Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Gastroenterology Research and Practice
Volume 2019, Article ID 3012509, 14 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3012509
Review Article

Cardiovascular Manifestations of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Preventive Strategies

1Department of Cardiology, Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Timisoara 300310, Romania
2Department of Radiology, County Emergency Hospital Timisoara, Timisoara 300723, Romania
3Department of Pathophysiology, Faculty of Medicine, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi 700111, Romania
4Department of Internal Medicine, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi 700111, Romania
53rd Internal Medicine Clinic, “Sf. Spiridon” County Clinical Emergency Hospital Iasi, Iasi, Romania
6Department of Morpho-Functional Sciences I, Discipline of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi 700111, Romania
7Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology-“Sf. Spiridon” County Clinical Emergency Hospital Iasi, Iasi, Romania
8“Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi 700111, Romania

Correspondence should be addressed to Cristian-Eugen Timofte; moc.duolci@etfomit.naitsirc and Mariana Floria; moc.oohay@anairam_airolf

Received 2 September 2018; Revised 18 November 2018; Accepted 6 December 2018; Published 13 January 2019

Academic Editor: Konstantinos Triantafyllou

Copyright © 2019 Diana-Maria Bunu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) refers to a group of chronic inflammatory diseases that targets mainly the gastrointestinal tract. The clinical presentation of IBD includes both gastrointestinal manifestations and extraintestinal manifestations (EIM). The reported cardiovascular manifestations in IBD patients include pericarditis, myocarditis, venous and arterial thromboembolism, arrhythmias, atrioventricular block, heart failure, endocarditis, valvulopathies, and Takayasu arteritis. The aim of this article is to review the available literature about the possible pathogenic mechanisms and determine preventive measures capable of reducing the incidence and severity of the cardiovascular manifestations. In IBD patients, the incidence of cardiovascular manifestations is low, but higher than that in the general population. Therefore, clinicians should pay attention to any new modification that might indicate cardiovascular involvement in IBD patients, and they should consider chronic inflammatory diseases in patients with cardiac conditions without an evident cause. Considering the role of inflammation in the development of cardiovascular manifestations, the management should include prevention of flares and maintenance of remission for as long as possible. Preventive measures should also include active screening and strict control of the cardiovascular risk factors in all IBD patients.

1. Introduction

IBD defines a group of chronic inflammatory diseases that targets predominantly the gastrointestinal tract. IBD can manifest itself in two major forms: Crohn’s Disease (CD) and Ulcerative Colitis (UC) [1, 2].

The etiopathogenesis of IBD is not yet fully elucidated, but it is known to involve the interaction between four major components: an aberrant immune system, genetic factors, environmental factors, and intestinal microbiota (therefore, the presence of only one component does not cause the onset of IBD) [3]. The inflammatory response is mediated by immune cells (T-helper 1 and T-helper 17 in CD and T-helper 2 in UC), cytokines (Tumor Necrosis Factor-α (TNF-α), transforming growth factor-β, and interleukins- (IL-) 12, IL-17, and IL23), chemokines, reactive oxygen species, neuropeptides, and nonimmune (myeloid, epithelial, mesenchymal, lymphoid, neurogenic, and endothelial) cells [4, 5].

The primary immune response to one or more stimuli induces tissue destruction and proliferation of endothelial and mesenchymal cells, resulting in a secondary immune response that amplifies the already present inflammation and stimulates fibrosis, tissue remodeling, angiogenesis, and lymphangiogenesis [3]. The nonresolving inflammation determines the installation of a vicious cycle of self-sustaining chronic inflammation and maintenance of angiogenesis, fibrosis, and tissue destruction processes [6].

The main manifestations in IBD are intestinal (abdominal pain, mucoid or bloody stool, rectal bleeding, and tenesmus) and systemic (fever, fatigue, loss of appetite, and weight loss) [7]. IBD can also exhibit a wide range of extraintestinal manifestations (IBD-associated disorders that affect organs that are distant to the digestive tract): hepatobiliary, genitourinary, musculoskeletal, respiratory, ophthalmic, cutaneous, and cardiovascular [8, 9].

Cardiovascular manifestations in IBD can be defined by IBD-associated disorders that affect the cardiovascular system [9]. Cardiovascular manifestations in patients with IBD mostly occur as immune-related consequences and include the following: pericarditis, myocarditis, venous and arterial thromboembolism, left ventricle impairment, arrhythmias and conduction disorders, infective endocarditis, valvulopathy, and Takayasu arteritis [10]. The pathogenic mechanisms behind the cardiovascular manifestations are briefly presented in each section and in Table 1.

Table 1: Cardiovascular manifestations in IBD.

2. Epidemiology of Cardiovascular EIM

Frequencies of EIM in IBD range from 6% to 47%, and multiple EIM may concomitantly occur. Moreover, EIM may occur prior to the diagnosis of IBD in up to 25% of cases [11].

The cardiovascular disease incidence among IBD patients is modestly higher than that in the general population [12]. This fact is supported by a recent Danish cohort study that also observed that the prevalence of traditional cardiovascular risk factors is surprisingly low among IBD patients [13]. Cardiovascular involvement rarely occurs in IBD patients, but its incidence should not be ignored, considering the serious impact of the consequences if untreated.

In 2016, Card et al. published their results on the incidence of EIM in IBD patients. Their study showed a slightly increased diagnosis rate for ischemic heart disease, atrial fibrillation, and hypertension in IBD patients when compared to the general population ( vs. 0.77, 1.51 vs. 0.56, and 1.69 vs. 0.51, respectively). There were similar diagnosis rates between CD and UC patients [14].

Pericarditis represents the most frequent cardiovascular EIM in IBD patients (70% of the total number of cardiovascular complications) [15, 16]. Its prevalence is 0.19% among the CD patients and 0.23% among the UC patients [17]. A review of 68 patients with IBD showed that pericarditis occurs more frequently in male patients with UC [16].

A 16-year Danish nationwide cohort study of 15572 IBD patients found that myocarditis had a total risk of 4.6 per 100000 years of risk in IBD patients. The incidence rate ratio for myocarditis was 8.3 for CD and 2.6 for UC when compared to the general population [18].

Patients with IBD may present with both venous and arterial thromboembolic complications. They present a 1.7-5.5-fold greater risk for venous thromboembolism than the general population [19]. The Swiss Inflammatory Bowel Disease Cohort Study showed a 3.9 prevalence of VTE among the IBD patients, with a higher incidence among the UC patients when compared to the CD patients (4.7 vs. 3.4, respectively) [20]. Moreover, the mortality associated with thromboembolism is 2 times higher in patients with IBD when compared to the general population [21].

There is an increased risk for arterial thromboembolic events in IBD patients (but to a lesser degree than venous thromboembolism), with similar rates in UC and CD patients [22]. Patients with IBD have a moderately higher risk (18%) of arterial thromboembolic events [23]. The arterial thromboembolic events occur most frequently at the cardiac (acute myocardial infarction), cerebral (stroke), and intestinal (mesenteric ischemia) levels [12]. Their incidence in IBD patients when compared to the general population is 1.2 times higher for acute myocardial infarction, 3.5 times higher for mesenteric ischemia and 1.2 times higher for stroke [22]. In 2013, a Danish cohort study has shown that patients with IBD are at an increased risk of arterial thromboembolism especially during flares and episodes of persistent disease activity [24]. Feng et al. conducted a meta-analysis study on the risk of ischemic heart disease in patients with IBD, and they have observed an increased risk in young female patients with CD [25]. An increased risk of stroke associated with IBD (the risk is greater for UC patients), independent of gender, was found in the meta-analysis conducted by Katsanos et al. [26]. There is also an increased risk of peripheral artery disease (the stenosis in arteries other than those supplying the heart and brain) among IBD patients [27, 28]. Koutroubakis presented in his literature review that most cases with the involvement of the peripheral arteries presented with thrombosis of the upper and lower limbs and they were associated with significantly increased morbidity and mortality [29].

