Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Diabetes Research
Volume 2013, Article ID 245271, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/245271
Research Article

Ethyl Pyruvate Inhibits Retinal Pathogenic Neovascularization by Downregulating HMGB1 Expression

Korean Medicine Based Herbal Drug Development Group, Herbal Medicine Research Division, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine (KIOM), 1672 Yuseongdaero, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 305-811, Republic of Korea

Received 26 July 2013; Revised 18 October 2013; Accepted 8 November 2013

Academic Editor: Ronald G. Tilton

Copyright © 2013 Yun Mi Lee et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Retinal pathogenic angiogenesis in the eyes is a causative factor in retinopathy of prematurity, diabetic retinopathy, and age-related macular degeneration. This study was designed to examine the pathogenic role of the high-mobility group box-1 (HMGB1) protein and the inhibitory effect of ethyl pyruvate (EP), a well-known antioxidant substance, in retinal pathogenic angiogenesis in mice with oxygen-induced retinopathy (OIR), one of the animal models of proliferative ischemic retinopathy. The OIR mouse model was used for our in vivo studies. The mice were exposed to 75% oxygen from postnatal day 7 (P7) to P11, after which the mice were brought to room air and intraperitoneally injected with EP (50 mg/kg, or 100 mg/kg) for five days. At P17, the mice were perfused with fluorescein isothiocyanate-dextran, and flat-mounted retinas were used to measure nonperfused and neovascular tufts. In OIR mice, an intraperitoneal injection of EP reduced the nonperfused retinal area in the treatment group and significantly reduced the retinal neovascular tufts. In addition, EP inhibited the overexpression of HMGB1 in the retinas of OIR mice. These data suggest that EP could serve as an innovative pharmaceutical agent to prevent retinal neovascularization through inhibiting HMGB1 expression.

1. Introduction

Angiogenesis, the formation of new vessels from existing vessels, plays an important role in pathological conditions in various organs [1]. Pathological angiogenesis in the eye is the most common cause of blindness in all age groups. Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) occurs in children, diabetic retinopathy (DR) in young adults, and age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in the elderly [2]. It is important to understand the mechanism of underlying pathological neovascularization to identify new targets to treat these diseases. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is thought to be the major angiogenesis factor in ROP, DR, and AMD [3]. Recently, some evidence indicates that chronic inflammation is also implicated in the pathogenesis of retinal neovascularization [4, 5]. The relationship between chronic inflammation and pathogenic angiogenesis is widely accepted [6]. The high-mobility group box-1 (HMGB1) protein was initially discovered as a nuclear chromatin-binding protein that stabilizes nucleosome formation and facilitates transcription. Necrotic cell death can result in passive leakage of HMGB1 from the cell. HMGB1 can be actively secreted by various cell types, including activated monocytes and macrophages, and endothelial cells, after inflammatory stimuli [7, 8]. Extracellular HMGB1 functions as a proinflammatory cytokine [6, 9] and exhibits angiogenic effects [10, 11]. HMGB1 signals through the receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) leading to the activation of the transcription factor nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) and induces the expression of various leukocyte adhesion molecules proinflammatory cytokines, chemokines, and angiogenic factors [6, 9]. In a previous report, increased levels of HMGB1 were found in vitreous samples from patients with proliferative DR [12], and HMGB1 expression was upregulated in the retinas of diabetic mice [13].

Ethyl pyruvate (EP) is derived from pyruvate by the addition of an aliphatic ester group and is more stable and safer than pyruvate in inhibiting the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and inflammation [14]. EP is also a potent HMGB1 inhibitor [15]. Moreover, EP inhibits tumor angiogenesis and intracerebral hemorrhage-induced angiogenesis [16, 17]. However, the pathogenic role of HMGB1 and the effect of its inhibitor, EP, in pathological retinal neovascularization have remained uncertain. In the present study, we examined whether EP has a preventive effect against pathological retinal neovascularization and inhibits HMGB1 expression in a mouse model of oxygen-induced retinopathy (OIR).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. A Mouse Model of Oxygen Induced Retinopathy

OIR was induced in mouse (C57BL/6) pups according to Smith et al. [18] with some modifications [19]. Briefly, postnatal day 7 (P7) mice, with their nursing mothers, were exposed to hyperoxia ( % oxygen) for five days (P7–P11) to produce retinal vasoobliteration and then returned to normoxia (room air) for five days (P12–P16) to induce ischemic retinal neovascularization. At P12, after the pups were exposed to 75% oxygen, they were randomly assigned to three groups: EP-50 (50 mg/kg/day), EP-100 (100 mg/kg/day), and the OIR. The normal group was maintained in room air from birth until postnatal day 17 (P17). EP (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was diluted with Hartmann’s solution (6.0 g NaCl, 0.3 g KCl, 0.2 g CaCl2·2H2O, and 3.1 g C3H5NaO3/L, Choongwae Pharma, Republic of Korea). The pups were injected in 100 μL intraperitoneally once a day for five days. In the normal group, Hartmann’s solution was injected. At P17, after five days of intraperitoneal injection, the mice were anesthetized and sacrificed. These experiments were repeated four times by four animals in each group. All of the experiments were approved by the Korean Institute of Oriental Medicine Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

2.2. Fluorescein-Dextran Microscopy

At P17, the mice were deeply anesthetized and then 0.1 mL of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 5 mg of fluorescein-dextran (FD40S, Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) was circulated through the left ventricle. The retinas were dissected, flat mounted onto glass slides, and viewed by fluorescence microscopy (BX51, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). Quantification of the central nonperfused area of the retina was performed using the ImageJ software (NIH, MD, USA).

2.3. Lectin Staining

Flat-mounted retinas were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 3 h at room temperature. The retinas were washed with PBS and then incubated for 3 h on an orbital shaker at room temperature with 5% Triton X-100 and 1% BSA. The retinas were washed with PBS and incubated overnight at 4°C with Bandeiraea simplicifolia isolectin B4 (1 : 50, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) diluted in PBS. The retinas were washed with 0.05% Tween 20 in PBS followed by incubation with streptavidin TRITC (1 : 500, Serotec, Oxford, UK) for 4 h at 37°C.

2.4. Protein Extraction and Western Blot

Protein was extracted from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded retinas. Retinal tissue sections were deparaffinized, hydrated with water, and pelleted. The samples were added in extraction buffer, 20 mM Tris HCl buffers (pH 4) with 2% SDS, incubated on ice for 5 min, and mixed by vortexing then boiled at 100°C for 20 min followed by an optional incubation at 80°C for 2 hours. After protein extraction, any remaining unsolubilized material was pelleted at 14000 ×g for 20 min, and protein concentration of total protein extracted was determined by the BCA Protein Assay (Pierce Chemicals Co., Rockford, IL,USA) [20]. The protein was separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to PVDF membrane (Biorad, CA, USA). Membrane was probed with anti-HMGB1 antibody (Abcam, MA, USA) and anti β-actin antibody (Sigma, MO, USA), and then the immune complexes were visualized with an enhanced chemiluminescence detection system (Amersham Bioscience, NJ, USA).

2.5. Histopathology and Immunohistochemistry

Mice from all of the groups were sacrificed on P17. The eyes were removed and fixed with Davidson’s solution at room temperature for 24 h and embedded in paraffin. The paraffin sections were deparaffinized, hydrated with water, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. For immunohistochemical HMGB1 staining, paraffin sections were deparaffinized, rinsed with 3% hydrogen peroxide, and boiled in citrate buffer (pH 6.0) for 15 min. These sections were washed with PBS, blocked with CAS-Block (Invitrogen, CA, USA) for 30 min, and subsequently incubated overnight at 4°C with a rabbit anti-HMGB1 antibody (1 : 1000, Epitomics, CA, USA). After washing with PBS, the sections were incubated with polymer peroxidase-conjugated rabbit anti-IgG for 30 min at room temperature and were visualized using a 3,3′-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (ImmPACT DAB, VECTOR, CA, USA) solution and hematoxylin (VECTOR, CA, USA).

2.6. Statistical Analysis

The data were expressed as the mean ± SE and analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test or by an unpaired Student’s t-test using GraphPad Prism 6.0 software (GraphPad, CA, USA). Differences with a value of were considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Retinal Neovascularization and Expression of HMGB1 in the Retina of OIR Mice

HMGB1 has been recognized as a proinflammatory cytokine and more recently as a proangiogenic factor [6, 9]. We therefore determined the expression levels of HMGB1 and its distribution in the retina of OIR mice by immunohistochemistry. First, retinal neovascularization was qualitatively analyzed using fluorescein angiography and quantitatively analyzed by counting neovascular tufts using isolectin B4 and H&E staining. The OIR mice showed a characteristic loss of central retinal vessels by P12, followed by hypoxia-induced regeneration of the central vascular plexus and the development of preretinal neovascularization [18]. In the OIR group, the neovascular response occurred predominantly at the junction between the nonperfused retina and perfused retina. The retinas of OIR mice had an area of multiple neovascular tufts (Figures 1 and 2). In western blot analysis and immunohistochemical staining for HMGB1, we found that HMGB1 was increased in the retinas of OIR mice compared with the control group (Figures 3 and 4). HMGB1 is highly expressed in ganglion cells, inner nuclear layers, outer nuclear layer, and retinal vasculatures, and HMGB1 levels were higher in the inner nuclear layer than the outer nuclear layer in OIR mice (Figure 4). Elevated expression of HMGB1 was detected in the nuclei as well as in the cytoplasm in OIR mice. These results suggest that HMGB1 is highly produced and translocates into the cytoplasm in retina of OIR mice. It was previously reported that a dramatic alteration of retinal gene expression occurred in OIR mice [21], and a high level of retinal HMGB1 expression might be related to active gene transcription [22]. Thus, an increase in HMGB1 might be related to active angiogenic-related gene transcription.

fig1
Figure 1: The effect of EP on retinal neovascularization in OIR mice. (a) The retinal vasculature was determined by fluorescein angiography using FITC-dextran. Whole mount retinal preparation from P17 control (Con), OIR (OIR), 50 mg/kg EP-treated (EP-50), and 100 mg/kg EP-treated (EP-100) mice. (b) Quantitative analyses revealed that EP treatment significantly reduced the area of neovascularization in retinas compared with OIR. The data are expressed as the mean ± SE . versus the OIR group.
fig2
Figure 2: The effect of EP on retinal neovascular tufts in OIR mice. (a) The retinal neovascular tufts were determined using isolectin B4 staining. The retinal preparation from P17 control (Con), OIR (OIR), 50 mg/kg EP-treated (EP-50), and 100 mg/kg EP-treated (EP-100) mice. (b) The arrows indicate neovascular tufts of intravitreous neovascularization. Hematoxylin and eosin-stained cross-section preparations are from P17 OIR (OIR) 50 mg/kg EP-treated (EP-50) and 100 mg/kg EP-treated (EP-100) mice. (c) Quantitative analyses revealed that EP treatment significantly reduced the retinal neovascular tufts compared with OIR. The data are expressed as the mean ± SE . versus the OIR group.
fig3
Figure 3: The effect of EP on retinal of HMGB1 expression in OIR mice. Western blot analysis in retina tissue from control (Con), OIR (OIR), 50 mg/kg EP-treated (EP-50), and 100 mg/kg EP-treated (EP-100) mice. The data are expressed as the mean ± SE . versus the OIR group.
fig4
Figure 4: The effect of EP on retinal of HMGB1 expression in OIR mice. (a) Representative photomicrographs of retinal sections labeled with an anti-HMGB1 antibody. Retinas from control (Con), OIR (OIR), 50 mg/kg EP-treated (EP-50), and 100 mg/kg EP-treated (EP-100) mice. (b) Morphological quantitative analyses of nuclei (c) and cytoplasm (d) HMGB1-positive signal intensity. The data are expressed as the mean ± SE . versus the Con group.
3.2. The Effect of EP on Retinal Neovascularization and HMGB1 Expression in OIR Mice

EP is a potent HMGB1 inhibitor [15]. To further investigate the proangiogenic role of HMGB1, we examined whether EP has a preventive effect against pathological retinal neovascularization and inhibits HMGB1 expression. To test whether pharmacological inhibition of HMGB1 decreases pathological retinal neovascularization, the mice were injected intraperitoneally with EP from P12 to P16. The OIR mice induced the formation of neovascular tufts that penetrate the internal limiting membrane of the retina (Figure 2). Five days after the injection (at P17), there were dose-dependently fewer neovascular tufts in the EP-injected eyes compared to the OIR group (Figure 4, ). Moreover, the treatment with EP significantly reduced retinal HMGB1 expression in OIR mice (Figures 3 and 4). It thus seemed that HMGB1 in the retina of OIR mice has a proangiogenic role and EP has an antiangiogenic effect via inhibition of the production and release of HMGB1. In addition, the retinas of OIR mice had an area of nonperfusion in the center, tortuous vessels (Figure 1). However, the EP (100 mg/kg)-treated mice had a significantly smaller nonperfused area compared to controls (Figure 1, ). This result suggests that EP treatment elicits retinal revascularization in OIR mice.

4. Discussion

Retinal neovascularization (RNV) is a major cause of blindness associated with ischemic retinopathy [2, 23]. OIR is a well-established animal model of proliferative ischemic retinopathy. In the OIR model, revascularization of the vasoobliteration (VO) area has progressed farther and pathologic neovascularization formation is at its maximum at P17. The VO area is then fully revascularized in all of the layers, and neovascularization is completely resolved at P25 [24]. In this study, to verify the pathogenic role of HMGB1 in retinal neovascularization, we determined the expression levels of HMGB1 and its distribution in the retina of OIR mice and examined whether EP, a well-known HMGB1 inhibitor, could prevent this retinal neovascularization in OIR mice. We showed that nuclear and cytoplasmic overexpression of HMGB1 and subsequent angiogenesis occurred in OIR mice. However, the treatment with EP dramatically promoted stable vascular growth and blocked retinal pathologic neovascularization. Based on these results, it is likely that the retinal pathogenic angiogenesis that occurs in ischemic retinopathy could also be linked to increases in HMGB1 expression.

Several angiogenic growth factors and cytokines are involved in the pathogenesis of retinal neovascularization [2527]. A critical role for HMGB1 in angiogenesis has been recently suggested by Wake et al. who reported that histidine-rich glycoproteins block HMGB1-heparin complex-induced vessel sprouting in Matrigel plugs [28]. HMGB1 signals through the RAGE leading to activation of the transcription fact or nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) and induces the expression of various angiogenic factors [9, 29]. HMGB1 and RAGE are expressed by vascular endothelial cells [30]. HMGB1 administration significantly increases the levels of growth factors, including VEGF, released by cultured human cardiac fibroblasts [31]. Although concrete evidence of HMGB1-induced retinal angiogenesis is lacking, our findings suggest that HMGB1 might provide the mechanistic link between ischemic retinopathy and pathogenic angiogenesis.

In OIR, ROS are increased in the retina and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase is activated, causing apoptosis in endothelial cells, which contributes to avascular retinas [32]. NADPH oxidase activation is exacerbated, contributing to angiogenic blood vessel growth into the vitreous [33]. ROS are increased in the retina, which directly correlates with VEGF expression and angiogenesis [34]. In addition, oxidative stress in various cells is induced in ischemic injury, and then HMGB1 is actively secreted into the extracellular environment under these conditions [35]. Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and the loss of superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1) mediated oxidative stress promote cytosolic HMGB1 expression and extracellular release [36]. Although we did not test the retinal oxidative status in our OIR mice, these findings suggest that increased retinal HMGB1 expression might be mediated through retinal ROS generation.

In this study, we showed that EP treatment prevents the overexpression of nuclear and cytoplasmic HMGB1 and retinal pathogenic angiogenesis in OIR mice. EP has salutary effects in lethal sepsis and systemic inflammation [15], hemorrhagic shock [37], and stroke [38] and pressure-induced retinal damage [39] and ameliorates murine colitis [40] and renal ischemia and reperfusion injury [41]. The pharmacological effects of EP include amelioration of redox-mediated damage to cells and tissues and the scavenging of ROS [16, 42]. EP regulates the activation of the expression of inflammatory proteins such as IL-6 and TNF-α and the inflammatory transcription factor NF-κB [43, 44]. Recently, it was reported that EP has anti-HMGB1 activity. This pharmacological agent has been shown to interfere specifically with HMGB1 released from the nucleus into the extracellular space [15]. In a previous study, EP prevented the increase of HMGB1 mRNA expression after RAW264.7 cells were stimulated with LPS [45]. Although EP is expected to exert an antioxidant effect, EP could be a potent HMGB1 inhibitor. This observation suggests that the antiangiogenic effect of EP is attributable, at least in part, to not only its antioxidative but also HMGB1-inhibitory properties. Therefore, to confirm a proangiogenic role of HMGB1, we also performed a similar animal study using a selective inhibitor of HMGB1, glycyrrhizin (GL). GL is a triterpenoid saponin glycoside of glycyrrhizic acid and its mechanism of action is different from EP. EP inhibits the expression and cytoplasmic release of HMGB1 but do not bind directly to HMGB1 and thus cannot block its extracellular functions. In contrast, GL does not interfere with HMGB1 release, but directly inhibit its extracellular cytokine activities [46]. GL treatment also significantly reduced the area of neovascularization in retinas compared with OIR (see Supplementary data in Supplementary Material available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/245271). This observation also strongly supports the proangiogenic role of HMGB1 in OIR mice.

In conclusion, our study shows for the first time that EP inhibits the retinal pathogenic angiogenesis induced by ischemic retinopathy in OIR mice. In addition, HMGB1 overexpression induced by ischemic retinopathy was significantly inhibited by treatment with EP. These observations suggest that EP acts through an anti-HMGB1 mechanism to protect against retinal pathogenic angiogenesis. Taken together, these results indicate that treatment with EP could be a valuable therapeutic approach in the treatment or prevention of ischemic retinopathy.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Acknowledgment

This research was supported a grant [K13040] from the Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine (KIOM).

References

  1. J. Folkman, “Angiogenesis,” Annual Review of Medicine, vol. 57, pp. 1–18, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. L. P. Aiello, R. L. Avery, P. G. Arrigg et al., “Vascular endothelial growth factor in ocular fluid of patients with diabetic retinopathy and other retinal disorders,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 331, no. 22, pp. 1480–1487, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. M. B. Schulze, K. Hoffmann, H. Boeing et al., “An accurate risk score based on anthropometric, dietary, and lifestyle factors to predict the development of type 2 diabetes,” Diabetes Care, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 510–515, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. A. M. Joussen, V. Poulaki, M. L. Le et al., “A central role for inflammation in the pathogenesis of diabetic retinopathy,” Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology Journal, vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 1450–1452, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. A. M. Abu El-Asrar, S. Struyf, D. Kangave, K. Geboes, and J. Van Damme, “Chemokines in proliferative diabetic retinopathy and proliferative vitreoretinopathy,” European Cytokine Network, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 155–165, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J. R. van Beijnum, W. A. Buurman, and A. W. Griffioen, “Convergence and amplification of toll-like receptor (TLR) and receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) signaling pathways via high mobility group B1 (HMGB1),” Angiogenesis, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 91–99, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. M. T. Lotze and K. J. Tracey, “High-mobility group box 1 protein (HMGB1): nuclear weapon in the immune arsenal,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 331–342, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. W. Jiang, J. Li, M. Gallowitsch-Puerta, K. J. Tracey, and D. S. Pisetsky, “The effects of CpG DNA on HMGB1 release by murine macrophage cell lines,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 78, no. 4, pp. 930–936, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. C. J. Treutiger, G. E. Mullins, A.-S. M. Johansson et al., “High mobility group 1 B-box mediates activation of human endothelium,” Journal of Internal Medicine, vol. 254, no. 4, pp. 375–385, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. R. van Beijnum, P. Nowak-Sliwinska, E. van den Boezem, P. Hautvast, W. A. Buurman, and A. W. Griffioen, “Tumor angiogenesis is enforced by autocrine regulation of high-mobility group box 1,” Oncogene, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 363–374, 2013. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. S. Mitola, M. Belleri, C. Urbinati et al., “Cutting edge: extracellular high mobility group box-1 protein is a proangiogenic cytokine,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 176, no. 1, pp. 12–15, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. A. M. Abu El-Asrar, M. I. Nawaz, D. Kangave, M. Abouammoh, and G. Mohammad, “High-mobility group box-1 and endothelial cell angiogenic markers in the vitreous from patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy,” Mediators of Inflammation, vol. 2012, Article ID 697489, 7 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. A. M. A. El-Asrar, M. I. Nawaz, D. Kangave et al., “High-mobility group box-1 and biomarkers of inflammation in the vitreous from patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy,” Molecular Vision, vol. 17, pp. 1829–1838, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. P. Fink, “Ethyl pyruvate: a novel anti-inflammatory agent,” Journal of Internal Medicine, vol. 261, no. 4, pp. 349–362, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. L. Ulloa, M. Ochani, H. Yang et al., “Ethyl pyruvate prevents lethality in mice with established lethal sepsis and systemic inflammation,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 99, no. 19, pp. 12351–12356, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. S.-Y. Park, E.-Y. Yi, M. Jung, Y. M. Lee, and Y.-J. Kim, “Ethyl pyruvate, an anti-inflammatory agent, inhibits tumor angiogenesis through inhibition of the NF-κB signaling pathway,” Cancer Letters, vol. 303, no. 2, pp. 150–154, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. C. Lei, S. Lin, C. Zhang et al., “Effects of high-mobility group box1 on cerebral angiogenesis and neurogenesis after intracerebral hemorrhage,” Neuroscience, vol. 229, pp. 12–19, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  18. L. E. H. Smith, E. Wesolowski, A. McLellan et al., “Oxygen-induced retinopathy in the mouse,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 101–111, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. J. H. Kim, B. J. Lee, J. H. Kim, Y. S. Yu, and K.-W. Kim, “Anti-angiogenic effect of caffeic acid on retinal neovascularization,” Vascular Pharmacology, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 262–267, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. H. Guo, W. Liu, Z. Ju et al., “An efficient procedure for protein extraction from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues for reverse phase protein arrays,” Proteome Science, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 56–67, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  21. K. Ishikawa, S. Yoshida, K. Kadota et al., “Gene expression profile of hyperoxic and hypoxic retinas in a mouse model of oxygen-induced retinopathy,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 51, no. 8, pp. 4307–4319, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. N. Arimura, Y. Ki-I, T. Hashiguchi et al., “Intraocular expression and release of high-mobility group box 1 protein in retinal detachment,” Laboratory Investigation, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 278–289, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. S. X. Zhang and J.-X. Ma, “Ocular neovascularization: implication of endogenous angiogenic inhibitors and potential therapy,” Progress in Retinal and Eye Research, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 1–37, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. A. Stahl, K. M. Connor, P. Sapieha et al., “The mouse retina as an angiogenesis model,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 2813–2826, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. S. Ishida, T. Usui, K. Yamashiro et al., “VEGF164-mediated inflammation is required for pathological, but not physiological, ischemia-induced retinal neovascularization,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 198, no. 3, pp. 483–489, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. H. Ozaki, M.-S. Seo, K. Ozaki et al., “Blockade of vascular endothelial cell growth factor receptor signaling is sufficient to completely prevent retinal neovascularization,” The American Journal of Pathology, vol. 156, no. 2, pp. 697–707, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. G. K. Kolluru, S. C. Bir, and C. G. Kevil, “Endothelial dysfunction and diabetes: effects on angiogenesis, vascular remodeling, and wound healing,” International Journal of Vascular Medicine, vol. 2012, Article ID 918267, 30 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. H. Wake, S. Mori, K. Liu, H. K. Takahashi, and M. Nishibori, “Histidine-rich glycoprotein inhibited high mobility group box1 in complex with heparin-induced angiogenesis in matrigel plug assay,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 623, no. 1–3, pp. 89–95, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. C. Fiuza, M. Bustin, S. Talwar et al., “Inflammation-promoting activity of HMGB1 on human microvascular endothelial cells,” Blood, vol. 101, no. 7, pp. 2652–2660, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. A. M. A. El-Asrar, L. Missotten, and K. Geboes, “Expression of high-mobility groups box-1/receptor for advanced glycation end products/osteopontin/early growth response-1 pathway in proliferative vitreoretinal epiretinal membranes,” Molecular Vision, vol. 17, pp. 508–518, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. A. Rossini, A. Zacheo, D. Mocini et al., “HMGB1-stimulated human primary cardiac fibroblasts exert a paracrine action on human and murine cardiac stem cells,” Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 683–693, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. Y. Saito, P. Geisen, A. Uppal, and M. E. Hartnett, “Inhibition of NAD(P)H oxidase reduces apoptosis and avascular retina in an animal model of retinopathy of prematurity,” Molecular Vision, vol. 13, pp. 840–853, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. Y. Saito, A. Uppal, G. Byfield, S. Budd, and M. E. Hartnett, “Activated NAD(P)H oxidase from supplemental oxygen induces neovascularization independent of VEGF in retinopathy of prematurity model,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 1591–1598, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. P. I. Lelkes, K. L. Hahn, D. A. Sukovich, S. Karmiol, and D. H. Schmidt, “On the possible role of reactive oxygen species in angiogenesis,” Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol. 454, pp. 295–310, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. D. Tang, R. Kang, H. J. Zeh III, and M. T. Lotze, “High-mobility group box 1, oxidative stress, and disease,” Antioxidants and Redox Signaling, vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 1315–1335, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. R. Kang, K. M. Livesey, H. J. Zeh III, M. T. Lotze, and D. Tang, “HMGB1 as an autophagy sensor in oxidative stress,” Autophagy, vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 904–906, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. P. D. Mongan, J. Capacchione, J. L. Fontana, S. West, and R. Bünger, “Pyruvate improves cerebral metabolism during hemorrhagic shock,” The American Journal of Physiology, vol. 281, no. 2, pp. H854–H864, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. J. Y. Lee, Y. H. Kim, and J. Y. Koh, “Protection by pyruvate against transient forebrain ischemia in rats,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 21, no. 20, Article ID RC171, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. M. H. Yoo, J.-Y. Lee, S. E. Lee, J.-Y. Koh, and Y. H. Yoon, “Protection by pyruvate of rat retinal cells against zinc toxicity in vitro, and pressure-induced ischemia in vivo,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 1523–1530, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. S. H. Davé, J. S. Tilstra, K. Matsuoka et al., “Ethyl pyruvate decreases HMGB1 release and ameliorates murine colitis,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 633–643, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. K.-Y. Chung, J.-J. Park, and Y. S. Kim, “The role of high-mobility group box-1 in renal ischemia and reperfusion injury and the effect of ethyl pyruvate,” Transplantation Proceedings, vol. 40, no. 7, pp. 2136–2138, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. K. K. Kao and M. P. Fink, “The biochemical basis for the anti-inflammatory and cytoprotective actions of ethyl pyruvate and related compounds,” Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 80, no. 2, pp. 151–159, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. R. Yang, D. J. Gallo, J. J. Baust et al., “Ethyl pyruvate modulates inflammatory gene expression in mice subjected to hemorrhagic shock,” The American Journal of Physiology, vol. 283, no. 1, pp. G212–G221, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. R. Yang, T. Uchiyama, S. M. Alber et al., “Ethyl pyruvate ameliorates distant organ injury in a murine model of acute necrotizing pancreatitis,” Critical Care Medicine, vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 1453–1459, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. C.-X. Wu, H. Sun, Q. Liu, H. Guo, and J.-P. Gong, “LPS induces HMGB1 relocation and release by activating the NF-κB-CBP signal transduction pathway in the murine macrophage-like cell line RAW264.7,” Journal of Surgical Research, vol. 175, no. 1, pp. 88–100, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. J.-P. Girard, “A Direct Inhibitor of HMGB1 Cytokine,” Chemistry and Biology, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 345–347, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus