Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity

Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity / 2019 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2019 |Article ID 3061607 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3061607

Sonja Stojković Burić, Ana Podolski-Renić, Jelena Dinić, Tijana Stanković, Mirna Jovanović, Stefan Hadžić, Jose M. Ayuso, María Virumbrales-Muñoz, Luis J. Fernández, Ignacio Ochoa, Victor M. Pérez-García, Milica Pešić, "Modulation of Antioxidant Potential with Coenzyme Q10 Suppressed Invasion of Temozolomide-Resistant Rat Glioma In Vitro and In Vivo", Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2019, Article ID 3061607, 14 pages, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3061607

Modulation of Antioxidant Potential with Coenzyme Q10 Suppressed Invasion of Temozolomide-Resistant Rat Glioma In Vitro and In Vivo

Academic Editor: Luigi Iuliano
Received06 Sep 2018
Accepted06 Jan 2019
Published11 Mar 2019

Abstract

The main reasons for the inefficiency of standard glioblastoma (GBM) therapy are the occurrence of chemoresistance and the invasion of GBM cells into surrounding brain tissues. New therapeutic approaches obstructing these processes may provide substantial survival improvements. The purpose of this study was to assess the potential of lipophilic antioxidant coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) as a scavenger of reactive oxygen species (ROS) to increase sensitivity to temozolomide (TMZ) and suppress glioma cell invasion. To that end, we used a previously established TMZ-resistant RC6 rat glioma cell line, characterized by increased production of ROS, altered antioxidative capacity, and high invasion potential. CoQ10 in combination with TMZ exerted a synergistic antiproliferative effect. These results were confirmed in a 3D model of microfluidic devices showing that the CoQ10 and TMZ combination is more cytotoxic to RC6 cells than TMZ monotherapy. In addition, cotreatment with TMZ increased expression of mitochondrial antioxidant enzymes in RC6 cells. The anti-invasive potential of the combined treatment was shown by gelatin degradation, Matrigel invasion, and 3D spheroid invasion assays as well as in animal models. Inhibition of MMP9 gene expression as well as decreased N-cadherin and vimentin protein expression implied that CoQ10 can suppress invasiveness and the epithelial to mesenchymal transition in RC6 cells. Therefore, our data provide evidences in favor of CoQ10 supplementation to standard GBM treatment due to its potential to inhibit GBM invasion through modulation of the antioxidant capacity.

1. Introduction

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary malignant tumor with an astrocytic lineage [1]. Treatment options for this type of brain tumor remain limited. The current first-line standard of care is maximal surgical resection and radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant chemotherapy with temozolomide (TMZ), a DNA alkylating agent that can cross the blood-brain barrier [2]. Unfortunately, the recurrence rate is high (~ 90%) and the median overall survival of GBM patients is 15 to 18 months, with less than 10% 5-year survival rate [3]. To a vast extent, the reason lies in the high level of intratumor heterogeneity and complex tumor microenvironment resulting in aggressive invasiveness and resistance to radio- and chemotherapy.

Invasion of glioma cells into brain parenchyma is a complex process that includes changes in cell-cell adhesion, remodeling of the extracellular matrix (ECM), and cell migration [4]. Glioma cells have a characteristic migratory pattern along blood vessel membranes or myelinated nerve fibers of the white matter [5]. Cell-cell adhesion is compromised during epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), the process that enables transit of polarized epithelial cells to invasive mesenchymal phenotype. This transition is accompanied by a decreased expression level of epithelial genes (e.g., E-cadherin, ZO-1, and occludin) and increased expression level of mesenchymal genes (e.g., N-cadherin, vimentin, and fibronectin) [6]. Different types of proteases are involved in ECM degradation and remodeling, including members of the matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) family, their inhibitors (tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMP)), urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and its receptor, and cathepsin B. Increased expression of these proteases positively correlates with invasion potential and glioma grade [7, 8]. Malignant gliomas also express a variety of integrin receptors which interact with different components of ECM (e.g., tenascin, laminin, and vitronectin) [9]. This interaction induces cytoskeletal rearrangement and promotes migration. In addition, there are complex bidirectional associations between development of drug resistance and EMT in various types of cancer [10, 11]. Thus, glioma cells resistant to bis-chloroethyl nitrosourea (BCNU), also known as carmustine, showed a significant decrease in E-cadherin expression, increase in vimentin expression and phenotypic changes consistent with EMT, spindle-shaped morphology, and enhanced pseudopodia formation [12].

Resistance to DNA-damaging agents, including TMZ, is usually followed by altered reactive oxygen species (ROS) production in mitochondria [13, 14]. Mitochondria are the major ROS producers due to leakage of electrons from electron transport chains which leads to partial reduction of oxygen and formation of superoxide [15]. Superoxide is dismutated to H2O2 by manganese superoxide dismutase (MnSOD) in the mitochondrial matrix or copper/zinc SOD (CuZnSOD) in the cytosol. Decomposition of H2O2 to oxygen and water is mediated by catalase (CAT) and glutathione peroxidase (GPx) with a help of glutathione reductase (GR) [16].

Our RC6 rat glioma model previously established from a C6 cell line is characterized by resistance to BCNU and TMZ (the only two drugs which have been approved so far by FDA for high-grade glioma treatment), lower proliferation rate, and increased invasion potential in vitro and in vivo [17, 18]. The main mechanism implicated in this resistant and highly invasive phenotype is the alteration of oxidative balance with an elevated level of ROS production and an increased expression of genes involved in redox regulation (MnSOD, GPx, and iNOS) [18].

Herein, we wanted to explore the influence of coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10), a lipid-soluble antioxidant involved in the mitochondrial electron transport chain, on RC6 cell-resistant and invasive phenotypes. In addition to direct antioxidant scavenging, CoQ10 regenerates vitamin E and ascorbate from their oxidized state [19]. CoQ10 supplementation has significant impact on the expression of many genes involved in cell signaling, metabolism, and transport [20]. Various diseases associated with CoQ10 deficiency can benefit from CoQ10 supplementation including cardiovascular and neurodegenerative diseases and cancer [21]. Recently, Frontiñán-Rubio et al. showed that CoQ10 treatment enhances DNA damage induced by radiation and potentiates TMZ cytotoxicity in human glioblastoma cell lines [22]. In addition, some mathematical works have hypothesized a synergistic effect of antioxidants in combination with chemotherapeutics [23].

Therefore, our first goal was to investigate the potential of antioxidant CoQ10 in sensitization of RC6 cells to TMZ, in vitro and in microfluidic devices. Next, we explored the single and combined effects of CoQ10 and TMZ on ROS production and expression of enzymatic components involved in redox regulation. We further tested the ability of single and combined CoQ10 and TMZ treatments to suppress the invasive capacity of RC6 cells in vitro and in vivo and finally examined the mechanism underlying inhibition of RC6 invasive phenotype.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Drugs and Agents

Temozolomide (TMZ) was purchased from Schering-Plough, Labo NV, Heist-op-den-Berg, Belgium. Coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) (Kaneka Corporation) was kindly provided by Dr. Mario Durán-Prado from the Faculty of Medicine, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Spain. TMZ was diluted in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and 100 mM aliquots were stored at 4°C. New 2 mM CoQ10 aliquots in DMSO were prepared for each treatment.

2.2. Cells and Culture Conditions

RC6 cells were selected from C6 cells by continuous exposure to stepwise increasing concentrations of BCNU for nine months [18]. Cells were maintained in DMEM medium supplemented with 10% FBS, 2 mM L-glutamine, 4.5 g/l glucose, 5000 U/ml penicillin, and 5 mg/ml streptomycin solution at 37°C in humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere. Passaging was performed in 72 h intervals using 0.25% trypsin/EDTA, and cells were seeded into fresh medium in a concentration of 8000 cells/cm2.

2.3. Cell Viability Analysis In Vitro and Median-Effect Analysis

Sulforhodamine B (SRB) assay (Sigma-Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany) was used to assess the combined effect of CoQ10 and TMZ on RC6 cell growth. 2000 cells/well were seeded in 96-well flat-bottom plates and incubated for 24 h at 37°C. Cells were then treated for 72 h with different concentrations of TMZ (10, 25, 50, 100, and 250 μM) combined with different concentrations of CoQ10 (5, 10, and 25 μM). Afterwards, cells were fixed in 50% trichloracetic acid for 1 h at 4°C, rinsed in tap water, and stained with 0.4% SRB in 1% acetic acid for 30 min at room temperature. The cells were then rinsed three times in 1% acetic acid to remove the unbound stain. The protein-bound SRB stain was extracted with a 10 mM Tris base. Absorbance was measured at 540 nm using an automated microplate reader (LKB 5060-006 Microplate Reader, LKB, Vienna, Austria). Half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values were defined as the concentration of the drug that inhibited cell growth by 50% and was calculated by nonlinear regression analysis using GraphPad Prism 6 software (La Jolla, CA, USA).

The median-effect analyses are based on the median-effect principle established by Chou and Talalay [24] which was used to calculate the combination index () value for the interaction between TMZ and CoQ10. The analyses were carried out using CalcuSyn software (Biosoft, Cambridge, UK). We used at least three data points for each single drug in each designed experiment. The nonconstant ratio combination was chosen to determine the effect of both drugs in combination. indicates synergism, indicates an additive effect, and indicates antagonism.

2.4. Cell Viability Analysis in Microfluidic Devices

The microfluidic devices used in our experiments were designed by the Group of Applied Mechanics and Bioengineering (AMB), Aragón Institute of Engineering Research (I3A), University of Zaragoza, Spain, and fabricated by BEONCHIP (Spain). The microfluidic chips were previously validated in drug toxicity analysis [24]. The microfluidic device comprises of a central microchamber and two lateral microchannels. Due to its specific design, a hydrogel can be confined in the central microchamber without invading the lateral microchannels. In this way, a 3D system was developed with the tumor cells being embedded in a collagen hydrogel, mimicking extracellular matrix, in the central microchamber. The lateral microchannels remained hydrogel-free, mimicking blood vessels, and were used for the delivery of medium with nutrients, oxygen, or drugs as required.

For the preparation of three-dimensional cell cultures in collagen hydrogels, all reagents and microdevices were placed on ice. RC6 cells were resuspended in 50 μl of medium. Cell suspension was then mixed with 50 μl of hydrogel (35.7 μl of collagen type I (Corning®, New York, USA); 0.89 μl 1 M NaOH; 10 μl 5x DMEM; 3.4 μl dH2O), and 10 μl of this mixture was injected in the central microchamber. Polymerization of the hydrogel was carried out for 15 min in the incubator, and then, lateral microchannels were perfused with medium to allow oxygen and nutrient diffusion. After 2 h, this medium was removed and a fresh one with 10 μM CoQ10, 250 μM TMZ, or their combination was perfused through the lateral microchannels. Drops of medium were left at each lateral microchannel inlet to prevent evaporation. Cell viability was examined after 72 h with calcein (CAM) (1 : 1000; Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA)/propidium iodide (PI) (4 μg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany) staining. Images of microdevices were taken using a Nikon Eclipse Ti microscope (Nikon Instruments Inc., Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a C1 modular confocal microscope system, at 2x magnification. The results were analyzed using Fiji® software and represented as PI fluorescence intensity across the microdevice. At least three independent experiments were performed.

2.5. ROS Production in Microfluidic Devices

Preparation of three-dimensional cell cultures in microfluidic devices was performed as described in Cell viability analysis in microfluidic device subsection. The medium with 10 μM CoQ10 was perfused through the lateral microchannels. ROS production was examined using 25 μM CellROX® Orange (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA) that was also perfused through the lateral microchannels after 2 h and 4 h. Images of microdevices were taken using a Nikon Eclipse Ti microscope equipped with a C1 modular confocal microscope system, at 10x magnification. The results were analyzed using Fiji® software and represented as fluorescence intensity of oxidized CellROX® Orange across the segment of the microdevice. At least three independent experiments were performed.

2.6. RNA Extraction, Reverse Transcription, and Real-Time Quantitative PCR

RC6 cells were treated with 10 μM CoQ10, 250 μM TMZ, or their combination for 24 h. Total RNA was isolated from these samples and control RC6 cells without treatment using TRIzol® reagent (Invitrogen Life Technologies, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA was quantified by spectrophotometry, and quality was determined by agarose gel electrophoresis. RT reactions were performed using 2 μg of total RNA, with a high-capacity cDNA reverse transcription kit (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA), following the manufacturer’s instructions.

Real-time quantitative PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed in order to determine MnSOD [25], CuZnSOD, CAT, GR [26], iNOS [27], MMP9 [17], and β-actin [28] gene expression levels. Prepared 100 ng cDNAs were amplified using Maxima SYBR Green/ROX qPCR Master Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA), according to the recommendations of the manufacturer, in a QuantStudio 3 Real-Time PCR System (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA). Thermocycler conditions comprised an initial step at 50°C for 5 min, followed by a step at 95°C for 10 min and a subsequent 2-step PCR program at 95°C for 15 s and 60°C for 60 s for 40 cycles. The accumulation of PCR products was detected in real time; the results were analyzed using the QuantStudio™ Design and Analysis Software 1.3.1. and presented as [29], being the difference between values of specific genes and β-actin as endogenous control.

2.7. Protein Isolation and Western Blot Analysis

RC6 cells were treated with 10 μM CoQ10, 250 μM TMZ, or their combination for 24 h. Proteins were isolated from these samples and control RC6 cells without treatment in RIPA buffer containing complete protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktails (Roche, Mannheim, Germany). Total protein concentrations were measured with Micro BCA™ Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA), using bovine serum albumin as standard.

Equal amounts of proteins (35 μg) were separated by 8% or 12% SDS-PAGE and transferred onto PVDF membranes (GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK). The membranes were blocked with 3% bovine serum albumin in blotto base buffer (0.1% Tween 20, 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.6, 137 mM NaCl) for 1 h at room temperature and incubated overnight at 4°C in the same buffer containing rabbit polyclonal antibodies specific to CAT (1 : 2000; ab16731; Abcam, UK), GR (1 : 2000; ab16801; Abcam, UK), CuZnSOD (1 : 2000; ab13533; Abcam, UK), MnSOD (1 : 5000; ab13498; Abcam, UK), iNOS (1 : 1000; MABN527; Darmstadt, Germany), or GAPDH (1 : 5000; G9545; Darmstadt, Germany) and mouse polyclonal antibodies specific to vimentin (1 : 1000; M0725; Dako, Denmark) or N-cadherin (1 : 5000; 610921; BD Biosciences, USA). After washing for five times with blotto base buffer, horseradish peroxidase- (HRP-) conjugated bovine anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibody (1 : 5000; ab6721; Abcam, UK) or rabbit anti-mouse IgG secondary antibody (1 : 3000; P0260; Dako, Denmark) was applied in the same buffer for 1 h at room temperature. Immunoreactive bands were detected on medical X-ray blue film (Carestream Health Inc., NY, USA) by the enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) detection system (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, TX, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Densitometric quantification of immunoreactive bands was performed using ImageQuant (GE Healthcare) image analysis software (ver. 5.2) and expressed as relative values normalized to GAPDH as internal control.

2.8. Gelatin Degradation Assay

RC6 cells were plated on top of glass coverslips (20000 cells per coverslip) coated with Alexa Fluor 488-labeled gelatin (Gelatin from Pig Skin, Oregon Green® 488 Conjugate, Life Technologies, MA, USA) in 6-well plates. The cells were treated with 10 μM CoQ10, 250 μM TMZ, or their combination. Corresponding control was used. After 24 h, cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) and costained with Hoechst 33342 (1 : 1000; Sigma-Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany) and ActinRed 555 (1 : 500; Invitrogen Life Technologies, MA, USA). The coverslips were analyzed at a 20x magnification under a Zeiss Axiovert inverted fluorescent microscope (Carl Zeiss Foundation, Heidenheim, Germany). The volume of the dark area caused by degradation of gelatin was measured in ImageJ software (v.1.48, Microsoft, WA, USA) and normalized in relation to the volume of the cell. At least 100 cells were analyzed per experiment.

2.9. Matrigel Invasion Assay

In Matrigel invasion assay, Transwell inserts (membrane pore size, 8 μm; diameter, 6.4 mm; BD Biosciences Discovery Labware, USA) were placed in 24-well plates. 70000 RC6 cells were seeded in serum-free medium in the upper chambers covered with a layer of Matrigel Basement Membrane Matrix (5 mg/ml, BD Biosciences) and treated 24 h with 10 μM CoQ10, 250 μM TMZ, or their combination. Corresponding untreated cells were used as a positive control. The lower chambers were filled with DMEM medium supplemented with 10% FBS as chemoattractant. A negative control with serum-free medium in the lower chamber was also included in the experiment. After the incubation, cells that invaded through the Matrigel and its underlying membrane were fixed in 4% PFA and stained with Hoechst 33342 (1 : 1000). Cells (their nuclei) present at the lower surfaces of the membranes were counted under a Zeiss Axiovert inverted fluorescent microscope, at 10x magnification. The average number of cells in 30 independent fields per membrane was analyzed using ImageJ software. At least three independent experiments were performed.

2.10. 3D Tumor Spheroid Invasion Assay

RC6 spheroids were generated using the hanging drop method with methylcellulose, as previously described [17]. For 3D invasion assay, 25 μl of spheroids was embedded in hydrogel mixture (17.85 μl collagen type I; 0.45 μl 1 M NaOH; 5 μl 5x DMEM; 1.7 μl dH2O), placed on top of 50 μl of hydrogel, and treated with 10 μM CoQ10, 250 μM TMZ, their combination, or 50 μM GM6001 (Selleckchem, TX, USA). Control without treatment was included. After 24 h, spheroids were stained with CAM (1 : 1000) and PI (1 : 500) in order to visualize spheroids and test viability. Images of spheroids were taken using a Nikon Eclipse Ti microscope equipped with a C1 modular confocal microscope system, at 20x magnification. The size of spheroids was analyzed using Fiji® software. At least 10 spheroids were analyzed per experiment.

2.11. Animal Studies

Three-month-old male Wistar rats were used for in vivo experiments. All animal procedures were in compliance with Directive (2010/63/EU) on the protection of animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes and were approved by the Ethical Committee for the Use of Laboratory Animals of the Institute for Biological Research “Siniša Stanković,” University of Belgrade. The animals were housed under standard conditions (, 60%–70% relative humidity, 12 h light and dark cycles, and free access to water and food).

The animal model was established as previously described by Stojković et al. [17]. Briefly, animals were anesthetized with Nembutal (Serva, Heidelberg, Germany) at 50 mg/kg, administered intraperitoneally (i.p.). 105 CFSE-labeled RC6 cells (Invitrogen Life Technologies, MA, USA) in 5 μl suspension were injected in brain parenchyma (primary motor cortex) using a Hamilton syringe. TMZ and CoQ10 were dissolved in DMSO and further diluted in 0.9% NaCl for subsequent i.p. administration. Animals were randomly divided into 4 groups; each group consisted of 5 animals: the control group, the group that received 10 mg/kg CoQ10 (starting the 5th day after cell inoculation, 2 times a week for three weeks), the group that received 4 mg/kg TMZ (starting the 12th day after cell inoculation, 5 days consecutively), and the group that received the combination regimen. After 25 days, animals were sacrificed and brains were removed and fixed in 4% PFA and cryoprotected in 30% sucrose in PBS. The brains were cut in coronal sections and stained with Hoechst 33342 (1 : 1000) for nuclei visualization. Images of coronal sections were taken using a Zeiss Axiovert inverted fluorescent microscope, at 5x magnification.

2.12. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed by GraphPad Prism 6 software (La Jolla, CA, USA). Data normality was estimated using Shapiro-Wilk’s test. The data obtained by SRB assay were analyzed by two-way ANOVA, using Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. Invasion assays, qRT-PCR, and Western blot experiments were analyzed by Student’s -test. Gelatin degradation data did not have a normal distribution, so the Wilcoxon matched-pair signed rank test was carried out. The observed differences were considered statistically significant if .

3. Results

3.1. CoQ10-Sensitized RC6 Cells to TMZ In Vitro and in Microfluidic Devices

First, we assessed the inhibitory effect of combined CoQ10 and TMZ treatments on RC6 cell growth after 72 h using the SRB assay. The application of all CoQ10 concentrations (5 μM, 10 μM, and 25 μM) decreased the IC50 values for TMZ. More prominent effects were obtained with 10 μM and 25 μM CoQ10 concentrations, showing 2.4-fold and 3.3-fold decreases in IC50 for TMZ, respectively (Figure 1). The obtained results were analyzed using a synergism/antagonism CalcuSyn software tool. Concentrations of 10 μM CoQ10 and 250 μM TMZ whose combination index (CI) was 0.427 were used in single and combined treatments in the following experiments. Nevertheless, all tested combinations showed synergistic effects having (data not shown).

Then, microfluidic devices were employed to study the efficacy of the proposed treatments in conditions that reflect more accurately the complex tumor microenvironment. RC6 cells/ml were embedded in a collagen hydrogel and injected in the central microchamber of microfluidic device. Lateral microchannels were perfused with growth medium, or medium supplemented with 10 μM CoQ10, 250 μM TMZ, or their combination. After 72 h, cells were stained with CAM and PI (Figure 2(a)). Treatment with CoQ10 did not change the intensity of PI fluorescence implying that CoQ10 did not induce cell death. TMZ treatment led to an increase of the PI fluorescence intensity in an area adjacent to the lateral microchannels confirming its cytotoxicity. Combined treatment produced more intense increase of PI fluorescence in a much wider area adjacent to the lateral microchannels compared to single TMZ treatment suggesting synergistic interaction between two drugs (Figure 2(b)).

3.2. CoQ10, Alone and in Combination with TMZ, Modulated Oxidative Balance and Antioxidant Enzyme Expression in RC6 Cells

Microfluidic devices were also used to assess the effect of CoQ10 on ROS production in RC6 cells. Again,  RC6 cells/ml were embedded in collagen hydrogel and injected in the central microchamber. Lateral microchannels were perfused with growth medium or medium supplemented with 10 μM CoQ10. After 2 h and 4 h, cells were stained with CellROX® Orange (Figure 3(a)). Results are presented as intensity of fluorescence that corresponds to oxidized reagent CellROX® Orange (ROS indicator). Treatment with CoQ10 led to decrease in ROS production at both tested time points (Figure 3(b)). The effect did not fade from 2 h to 4 h indicating that ROS decrease after CoQ10 application is not transient.

To test if any components of the antioxidative system could be modulated by CoQ10, we analyzed the expression of MnSOD, CuZnSOD, CAT, GR, and iNOS by qRT-PCR and Western blot in RC6 cells treated for 24 h with 10 μM CoQ10 and 250 μM TMZ, alone and in combination (Figure 4). Treatments with TMZ alone and in combination with CoQ10 led to a significant increase of MnSOD mRNA expression in RC6 cells of 3.2-fold () and 2.2-fold (), respectively. This trend was also detected at a protein level, where all three treatments led to a similar increase, around 2-fold (), in protein expression (Figure 4(a)). The combination also increased mRNA expression and protein expression of CuZnSOD by 1.4-fold () and 1.3-fold (), respectively (Figure 4(b)). Increased CAT mRNA expression by the combined treatment (1.5-fold, ) was followed by a similar increase in CAT protein expression (1.3-fold, ) (Figure 4(c)). Additionally, cotreatment with CoQ10 and TMZ significantly increased mRNA and protein expression of GR, 1.2-fold () and 1.8-fold (), respectively (Figure 4(d)). Likewise, treatment with either CoQ10 or the combination increased iNOS mRNA expression 2.5-fold () or 3-fold (), respectively, while iNOS protein expression remained unchanged (Figure 4(e)).

3.3. Single and Combined CoQ10 and TMZ Treatments Decreased the Invasiveness of RC6 Cells and Spheroids

Then, we tested the capacity of CoQ10 and TMZ to suppress gelatin degradation that was previously identified as an important feature of RC6 aggressive phenotype (Figure 5(a)). We found that the ability of RC6 cells to degrade gelatin was significantly inhibited () after single 10 μM CoQ10 and 250 μM TMZ treatments (2-fold and 4-fold, respectively), while their combination caused an 8-fold decrease in gelatin degradation compared to the untreated control () (Figure 5(b)).

Additionally, invasion assay was used to investigate the anti-invasive potential of 10 μM CoQ10 and 250 μM TMZ as well as their combination (Figure 6). We found that CoQ10 and its combination with TMZ significantly suppressed the invasion of RC6 cells through Matrigel by 50% and 80% (), respectively, when compared to untreated cells.

Finally, a 3D invasion assay was performed to evaluate the anti-invasive properties of the abovementioned treatments (Figure 7). Our results showed that CoQ10 significantly decreases the invasion of RC6 spheroids in collagen hydrogel by 33% (), while the TMZ effect was weaker leading to a decrease of 20% (). The most pronounced effect was observed in the combination treatment, which significantly inhibited invasion of RC6 spheroids by 60% (). Furthermore, the effects of CoQ10, TMZ, and their combination on RC6 invasion ability were compared to the effect of GM6001, a broad-spectrum matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor. Treatment with 50 μM GM6001 significantly decreased the invasion of RC6 spheroids by 38% (), which was comparable to CoQ10 treatment.

Further, we searched for the mechanism responsible for the anti-invasive potential of CoQ10 and TMZ combination. To that end, we analyzed MMP9 mRNA expression by qRT-PCR as well as N-cadherin and vimentin protein expression by Western blot (Figure 8). CoQ10, TMZ, and their combination significantly decreased the expression of MMP9 mRNA in RC6 cells by 1.7-fold, 1.9-fold, and 6-fold, respectively (, Figure 8(a)) indicating a strong potentiation of the studied effect when CoQ10 and TMZ were applied in combination. We found that CoQ10, TMZ, and their combination induced a similar reduction in N-cadherin expression 2-fold (), 1.9-fold (), and 2.3-fold (), respectively (Figure 8(b)), while CoQ10 and the combination led to a significant decrease of vimentin expression in RC6 cells by 1.6-fold () and 1.4-fold (), respectively (Figure 8(c)).

3.4. Anti-Invasive Effects of Single and Combined CoQ10 and TMZ Treatments of RC6 Orthotopic Allograft

Motivated by the results obtained in vitro, our further research was aimed at confirming these results in vivo. Previously, we had developed an orthotopic allograft by inoculation of CFSE fluorescently labeled RC6 cells in the Wistar rat brains. To study the effects of CoQ10, TMZ, and their combination, we divided animals into 4 groups: the control group, group treated with 10 mg/kg CoQ10 (i.p., twice a week for three weeks), the group treated with 4 mg/kg TMZ (i.p., 5 times consecutively during the second week), and the group treated with the combination of CoQ10 and TMZ (i.p., scheduled as single treatments). Coronal brain sections showed that RC6 cells in the control group migrated into distant ipsilateral brain structures and were found as far as in the ipsilateral olfactory bulb. Cells were present in dispersed clusters representing one of the main features of their infiltration pattern. Treatment with CoQ10 exhibited an anti-invasive effect as seen on corresponding coronal brain sections. RC6 cells were found in clusters near the injection site and at the outermost edge of the ipsilateral olfactory bulb. Fluorescently labeled RC6 cells on coronal brain sections of animals treated with TMZ were detected in distant brain regions where they followed an already established invasion pattern. The most noticeable anti-invasive effect was observed in animals treated with CoQ10 and TMZ combination, where the majority of RC6 cells stayed near the injection site (Figure 9).

4. Discussion

Despite the growing knowledge of the GBM development and progression, treatment advances and options are still poor. Results of current treatments for newly diagnosed and recurrent GBM are disappointing, and there is an urgent need for finding new modalities in chemotherapy. Several studies were undertaken to increase TMZ efficacy in GBM. Thus, various substances including interferon-β [30], ribonucleotide reductase inhibitors [31], and valproic acid [32] increased the sensitivity of GBM to TMZ through different mechanisms.

In this study, we used a TMZ-resistant RC6 cell line in order to test the potential of CoQ10, as an antioxidant, to enhance TMZ efficacy. CoQ10 drew our interest since it is a natural compound also synthesized by human cells [33]. In addition, it is a lipophilic compound able to cross the blood-brain barrier [34], which makes it suitable for glioma treatment. Due to its redox modulatory potential, CoQ10 may influence invasiveness and resistance, the key features associated with GBM pathology. Indeed, we showed that CoQ10 increased the sensitivity of RC6 cells to TMZ that is in accordance with a recent study in which CoQ10 increased radio- and TMZ sensitivity in human GBM cell lines, without affecting normal astrocytes [22]. However, 2D cell cultures are not able to portray the complex cellular interactions and specific environmental settings occurring in tumors, which is often the reason for drug failure in later research stages. Therefore, we used a 3D microfluidic model to closely mimic microenvironmental conditions and their effect on drug response [35]. Within the microfluidic device, RC6 cells embedded in collagen hydrogel in the central microchamber represented a “tumor slice” with specific microenvironmental conditions at different distances from surrogate blood vessels (the lateral microchannels). For this one and all subsequent experiments, we used 10 μM CoQ10, the concentration detected in human plasma after oral ingestion [36]. The results obtained using the 3D model confirmed that CoQ10 and TMZ combination was more effective in inducing RC6 cytotoxicity than TMZ treatment alone. Combined treatment created wider and more intense areas of cell death around the lateral microchannels probably due to different spatial distributions.

Oxidative stress and ROS have an important role in EMT through regulation of signaling pathways (e.g., NF-κB and TGF-β) required for MMP activation, ECM degradation, and loss of cell-cell junctions, as well as reversible or irreversible oxidative modification of the cytoskeleton protein components [37]. Increased ROS levels can activate NF-κB signaling and thus induce transcription of vimentin and MMPs as well as EMT-related morphological changes [38, 39]. Therefore, ROS reduction may diminish EMT progression implying antioxidants as beneficial agents for the inhibition of cancer invasion and metastasis.

Exogenously administered CoQ10 predominantly incorporates into mitochondrial membranes [40]. A recent study showed that incubation of human GBM cells with CoQ10 reduced mitochondrial O2- production and H2O2 levels [22]. Our results in a 3D microfluidic device model confirmed that CoQ10 alone reduced ROS production in rat RC6 cells causing a significant increase in MnSOD and CAT protein expression. Combined treatment with CoQ10 and TMZ led to a significant increase in MnSOD, CuZnSOD, CAT, and GR protein expression. Although CoQ10 alone and cotreatment with TMZ prominently increased iNOS mRNA expression, this change was not reflected at the protein level. In this way, CoQ10 exerted its antioxidant activity in RC6 cells by direct scavenging of ROS (e.g., O2-), the transformation of O2- to H2O2, and its subsequent degradation to H2O as a result of an increase in mitochondrial antioxidant capacity.

According to Tsai et al., overexpression of catalase leads to the decreased production of H2O2 and consequent inhibition of lung cancer cell migration and invasion [41]. Other evidences have established a positive correlation between H2O2 content and MMP2 activity in MCF-7 breast cancer cells also showing that CoQ10 application decreases H2O2 production leading to the inhibition of MMP2 activity [42]. Likewise, CoQ10 caused a decrease in O2- level in mitochondria, inhibited MMP2 and MMP9 activity, and reduced tumor volume and the number of metastasis in mouse lung carcinoma [43]. We demonstrated that combined treatment with CoQ10 and TMZ more efficiently decreased gelatin degradation and Matrigel and spheroid invasion in comparison with single treatments. Moreover, galardin (GM6001), a potent broad-spectrum MMP inhibitor, exhibited reduction of RC6 spheroid invasion at the level equivalent to single CoQ10 treatment.

Significant inhibition of MMP9 gene expression, a dominant form of gelatinase expressed in RC6 cells, together with significant inhibition of N-cadherin and vimentin, mesenchymal phenotype markers, implied both MMPs and EMT blockage as a possible anti-invasive mechanism of combined CoQ10 and TMZ treatment. Other potent antioxidants, such as resveratrol and curcumin, increased the expression of epithelial phenotype marker E-cadherin and reduced the expression of mesenchymal phenotype markers, vimentin and fibronectin, thus suppressing TGF-β1-induced EMT in lung and hepatoma cell lines [44, 45]. Our in vitro results were confirmed in RC6 orthotopic allograft, where CoQ10 and TMZ cotreatment efficiently interrupted the distinctive infiltration pattern of RC6 cells towards the ipsilateral olfactory bulb. Other authors also showed that CoQ10 could be valuable in combination with clinically approved chemotherapeutics, i.e., CoQ10 combined with tamoxifen significantly reduced the tumor weight and volume in rat mammary carcinoma [46].

5. Conclusions

In summary, we have demonstrated that CoQ10 sensitizes RC6 cells to TMZ and enhances TMZ-induced cell death in a 3D model. CoQ10 and TMZ applied in combination inhibited invasion of RC6 cells in vitro and in vivo, by modifying mitochondrial antioxidant capacity and expression of MMP9 and EMT markers. Significant advances in GBM therapy have not yet been achieved despite invested efforts. Recent clinical studies of erlotinib and cilengitide, as promising targeted therapeutics, in combination with standard GBM treatments have failed in phase II or III clinical trials [47, 48]. Our study highlights the benefit of CoQ10 supplementation in GBM therapy and provides a solid basis for further preclinical and clinical research of CoQ10 and TMZ combination. Therefore, CoQ10 which is widely used in human diet and different pathologies as a supplement could be considered as a valuable addition to standard GBM treatment.

Abbreviations

GBM:Glioblastoma
TMZ:Temozolomide
ECM:Extracellular matrix
EMT:Epithelial-mesenchymal transition
MMP:Matrix metalloproteinase
TIMP:Tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases
uPA:Urokinase-type plasminogen activator
BCNU:1,3-Bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea
ROS:Reactive oxygen species
MnSOD:Manganese superoxide dismutase
CuZnSOD:Copper/zinc superoxide dismutase
CAT:Catalase
GPx:Glutathione peroxidase
GR:Glutathione reductase
iNOS:Inducible nitric oxide synthase
CoQ10:Coenzyme Q10
DMSO:Dimethyl sulfoxide
FBS:Fetal bovine serum
EDTA:Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid
SRB:Sulforhodamine B
CI:Combination index
CAM:Calcein
PI:Propidium iodide
SDS-PAGE:Sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
GAPDH:Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase
HRP:Horseradish peroxidase
PFA:Paraformaldehyde
CFSE:Carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester
i.p.:Intraperitoneal
NF-κB:Nuclear factor kappa B
TGF-β:Transforming growth factor beta.

Data Availability

The rough data and analyses used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

I. Ochoa and L.J. Fernandez are both promoters and consultants for BEOnChip S.L. (Zaragoza, Spain).

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia for the financial support (Grant no. III41031); National Research Program of Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, Spain/FEDER (BIO2016-79092-R, DPI2015-65401-C3-1-R, and MTM2015-71200-R); Junta de Comunidades de Castilla-La Mancha, Spain (PEII-2014-031P); Junta de Comunidades de Castilla-La Mancha, Spain (Project SBPLY/17/180501/000154); and James S. Mc. Donnell Foundation (USA) (Pilot Grant # 220020351). The Aragon and Spanish Government also provided J.M.A. and M.V. studentships.

References

  1. J. P. Thakkar, T. A. Dolecek, C. Horbinski et al., “Epidemiologic and molecular prognostic review of glioblastoma,” Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention, vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 1985–1996, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. R. Stupp, M. E. Hegi, W. P. Mason et al., “Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial,” The Lancet Oncology, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 459–466, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. Q. T. Ostrom, H. Gittleman, J. Fulop et al., “CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2008-2012,” Neuro-Oncology, vol. 17, Supplement 4, pp. iv1–iv62, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. V. A. Cuddapah, S. Robel, S. Watkins, and H. Sontheimer, “A neurocentric perspective on glioma invasion,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 455–465, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. D. N. Louis, “Molecular pathology of malignant gliomas,” Annual Review of Pathology: Mechanisms of Disease, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 97–117, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. S. Lamouille, J. Xu, and R. Derynck, “Molecular mechanisms of epithelial–mesenchymal transition,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 178–196, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. J. S. Rao, “Molecular mechanisms of glioma invasiveness: the role of proteases,” Nature Reviews Cancer, vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 489–501, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. M. Wang, T. Wang, S. Liu, D. Yoshida, and A. Teramoto, “The expression of matrix metalloproteinase-2 and -9 in human gliomas of different pathological grades,” Brain Tumor Pathology, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 65–72, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. J. H. Uhm, C. L. Gladson, and J. S. Rao, “The role of integrins in the malignant phenotype of gliomas,” Frontiers in Bioscience, vol. 4, no. 1-3, article d188, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. J. Huang, H. Li, and G. Ren, “Epithelial-mesenchymal transition and drug resistance in breast cancer (review),” International Journal of Oncology, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 840–848, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. T. Arumugam, V. Ramachandran, K. F. Fournier et al., “Epithelial to mesenchymal transition contributes to drug resistance in pancreatic cancer,” Cancer Research, vol. 69, no. 14, pp. 5820–5828, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. Y. R. Yan, Q. Xie, F. Li et al., “Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition is involved in BCNU resistance in human glioma cells,” Neuropathology, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 128–134, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. C. R. Oliva, D. R. Moellering, G. Y. Gillespie, and C. E. Griguer, “Acquisition of chemoresistance in gliomas is associated with increased mitochondrial coupling and decreased ROS production,” PLoS One, vol. 6, no. 9, article e24665, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. C. R. Oliva, S. E. Nozell, A. Diers et al., “Acquisition of temozolomide chemoresistance in gliomas leads to remodeling of mitochondrial electron transport chain,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 285, no. 51, pp. 39759–39767, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. S. Drose and U. Brandt, “Molecular mechanisms of superoxide production by the mitochondrial respiratory chain,” in Mitochondrial Oxidative Phosphorylation, vol. 748 of Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, pp. 145–169, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. E. Birben, U. M. Sahiner, C. Sackesen, S. Erzurum, and O. Kalayci, “Oxidative stress and antioxidant defense,” World Allergy Organization Journal, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 9–19, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. S. Stojković, A. Podolski-Renić, J. Dinić et al., “Resistance to DNA damaging agents produced invasive of rat glioma cells—characterization of a new in vivo model,” Molecules, vol. 21, no. 7, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. S. Stojković, A. Podolski-Renić, J. Dinić et al., “Development of resistance to antiglioma agents in rat C6 cells caused collateral sensitivity to doxorubicin,” Experimental Cell Research, vol. 335, no. 2, pp. 248–257, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. F. L. Crane, “Biochemical functions of coenzyme Q10,” Journal of the American College of Nutrition, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 591–598, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. D. A. Groneberg, B. Kindermann, M. Althammer et al., “Coenzyme Q10 affects expression of genes involved in cell signalling, metabolism and transport in human CaCo-2 cells,” The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 1208–1218, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. J. Garrido-Maraver, M. D. Cordero, M. Oropesa-Ávila et al., “Coenzyme Q10 therapy,” Molecular Syndromology, vol. 5, no. 3-4, pp. 187–197, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. J. Frontiñán-Rubio, R. M. Santiago-Mora, C. M. Nieva-Velasco et al., “Regulation of the oxidative balance with coenzyme Q10 sensitizes human glioblastoma cells to radiation and temozolomide,” Radiotherapy & Oncology, vol. 128, no. 2, pp. 236–244, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. A. Martínez-González, M. Durán-Prado, G. F. Calvo, F. J. Alcaín, L. A. Pérez-Romasanta, and V. M. Pérez-García, “Combined therapies of antithrombotics and antioxidants delay in silico brain tumour progression,” Mathematical Medicine and Biology, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 239–262, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. T.-C. Chou and P. Talalay, “Quantitative analysis of dose-effect relationships: the combined effects of multiple drugs or enzyme inhibitors,” Advances in Enzyme Regulation, vol. 22, pp. 27–55, 1984. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. Y. N. Wu, H. Yu, X. H. Zhu et al., “Noninvasive delayed limb ischemic preconditioning attenuates myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats by a mitochondrial KATP channel-dependent mechanism,” Physiological Research, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 271–279, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  26. M. Miler, J. Živanović, V. Ajdžanović et al., “Citrus flavanones naringenin and hesperetin improve antioxidant status and membrane lipid compositions in the liver of old-aged Wistar rats,” Experimental Gerontology, vol. 84, pp. 49–60, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. D. L. Mattson and F. Wu, “Nitric oxide synthase activity and isoforms in rat renal vasculature,” Hypertension, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 337–341, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. R. NicAmhlaoibh, M. Heenan, I. Cleary et al., “Altered expression of mRNAs for apoptosis-modulating proteins in a low level multidrug resistant variant of a human lung carcinoma cell line that also expressesmdr1 mRNA,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 368–376, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. K. J. Livak and T. D. Schmittgen, “Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method,” Methods, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 402–408, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. A. Yoshino, A. Ogino, K. Yachi et al., “Effect of IFN-β on human glioma cell lines with temozolomide resistance,” International Journal of Oncology, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 139–148, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. M. Figul, A. Söling, H. J. Dong, T. C. Chou, and N. G. Rainov, “Combined effects of temozolomide and the ribonucleotide reductase inhibitors didox and trimidox in malignant brain tumor cells,” Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 41–46, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. C. H. Chen, Y. J. Chang, M. S. B. Ku, K. T. Chung, and J. T. Yang, “Enhancement of temozolomide-induced apoptosis by valproic acid in human glioma cell lines through redox regulation,” Journal of Molecular Medicine, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 303–315, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. H. N. Bhagavan and R. K. Chopra, “Coenzyme Q10: absorption, tissue uptake, metabolism and pharmacokinetics,” Free Radical Research, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 445–453, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. K. M. Smith, S. Matson, W. R. Matson et al., “Dose ranging and efficacy study of high-dose coenzyme Q10 formulations in Huntington’s disease mice,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease, vol. 1762, no. 6, pp. 616–626, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. J. M. Ayuso, M. Virumbrales-Muñoz, A. Lacueva et al., “Development and characterization of a microfluidic model of the tumour microenvironment,” Scientific Reports, vol. 6, no. 1, article 36086, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. H. N. Bhagavan and R. K. Chopra, “Plasma coenzyme Q10 response to oral ingestion of coenzyme Q10 formulations,” Mitochondrion, vol. 7, Suppl, pp. S78–S88, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. J. Jiang, K. Wang, Y. Chen, H. Chen, E. C. Nice, and C. Huang, “Redox regulation in tumor cell epithelial–mesenchymal transition: molecular basis and therapeutic strategy,” Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy, vol. 2, article 17036, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. M. A. Cichon and D. C. Radisky, “ROS-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition in mammary epithelial cells is mediated by NF-κB-dependent activation of snail,” Oncotarget, vol. 5, no. 9, pp. 2827–2838, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. W. Li, L. Cao, L. Han, Q. Xu, and Q. Ma, “Superoxide dismutase promotes the epithelial-mesenchymal transition of pancreatic cancer cells via activation of the H2O2/ERK/NF-κB axis,” International Journal of Oncology, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 2613–2620, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. D. J. M. Fernández-Ayala, G. Brea-Calvo, G. López-Lluch, and P. Navas, “Coenzyme Q distribution in HL-60 human cells depends on the endomembrane system,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes, vol. 1713, no. 2, pp. 129–137, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. J. Y. Tsai, M. J. Lee, M. Dah-Tsyr Chang, and H. Huang, “The effect of catalase on migration and invasion of lung cancer cells by regulating the activities of cathepsin S, L, and K,” Experimental Cell Research, vol. 323, no. 1, pp. 28–40, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. M. Bahar, S. Khaghani, P. Pasalar et al., “Exogenous coenzyme Q10 modulates MMP-2 activity in MCF-7 cell line as a breast cancer cellular model,” Nutrition Journal, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 62–62, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. A. P. Burlaka, I. I. Ganusevich, V. V. Golotiuk, A. V. Vovk, and S. M. Lukin, “Superoxide- and NO-dependent mechanisms of antitumor and antimetastatic effect of L-arginine hydrochloride and coenzyme Q10,” Experimental Oncology, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 31–35, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. H. Wang, H. Zhang, L. Tang et al., “Resveratrol inhibits TGF-β1-induced epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and suppresses lung cancer invasion and metastasis,” Toxicology, vol. 303, pp. 139–146, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. M.-T. Cao, H.-F. Liu, Z.-G. Liu et al., “Curcumin downregulates the expression of Snail via suppressing Smad2 pathway to inhibit TGF-β1-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in hepatoma cells,” Oncotarget, vol. 8, no. 65, pp. 108498–108508, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. S. S. Perumal, P. Shanthi, and P. Sachdanandam, “Combined efficacy of tamoxifen and coenzyme Q10 on the status of lipid peroxidation and antioxidants in DMBA induced breast cancer,” Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 273, no. 1-2, pp. 151–160, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. D. M. Peereboom, D. R. Shepard, M. S. Ahluwalia et al., “Phase II trial of erlotinib with temozolomide and radiation in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme,” Journal of Neuro-Oncology, vol. 98, no. 1, pp. 93–99, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. R. Stupp, M. E. Hegi, T. Gorlia et al., “Cilengitide combined with standard treatment for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma with methylated MGMT promoter (CENTRIC EORTC 26071-22072 study): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial,” The Lancet Oncology, vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 1100–1108, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2019 Sonja Stojković Burić et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

1520 Views | 531 Downloads | 4 Citations
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.