Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mediators of Inflammation
Volume 2012, Article ID 781375, 13 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/781375
Research Article

Syk/Src Pathway-Targeted Inhibition of Skin Inflammatory Responses by Carnosic Acid

1Department of Genetic Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 440-746, Republic of Korea
2Medical Beauty Research Institute, AmorePacific R&D Center, Yongin 446-729, Republic of Korea
3Department of Immunology and Physiology, College of Medicine, Konkuk University, Chungju 380-701, Republic of Korea

Received 24 January 2012; Accepted 5 February 2012

Academic Editor: Eric F. Morand

Copyright © 2012 Jueun Oh et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Carnosic acid (CA) is a diterpene compound exhibiting antioxidative, anticancer, anti-angiogenic, anti-inflammatory, anti-metabolic disorder, and hepatoprotective and neuroprotective activities. In this study, the effect of CA on various skin inflammatory responses and its inhibitory mechanism were examined. CA strongly suppressed the production of IL-6, IL-8, and MCP-1 from keratinocyte HaCaT cells stimulated with sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) and retinoic acid (RA). In addition, CA blocked the release of nitric oxide (NO), tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) from RAW264.7 cells activated by the toll-like receptor (TLR)-2 ligands, Gram-positive bacterium-derived peptidoglycan (PGN) and pam3CSK, and the TLR4 ligand, Gram-negative bacterium-derived lipopolysaccharide (LPS). CA arrested the growth of dermatitis-inducing Gram-positive and Gram-negative microorganisms such Propionibacterium acnes, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus aureus. CA also blocked the nuclear translocation of nuclear factor (NF)-κB and its upstream signaling including Syk/Src, phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K), Akt, inhibitor of κBα (IκBα) kinase (IKK), and IκBα for NF-κB activation. Kinase assays revealed that Syk could be direct enzymatic target of CA in its anti-inflammatory action. Therefore, our data strongly suggest the potential of CA as an anti-inflammatory drug against skin inflammatory responses with Src/NF-κB inhibitory properties.

1. Introduction

Skin inflammation (dermatitis) includes many inflammatory symptoms occurring in the skin layer in the form of a rash [1]. Infections with Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria (e.g., Propionibacterium acnes, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus aureus) and fungi (Candida albicans ATCC 10231, and Aspergillus niger), exposure to irritating chemicals such as sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) or retinoic acid (RA), and various allergens, such as 2,4-dinitrophenol (DNP), are regarded as major inflammatory signaling inducers causing skin rash [24]. Although most skin inflammatory symptoms are not serious, some can lead to life-threatening conditions such as meningitis or severe allergic reaction including anaphylaxis and allergic purpura [5, 6]. In addition, the undesirable cosmetic appearance often associated with inflammation of the facial skin underscores the importance of developing a promising agent to rapidly ameliorate such skin symptoms. When inflammatory signals occur in epithelial cells, macrophages, keratinocytes, mast cells, and Langerhans cells of the skin layer, various inflammatory mediators, including the interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α cytokines, IL-8 and monocyte chemotactic protein (MCP)-1 chemokines, and nitric oxide (NO) and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) mediators, are produced [7, 8]. For these events, toll-like receptor (TLR)- 2 or TLR4-dependent activation receptors [9, 10] or independent stimulation of intracellular signaling cascades composed of Src and syk nonreceptor protein tyrosine kinases, phosphoinositide- 3-kinase (PI3K), phosphoinositide-dependent kinase 1 (PDK1), and Akt (protein kinase B) serine-threonine protein kinases, as well as the activation and upregulation of nuclear factor (NF)-κB and activator protein (AP)-1 transcription factors [11, 12], transcriptionally activate inflammatory cells to express numerous inflammatory genes encoding pro-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α for TNF-α secretion, inducible NO synthase (iNOS) for NO release, and cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 for prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) production [1316].

Carnosic acid (CA; Figure 1(a)), isolated from the fresh leaves of Rosmarinus officinalis L. [17], is a pro-electrophilic diterpene displaying multiple actions similar to other diterpenoid compounds such as carnosol [18]. This compound has been reported to possess antioxidative, anti-cancer, anti-angiogenic, anti-inflammatory, anti-metabolic disorder, photoprotective, and hepatoprotective and neuroprotective activities [1921]. How this compound can have multi-potential pharmacological properties is not yet well understood. Although the molecular target of CA has not been fully identified, its antioxidative activity, activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma, and 5-lipoxygenase inhibition are regarded as major mechanisms of its multifunctional pharmacology [2224].

fig1
Figure 1: The chemical structure of CA and its cytotoxic activity. (a) Chemical structure of CA. (b) The viability of RAW264.7 and HaCaT cells was determined by MTT assays.

Although polyphenolic compounds including CA are currently being investigated for industrial applications, their mass production by chemical syntheses and their photostability remain critical factors for consideration. CA is chemically stable and CA production and yield have been greatly improved by current synthetic methods [25, 26]. In addition, because numerous cosmetic and pharmaceutical companies focus on skin inflammation symptoms, we were encouraged to study the effect of CA on skin inflammation and its anti-inflammatory mechanism. In this study, the inhibitory activity of CA on the production of inflammatory mediators in macrophages and keratinocytes and the inhibitory target molecule(s) of CA were examined.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

CA (95% purity), phenoxyethanol, octanediol, methylparaben, magnotics, ampicillin, 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT), peptidoglycan (PGN), and lipopolysaccharide (LPS; E. coli 0111:B4) were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA). Piceatannol (picea) and PP2 were obtained from Calbiochem (La Jolla, CA, USA). Luciferase constructs containing promoters sensitive to NF-κB, CREB, and AP-1 were gifts from Profs. Chung Hae Young (Pusan National University, Pusan, Republic of Korea) and Man Hee Rhee (Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea). Enzyme immunoassay (EIA) kits and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits for determining PGE2, IL-6, IL-8, MCP-1, and TNF-α were purchased from Amersham (Little Chalfont, Buckinghamshire, UK). Fetal bovine serum and RPMI1640 were obtained from Gibco (Grand Island, NY, USA). The murine macrophage cell line, RAW264.7, the human keratinocyte cell line, HaCaT, the rat basophilic leukemia mast cell line, RBL-2H3, and the human embryonic kidney cell line, HEK293, were purchased from the ATCC (Rockville, MD, USA). All other chemicals were of analytical grade and were obtained from Sigma. Phosphospecific or total antibodies to p65, p50, Src, Syk, PDK1, p85, Akt, IκBα, lamin A/C, and β-actin were obtained from Cell Signaling (Beverly, MA, USA).

2.2. Cell Culture

RAW264.7, HaCaT, RBL-2H3, and HEK293 cells were cultured in DMEM or RPMI1640 medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA), glutamine, and antibiotics (penicillin and streptomycin) at 37°C under 5% CO2. For each experiment, cells were detached with a cell scraper. At the cell density used for the experiments ( 2 × 1 0 6  cells/mL), the proportion of dead cells was less than 1% as measured by Trypan blue dye exclusion.

2.3. Cell Viability Test

After preincubation of RAW264.7 and HaCaT cells ( 1 × 1 0 6  cells/mL) for 18 h, CA (0 to 20 μg/mL) was added to the cells and incubated for 24 h. The cytotoxic effect of CA was then evaluated by a conventional MTT assay, as reported previously [27, 28]. At 3 h prior to culture termination, 10 μL MTT solution (10 mg/mL in phosphate buffered-saline, pH 7.4) was added to each well, and the cells were continuously cultured until termination of the experiment. The incubation was halted by the addition of 15% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) into each well, solubilizing the formazan [29]. Absorbance at 570 nm (OD570–630) was measured using a SpectraMax 250 microplate reader.

2.4. Determination of NO, PGE2, IL-6, IL-8, MCP-1, and TNF-α

After preincubation of RAW264.7 and HaCaT cells ( 1 × 1 0 6  cells/mL) for 18 h, cells were pretreated with CA (0 to 20 μg/mL) for 30 min and further incubated with LPS (1 μg/mL), pam3CSK (10 μg/mL), or PGN (10 μg/mL) for 6 (TNF-α) or 24 (all other treatments) h. The inhibitory effect of CA on the production of NO, PGE2, IL-6, IL-8, MCP-1, and TNF-α was determined by analyzing NO, PGE2, IL-6, IL-8, MCP-1, and TNF-α levels with Griess reagent and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits as described previously [30, 31].

2.5. β-Hexosaminidase Secretion Assay

RBL-2H3 cells were grown in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS in a 5% CO2 atmosphere. RBL-2H3 cells ( 2 × 1 0 5  cells/well) pretreated with CA were sensitized with 1 μg/mL anti-DNP IgE for 1 h at 37°C. IgE-sensitized cells were washed with PBS and stimulated with 4 μg/mL 2,4-dinitrophenylated bovine serum albumin (DNP-BSA) in PBS at 37°C for 30 min. Degranulation was assessed by measuring β-hexosaminidase release. Briefly, 40 μL supernatant and 100 μL 2 mM p-nitrophenyl-N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminide (in 0.4 M citrate and 0.2 M phosphate buffer, pH 4.5) were added to each well of a 96-well plate, and color was developed for 30 min at 37°C. The enzymatic reaction was terminated by adding 200 μL 0.2 M glycine-NaOH, pH 10.7. The absorbance at 405 nm was measured using a SpectraMax 250 microplate reader.

2.6. mRNA Analysis by Semiquantitative Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR)

To determine cytokine mRNA expression levels, total RNA was isolated from LPS-treated RAW264.7 cells using TRIzol Reagent (Gibco BRL) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Total RNA was stored at −70°C until use. Semiquantitative RT reactions were conducted as reported previously [32, 33]. The primers (Bioneer, Daejeon, Republic of Korea) used are listed in Table 1.

tab1
Table 1: Primer sequences used in RT-PCR analysis.
2.7. Luciferase Reporter Gene Activity Assay

HEK293 cells ( 1 × 1 0 6  cells/mL) were transfected with 1 μg plasmid containing NF-κB-Luc or AP-1-Luc along with β-galactosidase using the calcium phosphate method in a 12-well plate according to the manufacturer’s protocol [34]. The cells were used for experiments 48 h after transfection. Luciferase assays were performed using the Luciferase Assay System (Promega) as reported previously [35].

2.8. Preparation of Cell Lysates and Nuclear Fraction, Immunoblotting, and Immunoprecipitation

RAW264.7 cells ( 5 × 1 0 6  cells/mL) were washed three times in cold PBS with 1 mM sodium orthovanadate and lysed by a sonicator in lysis buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 2 mM EDTA, 2 mM ethylene glycol tetraacetic acid, 50 mM β-glycerophosphate, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 1% Triton X-100, 10% glycerol, 10 μg/mL aprotinin, 10 μg/mL pepstatin, 1 mM benzamide, and 2 mM PMSF) for 30 min with rotation at 4°C. The lysates were clarified by centrifugation at 16,000 ×g for 10 min at 4°C and stored at −20°C until needed.

Nuclear lysates were prepared in a three-step procedure [36]. After treatment, cells were collected with a rubber policeman, washed with PBS, and lysed in 500 μL lysis buffer containing 50 mM KCl, 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 25 mM HEPES (pH 7.8), 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 μg/mL leupeptin, 20 μg/mL aprotinin, and 100 μM 1,4-dithiothreitol (DTT) on ice for 4 min. Cell lysates were then centrifuged at 19,326 ×g for 1 min in a microcentrifuge. In the second step, the nuclear fraction pellet was washed once in washing buffer, which was the same as the lysis buffer without Nonidet P-40. In the final step, nuclei were treated with an extraction buffer containing 500 mM KCl, 10% glycerol, and the other reagents in the lysis buffer. The nuclei/extraction buffer mixture was frozen at −80°C and then thawed on ice and centrifuged at 19,326 ×g for 5 min. The supernatant was collected as a nuclear extract. Soluble cell lysates were immunoblotted, and protein levels were visualized as previously reported [37]. For immunoprecipitation, cell lysates containing equal amounts of protein (500 μg) from RAW264.7 cells ( 1 × 1 0 7  cells/mL) treated with or without LPS (1 μg/mL) for 2.5 min were precleared with 10 μL protein A-coupled Sepharose beads (50% v/v) (Amersham, UK) for 1 h at 4°C. Pre-cleared samples were incubated with 5 μL anti-JAK2 antibody overnight at 4°C. Immune complexes were mixed with 10 μL protein A-coupled Sepharose beads (50% v.v.) and rotated for 3 h at 4°C.

2.9. Enzyme Assay

For evaluating the inhibition of Src and Syk kinase activity using purified enzymes, the kinase profiler service from Millipore (Billerica, MA, USA) was used. In a final reaction volume of 25 μL, purified enzymes (1–5 mU) were incubated with the reaction buffer. The reaction was initiated by the addition of MgATP. After incubation for 40 min at room temperature, the reaction was stopped by the addition of 5 mL 3% phosphoric acid. Ten microliters of the reaction mixture was then spotted onto a P30 filtermat and washed three times for 5 min in 75 mM phosphoric acid and once in methanol prior to drying and scintillation counting.

2.10. In Vitro Antimicrobial Activity Assay

The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC, μg/mL) of the fourteen synthesized compounds was determined under conditions described in the literature [38] for each assay against Propionibacterium acnes (ATCC 6919), Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 33592), Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922), Candida albicans (ATCC 10231), and Aspergillus niger (ATCC 9142).

2.11. Statistical Analysis

Data (Figures 1(b), 2, 3, 4, 5(b), 6(a), and 6(c)) are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) as calculated from one ( 𝑛 = 6 ) of two independent experiments. Other data are representative of three different experiments with similar results. For statistical comparisons, results were analyzed using analysis of variance/Scheffe’s posthoc test and the Kruskal-Wallis/Mann-Whitney test. All 𝑃 values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. All statistical tests were conducted using SPSS (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

fig2
Figure 2: Effect of CA on the production of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines in HaCaT cells stimulated with SLS and RA. (a) and (b) Levels of IL-6, IL-8, and MCP-1 were determined by ELISA from culture supernatants of HaCaT cells treated with CA (0 to 10 μg/mL) or hydrocortisone (HC, 1 μg/mL) in the presence or absence of SLS (1 μg/mL) or RA (5 μM) for 24 h. 𝑃 < 0 . 0 5 and 𝑃 < 0 . 0 1 compared to the control.
781375.fig.003
Figure 3: Effect of CA on the degranulation of IgE-sensitized RBL-2H3 cells treated with DNP-BSA. IgE-sensitized RBL-2H3 cells ( 2 × 1 0 5  cells/mL) were incubated with CA in the presence or absence of DNP-BSA (4 μg/mL) for 6 h. Degranulation was determined by measuring β-hexosaminidase activity.
fig4
Figure 4: Effect of CA on the production of NO, TNF-α, and PGE2, in activated RAW264.7 cells. (a), (b), and (c) Levels of NO, TNF-α, and PGE2 were determined by the Griess assay, ELISA, and EIA, respectively, from RAW264.7 cell culture supernatants treated with CA (0 to 20 μg/mL) in the presence or absence of peptidoglycan (PGN, 10 μg/mL) (a), pam3CSK (10 μg/mL) (b), or LPS (1 μg/mL) (c), for 6 h (TNF-α) or 24 h (NO and PGE2). 𝑃 < 0 . 0 5 and 𝑃 < 0 . 0 1 compared to the control.
fig5
Figure 5: Effect of CA on the mRNA expression of proinflammatory genes, the activation of transcription factors, and upstream signaling cascades for NF-κB activation. (a) The mRNA levels (left panel) of genes encoding iNOS, TNF-α, and COX-2 were determined by semiquantitative PCR. (b) HEK293 cells cotransfected with NF-κB-Luc, IFN-β-promoter-Luc, or AP-1-Luc plasmid constructs (1 μg/mL each) and β-gal (as a transfection control) were treated with CA (0 to 20 μg/mL) in the presence or absence of PMA (100 nM) or by cotransfection with the adapter molecule, TRIF. Luciferase activity was measured using a luminometer. (b) Levels of NF-κB family proteins, p50 and p65, in the nuclear fraction were determined by immunoblotting analyses using antibodies against total protein. (d) and (e) Phosphoprotein or total protein levels of IκBα, IKK, Akt, PDK1, p85, Src, Syk, and β-actin from cell lysates were determined by immunoblotting analyses using phosphospecific or total protein antibodies. Relative intensity was calculated by densitometric scanning. 𝑃 < 0 . 0 5 and 𝑃 < 0 . 0 1 compared to the control.
fig6
Figure 6: Involvement of the Syk and Src pathways as a target of the CA-mediated anti-inflammatory response. (a) Kinase activities of Syk and Src were determined by a direct kinase assay using purified enzymes. The control was set at 100% with each enzyme (Src or Syk) activity obtained only with vehicle treatment. (b) RAW264.7 cells ( 5 × 1 0 6 cells/mL) were incubated with CA (20 μg/mL) in the presence or absence of LPS (1 μg/mL) for 2 min. After preparing total lysates, levels of phospho (p)-p85 binding to Syk (left panel) or Src (right panel) were identified by immunoprecipitation with antibodies to Syk or Src and immunoblotting with antibodies to rabbit immunoglobulin heavy chain, Syk, Src, and p-p85. (C) Culture supernatants prepared from LPS-treated RAW264.7 cells pretreated with standard Src and Syk inhibitors (PP2 and piceatannol (Picea)) were assayed for NO, TNF-α, and PGE2. Relative intensity of each blot was calculated from densitometric scanning. HC: heavy chain; 𝑃 < 0 . 0 1 compared to the control.

3. Results and Discussion

CA is a multipotential diterpene displaying antioxidative, anticancer, antiangiogenic, anti-inflammatory, antimetabolic disorder, photoprotective, hepatoprotective, and neuroprotective activities [1921]. Although the anti-inflammatory activity of CA has been reported previously, the molecular target of CA in its anti-inflammatory action is unknown. In addition, whether CA can block skin inflammatory responses induced by various irritants and infection with dermatological relevance has not been fully elucidated.

Our data indicate that CA up to 20 μg/mL (Figure 1(a)) is nontoxic and able to reduce various inflammatory events found in the skin layer (Figure 1(b)). Thus, this compound strongly suppressed the production of cytokines induced by skin irritation brought about by the contact irritants, all-trans retinoic acid (RA) and sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) [39]. Indeed, these chemicals dramatically enhanced the level of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines including IL-6, IL-8, and MCP-1 secreted from keratinocytic HaCaT cells. Interestingly, CA (0 to 10 μg/mL) remarkably reduced the production of these molecules to basal levels (Figures 2(a) and 2(b)). Hydrocortisone also displayed strong inhibitory activity on the production of cytokines and chemokines (Figures 2(a) and 2(b)), as reported previously [40], indicating that the experimental conditions were well established. To test whether CA can diminish itching of the skin based on histamine release [41], CA was examined using mast cells stimulated with anti-DNP-IgE. As seen in Figure 3, anti-DNP-IgE treatment stimulated the release of histamine up to 20-fold as assessed by measuring β-hexosaminidase activity [42]. CA did not block histamine release, implying that this compound is not able to attenuate the skin itching component of the inflammatory response.

Most serious skin inflammation is caused by infection with various microorganisms including the Gram-positive Propionibacterium acnes and Staphylococcus aureus and the Gram-negative Pseudomonas aeruginosa [43, 44]. Therefore, the ability of CA to modulate bacterium-induced inflammatory responses and to directly kill these bacteria was investigated. First, the anti-inflammatory activity of CA was examined using peptidoglycan, a major component of the cell wall of Gram-positive bacteria, as a TLR2 ligand [45]. Intriguingly, CA clearly reduced the release of NO, PGE2, and TNF-α triggered by PGN (10 μg/mL; Figure 4(a)). Consistent with this finding, the pam3CSK-induced production of NO and PGE2 was also similarly suppressed by CA exposure (Figure 4(b)), suggesting that CA can prevent P. acnes-mediated inflammation. In addition, CA showed a similar pattern of inhibition of NO production stimulated by LPS (Figure 4(c)), as was seen in LPS-treated microglial cells [21]. Of these inflammatory mediators, CA blocked PGE2 production more potently than NO and TNF-α in macrophage-like RAW264.7 cells. This suggests that PGE2 could be a strong target for CA-mediated anti-inflammatory activity, as demonstrated by the pharmacology of various anti-inflammatory drugs and agents such as resveratrol, quercetin, and curcumin [46]. Surprisingly, CA also inhibited the growth of P. acnes with an MIC value of 19.5 μg/mL. A representative antibiotic, ampicillin (MIC = 2 μg/mL), but not the recently developed antibiotic herb, Magnotics, which is known to inhibit pimples [47], showed much stronger activity (Table 2). Furthermore, CA also suppressed the growth of several microorganisms including P. aeruginosa, E. coli, S. aureus, C. albicans, and A. niger with MIC values ranging from 125 to 2,000 μg/mL, even though the activity was not as powerful as that of several antiseptics such as phenoxyethanol, octanediol, and methylparaben (Table 2). This implies that CA has an additional merit in that it directly kills microorganisms responsible for skin inflammation.

tab2
Table 2: MIC  (μg/mL) of CA and other chemicals against P. acnes and other microorganisms causing skin inflammation.

To understand the inhibitory mechanism by which CA suppresses the production of inflammatory mediators, the biochemical target of CA was explored using LPS-treated macrophages. The initial approach was to decide whether CA-induced inhibition of inflammatory mediator production was observed at the transcriptional or translational level by measuring mRNA levels of inflammatory genes. As expected, CA was shown to suppress the inflammatory response at the transcription level. Specifically, the mRNA levels of the genes encoding iNOS, COX-2, and TNF-α were remarkably reduced by CA exposure (Figure 5(a)). Two methods, a reporter gene assay (Figure 5(b)) using a construct with promoter regions binding activated NF-κB, AP-1, and CREB, and a nuclear translocation level analysis of transcription factor NF-κB (p50/p65) (Figure 5(c)) strongly suggested that CA could be targeted to the activation pathways for NF-κB rather than AP-1 and CREB. Indeed, the upstream signaling events for NF-κB activation were also clearly reduced as the phosphorylation of IκBα and its upstream kinase IKK were reduced by CA at 5 min (Figure 5(d)). Consistent with this finding, CA treatment diminished a series of Src, Syk, p85/PI3K, PDK1, and Akt phosphorylation events for the activation of IKK that occurred between 2 and 5 min (Figure 5(e)), suggesting that the target of CA could be enzyme(s) activated at early time points in the inflammatory signaling cascade. It has been similarly reported that CA is able to block NF-κB translocation in IL-1β-stimulated human umbilical vein endothelial cells linked to the suppression of adhesion molecule expression [48] and in TNF-α-stimulated human aortic smooth muscle cells linked to inhibition of cell migration and matrix metalloproteinase-9 [49].

It is known that the phosphorylation of Src and Syk, initially activated protein tyrosine kinases by inflammatory signaling [50, 51], is managed by their own kinase activity. Therefore, the possibility that CA can directly suppress the kinase activity of Syk or Src was confirmed by kinase assays using purified enzymes. Unexpectedly, CA (20 μg/mL) only directly and partially blocked the kinase activity of Syk but not Src (Figure 6(a)). When the fact that the inhibitory activity of CA on the production of IL-6, MCP-1, NO, and PGE2 exhibited higher level (80 to 50%) at even 5 and 10 μg/mL (Figures 2 and 4) is considered, it is strongly suggested that direct Syk inhibition is not enough to block the production of these mediators. However, the effect of CA on signaling molecule complex formation including Src or Syk examined by immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting analyses revealed that it can reduce the formation of the complex composed of active substrate phosphop85 and Syk or Src (Figure 6(b)), indicating that CA-mediated inhibition of Src and Syk phosphorylation and the activation of their downstream pathway (Figure 5(e)) could affect the generation of upstream signaling complexes, a critical event for NF-κB activation [50, 51]. Finally, whether the inhibition of these enzymes by their specific inhibitors, PP2 for Src and piceatannol for Syk, showed an inhibitory pattern similar to that of CA was investigated. As Figure 6(c) depicts, the two inhibitors significantly suppressed the production of NO, PGE2, and TNF-α, as previously reported [52]. The crucial role of these enzymes in various inflammatory events was also presented previously. Thus, the activation and phosphorylation of Src and Syk in macrophages, monocytic cells, and neutrophils under inflammatory conditions have been clearly characterized [52, 53]. Furthermore, anti-inflammatory drugs such as curcumin, resveratrol, and quercetin and anti-inflammatory herbal extracts prepared from Polygonum hydropiper, Cinnamomum aromaticum (cassia), Sorbus commixta, and Sanguisorba officinalis were shown to target these enzymes in their anti-inflammatory actions [5456]. Therefore, our data and previous reports strongly suggest that the anti-inflammatory action of CA could be Src/Syk-targeted.

In summary, we have found that CA strongly blocks several skin inflammatory responses such as the production of TNF-α, and PGE2 managed by macrophages and keratinocytes. Specifically, CA was clearly diminished the activation of NF-κB through the inhibition of its upstream signaling cascades composed of Syk, Src, PI3K, PDK1, Akt, IKK and IκBα (Figure 7). Considering that it is now possible to mass-produce CA by a completely synthetic method, CA has the potential to be used as a promising anti-NF-κB inhibitory drug available for skin inflammatory symptoms induced by various irritants, microorganism-derived immunogens, and allergens. To investigate this possibility, the in vivo efficacy using skin inflammatory models will be tested in the future. Furthermore, since two major pathways, JAK2/STAT-1 and TBK1/IRF-3 [57, 58], are also known as an important pathway for the production of inflammatory mediators in various inflammatory responses, whether CA is capable of suppressing these pathways will be continuously examined. In addition, it has been also reported that CA is able to induce Keap1/Nrf2 pathway [59] which is anti-oxidative and cytoprotective system against cellular oxidative stress [60]. Since this pathway is also known to participate in cellular anti-inflammatory responses, whether this pathway is needed in CA-mediated anti-inflammatory activity will be further confirmed in the future.

781375.fig.007
Figure 7: Putative inhibitory pathway of inflammatory signaling events by CA.

Authors’ Contribution

J. Oh, T. Yu, and S. J. Choi equally contributed to this work.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (no. 0004975).

References

  1. S. Briganti and M. Picardo, “Antioxidant activity, lipid peroxidation and skin diseases. What's new,” Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 663–669, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. I. Kurokawa, F. W. Danby, Q. Ju et al., “New developments in our understanding of acne pathogenesis and treatment,” Experimental Dermatology, vol. 18, no. 10, pp. 821–832, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. J. Kim, “Review of the innate immune response in acne vulgaris: activation of toll-like receptor 2 in acne triggers inflammatory cytokine responses,” Dermatology, vol. 211, no. 3, pp. 193–198, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. Y. Suzuki and C. Ra, “Analysis of the mechanism for the development of allergic skin inflammation and the application for its treatment: aspirin modulation of IgE-dependent mast cell activation: role of aspirin-induced exacerbation of immediate allergy,” Journal of Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 110, no. 3, pp. 237–244, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. P. M. Elias and M. Schmuth, “Abnormal skin barrier in the etiopathogenesis of atopic dermatitis,” Current Opinion in Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 437–446, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. E. Kingston and D. Mackey, “Skin clues in the diagnosis of life-threatening infections,” Reviews of infectious diseases, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 1986. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. I. T. Harvima and G. Nilsson, “Mast cells as regulators of skin inflammation and immunity,” Acta Dermato-Venereologica, vol. 91, no. 6, pp. 644–650, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. R. J. Toncic, J. Lipozencic, I. Martinac, and S. Greguric, “Immunology of allergic contact dermatitis,” Acta Dermatovenerologica Croatica, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 51–68, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  9. R. W. Kinne, R. Bräuer, B. Stuhlmüller, E. Palombo-Kinne, and G. R. Burmester, “Macrophages in rheumatoid arthritis,” Arthritis Research, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 189–202, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. T. Owens, A. A. Babcock, J. M. Millward, and H. Toft-Hansen, “Cytokine and chemokine inter-regulation in the inflamed or injured CNS,” Brain Research Reviews, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 178–184, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. Y. Sekine, T. Yumioka, T. Yamamoto et al., “Modulation of TLR4 signaling by a novel adaptor protein signal-transducing adaptor protein-2 in macrophages,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 176, no. 1, pp. 380–389, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. K. Takeda and S. Akira, “Roles of Toll-like receptors in innate immune responses,” Genes to Cells, vol. 6, no. 9, pp. 733–742, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. B. Bresnihan, “Pathogenesis of joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis,” Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 717–719, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. G. R. Burmester, B. Stuhlmüller, G. Keyszer, and R. W. Kinne, “Mononuclear phagocytes and rheumatoid synovitis: mastermind or workhorse in arthritis?” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 5–18, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. J. A. Gracie, R. J. Forsey, W. L. Chan et al., “A proinflammatory role for IL-18 in rheumatoid arthritis,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 104, no. 10, pp. 1393–1401, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. T. J. Kang, J. S. Moon, S. Lee, and D. Yim, “Polyacetylene compound from Cirsium japonicum var. ussuriense inhibits the LPS-induced inflammatory reaction via suppression of NF-κB activity in RAW 264.7 cells,” Biomolecules and Therapeutics, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 97–101, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. C. R. L. Wellwood and R. A. Cole, “Relevance of carnosic acid concentrations to the selection of rosemary, Rosmarinus officinalis (L.), accessions for optimization of antioxidant yield,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 52, no. 20, pp. 6101–6107, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. A. H. Lo, Y. C. Liang, S. Y. Lin-Shiau, C. T. Ho, and J. K. Lin, “Carnosol, an antioxidant in rosemary, suppresses inducible nitric oxide synthase through down-regulating nuclear factor-κB in mouse macrophages,” Carcinogenesis, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 983–991, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. T. Kayashima and K. Matsubara, “Antiangiogenic effect of carnosic acid and carnosol, neuroprotective compounds in rosemary leaves,” Bioscience, Biotechnology and Biochemistry, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 115–119, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. E. A. Offord, J. C. Gautier, O. Avanti et al., “Photoprotective potential of lycopene, β-carotene, vitamin E, vitamin C and carnosic acid in UVA-irradiated human skin fibroblasts,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 32, no. 12, pp. 1293–1303, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. M. Yanagitai, S. Itoh, T. Kitagawa, T. Takenouchi, H. Kitani, and T. Satoh, “Carnosic acid, a pro-electrophilic compound, inhibits LPS-induced activation of microglia,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 418, no. 1, pp. 22–26, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. O. Rau, M. Wurglics, A. Paulke et al., “Carnosic acid and carnosol, phenolic diterpene compounds of the labiate herbs rosemary and sage, are activators of the human peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma,” Planta Medica, vol. 72, no. 10, pp. 881–887, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. D. Poeckel, C. Greiner, M. Verhoff et al., “Carnosic acid and carnosol potently inhibit human 5-lipoxygenase and suppress pro-inflammatory responses of stimulated human polymorphonuclear leukocytes,” Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 91–97, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. O. I. Aruoma, B. Halliwell, R. Aeschbach, and J. Loligers, “Antioxidant and pro-oxidant properties of active rosemary constituents: carnosol and carnosic acid,” Xenobiotica, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 257–268, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. F. Pop, “Chemical stabilization of oils rich in long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids during storage,” Food Science and Technology International, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 111–117, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. M. Tada, T. Ohkanda, and J. Kurabe, “Syntheses of carnosic acid and carnosol, anti-oxidants in rosemary, from pisiferic acid, the major constituent of Sawara,” Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 27–29, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. R. Pauwels, J. Balzarini, M. Baba et al., “Rapid and automated tetrazolium-based colorimetric assay for the detection of anti-HIV compounds,” Journal of Virological Methods, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 309–321, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. Y. S. Roh, H. B. Kim, C. W. Kang, B. S. Kim, S. Y. Nah, and J. H. Kim, “Neuroprotective effects of ginsenoside Rg3 against 24-OH-cholesterol-induced cytotoxicity in cortical neurons,” Journal of Ginseng Research, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 246–253, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. J. R. Kim, D. R. Oh, M. H. Cha et al., “Protective effect of polygoni cuspidati radix and emodin on Vibrio vulnificus cytotoxicity and infection,” Journal of Microbiology, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 737–743, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. J. Y. Cho, K. U. Baik, J. H. Jung, and M. H. Park, “in vitro anti-inflammatory effects of cynaropicrin, a sesquiterpene lactone, from Saussurea lappa,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 398, no. 3, pp. 399–407, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. S. I. Lim, C. W. Cho, U. K. Choi, and Y. C. Kim, “Antioxidant activity and ginsenoside pattern of fermented white ginseng,” Journal of Ginseng Research, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 168–174, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. Y. O. Kim and S. W. Lee, “Microarray analysis of gene expression by ginseng water extracts in a mouse adrenal cortex after immobilization stress,” Journal of Ginseng Research, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 111–123, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  33. J. Kwon, S. Kim, S. Shim, D. S. Choi, J. H. Kim, and Y. B. Kwon, “Modulation of LPS-stimulated astroglial activation by ginseng total saponins,” Journal of Ginseng Research, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 80–85, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  34. H. J. Lim, H. Li, J. Y. Kim, and J. H. Ryu, “Quercetin derivatives from Siegesbeckia glabrescens inhibit the expression of COX-2 through the suppression of NF-κB activation in microglia,” Biomolecules and Therapeutics, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 27–32, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. T. Shen, J. Lee, M. H. Park et al., “Ginsenoside Rp1, a ginsenoside derivative, blocks promoter activation of iNOS and Cox-2 genes by suppression of an IKKβ-mediated NF-κB pathway in HEK293 cells,” Journal of Ginseng Research, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 200–208, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  36. S. E. Byeon, Y. G. Lee, B. H. Kim et al., “Surfactin blocks NO production in lipopolysaccharide-activated macrophages by inhibiting NF-κB activation,” Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 1984–1989, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. J. Y. Lee, Y. G. Lee, J. Lee et al., “Akt Cys-310-targeted inhibition by hydroxylated benzene derivatives is tightly linked to their immunosuppressive effects,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 285, no. 13, pp. 9932–9948, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. A. Klancnik, B. Guzej, M. H. Kolar, H. Abramovic, and S. S. Mozina, “in vitro antimicrobial and antioxidant activity of commercial rosemary extract formulations,” Journal of Food Protection, vol. 72, no. 8, pp. 1744–1752, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. J. Varani, P. Perone, D. M. Spahlinger et al., “Human skin in organ culture and human skin cells (keratinocytes and fibroblasts) in monolayer culture for assessment of chemically induced skin damage,” Toxicologic Pathology, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 693–701, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. W. G. Phillips, M. Feldmann, S. M. Breathnach, and F. M. Brennan, “Modulation of the IL-1 cytokine network in keratinocytes by intracellular IL-1α and IL-1 receptor antagonist,” Clinical and Experimental Immunology, vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 177–182, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. S. M. Herman and R. B. Vender, “Antihistamines in the treatment of atopic dermatitis,” Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 467–473, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. B. O. Lim, H. L. Jun, Y. K. Na et al., “Polygoni Cuspidati radix inhibits the activation of syk kinase in mast cells for antiallergic activity,” Experimental Biology and Medicine, vol. 232, no. 11, pp. 1425–1431, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. M. S. Dryden, “Skin and soft tissue infection: microbiology and epidemiology,” International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, vol. 34, no. 1, supplement, pp. S2–S7, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. M. R. Sohail, A. L. Gray, L. M. Baddour, I. M. Tleyjeh, and A. Virk, “Infective endocarditis due to Propionibacterium species,” Clinical Microbiology and Infection, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 387–394, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. A. P. Bieneman, K. L. Chichester, Y. H. Chen, and J. T. Schroeder, “Toll-like receptor 2 ligands activate human basophils for both IgE-dependent and IgE-independent secretion,” Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 115, no. 2, pp. 295–301, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. T. Sergent, N. Piront, J. Meurice, O. Toussaint, and Y. J. Schneider, “Anti-inflammatory effects of dietary phenolic compounds in an in vitro model of inflamed human intestinal epithelium,” Chemico-Biological Interactions, vol. 188, no. 3, pp. 659–667, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. Y. S. Kim, J. Y. Lee, J. Park, W. Hwang, J. Lee, and D. Park, “Synthesis and microbiological evaluation of honokiol derivatives as new antimicrobial agents,” Archives of Pharmacal Research, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 61–65, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. Y. M. Yu, C. H. Lin, H. C. Chan, and H. D. Tsai, “Carnosic acid reduces cytokine-induced adhesion molecules expression and monocyte adhesion to endothelial cells,” European Journal of Nutrition, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 101–106, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. Y. M. Yu, H. C. Lin, and W. C. Chang, “Carnosic acid prevents the migration of human aortic smooth muscle cells by inhibiting the activation and expression of matrix metalloproteinase-9,” British Journal of Nutrition, vol. 100, no. 4, pp. 731–738, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. Y. G. Lee, B. M. Chain, and J. Y. Cho, “Distinct role of spleen tyrosine kinase in the early phosphorylation of inhibitor of κBα via activation of the phosphoinositide-3-kinase and Akt pathways,” International Journal of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 811–821, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. J. Y. Kim, Y. G. Lee, M. Y. Kim et al., “Src-mediated regulation of inflammatory responses by actin polymerization,” Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 431–443, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. P. Lusková and P. Dráber, “Modulation of the Fcε receptor I signaling by tyrosine kinase inhibitors: search for therapeutic targets of inflammatory and allergy diseases,” Current Pharmaceutical Design, vol. 10, no. 15, pp. 1727–1737, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  53. C. Han, J. Jin, S. Xu, H. Liu, N. Li, and X. Cao, “Integrin CD11b negatively regulates TLR-triggered inflammatory responses by activating Syk and promoting degradation of MyD88 and TRIF via Cbl-b,” Nature Immunology, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 734–742, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. T. Yu, Y. J. Lee, H. J. Jang et al., “Anti-inflammatory activity of Sorbus commixta water extract and its molecular inhibitory mechanism,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 134, no. 2, pp. 493–500, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  55. T. Yu, Y. J. Lee, H. M. Yang et al., “Inhibitory effect of Sanguisorba officinalis ethanol extract on NO and PGE2 production is mediated by suppression of NF-κB and AP-1 activation signaling cascade,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 134, no. 1, pp. 11–17, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. Y. Yang, T. Yu, H. J. Jang et al., “in vitro and in vivo anti-inflammatory activities of Polygonum hydropiper methanol extract,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 139, no. 2, pp. 616–625, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  57. M. H. Kim, D. S. Yoo, S. Y. Lee et al., “The TRIF/TBK1/IRF-3 activation pathway is the primary inhibitory target of resveratrol, contributing to its broad-spectrum anti-inflammatory effects,” Pharmazie, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 293–300, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  58. J. S. Fridman, P. A. Scherle, R. Collins et al., “Preclinical evaluation of local JAK1 and JAK2 inhibition in cutaneous inflammation,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 131, no. 9, pp. 1838–1844, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  59. T. Satoh, K. Kosaka, K. Itoh et al., “Carnosic acid, a catechol-type electrophilic compound, protects neurons both in vitro and in vivo through activation of the Keap1/Nrf2 pathway via S-alkylation of targeted cysteines on Keap1,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 104, no. 4, pp. 1116–1131, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. A. T. Dinkova-Kostova and P. Talalay, “NAD(P)H:quinone acceptor oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1), a multifunctional antioxidant enzyme and exceptionally versatile cytoprotector,” Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, vol. 501, no. 1, pp. 116–123, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus