Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Infectious Diseases

Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Infectious Diseases / 2017 / Article
!A Corrigendum for this article has been published. To view the article details, please click the ‘Corrigendum’ tab above.

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2017 |Article ID 7279830 |

Mustafa Muhammad Gharrah, Areej Mostafa El-Mahdy, Rasha Fathy Barwa, "Association between Virulence Factors and Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamase Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae Compared to Nonproducing Isolates", Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Infectious Diseases, vol. 2017, Article ID 7279830, 14 pages, 2017.

Association between Virulence Factors and Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamase Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae Compared to Nonproducing Isolates

Academic Editor: Mary E. Marquart
Received12 Jan 2017
Revised06 Apr 2017
Accepted26 Apr 2017
Published08 Jun 2017


Klebsiella pneumoniae is considered an important opportunistic multidrug-resistant pathogen. Extended spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) and expression of a multitude of virulence factors may work in a harmony resulting in treatment failure. This study was undertaken to compare the virulence characteristics and genetic relatedness between ESBL and non-ESBL producing K. pneumoniae. Methods. Antibiotic sensitivity test of all isolates was determined by disc diffusion assay. Phenotypic and genotypic detection of ESBL were done. Various virulence factors and some virulence factor-associated genes were screened. Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) was employed to investigate the genetic fingerprints of ESBL from non-ESBL producing K. pneumoniae. Results. 50% of isolates were ESBL producers. A significant association was observed between ESBL production and biofilm (strong and moderate), serum resistance, and iss gene. Moreover, significant association between non-ESBL producers and hypermucoviscosity was identified. Dendogram analysis of RAPD profile classified K. pneumoniae isolates into four clusters (a, b, c, and d). Seventy-six percent of ESBL producers belonged to cluster a. In conclusion, this study suggests a correlation between ESBL production and some virulence factors. Therefore, success of treatment depends mainly on increased clinicians awareness and enhanced testing by laboratories to reduce the spread of these isolates.

1. Introduction

Klebsiella pneumoniae is responsible for many community-onset and nosocomial infections. The increasingly high level of antimicrobial drug resistance prevalence is an exaggerated problem, especially for healthcare providers. K. pneumoniae can confer resistance to the majority of antibiotics by applying vast amounts of resistance mechanisms, leading to high mortality and morbidity rates. Such resistant bacteria urge the importance of focusing on antimicrobial resistance. The dominant antibiotics used for treating infections today are the β-lactam antibiotics, which inhibit transpeptidases participating in bacterial cell wall synthesis. Unfortunately these beta-lactam antibiotics can be deactivated by β-lactamase enzymes [1].

Extended spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) producing bacteria are clinically and epidemiologically important, being resistant to the effects of β-lactam antibiotics, but are still sensitive to clavulanic acid [1]. ESBLs are now found in all Enterobacteriaceae species around the world [2]. The majority of ESBL enzymes in K. pneumoniae are derived from the two classical enzyme types TEM and SHV encoded by the plasmid [3]. Moreover, Klebsiella pneumoniae strains producing CTX-M type have increased [4].

Good analysis of sensitivity tests and proper prescription of antibiotics require screening and identification of isolates producing ESBLs [5]. K. pneumoniae can express high level of resistance to third-generation cephalosporins by means of gaining the plasmids which harbor genes encoding ESBLs. About 20% of K. pneumoniae infection in intensive care units in the United States involves strains resistant to third-generation cephalosporins [6]. The fast growing resistance expressed by ESBL producers to various antibiotic families is a serious problem that narrows the therapeutic chance against ESBL producers [7].

Virulence factors (VFs) comprise mechanisms allowing pathogenic bacteria to cause infections. Genomics becomes a good tool for defining virulence factors as it can be used to recognize genes harboring specific virulence factors. However, the organism can be avirulent if only a single factor presented; sometimes the presence of various factors at the same time is required to decide the bacterial ability of causing infections [8]. Many virulence factors like capsular polysaccharides, siderophores, aggregative adhesion, and both types 1 and 3 fimbriae play a major role in the severity level of K. pneumoniae infections [9].

Most researches are dedicated to studying either antimicrobial resistance or virulence, though the biological effect and relation between those factors are of particular importance. Since the third-generation cephalosporins, like other β-lactam antibiotics, are crucial for treatment of severe hospital-onset or community-acquired infections caused by K. pneumoniae [10], therefore, studying of both processes might provide better understanding of the relationship between β-lactam resistance and virulence.

Accordingly, this study aims to gain further insight into virulence characteristics of ESBLs and non-ESBLs producing K. pneumoniae isolates from Mansoura Hospitals. In addition, we sought to explore the genetic relatedness between ESBLs and non-ESBLs producing K. pneumoniae.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bacterial Isolation and Identification

Hundred K. pneumoniae isolates were isolated from 243 clinical specimens. These clinical specimens were obtained from various clinical sources including sputum, urine, wounds, and burns at Mansoura Hospitals. All isolates were biochemically identified according to biochemical standards [11]. The protocol conducted in the study complies with the ethical guidelines and use and handling of human subjects in medical research adopted by The Research Ethics Committee, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mansoura University, Egypt (Permit Number: 2013-30).

2.2. Antimicrobial Sensitivity Testing

For each pure isolate, an antimicrobial sensitivity testing was performed by disk diffusion technique as described in the guidelines of the Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (2014) [12]. The following antibiotics were used: aztreonam (30 μg), ceftriaxone (30 μg), ceftazidime (30 μg), cefotaxime (30 μg), cefoperazone (30 μg), and cefepime (30 μg).

2.3. Detection of ESBL Producing Isolates

K. pneumoniae strains were initially tested for β-lactamase production according to Hassan et al. 2010 [13]. All positive β-lactamase-producing strains were subjected to the Modified Double Disc Synergy Test (MDDST) in order to determine the production of ESBL [14, 15]. ESBL production is inferred by any distortion or augmentation ≥5 mm of an inhibition zone of the cephalosporin discs towards the amoxicillin-clavulanate disc.

2.4. Detection of Virulence Factors of K. pneumoniae Isolates
2.4.1. Blood Hemolysis

The plate hemolysis test was performed by streaking the isolates on blood agar plates which contain 5% (vol/vol) human blood. Total (β) and partial (α) red blood cell lysis were carefully detected after 24 hrs of incubation at 37°C [16].

2.4.2. Haemagglutination

A slide method was adapted for detection of erythrocytes clumping by bacterial fimbriae as described by Vagarali et al. 2008 [17]. The test was done using human blood (type “O”). After three times of washing steps of red blood cells with saline, 3% RBCs suspension in fresh saline was prepared. A drop of this suspension was added to one drop of the tested bacterial culture. Then the slide was rolled for 5 min at room temperature. Clumping was considered as a positive haemagglutination result.

2.4.3. Serum Resistance

Serum resistance was analyzed using the turbidimetric assay. The absorbance at 620 nm was carefully measured before and after three hours of incubation at 37°C. The average of 2 replicates was accepted to determine the final absorbance, and the mean of remaining absorbance relative to the initial absorbance before incubation was calculated. If the ratio was higher than 100%, the isolates were considered serum resistant [18].

2.4.4. Biofilm Detection

The ability of bacteria to form biofilm was assessed using microtiter plate assay [19, 20]. For each isolate, the mean OD492 of the six wells was calculated (ODT). The cut-off OD (ODc) was defined as three standard deviations above the mean OD of the negative control wells. The level of the formed biofilm was asserted as follows:(i)Nonadherent:  ODT ≤ ODC(ii)Weakly adherent:  ODC < ODT ≤ 2ODC(iii)Moderately adherent:  2ODC < ODT ≤ 4ODC(iv)Strongly adherent:  4ODC < ODT.

2.4.5. Lipase Production

According to Panus et al. 2008 [16], isolates were streaked individually on tween 80 agar (1%). After a week of incubation at 37°C, lipase producing isolates form an opaque precipitation zones.

2.4.6. Phenotypic Detection of Hypermucoviscosity (HMV)

It was done using a modified string test in which single colonies were tested for their ability to stretch a mucoviscous string. When the formed string stretched >10 mm in length, it indicated HMV phenotype [21].

2.4.7. Gelatinase Production

The production of gelatinase was identified after streaking bacteria in gelatin agar plates and incubation at 37°C for 24 hs. The gelatinase producing colonies were surrounded by a clear zone once mercuric chloride was poured on plates while the medium became opaque [22].

2.5. Polymerase Chain Analysis of Resistance and Virulence Genes

One single colony of each isolate was suspended in 70 μl DNase-free water and subjected to heat block at 95°C for 10 min. The ESBLs genes (TEM, SHV, and CTX-M-15) and virulence genes including fim H for haemagglutination, BssS for biofilm formation, iss and traT for serum resistance gene, and iucA for aerobactin gene were amplified using Dream Taq PCR Master Mix (Fermentas, US) and primers listed in Table 1. The reaction mixture composed of 12.5 μl Dream Taq Green PCR Master Mix (2x), 1 μl of forward primer (10 μM), 1 μl of reverse primer (10 μM), 1 μl of bacterial lysate, and 9.5 μl of nuclease-free water which were added for a total of 25 μl per reaction. A negative PCR control was prepared. The cycling conditions started with initial denaturing at 95°C for 5 min, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 30 s, annealing for 30 s at temperatures specified for each primer as listed in Table 1, and extension at 72°C for 1 min. This was followed by a final extension step at 72°C for 5 mins.

Gene nameTypePrimer SequenceAnnealing temp.Amplicon size (bp)Reference

CTX-M-15Fw5′-GTGATACCACTTCACCTC-3′49°C255This study

Forward, reverse, and base pair.
2.6. Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) Profile

According to Rodrigues et al. 2008, the primer Operon 18 (5′-CAGCACCCAC-3′) was used to generate suitable RAPD banding profiles [25]. RAPD was performed according to the method of Eftekhar and Nouri, 2015, with some modification [26]. The reaction mixtures (20 ml) contained 1 μM of the used primer, 0.2 mM dNTP, 1.5 U of FlexiTaq DNA polymerase, 1x GoTaq® Flexi buffer, 0.5 mM MgCl2, and 3 μl of DNA template. RAPD-PCR was performed in a thermal cycler (FPROGO2D, Techne Ltd., Cambridge, UK) using the following program: initial denaturation at 95°C for 3 min followed by 40 cycles of denaturation for 30 sec at 95°C, annealing for 30 sec at 37°C and extension for 2 min at 72°C, and then a final extension step at 72°C for 10 min. The amplified products were visualized by UV transillumination after electrophoresis on 1% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide. RAPD fingerprints were analyzed by visual inspection and compared with a 100 bp plus DNA molecular weight ladder.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

Data representing the presence of different virulence factors associated genes in both groups, the ESBL and non-ESBL, were analyzed by performing the test or Fisher exact test. The significance of differences was evaluated at .

3. Results

3.1. Bacterial Isolation and Identification

Two hundred and forty-three clinical isolates were collected from different patients in Mansoura Hospitals, Egypt. Hundred isolates were purified and identified biochemically as K. pneumoniae. The majority of K. pneumoniae isolates were obtained from urine (74%), sputum (11%), wounds (9%), and burns (6%).

3.2. Antimicrobial Sensitivity Testing of K. pneumoniae Isolates

The antimicrobial sensitivity pattern of K. pneumoniae isolates was determined by disc diffusion method. Forty-nine isolates (49%) were resistant to ceftriaxone and cefotaxime. Fifty isolates (50%) were resistant to cefoperazone. Regarding ceftazidime and aztreonam, it was found that 40 (40%) and 38 (38%) isolates were resistance to both antibiotics, respectively. On the other hand, only 19 (19%) of the isolated K. pneumoniae were resistant to cefepime.

3.3. Detection of Extended Spectrum β-Lactamase (ESBL) Producing Isolates

Detection of ESBL revealed that 50% of the tested isolates were ESBL producers and all these isolates harbored at least two ESBL genes (SHV, TEM, or CTX-M-15) (Table 2). Moreover, ESBL producers exhibited a significant decreased susceptibility to all the tested beta-lactams compared with non-ESBL producers ().

Isolate codeClinical sourceHospVirulence characteristicsRAPD profileRAPD pESBL type

E2UrineUNCBiofilm, haem, BssS, fimH|||P5S, C
E3UrineUNCBiofilm, haem, BssS, fimH||||||P1S, T, C
E5UrineUNCBiofilm, haem, hypermucoviscosity, BssS, fimH, iss, iucA|||P7S, T, C
E6WoundMUHBiofilm, haem, BssS, fimH, iss|||P7S, T, C
E7UrineUNCBiofilm, serum resistant, haem, BssS, fimH||||P2S, T, C
E8UrineUNCBiofilm, serum resistant, haem, BssS, fimH, iss||||||||P17S, T, C
E10UrineUNCBiofilm, haem, BssS, fimH, iss||||P2S, T, C
E11UrineUNCBiofilm, serum resistant, haem, BssS, fimH, iss||||P3S, T, C
E12UrineUNCBiofilm, haem, BssS, fimH||||||P6S, T, C
E14UrineUNCBiofilm, serum resistant, haem, BssS, fimH||||P2S, T, C
E16SputumBiofilm, BssS, fimH||||||P1S, T, C
E20SputumCHBiofilm, haem, BssS, fimH, iss|||P7S, T, C
E22UrineUNCBiofilm, haem, BssS, fimH||||P3S, T, C
E24UrineUNCBiofilm, serum resistant, haem, BssS, fimH, iss|||||P4S, C
E27UrineUNCBiofilm, serum resistant, haem, BssS, fimH||||P3S, T, C
E28WoundMUHBiofilm, haem, BssS, fimH||||P2S, C
E31BurnMUHBiofilm, serum resistant, haem, lipase, BssS, fimH||P8S, T, C
E34UrineUNCBiofilm, serum resistant, haem, BssS, fimH, iucA, iss|||P9S, T, C
E39BurnMUHBiofilm, haem, BssS, fimH|||P5S, T, C
E41UrineUNCBiofilm, haem, BssS, fimH, iss|||||P4S, T, C
E43UrineUNCBiofilm, serum resistant, haem, BssS, fimH, iucA, iss ||||||||P10T, C
E44UrineUNCBiofilm, serum resistant, haem, lipase, BssS,fimH, α-hemolysis||||P3S, T, C
E45UrineUNCBiofilm, serum resistant, haem, BssS, fimH, iss|||P5S, C
E47UrineUNCBiofilm, serum resistant, haem, BssS, fimH|||||P11S, T, C
E48UrineUNCBiofilm, serum resistant, haem, BssS, fimH, iucA||P12S, T, C
E54UrineUNCBiofilm, serum resistant, haem, BssS, fimH, iss|||P13S, T, C
E56UrineUNCBiofilm, serum resistant, haem, lipase, BssS, fimH|||P13S, T, C
E57UrineUNCBiofilm, serum resistant, haem, BssS, fimH, iss|||||P4S, T, C
E58UrineUNCBiofilm, serum resistant, haem, BssS, fimH||||P3S, T, C
E59UrineUNCBiofilm, serum resistant, haem, BssS, fimH, iss||||||P1S, T, C
E60UrineUNCBiofilm, serum resistant, haem, BssS, fimH, iss ||||P9S, C
E63UrineUNCBiofilm, serum resistant, haem, BssS, fimH||||P14S, T, C
E64UrineUNCBiofilm, haem, BssS, fimH||||P14S, T, C
E65UrineUNCBiofilm, serum resistant, haem, BssS, fimH, issP14T, C
E66UrineUNCBiofilm, haem, BssS, fimH, iss||||P14S, T, C
E72BurnMUHBiofilm, haem, BssS, fimH|||P15S, T, C
E75BurnMUHBiofilm, serum resistant, haem, BssS, fimH, iss||P12S, C
E77UrineUNCBiofilm, haem, BssS, fimH, iss||||P3S, T, C
E78SputumC HBiofilm, haem, BssS, fimH|||P16S, T, C
E79UrineUNCBiofilm, serum resistant, haem, BssS, fimH, iss||P12S, T, C
E83WoundMUHBssS, fimH||||P18S, C
E84UrineUNCBiofilm, serum resistant, haem, BssS, fimH, iss||P12S, T, C
E86UrineUNCBiofilm, serum resistant, haem, BssS, fimH|||||P4S, T, C
E89UrineUNCBiofilm, haem, BssS, fimH||||||P19S, C
E94UrineUNCBiofilm, serum resistant, haem, BssS,fimH, iss||||P3S, T, C
E96UrineUNCBiofilm, haem, BssS, fimH||||P2S, T, C
E98WoundMUHBiofilm, serum resistant, haem, BssS,fimH, iucA, iss||||||P1S, T, C
E110SputumMUHBiofilm, serum resistant, haem, hypermucoviscosity, BssS, fimH, iucA, iss|||||P4S, T, C
E111UrineUNCBiofilm, serum resistant, haem, BssS, fimH, iss||||P2S, T, C
E112UrineUNCBiofilm, haem, gelatinase, BssS, fimH|||P5S, T, C

Random amplified polymorphic DNA, pattern, hospital, Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura University Hospital, Chest Hospital, haemagglutination, SHV, CTX-M-15, and TEM.
3.4. Phenotypic and Genotypic Detection of Virulence Factors

The virulence features of 50 ESBLs and 50 non-ESBLs producing isolates are shown in Tables 2 and 3, respectively.

Isolate codeClinical sourceHospVirulence characteristicsRAPD profileRAPD p

N1UrineUNCHyper mucoviscosity, BssS, fimH||||P20
N4SputumMUHBiofilm, haem, hypermucoviscosity, BssS, fimH|||||P28
N9UrineMUHBiofilm, haem, BssS, fimH||||||P50
N13UrineUNCBiofilm, haem, hypermucoviscosity, BssS, fimH|||||P26
N15UrineUNCBiofilm, haem, BssS, fimH||||||P27
N17UrineUNCBiofilm, haem, BssS, fimH, iss||P8
N18UrineUNCBiofilm, haem, hypermucoviscosity, BssS, fimH|||||P28
N19SputumCHBiofilm, haem, hypermucoviscosity, BssS, fimH|||P29
N21UrineUNCBiofilm, haem, α-hemolysis, hyper mucoviscosity, BssS, fimH|||||P30
N23UrineUNCBiofilm, serum resistant, haem, hyper mucoviscosity, BssS, fimH, iss, iucA|||||P31
N25SputumMUHBiofilm, haem, hypermucoviscosity, BssS, fimH||P25
N26UrineUNCBiofilm, serum resistant, haem, α-hemolysis, lipase, hypermucoviscosity, BssS, fimH, iss|||||P32
N29WoundMUHBiofilm, haem, BssS, fimH||||||P33
N30WoundMUHBiofilm, BssS, fimH||||P34
N32WoundMUHBiofilm, haem, gelatinase, hypermucoviscosity, BssS, fimH|||||P32
N33UrineUNCBiofilm, serum resistant, haem, hypermucoviscosity, BssS, fimH, iss||||||P35
N35UrineUNCBiofilm, serum resistant, haem, BssS, fimH, iss|||||P32
N36UrineUNCBiofilm, haem, hypermucoviscosity, BssS, fimH|||P36
N37UrineUNCBiofilm, haem, BssS, fimH||||P37
N38UrineUNCBiofilm, haem, hypermucoviscosity, BssS, fimH|||||P28
N40UrineUNCBiofilm, haem, lipase, hypermucoviscosity, BssS, fimH, iucA, iss|||||P38
N42UrineUNCBiofilm, haem, hypermucoviscosity, BssS, fimH||||P39
N46UrineUNCBiofilm, haem, hypermucoviscosity, BssS, fimH|||||P32
N49UrineUNCHypermucoviscosity, BssS, fimH|||||P32
N50UrineUNCBiofilm, haem, hypermucoviscosity, BssS, fimH|||||P40
N51UrineUNCBiofilm, haem, BssS, fimH|||P41
N52UrineUNCBiofilm, haem, gelatinase, BssS, fimH|||P42
N53UrineUNCBiofilm, serum resistant, haem, BssS, fimH, iss|||||P32
N55UrineUNCBiofilm, haem, BssS, fimH|||||P40
N61UrineUNCBiofilm, haem, hypermucoviscosity, BssS, fimH||P25
N62UrineUNCBiofilm, haem, hypermucoviscosity, BssS, fimH|||P43
N67WoundMUHBiofilm, haem, BssS, fimH||||P44
N68UrineUNCBiofilm, haem, hypermucoviscosity, BssS, fimH|||||P28
N69UrineUNCBiofilm, haem, hypermucoviscosity, BssS, fimH|||||P45
N70UrineUNCBiofilm, haem, BssS, fimH|||P46
N71SputumMUHBiofilm, haem, hypermucoviscosity, BssS, fimH|||||P31
N73UrineMUHBiofilm, haem, BssS, fimH||||P39
N74SputumMUHBiofilm, haem, hypermucoviscosity, BssS, fimH||P25
N76UrineUNCBiofilm, serum resistant, haem, hypermucoviscosity, BssS, fimH, iss|||||P47
N80WoundMUHBiofilm, haem, BssS, fimH||||P48
N81BurnMUHBiofilm, haem, BssS, fimH|||||P49
N82UrineMUHBiofilm, haem, BssS, fimH|||||P40
N88UrineMUHBiofilm, serum resistant, haem, BssS, fimH, iss|||||P28
N91UrineUNCBiofilm, serum resistant, haem, BssS, fimH||||||P51
N92UrineUNCBiofilm, serum resistant, haem, lipase, hypermucoviscosity, BssS, fimH||||P39
N100UrineUNCBiofilm, serum resistant, haem, lipase, hypermucoviscosity, BssS, fimH, iss||||P21
N104BurnMUHBiofilm, haem, hypermucoviscosity, BssS, fimH||||||P22
N105UrineUNCBiofilm, serum resistant, haem, lipase, hypermucoviscosity, BssS, fimH||||||P23
N106SputumMUHBiofilm, haem, hypermucoviscosity, BssS, fimH, iucA, iss|||||P24
N109SputumMUHBiofilm, haem, hypermucoviscosity, BssS, fimH||P25

Random amplified polymorphic DNA, pattern, hospital, Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura University Hospital, Chest Hospital, and haemagglutination.

The blood hemolysis test for all isolates revealed that only one ESBL and two non-ESBL producing isolates were α-hemolytic.

All isolates were tested for their ability to agglutinate erythrocytes. Clumping of erythrocytes was observed in 48 ESBL producing isolates (96%) and 47 non-ESBL producing isolates (94%). PCR detection of fim H gene revealed that all ESBL and non-ESBL producing isolates harbored fim H gene.

Serum resistance of all isolates was analyzed using a turbidimetric assay. The remaining absorbance after 3 hours (OD620, 3 h) was greater than 100% relative to the initial absorbance in 29 (58%) of ESBL isolates and in 11 (22%) of non-ESBL isolates, so these isolates were designated serum resistant and the difference was highly significant (). The remaining isolates showed sensitivity to serum. PCR analysis revealed that none of the tested isolates harbored traT gene. In contrast, iss gene was detected in 50% and 22% of ESBL and non-ESBL isolates, respectively ().

Biofilm formation of all isolates was tested using microtiter plate assay. Biofilm intensity was classified as weak, moderate, and strong and was compared among ESBL and non-ESBL producers (Figure 1). Weak biofilm was detected in 40% of ESBL producers and 92% of non-ESBL with highly significant difference (). Moderate type of biofilm was higher in ESBL (38%) compared to non-ESBLs (4%) (). Moreover, strong biofilm production was detected only among ESBL producers (20%) (). Only one ESBL producer and 2 non-ESBL producers were nonbiofilm producers. Regarding BssS gene, it was found among all isolates.

For lipase production only 3 (6%) ESBL and 5 (10%) non-ESBL producing isolates were considered lipase producers with no significant difference of both groups.

The prevalence of HV phenotype was higher among non-ESBLs producing isolates where 31 (62%) of non-ESBLs exhibited hypermucoviscosity compared to the ESBLs (4%) ().

No significance difference was observed between ESBL and non-ESBL producing isolates in gelatinase production.

Aerobactin gene (iucA) was detected in 6 (12%) of ESBLs and 3 (6%) of non-ESBL producing isolates.

3.5. Virulence Profiles Associated with ESBLs and Non-ESBLs Producing Isolates

A total of twenty-four different virulence profiles were observed among the tested isolates. Six profiles were associated with ESBLs producing isolates compared to ten profiles for non-ESBLs producing isolates. In addition, seven profiles were found in both types of isolates. The most prevalent profiles associated with ESBLs producing isolates were biofilm-serum resistant-haemagglutination-BssS-fimH-iss (28%), while the most common profiles observed with non-ESBLs producing isolates were biofilm-haemagglutination-hypermucoviscosity-BssS-fimH (36%) (Table 4).

Virulence profilesESBLs producing isolates number (%)Non-ESBLs producing isolates number (%)

Biofilm-haemagglutination-BssS-fimH11 (22%)12 (24%)
Biofilm-haemagglutination-hypermucoviscosity-BssS-fimH-iss-iucA1 (2%)1 (2%)
Biofilm-haemagglutination-BssS-fimH-iss6 (12%)1 (2%)
Biofilm-serum resistant-haemagglutination-BssS-fimH7 (14%)1 (2%)
Biofilm-serum resistant-haemagglutination-BssS-fimH-iss14 (28%)3 (6%)
Biofilm-BssS-fimH1 (2%)1 (2%)
Biofilm-serum resistant-haemagglutination-lipase-BssS-fimH2 (4%)0 (0%)
Biofilm-serum resistant-haemagglutination-BssS-fimH-iss-iucA3 (6%)0 (0%)
Biofilm-serum resistant-haemagglutination-lipase-α-hemolysis-BssS-fimH1 (2%)0 (0%)
Biofilm-serum resistant-haemagglutination-BssS-fimH-iucA1 (2%)0 (0%)
BssS-fimH1 (2%)0 (0%)
Biofilm-serum resistant-haemagglutination-hypermucoviscosity-BssS-fimH-iss-iucA1 (2%)0 (0%)
Biofilm-haemagglutination-gelatinase-BssS-fimH1 (2%)1 (2%)
Hypermucoviscosity-BssS-fimH0 (0%)2 (4%)
Biofilm-haemagglutination-hypermucoviscosity-BssS-fimH0 (0%)18 (36%)
Biofilm-haemagglutination-hypermucoviscosity-α-hemolysis-BssS-fimH0 (0%)1 (2%)
Biofilm-serum resistant-haemagglutination-hypermucoviscosity-BssS-fimH-iss-iucA0 (0%)1 (2%)
Biofilm-serum resistant-haemagglutination-lipase-α-hemolysis-BssS-fimH-iss0 (0%)1 (2%)
Biofilm-haemagglutination-hypermucoviscosity-gelatinase-BssS-fimH0 (0%)1 (2%)
Biofilm-serum resistant-haemagglutination-hypermucoviscosity-BssS-fimH-iss0 (0%)2 (4%)
Biofilm-haemagglutination-hypermucoviscosity-lipase-BssS-fimH-iss-iucA0 (0%)1 (2%)
Biofilm-serum resistant-haemagglutination-hypermucoviscosity-lipase-BssS-fimH0 (0%)2 (4%)
Biofilm-serum resistant-haemagglutination-hypermucoviscosity-lipase-BssS-fimH-iss0 (0%)1 (2%)

Total50 (100%)50 (100%)

3.6. RAPD Profile Analysis

All isolates were typed by RAPD-PCR analysis. The number of patterns generated by operon 18 was 51 as shown in Tables 2 and 3. Eighteen patterns were specific for ESBL producing isolates, 32 patterns were specific for non-ESBL producing isolates, and 1 pattern (P8) was exhibited by both types of isolates. Of the eighteen RAPD patterns associated with ESBLs producing isolates, P3 was the most predominant (14%). The second most common pattern was P2; it was observed among 12% of ESBLs producing isolates. In addition, eight patterns were represented by single isolate. Overall, non-ESBL producing isolates were more diverse than ESBL producing isolates, where 26 out of 32 patterns were represented by single isolate.

Cluster analysis of RAPD profile classified all isolates into four clusters a, b, c, and d (Figure 2). The four groups consisted of both ESBLs and non-ESBL producing isolates with different level of distribution. ESBLs producing isolates were the most dispersed in cluster a (76%) () compared to non-ESBL producing isolates (16%) (). 12% () of ESBLs producing isolates were identified in cluster b while 8% () of non-ESBLs producing isolates were present in the same group. In contrast non-ESBLs producing isolates were more predominant in clusters c and d where 56% () and 20% () of these isolates were included in both groups, respectively. ESBLs producing isolates comprised lower percent in both clusters c and d.

4. Discussion

Klebsiella pneumoniae is a common pathogen associated with both community and hospital-acquired infections including respiratory and urinary tract infections and wound and blood infections [27]. Its pathogenicity is related to a multitude of virulence factors [28] and ability to readily acquire multiple antibiotic resistances [29]. In fact, it is an important host of ESBL. Bacterial resistance to β-lactams by ESBL production has increased dramatically in human pathogens, causing significant morbidity and mortality [30].

The proportion of K. pneumoniae isolates producing ESBL is variable among countries. These proportions were 12% in the United States, 33% in Europe, 52% in Latin America, and 28% in the Western Pacific [31]. In the study of Shin and Ko, 2014, 33.6% of the isolates were ESBLs producer [32]. A higher percent was found in Arabian region where Aljanaby and Alhasani, 2016, reported that rate of ESBL producing K. pneumoniae was 62.5% in AL-Najaf Governorate, Iraq [33]. In this study, 50% of isolates were estimated as ESBLs producers. These data confirm the dramatic spread of ESBL isolates all over the world.

Infections resulting from ESBL producers are associated with serious adverse conditions [34]. Indeed, this is related to both ineffective therapy and the failure in the choice of an antibiotic active against these isolates. However, the increased incidence of mortality associated with ESBL producers may also be associated with the increasing virulence of these isolates [35].

Most β-lactamases contribute to resistance to a variety of antibiotics including the third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins and monobactams [36]. This study confirms that ESBL producing isolates exhibited significantly greater resistance to the examined beta-lactams than did non-ESBL producers (). These results are comparable to that previously reported by Shin and Ko, 2014, where ESBL producing isolates showed a significant higher resistance to most beta-lactams than did non-ESBL producing isolates () [32].

K. pneumoniae mostly harbors ESBL genes (SHV, TEM, and CTX-M) which have shown resistance to the majority of antibiotics [37]. In this study, PCR detection of these genes revealed that 100, 96, and 84% of ESBL producing K. pneumoniae harbored CTX-M-15, SHV, and TEM, respectively (Table 2). Shin and Ko, 2014, showed similar results regarding CTX-M where all ESBL producers were found to harbor blaCTX-M gene [33]. Additionally, Aljanaby and Alhasani, 2016, reported that TEM and SHV were 93.75% (30/32) and 87.5% (28/32), respectively [33].

The pathogenicity of K. pneumoniae is a result of a variety of virulence factors that cause multiple diseases through attacking the immune system of mammalians [23]. Infections caused by ESBL producing K. pneumoniae are linked to severe conditions due to the capability of these strains to express virulence factors [35]. Microbial biofilm formation and development have been reported to have major role in Klebsiella pathogenicity. In addition, biofilms can protect bacteria from exposure to antimicrobials when compared with other nonbiofilm forming bacteria [38]. In the current study, biofilm was highly prevalent in both ESBL and non-ESBL producers. More importantly, development of strong and moderate biofilm is much more significant in ESBL producers compared to the non-ESBLs (Figure 1). Type 1 or type 3 fimbriae are the most important virulence factors responsible for adhesion of K. pneumoniae and increasing its ability to grow in biofilm community [9]. This explains why fimH gene was found in all biofilm producing isolates.

Serum resistance has been shown in multiple bacterial systems to be critical for the survival of invading bacteria and the establishments of disease, since mutations resulting in loss of serum resistance render several bacterial pathogens avirulent [39]. Because serum resistance is one of the pathogenicity factors of Klebsiella, the superior resistance to serum bactericidal activity in the present study (40%) is an indicator of their higher pathogenicity. Gundogan and Yakar, 2007, found that 32.5% of K. pneumoniae were serum resistant [40]. There are several studies reporting that there was positive association between ESBL and serum resistance. In the present study, comparing serum resistance among our tested isolates, ESBLs producers were significantly higher serum resistant than did non-ESBL producers. This result is matching with that previously established by Sahly et al. 2004 [41] which revealed that the prevalence of serum resistant isolates was greatly observed among ESBL producing isolates (TEM and SHV types) (30%; 27/90 isolates) compared to non-ESBL producers (17.9%; 32/178 isolates) (). Lin et al., 2016, reported that the percentage of serum resistance was significantly higher among the ESBL producing K. pneumoniae strains than among the non-ESBL producing K. pneumoniae strains [42].

Gene traT was not detected among the tested isolates. In a previous study of Atmani et al., 2015 [30] traT gene was present at low rate (3.1%) in municipal wastewater-treatment plant isolates and was absent in hospital effluents and clinical isolates. This serum resistance-associated outer membrane plasmid gene was previously reported in clinical isolates as minor contributor in serum resistance [23].

In the present study iss gene was detected in 50% and 22% of ESBL and non-ESBL producing isolates, respectively (). In the study of El-Mahdy et al., 2011 iss gene was found in 32% on genomic DNA and in 36% on plasmid DNA of E. coli isolates. In the same study iss gene was detected in 5% on genomic DNA and in 31% on plasmid DNA of K. pneumoniae isolates [43]. This confirms the horizontal transfer of iss gene among bacteria. Our finding that iss gene was detected in 65% of serum resistant isolates suggests that this gene might be related to serum resistance (Tables 2 and 3).

Diverse capsular ingredient and an increased amount of capsular material have been described in hypervirulent K. pneumoniae isolates [44]. However, little work elucidating the role of the hypermucoviscous (HMV) phenotype in the pathogenicity of K. pneumoniae exists, and no direct comparison of HMV and non-HMV isolates using the innate immune system components of susceptible hosts has been described. This is because a number of genetic loci appear to be related to the HMV phenotype of K. pneumoniae [45].

In the study of Lee et al., 2016, 94.3% of the isolates expressed the hypermucoviscous phenotype (capsular type K1/K2/K5) and they were serum resistant. In addition, 57.1% of nonhypermucoviscous (non-K1/K2/K5) isolates were also serum resistant. Lee et al., 2016, confirmed that hypermucoviscosity and serum resistance phenomena depend on the type of capsule [46]. In addition, Fang et al., 2004, found that high serum resistance was detected among eight randomly selected clinical K. pneumoniae isolates: four of them were HMV invasive isolates and four were non-HV noninvasive isolates [47]. Moreover, El Fertas-Aissani et al., 2013, reported that the hypermucoviscosity was found only in 9.2% of isolates although 92.6% of the isolates were serum resistant [23].

In the present study hypermucoviscosity was estimated among 33% of K. pneumoniae isolates. It was found that 8 (24%) HMV isolates exhibited serum resistance. Previous reports have indicated that ESBL genes are rarely detected in K. pneumoniae strains with the HMV phenotype and there is also negative association between hypermucoviscosity (HV) and ESBL [48]. This finding is supported by the result of our study where 62% of non-ESBLs exhibited hypermucoviscosity compared to the ESBLs (4%) (). In the study of Lee et al., 2010, HMV phenotypes were identified in 35 (38.5%) of 91 K. pneumoniae isolates. Detection of ESBLs in the same study revealed that 24 isolates (26.4%) were ESBL producing strains. Only one ESBL producing K. pneumoniae strain expressed the HMV phenotype. Their results indicated a significant negative association between the HMV phenotype and ESBL production in K. pneumoniae isolates [48]. Moreover, Yu et al., 2015, confirmed that the prevalence of the HMV phenotype was significantly lower in ESBL K. pneumoniae isolates (8.8%) than that in non-ESBL K. pneumoniae isolates (53.8%) [49].

Aerobactin is a citrate-hydroxamate siderophore rarely expressed by classical nosocomial K. pneumoniae. It is more expressed in HMV K. pneumoniae [50]. However, in our study 15.1% of HMV K. pneumoniae were aerobactin producers. These results were relatively similar to that reported by El Fertas-Aissani et al., 2013, where only 20% of HMV were aerobactin producers [23]. Furthermore, this siderophore is not common among both ESBL and non-ESBL producers in this study and as previously reported by Podschun et al. 2001 [51] and Atmani et al. 2015 [30]. Moreover, α-hemolysis which is often associated with virulence of various pathogenic microorganisms was very rare among our isolates (2% in ESBL and 4% in non-ESBL producers) and previous studies [32, 52]. However, Gundogan et al., 2011, [53] have confirmed that 67% of Klebsiella isolates from meat samples exhibited hemolytic activity. Likewise, both gelatinase and lipase enzymes are minor contributors of virulence in both ESBL and non-ESBL producers.

Analysis of virulence factors combination has brought out 23 different virulence profiles including 2 to 8 virulence factors (Table 4). Thirteen profiles were observed among ESBL producers and seventeen among non-ESBL producing isolates, of which seven profiles were shared by both isolates. Indeed, four of the established virulence profiles were circulated among 76% of ESBL producing isolates. The remaining nine virulence profiles of ESBL producers included one, two, or three isolates for each profile. Regarding non-ESBL producers, two virulence profiles were detected among 60% of the isolates. The remaining fifteen virulence profiles of non-ESBL producers included from one to three isolates in each profile. These findings suggest that ESBL producers were more genetically related than non-ESBL producers. Our observation was confirmed by RAPD analysis (Tables 2 and 3). This technique has been commonly used as an epidemiological tool to differentiate between different K. pneumoniae isolates [54]. Overall, our results confirmed a marked genetic relatedness among ESBL compared to the non-ESBL producers where eight out of eighteen RAPD patterns specific for ESBL were represented by single isolate, while 26 out of 32 RAPD patterns specific for non-ESBL were represented by single isolate. Dendogram analysis of RAPD profile classified all isolates into four clusters (a, b, c, and d) based on numerous fingerprints generated (Figure 2). The majority of ESBL isolates (, 76%) belonged to group a which in turn could confirm the genetic relatedness among ESBL producing isolates. In contrast, non-ESBL producers were genetically diverse where 16%, 8%, and 20% of the isolates were distributed among clusters a, b, and d, respectively, although half of nonproducing isolates were in cluster c (, 56%). On contrast, Eftekhar and Nouri 2015 [26] reported that most non-ESBL isolates (62.1%) belonged to a single cluster and the ESBL producers and their RAPD fingerprints were spread among 8 clusters.

In conclusion, this is the first study conducted in Mansoura University that shows the differences in virulence characteristics between ESBLs and non-ESBLs producing K. pneumoniae. Accordingly, this study suggests a correlation between ESBL production and some virulence factors. Therefore increased alertness of clinicians and enhanced testing by laboratories are necessary to reduce failure of therapy and prevent the dissemination of ESBL producing K. pneumoniae.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors did not declare any conflicts of interest.


All thanks and appreciation go to the staff of the clinical laboratories of Mansoura Hospitals for providing the clinical specimens used in this study.


  1. D. L. Paterson and R. A. Bonomo, “Extended-spectrum β-lactamases: a clinical update,” Clinical Microbiology Reviews, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 657–686, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. F. Bourjilat, B. Bouchrif, N. Dersi, J. D. P. G. Claude, H. Amarouch, and M. Timinouni, “Emergence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli in community-acquired urinary infections in Casablanca, Morocco,” The Journal of Infection in Developing Countries, vol. 5, pp. 850–855, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  3. T. M. Coque, A. Oliver, J. C. Pérez-Díaz, F. Baquero, and R. Cantón, “Genes encoding TEM-4, SHV-2, and CTX-M-10 extended-spectrum β-lactamases are carried by multiple Klebsiella pneumoniae clones in a single hospital (Madrid, 1989 to 2000),” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 500–510, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. R. Canton and T. M. Coque, “The CTX-M β-Lactamase pandemic,” Current Opinion in Microbiology, vol. 9, pp. 466–475, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. S. G. Jenkins and A. N. Schuetz, “Current concepts in laboratory testing to guide antimicrobial therapy,” Mayo Clinic Proceedings, vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 290–308, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. D. L. Paterson, “Resistance in gram-negative bacteria: enterobacteriaceae,” The American Journal of Medicine, vol. 119, no. 6, pp. S20–S28, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. J. D. Pitout and K. B. Laupland, “Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae: an emerging public-health concern,” The Lancet Infectious Diseases, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 159–166, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. U. Dobrindt, “(Patho-)genomics of Escherichia coli,” International Journal of Medical Microbiology, vol. 295, no. 6-7, pp. 357–371, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. C. Vuotto, F. Longo, M. P. Balice, G. Donelli, and P. E. Varaldo, “Antibiotic resistance related to biofilm formation in Klebsiella pneumoniae,” Pathogens, vol. 3, pp. 743–758, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. D. M. Livermore and N. Woodford, “The β-lactamase threat in Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter,” Trends in Microbiology, vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 413–420, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. K. Elmer, A. Jr Stephen, J. William, P. Gary, S. Paul, and W. Gall, Koneman's Color Atlas and Textbook of Diagnostic Microbiology, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, London, UK, 6th edition, 2006.
  12. Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute, “Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Twenty-four Informational supplements,” CLSI Document 2014; M100-S24, CLSI, Wayne, Pa, USA, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  13. R. Hassan, R. Barwa, and R. H. Shehata, “Antimicrobial resistance genes and some virulence factors in Escherichia coli and Streptococcus pyogenes isolated from Mansoura University Hospitals,” The Egyptian Journal of Medical Microbiology, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 27–40, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  14. N. Fam, D. Gamal, M. El Said, L. Aboul-Fadl et al., “Detection of plasmid-mediated AmpC beta-lactamases in clinically significant bacterial isolates in a research institute hospital in Egypt,” Life Science Journal, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 2294–2304, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  15. JA. Jacoby, AmpC β-Lactamases. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, vol. 22, pp. 161–182, 2009. View at: Publisher Site
  16. E. Panus, M. B. Chifiriuc, M. Bucur et al., “Virulence, pathogenicity, antibiotic resistance and plasmid profile of Escherichia coli strains isolated from drinking and recreational waters,” in 17th European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases and 25th International Congress of Chemotherapy, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  17. M. Vagarali, S. Karadesai, C. Patil, S. Metgud, and M. Mutnal, “Haemagglutination and siderophore production as the urovirulence markers of uropathogenic Escherichia coli,” Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 68–70, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. D. Vandekerchove, F. Vandemaele, C. Adriaensen et al., “Virulence-associated traits in avian Escherichia coli: comparison between isolates from colibacillosis-affected and clinically healthy layer flocks,” Veterinary Microbiology, vol. 108, no. 1-2, pp. 75–87, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. S. Stepanovic, D. Vukovic, I. Dakic, B. Savic, and M. Svabio-Vlahovic, “A modified microtiter-plate test for quantification of staphylococcal biofilm formation,” Journal of Microbiological Methods, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 175–179, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. A. Abdi-Ali, M. Mohammadi-Mehr, and Y. Agha Alaei, “Bactericidal activity of various antibiotics against biofilm-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa,” International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 196–200, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. H.-C. Lee, Y.-C. Chuang, W.-L. Yu et al., “Clinical implications of hypermucoviscosity phenotype in Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates: association with invasive syndrome in patients with community-acquired bacteraemia,” Journal of Internal Medicine, vol. 259, no. 6, pp. 606–614, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. J. G. Collee, R. S. Miles, and B. Watt, “Tests for identification of bacteria,” in Mackie and McCartney Practical Medical Microbiology, J. G. Collee, A. G. Fraser, B. P. Marmion, and A. Simmon, Eds., pp. 131–149, Churchill Livingston, New York, NY, USA, 14th edition, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  23. R. El Fertas-Aissani, Y. Messai, S. Alouache, and R. Bakour, “Virulence profiles and antibiotic susceptibility patterns of Klebsiella pneumoniae strains isolated from different clinical specimens,” Pathologie Biologie, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 209–216, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. R. Hassan, W. El-Naggar, E. El-Sawy, and A. El-Mahdy, “Characterization of some virulence factors associated with Enterbacteriaceae isolated from urinary tract infections in Mansoura Hospitals,” N. Egypt J Med Microbiol, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 9–17, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  25. M. V. P. Rodrigues, A. M. Fusco-Almeida, N. G. P. Nogueira, B. W. Bertoni, S. C. Z. Torres, and R. C. L. R. Pietro, “Evaluation of the spreading of isolated bacteria from dental consulting-room using RAPD technique,” Latin American Journal of Pharmacy, vol. 27, pp. 805–811, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  26. F. Eftekhar and P. Nouri, “Correlation of RAPD-PCR profiles with ESBL production in clinical isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae in Tehran,” Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. DC01–DC03, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. M. A. Bachman, J. E. Oyler, S. H. Burns et al., “Klebsiella pneumoniae yersiniabactin promotes respiratory tract infection through evasion of lipocalin 2,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 79, no. 8, pp. 3309–3316, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. V. L. Yu, D. S. Hansen, C. K. Wen et al., “Virulence characteristics of Klebsiella and clinical manifestations of K. pneumoniae bloodstream infections,” Emerging Infectious Diseases, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 986–993, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. V. Kumar, P. Sun, J. Vamathevan et al., “Comparative genomics of Klebsiella pneumoniae strains with different antibiotic resistance profiles,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 55, no. 9, pp. 4267–4276, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. S. M. Atmani, Y. Messai, S. Alouache et al., “Virulence characteristics and genetic background of ESBL-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates from wastewater,” Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 103–112, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  31. R. N. Jones, C. Mendes, P. J. Turner, and R. Masterton, “An overview of the Meropenem Yearly Susceptibility Test Information Collection (MYSTIC) Program: 1997–2004,” Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 247–256, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. J. Shin and K. S. Ko, “Comparative study of genotype and virulence in CTX-M-producing and non-extended-spectrum-β-lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 2463–2467, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. A. A. J. Aljanaby and A. H. A. Alhasani, “Virulence factors and antibiotic susceptibility patterns of multidrug resistance Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from different clinical infections,” African Journal of Microbiology Research, vol. 10, no. 22, pp. 829–843, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. M. J. Schwaber and Y. Carmeli, “Mortality and delay in effective therapy associated with extended-spectrum β-lactamase production in Enterobacteriaceae bacteraemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, vol. 60, no. 5, pp. 913–920, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. H. Sahly, S. Navon-Venezia, L. Roesler et al., “Extended-spectrum β-lactamase production is associated with an increase in cell invasion and expression of fimbrial adhesins in Klebsiella pneumoniae,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 52, no. 9, pp. 3029–3034, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. Z.-Q. Wei, Y.-G. Chen, Y.-S. Yu, W.-X. Lu, and L.-J. Li, “Nosocomial spread of multi-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae containing a plasmid encoding multiple β-lactamases,” Journal of Medical Microbiology, vol. 54, no. 9, pp. 885–888, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. O. I. Ahmed, S. A. El-Hady, T. M. Ahmed, and I. Z. Ahmed, “Detection of bla SHV and bla CTX-M genes in ESBL producing Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from Egyptian patients with suspected nosocomial infections,” Egyptian Journal of Medical Human Genetics, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 277–283, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. Bellifa S, H. Hassaine, D. Balestrino et al., “Evaluation of biofilm formation of Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from medical devices at the University Hospital of Tlemcen, Algeria,” African Journal of Microbiology Research, vol. 7, no. 49, pp. 5558–5564, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. C. Elkins, K. J. Morrow Jr., and B. Olsen, “Serum resistance in Haemophilus ducreyi requires outer membrane protein DsrA,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 1608–1619, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. N. Gundogan and U. A. Yakar, “Siderophore production, serum resistance, hemolytic activity and extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Klebsiella species isolated from milk and milk products,” Journal of Food Safety, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 251–264, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. H. Sahly, H. Aucken, V. J. Benedí et al., “Increased serum resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae strains producing extended-spectrum β-lactamases,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 48, no. 9, pp. 3477–3482, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. H.-A. Lin, Y.-L. Huang, K.-M. Yeh, L. K. Siu, J.-C. Lin, and F.-Y. Chang, “Regulator of the mucoid phenotype A gene increases the virulent ability of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing serotype non-K1/K2 Klebsiella pneumonia,” Journal of Microbiology, Immunology and Infection, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 494–501, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. A. M. El-Mahdy, E. M. A. El-Sawy, R. Hassan, and W. A. El-Naggar, Characterization of some virulence factors associated with clinically important Enterobacteriaceae [M.S. thesis], Faculty of Pharmacy, Mansoura University, 2011.
  44. A. S. Shon, R. P. S. Bajwa, and T. A. Russo, “Hypervirulent (hypermucoviscous) Klebsiella pneumoniae: a new and dangerous breed,” Virulence, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 107–118, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. T. Kawai, “Hypermucoviscosity: an extremely sticky phenotype of Klebsiella pneumoniae associated with emerging destructive tissue abscess syndrome,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 42, no. 10, pp. 1359–1361, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. I. R. Lee, J. S. Molton, K. L. Wyres et al., “Differential host susceptibility and bacterial virulence factors driving Klebsiella liver abscess in an ethnically diverse population,” Scientific Reports, vol. 6, Article ID 29316, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. C.-T. Fang, Y.-P. Chuang, C.-T. Shun, S.-C. Chang, and J.-T. Wang, “A Novel virulence gene in Klebsiella pneumoniae strains causing primary liver abscess and septic metastatic complications,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 199, no. 5, pp. 697–705, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. C.-H. Lee, J.-W. Liu, L.-H. Su, C.-C. Chien, C.-C. Li, and K.-D. Yang, “Hypermucoviscosity associated with Klebsiella pneumoniae-mediated invasive syndrome: a prospective cross-sectional study in Taiwan,” International Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 14, no. 8, pp. e688–e692, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. W.-L. Yu, M.-F. Lee, H.-J. Tang, M.-C. Chang, and Y.-C. Chuang, “Low prevalence of rmpA and high tendency of rmpA mutation correspond to low virulence of extended spectrum β-lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates,” Virulence, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 162–172, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. M. K. Paczosa and J. Mecsas, “Klebsiella pneumoniae: going on the offense with a strong defense,” Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, vol. 80, no. 3, pp. 629–661, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. R. Podschun, S. Pietsch, C. Höller, and U. Ullmann, “Incidence of Klebsiella species in surface waters and their expression of virulence factors,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 67, no. 7, pp. 3325–3327, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. R. Koczura and A. Kaznowski, “Occurrence of the Yersinia high-pathogenicity island and iron uptake systems in clinical isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae,” Microbial Pathogenesis, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 197–202, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. N. Gundogan, S. Citak, and E. Yalcin, “Virulence properties of extended spectrum β-lactamase-producing Klebsiella species in meat samples,” Journal of Food Protection, vol. 74, no. 4, pp. 559–564, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. C. Tribuddharat, S. Srifuengfung, and W. Chiangjong, “Preliminary study of randomly-amplified polymorphic DNA analysis for typing extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae,” Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand, vol. 91, no. 4, pp. 527–532, 2008. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2017 Mustafa Muhammad Gharrah et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.