International Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease

International Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease / 2010 / Article
!A Erratum for this article has been published. To view the article details, please click the ‘Erratum’ tab above.

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2010 |Article ID 859101 | https://doi.org/10.4061/2010/859101

L. Chouliaras, A. S. R. Sierksma, G. Kenis, J. Prickaerts, M. A. M. Lemmens, I. Brasnjevic, E. L. van Donkelaar, P. Martinez-Martinez, M. Losen, M. H. De Baets, N. Kholod, F. van Leeuwen, P. R. Hof, J. van Os, H. W. M. Steinbusch, D. L. A. van den Hove, B. P. F. Rutten, "Gene-Environment Interaction Research and Transgenic Mouse Models of Alzheimer's Disease", International Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, vol. 2010, Article ID 859101, 27 pages, 2010. https://doi.org/10.4061/2010/859101

Gene-Environment Interaction Research and Transgenic Mouse Models of Alzheimer's Disease

Academic Editor: A. I. Bush
Received29 May 2010
Accepted31 Jul 2010
Published05 Oct 2010

Abstract

The etiology of the sporadic form of Alzheimer's disease (AD) remains largely unknown. Recent evidence has suggested that gene-environment interactions (GxE) may play a crucial role in its development and progression. Whereas various susceptibility loci have been identified, like the apolipoprotein E4 allele, these cannot fully explain the increasing prevalence of AD observed with aging. In addition to such genetic risk factors, various environmental factors have been proposed to alter the risk of developing AD as well as to affect the rate of cognitive decline in AD patients. Nevertheless, aside from the independent effects of genetic and environmental risk factors, their synergistic participation in increasing the risk of developing AD has been sparsely investigated, even though evidence points towards such a direction. Advances in the genetic manipulation of mice, modeling various aspects of the AD pathology, have provided an excellent tool to dissect the effects of genes, environment, and their interactions. In this paper we present several environmental factors implicated in the etiology of AD that have been tested in transgenic animal models of the disease. The focus lies on the concept of GxE and its importance in a multifactorial disease like AD. Additionally, possible mediating mechanisms and future challenges are discussed.

1. Introduction

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia, characterized by an initial loss of short-term memory, followed by a progressive impairment in multiple cognitive domains. The estimated lifetime risk for developing AD is about 20% for women and 10% for men aged above 65 [1]. The pathology of AD is characterized by an accumulation of misfolded proteins, oxidative damage, and inflammatory changes ultimately resulting in region-specific loss of synaptic contacts and neuronal cell death [2]. Current biological theories on the etiology and pathology of AD posit central roles for age-related molecular and cellular aberrations that induce an imbalance in the production, cleavage, and clearance of amyloid- (A ), hyperphosphorylation of the tau protein, and aberrant apolipoprotein E (APOE) function in the aging brain [1]. Several genetic risk factors have been linked with an increased risk of developing AD, such as mutations in the amyloid precursor protein (APP) and presenilin (PS) 1 and 2 for the familial cases of AD (FAD), as well as the APOE4 allele for the sporadic late-onset form of AD (LOAD). Several new genetic findings derived from powerful genome-wide association studies (GWAS; see below) have confirmed that AD is a polygenic disorder. The genes identified in these studies may enlighten unknown biological pathways involved in AD [3].

Furthermore, various environmental exposures have been found to modify the risk of AD, such as diet and nutrition, physical exercise, exposure to metals, and brain trauma. Comorbidities, such as vascular disorders or depression, could also be of considerable importance, since these have also been suggested to contribute to the risk of AD. Recent evidence indicates that more attention should be paid to the role of the environment and its interactions with underlying genetic susceptibility in triggering disease-related phenotypes [4]. The gene-environment interaction (GxE) approach differs from the linear approach of either genetic or environmental effects by positing a causal role not only for either genes or environmental exposures in isolation, but for their synergistic participation in leading to a certain phenotype (here AD), where the effect of one is conditional for the other [57]. Where epidemiological studies on AD may reveal statistical evidence for GxE in the onset and course of AD, animal research can be instrumental in studying the underlying biological mechanisms.

1.1. Objective

The objective of this review is to give an overview of the available transgenic mouse studies on AD, specifically addressing the concept of GxE. We start with a brief description of the various genetic and environmental risk factors of AD, and the different available transgenic mouse models of AD. The main part of the paper describes the effects of several environmental exposures on AD-related phenotypes. These sections begin with a brief description of the epidemiological evidence in AD (when available from meta-analyses) and continue with describing the findings from experimental animal studies in which the environmental factor was manipulated in AD transgenic mice and, when performed, in wild-type (WT) mice. Thereafter, we discuss the strengths and limitations of these studies, and we end with identifying future challenges and prospects.

2. Alzheimer’s Disease

2.1. Genetics of AD

Twin studies on AD have shown a heritability of 60%–80% and a concordance of 18% up to 83%, depending on for example, the population and age of the subjects investigated. Thus, both heritable and nonheritable factors play an important role in AD’s age of onset, risk and etiology [811]. Several genetic risk factors have been linked to AD. Mutations in APP, PS1, and PS2 genes have consistently been associated with early-onset FAD. Also for LOAD several susceptibility loci have been linked with risk for AD, such as the gene encoding for the APOE4 allele or loci in the clusterin (CLU), phosphatidylinositol binding clathrin assembly protein (PICALM), complement receptor 1 (CR1), BIN1 (bridging integrator, amphiphysin) genes, a locus near the BLOC1S3 (biogenesis of lysosomal organelles complex1, subunit 3), and MARK4 (microtubule affinity-regulating kinase 4) genes [3, 1214]. Other susceptibility loci have also been associated with AD (see [12, 15], http://www.alzgene.org/).

2.2. Environment and AD

Although a range of environmental exposures have been linked to AD, well-replicated and meta-analyses’ evidence for the involvement of clear environmental factors in AD is sparse. Recent studies, however, have shown that dietary factors, such as exposure to a Mediterranean diet, fish and high omega-3 diets, cigarette smoking, head trauma, infections, systemic inflammation, and metal and pesticide exposure can significantly alter an individual’s risk of developing AD. In addition, psychosocial factors such as education, social network, leisure activities and physical activity, chronic stress, and depression also seem to be connected to the risk of developing AD [1618]. Somatic factors that are under the direct influence of environmental exposures, such as blood pressure, obesity, diabetes mellitus, cardio- and cerebrovascular diseases, and hyperlipidemia, have additionally been implicated in AD etiology [16, 18].

2.3. Gene-Environment Interactions and AD

The field of GxE research appears very promising for psychiatry and neuroscience, albeit still little investigated in AD [19]. The notion of potential existence of GxE in AD has substantial impact on the interpretation of reports on genetic and nongenetic contribution to this disorder. Reported contributions of environmental and genetic factors to disease risk can be misleading, since they represent the environmental exposure in relationship with the genetic susceptibility or resilience to it [6]. Thus, the advantage of the concept of GxE is that it includes the genetic control of sensitivity to the environment. Additionally, the genome-wide genetic findings identify associations that also include underlying GxE [6]. In fact, evidence for GxE in AD has recently started to accumulate. For example, an interaction between the APOE4 allele and cholesterol levels has been shown to increase the risk of AD [20, 21]. Significant statistical interactions were also found between moderate consumption of alcohol and the APOE4 genotype, as well as for smoking and the APOE4 genotype [22, 23]. Furthermore, an interaction with this risk genotype and social factors, such as cohabiting with a partner has been found; APOE4 carriers who lost their partner before midlife showed an increased risk of developing AD, compared to married or cohabiting people [24].

These epidemiological studies indicate that it makes sense to focus future clinical AD studies on measuring both genes and environment and analyzing possible interactions, given that certain environmental factors may only affect a phenotype when the person is genetically endowed. A major drawback of epidemiological clinical studies is that they may indicate merely statistical interactions and thus cannot easily decipher the biological mechanisms that underlie the observed statistical interactions. Other major obstacles in clinical studies are the heterogeneity of the study population and co-occurrence of various environmental exposures in the same individuals. Experimental animal research has the advantage of enabling strict control of genetic and environmental variables. Recent advances in transgenesis allow altering specific genes in isolation, and in a time- and region-specific manner. As such, transgenic mice form a useful tool to study the effects of genetic and environmental variations and to identify the biological mechanisms that underlie the statistical GxE interactions observed in epidemiological studies (see Figure 1).

2.4. Transgenic Mouse Models of AD

Without the intention of giving a full overview of the available AD mouse models, some details on the types of transgenic mice that are discussed in the present paper can be found in Table 1. Information on the promoters used for the transgenic construct, and further details on genetic background are not further discussed here as these aspects lie outside the scope of this paper.


NameMutationBackgroundEffectRef.

3xTgInjection of APPswe and tauP301L transgenes in PS1M146V knock-in mice129/C57BL6Intraneuronal A at 3 months, extracellular at 6, hippocampal hyperphosphorylated tau pathology at 12 months, synaptic dysfunction[26]

A PPsweCarrying the mutant A PPK670N, M671L geneMixed background of 56.25% C57, 12.5% B6, 18.75% SJL, and 12.5% Swiss-WebsterAmyloid deposition and cognitive decline starting at the age of 8 months[27]

APOE3, APOE4APOE knockout mice carry an inactivated APOE endogenous gene disrupted by gene targeting in embryonic stem cells. Human APOE genomic DNA fragments injected in single cell emryos fertilized by APOE knockout miceAPOE knockout and C57BL6Expression of human APOE in the brain, high cholesterol levels[28]

APP23cDNA of human APP with the Swedish double mutation at positions 670/671 combined with the V717I mutation, inserted to the blunt ended XhoI site of the expression cassette containing the murine Thy 1.2 geneC57BL6A deposition in the neocortex and hippocampus at the age of 6 months[29]

APP715SLSwedish (KM670/671NL) and London (V717I) mutation under control of Thy1 promotorCBA/C57BL6Amyloid plaque deposits at 6 months of age[30]

Human A coding sequence knocked-in to the endogenous APP gene, combined with the Swedish (K670N/M671L) mutation129/SvNo A depositions, but a 9-fold increase in human A production compared to normal human A levels[31]

APP/PS1 KIDouble knock-in mouse: crossed with PS1 P264L knock-in, using Cre-lox knock-in technology and endogenous promotersCD-1/129Increase of A 42 levels, amyloid deposition and reactive gliosis by 4 months of age.[32, 33]

APPswe/indExpressing human APP with Swedish mutation (K670N/M671L) and the V717I Indiana mutation under the PDGF promoter (J20 line)C57BL6 DBA/2Increased A production and A deposition at 5–7 months of age, decrease in synaptophysin immunoreactivity at 2–4 months of age[34]

APPswe/PS1 E9Cross of APPswe and PS1 E9 (expressing human PS1 carrying the exon 9 deleted variant)C57BL6JAmyloid plaque deposition, cholinergic marker decrease, memory deficits at 6 months of age[35]

APPswe/PS1Leu235ProAPP swedish mutation crossed with mutant human PS1 Leu235ProC3H/HeJ/C57BL/A2G[36, 37]

APPswe/PS1M146LTg2576 combined with PS1 (M146L) mutation (under PDGF promoter)C57/B6/SJL/Swiss WebsterCompared to Tg2576, 41% increase in A 42 which precedes fibrillar A deposits in cerebral cortex and hippocampus. Reduced spontaneous alternation performance in the Y-maze.[38]

APPV717I-C100Expressing the C-terminal 100 amino acid of human APP with 717 London mutationC57BL6Intracellular accumulation of soluble A [39]
APP-YACThe entire human APP gene inserted to the yeast artificial chromosome (YAC) B142F9, introduced to embryonic stem cell by lipofectionC57BL6Significant human APP expression in the cerebral cortex[40]

PDAPPIndiana mutation (V717F) with portions of APP introns 6–8, driven by the PDGF promoterExtracellular A deposits in the hippocampus from the age of 6 months and neocortex from 8 months of age[41]

PS1-L286VOverexpressing human PS1 with L286 mutation under the control of human PDGF- promoterFVB/NA 42 intracellular deposits at 13 months of age[42]

TASTPMCarrying human APPswe and PS1 M146V mutationsC57BL63HCerebral A deposition and cognitive deficits at 6 months of age[43]

Tg19959TgCRND8 mice plus M146L L286V PS1 transgene in the hamster PrP gene promoterC57/C3H/129SvEv/ Tac/FVBAmyloid deposits at 1 month of age[44]

Tg2576Human APPswe (double K670N, M671L) inserted to hamster prion protein promoter (PrP) (is also known and referred to in the text as APPswe)C57BL65-fold increase in A 40 and 14 fold increase in A 42, behavioral deficits, amyloid plaques at 9 months of age[45]

TgC100 Expressing the C-terminal 100 amino acid of human APP (with or without 717 London mutation)C57BL6Intracellular accumulation of soluble A [39]

TgCRND8Swedish and Indiana (V717F) APP mutationsC57/C3H/129SvEv/ Tac/FVBPlaques at 3 months of age, increased A 42/40 ratio[46]

TgV337MV337M longest tau, cDNA inserted to the PDGF -chain expression vectorB6SJLHyperphosphorylated tau aggregates in the hippocampus, neurodegeneration, reduced hippocampal neural activity and behavioral abnormality[47]

It is noteworthy that the A sequence of WT rodents has a three amino acid difference compared to humans, making it less likely to aggregate and deposit into amyloid plaques [25]. Therefore, to study A aggregation and plaque formation in rodents it is necessary to manipulate them genetically [25]. Most transgenic mouse models focus on overexpressing human APP, PS1, tau, or APOE variants.

3. Chronic Stress

3.1. Human Studies of Chronic Stress

Chronic stress has been implicated in the etiology of AD. The likelihood of developing AD has been shown to increase by a factor 2.7 with the personality trait distress proneness [25, 48, 49]. Moreover, AD patients show elevated plasma cortisol levels [50, 51] with higher levels of plasma cortisol being associated with a more rapid disease progression and cognitive deterioration [51, 52].

Sustained elevated levels of glucocorticoids can cause volumetric and dendritic changes in the hippocampus of rats, mice, and tree shrews [5356], decrease neurogenesis, and impair long-term potentiation [53, 57, 58]. It has, therefore, been proposed that alterations in HPA-axis functioning might also contribute to the etiology of AD [5961].

Evidence from studies over the last 20 years indicates that major depression may serve as a risk factor for developing AD [6269]. A lifetime history of depressive episodes doubles the chance of developing AD [70]. Interestingly, patients with major depression show a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) profile of A -species that resembles the profile seen in AD. They display decreased levels of A 42 and a decreased A 40 : A 42 ratio [71], which are considered putative biomarkers for AD [72]. In addition, the severity of depression correlated with binding of 2-(1- 6-[(2- 18F Fluoroethyl)(methyl)amino]-2-naphthyl ethylidine)malononitrile, also known as FDDNP, a tracer that binds to plaques and tangles, in the temporal lobe [73]. Moreover, more plaques and tangles in the hippocampus as well as a more rapid cognitive decline have been observed in AD patients with a lifetime history of major depression compared to patients without such history [74]. In contrast, others have suggested that major depression does not function as an independent risk factor for AD, but should merely be viewed as an AD prodrome [63, 75, 76].

3.2. Animal Studies of Chronic Stress

Several paradigms have been used to model the effects of chronic stress in mouse models of AD. The paradigms that have been applied most frequently are chronic isolation stress and chronic restraint or immobilization stress. Table 2 summarizes the current evidence for effects of stress exposure in transgenic mouse models of AD.


Mouse modelExposureDuration of the experimentAge at the startEffects on the brainEffects on behaviorReference

Tg2576Chronic isolation stress3 monthsFrom weaning soluble A 40 (38%) and A 42 (59%) in hippocampus, no change in A 40 : A 42 ratio, no difference in APP, - or -CTF levels, no changes in IDE, NEP (neprilepsyn) or APOE levelsNot measured[79]

Tg2576Chronic isolation stress5 monthsFrom weaning A plaques
proliferation in DG
contextual memory at 6 months[77]

Tg2576Chronic isolation stress6 monthsFrom weaning A 40 A 42 levels and plaque deposition in neocortex and hippocampus
expression of GR and CRFR1 in neocortex and hippocampus
basal corticosterone in plasma
Not measured[78]

TASTPMRepeated novel cage exposure (1 h/day, 4x/week)5 weeks4 monthsNo changes in basal corticosterone levels
soluble A 40 levels in the frontal cortex hippocampus
insoluble A 42 levels in frontal cortex hippocampus, no difference in endocannabinoid levels in frontal cortex and hippocampus
No difference in locomotion, nor in anxiety levels contextual memory [80]

APPsweAcute restraint stress (for 4 h)4 hours19 months 175% in blood glucose levels, dropping to below basal values 2 hours after restraint
in stress-induced corticosterone release
Not measured[81]

Tg2576Acute restraint stress (for 3 h)3 hours3-4 months interstitial fluid A , no difference in APP or -CTF levels
-CTF levels, no changes in IDE, NEP (neprilysin) or APOE levels
Not measured[79]

APPV717I-CT100Chronic immobilization stress (6 h/day, 4x/week)8 months3 months A plaques in hippocampus, entorhinal piriform cortex
APP-CTFs
pyknotic cells in hippocampus entorhinal cortex
phospho-tau in CA3 entorhinal cortex
Corticosterone in plasma
cognitive impairment[82]

Tg2576Chronic immobilization stress (6 h/day, 4x/week)6 months3 monthsNot measured cued food preference[82]

Tg2576Chronic restraint stress (2 h/day)16 days14 months A plaques in hippocampus, PFC, cingulate, motor, parietal and piriform cortex
A 40 A 42 in cortical homogenates
immunoreactive astrocytes near plaques
phospho-tau
dendritic arborization of cortical neurons
MMP-2 (A -degrading enzyme)
basal corticosterone levels
Not measured[83]
PS1-L286VChronic restraint stress (6 h/day)3 or 15 weeks7 weeks3 weeks exposure
body weight
adrenal gland weight
corticosterone levels in plasma
number of degenerating neurons in DG, CA3, and retrosplenial cortex, no effect on number of granule neuron precursors (Pax6) or proliferating cells (Ki67) in DG and/or SGZ
BrdU-positive cells
DCX-positive neuronal progenitor cells
15 weeks exposure
body weight
adrenal gland weight
number of degenerating neurons in DG, CA3 and retrosplenial cortex, no effect on of granule neuron precursors or proliferating cells in DG and/or SGZ
Not measured[84]

3xTgDexamethasone administration (1 or 5 mg/kg) i.p.7 days4 months A in hippocampus, neocortex, amygdala
tau in dendrites and axons in hippocampus, neocortex, amygdala
insoluble A 40 and A 42
total APP, BACE1, C99 levels
basal corticosterone levels from 9 months on
Not measured[85]

Chronic isolation stress by subjecting mice to either 3, 5, or 6 months of social isolation from weaning, has thus far only been used in the Tg2576 mouse model of AD [7779]. This resulted in elevated levels of soluble A 40 and A 42 up to 59% and increased plaque deposition in the hippocampus and the neocortex [77, 78]. Moreover, this stress exposure paradigm caused a rise in basal plasma corticosterone levels, paralleled with an increased expression of the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) and corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) receptor 1 [78]. In addition, impaired contextual memory and decreased cell proliferation in the hippocampal dentate gyrus was observed. Interestingly, the effects of isolation stress on memory deficits and cell proliferation in the dentate gyrus could be prevented by a 14-day treatment of fluoxetine [77].

Another widely used stress paradigm is restraint stress. Acute short-term restraint stress elevated intracerebral interstitial A levels in Tg2576 mice [79] and stress-induced corticosterone release in APPswe mice [81]. Administering CRF or a CRF-antagonist indicated that the interstitial rise in A depended on CRF levels [79]. Acute restraint stress furthermore resulted in a 175% increase in blood glucose levels in APPswe mice, suggesting a wide impact on metabolism [81].

Chronic restraint stress has so far been performed in 3 different mouse models of AD: APPV717I-C100, Tg2576, and PS1-L286V mice. Applying chronic restraint stress to APPV717I-C100 and Tg2576 mice generally resulted in an increased A plaque load, increased A 40 and A 42 levels, increased tau phosphorylation and increased basal plasma corticosterone levels [8284]. Chronic restraint stress applied to APPV717I-CT100 mice additionally induced cognitive impairment as measured for example by using cued food, that is, powdered chow mixed with a certain aroma, in the social transfer of food preference task [82]. Chronic restraint stress has also been associated with neuropathological alterations in AD mouse models. PS1-L286V mice exposed to chronic restraint stress displayed elevated numbers of degenerating neurons and a decreased number of proliferating cells in the hippocampus as compared to nonexposed mice [84]. Chronic restraint stress in APPV717I-CT100 mice caused elevated numbers of pyknotic cells in the hippocampus [82] and reduced dendritic arborization of cortical neurons in Tg2576 mice [83].

Another method to assess the effects of stress is by mimicking the physiological stress response by administering synthetic glucocorticoids, such as dexamethasone, for 7 days. Application of this approach in 3xTg mice resulted in elevated A - and tau-immunoreactivity in the hippocampus, amygdala and neocortex and increased levels of insoluble A 40 and A 42 and total APP, -site of APP cleaving enzyme (BACE1) and APP fragment C99 levels in brain homogenates [85].

4. Environmental Enrichment

4.1. Human Studies of Environmental Enrichment

A reduced risk for developing and a slower rate of cognitive decline have been observed in people having a greater purpose in life and higher levels of physical activity [86, 87].

4.2. Animal Studies of Environmental Enrichment

In the field of animal research, the environmental enrichment (EE) paradigm is frequently used to manipulate physical activity and social interactions. By introducing mates (social interaction) and/or toys (physical activity) into the cage of the rodent [88], this paradigm stimulates cognition as well as sensory and motor behavior with concomitant intracerebral cellular and molecular changes [89, 90]. To examine the effect of EE in AD several different paradigms have been imposed on various mouse models of AD. Table 3 summarizes the effects of EE in transgenic mouse models of AD.


Mouse modelExposureDuration of the exposureAge at the startEffect on brainEffect on behaviorReference

APPsweEnriched housing (multiple mice in a large bin containing an inner cage with platforms, passageways, running wheels, toys, and novel habitats) novel complex environment 3x weekly for several hours4 months16 monthsNo differences in total A load
Improved MWM performance[91]

TgCRND8Enriched housing (equipped with diverse physically and cognitively stimulating objects, for example, gnawing wood, tunnels, balls, running wheels, and ladders)4 months1 month angiogenesis
ApoE, LRP1, A2M
RAGE
Not measured[92]

TgCRND8Enriched housing (equipped with diverse physically and cognitively stimulating objects, for example, gnawing wood, tunnels, balls, running wheels, and ladders)4 months1 month BrdU-positive cells
synaptophysin immunoreactivity in the hippocampus
Not measured[93]

TgCRND8Enriched housing (plastic inset, wooden climbing frame, and a nesting material)4 months1 monthNot measured exploratory behavior
anxiety-related behavior
No effects in learning and memory,
as assessed with MWM, barrier test, open-field, elevated plus maze, object recognition task, and Barnes maze
[94]

APP23Enriched environment (multiple mice housed in large cages with a rearrangeable system of plastic tubes and cardboard boxes)1 months6, 18 monthsNo differences in plaque load
DCX/CR ratio
DCX- and calretinin-positive neurons in the hippocampus
[95]

APP23Enriched housing (spacious cage equipped with a rearrangeable system of tubes, a cardboard box house, wire mesh ladders, and a crawling ball)9 months2 monthsNo differences in plaque load in neocortex or hippocampus
hippocampal neurogenesis (DCX, calretinin)
BDNF, NT-3 in the hippocampus
Improved learning and memory in MWM[96]

APPswe/PS1 E9Enriched housing (multiple mice in a large cage with crawl-tubes, platforms, running wheels and toys, changed weekly)6 months1.5 month total A deposition, 28% in the hippocampus and 36% in entorhinal cortex
synaptophysin in CA1 and CA3
Improved performance in MWM, RAWM[97]
APPswe/PS1 E9Enriched environment (large cages, running wheels, colored tunnels, toys, and chewable material)1 month, 3 hours daily, next 4 months three times per week1 month neocortical and hippocampal A deposits
increased neprilysin expression
Not measured[98]

PS1/PDAPPEnriched housing (multiple mice in a large bin containing an inner cage with platforms, passageways, running wheels, toys, and novel habitats) novel complex environment 3/weekly for several hours5 monthsweaning gene expression of TTR, NF- B inhibitors,Improved performance in MWM, RAWM and platform recognition tasks[99]

APPswe/PS1 E9Enriched housing (larger cages with running wheels, plastic play tubes, cardboard boxes, and nesting material that were changes or rearranged weekly)6 months2 months 68% of plaque area in the hippocampus
52% of total A in hippocampus
Not measured[100]

APPswe/PS1 E9Enriched housing (larger cages with running wheels, plastic play tubes, cardboard boxes, and nesting material that were changes or rearranged weekly)6 months2 months 50% A 42 in the hippocampus
25% in hippocampal plaque load
Improved performance in MWM, RAWM[101]

APOE3, APOE4Cages with exploratory objects (toys, tunnels, and running wheels)5 months3 weeksimprovement in T-maze performance in APOE3 only expression of NGF
Synaptophysin in the hippocampus of APOE3 only
[102]

APOE3, APOE4Enriched housing ( cage with running wheel, labyrinth, bedding, house, chains, and wooden blocks)5 months3 weeks hippocampal A deposits in the APOE4Not measured[103]

APOE3, APOE4Wheel running6 weeks10 months BDNF in both
TrkB, PAK and synaptophysin only in APOE4
Improved performance in place recognition in both genotypes
Improved RAWM in APOE4 only
[104]

4.2.1. APP Mice

EE, in terms of housing multiple mice in a larger cage with platforms, running wheels, toys, and other novel habitats, for a period of 6 months improved cognition in a battery of tests such as Morris water maze (MWM), circular platform, platform recognition and radial arm water maze, despite signs of stable A deposition in 16-month-old APPswe mice [91]. EE for 4 months in 5-month-old TgCRND8 mice did not significantly alter soluble levels of A in the brain or the blood, but did enhance mRNA expression of angiogenic genes [92]. EE in this mouse model attenuated age-related reductions in cell proliferation, neurogenesis and synaptic plasticity [93], while the same paradigm in another laboratory elevated A plaque load without compromising behavioral phenotypes such as feeding and drinking pattern, grooming, locomotion or cognition [94, 105]. In an attempt to disentangle the exact components of EE that influence phenotypes in APP mutant mice, Wolf et al. [96] exposed APP23 transgenic mice to either an enriched environment or unlimited access to a running wheel and compared both conditions with standard housing. EE had differential effects upon improving performance in the MWM as compared to the increased physical activity and standard housing groups, however, no differential effects on plaque load in the neocortex or hippocampus were found [95, 96]. Moreover, mice exposed to EE exhibited signs of increased hippocampal neurogenesis and neurotrophic support [95, 96].

4.2.2. APP/PS1 Mice

When comparing social interaction and physical activity, differential effects of EE can be observed on learning and memory processes, A plaque load and synaptophysin immunoreactivity of 9-month-old APP/PS1 transgenic mice [97]. EE in APPswe/PS1 E9 mice reduced cortical and hippocampal A deposition with mice being more active in the running wheel showing an even more marked decrease in A [98]. Furthermore, EE in PS1/PDAPP mice attenuated cognitive impairments [99].

Possibly in contrast with overt beneficial effects, 2-month-old female APPswe/PS1 E9 mice exposed to EE for several months displayed increased A levels in the neocortex, and hippocampus [100]. After further backcrossing these mice to a C57Bl6 background strain in order to attain fewer genetic background differences, the same group demonstrated that EE in 2-month-old transgenic APPswe/PS1 E9 female mice, attenuated cognitive deficits [101], but still exhibited a 25% increase in A deposits in cortical and hippocampal brain regions [101]. One could argue that enhanced secretion and deposition of toxic soluble A species (scavenging the toxic species into packages away from intracellular and synaptic compartments) may be a mechanistic explanation for these findings.

4.2.3. APOE Mice

EE in mice carrying the APOE3 allele improved learning and memory, as assessed with the T-maze test, while it had no effect in the ones carrying the E4 allele. The improved cognitive performance in APOE3 mice was associated with increased neocortical and hippocampal synaptophysin- and nerve growth factor-immunoreactivity, which was not observed in the APOE4 mice [102].

In conclusion, the majority of studies indicate that EE affects AD-related phenotypes in transgenic mouse models of AD pathology, mostly in a beneficial manner, particularly with regards to behavior. However, contradictory results have been reported which can possibly be explained by different experimental paradigms, age, sex, and genetic background of the mice used.

5. Metal Exposure

5.1. Lead

Lead exposure has been proposed as a risk factor for AD by some authors [106, 107] while others have argued against it [108]. No studies to date have performed lead exposure experiments in mouse models of AD although other animal work has indicated that lead exposure early in life may contribute to the onset of AD-related pathology later in life [109, 110].

5.2. Aluminum

While it has been proposed that occupational aluminum exposure is not a significant risk factor for AD [108], prolonged exposure to aluminum in drinking water is significantly associated with an increased risk of developing AD in a dose-dependent manner with the relative risks varying from 1.00 to 2.14 (for review see [111]). These findings should be regarded with some caution as aluminum concentrations varied highly between the different studies and many variables (such as interaction with other chemical constituents in the drinking water as well as alternative sources of aluminum, for example through antacid use or dietary intake) have often been overlooked in these studies [111].

Products made of baking-powder often contain high levels of aluminum, and it has been observed that AD patients were more frequently exposed to ingestion of foods containing baking-powder (retrospectively investigated) than age-matched controls [112]. Other studies suggested that AD patients have significantly enhanced gastrointestinal absorption of aluminum (up to 1.64 times higher) compared to age-matched controls, and indicate that differential gastrointestinal function may lead to a systemic rise of aluminum [113, 114].

Praticò and colleagues [115] reported that Tg2576 mice exposed chronically to dietary aluminum displayed increased A 40 and A 42 levels, plaque deposition, and markers of oxidative stress in the hippocampus and neocortex compared to non-exposed Tg2576 mice. Others authors, however, were not able to replicate these findings. They reported that chronic aluminum treatment in Tg2576 mice did not affect A load in the cerebral cortex or oxidative stress reactions in the hippocampus, nor impair spatial cognition, as measured by the MWM [115117]. Aluminum treatment did raise the levels of aluminum and other metals in the hippocampus, neocortex and cerebellum, but no major differential effects could be found between Tg2576 and WT mice [116, 118]. The differential effect of aluminum exposure in these mice could possibly be explained by higher concentrations of aluminum in the chow, differential ages at the start of the experiment and a shorter duration of exposure.

5.3. Iron, Zinc, and Copper

The endogenous biometals iron, zinc and copper have often been implicated in AD, as they are present in and around amyloid deposits in the AD brain and their presence can promote aggregation of A [119121].

Although no report has confirmed a direct link between iron exposure and the risk of developing AD, Dwyer and colleagues do propose a ferrocentric model of AD [122]. Higher levels of ferritin iron in the basal ganglia have been considered a risk factor for AD [123, 124]. AD patients show elevated levels of iron in the hippocampus [125], and this metal seems to concentrate in the core and rims of plaques in the amygdala [126].

Rodent research has indicated that gestational or early developmental iron deficiency can alter the expression of the APP and CLU genes implicated in synaptic plasticity, dendritic outgrowth, and AD pathogenesis [127129]. Neonatal administration of iron for 3 days to APPswe/PS1 E9 mice was found not to alter A deposition in the hippocampus and temporal cortex at 6 months of age but did cause changes in lipid composition, decreased steady-state levels of oxidative damage markers, and increased astrocyte levels in the temporal cortex [130].

Zinc seems to play a double role in AD etiology. Low levels of zinc have been reported to be protective against A formation [131] and metalloproteases, such as neprilysin and insulin-degrading enzyme (IDE), that degrade A are zinc dependent [132]. It has also been found that high levels of zinc elevate A toxicity [131, 133] and promote total A aggregation [121]. AD patients displaying higher levels of zinc in hippocampus and amygdala [125, 126] exhibited normal zinc serum levels, but significantly lower zinc levels in CSF compared to matched controls [134]. This may be explained by the binding of zinc to A in the brain parenchyma [135]. However, to our knowledge, no reports have been published on putative associations between zinc exposure and risk of AD in the human population. Nonetheless, several studies have investigated the effects of altered zinc intake in AD mouse models.

Stoltenberg et al. [136] reported that lowering zinc by a 3-month dietary deficiency increased the plaque load in APPswe/PS1 E9 mice by 25%, without changing zinc ion distribution, zinc transporter mRNA expression levels nor inducing oxidative stress [136]. Alternatively, administrating zinc to TgCRND8 and Tg2576 mice through the drinking water for a period of 5 and 9 months, respectively, lowered the amyloid plaque burden in the hilar and molecular region of the dentate gyrus, while impairing spatial memory in MWM [137]. Concurrently, long-term administration of high zinc concentrations in TgC100 mice did not significantly affect soluble A levels or levels of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), superoxidase dismutase 1, APP, -secretase-cleaved carboxyl-terminal fragment, or neurofilament 200, a marker for neuronal damage [138]. Interestingly, a genetic reduction of zinc in the brain of Tg2576 mice, by crossing these mice with a zinc transporter 3 deficient mouse (ZnT3−/−), significantly reduced the plaque load in the hippocampus and neocortex while increasing the ratio between soluble versus insoluble A [139].

AD patients have been shown to display reduced copper levels in the amygdala and hippocampus, while copper levels are specifically elevated in amyloid plaques [125, 126]. Copper intake in AD patients decreases the reduction of A 42 in CSF most typically seen as the disease progresses, but does not ameliorate cognitive performance [140]. Adding copper to drinking water of cholesterol-fed rabbits causes accumulation of A and the formation of plaque-like structures [141].

Exposing AD mouse models to chronic upregulation of copper has yielded conflicting results. Chronic copper administration to APP715SL mice did not alter copper, zinc, iron, A nor APP levels in the brain [142]. Long-term administration of high levels of copper resulted in a 18% decrease in soluble A 40 and increased zinc levels in the brain without changing GFAP, SOD1, APP, C100, or NF200 levels to TgC100 mice. Yet, copper exposure in 3xTg mice led to elevated steady-state levels of APP, and C99 as well as to increased A production and tau phosphorylation in the brain [143]. Interestingly, copper, APP and A seem to be closely connected; Tg2576 mice displayed an overall reduction of copper in the brain whereas the ablation of APP and amyloid precursor-like protein 2 increased overall central copper levels [144, 145].

In summary, both human and rodent research on the exact contributing roles of metal exposures in interaction with AD risk genes APP and PS1 remain largely inconclusive. For an overview of metal exposure in the transgenic animal models of AD listed above, see Table 4.


Mouse modelExposureDuration of the exposureAge at the startEffect on brainEffect on behaviorReference

TgV337MAluminum-mltolate i.p. injection at various concentrations (50–100–200  M)Max 14 days3 monthsAl levels were too low to induce changes in tau phosphorylation in brain homogenates, but Al concentration was lethalNot measured[146]

Tg2576Dietary aluminum (2 mg/kg diet)9 months3 months soluble and insoluble A 40 and A 42 in neocortical and hippocampal homogenates
plaque load in hippocampus and neocortex
oxidative stress markers
Not measured[115]

Tg2576Dietary aluminum lactate (1 mg/g diet)120 days5 monthsNo significant differences in A 40 and A 42 in cortical homogenates, no alterations in proliferation, survival or differentiation of BrdU-positive neurons in DGNo improvement MWM[117]

Tg2576Dietary aluminum lactate (1 mg/g diet)6 months5 months Al concentration in hippocampus and cerebellum
Cu in hippocampus
Fe in cerebellum
Mn and Zn in neocortex, hippocampus and cerebellum
Not measured[118]

Tg2576Dietary aluminum lactate (1 mg/g diet)6 months5 months Al concentrations in the hippocampus, but no difference between WT and Tg animals, no difference in oxidative stress reaction in the hippocampus between WT and TgNot measured[116]

APPswe/PS1 E9Iron carbonyl (1 mg/ml)3 daysP12No difference in A plaque load in hippocampus and temporal cortex, no difference in microglial activity
GFAP levels in temporal cortex
saturated fatty acids
unsaturated fatty acids
oxidative damage markers
Not measured[130]

APPswe/PS1 E9Zinc-deficient (<10 parts Zn per million (ppm))3 months9 monthsNo significant difference in serum zinc levels, no difference cortical volume
25% in total plaque volume, no difference in number of plaques or laminar distribution, no difference in oxidative stress markers
Not measured[136]

Tg2576Zinc in drinking water (10 ppm/0.153 mM Zn)±12 monthsFrom conception A deposits in hilar and molecular region of the DG spatial memory in MWM both in Tg and WT, buth most pronounced in Tg[137]

TgCRND8Zinc in drinking water (10 ppm/0.153 mM Zn)5 monthsFrom weaningNo significant differences spatial memory in MWM both in Tg and WT, buth most pronounced in Tg[137]
TgC100Zinc in diet (ZnSO4, 1000, 500 or 300 ppm)15 months7 weeks Brain Zn levels in brain homogenates
Cu levels (n.s.)
Cu/Zn ratio
13% soluble A 40 (trend)
No changes in GFAP, SOD1, APP, C100, nor NF200 (neuron loss), no difference in intensity or distribution of A or GFAP staining
Not measured[138]

TgC100Copper in diet (CuSO4 150 or 100 ppm)7 weeks9 monthsNo significant differences in Cu levels in brain homogenates
Zn levels
18% soluble A 40, no changes in GFAP, SOD1, APP, C100, nor NF200 (neuron loss), no difference in intensity or distribution of A or GFAP staining
Not measured[138]

3xTgCopper sulfate (250 ppm) in 5% sucrose drinking water3 or 9 months2 months3 months exposure:
steady-state levels APP, C99 and BACE1
A 40 in total plaque load in hippocampus, no alterations in total tau, phospho-tau nor Thy1.2 transcription activity
AT8-positive neurons in CA1, no changes in steady-state levels of cdk5, p35/p25, GSK-3 or phospho-GSK-3
SOD1 activity in brain homogenates
9 months exposure:
steady-state levels APP, C99, C83, BACE1, ADAM10
soluble A 40, phospho-tau, no alterations total tau levels
p25 formation
SOD1 activity
Not measured[143]

A PPswElectromagnetic field exposure (918 MHz, 0.25 W/kg 2 dB)  h p/d7-8 month exposure2 months
5 months
Young adult 7 months exposure, no significant differences in soluble A in hippocampus neocortex, no effect op hippocampal DNA repair enzymes, antioxidant enzyme markers, protein oxidative damage, nor striatal DNA oxidation
Aged adult 8 months exposure
A plaque load in hippocampus (−35%) and entorhinal cortex (−32%)
soluble A in hippocampus neocortex
Young adult 7 months exposure
Prevention of cognitive deficits in retroactive interference
Y-maze spontaneous alternation level
No differences in open field activity, balance beam, string agility, and elevated plus maze
Aged adult 8 months exposure
Reversal of cognitive deficits
[27]

6. Traumatic Brain Injury

6.1. Human Studies of Traumatic Brain Injury

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) has repeatedly been identified as a risk factor for AD. It has been suggested that TBI accelerates the onset of AD and that the severity of the injury increases the risk of AD [147]. AD-like pathology has been observed after acute brain trauma, even in brains of young individuals. A polymorphism in the promoter of the gene that encodes neprilysin, causing a greater length in GT repeats, has been associated with the acute development of plaques following TBI [148]. In addition, carriers of the APOE4 genotype have been associated with poorer outcome after TBI [147].

6.2. Animal Studies of Traumatic Brain Injury

For an overview of TBI in mouse models of AD, see Table 5. After corticol contusion, 10- to 16-month-old PDAPP mice did not show significant differences in behavior or A neuropathology following TBI, as compared to WT controls that underwent the same procedure of experimental brain injury [149]. Inducing TBI in the PDAPP mouse model at 4 months of age, accelerated memory loss as assessed with the MWM test. TBI also resulted in hippocampal neuronal loss one week after injury, which was associated with an increase in hippocampal A 40 and A 42 [150]. Furthermore, TBI resulted in long-term effects at 2, 5, and 8 months after TBI: a significant reduction in A plaque load was found which was accompanied with more pronounced hippocampal atrophy. TBI induction in mice caused a twofold increase in soluble hippocampal A levels at 3 and 7 days after TBI. Additionally, post-TBI administration of caspase-3 inhibitors and the hypolipemic simvastatin were able to attenuate impaired hippocampal synaptic function, microglial activation and MWM performance after TBI induction in mice [151, 152]. TBI induced by cortical impact provoked gene expression changes in 22-month-old APPswe mice compared to WT mice. Expression changes were detected in genes involved in various biological pathways such as immune response, cell cycle and cell death, cellular development, tissue development and connective tissue function and development, cellular movement, and hematological systems [153].


Mouse modelExposureDuration exposureAge at start exposureEffects on brainEffects on behaviourReference

APP-YACCortical contusion impact (3-mm diameter impounder onto the left parietal cortex, 100 ms; velocity ( ) = 4.8−5.2 m/s; depth = 1 mm)10–16 monthsNo differenceNo difference in MWM[149]

PDAPPCortical impact brain injury (3-mm diameter impounder onto the left parietal cortex, 100 ms; = 4.8−5.2 m/s; depth = 1 mm)4 monthsIncreased hippocampal neuronal deathMWM memory impairment in transgenic as compared to controls[150]

PDAPPControlled cortical impact (3-mm diameter impounder onto the left parietal cortex, 100 ms; = 4.8−5.2 m/s; depth = 1 mm)6 monthsHippocampal atrophyDecrease the hippocampus and cingulate cortex 3 months after TBINot measured[156]

PDAPPControlled cortical impact (3-mm diameter impounder onto the left parietal cortex, 100 ms; = 4.8−5.2 m/s; depth = 1 mm)24 monthsIncreased hippocampal neuronal loss and gliosis Regression of in the hippocampusNot measured[157]

APPsweControlled cortical impact (3-mm diameter impounder onto the left parietal cortex, 47 ms; = 5.82 m/s; depth = 1.2 mm, driving pressure 73 psi)3 months2 increase in 40 and 42
Reduced CA3 ynaptophysin immunoreactivity
MWM performance deficit[152]

Tg2576Controlled cortical impact (mild to moderate, 2-mm diameter impounder onto the right cortex, = 3.3 m/s; depth = 1 mm)22 monthsGene expression differences in inflammation, immune response and cell deathNot measured[153]

Tg2576Controlled cortical impact (3-mm diameter impounder onto the left parietal cortex, 100 ms; = 4.8−5.2 m/s; depth = 1 mm)Repetitive (2 )9 monthsIncreased hippocampal amyloid depositionMWM cognitive dysfunction[154]

Single and repetitive mild TBI, using a cortical impact device, in 9-month-old Tg2576 mice as compared to sham treated transgenic and WT, resulted in significant cognitive dysfunction (measured with MWM) without affecting motor performance 16 weeks after TBI. However, only repetitive TBI caused increased A burden in the hippocampus and neocortex with a parallel increase in isoprostane, an indicator for increased oxidative stress [154]. TBI in 10-month-old transgenic mice overexpressing either human APOE3 or 4, was associated with differential gene expression, particularly in genes related to oxidative stress, with an increased expression of antioxidant genes in the APOE3 mice as compared to the APOE4 [155].

Thus, accumulating evidence indicates that TBI interacts with AD-related genes.

7. Electromagnetic Field Exposure

Occupational exposure to electromagnetic field (EMF) has been proposed as a risk factor of AD. In particular, extremely low-frequency exposure has been implicated to increase the odds to develop AD up to 2.03 (as reviewed in [155]). Strikingly, Arendash et al. [27] demonstrated that long-term high-frequency exposure to EMF (i.e., similar to that generated by cell-phone use) was beneficial to A PPswe mice (see Table 4). EMF exposure in young adult A PPsw mice prevented the age-related genotype-specific cognitive impairment, while EMF in aged A PPsw mice was also able to reverse cognitive impairment in these animals. Chronic EMF exposure furthermore influenced A aggregation in the brain, with higher levels of soluble A and less A plaques in the hippocampus and entorhinal cortex of A PPsw mice. EMF exposure has been proposed to contribute to a decrease in A aggregation, via altering levels of transthyretin [158]. Transthyretin is known to sequester A in CSF, thereby hindering its aggregation into amyloid plaques [158]. Interestingly, AD patients show a significant decrease in CSF transthyretin levels [159] while decreased transthyretin levels have also been found in blood serum of long-term wireless phone users [158]. Thus, effects of EMF are quite puzzling while the association with AD remains to be firmly established.

8. Effects of Diet and Nutritional Factors

8.1. Mediterranean Diet

Various dietary and nutritional factors seem to be protective or detrimental in the development and course of AD. One of the most prominent is the Mediterranean type of diet which has been linked to reduced risk of developing AD and showing a dose-response effect (high adherence to Mediterranean diet, OR: 0.76; moderate adherence, OR: 0.47) [160162].

A typical Mediterranean diet is characterized by higher consumption of vegetables, fruits, cereals, fish, and olive oil and associated with a general higher consumption of unsaturated fatty acids and lower consumption of saturated fatty acids, usually accompanied by mild or moderate alcohol intake (preferably red wine taken with meals) [160]. The exact factors and mechanisms by which the Mediterranean diet is protective remains to be elucidated, although it has been speculated that this diet can attenuate the detrimental effects of oxidative stress and inflammation [161].

8.2. Western Diet and Obesity

Obesity during mid-life is associated with an increased risk for AD, with an OR of 2.4, additively increasing up to 6.2 when combined with high total cholesterol levels and high systolic blood pressure [163]. Higher intake of calories and fat have been associated with increased risk for developing AD, particularly in APOE4 carriers, with a hazard ratio of 2.3 [164]. Western, high-fat and low carbohydrate diet for 4 months in 1-month-old Tg2576 mice, increased levels of soluble A in brain homogenates, while the treatment did not have any effect on plaque load [165]. Further, insulin resistance induced by 5 months of high-fat diet, in 9-month-old Tg2576 mice, was associated with to a twofold increase of A 40 and A 42 peptide content in the hippocampus and a twofold increase in plaque burden in the neocortex, with a concomitant acceleration of cognitive decline as measured by the MWM. In addition, γ-secretase activity was increased, while the expression of IDE was decreased by this diet [166]. APP/PS1 KI mice exposed to Western, high-fat diet showed increased oxidative stress markers as measured in brain homogenates of 2-month-old mice when compared to nontransgenic controls, but A levels were not altered [167]. In another study, Western diet increased A deposition in the hippocampus of the APPswe/PS1 E9 transgenic mice at 18 months of age, after a period of 12 months on a high-fat diet [168]. In the 3xTg mouse model of AD, a high fat diet starting at the age of 4 months for a total period of 13 months, induced similar effects in the frontal cortex [169].

8.3. Cholesterol

As the generation, deposition, and clearance of A is regulated by cholesterol, many studies have specifically focused on the implication of lipids, cholesterol metabolism, related vascular disease, APOE genotype, and their interrelationships on the development of AD [170172]. The precise mechanisms underlying cholesterol and APOE4 need further investigation, as it is not clear whether cholesterol and the APOE4 genotype act as independent factors or interact with one another or whether the effect of APOE4 is partially mediated by high cholesterol levels [171174]. Also, hypercholesterolemia in 3-month-old / mice has been shown to accelerate A accumulation while drug-induced hypocholesterolemia reduced the amyloid pathology [175, 176].

8.4. Docosahexaenoic (DHA)

Studies in mouse models of AD amyloidosis, such as Tg2576, APPswe/PS1 E9, and 3xTg, have shown that a diet rich in the omega-3 fatty acid DHA reduces A accumulation and somatodendritic tau accumulation, improves cognition, and induces cerebral hemodynamic changes [168, 177180]. Such findings are in line with evidence from epidemiological studies showing a protective effect of diets rich in omega-3 fatty acids [181183]. More specifically, DHA-enriched diet was shown to increase relative cerebral blood volume with a concomitant improvement in spatial memory and reduction of A load in / mice [184]. Exposing APPswe/PS1 E9 mice to a diet high in omega-3 fatty acids, however, neither improved cognition in APPswe/PS1 E9 mice nor reduced hippocampal A , but increased omega-3 fatty acid levels in their brain [185]. Interestingly, high levels of omega-6 were linked to cognitive impairment [185].

8.5. Vitamins

Dietary deficiency of B6, B12, and folate for 7 months increased A levels in the brains of 15-month-old Tg2576 mice, without altering APP, BACE-1, A disintegrin and metallopeptidase 10 (ADAM-10), nicastrin, IDE, APOE, or neprilysin [186]. Additionally, the same pattern of dietary vitamin B deficiency led to increased expression of PS1 via DNA demethylation of the promoter region of the encoding gene in brain homogenates of TgCRND8 mice [187]. In the brains of mice of the same animal model, vitamin B deficiency increased the levels of glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK3 ) and reduced the activity of protein phosphatase 2A, which are both involved in the hyperphosphorylation of tau [188]. Furthermore, folic acid deficiency for 3 months in APPswe mice did not affect the A plaque load, but induced neuron loss in the CA3 region of the hippocampus and enhanced hippocampal DNA damage, as compared to controls [189]. Besides B6 and B12, deficiency of B1, also called thiamine, exacerbated A pathology via an upregulation of BACE1 in brains of Tg19959 mice [190].

Furthermore, dietary supplementation with the coenzyme Q10 for 2 months delayed hippocampal atrophy in 22-month-old / mice as compared to vehicle treated controls [36, 37], with concurrent reduction in plaque load [36, 37].

Deficiency of vitamin A has been implicated in A accumulation, loss of long-term potentiation and memory impairment, while administration of its active metabolite retinoic acid for a duration of 2 months was able to rescue these deficits in the frontal cortex and hippocampus of 7-month-old APPswe/PS1 E9 transgenic mice [191].

8.6. Caffeine and Green Tea

Besides the various nutritional factors, other lifestyle habits have also been associated with AD. Longitudinal studies have shown that coffee and tea drinking are associated with decreased risk for cognitive decline, dementia and AD in various population samples [192, 193]. Another study showed a protective effect of caffeine only in women, with a relative risk of 0.49 [194], but a meta-analysis estimated an overall protective effect against dementia, with a relative risk of 0.84, though pointing out the large heterogeneity in the methods of the various epidemiological studies [195].

Acute and long-term caffeine consumption was recently shown to delay cognitive decline and lower A pathology in the hippocampus of 15-month-old APPswe and / mice, by suppressing - and γ-secretase levels [196, 197]. Furthermore, oral or intraperitoneal administration of epigallocatechin-3 gallate, which is derived from green tea, for 2 or 6 months, exerted beneficial effects in APPswe transgenic mice, at the age of 14 months. The beneficial effects consisted of a reduction in A pathology in the neocortex and hippocampus, with a parallel improvement of working memory [198200]. Furthermore, administration of the citrus-derived flavonoid luteolin and its analogue diosmin for a total of 30 days, significantly reduced A pathology in the hippocampus and neocortex of 9-month-old Tg2576 mice. This effect was mediated via an inhibition of GSK3 , which increased PS1 phosphorylation [201].

8.7. Wine

Moderate red wine consumption has been shown to be beneficial. Cabernet sauvignon administration for 7 months in 4-month-old Tg2576 mice attenuated the cognitive impairment that is observed in these mice, in terms of spatial memory, when compared to ethanol-consuming and tap water Tg2576 controls. Cabernet sauvignon consumption decreased cortical and hippocampal A plaque load in these mice, by promoting nonamyloidogenic processing in the direction of -secretase cleavage [202]. Further, in vitro studies in hippocampal neuron cultures derived from Tg2576 mice, showed that the polyphenol extracts from the Cabernet sauvignon grapes increased the levels of -secretase, which promotes the nonamyloidogenic cleavage of APP that reduced the levels of A peptides [202]. Furthermore, consumption of the muscadine wine was proven to attenuate A pathology in brains of 14-month-old Tg2576 mice, following a 10-month wine treatment, with a different mechanism of action. In this case, muscadine consumption reduced the aggregation of A , with a parallel improvement in spatial memory [203]. The differential effect of the two types of wine was attributed to their distinct composition in polyphenolic compounds, which have a differential effect on APP processing [203].

8.8. Nicotine

Smoking in humans has been linked with increased risk for AD [204206], while nicotine administration for 6 months to transgenic mice carrying the APPswe mutation reduced the levels of insoluble A in various brain regions of 15-month-old mice [207, 208]. Nevertheless, nicotine administration for 5 months exacerbated hippocampal tau pathology in 6-month-old 3xTg mice, increasing tau hyperphosphorylation and aggregation, in combination with an earlier onset of these tau-related changes compared to controls [209].

8.9. Caloric Restriction

Caloric restriction in animals has been found to prolong mean and maximum life span, reduce body fat, attenuate age-related molecular changes, and slow the decline associated with aging in various species [210]. In nonhuman primates, for example, caloric restriction prolongs lifespan and delays the onset of diseases, such as cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, and brain atrophy [211]. Restricting caloric intake by 40% for 6 weeks in APPswe and 14 weeks in / mice has been shown to reduce the number and size of amyloid plaques by 40% and 55%, respectively, while also reducing the plaque-related astrocyte activation. These effects were observed in the neocortex and hippocampus [210]. Similar effects have been observed in the hippocampus of the 3xTg model after 14 months of caloric restriction [212].

8.10. Others

In line with studies showing a beneficial effect of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory agents on AD pathology in transgenic models of AD [213], the phytogenic curcumin (a major dietary component in India) administered for 6 months reduced levels of soluble and insoluble A , plaque load, oxidative stress and inflammatory response in various brain regions of 16-month-old transgenic mice carrying the APPswe mutation [214]. Additionally, blueberry supplementation and Gingko biloba extract treatment have been found to improve memory deficits in APP/PS1 and Tg2576 mice without affecting amyloid plaque load [215, 216]. An overview of all nutritional and dietary factors influencing animal models of AD is given in Table 6.


Mouse modelExposureDuration of the exposureAge at the startEffect on brainEffect on behaviorReference

APPswe/indCaloric restriction, 40%2 weeks3 months 40% in cortical and hippocampal plaque loadNot measured[210]

/ Caloric restriction, 40%4 months2 months 55% in cortical plaque loadNot measured[210]

3xTgCaloric restriction, 40%7 or 14 months3 months hippocampal A 40, 42Improved open field activity
Improved performance in MWM
[212]

APP/PS1 KIWestern (40% fat) diet1 month1 month oxidative stress markers (protein nitrosylation, protein carbonyls, and lipid hydroperoxides)Not measured[167]

APPswe/PS1 E9DHA12 months6 months A deposition in the vasculature of the cingulate gyrusNot measured[168]

3xTgWestern (35% fat, low n-3 : n-6 PUFA ratio)9 months4 months cortical A 40, 42
cortical tau
cortical GFAP
Not measured[217]

Tg2576High-cholesterol diet (5% cholesterol, 10% fat, 2% sodium cholate, and 5.2 kcal/g)2 months1 month soluble A 40, 42
plaque number and size in neocortex and hippocampus
-CTFs
Not measured[175]

3xTgDHA-rich diet (1.3 g/100 g)3, 6, 9 months3 months soluble A 40, 42
PS1 levels
somatodendric accumulation of tau
tau phosphorylation (whole-brain homogenates)
Not measured[179]

Tg2576DHA-rich diet (0.6% DHA)3 months19 months 38% insoluble A in cortex
A 42 49%
A 40 47.5%
plaques by 39% in hippocampus, 49% in parietal cortex and 47% in perirhinal cortex
Not measured[177]

APPswe/PS1 E9Fish oil-based diet (0.4% DHA, 0.4% EPA, and 0.2% arachidonic acid)4 months6 months A 40, 42 levels in the hippocampusNot measured[178]

APPswe/PS1 E9DHA rich diet (0.6% with safflower oil)3 months3 months plaque load by 27–30% in neocortex, ventral hippocampus, striatum, only in females
hippocampal synaptotagmin and drebrin in females
Not measured[180]

APPswe/PS1 E9DHA rich diet (0.4%, low-saturated fatty acids, high PUFA, and low n-6/n-3 ratio)6–13 months2 months rCBV in 8 months and
in 15 months in cerebral cortex
No diet effects on open field, MWM, reverse MWM, 12 circular hole board tasks[184]
Tg2576Folate, B6, and B12 deficiency7 months8 months A 40, 42 peptides in neocortex and hippocampus
plaques in neocortex and hippocampus
Not measured[186]

TgCRND8Folate, B6, and B12 deficieny3 months1 month PP2A, GSK3b mRNA
tau phosphorylation
Not measured[188]

APPsweFolic acid deficiency3 months7 months20% loss of neurons in CA3
DNA damage in hippocampus, measured by DNA strand breaks
Not measured[189]

Tg19959Thiamine deficiency10 days2 months KGDHC ( -ketoglutarate dehydrogenase complex)
neuronal loss in thalamus
TNF-a and antimalondialdehyde, markers for oxidative stressAcceleration of amyloid plaques,
total and insoluble A
BACE1 levels
Not measured[190]

/ CoQ10 supplementation (2400 mg/kg/day, oral)2 months19 months hemisphere and hippocampal atrophyNot measured[36]

APPswe/PS1 E9Retinoic acid (20 mg/kg, i.p.) 2 months5 months A plaque levels in frontal cortex and hippocampus
APP-CTFs, 70% neocortex, 50% hippocampus,
tau phosphorylation
GFAP
Improved MWM performance[191]

/ Caffeine (0.3 mg/ml in H2O)1 month19 months of total A , 46% in entrorhinal cortex, 40% in the hippocampus
soluble A 42, neocortex 51%, hippocampus 59%
soluble A 40, neocortex 25%, hippocampus 37%
cRaf-1 in hippocampus
Improved working memory in RAWM[196, 197, 218]

/ Caffeine (0.3 mg/ml in H2O)4 months4 months insoluble A 42 32%, soluble A 40 37% in the hippocampus
expression of PS1 and BACE1
Improved performance in MWM, RAWM, platform recognition[218]

/ Caffeine (1.5 mg/0.2 ml, oral)2 months15–20 months soluble A 42 in neocortex and hippocampus, by 51% and 59%, respectivelyImproved RAWM performance[197]

Tg2576Green tea derived EGCG (50 mg/kg, oral in H2O)6 months8 months 50% in plaque load in hippocampus, cingulate and entorhinal cortexImproved performance in RAWM[199, 200]
Tg2576EGCG (20 mg/kg,i.p.)2 months12 months 50 % in soluble A 40, 42
-secretase cleavage by 40%
Not measured[200]

Tg2576Luteolin (20 mg/kg, i.p.)1 month8 months GSK3 activity
PS1 processing
Not measured[201]

Tg2576Cabernet sauvignon wine (6% final ethanol concentration in H2O)7 months4 months A 40, 42 peptides in neocortex and hippocampus
CTF cleaved fragment in neocortex
-secretase activity
Improved performance in Barnes maze task[202]

3xTgNicotine (0.025–0.6 mg/ml, in H2O)5 months1 months hippocampal A 42 AChRs
tau phosphorylation in the hippocampus
p38-MAP kinase
Not measured[209]

Tg2576Nicotine (0.25–45 mg/kg, in H2O)10 days9 months soluble A 40, 42 in neocortexNot measured[207, 208]

Tg2576Nicotine (25–35 mg/kg, in H2O)5.5 months9 months A 42 plaques in the neocortex, hippocampus, and olfactory bulbNot measured[207]

APPsweCurcumin (160–5000 ppm)6 months10 months oxidized proteins in neocortex and hippocampus
soluble A in neocortex and hippocampus
total area and number of plaques
Not measured[214]

Tg2576Ginko biloba (0.35 mg/kg, in H2O)6 months8 monthsNo differences in plaque loadImproved performance in MWM[216]

9. Strengths, Limitations, and Future Challenges of G×E Research in AD

This paper provides an overview of experimental mouse data on environmental exposures known to be associated with AD. In general, it may be concluded that many studies have shown effects of environmental manipulations on a wide variety of phenotypes in transgenic mouse models of AD.

It is challenging to evaluate the exact role of GxE in the field of preclinical AD research, due to several limitations. Numerous mouse models have been used on different genetic backgrounds and at multiple ages, applying various protocols of experimental exposures. This high level of variability makes it difficult to draw firm and general conclusions on any of the discussed exposures. In addition, the read-out parameters differed per group, with some focusing on A pathology, synaptic integrity, or oxidative stress and others emphasizing behavioral effects. Another limitation is that most animal models used have focused on fAD mutations, while a GxE be more applicable in sporadic forms of AD.

The experimental design of most of the available studies often consisted of testing the effects of environmental exposures only in transgenic mice, without full comparison of the effects of those environmental exposures in wild type animals. In such an experimental setup, one can merely study disease acceleration or progression as a result of environmental exposure. Additionally, some environmental factors may have a differential effect in the initiation of the disease from their effect on disease progression. Evidently, this type of research can still provide us with insights on underlying biological mechanisms, but it cannot disentangle the synergistic participation of genes and environment in the induction of an AD phenotype.

In a clinical setting, however, GxE in AD etiology is particularly complex to decipher with standard epidemiological designs, particularly because the time-window between environmental exposures during life and the clinical phenotype of AD is very long. The high variability in environmental exposure across the life span also makes it challenging to capture this interaction.

Most AD research over the past decades has been A -centered, yet recent clinical trials based on the amyloid cascade hypothesis have yielded controversial and sometimes disappointing results [219]. Similarly, the majority of animal models of AD have also grossly been focused on A -enhancing mutations. Furthermore, outcome measures on the effects on environmental factors are often expressed in terms of soluble and insoluble A and plaque load alterations. Because the extent of amyloid burden does not correlate well with AD symptomatology, one could argue that it would be advantageous to design future studies in a multidisciplinary manner encompassing a wide range of outcome measures such as behavioural phenotypes, biochemical, molecular, as well as neuropathological alterations and use similar outcome measures in the various studies conducted by different research groups so that results are more comparable.

Possible biological mechanisms that mediate the effects of environmental exposures and that could be the focus of further translational AD research are, among others, inflammation, oxidative stress, protein misfolding, glucose metabolism, and epigenetics [19, 220223]. The AD brain shows ample signs of ongoing inflammatory processes, such as the presence of proinflammatory cytokines and activated microglia surrounding amyloid plaques [224]. A large body of evidence has pointed towards a role of oxidative stress and oxidative damage in brain regions that are affected by AD [220]. In addition, changes in the epigenome have been implicated in the pathophysiology of AD that can be triggered by various environmental factors [19], while the exact role of misframed proteins, such as ubiquitin 1 that have been found to accumulate in AD, remains also to be fully elucidated [223, 225].

10. Concluding Remarks

It appears likely that a large part of, at least, sporadic cases can be connected with GxE, with the field being challenged to identify the most relevant GxE by for example conducting prospective clinical studies of subjects that will develop AD. Exposure to environmental risk factors during early life has been linked to other complex psychiatric phenotypes and disorders. For example, prenatal maternal and early life stress can be viewed as a risk factor for developing major depression and schizophrenia [226228]. Likewise, environmental exposures during early life may well impact on the risk of developing AD. For example, neonatal exposure to metal lead has been proposed as an early environmental trigger for AD-related pathology in rodents and macaque monkeys [109]. Findings like these have spurred researchers to formulate the “Latent Early Associated Regulation” (LEARn) theory of AD pathogenesis proposing that indeed early environmental exposures can change gene expression for long time periods and can induce pathology that only becomes apparent later in life, after subsequent trigger(s) [109, 229].

While numerous challenges lie ahead, it can be argued that it is timely to move attention of epidemiological as well as experimental animal research in the field of AD towards the synergistic approach of GxE research. In a preclinical setting, one could envision focusing more on the use of recently identified genetic variants of the newly found GWAS genes. Second, current studies can benefit from the further technological advances in transgenesis that enable time- and region-specific expression of transgenes, thereby allowing for the investigation of GxE during specific time windows in development and aging, as well as in specific brain regions. Third, it may be valuable to scrutinize the roles of genetic and environmental risk factors (and their interactions) of diseases that have been associated with the onset of AD, such as cardiovascular disease and diabetes mellitus type 2. The underlying mechanisms of these disorders, which likely involve GxE, could shed a new light on the etiology of AD.

To conclude, moving towards a GxE approach in both clinical and experimental animal studies seems promising in further elucidating the multifactorial etiology of AD, and in identifying modifiable factors that are of particular relevance for subgroups of AD patients. The further use and development of animal models combining genetic and environmental manipulations will be a driving force in elucidating the exact biological underpinnings of this detrimental disorder.

Acknowledgment

Funds were provided by the International Stichting Alzheimer Onderzoek (ISAO), Grant no. 09552 to B. P. F. Rutten and Grant no. 07551 to D. L. A. van den Hove; by a Marie Curie Host Fellowship Grant MC-EST 020589 EURON to L. Chouliaras; and by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grant no. AG05138 to P. R. Hof. L. Chouliaras and A. S. R. Sierksma are first joint to this study.

References

  1. S. Seshadri and P. A. Wolf, “Lifetime risk of stroke and dementia: current concepts, and estimates from the Framingham Study,” Lancet Neurology, vol. 6, no. 12, pp. 1106–1114, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. H. W. Querfurth and F. M. LaFerla, “Alzheimer's disease,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 362, no. 4, pp. 329–344, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  3. S. Seshadri, A. L. Fitzpatrick, M. A. Ikram et al., “Genome-wide analysis of genetic loci associated with Alzheimer disease,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 303, no. 18, pp. 1832–1840, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. N. L. Pedersen, “Reaching the limits of genome-wide significance in Alzheimer disease: back to the environment,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 303, no. 18, pp. 1864–1865, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. EU-GEI, “Schizophrenia aetiology: do gene-environment interactions hold the key?” Schizophrenia Research, vol. 102, no. 1–3, pp. 21–26, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  6. J. Van Os and B. P. F. Rutten, “Gene-environment-wide interaction studies in psychiatry,” American Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 166, no. 9, pp. 964–966, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. J. Van Os, B. P. F. Rutten, and R. Poulton, “Gene-environment interactions in schizophrenia: review of epidemiological findings and future directions,” Schizophrenia Bulletin, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 1066–1082, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. M. Gatz, C. A. Reynolds, L. Fratiglioni et al., “Role of genes and environments for explaining Alzheimer disease,” Archives of General Psychiatry, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 168–174, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. I. Räihä, J. Kaprio, M. Koskenvuo, T. Rajala, and L. Sourander, “Alzheimer's disease in Finnish twins,” Lancet, vol. 347, no. 9001, pp. 573–578, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. I. Räihä, J. Kaprio, M. Koskenvuo, T. Rajala, and L. Sourander, “Environmental differences in twin pairs discordant for Alzheimer's disease,” Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, vol. 65, no. 5, pp. 785–787, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  11. N. L. Pedersen, M. Gatz, S. Berg, and B. Johansson, “How heritable is Alzheimer's disease late in life? Findings from Swedish twins,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 180–185, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. L. Bertram, M. B. McQueen, K. Mullin, D. Blacker, and R. E. Tanzi, “Systematic meta-analyses of Alzheimer disease genetic association studies: the AlzGene database,” Nature Genetics, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 17–23, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. D. Harold, R. Abraham, P. Hollingworth et al., “Genome-wide association study identifies variants at CLU and PICALM associated with Alzheimer's disease,” Nature Genetics, vol. 41, no. 10, pp. 1088–1093, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. J.-C. Lambert, S. Heath, G. Even et al., “Genome-wide association study identifies variants at CLU and CR1 associated with Alzheimer's disease,” Nature Genetics, vol. 41, no. 10, pp. 1094–1099, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. G. Laumet, V. Chouraki, B. Grenier-Boley et al., “Systematic analysis of candidate genes for Alzheimer's disease in a French, genome-wide association study,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 1181–1188, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. M. Ganguli and W. A. Kukull, “Lost in translation: epidemiology, risk, and alzheimer disease,” Archives of Neurology, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 107–111, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. L. Migliore and F. Coppedè, “Genetics, environmental factors and the emerging role of epigenetics in neurodegenerative diseases,” Mutation Research, vol. 667, no. 1-2, pp. 82–97, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. C. Qiu, D. De Ronchi, and L. Fratiglioni, “The epidemiology of the dementias: an update,” Current Opinion in Psychiatry, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 380–385, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. L. Chouliaras, B. P. F. Rutten, G. Kenis et al., “Epigenetic regulation in the pathophysiology of Alzheimer's disease,” Progress in Neurobiology, vol. 90, no. 4, pp. 498–510, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. V. Chandra and R. Pandav, “Gene-environment interaction in Alzheimer's disease: a potential role for cholesterol,” Neuroepidemiology, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 225–232, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  21. G. P. Jarvik, E. M. Wijsman, W. A. Kukull, G. D. Schellenberg, C. Yu, and E. B. Larson, “Interactions of apolipoprotein E genotype, total cholesterol level, age, and sex in prediction of Alzheimer's disease: a case-control study,” Neurology, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 1092–1096, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  22. A. Elbaz, C. Dufouil, and A. Alpérovitch, “Interaction between genes and environment in neurodegenerative diseases,” Comptes Rendus Biologies, vol. 330, no. 4, pp. 318–328, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. C. Dufouil, C. Tzourio, C. Brayne, C. Berr, P. Amouyel, and A. Alpérovitch, “Influence of apolipoprotein E genotype on the risk of cognitive deterioration in moderate drinkers smokers,” Epidemiology, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 280–284, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. K. Håkansson, S. Rovio, E. L. Helkala et al., “Association between mid-life marital status and cognitive function in later life: population based cohort study,” British Medical Journal, vol. 339, p. b2462, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. M. R. Basha, M. Murali, H. K. Siddiqi et al., “Lead (Pb) exposure and its effect on APP proteolysis and Aβ aggregation,” FASEB Journal, vol. 19, no. 14, pp. 2083–2084, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. S. Oddo, A. Caccamo, J. D. Shepherd et al., “Triple-transgenic model of Alzheimer's Disease with plaques and tangles: intracellular Aβ and synaptic dysfunction,” Neuron, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 409–421, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. G. W. Arendash, J. Sanchez-Ramos, T. Mori et al., “Electromagnetic field treatment protects against and reverses cognitive impairment in Alzheimer's disease mice,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 191–210, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. P.-T. Xu, D. Schmechel, T. Rothrock-Christian et al., “Human apolipoprotein E2, E3, and E4 isoform-specific transgenic mice: human-like pattern of glial and neuronal immunoreactivity in central nervous system not observed in wild-type mice,” Neurobiology of Disease, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 229–245, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. C. Sturchler-Pierrat, D. Abramowski, M. Duke et al., “Two amyloid precursor protein transgenic mouse models with Alzheimer disease-like pathology,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 94, no. 24, pp. 13287–13292, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. V. Blanchard, S. Moussaoui, C. Czech et al., “Time sequence of maturation of dystrophic neurites associated with Aβ deposits in APP/PS1 transgenic mice,” Experimental Neurology, vol. 184, no. 1, pp. 247–263, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. A. G. Reaume, D. S. Howland, S. P. Trusko et al., “Enhanced amyloidogenic processing of the β-amyloid precursor protein in gene-targeted mice bearing the Swedish familial Alzheimer's disease mutations and a “humanized” Aβ sequence,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 271, no. 38, pp. 23380–23388, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. R. Siman, A. G. Reaume, M. J. Savage et al., “Presenilin-1 P264L knock-in mutation: differential effects on Aβ production, amyloid deposition, and neuronal vulnerability,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 20, no. 23, pp. 8717–8726, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  33. M. P. Murphy et al., “Abeta solubility and deposition during AD progression and in APPxPS-1 knock-in mice,” Neurobiology of Disease, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 301–311, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  34. L. Mucke, E. Masliah, G.-Q. Yu et al., “High-level neuronal expression of Aβ(1-42) in wild-type human amyloid protein precursor transgenic mice: synaptotoxicity without plaque formation,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 20, no. 11, pp. 4050–4058, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  35. A. Savonenko, G. M. Xu, T. Melnikova et al., “Episodic-like memory deficits in the APPswe/PS1dE9 mouse model of Alzheimer's disease: relationships to β-amyloid deposition and neurotransmitter abnormalities,” Neurobiology of Disease, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 602–617, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. G. Li, C. R. Jack, X.-F. Yang, and E. S. Yang, “Diet supplement CoQ10 delays brain atrophy in aged transgenic mice with mutations in the amyloid precursor protein: an in vivo volume MRI study,” BioFactors, vol. 32, no. 1–4, pp. 169–178, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  37. X. Yang, G. Dai, G. Li, and E. S. Yang, “Coenzyme Q10 reduces β-amyloid plaque in an APP/PS1 transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer's disease,” Journal of Molecular Neuroscience, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 110–113, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. L. Holcomb, M. N. Gordon, E. Mcgowan et al., “Accelerated Alzheimer-type phenotype in transgenic mice carrying both mutant amyloid precursor protein and presenilin 1 transgenes,” Nature Medicine, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 97–100, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. Q.-X. Li, C. Maynard, R. Cappai et al., “Intracellular accumulation of detergent-soluble amyloidogenic Aβ fragment of Alzheimer's disease precursor protein in the hippocampus of aged transgenic mice,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 72, no. 6, pp. 2479–2487, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. J. D. Buxbaum, J. L. Christensen, A. A. Ruefli, P. Greengard, and J. F. Loring, “Expression of APP in brains of transgenic mice containing the entire human APP gene,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 197, no. 2, pp. 639–645, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. C. Duyckaerts, M.-C. Potier, and B. Delatour, “Alzheimer disease models and human neuropathology: similarities and differences,” Acta Neuropathologica, vol. 115, no. 1, pp. 5–38, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. D.-H. Chui, H. Tanahashi, K. Ozawa et al., “Transgenic mice with Alzheimer presenilin 1 mutations show accelerated neurodegeneration without amyloid plaque formation,” Nature Medicine, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 560–564, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. D. R. Howlett, J. C. Richardson, A. Austin et al., “Cognitive correlates of Aβ deposition in male and female mice bearing amyloid precursor protein and presenilin-1 mutant transgenes,” Brain Research, vol. 1017, no. 1-2, pp. 130–136, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. M. Gallant, M. Rak, A. Szeghalmi et al., “Focally elevated creatine detected in amyloid precursor protein (APP) transgenic mice and alzheimer disease brain tissue,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 281, no. 1, pp. 5–8, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. K. Hsiao, P. Chapman, S. Nilsen et al., “Correlative memory deficits, Aβ elevation, and amyloid plaques in transgenic mice,” Science, vol. 274, no. 5284, pp. 99–102, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. M. A. Chishti, D.-S. Yang, C. Janus et al., “Early-onset amyloid deposition and cognitive deficits in transgenic mice expressing a double mutant form of amyloid precursor protein 695,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 276, no. 24, pp. 21562–21570, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. K. Tanemura, M. Murayama, T. Akagi et al., “Neurodegeneration with tau accumulation in a transgenic mouse expressing V337M human tau,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 133–141, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  48. R. S. Wilson, S. E. Arnold, J. A. Schneider, J. F. Kelly, Y. Tang, and D. A. Bennett, “Chronic psychological distress and risk of Alzheimer's disease in old age,” Neuroepidemiology, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 143–153, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. R. S. Wilson, D. A. Evans, J. L. Bienias, C. F. Mendes De Leon, J. A. Schneider, and D. A. Bennett, “Proneness to psychological distress is associated with risk of Alzheimer's disease,” Neurology, vol. 61, no. 11, pp. 1479–1485, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  50. B. J. Carroll and G. C. Curtis, “Neuroendocrine identification of depressed patients,” Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 13–20, 1976. View at: Google Scholar
  51. J. G. Csernansky, H. Dong, A. M. Fagan et al., “Plasma cortisol and progression of dementia in subjects with Alzheimer-type dementia,” American Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 163, no. 12, pp. 2164–2169, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. M. F. Weiner, S. Vobach, K. Olsson, D. Svetlik, and R. C. Risser, “Cortisol secretion and Alzheimer's disease progression,” Biological Psychiatry, vol. 42, no. 11, pp. 1030–1038, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. M. Joëls, H. Karst, D. Alfarez et al., “Effects of chronic stress on structure and cell function in rat hippocampus and hypothalamus,” Stress, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 221–231, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. A. M. Magariños, B. S. McEwen, G. Flügge, and E. Fuchs, “Chronic psychosocial stress causes apical dendritic atrophy of hippocampal CA3 pyramidal neurons in subordinate tree shrews,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 3534–3540, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  55. R. M. Sapolsky, “A mechanism for glucocorticoid toxicity in the hippocampus: increased neuronal vulnerability to metabolic insults,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 1228–1232, 1985. View at: Google Scholar
  56. R. M. Sapolsky, L. C. Krey, and B. S. McEwen, “Prolonged glucocorticoid exposure reduces hippocampal neuron number: implications for aging,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 1222–1227, 1985. View at: Google Scholar
  57. D. N. Alfarez, M. Joëls, and H. J. Krugers, “Chronic unpredictable stress impairs long-term potentiation in rat hippocampal CA1 area and dentate gyrus in vitro,” European Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 1928–1934, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. E. Gould, B. S. McEwen, P. Tanapat, L. A. M. Galea, and E. Fuchs, “Neurogenesis in the dentate gyrus of the adult tree shrew is regulated by psychosocial stress and NMDA receptor activation,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 2492–2498, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  59. A. S. R. Sierksma, D. L. A. van den Hove, H. W. M. Steinbusch, and J. Prickaerts, “Major depression, cognitive dysfunction and Alzheimer's disease: is there a link?” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 626, no. 1, pp. 72–82, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. F. Caraci, A. Copani, F. Nicoletti, and F. Drago, “Depression and Alzheimer's disease: neurobiological links and common pharmacological targets,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 626, no. 1, pp. 64–71, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. S. M. Rothman and M. P. Mattson, “Adverse stress, hippocampal networks, and Alzheimer's disease,” NeuroMolecular Medicine, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 56–70, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. M. I. Geerlings, T. Den Heijer, P. J. Koudstaal, A. Hofman, and M. M. B. Breteler, “History of depression, depressive symptoms, and medial temporal lobe atrophy and the risk of Alzheimer disease,” Neurology, vol. 70, no. 15, pp. 1258–1264, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. M. I. Geerlings, R. A. Schoevers, A. T. F. Beekman et al., “Depression and risk of cognitive decline and Alzheimer's disease. Results of two prospective community-based studies in The Netherlands,” British Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 176, pp. 568–575, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. R. C. Green, L. A. Cupples, A. Kurz et al., “Depression as a risk factor for Alzheimer disease: the MIRAGE Study,” Archives of Neurology, vol. 60, no. 5, pp. 753–759, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. E. Grünblatt, C. M. Monoranu, M. Apfelbacher et al., “Tryptophan is a marker of human postmortem brain tissue quality,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 110, no. 5, pp. 1400–1408, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. D. P. Devanand, M. Sano, M.-X. Tang et al., “Depressed mood and the incidence of Alzheimer's disease in the elderly living in the community,” Archives of General Psychiatry, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 175–182, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  67. V. M. Dotson, M. A. Beydoun, and A. B. Zonderman, “Recurrent depressive symptoms and the incidence of dementia and mild cognitive impairment,” Neurology, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 27–34, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. J. S. Saczynski, A. Beiser, S. Seshadri, S. Auerbach, P. A. Wolf, and R. Au, “Depressive symptoms and risk of dementia: the Framingham Heart Study,” Neurology, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 35–41, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. R. S. Wilson, G. M. Hoganson, K. B. Rajan, L. L. Barnes, C. F. Mendes De Leon, and D. A. Evans, “Temporal course of depressive symptoms during the development of Alzheimer disease,” Neurology, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 21–26, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. D. R. Ownby, C. C. Johnson, and E. L. Peterson, “Incidence and prevalence of physician-diagnosed asthma in a suburban population of young adults,” Annals of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology, vol. 77, no. 4, pp. 304–308, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  71. X. Sun, C. C. Chiu, E. Liebson et al., “Depression and plasma amyloid β peptides in the elderly with and without the apolipoprotein E4 allele,” Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 238–244, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. M. van Oijen, A. Hofman, H. D. Soares, P. J. Koudstaal, and M. M. Breteler, “Plasma Aβ1-40 and Aβ1-42 and the risk of dementia: a prospective case-cohort study,” Lancet Neurology, vol. 5, no. 8, pp. 655–660, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. H. Lavretsky, P. Siddarth, V. Kepe et al., “Depression and anxiety symptoms are associated with cerebral FDDNP-PET binding in middle-aged and older nondemented adults,” American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 493–502, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. M. A. Rapp, M. Schnaider-Beeri, H. T. Grossman et al., “Increased hippocampal plaques and tangles in patients with Alzheimer disease with a lifetime history of major depression,” Archives of General Psychiatry, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 161–167, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. M. I. Geerlings, B. Schmand, A. W. Braam, C. Jonker, L. M. Bouter, and W. Van Tilburg, “Depressive symptoms and risk of Alzheimer's disease in more highly educated older people,” Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, vol. 48, no. 9, pp. 1092–1097, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  76. D. F. Swaab, A.-M. Bao, and P. J. Lucassen, “The stress system in the human brain in depression and neurodegeneration,” Ageing Research Reviews, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 141–194, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. H. Dong, B. Goico, M. Martin, C. A. Csernansky, A. Bertchume, and J. G. Csernansky, “Modulation of hippocampal cell proliferation, memory, and amyloid plaque deposition in APPsw (Tg2576) mutant mice by isolation stress,” Neuroscience, vol. 127, no. 3, pp. 601–609, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  78. H. Dong, C. M. Yuede, H.-S. Yoo et al., “Corticosterone and related receptor expression are associated with increased β-amyloid plaques in isolated Tg2576 mice,” Neuroscience, vol. 155, no. 1, pp. 154–163, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  79. J.-E. Kang, J. R. Cirrito, H. Dong, J. G. Csernansky, and D. M. Holtzman, “Acute stress increases interstitial fluid amyloid-β via corticotropin-releasing factor and neuronal activity,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 104, no. 25, pp. 10673–10678, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  80. M.-C. Pardon, S. Sarmad, I. Rattray et al., “Repeated novel cage exposure-induced improvement of early Alzheimer's-like cognitive and amyloid changes in TASTPM mice is unrelated to changes in brain endocannabinoids levels,” Neurobiology of Aging, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 1099–1113, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  81. W. A. Pedersen, C. Culmsee, D. Ziegler, J. P. Herman, and M. P. Mattson, “Aberrant stress response associated with severe hypoglycemia in a transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer's disease,” Journal of Molecular Neuroscience, vol. 13, no. 1-2, pp. 159–165, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  82. Y. H. Jeong, C. H. Park, J. Yoo et al., “Chronic stress accelerates learning and memory impairments and increases amyloid deposition in APPV717I-CT100 transgenic mice, an Alzheimer's disease model,” FASEB Journal, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 729–731, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  83. K.-W. Lee, J.-B. Kim, J.-S. Seo et al., “Behavioral stress accelerates plaque pathogenesis in the brain of Tg2576 mice via generation of metabolic oxidative stress,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 165–175, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  84. S. Kunimoto, S. Nakamura, K. Wada, and T. Inoue, “Chronic stress-mutated presenilin 1 gene interaction perturbs neurogenesis and accelerates neurodegeneration,” Experimental Neurology, vol. 221, no. 1, pp. 175–185, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  85. K. N. Green, L. M. Billings, B. Roozendaal, J. L. McGaugh, and F. M. LaFerla, “Glucocorticoids increase amyloid-β and tau pathology in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 26, no. 35, pp. 9047–9056, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  86. P. A. Boyle, A. S. Buchman, L. L. Barnes, and D. A. Bennett, “Effect of a purpose in life on risk of incident Alzheimer disease and mild cognitive impairment in community-dwelling older persons,” Archives of General Psychiatry, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 304–310, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  87. D. Laurin, R. Verreault, J. Lindsay, K. MacPherson, and K. Rockwood, “Physical activity and risk of cognitive impairment and dementia in elderly persons,” Archives of Neurology, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 498–504, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  88. D. Krech, M. R. Rosenzweig, and E. L. Bennett, “Effects of environmental complexity and training on brain chemistry,” Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 509–519, 1960. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  89. J. Nithianantharajah and A. J. Hannan, “The neurobiology of brain and cognitive reserve: mental and physical activity as modulators of brain disorders,” Progress in Neurobiology, vol. 89, no. 4, pp. 369–382, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  90. P. A. Adlard, V. M. Perreau, V. Pop, and C. W. Cotman, “Voluntary exercise decreases amyloid load in a transgenic model of Alzheimer's disease,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 25, no. 17, pp. 4217–4221, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  91. G. W. Arendash, M. F. Garcia, D. A. Costa, J. R. Cracchiolo, I. M. Wefes, and H. Potter, “Environmental enrichment improves cognition in aged Alzheimer's transgenic mice despite stable β-amyloid deposition,” NeuroReport, vol. 15, no. 11, pp. 1751–1754, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  92. A. Herring, H. Yasin, O. Ambrée, N. Sachser, W. Paulus, and K. Keyvani, “Environmental enrichment counteracts Alzheimer's neurovascular dysfunction in TgCRND8 mice,” Brain Pathology, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 32–39, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  93. A. Herring, O. Ambrée, M. Tomm et al., “Environmental enrichment enhances cellular plasticity in transgenic mice with Alzheimer-like pathology,” Experimental Neurology, vol. 216, no. 1, pp. 184–192, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  94. N. Görtz, L. Lewejohann, M. Tomm et al., “Effects of environmental enrichment on exploration, anxiety, and memory in female TgCRND8 Alzheimer mice,” Behavioural Brain Research, vol. 191, no. 1, pp. 43–48, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  95. S. Mirochnic, S. Wolf, M. Staufenbiel, and G. Kempermann, “Age effects on the regulation of adult hippocampal neurogenesis by physical activity and environmental enrichment in the APP23 mouse model of Alzheimer disease,” Hippocampus, vol. 19, no. 10, pp. 1008–1018, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  96. S. A. Wolf, G. Kronenberg, K. Lehmann et al., “Cognitive and physical activity differently modulate disease progression in the amyloid precursor protein (APP)-23 model of Alzheimer's disease,” Biological Psychiatry, vol. 60, no. 12, pp. 1314–1323, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  97. J. R. Cracchiolo, T. Mori, S. J. Nazian, J. Tan, H. Potter, and G. W. Arendash, “Enhanced cognitive activity-over and above social or physical activity-is required to protect Alzheimer's mice against cognitive impairment, reduce Aβ deposition, and increase synaptic immunoreactivity,” Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 277–294, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  98. O. Lazarov, J. Robinson, Y.-P. Tang et al., “Environmental enrichment reduces Aβ levels and amyloid deposition in transgenic mice,” Cell, vol. 120, no. 5, pp. 701–713, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  99. D. A. Costa, J. R. Cracchiolo, A. D. Bachstetter et al., “Enrichment improves cognition in AD mice by amyloid-related and unrelated mechanisms,” Neurobiology of Aging, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 831–844, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  100. J. L. Jankowsky, G. Xu, D. Fromholt, V. Gonzales, and D. R. Borchelt, “Environmental enrichment exacerbates amyloid plaque formation in a transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer disease,” Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology, vol. 62, no. 12, pp. 1220–1227, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  101. J. L. Jankowsky, T. Melnikova, D. J. Fadale et al., “Environmental enrichment mitigates cognitive deficits in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 25, no. 21, pp. 5217–5224, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  102. O. Levi, A. L. Jongen-Relo, J. Feldon, A. D. Roses, and D. M. Michaelson, “ApoE4 impairs hippocampal plasticity isoform-specifically and blocks the environmental stimulation of synaptogenesis and memory,” Neurobiology of Disease, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 273–282, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  103. O. Levi, I. Dolev, H. Belinson, and D. M. Michaelson, “Intraneuronal amyloid-β plays a role in mediating the synergistic pathological effects of apoE4 and environmental stimulation,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 103, no. 3, pp. 1031–1040, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  104. K. Nichol, S. P. Deeny, J. Seif, K. Camaclang, and C. W. Cotman, “Exercise improves cognition and hippocampal plasticity in APOE epsilon4 mice,” Alzheimer's and Dementia, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 287–294, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  105. L. Lewejohann, N. Reefmann, P. Widmann et al., “Transgenic Alzheimer mice in a semi-naturalistic environment: more plaques, yet not compromised in daily life,” Behavioural Brain Research, vol. 201, no. 1, pp. 99–102, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  106. L. R. French, A. N. Williams, and R. G. Campbell, “Lead toxicity,” Minnesota Medicine, vol. 68, no. 12, pp. 899–901, 1985. View at: Google Scholar
  107. R. T. Gun, A. E. Korten, A. F. Jorm et al., “Occupational risk factors for Alzheimer disease: a case-control study,” Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 21–27, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  108. M. Santibañez, F. Bolumar, and A. M. García, “Occupational risk factors in Alzheimer's disease: a review assessing the quality of published epidemiological studies,” Occupational and Environmental Medicine, vol. 64, no. 11, pp. 723–732, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  109. M. R. Basha, W. Wei, S. A. Bakheet et al., “The fetal basis of amyloidogenesis: exposure to lead and latent overexpression of amyloid precursor protein and β-amyloid in the aging brain,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 823–829, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  110. J. Wu, M. R. Basha, B. Brock et al., “Alzheimer's Disease (AD)-like pathology in aged monkeys after infantile exposure to environmental metal lead (Pb): evidence for a developmental origin and environmental link for AD,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 3–9, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  111. T. P. Flaten, “Aluminium as a risk factor in Alzheimer's disease, with emphasis on drinking water,” Brain Research Bulletin, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 187–196, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  112. M. A. M. Rogers and D. G. Simon, “Aluminium intake and risk of Alzheimer's disease,” Age and Ageing, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 205–209, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  113. P. B. Moore, J. P. Day, G. A. Taylor, I. N. Ferrier, L. K. Fifield, and J. A. Edwardson, “Absorption of aluminium-26 in Alzheimer's disease, measured using accelerator mass spectrometry,” Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 66–69, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  114. G. A. Taylor, I. N. Ferrier, I. J. McLoughlin et al., “Gastrointestinal absorption of aluminium in Alzheimer's disease: response to aluminium citrate,” Age and Ageing, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 81–90, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  115. D. Praticò, K. Uryu, S. Sung, S. Tang, J. Q. Trojanowski, and V. M. Lee, “Aluminum modulates brain amyloidosis through oxidative stress in APP transgenic mice,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 1138–1140, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  116. T. Garcia, J. Esparza, M. R. Nogués, M. Romeu, J. Domingo, and M. Gómez, “Oxidative stress status and RNA expression in hippocampus of an animal model of Alzheimer's disease after chronic exposure to aluminum,” Hippocampus, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 218–225, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  117. D. Ribes, M. T. Colomina, P. Vicens, and J. L. Domingo, “Effects of oral aluminum exposure on behavior and neurogenesis in a transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer's disease,” Experimental Neurology, vol. 214, no. 2, pp. 293–300, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  118. M. Gómez, J. L. Esparza, M. Cabré, T. García, and J. L. Domingo, “Aluminum exposure through the diet: metal levels in AβPP transgenic mice, a model for Alzheimer's disease,” Toxicology, vol. 249, no. 2-3, pp. 214–219, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  119. A. I. Bush, W. H. Pettingell Jr., M. D. Paradis, and R. E. Tanzi, “Modulation of Aβ adhesiveness and secretase site cleavage by zinc,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 269, no. 16, pp. 12152–12158, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  120. T. Miura, K. Suzuki, N. Kohata, and H. Takeuchi, “Metal binding modes of Alzheimer's amyloid β-peptide in insoluble aggregates and soluble complexes,” Biochemistry, vol. 39, no. 23, pp. 7024–7031, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  121. F. Ricchelli, D. Drago, B. Filippi, G. Tognon, and P. Zatta, “Aluminum-triggered structural modifications and aggregation of β-amyloids,” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, vol. 62, no. 15, pp. 1724–1733, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  122. B. E. Dwyer, L. R. Zacharski, D. J. Balestra et al., “Getting the iron out: phlebotomy for Alzheimer's disease?” Medical Hypotheses, vol. 72, no. 5, pp. 504–509, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  123. G. Bartzokis, D. Sultzer, J. Cummings et al., “In vivo evaluation of brain iron in Alzheimer disease using magnetic resonance imaging,” Archives of General Psychiatry, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 47–53, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  124. G. Bartzokis, T. A. Tishler, I.-S. Shin, P. H. Lu, and J. L. Cummings, “Brain ferritin iron as a risk factor for age at onset in neurodegenerative diseases,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1012, pp. 224–236, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  125. M. A. Deibel, W. D. Ehmann, and W. R. Markesbery, “Copper, iron, and zinc imbalances in severely degenerated brain regions in Alzheimer's disease: possible relation to oxidative stress,” Journal of the Neurological Sciences, vol. 143, no. 1-2, pp. 137–142, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  126. M. A. Lovell, J. D. Robertson, W. J. Teesdale, J. L. Campbell, and W. R. Markesbery, “Copper, iron and zinc in Alzheimer's disease senile plaques,” Journal of the Neurological Sciences, vol. 158, no. 1, pp. 47–52, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  127. E. S. Carlson, R. Magid, A. Petryk, and M. K. Georgieff, “Iron deficiency alters expression of genes implicated in Alzheimer disease pathogenesis,” Brain Research, vol. 1237, pp. 75–83, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  128. L. A. Jorgenson, M. Sun, M. O'Connor, and M. K. Georgieff, “Fetal iron deficiency disrupts the maturation of synaptic function and efficacy in area CA1 of the developing rat hippocampus,” Hippocampus, vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 1094–1102, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  129. L. A. Jorgenson, J. D. Wobken, and M. K. Georgieff, “Perinatal iron deficiency alters apical dendritic growth in hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons,” Developmental Neuroscience, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 412–420, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  130. L. L. Fernandez, M. Carmona, M. Portero-Otin et al., “Effects of increased iron intake during the neonatal period on the brain of adult AβPP/PS1 transgenic mice,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 1069–1080, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  131. P. Moreira, C. Pereira, M. S. Santos, and C. Oliveira, “Effect of zinc ions on the cytotoxicity induced by the amyloid β- peptide,” Antioxidants and Redox Signaling, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 317–325, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  132. J. A. Carson and A. J. Turner, “β-amyloid catabolism: roles for neprilysin (NEP) and other metallopeptidases?” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  133. M. A. Lovell, C. Xie, and W. R. Markesbery, “Protection against amyloid beta peptide toxicity by zinc,” Brain Research, vol. 823, no. 1-2, pp. 88–95, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  134. J. A. Molina, F. J. Jiménez-Jiménez, M. V. Aguilar et al., “Cerebrospinal fluid levels of transition metals in patients with Alzheimer's disease,” Journal of Neural Transmission, vol. 105, no. 4-5, pp. 479–488, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  135. D.-S. Yang, J. McLaurin, K. Qin, D. Westaway, and P. E. Fraser, “Examining the zinc binding site of the amyloid-β peptide,” European Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 267, no. 22, pp. 6692–6698, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  136. M. Stoltenberg, A. I. Bush, G. Bach et al., “Amyloid plaques arise from zinc-enriched cortical layers in APP/PS1 transgenic mice and are paradoxically enlarged with dietary zinc deficiency,” Neuroscience, vol. 150, no. 2, pp. 357–369, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  137. D. H. Linkous, P. A. Adlard, P. B. Wanschura, K. M. Conko, and J. M. Flinn, “The effects of enhanced zinc on spatial memory and plaque formation in transgenic mice,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 565–579, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  138. C. J. Maynard, R. Cappai, I. Volitakis et al., “Chronic exposure to high levels of zinc or copper has little effect on brain metal homeostasis or Aβ accumulation in transgenic APP-C100 mice,” Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 757–767, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  139. J.-Y. Lee, T. B. Cole, R. D. Palmiter, S. W. Suh, and J.-Y. Koh, “Contribution by synaptic zinc to the gender-disparate plaque formation in human Swedish mutant APP transgenic mice,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 99, no. 11, pp. 7705–7710, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  140. H. Kessler, F.-G. Pajonk, D. Bach et al., “Effect of copper intake on CSF parameters in patients with mild Alzheimer's disease: a pilot phase 2 clinical trial,” Journal of Neural Transmission, vol. 115, no. 12, pp. 1651–1659, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  141. D. L. Sparks and B. G. Schreurs, “Trace amounts of copper in water induce β-amyloid plaques and learning deficits in a rabbit model of Alzheimer's disease,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 100, no. 19, pp. 11065–11069, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  142. S. Schäfer, F.-G. Pajonk, G. Multhaup, and T. A. Bayer, “Copper and clioquinol treatment in young APP transgenic and wild-type mice: effects on life expectancy, body weight, and metal-ion levels,” Journal of Molecular Medicine, vol. 85, no. 4, pp. 405–413, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  143. M. Kitazawa, D. Cheng, and F. M. Laferla, “Chronic copper exposure exacerbates both amyloid and tau pathology and selectively dysregulates cdk5 in a mouse model of AD,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 108, no. 6, pp. 1550–1560, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  144. C. J. Maynard, R. Cappai, I. Volitakis et al., “Overexpression of Alzheimer's disease amyloid-β opposes the age-dependent elevations of brain copper and iron,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 277, no. 47, pp. 44670–44676, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  145. A. R. White, R. Reyes, J. F. B. Mercer et al., “Copper levels are increased in the cerebral cortex and liver of APP and APLP2 knockout mice,” Brain Research, vol. 842, no. 2, pp. 439–444, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  146. T. Mizoroki, S. Meshitsuka, S. Maeda, M. Murayama, N. Sahara, and A. Takashima, “Aluminum induces tau aggregation in vitro but not in vivo,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 419–427, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  147. V. E. Johnson, W. Stewart, and D. H. Smith, “Traumatic brain injury and amyloid-β pathology: a link to Alzheimer's disease?” Nature Reviews Neuroscience, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 361–370, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  148. V. E. Johnson, W. Stewart, D. I. Graham, J. E. Stewart, A. H. Praestgaard, and D. H. Smith, “A neprilysin polymorphism and amyloid-β plaques after traumatic brain injury,” Journal of Neurotrauma, vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 1197–1202, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  149. H. Murai, J. E. S. Pierce, R. Raghupathi et al., “Twofold overexpression of human β-amyloid precursor proteins in transgenic mice does not affect the neuromotor, cognitive, or neurodegenerative sequelae following experimental brain injury,” Journal of Comparative Neurology, vol. 392, no. 4, pp. 428–438, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  150. D. H. Smith, M. Nakamura, T. K. McIntosh et al., “Brain trauma induces massive hippocampal neuron death linked to a surge in β-amyloid levels in mice overexpressing mutant amyloid precursor protein,” American Journal of Pathology, vol. 153, no. 3, pp. 1005–1010, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  151. E. E. Abrahamson, M. D. Ikonomovic, J. R. Ciallella et al., “Caspase inhibition therapy abolishes brain trauma-induced increases in Aβ peptide: implications for clinical outcome,” Experimental Neurology, vol. 197, no. 2, pp. 437–450, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  152. E. E. Abrahamson, M. D. Ikonomovic, C. Edward Dixon, and S. T. DeKosky, “Simvastatin therapy prevents brain trauma-induced increases in β-amyloid peptide levels,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 407–414, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  153. F. C. Crawford, M. Wood, S. Ferguson et al., “Genomic analysis of response to traumatic brain injury in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease (APPsw),” Brain Research, vol. 1185, no. 1, pp. 45–58, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  154. K. Uryu, H. Laurer, T. McIntosh et al., “Repetitive mild brain trauma accelerates Aβ deposition, lipid peroxidation, and cognitive impairment in a transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer amyloidosis,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 446–454, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  155. S. Ferguson, B. Mouzon, G. Kayihan et al., “Apolipoprotein E genotype and oxidative stress response to traumatic brain injury,” Neuroscience, vol. 168, no. 3, pp. 811–819, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  156. Y. Nakagawa, M. Nakamura, T. K. McIntosh et al., “Traumatic brain injury in young, amyloid-β peptide overexpressing transgenic mice induces marked ipsilateral hippocampal atrophy and diminished deposition during aging,” Journal of Comparative Neurology, vol. 411, no. 3, pp. 390–398, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  157. Y. Nakagawa, L. Reed, M. Nakamura et al., “Brain trauma in aged transgenic mice induces regression of established Aβ deposits,” Experimental Neurology, vol. 163, no. 1, pp. 244–252, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  158. F. Söderqvist, L. Hardell, M. Carlberg, and K. H. Mild, “Radiofrequency fields, transthyretin, and alzheimer's disease,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 599–606, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  159. J.-M. Serot, D. Christmann, T. Dubost, and M. Couturier, “Cerebrospinal fluid transthyretin: aging and late onset Alzheimer's disease,” Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 506–508, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  160. J. E. Galvin, “Pass the grain; spare the brain,” Neurology, vol. 69, no. 11, pp. 1072–1073, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  161. N. Scarmeas, Y. Stern, R. Mayeux, and J. A. Luchsinger, “Mediterranean diet, alzheimer disease, and vascular mediation,” Archives of Neurology, vol. 63, no. 12, pp. 1709–1717, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  162. N. Scarmeas, Y. Stern, R. Mayeux, J. J. Manly, N. Schupf, and J. A. Luchsinger, “Mediterranean diet and mild cognitive impairment,” Archives of Neurology, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 216–225, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  163. M. Kivipelto, T. Ngandu, L. Fratiglioni et al., “Obesity and vascular risk factors at midlife and the risk of dementia and Alzheimer disease,” Archives of Neurology, vol. 62, no. 10, pp. 1556–1560, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  164. J. A. Luchsinger, M.-X. Tang, S. Shea, and R. Mayeux, “Caloric intake and the risk of Alzheimer disease,” Archives of Neurology, vol. 59, no. 8, pp. 1258–1263, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  165. S. Pedrini, C. Thomas, H. Brautigam et al., “Dietary composition modulates brain mass and solubilizable A levels in a mouse model of aggressive Alzheimer's amyloid pathology,” Molecular Neurodegeneration, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 40, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  166. L. Ho, W. Qin, P. N. Pompl et al., “Diet-induced insulin resistance promotes amyloidosis in a transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer's disease,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 902–904, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  167. C. M. Studzinski, F. Li, A. J. Bruce-Keller et al., “Effects of short-term Western diet on cerebral oxidative stress and diabetes related factors in APP x PS1 knock-in mice,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 108, no. 4, pp. 860–866, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  168. C. R. Hooijmans, F. Rutters, P. J. Dederen et al., “Changes in cerebral blood volume and amyloid pathology in aged Alzheimer APP/PS1 mice on a docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) diet or cholesterol enriched Typical Western Diet (TWD),” Neurobiology of Disease, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 16–29, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  169. C. Julien, C. Tremblay, A. Phivilay et al., “High-fat diet aggravates amyloid-beta and tau pathologies in the 3xTg-AD mouse model,” Neurobiology of Aging, vol. 31, no. 9, pp. 1516–1531, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  170. M. Simons, P. Keller, J. Dichgans, and J. B. Schulz, “Cholesterol and Alzheimer's disease: is there a link?” Neurology, vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 1089–1093, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  171. I.-L. Notkola, R. Sulkava, J. Pekkanen et al., “Serum total cholesterol, apolipoprotein E ε4 allele, and Alzheimer's disease,” Neuroepidemiology, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 14–20, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  172. L. Puglielli, R. E. Tanzi, and D. M. Kovacs, “Alzheimer's disease: the cholesterol connection,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 345–351, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  173. R. M. Evans, S. Hui, A. Perkins, D. K. Lahiri, J. Poirier, and M. R. Farlow, “Cholesterol and APOE genotype interact to influence Alzheimer disease progression,” Neurology, vol. 62, no. 10, pp. 1869–1871, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  174. M. Kivipelto, E.-L. Helkala, M. P. Laakso et al., “Apolipoprotein E ε4 allele, elevated midlife total cholesterol level, and high midlife systolic blood pressure are independent risk factors for late-life Alzheimer disease,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 137, no. 3, pp. 149–155, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  175. L. M. Refolo, M. A. Pappolla, B. Malester et al., “Hypercholesterolemia accelerates the Alzheimer's amyloid pathology in a transgenic mouse model,” Neurobiology of Disease, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 321–331, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  176. L. M. Refolo, M. A. Pappolla, J. LaFrancois et al., “A cholesterol-lowering drug reduces β-amyloid pathology in a transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer's disease,” Neurobiology of Disease, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 890–899, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  177. G. P. Lim, F. Calon, T. Morihara et al., “A diet enriched with the omega-3 fatty acid docosahexaenoic acid reduces amyloid burden in an aged Alzheimer mouse model,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 25, no. 12, pp. 3032–3040, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  178. M. Oksman, H. Iivonen, E. Hogyes et al., “Impact of different saturated fatty acid, polyunsaturated fatty acid and cholesterol containing diets on beta-amyloid accumulation in APP/PS1 transgenic mice,” Neurobiology of Disease, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 563–572, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  179. K. N. Green, H. Martinez-Coria, H. Khashwji et al., “Dietary docosahexaenoic acid and docosapentaenoic acid ameliorate amyloid-β and tau pathology via a mechanism involving presenilin 1 levels,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 27, no. 16, pp. 4385–4395, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  180. S. E. Perez, B. M. Berg, K. A. Moore et al., “DHA diet reduces AD pathology in young APPswe/PS1ΔE9 transgenic mice: possible gender effects,” Journal of Neuroscience Research, vol. 88, no. 5, pp. 1026–1040, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  181. M. C. Morris, D. A. Evans, J. L. Bienias et al., “Dietary fats and the risk of incident Alzheimer disease,” Archives of Neurology, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 194–200, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  182. M. C. Morris, D. A. Evans, J. L. Bienias et al., “Consumption of fish and n-3 fatty acids and risk of incident Alzheimer disease,” Archives of Neurology, vol. 60, no. 7, pp. 940–946, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  183. M. C. Morris, D. A. Evans, C. C. Tangney, J. L. Bienias, and R. S. Wilson, “Fish consumption and cognitive decline with age in a large community study,” Archives of Neurology, vol. 62, no. 12, pp. 1849–1853, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  184. C. R. Hooijmans, C. E. E. M. Van der Zee, P. J. Dederen et al., “DHA and cholesterol containing diets influence Alzheimer-like pathology, cognition and cerebral vasculature in APPswe/PS1dE9 mice,” Neurobiology of Disease, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 482–498, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  185. G. W. Arendash, M. T. Jensen, N. Salem Jr. et al., “A diet high in omega-3 fatty acids does not improve or protect cognitive performance in Alzheimer's transgenic mice,” Neuroscience, vol. 149, no. 2, pp. 286–302, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  186. J.-M. Zhuo and D. Praticò, “Acceleration of brain amyloidosis in an Alzheimer's disease mouse model by a folate, vitamin B6 and B12-deficient diet,” Experimental Gerontology, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 195–201, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  187. A. Fuso, V. Nicolia, A. Pasqualato, M. T. Fiorenza, R. A. Cavallaro, and S. Scarpa, “Changes in Presenilin 1 gene methylation pattern in diet-induced B vitamin deficiency,” Neurobiol. Aging 2010. In press. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  188. V. Nicolia, A. Fuso, R. A. Cavallaro, A. Di Luzio, and S. Scarpa, “B vitamin deficiency promotes tau phosphorylation through regulation of GSK3β and PP2A,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 895–907, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  189. I. I. Kruman, T. S. Kumaravel, A. Lohani et al., “Folic acid deficiency and homocysteine impair DNA repair in hippocampal neurons and sensitize them to amyloid toxicity in experimental models of Alzheimer's disease,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 1752–1762, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  190. S. S. Karuppagounder, H. Xu, Q. Shi et al., “Thiamine deficiency induces oxidative stress and exacerbates the plaque pathology in Alzheimer's mouse model,” Neurobiology of Aging, vol. 30, no. 10, pp. 1587–1600, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  191. Y. Ding, A. Qiao, Z. Wang et al., “Retinoic acid attenuates β-amyloid deposition and rescues memory deficits in an Alzheimer's disease transgenic mouse model,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 28, no. 45, pp. 11622–11634, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  192. M. H. Eskelinen and M. Kivipelto, “Caffeine as a protective factor in dementia and Alzheimer's disease,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 20, supplement 1, pp. S167–S174, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  193. M. H. Eskelinen, T. Ngandu, J. Tuomilehto, H. Soininen, and M. Kivipelto, “Midlife coffee and tea drinking and the risk of late-life dementia: a population-based CAIDE study,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 85–91, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  194. C. Santos et al., “Caffeine intake is associated with a lower risk of cognitive decline: a cohort study from Portugal,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 20, supplement 1, pp. S175–S185, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  195. C. Santos et al., “Caffeine intake and dementia: systematic review and meta-analysis,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 20, supplement 1, pp. S187–S204, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  196. G. W. Arendash, T. Mori, C. Cao et al., “Caffeine reverses cognitive impairment and decreases brain amyloid-β levels in aged alzheimer's disease mice,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 661–680, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  197. C. Cao, J. R. Cirrito, X. Lin et al., “Caffeine suppresses amyloid-β levels in plasma and brain of alzheimer's disease transgenic mice,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 681–697, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  198. D. F. Obregon, K. Rezai-Zadeh, Y. Bai et al., “ADAM10 activation is required for green tea (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate- induced α-secretase cleavage of amyloid precursor protein,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 281, no. 24, pp. 16419–16427, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  199. K. Rezai-Zadeh, G. W. Arendash, H. Hou et al., “Green tea epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) reduces β-amyloid mediated cognitive impairment and modulates tau pathology in Alzheimer transgenic mice,” Brain Research, vol. 1214, pp. 177–187, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  200. K. Rezai-Zadeh, D. Shytle, N. Sun et al., “Green tea epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) modulates amyloid precursor protein cleavage and reduces cerebral amyloidosis in Alzheimer transgenic mice,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 25, no. 38, pp. 8807–8814, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  201. K. Rezai-Zadeh, R. Douglas Shytle, Y. Bai et al., “Flavonoid-mediated presenilin-1 phosphorylation reduces Alzheimer's disease β-amyloid production,” Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 574–588, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  202. J. Wang, L. Ho, Z. Zhao et al., “Moderate consumption of Cabernet Sauvignon attenuates Aβ neuropathology in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease,” FASEB Journal, vol. 20, no. 13, pp. 2313–2320, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  203. L. Ho, L. H. Chen, J. Wang et al., “Heterogeneity in red wine polyphenolic contents differentially influences Alzheimer's disease-type neuropathology and cognitive deterioration,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 59–72, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  204. O. P. Almeida, G. J. Garrido, N. T. Lautenschlager, G. K. Hulse, K. Jamrozik, and L. Flicker, “Smoking is associated with reduced cortical regional gray matter density in brain regions associated with incipient alzheimer disease,” American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 92–98, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  205. O. P. Almeida, G. K. Hulse, D. Lawrence, and L. Flicker, “Smoking as a risk factor for Alzheimer's disease: contrasting evidence from a systematic review of case-control and cohort studies,” Addiction, vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 15–28, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  206. J. K. Cataldo, J. J. Prochaska, and S. A. Glantz, “Cigarette smoking is a risk factor for Alzheimer's disease: an analysis controlling for tobacco industry affiliation,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 465–480, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  207. A. Nordberg, E. Hellström-Lindahl, M. Lee et al., “Chronic nicotine treatment reduces β-amyloidosis in the brain of a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease (APPsw),” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 655–658, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  208. E. Hellström-Lindahl, J. Court, J. Keverne et al., “Nicotine reduces Aβ in the brain and cerebral vessels of APPsw mice,” European Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 19, no. 10, pp. 2703–2710, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  209. S. Oddo, A. Caccamo, K. N. Green et al., “Chronic nicotine administration exacerbates tau pathology in a transgenic model of Alzheimer's disease,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 102, no. 8, pp. 3046–3051, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  210. N. V. Patel, M. N. Gordon, K. E. Connor et al., “Caloric restriction attenuates Aβ-deposition in Alzheimer transgenic models,” Neurobiology of Aging, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 995–1000, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  211. R. J. Colman, R. M. Anderson, S. C. Johnson et al., “Caloric restriction delays disease onset and mortality in rhesus monkeys,” Science, vol. 325, no. 5937, pp. 201–204, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  212. V. K. M. Halagappa, Z. Guo, M. Pearson et al., “Intermittent fasting and caloric restriction ameliorate age-related behavioral deficits in the triple-transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer's disease,” Neurobiology of Disease, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 212–220, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  213. G. P. Lim, F. Yang, T. Chu et al., “Ibuprofen effects on Alzheimer pathology and open field activity in APPsw transgenic mice,” Neurobiology of Aging, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 983–991, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  214. G. P. Lim, T. Chu, F. Yang, W. Beech, S. A. Frautschy, and G. M. Cole, “The curry spice curcumin reduces oxidative damage and amyloid pathology in an Alzheimer transgenic mouse,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 21, no. 21, pp. 8370–8377, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  215. J. A. Joseph, N. A. Denisova, G. Arendash et al., “Blueberry supplementation enhances signaling and prevents behavioral deficits in an Alzheimer disease model,” Nutritional Neuroscience, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 153–162, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  216. R. W. Stackman, F. Eckenstein, B. Frei, D. Kulhanek, J. Nowlin, and J. F. Quinn, “Prevention of age-related spatial memory deficits in a transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer's disease by chronic Ginkgo biloba treatment,” Experimental Neurology, vol. 184, no. 1, pp. 510–520, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  217. C. Julien, C. Tremblay, A. Phivilay et al., “High-fat diet aggravates amyloid-beta and tau pathologies in the 3xTg-AD mouse model,” Neurobiology of Aging, vol. 31, no. 9, pp. 1516–1531, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  218. G. W. Arendash, W. Schleif, K. Rezai-Zadeh et al., “Caffeine protects Alzheimer's mice against cognitive impairment and reduces brain β-amyloid production,” Neuroscience, vol. 142, no. 4, pp. 941–952, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  219. J. Hardy, “The amyloid hypothesis for Alzheimer's disease: a critical reappraisal,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 110, no. 4, pp. 1129–1134, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  220. B. P. F. Rutten, H. W. M. Steinbusch, H. Korr, and C. Schmitz, “Antioxidants and Alzheimer's disease: from bench to bedside (and back again),” Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 645–651, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  221. B. P. F. Rutten, N. M. Van Der Kolk, S. Schafer et al., “Age-related loss of synaptophysin immunoreactive presynaptic boutons within the hippocampus of APP751SL, PS1M146L, and APP751 SL/PS1M146L transgenic mice,” American Journal of Pathology, vol. 167, no. 1, pp. 161–173, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  222. C. Schmitz, B. P. F. Rutten, A. Pielen et al., “Hippocampal neuron loss exceeds amyloid plaque load in a transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer's disease,” American Journal of Pathology, vol. 164, no. 4, pp. 1495–1502, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  223. F. J. A. Dennissen, N. Kholod, H. W. M. Steinbusch, and F. W. Van Leeuwen, “Misframed proteins and neurodegeneration: a novel view on Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases,” Neurodegenerative Diseases, vol. 7, no. 1–3, pp. 76–79, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  224. B. B. A. McNaull, S. Todd, B. McGuinness, and A. P. Passmore, “Inflammation and anti-inflammatory strategies for Alzheimer's disease—a mini-review,” Gerontology, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 3–14, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  225. F. W. Van Leeuwen, D. P. V. De Kleijn, H. H. Van Den Hurk et al., “Frameshift mutants of β amyloid precursor protein and ubiquitin-B in Alzheimer's and Down patients,” Science, vol. 279, no. 5348, pp. 242–247, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  226. E. S. Brown, M. K. Fulton, A. Wilkeson, and F. Petty, “The psychiatric sequelae of civilian trauma,” Comprehensive Psychiatry, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 19–23, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  227. B. P. Rutten and J. Mill, “Epigenetic mediation of environmental influences in major psychotic disorders,” Schizophrenia Bulletin, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 1045–1056, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  228. J. Van Os and J.-P. Selten, “Prenatal exposure to maternal stress and subsequent schizophrenia. The May 1940 invasion of The Netherlands,” British Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 172, pp. 324–326, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  229. D. K. Lahiri, B. Maloney, and N. H. Zawia, “The LEARn model: an epigenetic explanation for idiopathic neurobiological diseases,” Molecular Psychiatry, vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 992–1003, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2010 L. Chouliaras et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views2122
Downloads878
Citations

Related articles