Gastroenterology Research and Practice

Gastroenterology Research and Practice / 2021 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 |Article ID 5592525 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5592525

Pengyan Wang, Jingci Chen, Ying Jiang, Congwei Jia, Junyi Pang, Shan Wang, Xiaoyan Chang, "Neuroendocrine Neoplasms of the Gallbladder: A Clinicopathological Analysis of 13 Patients and a Review of the Literature", Gastroenterology Research and Practice, vol. 2021, Article ID 5592525, 10 pages, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5592525

Neuroendocrine Neoplasms of the Gallbladder: A Clinicopathological Analysis of 13 Patients and a Review of the Literature

Academic Editor: Oronzo Brunetti
Received28 Feb 2021
Accepted10 May 2021
Published24 May 2021

Abstract

Objectives. Mixed neuroendocrine–non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) are rare gallbladder neuroendocrine neoplasms (GB-NENs). This study is aimed at investigating the clinicopathological features of GB-NENs and identifying prognostic factors related to overall survival (OS) of GB-MiNENs. Methods. The clinical data and pathological features of 13 patients with GB-NENs in our hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Additionally, 41 GB-MiNENs cases reported in English literature were reviewed and survival analysis was performed. Results. The mean age of thirteen patients (6 males and 7 females) with GB-NENs was 57.2 years (range: 35-75 years). Two patients were diagnosed with NET grade 1 (G1), two patients with NEC (), and nine patients with MiNENs. Of these 9 patients with MiNENs, 8 had composite tumors and 1 had amphicrine carcinoma. Microscopically, the adenocarcinoma component was located in the surface mucosa, and the neuroendocrine component was in the area of deep invasion, liver infiltration, and lymph node metastasis. Total analysis of 41 GB-MiNENs showed that patients were mainly elderly women (female/male ratio, 2.4 : 1.0; median age, 60 years). Kaplan-Meier’s analysis demonstrated that liver metastasis and TNM stage III-IV were associated with decreased OS (), whereas age, sex, tumor size, grade of the neuroendocrine component, lymph node metastasis, and adjuvant chemotherapy were not significantly prognostic indicators of OS. Multivariate analysis identified liver metastasis (, , ) as an independent unfavorable prognostic factor. Conclusions. GB-MiNENs were the most common type of GB-NENs in our case series, and neuroendocrine components exhibited more aggressive lymph node metastasis and local invasion than adenocarcinoma. Liver metastasis was a poor prognostic indicator in GB-MiNENs patients.

1. Introduction

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) originate from disseminated neuroendocrine cells and account for approximately 0.5% of all newly diagnosed malignancies [1]. Most of these tumors are found in the gastrointestinal and respiratory systems, accounting for 66% and 31%, respectively [2]. The gallbladder mucosa is absent from neuroendocrine cells except for those in the gallbladder neck region [3, 4], which is why NENs of the gallbladder are rare and account for only 0.5% of all NENs and 2% of all gallbladder tumors [5].

According to the World Health Organization (WHO) 2019 classification, gallbladder neuroendocrine neoplasms (GB-NENs) are divided into neuroendocrine tumors (grade 1, 2, or 3 NETs), neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs, large cell or small cell type), and mixed neuroendocrine–non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) [6]. Mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinomas (MANECs) were renamed MiNENs in the WHO 2017 classification [7]. MiNENs are neoplasms in which areas of the neuroendocrine component intermingle with areas of the non-neuroendocrine component, each comprising at least 30% of the tumor [6]. In 1987, Lewin was the first to propose three combinations of this unique type of tumor: collision, composite, and amphicrine [8].

To date, only a few primary GB-NENs have been reported in the English language literature. The clinicopathological characteristics and prognoses for NENs of the gallbladder remain largely undetermined. Therefore, we present the pathological and clinical features of a series of 13 patients with GB-NENs and a brief literature review.

2. Methods and Materials

2.1. Patients and Clinicopathological Characteristics

From September 2000 to December 2020, the medical records of 13 patients with GB-NENs (6 males and 7 females) were retrieved from the archive files of the Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital. The clinical and follow-up data were obtained from electronic medical records, from the hospital discharge summary, or through telephone inquiry. Patient data were analyzed to the last follow-up before December 1, 2020. All patients underwent a cholecystectomy to extensive surgical resections, including regional lymphadenectomy and partial liver resection. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from surgery to the date of death or the last follow-up. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) slides and immunohistochemistry (IHC) results were reviewed by three experienced pathologists. Tumor characteristics evaluated on routine H&E-stained slides included the tumor growth pattern, cell type, mitotic index (10/high-power fields (HPFs)), stroma, and necrosis. Other pathological features that were also examined included tumor size, gross classification (protruding or infiltrative), depth of invasion, and lymph node metastasis. Staging was determined according to the Union for International Cancer Control/American Joint Committee on Cancer (UICC/AJCC) 8th edition [9].

Based on histopathological features, the WHO (2019) classifies NENs into four categories: (1) NET G1 ( and/or ), (2) NET G2 ( and/or ), (3) NET G3 ( and/or ), (4) NEC ( and/or ), and (5) MiNENs [7]. The diagnosis of MiNENs was made based on the WHO 2019 classification, which states that each tumor component comprises at least 30% of the specimen. The combinations of the neuroendocrine and adenocarcinoma components in MiNENs were classified as follows: “collision” (the two components are clearly demarcated); “combined” (the two components are intimately and diffusely admixed); and “amphicrine” (both components are coexpressed in the same cells) [8, 1012]. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Peking Union Medical College Hospital.

2.2. IHC Analyses

All 13 patients included in this study were analyzed by IHC. The immunohistochemical analysis was performed on paraffin-embedded sections on a DAKO Autostainer. The primary antibodies used in the study included synaptophysin (SP11, dilution 1 : 100; Thermo Fisher Scientific), chromogranin A (DAK-A3, dilution 1 : 100; DAKO), Ki-67 (MIB-1, dilution 1 : 200; DAKO), cluster of differentiation protein 56 (123C3, dilution 1 : 100; DAKO), CK7 (OV-TL12/30, dilution 1 : 400; DAKO), CK19 (RCK 108, dilution 1 : 100, DAKO), and cytokeratin (AE1/AE3, dilution 1 : 100; DAKO). Appropriate positive and negative controls were used for all antibodies tested. For each immunohistochemical procedure, antigen retrieval was performed in a citrate buffer, and detection was amplified with the DAKO EnVision System. Mitoses were counted in at least 50 HPFs (), and the Ki-67 index was defined using the MIB antibody as the percentage of 500-2000 cells counted in areas of the strongest nuclear labeling (“hot spots”) [6].

2.3. Statistical Analyses

An English literature search was performed in December 2020 to identify all of the studies that reported gallbladder mixed neuroendocrine–non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (GB-MiNENs) [4, 1340]. SPSS version 23.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and GraphPad Prism version 7 (GraphPad Software, CA, USA) were used for statistical analyses. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for analysis of survival data, and differences were assessed using the log-rank test. The Cox regression analyses were employed to evaluate independent prognostic factors associated with GB-MiNENs. was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Clinicopathological Information

Thirteen patients diagnosed with GB-NENs were evaluated in the current study. Their clinical characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Among the 13 patients, 6 were males, and 7 were females with a male-to-female ratio of 1 : 1.2. The mean age at diagnosis was 57.2 years (range 35-75 years). The imaging studies, such as ultrasound examination, contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scanning, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), showed that eight patients had intramural protruding masses. Specifically, 5 patients had gallstones with diffuse thickening of the gallbladder wall, and 3 patients presented in an advanced stage with infiltration of the liver parenchyma (Figure 1(a)).


PatientSex/agePresentationLiver invasionLymph node metastasisTumor stageTreatmentSurvival (months)

1M/57NO+IIIB (pT3N1M0)Radical ChoD (11)
2F/63FeverIIB (pT2bN0M0)Radical Cho, CheD (13)
3F/70NOIIIA (pT3N0M0)Radical Cho, CheD (27)
4F/53Backache++IIIB (pT3N1M0)Radical ChoD (5)
5M/37NOIIIA (pT3N0M0)Radical Cho, CheD (12)
6M/57Right upper abdominal pain+IIIA (pT3N0M0)Radical ChoD (3)
7M/64BackacheIIB (pT2bN0M0)Radical Cho, CheDFS (54)
8F/75Right upper abdominal painIIA (pT2aN0M0)Radical ChoD (10)
9F/60NOIIB (pT2bN0M0)Radical ChoD (40)
10F/56NO++IVB (pT1N2M0)Radical Cho, CheD (15)
11M/59Right upper abdominal pain+IIIB (pT3N1M0)Radical Cho, CheD (10)
12F/58Right upper abdominal painIB (pT1bN0M0)ChoDFS (229)
13M/35Right upper abdominal painIB (pT1bN0M0)Radical ChoDFS (6)

pTNM: pathological tumor-node-metastasis; Che: chemotherapy; Cho: cholecystectomy; DFS: disease-free survival; D: death.

