Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Diabetes Research
Volume 2016, Article ID 4196460, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4196460
Research Article

Treatment with Tacrolimus and Sirolimus Reveals No Additional Adverse Effects on Human Islets In Vitro Compared to Each Drug Alone but They Are Reduced by Adding Glucocorticoids

1Department of Transplant Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4950, 0424 Oslo, Norway
2Institute for Surgical Research, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4950, 0424 Oslo, Norway
3Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1171, Blindern, 0318 Oslo, Norway
4Department of Pharmacology, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4950, 0424 Oslo, Norway
5Science for Life Laboratory, Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Box 815, 75108 Uppsala, Sweden
6Department of Clinical Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Rudbeck Laboratory, Uppsala University Hospital, 75185 Uppsala, Sweden
7School of Pharmacy, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1171, Blindern, 0318 Oslo, Norway

Received 30 September 2015; Revised 20 December 2015; Accepted 24 December 2015

Academic Editor: Laurent Crenier

Copyright © 2016 Kristine Kloster-Jensen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Tacrolimus and sirolimus are important immunosuppressive drugs used in human islet transplantation; however, they are linked to detrimental effects on islets and reduction of long-term graft function. Few studies investigate the direct effects of these drugs combined in parallel with single drug exposure. Human islets were treated with or without tacrolimus (30 μg/L), sirolimus (30 μg/L), or a combination thereof for 24 hrs. Islet function as well as apoptosis was assessed by glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS) and Cell Death ELISA. Proinflammatory cytokines were analysed by qRT-PCR and Bio-Plex. Islets exposed to the combination of sirolimus and tacrolimus were treated with or without methylprednisolone (1000 μg/L) and the expression of the proinflammatory cytokines was investigated. We found the following: (i) No additive reduction in function and viability in islets existed when tacrolimus and sirolimus were combined compared to the single drug. (ii) Increased expression of proinflammatory cytokines mRNA and protein levels in islets took place. (iii) Methylprednisolone significantly decreased the proinflammatory response in islets induced by the drug combination. Although human islets are prone to direct toxic effect of tacrolimus and sirolimus, we found no additive effects of the drug combination. Short-term exposure of glucocorticoids could effectively reduce the proinflammatory response in human islets induced by the combination of tacrolimus and sirolimus.

1. Introduction

Despite promising results in islet transplantation, glycaemic control is gradually impaired due to progressive graft dysfunction [1, 2]. The initial loss of islets immediately after islet transplantation is a result of inflammatory events and an alloantigen-nonspecific inflammatory process where inflammatory cytokines play a part in cellular injury to islets. Another major reason for graft dysfunction is toxicity caused by the use of immunosuppressive drug therapy. The common immunosuppressive protocols used in clinical islet transplantation include induction therapy with either ATG or IL-2 receptor monoclonal antibody, followed by maintenance treatment including that of tacrolimus and sirolimus [1]. Tacrolimus, a CNI (calcineurin inhibitor), is the pillar of immunosuppressive therapy in both solid organ and islet transplantation because of its efficacy in preventing acute rejection and improving short-term graft survival [1, 3]. Tacrolimus inhibits insulin secretion and reduces islets viability [46]. Sirolimus is an mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) inhibitor, which inhibits cell proliferation and reduces allograft rejection resulting in improved long-term graft survival [7, 8]. Sirolimus decreases insulin secretion in islets, impairs revascularization, and reduces angiogenesis [911]; however the impact of these effects on transplanted islets is not fully characterized [12]. To what extent the combination treatment of sirolimus and tacrolimus shows additive toxicity to islets is not fully elucidated and few studies compare the direct effects on human islets of this drug combination in vitro [13, 14].

The instant inflammatory reaction observed in the peritransplant period after human islet transplantation leads to loss of more than 50% of the injected islets within the first hour [2, 15, 16]. Several approaches such as inhibition of specific cytokines such as TNF alpha and IL-1beta have been studied to evaluate potency in helping reduce this effect [17, 18]. Glucocorticoids are well-known immunosuppressive agents in transplantation, with strong anti-inflammatory properties by inhibiting production of several cytokine and chemokine. But because glucocorticoids have diabetogenic effects in vivo and directly impair insulin secretion, they have mostly been excluded from the immunosuppressive regimens in clinical islet transplantation after presentation of the Edmonton protocol. We have previously shown that short-term use of methylprednisolone during islet culturing prior to transplantation is effective for maintaining islet viability by reducing the proinflammatory cytokines production even though insulin secretion was temporarily suppressed [19].

This study was undertaken to elaborate on the direct effects of the combination treatment with tacrolimus and sirolimus on the function and viability in human islets compared to the effect of each drug alone. Finally we also investigated the effect of methylprednisolone, a glucocorticoid, on human islets after treatment with the combination of tacrolimus and sirolimus.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Islet Isolation and Culture

Human islets were isolated from 5 human pancreata obtained from multiorgan donors (one female and four males) after appropriate consent in the islet isolation laboratory facility at The Nordic Network for Clinical Islet Transplantation, Uppsala University Hospital, Sweden, according to the automated method refined by the Nordic Network for Islet Transplantation [20]. Approval of the experimental use of the islets was granted by the local Institutional Ethical Committee and performed in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki 2000. The average donor age was 53 years (range 39–60 years), the body mass index (BMI) 26.6 kg/m2 (range 22–32 kg/m2). All donors met the criteria with glycosylated haemoglobin A1c below 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) [21]. Islet preparations were maintained in culture medium CMRL1066 (Mediatech), supplemented with 10% ABO-compatible serum, 10 mM Hepes, and 1% penicillin/streptomycin/L-glutamine (Invitrogen), at 37°C (5% CO2) for the first 24 hours after isolation. After a medium change, the islets were maintained at 22°C (5% CO2) until being used in experiments.

2.2. Immunosuppressive Drugs and Culturing

Between 2 and 5 days after isolation, equal aliquots of clinical grade islet preparations (purities from 75 ± 20% and viability of 85 5%) were placed into 90 mm Petri dishes and cultured with tacrolimus 30 µg/L (37 nM), sirolimus 30 µg/L (33 nM) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), or the combination thereof for 24 hours at 37°C (5% CO2). Each experiment comprised control and stimulated islets from the same donor. In parallel experiments methylprednisolone (1000 μg/L) was added or not to the combined treatment of tacrolimus and sirolimus for 24 hours at 37°C (5% CO2). We used our previous investigation into the blood through concentrations of methylprednisolone after a bolus dose of 500 mg intravenously in liver transplant recipients, to select the dose to use in in vitro exposure [22, 23]. We have also shown that 48 hours use of different doses of methylprednisolone to human islets in vitro reduced the viability and insulin secretion, without representing a durable detrimental effect [19]. Many transplant centers include a single dose of methylprednisolone as premedication prior to islet transplant [24]. Based on these findings, we selected 100 mg as the dose for the present study in order to investigate the anti-inflammatory effects of methylprednisolone on immunosuppressive exposed human islets.

Following treatment, cultured supernatants were collected and human islets were hand-picked into columns, washed two times with ice-cold phosphate buffered saline (PBS) before being used for either RNA extraction or lysed in 200 μL MiliQ water before homogenization by sonication, and then stored at −70°C until analyses with RT-PCR or multiplex bioassay (Bio-Plex human cytokine assay), respectively. The drug concentrations were selected to simulate toxic blood drug concentrations observed in portal vein immediately after transplantation [25]. Generally the therapeutic level of both FK506 (Tacrolimus) and rapamycin (Sirolimus) is assumed to be between 5 and 15 μg/L, although it may reach toxic levels of 20–25 μg/L [26]. Animal studies have shown that portal vein peak concentrations after 12 hours of tacrolimus and sirolimus are 5–7 times higher than the mean 24 hours through systemic level [25]. To represent a high level of drug concentration we therefor chose to use 30 μg/L. All drugs were solved in methanol and diluted in cell culture medium to reach their final concentrations.

2.3. Glucose-Stimulated Insulin Secretion Assay

Following treatment, twenty islets were hand-picked, transferred into 12 Transwell trays (Costar, Cambridge, MA, USA), and preincubated in Krebs-Ringer bicarbonate buffer (11.5 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM KCl, 2.4 mM NaHCO3, 2.2 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, 20 mM HEPES, and 2 mg/L albumin: all Sigma-Aldrich) containing 1.67 mmol/L glucose (Fresenius Kabi, Halden, Norway) at 37°C (5% CO2) for 30 min before the islets were incubated for 40 min in fresh Krebs-Ringer bicarbonate buffer containing 1.67 mmol/L glucose (basal insulin secretion). Finally, the islets were incubated for 40 min in fresh Krebs-Ringer bicarbonate buffer containing 20.0 mmol/L glucose (for stimulated insulin secretion). The supernatants were subsequently collected, and insulin concentration was measured using a human insulin enzyme immunoassay (EIA) (Mercodia AB, Uppsala, Sweden). Stimulation index (SI) expresses the islets capacity for insulin secretion and is calculated as the ratio of insulin secretion at 20.0 mmol/L to 1.67 mmol/L glucose/40 min.

2.4. Detection of Cell Apoptosis and Cell Death

Assessment of apoptosis in islets was measured by the detection of DNA-histone complexes present in the cytoplasmic fraction of the cells using Cell Death Detection (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) according to the instructions of the manufacturer.

2.5. Real-Time Quantitative PCR

Total RNA was isolated from frozen islet pellets using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to manufacturer’s guidelines. The concentration of all RNA samples was quantified using a NanoDrop ND-1000 UV/Vis spectrophotometer (Saveen Werner AB, Sweden), and 1 μg total RNA was reverse-transcribed using the High-Capacity cDNA Archive Kit according to the instructions of the manufacturer (Applied Biosystems, Forster City, CA, USA). Quantification of mRNA expression was performed using the following TaqMan assays: human IL-1β: Hs00174097m1 and IL-8: Hs00174103m1 with an ABI 7900HT Fast Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems). Results were normalised to the housekeeping gene beta-actin and data were analysed using the method.

2.6. Measurement of Proinflammatory Cytokines

Concentrations of IL-8 and IL-6 were measured in islet lysate utilizing multiplex technology on a Multiplex Analyser (BioRad, Hercules, CA) following the instructions of the manufacturer. Each sample was correlated to the protein content of the islet lysate measured by protein assay kit (BCA; Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA).

2.7. Statistical Analyses

Results are presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical analyses were performed with Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by unpaired -test. Differences were considered significant at levels of . Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 5.0 (GraphPad Software, CA, USA).

3. Results

3.1. No Additive Adverse Effect on Human Islet Function by the Combination Treatment with Tacrolimus and Sirolimus Compared to Tacrolimus Alone

To investigate the effect of tacrolimus and sirolimus on human islets function compared to either drug alone, we performed a glucose challenge test after 24 hours of exposure to either tacrolimus or sirolimus or the combination thereof. The insulin release from control islets was significantly increased in response to stimulation with high glucose (20 mM) solution compared to low glucose (1.67 mM) solution (Figure 1(a)). The combination treatment of tacrolimus and sirolimus resulted in a slight increase of basal insulin secretion and a reduced glucose-stimulated insulin secretion after stimulation with high glucose solution (Figure 1(a)). These results lead to a significant reduction of the stimulation index (SI) compared to untreated islets (; Figure 1(b)). When methylprednisolone was added to the combination treatment we found no altered basal insulin secretion level in human islets after incubation in low glucose solution, whereas we found reduced insulin secretion after 1 hour in high glucose solution (Figure 1(a)), which led to a reduced SI (; Figure 1(b)). As previously reported, tacrolimus treated islets show a significant reduction in capacity for stimulated insulin secretion (Figure 1(a)) [4] with no effects on the insulin content [5]. This suppression of high glucose-induced insulin release is also expressed by the reduced stimulation index compared to untreated control (; Figure 1(b)). Following the incubation with sirolimus alone, the islets presented an almost normal insulin secretion both at basal and at stimulated level (), in accordance with previous findings [12]. Importantly when we compared the effects of the combination to each drug alone, we did not find additional deleterious effects of the combined treatment compared to tacrolimus alone on the GSIS in human islets (Figures 1(a) and 1(b)).

Figure 1: The effect of immunosuppressant drugs on human islets function and survival. Human islets treated without or with tacrolimus (TAC 30 µg/L), sirolimus (SRL 30 µg/L), or a combination thereof with or without methylprednisolone (MP 100 ng/L) for 24 h. (a) Glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS) and (b) corresponding stimulation index (SI) (ratio stimulated to basal glucose-stimulated insulin secretion) in human islets as described in Section 2. (c) Apoptotic cell death measured by the Cell Death Detection in human islet following the same culture conditions. Data are presented as means ± SEM of five separate experiments from five different donors. , versus control.
3.2. The Combination Treatment of Tacrolimus and Sirolimus Induced Apoptosis in Human Islets

In order to investigate its potential role in the reduction of islets function, we characterized apoptosis by measurements of the double-stranded DNA breaks using Cell Death . Human islets treated with the combination of tacrolimus and sirolimus or sirolimus alone showed a significantly increased apoptosis (; Figure 1(c)) whereas tacrolimus exposure alone did not affect the apoptosis. In addition, the combination of tacrolimus and sirolimus with methylprednisolone showed no significant difference compared to untreated controls suggesting that methylprednisolone helps reduce apoptosis in islets exposed to the drug combination.

3.3. Treatment with Tacrolimus and Sirolimus Induces Expression of Proinflammatory Cytokines

To further characterize the molecular mechanisms associated with the detrimental effect of tacrolimus and sirolimus, we studied the expression (mRNA and protein) of the proinflammatory cytokines, IL-8, IL-6, and IL-1beta, known mediatorscausing pancreatic islet dysfunction and apoptosis [27, 28]. We found increased mRNA expression levels of IL-1beta (Figure 2(a)) and IL-8 (Figure 2(b)) in human islets after exposure to the combined treatment with tacrolimus and sirolimus as well as each of the drugs alone, compared to untreated controls. However, no additive elevation of the mRNA expression of neither IL-1beta (Figure 2(a)) nor IL-8 (Figure 2(b)) in the combination treatment compared to either drug alone was observed. Correspondingly, we found a significant increased protein expression of IL-8 (Figure 3(a)) and IL-6 (Figure 3(b)) in human islets.

Figure 2: The effect of immunosuppressant drugs on gene expression of IL-1beta and IL-8 in human islets. Human islets cultured without or with tacrolimus (TAC 30 µg/L), sirolimus (SRL 30 µg/L), or a combination thereof for 24 hours were tested for gene expression of (a) IL-1beta and (b) IL-8 by qPCR in relation to the control gene -actin. Data are presented as mean ± SEM of four separate experiments from four different donors. , , and < 0.0001 versus control.
Figure 3: The effect of immunosuppressant drugs on protein release of IL-8 and IL-6 in human islets. Human islets cultured without or with tacrolimus (TAC 30 µg/L), sirolimus (SRL 30 µg/L), or a combination thereof for 24 hours. Protein levels of (a) IL-8 and (b) IL-6 in human islets were investigated in cell lysate using multiplex bead-based cytokine assay (Bio-Plex Human Cytokine Group 1). Data is presented as mean ± SEM of four separate experiments from four different donors. versus control.
3.4. Methylprednisolone Reduce the Proinflammatory Response Induced by the Combined Treatment with Tacrolimus and Sirolimus

Adding methylprednisolone to the combination treatment caused a significant reduction in gene expression of IL-8 () and IL-1beta () (Figure 4(a)) in the human islets. This reduction was followed by significantly reduced protein levels of IL-8 () and IL-6 () in human islets compared to the combination alone (Figure 4(b)).

Figure 4: The effect of methylprednisolone on the inflammatory potential in human islets. Human islets cultured with tacrolimus (TAC 30 µg/L), sirolimus (SRL 30 µg/L), with or without methylprednisolone (MP 1000 ng/L), for 24 hours were tested for (a) gene expression of IL-1beta and IL-8 and (b) protein release of IL-8 and IL-6. The fold change represents the expression of target genes in isolated islets relative to the -actin mRNA level. Data is presented as mean ± SEM of four separate experiments from four different donors. , , and versus control.

4. Discussion

Many studies compare the direct effects of immunosuppressive drug regimens on islets in vitro, but few are on human islets. And although a wide range of clinical observations involve drug regimens few studies compare the effects of regimens to the effects of the drugs alone [1, 29, 30].

In this study we investigate the impact of the combined drug therapy of tacrolimus and sirolimus on islets compared to the exposure to each drug alone. Also, we explore how this drug combination is influenced by methylprednisolone. In summary, we found that the combination of tacrolimus and sirolimus does not reduce human islet function and survival more than each of the drugs alone, nor does it further increase proinflammatory cytokine expression. Methylprednisolone reduced the proinflammatory cytokine expression induced by the combination of tacrolimus and sirolimus.

In our data islets function was reduced when exposed to tacrolimus whereas sirolimus exposure did not significantly influence islet function. This is consistent with clinical observations where islets cultured with the combination tacrolimus and sirolimus decrease GSIS [31, 32]. Despite different mechanisms of action, tacrolimus [4, 6] and sirolimus [12, 31, 33, 34] ultimately reduced islet function. Sirolimus is known to influence glucose homeostasis through reduction in mitochondrial ATP production, decrease in beta cell proliferation, and impairing of insulin secretion and resistance as a consequence of chronicle exposure [11, 35]. Since our study was an acute in vitro study it is likely that deteriorating effects of sirolimus would be masked by the short exposure time.

Apoptosis is a major cause of islet cell loss in the early posttransplantation period [36] and it is triggered by the isolation process, islet hypoxia [37], and proinflammatory cytokines [38]. Human islets exposed to either sirolimus or tacrolimus have been shown to induce apoptosis in human islets regardless of added dose [4, 9, 29]. But tacrolimus is also shown not to cause significant apoptosis in beta-cells [6, 39], which correlates well with our findings of no increase in cell death following tacrolimus exposure. Short time exposure of tacrolimus has recently been shown to highly suppress insulin secretion in human islets without changing intracellular insulin content or viability [40]. This is consistent with our study (Figure 1(c)) and others [6, 39]. Sirolimus reduced the survival of islets, supporting the findings from previous studies showing that sirolimus conclusively causes detrimental effects on beta-cells survival and cell apoptosis both in murine and in human beta-cells [9, 41] and increased apoptosis [9, 29].

Following islet transplantation proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-1beta and IL-8 are activated [42] suggesting an alloantigen nonspecific, inflammatory process [42, 43]. We observed a significantly increased expression of IL-1beta, IL-8, and IL-6 on mRNA and protein levels in islets exposed to tacrolimus and sirolimus equally in the combination and single drugs. Our observation could therefore illustrate a reciprocal inhibition of the two drugs [13] or that maximum intervention has been reached. Others have shown that sirolimus and tacrolimus have anti-inflammatory properties [4447]. Compared to our data they use longer exposure time and lower drug dose, which are reasonable explanations for these differences.

Tacrolimus and sirolimus are structurally similar and both bind to FK506 binding proteins to form immunosuppressive complexes; however they are not considered antagonistic to one another [48]. We found no significant difference in impact on islets exposed to the drug combinations compared to each drug alone. One explanation for this could be that tacrolimus and sirolimus exert opposite effects and inhibit the actions of each other [13, 14, 49]. Another explanation could be that both drugs act by means of a common immunosuppressant binding protein or yet unidentified intracellular proteins. We recently published a paper where we found a difference in intracellular uptake of drugs when tacrolimus and sirolimus are given in combination compared to separately [50]. Even though it has been debatable we cannot exclude an antagonism between tacrolimus and sirolimus [48, 51] or that there is a distinction between high and low dose being essential for the drug-drug interaction [52].

It is well known that corticosteroid induces hyperglycemia mainly by reducing insulin-mediated glucose uptake. But the direct beta-cells toxicity through inhibition of insulin production and secretion is still controversial; most likely it depends on dose and exposure time [19, 53]. Improvement in the outcome of islet transplantation after the Edmonton protocol is partially due to steroid-free immunosuppressive protocol [1]. To enhance therapeutic efficacy while minimizing the toxicity of each drug multiple immunosuppressive drugs are being used in transplantation. Due to proinflammatory cytokines impact on islet survival, induction therapy has shifted from interleukin-2 receptor antagonist alone to a variety of new T-cell depleting antibodies, TNF alpha inhibitors, CXCR1/2 blocker, and several others [1, 54]. Our findings support that induction treatment may be needed to reduce inflammatory reactions during transplantation. We found that methylprednisolone reduced cytokine and chemokine production from islet preparations; this accords well with previous findings [55, 56]. On the other hand steroids are also known to reduce insulin secretion from beta-cells [57]; fortunately this is not permanent state [19] and a brief exposure to steroids in the preculturing phase even improves survival in an experimental mouse model. The proinflammatory cytokine production caused by sirolimus and tacrolimus was suppressed by methylprednisolone. Because of their diabetogenic properties it is still controversial whether glucocorticoids are deleterious to islets in the acute phase of transplantation. Indeed, a new trend according to the latest CITR report demonstrates that glucocorticoids are used after first infusion in approximately 17% of islet transplant patients as part of the immunosuppressive treatment, while at 6 months only 6% use these drugs [1]. Our results support short-term use of methylprednisolone as an inhibitor of the cytokine release following tacrolimus and sirolimus.

In conclusion, the ex vivo exposure of human islets to tacrolimus, sirolimus, and the combination of the two reduces islet function and survival and increases proinflammatory cytokines in the islets. The proinflammatory response of the tacrolimus-sirolimus combination was reduced by short-term exposure to methylprednisolone. These findings provide a basis for further investigations into the drug interactions between tacrolimus and sirolimus that can help tailor immunosuppressive regimens for islet transplant recipients.

Abbreviations

CNI:Calcineurin inhibitor
GSIS:Glucose-stimulated insulin secretion.

Conflict of Interests

All authors state that they have no conflict of interests.

Authors’ Contribution

Kristine Kloster-Jensen, Afaf Sahraoui, Aksel Foss, Olle Korsgren, and Hanne Scholz participated in the research design and reviewed/edited the paper, Nils Tore Vethe, Stein Bergan contributed to the scientific discussion and reviewed/edited the paper, and Kristine Kloster-Jensen, Hanne Scholz performed the experiments and wrote the paper.

Acknowledgments

Human islets were provided through the JDRF Award 31-2008-413 (ECIT Islet for Basic Research Programs). The authors are grateful to the Nordic Network for Clinical Islet Transplantation and thank Odd Fellow Medical Research foundation, The Norwegian Diabetes Association, and a grant from South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority.

References

  1. F. B. Barton, M. R. Rickels, R. Alejandro et al., “Improvement in outcomes of clinical islet transplantation: 1999-2010,” Diabetes Care, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 1436–1445, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. O. Korsgren, T. Lundgren, M. Felldin et al., “Optimising islet engraftment is critical for successful clinical islet transplantation,” Diabetologia, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 227–232, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. T. R. Srinivas and H.-U. Meier-Kriesche, “Minimizing immunosuppression, an alternative approach to reducing side effects: objectives and interim result,” Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 3, supplement 2, pp. S101–S116, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. Bugliani, M. Masini, R. Liechti et al., “The direct effects of tacrolimus and cyclosporin A on isolated human islets: a functional, survival and gene expression study,” Islets, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 106–110, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. R. G. Radu, S. Fujimoto, E. Mukai et al., “Tacrolimus suppresses glucose-induced insulin release from pancreatic islets by reducing glucokinase activity,” American Journal of Physiology—Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 288, no. 2, pp. E365–E371, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. N. Rostambeigi, I. R. Lanza, P. P. Dzeja et al., “Unique cellular and mitochondrial defects mediate FK506-induced islet beta-cell dysfunction,” Transplantation, vol. 91, no. 6, pp. 615–623, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. B. Kaplan, Y. Qazi, and J. R. Wellen, “Strategies for the management of adverse events associated with mTOR inhibitors,” Transplantation Reviews, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 126–133, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. L. Rostaing and N. Kamar, “mTOR inhibitor/proliferation signal inhibitors: entering or leaving the field?” Journal of Nephrology, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 133–142, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. A. D. Barlow, J. Xie, C. E. Moore et al., “Rapamycin toxicity in MIN6 cells and rat and human islets is mediated by the inhibition of mTOR complex 2 (mTORC2),” Diabetologia, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 1355–1365, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. C. T. Bussiere, J. R. T. Lakey, A. M. J. Shapiro, and G. S. Korbutt, “The impact of the mTOR inhibitor sirolimus on the proliferation and function of pancreatic islets and ductal cells,” Diabetologia, vol. 49, no. 10, pp. 2341–2349, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. S.-B. Yang, H. Y. Lee, D. M. Young et al., “Rapamycin induces glucose intolerance in mice by reducing islet mass, insulin content, and insulin sensitivity,” Journal of Molecular Medicine, vol. 90, no. 5, pp. 575–585, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. S. Marcelli-Tourvieille, T. Hubert, E. Moerman et al., “In vivo and in vitro effect of sirolimus on insulin secretion,” Transplantation, vol. 83, no. 5, pp. 532–538, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. B. E. Bierer, P. S. Mattila, R. F. Standaert et al., “Two distinct signal transmission pathways in T lymphocytes are inhibited by complexes formed between an immunophilin and either FK506 or rapamycin,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 87, no. 23, pp. 9231–9235, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. R. E. Morris, B. M. Meiser, J. Wu, R. Shorthouse, and J. Wang, “Use of rapamycin for the suppression of alloimmune reactions in vivo: schedule dependence, tolerance induction, synergy with cyclosporine and FK 506, and effect on host-versus-graft and graft-versus-host reactions,” Transplantation Proceedings, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 521–524, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. A. Citro, E. Cantarelli, and L. Piemonti, “Anti-inflammatory strategies to enhance islet engraftment and survival,” Current Diabetes Reports, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 733–744, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. H. Johansson, A. Lukinius, L. Moberg et al., “Tissue factor produced by the endocrine cells of the islets of langerhans is associated with a negative outcome of clinical islet transplantation,” Diabetes, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 1755–1762, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. B. J. Hering, R. Kandaswamy, J. D. Ansite et al., “Single-donor, marginal-dose islet transplantation in patients with type 1 diabetes,” The Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 293, no. 7, pp. 830–835, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. M. McCall, R. Pawlick, T. Kin, and A. M. J. Shapiro, “Anakinra potentiates the protective effects of etanercept in transplantation of marginal mass human islets in immunodeficient mice,” American Journal of Transplantation, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 322–329, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. T. Lund, B. Fosby, O. Korsgren, H. Scholz, and A. Foss, “Glucocorticoids reduce pro-inflammatory cytokines and tissue factor in vitro and improve function of transplanted human islets in vivo,” Transplant International, vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 669–678, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. M. Goto, T. M. Eich, M. Felldin et al., “Refinement of the automated method for human islet isolation and presentation of a closed system for in vitro islet culture,” Transplantation, vol. 78, no. 9, pp. 1367–1375, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. M. Stahle, A. Foss, B. Gustafsson et al., “Clostripain, the missing link in the enzyme blend for efficient human islet isolation,” Transplantation Direct, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 1–6, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. I. Sæves, P.-D. Line, and S. Bergan, “The pharmacokinetics of prednisolone and prednisone in adult liver transplant recipients early after transplantation,” Therapeutic Drug Monitoring, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 452–459, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. I. Sæves, N. T. Vethe, and S. Bergan, “Quantification of 6 glucocorticoids in human plasma by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry: method development, validation, and assessment of matrix effects,” Therapeutic Drug Monitoring, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 402–410, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. A. M. Posselt, M. D. Bellin, M. Tavakol et al., “Islet transplantation in type 1 diabetics using an immunosuppressive protocol based on the anti-LFA-1 antibody efalizumab,” American Journal of Transplantation, vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 1870–1880, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. A. M. J. Shapiro, H. L. Gallant, G. H. Er et al., “The portal immunosuppressive storm: relevance to islet transplantation?” Therapeutic Drug Monitoring, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 35–37, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. S. M. Tsunoda and F. T. Aweeka, “Drug concentration monitoring of immunosuppressive agents: focus on tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and sirolimus,” BioDrugs, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 355–369, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. N. R. Barshes, S. Wyllie, and J. A. Goss, “Inflammation-mediated dysfunction and apoptosis in pancreatic islet transplantation: implications for intrahepatic grafts,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 77, no. 5, pp. 587–597, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. S. Negi, A. Jetha, R. Aikin, C. Hasilo, R. Sladek, and S. Paraskevas, “Analysis of beta-cell gene expression reveals inflammatory signaling and evidence of dedifferentiation following human islet isolation and culture,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 1, Article ID e30415, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. J. D. Johnson, Z. Ao, P. Ao et al., “Different effects of FK506, rapamycin, and mycophenolate mofetil on glucose-stimulated insulin release and apoptosis in human islets,” Cell Transplantation, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 833–845, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. B. W. Paty, J. S. Harmon, C. L. Marsh, and R. P. Robertson, “Inhibitory effects of immunosuppressive drugs on insulin secretion from HIT-T15 cells and Wistar rat islets,” Transplantation, vol. 73, no. 3, pp. 353–357, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. P. Gillard, Z. Ling, C. Mathieu et al., “Comparison of sirolimus alone with sirolimus plus tacrolimus in type 1 diabetic recipients of cultured islet cell grafts,” Transplantation, vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 256–263, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. D. L. Roelen, V. A. L. Huurman, R. Hilbrands et al., “Relevance of cytotoxic alloreactivity under different immunosuppressive regimens in clinical islet cell transplantation,” Clinical and Experimental Immunology, vol. 156, no. 1, pp. 141–148, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. N. Niclauss, D. Bosco, P. Morel, L. Giovannoni, T. Berney, and G. Parnaud, “Rapamycin impairs proliferation of transplanted islet β cells,” Transplantation, vol. 91, no. 7, pp. 714–722, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. N. Zhang, D. Su, S. Qu et al., “Sirolimus is associated with reduced islet engraftment and impaired β-cell function,” Diabetes, vol. 55, no. 9, pp. 2429–2436, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. M. Shimodahira, S. Fujimoto, E. Mukai et al., “Rapamycin impairs metabolism-secretion coupling in rat pancreatic islets by suppressing carbohydrate metabolism,” The Journal of Endocrinology, vol. 204, no. 1, pp. 37–46, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. L. Moberg, H. Johansson, A. Lukinius et al., “Production of tissue factor by pancreatic islet cells as a trigger of detrimental thrombotic reactions in clinical islet transplantation,” The Lancet, vol. 360, no. 9350, pp. 2039–2045, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. Z. Ma, N. Moruzzi, S.-B. Catrina, V. Grill, and A. Björklund, “Hyperoxia inhibits glucose-induced insulin secretion and mitochondrial metabolism in rat pancreatic islets,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 443, no. 1, pp. 223–228, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. S. Paraskevas, W. P. Duguid, D. Maysinger, L. Feldman, D. Agapitos, and L. Rosenberg, “Apoptosis occurs in freshly isolated human islets under standard culture conditions,” Transplantation Proceedings, vol. 29, no. 1-2, pp. 750–752, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  39. I. Hernández-Fisac, J. Pizarro-Delgado, C. Calle et al., “Tacrolimus-induced diabetes in rats courses with suppressed insulin gene expression in pancreatic islets,” American Journal of Transplantation, vol. 7, no. 11, pp. 2455–2462, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. B. L. Gala-Lopez, A. R. Pepper, R. L. Pawlick et al., “Anti-aging glycopeptide protects human islets against tacrolimus-related injury and facilitates engraftment in mice,” Diabetes, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  41. E. Bell, X. Cao, J. A. Moibi et al., “Rapamycin has a deleterious effect on MIN-6 cells and rat and human islets,” Diabetes, vol. 52, no. 11, pp. 2731–2739, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. U. Johansson, A. Olsson, S. Gabrielsson, B. Nilsson, and O. Korsgren, “Inflammatory mediators expressed in human islets of Langerhans: implications for islet transplantation,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 308, no. 3, pp. 474–479, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. M. J. Cowley, A. Weinberg, N. W. Zammit et al., “Human islets express a marked proinflammatory molecular signature prior to transplantation,” Cell Transplantation, vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 2063–2078, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. J. M. B. Del Castillo, M. C. García-Martín, J. Arias-Díaz, E. Giné, E. Vara, and J. L. B. Cantero, “Antiapoptotic effect of tacrolimus on cytokine-challenged human islets,” Cell Transplantation, vol. 18, no. 10-11, pp. 1237–1246, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. A. Mita, C. Ricordi, A. Miki et al., “Anti-proinflammatory effects of sirolimus on human islet preparations,” Transplantation, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 46–53, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. B. M. Rau, C. M. Krüger, C. Hasel et al., “Effects of immunosuppressive and immunostimulative treatment on pancreatic injury and mortality in severe acute experimental pancreatitis,” Pancreas, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 174–183, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. A. M. J. Shapiro, W. L. Suarez-Pinzon, R. Power, and A. Rabinovitch, “Combination therapy with low dose sirolimus and tacrolimus is synergistic in preventing spontaneous and recurrent autoimmune diabetes in non-obese diabetic mice,” Diabetologia, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 224–230, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. M. D. Vu, S. Qi, D. Xu et al., “Tacrolimus (FK506) and sirolimus (rapamycin) in combination are not antagonistic but produce extended graft survival in cardiac transplantation in the rat,” Transplantation, vol. 64, no. 12, pp. 1853–1856, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. F. J. Dumont, M. R. Melino, M. J. Staruch, S. L. Koprak, P. A. Fischer, and N. H. Sigal, “The immunosuppressive macrolides FK-506 and rapamycin act as reciprocal antagonists in murine T cells,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 144, no. 4, pp. 1418–1424, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. K. Kloster-Jensen, N. T. Vethe, S. Bremer et al., “Intracellular sirolimus concentration is reduced by tacrolimus in human pancreatic islets in vitro,” Transplant International, vol. 28, no. 10, pp. 1152–1161, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  51. H. Chen, S. Qi, D. Xu et al., “Combined effect of rapamycin and FK 506 in prolongation of small bowel graft survival in the mouse,” Transplantation Proceedings, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 2579–2581, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. M. J. Barten, F. Streit, M. Boeger et al., “Synergistic effects of sirolimus with cyclosporine and tacrolimus: analysis of immunosuppression on lymphocyte proliferation and activation in rat whole blood,” Transplantation, vol. 77, no. 8, pp. 1154–1162, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. C. Lambillotte, P. Gilon, and J.-C. Henquin, “Direct glucocorticoid inhibition of insulin secretion. An in vitro study of dexamethasone effects in mouse islets,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 414–423, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. M. D. Bellin, F. B. Barton, A. Heitman et al., “Potent induction immunotherapy promotes long-term insulin independence after islet transplantation in type 1 diabetes,” American Journal of Transplantation, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 1576–1583, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. A. C. Liberman, J. Druker, M. J. Perone, and E. Arzt, “Glucocorticoids in the regulation of transcription factors that control cytokine synthesis,” Cytokine & Growth Factor Reviews, vol. 18, no. 1-2, pp. 45–56, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. R. I. Scheinman, A. Gualberto, C. M. Jewell, J. A. Cidlowski, and A. S. Baldwin Jr., “Characterization of mechanisms involved in transrepression of NF-κB by activated glucocorticoid receptors,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 943–953, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. F. Delaunay, A. Khan, A. Cintra et al., “Pancreatic β cells are important targets for the diabetogenic effects of glucocorticoids,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 100, no. 8, pp. 2094–2098, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus