvent signal (CD3OD : D2O; δH 3.3, 4.8). Separations were monitored, and fractions were pooled by TLC on Merck 60 F254 (0.25 mm) plates (butanol : acetic acid : H2O; 4 : 1 : 5) and were visualized by UV inspection and/or staining with Ce(SO4)2/molybdate and heating. HPLC purifications were achieved on a Young Lin apparatus equipped with a binary pump (YL 9111S) and photodiode array detector (YL 9160). Vertica (reverse phase, RP18 250 × 30 mm) columns were used, with 10 mL/min as flow rate. The cell viability and mitochondrial membrane potential were measured by a plat reader (Hybrid SynergyH1, Biotec, USA).

Cell culture plates were products of NEST (China). Glucose assay kit (reagents including glucose oxidase/peroxidase (G-3660), O-dianisidine reagent (D-2679), glucose standard solution (G-3285)), 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium (MTT), dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), rhodamine 123, Triton X-100, and streptozotocin (STZ) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, USA. Dulbecco modified Eagle medium (DMEM), fetal bovine serum (FBS), bovine serum albumin (BSA), penicillin-streptomycin, and trypsin were purchased from Atocell, Hungary. All the solvents used for extraction and/or fractionation were obtained from Merck Chemical Company (Darmstadt, Germany).

2.2. Plant Material

The roots of P. farcta were collected from western Ilam surroundings, Iran, at ca. 1400 m above sea level. The plant material was identified by Dr. Shahram Miraghayi at the Medical Biology Research Center of KUMS (Kermanshah, Iran), and the voucher specimen (No. 1002 RUH) was deposited at the Herbarium of Agricultural Faculty of Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran.

2.3. Extraction of the Plant Material

The air-dried plant material was subjected to hot water extraction. Briefly, 3.2 L of boiling water was added to 400 g of the root powder in a flask and left for 30 min on a water bath at 90°C. The extract was then filtered and concentrated under reduced pressure using a rotary evaporator to yield 36.92 g of the crude extract. The crude extract was then kept at −20°C until used.

2.4. Fractionation of the Crude Extract Using Open Column Chromatography

The crude extract (36.92 g) was fractionated with vacuum liquid chromatography over RP18 and eluted with a H2O : EtOH gradient (90 : 10 to 0 : 100). Seven fractions were collected (F1–F7). A portion (3.35 g) of fraction 2 (F2) that showed antidiabetic activity in the in vitro STZ-induced β-TC3 cell assay was further fractionated on RP18 using H2O : MeOH (95 : 5 to 50 : 50) to yield 4 subfractions, F2A–F2D.

2.5. High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Purification of Active Subfractions

The subfraction F2C was purified using Vertica (reversed phase, RP18 250 × 30 mm) column using a gradient of H2O : MeOH from 90 : 10 to 85 : 25 to afford four fractions, F2C-A to F2C-D. The fractions were combined on the basis of UV absorption at 210 nm. The most active fraction on the β-TC3 cell assay system was F2C-D and was analyzed by 1H NMR spectroscopy. The overall fractionation procedure is depicted in Scheme 1.

2.6. Cell Culture Conditions

The mouse pancreatic β-cell (β-TC3) and human liver hepatocellular carcinoma (HepG2 Cells) cell lines were purchased from the Iran genetic resources center (Tehran, Iran). Cell cultures were maintained in DMEM medium supplemented with 10% v/v FBS and penicillin/streptomycin (100 U/mL, 100 mg/mL) and kept at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere and 5% CO2. The growth medium was changed every 2-3 days and subcultured using trypsin.

2.7. Cell Viability Assay

The cytotoxic effect of the crude extract and fractions on β-TC3 cell line was determined by the MTT colorimetric assay. Cells were plated onto a 96-well plate at a density of 5.0 × 104 cells/mL and in a volume of 180 μL. After the culture was left to establish for 24 h, test samples prepared in water were added in 20 μL volume of various concentrations. The end-point cell viability measurement was based using the MTT assay whereby 20 μL of the stock (5 mg/mL) was added during the last 3 h of the 24 h drug treatment. The medium was then removed by aspiration; the reduced MTT dye in each well was solubilized with 150 μL DMSO, and the absorbance was determined using an ELISA plate reader (synergy H1, Biotek, USA) with a test wavelength of 540 nm and a reference wavelength of 630 [14]. The percentage of viable cells was calculated as follows:

2.8. Inhibition of STZ-Induced β-TC3 Cell Death

The β-cell protective effect of the plant samples was assessed using 48 μg/μL of STZ that represent its IC50 concentration for lethality in this cell line. The noncytotoxic concentrations of test samples were added either 6 h before or together (coadministration) and cell viability measured using the MTT assay as described above [16].

2.9. Glucose Consumption Assay

HepG2 cells maintained in DMEM (5.5 mmol/L glucose plus 10% FBS) were plated onto a 96-well plate and left to establish as confluence over 48 h of incubation. The medium was then replaced by 0.2% BSA and high glucose (11.1 mM) for further 12 h of incubation. After 24 h of incubation with test samples in replicates, culture medium was collected and glucose concentration was measured using an ELISA plate reader (synergy H1, Biotek, USA) with a test wavelength of 540 nm following the instruction of the glucose oxidase kit (Sigma). Glucose consumption was evaluated by measuring the change in absorbance as follows [17]:

2.10. Measurement of Mitochondrial Membrane Potential

β-TC3 cells were seeded in 24-well plates at a density of 105 cells/mL and left to establish for 24 h. After treatment with test samples for 24 h, rhodamine 123 was added for 30 min at 37°C. Cells were then washed three times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and lysed on ice using lysis buffer (1% Triton X-100 in PBS, for 1 h). The fluorescence was measured at an excitation wavelength of 488 nm and emission wavelength of 520 nm using the microplate reader. The mean fluorescence intensity was normalized to the amount of protein present in the sample using Bradford assay [18].

2.11. Statistical Analyses

All tests were performed at least in triplicate, and the results were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) with post hoc Tukey was used to recognize significant differences between the means of the experimental groups using GraphPad Software version 5.0 (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Statistical significance was set at .

3. Results

3.1. Determination of Nontoxic Concentration of Fractions on β-TC3 Cell Line

The crude extract of the roots of P. farcta was fractioned as described in the experimental section, and the overall approach is depicted in Scheme 1. As shown in Table 1, the fractions (F1-F2) obtained from the crude extract did not display significant cytotoxicity to β-TC3 cells at all concentrations tested (0.01–0.5 mg/mL). The subfractions F2A-F2D and final HPLC fractions (F2C-a - 2C-d) (Table 1) did not also display cytotoxicity at the same concentration range. Hence, the chosen concentration range of 0.01–0.5 mg/ml with no sign of toxicity was safe to be used in antidiabetic assay in the β-TC3 assay system.

FractionsConcentrations (mg/mL)

F196.0 ± 898.0 ± 7.0100.0 ± 7.0108.0 ± 9.0
F2103.0 ± 8.7105.0 ± 10107.0 ± 6.0110.0 ± 8.0
F392 ± 993.0 ± 9.797.0 ± 8.0107.0 ± 4.0
F4104.0 ± 4.75107.3 ± 4.6108.1 ± 5.2109.0 ± 6.1
F594.7 ± 8.1896.2 ± 5.698.32 ± 5.38103.2 ± 6.1
F695.2 ± 3.8104.2 ± 4.14108 ± 4.1110.0 ± 6
F7105.53 ± 8108.6 ± 6.35110.3 ± 6.98114.8 ± 7.2
F2A89.9 ± 7.3496.9 ± 15105 ± 4.14114.2 ± 7.8
F2B87.9 ± 8.390.0 ± 10.796.94 ± 7.8298.07 ± 6.6
F2C91.0 ± 8.7103.0 ± 8.0111.7 ± 6.0115 ± 8.0
F2D96.3 ± 3.298.07 ± 4.595 ± 7.4112.56 ± 8.5
F2C-a88.8 ± 3.788.23 ± 6.986.8 ± 6.584.8 ± 4.6
F2C-b84.31 ± 7.185.27 ± 5.284.5 ± 5.587.7 ± 2.7
F2C-c92.1 ± 7.596.4 ± 7.088.7 ± 12.094.7 ± 9.3
F2C-d93.9 ± 6.597.0 ± 8.2899.0 ± 10.23108.5 ± 14.0

Cell viability was determined by the MTT assay after 24 h of treatment with the various fractions. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD of three separate experiments and were not significantly different from the untreated control group at the level of .
3.2. Effect of Different Fractions on STZ-Induced Cytotoxicity in β-TC3 Cells

When fractions F1–F7 were screened at the highest nontoxic concentration used (0.5 mg/mL coadministered with STZ) [16], only F2 showed significant protective effect to β-TC3 cells against STZ (Figure 1). Fraction F2 was therefore selected for further bioassay-guided fraction procedure using reverse-phase silica gel open column chromatography to yield four subfractions (F2A-F2D). Of these, only F2C showed significant cytoprotective effect against STZ (Figure 2). The protective efficiency of F2C was also higher than F2 (approximately 10% higher), suggesting increased bioactivity as the purification proceeds. On this basis, F2C was further fractionated to four subfractions leading to the identification of F2C-d as the active principle (Figure 3). The viability of β-TC3 cells treated with F2C-d reached close to 100%, i.e., the cytotoxicity of STZ in pancreatic β-cells could be completely abolished by F2C-d (Figure 3).

In the pretreatment protocol where test samples were added 6 h before STZ, the comparative cytoprotective effect of active fractions was also assessed. As shown in Figure 4, cytoprotection were demonstrated for F2, F2C, and F2C-d with the latter being the most potent. No significant difference between pretreatment and coadministration was also observed suggesting the quick onset of action of the active principle(s).

3.3. Effects of F2, F2C, and F2C-d Fractions on Mitochondrial Membrane Potential (MMP)

Mitochondria membrane potential (MMP) is commonly measured using the lipophilic cation, rhodamine 123, which readily passes the mitochondrial membrane and accumulated in the mitochondria. MMP is tightly linked to the mitochondrial function and a decrease in the MMP could result from apoptosis induced by STZ. As assessed by rhodamine 123 fluorescence, STZ decreased the MMP by up to 50% of the control group in β-TC3 cell line (Figure 5). Pretreatment or co-treatment of cells with the active fractions (F2, F2C, and F2C-d), however, significantly increases the intracellular fluorescence () of β-TC3 cells. As with the cytoprotective effect, there was no significant difference between pretreatment and coadministration (Figure 5). The MMP result demonstrated that there was no significant difference between F2 and F2C fractions, while F2C-d was the most active.

3.4. Effect of F2, F2C, and F2C-d Fractions on Glucose Consumption in HepG2 Cells

Under high-glucose or hyperglycemic (11.1 mM glucose) condition, the 0.5 mg/mL of the active extracts/fractions consumption in hepatic HepG2 cells was assessed. As shown in Figure 6, treatment with the active fractions for 24 h showed the glucose-lowering effect of F2, F2C, and F2C-d. Once more, the higher activity of fraction F2C-d was evident while there was no significant difference between F2 and F2C. Since glucose consumption was normalized by viable cells (Figure 6), the observed increase in glucose consumption was not due to an increment of cell number.

3.5. Preliminary NMR Analysis of F2C-d

Preliminary 1H NMR analysis of the most active fraction (F2C-d) showed the classical sugar region resonances (3 to 5 ppm) suggesting possible complex polysaccharide or the oligosaccharide nature of the active compound (Figure 7). The small amount of the sample obtained in our experiment did not permit more studies on detailed structural elucidation of the active principle.

4. Discussion

The various parts of P. farcta have been shown to display a range of pharmacological activities. For example, the fruits have been shown to display antidiabetic effect in STZ-induced diabetic rats [17]. The fruits are also shown to increase the high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol while decreasing low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol in ostriches suggesting its potential lipid-lowering effect although improvement of lipid dysregulation under diabetic conditions was not demonstrated for the fruits extract in animal models [15]. On the other hand, antioxidant effect in the diabetes model was illustrated [13]: an effect that was linked to the presence of antioxidant polyphenolic compounds such as quercetin in the plant [16]. The antioxidant activity as a mechanism of biological action for the plant was also suggested [19].

In the present study, we used an efficient in vitro model using two of the most diabetes-relevant targets: hepatocytes and pancreatic β-cells. To date, the most widely used diabetes model is based on induction of pancreatic β-cells loss by injecting the antibacterial, antitumor, and carcinogenic antibiotic, STZ [20]. Accumulated in β-cells via uptake through the glucose transporter 2 (GLUT2), STZ, can induce diabetes through direct cytotoxic effect against β-cells [21]. As a mechanism of this cytotoxic effect, methylation of DNA through the activation of the poly-ADP-ribose synthetase and consequently, NAD+ depletion, nitric oxide production, free radical generation, and modulation of the NF-κB-based cell signal transduction pathway have been suggested [22]. The induction of cell death in pancreatic β-cell by STZ also involve the generation of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) [23]. Hence, the direct protective effect of natural products in β-cells is regarded as a valid antidiabetic mechanism of action.

Natural products can induce antidiabetic effect through diverse mechanisms including suppression of glucose availability from the intestine or glucose production in the liver, enhancing the glucose uptake by tissues, increasing insulin secretion from β-cells, and increasing pancreatic tissue regeneration [24]. In the present study, we first demonstrated that concentrations up to 0.5 mg/mL of the tested water extracts and/or fractions obtained from the roots of P. farcta do not induce cytotoxic effect in β-TC3 cell in vitro. When these nontoxic concentrations were coadministered or added 6 h before STZ, cytoprotective effects were demonstrated. We then followed a bioassay-guided fractionation procedure and successfully isolated the active principle(s) that appear to be polysaccharide/sugar nature on the basis of preliminary NMR analysis. The overall bioassay-guided fractionation procedure is depicted in Scheme 1. Hence, our study appears to lay down the foundation for the isolation of the polysaccharide-based active principle in the future studies.

The mitochondria being the center of ROS production and apoptosis signaling, we measured the potential effect of the active fractions on MMP. Our data have shown that the active fractions could modulate the MMP. As evidenced from the rhodamine 123 fluorescence study, amelioration of the STZ-effect on mitochondrial changes suggests the antidiabetic potential of the roots of P. farcta.

The other most important diabetes target is the liver which is central to glucose metabolism and insulin resistance. Various antidiabetic agents of clinical relevance including metformin increase the glycogen synthesis and/or suppress glucose production in the liver [25]. Hence, our bioassay also included glucose uptake and/or utilization in hepatocytes (HepG2 cells) in vitro. Interestingly, the fractions and the active principle identified in pancreatic β-cell protection assay also displayed activity, i.e., it increased glucose consumption in these cells. This could be a result of either increased glucose uptake or utilization, but the detailed mechanism of action remains to be elucidated.

Numerous studies on plant-based antidiabetic agents have shown the identification of polysaccharides as active principle. This include inhibition of β-cell apoptosis and enhancement of β-cell viability/numbers by polysaccharides extracted from mulberry leaf [26], Ganoderma atrum [27], Ganoderma lucidum fruiting bodies [28], and pumpkin fruits [29]. Other examples include the antidiabetic effects demonstrated for the polysaccharides from Salvia miltiorrhiza [30], fruit body of Grifola frondosa [31, 32], Catathelasma ventricosum [32], and roots of Ophiopogon japonica [33]. In line with our observation in the present study, the antidiabetic potential of polysaccharides by inhibiting glucose uptake has been shown previously [34]. Further studies are however required to establish the exact antidiabetic mechanism of the roots of P. farcta or the active sugar component. Further studies are also necessary to isolate and elucidate the structures of the saccharide(s) presented in F2C-d.

5. Conclusion

The study demonstrated that the water extract of P. farcta could protect β-TC3 cells from STZ-induced cytotoxicity in vitro. Bioassay-guided fractionation of the water extract resulted in the isolation of a carbohydrate/sugar fractions as active principle. The active principle was also a better protective agent against the STZ-induced MMP change and cytotoxicity in these cells. Furthermore, augmentation of glucose consumption in HEPG2 hepatocyte cells was more prevalent for the isolated compound/fraction than crude fractions. Further study is thus well merited to undertake large-scale isolation of the active components for further mechanistic and potential antidiabetic assessments.

Data Availability

The data generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they do not have any conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this study.

Authors’ Contributions

Shahbazi B and Feyzmand S contributed toward the laboratory experiments, data analyses, and writing of manuscript. Fattahi A contributed toward cellular assays and data analyses. Shokoohinia Y, Ghiasvand N, and Bahrami G contributed toward fractionation and NMR analysis. Jafari F, Nabavi SM, and Habtemariam S critically appraised the data and revise the manuscript. All authors have approved the final version of the manuscript.


The authors gratefully acknowledge the Research Council of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences for its financial support. This work was performed in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Pharm.D of Saba Feyzmand, faculty of pharmacy, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.


  1. K. L. Graham, R. M. Sutherland, S. I. Mannering et al., “Pathogenic mechanisms in type 1 diabetes: the islet is both target and driver of disease,” The Review of Diabetic Studies, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 148–168, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. M. Murea, L. Ma, and B. I. Freedman, “Genetic and environmental factors associated with type 2 diabetes and diabetic vascular complications,” The Review of Diabetic Studies: RDS, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 6–22, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. A. D. Association, “Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus,” Diabetes Care, vol. 33, no. Suppl. 1, pp. S62–S9, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  4. K. B. Alharbi, H. M. Mousa, Z. H. Ibrahim, and El-Ashmawy, “Hepatoprotective effect of methanolic extracts of Prosopis farcta and Lycium shawii against carbon tetrachloride-induced hepatotoxicity in rats,” Journal of Biological Sciences, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 35–41, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. R. Chawla, A. Chawla, and S. Jaggi, “Microvasular and macrovascular complications in diabetes mellitus: distinct or continuum?” Indian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 20, no. 4, p. 546, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. R. W. Snyder and J. S. Berns, “Use of insulin and oral hypoglycemic medications in patients with diabetes mellitus and advanced kidney disease,” Seminars in Dialysis, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 365–370, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. G. M. Cragg and D. J. Newman, “Natural products: a continuing source of novel drug leads,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)—General Subjects, vol. 1830, no. 6, pp. 3670–3695, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. S. Habtemariam, “Going back to the good old days: the merit of crude plant drug mixtures in the 21st century,” International Journal of Complementary & Alternative Medicine, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 1–10, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. M. S. Amal, A. G. Mosad, S. A.-A. Mohamed et al., “Chemical constituents and biological activities of different solvent extracts of Prosopis farcta growing in Egypt,” Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytotherapy, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 67–76, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. M. Mollashahi, M. Tehranipour, J. Khayyatzade, and B. ZahraJavad Moosavi, “The neuroprotective effects of Prosopis farcta pod aqueous and ethanol extracts on spinal cord α-motoneurons neuronal density after sciatic nerve injury in rats,” Life Science Journal, vol. 10, pp. 293–297, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  11. M. R. Saidi, M. H. Farzaei, S. Miraghaee et al., “Antihyperlipidemic effect of Syrian mesquite (Prosopis farcta) root in high cholesterol diet–fed rabbits,” Journal of Evidence-Based Complementary & Alternative Medicine, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. NP62–NP66, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. F. Direkvand-Moghadam, V. Ghasemi-Seyed, A. R. Abdali-Mashhadi, A. L. Otfi, A. Direkvand-Moghadam, and A. Delpisheh, “Extraction and measurement of the quercetin flavonoid of Prosopis farcta in Khouzestan climatic condition,” Advanced Herbal Medicine, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 29–35, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  13. A. Al-Aboudi and F. U. Afifi, “Plants used for the treatment of diabetes in Jordan: a review of scientific evidence,” Pharmaceutical Biology, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 221–239, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. M. S. Ali-Shtayeh, R. M. Jamous, J. H. Al-Shafie et al., “Traditional knowledge of wild edible plants used in Palestine (northern west bank): a comparative study,” Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 13, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. A. Omidi, H. Ansari nik, and M. Ghazaghi, “Prosopis farcta beans increase HDL cholesterol and decrease LDL cholesterol in ostriches (Struthio camelus),” Tropical Animal Health and Production, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 431–434, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. S. Feyzmand, B. Shahbazi, M. Marami, G. Bahrami, A. Fattahi, and Y. Shokoohinia, “Mechanistic in vitro evaluation of Prosopis farcta roots potential as an antidiabetic folk medicinal plant,” Pharmacognosy Magazine, vol. 13, no. Suppl 4, p. S852, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
  17. A. Fattahi, F. Niyazi, B. Shahbazi, M. H. Farzaei, and G. Bahrami, “Antidiabetic mechanisms of Rosa canina fruits: an in vitro evaluation,” Journal of Evidence-Based Complementary & Alternative Medicine, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 127–133, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. S. Abdolmaleki, M. Ghadermazi, A. Fattahi et al., “Synthesis, crystallographic and spectroscopic studies, evaluation as antimicrobial and cytotoxic agents of a novel mixed-ligand nickel (II) complex,” Journal of Coordination Chemistry, vol. 70, no. 8, pp. 1406–1423, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. M. C. Sabu and R. Kuttan, “Anti-diabetic activity of medicinal plants and its relationship with their antioxidant property,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 155–160, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. A. Vikram, D. N. Tripathi, P. Ramarao, and G. B. Jena, “Intervention of D-glucose ameliorates the toxicity of streptozotocin in accessory sex organs of rat,” Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, vol. 226, no. 1, pp. 84–93, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. T. Szkudelski, “The mechanism of alloxan and streptozotocin action in B cells of the rat pancreas,” Physiological Research, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 537–546, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  22. C. Eleazu, K. Eleazu, S. Chukwuma, and U. Essien, “Review of the mechanism of cell death resulting from streptozotocin challenge in experimental animals, its practical use and potential risk to humans,” Journal of Diabetes & Metabolic Disorders, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 60, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. T. Matsunami, Y. Sato, Y. Hasegawa et al., “Enhancement of reactive oxygen species and induction of apoptosis in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats under hyperbaric oxygen exposure,” International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, vol. 4, no. 3, p. 255, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  24. M. S. Bhushan, C. Rao, S. Ojha, M. Vijayakumar, and A. Verma, “An analytical review of plants for anti diabetic activity with their phytoconstituent & mechanism of action,” International Journal of Pharmaceutical Science Research, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 29–46, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  25. M. C. Petersen, D. F. Vatner, and G. I. Shulman, “Regulation of hepatic glucose metabolism in health and disease,” Nature Reviews Endocrinology, vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 572–587, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. Y. Zhang, C. Ren, G. Lu et al., “Anti-diabetic effect of mulberry leaf polysaccharide by inhibiting pancreatic islet cell apoptosis and ameliorating insulin secretory capacity in diabetic rats,” International Immunopharmacology, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 248–257, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. K. Zhu, S. Nie, D. Gong, and M. Xie, “Effect of polysaccharide from Ganoderma atrum on the serum metabolites of type 2 diabetic rats,” Food Hydrocolloids, vol. 53, pp. 31–36, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. J. Zheng, B. Yang, Y. Yu, Q. Chen, T. Huang, and D. Li, “Ganoderma lucidum polysaccharides exert anti-hyperglycemic effect on streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats through affecting β-cells,” Combinatorial Chemistry & High Throughput Screening, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 542–550, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. H.-Y. Zhu, G.-T. Chen, G.-L. Meng, and J.-L. Xu, “Characterization of pumpkin polysaccharides and protective effects on streptozotocin-damaged islet cells,” Chinese Journal of Natural Medicines, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 199–207, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. G. Stark, “Functional consequences of oxidative membrane damage,” Journal of Membrane Biology, vol. 205, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. L. Hong, W. Qin, G. Shuzhen et al., “The protective effect of MT-α-glucan against streptozotocin (STZ)-induced NIT-1 pancreatic β-cell damage,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 92, no. 2, pp. 1211–1217, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. Y. Liu, J. Sun, S. Rao, Y. Su, and Y. Yang, “Antihyperglycemic, antihyperlipidemic and antioxidant activities of polysaccharides from Catathelasma ventricosum in streptozotocin-induced diabetic mice,” Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 57, pp. 39–45, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. X. Chen, J. Jin, J. Tang et al., “Extraction, purification, characterization and hypoglycemic activity of a polysaccharide isolated from the root of Ophiopogon japonicus,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 749–754, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. H.-L. Tang, C. Chen, S.-K. Wang, and G.-J. Sun, “Biochemical analysis and hypoglycemic activity of a polysaccharide isolated from the fruit of Lycium barbarum L,” International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, vol. 77, pp. 235–242, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2020 Behzad Shahbazi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles