The Role of Defensins in HIV Pathogenesis

Pace, Barcley T.; Lackner, Andrew A.; Porter, Edith; Pahar, Bapi

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/5186904

Mediators of Inflammation

On this page

Abstract Introduction Conclusion Conflicts of Interest Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2017 | Article ID 5186904 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/5186904

The Role of Defensins in HIV Pathogenesis

Barcley T. Pace,¹Andrew A. Lackner,^1,2Edith Porter,³and Bapi Pahar^1,2

Academic Editor: Maria Rosaria Catania

Received14 Mar 2017

Accepted24 Jul 2017

Published03 Aug 2017

Abstract

Profound loss of CD4⁺ T cells, progressive impairment of the immune system, inflammation, and sustained immune activation are the characteristics of human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) infection. Innate immune responses respond immediately from the day of HIV infection, and a thorough understanding of the interaction between several innate immune cells and HIV-1 is essential to determine to what extent those cells play a crucial role in controlling HIV-1 in vivo. Defensins, divided into the three subfamilies α-, β-, and θ-defensins based on structure and disulfide linkages, comprise a critical component of the innate immune response and exhibit anti-HIV-1 activities and immunomodulatory capabilities. In humans, only α- and β-defensins are expressed in various tissues and have broad impacts on HIV-1 transmission, replication, and disease progression. θ-defensins have been identified as functional peptides in Old World monkeys, but not in humans. Instead, θ-defensins exist only as pseudogenes in humans, chimpanzees, and gorillas. The use of the synthetic θ-defensin peptide “retrocyclin” as an antiviral therapy was shown to be promising, and further research into the development of defensin-based HIV-1 therapeutics is needed. This review focuses on the role of defensins in HIV-1 pathogenesis and highlights future research efforts that warrant investigation.

1. Introduction

Since the start of the epidemic in the 1980s, 35 million people have died and more than 70 million have been infected from human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) infection [1]. The primary manner of HIV-1 transmission occurs at mucosal surfaces [2, 3], including the oral [4], cervicovaginal [5], and rectal mucosal epithelia [6]. HIV-1 predominantly targets cells associated with the adaptive immune response, in particular CD4⁺ T cells [7], which reside primarily in the lymph nodes and gastrointestinal tract [8, 9]. Immune activation induced by HIV-1 infection provides more CD4⁺ T cell targets for viral replication, increases T cell turnover and depletion, and eventually initiates a vicious cycle of uncontrolled viral replication [8]. At this stage of infection, the failing immune system allows for the reemergence of preexisting, latent pathogens that further burden immune responses [10]. The formation of this vicious cycle leads to exhaustion of the adaptive immune system and eventual progression to acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS). Although the adaptive immune response plays a large role in HIV-1 pathogenesis and progression to AIDS, mounting evidence suggests that the innate immune system directly or indirectly impacts disease progression [11]. Myeloid cells of the innate immune system including monocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells (DCs) are also targeted by the virus [12]. In early stages of HIV-1 infection, evidence suggests that DCs initially transmit HIV-1 across mucosal barriers [3]. The exact time course of disease progression is difficult to predict, owing to variation in factors such as host genetics and the environment. Two to four weeks may pass following initial exposure to HIV-1 before full activation of the adaptive immune response is initiated [13]. During this time, the virus replicates and spreads without much control via infected CD4⁺ T cells [8]. This unregulated viral replication suggests a failure of innate immune mechanisms, such as natural killer cells that normally control viral infections, whose cytolytic function is compromised during HIV-1 viremia [14]. In rhesus macaques, rapid upregulation of inflammasome following simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) infection was shown to be responsible for the dysregulation of innate and acquired immune responses [11, 15]. When finally activated, CD8⁺ T cells dramatically decrease HIV-1 viremia. However, at this stage of infection, the virus has already established a reservoir for persistent, low-level replication in mucosa-associated lymphatic tissue, in particular in the gut, and the host becomes chronically infected [8]. It is unclear whether innate immunity contributes to the reduced viral replication and regulates immune activation.

One critical component of the innate response includes a family of small, antimicrobial peptides termed defensins [16]. Defensins are cationic peptides characterized by a β-sheet structure and three intramolecular cysteine-disulfide bonds [17]. Vertebrate defensins are comprised of α, β, and θ subfamilies, with each differing in both the size and pattern of disulfide linkages [18]. α-Defensins can be further subdivided into two classes, myeloid and enteric α-defensins. Myeloid α-defensins, consisting of human neutrophil peptides (HNP) 1–4, reside within primary granules of neutrophils and are synthesized in the bone marrow (Table 1) [16, 19, 20]. There have been conflicting reports on the presence of HNPs in T lymphocytes and other cell types, but while, under certain circumstances, genuine expression may occur, the presence seems to be rather a consequence of pinocytic uptake [21]. The enteric α-defensins, human defensins (HD) 5 and 6, are both produced by Paneth cells (PCs) in the crypts of the small intestine, while HD5 is also synthesized by epithelial cells of the genitourinary tract [22–24]. Human β-defensins (HBDs) are expressed by skin and mucosal epithelial cells lining organs such as those in the urinary tract, kidney, and trachea (Table 2) [18, 25]. Numerous HBDs have been described at the genomic level and some at the protein level including HBD1–4 [26–28]. Both α- and β-defensins can also be expressed in some monocytes, macrophages, and DCs [29]. Unlike α- and β-defensins, θ-defensins possess a cyclical structure and exist only in certain nonhuman primate species, most notably in Old World monkeys and macaques, but not in chimpanzees or gorillas. Rhesus θ-defensins (RTDs) exhibiting strong antimicrobial activity, including anti-HIV activity [30], are primarily synthesized in the bone marrow and are expressed by neutrophils, monocytes [29], and PCs (Table 3) [31]. For RTD1, strong anti-inflammatory activity has been described [32]. Although humans (and chimpanzees) possess ancestral genes for θ-defensins, these are not expressed due to a stop codon in the preprocoding sequence of θ-defensin genes. However, the chemically synthesized ancestral human RTD peptides “retrocyclins” (RCs) have shown great promise for research into antiviral therapies, drug development, and regulatory immune functions [33]. While defensins serve as strong microbicidal agents, they also aid in the regulation of certain facets of the adaptive immune system, including chemotaxis of T cells and monocytes [34–36] and maturation of DCs [37, 38]. On the other hand, some are downregulators of the immune response such as RTD1, which interferes with NF-κB signaling ablating immune activation [32]. This brief review will focus on the role of defensins in HIV-1 pathogenesis and disease progression and as effectors of innate immune responses and modulators of adaptive immune responses.

2. α-Defensins

2.1. HNP1–4

The HNP1–4 defensins affect a wide range of responses to infections with pathogenic microbes. Among these, inhibition of HIV-1 infection was shown to be mediated by blocking viral entry into cells and interfering with critical steps of viral replication following infection in vitro. HNP1–3 prevent HIV-1 entry into cells by interfering with the binding of viral gp120 to the CD4⁺ T cells [39–42]. HNP1 can also inhibit HIV-1 replication via the disruption of the protein kinase C signaling pathway in an HIV-infected cell [40]. However, the binding of HNPs to HIV-1 envelope is compromised in the presence of serum due to the high binding affinity of HNPs for serum proteins [43, 44]. This suggests that HNPs may not effectively bind to the virions circulating in the blood. Nonetheless, in breast milk, when adjusted for HIV RNA quantity, HIV-1-positive women with higher concentrations of HNP1–3 were less likely to transmit the virus to their child compared to HIV-1-positive women with lower concentrations [45]. Thus, the anti-HIV activity of HNP1–3 is likely more important in regions with low concentrations of serum proteins, such as at mucosal surfaces [43]. While the ability of HNP1–3 to block viral entry is attenuated in the presence of serum proteins, research demonstrates that HNP4 remains active against HIV-1 by binding gp120 and CD4 regardless of the presence of serum proteins [46]. The ability of HNP4 to limit viral infection may be attributable to the higher binding affinities of HNP1–3 for serum proteins compared to that of HNP4 or unique properties of HNP4 that enable it to interact with different regions of gp120 and CD4 than those that bind HNP1–3. The structure and properties of HNP4 differ dramatically from those of HNP1–3 [47], which may further contribute to the observed differences in HNP activity against HIV-1. While HNP4 remains active against HIV-1 in vitro, this effect may be biologically negligible in vivo due to the scarce amount of HNP4 produced by neutrophils [47].

Although neutrophils are not prominently represented in HIV-mediated gastroentropathy, HNP1 had been recently shown to reduce tight junction expression in intestinal epithelial cells and promote HIV traversal, adding to the complexity of HNPs’ role in the HIV infection process [48].

2.2. HD5-6

The direct effects of HD5-6 on HIV-1 transmission in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract and genital mucosa are complex. Because HIV-1 can establish infection within hours after traversing mucosal barriers [3], the ability of innate immune factors to mount a vigorous and immediate response may be the key to successfully preserve intact mucosal barriers and limit viral spread to other tissues. Unlike HNP1, HD5 does not disrupt the intestinal epithelial cell barrier [48], and intestinal PCs constitutively secrete HD5 and 6 to protect the host against invading pathogens and to maintain commensal microbial communities [49–51]. The clinical significance of this role has been well documented for Crohn’s disease, which is characterized by Paneth cell dysfunction with reduced HD5 production, alteration of the resident microbiota, subsequent inflammation, and T cell-mediated immune responses [49]. An upregulation of HD5 in the colorectal mucosa has been observed in patients with HIV-1, possibly in response to intestinal inflammation [52]. Similarly, in response to bacterial vaginosis, the synthesis of HD5 (and HBDs) increased, in agreement with the role of defensins in protecting mucosal barriers [53]. HD5 has been demonstrated to have direct inhibitory effects on HIV-1 entry into purified peripheral blood CD4⁺ T lymphocytes by binding with viral gp120 and the CD4 receptor in serum-free condition in vitro [54]. However, Ding and colleagues showed that the antiviral effect of HD5 on HIV infection in serum-free primary CD4⁺ T lymphocyte cultures was a result of defensin-mediated cell death and was independent of HIV receptors [55]. Moreover, HD5 treatment enhanced HIV infectivity of HeLa-CD4-CCR5 cells in serum-free condition in vitro, in the absence of defensin-mediated cell death [55]. Recent research findings from a mouse enteric adenovirus model revealed that Paneth cell defensins are required for a protective neutralizing antibody response against oral viral infection, suggesting interaction between enteric defensins and the adaptive immune response. Apart from defensin-triggered enhanced immunogenicity of the viral particle through formation of larger aggregates, enteric defensins may chemoattract immune cells and alter T helper and B cell functions. Further studies are needed to determine if enteric defensins similarly recruit T cells in the gut, thereby inducing the gut-associated HIV reservoir.

2.3. Effects on Inflammation and HIV-1 Progression

One intriguing area of research that warrants further investigation is the role of α-defensins in mitigating the effects of HIV-1 as the disease progresses. HIV-1 and SIV infection in human and animals, respectively, induce inflammation by upregulating proinflammatory cytokine and chemokine expression and increase intestinal permeability in the GI tract [56–58]. Understanding the causes and consequences of continuous immune activation and resulting inflammation associated with HIV-1 pathogenesis has become a focus of current research efforts. These pathologic changes occur in acute or chronic stage infection, and activation of immune responses has been implicated in the development of the enteropathy characteristic of HIV-1 [59]. For example, infection of polarized T84 intestinal epithelial cells with various HIV-1 strains led to an upregulation of TNFα, which in turn led to disruption of tight junction proteins and increased permeability, and TNFα produced by HIV-1-infected monocyte-derived macrophages impaired barrier function in HT-29/B6 cells by inducing apoptosis [52, 53].

Similarly, the upregulation of IFNγ and TNFα in SIV-infected macaques promotes apoptosis of intestinal epithelial cells [57]. In humans, the upregulation of intestinal IFNγ stimulates PC degranulation, and the subsequent release of HD5 and 6 may promote barrier integrity but nevertheless could increase viral transmission rates due to increased viral uptake [60, 61]. In SIV-infected macaques, enteric α-defensin expression was increased in the gut at all stages of infection compared to that in control, suggesting that innate defenses are attempting to compensate for the viral-induced epithelial damage and the effects of mucosal T cell depletion [62]. Once intestinal barriers are compromised, microbes that normally inhabit the gut can cross the epithelium and circulate in the systemic immune system (microbial translocation), which is partly responsible for the persistent immune activation associated with HIV-1/SIV disease progression [63, 64]. The continual immune activation eventually exhausts resources to replenish depleted T cell populations and promotes HIV disease progression. Synthesis of enteric defensins certainly functions to protect the host by preventing intestinal barrier disruption; however, there is a lack of information on the potential immunological impacts of these peptides. Decreases in enteric defensin protein levels were observed in SIV-infected macaques at an advanced stage of infection and correlated with an increase in opportunistic bacterial infections [62]. In SIV-infected sooty mangabeys (SMs), a natural host of SIV, α- and θ-defensin expression levels were elevated compared to those in SIV-infected macaques, and the lack of disease progression despite high levels of viral replication observed in SMs compared to macaques was in part attributed to an active downregulation of inflammation in SMs [65]. In response to bacterial infection, HNPs reduce proinflammatory cytokine concentration in vivo in blood in mice [66]. A recent study demonstrated that HNP1, which retains antimicrobial activity when released from apoptotic neutrophils, inhibits, after uptake, mRNA translation in macrophages and reduces inflammatory exudate formation in vitro [66, 67]. However, there is no evidence for elevated gastrointestinal HNP1 concentrations in HIV patients, and a lack of HNP-mediated control of macrophage-driven inflammation may contribute to the development of the continuous inflammation seen in HIV gastroenteropathy.

The antimicrobial activity of α-defensins, combined with their effects on immune regulation and response, necessitates further investigation into the complex relationship between these peptides and HIV-1 pathogenesis.

3. β-Defensins

3.1. In Vitro Study

β-Defensins are predominantly expressed by epithelial cells and therefore can serve as a first line of defense against invading pathogens at mucosal surfaces and skin. The synthesis of HBDs is regulated by, and can regulate, responses of both innate and adaptive immunities. HBD production and secretion are stimulated by microbes [68, 69] and the release of cytokines including IFNγ, IL1, IL17A, IL22, and TNFα [70–72]. The effects of β-defensins on HIV-1 pathogenesis have traditionally centered on the oral environment because the rate of oral HIV-1 transmission is significantly less than that of vaginal or rectal transmission [73, 74], and detectable levels of HBD1, 2, and 3 are routinely found in normal oral epithelium of adults [75]. In addition, recombinant HBD2 and 3 were shown to directly inactivate HIV-1 [76]. A recent study in tonsil epithelial cells has demonstrated that simultaneous binding of heparan sulfate proteoglycans of epithelial cells to HBDs and viral gp120 initiates cointernalization of the defensins and the virions into endosomes and results in reduced HIV infectivity [77]. Following viral entry, HBD2 also blocks HIV-1 replication by preventing an accumulation of reverse transcription products [74]. Moreover, HBD2 and 3 exert anti-HIV-1 activity against both CCR5 and CXCR4 tropic HIV infections [74]. Mother-to-child transmission of HIV-1 most commonly occurs at the oral and gastrointestinal epithelia [78]. In fetal and infant oral epithelial tissues, a lack of HBD expression allows transmigration of virions within oral mucosa and increases the risk of HIV-1 transmission [79]. Both cell-free and cell-associated HIV-1 viral particles can transmigrate through fetal, but not adult, oral epithelium and infect permissive cells [80], further highlighting the potent antiviral activity of HBDs in the adult oral environment.

Coculture experiments with epithelial cells, stromal fibroblasts, and CD4⁺ T cells have shown that epithelial-derived antimicrobial factors can protect CD4⁺ T cells from HIV infection. Endometrial epithelial cells (eEC) significantly overexpressed six genes associated with anti-HIV-1 activity, the most abundant of which were secretory leukocyte peptidase inhibitor and HBD2. The increased gene expression observed in eEC potently inhibited HIV-1 infection of CD4⁺ T cells [81]. However, this study also showed that in the absence of epithelial cells, stromal fibroblasts markedly enhanced HIV infection of CD4⁺ T cells, highlighting the importance of the epithelial cell barrier.

Apart from direct antimicrobial activities, HBD2 has prominent immunomodulatory activities including recruitment of immune cells and induction of antiviral proteins. The first described was the chemotactic activity of HBD2 recruiting not only immature DCs but also memory CD4⁺ T cells by binding to the chemokine receptor CCR6 and later on the chemotaxis induced by HBD2 and HBD3 through CCR2 on myeloid cells [34, 35]. HIV-1 replication is inhibited postentry in PBMCs treated with HBD2 as documented by the inhibition of the accumulation of reverse transcription products [82]. HIV/SIV infection selectively targets and depletes CCR6⁺ CD4⁺ T cells from peripheral blood and those populations that cannot be restored or maintained by antiretroviral treatment [83–86]. However, the interaction between HBD2 and its receptor CCR6 induces the expression of an antiviral protein, the host restriction factor apolipoprotein B mRNA-editing enzyme-catalytic polypeptide-like 3G (APOBEC3G) [82], an enzyme known to prevent complete synthesis of HIV-1 reverse transcripts [87]. CCR6 is expressed on DCs and memory CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells, indicating a potentially important role for HBD2 in preventing HIV-1 infection in CCR6⁺ target cells through the upregulation of additional innate antiviral factors. Other effects include the induction of not only proinflammatory cytokines but also the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL10 and the suppression of IL17 production in CD3/CD28-stimulated T cells [88]. Thus, any alteration in the physiological concentration of HBD2 is likely to have a multitude of effects on the local homeostasis, which is also influenced by the presence of other defensins.

3.2. In Vivo Studies

β-Defensin synthesis has been shown to be associated with the maintenance of GI health following pathogenic infection or the development of intestinal disorders. HBD1 is constitutively expressed in the intestinal epithelium and colon, while HBD2 expression is induced in the colon and duodenum following pathogen exposure [89]. During HIV-1 infection, the extent of microbial translocation that occurs correlates with the amount of inflammation and GI epithelial damage [64]. One proposed reason for the increased intestinal damage in HIV-1-infected patients is the progressive loss of Th17 cells and subsequent diminished control of the resident microbiota by epithelial cells and neutrophils [90]. Th17 cells secrete cytokines that regulate mucosal immune responses and promote secretion of antimicrobial peptides [71], including HBD2 [91]. In SIV infection, a depletion of Th17 cells in the ileal mucosa resulted in increased microbial translocation [92]. The loss of Th17 cells could lead to reduced innate defensin levels triggering additional alteration of immunological signals, thereby exacerbating epithelial damage and translocation of microbes that ultimately induces systemic immune activation in HIV-1-infected individuals. Similar to HIV-1 enteropathy, inflammation induced by irritable bowel disease and ulcerative colitis results in damage to the intestinal epithelium and the subsequent translocation of microbes [93]. HBD2 expression increases in patients with irritable bowel disease [94] and ulcerative colitis [95]. Conversely, HBD1 expression decreases in ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease [95]. The observed variation in intestinal HBD expression highlights the need for future studies to more thoroughly investigate the underlying mechanisms responsible for regulating antimicrobial synthesis in response to GI disorders and pathogenic infections.

Preexisting genital infections affect inflammatory molecule secretions and HBD synthesis, with downstream effects on HIV-1 disease progression. In women with human papillomavirus (HPV) and HIV-1, HBD2 and proinflammatory cytokine levels were elevated compared to those in HIV-1-positive women without HPV [96]. Similarly, a recent study found that greater Escherichia coli inhibitory activity and higher concentrations of HBD1 in cervicovaginal lavage (CVL) were associated with an increased risk of HIV-1 acquisition [97], possibly due to increased mucosal inflammation. An analogous study observed that women who seroconverted to HIV-1 were more likely to have greater E. coli bactericidal activity and higher concentrations of HBD2 in vaginal fluid prior to seroconversion compared to women who did not seroconvert [98]. Conversely, women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia resulting from HPV infection had significantly greater concentrations of proinflammatory cytokines but exhibited lower levels of HBD2 and 3 in CVL compared to controls [99]. Moreover, the defensin-mediated recruitment of innate and adaptive immune cells in response to preexisting genital infections may facilitate HIV-1 dissemination and replication by increasing the number of available target cells [100]. Although HBDs exhibit anti-HIV-1 activity, these studies suggest that a multitude of other factors in the female genital tract including differences in the vaginal microbiome and presence of additional sexually transmitted infections may alter the role of HBDs in vivo. Such discrepancies emphasize the need for further research on the complex interactions between genital infections, innate immunity, adaptive immunity, and HIV-1 pathogenesis.

The variable expression of HBDs in epithelial cells of different origins ultimately impacts how these peptides function to protect the host from infectious agents. While β-defensins exhibit strong anti-HIV-1 activity in oral epithelial cells, in the GI tract, their association with increased secretion of proinflammatory molecules may promote local inflammation and viral transmission. Future research efforts on the relationship between HBDs and HIV-1 should focus on (1) elucidating the mechanisms involved in reduced virion infectivity by β-defensins in the oral environment and assessing their potential to limit HIV-1 spread in other epithelial tissues and (2) exploring the human genomic sequence for novel HBDs. To date, over 50 β-defensins have been identified at the genomic and transcriptional level in humans, although only four HBDs (HBD1–4) have been well characterized at the protein and functional level [101–104]. The two β-defensin isoforms HBD5 and 6 were found to be exclusively expressed in the human epididymis [28], and β-defensins HBD25–29, also known as DEFB125–129, appear to be similarly predominantly expressed in the male genital tract [27]. Recombinantly produced HBD5 and HBD6 exhibited antimicrobial activity against E. coli [105], suggesting that these peptides may also promote host protection and innate immunity. Additional roles may be assigned to sperm maturation and transport impacting male fertility as it had been suggested for DEFB126 [106].

4. θ-Defensins

4.1. Immunomodulatory Properties

θ-Defensins are naturally expressed in Old World monkeys and are the only cyclic peptide identified in mammals [107]. Six isoforms, RTD1–6, have been isolated from neutrophils and bone marrow of nonhuman primates [108, 109]. Like most defensins, RTDs have potent antimicrobial activity, but, compared to α- and β-defensins, θ-defensin activities are relatively insensitive to salt, divalent cations, and serum [110–112]. Although human bone marrow expresses mRNA similar to the mRNA precursor of RTDs, defensin peptides are not synthesized naturally. Using solid-phase peptide synthesis, researchers have synthesized homologous RTD peptides referred to as retrocyclins according to the human pseudogene sequences [107]. In addition to their antimicrobial and possibly protease-inhibiting activities [113, 114], θ-defensins also exhibit immunomodulatory properties. Unlike α- and β-defensins, the θ-defensin RTD1 suppresses the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines by inhibiting the activation of NF-κB and MAPK pathways [32], and RTD1 treatment in mice reduced the levels of proinflammatory cytokines in blood leukocytes that correlated with increased survival of bacterially infected animals [115]. RTD1-treated mice exposed to a mouse severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) coronavirus also showed increased survival associated with decreased levels of proinflammatory cytokines [116]. Interestingly, viral titers remained high throughout the study, suggesting that RTD1 increased survival without inactivating viral particles. RTD1 may also inhibit TNFα-converting enzyme [114] possibly adding to the immunosuppressive activity of RTD1. This protective activity of θ-defensins is unique compared to that of other defensins in which it stems from a pronounced suppression of proinflammatory responses, rather than direct interaction with the pathogens [115]. Because excess production of proinflammatory cytokines induced by HIV-1 exacerbates disease progression, the potential for θ-defensins to mediate these responses needs to be assessed. On the other hand, the expression of functional θ-defensins in Old World monkeys and their resistance to HIV-1 may be a causal relationship, and the anti-inflammatory characteristics of θ-defensins should be evaluated to determine if these peptides can reduce inflammation and subsequent epithelial impairment resulting from HIV-1 infection and can be used to combat HIV in humans.

4.2. Anti-HIV Properties

Both natural and synthetic θ-defensins possess anti-HIV-1 activity [117–119]. Like HNP1 and HBD2, RTD1 downmodulates CXCR4 and inhibits the entry of CXCR4 tropic HIV-1. However, HNP1 and HBD2 also block viral replication after cDNA formation and inhibit CCR5 tropic HIV-1, indicating that distinct mechanisms are utilized by cyclic and acyclic defensins [30]. Key differences in antiretroviral and immune modulatory activities of selected human defensins and rhesus θ-defensins are highlighted in Figure 1. The synthetic RC1 reduces infectivity by preventing the formation of proviral DNA [119] and blocking HIV-1 Env-mediated cell fusion [120]. Furthermore, RC1 provides more protection to CD4⁺ T cells from both T cell tropic and M-tropic HIV-1 strains than do RTD1, 2, or 3 [119]. RCs can further inhibit viral entry by binding viral gp120 and CD4 receptors, where RC2 exhibits the strongest binding affinity compared to other RCs [41]. These studies suggest that RTDs and RCs reduce HIV-1 infectivity by disrupting viral entry instead of directly inactivating virions, as observed for HNPs and HBDs.

Figure 1

Model of the differential action of human and rhesus defensins with antiretroviral activity. The actions of the best-described human defensins with antiretroviral activity, human neutrophil peptide 1 (HNP1) and human beta-defensin 2 (HBD2) (left side) are contrasted to the actions of rhesus theta defensin 1 (RTD1) (right side) leading to the proposed differential immune response and outcome of the retrovirus infection. HIV and SIV represent human immunodeficiency or simian immunodeficiency virus, respectively, shown with yellow hexagons. CXCR4 and CCR5 are the chemokine coreceptors mediating virus entry on susceptible cells, in particular, lymphocytes, monocytes, and macrophages (L/M). Red bars: inhibitory activity at the level of virus entry or viral replication. Triangle: chemotactic activity. Defensin-mediated changes in the levels of key cytokines are shown with the proposed effects on the overall immune response and outcome of the viral infection.

Recent research has focused on the use of RC congeners to develop anti-HIV-1 microbicides that prevent viral transmission. Analogues of RC1 have been engineered to enhance antiviral properties, with the analog RC101 demonstrating greater inhibitory activity against HIV-1 than RC1 [117]. As such, RC101 has been tested for use as a microbicide in vaginal tissues, and the results are promising. A quick-dissolving film formulated with RC101 showed anti-HIV-1 activity in vitro, was nontoxic in reproductive tissues, and remained bioactive for up to 6 months [121, 122]. Moreover, RC101 treatment inhibited pathogenic bacteria in vaginal tissues that are associated with bacterial vaginosis, a condition that increases HIV-1 susceptibility, while simultaneously maintaining beneficial microbial communities that protect the host from infection [123]. The lack of toxicity in vivo, the compatibility of RC101 with normal vaginal microbiota, and the ability of RC101 to inhibit pathogenic bacterial growth make RC101 an ideal peptide for anti-HIV-1 microbicide development. Research and development of inexpensive anti-HIV-1 microbicides are especially important in countries with high infection rates and limited resources. Topical microbicides that prevent HIV-1 transmission could dramatically reduce the number of new infections and deaths resulting from AIDS each year. Future investigations should continue to assess the use of RC101 as a safe, effective microbicide, with an eventual transition into clinical trials.

5. Conclusion

Defensins comprise a critical component of the innate immune response, exhibit activities against a broad range of pathogens, shape the normal microbiota, and modulate immune responses. As HIV-1 preferentially targets cells associated with adaptive immunity, the innate immune response is critical and research continues to explore the ability of defensins to limit viral transmission and to mediate the effects of disease progression. The anti-HIV-1 activity of defensins works on several levels: direct inactivation of virions, inhibition of viral entry, interference of viral replication following cell entry, increasing the production of other antiviral factors, and facilitation of cellular communications that regulate adaptive responses. On the other hand, the immunomodulatory action of defensins may also impact the epithelial barrier function, thereby contributing to HIV dissemination through increased uptake of HIV via stromal fibroblasts and recruitment of susceptible target cells (Figure 2). The SIV-infected macaque model is a well-accepted model for the study of HIV pathogenesis. Continuing to employ the macaque model of SIV infection, combined with insights gained from studies in other diseases on defensin synthesis and immunomodulatory characteristics, is an important key to future progress in HIV research. One crucial next step includes further research into the development of defensin-based HIV-1 therapeutics. The successful use of RC101 in topical microbicides to reduce HIV-1 transmission is encouraging, and research efforts must continue to explore effective, inexpensive ways to decrease the rate of new infections. Targeting the immunomodulatory action of defensins on the GI barrier opens new approaches for limiting HIV dissemination and disease progression in infected patients.

Figure 2

Impact of defensins on HIV infection. Dendritic cells (DC) sampling mucosal surfaces deliver HIV (yellow hexagon) to mononuclear cells (L/M, lymphocytes and monocytes/macrophages). Epithelial cell injury with subsequent inflammatory responses or inflammation of other causes (i) activates epithelial cells (rectangles with solid lines) to increase the production of human defensin 5 (HD5) and β-defensins (HBDs) and (ii) recruits neutrophils (N) which deliver human neutrophil peptides (HNPs). HNPs impair the epithelial cell barrier (rectangles with dotted lines) and HD5, supported by HBDs, and enhance HIV influx which is amplified by stromal fibroblasts (F). Simultaneously, the chemotactic properties of HNP1 and HBD2 have effected an influx of susceptible mononuclear cells further aggravating the HIV infection.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

The study was supported by NIH grants P20-GM103458-09, P51-OD011104, and R01DK109883 (Bapi Pahar) and by the Tulane Office of Research Bridge Funding.

References

Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS, Global AIDS Update 2016, UNAIDS, Switzerland, 2016.
R. Shattock, B. Haynes, B. Pulendran, J. Flores, J. Esparza, and Working Group convened by the Global HIV Vaccine Enterprise, “Improving defences at the portal of HIV entry: mucosal and innate immunity - a summary report from a global HIV vaccine enterprise working group,” PLoS Medicine, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 537–541, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Lackner and R. Veazey, “Current concepts in AIDS pathogenesis: insights from the SIV/macaque model,” Annual Review of Medicine, vol. 58, pp. 461–476, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Page-Shafer, S. Sweet, S. Kassaye, and C. Ssali, “Saliva, breast milk, and mucosal fluids in HIV transmission,” Advances in Dental Research, vol. 19, pp. 152–157, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Pope and A. Haase, “Transmission, acute HIV-1 infection and the quest for strategies to prevent infection,” Nature Medicine, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 847–852, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. F. Baggaley, R. G. White, and M. C. Boily, “HIV transmission risk through anal intercourse: systematic review, meta-analysis and implications for HIV prevention,” International Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 1048–1063, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Zhang, S. Wietgrefe, Q. Li et al., “Roles of substrate availability and infection of restina and activated CD4(+) T cells in transmission and acute simian immunodeficiency virus infection,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 101, no. 15, pp. 5640–5645, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Appay and D. Sauce, “Immune activation and inflammation in HIV-I infection: causes and consequences,” The Journal of Pathology, vol. 214, no. 2, pp. 231–241, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. M. Brenchley, T. W. Schacker, L. E. Ruff et al., “CD4+ T cell depletion during all stages of HIV disease occurs predominantly in the gastrointestinal tract,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 200, no. 6, pp. 749–759, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. M. Doisne, A. Urrutia, C. Lacabaratz-Porret et al., “CD8+ T cells specific for EBV, cytomegalovirus, and influenza virus are activated during primary HIV infection,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 173, no. 4, pp. 2410–2418, 2004.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Tomalka, K. Ghneim, S. Bhattacharyya et al., “The sooner the better: innate immunity as a path toward the HIV cure,” Current Opinion in Virology, vol. 19, pp. 85–91, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Aggarwal, S. McAllery, and S. Turville, “Revising the role of myeloid cells in HIV pathogenesis,” Current HIV/AIDS Reports, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 3–11, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Coffin and R. Swanstrom, “HIV pathogenesis: dynamics and genetics of viral populations and infected cells,” Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine, vol. 3, no. 1, article a012526, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Mavilio, J. Benjamin, M. Daucher et al., “Natural killer cells in HIV-1 infection: dichotomous effects of viremia on inhibitory and activating receptors and their functional correlates,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 100, no. 25, pp. 15011–15016, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. H. Barouch, K. Ghneim, W. J. Bosche et al., “Rapid inflammasome activation following mucosal SIV infection of rhesus monkeys,” Cell, vol. 165, no. 3, pp. 656–667, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Ganz, “Defensins: antimicrobial peptides of innate immunity,” Nature Reviews. Immunology, vol. 3, no. 9, pp. 710–720, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Lehrer and T. Ganz, “Antimicrobial peptides in mammalian and insect host defence,” Current Opinion in Immunology, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 23–27, 1999.
View at: Google Scholar
D. Yang, A. Biragyn, L. Kwak, and J. Oppenheim, “Mammalian defensins in immunity: more than just microbicidal,” Trends in Immunology, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 291–296, 2002.
View at: Google Scholar
L. Liu, A. A. Roberts, and T. Ganz, “By IL-1 signaling, monocyte-derived cells dramatically enhance the epidermal antimicrobial response to lipopolysaccharide,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 170, no. 1, pp. 575–580, 2003.
View at: Google Scholar
R. Hancock and G. Diamond, “The role of cationic antimicrobial peptides in innate host defences,” Trends in Microbiology, vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 402–410, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar
R. I. Lehrer and W. Lu, “Alpha-defensins in human innate immunity,” Immunological Reviews, vol. 245, no. 1, pp. 84–112, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. P. Gounder, N. D. Myers, P. M. Treuting et al., “Defensins potentiate a neutralizing antibody response to enteric viral infection,” PLoS Pathogens, vol. 12, no. 3, article e1005474, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Quayle, E. Porter, A. Nussbaum et al., “Gene expression, immunolocalization, and secretion of human defensin-5 in human female reproductive tract,” American Journal of Pathology, vol. 152, no. 5, pp. 1247–1258, 1998.
View at: Google Scholar
J. D. Spencer, D. S. Hains, E. Porter et al., “Human alpha defensin 5 expression in the human kidney and urinary tract,” PLoS One, vol. 7, no. 2, article e31712, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. S. Wilson, M. E. Wiens, and J. G. Smith, “Antiviral mechanisms of human defensins,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 425, no. 24, pp. 4965–4980, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Niyonsaba, C. Kiatsurayanon, and H. Ogawa, “The role of human beta-defensins in allergic diseases,” Clinical and Experimental Allergy, vol. 46, no. 12, pp. 1522–1530, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Rodriguez-Jimenez, A. Krause, S. Schulz et al., “Distribution of new human beta-defensin genes clustered on chromosome 20 in functionally different segments of epididymis,” Genomics, vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 175–183, 2003.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Yamaguchi, T. Nagase, R. Makita et al., “Identification of multiple novel epididymis-specific β-defensin isoforms in humans and mice,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 169, no. 5, pp. 2516–2523, 2002.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Selsted and A. Ouellette, “Mammalian defensins in the antimicrobial immune response,” Nature Immunology, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 551–557, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Seidel, Y. Ye, L. R. de Armas et al., “Cyclic and acyclic defensins inhibit human immunodeficiency virus type-1 replication by different mechanisms,” PLoS One, vol. 5, no. 3, article e9737, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. M. Lucero, B. Fallert Junecko, C. R. Klamar et al., “Macaque paneth cells express lymphoid chemokine CXCL13 and other antimicrobial peptides not previously described as expressed in intestinal crypts,” Clinical and Vaccine Immunology, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 1320–1328, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Tongaonkar, K. K. Trinh, J. B. Schaal et al., “Rhesus macaque theta-defensin RTD-1 inhibits proinflammatory cytokine secretion and gene expression by inhibiting the activation of NF-kappaB and MAPK pathways,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 98, no. 6, pp. 1061–1070, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. C. Conibear and D. J. Craik, “The chemistry and biology of theta defensins,” Angewandte Chemie (International Edition In English), vol. 53, no. 40, pp. 10612–10623, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Rohrl, D. Yang, J. J. Oppenheim, and T. Hehlgans, “Human beta-defensin 2 and 3 and their mouse orthologs induce chemotaxis through interaction with CCR2,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 184, no. 12, pp. 6688–6694, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Yang, O. Chertov, N. Bykovskaia et al., “Beta-defensins: linking innate and adaptive immunity through dendritic and T cell CCR6,” Science, vol. 286, no. 5439, pp. 525–528, 1999.
View at: Google Scholar
D. Yang, Q. Chen, O. Chertov, and J. Oppenheim, “Human neutrophil defensins selectively chemoattract naive T and immature dendritic cells,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 9–14, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Biragyn, P. A. Ruffini, C. A. Leifer et al., “Toll-like receptor 4-dependent activation of dendritic cells by β-defensin 2,” Science, vol. 298, pp. 1025–1029, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. K. Ferris, Y. K. Mburu, A. R. Mathers et al., “Human beta-defensin 3 induces maturation of human langerhans cell-like dendritic cells: an antimicrobial peptide that functions as an endogenous adjuvant,” The Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 133, no. 2, pp. 460–468, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Furci, F. Sironi, M. Tolazzi, L. Vassena, and P. Lusso, “Alpha-defensins block the early steps of HIV-1 infection: interference with the binding of gp120 to CD4,” Blood, vol. 109, no. 7, pp. 2928–2936, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. L. Chang, J. Vargas Jr., A. DelPortillo, and M. E. Klotman, “Dual role of alpha-defensin-1 in anti-HIV-1 innate immunity,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 115, no. 3, pp. 765–773, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Wang, S. M. Owen, D. L. Rudolph et al., “Activity of - and -defensins against primary isolates of HIV-1,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 173, no. 1, pp. 515–520, 2004.
View at: Google Scholar
C. Mackewicz, J. Yuan, P. Tran et al., “Alpha-defensins can have anti-HIV activity but are not CD8 cell anti-HIV factors,” AIDS, vol. 17, no. 14, pp. F23–F32, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. E. Klotman and T. L. Chang, “Defensins in innate antiviral immunity,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 447–456, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Daher, M. Selsted, and R. Lehrer, “Direct inactivation of viruses by human granulocyte defensins,” Journal of Virology, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 1068–1074, 1986.
View at: Google Scholar
L. Kuhn, D. Trabattoni, C. Kankasa et al., “Alpha-defensins in the prevention of HIV transmission among breastfed infants,” Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 138–142, 2005.
View at: Google Scholar
Z. Wu, F. Cocchi, D. Gentles et al., “Human neutrophil alpha-defensin 4 inhibits HIV-1 infection in vitro,” FEBS Letters, vol. 579, no. 1, pp. 162–166, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Wilde, J. Griffith, M. Marra, J. Snable, and R. Scott, “Purification and characterization of human neutrophil peptide-4, a novel member of the defensin family,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 264, no. 19, pp. 11200–11203, 1989.
View at: Google Scholar
K. Valere, A. Rapista, E. Eugenin, W. Lu, and T. L. Chang, “Human alpha-defensin HNP1 increases HIV traversal of the epithelial barrier: a potential role in STI-mediated enhancement of HIV transmission,” Viral Immunology, vol. 28, no. 10, pp. 609–615, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Wehkamp, N. Salzman, E. Porter et al., “Reduced Paneth cell alpha-defensins in ileal Crohn’s disease,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 102, no. 50, pp. 18129–18134, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Bevins and N. Salzman, “Paneth cells, antimicrobial peptides and maintenance of intestinal homeostasis,” Nature Reviews Microbiology, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 356–368, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Chu, M. Pazgier, G. Jung et al., “Human α-defensin 6 promotes mucosal innate immunity through self-assembled peptide nanonents,” Science, vol. 337, pp. 477–487, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Mait-Kaufman, E. Fakioglu, P. M. Mesquita, J. Elliott, Y. Lo, and R. P. Madan, “Chronic HIV infection is associated with upregulation of proinflammatory cytokine and chemokine and alpha defensin gene expression in colorectal mucosa,” AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 615–622, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. R. Fan, X. P. Liu, and Q. P. Liao, “Human defensins and cytokines in vaginal lavage fluid of women with bacterial vaginosis,” International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 50–54, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Furci, M. Tolazzi, F. Sironi, L. Vassena, and P. Lusso, “Inhibition of HIV-1 infection by human alpha-defensin-5, a natural antimicrobial peptide expressed in the genital and intestinal mucosae,” PLoS One, vol. 7, no. 9, article e45208, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Ding, C. Tasker, K. Valere et al., “Anti-HIV activity of human defensin 5 in primary CD4+ T cells under serum-deprived conditions is a consequence of defensin-mediated cytotoxicity,” PLoS One, vol. 8, no. 9, article e76038, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Olsson, M. Poles, A. Spetz et al., “Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection is associated with significant mucosal inflammation characterized by increased expression of CCR5, CXCR4, and beta-chemokines,” Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 182, no. 6, pp. 1625–1635, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Pan, C. Kenway-Lynch, W. Lala et al., “Lack of interleukin-10-mediated anti-inflammatory signals and upregulated interferon gamma production are linked to increased intestinal epithelial cell apoptosis in pathogenic simian immunodeficiency virus infection,” Journal of Virology, vol. 88, no. 22, pp. 13015–13028, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. S. Kenway-Lynch, A. Das, D. Pan, A. A. Lackner, and B. Pahar, “Dynamics of cytokine/chemokine responses in intestinal CD4+ and CD8+ T cells during acute simian immunodeficiency virus infection,” Journal of Virology, vol. 87, no. 21, pp. 11916–11923, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Brenchley and D. Douek, “HIV infection and the gastrointestinal immune system,” Mucosal Immunology, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 23–30, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Farin, W. Karthaus, P. Kujala et al., “Paneth cell extrusion and release of antimicrobial products is directly controlled by immune cell-derived IFN-gamma,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 211, no. 7, pp. 1388–1400, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Klotman, A. Rapista, N. Teleshova et al., “Neisseria gonorrhoeae-induced human defensins 5 and 6 increase HIV infectivity: role in enhanced transmission,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 180, no. 9, pp. 6176–6185, 2008.
View at: Google Scholar
M. M. Zaragoza, S. Sankaran-Walters, D. R. Canfield et al., “Persistence of gut mucosal innate immune defenses by enteric alpha-defensin expression in the simian immunodeficiency virus model of AIDS,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 186, no. 3, pp. 1589–1597, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
J. M. Brenchley, D. A. Price, and D. C. Douek, “HIV disease: fallout from a mucosal catastrophe?” Nature Immunology, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 235–239, 2006.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Estes, L. Harris, N. Klatt et al., “Damaged intestinal epithelial integrity linked to microbial translocation in pathogenic simian immunodeficiency virus infections,” PLoS Pathogens, vol. 6, no. 8, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. E. Bosinger, Q. Li, S. N. Gordon et al., “Global genomic analysis reveals rapid control of a robust innate response in SIV-infected sooty mangabeys,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 119, no. 12, pp. 3556–3572, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Miles, D. J. Clarke, W. Lu et al., “Dying and necrotic neutrophils are anti-inflammatory secondary to the release of alpha-defensins,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 183, no. 3, pp. 2122–2132, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Brook, G. H. Tomlinson, K. Miles et al., “Neutrophil-derived alpha defensins control inflammation by inhibiting macrophage mRNA translation,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 113, no. 16, pp. 4350–4355, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Vareille, E. Kieninger, M. R. Edwards, and N. Regamey, “The airway epithelium: soldier in the fight against respiratory viruses,” Clinical Microbiology Reviews, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 210–229, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. I. Lee, S. K. Kang, H. J. Jung, Y. H. Chun, Y. D. Kwon, and E. C. Kim, “Muramyl dipeptide activates human beta defensin 2 and pro-inflammatory mediators through Toll-like receptors and NLRP3 inflammasomes in human dental pulp cells,” Clinical Oral Investigations, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 1419–1428, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. R. Dixon, J. N. Radin, M. B. Piazuelo, D. C. Contreras, and H. M. Algood, “IL-17a and IL-22 induce expression of antimicrobials in gastrointestinal epithelial cells and may contribute to epithelial cell defense against helicobacter pylori,” PLoS One, vol. 11, no. 2, article e0148514, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Kolls, P. McCray, and Y. Chan, “Cytokine-mediated regulation of antimicrobial proteins,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 829–835, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. King, D. Fleming, H. Critchley, and R. Kelly, “Regulation of natural antibiotic expression by inflammatory mediators and mimics of infection in human endometrial epithelial cells,” Molecular Human Reproduction, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 341–349, 2002.
View at: Google Scholar
D. C. Shugars and S. M. Wahl, “The role of the oral environment in HIV-1 transmission,” Journal of the American Dental Association, vol. 129, pp. 851–858, 1998.
View at: Google Scholar
L. Sun, C. M. Finnegan, T. Kish-Catalone et al., “Human beta-defensins suppress human immunodeficiency virus infection: potential role in mucosal protection,” Journal of Virology, vol. 79, no. 22, pp. 14318–14329, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Dunsche, Y. Acil, H. Dommisch, R. Siebert, J. Schroder, and S. Jepsen, “The novel human beta-defensin-3 is widely expressed in oral tissues,” European Journal of Oral Sciences, vol. 110, no. 2, pp. 121–124, 2002.
View at: Google Scholar
M. E. Quinones-Mateu, M. M. Lederman, Z. Feng et al., “Human epithelial beta-defensins 2 and 3 inhibit HIV-1 replication,” AIDS, vol. 17, no. 16, pp. F39–F48, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Herrera, M. Morris, K. Rosbe, Z. Feng, A. Weinberg, and S. Tugizov, “Human beta-defensins 2 and -3 cointernalize with human immunodeficiency virus via heparan sulfate proteoglycans and reduce infectivity of intracellular virions in tonsil epithelial cells,” Virology, vol. 487, pp. 172–187, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Luzuriaga, “Mother-to-child transmission of HIV: a global perspective,” Current Infectious Disease Reports, vol. 9, pp. 511–517, 2007.
View at: Google Scholar
S. M. Tugizov, R. Herrera, P. Veluppillai et al., “HIV is inactivated after transepithelial migration via adult oral epithelial cells but not fetal epithelial cells,” Virology, vol. 409, no. 2, pp. 211–222, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. M. Tugizov, R. Herrera, P. Veluppillai et al., “Differential transmission of HIV traversing fetal oral/intestinal epithelia and adult oral epithelia,” Journal of Virology, vol. 86, no. 5, pp. 2556–2570, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. A. Neidleman, J. C. Chen, N. Kohgadai et al., “Mucosal stromal fibroblasts markedly enhance HIV infection of CD4+ T cells,” PLoS Pathogens, vol. 13, no. 2, article e1006163, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. K. Lafferty, L. Sun, L. DeMasi, W. Lu, and A. Garzino-Demo, “CCR6 ligands inhibit HIV by inducing APOBEC3G,” Blood, vol. 115, no. 8, pp. 1564–1571, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. S. McGary, X. Alvarez, S. Harrington et al., “The loss of CCR6+ and CD161+ CD4+ T-cell homeostasis contributes to disease progression in SIV-infected rhesus macaques,” Mucosal Immunology, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 1082–1096, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. K. Lafferty, L. Sun, A. Christensen-Quick, W. Lu, and A. Garzino-Demo, “Human beta defensin 2 selectively inhibits HIV-1 in highly permissive CCR6(+)CD4(+) T cells,” Virus, vol. 9, no. 5, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Gosselin, P. Monteiro, N. Chomont et al., “Peripheral blood CCR4+CCR6+ and CXCR3+CCR6+CD4+ T cells are highly permissive to HIV-1 infection,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 184, no. 3, pp. 1604–1616, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Lecureuil, B. Combadiere, E. Mazoyer et al., “Trapping and apoptosis of novel subsets of memory T lymphocytes expressing CCR6 in the spleen of HIV-infected patients,” Blood, vol. 109, no. 9, pp. 3649–3657, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. N. Bishop, M. Verma, E. Y. Kim, S. M. Wolinsky, and M. H. Malim, “APOBEC3G inhibits elongation of HIV-1 reverse transcripts,” PLoS Pathogens, vol. 4, no. 12, article e1000231, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Kanda, M. Kamata, Y. Tada, T. Ishikawa, S. Sato, and S. Watanabe, “Human beta-defensin-2 enhances IFN-gamma and IL-10 production and suppresses IL-17 production in T cells,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 89, no. 6, pp. 935–944, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. O'Neil, E. Porter, D. Elewaut et al., “Expression and regulation of the human beta-defensins hBD-1 and hBD-2 in intestinal epithelium,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 163, no. 12, pp. 6718–6724, 1999.
View at: Google Scholar
V. Cecchinato, C. J. Trindade, A. Laurence et al., “Altered balance between Th17 and Th1 cells at mucosal sites predicts AIDS progression in simian immunodeficiency virus-infected macaques,” Mucosal Immunology, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 279–288, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. C. Liang, X. Y. Tan, D. P. Luxenberg et al., “Interleukin (IL)-22 and IL-17 are coexpressed by Th17 cells and cooperatively enhance expression of antimicrobial peptides,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 203, no. 10, pp. 2271–2279, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Raffatellu, R. L. Santos, D. E. Verhoeven et al., “Simian immunodeficiency virus-induced mucosal interleukin-17 deficiency promotes Salmonella dissemination from the gut,” Nature Medicine, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 421–428, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Caradonna, L. Amati, T. Magrone, N. Pellegrino, E. Jirillo, and D. Caccavo, “Enteric bacteria, lipopolysaccharides and related cytokines in inflammatory bowel disease: biological and clinical significance,” Journal of Endotoxin Research, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 205–214, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Langhorst, A. Junge, A. Rueffer et al., “Elevated human beta-defensin-2 levels indicate an activation of the innate immune system in patients with irritable bowel syndrome,” The American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 104, no. 2, pp. 404–410, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Wehkamp, J. Harder, M. Weichenthal et al., “Inducible and constitutive β-defensins are differentially expressed in Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis,” Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 215–223, 2003.
View at: Google Scholar
N. Buckley, A. Huber, Y. Lo et al., “Association of high-risk human papillomavirus with genital tract mucosal immune factors in HIV-infected women,” American Journal of Reproductive Immunology, vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 146–154, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Madan, L. Masson, J. Tugetman et al., “Innate antibacterial activity in female genital tract secretions is associated with increased risk of HIV acquisition,” AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses, vol. 31, no. 11, pp. 1153–1159, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. S. Dezzutti, B. A. Richardson, J. M. Marrazzo et al., “Mucosal Escherichia coli bactericidal activity and immune mediators are associated with HIV-1 seroconversion in women participating in the HPTN 035 trial,” The Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 206, no. 12, pp. 1931–1935, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Mhatre, T. McAndrew, C. Carpenter, R. D. Burk, M. H. Einstein, and B. C. Herold, “Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia is associated with genital tract mucosal inflammation,” Sexually Transmitted Diseases, vol. 39, no. 8, pp. 591–597, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. T. Haase, “Targeting early infection to prevent HIV-1 mucosal transmission,” Nature, vol. 464, no. 7286, pp. 217–223, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. B. Lombardo Bedran, M. P. Morin, D. Palomari Spolidorio, and D. Grenier, “Black tea extract and its theaflavin derivatives inhibit the growth of periodontopathogens and modulate interleukin-8 and beta-defensin secretion in oral epithelial cells,” PLoS One, vol. 10, no. 11, article e0143158, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Prahl, M. Pazgier, J. Alexandratos, and J. Lubkowski, “Human beta-defensin 4 - defensin without the “twist”,” Postepy Biochemii, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 349–361, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
R. Pero, L. Coretti, E. Nigro et al., “Beta-defensins in the fight against helicobacter pylori,” Molecules, vol. 22, no. 3, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. J. Schneider, A. Unholzer, M. Schaller, M. Schafer-Korting, and H. C. Korting, “Human defensins,” Journal of Molecular Medicine (Berlin), vol. 83, no. 8, pp. 587–595, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Huang, C. B. Ching, R. Jiang, and S. S. Leong, “Production of bioactive human beta-defensin 5 and 6 in Escherichia coli by soluble fusion expression,” Protein Expression and Purification, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 168–174, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. L. Tollner, C. L. Bevins, and G. N. Cherr, “Multifunctional glycoprotein DEFB126—a curious story of defensin-clad spermatozoa,” Nature Reviews Urology, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 365–375, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. I. Lehrer, A. M. Cole, and M. E. Selsted, “Theta-defensins: cyclic peptides with endless potential,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 287, no. 32, pp. 27014–27019, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Tran, P. A. Tran, Y. Q. Tang, J. Yuan, T. Cole, and M. E. Selsted, “Homodimeric theta-defensins from rhesus macaque leukocytes: isolation, synthesis, antimicrobial activities, and bacterial binding properties of the cyclic peptides,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 277, no. 5, pp. 3079–3084, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Tongaonkar, P. Tran, K. Roberts et al., “Rhesus macaque theta-defensin isoforms: expression, antimicrobial activities, and demonstration of a prominent role in neutrophil granule microbicidal activities,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 283–290, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Tran, P. Tran, K. D. Roberts et al., “Microbicidal properties and cytocidal selectivity of rhesus macaque theta defensins,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 944–953, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. E. Selsted, “θ-Defensins: cyclic antimicrobial peptides produced by binary ligation of truncated α-defensins,” Current Protein and Peptide Science, vol. 5, pp. 365–371, 2004.
View at: Google Scholar
P. M. Beringer, T. J. Bensman, H. Ho et al., “Rhesus theta-defensin-1 (RTD-1) exhibits in vitro and in vivo activity against cystic fibrosis strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa,” The Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 181–188, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. A. Rothan, H. C. Han, T. S. Ramasamy, S. Othman, N. A. Rahman, and R. Yusof, “Inhibition of dengue NS2B-NS3 protease and viral replication in Vero cells by recombinant retrocyclin-1,” BMC Infectious Diseases, vol. 12, p. 314, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Li, A. Gould, T. Aboye et al., “Full sequence amino acid scanning of theta-defensin RTD-1 yields a potent anthrax lethal factor protease inhibitor,” Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 60, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. B. Schaal, D. Tran, P. Tran et al., “Rhesus macaque theta defensins suppress inflammatory cytokines and enhance survival in mouse models of bacteremic sepsis,” PLoS One, vol. 7, no. 12, article e51337, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. L. Wohlford-Lenane, D. K. Meyerholz, S. Perlman et al., “Rhesus theta-defensin prevents death in a mouse model of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus pulmonary disease,” Journal of Virology, vol. 83, no. 21, pp. 11385–11390, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. M. Owen, D. L. Rudolph, W. Wang et al., “RC-101, a retrocyclin-1 analogue with enhanced activity against primary HIV type 1 isolates,” AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses, vol. 20, no. 11, pp. 1157–1165, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Münk, G. E. Wei, O. O. Yang et al., “The θ-defensin, retrocyclin, inhibits HIV-1 entry,” AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses, vol. 19, no. 10, pp. 875–881, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. M. Cole, T. Hong, L. M. Boo et al., “Retrocyclin: a primate peptide that protects cells from infection by T- and M-tropic strains of HIV-1,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 99, no. 4, pp. 1813–1818, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. A. Gallo, W. Wang, S. S. Rawat et al., “Theta-defensins prevent HIV-1 Env-mediated fusion by binding gp41 and blocking 6-helix bundle formation,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 281, no. 27, pp. 18787–18792, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. M. Cole, D. L. Patton, L. C. Rohan et al., “The formulated microbicide RC-101 was safe and antivirally active following intravaginal application in pigtailed macaques,” PLoS One, vol. 5, no. 11, article e15111, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. B. Sassi, M. R. Cost, A. L. Cole et al., “Formulation development of retrocyclin 1 analog RC-101 as an anti-HIV vaginal microbicide product,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 2282–2289, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. R. Eade, A. L. Cole, C. Diaz et al., “The anti-HIV microbicide candidate RC-101 inhibits pathogenic vaginal bacteria without harming endogenous flora or mucosa,” American Journal of Reproductive Immunology, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 150–158, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Ganz, M. E. Selsted, D. Szklarek et al., “Defensins: natural peptide antibiotics of human neutrophils,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 76, pp. 1427–1435, 1985.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Chalifour, P. Jeannin, J. F. Gauchat et al., “Direct bacterial protein PAMP recognition by human NK cells involves TLRs and triggers alpha-defensin production,” Blood, vol. 104, no. 6, pp. 1778–1783, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Jones and C. Bevins, “Paneth cells of the human small-intestine express an antimicrobial peptide gene,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 267, no. 32, pp. 23216–23225, 1992.
View at: Google Scholar
D. Jones and C. Bevins, “Defensin-6 messenger-RNA in human Paneth cells - implications for antimicrobial peptides in host defense of the human bowel,” FEBS Letters, vol. 315, no. 2, pp. 187–192, 1993.
View at: Google Scholar
E. Valore, C. Park, A. Quayle, K. Wiles, P. McCray, and T. Ganz, “Human beta-defensin-1: an antimicrobial peptide of urogenital tissues,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 101, no. 8, pp. 1633–1642, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Zhao, I. Wang, and R. Lehrer, “Widespread expression of beta-defensin hBD-1 in human secretory glands and epithelial cells,” FEBS Letters, vol. 396, no. 2-3, pp. 319–322, 1996.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Harder, J. Bartels, E. Christophers, and J. Schroder, “A peptide antibiotic from human skin,” Nature, vol. 387, no. 6636, pp. 861–861, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Harder, J. Bartels, E. Christophers, and J. Schroder, “Isolation and characterization of human beta-defensin-3, a novel human inducible peptide antibiotic,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 276, no. 8, pp. 5707–5713, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Harder, U. Meyer-Hoffert, K. Wehkamp, L. Schwichtenberg, and J. Schroder, “Differential gene induction of human beta-defensins (hBD-1, -2, -3, and -4) in keratinocytes is inhibited by retinoic acid,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 123, no. 3, pp. 522–529, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Garcia, A. Krause, S. Schulz et al., “Human beta-defensin 4: a novel inducible peptide with a specific salt-sensitive spectrum of antimicrobial activity,” FASEB Journal, vol. 15, no. 8, p. 1819, 2001.
View at: Google Scholar
L. Duits, B. Ravensbergen, M. Rademaker, P. Hiemstra, and P. Nibbering, “Expression of beta-defensin 1 and 2 mRNA by human monocytes, macrophages and dendritic cells,” Immunology, vol. 106, no. 4, pp. 517–525, 2002.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Tang, J. Yuan, G. Osapay et al., “A cyclic antimicrobial peptide produced in primate leukocytes by the ligation of two truncated alpha-defensins,” Science, vol. 286, no. 5439, pp. 498–502, 1999.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Garcia, G. Osapay, P. Tran, J. Yuan, and M. Selsted, “Isolation, synthesis, and antimicrobial activities of naturally occurring theta-defensin isoforms from baboon leukocytes,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 76, no. 12, pp. 5883–5891, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2017 Barcley T. Pace et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

2663

Downloads

1265

Citations