There are not many studies concerning the prevalence of heart failure among the IBD patients. However, a recent population-based cohort study showed a twofold higher risk of heart failure in IBD patients (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.36–3.03) and 2.5-fold increased risk in systemic corticosteroid users (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.51; 95% CI, 1.93–4.57) when compared to the control group. Also, it appears that only patients with UC have a significantly higher relative risk of heart failure [30]. Another Danish population cohort study found an increased risk of first heart failure hospitalization in patients with IBD, with a 2.5 times higher risk during the periods of active disease (persistent activity or flares) [31].

The incidence of atrial fibrillation is 11.3% in patients with IBD versus 0.9% in the general population [32]. A Danish cohort study found a 2 times higher risk of atrial fibrillation in IBD during flares and episodes of persistent activity [33]. It is important to acknowledge the increased risk of atrial fibrillation in IBD patients since this arrhythmia is associated with an increased risk of thromboembolism, heart failure, and mortality, it affects the quality of life and exercise capacity, and it increases the hospitalization risk [34].

Concerning the endocarditis prevalence in IBD patients, there are some case reports cited in the literature and a retrospective and prospective case control study from 1992 that shows an increased prevalence of bacterial endocarditis in patients with IBD [35, 36].

There have been several case reports cited in the literature that presented patients with IBD who developed mitral or aortic regurgitation, but its incidence is very rare [37].

The coexistence of IBD and Takayasu arteritis is also rare, with just a small number of reported cases in the literature [38].

3. Myocarditis and Pericarditis

Pericarditis represents the most common cardiovascular complication in IBD [13]. Myocarditis can be defined as an inflammation of the myocytes and the interstitial tissue. Occasionally, the pericardium may also be involved, in which case it is called myopericarditis [39].

Patients with IBD have a higher risk for developing myopericarditis than the general population. This can be explained by two mechanisms: autoimmune mediation generated by exposure to autoantigens and drug toxicity following an administration of 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) or its derivatives [40].

Exposure to autoantigens in an acute episode may cause direct cytotoxicity on myocytes, causing the release of inflammatory mediators and activation of the immune system. This sequence of events can lead to acute myocarditis [41]. If myocarditis is not detected in the acute or subacute stage and the inflammation is not counteracted, myocardial destruction will continue and patients will develop chronic myocarditis [42]. Remodeling processes that are characteristic of chronic inflammation may cause dilation of the cardiac cavities (resulting in systolic dysfunction, anomalies of parietal kinetics, and decreased ejection fraction), valvular regurgitation (by rupture of papillary muscles), or arrhythmias (due to the fibrosis of the conduction system, occurrence of reentry phenomena, and excessive adrenergic stimulation) [43].

The clinical picture for myopericarditis is nonspecific. Patients may present with symptoms similar to those of the acute coronary syndrome, heart failure (new onset or decompensated heart failure), arrhythmias, cardiogenic shock, or sudden death [43]. The occurrence of such clinical picture within the first 28 days since the initiation of the treatment with 5-ASA or its derivatives raises the suspicion of drug toxicity [44].

The 12-lead electrocardiogram may be normal, or it may reveal an ST segment elevation or depression, a negative T wave or rhythm, or conduction disorders [45]. Blood tests may indicate elevated levels of biomarkers of cardiac injury (troponin, creatine kinase, creatine kinase-MB, alanine aminotransferase, and aspartate aminotransferase), as well as B-type natriuretic peptide and N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide in patients with associated heart failure. Leukocytosis and increased levels of acute-phase reactants (erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, and fibrinogen) may also be present [46].

Transthoracic echocardiography should be performed in all patients with clinical presentation suggestive for myopericarditis. The presence of left ventricular dysfunction, anomalies of parietal kinetics, low ejection fraction, or accumulation of pericardial fluid should raise the suspicion of myopericarditis [47]. Angiocoronarography should be performed in all patients with the clinical picture suggestive for acute coronary syndrome, since the absence of hemodynamically significant angiographic lesions of the coronary arteries excludes the diagnosis of myocardial infarction [39].

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) offers noninvasive characterization of the myocardial tissue, and it can provide the necessary information for the diagnosis of myocarditis. CMR diagnostic criteria for myocarditis reveal myocardial (regional or global) oedema, myocardial hyperaemia, and focal fibrosis or necrosis with noncoronary artery distribution [45]. If patients are hemodynamically stable and CMR is available, then it is recommended to perform CMR before endomyocardial biopsy. Endomyocardial biopsy should be performed in life-threatening conditions, when CMR is not indicated [40].

Endomyocardial biopsy remains the gold standard in diagnosing and establishing the etiology of myocarditis [48]. IBD-associated myocarditis can frequently present under two histopathological forms: acute/chronic lymphocytic myocarditis and giant cell myocarditis (the latter form has a poor prognosis) [43].

Supportive therapy depends on the patients’ hemodynamic stability. Patients who are hemodynamically unstable should be redirected to intensive care units that can provide advanced cardiopulmonary support such as mechanical ventilation and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation [46]. Hemodynamically stable patients should be monitored in a hospital setting and treated according to the current guidelines for heart failure with beta-blockers and/or inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system [49].

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs can be used in patients with pericardial involvement [46]. Considering the high possibility of gastrointestinal toxicity, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs which selectively inhibit the cyclooxygenase-2 should be recommended [50]. Colchicine, another drug usually prescribed for pericarditis, may cause diarrhea as a side effect and, therefore, it can potentially complicate the evolution of IBD [15].

Immunosuppressive therapy may be associated with the supportive therapy, but only after exclusion of infectious etiology. The most widely used immunosuppressive agents are immunoglobulin, corticosteroids, azathioprine, and cyclosporine, and the duration of administration ranges from 3 to 6 months [51].

Management of myocarditis also includes restriction of physical activity during the acute phase and for the following 6 months. Recovery signs include improvement of ejection fraction and parietal kinetics [45].

4. Venous Thromboembolism

Deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary thromboembolism represent the most frequent venous thromboembolic complications. But venous thromboembolic events can also occur in the cerebral, portal, mesenteric, or retinal sites [52].

Venous thromboembolism can be triggered by genetic or acquired factors. Long-term hospitalization, surgical interventions, central venous catheters, prolonged bed rest and immobilization, corticosteroid therapy, smoking, use of oral contraceptives, vitamin deficiency, dehydration, hormone replacement therapy, and hyperhomocysteinemia are among the most frequent acquired risk factors for venous thromboembolism [53]. Genetic risk factors such as dysfibrinogenemia, mutations of the prothrombin gene, factor V Leiden, antithrombin, and protein C or S deficiency should be considered in patients with IBD who experience recurrent thromboembolic venous events [54].

Virchow’s triad, known to be associated with venous thromboembolism, describes three conditions that predispose to thrombosis: hypercoagulability, endothelial dysfunction, and venous stasis [55].

Hypercoagulability is mediated by the inflammatory process that initiates clotting and interferes with the fibrinolytic system, decreasing the anticoagulant activity [56]. The inflammation in IBD levels can be illustrated by increased levels of C-reactive protein and cytokines (the most frequently observed cytokines are TNF-α, vascular endothelial growth factor, and IL-6) [57]. The reduction in anticoagulant activity not only increases thrombosis risk but also helps maintain the inflammatory status by stimulation of thrombin to produce TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-10 [58].

In addition, the following hemostatic disorders have been observed during flares: elevated levels of coagulation factors (V, VIII, von Willebrand, and fibrinogen) and products of thrombin and fibrin formation, increased markers of vascular endothelial activation, and acquired deficiencies or dysfunction of natural anticoagulants (protein C, protein S, and antithrombin) [22]. Platelet abnormalities (reactive thrombocytosis, reduced mean platelet volume, and augmented granular content) also contribute to the hypercoagulability. The enhanced activation state of platelets is mediated by the CD40-CD40 ligand pathway [59].

Endothelial dysfunction in IBD patients (procoagulant surface of the vascular bed) is a consequence of mechanical damage (e.g., intravenous catheters) or activation of the vascular endothelial cells by inflammatory mediators. Inflammation determines the occurrence of the thrombophilic effect of the vascular endothelium, and it accentuates the adhesion between the endothelial surface and leukocytes or platelets [22, 60].

The last condition described by Virchow’s triad is represented by a disturbance of the blood flow, as it is seen in patients with prolonged immobilization (a common situation encountered during flares in IBD), dehydration, or central vein catheters [22, 61].

The clinical picture of venous thromboembolism depends on the site of the thrombus, and it can range from asymptomatic to severely symptomatic, but the suspicion of venous thromboembolic event is raised when the patient has an unexplained episode of dyspnea, hypoxia or unilateral leg pain, and swelling [62].

The diagnosis of venous thromboembolic events is based on appropriate imaging investigations such as compression ultrasound or venography for deep vein thrombosis, ventilation/perfusion lung scanning or spiral computed tomography for pulmonary emboli, and computed tomography for other affected sites [52, 63].

The primary prevention of venous thromboembolism in acutely ill-hospitalized patients includes the prophylactic administration of one of the following anticoagulants: low-molecular-weight heparin, low-dose-unfractionated heparin, or fondaparinux [64]. Mechanical thromboprophylaxis (graduated compression stockings and pneumatic compression devices) represents a valid alternative for patients who present contraindications for anticoagulation [65].

The primary prevention of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized but stable patients includes prophylactic anticoagulation and management of additional risk factors. Thus, it is intended to maintain the remission, to use intravenous catheters with caution, to correct vitamin deficiencies and dehydration, and to early mobilize the patients [22].

Treatment of acute venous thromboembolism in patients with IBD is similar to that in patients without IBD. The use of anticoagulants (unfractionated heparin and low-molecular-weight heparin) is recommended for mild and moderate venous thrombosis, whereas local or systemic thrombolysis is recommended for massive vein thrombosis [66].

The secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism (anticoagulation) must be individualized according to each patient’s hemorrhagic and thromboembolic risks [65]. Long-term anticoagulation using low-molecular-weight heparin, vitamin K antagonists, or novel direct oral anticoagulants is indicated in case of initial unprovoked venous thromboembolic event (in the absence of disease activity or temporary/transient risk factors) [64]. Short-term anticoagulation (3-6 months) is indicated in case of provoked thromboembolic event, and prophylaxis of disease exacerbations can also be added. The placement of inferior vena cava filters is recommended to patients with high thromboembolic risk [66].

5. Arterial Thromboembolism

Out of traditional cardiovascular risk factors (male gender, , smoking, obesity, dyslipidemia, arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and chronic kidney disease), advanced age, obesity, and smoking have a reduced prevalence among the IBD patients [67]. But IBD patients also present nontraditional cardiovascular risks: hyperhomocysteinemia, leukocytosis, anemia, corticosteroid therapy, thrombocytosis, high levels of C-reactive protein, and increased erythrocyte sedimentation rate [68].

It is a well-known fact that chronic inflammation and endothelial dysfunction play a role in atherogenesis, one of the most important factors involved in arterial thromboembolism. C-reactive protein, TNF-α, vascular endothelial growth factor, and IL-6 represent molecules involved in both atherogenesis and IBD, and their increased serum levels among the IBD patients confirm the fact that atherogenesis is accelerated among this class of patients [57, 69].

There are multiple mechanisms that contribute to the maintenance of the chronic inflammation. IBD patients are also characterized by a disrupted intestinal barrier which allows microbial products (lipopolysaccharides and other endotoxins) to enter the bloodstream. Lipopolysaccharides are known to induce the expression of proinflammatory cytokines, to affect the oxidation of low-density cholesterol, and to activate the macrophages, all of which contributing to endothelial dysfunction, foam cell formation, and atherosclerosis [57].

Obesity (when present) also contributes to the inflammatory status. The adipose tissue is responsible for producing adipokines: leptin, resistin, and adiponectin (proinflammatory cytokines). Mesenteric fat also produces proinflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-α and IL-6 [70].

The gut microbiota in IBD is characterized by an abnormal microbial composition (loss of microbial diversity) that can induce immunoregulatory pathways and can mitigate the chronic inflammation [71, 72]. The gut microbiota is also implicated in the atherosclerosis process and increased platelet activation via decreased levels of trimethylamine N-oxide and the induction of expression of Toll-like receptors 2 and 4. Microorganisms can also influence the blood pressure in IBD [73, 74].

Calprotectin is another acute-phase reactant that has been linked to the disease activity in IBD and higher risk for cardiovascular events. Calprotectin binds to Toll-like receptor 4, a receptor that amplifies inflammation and atherosclerosis. Also, calprotectin binds to the receptors for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) which mediate cardiomyocyte dysfunction [75].

The chronic inflammatory process causes structural and functional arterial changes. Smooth muscle cell hyperplasia can be demonstrated by determining carotid intima-media thickness (a subclinical marker of atherosclerosis). Vascular fibrosis and degradation of elastic fibers that occur in the walls of large blood vessels determine vascular stiffness (another subclinical marker of atherosclerosis) [60]. Vascular stiffness is not associated with the cardiovascular risk factors, but with the duration of the episodes of disease activity [76].

Moreover, preexisting coronary atheromatous plaques are more unstable in patients with CD than in the general population. This can be explained by the common genetical characterization of both CD and atherogenesis by a polymorphism of the NOD2/CARD15 gene [77]. Thrombus formation and acute coronary syndrome are favored by the fact that, after the atheromatous plaque has cracked, the lipid core is being exposed to the bloodstream characterized by hypercoagulability and platelet anomalies [58].

IBD patients are also characterized by altered lipid profiles (low levels of total and high-density cholesterol and high levels of low-density cholesterol), known risk factors for atherosclerosis. The exact mechanism is unknown, but it is thought to be either chronic inflammation or malabsorption [78].

Thromboembolic arterial complications also include ventricular thrombosis that occurs, most frequently, in the left ventricle, during flares. Most patients with ventricular thrombosis are asymptomatic, and diagnosis is made predominantly incidental, using imagistic techniques: transthoracic echocardiography (simple or contrast-enhanced), transoesophageal echocardiography, and CMR [79].

The clinical picture depends on the thrombus location, and it can vary from asymptomatic to intensely symptomatic (e.g., chest pain or heart failure symptoms in myocardial infarction and pale, cold, and painful extremities in acute limb ischemia). The probability for arterial thromboembolism is high when the patients complain of chest pain or motor deficits [8082].

Primary preventive measures of arterial thromboembolism include maintaining the remission, strict control of cardiovascular risk factors, avoiding consumption of oral contraceptives or hormonal replacement therapy, and administration of vitamin B6, B12, and folic acid supplements in case of hyperhomocysteinemia [19]. Acute management and secondary prevention of arterial thromboembolism are not different from those in non-IBD patients [8082].

6. Heart Failure

Acute heart failure can be caused by acute myocardial infarction, myocarditis, pericarditis complicated by tamponade, or endocarditis. Chronic heart failure is caused by valvulopathies, untreated/undiagnosed myocarditis, heart muscle atrophy due to prolonged use of corticosteroids or total parenteral nutrition, and chronic inflammatory status [8386].

A chronic inflammatory status associated with IBD affects collagen metabolism, causing an inadequate collagen deposit in both affected and distant target organs (demonstrated by elevated serum levels of procollagen III peptides) [84]. This, together with secondary microvascular endothelial dysfunction, alteration of nitric oxide-mediated vasodilation, and deficiencies of vitamins and essential elements, contributes to myocardial fibrosis [85, 86].

Myocardial fibrosis causes left ventricle (LV) impairment: both systolic and diastolic [10]. Transthoracic echocardiography represents the method of choice to diagnose heart failure and evaluate both systolic and diastolic functions of LV. LV ejection fraction reflects the systolic function of the LV, but there are new deformation imaging techniques (strain and strain rate) that can detect subtle abnormalities in the systolic function of the LV even from the preclinical stage [49]. Thus, one can see a low LV global longitudinal strain that can moreover be correlated with the indexes for IBD activity [8789]. In addition, LV longitudinal strain rates are also reduced, suggesting delayed LV peak contractility [88, 89]. Another sign of LV systolic dysfunction is the detection of abnormalities of wall kinetics (myocarditis and arterial involvement should be taken into consideration) [49].

Diastolic dysfunction can be evidenced in the early stages by measuring the ratio between early mitral inflow velocity and early mitral annular diastolic velocity (one of the most used echocardiographic parameters, a ratio that reflects the LV filling pressures), which will be increased (>14) in patients with IBD with subclinical LV diastolic impairment [90].

7. Arrhythmias and Conduction Disorders

Patients with IBD present a predisposition for atrial and ventricular arrhythmias and conduction disturbances [15].

The chronic inflammatory condition found in IBD is the key element in the pathogenesis of arrhythmias. The chronic inflammatory process mediated by proinflammatory cytokines (C-reactive protein, IL-6, and TNF-α) causes, through ischemia and oxidative stress, myocardial destruction that, in time, causes interstitial fibrosis and impairs the intracellular calcium current resulting in structural and electrical remodeling, known determinants of arrhythmias [67]. During the active periods of the disease, the enhanced inflammatory status will probably trigger the arrhythmia [34].

Chronic inflammation also leads to the occurrence of autonomic dysregulation (increased sympathetic tone and decreased parasympathetic tone), resulting in reduced heart rate variability and prolonged QT interval, factors that contribute to the development of arrhythmias [9294]. Heart rate variability in patients with IBD correlates with periods of activity, duration of illness, and inflammatory markers [95].

Patients with IBD experienced increased values for corrected QT interval and corrected QT dispersion. These parameters reflect the ventricular depolarization/repolarization time and conduction heterogeneity at this level. This indicates the increased risk of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with IBD [92, 94]. Obesity, iron deficiency anemia and electrolyte disturbances (hypokalemia, hypocalcaemia, and hypomagnesaemia), and selenium deficiency among IBD patients are additional risk factors for ventricular arrhythmias [16, 94].

P-wave dispersion measured on the electrocardiogram reflects the conduction of the sinus electrical stimulus at the atrial level. Increased values are found in IBD patients, and it indicates the heterogeneity of intra-atrial and interatrial conduction as well as discontinuous propagation of electrical impulses, which predisposes to atrial fibrillation [96]. Intra-atrial and interatrial conduction can also be assessed by the Doppler echocardiography, and IBD patients present an increase in atrial electromechanical delay and a reduction in left atrial mechanical function, changes that correlate with the disease duration (patients with active disease have significantly higher values than patients in remission, but both patients with active disease and in remission have higher values than the general population) [34, 97]. Chronic inflammation also affects the success rate of cardioversion and maintenance of the sinus rhythm in patients with IBD and atrial fibrillation [98].

Atrioventricular conduction disturbances (complete atrioventricular block, second-degree or first-degree atrioventricular block) have been reported in patients with IBD and may occur due to the administration of infliximab, ischemia in the conduction system secondary to inflammation, vasculitis, or microvascular endothelial dysfunction [99101]. Pacemaker implantation is the gold standard treatment in the complete atrioventricular block and other symptomatic conduction disorders that affect the general status of the IBD patient (syncope, altered general status, fatigue, and worsening of the heart failure) [102].

Careful ECG monitoring (including 24 h Holter ECG), regular determination of serum electrolyte levels, and maintenance of remission for as long as possible are additional measures that need to be taken into consideration in the management of IBD.

8. Endocarditis

Cases of infectious endocarditis are reported in the literature in patients with IBD. Predisposing risk factors include immunosuppressive medication, the presence of central venous catheters, and significant preexisting valvulopathies [16]. In addition, IBD patients have an increased risk of secondary bacteremia due to increased transmucosal permeability and secondary immunosuppression due to the corticosteroids or other immunosuppressants [103, 104]. Microbial agents cited in the literature as being involved in the etiopathogenesis of infectious endocarditis are Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus faecium, Peptostreptococcus, Streptococcus bovis, Candida albicans, and Bacteroides fragilis [36, 105].

There has been reported a case of nonbacterial thrombotic endocarditis (Libman-Sacks endocarditis) in a patient with IBD. The noninfective endocarditis is associated with a higher thromboembolic risk, especially in IBD patients who are characterized by hypercoagulability [106].

Symptoms and signs that suggest the possibility of endocarditis are fever, heart murmurs, or embolic phenomena. Treatment of infectious endocarditis in patients with IBD does not differ from that in patients without IBD [107].

The Advisory Group of the British Cardiac Society Clinical Practice Committee and Royal College of Physicians Clinical Effectiveness and Evaluation Unit include the IBD patients in the high-risk group. Antibiotic prophylaxis should be mandatory in the case of invasive procedures or central venous catheters, especially if the patient has a preexistent valvulopathy. Furthermore, the use of immunosuppressive therapy and corticosteroids should be also minimized [108, 109].

9. Valvulopathies

The most common IBD-related valvulopathies are aortic regurgitation and mitral regurgitation [37].

In IBD, inflammation causes mitral and aortic valvulopathies (where blood pressures are high), and excess TNF-α causes the thickening and shortening of the leaflets, resulting in regurgitation [110]. In addition, there is an overwhelming fibroblastic healing phenomenon (seen echocardiographically as a subaortic bump) and a thickening of the aortic intima, both conditions leading to an ascending aortic aneurysm. Thus, localized lesions of the aortic root also contribute to the occurrence of aortic regurgitation [111]. Another possible mechanism is the myxomatous degeneration (collagen deposition on the valve) resulting in a benign valve prolapse or even mild regurgitation [10].

Other changes that may be secondary to the chronic inflammatory process include aortic aneurysm or ectasia, coronary ostial stenosis, and atrioventricular conduction disorders [112].

Early detection of these valvular changes could lead to prevention of flares in IBD or worsening of the valvulopathies [113].

10. Takayasu Arteritis

Takayasu arteritis is an autoimmune condition that targets large vessel components. The inflammation of the vessels determines fibrosis, stenosis, and thrombosis [114].

Takayasu arteritis and IBD (especially UC) have several common types of HLA: class I (HLA-A24:02 and HLA-B52:01) and class II (HLA-DRB-115:02), which could explain their coexistence in some patients with IBD [115].

In patients with IBD and Takayasu arteritis, IBD symptoms are the first to appear. At the same time, in these patients, Takayasu arteritis manifestations appear more rapidly when compared to patients with only Takayasu arteritis, without IBD [116].

The clinical picture includes fatigue, fever, and focal symptoms (depending on the affected vessel): cervical, maxillary, brachial, humeroscapular, or chest pain, whether or not accompanied by unilateral or bilateral paraesthesia [117]. In patients with IBD and Takayasu arteritis, the clinical picture is formed more frequently by constitutional symptoms, headache, vertigo, and gastrointestinal symptoms [118].

Early diagnosis of Takayasu arteritis by means of a thorough clinical examination (vascular murmurs, pulse reduction, and hypertension) and noninvasive imaging methods (transthoracic echocardiography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography) and early therapy contribute to the prevention of Takayasu arteritis complications: aortic regurgitation, congestive heart failure, renal hypertension, or stroke [38, 116].

Takayasu arteritis treatment includes first-line corticosteroids. If corticosteroids prove to be ineffective or withdrawal is not possible, immunosuppressants will be added: methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, or tacrolimus [117]. Biological agents such as infliximab, rituximab, and tocilizumab can also be used in refractory cases, with infliximab being elective in patients with IBD [114]. Cases of arterial stenosis or occlusion may require surgery or endovascular surgery [117].

11. Medicines in IBD Treatment and Cardiovascular Complications

Pharmacological treatment in IBD includes five main classes: aminosalicylates (5-aminosalicylic acid-based compounds), corticosteroids, immunosuppressants (azathioprine, mercaptopurines, and methotrexate), calcineurin inhibitor (cyclosporine), and monoclonal antibodies (infliximab, adalimumab, and certolizumab) [119]. The most frequent cardiovascular side effects are presented in Table 2.

Table 2: Cardiovascular side effects of IBD treatment [44, 92, 120134].

5-ASA and its derivatives represent one of the most widely used drug classes in the treatment of IBD (especially for UC). But myopericarditis is among the side effects of these drugs. Four possible mechanisms can explain the occurrence of these side effects: direct cytotoxicity, cell-mediated hypersensitivity reaction, autoimmune response, or immunoglobulin E-mediated allergic reaction. The first therapeutic measure in myopericarditis secondary to 5-ASA or its derivative is to discontinue the administration [44]. If the symptoms persist, then corticosteroids will be administrated and other causes for myopericarditis will be sought [120]. Rechallenge with an alternative agent may be attempted only after the patient has been hemodynamically stabilized (e.g., mesalazine may be attempted in patients with myopericarditis caused by sulfasalazine) and only under close medical supervision due to the possibility of recurrence of symptomatology [44]. Sinus bradycardia has been associated with mesalamine administration [121].

The most important side effects of corticosteroids affecting the cardiovascular system are hypertension, dyslipidemia, and thromboembolism, all of which contribute to the acceleration of atherosclerosis and increase the risk of acute coronary syndrome [122]. Other side effects are oedema, worsening heart failure, and electrolyte imbalances (hypernatremia and hypokalemia) [123]. Preventive measures to lower the side effect incidence include a diet based on low salt and sugar intake, potassium supplementation, and initiation of antihypertensive treatment in case of hypertension with careful electrolyte monitoring [124]. The contribution of corticosteroid therapy to the reduction of cardiovascular risk is controversial. Although corticotherapy reduces the inflammation, it is associated with a 2.5 higher risk of cardiovascular events, especially because its long-term side effects (diabetes, hypertension, and obesity) represent well-known cardiovascular risk factors [103, 125, 126].

It is worth mentioning that in the literature, there have been reported cases of atrial fibrillation and prolonged QT interval that occurred during azathioprine use (but other risk factors were also present) [92, 127129]. Other rare cardiovascular side effects of azathioprine are angina, hypotension, venous thrombosis, and cardiogenic shock [130]. Methotrexate administration is associated with hypotension, acute coronary syndrome, pericarditis, myocarditis, thromboembolic events, and methotrexate side effects [131].

Cyclosporine is associated with increased risk of hypertension, arrhythmias, acute coronary syndrome, and heart failure [132].

Biological molecules are associated with increased arrhythmogenic risks: supraventricular tachycardia, atrial fibrillation, ventricular tachycardia, multiple ectopic ventricular beats, bradyarrhythmias, and conduction disturbances [132]. Besides the arrhythmogenic risks, cardiovascular adverse effects include hypotension, hypertension, acute coronary syndrome, dyslipidemia, and worsening heart failure. An important contraindication to infliximab is heart failure class NYHA III and IV [133, 134].

On the other hand, IBD treatment can positively influence the cardiovascular system. For instance, long-term treatment with immunosuppressants may reduce the aortic wall stiffness and improve the endothelial dysfunction, but it does not influence the peripheral arteries [135]. TNF-α antagonists increase the cardiovascular risk in patients with IBD, while, surprisingly, thiopurine administration and surgical interventions could, potentially, decrease the risk [136]. 5-ASA treatment reduces the inflammation status, thereby decreasing the cardiovascular risk [137].

12. Discussion

During the past two decades, there has been growing evidence that IBD patients can have cardiovascular manifestations besides other EIM. Even though the increased risk of venous thromboembolism in IBD patients has been proven, the prevalence of the rest of cardiovascular EIM is low.

There are studies that deny the moderate risk of arterial thromboembolic events. For instance, Sridhar et al. performed a cross-sectional study to observe the association of different cardiovascular conditions with IBD. They found a significantly increased risk for mesenteric ischemia (adjusted odds ratio 3.4; 95% CI, 2.9-4.0), venous thromboembolism (adjusted odds ratio, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.25-1.53), and arrhythmias (among young females, adjusted odds ratio, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.72-2.44), but not with any other cardiovascular conditions (such as stroke or acute coronary syndrome) [93]. But cardiovascular mortality is not increased in IBD patients when compared to the general population, with no differences between UC and CD [138].

It is difficult to differentiate between true cardiovascular EIM and cardiovascular complications. Considering the rarity of cardiovascular EIM and the large number of side effects associated with the treatment in IBD, when patients present with cardiovascular symptoms and signs, clinicians should try to exclude the possibility of side effects associated with certain drugs used for treating IBD before establishing the disease activity as a causal factor.

Preventive measures that aim to reduce the incidence of cardiovascular EIM and its impact on the disease natural evolution are briefly presented in Table 3.

Table 3: Recommended preventive measures for cardiovascular EIM in IBD.

13. Conclusions

Cardiovascular manifestations in patients with IBD, although rare, are characterized by a higher incidence when compared to the general population, and they occur due to the effects of chronic or acute inflammation, drug toxicity, or genetic predisposition. Early recognition helps prevent complications and minimize the impact on the disease’s natural course. Among the primary preventive measures for cardiovascular manifestations, some of the most important are maintenance of remission for as long as possible, cardiologic periodic evaluation (physical exam, blood tests, electrocardiogram, and transthoracic echocardiography), anticoagulation of patients with high thromboembolic risk, and management of traditional and nontraditional cardiovascular risk factors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

  1. A. Kilcoyne, J. L. Kaplan, and M. S. Gee, “Inflammatory bowel disease imaging: current practice and future directions,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 917–932, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. A. N. Aslan, C. Sarı, S. Özer Sarı et al., “Association between aortic stiffness and left ventricular function in inflammatory bowel disease,” Cardiology Journal, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 202–210, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. H. S. P. de Souza and C. Fiocchi, “Immunopathogenesis of IBD: current state of the art,” Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 13–27, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. F. Neurath, “Cytokines in inflammatory bowel disease,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 329–342, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. Coskun, S. Vermeire, and O. H. Nielsen, “Novel targeted therapies for inflammatory bowel disease,” Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 127–142, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. C. Nathan and A. Ding, “Nonresolving inflammation,” Cell, vol. 140, no. 6, pp. 871–882, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. H. J. Su, Y. T. Chiu, C. T. Chiu et al., “Inflammatory bowel disease and its treatment in 2018: Global and Taiwanese status updates,” Journal of the Formosan Medical Association, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. J. D. Olpin, B. P. Sjoberg, S. E. Stilwill, L. E. Jensen, M. Rezvani, and A. M. Shaaban, “Beyond the bowel: extraintestinal manifestations of inflammatory bowel disease,” Radiographics, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 1135–1160, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. K. Karmiris, A. Avgerinos, A. Tavernaraki et al., “Prevalence and characteristics of extra-intestinal manifestations in a large cohort of Greek patients with inflammatory bowel disease,” Journal of Crohn's and Colitis, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 429–436, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. E. Vizzardi, E. Sciatti, I. Bonadei et al., “Subclinical cardiac involvement in Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis: an echocardiographic case-control study,” Panminerva Medica, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 115–120, 2016. View at Google Scholar
  11. S. R. Vavricka, A. Schoepfer, M. Scharl, P. L. Lakatos, A. Navarini, and G. Rogler, “Extraintestinal manifestations of inflammatory bowel disease,” Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 1982–1992, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. M. Harbord, V. Annese, S. R. Vavricka et al., “The first European evidence-based consensus on extra-intestinal manifestations in inflammatory bowel disease,” Journal of Crohn's and Colitis, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 239–254, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J. Aarestrup, T. Jess, C. J. Kobylecki, B. G. Nordestgaard, and K. H. Allin, “Cardiovascular risk profile among patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a population-based study of more than 100000 individuals,” Journal of Crohn's and Colitis, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. T. R. Card, S. M. Langan, and T. P. C. Chu, “Extra-gastrointestinal manifestations of inflammatory bowel disease may be less common than previously reported,” Digestive Diseases and Sciences, vol. 61, no. 9, pp. 2619–2626, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. N. E. Mitchell, N. Harrison, Z. Junga, and M. Singla, “Heart under attack: cardiac manifestations of inflammatory bowel disease,” Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 2322–2326, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. K. H. Katsanos and E. V. Tsianos, “The heart in inflammatory bowel disease,” Annals of Gastroenterology, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 124–133, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  17. E. H. Park, B. J. Kim, J. K. Huh et al., “Recurrent mesalazine-induced myopericarditis in a patient with ulcerative colitis,” Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 154–156, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. H. T. Sørensen and K. M. Fonager, “Myocarditis and inflammatory bowel disease. A 16-year Danish nationwide cohort study,” Danish Medical Bulletin, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 442–444, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  19. V. P. Tan, A. Chung, B. P. Yan, and P. R. Gibson, “Venous and arterial disease in inflammatory bowel disease,” Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 1095–1113, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. A. Alatri, A. Schoepfer, N. Fournier et al., “Prevalence and risk factors for venous thromboembolic complications in the Swiss inflammatory bowel disease cohort,” Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 51, no. 10, pp. 1200–1205, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. L. Bollen, N. Vande Casteele, M. Peeters et al., “The occurrence of thrombosis in inflammatory bowel disease is reflected in the clot lysis profile,” Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, vol. 21, no. 11, pp. 2540–2548, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. P. Zezos, G. Kouklakis, and F. Saibil, “Inflammatory bowel disease and thromboembolism,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 20, no. 38, pp. 13863–13878, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. S. Singh, H. Singh, E. V. Loftus Jr., and D. S. Pardi, “Risk of cerebrovascular accidents and ischemic heart disease in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 382–393.e1, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. S. L. Kristensen, O. Ahlehoff, J. Lindhardsen et al., “Disease activity in inflammatory bowel disease is associated with increased risk of myocardial infarction, stroke and cardiovascular death – a Danish nationwide cohort study,” PLoS One, vol. 8, no. 2, p. e56944, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. W. Feng, G. Chen, D. Cai, S. Zhao, J. Cheng, and H. Shen, “Inflammatory bowel disease and risk of ischemic heart disease: an updated meta‐analysis of cohort studies,” Journal of the American Heart Association, vol. 6, no. 8, article e005892, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. A. H. Katsanos, M. Kosmidou, S. Giannopoulos et al., “Cerebral arterial infarction in inflammatory bowel diseases,” European Journal of Internal Medicine, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 37–44, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. T.-Y. Lin, Y.-G. Chen, C.-L. Lin, W.-S. Huang, and C.-H. Kao, “Inflammatory bowel disease increases the risk of peripheral arterial disease: a nationwide cohort study,” Medicine, vol. 94, no. 52, p. e2381, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. F. Agüero, G. González-Zobl, J. M. Baena-Díez et al., “Prevalence of lower extremity peripheral arterial disease in individuals with chronic immune mediated inflammatory disorders,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 242, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. I. E. Koutroubakis, “Therapy insight: vascular complications in patients with inflammatory bowel disease,” Nature Clinical Practice Gastroenterology & Hepatology, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 266–272, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. S. Aniwan, D. S. Pardi, W. J. Tremaine, and E. V. Loftus Jr, “Increased risk of acute myocardial infarction and heart failure in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases,” Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 1607–1615.e1, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. S. L. Kristensen, O. Ahlehoff, J. Lindhardsen et al., “Inflammatory bowel disease is associated with an increased risk of hospitalization for heart failure: a Danish nationwide cohort study,” Circulation: Heart Failure, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 717–722, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. D. J. Pattanshetty, K. Anna, R. D. Gajulapalli, and R. S. R. Sappati-Biyyani, “Inflammatory bowel “cardiac” disease: point prevalence of atrial fibrillation in inflammatory bowel disease population,” Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 325–329, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. S. L. Kristensen, J. Lindhardsen, O. Ahlehoff et al., “Increased risk of atrial fibrillation and stroke during active stages of inflammatory bowel disease: a nationwide study,” Europace, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 477–484, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. T. H. Efe, T. Cimen, A. G. Ertem et al., “Atrial electromechanical properties in inflammatory bowel disease,” Echocardiography, vol. 33, no. 9, pp. 1309–1316, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. C. Berkelhammer, J. Andrejic, and A. Mohammed, “Endocarditis in Crohn’s disease,” Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 1293-1294, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. G. Kreuzpaintner, D. Horstkotte, A. Heyll, B. Lösse, and G. Strohmeyer, “Increased risk of bacterial endocarditis in inflammatory bowel disease,” The American Journal of Medicine, vol. 92, no. 4, pp. 391–395, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. G. Bragagni, R. Brogna, P. Franceschetti, and G. Zoli, “Cardiac involvement in Crohn’s disease: echocardiographic study,” Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 18–22, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. R. Kusunoki, S. Ishihara, M. Sato et al., “Rare case of Takayasu’s arteritis associated with Crohn’s disease,” Internal Medicine, vol. 50, no. 15, pp. 1581–1585, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. S. Le Mener, S. Huynh-Moynot, J. A. Bronstein, U. Vinsonneau, and Z. Richert, “Les myocardites aiguës compliquant les maladies inflammatoires chroniques de l’intestin : à propos de deux observations,” La Revue de Médecine Interne, vol. 33, no. 10, pp. 583–585, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. A. L. P. Caforio, S. Pankuweit, E. Arbustini et al., “Current state of knowledge on aetiology, diagnosis, management, and therapy of myocarditis: a position statement of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases,” European Heart Journal, vol. 34, no. 33, pp. 2636–2648, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. J. Asadi, S. S. Bhandari, and N. Ahmed, “Mesalazine-induced myopericarditis in a patient with ulcerative colitis,” Echo Research and Practice, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. K1–K5, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. F. Dominguez, U. Kühl, B. Pieske, P. Garcia-Pavia, and C. Tschöpe, “Update on myocarditis and inflammatory cardiomyopathy: reemergence of endomyocardial biopsy,” Revista Española de Cardiología, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 178–187, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. W. Bracamonte-Baran and D. Čiháková, “Cardiac autoimmunity: myocarditis,” Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol. 1003, pp. 187–221, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. G. Brown, “5-Aminosalicylic acid-associated myocarditis and pericarditis: a narrative review,” The Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy, vol. 69, no. 6, pp. 466–472, 2016. View at Google Scholar
  45. M. Moonen and P. Lancellotti, “La myocardite,” Revue Médicale de Liège, vol. 73, no. 5-6, pp. 269–276, 2018. View at Google Scholar
  46. I. Kindermann, C. Barth, F. Mahfoud et al., “Update on myocarditis,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 59, no. 9, pp. 779–792, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. V. C. Varnavas, N. Reinsch, M. Perrey et al., “Recurrent lymphocytic myocarditis in a young male with ulcerative colitis,” European Journal of Medical Research, vol. 19, no. 1, p. 11, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. L. T. Cooper, K. L. Baughman, A. M. Feldman et al., “The role of endomyocardial biopsy in the management of cardiovascular disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association, the American College of Cardiology, and the European Society of Cardiology. Endorsed by the Heart Failure Society of America and the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 50, no. 19, pp. 1914–1931, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. P. Ponikowski, A. A. Voors, S. D. Anker et al., “2016 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure,” European Journal of Heart Failure, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 891–975, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. A. Klein and R. Eliakim, “Non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and inflammatory bowel disease,” Pharmaceuticals (Basel), vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 1084–1092, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. H. P. Schultheiss, U. Kühl, and L. T. Cooper, “The management of myocarditis,” European Heart Journal, vol. 32, no. 21, pp. 2616–2625, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. G. Van Assche, A. Dignass, B. Bokemeyer et al., “Second European evidence-based consensus on the diagnosis and management of ulcerative colitis part 3: special situations,” Journal of Crohn's and Colitis, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–33, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. M. Giannotta, G. Tapete, G. Emmi, E. Silvestri, and M. Milla, “Thrombosis in inflammatory bowel diseases: what’s the link?” Thrombosis Journal, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 14, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. D. Kohoutova, P. Moravkova, P. Kruzliak, and J. Bures, “Thromboembolic complications in inflammatory bowel disease,” Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 489–498, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. V. F. Tapson, “Acute pulmonary embolism,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 358, no. 10, pp. 1037–1052, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. D. Owczarek, D. Cibor, M. K. Głowacki, T. Rodacki, and T. Mach, “Inflammatory bowel disease: epidemiology, pathology and risk factors for hypercoagulability,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 53–63, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. R. Schicho, G. Marsche, and M. Storr, “Cardiovascular complications in inflammatory bowel disease,” Current Drug Targets, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 181–188, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. F. Scaldaferri, S. Lancellotti, M. Pizzoferrato, and R. De Cristofaro, “Haemostatic system in inflammatory bowel diseases: new players in gut inflammation,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 594–608, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. S. Danese, C. de la Motte, and C. Fiocchi, “Platelets in inflammatory bowel disease: clinical, pathogenic, and therapeutic implications,” The American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 99, no. 5, pp. 938–945, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. O. A. Hatoum and D. G. Binion, “The vasculature and inflammatory bowel disease: contribution to pathogenesis and clinical pathology,” Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 304–313, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. N. Chande, “Prevention of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients with inflammatory bowel disease,” Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 669–671, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. S. Alhassan, A. Pelinescu, V. Gandhi, M. Naddour, A. C. Singh, and E. Bihler, “Clinical presentation and risk factors of venous thromboembolic disease,” Critical Care Nursing Quarterly, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 201–209, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. P. Papay, W. Miehsler, H. Tilg et al., “Clinical presentation of venous thromboembolism in inflammatory bowel disease,” Journal of Crohn's and Colitis, vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 723–729, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. G. C. Nguyen, C. N. Bernstein, A. Bitton et al., “Consensus statements on the risk, prevention, and treatment of venous thromboembolism in inflammatory bowel disease: Canadian association of gastroenterology,” Gastroenterology, vol. 146, no. 3, pp. 835–848.e6, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. W. H. Geerts, D. Bergqvist, G. F. Pineo et al., “Prevention of venous thromboembolism: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (8th Edition),” Chest Journal, vol. 133, Supplement, no. 6, pp. 381S–453S, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. N. L. Zitomersky, M. Verhave, and C. C. Trenor III, “Thrombosis and inflammatory bowel disease: a call for improved awareness and prevention,” Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 458–470, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. C. Rungoe, N. Nyboe Andersen, and T. Jess, “Inflammatory bowel disease and risk of coronary heart disease,” Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 699–704, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. A. J. Yarur, A. R. Deshpande, D. M. Pechman, L. Tamariz, M. T. Abreu, and D. A. Sussman, “Inflammatory bowel disease is associated with an increased incidence of cardiovascular events,” The American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 106, no. 4, pp. 741–747, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. A. B. Reiss, N. M. Siegart, and J. De Leon, “Interleukin-6 in atherosclerosis: atherogenic or atheroprotective?” Clinical Lipidology, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 14–23, 2017. View at Google Scholar
  70. J. W. Harper and T. L. Zisman, “Interaction of obesity and inflammatory bowel disease,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 22, no. 35, pp. 7868–7881, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. I. D'Odorico, S. di Bella, J. Monticelli, D. R. Giacobbe, E. Boldock, and R. Luzzati, “Role of fecal microbiota transplantation in inflammatory bowel disease,” Journal of Digestive Diseases, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 322–334, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. C. Manichanh, N. Borruel, F. Casellas, and F. Guarner, “The gut microbiota in IBD,” Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology, vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 599–608, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. A. Wilson, W. A. Teft, B. L. Morse et al., “Erratum to: trimethylamine-N-oxide: a novel biomarker for the identification of inflammatory bowel disease,” Digestive Diseases and Sciences, vol. 61, no. 1, p. 325, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. W. H. W. Tang, D. Y. Li, and S. L. Hazen, “Dietary metabolism, the gut microbiome, and heart failure,” Nature Reviews Cardiology, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  75. P. Kruzliak, J. Novák, M. Novák, and G. J. Fodor, “Role of calprotectin in cardiometabolic diseases,” Cytokine & Growth Factor Reviews, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 67–75, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  76. L. Zanoli, S. Rastelli, A. Granata et al., “Arterial stiffness in inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Journal of Hypertension, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 822–829, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  77. S. Galluzzo, G. Patti, G. Dicuonzo et al., “Association between NOD2/CARD15 polymorphisms and coronary artery disease: a case-control study,” Human Immunology, vol. 72, no. 8, pp. 636–640, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  78. R. S. R. Sappati Biyyani, B. S. Putka, and K. D. Mullen, “Dyslipidemia and lipoprotein profiles in patients with inflammatory bowel disease,” Journal of Clinical Lipidology, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 478–482, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  79. S. Pak, J. Linares, Y. Yatsynovich et al., “Spontaneous ventricular thrombosis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease,” Cardiology in the Young, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 351–353, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  80. W. J. Powers, A. A. Rabinstein, T. Ackerson et al., “2018 guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association,” Stroke, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. e46–e110, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  81. B. Ibanez, S. James, S. Agewall et al., “2017 ESC guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: the task force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC),” European Heart Journal, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 119–177, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  82. M. Bala, J. Kashuk, E. E. Moore et al., “Acute mesenteric ischemia: guidelines of the World Society of Emergency Surgery,” World Journal of Emergency Surgery, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 38, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  83. K. H. Katsanos, D. K. Christodoulou, K. Pappas, C. Pappas, and E. V. Tsianos, “Electrocardiograph abnormalities in patients with active inflammatory bowel disease,” Annals of Gastroenterology, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 275–281, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  84. M. De Simone, U. Cioffi, E. Contessini-Avesani et al., “Elevated serum procollagen type III peptide in splanchnic and peripheral circulation of patients with inflammatory bowel disease submitted to surgery,” BMC Gastroenterology, vol. 4, no. 1, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  85. O. A. Hatoum, D. G. Binion, M. F. Otterson, and D. D. Gutterman, “Acquired microvascular dysfunction in inflammatory bowel disease: loss of nitric oxide-mediated vasodilation,” Gastroenterology, vol. 125, no. 1, pp. 58–69, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  86. D. Waśko-Czopnik and L. Paradowski, “The influence of deficiencies of essential trace elements and vitamins on the course of Crohn’s disease,” Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 5–11, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  87. A. Cincin, M. Sunbul, T. Kivrak et al., “Evaluation of cardiac function by two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography in ulcerative colitis patients,” Digestive Diseases and Sciences, vol. 59, no. 12, pp. 3004–3011, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  88. T. Kivrak, M. Sunbul, A. Cincin et al., “Two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography is useful in early detection of left ventricular impairment in patients with Crohn’s disease,” European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 20, no. 15, pp. 3249–3254, 2016. View at Google Scholar
  89. K. O. Hensel, F. E. Abellan Schneyder, L. Wilke, A. Heusch, S. Wirth, and A. C. Jenke, “Speckle tracking stress echocardiography uncovers early subclinical cardiac involvement in pediatric patients with inflammatory bowel diseases,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 2966, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  90. S. F. Nagueh, O. A. Smiseth, C. P. Appleton et al., “Recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging,” Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 277–314, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  91. O. Gedikli, A. Dogan, I. Altuntas et al., “Inflammatory markers according to types of atrial fibrillation,” International Journal of Cardiology, vol. 120, no. 2, pp. 193–197, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  92. H. A. Bornaun, N. Yılmaz, G. Kutluk et al., “Prolonged P-wave and QT dispersion in children with inflammatory bowel disease in remission,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2017, Article ID 6960810, 7 pages, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  93. A. R. M. Sridhar, S. Parasa, U. Navaneethan, M. D. Crowell, and K. Olden, “Comprehensive study of cardiovascular morbidity in hospitalized inflammatory bowel disease patients,” Journal of Crohn's and Colitis, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 287–294, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  94. D. J. Pattanshetty, R. D. Gajulapalli, K. Anna, and R. S. S. Biyyani, “Prevalence of QT interval prolongation in inflammatory bowel disease,” The Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 136–142, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  95. T. Engel, S. Ben-Horin, and M. Beer-Gabel, “Autonomic dysfunction correlates with clinical and inflammatory activity in patients with Crohn’s disease,” Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, vol. 21, no. 10, pp. 2320–2326, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  96. Y. Dogan, A. Soylu, G. A. Eren et al., “Evaluation of QT and P wave dispersion and mean platelet volume among inflammatory bowel disease patients,” International Journal of Medical Sciences, vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 540–546, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  97. G. Nar, B. Ergul, G. Aksan, and S. Inci, “Assessment of atrial electromechanical delay and left atrial mechanical functions in patients with ulcerative colitis,” Echocardiography, vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 970–976, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  98. T. T. Issac, H. Dokainish, and N. M. Lakkis, “Role of inflammation in initiation and perpetuation of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review of the published data,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 50, no. 21, pp. 2021–2028, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  99. C. P. Anand, A. Al-Juburi, and B. Sandeep, “Heart block occurring during infliximab infusion: a report of two cases,” The American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 98, no. 9, p. S144, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  100. M. Curione, M. Barbato, S. Amato et al., “Atrioventricular block associated with Crohn’s relapsing colitis in a 12-year-old child,” Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 373-374, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  101. M. Gesualdo, P. Scicchitano, S. Carbonara et al., “The association between cardiac and gastrointestinal disorders: causal or casual link?” Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 330–338, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  102. P. M. Seferović, A. D. Ristić, R. Maksimović et al., “Cardiac arrhythmias and conduction disturbances in autoimmune rheumatic diseases,” Rheumatology, vol. 45, Supplement_4, pp. iv39–iv42, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  103. U. Nussinovitch, J. Freire de Carvalho, R. M. R. Pereira, and Y. Shoenfeld, “Glucocorticoids and the cardiovascular system: state of the art,” Current Pharmaceutical Design, vol. 16, no. 32, pp. 3574–3585, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  104. P. Eickhoff, T. Fazekas, A. Attarbaschi, and T. Binder, “Mitral valve endocarditis caused by ulcerative colitis followed by septic embolic occlusion of the superior mesenteric artery,” European Journal of Echocardiography, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 806-807, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  105. S. Singh, V. Goyal, P. Padhi, and E. Aoun, “Bacteroides fragilis endocarditis in a patient with Crohn’s disease,” Case Reports, vol. 2013, article bcr2013009248, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  106. W. Uchida, M. Mutsuga, H. Ito, H. Oshima, and A. Usui, “Nonbacterial thrombotic endocarditis associated with Crohn disease,” The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, vol. 105, no. 5, pp. e199–e201, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  107. G. Habib, P. Lancellotti, M. J. Antunes et al., “2015 ESC guidelines for the management of infective endocarditis: the task force for the management of infective endocarditis of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Endorsed by: European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS), the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM),” European Heart Journal, vol. 36, no. 44, pp. 3075–3128, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  108. R. Giacomo, T. Gianluca, T. Luca, and C. Maurizio, “A severe but predictable complication of an inflammatory bowel disease,” World Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 129-130, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  109. D. R. Ramsdale, T. S. J. Elliott, P. Wright et al., “Guidance on the prophylaxis and treatment of infective endocarditis in adults,” http://www.bcs.com/restricted/registered/affiliates/endocarditis_guidance.pdf.
  110. D. Lacey and P. Bouillet, “Deregulation of TNF expression can also cause heart valve disease,” Cytokine, vol. 77, pp. 248-249, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  111. K. A. LaBresh, E. V. Lally, S. C. Sharma, and G. Ho Jr, “Two-dimensional echocardiographic detection of preclinical aortic root abnormalities in rheumatoid variant diseases,” The American Journal of Medicine, vol. 78, no. 6, pp. 908–912, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  112. I. Ozsöyler, L. Yilik, S. Bozok, C. Ozbek, and A. Gürbüz, “Cardiovascular involvement in Crohn’s disease in the absence of ankylosing spondylitis,” Heart and Vessels, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 164–166, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  113. M. E. Evangelopoulos, S. Toumanidis, D. Sotou et al., “Mitral valve prolapse in young healthy individuals. An early index of autoimmunity?” Lupus, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 436–440, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  114. N. Minami, H. Nakase, T. Yoshino et al., “Effect of infliximab on inflammatory bowel disease with Takayasu arteritis: case series and review of the literature,” Clinical Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 226–230, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  115. S. Akiyama, T. Fujii, K. Matsuoka et al., “Endoscopic features and genetic background of inflammatory bowel disease complicated with Takayasu arteritis,” Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 1011–1017, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  116. E. Seyahi, “Takayasu arteritis: an update,” Current Opinion in Rheumatology, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 51–56, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  117. M. Isobe, “Takayasu arteritis revisited: current diagnosis and treatment,” International Journal of Cardiology, vol. 168, no. 1, pp. 3–10, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  118. A. Sy, N. Khalidi, N. Dehghan et al., “Vasculitis in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases: a study of 32 patients and systematic review of the literature,” Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 475–482, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  119. A. B. Pithadia and S. Jain, “Treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD),” Pharmacological Reports, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 629–642, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  120. J. F. Jackson and S. V. Sitaraman, “Pericarditis as the presenting sign of Crohn’s disease,” Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 81-82, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  121. S. Asirvatham, C. Sebastian, and U. Thadani, “Severe symptomatic sinus bradycardia associated with mesalamine use,” American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 470-471, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  122. H. Schacke, W. D. Döcke, and K. Asadullah, “Mechanisms involved in the side effects of glucocorticoids,” Pharmacology & Therapeutics, vol. 96, no. 1, pp. 23–43, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  123. J. N. Hoes, J. W. G. Jacobs, S. M. M. Verstappen, J. W. J. Bijlsma, and G. J. M. G. van der Heijden, “Adverse events of low- to medium-dose oral glucocorticoids in inflammatory diseases: a meta-analysis,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 68, no. 12, pp. 1833–1838, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  124. R. M. Stanbury and E. M. Graham, “Systemic corticosteroid therapy—side effects and their management,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 82, no. 6, pp. 704–708, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  125. L. Wei, T. M. MacDonald, and B. R. Walker, “Taking glucocorticoids by prescription is associated with subsequent cardiovascular disease,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 141, no. 10, pp. 764–770, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  126. P. Welsh, G. Grassia, S. Botha, N. Sattar, and P. Maffia, “Targeting inflammation to reduce cardiovascular disease risk: a realistic clinical prospect?” British Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 174, no. 22, pp. 3898–3913, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  127. P. Dogan, E. Grbovic, S. Inci, F. Bayraktar, and K. Cagli, “Azathioprine-induced atrial fibrillation,” Intractable & Rare Diseases Research, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 207–209, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  128. A. Cassinotti, A. Massari, E. Ferrara et al., “New onset of atrial fibrillation after introduction of azathioprine in ulcerative colitis: case report and review of the literature,” European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, vol. 63, no. 9, pp. 875–878, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  129. A. Yuri Gasparyan, L. Ayvazyan, G. Cocco, and G. D. Kitas, “Adverse cardiovascular effects of antirheumatic drugs: implications for clinical practice and research,” Current Pharmaceutical Design, vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 1543–1555, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  130. G. Demirtaş-Ertan, A. T. Rowshani, and I. J. ten Berge, “Azathioprine-induced shock in a patient suffering from undifferentiated erosive oligoarthritis,” The Netherlands Journal of Medicine, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 124–126, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  131. https://www.drugs.com/sfx/methotrexate-side-effects.html 2018 November.
  132. P. E. Lazzerini, P. L. Capecchi, M. Galeazzi, and F. Laghi-Pasini, “Biologic drugs and arrhythmic risk in chronic inflammatory arthritis: the good and the bad,” Immunologic Research, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 262–275, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  133. W. Miehsler, G. Novacek, H. Wenzl et al., “A decade of infliximab: the Austrian evidence based consensus on the safe use of infliximab in inflammatory bowel disease,” Journal of Crohn's and Colitis, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 221–256, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  134. L. Tomáš, I. Lazúrová, L. Pundová et al., “Acute and long-term effect of infliximab on humoral and echocardiographic parameters in patients with chronic inflammatory diseases,” Clinical Rheumatology, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 61–66, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  135. L. Zanoli, S. Rastelli, G. Inserra et al., “Increased arterial stiffness in inflammatory bowel diseases is dependent upon inflammation and reduced by immunomodulatory drugs,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 234, no. 2, pp. 346–351, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  136. S. D. Thapa, H. Hadid, W. Imam, J. Schairer, and S. M. Jafri, “Effect of inflammatory bowel disease-related characteristics and treatment interventions on cardiovascular disease incidence,” The American Journal of the Medical Sciences, vol. 350, no. 3, pp. 175–180, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  137. M. Zuin, G. Rigatelli, G. del Favero et al., “Cardiovascular disease in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: an issue in no guidelines land,” International Journal of Cardiology, vol. 222, pp. 984-985, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  138. H. H. Sun and F. Tian, “Inflammatory bowel disease and cardiovascular disease incidence and mortality: a meta-analysis,” European Journal of Preventive Cardiology, vol. 25, no. 15, pp. 1623–1631, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus