Research Article | Open Access
Reduced Kidney Function in Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Based Regimen and Associated Factors: A Hospital Based Prospective Observational Study in Ethiopian Patients
Purpose. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), a drug broadly used in combination antiretroviral therapy, is associated with renal dysfunction but the prevalence varied from country to country and it is not known in Ethiopia. The objectives of this study were to assess the prevalence of renal dysfunction and risk factors associated with it and the mean change in estimated glomerular filtration rate in human immunodeficiency virus infected patients receiving TDF based antiretroviral regimen at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital. Method. It was a hospital based prospective cohort study. The study participants were treatment naïve HIV infected patients initiating TDF containing combination antiretroviral therapy or switched to it because of adverse events. Multivariable logistic analysis was used to identify variables which have significant association. Result. A total of 63 study participants were studied, 16 (25.4%) of whom had fall in eGFR greater than 25% relative to baseline. Only age greater than 50 years, baseline CD4 count less than 200 cells/mm3, and baseline proteinuria were significantly associated with renal dysfunction in multivariable logistic regression. There was -8.4 ml/min/1.73m2 mean change in estimated glomerular filtration rate relative to baseline at six months of study. Conclusion. The renal dysfunction (defined as decline in eGFR greater than 25%) was found in a quarter of the study population. The long term impact and the clinical implication of it are not clear. Future prospective study is required with large sample size and long duration to ascertain the prevalence of decline greater than 25% in estimated glomerular filtration rate and its progression to chronic kidney disease.
Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) is an oral prodrug of tenofovir, a nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor with activity against human immunodeficiency virus-1 and human immunodeficiency virus-2 (HIV-1 and HIV-2) . It is a widely used drug in combination with other antiretroviral drugs for the treatment of HIV owing to its favorable pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics properties that allow once daily administration to increase adherence to lifelong treatment . TDF use is generally considered safe in clinical trials  and a meta-analysis of 17 prospective studies (including 9 randomized controlled trials) showed that TDF based antiretroviral therapy results in a modest decline in renal function that does not restrict TDF use where regular monitoring of renal function is impractical ; however, there are increasing numbers of TDF induced nephrotoxicity case reports in real clinical practice [5, 6] and it has a claim to be a potential cause of both acute kidney injury (AKI) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) [7, 8]. In addition, TDF induced nephrotoxicity was reported recently in nearly 41% of participants treated with TDF based regimen for 10 years which makes its continuous use questionable . The disparity of TDF safety profile between clinical trials and studies in real clinical practice may be attributed to different sociodemographic factors, presence of comorbidity, and comedications in real clinical practice [10–12]. While the exact mechanism of tenofovir nephrotoxicity remains unclear, mitochondria toxicity has been claimed as the target of tenofovir induced renal toxicity . In addition, it can also indirectly damage the renal tubule possibly by activating nuclear factor kappa B protein 65 which results in inflammation induced kidney damage .
Several studies revealed fall greater than 25% and mean change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) relative to baseline in TDF based antiretroviral regimen. The prevalence of fall greater than 25% in eGFR in those studies varied from country to country and it was found in the range of 6% to 40.8% [9, 15–20]. There is no study in Africa as well as in Ethiopia to show the extent of fall in eGFR greater than 25% relative to baseline. However, a prospective case cohort study in South Africa showed that among admitted patients with AKI 61% were on TDF based antiretroviral regimen .
Significant mean reduction in eGFR ranging from 5ml/min to 9ml/min/1.73m2 from baseline at 6 months of posttreatment initiation was revealed in previous studies [9, 16, 22, 23]. In contrast, studies in Africa showed a mean increase of 1.9ml/min of eGFR  and nonsignificant mean decline in eGFR (-0.5ml/min) .
Several predisposing factors were identified for TDF induced nephrotoxicity such as lower body mass index, protease inhibitor  low CD4 count, old age  and black race , and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in tenofovir transporter proteins [28–30]. Highly active antiretroviral therapy adverse drug reactions in developing countries may differ from those in developed countries because of high prevalence of conditions such as malnutrition, tuberculosis, anemia, and patients presenting with advanced HIV disease . Furthermore, studies indicated that black race is at increased risk of developing AKI [27, 32, 33].
Generally, the occurrence of renal dysfunction is becoming common in HIV infected patients who received TDF based antiretroviral regimen and its burden on survival and quality of life is becoming worse . The condition of renal complication in HIV infected patients can be worst in low and middle income countries as the condition requires enough capital to manage renal complications. Developing countries do not have enough access to dialysis and kidney transplant procedures; this further can make the consequence of AKI worse .
Our national guideline put TDF based antiretroviral regimen as preferred first line for treatment of HIV in adults, adolescents, and pregnant women, and many patients are more likely to be exposed to TDF. In addition, there is no routine renal function monitoring in our clinical settings  and there is no local data that addresses renal dysfunction in HIV infected patients receiving TDF.
So, this study was planned to assess prevalence of renal dysfunction and risk factors associated with it and the mean change in eGFR. This study is used as a guide for early detection of renal dysfunction. It helps healthcare providers to identify HIV infected patients who are at risk. It also helps policy makers to give more attention to TDF related renal dysfunction and the necessity of future large scale study in order to know the clinical impact of TDF on renal function.
This is a prospective cohort study with 6-month duration of follow-up. Data was collected through face to face interview and by laboratory tests. Approval for the study was given by School of pharmacy and department of Internal medicine, Addis Ababa University (Ref. No. ERB/SOP/07/09/2016). Written informed consent was obtained from all study participants and for data analysis patient details were anonymized.
2.1. Study Participants
Participants had been recruited and enrolled prospectively before they started taking TDF based antiretroviral regimen from January 15 to March 23, 2017, Gregorian calendar. This recruitment and enrollment period was selected conveniently due to time and budget constraints. Individuals who had the following characteristics were enrolled consecutively: (1) Individuals who were voluntarily participated in the study; (2) age ≥ 18 years; (3) treatment naïve patients who were assigned to start taking TDF based antiretroviral regimen after enrollment; (4) treatment experienced patients whose antiretroviral therapy is going to be switched to TDF based antiretroviral regimen; (5) patients who had eGFR by CKD EPI equation greater than 60ml/min/1.73m2; (6) patients who gave consent to complete the study follow-up period. In contrast, pregnant women, inpatient individuals, and individuals who took TDF based antiretroviral regimen previously were excluded.
2.2. Measurement of Weight and Height
Weight and height were measured by using Seca 761 weight scales and height ruler (with meter reading) which is attached with it, respectively (made in Germany). Body mass index of participants was calculated as follows: body mass index = weight (in kg) ÷ (height (in m))2.
2.3. Measurement of Serum Creatinine and Urinalysis
After collection of urine by 30ml urine cap (HENSO Medical, Co., Ltd., China), baseline proteinuria and glycosuria were determined by comber 10 strip (HENSO Medical, Co., Ltd., China). Serum creatinine was analyzed prospectively at baseline, then after 1 month and 2 months, and at the end of 6 months by chemistry analyzer (HITACHI 902) at TASH chemistry laboratory.
2.4. eGFR Measurements
Renal dysfunction was defined as more than 25% decline in eGFR relative to baseline after commencement of TDF based antiretroviral regimen . Guideline and study recommend the use of CKD EPI equation to calculate eGFR in HIV infected patients against other equations [37, 38]. Serum creatinine values were used to calculate eGFR in the following equations.(i)For female with serum creatinine ≤ 0.7mg/dl: GFR = 166 × (Scr/0.7)−0.329 × ; female with serum creatinine > 0.7mg/dl: GFR = 166 × (Scr/0.7)−1.209 × (ii)For male with serum creatinine ≤ 0.9mg/dl: GFR = 163 × (Scr/0.9)−0.411 × ; female with serum creatinine > 0.9mg/dl: GFR = 163× (Scr/0.9)−1.209 × . Here, age is in year and serum creatinine is in mg/dl.
2.5. Data Analysis
Mean (±standard deviation (SD)), median (interquartile range (IQR)), frequencies, and percent (%) were used to describe patients’ characteristics. The prevalence of decline in eGFR greater than 25% relative to baseline was calculated by dividing a number of patients with decline in eGFR greater than 25% by total number of patients and multiplying by 100. A repeated measures (within-subjects) analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare means of eGFR obtained at different study visits and post hoc tests were performed by paired t-test using Bonferroni correction to pinpoint specific mean that significantly differed from other means. Univariate logistic regression was used to determine the factors associated with renal dysfunction. Clinically significant factors in the literature were entered in multivariable logistic regression without restriction by p < 0.2. Other independent variables that presented with P < 0.20 were considered in a multivariable logistic regression model. Adjusted odds ratio (AOR) and its 95% CI were estimated. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using version 20 of SPSS program.
3.1. Sociodemographic Characteristics of Study Participants
A total of 66 HIV infected patients with 61 treatment naïve patients to antiretroviral therapy and 5 treatment experienced patients whose antiretroviral therapy is going to be switched to TDF based antiretroviral therapy were enrolled in the study. Three treatment naïve participants were lost to follow-up without having serum creatinine values after baseline visits and nonadherence was reported as the reason for their loss of follow-up. The age of lost participants was around the median age of study participants. Among lost participants, 2 had CD4 counts lower than the median CD4 count of the study participants and 1 had CD4 count higher than the median CD4 count of participants. A total of 63 participants were included in the final analysis. The mean (± SD) age was 39.7 (±10); 43 (68.3%) of study participants were female. The mean (±SD) body mass index was 22.6 (±4.5) kg/m2 and other sociodemographic characteristics are shown in Table 1.
Note: other ethnic groups include mixed ethnicity, Gurage, Silte, Hadiya, Welayta, and Harari.
3.2. Clinical Characteristics of Study Participants
Among participants, 5 (7.9%) had prior exposure to zidovudine based antiretroviral regimen. Majority of patients (56, 88.9%) were taking TDF + lamivudine + efavirenz whereas the remaining patients were taking TDF + lamivudine+ ritonavir boosted atazanavir regimen. Median (IQR) CD4 count was 241 (106-457); 42 (66.7%) of patients were found in World Health Organization (WHO) clinical stage I. The median (IQR) of duration of HIV infection since diagnosis was 3 months (0 – 60); 20 (31.8%) of study participants were with comorbidity of either hypertension (6.4%), type 2 diabetes mellitus (3.2%), cancer (12.7%), tuberculosis (12.7%), or kidney stone (3.2%). Opportunistic infections other than tuberculosis were found in 8 (12.7%) of participants.
Among study participants, 8 (12.7%) were taking isoniazid preventive therapy. In addition, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (enalapril) + hydrochlorothiazide and metformin + glibenclamide were taken by 4 (6.3%) and 2 (3.2%) of study participants, respectively, and other clinical characteristics are shown in Table 2.
WHO, World Health Organization; DX, diagnosis; IQR, interquartile range; SD, standard deviation; NSAIDs, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate.
3.3. Renal Dysfunction among Study Participants
Among study participants fall in eGFR greater than 25% was found in 16 (25.4%) of study participants during the entire study period and the majority of these case occurred in the first month of study follow-up period. Out of 16 (25.4%) of study participants who were diagnosed with renal dysfunction, 7 (11.1%) and 9 (14.3%) were male and female, respectively. Renal dysfunction occurred in 15 (23.8%) of participants who were taking TDF + lamivudine + efavirenz and in 1 (6.2%) of participants who were taking TDF + lamivudine + ritonavir boosted atazanavir regimen. In the study period, 11 (93.3%) of the cases occurred in patients who had baseline eGFR equal to or greater than 90ml/min/1.73m2 (Table 3).
Note: glomerular filtration rate was estimated by CKD EPI equation and events expressed in number (percent); eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate in ml/min/1.73m2. New cases mean cases that occurred newly at each visit. Total cases mean sum of cases that occurred in previous study visit (that persisted) and new cases that occurred at a given visit.
In the current study, chronic kidney disease (CKD) was confirmed by 2 consecutive measurements of eGFR < 60ml/min/1.73m2 at 4-month interval and CKD was detected in 2 (3.2%) of study participants (Table 4).
At the end of 6 months, the prevalence of proteinuria was higher than the prevalence of baseline proteinuria (27% and 20.6%, respectively). Among 27% of proteinuria, 14.3% of proteinuria was found in patients with renal dysfunction. However, the prevalence of glycosuria at the end of 6 months was the same as the prevalence of baseline glycosuria (4.8%).
3.4. Factors Associated with Renal Dysfunction
Hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, tuberculosis, kidney stone, and prior exposure to antiretroviral drugs were not included in univariate logistic analysis because participants with these factors did not experience renal dysfunction. Clinically significant factors (body mass index, chemotherapy, age, and protease inhibitor) were included in multivariable logistic regression without restriction by p < 0.2. Independent variables which were entered in univariate logistic regression were sex, ethnicity, age, body mass index, WHO clinical stage, baseline CD4 count, duration of HIV infection since diagnosis, current ART, cotrimoxazole prophylaxis therapy, isoniazid preventive therapy, history of cancer, presence of opportunistic infections, presence of chemotherapy, proton pump inhibitors, baseline proteinuria, baseline glycosuria, baseline serum creatinine, and baseline eGFR. Among them, baseline CD4 count, baseline eGFR, baseline proteinuria, history of cancer, and cotrimoxazole prophylaxis therapy were significantly associated with renal dysfunction.
In multivariable logistic regression, age greater than 50 years, baseline proteinuria, and baseline CD4 count less than 200 cells/mm3 were significantly associated with renal dysfunction (AOR = 64.8, 95% CI 1.60-2707.70, and P = 0.029; AOR = 51.3, 95% CI 1.80-1448.70, and P = 0.021; AOR = 63.2, 95% CI 2.02-1979.66, and p = 0.018), respectively. However, other variables did not maintain their statistical significance in multivariable logistic regression (Table 5).
COR, crude odds ratio; AOR, adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; ART, antiretroviral therapy; 3TC, lamivudine; EFV, efavirenz; ATV/r, ritonavir boosted atazanavir. indicates variables that were entered in univariate logistic regression; indicates variables which were significant in multivariate logistic regression (P < 0.05).
3.5. Mean Change in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate
The mean (± SD) baseline eGFR of study participants was 90.8 (± 16.8)ml/min/1.73m2 and 55.6% of them had baseline eGFR of less than 90ml/min/1.73m2. A repeated measures one-way ANOVA determined that means differed significantly between time points (F (2.63, 163.32) = 8.80, P < 0.005). Post hoc tests using Bonferroni correction revealed nonsignificant mean increase of eGFR from post-1-month to post-2-month TDF based regimen initiation (p = 1) whereas there was nonsignificant mean reduction of eGFR from post-1-month to post-6-month (P = 1) and from post-2-month to post-6-month TDF based regimen initiation (P = 1). Post hoc tests using Bonferroni correction showed significant mean reduction of eGFR from baseline to the case after 1, 2, and 6 months of TDF based regimen initiation.
A repeated measures one-way ANOVA confirmed that means of SCr significantly differed between time points (F (2.75, 170.33) = 8.58, P < 0.0005). Post hoc tests using Bonferroni correction revealed that there was no significant difference between mean of SCr after 1 month and 2 months, after 1 month and 6 months, and after 2 months and 6 months of TDF based regimen initiation. Post hoc tests using Bonferroni correction showed significant mean increase of SCr from baseline to the case after 1, 2, and 6 months of TDF based regimen initiation (shown in Table 6).
Note: eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; SEM, standard deviation; CI, confidence interval; SCr, serum creatinine. P values by repeated measures one-way ANOVA ( stands for P < 0.05) and post hoc tests using paired t-test with Bonferroni correction (+ stands for P < 0.05).
In the present study, renal dysfunction was detected in 16 (25.4%) of study participants and factors associated with renal dysfunction were age greater than 50 years, baseline CD4 count less than 200 cells/mm3, and baseline proteinuria. In this study, there was significant mean reduction of eGFR at 1, 2, and 6 months of post-TDF based regimen initiation compared to mean baseline eGFR (-8.35; P = 0.001, -7.89; P = 0.001 and -8.44; P = 0.002, respectively).
Among participants who were diagnosed with renal dysfunction at end of first-month visit, 9.5% of them continued with renal dysfunction at 2- and 6-month study visits. However, none of them developed CKD. The prevalence of renal dysfunction in the current study was higher than from studies conducted in Thailand (19.3%), Malaysia (15.2%), Japan (19.6%, 22.1%), Spain (10%), Vietnam (12.4%), and Korea [15–20, 26]. This discrepancy may be attributed to difference in genetic factors as some patients experience renal adverse effects of tenofovir more frequently than others. This issue may be related to genetic polymorphism in drug transporter proteins of the renal tubule and consequently accumulation of TDF in proximal tubular cells may lead to reduction in glomerular filtration rate . Participants in Thailand, Spain, Vietnam, and Korea had higher median baseline CD4 count (more than 320 cells/mm3) than the median CD4 count (241 cells/mm3) of the participants of the present study. Participants in Japan and Vietnam had younger median age (36 years) than participants (40 years) of the present study. Therefore, these differences in median CD4 count and age may partially explain the discrepancy between the results of the current study and the previous studies.
The finding of the present study was lower than the finding of another study done in Japan (40.8%) . This discrepancy may be attributed to difference in sociodemographic factors and number of study participants. A study done in Japan was a 10-year follow-up study and most of patients (89%) compared to this study (11.1%) were taking protease inhibitor based antiretroviral regimen which is known to decrease eGFR greater than TDF regimen with nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors . Therefore, these differences in duration of follow-up and proportion of participants taking protease inhibitor based antiretroviral regimen may be another possible reason for the variation of the findings.
Even if assessment of CKD was not the objective of the present study, CKD was diagnosed in 2 (3.2%) of participants which was similar to another study . The result of this study was lower than the result of the study done in Japan. The difference might be due to difference in duration of study follow-up .
The result of this study was lower than the results of the studies done in Africa. However, studies in Africa were cross-sectional which diagnosed CKD at a point of time which might overestimate CKD [38, 43]. In addition, the prevalence of APOL1 risk variants for renal disease was found to be low among Ethiopians compared to other Africans. Therefore, this can be considered as additional explanation for the disagreement of the findings . The finding of this study was higher than the study finding in Italy. Participants in Italy did not receive protease inhibitors and had higher median baseline CD4 count, so these differences might be the reason for the discrepancy of the findings . The difference also might be attributed to sociodemographic factors because black race is more risky for developing CKD .
In the present study, age greater than 50 years was associated with renal dysfunction (AOR = 64.8, 95% CI 1.60-2707.70, and p = 0.029). This finding was in line with another finding that was done in Malaysia  and it is known that age greater than 50 years is an established risk factor for tenofovir induced nephrotoxicity. This can be explained by age related structural and physiological deterioration of the kidney .
There was a significant association between baseline CD4 count less than 200 cells/mm3 and eGFR fall greater than 25% as compared to study participants who had baseline CD4 count equal to or greater than 200 cells/mm3 in the present study (AOR = 63.2, 95% CI 2.02-1979.66, and P = 0.018). This result was similar to the study in Maryland and United States of America [3, 11]. Study done in Spain also revealed that patients who had lower baseline CD4 count were associated with AKI . This might be related to the fact that patients with advanced HIV infection are more risky to renal dysfunction owing to direct injury of HIV on renal cells . However, the occurrence of HIV associated nephropathy is less likely in the present study because Ethiopians have low prevalence of APOL1 risk variants .
The present study had also shown that there was association between baseline proteinuria and renal dysfunction (AOR = 51.3, 95% CI 1.80-1448.70, and P = 0.021) and this result was similar to study conducted in Canada . The study done in Japan also found that participants with proteinuria had significantly low eGFR compared to participants without proteinuria . In the current study body mass index was not associated with renal dysfunction in contrast to the finding of the study in Thailand (AOR = 2.26) . The discrepancy might be attributed to difference in number of study participants.
The present study by post hoc tests using Bonferroni correction showed significant mean reduction of eGFR from baseline to the case after 1, 2, and 6 months of TDF based regimen initiation. The mean decline in eGFR of -8.4ml/min/1.73m2 at the end of the study relative to baseline was similar to other studies [9, 16, 23]. This result was higher than the finding of the study done in Italy. The participants of the study in Italy had higher median baseline CD4 count than participants of this study and no participants received protease inhibitors. So, these differences might be the reason for the disagreement of the findings .
In addition, the finding of the current study was higher than results from study done in Africa (participants recruited from Senegal and Cameroon). Participants of the study in Africa did not take protease inhibitors and had no comorbidities in contrast to our study. These differences might partially explain the discrepancy of the findings . The result of the study in Africa showed a mean increase of 1.9ml/min in eGFR, which is in contrast to findings from several studies [9, 16, 23]. How tenofovir increases glomerular filtration rate in African HIV infected patients is not yet clear.
The result of the current study was also higher than the result of the study from South Africa. The discrepancy of the findings might be partially due to difference in inclusion criteria. The median age of South African participants was 35.4 years whereas median age of the participants of this study was 40 years . The mechanism by which tenofovir reduces glomerular filtration rate is not well understood. In fact, tenofovir is known to cause renal tubular dysfunction , which might subsequently result in significant reduction in glomerular filtration rate [30, 46].
The present study has strong side of being the first, prospective cohort study in Ethiopia. In this study a quarter of participants were diagnosed with renal dysfunction, which makes the long term use of TDF questionable. However, this study has limitations of small sample size and relatively short duration of follow-up. In addition, renal tubular dysfunction was not assessed in this study, so tenofovir associated renal dysfunction may be underestimated.
In conclusion, the current study demonstrated that fall in eGFR greater than 25% occurred in a quarter of participants. Age greater than 50 years, CD4 count less than 200 cells/mm3, and baseline proteinuria were risk factors for the occurrence of renal dysfunction.
All data used for the current study are available from the corresponding author on justifiable request.
There was no funding to support the present study. This article is based on a thesis by Mr. Taklo Simeneh Yazie. Professor Teferra Abula Orjino and Dr. Wondwossen Amogne Degu worked as advisors for the study, http://etd.aau.edu.et/bitstream/handle/123456789/14790/taklo%20Simeneh.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Taklo Simeneh Yazie designed the study protocol, analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. Teferra Abula Orjino and Wondwossen Amogne Degu worked as supervisors of the study and edited the final manuscript.
We would like to thank all staff of Internal Medicine Department of TASH Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) Clinic and laboratory staff for their help in facilitating the completion of this study. We also thank study participants and data collectors. At last, we acknowledge Addis Ababa University, Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, and Samara University for the financial support, facilitating the study, and sponsoring the corresponding author education, respectively.
- B. P. Kearney, J. F. Flaherty, and J. Shah, “Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate: Clinical pharmacology and pharmacokinetics,” Clinical Pharmacokinetics, vol. 43, no. 9, pp. 595–612, 2004.
- A. Spaulding, G. W. Rutherford, and N. Siegfried, “Tenofovir or zidovudine in three-drug combination therapy with one nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor and one non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor for initial treatment of HIV infection in antiretroviral-naïve individuals,” Cochrane Library, vol. 10, Article ID CD008740, pp. 1–28, 2010.
- J. E. Gallant and R. D. Moore, “Renal function with use of a tenofovir-containing initial antiretroviral regimen,” AIDS, vol. 23, no. 15, pp. 1971–1975, 2009.
- R. D. Cooper, N. Wiebe, N. Smith, P. Keiser, S. Naicker, and M. Tonelli, “Systematic review and meta-analysis: renal safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in HIV-infected patients,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 51, pp. 496–505, 2010.
- H. Peyrire, J. Reynes, I. Rouanet et al., “Renal tubular dysfunction associated with tenofovir therapy: report of 7 cases,” Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 269–273, 2004.
- S. Waheed, D. Attia, M. M. Estrella et al., “Proximal tubular dysfunction and kidney injury associated with tenofovir in HIV patients: a case series,” Clinical Kidney Journal, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 420–425, 2015.
- “Panel on Antiretroviral Guidelines for Adults and Adolescents. Guidelines for the use of antiretroviral agents in HIV-1-infected adults and adolescents. Department of Health and Human Services,” pp. 1-288, 2016, http://www.aidsinfo.nih.gov/ContentFilesAdultand.
- WHO, Consolidated Guidelines on the Use of Antiretroviral Drugs for Treating and Preventing HIV Infection: Recommendations for a Public Health Approach, WHO, 2nd edition, 2016, https://www.who.int/.
- T. Nishijima, Y. Kawasaki, N. Tanaka et al., “Long-term exposure to tenofovir continuously decrease renal function in HIV-1-infected patients with low body weight: Results from 10 years of follow-up,” AIDS, vol. 28, no. 13, pp. 1903–1910, 2014.
- J. Röling, H. Schmid, M. Fischereder, R. Draenert, and F. D. Goebel, “HIV-associated renal diseases and highly active antiretroviral therapy-induced nephropathy,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 42, no. 10, pp. 1488–1495, 2006.
- N. Crum-Cianflone, A. Ganesan, N. Teneza-Mora et al., “Prevalence and factors associated with renal dysfunction among HIV-infected patients,” AIDS Patient Care and STDs, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 353–360, 2010.
- P. Santiago, B. Grinsztejn, R. K. Friedman et al., “Screening for decreased glomerular filtration rate and associated risk factors in a cohort of HIV-infected patients in a middle-income country,” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 1–7, 2014.
- H. Ramamoorthy, P. Abraham, and B. Isaac, “Mitochondrial dysfunction and electron transport chain complex defect in a rat model of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate nephrotoxicity,” Journal of Biochemical and Molecular Toxicology, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 246–255, 2014.
- H. Ramamoorthy, P. Abraham, B. Isaac, and D. Selvakumar, “Role for NF-κB inflammatory signalling pathway in tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) induced renal damage in rats,” Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 99, pp. 103–118, 2017.
- K. Chaisiri, C. Bowonwatanuwong, N. Kasettratat, and S. Kiertiburanakul, “Incidence and risk factors for tenofovir-associated renal function decline among Thai HIV-infected patients with low-body weight.,” Current HIV Research, vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 504–509, 2010.
- T. Nishijima, H. Gatanaga, H. Komatsu et al., “Renal function declines more in tenofovir- than abacavir-based antiretroviral therapy in low-body weight treatment-naïve patients with HIV infection,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2012.
- T. Nishijima, H. Komatsu, H. Gatanaga et al., “Impact of small body weight on tenofovir-associated renal dysfunction in HIV-infected patients: A retrospective cohort study of Japanese patients,” PLoS ONE, vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 1–8, 2011.
- P. Wikman, P. Safont, M. D. Palacio, A. Moreno, S. Moreno, and J. L. Casado, “The significance of antiretroviral-associated acute kidney injury in a cohort of ambulatory human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients,” Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation , vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 2073–2081, 2013.
- D. Mizushima, J. Tanuma, N. T. Dung et al., “Low body weight and tenofovir use are risk factors for renal dysfunction in Vietnamese HIV-infected patients. A prospective 18-month observation study,” Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy, vol. 20, no. 12, pp. 784–788, 2014.
- K. H. Lee, J. U. Lee, N. S. Ku et al., “Change in renal function among HIV-infected Koreans receiving tenofovir disoproxil fumarate-backbone antiretroviral therapy: A 3-year follow-up study,” Yonsei Medical Journal, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 770–777, 2017.
- F. Seedat, N. Martinson, K. Motlhaoleng et al., “Acute kidney injury, risk factors, and prognosis in hospitalized HIV-infected adults in South Africa, compared by tenofovir exposure,” AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 33–40, 2017.
- L. Calza, F. Trapani, C. Salvadori et al., “Incidence of renal toxicity in HIV-infected, antiretroviral-naïve patients starting tenofovir/emtricitabine associated with efavirenz, atazanavir/ritonavir, or lopinavir/ritonavir,” Infectious Diseases, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 147–154, 2013.
- S. N. Pujari, C. Smith, A. Makane et al., “Higher risk of renal impairment associated with tenofovir use amongst people living with HIV in India: A comparative cohort analysis between Western India and United Kingdom,” BMC Infectious Diseases, vol. 14, no. 173, pp. 1–7, 2014.
- M. P. Lê, R. Landman, S. Koulla-Shiro et al., “Tenofovir plasma concentrations related to estimated glomerular filtration rate changes in first-line regimens in African HIV-infected patients: ANRS 12115 DAYANA substudy,” Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, vol. 70, no. 5, pp. 1517–1521, 2014.
- R. De Waal, K. Cohen, M. P. Fox et al., “Changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate over time in South African HIV-1-infected patients receiving tenofovir: A retrospective cohort study,” Journal of the International AIDS Society, vol. 20, no. 1, Article ID 21317, pp. 1–9, 2017.
- S. Kumar and H. M. Koh, “Tenofovir-induced nephrotoxicity: A retrospective cohort study,” Medical Journal, vol. 71, no. 6, pp. 1–4, 2016.
- R. C. Kalayjian, B. Lau, R. N. Mechekano et al., “Risk factors for chronic kidney disease in a large cohort of HIV-1 infected individuals initiating antiretroviral therapy in routine care,” AIDS, vol. 26, no. 15, pp. 1907–1915, 2012.
- K. Rungtivasuwan, A. Avihingsanon, N. Thammajaruk et al., “Influence of ABCC2 and ABCC4 polymorphisms on tenofovir plasma concentrations in Thai HIV-infected patients,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 3240–3245, 2015.
- T. Nishijima, H. Komatsu, K. Higasa et al., “Single nucleotide polymorphisms in ABCC2 associate with tenofovir-induced kidney tubular dysfunction in japanese patients with HIV-1 infection: A Pharmacogenetic Study,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 55, no. 11, pp. 1558–1567, 2012.
- A. Dahlin, M. Wittwer, M. De La Cruz et al., “A pharmacogenetic candidate gene study of tenofovir-associated Fanconi syndrome,” Pharmacogenetics and Genomics, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 82–92, 2015.
- R. Subbaraman, S. K. Chaguturu, K. H. Mayer, T. P. Flanigan, and N. Kumarasamy, “Adverse effects of highly active antiretroviral therapy in developing countries,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 45, no. 8, pp. 1093–1101, 2007.
- A. I. Choi, Y. Li, C. Parikh, P. A. Volberding, and M. G. Shlipak, “Long-term clinical consequences of acute kidney injury in the HIV-infected,” Kidney International, vol. 78, no. 5, pp. 478–485, 2010.
- H. E. Wang, P. Muntner, G. M. Chertow, and D. G. Warnock, “Acute kidney injury and mortality in hospitalized patients,” American Journal of Nephrology, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 349–355, 2012.
- G. Lapadula, D. P. Bernasconi, S. Casari et al., “Risk of chronic kidney disease among patients developing mild renal impairment during tenofovir-containing antiretroviral treatment,” PLoS ONE, vol. 11, no. 9, pp. 1–11, 2016.
- S. A. Silver and G. M. Chertow, “The economic consequences of acute kidney injury,” Nephron, vol. 137, no. 4, pp. 297–301, 2017.
- FMoH, National Guidelines for Comprehensive HIV Prevention, Care and Treatment, 2014.
- F. Ibrahim, L. Hamzah, R. Jones, D. Nitsch, C. Sabin, and F. A. Post, “Comparison of CKD-EPI and MDRD to estimate baseline renal function in HIV-positive patients,” Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation , vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 2291–2297, 2012.
- T. Shamu, M. Wellington, M. Pascoe, L. Gwanzura, and C. E. Ndhlovu, “Incidence of nephropathy in HIV infected patients receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy at newlands clinic: A retrospective study,” World Journal of AIDS, vol. 05, no. 02, pp. 113–123, 2015.
- A. S. Levey, L. A. Stevens, C. H. Schmid et al., “A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 150, no. 9, pp. 604–612, 2009.
- A. Jafari, H. Khalili, and S. Dashti-Khavidaki, “Tenofovir-induced nephrotoxicity: Incidence, mechanism, risk factors, prognosis and proposed agents for prevention,” European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, vol. 70, no. 9, pp. 1029–1040, 2014.
- A. Mocroft, J. D. Lundgren, M. Ross et al., “Development and validation of a risk score for chronic kidney disease in HIV infection using prospective cohort data from the D:A:D study,” PLoS Medicine, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 1–31, 2015.
- S. Suzuki, T. Nishijima, Y. Kawasaki et al., “Effect of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate on incidence of chronic kidney disease and rate of estimated glomerular filtration rate decrement in HIV-1-infected treatment-naïve Asian patients: Results from 12-year observational cohort,” AIDS Patient Care and STDs, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 105–112, 2017.
- E. Mugomeri, M. D. Olivier, and W. M. Van den Heever, “The effect of tenofovir on renal function in HIV-positive patients,” Medical Technology SA, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 34–38, 2014.
- D. M. Behar, E. Kedem, S. Rosset et al., “Absence of APOL1 Risk Variants Protects against HIV-Associated Nephropathy in the Ethiopian Population,” American Journal of Nephrology, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 452–459, 2011.
- T. C. Turin, M. James, P. Ravani et al., “Proteinuria and rate of change in kidney function in a community-based population,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 24, no. 10, pp. 1661–1667, 2013.
- N. Miyatake, K. Shikata, H. Makino, and T. Numata, “The relation between estimated glomerular filtration rate and proteinuria in Okayama Prefecture, Japan,” Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 191–195, 2011.
Copyright © 2019 Taklo Simeneh Yazie et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.