Histological features are listed in Table 2, and immunohistochemical data are provided in Table 3. Grossly, these tumors measured 0.6 to 7 cm in the greatest dimension and were gray-white to yellow with clear, identifiable boundaries (Figure 1(b)). Lesions are situated in the fundus of the gallbladder in 7 patients, in the body in 3 patients, and in the neck in 3 patients. Microscopically, two patients had NET G1, two patients had NEC (large cell/small cell = 1/1), and nine patients had MiNENs (Figure 2).


PatientSiteMorphologyTumor sizeMitotic index (/10 HPFs)Neuroendocrine tumor gradeNeuroendocrine neoplasm histologic subtypeAdenocarcinoma component

1BodyInfiltrative230MiNENs-NECLarge cell typeModerately differentiated
2FundusInfiltrative3.520MiNENs-NECLarge cell typeModerately differentiated
3NeckInfiltrative2.520MiNENs-NECSmall cell typeWell differentiated
4NeckProtruding450MiNENs-NECLarge cell typeWell differentiated
5BodyInfiltrative5.540MiNENs-NECSmall cell typeWell differentiated
6FundusProtruding520MiNENs-NECLarge cell typeModerately differentiated
7BodyInfiltrative230MiNENs-NECSmall cell typeWell differentiated
8FundusInfiltrative710MiNENs-NET G2Neuroendocrine tumorWell differentiated
9NeckProtruding340Amphicrine carcinomaAmphicrine carcinoma
10FundusProtruding230NECSmall cell typeAbsent
11FundusProtruding440NECLarge cell typeAbsent
12FundusProtruding0.61NET-G1Neuroendocrine tumorAbsent
13FundusProtruding0.61NET-G1Neuroendocrine tumorAbsent


SynCgAKi-67CD56CK7CK19Cytokeratin

Case 1++40%+NP+Focal+
Case 2++85%+++Focal+
Case 3++Focal50%NP+
Case 4+70%NPNP+
Case 5++55%+NPNP+
Case 6++80%NPNP+
Case 7++65%+NP++
Case 8++10%++NP+
Case 9++60%+++Focal+
Case 10++50%+NPNP+
Case 11++60%++NP+
Case 12++2%_NPNP+
Case 13++1%NPNPNP

Syn: synaptophysin; CgA: chromogranin A; NP: not performed.

Of these 9 patients with MiNENs, 3 (33.3%) had NEC of the small cell type (SCC), 4 (44.5%) had histomorphology of large cell NEC (LCNEC), 1 (11.1%) had amphicrine carcinoma, and 1 (11.1%) had NET G2. The neuroendocrine cells were arranged in sheets with areas of a large nest, trabecula, and cord. These cells were positive for the expression of neuroendocrine markers, such as chromogranin A, synaptophysin, and CD56, but negative for epithelial markers (cytokeratins CK7 and CK19). The glandular component was composed of tubular and papillary structures formed by columnar, goblet, and Paneth-like cells, which were positive for epithelial markers but negative for neuroendocrine markers.

The present 9 patients with GB-MiNENs were classified as follows: composite tumors (8 patients) and amphicrine carcinoma (1 patient). Of the 8 patients with composite tumors, 5 patients had mainly neuroendocrine components, and 3 patients had adenocarcinoma components. The two components were closely intermingled and difficult to separate in most of the lesions. Both components invaded through the adventitia with the deeper infiltrating tumor exhibiting strong expression of the neuroendocrine markers chromogranin and synaptophysin. In two of the eight patients (patients 4 and 6), the neuroendocrine carcinoma had directly invaded into liver parenchyma. Furthermore, the neuroendocrine components of patients 4 and 1 were involved in lymph node metastasis. There was 1 amphicrine carcinoma (patient 9) that was predominantly composed of nests of cells with moderate atypia, finely and spotted nuclei, and focal mucin lakes, which exhibited concurrent neuroendocrine and nonendocrine differentiation (Figure 2).

3.2. Immunohistochemical Analysis

Immunohistochemistry for GB-NENs is shown in Table 3. Immunohistochemical examinations showed positivity rates of 100% for synaptophysin, 92.3% for chromogranin A, and 66.7% for CD56. All the patients showed positive Ki-67 staining by IHC with a range of 1% to 85%. In addition, almost every amphicrine carcinoma tumor cell (patient 9) showed diffuse and strong expression of synaptophysin and chromogranin A and low immunoreactivity of cytokeratin. The Ki-67 labeling index was 60%.

3.3. Treatment Outcomes

Follow-up was available in 13 patients with a median survival of 11.5 months (3-40 months) (Table 1). Six patients received adjuvant chemotherapy, and 4 patients refused treatment. Two patients with NET G1 (patients 12 and 13) had no recurrence during 213-month and 6-month follow-up periods, respectively, after cholecystectomy without adjuvant therapy. Patient 7 underwent radical cholecystectomy and received six cycles of chemotherapy using cisplatin and etoposide; this patient exhibited disease-free survival (DFS) after a 54-month follow-up period. The remaining patients died of tumor progression with or without adjuvant treatment; however, the patient with amphicrine carcinoma did not undergo chemotherapy and died due to recurrence 40 months after surgery, which was much longer than the median survival time of patients with GB-MiNENs (11.5 months).

3.4. Total Analysis with Cases Reported in the Literature

We reviewed the clinical presentation and management of 41 patients with MiNENs of the gallbladder in the published literature as well as 9 patients from our institute, as shown in Table 4 [4, 1340]. According to our data, GB-MiNENs were more frequent in females than males (female/male ratio, 2.4 : 1.0), and the median age at presentation was 60.0 years (range 34 to 85 years). Most of the patients presented with abdominal pain (62.9%), followed by asymptomatic cases (20.0%). The tumors were commonly reported to be in the fundus (55.2%) of the gallbladder. The diameters of the tumors ranged from 1.0 cm to 15.0 cm (mean size 4.9 cm), which usually present as nodular masses (75.0%). Approximately 38.5% of the reported cases had gallstones. Nineteen of 41 (46.3%) cases were large cell type (LCNEC), which was the most common type of GB-MiNENs; however, only two (4.9%) exhibited amphicrine carcinoma in morphology and immunohistochemistry. Among the cases reporting the histology of metastases, most of the lymph node metastasis, liver infiltration, and distant metastasis were composed of the pure neuroendocrine component [14, 18, 21, 23, 29, 34, 37].


Total number of patients41
SexMale: 12 (12/41, 29.2%)
Female: 29 (29/41, 70.7%)
Female-to-male ratio: 2.4 : 1
Median age60 years (age range: 34-85 years)
Primary tumor locationGallbladder
Tumor siteFundus: 16 (16/29, 55.2%)
Body: 5 (7/29, 24.1%)
Neck: 4 (4/29, 13.8%)
Fundus and body: 2 (2/29, 6.9%)
Metastatic siteLymph nodes: 15 (15/41, 36.6%)
Liver: 17 (17/41, 41.5%)
Duodenum: 1 (1/41, 2.4%)
Bone: 1 (1/41, 2.4%)
Presenting symptomsAbdominal pain: 22 (22/35, 62.9%)
Fever: 2 (2/35, 5.7%)
Back pain: 3 (3/35, 8.5%)
Asymptomatic: 7 (7/35, 20.0%)
Anorexia: 1 (1/35, 2.9%)
MorphologyProtruding: 27 (27/36, 75.0%)
Infiltrative: 9 (9/36, 25.0%)
Histopathology of the neuroendocrine componentSCC: 9 (9/41, 22.0%)
LCNEC: 19 (19/41, 46.3%)
SCC and LCNEC: 1 (1/41, 2.4%)
NEC: 6 (6/41, 14.6%)
NET: G2, 4 (4/41, 9.8%)
Amphicrine carcinoma: 2 (2/41, 4.9%)
OutcomeMedian survival: 11.5 months (range: 2-40 months)
Median disease-free survival: 12 months (range: 2-48 months)

In the subsequent prognostic analysis, the Kaplan-Meier method was used to evaluate prognostic factors, including age, sex, tumor diameter, neuroendocrine component, lymph node metastasis, liver metastasis, TNM tumor stage, and adjuvant chemotherapy, as shown in Table 5. Only thirty patients with survival data were analyzed, with a median OS of 11 months (2-27 months). Liver metastasis and TNM tumor stage were identified as significant predictors of OS (Figure 3). Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to assess the factors related to OS, and liver metastasis (, , ) was found to be independently associated with poor survival, as shown in Table 6.


VariableGroupEvent value

Age (years)<60140.300
≥6016
SexMale100.238
Female20
Diameter<4.9210.695
≥4.97
NA2
Neuroendocrine componentNET30.709
NEC27
Positive LNYes80.535
No22
Liver metastasisYes100.013
No20
Tumor stageI + II130.043
III + IV15
NA2
Adjuvant chemotherapyYes150.916
No15

.

ParameterUnivariate analysisMultivariate analysis
HR (95% CI) valueHR (95% CI) value

Age0.983 (0.945-1.023)0.394
Sex (male vs. female)0.576 (0.202-1.641)0.301
Tumor diameter1.295 (0.904-1.855)0.1591.525 (0.969-2.402)0.068
Grade of the neuroendocrine component (NET vs. NEC)1.531 (0.199-11.754)0.682
Lymph node metastasis (negative vs. positive)1.754 (0.547-5.628)0.345
Liver metastasis (negative vs. positive)4.364 (1.503-12.673)4.262 (1.066-17.044)
Tumor stage (stages I + II vs. stages III + IV)3.028 (0.961-9.545)0.0591.341 (0.322-5.582)0.686
Adjuvant chemotherapy1.020 (0.355-2.933)0.971

Variables with in the univariate analysis were included in the multivariate analysis. .

4. Discussion

GB-NENs are rare but highly malignant gallbladder tumors, most of which are found after cholecystectomy for cholecystitis, surgery for a suspected biliary malignancy, or autopsy [41]. The current literature has shown that more than one-third of gallbladder NECs are combined with an adenocarcinoma component (MiNENs) [6]. By definition, MiNENs are regarded as a conceptual category and diagnosed only when both components are present in more than 30% of the tumor based on pathological examinations [6]. To date, only a few patients with GB-NENs have been described in the literature, and even fewer with GB-MiNENs have been described.

The pathogenesis of GB-NENs remains controversial. Some researchers believe that this malignancy originates from the gastric or intestinal metaplasia of the gallbladder epithelium, which may explain the coexistence of cholecystitis and cholelithiasis in patients with GB-NENs [42]. In our study, we observed that 5 of 13 patients had gallstones with cholecystitis. However, recent studies revealed that the different components of MiNENs have similar mutation profiles, suggesting a common monoclonal origin [39, 43, 44]. In our case series, 69.2% (9/13) of gallbladder neuroendocrine neoplasms were accompanied by adenocarcinoma components, suggesting that gallbladder neuroendocrine differentiation develops from adenocarcinomas and that both components arise from a single cancer stem cell.

In 1987, Lewin [8] first proposed dividing mixed exocrine-neuroendocrine tumors into three categories: composite tumors, collision tumors, and amphicrine tumors. Fujiyoshi et al. [10] reclassified these tumors by dividing them into six categories: neuroendocrine cells interspersed within carcinomas, carcinoids (NETs) with interspersed nonendocrine cells, composite glandular-neuroendocrine cell carcinomas, collision tumors, amphicrine tumors, and combinations of the previous types. In this study, we reviewed 9 cases of gallbladder MiNENs, including 8 composite tumors and 1 amphicrine carcinoma. To the best of our knowledge, this is the second case in which amphicrine carcinoma has been reported in the gallbladder. Zhang et al. [40] presented the first case of gallbladder amphicrine carcinoma, in which the patient received surgical resection and adjuvant capecitabine chemotherapy with disease-free survival after 8 months of surgery. Regarding composite tumors, the histomorphology revealed that the surface mucosa comprised the adenocarcinoma component, and the neuroendocrine component was in the area of deep invasion, the liver and lymph node metastasis. In the GB-MiNENs patients with histological information on metastases, most of the lymph node metastases, liver infiltration, and distant metastases were composed of a pure neuroendocrine component [14, 18, 21, 23, 29, 34, 37]. On the basis of these findings, the neuroendocrine component appears to be more invasive than the adenocarcinoma component.

The standard therapeutic strategy for GB-NENs has not yet been established. Surgical management remains the first choice for early-stage patients and was also offered to some advanced patients. For Tis and stage I tumors, a cholecystectomy could be enough. Chemotherapy is the first treatment option for advanced patients, and the combination of cisplatin and etoposide has been effective [45]. Furthermore, somatostatin analogs have also been used, with partial success [46].

At present, prognostic factors for NENs are still controversial, and the prognosis depends not only on the stage of the disease but also on the exact histological type [47]. Shi et al. considered that the survival time of patients with GB-MiNENs was similar to that of patients with GB-NECs [48]. Harada et al. [21] concluded that the presence of the neuroendocrine tumor component of MiNENs in the biliary tract defines the prognosis. Moreover, most of the MiNENs cases had a high-grade neuroendocrine component, which has the tendency to invade lymph nodes and adjacent hepatic tissues, resulting in a dismal prognosis even after complete resection [12, 31]. In our study, most tumors were diagnosed at an advanced stage, and all of the patients received surgical resection with a median survival time of 11.5 months. Similarly, one study showed that the median survival time of 20 patients with curatively resected biliary neuroendocrine tumors was 13.7 months [49]. Total analysis combined with GB-MiNENs cases reported in the literature revealed that liver metastasis and tumor stage were significant predictors of OS, and liver metastasis was an independent unfavorable prognostic factor.

The main limitation of the present study was the lack of a statistical power analysis due to the small number of patients. Additionally, some laboratory indicators should be evaluated in future investigations to improve GB-MiNENs prognosis.

5. Conclusions

Although there is a low incidence of GB-NENs, our results provide a good picture of the behavior of this rare condition. GB-MiNENs were the most common type in our case series. More importantly, however, the neuroendocrine component of GB-MiNENs follows an aggressive clinical course, as shown in our patients, with higher local invasion and lymph node metastasis than the adenocarcinoma. Liver metastasis was an independent negative prognostic factor for the survival of GB-MiNENs patients in this retrospective study.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ Contributions

XYC conceived and designed the study. PYW and JCC collected the clinical and follow-up information, performed the literature review, and drafted the manuscript. JYP and SW performed the immunohistochemistry staining. YJ, CWJ, and XYC participated in the histological diagnosis and immunohistochemical evaluation. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Pengyan Wang and Jingci Chen contributed equally to this work.

References

  1. B. G. Taal and O. Visser, “Epidemiology of neuroendocrine tumours,” Neuroendocrinology, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 3–7, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. J. Rothenstein, S. P. Cleary, G. R. Pond et al., “Neuroendocrine tumors of the gastrointestinal tract: a decade of experience at the Princess Margaret Hospital,” American Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 64–70, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. E. B. Stelow, S. M. Hong, and J. H. F. Frierson, “Gallbladder and extrahepatic biliary system,” in Histology for Pathologists, S. E. Mills, Ed., pp. 705–722, Academic, Philadelphia, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  4. D. Chatterjee and H. Wang, “Mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma arising in a papillary adenoma of gallbladder,” American Journal of Cancer Case Reports, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 37–42, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  5. J. C. Yao, M. Hassan, A. Phan et al., “One hundred years after “carcinoid”: epidemiology of and prognostic factors for neuroendocrine tumors in 35,825 cases in the United States,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 26, no. 18, pp. 3063–3072, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. D. S. Klimstra, G. Klöppel, S. La Rosa, and G. Rindi, “Classification of neuroendocrine neoplasms of the digestive system,” in WHO Classification of Tumours of Digestive System, I. D. Nagtegaal, R. D. Odze, and D. S. Klimstra, Eds., pp. 16–19, IARC, Lyon, 5th edition, 2019. View at: Google Scholar
  7. G. Kloppel, A. Couvelard, R. H. Hruban, D. S. Klimstra, P. Komminoth, and R. Y. Osamura, “Introduction. Neoplasms of the neuroendocrine pancreas,” in WHO Classification of Tumours of Endocrine Organs, R. V. Lloyd, R. Y. Osamura, and G. Kloppel, Eds., pp. 210–239, IARC, Lyon, 4th edition, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
  8. K. Lewin, “Carcinoid tumors and the mixed (composite) glandular-endocrine cell carcinomas,” The American Journal of Surgical Pathology, vol. 11, Supplement 1, pp. 71–86, 1987. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. M. B. Amin, S. B. Edge, F. L. Greene, C. C. Compton, J. E. Gershenwald, and R. K. Brookland, AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, Springer, New York, 8th edition, 2017. View at: Publisher Site
  10. Y. Fujiyoshi, H. Kuhara, and T. Eimoto, “Composite glandular-endocrine cell carcinoma of the stomach. Report of two cases with goblet cell carcinoid component,” Pathology, Research and Practice, vol. 200, no. 11-12, pp. 823–829, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. L. de Mestier, J. Cros, C. Neuzillet et al., “Digestive system mixed neuroendocrine–non-neuroendocrine neoplasms,” Neuroendocrinology, vol. 105, no. 4, pp. 412–425, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. S. La Rosa, A. Marando, F. Sessa, and C. Capella, “Mixed Adenoneuroendocrine Carcinomas (MANECs) of the gastrointestinal tract: an update,” Cancers, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 11–30, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. M. Papotti, P. Cassoni, A. Sapino, G. Passarino, J. E. Krueger, and J. Albores-Saavedra, “Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the gallbladder: report of two cases,” The American Journal of Surgical Pathology, vol. 24, no. 10, pp. 1424–1428, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. A. Noske and S. Pahl, “Combined adenosquamous and large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the gallbladder,” Virchows Archiv, vol. 449, no. 1, pp. 135-136, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. T. Shimizu, T. Tajiri, K. Akimaru et al., “Combined neuroendocrine cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the gallbladder: report of a case,” Journal of Nippon Medical School = Nippon Ika Daigaku zasshi, vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 101–105, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. H. Oshiro, K. Matsuo, H. Mawatari et al., “Mucin-producing gallbladder adenocarcinoma with focal small cell and large cell neuroendocrine differentiation associated with pancreaticobiliary maljunction,” Pathology International, vol. 58, no. 12, pp. 780–786, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. S. Iype, T. A. Mirza, D. J. Propper, S. Bhattacharya, R. M. Feakins, and H. M. Kocher, “Neuroendocrine tumours of the gallbladder: three cases and a review of the literature,” Postgraduate Medical Journal, vol. 85, no. 1002, pp. 213–218, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. K. Sato, T. Imai, Y. Shirota, Y. Ueda, and S. Katsuda, “Combined large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the gallbladder,” Pathology, Research and Practice, vol. 206, no. 6, pp. 397–400, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. A. E. Paniz Mondolfi, D. Slova, W. Fan et al., “Mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma (MANEC) of the gallbladder: a possible stem cell tumor?” Pathology International, vol. 61, no. 10, pp. 608–614, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. S. Russo, F. Russo, F. M. Maiello, B. Paolini, A. Carrabba, and A. De Gregorio, “Biphasic large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma—pure mucinous carcinoma of the gallbladder (MANEC): a unique combination,” Pathologica, vol. 104, no. 4, pp. 185–189, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  21. K. Harada, Y. Sato, H. Ikeda et al., “Clinicopathologic study of mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinomas of hepatobiliary organs,” Virchows Archiv, vol. 460, no. 3, pp. 281–289, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. N. Al-Brahim and R. Albannai, “Combined large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the gallbladder,” Endocrine Pathology, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 110–113, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. T. Abe, K. Kajiyama, N. Harimoto, T. Gion, K. Shirabe, and T. Nagaie, “Composite adeno-endocrine carcinoma of the gallbladder with long-term survival,” International Journal of Surgery Case Reports, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 504–507, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. M. Shintaku, K. Kataoka, and K. Kawabata, “Mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma of the gallbladder with squamous cell carcinomatous and osteosarcomatous differentiation: report of a case,” Pathology International, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 113–119, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. Y. Meguro, N. Fukushima, M. Koizumi et al., “A case of mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma of the gallbladder arising from an intracystic papillary neoplasm associated with pancreaticobiliary maljunction,” Pathology International, vol. 64, no. 9, pp. 465–471, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. H. Chen, Y. Y. Shen, and X. Z. Ni, “Two cases of neuroendocrine carcinoma of the gallbladder,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 20, no. 33, pp. 11916–11920, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. S. Azad, D. Shukla, A. Garg, S. S. Negi, and V. Malhotra, “Mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma of the gallbladder, histopathological features,” Indian Journal of Pathology & Microbiology, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 543–545, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. M. Kamboj, J. S. Gandhi, G. Gupta et al., “Neuroendocrine carcinoma of gall bladder: a series of 19 cases with review of literature,” Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 356–364, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. A. M. Acosta, F. S. Hamedani, A. Kajdacsy-Balla, and E. L. Wiley, “Primary mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma of the gallbladder in a 55-year-old female patient: a case report and review of the literature,” International Journal of Surgical Pathology, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 414–418, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. W. Liu, L. Wang, X. D. He, C. Feng, X. Y. Chang, and Z. H. Lu, “Mixed large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the gallbladder: a case report and brief review of the literature,” World Journal of Surgical Oncology, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 114, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. H. J. Hu, R. X. Zhou, Y. Q. Tan et al., “Coexisting cancers: a mixture of neuroendocrine carcinoma and adenocarcinoma in the gallbladder: a case report,” Medicine, vol. 95, no. 44, article e5281, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. Y. X. Lin, Q. B. Jia, Y. Y. Fu, and N. S. Cheng, “Mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma of the gallbladder,” Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 1452–1454, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. J. Jung, Y. S. Chae, C. H. Kim et al., “Combined adenosquamous and large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the gallbladder,” Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 121–125, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. S. Soin, B. S. Pannu, P. T. Myint, and A. S. Dhillon, “Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of gallbladder with concomitant hepatitis C infection,” BMJ Case Reports, vol. 2018, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. A. Skalický, L. Vištejnová, M. Dubová, T. Malkus, T. Skalický, and O. Troup, “Mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine carcinoma of gallbladder: case report,” World Journal of Surgical Oncology, vol. 17, no. 1, p. 55, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. N. Yannakou, S. Rizos, P. Parissi-Mathiou, D. Smailis, S. Charanioti, and C. Dervenis, “Mixed (composite) glandular-endocrine cell carcinoma of the gallbladder,” HPB: The Official Journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 7–9, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. H. Okamoto, K. Miura, T. Ogawara, H. Fujii, and Y. Matsumoto, “Small-cell carcinoma manifesting systemic lymphadenopathy combined with adenocarcinoma in the gallbladder: aggressiveness and sensitivity to chemotherapy,” Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 801–805, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. W. Song, W. Chen, S. Zhang, J. Peng, and Y. He, “Successful treatment of gallbladder mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy,” Diagnostic Pathology, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 163, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. A. Sciarra, E. Missiaglia, M. Trimech et al., “Gallbladder mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasm (MiNEN) arising in intracholecystic papillary neoplasm: clinicopathologic and molecular analysis of a case and review of the literature,” Endocrine Pathology, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 84–93, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. D. Zhang, P. Li, P. Szankasi, and X. Liao, “Mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma of the gallbladder, amphicrine type: case report and review of literature,” Pathology, Research and Practice, vol. 216, no. 7, article 152997, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. I. M. Modlin, M. D. Shapiro, and M. Kidd, “An analysis of rare carcinoid tumors: clarifying these clinical conundrums,” World Journal of Surgery, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 92–101, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. K. M. Eltawil, B. I. Gustafsson, M. Kidd, and I. M. Modlin, “Neuroendocrine tumors of the gallbladder: an evaluation and reassessment of management strategy,” Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology, vol. 44, no. 10, pp. 687–695, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. M. Jesinghaus, B. Konukiewitz, G. Keller et al., “Colorectal mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinomas and neuroendocrine carcinomas are genetically closely related to colorectal adenocarcinomas,” Modern Pathology, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 610–619, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. M. Scardoni, E. Vittoria, M. Volante et al., “Mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinomas of the gastrointestinal tract: targeted next-generation sequencing suggests a monoclonal origin of the two components,” Neuroendocrinology, vol. 100, no. 4, pp. 310–316, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  45. R. Garcia-Carbonero, P. JImenez-Fonseca, A. Teulé, J. Barriuso, I. Sevilla, and Spanish Society for Medical Oncology, “SEOM clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) 2014,” Clinical & Translational Oncology, vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 1025–1034, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. K. Oberg, G. Akerström, G. Rindi, and S. Jelic, “Neuroendocrine gastroenteropancreatic tumours: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up,” Annals of Oncology, vol. 21, Suppl 5, pp. v223–v227, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. D. E. Henson, J. Albores-Saavedra, and D. Code, “Carcinoma of the gallbladder. Histologic types, stage of disease, grade, and survival rates,” Cancer, vol. 70, no. 6, pp. 1493–1497, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. H. Shi, C. Qi, L. Meng et al., “Do neuroendocrine carcinomas and mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasm of the gastrointestinal tract have the same prognosis? A SEER database analysis of 12,878 cases,” Therapeutic Advances in Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 11, p. 2042018820938304, 2020. View at: Google Scholar
  49. J. Kim, W. J. Lee, S. H. Lee et al., “Clinical features of 20 patients with curatively resected biliary neuroendocrine tumours,” Digestive and Liver Disease, vol. 43, no. 12, pp. 965–970, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2021 Pengyan Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views485
Downloads697
Citations

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.